Laserfiche WebLink
TARASOFF WARNING <br />The Tarasoff decision deals with responsibility of the psychotherapist to warn victims of <br />potential violence by clients. Simply stated, this means that the psychotherapist -patient privilege <br />is overshadowed by the therapist's responsibility to warn an intended victim. <br />A. The general legal requirements for Tarasoff warnings: <br />1. The duty to warn arises whenever the therapist determines, or pursuant to standards of the <br />profession should determine, that the patient presents a serious danger to another. If a patient <br />threatens physical violence against someone, the threat must be a serious one and the victim or <br />victims must be reasonably identifiable. Some examples of when a victim is "reasonably <br />identifiable" include: a) the victim is specifically named by patient (ex. Bob Smith of 123 <br />Sesame Street); b) the victim is easily identifiable by their relationship to the patient (ex: my <br />mother, brother, employer, colleague, competitor, etc.); or c) other easily recognizable trait (ex.: <br />the Mayor, my congressman, the anchor for the Channel 22 5 p.m. news hour). In order to <br />discharge the duty to warn, the therapist must make reasonable efforts to communicate the threat <br />to the victim or victims and must notify a law enforcement agency. <br />2. Persons to be notified in a Tarasoff situation must include the intended victim, and the police. <br />The therapist must take all necessary steps to warn the victim of the circumstances such as <br />attempting to contact the potential victim by telephone and/or letter. This may include telling <br />other persons who are in a position to warn the victim. It is reasonable to provide the name and <br />address of the client malting the threats and the nature of the violence that the client has <br />threatened. It is not permissible to provide the police or the victim access to confidential patient <br />records without a valid court order, however. <br />B. Serious consideration should be given to initiating a 72-hour involuntary evaluation hold <br />pursuant to Welfare & Institutions Code 5150 on the patient. <br />C. Once a decision has been made as to how the situation will be handled clinically, this should <br />be carefully charted and/or documented. The therapist needs to chart what information was <br />disclosed, to whom, when and why. <br />D. The name and location of the law enforcement agency contacted and the name and badge <br />number of the officer must also be included in the chart. <br />E. A written incident report must always be completed by clinical staff and distributed through <br />appropriate channels when a Tarasoff warning has taken place. This report would include the <br />name of the staff member issuing the warning, the name of the supervisor and any other persons <br />involved in the decision, as well as the circumstances surrounding the warning. <br />In addition, the report must indicate: <br />1. The patient communicated to the therapist a threat of physical violence <br />19 <br />