Laserfiche WebLink
INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FAIRVIEw BRIDGE REPLACEMENT AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS w <br />MAY 2020 (9TH STREET TO 16TH STREET) PROJECT `J" <br />SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA <br />Operation. Potential long-term noise impacts under the Future Plus Project condition are solely <br />from traffic noise. Future traffic noise levels at all 92 receptor locations were determined using <br />either the worst -case traffic operations (prior to speed degradation) or the 2040 a.m. peak -hour <br />traffic volumes obtained from the TIA,51 whichever were lower, as described above. <br />Long-term traffic noise impacts were evaluated based on the noise standards in the City's <br />General Plan Noise Element. According to the Noise Element, the long-term operational noise <br />standard for residential uses is 65 dBA Community Noise Level Equivalent (CNEL). A 3 dBA <br />change is the lowest level that is barely perceptible by the average human ear in an outdoor <br />environment. Under CEQA, a comparison is made between the Existing No Project and Future <br />Plus Project noise levels. A receptor is considered significantly impacted under CEQA if an <br />increase of 3 dBA or more occurs and the Future Plus Project traffic noise level is 65 dBA CNEL or <br />more. <br />As shown in Table 6.1 in Appendix B of the NSR (Appendix A of this IS/MND), the Project -related <br />traffic noise increase (from Existing No Project to Future Plus Project) at all 92 modeled receptor <br />locations would be less than 3 dBA and would not be perceptible to the human ear in an <br />outdoor environment. Although noise level results from FHWA TNM 2.5 are described using the <br />Leq level and the City's noise standards are described using the CNEL level, the change in noise <br />level from Existing No Project to Future Plus Project would be the same between the Leq and <br />CNEL. Therefore, long-term noise impacts related to operations of the proposed Project would <br />be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. <br />The modeled future noise levels were also compared to the Caltrans Noise Abatement Criteria <br />(NAC) to determine whether noise abatement should be considered under NEPA, because the <br />Project would utilize federal transportation funding. <br />The following noise barriers (NBs) were analyzed to shield receptor locations that would be <br />exposed to traffic noise levels approaching or exceeding the Caltrans NAC for the future Project <br />conditions: <br />NB No. 1: A 169 ft long barrier along the right-of-way and private property line on the <br />northbound side of Fairview Street between Civic Center Drive and 9th Street was analyzed <br />to shield Receptor R-5. <br />NB No. 2: A 129 ft long barrier along the right-of-way and private property line on the <br />southbound side of Fairview Street between Civic Center Drive and 9th Street was analyzed <br />to shield Receptor R-8. <br />• NB No. 3: A 113 ft long barrier along the right-of-way and private property line on the <br />southbound side of Fairview Street between West 9th Street and West 12th Street was <br />analyzed to shield Receptor R-14. <br />51 LSA Associates, Inc. 2018b. op. cit. <br />R:\WKE1702\ISMND\Final ISMND\Fairview Street Bridge Final ISMND.docx (05/26/20) 3-81 <br />