My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
LE, THERESA V. CITY OF SANTA ANA, (CVRA)
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
L
>
LE, THERESA V. CITY OF SANTA ANA, (CVRA)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/3/2018 7:56:13 AM
Creation date
10/2/2018 10:41:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
THERESA LE V. CITY OF SANTA ANA, ET AL.
Contract #
A-2018-231
Agency
CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Council Approval Date
9/4/2018
Destruction Year
2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
INSURANCL NOT REQUIRED <br />WORK MAY RROCra <br />„T. <br />CLC "K Oi COUiNCIL <br />SEP 2 5 2018 <br />SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE OF CLAIMS <br />0WCAO (o <br />A r�cgt kc r d S The parties to this SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE OF <br />CLAIMS ("Agreement") are Theresa Le (referred to as "Plaintiff' herein), on the one <br />hand, and the City of Santa Ana, a California Charter City (sometimes referred to as <br />"Defendant" or "City") and Maria D. Huizar, Clerk of the Council, City of Santa Ana <br />(sometimes referred to as the "individual Defendant" or "Huizar") (collectively, <br />"Defendants"), on the other. <br />These persons and entity are sometimes referred to as "Parties" or "each <br />Party" herein. This Agreement is effective as of the latest date written next to the <br />signature of a Party to this Agreement. <br />L Recitals. <br />'Che purpose of this Agreement is to settle the action filed in the Orange <br />County Superior Court under the California Voting Rights Act ("CVRA") entitled <br />Theresa Le v. City of Santa Ana and Maria D. Huizar, Clerk of the Council, Case No, 30- <br />2018-00988426-CU-CR-CJC ("CVRA lawsuit"). <br />A-2018-231 <br />The Parties desire to settle the CVRA Lawsuit and to fully and finally settle <br />any and all matters between them arising out of, or relating to, the CVRA Lawsuit, or <br />any claims that could have been raised in connection with the CVRA Lawsuit or the <br />City's ward -based, at -large electoral system occurring prior to the date of this <br />Agreement, without any further court proceedings (with the exception of a potential <br />motion for Plaintiffs attorneys' fees), trial, appeal or adjudication of any issue of fact <br />or law, and without any admission with respect to such matters. <br />IL Introduction. <br />On March 6, 2018, counsel for Plaintiff mailed a written notice to Defendant <br />Huizar asserting that the City s at -large voting system violated the CVRA. The City <br />did not respond within forty-five (45) days, as provided in California Elections Code <br />section 10010(e)(2). As a result, Plaintiff filed the CVRA Lawsuit on April 25, 2018, <br />alleging that the current at -large method of electing Council Members from wards in <br />the City violates the CVRA, Cal. Elec. Code §§ 14025 et seq. Plaintiff alleges that <br />racially polarized voting (as defined in California Elections Code section 14026(e)) <br />in at -large City Council elections dilutes the voting strength of Asian -American <br />voters in the City in violation of the CVRA. Plaintiff further alleges that racial <br />polarization occurring in Council Member elections denies Asian -American voters a <br />meaningful voice in the political process and prevents Asian -American voters from <br />electing Council Members of their choice, also in violation of the CVRA. <br />The Parties subsequently met and conferred regarding Plaintiffs CVRA claim, <br />and agreed to resolve the claim through this Agreement. This Agreement has been <br />voluntarily entered into by the Parties to this litigation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.