Laserfiche WebLink
March 5, 2020 are the only authoritative source of airspace impact <br />information as stated in the AELUP. <br />ii. The AELUP clearly identifies its airport land use planning <br />standards around aircraft noise, safety, and height. Objective <br />measures of these standards are clearly identified in AELUP <br />Section 2.1. The Project is consistent with each of these objective <br />standards. <br />iii. Two-dimensional flight tracks and a list of unassociated aircraft do <br />nothing to inform the impact of overflights. The ALUC provided <br />one day of arrival flight tracks, one day of departure flight tracks <br />and lists of aircraft by time of day and altitude that were purported <br />to have produced these flight tracks. <br />iv. The Project proponent prepared three-dimensional models of the <br />ALUC-provided flight track information to depict actual overflight <br />proximity to a scaled model of the Project. These three- <br />dimensional models show that some residents and users of the <br />property would likely be able to see aircraft flying past the property <br />from certain locations. Aircraft noise information from the AELUP, <br />the JWA GAIP EIR and from the Project EIR demonstrate that the <br />noise impact would be less than 60 dBA CNEL and less than <br />single event noise standards identified in the JWA GAIP EIR. <br />V. Aircraft noise contours used to objectively measure noise impact <br />already assume flight tracks and actual operating conditions for a <br />full year including future operations. One day of arrival flight <br />tracks and one day of departure flight tracks are simple anecdotes <br />and not substantive evidence. <br />vi. The project is located outside of the JWA single event noise <br />exposure areas documented in the JWA General Aviation <br />Improvement Program EIR certified on June 25, 2019. The <br />project developer presented this information to the ALUC <br />Commission at its hearing on May 21, 2020. <br />vii. ALUC Commissioners Monin and Murphy asked for but did not <br />receive evidence of general aviation aircraft using Runway 2R/20L <br />would "be turning right in front of the site." In fact, the GA aircraft <br />pattern and voluntary noise abatement procedures for Runway <br />2R/20L operate within one to two miles from the end of the runway <br />north of the airport and on a 15-degree offset from the extended <br />runway centerline to avoid airspace conflicts with aircraft arriving <br />Runway 20R. This location places GA aircraft south of Barranca <br />Parkway and aligned with the Tustin Legacy property southeast of <br />the Project site. These regular GA aircraft flight tracks are <br />Resolution No. 2020-xx <br />75C-807 Page 9 of 13 <br />