My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75A - PH KARA GRANT APPEAL
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
10/15/2019
>
75A - PH KARA GRANT APPEAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2019 5:26:14 PM
Creation date
10/10/2019 4:53:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75A
Date
10/15/2019
Destruction Year
2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
450
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning and aullding Agency <br />Planning Division <br />20 DMic center Phis <br />PA. BOA 1988 (W20) <br />Santa Ana, CA SM2 VARIANCE <br />(iti4} 847�eo1 <br />www.aanfa-ana.wlt Application <br />Variance Requirement <br />A Variance is required when, properties are proposed with development standards below the minimum <br />standards of the zone A variance is allowed only when extraordinary or exceptional circumstances are <br />applicable to the property involved or the use proposed <br />Variance Purpose Clearly State the Ordinance Requirements Requested for Vanance <br />Reduction of landscape setback requirement for 44' of Tustin Ave. frontage from 15'-0" <br />required to 10'-T provided. <br />III. Variance Justification <br />The zone varurnce procedure is Intended to provide relief from zoning ordinance regulations that result in <br />unintended inequities or hardships when applied to specisc properties and must not be a grant of special <br />privilege [See Santa Ana Municipal Code ($AMC) Sections 41-639 (a)(2)(i). (n), (n), and {v) I The <br />Zoning Administrator, Planning Commission, and City Council must make affirmative findings on all four <br />items listed in the above mentioned Code sections d this request is to be approved Your concise <br />responses to the following four criteria are asaenual [Please read $AMC Sections 41-638 (a)(2)t1l, tiA, <br />(un), and (iv) carefully, they have been reproduced at the end of this fprm for your convenience I <br />Section 41-638 (a)(2)(i) (special circumstances applicable) <br />The City has directed the applicant to locate the cerwash tunnel against the southern <br />properly line so as to improve street access and internal Circulation based on the city's <br />evaluation, in doing this, keeping the 16 setback requirement in addition to the 2' <br />dedication being granted to the city would reduce the carwash tunnel length to an <br />unacceptable length in terms of its operational efficiency. As a compromise measure, it <br />was aoceoted conceotually by Plannino and Public Works to allow for a 5' landscape a <br />Section 41-63U (a)(2)(ii) (preservation of substantial property rights) <br />if the landscape reduction is not approved, the applicant would be denied the <br />opportunity to develop his property to create a carwash facility that is designed to <br />operate at the highest efficiency, and with the highest possible return on the <br />considerable investment required to develop a stat"f-the art express carwash. <br />Par 102 <br />onetibnnaw�nrrcx <br />e,na <br />75A-112 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.