My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75A - PH- RESO ONE BROADWAY PLAZA
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
04/21/2020
>
75A - PH- RESO ONE BROADWAY PLAZA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2020 3:36:00 PM
Creation date
4/16/2020 3:28:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75A
Date
4/21/2020
Destruction Year
2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
465
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ONE BROADWAY PLAZA PROJECT FIR ADDENDUM <br />CITY OF SANTA ANA <br />5. Environmental Analysis <br />regulations; establishes permittingrequirements for stationary sources; inspects emissions sources; and enforces <br />such measures through educational programs or fines, when necessary for over an approximately 10,743 square - <br />mile area. The SCAQMD is directly fesponsible for reducing emissions from stationary (area and point), mobile, <br />and indirect sources. The Proposed Project supports AQMP objectives to reduce trips, promote infill <br />development, and balance jobs and housing and would not conflict with implementation of the AQMP. <br />In March of 2017, the SCAQMD Governing Board released the Final 2016 AQMP, which continues to evaluate <br />current mtegiated strategies and control measures to meet the NAAQS, as well as, explore new and innovative <br />methods to reach its goals. Some of these approaches include utilizing incentive pfogfams, fecognizing existing <br />co -benefit programs from other sectors, and developing a strategy with fair -share reductions at the federal, <br />state, and local levels. <br />The two principal criteria for conformance with the AQMP are: <br />1. Whether the project would result in an increase in the frequency of severity of existing air quality <br />violations of contribute to new violations or delay the timely attainment of air quality standards of <br />the interim emissions feductions specified in the AQMP. <br />2. Whether the project would exceed the assumptions in the AQMP based on the years of Project <br />buildoutphase. <br />With respect to the first criterion, implementation of the Proposed Project would not exceed the regional <br />significance thresholds for construction of operational activity after implementation. Therefore, the Proposed <br />Pfojectwould not conflict with the AQMP according to this criterion. The Proposed Pfojectwould not generate <br />short-term of long-term emissions of criteria pollutants that could potentially cause an increase in the frequency <br />of severity of existing au quality violations; cause of contribute to new violations; of delay timely attainment of <br />au quality standards beyond those impacts considered in the Ceftified EIR. <br />With respect to the second criterion, implementation of the Proposed Project according to the AQ/GHG <br />Memo prepared by Urban Crossroads would not exceed regional of local thresholds for construction of <br />operational impacts and would therefore have less than significant impacts. The Proposed Project would not <br />exceed SCAG's population, housing or employment projections. The Project would not result in of cause <br />NAAQS or CAAQS violations nor would it result in any regional daily construction -source of operational <br />source emissions exceedancs. The Project would support AQMP objectives to reduce trips, promote infill <br />development, and balance jobs and housing, and would not conflict with implementation of the AQMP. The <br />Project is therefore considered to be consistent with the AQMP. Therefore, the Proposed Project would be <br />consistent with the region's AQMP. There would be no new significant impact of a substantial increase in the <br />severity of previously identified effects. <br />b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project <br />region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? <br />Less Than Significant Impact/No Changes or New Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. <br />The Certified EIR disclosed that construction -related NO,; and PMro emissions would be significant and <br />Page 30 PlaceWorkr <br />75A-343 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.