Laserfiche WebLink
I'm asking for a strong independent oversight body with subpoena power; investigatory authority; disciplinary <br />authority; and the ability to hire and fire officers, including the Chief of Police. <br />Police need to be held accountable if they do something wrong <br />We don't need it. SAPID is a great department that keeps our streets safe. <br />I think all law enforcement agencies should have independent civilian oversight <br />Never trust SAPD!! corrupt! You got my info. Come at me bro. <br />Police oversight will benefit and support the goals of our community -oriented policing as it seeks to utilize problem <br />solving techniques to work in a cooperative effort with the community to proactively address concerns. <br />methods and procedures of our s public satety organizations recommend changes that improve the efficiency <br />and outcomes of these strategies. Day to day operations remain the purview of public safety professionals, but an <br />oversight committee would have wider latitude to recommend policy shifts or legislative changes that can be <br />brought to the city council. Examples include evaluation of when physical visits by patrol units are required, how <br />priority categories are divided, what overtime expenses are approved, and how public safety resources can be <br />Your community outreach tab is not working. - Accountability should be the focus. <br />more helpful is DEFUNDING the police & using that money to fund community programs that would actually benefit <br />OUR community. Our city council somehowthinks that the Public Library and Community & Development should <br />only receive 3% of our budget, and the SAPID seem worthy of 41%! <br />Police oversight is needed. Defunding SAPID is needed. <br />more helpful is DEFUNDING the police & using that money to fund community programs that would actually benefit <br />OUR community. Our city council somehow thinks that the Public Library and Community & Development should <br />only receive 3% of our budget, and the SAPID seem worthy of 41%! <br />more helpful is DEFUNDING the police & using that money to fund community programs that would actually benefit <br />OUR community. Our city council somehow thinks that the Public Library and Community & Development should <br />only receive 3% of our budget, and the SAPID seem worthy of 41%! <br />more e pffiF—is0FF1J1NDTNG t e po ice& using that money to fund community programs t at wou actua y ene it <br />OUR community. Our city council somehow thinks that the Public Library and Community & Development should <br />only receive 3% of our budget, and the SAPID seem worthy of 41%! <br />to accept them as Neighbors instead of a foreign army to be in fear of. <br />Do any Officers get out there vehicle just to say hello or is the only contact a negative one. <br />Walk the Neighborhood learn the names share a cup of coffee or water, kids in the neighborhood are taught to <br />avoid the police like the plague- <br />[ trust my police department, the men and women that help protect the city are heroes <br />sapd sucks <br />active 10 years ago in a group of organizers who attended i izen ftewew Boarci (CRB) meetings at the University <br />of California, Berkeley during the Occupy years to hold the university accountable for injuries and complaints <br />sustained by campus police during Occupy protests. It would be helpful for me to have a little bit more information <br />about the organizational structure of police oversight, be what is important for me is that all of the models be <br />community -facing. I'm struggling to identify which model the UC CRB used (I think it was a combination of review & <br />auditor?). We definitely did not have access to internal affairs (which was problematic be there was very little room <br />for us to actually make recommendations to the police department about specific complaints), but we filed reports <br />and had public comment about reports as they were completed. The auditor model seems like the best option be it <br />would allow the CRB to initiate and re -open IA investigations after they have been reviewed, but it also feels like it <br />would be the only option that would allow community members to review budgets and advocate for policy decisions <br />that would lead to defunding (or abolishing) the police. However, regardless of the model, it feels important to <br />emphasize that the public/community have transparent access to CRB processes so that there can be as much <br />community involvement as possible. If the CRB is as inaccessible as the police department itself, it lessens <br />opportunities for citizens (participants particularly unhoused folks to experience agency around advocating for <br />accountability to the residents. <br />have been implemented years ago. Regardless of the oversight model, transparency with residents needs to be a <br />priority. <br />Let's also not buy over the top military style weapons and reinvest in our school(students and teachers) <br />65D-124 <br />