Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet_2022-04-19City Council Meeting Packet April 19, 2022 CLOSED SESSION MEETING - 5:00 PM REGULAR OPEN MEETING - 5:45 PM (Immediately following the Closed Session Meeting) CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER 22 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701 Vicente Sarmiento Mayor Thai Viet Phan Councilmember —Ward 1 Jessie Lopez Councilmember - Ward 3 Johnathan Ryan Hernandez Councilmember - Ward 5 David Penaloza Councilmember - Ward 2 Phil Bacerra Mayor Pro Tem - Ward 4 Nelida Mendoza Councilmember - Ward 6 Mayor and Council telephone: 714-647-6900 Agenda item inquiries: 714-647-6520 Sonia R. Carvalho Kristine Ridge City Attorney City Manager Daisy Gomez Clerk of the Council In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this Meeting, ®contact Michael Ortiz, City ADA Program Coordinator, at (714) 647-5624. Notification 48 hours prior to the Meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting. The City Council agenda and supporting documentation can be found on the City's website — www.santa-ana.org/city-meetings. City Council 1 4/19/2022 CITY VISION AND CODE OF ETHICS The City of Santa Ana is committed to achieving a shared vision for the organization and its community. The Vision, Mission and Guiding Principles (Values) are the result of a thoughtful and inclusive process designed to set the City and organization on a course that meets the challenges of today and tomorrow, as follows: Vision - The dynamic center of Orange County which is acclaimed for our: Investment in youth • Safe and healthy community • Neighborhood pride • Thriving economic climate - Enriched and diverse culture • Quality government services Mission - To deliver efficient public services in partnership with our community which ensures public safety, a prosperous economic environment, opportunities for our youth, and a high quality of life for residents. Guiding Principles - Collaboration • Efficiency • Equity • Excellence • Fiscal Responsibility - Innovation • Transparency Code of Ethics and Conduct - At the Special Municipal Election held on February 5, 2008, voters approved an amendment to the City Charter which established the Code of Ethics and Conduct for elected officials and members of appointed boards, commissions, and committees to assure public confidence. The following are the core values expressed: - Integrity • Honesty • Responsibility • Fairness • Accountability • Respect • Efficiency City Council 2 4/19/2022 Members of the public may attend the City Council meeting in -person or join via Zoom. The City Council meeting will occur live via teleconference Zoom webinar. You may view the meeting from your computer, tablet or smart phone via YouTube LiveStream at www.youtube.com/user/SantaAnaLibrary or on CTV3, available on Spectrum channel. PUBLIC COMMENTS — Members of the public who wish to address the City Council on closed session items, items on the regular agenda or on matters which are not on the agenda, but are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council may do so by one of the following ways: • MAILING OPTION written communications — Public comments may be mailed to: Office of the Clerk of the Council, 20 Civic Center Plaza M-30, Santa Ana, CA 92701. All written communications received via mail by 4:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting will be distributed to the City Council and imaged into the City's document archive system which is available for public review. • SENDING E-MAIL OPTION — Public comments may be sent via email to the City Clerk's office at eComment(a)santa-ana.org. Please note the agenda item you are commenting on in the subject line of the email. All emails received before 4:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting will be distributed to the City Council and imaged into the City's document archive system which is available for public review. • LIVE VIRTUAL OPTION — Members of the public may provide live comments during the meeting by Zoom or Conference Call. To join by Zoom click on or type the following address into your web browser https://us02web.zoom.us/j/315965149. To join the Conference Call: Dial (669) 900-9128 and enter MEETING ID: 315 965 149#. You will be prompted by the City Clerk when it is time for a: i) closed session item, ii) general agenda item, iii) public hearing item, iv) special agenda item, or v) for Housing Authority item. You may request to speak by dialing *9 from your phone or you may virtually raise your hand from Zoom. After the Clerk confirms the last three digits of the caller's phone number or Zoom ID and unmutes them, the caller must press *6 or microphone icon to speak. Callers are encouraged, but not required, to identify themselves by name. Each caller will be provided three (3) minutes to speak, unless due to the number of speakers wanting to speak a decision is made to provide a different amount of time to speak. • IN -PERSON OPTION - Members of the public can provide in -person comments at the podium in the Council Chamber. The Council Chamber will have seating available for members of the public to attend the meeting in -person. Face coverings are strongly recommended for members of the public who enter City buildings. Public comments are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker, unless a different time is announced by the presiding chair. Speakers who wish to address the Council must do so by submitting a "Request to Speak" card by 5:00 p.m. for Closed Session items and by 6:00 p.m. for all other designated public comment periods as listed below. Cards will not be accepted after the Public Comment Session begins without the permission of the presiding chair. The following designated public comment periods are: 1. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS —You can provide live City Council 3 4/19/2022 comments on closed session items by joining Zoom or the Conference Call as described in the LIVE or IN -PERSON PUBLIC COMMENTS OPTION above. Speaker queue will open at 4:30 p.m. YOU MUST JOIN ZOOM OR THE CONFERENCE CALL BY 5:00 p.m. Speakers who are not in the speaker queue by 5:00 p.m. will not be permitted to speak. 2. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS AND NON -AGENDA ITEMS (GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT) — You can provide comments by joining Zoom or the Conference Call as described in the LIVE or IN -PERSON PUBLIC COMMENTS OPTION above. Speaker queue will open at 4:30 p.m. YOU MUST JOIN ZOOM OR THE CONFERENCE CALL PRIOR TO 6:00 p.m. Speakers who are not in the speaker queue by 6:00 p.m. will not be permitted to speak. 3. LIVE PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS —You can provide comments by joining Zoom or the Conference Call as described in the LIVE or IN -PERSON PUBLIC COMMENTS OPTION above. Speakers not in the queue by 6:00 p.m. will not be permitted to speak. About the Agenda To download or view the attachments (staff report and other supporting documentation) for each agenda item, you must select the agenda item to see the attachments to either open in a new link (the eyeball <!!>) or download a pdf (the cloud symbol with the down arrow ). CLOSED SESSION CALL TO ORDER ATTENDANCE Council Members Mayor Pro Tern Mayor City Manager City Attorney Clerk of the Council ROLL CALL Johnathan Ryan Hernandez Jessie Lopez Nelida Mendoza David Penaloza Thai Viet Phan Phil Bacerra Vicente Sarmiento Kristine Ridge Sonia R. Carvalho Daisy Gomez PUBLIC COMMENTS — Members of the public may address the City Council on Closed Session items. CLOSED SESSION ITEMS — The Brown Act permits legislative bodies to discuss certain City Council 4 4/19/2022 matters without members of the public present. The City Council finds, based on advice from the City Attorney, that discussion in open session of the following matters will prejudice the position of the City in existing and anticipated litigation: 1. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 Title: Clerk of the Council, City Attorney and City Manager 2. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6(a): Agency Negotiators: Human Resources Executive Director, Jason Motsick Employee Organizations: • Santa Ana Police Officers Association (POA) • Service Employees' International Union (SEIU) Full -Time Employees • Service Employees' International Union (SEIU) Part -Time Non -Civil Service Employees CLOSED SESSION REPORT — The City Attorney will report on any action(s) to be taken at the Regular Open Session which will begin immediately following the Closed Session. RECESS — City Council will recess to Closed Session for the purpose of conducting regular City business. RECONVENE — City Council will reconvene to continue regular City business. City Council 5 4/19/2022 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR OPEN SESSION CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE WORDS OF INSPIRATION CEREMONIAL PRESENTATIONS Mayor Sarmiento Bob Barnett, Police Chaplain 1. Proclamation presented by Mayor Sarmiento declaring April 2022 as Autism /G� ►TA1701KINI 2. Certificate of Recognition presented by Mayor Pro Tern Bacerra to Roger Eyes, Crisselle Mendiola, and Fernando Olivares for Outstanding Contributions to the Community. 3. Certificate of Recognition presented by Councilmember Hernandez to the Orange County School of the Arts Ambassador Jazz Orchestra for Outstanding Contributions to the Community. 4. Proclamation presented by Councilmember Lopez to Southern Coalition for Occupational Safety & Health declaring April 28, 2022 as Workers' Memorial Day. 5. Certificate of Recognition presented by Councilmember Mendoza to Micaela Andrade for her Outstanding Contributions to the Community. 6. Proclamation presented by Councilmember Phan to the Vietnamese Heritage Museum declaring April 30, 2022 as Black April. STAFF PRESENTATIONS 7. COVID-19 Update in the Community CLOSED SESSION REPORT — The City Attorney will report on any action(s) from Closed Session. PUBLIC COMMENT — Public comments will be held during the beginning of the meeting for ALL comments on agenda and non -agenda items, with the exception of public hearings. Comments for public hearings will take place after the hearing is opened. I CONSENT CALENDAR City Council 6 4/19/2022 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve staff recommendations on the following Consent Calendar Items: 8 through 26. 8. Excused Absences Department(s): Clerk of the Council Office Recommended Action: Excuse the absent members. 9. Adopt Ordinance - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA ESTABLISHING NEW WARD BOUNDARY LINES OF THE WARDS OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. NS-2958 First reading at the April 5, 2022 City Council meeting and approved by a vote of 7-0. Published in the Orange County Reporter on April 8, 2022. Department(s): Clerk of the Council Office Recommended Action: 1. Place ordinance on second reading and adopt. 2. Receive and file staff report regarding the use of new ward maps for purposes of city operations. 10. Adopt Ordinance No. NS-XXXX -ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2021-03 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA REPEALING AND REENACTING IN ITS ENTIRETY ARTICLE XVIII.I. OF CHAPTER 41 OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE HOUSING OPPORTUNITY ORDINANCE First reading at the April 5, 2022 City Council meeting and approved by a vote of 5-2 (Bacerra and Penaloza dissented). Published in the Orange County Reporter on April 8, 2022. Department(s): Planning and Building Agency Recommended Action: Place ordinance on second reading and adopt. 11. Approve Destruction of Obsolete City Records Department(s): Community Development Agency Recommended Action: Approve the request for the destruction of obsolete records from the Community Development Agency in accordance with the retention schedule outlined in City Council Resolution No. 2013-014. 12. Award Contract to Office Depot for the Purchase of Office Supplies in an Annual Amount not to exceed $175,000 for a Two-year Term with Three One -Year Renewal Options (Specification No. 22-061) (General Fund) Department(s): Finance and Management Services Recommended Action: Award a blanket order contract with Office Depot for an City Council 7 4/19/2022 annual amount not to exceed $175,000 for the period beginning June 1, 2022 and expiring May 31, 2024 with an option for three one-year renewals, subject to non - substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. 13. Award a Purchase Order in the Amount of $387,809 to Presidio Networked Solutions for Data Center Server and Storage Infrastructure Equipment (Specification No. 22- 014) (Non -General Fund) Department(s): Information Technology Recommended Action: Award a purchase order to Presidio Networked Solutions for HPE Disaggregated Hyperconverged Infrastructure Equipment (dHCI), in the amount of $387,809, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. 14. Award a Purchase Order in the Amount of $76,140 to National Auto Fleet Group for Two Ford Ranger XL SuperCrew Trucks for the Parks and Facilities Division of the Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Agency (Specification No. 22-029) (General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency, Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Recommended Action: Authorize a one-time purchase and payment of purchase order to National Auto Fleet Group for the purchase of two Ford Ranger XL SuperCrew Trucks, in the amount of $71,140, plus a contingency of $5,000, for a total amount not to exceed $76,140, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. 15. Award Blanket Order Contracts to Sunbelt Rentals and United Rentals for Equipment Rental in the Annual Aggregate Amount of $80,000, for a One -Year Term with Four, One -Year Renewal Options (Specification No. 22-045) (General and Non -General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Award blanket order contracts to Sunbelt Rentals and United Rentals for equipment rental for a one-year period beginning April 20, 2022 and expiring April 19, 2023, with provisions for four, one-year renewals exercisable by the City Manager, in an annual aggregate amount not to exceed $80,000, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. 16. Approve Appropriation Adjustment, Budget Reallocation, and Award a Construction Contract to Big Ben, Inc. in the Amount of $1,453,765 for the Lincoln Avenue Water and Sewer Main Improvements Project, with an Estimated Project Delivery Cost of $2,000,000 (Project No. 22-6468 and 22-6620) (Non -General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment to recognize $500,000 of prior -year fund balance in the Water Fund, Public Works Water Revenue, City Council 8 4/19/2022 Prior Year Carryforward revenue account, and appropriate the same amount to the Acquisition & Construction, Water Utility Capital Projects, Water Capital Project expenditure account. (Requires five affirmative votes) 2. Award a construction contract to Big Ben, Inc., the lowest responsible bidder, in accordance with the base bid in the amount of $1,453,765, for construction of the Lincoln Water and Sewer Main Improvements Project, for the term beginning April 19, 2022 and ending upon project completion, and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and the City Attorney. 3. Approve the Project Cost Analysis for a total estimated construction delivery cost of $2,000,000, which includes $1,453,765 for the construction contract, $218,000 for contract administration, inspection and testing, $100,000 for water engineering, and a $228,235 project contingency for unanticipated or unforeseen work. 4. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2021-22 Capital Improvement Program to include $500,000 in construction funds for the Lincoln Avenue Water and Sewer Improvements Project. 17. Award a Construction Contract to All American Asphalt in the Amount of $823,333 for the MacArthur Boulevard Resurfacing Project from Flower Street to Main Street, Fiscal Year (FY) 2021-22, with an Estimated Project Delivery Cost of $1,127,000 (Project No. 20-6957) (Non -General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: 1. Authorize budget reallocation of $126,576 in unspent HUTA 2103 Gas Tax funds to the MacArthur Boulevard Resurfacing Project from Flower Street to Main Street (No. 20-6957) from the Gas Tax Local Street Improvements Project (No. 20-6956). 2. Award a construction contract to All American Asphalt, the lowest responsible bidder, in accordance with the base bid in the amount of $823,333, for construction of the MacArthur Boulevard Resurfacing Project from Flower Street to Main Street FY 2021-22. 3. Approve the Project Cost Analysis for a total estimated construction delivery cost of $1,127,000, which includes $823,333 for the construction contract, $113,334 for contract administration, inspection and testing, and a $190,333 project contingency for unanticipated, unforeseen work, and additional nearby asphalt pavement improvements. 18. Award a Construction Contract to CJ Concrete Construction Inc. in the Amount of $276,430 for the Local Street Sidewalk Improvements FY 2021-22 Project with an Estimated Project Delivery Cost of $373,060 (Project No. 22-7535) (Non -General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: 1. Award a construction contract to CJ Concrete City Council 9 4/19/2022 Construction Inc., the lowest responsible bidder, in accordance with the base bid in the amount of $276,430, for construction of the Local Street Sidewalk Improvements FY 2021-22, for the term beginning April 19, 2022 and ending upon project completion, and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract subject to non - substantive changes approved by the City Manager and the City Attorney. 2. Approve the Project Cost Analysis for a total estimated construction delivery cost of $373,060, which includes $276,430 for the construction contract, $41,465 for contract administration, inspection and testing, and a $55,165 project contingency for unanticipated or unforeseen work. 3. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2021-22 Capital Improvement Program adding the Residential Street Repair Program FY 2021-22 Project with a budget of $373,060 in Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. 19. Approve Submittal of Request for Time Extension of the Measure M2 Comprehensive Transportation Funding Program for Warner Avenue Improvements Phase 2 and Bristol Street and Memory Lane Projects (Project No. 14-6802 and 17-6883) (Non - General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Authorize the Public Works Agency to request a two-year time extension of Measure M2 Comprehensive Transportation Funding Program construction funds for the Warner Avenue Improvements, Phase 2, from Oak Street to Grand Street project (21-SNTA-ACE-3997) and for Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements (21-SNTA-ICE-3995). 20. Approve a License Agreement with NOVA Academy for use of Birch Park and Sasser Park for an Emergency Evacuation Plan Department(s): Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Recommended Action: Approve a license Agreement with NOVA academy for use of Birch Park and Sasser Park for an Emergency Evacuation Plan for the period of April 19, 2022 to June 30, 2025 with two, one-year renewal options, subject to non - substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney (Agreement No. 2022-XXX). 21. Approve Renewal Agreement with InfoSend, Inc. for Data Processing, Printing and Mailing, and Electronic Bill Present Services in an amount not to exceed $10,904,376 (General and Non -General Fund) Department(s): Finance and Management Services Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to execute a renewal agreement with InfoSend, Inc. for data processing, printing and mailing, and electronic bill presentment services for Municipal Utility Services, Business License, Proactive Residential Enforcement Program, Dog Licensing, Paramedic Subscriptions, and City newsletters and other City -related miscellaneous mailing notices. Said renewal City Council 10 4/19/2022 agreement is to be for an amount not to exceed $10,904,376, which includes a 15% contingency funding for annual Cost Price Index ("CPI") adjustments and a further 15% contingency set -aside for anticipated United States postage increases — altogether totaling $2,516,394 over the maximum 8'/2-year life of the agreement. The renewal agreement commences April 19, 2022 and contains a base term covering FY 2021- 22, 2022-23, 2023-24 and FY 2024-25, expiring December 31, 2025, with provision for two renewal options of three years, and one year, respectively, ending December 31, 2029 (Agreement No. 2022-XXX). 22. Approve an Agreement with Outfront Media LLC for the Design, Construction, Maintenance, and Operation of Digital Billboards and Digital Banners at City -owned Properties throughout the City for a 25-Year Term (General Fund) Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Outfront Media LLC to design, construct, maintain, and operate digital billboards at City -owned freeway locations and digital banners throughout the City, and to share advertising revenue from digital billboards and digital banners, for a 25-year period beginning April 19, 2022 and ending April 18, 2047, with an option to extend for a period of ten years, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney (Agreement No. 2022-XXX). 23. Approve Agreement with Group 4 Architecture, Research + Planning, Inc. in an Amount Not to Exceed $2,158,565 for a Three -Year Term (Project No. 22-1380) (Revive Santa Ana Program) Department(s): Public Works Agency, Library Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Group 4 Architecture, Research + Planning, Inc. to provide full design services for the Santa Ana Main Library's renovation project, in the amount of $2,158,565, for a three- year term beginning April 19, 2022 and expiring April 18, 2025, with an option for two, one-year extensions, subject non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney (Agreement No. 2022-XXX). 24. Adopt a Resolution Establishing the Joint School Collaboration City Council Standing Subcommittee between the City of Santa Ana and the Santa Ana Unified School District Department(s): Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Recommended Action: Resolution No. 2022-XXX — Adopt a resolution establishing the joint school collaboration City Council standing subcommittee between the City of Santa Ana and the Santa Ana Unified School District. 25. Approve Appropriation Adjustment to Recognize Initial Disbursement of Homeless Housing, Assistance and Prevention Program Funds (Non -General Fund) City Council 11 4/19/2022 Department(s): Community Development Agency Recommended Action: Approve appropriation adjustment recognizing $2,058,070.34 in funds from the State of California, Business, Consumer Services and Housing Agency revenue account and appropriate the same amount to expenditure account to address homelessness in Santa Ana. (Requires five affirmative votes) 26. Approve Increase in Spending Capacity with Dyer 18 LLC for Unforeseen Tenant Improvement Costs Relating to the Homeless Navigation Center (Non -General Fund) Department(s): Community Development Agency Recommended Action: Authorize the City Manager to increase spending capacity with Dyer 18, LLC for tenant improvements at the Homeless Navigation Center, in the amount of $1,200,000. **END OF CONSENT CALENDAR** I BUSINESS CALENDAR 27. Ordinance Amending Chapter 33 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code Related to the Ceremonial Naming of Streets Department(s): Public Works Agency Recommended Action: Approve first reading of an ordinance amending Chapter 33 of the Municipal Code by adding Article XI relating to the ceremonial naming of streets. 28. Charter Review Ad Hoc Committee's Recommendation on Fireworks Department(s): City Manager Office Recommended Action: Accept informational report and provide direction to staff. **END OF BUSINESS CALENDAR** PUBLIC HEARINGS PUBLIC COMMENTS — Members of the public may address the City Council on each of the Public Hearing items. 29. Public Hearing — Approve the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan and budgets for the Community Development Block Grant, HOME Investment Partnerships Grant, and Emergency Solutions Grant, and authorize submission to the United States City Council 12 4/19/2022 Department of Housing and Urban Development Legal notice published in the Orange County Register, La Opinion, and Nguoi Viet on March 10, 2022. Department(s): Community Development Agency Recommended Action: 1. Hold a public hearing to receive resident and stakeholder comments on funding priorities and needs for activities funded with the Community Development Block Grant, HOME Investment Partnerships Grant, and Emergency Solutions Grant programs for the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Annual Action Plan. 2. Approve the Fiscal Year 2022 - 2023 Annual Action Plan and authorize the submission of the Fiscal Year 2022 - 2023 Annual Action Plan to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. 3. Approve the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 budgets for the Community Development Block Grant Program in the total amount of $8,294,360 that includes $5,640,635 from Grant Year 2022 allocation and a re -allocation of $2,653,725 in prior year program funds and program income; HOME Investment Partnerships grant in the amount of $1,706,231 from the Grant Year 2022 allocation and a re -allocation of $9,428,513 in prior year program funds; and Emergency Solutions Grant in the amount of $489,141 from the Grant Year 2022 allocation. All proposed activities' budgets will be proportionally increased or decreased from the estimated funding levels to match actual allocation amounts. 4. Direct the City Attorney to finalize and authorize the City Manager to execute memorandums of understanding with various city departments and agreements with non-profit public service providers awarded funds as part of the approved Community Development Block Grant program budget for a two-year term beginning July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2024, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, and direct the Risk Manager or designee to determine the necessary insurance requirements applicable for each project (Agreement No. 2022- XXX). 