Laserfiche WebLink
DOWDALL LAW OFFICES <br />A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION <br />ATTO R N EYS AT LAW <br />City Council of the City of Santa Ana <br />City of Santa Ana <br />September 16, 2021 <br />Page 8 <br />1. John Williams, a U.S. economist, described his view of this manipulation when <br />interviewed. Williams prefers a CPI, or inflation measure, calculated using the original <br />methodology based on a basket of goods having quantities and qualities fixed.; <br />2. David Ranson, another U.S. economist, questions the official CPI's viability as an <br />indicator of inflation. <br />Unlike Williams, Ranson doesn't espouse the viewpoint that the CPI is being <br />manipulated. Instead, his view is that the CPI is a lagging indicator of inflation and is not a good <br />indicator of current inflation. According to Ranson, increases in the price of commodities are a <br />better indicator of current inflation because inflation initially affects commodity prices, and it <br />may take several years for this commodity inflation to work its way through an economy and be <br />reflected in the CPI. Ranson's preferred inflation measure is based on a commodity basket of <br />precious metals. (http://www.investopedia.com/articles/07/consumerpriceindex.asp) <br />What is immediately apparent is that three different definitions of the CPI are being used. <br />Since these definitions are not operationally equivalent, each method of measuring inflation <br />would lead to different results. <br />Why CPI is not enough to approximate the changes in rent to maintain a fair return and <br />the avoidance of a confiscatory effect: The CPI excludes from consideration, "real estate."' <br />... it excludes investment items, such as stocks, bonds, real estate, and business expenses... <br />The CPI therefore excludes the most relevant items of concern to the operation of investment <br />real estate. If that number is parsed to some fraction, then, the allowance is not for inflation, it is <br />an arbitrary number having no basis to the facts as between one decision is better than another. It <br />is inherently arbitrary if the entire CPI, as denuded as it is, is not awarded. <br />- a lower inflation rate makes the economy look better than it really is. In other words, if the true rate <br />of inflation is higher than the CPI as the government calculates it, then an investor's real rate of <br />return will be less than originally expected, as the unplanned amount of inflation eats away at gains." <br />a Bureau of Labor Statistics, Handbook of Methods, 6/2015 at page 2: "Excluded goods and <br />services. The CPI covers the consumption sector of the U.S. economy. Consequently, it excludes <br />investment items, such as stocks, bonds, real estate, and business expenses. Life insurance also is <br />excluded for this reason, although health, household, and vehicle insurance are in scope. Employer <br />provided in -kind benefits are viewed as part of income. Purchases of houses, antiques, and <br />collectibles are viewed as investment expenditures and therefore excluded. Gambling losses, fines, <br />cash gifts to individuals or charities, and child support and alimony payments also are out of scope. <br />Changes in interest costs or interest rates are now excluded from the CPI scope, although some were <br />in the CPI for many years. And, for practical reasons, the CPI excludes illegal goods and services <br />and the value of home -produced items other than owners' equivalent rent." <br />