Laserfiche WebLink
EXHIBIT A <br />to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for police <br />protection? <br />Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.10-8 through 4.10-9.) <br />Facts in Support of Finding: The Project would result in an incremental increase in demands on law <br />enforcement services but would not be significant when compared to the current demand levels. The <br />residential population of the Project would be approximately 0.27 percent of the City's population and <br />based on the Police Department's 2016 staffing of 1.04 officers per thousand population, the Project would <br />require less than one additional officer. In addition, the Police Department headquarters are 2.5 miles from <br />the Project and within response distance. Furthermore, typical police operations within the Department's <br />Northeast District deploys coverage to be able to respond to calls from services throughout the area. The <br />addition of one officer on patrol would not require the construction or expansion of the City's existing <br />policing facilities. Therefore, the Project would not result in the need for new or physically altered police <br />protection facilities. <br />For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue <br />would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (DEIR, p. 4.10-8 through 4.10-9.) <br />9.14.3 Education <br />Threshold: Would the Project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the <br />provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or a need for new or physically altered <br />governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order <br />to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for schools? <br />Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 2-8; Initial Study, p. 54.) <br />Facts in Support of Finding: As described in the Initial Study, the Project is required to pay fees for the <br />provision of school services pursuant to state law AB 2926. This fee would contribute to a fund that would <br />pay for new or expanded buildings, faculty, or equipment. Under state law, payment of school impact fees <br />constitutes mitigation for school facility impacts of projects and such payments are deemed to provide full <br />and complete school facilities mitigation. (Initial Study, p. 54.) <br />For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and Initial Study, impacts <br />associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. <br />54.) <br />9.14.4 Parks <br />Threshold: Would the Project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the <br />provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, or a need for new or physically altered <br />governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order <br />to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for parks? <br />Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.10-12 through 4.10-13.) <br />Facts in Support of Finding: As described in Section 3.0, Project Description, the Project includes <br />34,300 square feet of onsite exterior open space and recreation facilities that includes 5 recreation <br />courtyard areas that total 22,900 square feet and an 11,400 -square foot amenity deck on the roof of the <br />Resolution No. _ <br />Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR <br />75E-81 <br />Page 43 of 71 <br />