5. Direct the City Attorney to finalize and authorize the City Manager to execute a memorandum of understanding with the Santa Ana Police Department and agreements with non-profit homeless service providers awarded funds as part of the approved Emergency Solutions Grant program budget for a term beginning July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, and direct the Risk Manager or designee to determine the necessary insurance requirements applicable for each project (Agreement No. 2022- XXX). 30. Public Hearing - Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report No. 2020- 03 and General Plan Amendment No. 2020-06 for Santa Ana General Plan Update Legal notice published in the Orange County Reporter on April 8, 2022 and notices mailed on April 6, 2022. Department(s): Planning and Building Agency City Council 13 4/19/2022 Recommended Action: 1. Resolution No. 2022-XXX — Adopt a resolution certifying Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report No. 2020-03 (SCH No. 2020029087), including adoption of environmental findings of fact pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adoption of a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. 2. Resolution No. 2022-XXX — Adopt a resolution approving General Plan Amendment No. 2020-06. 3. Resolution No. 2022-XXX — Adopt a resolution of findings to overrule the John Wayne Airport Orange County Airport Land Use Commission's determination that the Proposed General Plan Update is inconsistent with the Airport Environs Land Use Plan. COUNCILMEMBER REQUESTED ITEMS 31. Discuss and Consider Directing the City Manager to Direct Staff to Prepare an Ordinance to Require Shopping Centers to Post Contact Information for the Center's Management Personnel at All Entrances and Exits — Mayor Pro Tern Bacerra 32. Discuss and Consider Directing City Manager to Direct Staff to Introduce a Resolution, Policy, or Ordinance to Ban Loud Music for Use By Police Officers — Councilmember Hernandez CITY MANAGER COMMENTS CLERK OF THE COUNCIL COMMENTS COUNCIL COMMENTS AB1234 DISCLOSURE — If the City paid for travel or other expenses this is the time for members of the Council to provide a brief oral report on attendance of any regional board or commission meeting or any conference, meeting or event attended. ADJOURNMENT — Adjourn the City Council meeting. Adjourn in memory of Michael Macres. Future Items limiTA iM10=HOLY [.7:11[��I1[ i�•Y�rR .Cl�- �. 2. Housing Element Update 3. Billboard Ordinance Update 4. Cannabis Ordinance Update 5. Proposition 218 Solid Waste Rates Public Hearing 6. Parks, Facilities, Trails and Open Space Master Plan 7. Body Worn Cameras City Council 14 4/19/2022 Clerk of the Council Office www.santa-ana.org/cc Item # 9 or City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report April 19, 2022 TOPIC: 2022 Ward Map AGENDA TITLE: Adopt Ordinance - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA ESTABLISHING NEW WARD BOUNDARY LINES OF THE WARDS OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. NS-2958 RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Place ordinance on second reading and adopt. 2. Receive and file staff report regarding the use of new ward maps for purposes of city operations. DISCUSSION At the April 5, 2022 meeting, the City Council adopted a resolution and the first reading of the ordinance establishing new ward boundary lines of the wards of the City of Santa Ana to meet the April 17, 2022 deadline. The Clerk of the Council submitted the newly adopted map, Resolution No. 2022-022, to the Registrar of Voters on April 7, 2022. The next General Municipal Election will be held on Tuesday, November 8, 2022 for council seats in wards 2, 4, 6, and for the mayor. The new ward boundaries for wards 2, 4, and 6 will be used for the November 8, 2022 General Municipal Election and elections thereafter. The new ward boundaries for wards 1, 3 and 5 will be used for the November 2024 General Municipal Election and elections thereafter. To improve efficiency of City department functions and reduce confusion, the new map shall be deemed effective April 19, 2022 for purposes of City operations. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with this action. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. City Council 9-1 4/19/2022 2022 Ward Map April 19, 2022 Page 2 EXHIBIT(S) 1. Ordinance Submitted By: Daisy Gomez, Clerk of the Council Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager City Council 9-2 4/19/2022 ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA ESTABLISHING NEW WARD BOUNDARY LINES OF THE WARDS OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. NS-2958 WHEREAS, in 2018, pursuant to a settlement agreement resulting from litigation regarding an alleged violation of the California Voting Rights Act, the Santa Ana City Council adopted Ordinance NS-2958 establishing new boundary lines of the wards of the City of Santa Ana; and WHEREAS, in 2019, pursuant to a Charter amendment approved by the voters, the City of Santa Ana transitioned from wards where candidates for City Council were nominated by registered voters from their ward but elected at large to a system where candidates for City Council were both nominated and elected by registered voters residing in their ward; WHEREAS, on September 17, 2019, the Santa Ana City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-2975 changing the boundaries of ward 3 in conjunction with the proposed 24.78 acre county island annexation generally located as the northeast corner of Seventeenth Street and Tustin Avenue; WHEREAS, in 2020 the federal decennial census was conducted and census data was recently released by the federal government; and WHEREAS, pursuant to California Elections Code § 21621 and Santa Ana Charter § 101.2, after the federal decennial census, the City Council shall adopt boundaries of all Council wards; and WHEREAS, on September 21, 2021, the Santa Ana City Council adopted Resolution No. 2021-053 regarding the City Council's intent to consider changes to boundary lines of the wards and fixing the date, time, and place of public hearings and public workshops for the redistricting process; WHEREAS, on October 5, 2021 the Santa Ana City Council held its first Public Hearing regarding redistricting and adopted Resolution No. 2021-060 Amending and Restating Resolution No. 2021-053 regarding the City Council's intent to consider changes to boundary lines of the wards and fixing the date, time, and place of the public hearings and workshops; and WHEREAS, Pursuant to Elections Code § 21627.1 of the Fair Maps Act, the City is required to hold four (4) public hearings to engage the public in the redistricting process, one (1) of which must be held prior to drawing the draft map(s), two (2) public hearings to be held after drawing the draft maps, and one public hearing or public workshop on a Saturday, Sunday or after 6 p.m. on a weekday; and Ordinance No. NS-XXX City Council 9-3 4/19/fM21 of 4 WHEREAS, the City held eleven (11) Public Hearings on the following dates: October 5, 2021, October 19, 2021, November 2, 2021, November 15, 2021, December 6, 2021, January 18, 2022, February 1, 2022, February 16, 2022, March 7, 2022, March 11, 2022, and April 5, 2022. At each of the Public Hearings, the Santa Ana City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to receive public input regarding the redistricting process, communities of interest, and/or the draft maps. During the Public Hearings, public comment was received in person, in writing, and virtually in real time; and WHEREAS, the City held six (6) public workshops in person and virtually on the following dates: September 25, 2021, October 7, 2021, October 9, 2021, October 23, 2021, October 29, 2021, and October 30, 2021; and WHEREAS, the Clerk of Council attended six (6) additional community meetings; and WHEREAS, the Clerk of Council retained a demography expert, Redistricting Partners to assist with the redistricting process; and WHEREAS, throughout the redistricting process the City has maintained a detailed redistricting website as required by the Fair Maps Act: https://www.santa- ana.org/cc/redistricting; and WHEREAS, the City has provided notices and other materials to the public in English, Spanish, Vietnamese, Chinese, and Korean; and WHEREAS, the City made available to the public an online mapping tool to permit the public to submit draft maps and which the public utilized during the redistricting process; and WHEREAS, the Santa Ana City Council has considered all public comments on the proposed Council ward boundary changes including maps drawn by the public and submitted through the City's mapping program on the City redistricting website; and WHEREAS, Santa Ana City Charter§ 101.2 provides that an ordinance adjusting ward boundaries must be approved by a 2/3 affirmative vote requirement and be adopted no later than 120 days before an election in order to be effective for that election; and WHEREAS, the Santa Ana City Council believes that the wards contained in the proposed draft map N2 ("Recommended Map") attached as Exhibit "A" hereto and incorporated herein by reference, would best serve the interests of the City and the residents of the City of Santa Ana; and WHEREAS, the Recommended Map has been posted on the City's website in compliance with the Fair Maps Act; and WHEREAS, the populations set forth in the wards of the Recommended Map are substantially equal in population and in compliance with all other legal requirements of the Fair Maps Act, United States Constitution, California Constitution, and the Federal Voting Rights Act. Ordinance No. NS-XXX City Council 9-4 4/19/fn,22 of 4 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Santa Ana City Council hereby finds, determines and declares that all of the Recitals set forth herein above are true and correct. SECTION 2. Pursuant to Elections Code § 21621 and Santa Ana Charter § 101.2, the Santa Ana City Council hereby adopts the ward boundaries set forth in the Recommended Map (previously Draft Map N2) attached as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference, for use in the City's General Municipal Election on November 8, 2022 and subsequent elections thereafter until a further redistricting is required pursuant to state law or the City of Santa Ana Charter. Metes and bounds of each district are attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 3. The Clerk of Council or her designee shall take all actions necessary to notify the Orange County Registrar of Voters Office of the City Council's determination forthwith and provide whatever assistance may be required by the County Registrar of Voters to implement the new ward boundary lines. SECTION 4. The Clerk of Council shall cause a map diagram showing the new ward boundary lines of each and every ward to be published in the Orange County Register not less than thirty (30) days prior to the 2022 general municipal election as required by Santa Ana Charter § 101.4. SECTION 5. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall become effective and be in force immediately from and after the date of its passage. SECTION 7. The Clerk of the Council shall certify and attest to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. ADOPTED this day of April, 2022. Vicente Sarmiento Mayor Ordinance No. NS-XXX City Council 9-5 4/19/fn,23 of 4 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho City Attorney By: N - Q"'� Laura A. Rossini Chief Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, Daisy Gomez, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Ordinance No. NS- to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on , and that said ordinance was published in accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana. Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Ordinance No. NS-XXX City Council 9-6 4/19/fn'24 of 4 Exhibit A GARDEN GROVE,_, r DNA PARK SANTA ANA _ TRIANGLE Exhibit B City of Santa Ana I Draft Plan N2 I Metes & Bounds First District All of that portion of Orange County bounded and described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the Garden Grove/Santa Ana city line and the Fountain Valley/Santa Ana city line, and proceeding easterly along the Garden Grove/Santa Ana city line to N Harbor Blvd, and proceeding southerly along N Harbor Blvd to W 1st St, and proceeding easterly along W 1st St to N Fairview St, and proceeding southerly along N Fairview St to S Fairview St, and proceeding southerly along S Fairview St to W McFadden Ave, and proceeding easterly along W McFadden Ave to S Fairview St, and proceeding southerly along S Fairview St to W Dahl Ln, and proceeding westerly along W Dahl Ln to S Fairview St, and proceeding southerly along S Fairview St to W Edinger Ave, and proceeding easterly along W Edinger Ave to S Fairview St, and proceeding southerly along S Fairview St to W Warner Ave, and proceeding easterly along W Warner Ave to S Raitt St, and proceeding southerly along S Raitt St to W Segerstrom Ave, and proceeding westerly along W Segerstrom Ave to S Greenville St, and proceeding southerly along S Greenville St to W Alton Ave, and proceeding westerly along W Alton Ave to S Fairview St, and proceeding southerly along S Fairview St to the Costa Mesa/Santa Ana city line, and proceeding westerly along the Costa Mesa/Santa Ana city line to the Santa Ana city line, and proceeding northerly along the Santa Ana city line to the Fountain Valley/Santa Ana city line, and proceeding northerly along the Fountain Valley/Santa Ana city line to the point of beginning. Second District All of that portion of Orange County bounded and described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of S Fairview St and W Dahl Ln, and proceeding northerly along S Fairview St to W McFadden Ave, and proceeding easterly along W McFadden Ave to S Center St, and proceeding northerly along S Center St to W Monta Vista Ave, and proceeding westerly along W Monta Vista Ave to unnamed Local road, and proceeding northerly along unnamed Local road to W Willits St, and proceeding easterly along W Willits St to S Raitt St, and proceeding northerly along S Raitt St to W 1st St, and proceeding easterly along W 1st St to N Bristol St, and proceeding northerly along N Bristol St to W 1st St, and proceeding easterly along W 1st St to N Main St, and proceeding southerly along N Main St to E 1st St, and proceeding easterly along E 1st St to S Standard Ave, and proceeding southerly along S Standard Ave to McFadden Ave, and proceeding westerly along McFadden Ave to S Halladay St, and proceeding northerly along S Halladay St to E McFadden Ave, and proceeding westerly along E McFadden Ave to S Orange Ave, and proceeding southerly along S Orange Ave to McFadden Ave, and proceeding westerly along McFadden Ave to S Main St, and proceeding northerly along S Main St to W McFadden Ave, and proceeding westerly along W McFadden Ave to S Flower St, and proceeding southerly along S Flower St to W Edinger Ave, and proceeding westerly along W Edinger Ave to S Fairview St, and proceeding northerly along S Fairview St to W Dahl Ln, and proceeding easterly along W Dahl Ln to the point of beginning. City Council 9-8 4/19/ 22 g e Third District All of that portion of Orange County bounded and described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the Garden Grove/Santa Ana city line and W 17th St, and proceeding easterly along the Garden Grove/Santa Ana city line to the Orange/Santa Ana city line, and proceeding easterly along the Orange/Santa Ana city line to the Tustin/Santa Ana city line, and proceeding southerly along the Tustin/Santa Ana city line to nonvisible boundary, and proceeding southerly along nonvisible boundary to the Tustin/Santa Ana city line, and proceeding easterly along the Tustin/Santa Ana city line to McFadden Ave, and proceeding westerly along McFadden Ave to S Lyon St, and proceeding northerly along S Lyon St to E 1st St, and proceeding westerly along E 1st St to N Grand Ave, and proceeding northerly along N Grand Ave to 1- 5, and proceeding westerly along 1- 5 to E 17th St, and proceeding westerly along E 17th St to N Main St, and proceeding southerly along N Main St to W 17th St, and proceeding westerly along W 17th St to nonvisible boundary, and proceeding westerly along nonvisible boundary to N Fairview St, and proceeding southerly along N Fairview St to W 17th St, and proceeding westerly along W 17th St to the point of beginning. Fourth District All of that portion of Orange County bounded and described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of S Fairview St and W Warner Ave, and proceeding northerly along S Fairview St to W Edinger Ave, and proceeding easterly along W Edinger Ave to S Bristol St, and proceeding southerly along S Bristol St to nonvisible boundary, and proceeding easterly along nonvisible boundary to W Warner Ave, and proceeding easterly along W Warner Ave to S Main St, and proceeding southerly along S Main St to E Dyer Rd, and proceeding easterly along E Dyer Rd to Costa Mesa Fwy, and proceeding northerly along Costa Mesa Fwy to the Tustin/Santa Ana city line, and proceeding easterly along the Tustin/Santa Ana city line to the Irvine/Santa Ana city line, and proceeding southerly along the Irvine/Santa Ana city line to the Costa Mesa/Santa Ana city line, and proceeding northerly along the Costa Mesa/Santa Ana city line to S Fairview St, and proceeding northerly along S Fairview St to W Alton Ave, and proceeding easterly along W Alton Ave to S Greenville St, and proceeding northerly along S Greenville St to W Segerstrom Ave, and proceeding easterly along W Segerstrom Ave to S Raitt St, and proceeding northerly along S Raitt St to W Warner Ave, and proceeding westerly along W Warner Ave to the point of beginning. Fifth District All of that portion of Orange County bounded and described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of N Harbor Blvd and W 1st St, and proceeding northerly along N Harbor Blvd to the Garden Grove/Santa Ana city line, and proceeding easterly along the Garden Grove/Santa Ana city line to W 17th St, and proceeding easterly along W 17th St to N Fairview St, and proceeding northerly along N Fairview St to nonvisible boundary, and proceeding easterly along nonvisible boundary to W 17th St, and proceeding easterly along W 17th St to N Main St, and proceeding southerly along N Main St to W 1st St, and proceeding westerly along W 1st St to N Bristol St, and proceeding southerly along N Bristol St to W 1st St, and proceeding westerly along W 1st St to S Raitt St, and proceeding southerly along S Raitt St to W Willits St, and proceeding westerly along W Willits St to unnamed Local road, and proceeding southerly along City Council 9-9 4/19/ 22 g e unnamed Local road to W Monta Vista Ave, and proceeding easterly along W Monta Vista Ave to S Center St, and proceeding southerly along S Center St to W McFadden Ave, and proceeding westerly along W McFadden Ave to S Fairview St, and proceeding northerly along S Fairview St to N Fairview St, and proceeding northerly along N Fairview St to W 1st St, and proceeding westerly along W 1st St to the point of beginning. Sixth District All of that portion of Orange County bounded and described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of S Bristol St and nonvisible boundary, and proceeding northerly along S Bristol St to W Edinger Ave, and proceeding easterly along W Edinger Ave to S Flower St, and proceeding northerly along S Flower St to W McFadden Ave, and proceeding easterly along W McFadden Ave to S Main St, and proceeding southerly along S Main St to McFadden Ave, and proceeding easterly along McFadden Ave to S Orange Ave, and proceeding northerly along S Orange Ave to E McFadden Ave, and proceeding easterly along E McFadden Ave to S Halladay St, and proceeding southerly along S Halladay St to McFadden Ave, and proceeding easterly along McFadden Ave to S Standard Ave, and proceeding northerly along S Standard Ave to E 1st St, and proceeding westerly along E 1st St to N Main St, and proceeding northerly along N Main St to E 17th St, and proceeding easterly along E 17th St to 1- 5, and proceeding southerly along I- 5 to N Grand Ave, and proceeding southerly along N Grand Ave to E 1st St, and proceeding easterly along E 1st St to S Lyon St, and proceeding southerly along S Lyon St to McFadden Ave, and proceeding easterly along McFadden Ave to the Tustin/Santa Ana city line, and proceeding easterly along the Tustin/Santa Ana city line to Costa Mesa Fwy, and proceeding southerly along Costa Mesa Fwy to E Dyer Rd, and proceeding westerly along E Dyer Rd to S Main St, and proceeding northerly along S Main St to W Warner Ave, and proceeding westerly along W Warner Ave to nonvisible boundary, and proceeding westerly along nonvisible boundary to the point of beginning. City Council 9 — 10 4/19/ 22 g e ORDINANCE NO. NS- ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2021-03 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA REPEALING AND REENACTING IN ITS ENTIRETY ARTICLE XVIII.I. OF CHAPTER 41 OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE HOUSING OPPORTUNITY ORDINANCE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines, and declares as follows: A. On November 28, 2011, the Santa Ana City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-2825, known as the Housing Opportunity Ordinance and appearing as "Article XVIII.I. — Housing Opportunity Ordinance" ("Housing Opportunity Ordinance") of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. The Housing Opportunity Ordinance was adopted to implement the City's Housing Element Goal of providing affordable housing within the City. B. On September 1, 2015, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-2881, which amended the Housing Opportunity Ordinance in various respects, including applicability, options to satisfy inclusionary requirements, and calculation of the in -lieu housing fee. These amendments were intended to make the inclusionary housing requirements more predictable for housing developers and to incentivize the production of more affordable housing. C. In response to impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the development and construction of housing in the City, including the reduction of housing starts, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-2994 on September 1, 2020. Ordinance No. NS- 2994 further amended the Housing Opportunity Ordinance to lower the in -lieu housing fee for all projects from $15 to $5 per square foot, adjust the trigger of the ordinance, and expand the eligible uses of in -lieu fees collected by the City. D. On March 2, 2021, at the direction of the City Council, an Ad Hoc Committee for Housing was formed. The Ad Hoc Committee reviewed the Housing Opportunity Ordinance and recommended certain changes. The Ad Hoc Committee's recommendations were presented and discussed at the City Council Meeting on July 6, 2021. E. On July 26, 2021, the City Council conducted a work-study session to further evaluate the Committee's recommendations and to receive input from key stakeholders and members of the public. The City Council provided direction to staff to prepare amendments to the Housing Opportunity Ordinance concerning the applicability City Council 10 — 1 or*4W2022-xxx Page 1 of 17 and triggers for the ordinance, adjustments to the in -lieu fee calculation, set -aside units, and options for satisfaction of inclusionary requirements. F. On September 7, 2021, the City Council further considered this matter and provided additional direction to staff regarding proposed amendments to the Housing Opportunity Ordinance. G. At the City Council meeting of October 5, 2021, staff received direction to initiate the adoption hearing in order for the City Council to consider the changes recommended by the Housing Ad Hoc Committee. H. On October 25, 2021, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed amendments and considered the staff report, recommendations by staff, and public testimony concerning the proposed Ordinance. The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council adopt the proposed Ordinance. I. The Request for City Council Action for this Ordinance dated November 16 and December 7, 2021 and duly signed by the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency shall, by this reference, be incorporated herein, and together with this ordinance, any amendments or supplements, and oral testimony, constitute the necessary findings for this ordinance. Section 2. The City Council finds and determines that this Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, as there is no possibility it will have a significant effect on the environment and it is not a "project", as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines. Furthermore, the proposed Ordinance falls within the "common sense" CEQA exemption set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), excluding projects where "it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment." Adoption of this Ordinance will not have a significant effect on the environment because the proposed changes will only modernize, update, and clarify existing affordable and inclusionary housing requirements responding to the current economic and housing trends in the City and will not cause a physical change in the environment. Section 3, Article XVIII.I of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby repealed in its entirety. Section 4. Article XVIII.I. of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code is hereby reenacted and amended to read in its entirety as follows: ARTICLE XVIII.I. - 2021 AFFORDABLE HOUSING OPPORTUNITY AND CREATION ORDINANCE City Council 10 — 2 044W240M-xxx Page 2 of 17 Sec. 41-1900. Purpose. This article establishes standards and procedures to encourage the development of housing that is affordable to a range of households with varying income levels. The purpose of this article is to encourage the development and availability of affordable housing by requiring the inclusion of affordable housing units within new developments when the number of units exceed the densities permitted under the general plan, zoning classification, or the conversion of rental units to condominium ownership. Sec. 41-1901. Definitions. As used in this article, the following terms shall have the following meanings: Adjusted for household size appropriate for the unit means a household of one person in the case of a studio unit, two (2) persons in the case of a one -bedroom unit, three (3) persons in the case of a two -bedroom unit, four (4) persons in the case of a three - bedroom unit, and five (5) persons in the case of a four -bedroom unit. Administrative procedures means those regulations promulgated by the executive director pursuant to section 41-1910 of this article. Affordable housing cost means the total housing costs paid by a qualifying household, which shall not exceed the fraction of gross income specified, as follows: Extremely low-income households. Thirty (30) percent of the income of a household earning thirty (30) percent of the Orange County median income adjusted for family size appropriate for the unit. Very low-income households. Thirty (30) percent of the income of a household earning fifty (50) percent of the Orange County median income adjusted for family size appropriate for the unit. Low-income households. Thirty (30) percent of the income of a household earning eighty (80) percent of the Orange County median income for family size appropriate for the unit. Moderate -income households. Thirty (30) percent of the income of a household earning one hundred twenty (120) percent of the Orange County median income adjusted for family size appropriate for the unit. The qualifying limits for extremely low-income, very low-income, low-income and moderate -income households are established and amended annually pursuant to Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937. The limits are published by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. Base Density means the maximum number of dwelling units allowed per acre of land within each land use category designated in the General Plan. Developer means any association, corporation, firm, joint venture, partnership, person, or any entity or combination of entities, which seeks city approval for all or part of a residential project. City Council 10 — 3 or 4W24022-xxx Page 3 of 17 Development agreement means an agreement approved by the city council between a property owner and the city pursuant to Government Code section 65864, et seq. Executive director means the executive director of community development for the city. General plan means the adopted general plan for the City of Santa Ana. Inclusionary housing agreement means a legally binding agreement between the developer and the city, in a form and substance satisfactory to the executive director and the city attorney, and containing those provisions necessary to ensure that the requirements of this article are satisfied, whether through the provision of inclusionary units or through an approved alternative method. Inclusionary housing fund means the fund created by the city in which all fees collected in compliance with this article shall be deposited. Inclusionary housing plan means the plan submitted by the developer, in a form specified by the executive director, detailing how the provisions of this article will be implemented for the proposed residential project. Inclusionary unit means a dwelling unit that will be offered for sale or rent to extremely low, very low, low, or moderate -income households, at an affordable housing cost, in compliance with this article. Low-income units, very low-income units, and extremely low-income units means inclusionary units restricted to occupancy by low, very low, and extremely low-income households, respectively, at an affordable housing cost. Market rate units means dwelling units in a residential project that are not inclusionary units. Moderate -income units means inclusionary units restricted to occupancy by moderate -income households at an affordable housing cost. Regulatory agreement means an agreement entered into between the City of Santa Ana or the Santa Ana Community Development Agency and a developer by which the developer covenants to keep certain housing units at an affordable housing cost for a specified period of time. Rehabilitated units/rehabilitation means the improvement of a unit in substandard condition to a decent, safe and sanitary level. Units are in substandard condition when, while they may be structurally sound, they do not provide safe and adequate shelter, and in their present condition endanger the health, safety or well-being of the occupants. Residential project/project means any of the following: A subdivision resulting in the creation of five (5) or more residential lots or residential condominium units; or The new construction of a project consisting of five (5) or more multi -family units; or The new construction of five (5) or more separate houses or dwelling units; or City Council 10 — 4 or*4W2JgM-xxx Page 4 of 17 The conversion of five (5) or more existing residential rental units to condominium ownership. Target area means that area designated by the city from time to time, on an as -needed basis, as a priority area for rehabilitation due to health and safety concerns. Total housing costs the total monthly or annual recurring expenses required of a household to obtain shelter. For a rental unit, total housing costs shall include the monthly rent payment and utilities paid by the tenant (excluding telephone and television). For an ownership unit, total housing costs shall include the mortgage payment (principal and interest), insurance, homeowners' association dues (if applicable), private mortgage insurance (if applicable), taxes, utilities, an allowance for maintenance and any other related assessments. Sec. 41-1902. Applicability and inclusionary unit requirements. (a) Applicability. The requirements of this article shall apply to any new project comprised of five (5) or more residential lots or residential units, including new construction and condominium conversions, which meets one or all of the following applicability thresholds: (1) A change in use to allow for residential or that exceeds the general plan or zoning prescribed densities or percentage of residential development of the subject property at the time of application. (2) Implementation of the permitted residential density or percentage of residential development allowed as a result of city initiated zone changes or city initiated general plan amendments after November 28, 2011. (3) Increase of the permitted percentage of residential development allowed for a mixed -use development above the percentage permitted under the zoning classification at the time of application. (4) Development of new residential uses or increase of the permitted residential density or percentage of residential development within an overlay zone approved pursuant to Division 28 of Article I of this Chapter. (5) Conversion of rental units to condominium ownership. (b) Applications. The inclusionary requirements shall only apply to the incremental units beyond that which is allowed as prescribed in Subsection (a) above. (c) Units for sale. If the new residential project consists of units for sale, then a minimum of five (5) percent of the total number of units in the project shall be sold to moderate -income households. (d) Rental units. If the new residential project consists of rental units, the inclusionary units shall be constructed as follows: City Council 10 — 5 04MV2022-xxx Page 5 of 17 (1) A minimum of fifteen (15) percent of the units shall be rented to low-income households, or (2) A minimum of ten (10) percent shall be rented to very low-income households, or (3) A minimum of five (5) percent shall be rented to extremely low-income households, or (4) A minimum of ten (10) percent shall be available at an affordable housing cost of which five (5) percent rented to low-income households, three (3) percent rented to very low-income households, and two (2) percent rented to extremely low-income households. (e) Rounding of quantities in calculations. In calculating the required number of inclusionary units, fractional units shall be rounded -up to the next whole unit. The developer may choose to pay an in -lieu fee set forth in section 41-1904(c) for the fractional units, which shall be calculated based on the number of habitable square feet applicable in each case. (f) Displacement of existing inclusionary units. Notwithstanding any other provision of this article, any residential project subject to this article that results in the displacement of extremely low, very low and/or low-income household(s) shall be required to provide on - site inclusionary units as required by this article. (g) Compliance with article. All inclusionary units required by this article shall be sold or rented in compliance with this article. Sec. 41-1903. Exempt projects. The following are exempt from the requirements of this article: (a) Development agreements. A residential project that is the subject of a development agreement under applicable provisions of the California Government Code that expressly provides for an exclusion to this article, provides for a different amount of inclusionary units, or provides for a different specified method for determining the in -lieu fee provisions of this ordinance, such as the timing of payment or the point in time for determining the applicable in -lieu fee amount, to satisfy the inclusionary units from that specified by this article. (b) Project with regulatory agreement. A residential project for which a regulatory agreement has been approved, provided that the regulatory agreement is effective at the time the residential project would otherwise be required to comply with the requirements of this article, and there is no uncured breach of the regulatory agreement before issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the project. This may include a residential project that has City Council 10-6 or4a1W2022-xxx Page 6 of 17 obtained a density bonus under article XVI.I of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. Such projects cannot be used to satisfy the inclusionary requirement for another project. (c) Adaptive Reuse. Adaptive reuse development projects pursuant to Chapter 41, Article XVI.II - Adaptive Reuse. (d) Development Projects Approved Under the Provisions of Ordinance No. NS-2994 Adopted on September 1, 2020. A development project that has received entitlement approvals by city council action prior to November 16, 2021 to construct new residential units is hereby determined to have vested the right to carry out the completion and construction of the project under the regulations and provisions of Ordinance No. NS- 2994. The vested regulations and provisions in accordance with this section shall terminate if any or all of the entitlement approvals become invalid for any reasons or have expired under the various applicable time limits established in the Santa Ana Municipal Code. A list of these projects and the vested right(s) under Ordinance No. NS-2994 are attached hereto as Exhibit A and is incorporated herein by reference. Sec. 41-1904. Options to satisfy inclusionary requirements. (a) On -site units. The primary means of complying with the inclusionary requirements of this article shall be the provision of on -site inclusionary units in accordance with section 41-1902 above. A developer may only satisfy the requirements of this article by means of an alternative to on -site inclusionary units in accordance with the requirements and procedures of this section. (b) Off -site units. (1) New units. The developer may satisfy the inclusionary unit requirements for the project, in whole or in part by constructing the required new inclusionary housing at a different location within the city borders at the ratio of one square foot of habitable inclusionary unit space for each required habitable square foot. While the total habitable square footage area of the required new inclusionary units must be the same as the sum - total of the number of habitable square feet for the project as directed by this ordinance, the number of units and bedrooms associated with the off -site units may be approved by the review authority of the city, consistent with the type of affordable housing needed at the time of project review. (2) Rehabilitated units outside a designated target area. The developer may satisfy the inclusionary unit requirements for the project, in whole or in part by substantially rehabilitating existing housing units elsewhere within the borders of the city at a rate of one and one-half (1'/2) habitable square feet per each required habitable square foot of inclusionary units. (3) Rehabilitated units within a designated target area. Upon application, the developer may satisfy the inclusionary unit requirements for the project, in whole or in part by substantially rehabilitating existing housing units elsewhere within the borders of City Council 10 — 7 04MV2022-xxx Page 7 of 17 the city at a rate of one habitable square foot per each required habitable square foot of affordable inclusionary units. (c) In -lieu fee. (1) Five (5) or more units. For a residential project comprised of five (5) or more residential lots or residential units, the developer may elect to satisfy the inclusionary unit requirements for the project, in whole or in part, by payment of a fee in -lieu of constructing some or all of the required units. The total amount of the fee allowed by this section shall be calculated using the In -Lieu Fee Schedule in section 41-1904(c)(1)(i) multiplied by the sum total of the number of habitable square feet within the entire project, as measured from the exterior walls of the residential units. This calculation does not include exterior hallways, common areas, landscape, open space or exterior stairways. (i) In -Lieu Fee Schedule Units/Lots Fee Per Square Foot of Habitable Area 5-9 $6.00 10 — 14 $9.00 15 — 19 $12.00 20 or more $15.00 (ii) Local Skilled and Trained Workforce. The use of a local skilled and trained workforce shall be phased in over time and shall only apply to a development project proposing twenty (20) or more lots or units opting to exercise the in -lieu fee payment option. The implementation of this subsection shall be phased as follows: (A) Between November 16, 2021 and December 31, 2025, a project proposing twenty (20) or more lots or units exercising the option to pay the $15 per square foot in -lieu fee amount shall not be required to utilize a local skilled and trained workforce for completing the construction of the project. However, this fee shall be reduced if the developer provides the City with an executed enforceable commitment to use a "Skilled and Trained Workforce" as defined in Public Contract Code section 2601 to complete the construction of the project as specified in the table below: Use of Skilled and Trained Workforce Fee Per Square Foot of Habitable Area 30% of workforce utilizing 2 or more construction $10.00 trades 60% of workforce utilizing 3 or more construction $5.00 trades City Council 10 — 8 or4/4W2JOM-xxx Page 8 of 17 A minimum of 20% of the above work -hours shall be performed in accordance with local hire policies approved by the City Council. (B) Effective January 1, 2026 and thereafter, a project proposing twenty (20) or more lots or units exercising the option to pay the $15 per square foot in - lieu fee amount shall be required to provide the City with an executed enforceable commitment that 30 percent of the workforce utilized to complete the construction of the project be derived from a "Skilled and Trained Workforce" as defined in Public Contract Code section 2601; and that a minimum of 35 percent of the required skilled and trained workforce total work -hours shall be performed in accordance with local hire policies approved by the City Council. This fee shall be reduced when the developer commits to a higher utilization level as specified in the table below: Use of Skilled and Trained Fee Per Square Foot of Workforce Habitable Area 60% of workforce $10.00 90% of workforce $5.00 minimum of 35% of the above work -hours shall be performed in accordance with local hire policies approved by the City Council. (2) Timing of payment. The total fee amount for the entirety of a project is calculated, determined, and set at the time of issuance of the first building permit for the project. All in -lieu fees allowed by this section shall be paid no later than prior to issuance of the first occupancy approval for any construction which adds net residential units. If the city approves a phased project, a proportional share of the required fee shall be paid within each phase of the residential project. The in -lieu fees collected by the city are city funds over which the city has complete and absolute discretion. (3) Inclusionary housing fund. Fees collected in compliance with this section shall be deposited in the inclusionary housing fund. (4) The provisions of Section 41-1904(c)(1) may only be modified by the affirmative vote of at least five (5) members of the City Council. Sec. 41-1904.1. Inclusionary housing development incentives for production of units. (a) In order to make the production of new inclusionary units on -site or off -site or off - site rehabilitated units, certain incentives, standards and concessions shall be allowed City Council 10 — 9 or*4W2422-xxx Page 9 of 17 and prescribed as set forth herein below. Such concessions shall not be available to those developers that choose to pay an in lieu fee rather than build the units. The developer may opt to take advantage of up to two (2) concessions among the following possible concessions: (1) Parking concession. One on -site parking space for each zero to one bedroom unit; two (2) on -site parking spaces for each two (2) to three (3) bedroom unit; two and one-half (2'/2) parking spaces for each four (4) or more bedroom unit. (2) Concession on one of the following Zoning Code site development standards: (i) Setback reduction of up to twenty-five (25) percent reduction on subject property; (ii) Height increase of up to twenty (20) additional feet. (b) A developer of a for sale residential project proposing to provide on -site moderate income units and a surrounding community benefit may opt to take advantage of up to three (3) of the above concessions. The surrounding community benefit will include but not be limited to park improvements, urban community gardens, developer -funded down payment assistance, or subsidy of services, activities or programs. (1) Local Density Bonus. For each 1 percent increase above 5 percent in the percentage of for -sale units affordable to moderate income households, the base density shall be increased by 1.5 percent up to a maximum of 35 percent. Sec. 41-1905. Housing plan and housing agreement. (a) Submittal and execution. The developer shall comply with the following requirements: (1) Inclusionary housing plan. The developer shall submit an inclusionary housing plan in a form specified by the executive director, detailing how the provisions of this article will be implemented for the proposed residential project. The inclusionary housing plan and its supportive documents, plans, and details shall be submitted at the same time as the site plan and application materials for the original project. All inclusionary housing plans shall be subject to the approval of the executive director and subject to appeal processes and procedures set forth in the Santa Ana Municipal Code. 2) Inclusionary housing agreement. The developer shall execute and cause to be recorded an inclusionary housing agreement. The inclusionary housing agreement shall be a legally binding agreement between the developer and the city, executed by the city manager, or his or her designee, and in a form and substance satisfactory to the executive director and the city attorney, and containing those provisions necessary to ensure that the requirements of this article are satisfied, whether through the provision of inclusionary units or through an approved alternative method. (b) Discretionary approvals. No discretionary approval shall be issued for a residential project subject to this article until the developer has submitted an inclusionary housing plan. City Council 10 — 10 or*4W24022-xxx Page 10 of 17 (c) Issuance of building permit. No building permit shall be issued for a residential project subject to this article unless the executive director has approved the inclusionary housing plan, and any required inclusionary housing agreement has been recorded. (d) Issuance of certificate of occupancy. A certificate of occupancy shall not be issued for a residential project subject to this article unless the approved inclusionary housing plan has been fully implemented. Sec. 41-1906. Standards. (a) Location within project, relationship to non-inclusionary units. All inclusionary units shall be: (1) Reasonably dispersed throughout the residential project; (2) Proportional, in number of bedrooms, gross floor area of habitable space, and location, to the market rate units; (3) Comparable to the market rate units included in the residential project in terms of design, materials, finished quality, and appearance; and (4) Permitted the same access to project amenities and recreational facilities, as are market rate units. (b) Timing of construction. All inclusionary units in a residential project shall be constructed concurrent with, or before the construction of the market rate units. If the city approves a phased project, a proportional share of the required inclusionary units shall be provided within each phase of the residential project. (c) Location outside the proposed original project. For projects where the developer proposes to either produce new inclusionary units or rehabilitate existing off -site units to meet the inclusionary affordable housing requirements of this ordinance, the off -site project(s) containing the required inclusionary units shall be subject to the following requirements: (1) The sum -total area (in habitable square feet) of all the newly constructed off -site inclusionary units shall be the same number of habitable square feet of inclusionary area as required by this ordinance. For the purpose of the calculation of the number of square feet of required inclusionary housing, the total gross habitable square feet of the housing units of the original market rate project shall be used, as measured from exterior walls to exterior walls of the market units provided as the base for calculation. The common areas, exterior hallways, stairways, patios, and balconies shall not be calculated in determining the number of required square feet of inclusionary housing production. All new or rehabilitated units must meet all current zoning and general plan standards. City Council 10 — 11 04iaV24022-xxx Page 11 of 17 (2) While the total number of square feet of inclusionary housing requirement is calculated based on the requirements of this ordinance, the number of units, bedrooms and other amenities on the proposed off -site inclusionary housing location shall be approved by the review authority commensurate with the size and type of units most in demand at the time of submittal of the application. (3) Any off -site affordable inclusionary housing project shall be substantially comparable to the market rate units included in the residential project in terms of quality of design, materials and finishes. (4) If tenants are displaced due to rehabilitation of housing to meet the inclusionary unit requirement, the developer shall be responsible for relocation costs as required by state law. (5) No city, housing authority, or public funds, subsidies, or participation of any kind shall be expended on the production or building of any inclusionary housing projects associated with meeting the inclusionary unit requirement. (d) Timing of construction. All inclusionary units in a residential project or proposed off -site new inclusionary units or rehabilitated units shall be constructed concurrent with, or before the construction of the market rate units. If the city approves a phased project, a proportional share of the required inclusionary units shall be provided within each phase of the residential project. (e) Units for sale. (1) Time limit for inclusionary restrictions. A unit for sale shall be restricted to the target income level group at the applicable affordable housing cost for a minimum of fifty-five (55) years. (2) Certification of purchasers. The developer and all subsequent owners of an inclusionary unit offered for sale shall certify, on a form provided by the city, the income of the purchaser and that such owners will live in such inclusionary unit as their primary residence. (3) Resale price control. In order to maintain the availability of inclusionary units required by this article, the resale price of an owner occupied inclusionary unit shall be limited to the lesser of the fair market value of the unit as established by a licensed real estate agent based upon three (3) comparable properties or the restricted resale price. For these purposes, the restricted resale price shall be the applicable affordable housing cost. (4) Inheritance of inclusionary units. Upon the death of an owner of an owner - occupied inclusionary unit, title in the property may transfer to the surviving joint tenant or heir (in the case of the death of a sole owner or all owners of the household). City Council 10 — 12 04MV24022-xxx Page 12 of 17 (5) Forfeiture. If an inclusionary unit for sale is sold for an amount in excess of the resale price controls required by this section, the buyer and the seller shall be jointly and severally liable to the city for the amount in excess of the affordable housing cost at the time of such sale of the inclusionary unit. Recovered funds shall be deposited into the inclusionary housing fund. Notwithstanding the foregoing, city may allow the buyer and seller to cure any violation of the resale price controls within one hundred eighty (180) days. (f) Rental units. (1) Time limit for inclusionary restrictions. A rental inclusionary unit shall remain restricted to the target income level group at the applicable affordable housing cost for fifty-five (55) years. (2) Certification of renters. The owner of any rental inclusionary unit shall certify, on a form provided by the city, the income of all members of the household above the age of eighteen (18) at the time of the initial rental and annually thereafter. (3) Forfeiture. Any lessor who leases an inclusionary unit in violation of this article shall be required to forfeit to the city all money so obtained. Recovered funds shall be deposited into the inclusionary housing fund. (g) Execution and recording of documents. The executive director may require the execution and recording of whatever documents are required to ensure enforcement of this section; including, but not limited to, promissory notes, deeds of trust, resale restrictions, rights of first refusal, options to purchase, and/or other documents, which shall be recorded against all inclusionary units. (h) General prohibitions. (1) No person shall sell or rent an inclusionary unit at a price or rent in excess of the maximum amount allowed by any restriction placed on the unit in accordance with this article. (2) No person shall sell or rent an inclusionary unit to a person or persons that do not meet the income restrictions placed on the unit in accordance with this article. (3) No person shall provide false or materially incomplete information to the city or to a seller or lessor of an inclusionary unit to obtain occupancy of housing for which that person is not eligible. (i) Principal residency requirement. 