Laserfiche WebLink
ARCO STATION <br />BACKGROUND INFORMATION <br />• February 1988: Prior to the removal of multiple gasoline USTs, exploratory borings were advanced that de- <br />termined significant total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg) and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, <br />and xylene (BTEX) impacts to the subsurface. <br />• June 1988: Multiple USTs were removed from the southeast portion of the site. Confirmation soil samples <br />were collected (E-1 through E-5) that revealed TPHg and benzene concentrations up to 43,000 and 496 <br />parts per million (ppm), respectively. <br />• March 1993: A groundwater monitoring program was established under the Santa Regional Water Quality <br />Control Board (RWQCB) oversight. Groundwater sampling is still presently being conducted, with up to 17 <br />groundwater monitoring wells having been installed around the site and vicinity. <br />• June 1994 to December 1996: A soil vapor extraction (SVE) and carbon treatment system was operated, <br />which removed approximately 1,952 pounds of TPHg. <br />• September 1999: Oxygen -release compounds (ORC) in the form of magnesium peroxide was injected into <br />the subsurface from 14 direct -push borings (approximately 30 pounds per boring) in September, to increase <br />the level of oxygen aiding in the natural biodegradation of TPHg. TPHg and volatile organic compounds <br />(VOCs) continued to persist after the injection of the ORC. <br />• September- October 2000: A high -vacuum dual-phase extraction system (HVDPE) was operated, which <br />extracted approximately 74,000 gallons of groundwater and 376 pounds of TPHg. <br />• October 2003: A HVDPE system was operated, which extracted approximately 43,000 gallons of groundwa- <br />ter, 294,000 cubic feet of vapor, and 11.5 pounds of TPHg. Based on the low amount of TPHg recovered, <br />HVDPE was considered cost ineffective and discontinued as a viable remedial option. <br />• July 2009: Groundwater monitoring was changed from quarterly to semi-annually based on a letter from the <br />Santa Ana RWQCB. <br />• May 2012: Confirmation soil borings were advanced in the vicinity of former USTs and dispenser islands. <br />High TPHg and benzene concentrations were reported at 10 feet bgs in two of the borings, but in general <br />concentrations demonstrated a reduction in concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons. <br />• October 2013: A soil vapor survey and health risk assessment was conducted, which found low vapor con- <br />centrations and insignificant health risks to workers at the ARCO station and nearby residences. <br />• October 2014: The Santa Ana RWQCB accepted groundwater monitoring and sampling to be conducted on <br />an annual basis. The Santa Ana RWQCB also indicated that the site was eligible for regulatory closure. <br />• April 2017: Groundwater sampled during the second quarter 2017 event indicated residual concentrations <br />of TPHg and benzene at maximum concentrations of 3,200 and 180 micrograms per liter (pg/1), respectively. <br />TPHg and VOC contamination is generally confined to the site, and therefore natural attenuation and moni- <br />toring is the ongoing remedial action at the site. <br />Appendix B-BAckSround tufo <br />