Laserfiche WebLink
Table T-14: Parking Survey Data Summary <br />Survey Location <br />Number of Units <br />Day of Week <br />Parking Occu an <br />Parking Rate <br />Nineteen01 <br />264 <br />Peak Weekday Demand <br />344 <br />1.35 <br />Peak Weekend Demand <br />342 <br />1.35 <br />The Marke <br />300 <br />Peak Weekday Demand <br />230 <br />0.77 <br />Peak Weekend Demand <br />193 <br />0.64 <br />Average Demand(Weekday) <br />1.06 <br />Average Demand Weekend <br />0.99 <br />Peak Demand Per Unit(Weekday & Weekend <br />1.35 <br />Total Project Parking Provided <br />539 <br />Total Project Parking Required <br />Per Peak Demand <br />365 <br />Project Parking Surplus <br />174 <br />Source: Trans lutions, 2019. Attachment C. <br />As identified on Table T-14, the peak parking demand is 1.35 spaces per unit at Nineteen01 and The Marke has <br />much lower parking rates. Applying the Nineteen01 peak parking rate to the Modified Project would result in a need <br />for 346 parking spaces. As described previously, the Modified Project includes 511 parking spaces, which is 165 <br />more than the number of spaces forecast to be needed for the Modified Project based on recent parking surveys <br />done at similar multi -family developments. As a result, no potentially significant impact related to residential parking <br />would occur. <br />In addition, the site currently provides 180 parking spaces for use by the OC Discovery Cube. The Modified Project <br />would maintain the use of these spaces for the OC Discovery Cube by implementation of a perpetual easement of <br />the shared surface lot area. As this is an existing condition, no impacts related to the use of the site for OC Discovery <br />Cube parking would occur. <br />Conclusion for Transportation/Traffic and Circulation <br />The Modified Project would develop 48.4 percent fewer residential units than the Original Project, which would result <br />in more than 79 fewer a.m. peak hour trips, 96 fewer p.m. peak hour trips, and 1,186 fewer daily trips than the <br />Original Project. Thus, no new impacts related to the volume of vehicular trips would occur from the Modified Project. <br />Additionally, the Modified Project would implement changes to the Main Street and Walkie Way intersection <br />geometrics that would result in less than significant impacts to study area intersections, roadway segments, and <br />vehicle queues, which is consistent with the impacts of the Original Project as detailed in the EIR. The Modified <br />Project would also provide parking for the proposed onsite multi -family residential uses that meet the anticipated <br />parking demand pursuant to ITE rates and parking surveys at similar developments within the City. As a result, <br />parking related impacts would be less than significant. Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in <br />CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5 that would trigger the need to prepare a recirculated EIR or other environmental <br />document exist. The Modified Project would not result in either a new significant environmental impact or a <br />substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact. <br />EIR Mitigation Measure <br />The EIR determined that impacts related to transportation and traffic would be less than significant and no mitigation <br />measures are required. <br />