1. The owner or lessee of an inclusionary unit shall reside in the unit for not less than ten (10) out of every twelve (12) months. City Council 10 — 13 or4a W2022-xxx Page 13 of 17 2. No owner or lessee of an inclusionary unit shall lease or sublease, as applicable, an inclusionary unit without the prior permission of the executive director. Sec. 41-1907. Reserved. Sec. 41-1908. Enforcement. (a) Violation. Any violation of this article constitutes a misdemeanor. (b) Forfeiture of funds. Any individual who sells an inclusionary unit in violation of this article shall be required to forfeit any money in excess of the affordable housing cost at such time. Any individual who rents an inclusionary unit in violation of this article shall be required to forfeit all money so obtained. Recovered funds shall be deposited into the inclusionary housing fund. (c) Legal actions. The city may institute any appropriate legal actions or proceedings necessary to ensure compliance with this article, including actions: (1) To disapprove, revoke, or suspend any permit, including a building permit, certificate of occupancy, or discretionary approval; and (2) For injunctive relief or damages. (d) Recovery of costs. In any action to enforce this article, or an inclusionary housing agreement recorded hereunder, the city shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorney's fees and costs. Sec. 41-1909. Inclusionary housing fund. (a) Inclusionary housing fund. There is hereby established a separate fund of the city, to be known as the inclusionary housing fund. All monies collected pursuant to this article shall be deposited in the inclusionary housing fund. Additional monies from other sources may be deposited in the inclusionary housing fund. The monies deposited in the inclusionary housing fund shall be subject to the following conditions: (1) Monies deposited into the inclusionary housing fund must be used to increase and improve the supply of housing affordable to moderate, low, very low, and extremely low income households in the city as specified in the city's affordable housing funds policies and procedures. A priority will be on the creation of affordable housing opportunities or units from the existing market rate housing stock rather than construction of new affordable housing units and on the creation of new affordable housing opportunities for large families currently living in the City. This includes, but is not limited to, the purchase and rehabilitation of units for sale. Monies may also be used to pay for one-time programs for code enforcement, quality of life and general health and safety activities. Monies may also be used to cover reasonable administrative or related expenses associated with the administration of this article. (2) The fund shall be administered by the executive director, or his or her designee, who may develop procedures in the city's affordable housing funds policies and City Council 10 — 14 Or*4W2JOM-xxx Page 14 of 17 procedures to implement the purposes of the inclusionary housing fund consistent with the requirements of this article and any adopted budget of the city. (3) Monies deposited in accordance with this section shall be used in accordance with the affordable housing funds policies and procedures, housing element, consolidated plan, or subsequent plan adopted by the city council to construct, rehabilitate, or subsidize affordable housing or to recapture affordable housing at risk of market conversion, or to assist other government entities, private organizations, or individuals to do so. Permissible uses include, but are not limited to, assistance to housing development corporations, equity participation loans, grants, pre -home ownership co - investment, pre -development loan funds, participation leases, or other public -private partnership arrangements. The inclusionary housing fund may be used for the benefit of both rental and owner -occupied housing. (4) A developer receiving funding from the inclusionary housing fund shall implement a local preference in their resident selection criteria and marketing policies meeting guidelines established by the executive director. (5) A developer receiving funding from the inclusionary housing fund, as well as its contractors and subcontractors at every tier performing work for the new housing units is encouraged to negotiate in good faith to provide the City with an enforceable commitment that a minimum 30% of the labor utilizing 2 or more construction trades be performed by a "Skilled and Trained Workforce" as defined in Public Contract Code section 2601 to complete the construction of the project. If so provided, a minimum of 35% of such labor for the project shall be performed in accordance with local hire policies approved by the City Council. Sec. 41-1910. Administrative. (a) In -lieu fee calculation. The amount per square foot of the inclusionary housing in - lieu fee shall be subject to city council review and consideration as needed. (b) Administration fees. The council may by resolution establish reasonable fees and deposits for the administration of this article including an annual monitoring fee and an inclusionary housing plan submittal fee. (c) Monitoring/audits. At the time of initial occupancy, and annually thereafter, the city will monitor the project to ensure that the income verifications are correct and in compliance with the inclusionary housing administrative procedures. For ownership units, the city shall monitor to verify that owner -occupancy requirements are maintained. Developer/property owners are required to cooperate with the city in promptly providing all information requested by the city in monitoring compliance with program requirements. The city will conduct periodic random quality control audits of inclusionary units to ensure compliance with rules and requirements. Such audits may include verification of continued occupancy in inclusionary units by eligible tenants, compliance with the City Council 10 — 15 04iV24022-xxx Page 15 of 17 inclusionary housing plan and agreement, and physical inspections of the residential project. (e) Administrative procedures. The city manager is hereby authorized and directed to promulgate administrative procedures for the implementation of this article. Secs. 41-1911-41-1999. Reserved. Section 5. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its adoption. Section 7. The Clerk of the Council shall certify the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. ADOPTED this day of , 2021. APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By:_% John M. Funk Sr. Assistant City Attorney AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: NOT PRESENT Councilmembers Councilmembers Councilmembers Councilmembers Vicente Sarmiento Mayor City Council 10 — 16 orb' WPOM-xxx Page 16 of 17 CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, Daisy Gomez, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Ordinance No. NS- to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on , and that said ordinance was published in accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana. Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana City Council 10 — 17 ord*MV2022-xxx Page 17 of 17 EXHIBIT A 2021 List of Entitled Projects Vested Under the Regulations and Provisions of Ordinance No. NS-2994 The development projects listed in Table 1 have received entitlement approvals by Planning Commission and/or City Council action prior to November 16, 2021, to construct new residential units and are hereby determined to have vested the right to carry out the completion and construction of the project under the regulations and provisions of Ordinance No. NS-2994 (HOO). The vested regulations and provisions shall automatically terminate if any or all of the entitlement approvals become invalid for any reasons or have expired under the various applicable time limits established in the Santa Ana Municipal Code or any applicable State Covid-19 pandemic relief or other applicable time extension provisions. Ordinance No. NS-2994 is incorporated herein by reference. Table 1. Entitled Projects Vested Under the Regulations and Provisions of Ordinance No. NS-2994 No. Project Address Project Name Number of HOO Compliance Requirements Dwelling Units 1. 1122 N. Bewley Street Bewley Townhomes 10 Provide inclusionary units as required under NS-2994 or payment of in -lieu of $5/sf 2. 301 N. Mountain View Street Mountain View 8 Provide inclusionary units as required by Townhomes NS-2994 or payment of in -lieu of $5/sf 3. 200 N. Cabrillo Park Drive The Madison 260 Provide inclusionary units as required by NS-2994 or payment of in -lieu of $5/sf 4. 1109 N. Broadway One Broadway Plaza 415 $15/sf in -lieu payment under a project Mutual Declaration 5. 3025 W. Edinger Avenue Haphan Townhomes 17 Provide inclusionary units as required by NS-2994 or payment of in -lieu of $5/sf 6. 2800 N. Main Street/Specific MainPlace Mall 1,900 Provide inclusionary units as required by Plan No. 4 Transformation 1,900 NS-2994 or payment of in -lieu of $5/sf residential units 7. 419 N. Harbor Boulevard Fifth and Harbor 94 Provide inclusionary units as required by (previously 421 N. Harbor Mixed Use Apartments NS-2994 or payment of in -lieu of $5/sf Boulevard) 8. 3417 W. Fifth Street West Fifth Villas 8 Provide inclusionary units as required by NS-2994 or payment of in -lieu of $5/sf The development projects listed in Table 2 have received entitlement approvals by Planning Commission or City Council action prior to November 16, 2021, but did not trigger H00 provisions and have been identified herein for implementation clarity. Table 2. Entitled Projects Not Triggering HOO requirements No. Project Address Project Name Number of Dwelling Units HOO Compliance Requirements 1. 201 W. Third Street 3rd and Broadway 171 H00 provisions not applicable to project 2. 409 E. Fourth Street and 509 E. Fourth Street 4th and Mortimer 169 H00 provisions not applicable to project 3. 1801 E. Fourth Street Central Pointe 644 HOO provisions not applicable to project 4. 200 E. First American Way Legado at the Met 278 HOO provisions not applicable to project 5. 114 E. Fifth Street and 115 E. Fifth Street Rafferty (4t" + Main) 220 HOO provisions not applicable to project City Council 10 — 18 4/19/2022 Community Development Agency www.santa-ana.org/cd Item # 11 or City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report April 19, 2022 TOPIC: Destruction of Obsolete City Records AGENDA TITLE: Approve Destruction of Obsolete City Records RECOMMENDED ACTION Approve the request for the destruction of obsolete records from the Community Development Agency in accordance with the retention schedule outlined in City Council Resolution No. 2013-014. DISCUSSION On April 1, 2013, the City Council approved Resolution No. 2013-014 ("Resolution"). This Resolution provides to the multiple agencies, departments, and offices of the City, guidance on the retention of City records and how long the records need to be retained. To assist the City, the Citywide Records Team compiled the Citywide Records Retention Schedule ("Schedule") which sets forth the retention period for a particular record. The Schedule reflects the requirements of the California Public Records Act, is modeled after the California Secretary of State's sample for local government, and incorporates other statutory periods applicable to Santa Ana. The Resolution attaches the Schedule, which is broken down into multiple sections covering the varied responsibilities and retention periods for a City department. These are minimum retention periods. Each department makes discretionary decisions on whether to retain records past the minimum retention period requirements. Section 5.13 of this Resolution and the City's Municipal Code require that the City Attorney approve the destruction of a City record. Accordingly, the Executive director of the Community Development Agency lists obsolete records proposed for destruction. A copy of the memorandum was reviewed by staff from the City Attorney's Office and approved by the City Attorney. The memorandum is attached as an exhibit to this staff report. Destruction of these records will serve to benefit each office with a more efficient access to files and alleviate the City's current storage needs to maintain these obsolete records. City Council 11 — 1 4/19/2022 Destruction of Obsolete City Records April 19, 2022 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with this action. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this item. EXHIBIT(S) 1. Request for Destruction of Records - Community Development Agency Submitted By: Daisy Gomez, Clerk of the Council Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager City Council 11 — 2 4/19/2022 MEMORANDUM Sonia Carvalho To: City Attorney Steven A. Mendoza From: Assistant City Manager Subject: Request For Destruction Of Records Date: March 17, 2022 The Community Development Agency requests your consent to destroy the city records identified on the attached listing in accordance with the retention schedule outlined in City Council Resolution 2013-014. City Council 11 — 3 4/19/2022 CITY OF SANTA ANA OBSOLETE RECORDS DESTRUCTION SCHEDULE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY APRIL 2022 RECORD RECORD RECORD START RECORD BOX CATEGORY RECORD SERIES DESCRIPTION DATE/RETENTION PERIOD GOVT. CODE NO. PERIOD Forms to charge labor expenditures to January 2013 Payroll Exception applicable Fund and Activity other than 3 years — December GC 34090 (d) 1 .I Sheets home account 2014 Leave of Forms to charge labor expenditures to January 2013 Payroll Absence applicable Fund and Activity other than 2 years — December GC 34090 (d) 1 home account 2014 Code of Civil Admin Audited Agency Financial Statements, 10 Years from July 1983 — Procedures Services CDA Reports Redevelopment Agency Annual Report FY date June 2011 Sec. 337 GC 2 (Report to State Controller) 34090 Contracts entered into by the Agency and Code of Civil Admin City relating to goods, services, legal January 1985 Procedures Services Agreements settlements and program responsibilities; 4 years —January Sec. 337 GC 2 includes joints powers agreements 2011 34090 Authorization/public Code of Civil Admin hearing/prospectus/proposals/ December Procedures Services Bonds certificates/notices Plus 10 years 1985 —June Sec.336a, 7 (transcripts)/registers/statements 2006 337.5 Code of Civil Project Files including correspondence, Prior to Procedures General CDA Project Files reports, and relevant back-up 3 years 20 documentation January 2012 Sec. 337 GC 34090 Workforce September Economic Investment Subgrantee Agreements, Plans, 6 years 2009 — March 29CFR, Part 1 Development Board (WIB) Participant And Fiscal Reports 2014 97.42(b)(2) Workforce Economic Investment Procurement Records And RFPS 6 years March 2013 29CFR, Part 1 Development Board (WIB) 97.42(b)(2) Workforce Economic Investment Act Contracts And Other Backup Data For July 2008 — 29CFR, Part Development (WIA) & Special Processing Invoice 6 years June 2011 97.42(b)(2) 4 Projects Workforce Economic Investment Act Oversight And Monitoring Reports July 2006 — 29CFR, Part Development (WIA) & Special Including Backup Data And Program 6 years June 2009 97.42(b)(2) 1 Operator Audit Reports Projects Workforce Economic Investment Act Participant Payroll Records (Timecards, January 2013 29CFR, Part Development p (WIA) &Special Participant Profiles, Payroll Printouts) 6 years —December 97.42(B)(2) 1 2014 Projects Federal Oversight and monitoring reports Economic Empowerment including backup data and program 5 years October 2014 29CFR, Part 1 Development 97.42(b)(2) Zone Grant operator audit reports Workforce Economic Investment Subgrantee agreements, plans, 6 years PY 2001— 29CFR, Part 3 Development participant and fiscal reports PY 2012 97.42(b)(2) Board (WIB) City Council 11 — 4 4/19/2022 RECORD START RECORD RECORD SERIES RECORD DATE/RETENTION RECORD GOVT. CODE BOX CATEGORY DESCRIPTION PERIOD NO. PERIOD CDBG Loans Paid -Off, CalHome Rehab, Code Civil NSP/ANR, Mobile Home Hardship Housing Loan Files Program Loans Paid -Off, HOME Rehab 5 Years 2010 - 2016 Procedures 26 Loans. Loans have been forgiven or loans Sec. 337 GC Paid -Off; Ineligible loan files; 34090 Grant documents and all supporting documents: applications, reports, 2003 - 2004 NSP/HOME/ contracts, project files, proposal, 4 years from GC 34090 24 Housing HOPWA statements, sub -recipient dockets, FY date July 2011— CFR 570.502 3 environmental review, inventory, June 2012 24 CFR 85.42 consolidated plans, CAPERS, etc. Development, General Internal working files including Housing Subject Files, correspondence 2 Years 2001 - 2013 24 CFR 85.42 2 Projects Housing Housing Planning/Redevelopment Agency files. Plus 2 Years 2001 - 2013 GC 34090 6 Programs PREPARED BY: Blanca L. Zurita Date Commission Secretary RECORDS DESTROYED: Number of Boxes CONSENT BY: Steven A. Mendoza Date Assistant City Manager/Executive Director APPROVED BY: for March 29, 2022 Sonia Carvalho Date City Attorney City Council 11 — 5 4/19/2022 Finance & Management Services www.santa-ana.org/finance Item # 12 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report April 19, 2022 TOPIC: Award Blanket Order Contract for Office Supplies AGENDA TITLE: Award Contract to Office Depot for the Purchase of Office Supplies in an Annual Amount not to exceed $175,000 for a Two-year Term with Three One -Year Renewal Options (Specification No. 22-061) (General Fund) RECOMMENDED ACTION Award a blanket order contract with Office Depot for an annual amount not to exceed $175,000 for the period beginning June 1, 2022 and expiring May 31, 2024 with an option for three one-year renewals, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. DISCUSSION The City utilizes an assortment of office products for its daily operations such as, binders, file folders, writing instruments, calendars, and labels, as well as small office equipment. Office Depot, the City's current vendor, is the leading provider of core office supplies and products including a wide variety of green/sustainable products. Office Depot has an online ordering system, which provides next -day delivery service, tracking and payment information for the requesting agency, and spend analysis reports for buyers. Over the past five years, the utilization of the online ordering system has significantly reduced citywide office supply expenses and has created efficiencies within departments to secure their orders at a much quicker pace. Santa Ana City Ordinance No. NS-2312 authorizes the City to purchase against contracts from any public agency utilizing a competitive bid process. Region 4 Educational Service Center of Houston entered into Contract No. R190303 with Office Depot for Office Supplies, Related Products and Services through an Omnia Cooperative Agreement. This cooperative procurement allows all public agencies access to discounted pricing. The City proposes to enter into a cooperative contract with Office Depot for office supplies. Contract R190303 ensures the products and services offered will continue to provide staff with high quality, discounted materials. City Council 12 — 1 4/19/2022 Award a Blanket Order Contract for Office Supplies April 19, 2022 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with this action. FISCAL IMPACT Funds for the duration of the contract period, an amount not to exceed $175,000 annually, will be included in various departmental Miscellaneous Operating Expense account (no.63001). Submitted By: Kathryn Downs, Finance and Management Services Executive Director Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager City Council 12 — 2 4/19/2022 Information Technology www.santa-ana.org/it Item # 13 or City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report April 19, 2022 TOPIC: Award Purchase Order to Presidio Networked Solutions AGENDA TITLE: Award a Purchase Order in the Amount of $387,809 to Presidio Networked Solutions for Data Center Server and Storage Infrastructure Equipment (Specification No. 22-014) (Non -General Fund) RECOMMENDED ACTION Award a purchase order to Presidio Networked Solutions for HPE Disaggregated Hyperconverged Infrastructure Equipment (dHCI), in the amount of $387,809, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. DISCUSSION The Information Technology (IT) Department provides support to both City Hall and the Santa Ana Police Department (SAPD) data centers, which together house the largest concentration of computer systems used to support City operations. These systems include the City's financial systems, payroll system, tax systems, permitting system, public safety systems, email system, document management system, and all file share storage. Each of the data centers has servers that make up a virtual server environment as well as a storage area network (SAN) that provides the data storage. The two SAN environments are both nearing the end of their useful lives as are many of the physical servers used to house the virtual servers and will no longer be supported by the vendor. To replace the end -of -life servers and SAN environments, staff recommends moving to a Disaggregated Hyperconverged Infrastructure (dHCI). dHCI is a scalable, powerful solution that integrates software defined compute and storage with automation to deliver simplicity, ease of use, and better economics —by collapsing silos and removing complexity. The simplicity of the dHCI environment will allow staff to more finely tune the ratio of compute -to -storage resources, thus reducing overprovisioning and making more efficient use of available resources. The procurement includes one dHCI environment for each of the two City data centers. City Council 13 — 1 4/19/2022 Award Purchase Order to Presidio Networked Solutions April 19, 2022 Page 2 The Notice Inviting Bids was advertised on January 28, 2022, on the City's online bid management and publication system. A summary of the bid invitation and bids received is as follows: 396 Vendors were notified 16 Santa Ana vendors were notified 29 Vendors downloaded the bid packet 4 Bids received 0 Bids received from Santa Ana vendors The bids were received and opened on February 17, 2022, and evaluated (Exhibit 1). The bids submitted by Presidio Networked Solutions located in Pleasanton, California was determined to be responsive and met the City's requirements. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with this action. FISCAL IMPACT Funds in the amount of $387,809 are available for expenditure in the current Fiscal Year 2021-22 budget as follows: Fiscal Accounting Fund Accounting Unit, Amount Year Unit — Description Account Description Account# FY 21-22 10920149- Information IT Projects, Machinery & $387,809 66400 Technology Equipment Total $387,809 Submitted By: Jack Ciulla, Chief Technology Innovations Officer Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager City Council 13 — 2 4/19/2022 Public Works Agency www.santa-ana.org/pw Item # 14 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report April 19, 2022 TOPIC: Purchase of Two Ford Ranger Trucks AGENDA TITLE Award a Purchase Order in the Amount of $76,140 to National Auto Fleet Group for Two Ford Ranger XL SuperCrew Trucks for the Parks and Facilities Division of the Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Agency (Specification No. 22-029) (General Fund) RECOMMENDED ACTION Authorize a one-time purchase and payment of purchase order to National Auto Fleet Group for the purchase of two Ford Ranger XL SuperCrew Trucks in the amount of $71,140, plus a contingency of $5,000, for a total amount not to exceed $76,140, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. DISCUSSION The Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Agency (PRCSA) is responsible for the maintenance and care of parks and amenities. PRCSA was approved to hire additional Park Services Inspectors to oversee the maintenance of parks, inspect service provided by contractors, and manage maintenance issues that arise. To accommodate the need for these new inspectors to travel throughout the city to inspect the various parks, PRCSA is requesting approval for the purchase of two Ford Ranger trucks. Santa Ana Ordinance No. NS-2312 authorizes the City to use purchase contracts from any public agency utilizing a competitive bid process. Sourcewell (formerly National Joint Powers Alliance), awarded a contract to National Auto Fleet Group (Contract No. 091521- NAF) for procurement of Cars, Trucks, Vans, SUVs, Cab Chassis, and Other Vehicles as a result of open competitive bidding on behalf of its members, which include government agencies. Utilizing the contract awarded to National Auto Fleet Group allows the City to make purchases through November 8, 2025, and is in accordance with the City's existing Purchasing Guidelines. