My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FULL AGENDA PACKET_2021-05-18
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
05/18/2021 Regular
>
FULL AGENDA PACKET_2021-05-18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2021 3:30:11 PM
Creation date
7/8/2021 4:52:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Date
5/18/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
932
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RFP No. 21-025 <br />EXHIBIT B <br />Given this context, Pension Obligation Bonds (POBs) in California may be viewed as a debt <br />"refinancing. PORs must be issued on a taxable basis because the pension benefits private <br />individuals (the City's current and former employees). Nonetheless, POBs present the only <br />financing tool available to significantly impact the City's required UAL payment schedule. <br />Options for City Council Consideration <br />Our study of the City's UAL and financial viability to meet its current and forecasted obligation <br />led us to assume two (2) POB funding options for City consideration; 1) a POB equal to 500/ of <br />the City's current UAL; and 2) a POB equal to 90% of the City's current UAL. <br />In preparing the analysis for the 50% UAL option the following was taken into consideration: <br />1. POBs — SO% UAL <br />a. $358 Million POBs with Hybrid — Level Debt Service <br />b. 25-Year Final Maturity <br />c. Target Longest Safety Bases Only <br />sod% UAL If" A:1 Rs Year (:5ulfiAy OrTIy). I tylarid Lcnrcl <br />S:�al,00n,ono <br />$358 Million POO <br />$1113 Million nwfarrnd UAL CocK <br />?Jo.000,ono .. $32 Million 9udgac2ry Savings <br />° y 5144 Million NPV Savings =41% <br />AA- 5[Ok -1S d05 = 3.15 11L." <br />fif4),0of1,00o •• •••-•.• d10,s, UAL Papn=nhx <br />• �ti7""ofnlnp 5A.nV UN <br />Sim o00,00o VOIl Uc4v inns <br />UnvUe9=lar) < asPo Flow SavfiveN*, <br />J ,.nal WA 1',yr..nu <br />$30,po{ypao <br />tz+�,on2onn <br />i I n,nnr? 00;Y <br />I4V." •013 -!0I4 'I1Z5.[OZfi ]11 f! •0 ttl 9)P9 to 11) Al t 1803Z do a r 4114 11 V, JO A, A;; A) IK In 14 ko4020,11 Soo/ B143 10442014 AW, J041 Z041i <br />$14),GIlo,000 <br />In preparing the analysis for the 90% UAL option the following was taken into consideration: <br />2. POBs-90% UAL Million <br />a. $642 Million POBs with Hybrid —Level Debt Service <br />b. 2S-Year Final Maturity <br />c. Misc. Base #14 & #16 remain outstanding <br />City Council 23 — 52 5/18/2021 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.