Laserfiche WebLink
Agenda Item 2- The Bowery <br />May 21, 2020 <br />Page 4 <br />JWA (approximately five percent (5%) of the time) new residents would experience noise <br />associated with aircraft departures. The letters also recommended outdoor signage informing the <br />public of the presence of operating aircraft/aircraft overflight. The City had included Mitigation <br />Measures NOI-3 regarding noise and LU-2 regarding signage in the Draft EIR, but then removed <br />those measures in the revised EIR, which will be considered by the Santa Ana Planning <br />Commission and City Council at their upcoming meetings (see Attachment 11). <br />Conclusion <br />Attachment 9 to this report contains excerpts from the project submittal package received from <br />the City of Santa Ana for your reference. ALUC staff has reviewed this project, zone change and <br />General Plan Amendment with respect to compliance with the AELUP for JWA, including <br />review of height restrictions, imaginary surfaces, flight tracks, heliports and environmental <br />compliance. The proposed project is not located within the noise contours or safety zones for <br />JWA and does not penetrate the notification or the obstruction imaginary surfaces for JWA. The <br />project is, however, located within the primary aircraft approach corridor to JWA. <br />The proposed project, with the associated zone change and General Plan Amendment would <br />introduce mixed -uses (residential) to this site, which has been historically light industrial and <br />office. This would subject many individuals to overflight activity and likely create disturbances <br />and annoyances for many of the new inhabitants, especially during morning and evening arrivals. <br />As noted in the DEIR comments from the ALUC, in addition to regular arrival operations, future <br />residents will also be exposed to reverse flow (departure) operations at JWA, which take place <br />approximately five percent (5%) of the time. <br />On August 28, 2019, JWA also provided comments on the NOP, emphasizing the same points <br />discussed above (See Attachment 10). Because of the project location within the primary <br />approach corridor and its proximity to JWA (2.25 miles), JWA stated it is not supportive of the <br />proposed residential portion of this project. Residents would be subject to significant aircraft <br />overflight, noise and annoyance as approaching aircraft fly overhead at an average altitude of <br />790 feet above ground level. Additionally, during reverse flow circumstances, departing aircraft <br />may be higher in altitude, but louder over the project area. It has been JWA's experience that <br />residential uses located under aircraft approach and departure corridors generate a significant <br />number of noise complaints from affected residents. JWA also suggested that the City should <br />give consideration as to how these noise complaints will be addressed should the project be <br />approved. <br />Per Section 1.2 of the AELUP for JWA, the purpose of the AELUP is to safeguard the general <br />welfare of the inhabitants within the vicinity of the airport and to ensure the continued operation <br />of the airport. Specifically, the plan seeks to protect the public from the adverse effects of <br />aircraft noise to ensure that people and facilities are not concentrated in areas susceptible to <br />aircraft accidents, and to ensure that no structures or activities adversely affect navigable <br />airspace. Additionally, Section 2.1.4 of the AELUP for JWA and PUC Section 21674 charge the <br />Commission to coordinate at the local level to ensure compatible land use planning. Therefore, <br />because of the proposed zone change, General Plan amendment and the project's proposed <br />residential uses, the project's location within the primary approach corridor for JWA and the <br />75C-906 <br />