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with the action. City Council 14 — 1 4/19/2022 Purchase of Two Ford Ranger Trucks April 19, 2022 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT Funds are budgeted and made available in the following account for the specified year. Fiscal Accounting Unit- Fund Accounting Unit, Amount Year Account # Description Account Description 2021-22 01113250-66400 General Fund Fa Facilities, PaPark rkinera $76,140 Mac Equipment Submitted By: Lisa Rudloff, Executive Director — Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Agency and Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director— Public Works Agency Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager City Council 14 — 2 4/19/2022 Public Works Agency www.santa-ana.org/pw Item # 15 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report April 19, 2022 TOPIC: Blanket Order Contracts for Equipment Rental AGENDA TITLE Award Blanket Order Contracts to Sunbelt Rentals and United Rentals for Equipment Rental in the Annual Aggregate Amount of $80,000, for a One -Year Term with Four, One - Year Renewal Options (Specification No. 22-045) (General and Non -General Fund) RECOMMENDED ACTION Award blanket order contracts to Sunbelt Rentals and United Rentals for equipment rental for a one-year period beginning April 20, 2022 and expiring April 19, 2023, with provisions for four, one-year renewals exercisable by the City Manager, in an annual aggregate amount not to exceed $80,000, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. DISCUSSION The Public Works Agency's Water Resources Division oversees and maintains the daily operations of the City's water and sanitary sewer systems and associated facilities. The Parks, Recreation and Community Services Agency (PRCSA) is responsible for the maintenance and repair of City parks and trails. Both agencies rely on rental services to provide the necessary equipment to assist with operations and special projects. Sunbelt Rentals and United Rentals both maintan a comprehensive inventory of rental equipment that meet Water Resources and PRCSA's needs. Santa Ana Ordinance No. NS-2312 authorizes the City to utilize purchase contracts from any public agency employing a competitive bid process. Sourcewell has awarded contracts for equipment rentals to both Sunbelt Rentals (Contract No. 062320-SNB) and United Rentals (Contract No. 062320-URI) and has made them available to public agencies as a result of open competitive bidding. Utilizing the contracts awarded to both vendors will ensure a wide variety of equipment availability while providing an efficient procurement process. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with the action. City Council 15 — 1 4/19/2022 Blanket Order Contracts for Equipment Rentals April 19, 2022 Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT Funds are available in the following accounts for expenditure in Fiscal Year 2021-22, and will be budgeted for future years as follows: Fiscal Accounting Fund Accounting Unit, Amount Year Unit -Account # Description Account Description Contract (1-Year Term) Water Utility Water 06017640- Water Production and Supply, $18,000 63001 Miscellaneous Operating 2021-22 Expenses (April - June) Park Facilities Service 01113250- General Enhancement, $2,000 62320 Fund Maintenance & Repair Buildings & Grounds Renewal Options (Four 1-Year Terms) 06017640- Water Water Utility Water 63001 Production and Supply, $60,000 Miscellaneous Operating 2022-23 Expenses (July -June) 01113250- General Park Facilities Service 62320 Fund Enhancement, $20,000 Maintenance & Repair Buildings & Grounds 06017640- Water Water Utility Water 63001 Production and Supply, $60,000 Miscellaneous Operating 2023-2024 Expenses (July -June) 01113250- General Park Facilities Service 62320 Fund Enhancement, $20,000 Maintenance & Repair Buildings & Grounds 06017640- Water Water Utility Water 63001 Production and Supply, $60,000 Miscellaneous Operating 2024-25 Expenses (July -June) 01113250- General Park Facilities Service 62320 Fund Enhancement, $20,000 Maintenance & Repair Buildings & Grounds 2025-26 06017640- Water Water Utility Water $60,000 63001 Production and Supply, City Council 15 — 2 4/19/2022 Blanket Order Contracts for Equipment Rentals April 19, 2022 Page 3 Fiscal Accounting Fund Accounting Unit, Year Unit -Account # Description Account Description Amount (July -June) Miscellaneous Operating Expenses 01113250- General Park Facilities Service 62320 Fund Enhancement, $20,000 Maintenance & Repair Buildings & Grounds 06017640- Water Water Utility Water 63001 Production and Supply, $40,000 Miscellaneous Operating 2026-27 Expenses (July -April) 01113250- General Park Facilities Service 62320 Fund Enhancement, $20,000 Maintenance & Repair Buildings & Grounds Total $400,000 Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director — Public Works Agency and Lisa Rudloff, Executive Director — Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Agency Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager City Council 15 — 3 4/19/2022 Public Works Agency www.santa-ana.org/pw Item # 16 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report April 19, 2022 TOPIC: Lincoln Avenue Water and Sewer Main Improvements AGENDA TITLE Approve Appropriation Adjustment, Budget Reallocation, and Award a Construction Contract to Big Ben, Inc. in the Amount of $1,453,765 for the Lincoln Avenue Water and Sewer Main Improvements Project, with an Estimated Project Delivery Cost of $2,000,000 (Project No. 22-6468 and 22-6620) (Non -General Fund) RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Approve an appropriation adjustment to recognize $500,000 of prior -year fund balance in the Water Fund, Public Works Water Revenue, Prior Year Carryforward revenue account, and appropriate the same amount to the Acquisition & Construction, Water Utility Capital Projects, Water Capital Project expenditure account. (Requires five affirmative votes) 2. Award a construction contract to Big Ben, Inc., the lowest responsible bidder, in accordance with the base bid in the amount of $1,453,765, for construction of the Lincoln Water and Sewer Main Improvements Project, for the term beginning April 19, 2022 and ending upon project completion, and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and the City Attorney. 3. Approve the Project Cost Analysis for a total estimated construction delivery cost of $2,000,000, which includes $1,453,765 for the construction contract, $218,000 for contract administration, inspection and testing, $100,000 for water engineering, and a $228,235 project contingency for unanticipated or unforeseen work. 4. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2021-22 Capital Improvement Program to include $500,000 in construction funds for the Lincoln Avenue Water and Sewer Improvements Project. City Council 16 — 1 4/19/2022 Lincoln Avenue Water and Sewer Main Improvements April 19, 2022 Page 2 DISCUSSION The Public Works Agency's Water Resources Division staff monitors the condition of water main pipelines by assessing critical factors such as history of breaks, pipe size, alignment, location, and system redundancy to determine replacement priorities. The water main on Lincoln Avenue, as well as sewer laterals, have been identified for replacement (Exhibit 1). The improvements include a new polyvinyl chloride (PVC) water main, fire hydrants, water services, sewer laterals, appurtenances, asphalt concrete pavement, and traffic striping. Once completed, water service reliability and general service quality will improve significantly. In addition, the potential for disruption due to water main breaks will be substantially reduced. Public Outreach and Contractor Participation To provide an opportunity for local vendors to submit bids, a Notice Inviting Bids was advertised in the Orange County Register newspaper on February 26 and March 5, 2022. The project was also advertised on PlanetBids, and bids were received electronically via PlanetBids on March 17, 2022. The City notified a total of 647 regional vendors via PlanetBids, 21 of which are Santa Ana based. Fifty-eight vendors requested bidding documents. A total of four bids were received. However, no bids were received from Santa Ana contractors. Bid Results Summary RANK BIDDER'S NAME LOCATION BASE BID 1 Big Ben, Inc. Irvine $1,453,765 2 Excel Paving Co. Long Beach $1,674,170 3 DOJA INC. Ontario $2,100,000 4 Colich & Sons L.P. Gardena $2,654,475 All four bids were deemed responsive. Big Ben, Inc. submitted the lowest responsive base bid, in the amount of $1,453,765 (Exhibit 2). As specified in the bid documents, the lowest bid shall be determined on the basis of the Base Bid. Based on the bid analysis and a contractor's reference check, staff recommends awarding the construction contract to Big Ben, Inc. in the amount of the base bid totaling $1,453,765 (Exhibit 3). Big Ben, Inc. has completed the Centennial Park Neighborhood Water Main Improvements and the Baker -Glenwood Sewer Main Improvements projects in the City. City Council 16 — 2 4/19/2022 Lincoln Avenue Water and Sewer Main Improvements April 19, 2022 Page 3 Project Delivery To deliver a complete project, in addition to the construction contract, the estimated total project delivery cost includes construction administration, inspection, and testing, along with an allowance for contingencies to account for unexpected or unforeseen conditions. Construction administration and inspection includes the following: construction management; implementation of the City's Community Workforce Agreement requirements; inspection of the Contractor's work to ensure contract compliance, workmanship, and quality; and materials testing. As indicated in the Cost Analysis (Exhibit 4) and as summarized in the table below, the estimated total construction delivery cost of the project is $2,000,000. Project Item Total Construction Contract $1,453,765 Construction Administration, Inspection, Testing $218,000 Contingencies $228,235 Water Engineering $100,000 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION DELIVERY COST $2,000,000 Approval of the amendment to the FY 2021-22 Capital Improvement Program (Exhibit 5) will officially incorporate this project into the program. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. ER- 2021-79 was filed for the project. FISCAL IMPACT As indicated in the Cost Analysis, the estimated total construction delivery cost of the project is $2,000,000, which includes the construction contract, contract administration, inspection, testing, and project contingency. Approval of the requested appropriation adjustments will recognize sufficient funds to complete the funding to deliver the project (Exhibit 5). Recognize $500,000 from Water Fund, Public Works Water Revenue, Prior Year Carryforward revenue account (No. 06017002-50001) and appropriate the same amount to the Acquisition & Construction, Water Utility Capital Projects, Water Capital Project expenditure account (No. 06617647-66301) The following table summarizes the funds budgeted and available for expenditure to deliver construction of this project. Any remaining balances not expended at the end of the fiscal year will be carried forward for expenditure in the following fiscal year, if needed. City Council 16 — 3 4/19/2022 Lincoln Avenue Water and Sewer Main Improvements April 19, 2022 Page 4 Fiscal Accounting Unit Fund Accounting Unit — Year — Account No. Description Account No. Amount Description Prior Authorized Funds 2021-22 06617647-66301 Acquisition & Water Utility Capital Projects, Water $800,000 (22-6468) Construction Capital Project Capital Recovery 2021-22 05417647-66220 Sanitary Sewer Charges, $700,000 (22-6620) Capital Improvements Other Than Building Appropriation Adjustments 2021-22 06617647-66301 Acquisition & Water Utility Capital Projects, Water $500,000 (22-6468) Construction Capital Project TOTAL: $2,000,000 EXHIBIT(S) 1. Location Map 2. Bid Proposal 3. Construction Contract 4. Cost Analysis 5. FY 2021-22 Capital Improvement Program Sheet Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director — Public Works Agency Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager City Council 16 — 4 4/19/2022 Exhibit 1 SANTA ANA i Project Nos. 22-6468 & 22-6620: uajLincoln Avenue Water & Sewer Improvements PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY CITY OF SANTA ANA ADDENDUM NO. 1 PROPOSAL EXHIBIT 2 PROJECT NO.: 22-6468 & 22-6620 LINCOLN AVENUE WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS BID PROPOSAL [1�i�911.� Iili�►[iff�i��l�. 090WK0J�"lm"rAUI 1"RON1: 4] 1 a REQUIREMENT: The undersigned bidder declares that they have carefully examined the location of the proposed work, that they have examined the Contract Documents in its entirety and hereby proposes to furnish all material and do all the work required to complete the said work in accordance with said plans (if any) and the specifications for the unit price(s) or hump sure(s) set forth in the following schcdule: Item Description Qty Unit Unit .Price Amount I Mobilization (max. 5% of total bid) l LS $ 7Dfoo-o 70 000 2 8" Class 305 (DR 14) C900 PVC Pipe 920 LF $ $ 9 0 j �j f 3 l" Copper Water Service 9 EA $-; f I 4 4" Fire Sen+ice 1 EA $ r $ 5 8" Resilient Wedge Gate Valve 4 EA S of o o O 6 Firc Hydrant 4 EA S r r J 0� 0 $� 1 a) 7 Vertical Offset (As -Needed)* 3 EA S 000 ';� 00 J 8 1" Air and Vacuum release Valve (As -Needed)* I EA S 71 7 O Q $ r 7 7 9 Additional Potholing (As -Needed)* I EA $ 750 S 7 �_p O 10 6" SDR-26 PVC Pipe 20 LF S CJ 1 1 8" SDR-26 PVC Pipe 820 Ll= $ r 37 `7 S 3o7, �_oD 12 Scwer Lateral and Cleanout (Omen Trench) 10 EA S 6r O DQ 160 I 0-0-0 13 Remove Existing Manhole Structure 4 EA $ q, d Do 116, 000 14 New Manhole Structure 5 EN S $ 60 D O-D filly liVU1 IL..11 I V - V It/ I /GVGG P-1 of P-18 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 22-6468 & 22-6620 LINCOLN AVENUE WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS Item Description Qt`° Unit Unit Price Amount 15 CCTV Inspection of New Sewer Main 840 LF $ -7 I S $ g O 16 CCTV Inspection of New Sewer Lateral 10 EA S S r 17 Bypass Pumping I.5 S�a1 10 i 18 Unclassified Excavation 265 CY $7 Sq S 19 Asphalt Concrete 975 TN S + O i S+ + � O ! 20 Cold Mill (2") 570 SF S � S � g � � 21 PCC Sidewalk (T=4") 4420 SF S Sq 7� r 22 PCC Curb Ramp 12.0 SF S� S 6,600 23 PCC Driveway Approach 1020 SF S r S � 6,�o 24 PCC Cross -Gutter 140 SF $ S -7o 0 0 f 25 PCC Curb & Gutter (A-2-6) 660 LF $ ZQ S � $D'a 26 PCC Curb 610 LF S D S p 27 Fence 610 LF S 60 S U 6 ❑ O J 28 Remove Existing Bollard t2 EA $ q-0 S G � 0 0fl 29 Project Advertisement Sign. 2 EA S ()L)Q S o Oo 30 Signing & Striping 1 LS $' .y o S I 31 Construction Permit 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 32 As -Built Plans 1 LS $25,000 S25,400 City Council 16 — 7 4/19/2022 P-2 of P-18 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 22-6468 & 22-6620 LINCOLN AVENUE WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL BASE BM $ 1 1 -! S -3f � �157, O0 The lowest responsible bidder shall be selected based on the total base bid. The City reserves the right to award the Base Bid, and any, all, or none of the add -alternate bid items (if any). * The quantity for this bid item is shown for bid comparison only. This bid item shall not be subject to the "25%" lLnit as stated in Section ;-2 of the Standard Specifications. The actual amount for this item will be dictated by the actual quantity used, and the Agency reserves the right to increase or decrease the quantity of this item accordingly_ t This bid item is considered a Specialty Item per Section 2-3.2 of the Standard Specifications. TIME FOR COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND LIQUIDATED DAMAGES The undersigned bidder hereby proposes to complete the Work for the total base bid amount shown above, within forty-five 45) working days after the commencement date stated in the Notice to Proceed. The liquidated damages amount, in lieu of the amount specified in Subsection 6-9 of the Standard Specifications, shall be $6,700 per calendar day. Name of Firm F % � be w 1 h <-. Signature of BIDDER Title P(e-s cd ew f (If an individual, so state. If a firm or co -partnership, state the firm name and give the names of all individual co-partners composing the firm. If a corporation, state legal name of corporation, and names of President, Secretary, Treasurer and Manager, thereof.) City Council 16 — 8 4/19/2022 P-3 of P-18 CITY OF SANTA ANA CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT PROJECT NOS. 22-6468 & 22-6620 LINCOLN AVENUE WATER & SEWER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS This CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT is made and entered into this 19th day of April, 2022 by and between the City of Santa Ana, California, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California (hereinafter "CITY"), and Big Ben, Inc. (hereinafter "CONTRACTOR"). WITNESSETH: The CITY and the CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: 1. CONTRACTOR agrees to perform all the work and furnish all the materials at its own cost and expense necessary to construct and complete in a good and workmanlike manner and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer of the CITY, the Lincoln Avenue Water & Sewer Main Improvements (hereinafter referred to as the "WORK OF IMPROVEMENT") identified in and in accordance with the Contract Documents prepared by the City's Public Works Agency and approved by the City Council. 2. The complete Construction Contract consists of the "Contract Documents" as defined by the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction and which include the following: • Notice Inviting Bids • Information to Bidders • Bid Proposal • Bid Bond • Contract Form • Contract Bonds • General Provisions • Special Provisions • Technical Provisions and Project Plans • Community Workforce Agreement • Appendices In case of conflict between the Contract Documents, the precedence of documents shall be as established in the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction. 3. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept in full payment to complete the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT the sum total amount not to exceed One Million Four Hundred Fifty -Three Thousand Seven Hundred Sixty -Five Dollars and No Cents ($1,453,765.00), as set forth and identified in the BID PROPOSAL, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A." The BID PROPOSAL contains a schedule of unit price(s) or lump sum(s) based on approximate quantities only, and the City does not expressly or by implication agree that the actual amount of work will correspond therewith, but reserves the right to increase or decrease the amount of any class or portion of the work or to omit portions of the work as may be deemed necessary or advisable. City Council 16 — 9 4/19/2022 rev. 09/01/2017 Pagel of 3 4. CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT within the time specified in the Time for Completion of Improvements section of the BID PROPOSAL (Exhibit "A") including commencing construction within the timeframe therein specified after issuance of a Notice to Proceed. 5. The CONTRACTOR will pay, and will require all subcontractors to pay, all employees on the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT a salary or wage at least equal to the prevailing salary or wage established for such work as set forth in the wage determinations for this work in accordance with applicable State and Federal law. 6. If applicable, the CONTRACTOR shall adhere to the CITY'S Community Workforce Agreement (CWA), a pre -hire collective bargaining agreement, which establishes the labor relations policies and procedures for CONTRACTOR to follow in the crafts persons employed to complete the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT as more fully described in the CWA. The CWA may be found on the City's website at: http://www.santa-ana.org/pwa/documents/CWA.pdf. 7. CONTRACTOR shall, after award of this Contract, furnish two bonds to be approved by the CITY, one in the amount of One Hundred Percent (100%) of the Contract price, to guarantee the faithful performance of the work (Performance Bond), and one in the amount of One Hundred Percent (100%) of the Contract price to guarantee payment of all claims for labor and materials furnished (Payment Bond). This Contract shall not become effective until such bonds are supplied to and approved by the CITY. 8. CONTRACTOR shall, prior to the release of the performance and payment bonds or the retention payment, furnish a warranty performance and payment bond (Warranty Bond). Said Warranty Bond shall also be required as a condition of project acceptance. For projects up to Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000), the Warranty Bond amount shall be the greater of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) or Twenty Percent (20%) of the final contract price. For projects above Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000), the Warranty Bond amount shall be the greater of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) or Ten Percent (10%) of the final contract price. 9. CONTRACTOR shall, after award of this Contract, furnish Certificates of Liability Insurance and Worker's Compensation Insurance as outlined in the General Provisions, to be approved by the CITY. 10. INDEMNIFICATION. To the fullest extent allowed by law, CONTRACTOR and its Subcontractors hereby agree to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless CITY, its City Council, boards and commissions, officers, agents, employees, representatives and volunteers (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Indemnitees"), through legal counsel acceptable to CITY, from and against any liability, claims, actions, costs, damages or losses, including reasonable costs and attorney's fees, for injury, including death to any person or damage to any property, arising directly or indirectly from, or in any manner relating to, any of the following: (i) Performance or nonperformance of the Work of Improvement by CONTRACTOR or its Subcontractors of any lower tier; (ii) Performance or nonperformance by CONTRACTOR or its Subcontractors of any lower tier, of any of the obligations under the Contract Documents; City Council 16 — 10 4/19/2022 Page 2 of 3 (iii) The construction activities of CONTRACTOR or its Subcontractors of any lower tier, either on the project site or on other properties; (iv) The payment or nonpayment by CONTRACTOR of any of its Subcontractors of any lower tier, for Work of Improvement performed on or off the project site; and (v) Any personal injury, property damage or economic loss to third persons related to and arising from the performance or nonperformance by CONTRACTOR or its Subcontractors of any lower tier, of the Work of Improvement. (vi) The indemnity obligations of Subcontractors provided by this Section shall be included in all subcontract documents issued by CONTRACTOR. Nothing in the Contract Documents shall be construed to give rise to any implied right of indemnity in favor of CONTRACTOR against CITY or any other Indemnitee. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Construction Contract on the day and year first above written. ATTEST: DAISY GOMEZ Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM: SONIA R. CARVALHO City Attorney By: r� 9W � 19 JOHN FUNK Senior Assistant City Attorney RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: NABIL SABA, PE Executive Director Public Works Agency CITY OF SANTA ANA KRISTINE RIDGE City Manager CONTRACTOR: Big Ben, Inc. Sep Digitally signed by Sep Sharifi DN: cn=Sep Sharifi, o, ou, email=sep@big benengineerin US Date: 23:28:41 Sharifi 07,00, SEP SHARIFI President City Council 16 — 11 4/19/2022 Page 3 of 3 CITY OF SANTA ANA ADDENDUM NO. 1 PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 22-6468 & 22-6620 LINCOLN AVENUE WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS BIB PROPOSAL l(Yi�9ll.� Iili�►[iff�i��l�. 090WK0J�"lm"rAUI 1"RON1: 4] 1 a REQUIREMENT: The undersigned bidder declares that they have carefully examined the location of the proposed work, that they have examined the Contract Documents in its entirety and hereby proposes to furnish all material and do all the work required to complete the said work in accordance with said plans (if any) and the specifications for the unit price(s) or hump sure(s) set forth in the following schcdule: Item Description Qty Unit Unit .Price Amount I Mobilization (max. 5% of total bid) l LS $ 7Dfoo-o 70 000 2 8" Class 305 (DR 14) C900 PVC Pipe 920 LF $ $ 9 0 j �j f 3 l" Copper Water Service 9 EA $-; f I 4 4" Fire Sen+ice 1 EA $ r $ 5 8" Resilient Wedge Gate Valve 4 EA S of o o O 6 Firc Hydrant 4 EA S r r J 0� 0 $� 1 a) 7 Vertical Offset (As -Needed)* 3 EA S 000 ';� 00 J 8 1" Air and Vacuum release Valve (As -Needed)* I EA S 71 7 O Q $ r 7 7 9 Additional Potholing (As -Needed)* I EA $ 750 S 7 �_p O 10 6" SDR-26 PVC Pipe 20 LF S CJ 1 1 8" SDR-26 PVC Pipe 820 Ll= $ r 37 `7 S 3o7, �_oD 12 Scwer Lateral and Cleanout (Omen Trench) 10 EA S 6r O DQ 160 I 0-0-0 13 Remove Existing Manhole Structure 4 EA $ q, d Do 116, 000 14 New Manhole Structure 5 EN S $ 60 D O-D filly liVU1 IL..II IV - IG It/ I /GVGG P-1 of P-18 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 22-6468 & 22-6620 LINCOLN AVENUE WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS Item Description Qt`° Unit Unit Price Amount 15 CCTV Inspection of New Sewer Main 840 LF $ -7 I S $ g O 16 CCTV Inspection of New Sewer Lateral 10 EA S S r 17 Bypass Pumping I.5 S�a1 10 i 18 Unclassified Excavation 265 CY $7 Sq S 19 Asphalt Concrete 975 TN S + O i S+ + � O ! 20 Cold Mill (2") 570 SF S � S � g � � 21 PCC Sidewalk (T=4") 4420 SF S Sq 7� r 22 PCC Curb Ramp 12.0 SF S� S 6,600 23 PCC Driveway Approach 1020 SF S r S � 6,�o 24 PCC Cross -Gutter 140 SF $ S -7o 0 0 f 25 PCC Curb & Gutter (A-2-6) 660 LF $ ZQ S � $D'a 26 PCC Curb 610 LF S D S p 27 Fence 610 LF S 60 S U 6 ❑ O J 28 Remove Existing Bollard t2 EA $ q-0 S G � 0 0fl 29 Project Advertisement Sign. 2 EA S ()L)Q S o Oo 30 Signing & Striping 1 LS $' .y o S I 31 Construction Permit 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 32 As -Built Plans 1 LS $25,000 S25,400 City Council 16 — 13 4/19/2022 P-2 of P-18 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 22-6468 & 22-6620 LINCOLN AVENUE WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL BASE BM $ 1 1 -! S -3f � �157, O0 The lowest responsible bidder shall be selected based on the total base bid. The City reserves the right to award the Base Bid, and any, all, or none of the add -alternate bid items (if any). * The quantity for this bid item is shown for bid comparison only. This bid item shall not be subject to the "25%" lLnit as stated in Section ;-2 of the Standard Specifications. The actual amount for this item will be dictated by the actual quantity used, and the Agency reserves the right to increase or decrease the quantity of this item accordingly_ t This bid item is considered a Specialty Item per Section 2-3.2 of the Standard Specifications. TIME FOR COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND LIQUIDATED DAMAGES The undersigned bidder hereby proposes to complete the Work for the total base bid amount shown above, within forty-five 45) working days after the commencement date stated in the Notice to Proceed. The liquidated damages amount, in lieu of the amount specified in Subsection 6-9 of the Standard Specifications, shall be $6,700 per calendar day. Name of Firm F % � be w 1 h <-. Signature of BIDDER Title P(e-s cd ew f (If an individual, so state. If a firm or co -partnership, state the firm name and give the names of all individual co-partners composing the firm. If a corporation, state legal name of corporation, and names of President, Secretary, Treasurer and Manager, thereof.) City Council 16 — 14 4/19/2022 P-3 of P-18 EXHIBIT 4 COST ANALYSIS CONSTRUCTION OF PROJECT NOS. 22-6468 & 22-6620: LINCOLN AVENUE WATER & SEWER IMPROVEMENTS Construction Contract $ 1,453,765.00 Contract Administration, Inspection and Testing $ 218,000.00 Contingencies $ 228,235.00 Water Engineering $ 100,000.