My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5 1109 N BROADWAY
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Planning Commission (2002-Present)
>
2020
>
03-30-20 Special Meeting
>
5 1109 N BROADWAY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2020 9:33:47 PM
Creation date
11/9/2020 9:31:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
275
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
O NE B RO A D WA Y P LA Z A P RO J E CT E I R A D DE N DU M CI T Y O F S A NT A A NA <br />5. Environmental Analysis <br />Page 82 PlaceWorks <br />Environmental Issues <br />Substantial Change in Project <br />Requiring Major EIR Revisions <br />Substantial Change in Circum-stances <br />Requiring Major EIR Revisions <br />New Information Showing New <br />or Increased Significant Effects <br />Less Than Significant <br />Impact/No Changes or New Information <br />Requiring Preparation of an EIR No Impact <br />a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or <br />policy addressing the circulation system, <br />including transit, roadway, bicycle and <br />pedestrian facilities? <br /> x <br />b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent <br />with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, <br />subdivision (b)? x <br />c) Substantially increase hazards due to a <br />geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves <br />or dangerous intersections) or incompatible <br />uses (e.g., farm equipment)? <br /> x <br />d) Result in inadequate emergency access? x <br /> <br />This section is based on the report prepared by Urban Crossroads on March 9, 2020, titled One Broadway Plaza <br />Trip Generation Evaluation (“Trip Generation Evaluation”). The Trip Generation Evaluation is contained in <br />Appendix B. <br />Methodology <br />Trip Generation <br />The Trip Generation Evaluation by Urban Crossroads compared the Proposed Project’s trip generation with <br />the Approved Project’s Trip generation. Urban Crossroads calculated the Proposed Project’s trip generation . <br />Table 10 presents the trip generation rates obtained from the ITE Trip Generation Manual (10th Edition, 2017) <br />for the proposed multifamily housing us e and the remaining other office, retail, and restaurant uses originally <br />contemplated. The ITE trip generation rate utilized for the multifamily housin g is for developments located <br />within City Center Core areas (as opposed to rates for developments within a general urban/suburban setting). <br />The average rates for General Office uses located within City Center Core areas has also been utilized to <br />estimate the trip generation for the office uses proposed in the tower, while the average rates for General Office <br />located within general urban/suburban areas have been used to estimate traffic for the rehabilitated structures. <br />The latest ITE Trip Generation Manual does not provide any trip rate data for Specialty Retail, as such, the <br />average rates for the Shopping Center land use (ITE Code 820) have been utilized. Similar to the 2002 Traffic <br />Study, an AM inbound and outbound split is not reported for the Quality Res taurant land use. As such, a <br />50%/50% split has been assumed for the AM peak hour, consistent with the 200 2 Traffic Study. <br />5 - 136
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.