My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HDL COREN & CONE (2)
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
H
>
HDL COREN & CONE (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2021 3:45:15 PM
Creation date
2/1/2021 3:33:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
HDL COREN & CONE
Contract #
A-2021-013
Agency
Finance & Management Services
Council Approval Date
1/19/2021
Expiration Date
1/31/2024
Insurance Exp Date
1/1/1900
Destruction Year
2029
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
145
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
and no assurance is made hereby that any Agreement will be awarded pursuant to this RFP. The <br />City reserves the right to waive minor inconsistencies in submitted proposals. <br />Protests <br />Proposers may file a "protest" to a Request for Proposal (RFP) with the City's Purchasing <br />Department. In order for a protest to be considered valid it must: <br />1. Be filed in writing within five (5) business days of either the RFP issued date or before 5:00 <br />p.m, of the 5th business day following the posting of RFP Results/Notice of Intent to Award <br />Agreement on the City's website; <br />2. Clearly identify the specific irregularity or accusation; <br />3. Clearly identify the specific City staff determination or recommendation being protested; <br />4. Specify, in detail, the grounds of the protest and the facts supporting the protest; and <br />5. Include all relevant, supporting documentation with the protest at time of filing. <br />If the protest does not comply with each of these requirements, it will be rejected as invalid. If the <br />protest is valid, the City's Purchasing Supervisor, or other designated City staff member, shall <br />review the basis of the protest and all relevant information. The Purchasing Supervisor or designee <br />will provide a written decision to the protestor within ten (10) business days from receipt of <br />protest. The decision of the Purchasing Supervisor, or designee, Is final and no further appeals will <br />be considered. <br />Negotiations <br />Negotiations for a binding estimate of cost structure will begin with the recommended top -ranked <br />firm(s). If an Agreement acceptable to the City cannot be negotiated at a price considered fair and <br />reasonable, negotiations shall be terminated with the top -ranked firm(s) and negotiation will then <br />proceed with the next highest ranked firm(s) until an Agreement is reached or withdraw the RFP. <br />The evaluation team will conduct all subsequent negotiations and will make a recommendation to <br />the City. <br />The City reserves the right to negotiate final contract terms with any Proposer selected. <br />Negotiations shall be confidential and not subject to disclosure to competing Consultant/Vendors <br />unless and until an agreement is reached. The contract between the parties will consist of the RFP <br />together with any modifications thereto, and the awarded Consultant/Vendor's proposal, together <br />with any modifications and clarifications thereto that are submitted at the request of the City <br />during the evaluation and negotiation process. In the event of any conflict or contradiction between <br />or among these documents, the documents shall control in the following order of precedence: the <br />final executed contract, the RFP, any modifications and clarifications to the awarded <br />Consultant/Vendor's proposal, and the awarded Consultant/Vendor's proposal. Specific exceptions <br />to this general rule may be noted in the final executed contract. <br />Exceptions to the RFP <br />The format of the RFP must be followed and all requested information must be submitted as <br />indicated for continued consideration. However, the City of Santa Ana is receptive to any <br />additional information and/or suggestions pertaining to the required services and additional related <br />capabilities of the proposer. Exceptions raised during Agreement negotiations that have not been <br />previously declared in the proposal may be grounds for disqualification as deemed appropriate by <br />the City of Santa Ana. <br />City of Santa Ana — Revenue Auditing, Recovery, Reporting, Analysis, and Legislative/State Agency <br />Liaison and Implementation Monitoring Services <br />Request for Proposals No. 20-126 <br />October 1, 2020 Page 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.