Laserfiche WebLink
v. Other public facilities? No Impact. There are no public facilities or services that would be <br />impacted by the project. <br />XVI. RECREATION <br />a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other <br />recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or <br />be accelerated? Less Than Significant Impact. The project would not significantly impact recreation <br />facilities. Please see Public Services section "XV.a.iv)" above. <br />b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of <br />recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Less Than <br />Significant Impact. As discussed in section "XV.a.iv)" above, the project proposes to provide an on - <br />site fitness center, pool and spa, outdoor yoga and fitness court, residential gardens and outdoor <br />dining, and dog park for project residents. The proposed fitness center would be constructed during <br />construction of the project and would not have an adverse impact on the environment. The project <br />would not require the construction of the expansion of other recreational facilities that would impact the <br />environment. The project would not significantly impact recreation facilities. <br />XVII. TRANSPORTATION: Would the project: <br />a) Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including <br />transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation <br />Incorporated. A traffic study was prepared for the project.38 A copy of the traffic study is included in <br />Appendix F. <br />The project is estimated to generate approximately 1,268 vehicle trips a day, including 84 AM and 103 <br />PM trips. The daily vehicle trips associated with the existing church were not taken into account to <br />provide a conservative estimate of the project trip generation. The estimated project trip generation is <br />shown in Table 26. <br />Table 26 <br />Project Traffic Generation Rates and Forecast39 <br />Description <br />Daily 2- <br />AM Peak Hour <br />PM Peak Hour <br />Way <br />Enter <br />Exit <br />Total <br />Enter <br />Exit <br />Total <br />Trip Generation Rate: <br />• 221: Multifamily Housing (Mid- <br />Rise41) (TE/DU*) <br />5.44 <br />26% <br />74% <br />0.36 <br />61% <br />39% <br />0.44 <br />Proposed Project Trip Generation: <br />• Apartments (233) <br />1,268 <br />22 <br />62 <br />84 <br />63 <br />40 <br />103 <br />Note: TE/DU = Trip End per Dwelling Unit <br />38 Traffic Impact Analysis Report, Legacy Sunflower Apartments, Santa Ana, California, Lincscott Law & Greenspan, January 24, 2019 <br />39 Source: Trip Generation, 10th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Washington, D.C. (2017). <br />40 Mid -Rise Multifamilv Housina consists of buildinas that ranae between 3 and 10 levels. <br />Legacy Sunflower Apartments Page 93 <br />Mitigated Negative Declaration — March 14, 2019 <br />