JOHN ROBINSON CONSULTING, INC. - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mr. Brian Ige 3 of 4 December 2, 2020 c, Description of other water supply alternatives considered to accomplish the objectives to be addressed by the proposed water reclamation, recycling or desalination project, including benefits to be gained by each alternative, total project cost, life cycle cost, and corresponding cost of the project water produced expressed in dollars per MG, and/or dollars per acre-foot. An appraisal level cost estimates, or better, is acceptable for these alternatives. BOR Comment: Section 7.2.1 and 7.3 provide very brief descriptions. This criterion requires more description for the alternatives, such as benefits to be gained by each alternative, total project cost, life cycle cost, and corresponding cost of the project water produced expressed in dollars per MG, and/or dollars per acre-foot (please see the D&S). Do these alternatives match with the alternatives in table 7-2? d. When a water reclamation, recycling or desalination project provides water supplies for municipal and industrial use, the benefits of the project can be measured in terms of the cost of the alternative most likely to be implemented in the absence of the project. This is assuming that the two alternatives would provide comparable levels of service. This comparison must be provided, if applicable. BOR Comment: Also, which one in the table is the proposed Title XVI project? Following are also missing in the Recycled Water Master Plan: 1. Description of potential sources of water to be reclaimed, recycled or desalinated, including impaired surface and ground waters. Statement of the specific objectives all alternatives, including the reclamation, recycling or desalination project, are designed to address. 3. Analysis of any water rights issues potentially resulting from implementation of the proposed water reclamation, recycling or desalination project. All proposed water reclamation, recycling or desalination projects must comply with state water law. time Schedule JR Consulting will commence with the proposed scope of services after the Professional Services Agreement (PSA) has fully been executed. RWMP revisions would be completed within 60 days with the goal to be completed by February 28, 2021 to allow IJSBR a 6-month review of the revised crosswalk so they can make their final decision before the end of the Federal fiscal year. Compensation JR Consulting will provide the scope of services with the proposed schedule as set forth in this proposal to the City on a time and material basis. Based on JR Consulting's present knowledge of the services described above, it is recommended a not -to -exceed budget of $24,900 which is based upon 166 hours at $150 per hour.