75D - PH - VMT AND CEQA GUIDELINES

Home Browse Search

Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Fire protection? ❑ El El ❑ Police protection? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Schools? El ❑ ❑ Parks? ❑ ❑ El Other public facilities? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ XVI. RECREATION -- a) Would the project increase the use of ❑ ❑ existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational ❑ facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which have an adverse physical effect on the environment? XVII. TRANSPORTATION --Would the project: a) Conflict with program plan, ordinance or ❑ ❑ ❑ policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Guidelines section 15064.3' or will conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to, level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Substantially increase hazards due to a El ❑ ❑ ❑ geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? d) Result in inadequate emergency access? ❑ El El t CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3(c) provides that a lead agency"may elect to be governed by the provisions" of the section immediately; otherwise, the section's provisions apply July 1, 2020. Here, the District has not elected to be governed by Section 15064.3. Accordingly, an analysis of vehciles miles traveled (VMT) is not necessary to determine whether a proposed project will have a significant transportation impact. Initial Study Form Page 12 of 15 FORM "J" 75D-210