My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - #08
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2022
>
01/18/2022 Regular & Special SA
>
CORRESPONDENCE - #08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2022 4:02:40 PM
Creation date
1/11/2022 11:20:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
1/18/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The FPPC outlines five types of interests that may result in disqualification. Of these, the "income" <br />interest is clearly met by Ramos. "An individual or an entity from whom the official has received income <br />or promised income aggregating to $500 or more in the previous 12 months." <br />Please see the attached Form 700's filed by Councilwoman Phan. The test goes on to see whether the <br />financial impact of the decision is foreseeable and significant enough to material. In this case, the facts <br />speak for themselves. The amendments to the HOO are significant to current and future builders and <br />developers who may be or are current clients of Phan's. <br />Potential State Law Violations: <br />1. City Councilwoman Thai Phan likely violated the code by voting on the HOO due to the number <br />of economically affected clients who are the sources of income to her employer Rutan and <br />Tucker and to her team within the firm. <br />Potential City of Santa Ana Violations: <br />Councilwoman Thai Phan's participation in the November 16, 2021 hearing likely violated Santa <br />Ana Municipal Code section 2-105. First, Phan should have "absented" [herself] from the room <br />where the meeting was held during debate and voting on the matter. Second, per the code, <br />Phan should have divulged any "remote interest" before voting. Neither of these occurred and <br />the City Attorney cannot "sweep it all under the rug" by stating that there is no financial <br />interest. This opinion violates the latter part of code section 2-105. <br />As stated previously, the California State Fair Political Practices Commission is being contacted because <br />the complaint filed with the Mayor and City Attorney were not taken seriously. Additionally, the <br />investigative authority of the Commission is ideally situated to obtain information regarding the conflicts <br />of interest alleged herein. <br />A hearing for the second reading of the HOO amendments is scheduled for Tuesday December 7, 2021 <br />beginning at 5:00 pm. It is requested that FPPC staff alert the City of Santa Ana to the conflicts of <br />interest before this meeting occurs. <br />We have referred this matter to an attorney and reserve the right to challenge these decisions. <br />Sincerely, <br />a e--� <br />Alex Lee <br />On behalf of numerous concerned Santa Ana <br />residents <br />a....�".%�.1..�".�.d.2:..:. ...I..lrvratral..! .2.!..l..:.com <br />Enc: Councilwoman Phan Statement of Economic Impact Forms <br />Rutan and Tucker Builders and Land Developers Team page <br />cc: Rutan &Tucker Managing Partner <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.