Laserfiche WebLink
Authorize Staff to Prepare Documents for Proposed Water and Sewer Rate Adjustments <br />September 17, 2019 <br />Page 3 <br />as the AMI Project) that are anomalies compared to normal capital spending levels. Debt <br />financing in those cases allows the utility to avoid unnecessary "rate shock" and helps spread the <br />cost of large projects over a longer period. It also ensures that future ratepayers who benefit from <br />the project will also pay for the project. <br />As part of the analysis, existing reserve levels were examined. Recommended reserves include <br />an Operating & Maintenance Reserve target equal to 90 days (3 months) of annual operating <br />expenses; an Emergency Reserve set a $4 million (for both the Water and Sewer Enterprises); <br />and a Repair, Renewal, and Replacement Capital Reserve equal to 50% of average annual <br />projected capital spending. <br />Rate Design <br />Over the past decade the legal requirements surrounding utility rate setting in California have <br />evolved. Namely the courts have made rulings with respect to California Constitution Article XIII <br />C and D (commonly known as Proposition 218) that have created a higher "cost of service" <br />standard for rate setting than has historically been practiced by public utilities. Simply put, the <br />burden of proof is on utilities to demonstrate that all aspects of water and sewer rates are directly <br />proportionate to the cost of providing service. This means aligning fixed revenue (fixed charges) <br />with fixed costs, and variable revenue (usage rates) with variable costs. In addition, Stantec <br />looked at opportunities to strengthen revenue stability for both utilities, which were found to rely <br />too heavily on usage rates, making the utilities susceptible to revenue volatility. Currently, the <br />City's water utility recovers approximately 17% of revenues through the fixed base charge while <br />the sewer utility collects approximately 13% through fixed charges. These rates were not found to <br />be aligned with the utilities' actual fixed costs, which were found to be closer to 40% for the water <br />utility and nearly 100% for the sewer utility. <br />The proposed water rates are structured to directly align the water utility's variable costs (i.e., <br />water purchases and electricity) with the wafter usage rates ("Water Usage Charge"). By <br />extension, the water utility's fixed costs (i.e., salaries, capital spending, maintenance, and <br />overhead) will be aligned with the fixed water charges ("Water Utility Charge"). Sewer rates <br />("Sewer Utility Charge") are proposed to be fixed for all customers based on the size of their <br />meter and the type of customer, since some customers (e.g., commercial accounts) return a <br />larger percentage of their water to the sewer than others (e.g., single-family residences) which <br />have higher irrigation needs. The Fats Oils and Grease (FOG) Charge for food service accounts <br />will increase by 68% in order to better reflect the cost of the FOG Control Program. <br />The proposed rate revenue adjustments outlined below support the recommended CIP plans and <br />allow both enterprises to meet their respective financial goals: <br />L• <br />