Laserfiche WebLink
1 ;n[iago P ash M aizi tili� f [ f.ulian�: fb„i��n <br />The existing surface runoff patterns were planned to drain toward the creek and then pass thru several stone lined <br />override drains (it appears these may have been constructed as a WPA project in the 1930's). With today's regulatory <br />focus on water quality, treatment of the runoff before entering the creek may be required. To minimize the amount to be <br />treated, the use of permeable pavements for the access road, parking and bikeway would enable rainfall to permeate into <br />the underlying soil. When compared to the existing surface areas, H&A staff believes we can show the amount of runoff <br />has been reduced and the need for water guality treatment can be done effectively with one of more stone lined swales <br />incorporated into the landscape areas using infiltration andlor biological uptake saving the City both construction and <br />operation costs of alternative water quality treatment systems. <br />The site plan in the RFP has several deficiencies that need to be remedied as the design evolves. First the cul-de-sac as <br />shown does not comply with City standards that are based on emergency vehicle maneuvering characteristics. Second <br />the parking located radial to the center will require the minimum width to be available at the "narrow end". The H&A Team <br />has developed an alternative configuration that addresses these deficiencies while remaining generally consistent with <br />the site plan arrangement (see followingpaoe) The exceptions are a loss of planting between the roadway and bike trail <br />(we believe the existing pavement may be reused for the bike trail in the H&A layout to save the City money) and some <br />added curves in both the bike trail and decomposed granite walk to accommodate the revised cul-de-sac. <br />City Council 16 — 23 5/18/2021 <br />nUNSAMR& )NOCIAHN(Rv1NE.1NC. <br />