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS 1 $ 2,000,000.00 City Council 16 — 15 4/19/2022 rPROJECT TITLE: ECT CATEGORY: LOCATION MAP A N CI TY OF SANTA ANA FY 21 / 22CI P CAPITAL I MPROVEMENT PROJECT V1IORKSHEET PROJECT DESCRI PTI ON: 4v FPROJ ECT NEED: iv EXHIBIT 5 a PROJECT COSTS FY 21 / FY 22/ FY 23/ FY 24/ FY 25/ FY 26/ FY 27/ Construction 1,300,000 - - - - - - TOTAL 1,300, 000 - - - - - - SOURCE OF FUNDS FY 21/ FY 22/ FY 23/ FY 24/ FY 25/ FY 26/ FY 27/ WATER CAPITAL 1,300,000 - - - - - - TOTAL 1,300, 000 AGENCY: DI VI SI ON: CONTACT: DATE: IV M/ p City Council 16 — 16 4/19/2022 Public Works Agency www.santa-ana.org/pw Item # 17 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report April 19, 2022 TOPIC: Construction Contract Award for MacArthur Boulevard Resurfacing AGENDA TITLE Award a Construction Contract to All American Asphalt in the Amount of $823,333 for the MacArthur Boulevard Resurfacing Project from Flower Street to Main Street, Fiscal Year (FY) 2021-22, with an Estimated Project Delivery Cost of $1,127,000 (Project No. 20- 6957) (Non -General Fund) RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Authorize budget reallocation of $126,576 in unspent HUTA 2103 Gas Tax funds to the MacArthur Boulevard Resurfacing Project from Flower Street to Main Street (No. 20-6957) from the Gas Tax Local Street Improvements Project (No. 20-6956). 2. Award a construction contract to All American Asphalt, the lowest responsible bidder, in accordance with the base bid in the amount of $823,333, for construction of the MacArthur Boulevard Resurfacing Project from Flower Street to Main Street FY 2021- 22. 3. Approve the Project Cost Analysis for a total estimated construction delivery cost of $1,127,000, which includes $823,333 for the construction contract, $113,334 for contract administration, inspection and testing, and a $190,333 project contingency for unanticipated, unforeseen work, and additional nearby asphalt pavement improvements. DISCUSSION The City's Pavement Management Program (PMP) has been developed to prioritize and recommend the most cost-effective roadway repairs, and maximize the return from available funding for street pavement. The segment of MacArthur Boulevard, from Flower Street to Main Street (Exhibit 1), is identified as a high priority for pavement rehabilitation in the PMP. This work includes reconstruction/resurfacing of existing pavement and replacement/ installation of missing and damaged curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and curb ramps within this street segment. The proposed contract has favorable bid pricing for asphalt pavement City Council 17 — 1 4/19/2022 Construction Contract Award for MacArthur Boulevard Resurfacing April 19, 2022 Page 2 repair. As a result, the project contingency amount is being increased to 23 percent to perform additional asphalt repairs in the surrounding areas as necessary. Public Outreach and Contractor Participation To provide an opportunity for local vendors to submit bids, a Notice Inviting Bids was advertised in the Orange County Register newspaper on December 20 and 27, 2021. The project was also advertised on PlanetBids, and bids were received electronically via PlanetBids on January 18, 2022. The City notified a total of 1,216 regional vendors via PlanetBids, 77 of which are Santa Ana based. Forty-four vendors requested bidding documents. A total of five bids were received. However, no bids were received from Santa Ana contractors. Bid Results Summary RANK BIDDER'S NAME LOCATION BASE BID 1 All American Asphalt Corona $823,333 2 R.J. Noble Company Orange $866,058 3 Hardy & Harper Inc. Lake Forest $870,000 4 EBS General Engineering Inc. Corona $928,526 5 Excel Paving Co Long Beach $972,348 A total of five bids were received and all were deemed responsive. All American Asphalt submitted the lowest responsive base bid in the amount of $823,333 (Exhibit 2). As specified in the bid documents, the lowest bid shall be determined on the basis of the Base Bid. Based on the bid analysis and a contractor's reference check, staff recommends awarding the construction contract to All American Asphalt in the amount of the base bid totaling $823,333 (Exhibit 3). All American Asphalt has worked on various projects for the City of Santa Ana throughout the last several years. The most recent projects are Bristol Street Protected Bike Lanes Project from Edinger Avenue to First Street, Residential Street Repair Program, and Flower Street Rehabilitation from McFadden Avenue to First Street. Project Delivery To deliver a complete project, in addition to the construction contract, the estimated total project delivery cost includes construction administration, inspection, and testing, along with an allowance for contingencies to account for unexpected, unforeseen conditions, and additional nearby asphalt pavement improvements. Construction administration and inspection includes the following: construction management; implementation of the City's Community Workforce Agreement requirements; inspection of the Contractor's work to City Council 17 — 2 4/19/2022 Construction Contract Award for MacArthur Boulevard Resurfacing April 19, 2022 Page 3 ensure contract compliance, workmanship, and quality; and materials testing. As indicated in the Cost Analysis (Exhibit 4) and as summarized in the table below, the estimated total construction delivery cost of the project is $1,127,000. Project Item Total Construction Contract $823,333 Construction Administration, Inspection, Testing $113,334 Contingencies $190,333 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION DELIVERY COST $1,127,000 Approval of the amendment to the FY 2021-22 Capital Improvement Program (Exhibit 5) will officially incorporate this project into the program. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. ER- 2020-98 was filed for the project. FISCAL IMPACT As indicated in the Cost Analysis, the estimated total construction delivery cost of the project is $1,127,000.00 which includes construction, contract administration, inspection, testing, and an authorized contingency. The following table summarizes the funds budgeted and available for expenditure to deliver construction of this project. Fiscal Accounting Unit - Fund Accounting Unit - Y Year Account No. Description Account No. Amount (Project No.) Description EXISTING PROJECT BUDGET 2021-22 05917665-66220 Select Street HUTA Gas Tax- RMRA, Improvements $1,000,424 (20-6957) Construction Other Than Building BUDGET REALLOCATION 05917663-66220 Select Street HUTA 2103 Gas Tax, 2021-22 (From Proj. 20-6956 Construction Improvements Other $126,576 To Pro'. 20-6957) Than Buildin dff Total $1,127,000 EXHIBIT(S) 1. Location Map 2. Bid Proposal City Council 17 — 3 4/19/2022 Construction Contract Award for MacArthur Boulevard Resurfacing April 19, 2022 Page 4 3. Construction Contract 4. Cost Analysis 5. CIP Worksheet Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director — Public Works Agency Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager City Council 17 — 4 4/19/2022 SANTAANA Project No. 20-6957: PWi Exhibit 1 MACARTHUR BOULEVARD �) RESURFACING: FLOWER STREET TO PUBLICWORKS AGENCY I RA A 1\1 nTMr rT CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 20-6957 MACARTHUR BOULEVARD RESURFACING FROM FLOWER STREET TO MAIN STREET BID PROPOSAL TO: CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA FROM: Al American Asphalt REQUIREMENT: The undersigned bidder declares that they have carefully examined the location of the proposed work, that they have examined the Contract Documents in its entirety and hereby proposes to furnish all material and do all the work required to complete the said work in accordance with said plans (if any) and the specifications for the unit price(s) or lump sum(s) set forth in the following schedule: Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Amount 1 Unclassified Excavation 360 CY $ 179.00 $ 64,440.00 2 Asphalt Concrete 1,030 TN $ 90.00 $ 92,700.00 3 ARAM 16,340 SY $ 6.10 $ 99,674.00 4 Cold Mill (3") 147,000 SF $ 0.25 $ 36,750.00 5 Cold Mill (2") 56,300 SF $ 0.17 $ 9,571.00 6 Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix 2,300 TN $ 106.00 $ 243,800.00 7 PCC Sidewalk (4") 2,600 SF $ 7.38 $19,188.00 8 PCC Driveway Approach 400 SF $ 12.98 $ 5,192.00 (Commercial = 8") 9 PCC Curb Ramp 1,100 SF $ 15.79 $17,369.00 10 PCC Curb and Gutter (Type 400 LF $ 45.60 $18,240.00 A-2-8) 11 PCC Curb and Gutter (Type 200 LF $ 31.84 $ 6,368.00 B-1) 12 PCC Cross -Gutter (Local 700 SF $ 16.78 $1 1, 746.00 Street) 13 PCC Bus Pad 5,970 SF $ 18.00 $107,460.00 City Council P-1 of P-187 — 6 4/19/2022 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 20-6957 MACARTHUR BOULEVARD RESURFACING FROM FLOWER STREET TO MAIN STREET Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Amount 14 Root Shave 5 EA $ 265.00 $ 1,325.00 15 Furnish and Install New #6 1 EA $ 1,060.00 $ 1,060.00 Pullbox 16 Adjust Sewer and Drainage 8 EA $ 1,500.00 $ 12,000.00 Manhole to Finished Grade 17 Furnish and Install New Water 7 EA $ 1,500.00 $ Valve Frame and Cover to 10,500.00 Finished Grade 18 Furnish and Install New Water 1 EA $ 950.00 $ 950.00 Meter Box 19 Adjust Survey Monument to 2 EA $ 1,200.00 $ 2,400.00 Finished Grade 20 Furnish and Install Traffic 74 EA $ 300.00 $ 22,200.00 Loops 21 Project Advertisement Sign 2 EA $ 2,650.00 $ 5,300.00 22 Signing and Striping I LS $ 18,600.00 $18,600.00 23 Construct Circular PCC Collar I EA $ 1,500.00 $ 10,500.00 24 Construction Permit 1 EA $ 10,000 $ 10,000 25 As -Built Plans 1 EA $ 5,000 $ 5,000 City Council P-2 of P-111— 7 4/19/2022 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 20-6957 MACARTHUR BOULEVARD RESURFACING FROM FLOWER STREET TO MAIN STREET TOTAL BASE BID (1-25) ' 823,333.00 The lowest responsible bidder shall be selected based on the total base bid. The City reserves the right to award the Base Bid, and any, all, or none of the add -alternate bid items (if any). * The quantity for this bid item is shown for bid comparison only. This bid item shall not be subject to the "25%" limit as stated in Section 3-2 of the Standard Specifications. The actual amount for this item will be dictated by the actual quantity used, and the Agency reserves the right to increase or decrease the quantity of this item accordingly. t This bid item is considered a Specialty Item per Section 2-3.2 of the Standard Specifications. TIME FOR COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND LIQUIDATED DAMAGES The undersigned bidder hereby proposes to complete the Work for the total base bid amount shown above, within 60 working days after the commencement date stated in the Notice to Proceed. The liquidated damages amount. in lieu of the amount specified in Subsection 6-9 of the Standard Specifications, shall be $2,200 per calendar day. Name of Firm All American Asphalt Signature of BIDDER Title Edward J. Carlson, Vice President (If an individual, so state. If a firm or co -partnership, state the firm name and give the names of all individual co-partners composing the firm. If a corporation, state legal name of corporation, and names of President, Secretary, Treasurer and Manager, thereof.) City Council P-3 of P-1 7 — 8 4/19/2022 CITY OF SANTA ANA CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT PROJECT 20-6957 MACARTHUR BOULEVARD REHABILITATION FROM FLOWER STREET TO MAIN STREET This CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT is made and entered into this 5th day of April, 2022 by and between the City of Santa Ana, California, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California (hereinafter "CITY"), and All American Asphalt (hereinafter "CONTRACTOR"). WITNESSETH: The CITY and the CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: CONTRACTOR agrees to perform all the work and furnish all the materials at its own cost and expense necessary to construct and complete in a good and workmanlike manner and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer of the CITY, the MACARTHUR BOULEVARD REHABILITATION FROM FLOWER STREET TO MAIN STREET (hereinafter referred to as the "WORK OF IMPROVEMENT") identified in and in accordance with the Contract Documents prepared by the City's Public Works Agency and approved by the City Council. 2. The complete Construction Contract consists of the "Contract Documents" as defined by the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction and which include the following: • Notice Inviting Bids • Information to Bidders • Bid Proposal • Bid Bond • Contract Form • Contract Bonds • General Provisions • Special Provisions • Technical Provisions and Project Plans • Community Workforce Agreement • Appendices In case of conflict between the Contract Documents, the precedence of documents shall be as established in the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction. 3. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept in full payment to complete the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT the sum total amount not to exceed Eight Hundred Twenty Three Thousand Three Hundred Thirty -Three Dollars and No Cents ($823,333.00), as set forth and identified in the BID PROPOSAL, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A." The BID PROPOSAL contains a schedule of unit price(s) or lump sum(s) based on approximate quantities only, and the City does not expressly or by implication agree that the actual amount of work will correspond therewith, but reserves the right to increase or decrease the amount of any class or portion of the work or to omit portions of the work as may be deemed necessary or advisable. City Council 17 — 9 4/19/2022 rev. 09/01/2017 Page 1 of 3 4. CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT within the time specified in the Time for Completion of Improvements section of the BID PROPOSAL (Exhibit "A") including commencing construction within the timeframe therein specified after issuance of a Notice to Proceed. 5. The CONTRACTOR will pay, and will require all subcontractors to pay, all employees on the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT a salary or wage at least equal to the prevailing salary or wage established for such work as set forth in the wage determinations for this work in accordance with applicable State and Federal law. 6. If applicable, the CONTRACTOR shall adhere to the CITY'S Community Workforce Agreement (CWA), a pre -hire collective bargaining agreement, which establishes the labor relations policies and procedures for CONTRACTOR to follow in the crafts persons employed to complete the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT as more fully described in the CWA. The CWA may be found on the City's website at: http://www.santa-ana.ora/pwa/documents/CWApdf CONTRACTOR shall, after award of this Contract, furnish two bonds to be approved by the CITY, one in the amount of One Hundred Percent (100%) of the Contract price, to guarantee the faithful performance of the work (Performance Bond), and one in the amount of One Hundred Percent (100%) of the Contract price to guarantee payment of all claims for labor and materials furnished (Payment Bond). This Contract shall not become effective until such bonds are supplied to and approved by the CITY. CONTRACTOR shall, prior to the release of the performance and payment bonds or the retention payment, furnish a warranty performance and payment bond (Warranty Bond). Said Warranty Bond shall also be required as a condition of project acceptance. For projects up to Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000), the Warranty Bond amount shall be the greater of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) or Twenty Percent (20%) of the final contract price. For projects above Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000), the Warranty Bond amount shall be the greater of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) or Ten Percent (10%) of the final contract price. 9. CONTRACTOR shall, after award of this Contract, furnish Certificates of Liability Insurance and Worker's Compensation Insurance as outlined in the General Provisions, to be approved by the CITY. 10. INDEMNIFICATION. To the fullest extent allowed by law, CONTRACTOR and its Subcontractors hereby agree to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless CITY, its City Council, boards and commissions, officers, agents, employees, representatives and volunteers (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Indemnitees"), through legal counsel acceptable to CITY, from and against any liability, claims, actions, costs, damages or losses, including reasonable costs and attorney's fees, for injury, including death to any person or damage to any property, arising directly or indirectly from, or in any manner relating to, any of the following: (i) Performance or nonperformance of the Work of Improvement by CONTRACTOR or its Subcontractors of any lower tier; (ii) Performance or nonperformance by CONTRACTOR or its Subcontractors of any lower tier, of any of the obligations under the Contract Documents; City Council 17 — 10 4/19/2022 Page 2 of 3 (iii) The construction activities of CONTRACTOR or its Subcontractors of any lower tier, either on the project site or on other properties; (iv) The payment or nonpayment by CONTRACTOR of any of its Subcontractors of any lower tier, for Work of Improvement performed on or off the project site; and (v) Any personal injury, property damage or economic loss to third persons related to and arising from the performance or nonperformance by CONTRACTOR or its Subcontractors of any lower tier, of the Work of Improvement. (vi) The indemnity obligations of Subcontractors provided by this Section shall be included in all subcontract documents issued by CONTRACTOR. Nothing in the Contract Documents shall be construed to give rise to any implied right of indemnity in favor of CONTRACTOR against CITY or any other Indemnitee. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Construction Contract on the day and year first above written. ATTEST: DAISY GOMEZ Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM: SONIA R. CARVALHO City Attorney By: JO FUNK Assistant City Attorney RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: NABIL SABA, PE Executive Director Public Works Agency CITY OF SANTA ANA KRISTINE RIDGE City Manager CONTRACTOR: All American Asphalt NAME: Edward J. Carlson TITLE: Vice President City Council 17 — 11 4/19/2022 Page 3 of") CITY OF SANTA ANA EXHIBIT A PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 20-6957 MACARTHUR BOULEVARD RESURFACING FROM FLOWER STREET TO MAIN STREET BID PROPOSAL TO: CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA FROM: All American Asphalt REQUIREMENT: The undersigned bidder declares that they have carefully examined the location of the proposed work, that they have examined the Contract Documents in its entirety and hereby proposes to furnish all material and do all the work required to complete the said work in accordance with said plans (if any) and the specifications for the unit price(s) or lump sum(s) set forth in the following schedule: Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Amount 1 Unclassified Excavation 360 CY $ 179.00 $ 64,440.00 2 Asphalt Concrete 1,030 TN $ 90.00 $ 92,700.00 3 ARAM 16,340 SY $ 6.10 $99, 674.00 4 Cold Mill (3") 147,000 SF $ 0.25 $ 36,750.00 5 Cold Mill (2") 56,300 SF $ 0.17 $ 9,571.00 6 Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix 2,300 TN $ 106.00 $ 243, 800.00 7 PCC Sidewalk (4") 2,600 SF $ 7.38 $19,188.00 8 PCC Driveway Approach 400 SF $ 12.98 $ 5,192.00 (Commercial = 8") 9 PCC Curb Ramp 1,100 SF $ 15.79 $17,369.00 10 PCC Curb and Gutter (Type 400 LF $ 45.60 $18,240.00 A-2-8) 11 PCC Curb and Gutter (Type B-1) 200 LF $ 31.84 $ 6,368.00 12 PCC Cross -Gutter (Local 700 SF $ 16.78 $1 1, 746.00 Street) 13 1 PCC Bus Pad 5,970 1 SF $ 18.00 $107,460.00 City Council of 7 — 12 4/19/2022 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 20-6957 MACARTHUR BOULEVARD RESURFACING FROM FLOWER STREET TO MAIN STREET Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Amount 14 Root Shave 5 EA $ 265.00 $1,325.00 15 Furnish and Install New #6 1 EA $ 1,060.00 $ 1,060.00 Pullbox 16 Adjust Sewer and Drainage 8 EA $ 1,500.00 $ 12,000.00 Manhole to Finished Grade 17 Furnish and Install New Water 7 EA $ 1,500.00 $ Valve Frame and Cover to 10,500.00 Finished Grade 18 Furnish and Install New Water 1 EA $ 950.00 $ 950.00 Meter Box 19 Adjust Survey Monument to 2 EA $ 1,200.00 $ 2,400.00 Finished Grade 20 Furnish and Install Traffic 74 EA $ 300.00 $ 22 200.00 Loops , 21 Project Advertisement Sign 2 EA $ 2,650.00 $ 5,300.00 22 Signing and Striping 1 LS $ 18,600.00 $18,600.00 23 Construct Circular PCC Collar 1 EA $ 1,500.00 $ 10,500.00 24 Construction Permit 1 EA $ 10,000 $ 10,000 25 As -Built Plans 1 I EA $ 5,000 $ 5,000 City Council - o - 7 — 13 4/19/2022 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 20-6957 MACARTHUR BOULEVARD RESURFACING FROM FLOWER STREET TO MAIN STREET TOTAL BASE BID (1-25) $ 823,333.00 The lowest responsible bidder shall be selected based on the total base bid. The City reserves the right to award the Base Bid, and any, all, or none of the add -alternate bid items (if any). * The quantity for this bid item is shown for bid comparison only. This bid item shall not be subject to the '*25%" limit as stated in Section 3-2 of the Standard Specifications. The actual amount for this item will be dictated by the actual quantity used, and the Agency reserves the right to increase or decrease the quantity of this item accordingly. t This bid item is considered a Specialty Item per Section 2-3.2 of the Standard Specifications. TIME FOR COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND LIQUIDATED DAMAGES The undersigned bidder hereby proposes to complete the Work for the total base bid amount shown above, within 60 working days after the commencement date stated in the Notice to Proceed. The liquidated damages amount, in lieu of the amount specified in Subsection 6-9 of the Standard Specifications, shall be $2,200 per calendar day. Name of Firm All American Asphalt Signature of BIDDER Title Edward J. Carlson, Vice President (If an individual, so state. If a firm or co -partnership, state the firm name and give the names of all individual co-partners composing the firm. If a corporation, state legal name of corporation, and names of President, Secretary, Treasurer and Manager, thereof.) City Council 17 — 14 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 4 COST ANALYSIS CONSTRUCTION OF PROJECT NO. 20-6957: MacArthur Boulevard Project From Flower to Main Construction Contract $ 823,333.00 Contract Administration, Inspection and Testing $ 113,333.70 Contingencies $ 82,333.30 TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS I $ 1,019,000.00 City Council 17 — 15 4/19/2022 PROJECT TITLE: MacArthur Boulevard Resurfacing: Flower to Main PROJECT CATEGORY: Street Improvements - Arterial Street Rehabilitation LOCATION MAP u .. MMV•iN W Warner Ave ve �+ E Wa Are E W.m , Aw w 9 h N rry�k Ave N W pyv Rd F Dyer Rd yl �*c EA.`ran RvR ,rr � W MacArthur sib 7.� a W Sunflower Ave SunRp Ara fr� « Sou,h u+ 5Wr�r COAST WTRO �Va:a � R Cn CITY OF SANTA ANA FY 19/20 CIP CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WORKSHEET PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Reconstruction/resurfacing of existing pavement and replacement/installation of missing or damaged, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, driveway approaches, and wheelchair ramps within this segment of roadway. PROJECT NEED: The City's Pavement Management Program (PMP) has been developed to prioritize and recommend the most cost-effective roadway repairs, and maximize the return from available funding for street pavement. This segment of MacArthur Boulevard pavement rehabilitation is identified as a high priority in the PMP. PROJECT COSTS FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 Construction $1,019,000 Engineering $81,000 TOTAL $iloo,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 RMRA SB1 $1,100,000 TOTAL $1,100,000 AGENCY DIVISION: CONTACT: DATE: Public Works ,left/yceounCII Design Engineering 17 — 16 Kenny Nguyen, Senior Civil Engineer 4/1 g 2y-2o19 -13- Public Works Agency www.santa-ana.org/pw Item # 18 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report April 19, 2022 TOPIC: Local Street Sidewalk Improvements AGENDA TITLE Award a Construction Contract to CJ Concrete Construction Inc. in the Amount of $276,430 for the Local Street Sidewalk Improvements FY 2021-22 Project with an Estimated Project Delivery Cost of $373,060 (Project No. 22-7535) (Non -General Fund) RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Award a construction contract to CJ Concrete Construction Inc., the lowest responsible bidder, in accordance with the base bid in the amount of $276,430, for construction of the Local Street Sidewalk Improvements FY 2021-22, for the term beginning April 19, 2022 and ending upon project completion, and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and the City Attorney. 2. Approve the Project Cost Analysis for a total estimated construction delivery cost of $373,060, which includes $276,430 for the construction contract, $41,465 for contract administration, inspection and testing, and a $55,165 project contingency for unanticipated or unforeseen work. 3. