My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - #27
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2022
>
03/01/2022 Regular
>
CORRESPONDENCE - #27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2022 3:58:15 PM
Creation date
3/1/2022 9:14:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
3/1/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2. If the ban were to be implemented now, can stores and sellers be allowed to sell their remaining <br />affected tobacco products through the end of 2022? If not, can the City reimburse stores and sellers for the <br />costs of buying and legally discarding the affected property and merchandise? Federal and state laws <br />heavily restrict the ability of tobacco products to be resold to others or sold back to manufacturers. Have you <br />estimated the value of the property and costs to discard the tobacco products? <br />3. Since the City is aware of the statewide referendum vote in November that would ban the <br />same tobacco products being discussed by the Santa Ana Council, why would the City want to pass <br />something by itself now since it will hurt Santa Ana small businesses but help surrounding cities like Garden <br />Grove, Orange and Anaheim. Not only would our stores lose the tobacco sales, but also the sales of many <br />other purchases that our customers usually make during the same store visit. Things like coffee, <br />sandwiches, chips, drinks, and many more items. Why is Santa Ana doing this to its 7-Eleven stores and <br />other community stores? It's very unfair and discriminatory and many of our employees who are Santa Ana <br />residents and minorities will be negatively affected. <br />4. We implore the City to postpone action on this tobacco ban until December, so that our Santa Ana stores <br />don't have to suffer an extra 9 months early before other cities. Can the City postpone this ban ordinance <br />vote until December? We don't understand why there is a rush in Santa Ana. If some type of ban were to be <br />considered before November, can there be an option like with the cannabis stores that allows us to continue <br />to sell our existing products if we use ID scanning technology, fraud detection software and other automated <br />software -based technology like the Council discussed at the last meeting? <br />Mayor, please don't force our Santa Ana customers to drive to other cities in Orange County to get their <br />favorite tobacco products. We strongly recommend that you postpone the ordinance ban issue until later in <br />the year when the statewide ballot measure is voted on. Thank you for your time and consideration. <br />On Behalf of Your Local 7-Eleven Convenience Stores, <br />PAUL GHUMAN <br />Paul Ghuman <br />7-Eleven Small Business Owner <br />President of 7-Eleven West Coast Franchisee Owners Association <br />914 North Harbor Avenue <br />Santa Ana, CA 92703 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.