My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - #33
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
09/21/2021 Regular and Special
>
Correspondence - #33
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/22/2021 4:52:11 PM
Creation date
9/20/2021 10:11:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
549
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DOWDALL LAW OFFICES <br />A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION <br />ATTO R N EYS AT LAW <br />City Council of the City of Santa Ana <br />City of Santa Ana <br />September 16, 2021 <br />Page 37 <br />Brookside is leased in largest part. The effect of the ordinance is to purport to cover a handful of <br />residents, in a park with manifest vacancies and housing opportunity. <br />Later precedents reflect that the ordinance cannot be more intrusive on the property <br />owner than required by the findings and purpose. Here, the only legitimate purpose is to <br />maintain housing supply and avoid excessive rents amid a housing shortage. But there is no <br />shortage. <br />For further restrictions in the rent law to be even contemplated, there must be some <br />evidence, need, or purpose demonstrated, with findings, to show such action is rational as a <br />curative measure addressing actual consequences of mobilehome park operations at this time. <br />Any consideration of rent control ordinance is, on this basis alone, improper to <br />promulgate because there are none of the essential constitutional facts for additional restrictions <br />needed to make a competent finding or constitute a rational basis. <br />The law allows the park owner may prove that one or more of the conditions stated to <br />exist to justify rent controls ["constitutional facts"] do not in fact exist. Birkenfeld held that <br />"findings" of the local governmental entity must be examined in order to determine whether a <br />sufficient and accurate statement is present that rent controls are a: <br />"...reasonable means of counter -acting harms and dangers to the public health and <br />welfare emanating from a housing shortage." <br />Birkenfeld, 17 Cal.3d 129 at 161. <br />Upon a challenge to a rent control law, a trial court's interpretation of municipal findings <br />is scrutinized on appeal. Id. at 161. The Court extensively discussed those findings (as <br />contained within the Berkeley Charter Amendment then at -issue) to ascertain whether the <br />declaration of constitutional facts was sufficient and true. Id. at 161-163. These are the very <br />same requirements that the City must meet prior to enacting arry form of additional mandatory <br />rent regulations, and must prove in any later court challenge. <br />The complexity of performing these required studies is compounded by questions of <br />housing availability (apt supply), actual cause of vacancies (bad economy in general), <br />encouragement of new construction, housing alternatives, selection of leasing as a viable <br />alternative to rent restrictions (adopted in the park in large part), as well as available <br />ameliorative remedies under a voluntarily -provided subsidy program which has existed for <br />decades. These factors reflect the absence of any basis for the passage of rent controls. <br />-37- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.