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2021-22 Capital Improvement Program adding the Residential Street Repair Program FY 2021-22 Project with a budget of $373,060 in Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. DISCUSSION Staff evaluates the condition of damaged sidewalks, curbs, gutters and driveways to identify uneven surfaces and cracks that may pose a risk to pedestrians. The goal is to improve accessibility for pedestrians and increase active modes of transportation, such as walking and biking. The Local Street Sidewalk Improvements project involves replacement of existing damaged concrete sidewalks in residential neighborhoods and will include the removal and replacement of adjacent damaged concrete curbs, gutters and driveways. The project will focus on areas with the highest concentration of needed repairs to help mitigate trip City Council 18 — 1 4/19/2022 Award Construction Contract to CJ Concrete Construction Inc. April 19, 2022 Page 2 and fall hazards, and assist in complying with regulations set forth by the American with Disabilities Act (Exhibit 1). Public Outreach and Contractor Participation To provide an opportunity for local vendors to submit bids, a Notice Inviting Bids was advertised in the Orange County Register newspaper on January 31 and February 8, 2022. The project was also advertised on PlanetBids, and bids were received electronically via PlanetBids on February 22, 2022. The City notified a total of 1,360 regional vendors via PlanetBids, 81 of which are Santa Ana based. Forty-one vendors requested bidding documents. A total of 7 bids were received, one of which was received from a Santa Ana contractor. Bid Results Summary RANK BIDDER'S NAME LOCATION BASE BID 1 CJ Concrete Construction Inc. Santa Fe Springs $276,430 2 EBS General Engineering Inc. Corona $300,900 3 Diamond Construction and Design La Habra $368,460 4 DOJA Inc. Ontario $374,050 5 Aneen Construction Inc. Riverside $388,620 6 HZS Engineering and Construction Santa Ana $622,550 7 CT&T Concrete Paving Inc. Diamond Bar $626,500 A total of seven bids were received, and all were deemed responsive. CJ Concrete Construction Inc. submitted the lowest responsive base bid in the amount of $276,430 (Exhibit 2). As specified in the bid documents, the lowest bid shall be determined on the basis of the Base Bid. Based on the bid analysis and a contractor's reference check, staff recommends awarding the construction contract to CJ Concrete Construction Inc. in the amount of the base bid totaling $276,430 (Exhibit 3). In the past five years, CJ Concrete Construction has performed concrete repairs throughout the City. Project Delivery To deliver a complete project, in addition to the construction contract, the estimated total project delivery cost includes construction administration, inspection, and testing, along with an allowance for contingencies to account for unexpected or unforeseen conditions. Construction administration and inspection includes the following: construction management; implementation of the City's Community Workforce Agreement requirements; inspection of the Contractor's work to ensure contract compliance, City Council 18 — 2 4/19/2022 Award Construction Contract to CJ Concrete Construction Inc. April 19, 2022 Page 3 workmanship, and quality; and materials testing. As indicated in the Cost Analysis (Exhibit 4) and as summarized in the table below, the estimated total construction delivery cost of the project is $373,060. Because the construction bids came in lower than anticipated, the contingency was increased to take advantage of lower costs and to maximize the allocation of CDBG funding. This will allow additional street improvements to be completed beyond the anticipated scope. Project Item Total Construction Contract $276,430 Construction Administration, Inspection, Testing $41,465 Contingencies $55,165 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION DELIVERY COST $373,060 Approval of the amendment to the FY 2021-22 Capital Improvement Program (Exhibit 5) will officially incorporate this project into the program. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. ER- 2022-3 was filed for the project. Additionally, a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Environmental Review was conducted and was determined that project was Categorically Excluded (Not Subject to 58.5). FISCAL IMPACT As indicated in the Cost Analysis, the estimated total construction delivery cost of the project is $373,060.00, which includes construction, contract administration, inspection, testing, and an authorized contingency. With the approval of the amendment to the Fiscal Year 2021-22 Capital Improvement Program will officially incorporate this project into the program. Funding in the amount of $373,060 is available from Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds to deliver this project. All Funds are available for expenditure in Fiscal Year 2021-22, however any remaining balances not expended at the end of the fiscal year will be carried forward into FY 2022-23. The following table summarizes the funds budgeted and available for expenditure to deliver construction of this project. Fiscal Accounting Unit - Fund Accounting Unit -Account Year Account No. Description No. Description Amount (project No.) City Council 18 — 3 4/19/2022 Award Construction Contract to CJ Concrete Construction Inc. April 19, 2022 Page 4 13518783-66220 Community CDBG Programs, 2021-22 (22-7535) Development Improvements Other Than $373,060 Block Grant Building Total $373,060 EXHIBIT(S) 1. Location Map 2. Bid Proposal 3. Construction Contract 4. Cost Analysis 5. Amend FY 2021-22 CIP Project Street Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director — Public Works Agency Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager City Council 18 — 4 4/19/2022 ir SANTAANA Project No. 22-7535. u Pi Local Street Sidewalk Improvements PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 22--7535 LOCAL STREET SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS BID PROPOSAL TO: CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA FROM: C-�- 1 V 4 cr li C cln"-yu ` ) c)o T G. REQUIREMENT: The undersigned bidder declares that they have carefully examined the location of the proposed work, that they have examined the Contract Documents in its entirety and hereby proposes to furnish all material and do all the work required to complete the said work in accordance with said plans (if any) and the specifications for the unit price(s) or lump sum(s) set forth in the following schedule: Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Amount 1 Unclassified Excavation* 310 CY $ cy V $ 23,2r� Qa 2 PCC Sidewalk(T=4")* 24,400 SF $ $ 9. 20 a 2-90$0 3 Root Shave` 56 EA $ $ c� Z a0 -' 11 Z 00. Ga 4 Adjust Sewer cleanout valve 10 EA $ $ frame and cover to finished 5-00 ' OGO 'moo grade* 5 Project Advertisement Sign 1 EA $ uv $ I I's 6 Construction Permit $10,000 $ 10 vo 'UU City Council 18 - 6 4/19/2022 CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO.: 22-7535 LOCAL STREET SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL BASE BID (Items 1-6) $ 'L��� 1� p W The lowest responsible bidder shall be selected based on the total base bid. The City reserves the right to award the Base Bid, and any, all, or none of the add -alternate bid items (if any). * The quantity for this bid item is shown for bid comparison only. This bid item shall not be subject to the "25%" limit as stated in Section 3-2 of the Standard Specifications. The actual amount for this item will be dictated by the actual quantity used, and the Agency reserves the right to increase or decrease the quantity of this item accordingly. t This bid item is considered a Specialty Item per Section 2-3.2 of the Standard Specifications. TIME FOR COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND LIQUIDATED DAMAGES The undersigned bidder hereby proposes to complete the Work for the total base bid amount shown above, within number (30) working days after the commencement date stated in the Notice to Proceed. The liquidated damages amount, in lieu of the amount specified in Subsection 6-9 of the Standard Specifications, shall be $1,500 per calendar day. Name of Firm CT ('Oncr-e-fi6 (1n St(U C-7 U y-? Signature of BIDDER Title P rr f j ov ►i �— (If an individual, so state. If a finn or co -partnership, state the firm name and give the names of all individual co-partners composing the firm. If a corporation, state legal name of corporation, and names of President, Secretary, Treasurer and Manager, thereof.) City Council 18 — 7 4/19/2022 CITY OF SANTA ANA CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT PROJECT 22-7535 LOCAL STREET SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS This CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT is made and entered into this 15"' day of April, 2022 by and between the City of Santa Ana, California, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California (hereinafter "CITY"), and CJ Concrete Construction, Inc. (hereinafter "CONTRACTOR"). WITNESSETH: The CITY and the CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: 1. CONTRACTOR agrees to perform all the work and furnish all the materials at its own cost and expense necessary to construct and complete in a good and workmanlike manner and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer of the CITY, the Local Street Sidewalk Improvements (hereinafter referred to as the "WORK OF IMPROVEMENT") identified in and in accordance with the Contract Documents prepared by the City's Public Works Agency and approved by the City Council. 2. The complete Construction Contract consists of the "Contract Documents" as defined by the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction and which include the following: • Notice Inviting Bids • Information to Bidders • Bid Proposal • Bid Bond • Contract Form • Contract Bonds • General Provisions • Special Provisions • Technical Provisions and Project Plans • Community Workforce Agreement • Appendices In case of conflict between the Contract Documents, the precedence of documents shall be as established in the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction. 3. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept in full payment to complete the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT the sum total amount not to exceed Two Hundred Seventy Six Thousand Four Hundred Thirty Dollars and No Cents ($276,430.00), as set forth and identified in the BID PROPOSAL, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A." The BID PROPOSAL contains a schedule of unit price(s) or lump sum(s) based on approximate quantities only, and the City does not expressly or by implication agree that the actual amount of work will correspond therewith, but reserves the right to increase or decrease the amount of any class or portion of the work or to omit portions of the work as may be deemed necessary or advisable. rev.09/0i/2017 &nbsp; Page I of 3 City Council &nbsp;18 &ndash;&nbsp;8 4/ 19/2022 &nbsp; 4. CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT within the time specified in the Time for Completion of Improvements section of the BID PROPOSAL (Exhibit "A") including commencing construction within the timefra►ne therein specified after issuance of a Notice to Proceed. 5. The CONTRACTOR will pay, and will require all subcontractors to pay, all employees on the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT a salary or wage at least equal to the prevailing salary or wage established for such work as set forth in the wage determinations for this work in accordance with applicable State and Federal law. 6. If applicable, the CONTRACTOR shall adhere to the CITY'S Community Workforce Agreement (CWA), a pre -hire collective bargaining agreement, which establishes the labor relations policies and procedures for CONTRACTOR to follow in the crafts persons employed to complete the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT as more fully described in the CWA. The CWA may be found on the City's website at: http://www.santa-ana.org/ 2wa/documents/CWA.pdf 7. CONTRACTOR shall, after award of this Contract, furnish two bonds to be approved by the CITY, one in the amount of One Hundred Percent (100%) of the Contract price, to guarantee the faithful performance of the work (Performance Bond), and one in the amount of One Hundred Percent (100%) of the Contract price to guarantee payment of all claims for labor and materials furnished (Payment Bond). This Contract shall not become effective until such bonds are supplied to and approved by the CITY. 8. CONTRACTOR shall, prior to the release of the performance and payment bonds or the retention payment, furnish a warranty performance and payment bond (Warranty Bond), Said Warranty Bond shall also be required as a condition of project acceptance. For projects up to Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000), the Warranty Bond amount shall be the greater of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) or Twenty Percent (20%) of the final contract price. For projects above Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000), the Warranty Bond amount shall be the greater of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) or Ten Percent (10%) of the final contract price. 9. CONTRACTOR shall, after award of this Contract, furnish Certificates of Liability Insurance and Worker's Compensation Insurance as outlined in the General Provisions, to be approved by the CITY. 10. INDEMNIFICATION. To the fullest extent allowed by law, CONTRACTOR and its Subcontractors hereby agree to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless CITY, its City Council, boards and commissions, officers, agents, employees, representatives and volunteers (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Indemnitees"), through legal counsel acceptable to CITY, from and against any liability, claims, actions, costs, damages or losses, including reasonable costs and attorney's fees, for injury, including death to any person or damage to any property, arising directly or indirectly from, or in any manner relating to, any of the following: (i) Performance or nonperformance of the Work of Improvement by CONTRACTOR or its Subcontractors of any lower tier; (ii) Performance or nonperformance by CONTRACTOR or its Subcontractors of any lower tier, of any of the obligations under the Contract Documents; &nbsp; Page 2 of 3 City Council &nbsp;18 &ndash;&nbsp;9 4/ 19/2022 &nbsp; (iii) The construction activities of CONTRACTOR or its Subcontractors of any lower tier, either on the project site or on other properties; (iv) The payment or nonpayment by CONTRACTOR of any of its Subcontractors of any lower tier, for Work of Improvement performed on or off the project site; and (v) Any personal injury, property damage or economic loss to third persons related to and arising from the performance or nonperformance by CONTRACTOR or its Subcontractors of any lower tier, of the Work of Improvement. (vi) The indemnity obligations of Subcontractors provided by this Section shall be included in all subcontract documents issued by CONTRACTOR. Nothing in the Contract Documents shall be construed to give rise to any implied right of indemnity in favor of CONTRACTOR against CITY or any other Indemnitee. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Construction Contract on the day and year first above written. ATTEST: CITY OF SANTA ANA DAISY GOMEZ KRISTINE RIDGE Clerk of the Council City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: SONIA R. CARVALHO CONTRACTOR: City Attorney CJ Concrete Construction, Inc. By: 4L4 $v -F- JOHN FUNK Assistant City Attorney TITL : ►esiCh ►'� RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL; NABIL SABA, PE Executive Director Public Works Agency &nbsp; Page 3 of 3 City Council &nbsp;18 &ndash;&nbsp;10 4/19/2022 &nbsp; CITY OF SANTA ANA EXHIBIT A PROPOSAL PROJECT NO,: 22-7535 LOCAL STREET SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS BID PROPOSAL TO: CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA FROM: c- -�..._ C. REQUIREMENT: The undersigned bidder declares that they have carefully examined the location of the proposed work, that they have examined the Contract Documents in its entirety and hereby proposes to furnish all material and do all the work required to complete the said work in accordance with said plans (if any) and the specifications for the unit price(s) or lump sum(s) set forth in the following schedule: Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Amount 1 Unclassified Excavation* 310 CY $ 0 v $ 1 S z Z 50 2 PCC Sidewalk(T=4")* 24,400 SF $ $ 7 Z`-vl� o a 3 Root Sliave* 56 EA $ $ 4 Adjust Sewer cleanout valve 10 EA $ $ frame and cover to finished grade* 5 Project Advertisement Sign 1 EA $ uc, $ .215W 2 6 Construction Permit 1 LS $10,000 $ I0,()v0'�U &nbsp; City Council &nbsp;18 &ndash;&nbsp;11 4/19/2022 &nbsp; CITY OF SANTA ANA PROPOSAL PROJECT NO,: 22-7535 LOCAL STREET SIDEWALIf IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL BASE BID (.Items 1-6) 1 $ - 7ip, J3 p The lowest responsible bidden shall be selected based on the total base bid. The City reserves the right to award the Base Bid, and any, all, or none of the add -alternate bid items (if any). * The quantity for this bid item is shown for hid comparison only. This bid item shall not be subject to the "25%" limit as stated in Section 3-2 of the Standard Specifications. The actual amount for this item will be dictated by the actual quantity used, and the Agency reserves the right to increase or decrease the quantity of this item accordingly, t This bid item is considered a Specialty Item per Section 2-3.2 of the Standard Specifications, TIME FOR COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND LIQUIDATED DAMAGES The undersigned bidder hereby proposes to complete the Work for the total base bid amount shown above, within number (30)working dates after the commencement date stated in the Notice to Proceed. The liquidated damages amount, in lieu of the amount specified in Subsection 6-9 of the Standard Specifications, shall be $1,500 per calendar day. Name of Firm Signature of BIDDER Q ' Title P veJ), OV r, (If an in(Gidual, so state. If a firm or co -partnership, state the firm name and give the names of all individual co-partners composing the firm. If a corporation, state legal name of corporation, and names of President, Secretary, Treasurer and Manager, thereof.) &nbsp; City Council &nbsp;18 &ndash;&nbsp;12 4/19/2022 &nbsp; EXHIBIT 4 COST ANALYSIS CONSTRUCTION OF PROJECT NO. 22-7535: Local Street Sidewalk Improvements Construction Contract $ 276,430.00 Contract Administration, Inspection and Testing $ 41,465.00 Contingencies $ 55,165.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS 1 $ 373,060.00 City Council 18 — 13 4/19/2022 PROJECT TITLE: Local Street Sidewalk Improvements PROJECT CATEGORY: Street Improvements Street/Bridge Improvements & Widening LOCATION MAP A N CITY OF SANTA ANA FY21/22CIP CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WORKSHEET PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project involves replacement of existing damaged concrete sidewalks in residential neighborhoods and will include the removal and replacement of adjacent damaged concrete curbs, gutter and driveways. Project will focus on areas with the highest concentration of needed repairs, to help mitigate trip and fall hazards and reducing potential of liability claims and assist in complying with regulations set forth by the American with Disabilities Act. PROJECT NEED: Staff evaluates the condition of damaged sidewalks, curbs, gutters and driveways to identify uneven surfaces and cracks that may pose a risk to pedestrians. The goal is to improve safe walking accessibility for pedestrians and increase active modes of transportation, such as walking and biking. PROJECT COSTS FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 Construction 373,064 - - - - - - TOTAL 373,064 - SOURCE OF FUNDS FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 CDBG Programs 373,064 - - - - - - TOTAL 373,064 - - - - AGENCY: DIVISION: CONTACT: DATE: Public Works C/P Engineering Gilbert Castillo, Senior Engineer 22-Mar-2022 City Council 18 — 14 4/19/2022 Public Works Agency www.santa-ana.org/pw Item # 19 o`7, City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report April 19, 2022 TOPIC: Time Extension of Measure M2 CTFP Construction Grant Funds AGENDA TITLE Approve Submittal of Request for Time Extension of the Measure M2 Comprehensive Transportation Funding Program for Warner Avenue Improvements Phase 2 and Bristol Street and Memory Lane Projects (Project No. 14-6802 and 17-6883) (Non -General Fund) RECOMMENDED ACTION Authorize the Public Works Agency to request a two-year time extension of Measure M2 Comprehensive Transportation Funding Program construction funds for the Warner Avenue Improvements, Phase 2, from Oak Street to Grand Street project (21-SNTA-ACE- 3997) and for Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements (21-SNTA-ICE- 3995). DISCUSSION The Warner Avenue Improvements, Phase 2, from Oak Street to Grand Street project and the Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements project were awarded $10,088,805 in construction funding by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Measure M2 Comprehensive Transportation Funding Program (CTFP) for Fiscal Year 2021-22. The Warner Avenue improvements from Oak Street to Grand Street include adding sidewalks and bike lanes, undergrounding utilities, and widening the roadway from the existing four lanes to six lanes. In addition to the on -street, dedicated Class II bike lanes and ADA-compliant sidewalks, the project includes a raised landscape median and landscaped parkway buffer, both with drought -tolerant plants. Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Widening Improvements involve the widening of Bristol Street immediately north of Memory Lane to accommodate an additional through southbound lane. Additionally, the proposed improvements would include the construction of a sidewalk, curb and gutter, pavement, signal modification, and curb ramps. City Council 19-1 4/19/2022 Time Extension of Measure M2 CTFP Construction Grant Funds April 19, 2022 Page 2 In accordance with CTFP guidelines, the construction phases for these projects must be awarded by June 30, 2022. Acquisition and relocation activities need to be completed before construction can begin, and despite diligent efforts to prepare these projects for construction, additional time is needed in order to complete the right-of-way acquisition before construction contracts can be awarded. CTFP guidelines provide a one-time, two-year extension of Measure M2 CTFP funding, which will allow sufficient time to complete acquisitions and prepare the project for construction. The request also helps avoid a potential lapse in grant funding. The table below summarizes the request: Resolution for Funding OCTA Board Extension Project Name Application Amount Approval / Request Programmed FY Warner Avenue November 17, 2020 $9,076,305 May, 2021 2-yr. time Improvements from Oak Res. no. 2020-084 FY 2021-22 extension St. to Grand Ave. Bristol Street and Memory November 17, 2020 $1,012,500 May, 2021 2-yr. time Lane Intersection Res. no. 2020-085 FY 2021-22 extension Improvements ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with the action. FISCAL IMPACT If the Recommended Action is not approved the City will relinquish $10,088,805 in awarded construction grant funding that will expire. Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director — Public Works Agency Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager City Council 19 — 2 4/19/2022 Parks, Recreation, and Community Services www.santa-ana.org/parks Item # 20 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report April 19, 2022 TOPIC: License Agreement with NOVA Academy for use of Birch Park and Sasser Park for an Emergency Evacuation Plan AGENDA TITLE: Approve a License Agreement with NOVA Academy for use of Birch Park and Sasser Park for an Emergency Evacuation Plan RECOMMENDED ACTION Approve a license Agreement with NOVA academy for use of Birch Park and Sasser Park for an Emergency Evacuation Plan for the period of April 19, 2022 to June 30, 2025 with two, one-year renewal options, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. DISCUSSION The NOVA academy, located at 500 W Santa Ana Boulevard, has contacted the City in the hopes of making arrangements to use Birch Park and Sasser Park as off -site locations for their Emergency Evacuation Plan. In addition to evacuating in the case of an emergency, NOVA will utilize the site for earthquake (four annually), fire (four annually), and Iockdown (two annually) drills. The City understands their need for such a space to be identified for the safety of their students and faculty. Therefore, the City recommends entering into a license agreement with NOVA academy. Use of these sites under the license agreement is limited to emergency needs. Other uses of the site will be processed through the customary facility reservation process. Due to the nature of use, protection of students and staff in the event of an emergency, the City shall not charge a fee as part of the license agreement. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with this action. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. EXHIBIT(S) 1. License Agreement City Council 20-1 4/19/2022 License Agreement with NOVA academy for use of Birch Park and Sasser Park for an Emergency Evacuation Plan April 19, 2022 Page 2 Submitted By: Lisa Rudloff, Executive Dir. of Parks, Recreation and Community Services Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager City Council 20 — 2 4/19/2022 LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH NOVA ACADEMY This LICENSE AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is dated as of April 19, 2022, and entered into by and between the CITY OF SANTA ANA, a charter city and municipal corporation existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California ("City"), and NOVA Academy, a California non-profit corporation ("Licensee"). RECITALS A. The City is the owner of that certain real property located in the City of Santa Ana, County of Orange, California, more specifically identified as 210 N. Birch Street, also known as Birch Park, and 502 W. Santa Ana Boulevard, also known as Sasscer Park, as depicted in Exhibit A ("License Area"). B. Licensee desires to use the License Area for purposes of an evacuation relocation site for Licensee in the event of an emergency and for emergency drills as they may be scheduled by Licensee from time to time during the License period ("Permitted Uses"). C. The City has agreed to grant Licensee a license to use the License Area, on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. License. The City hereby grants to Licensee a nonexclusive license for the right to enter and use the License Area beginning on April 19, 2022, for the Pennitted Uses described in Recital B, upon the terns and conditions set forth herein ("License"), subject to Licensee's performance of all of its obligations under this Agreement. This License shall remain in effect until June 30, 2025. The term of this License may be extended for two (2) one-year periods upon a writing executed by the Executive Director of the Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Agency, or his or her designee. The License may be terminated by City upon thirty (30) days written notice. This Agreement is intended and shall be construed only as a revocable license to use the License Area and not as a lease or grant of any possessory or other interest. To facilitate NOVA's Permitted Use under this License, City will provide the Administrative Director of Licensee five (5) keys for the gate at Birch Park to be distributed to and used by Licensee personnel designated by the Administrative Director of Licensee. These keys shall be returned to City at the expiration or earlier termination of this License. 