Laserfiche WebLink
TARASOFF WARNING <br />The Tarasoff decision deals with responsibility of the psychotherapist to warn victims of potential <br />violence by clients. Simply stated, this means that the psychotherapist -patient privilege is <br />overshadowed by the therapist's responsibility to warn an intended victim. <br />General legal requirements for Tarasoff warnings: <br />1. The duty to wain arises when the therapist determines, or pursuant to standards of the profession <br />should determine, that the patient presents a serious danger to another. If a patient threatens <br />physical violence against someone, the threat must be a serious one and the victim or victims must <br />be reasonably identifiable. Some examples of when a victim is "reasonably identifiable" include: <br />a) the victim is specifically named by patient (ex. Bob Smith of 123 Sesame Street); b) the victim <br />is easily identifiable by their relationship to the patient (ex: my mother, brother, employer, <br />colleague, competitor, etc.); or c) other easily recognizable trait (ex.: the Mayor, my congressman, <br />the anchor for the Channel 22 5 p.m. news hour). In order to discharge the duty to warn, the <br />therapist must make reasonable efforts to communicate the threat to the victim or victims and must <br />notify a law enforcement agency. <br />Persons to be notified in a Tarasoff situation must include the intended victim and the police. The <br />therapist must take all necessary steps to warn the victim of the circumstances such as attempting <br />to contact the potential victim by telephone and/or letter. This may include telling other persons <br />who are in a position to warn the victim. It is reasonable to provide the name and address of the <br />client making the threats and the nature of the violence the client has threatened. It is not <br />permissible to provide the police or the victim access to confidential patient records without a valid <br />court order. <br />Serious consideration should be given to initiating a 72-hour involuntary evaluation hold pursuant <br />to Welfare & Institutions Code 5150. <br />Once a decision has been made as to how the situation will be handled clinically, it should be <br />documented. The therapist needs to document what information was disclosed, to whom, when <br />and why. <br />The name and location of the law enforcement agency contacted and the name and badge number <br />of the officer must also be documented. <br />A written incident report must always be completed by clinical staff and distributed through <br />appropriate channels when a Tarasoff warning has taken place. This report would include the name <br />,of the staff member issuing the warning, the name of the supervisor and any other persons involved <br />in the decision, as well as the circumstances surrounding the warning. <br />The report must indicate that: <br />1. The patient communicated to the therapist a threat of physical violence. <br />2. The threat was serious. <br />19 <br />