Laserfiche WebLink
ONE BROADWAY PLAZA PROJECT FIR ADDENDUM <br />CITY OF SANTA ANA <br />5. Environmental Analysis <br />significant new impact or substantial increase in the severity of a previously described impact would occur, and <br />the preparation of a subsequent EIR would not be required. <br />Table 12 Trip Generation Comparison <br />Project <br />AM Peak Hour <br />PM Peak Hour <br />Daily <br />In <br />Out <br />Total <br />In <br />Out <br />I Total <br />Currently Approved 1 <br />637 <br />107 <br />744 <br />211 <br />609 <br />819 <br />1 6,686 <br />Proposed Project 2 <br />170 <br />91 <br />261 <br />153 <br />172 <br />325 <br />3,026 <br />Change <br />-467 <br />-16 <br />-483 <br />S8 <br />437 <br />-494 <br />-3,660 <br />Source. Urban Crossroads 2020 (Appendix B) <br />t Trip generation based on the currently approved Pmject per the 2002 Traffic Study. <br />2 Proposed Project Mpgeneration. <br />All roadway improvements described in Mitigation Measures T-1 through T-13 are part of the Approved <br />Project and will continue to be in effect as part of the Proposed Project. Since the Proposed Project would <br />reduce the number of trips compared to the Approved Project, the Proposed Project would not require any <br />additional roadway improvements than those required as part of the Approved Project. The Proposed Project <br />will incorporate all mitigation measures that are part of the Proposed Project, which would further ensure that <br />impacts to the City's circulation systems are less than significant. <br />Transit, Bicycle and Pedestrian Faci&ties <br />The Proposed Pfojectwould occur within the building envelop of the Appfoved Pfoject. The Proposed Project <br />would not introduce any new foadway features that may impact transit, bicycle of pedestrian facilities. The <br />Proposed Project would not conflict with adopted policies, plans, of programs supporting alternative <br />transportation. The Proposed Pfoject would comply -with City of Santa Ana Municipal Code fequirements and <br />applicable local, state, of federal laws of regulations. The Proposed Project will adhere to mitigation measures <br />identified in the Ceftified EIR, which would ensure that impacts to alternative transportation remains less than <br />significant, therefore, the preparation of a subsequent EIR would not be required. <br />b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision <br />(b)? <br />Less Than Significant Impact/No Changes or New Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. <br />The Pfoposed Project is a mixed use fesidential/office pfoject located within a designated TPA. As a result, the <br />Proposed Pfoject is consistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3. <br />The Trip Generation Evaluation determined that the Approved Project would generate an annual VMT of <br />approximately 14,586,813 vehicle -miles. The Proposed Project would generate an annual VAIT of <br />approximately 7,206,576 vehicle -miles. The development of the Proposed Project is anticipated to generate an <br />annual VMT of 7,380,237 fewer vehicle miles. This equates to an approximate 50% reduction in annual VNIT. <br />The Proposed Project would result in a less than significant impact. The preparation of a subsequent EIR <br />would not be required. <br />March 2020 Page 85 <br />75A-398 <br />