Laserfiche WebLink
CRIME SURVIVORS <br />(20-w uhct� CeA&A, <br />AWARENESS I PREVENTION I ADVOCACY I HEALING <br />September 19, 2021 <br />Mayor and City Council <br />City of Santa Ana <br />20 Civic Center Plaza <br />Santa Ana, CA 92701 <br />Re: Concerns Regarding Item 33 Just Cause Ordinance — OPPOSE Unless Amended <br />Honorable Mayor Sanniento and Members of the City Council: <br />On behalf of Crime Survivors, I would like to express my concerns about specific provisions of the "Just <br />Cause" ordinance being proposed in Item 33. While Crime Survivors believes the ordinance to be well- <br />intentioned, Crime Survivors is concerned that the proposed just cause ordinance may introduce greater <br />harm to victims and witnesses of crime. Crime Survivors is "opposed unless amended" to the ordinance in <br />its current form and we would encourage you to conduct community and stakeholder outreach prior to <br />City Council considering the item. <br />By making it more difficult to evict tenants who engage in criminal activity, the proposed ordinance <br />prioritizes the interests of those engaging in and encouraging criminal activity over the interests of <br />victims, survivors, and witnesses. <br />The proposed ordinance deprives crime victims of the ability to feel safe and secure in their homes. For <br />example, the ordinance only allows for the eviction of that tenant who committed the criminal activity, <br />while remaining members of that household are permitted to remain in place. This means the remaining <br />household members can continue to host the offending tenant as a visitor and guest, leaving the victim of <br />the crime no recourse but to continue to encounter the offending tenant. <br />The most concerning provision of the proposed just cause ordinance allows tenants evicted for criminal <br />activity a right to return in the event they are acquitted of the crime or if the district attorney fails to file <br />charges within the applicable statute of limitations. As you may know, an acquittal or decision not to <br />bring charges may be entirely unrelated to the crime itself. This puts victims in an untenable position of <br />potentially waiting years to know whether they will be forced to live alongside the offending tenant. <br />This provision provides a strong disincentive for victims and witnesses to cooperate with their landlords <br />and law enforcement to remove problematic tenants, as victims may end up more danger by testifying <br />against the offending tenant at the eviction hearing. For example, a tenant who is an innocent bystander <br />injured by gang violence is much more likely to move out of their own home, rather than risk testifying <br />against the perpetrator when they know that person would have a right of return. In such a case, the victim <br />has already been failed by the criminal justice system. To require that person choose either to move or to <br />live beside their perpetrator quite literally adds insult to injury. <br />Crime Survivors encourages Santa Ana City Council to take the necessary time to reevaluate the proposed <br />just cause ordinance and not rush its approval. Approval today would have near -term consequences for <br />survivors of domestic violence, elderly abuse, and other crimes. <br />Sincerely, <br />Patricia Wenskunas <br />Founder/CEO, Crime Survivors <br />Crime Survivors, Inc. <br />P.O. Box 54552 • Irvine, CA 926194552 <br />Office: (844) 853-HOPE • Cell: (949) 872-7895 • Fax: (775) 2454798 <br />Email: info@crimesurvivors.org • w .crimesmvivors.org <br />