My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AGENDA PACKET_2021-09-21
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
09/21/2021 Regular and Special
>
AGENDA PACKET_2021-09-21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2021 9:20:28 AM
Creation date
9/20/2021 9:19:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Date
9/21/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
535
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Rent Stabilization Ordinance and Just Cause Eviction Ordinance <br />September 21, 2021 <br />Page 4 <br />that was received and filed by City Council on May 21, 2019. There are twenty-nine <br />mobilehome parks containing 3,913 spaces. Six of the mobilehome parks and 1,020 <br />spaces in the City are currently age-restricted to persons 55 years of age or older. <br /> Relative to the State’s Tenant Protection Act of 2019 (“AB 1482”), the State’s rent <br />stabilization law caps the statewide rent increases to 5% plus the percentage change in <br /> the CPI, or 10%, whichever is lower. The City’s local Ordinance will go further than <br />AB 1482 and the protections provided in this Ordinance are more restrictive than those <br />set forth in AB 1482. <br />An owner must, on or before the date of commencement of a tenancy, give the tenant or <br />mobilehome resident a written notice in a form prescribed by the City information on the <br /> existence and scope of the Ordinance and the tenant’s right to respond to any petition <br />filed with the City as described in detail below. A rent increase cannot take effect until <br />the notice has been provided. <br />Fair Return in Response to Takings Clause <br />In cases where a cap on rent increases poses difficulty for a particular landlord, the legal <br />requirement for a fair return under the Fifth Amendment takings clause is satisfied so long <br />as an adequate process is established for the landlord to seek an individualized <br />adjustment. A CPI-based increase in the Ordinance will provide a just and reasonable <br /> return on an owner’s property, and has been included in the Ordinance to encourage <br />good management, reward efficiency, and discourage the flight of capital, as well as to <br />be commensurate with returns on comparable investments, but not so high as to defeat <br />the purpose of curtailing excessive rents and rental increases. Courts in California have <br />long upheld the constitutionality of the maintenance of net operating income (MNOI) <br />standard in these individualized determinations. The MNOI standard typically indexes <br />increases to those found in the CPI, including indexing the MNOI standard at less than <br />100% of the change in the CPI. One reason is that such indexing accounts for the fact <br /> that a landlord’s return on investment is not limited to the revenue from rent rolls, but also <br /> includes increases to the landlord’s equity in the property and overall appreciation of the <br />property. Another reason is that a major component of the CPI is determined by increases <br />in housing costs, which are often driven by speculation rather than maintenance costs, <br />and thus these costs unduly influence the rise in the overall CPI. Over the last 40 years, <br /> the change in the CPI for the Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim region for “All Items, <br /> less shelter” was approximately 80% of the change in the CPI for “All Items.” The <br /> Ordinance will index the MNOI standard at 80% of the change in the CPI for “All Items” <br />as a reasonable guarantee that landlords will obtain a fair rate of return on their <br />investments. <br />However, any owner of residential real property or a mobilehome park who contends that <br />the limit on rental increases set forth in the Ordinance will prevent the owner from <br />receiving a fair and reasonable return on their property, may petition for relief from the <br /> cap. The owner’s petition must be on an application form prescribed by the City Manager <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.