My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75C - PH - THE BOWERY
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
08/18/2020
>
75C - PH - THE BOWERY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2020 5:10:27 PM
Creation date
8/13/2020 4:53:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75C
Date
8/18/2020
Destruction Year
2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1021
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ALUC Bowery Overrule Response <br />July 29, 2020 <br />Page 2 <br />of the airport. Specifically, the plan seeks to protect the public from the adverse effects of aircraft <br />noise to ensure that people and facilities are not concentrated in areas susceptible to aircraft <br />accidents, and to ensure that no structures or activities adversely affect navigable airspace. <br />Additionally, Section 2.1.4 of the AELUP for JWA and PUC Section 21674 charge the <br />commission to coordinate planning to protect the public health, safety and welfare. Therefore, <br />because the proposed zone change, General Plan amendment and the project's inclusion of <br />residential uses, the proposed project location within the primary approach corridor for JWA and <br />the existing significant aircraft overflight above the proposed project site, the project is <br />inconsistent with the AELUP. <br />The City of Santa Ana Draft Resolution No. 2020-xx ("Draft Resolution") states that the <br />proposed project does not add any new residential or commercial noise impacts to the JWA 65 <br />dBA CNEL noise areas. While the project is located outside of the 60 and 65 dBA noise contours <br />(Attachment 1 hereto), changing the site's General Plan designation from Professional and <br />Administrative Office (PAO) to District Center (DC), and allowing up to 1,100 residential units <br />in the aircraft approach corridor for JWA would subject residents to noise from overflight of <br />commercial and general aviation aircraft (Attachment 2). <br />Exhibits showing flight tracks in relation to the proposed project site were provided at the May <br />21, 2020 ALUC meeting (Attachment 3 & 4). Attachment 3 shows a day's worth of normal <br />aircraft arrival operations and has a corresponding table listing each flight, the time of day and <br />elevation above the proposed project site. The table shows that the majority of flights over the <br />property are in range of 750 to 800 feet above ground level and arrive in very close intervals. <br />Attachment 4 has also been included for your information and shows a day's worth of reverse <br />flow departure flight tracks. The reverse departure flow occurs approximately 5% of the time, <br />primarily due to weather factors. During reverse flow circumstances, departing aircraft may be <br />higher in altitude, but louder over the project area. Based upon these aircraft arrival, departure <br />and altitude statistics, future residents of the proposed Bowery Project will experience significant <br />aircraft overflight and single event noise. <br />It has been the ALUC's experience that residential uses located under aircraft approach and <br />departure corridors generate a significant number of noise complaints from the affected <br />residents. The city should give consideration as to how these noise complaints will be addressed <br />should the City Council overrule the ALUC and approve the proposed project. These complaints <br />will likely contact the JWA Noise Office and not the city, despite the fact that the city will have <br />overruled ALUC's valid concerns for the welfare of its future residents. The complainants will <br />then be directed to the city, as the approving authority, and thus, noise concerns should be <br />addressed by the city's regulations or by including noise attenuation conditions of approval. <br />These are not conditions that ALUC can place on the project, but that the city should consider for <br />the protection of their own residents. <br />Finding "F" on page four of Draft Resolution states that the ALUC staff report for the subject <br />item found that "with regard to AELUP issues of aircraft noise, building heights, safety zones <br />and heliports that the proposed project, zone change, and General Plan Amendment are each <br />75C-994 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.