3 - The Bowery - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Santa Ana Redhill Development Prepared for: City of Santa Ana AECOM 34 Table 25: Fiscal Expenditures - Industrial Prototype Table 5.4: Industrial Prototype - Calculated Per Service Population Costs to General Fund Department City of Santa Ana Budget City Cost per Service Population Burden of Cost for New Service Population Police $131,600,000 $312.81 100% $312.81 Fire $45,600,000 $108.39 100% $108.39 Planning and Building $13,200,000 $31.38 60% $18.83 Finance and Management Services $9,700,000 $23.06 60% $13.83 City Manager's Office $2,200,000 $5.23 40% $2.09 City Attorney's Office $3,200,000 $7.61 40% $3.04 Clerk of the Council's Office $1,700,000 $4.04 40% $1.62 Public Works Agency $13,200,000 $31.38 100% $31.38 Community Development Agency $3,300,000 $7.84 60% $4.71 Human Resources $2,500,000 $5.94 80% $4.75 Parks, Recreation, Community Services $21,400,000 $50.87 100% $50.87 Bower's Museum $1,500,000 $3.57 100% $3.57 Library $5,400,000 $12.84 100% $12.84 Civic Center $1,200,000 $2.85 100% $2.85 Strategic Plan $2,500,000 $5.94 60% $3.57 Transfer to Project Funds $9,000,000 $21.39 100% $21.39 Total Cannabis Program $6,200,000 $14.74 100% $14.74 Total Budgeted Expenditures $273,400,000 Total Pro Rata Cost per Service Population $610 Total Incremental Service Population 305 Total Cost of New Service to Incremental Population $185,000 Note: Numbers are rounded and may not sum Source: Santa Ana FY2019-2020 Adopted Budget; AECOM While it is estimated the Industrial Prototype requires fewer services from the City, the Project would likely generate a more significant increase in property taxes through assessed improvements and induce greater sales taxes from increased households in the City. The Project could lead to capital deficits for Focus Area because of higher densities of households and businesses concentrated in and around the current institutions and infrastructure5. A further analysis of the current capacity and distribution of public facilities should be conducted to understand the impact of the incremental growth in service population on facilities such as schools, police/fire stations, or other capital investments associated with the provision of public services. The City will consider commissioning an infrastructure needs assessment after the environmental assessment has been completed. Assumptions on Revenues: Property Taxes: Property taxes for both the Project and Industrial Prototype were assessed on the total construction costs of the improvements discounted by 5% to account for the difference between market value and assessed value. The corresponding Tax Rate Area (TRA) allocates 19.4% of the tax assessment to the City’s General Fund. Detailed tables are shown in Appendix A. 5 For the purposes of this study, AECOM assumed all expenditures to the City would be based on a pro-rata allocation to the service population, which is the industry-standard for anticipating long-term citywide fiscal impacts. Developers are required to pay development fees designed to offset immediate capital costs to the City. AECOM did not work with City staff or public service agents to analyze the thresholds required for new fixed costs to service provision, such as an additional police or fire station. 3-261