My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
65A - JAIL REUSE STUDY
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2018
>
09/04/2018
>
65A - JAIL REUSE STUDY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2018 8:08:08 PM
Creation date
8/30/2018 8:03:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
City Manager's Office
Item #
65A
Date
9/4/2018
Destruction Year
2023
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Disadvantages (Weaknesses) <br />- The total annual cost for booking arrestees into a temporary jail holding facility <br />estimated at approximately $8.7 million would be borne entirely by the City. This <br />cost will continue to modestly increase due to cost of living adjustments and <br />inflation factors given to personnel working in the detention facility 24 -hours, <br />seven -days -a -week. <br />- General fund budget allocations would be the primary revenue source for Jail <br />expenditures. Contract leased detention bed revenue would not be available to <br />offset the yearly cost of the holding facility. <br />- The City would continue to be responsible for the repayment of the annual debt <br />serve on the Jail building through 2024. <br />- The third and fourth inmate housing floors of the detention facility would not be <br />used. However, costs for age-related maintenance issues would continue as a <br />City expense because the plumbing, electrical, and other mechanical systems <br />which support these areas must still be maintained. <br />Opportunities <br />Converting the City detention complex into a temporary holding facility will <br />significantly lower the total number of custody officers and records specialists <br />personnel needed to process and supervise inmates incarcerated at the Jail. In <br />the past, personnel costs have accounted for approximately 85.0% of the Jail's <br />budget requiring 124 staff to run the facility. This compares to 54 staff for a <br />facility which temporarily holds detained offenders only up to 24 hours. The <br />staffing reductions due to the proposed changes in inmate housing policies will <br />translate into major reductions in yearly personnel costs. <br />- By not using the third and fourth housing floors of the Jail, the City will be able to <br />lower building overhead costs (less utilities, wear and tear on equipment, etc.) <br />which will reduce total building budgeted expenditures. <br />- The change to a temporary Jail holding facility operational model for the Santa <br />Ana Police Department will likely increase the efficiency of shift patrol officers. <br />By reducing the longer wait time to book apprehended arrestees at the Orange <br />County Jail, they will have the opportunity to remain on patrol in the community <br />for greater periods of time. <br />Negative Impacts (Threats) <br />There has been great community opposition to continue use of the existing <br />building as a detention facility. Much of the opposition has surrounded the use of <br />the building as an ICE -contracted facility. There will likely continue to be some <br />vocal opposition to any use of the facility related to correctional or detention <br />purposes. <br />Jail Reuse Feasibility Study <br />Vanir Consultant Team Recommended Feasibility Options Ranking <br />Based on the results of the analysis and evaluation process, a summary <br />ranking from best to worst for the implementation of the proposed five jail <br />reuse feasibility options was established by the Vanir consultant team. <br />71 <br />65A-78 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.