My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Appendix A Natural Environment Study (Minimal Impacts)
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
06/16/2020
>
75B - FAIRVIEW BRIDGE PROJECT CD
>
Appendix A Natural Environment Study (Minimal Impacts)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2020 8:35:34 AM
Creation date
6/16/2020 8:17:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
6/16/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION REPORT FAIRVIEW STREET IMPROVEMENTS A <br />N OVEMBER 2018 FROM 9TH STREET TO 16TH STREET AND BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT `J" <br />SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA <br />REGULATORY BACKGROUND <br />UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS <br />The United States Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) regulates discharges of dredged or fill material <br />into waters of the United States (waters of the U.S.). These waters include wetland and nonwetland <br />bodies of water that meet specific criteria. Corps regulatory jurisdiction pursuant to Section 404 of <br />the Clean Water Act (CWA) is founded on a connection, or nexus, between the water body in <br />question and interstate commerce. This connection may be direct, through a tributary system <br />linking a stream channel with traditionally navigable waters (TNWs) used in interstate or foreign <br />commerce, or may be indirect, through a nexus identified in the Corps regulations. The following <br />definition of waters of the U.S. is from 33 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 328.3: <br />The term waters of the United States means: <br />(1) All waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be <br />susceptible to use in interstate or foreign commerce ... ; <br />(2) All interstate waters including interstate wetlands; <br />(3) All other waters such as intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent <br />streams) ... the use, degradation or destruction of which could affect interstate <br />or foreign commerce ... ; <br />(4) All impoundments of waters otherwise defined as waters of the United States <br />under the definition; and <br />(5) Tributaries of waters defined in paragraphs (a) (1)—(4) of this section. <br />The Corps typically regulates as waters of the U.S. any body of water displaying an Ordinary High <br />Water Mark (OHWM). Corps jurisdiction over nontidal waters of the U.S. extends laterally to the <br />OHWM or beyond the OHWM to the limit of any adjacent wetlands, if present (33 CFR 328.4). The <br />OHWM is defined as "... that line on the shore established by the fluctuations of water and indicated <br />by physical characteristics such as a clear natural line impressed on the bank, shelving, changes in <br />the character of soil, destruction of terrestrial vegetation, the presence of litter and debris, or other <br />appropriate means that consider the characteristics of the surrounding area" (33 CFR 328.3). Corps <br />jurisdiction typically extends upstream to the point where the OHWM is no longer perceptible. <br />As discussed above, Corps regulatory jurisdiction under Section 404 of the CWA is founded on a <br />connection between the water body in question and interstate commerce. This connection may be <br />direct, through a tributary system linking a stream channel with TNW used in interstate or foreign <br />commerce, or may be indirect, through a nexus identified in the Corps regulations. In the past, an <br />indirect nexus could potentially be established if isolated waters provided habitat for migratory <br />birds, even in the absence of a surface connection to navigable water of the U.S. The 1984 rule that <br />enabled the Corps to expand jurisdiction over isolated waters of this type became known as the <br />Migratory Bird Rule. On January 9, 2001, the United States Supreme Court narrowly limited the <br />\\vcorp12\projects\WKE1702\N ES- MI\November 2018 Sub mittal\Fairview Street I m proveme nts_Draft JD 110918.docx all/09/18» <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.