3 - CEQA GUIDELINES_CITYWIDE - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2019) TYPES OF EIRS 2019 City of Santa Ana Local Guidelines 8-5 ©Best Best & Krieger LLP (c) In connection with the issuance of rules, regulations, plans or other general criteria to govern the conduct of a continuing program; or (d) As individual projects carried out under the same authorizing statutory or regulatory authority and having generally similar environmental effects that can be mitigated in similar ways. (State CEQA Guidelines Section, 15168.) An advantage of using a Program EIR is that it can “[a]llow the Lead Agency to consider broad policy alternatives and program wide mitigation measures at an early time when the agency has greater flexibility to deal with basic problems or cumulative impacts.” (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(b)(4).) A Program EIR is distinct from a Project EIR, as a Project EIR is prepared for a specific project and must examine in detail site-specific considerations. Program EIRs are commonly used in conjunction with the process of tiering. Tiering is the coverage of general matters in broader EIRs (such as on general plans or policy statements) with subsequent narrower EIRs. (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15385; see also Local Guidelines Sections 8.02 and 11.73.) Tiering is proper “when it helps a public agency to focus upon the issues ripe for decision at each level of environmental review and in order to exclude duplicative analysis of environmental effects examined in previous environmental impact reports.” (Pub. Res. Code, § 21093(a).) For example, the California Supreme Court has ruled that “CEQA does not mandate that a first-tier program EIR identify with certainty particular sources of water for second-tier projects that will be further analyzed before implementation during later stages of the program. Rather, identification of specific sources is required only at the second-tier stage when specific projects are considered.” (In re Bay-Delta etc. (2008) 43 Cal. 4th 1143.) Subsequent activities in the program must be examined in light of the Program EIR to determine whether additional environmental documents must be prepared. Additional environmental review documents must be prepared if the proposed later project may arguably cause significant adverse effects on the environment. 8.09 USE OF A PROGRAM EIR WITH SUBSEQUENT EIRS AND NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS. A Program EIR can be used to simplify the task of preparing environmental documents on later activities in the program. The Program EIR can: (a) Provide the basis for an Initial Study to determine whether the later activity may have any significant effects; (b) Be incorporated by reference to deal with regional influences, secondary effects, cumulative impacts, broad alternatives and other factors that apply to the program as a whole; or (c) Focus an EIR on a later activity to permit discussion solely of new effects which had not been considered before. If a Program EIR is prepared for a redevelopment plan, subsequent activities in the redevelopment program will be subject to review if they would have effects that were not examined in the Program EIR. Where the later activities involve site-specific operations, the City should use a written checklist or similar device to document the evaluation of the site and the proposed activity