Laserfiche WebLink
If the find is considered a "resource" the archaeologist, in cooperation with a Native American monitor shall pursue <br />either protection in place or recovery, salvage and treatment of the deposits. Recovery, salvage and treatment <br />protocols shall be developed in accordance with applicable provisions of Public Resource Code Section 21083.2 and <br />State CEQA Guidelines 15064.5 and 15126.4. If unique a tribal cultural resource cannot be preserved in place or left <br />in an undisturbed state, recovery, salvage and treatment shall be required at the Project Applicant's expense. All <br />recovered and salvaged resources shall be prepared to the point of identification and permanent preservation in an <br />established accredited professional repository. <br />3.13 Utilities and Service Systems <br />Summary of Impacts Identified in the EIR <br />Water <br />As detailed in DEIR Section 4.13, Utilities and Service Systems, the Original Project would result in a total demand of <br />131.53 AFY of water at full occupancy. The EIR describes that the City's Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) <br />anticipates a water supply and demand increase of 8.2 percent (3,028 acre feet) per year. The Original Project would <br />result in an increase in demand for water supplies that is 4.3 percent of the UWMP's anticipated increase per year. <br />Therefore, the EIR determined that City would have water supplies available to serve the Original Project. (DEIR, p. <br />4.13-7 through 4.13-8.) <br />Wastewater <br />As detailed in DEIR Section 4.13, Utilities and Service Systems, based on results of the sewer flow monitoring and <br />the City's Design Criteria wastewater generation rates, it was determined that existing sewer lines that serve the <br />Project site would be able to adequately accommodate the additional wastewater flows from the Original Project. <br />Additionally, it was determined that the existing wastewater treatment facilities have adequate capacity to <br />accommodate the increase in wastewater flow from full occupancy of the Original Project and impacts were <br />determined to be less than significant. (DEIR, p. 4.13-11.) <br />Drainage and Water Quality <br />As detailed in DEIR Section 4.13, Utilities and Service Systems, all projects in the watershed are required to <br />implement measures to comply with the LID, Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit, Drainage Area <br />Management Plan (DAMP) requirements for implementation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and <br />Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). These requirements were developed to reduce the potential of impacts to <br />water quality, and to ensure that development projects accommodate stormwater drainage. <br />The EIR determined that the Original Project would result in an increase of pervious area from creation of larger <br />areas of landscape and open space than currently exist onsite, and that stormwater from the site would be filtered <br />through detention and drywell systems prior to discharge off -site to manage stormwater drainage and protect water <br />quality. The EIR determined that the Original Project would result in less than significant impacts related to drainage <br />facilities and water quality. (DEIR, pp. 4.13-16 through 4.13-19.) <br />Comparison of Impacts Associated with the Proposed Modified Project <br />Water <br />Consistent with the methodology of the EIR, the estimated water demand that would result from the Modified Project <br />was based on the City of Santa Ana Design Guidelines that assume 120 gpd per capita and 3,000 gallons per day <br />per acre of landscaping. As shown in Table U-1, the reduction of 453 residents and 0.46 acre of landscaping would <br />reduce the water demand from the Project site by 55,740 gallons per day (gpd) or 62.44 acre feet yearly (AFY) in <br />comparison to the Original Project, as shown on Table U-1. <br />