Laserfiche WebLink
DOWDALL LAW OFFICES <br />A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION <br />ATTO R N EYS AT LAW <br />City Council of the City of Santa Ana <br />City of Santa Ana <br />September 16, 2021 <br />Page 12 <br />have gone up in price to other items that have risen less, such as buying round steak instead of <br />porterhouse. <br />— The Bureau has long adjusted prices for quality improvements. If a product gets better <br />or if useful features are added, its price is adjusted down. Thus, with automobiles, additions such <br />as anti -lock brakes have sometimes resulted in price decreases in calculating the CPI, even <br />though the actual cost of cars went up. <br />— In the late 1980s and 1990s, new quality -adjustment techniques were introduced for a <br />range of products, including washers, dryers and televisions. <br />Each of these changes has had the effect of reducing the reported inflation rate <br />(economist Walter Williams). <br />— The Frequency of Applications, Petitions and Other Filings Will Spike because the <br />proposed annual minimum adjustment ("permissive adjustment") would be a fraction of inflation <br />measured by CPI. And then, CPI is a poor indicator of the "real -life" operating experience of the <br />mobilehome park owner. Because CPI is politically driven to understate inflation, mobilehome <br />park owners operating in the "real world" must apply for just return administrative relief to avoid <br />confiscatory effects. The resulting staff expense, hearing time, administrative record keeping, <br />enforcement, and litigation will result in significant increases in taxpayer burden. <br />Even assuming the consumer present accurately measured the true effect of inflation <br />upon the operation of a mobilehome park, anything less than 100% is merely to deprive the <br />owners of the ability to maintain status quo of its operations. The quality of the housing will <br />decline, and, or, it will be a frequency of petitions to seek the adjustments that should be allowed <br />automatically. <br />— 100% of reimbursements will be sought. The city will be required to face an avalanche <br />of section 13 rent increase petitions for a fair return because the automatic allowance does not <br />provide it. This may not occur immediately, but shall continue to increase over the course of <br />time as the confiscatory effect of insufficient indexing begins to accumulate. <br />— Higher Increases Sought: Park owners may stagger applications from year to year <br />resulting in net operating income increases for exceeding the partial CPI indexing. By forcing an <br />unrealistic change in operation with partial indexing, the city will be accelerating demands for <br />even greater increases. <br />— Legal Costs: Tenants will be required to obtain representatives to fight rent increase <br />applications, year to year. Since the ordinance does not allow park owners to forbear from <br />adjustments in any given year, the park owners are constrained to leave "nothing on the table." <br />While forbearance in deference of increases is a very common practice among many landlords, <br />this ordinance actually forces owners to impose rental adjustments, or else sacrifice the value of <br />their property rights. <br />-12- <br />