Laserfiche WebLink
Housing Opportunity Ordinance <br />September 7, 2021 <br />Page 6 <br />Orange County are not privy to project level financial data; and the development <br />community indicated this type of data was confidential and therefore did not share it. <br />Staff met with the local labor unions at their request and received input regarding the STW <br />and the various benefits that it will bring to the City and residents. This meeting included <br />the Building and Construction Trades Council, Local 652 of the Laborers' International <br />Union of North America based in Santa Ana, Local 441 of the International Brotherhood <br />of Electrical Workers, Local Union 105, and the Southwest Regional Council of <br />Carpenters (collectively referred to as the building trade labor unions). The labor <br />unions recognize that there is a cost increase when using a skilled and trained workforce <br />and contend that the waterfall of benefits are tangible and address the core of the <br />affordable housing crisis. An employee earning a living wage with employment benefits <br />can attain decent housing and a higher quality of life. Other key benefits include a reliable <br />and stable workforce, reduced public reliance on government assistance programs, <br />higher efficiency from a trained employee, a career pathway to the various construction <br />trades, promote regional jobs -housing balance, promote environmental benefits from <br />reduced vehicle miles traveled, local pride of working on a project developed in Santa <br />Ana, and many other social and economic benefits. The labor unions also expressed <br />support for a sliding scale approach to incentivize the use of a STW. <br />Staff also met with the BIA and received feedback that the proposed $15 per square foot <br />cannot be absorbed by a project. While no specific data were provided by the BIA <br />regarding the cost differential using STW, the verbal indication is a STW requirement will <br />significantly impact the feasibility of constructing a project in the City. <br />As an alternative data source to this outreach, staff obtained data from the Terner Center <br />for Housing at the University of California, Berkeley (Terner Center).According to a study, <br />"The Hard Costs of Construction", completed in March of 2020 by the Terner Center, hard <br />construction costs per square foot from 2008 to 2018 generally fluctuated between $177 <br />to $222 per square foot. Hard construction costs include materials and labor only where <br />materials make up approximately 85% of the hard construction costs and labor makes up <br />the remaining 15%. The study also found that prevailing wage requirements are <br />associated with higher hard costs and on the average, add $30 or more per square foot <br />than those without. While prevailing wage requirements do not have the exact same <br />stringent requirements as a STW represented by a labor organization, they share similar <br />labor monitoring and wage requirements and characteristics. Depending on the per <br />square foot total indicated in the study, the addition of a $30 per square foot in labor, <br />increases the hard construction costs of a project on the average between 14% to 17%. <br />Anecdotally, verbal feedback received from the development community indicates the <br />average per square foot hard construction costs for a residential project range between <br />$130 and $250 depending on construction and housing type and the inclusion of a STW <br />requirement would increase their estimated cost per square foot approximately 15% to <br />20%. The labor union and BIA representatives all acknowledged the percentage increase <br />in costs and the information that staff had gathered from the research. <br />City Council 35 — 6 9/7/2021 <br />