My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
65A - JAIL REUSE STUDY
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2018
>
09/04/2018
>
65A - JAIL REUSE STUDY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2018 8:08:08 PM
Creation date
8/30/2018 8:03:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
City Manager's Office
Item #
65A
Date
9/4/2018
Destruction Year
2023
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Expenditure Category I Estimated Cost <br />Base Construction <br />$0 <br />General Contractor Overhead & Profit <br />$0 <br />General Contractor Markups <br />$0 <br />General Contractor Bonds <br />$0 <br />Design Contingency <br />$0 <br />Market Factor <br />$0 <br />Sub -Total <br />$0 <br />Construction Contingency (10%) $0 <br />A/ E Fees (10%) $0 <br />CM Inspection (4%) $0 <br />Miscellaneous (2%) $0 <br />FF&E (10%) $0 <br />Sub_ -Total <br />Total <br />(See Appendix E. Santa Ana City Jail Reuse Options Detailed Construction <br />and Project Cost Estimates) <br />D. Advantages / Disadvantages Considerations: As part of the assessment evaluation <br />process, the consultant team also utilized an SWOT analysis strategic planning <br />technique to identify the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and negative impacts <br />associated with each Jail reuse feasibility option. The SWOT analysis is intended to <br />take the objectives of each reuse option or project and identify the internal and <br />external factors that are favorable and unfavorable for achieving individual project <br />objectives. <br />Based on the results of the SWOT analysis process, a summary ranking from best to <br />worst for the implementation of the proposed five Jail reuse options was also <br />examined in this Study. Analysis of this information and related fiscal impact data <br />was used to form the recommended ranking which is highlighted in the following <br />analysis. <br />Advantages I Disadvantages and Ranking From Best to Worst <br />For Jail Feasibility Reuse Options <br />❑ Temporary Jail Holding Facility This Jail Reuse Feasibility Option will minimize <br />the ongoing yearly operational costs of the City's adult detention facility while <br />maintaining the building as its intended use, a Jail. <br />69 <br />65A-76 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.