Laserfiche WebLink
For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and Initial Study, impacts <br />associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, pp. <br />49-50.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. <br />9.12.3 Private Airstrips <br />Threshold: For a Project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the Project expose people <br />residing or working in the Project area to excessive noise levels? <br />Finding: No Impact. (DEK p. 2-7; Initial Study, p. 50.) <br />Facts in Support of Finding: The proposed Project site is not located within the vicinity of a private <br />airstrip and would not expose people residing or working in the Project area to excessive noise levels <br />related to an airstrip. (Initial Study, p. 50.) <br />For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR and Initial Study, impacts <br />associated with this issue would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (Initial Study, p. <br />50.) This conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. <br />9.13 Population and Housing <br />9.13.1 Population Growth <br />Threshold: Would the Project induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly or <br />indirectly? <br />Finding: Less than significant impact. (DEIR, p. 4.9-7 through 4.9-10.) <br />Facts in Support of Finding: As described in Section 4.9, Population and Housing, of the DEK the <br />Project would not induce substantial population growth. SCAG anticipates a population increase of 8.4 <br />percent by 2040 or an average annual increase of 0.4 percent throughout the County. The anticipated <br />population that would result from the Project would be 0.28 percent of the City's population, and thus, <br />within the projected population growth. Similarly, SCAG anticipates the number of housing units would <br />increase 6.3 percent or an average annual increase of 0.3 percent through 2040. Thus, the 496 new multi- <br />family units would also be within the SCAG projected growth. Furthermore, the infrastructure <br />improvements needed to serve the Project would be sized to specifically serve the development and excess <br />capacity would not be developed that could generate additional growth. Thus, impacts related to growth <br />would be less than significant. (DEK p. 4.9-7 through 4.9-10.) <br />For the reasons discussed above and the reasons discussed in the DEIR, impacts associated with this issue <br />would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (DEIR, p. 4.9-7 through 4.9-10.) This <br />conclusion also applies, for the same reasons, to the Modified Project. <br />9.13.2 Displacement of Housing <br />Threshold: Would the Project displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the <br />construction of replacement housing elsewhere? <br />Resolution No. Page 46 of 76 <br />Certification of the Magnolia at the Park EIR <br />