2. Restoration and Clean Up. At its sole cost, Licensee shall, after each use of the License Area, restore the License Area to its original condition in which it existed immediately prior to the Agreement, leave the License Area in a neat and clean condition to the sole satisfaction of the City, free of trash and debris, and remove all property and materials of Licensee. Licensee shall cause the License Area to be cleaned, with such work to be completed no later than the times specified in the License as -stated in paragraph 1 above, and the License shall be extended to such time for the limited purpose of allowing the cleaning work to be completed. 3. Compliance with Laws. Licensee shall cause all activities of Licensee under this Agreement and all activities on the License Area to be performed in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, and regulations, and permits. Page 1 of 5 City Council 20 — 3 4/19/2022 4. Damage. In the event that Licensee damages any portion of the License Area or the improvements or equipment therein, Licensee shall iimnediately repair the damage at Licensee's sole cost. Alternatively, the City may, at its election, repair the damage in which case Licensee shall reimburse the City for its cost within fifteen (15) days of receipt of written demand from City. 5. Licensee Parties. Licensee, together with its employees, subcontractors, agents, representatives, students, and all persons entering the License Area, by or through or at the direction of Licensee, are collectively referred to herein as the "Licensee Parties." Licensee shall be responsible for the Licensee Parties and shall cause the Licensee Parties to comply with the terms of this Agreement. 6. Fee. Because the City finds the protection of students in the event of an emergency to be of public benefit, City shall not charge and Licensee shall not pay a fee for this License. 7. AS -IS Condition. City makes no representation or warranty of any kind as to the condition of the License Area or any other matter relating to Licensee's use of the License Area. Licensee hereby disclaims and waives any and all objections to the physical and other characteristics and conditions of the License Area. Licensee acknowledges and agrees that the use of the License Area will be on the basis of Licensee's own investigation of the condition of the License Area. The license to use the License Area shall be granted on an "AS -IS," "WITH ALL FAULTS" basis, without representation or warranty expressed or implied by City, or by operation of law. City expressly disclaims, which Licensee hereby acknowledges and accepts, any implied warranty of condition or fitness for a particular purpose or use. Licensee's use of the License Area shall be subject to the License Area being in a usable and safe condition at the time of Licensee's use and Licensee shall be responsible for determining whether the License Area is in such condition. In connection therewith, in the event that the License Area or access thereto is damaged or obstructed or the use by Licensee is otherwise impaired, prevented or limited, City shall have no obligation or duty to repair the damage or rectify the condition to make the License Area usable or safe. 8. Insurance. NOVA Academy shall procure and maintain for the duration, of this License insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property that may arise from or in connection with NOVA's use under this License. Such insurance coverage shall be at least as broad as: 8.1 Commercial General Liability ("CGL"): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an "occurrence" basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 8.2 Workers' Compensation: as required by the State of California, with statutory limits, and employer's liability insurance with a limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. 8.3 Broader Coverage: if Licensee maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by the Licensee. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City. 8.4 Primary Coverage: for any claims related to this license, the Licensee's coverage shall be primary insurance coverage at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects to the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Page 2 of 5 City Council 20 — 4 4/19/2022 8.5 Notice of Cancellation: each insurance policy required shall not be canceled, except with thirty (30) days written notice to the City. 8.6 Waiver of Subrogation: Licensee hereby grants to City a waiver of any right to subrogation, which any insurer of said Licensee may acquire against the City by virtue of the payment of loss under such insurance. Licensee agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer. 8.7 Self -Insured Retentions: self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. The City may require the Licensee to purchase coverage with a lower retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self -insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or City. 8.8 Acceptability of Insurers: insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the state of California with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. 8.9 Verification of Coverage: Licensee shall furnish the City with original certificates of insurance, including all required amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause) a copy of the Declarations and Endorsement page of the CGL policy listing all policy endorsements to City before work begins. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the use contemplated by the License begins shall not waive the Licensee's obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements require by these specifications at any time. 9. Indemnity. Licensee shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City, and its respective agents, representatives, employees, subsidiaries and affiliates ("Covered Parties") from and against any and all actions, suits, claims, demands, judgments, losses, expenses, or liabilities, injuries and damages to persons and property, including death, arising out of or related to Licensee's use of the License Area, the entry by any Licensee Party on the License Area or surrounding property, or Licensee's breach or default in the performance of any of its obligations under this Agreement; provided, however, that Licensee will not be obligated to indemnify the Covered Parties from any claims arising solely from the gross negligence or willful misconduct of a Covered Party. If any action or proceeding is brought against any Covered Party by reason of any such claim, Licensee, upon receipt of written notice from Covered Party, shall defend the same at Licensee's expense with legal counsel reasonably acceptable to Covered Party. Payment shall not be a condition precedent to recovery under any indemnification in this Agreement, and a finding of liability or an obligation to indemnify shall not be a condition precedent to the duty to defend. The provisions of this Section 9 shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement. 10. Miscellaneous. 10.1 Entire Agreement, Waiver and Amendments. This Agreement incorporates all of the terms and conditions mentioned herein, or incidental hereto, and supersedes all negotiations and previous agreements between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement. All waivers of the provisions of this Agreement must be in writing and signed by the appropriate authorities of the party to be charged. Any amendment or modification to this Agreement must be in writing and executed by the appropriate authorities of the City and Licensee. Page 3 of 5 City Council 20 — 5 4/19/2022 10.2 Severability. If any term, provision, covenant, or condition of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect, unless and to the extent the rights and obligations of one or both parties has been materially altered or abridged by such holding. 10.3 No Assignment. Licensee shall not assign or transfer or otherwise convey any interest in this Agreement to any party without the express prior written consent of City, which consent may be withheld in City's sole and absolute discretion. 10.4 Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the internal laws of the State of California. 10.5 Litigation Expenses. If either party to this Agreement commences an action against the other party to this Agreement arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees, expert witness fees, costs of investigation, and costs of suit from the losing party. 10.6 Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto represent and warrant to the other party that they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of such party, and by so executing this Agreement, said party is fonnally bound to the provisions of this Agreement. 10.7 Notices. Any notices, requests, or approvals given under this Agreement from one party to another shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered or deposited with the United States Postal Service for mailing, postage prepaid, by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the addresses of the other party as stated in this section, and shall be deemed to have been received at the time of personal delivery or three (3) days after the deposit for mailing. Notices shall be sent to: If to Licensee: NOVA Academy Attn: Renee Lancaster, CEO 500 W. Santa Ana Blvd. Santa Ana, CA 92701 If to City: Clerk of the City Council City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702-1988 10.8 Execution in Counterpart. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, and all so executed shall constitute one agreement binding on both of the parties hereto, notwithstanding that both parties are not signatories to the original or the same counterpart. [signature page to follow] Page 4 of 5 City Council 20 — 6 4/19/2022 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Licensee have entered into this Agreement as of the day and year first written above. CITY OF SANTA ANA LICENSEE �Jr1 Kristine Ridge R—en—ee�Lancast r City Manager CEO/Founder ATTEST Daisy Gomez Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM SONIA R. CARVALHO City Attorney By: Br n Salvatierra Deputy City Attorney RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL Lisa Rudloff Executive Director Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Agency Page 5 of 5 City Council 20 — 7 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT A City Council 20 — 8 4/19/2022 Secondary Reunification Point: Senior Center Exit the building using the nearest stairwell. Make sure your entire class makes it safely across the street. 1. Balmer 8. Hobbis 15. Ramberg 2. Carmody 9. Jahed 16. Santillan 3. Dann 10. Jimenez 17. Tripp & Vivas Lara 4. Delgado 11. Lee 18. Vidaurre 5. Dibblee 12. Lemtouni 19. Wilson 6. Fong 13. Mitchell 7. Goodheart 14. Poff Command Center: • Office Staff • Counseling Staff • Support Staff • Business Office Staff City Council 20 — 9 4/19/2022 SASSCER PARK Primary Reunification Point: Sasscer Park Fountain Exit the building using the nearest stairwell. Make sure your entire class makes it safely to the fountain. Safety Captains: Lee (2nd floor), Bahner (3rd Floor), Goodheart (4th Floor) Evacuation Area Sasscer Park Fountain �R :. ._ Er C: 1 1- "Pro rr o-° 1. Bahner S. Hobbis 15. Ramberg 2. Carmody 9. Jelled 16. Santillan 3. Dann 10. Jimenez 17. Tripp & Vivas-Lara 4. Delgado 11. Lee 18. Vidaurre 5. Dibblee 12. Leintouni 19. Wilson 6. Fang 13. '\Iitcliell 7. Goodheart 14. Poff Command Center: • Office Staff • Counseling Staff • Support Staff • Business Office Staff City Council 20 — 10 4/19/2022 Finance and Management Services www.santa-ana.org/finance Item # 21 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report April 19, 2022 TOPIC: Data Processing, Printing and Mailing, and Electronic Bill Present Services AGENDA TITLE: Approve Renewal Agreement with InfoSend, Inc. for Data Processing, Printing and Mailing, and Electronic Bill Present Services in an amount not to exceed $10,904,376 (General and Non -General Fund) RECOMMENDED ACTION Authorize the City Manager to execute a renewal agreement with InfoSend, Inc. for data processing, printing and mailing, and electronic bill presentment services for Municipal Utility Services, Business License, Proactive Residential Enforcement Program, Dog Licensing, Paramedic Subscriptions, and City newsletters and other City -related miscellaneous mailing notices. Said renewal agreement is to be for an amount not to exceed $10,904,376, which includes a 15% contingency funding for annual Cost Price Index ("CPI") adjustments and a further 15% contingency set -aside for anticipated United States postage increases — altogether totaling $2,516,394 over the maximum 8'/2-year life of the agreement. The renewal agreement commences April 19, 2022 and contains a base term covering FY 2021-22, 2022-23, 2023-24 and FY 2024-25, expiring December 31, 2025, with provision for two renewal options of three years, and one year, respectively, ending December 31, 2029. DISCUSSION The Treasury & Customer Service Division ("Treasury") of the Finance and Management Services Agency ("FMSA") is responsible for the billing and payment processing for Municipal Utility Services ("MUS") accounts, Business Licenses, and Proactive Residential Enforcement Program ("PREP") accounts, Dog Licenses, and Paramedic Subscription services. Billing and payment services require data processing, printing and mailing services, and e-business services (electronic billing and payment presentation ("EBPP") online and/or accepting and reporting payment transactions via the internet). InfoSend, Inc.'s ("InfoSend") scope of bill print services include, but are not limited to, the following: data processing, printing, and mailing services. InfoSend's data processing, printing, and mailing services encompass the following City operations: MUS, Business License, PREP, and Dog Licenses, and include other City -related miscellaneous mailings of associated billing statements, notices, advisories, form correspondence, as well as City City Council 21 — 1 4/19/2022 Renewal Agreement with InfoSend, Inc. April 19, 2022 Page 2 newsletters and a variety of other miscellaneous independent communications or notices. InfoSend's EBPP services include an online bill payment portal for Dog Licensing. InfoSend is a full billing services provider and utilizes the most current technology and offers an innovative approach with flexible and secure solutions for organizations such as the City, who seek outsourced data processing, printing, mailing, and electronic presentment and/or payment services. The City has benefitted from InfoSend business perspective as they have recognized the City's unique needs and have personalized the way they build solutions for the City's data processing, printing, mailing, and electronic presentment services. InfoSend is fundamentally involved with and has extensive knowledge of, the City's data processing, bill printing, mailing, and EBPP services. In addition, despite significant anticipated increases in USPS postal rates, InfoSend has agreed to maintain the City's current postage deposit on hand in the amount of $13,040. InfoSend is able to solely -handle all requested data processing, print, mail services, and associated e-business services. Their professional services include project management for each print job from beginning to end, as well as providing a high level of quality assurance through their Quality Control Department by checking mail files at multiple stages throughout the production process. InfoSend's information technology, document formatting, electronic payment service, and document production currently integrates seamlessly into our various existing Treasury billing structures, as it presently generates all electronic document files, exchanges them with other integrated vendors, inserts mailing pieces, meters postage, and prepares all mail items for delivery. All standard paper and envelopes sourced by InfoSend are Sustainable Forestry Initiative Certified ("SFI"). The SFI program is a comprehensive system of principles, objectives and performance measures developed by professional foresters, conservationists and scientists, among others that combines the perpetual growing and harvesting of tress with the long-term protection of wildlife, plants, soil and water quality. InfoSend's standard double window #10 and single window #9 envelopes are sustainably produced and are provided to clients at no cost. Additionally, because of ongoing worldwide shortages of certain paper grades (the most affected type being recycled paper stock) and as a response to their client's ongoing needs, InfoSend during this time has worked closely with their current suppliers and have established new vendor relationships to ensure an uninterrupted supply of paper stock (which is SFI Certified) to protect against any unexpected disruptions in the supply chain. Furthermore, beginning in Fiscal Year 2019-20, the Finance and Management Services ("FMSA"), Public Works ("PWA"), and Information Technology ("IT") agencies undertook development of a program for the implementation of Advanced Metering Infrastructure ("AMI") to provide modern smart metering services for the City's water utility operation and for MUS customers to which InfoSend's services are tied. In March 2020, Treasury started a comprehensive upgrade to the City's existing water, sewer, sanitation, and City Council 21 — 2 4/19/2022 Renewal Agreement with InfoSend, Inc. April 19, 2022 Page 3 refuse customer information service/utility billing system, enQuesta, to ensure the City is keeping up with best practices as they relate to utility customer service, billing technology, and to ensure compatibility with AMI systems. The AMI program is dependent on expanded use of the City's upgraded MUS enQuesta system, with which InfoSend's services are integrated. InfoSend's services directly support and are bilaterally integrated with this comprehensive upgrade. The cost to implement an equivalent bill print and e- business service provider is unknown, but would require new software and substantial additional integration expenses to the City as InfoSend is fully integrated into all Treasury programs that require bill print/e-business services. In connection with the AMI program development, PWA has launched an Awareness and Education Campaign as a sustained effort to educate residents and boost public awareness about AMI smart metering services for the City. As a response to the COVID- 19 pandemic, the City launched various community assistance programs to provide much -needed services to the City's residents and business community. Inclusively, the City adopted a Rent Stabilization Ordinance effective November 19, 2021, which requires mailing notices to various tenants and Santa Ana rental property owners. For these community outreach reasons and because InfoSend is the City's data processing, printing, and mailing service provider, budgeted amounts for the other agencies, like the City Manager's Office ("CMO"), who use InfoSend's printing and mailing services, need to be expanded to cover service use and avoid overspending maximum compensation spending caps. In addition to the data processing, printing and mailing, and e-business services, there are other related critical payment processing agreements, like the City's walk-in cashiering station merchant processing services, online cloud -based electronic billing and payment presentation/bill print services, and 24-7/365 walk-up payment kiosk services. Based on the synchronization of all of these payment -processing services, the City will achieve full PCI-DSS compliance, thereby transferring future credit card fraud liability from the City to the payment card providers. The enQuesta agreement with which this InfoSend renewal agreement is synchronized runs through December 31, 2025, with optional extensions through December 31, 2029. Moreover, the renewal agreement for the City's integrated Interactive Voice Response ("IVR") contract, which was approved by the City Council on August 17, 2021, was constructed to be co -extensive with the underlying Systems & Software enQuesta Municipal Utility Services billing system software agreement because they are integrated and effectively are sole -source providers due to their extensive and expensive custom software systems integrations. Therefore, staff recommends the approval of a renewal agreement with InfoSend to assure annual data processing, printing and mailing, and e-business services for the City. By approving the InfoSend renewal agreement, the City Council will be harmonizing agreements with other critical payment processing contracts, such as the enQuesta/AMI integrated project agreements. City Council 21 — 3 4/19/2022 Renewal Agreement with InfoSend, Inc. April 19, 2022 Page 4 Below is a breakdown of costs, including the optional costs: City Agency Contracted Amount Contingency (Plus Annual CPI Increases) Annual Postal Rate Increases Maximum Amount FMSA - Treasury & Customer Service $2,457,696 $368,654 $368,654 $3,195,004 FMSA - Service Enhancement $409,616 $61,442 $61,442 $532,500 PWA - Water Miscellaneous Expenses $3,264,420 $489,663 $489,663 $4,243,746 PWA - Refuse Collection Service $455,000 $68,250 $68,250 $591,500 CMO - General $170,000 $25,500 $25,500 $221,000 CMO - General Non -Departmental $170,000 $25,500 $25,500 $221,000 CMO - Revive Fund $80,000 $12,000 $12,000 $104,000 SAPD - Fiscal & Budget $425,000 $63,750 $63,750 $552,500 CDA - Inclusionary Housing Fund $233,750 $35,063 $35,063 $303,876 CDA - Housing Authority -Vouchers ADM $170,000 $25,500 $25,500 $221,000 CDA - Service Enhancement $85,000 $12,750 $12,750 $110,500 CDA - Economic Development $42,500 $6,375 $6,375 $55,250 PRCSA - Recreation & Comm. Svs. $212,500 $31,875 $31,875 $276,250 PRCSA - Park Facilities $212,500 $31,875 $31,875 $276,250 Totals: $8,387,982 $1,258,197 $1,258,197 $10,904,376 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with this action. FISCAL IMPACT Funds for this renewal agreement and services are budgeted and available in the FMSA - Treasury & Customer Service Contract Services -Professional (No. 01110130-62300); FMSA - Service Enhancement Contract Services -Professional (No. 01110017-62300); PWA Water- Miscellaneous Expenses (No. 06017642-65220); PWA - Refuse Collection Service Contract Services -Professional (No. 06917640-62300); CMO - Contract Services -Professional (No. 01103010-62300); CMO - General Non -Departmental Contract Services -Professional (No. 01105015-62300); CMO - Revive Fund Contract Services -Professional (No. 18103013-62300); SAPD - Fiscal & Budget (No. 01114401- 63001); CDA - Inclusionary Housing Fund (No. 41718820-62300); CDA - Housing Authority -Vouchers ADM (No. 14018760-62300); CDA - Service Enhancement (No. 01118017-62300); CDA - Economic Development (No. 01118810-62300); PRCSA - Recreation & Comm. Svs. (No. 01113230-63001); PRCSA - Park Facilities (No. 01113250-63200). Funds will be budgeted for expenditure as follows: City Council 21 - 4 4/19/2022 Renewal Agreement with InfoSend, Inc. April 19, 2022 Page 5 Accounting Contingency Unit - Fund Accounting Unit - Contracted (Plus Annual Maximum FY Account Description Accounting No. Amount Postage Rate Amount No. Description & CPI Increases FMSA- 01110130- Treasury & Contract Services $288,462 $86,538 $375,000 62300 Customer Professional Service 01110017- FMSA - Service Contract Services $48,077 $14,424 $62,501 62300 Enhancement Professional 06017642- PWA Water - Miscellaneous Treasury/Accounting $384,615 $115,384 $499,999 65220 Expenses Services Charges 06917640- PWA - Refuse Collection Contract Services $80,000 $24,000 $104,000 62300 Service Professional 01103010- CMO - Contract Services $20,000 $6,000 $26,000 62300 General Professional 2021- 01105015- CMO - General Non- Contract Services $20,000 $6,000 $26,000 22 62300 Departmental Professional 18103013- CMO - Revive Contract Services $20,000 $6,000 $26,000 62300 Fund Professional 01114401- SAPD - Fiscal Misc. Operating $50,000 $15,000 $65,000 63001 & Budget Expenses 41718820- CDA - Inclusionary Contract Services $27,500 $8,250 $35,750 62300 Housing Fund Professional CDA - 14018760- Housing Authority- Contract Services $20,000 $6,000 $26,000 62300 Vouchers Professional ADM 01118017- CDA - Service Contract Services $10,000 $3,000 $13,000 62300 Enhancement Professional City Council 21 - 5 4/19/2022 Renewal Agreement with InfoSend, Inc. April 19, 2022 Page 6 01118810- CDA - Economic Contract Services $5,000 $1,500 $6,500 62300 Development Professional 01113230- PRCSA - Recreation & Misc. Operating $25,000 $7,500 $32,500 63001 Comm. Svs. Expenses 01113250- PRCSA - Contract Services $25,000 $7,500 $32,500 63200 Park Facilities Professional FMSA- 01110130- Treasury & Contract Services $288,462 $86,538 $375,000 62300 Customer Professional Service 01110017- FMSA - Service Contract Services $48,077 $14,424 $62,501 62300 Enhancement Professional 06017642- PWA Water - Miscellaneous Treasury/Accounting $384,615 $115,384 $499,999 65220 Expenses Services Charges 06917640- PWA - Refuse Collection Contract Services $50,000 $15,000 $65,000 62300 Service Professional 01103010- CMO - Contract Services $20,000 $6,000 $26,000 62300 General Professional 2022- 23 CMO - 01105015- General Non- Contract Services $20,000 $6,000 $26,000 62300 Departmental Professional 18103013- CMO - Revive Contract Services $20,000 $6,000 $26,000 62300 Fund Professional 01114401- SAPID - Fiscal Misc. Operating $50,000 $15,000 $65,000 63001 & Budget Expenses 41718820- CDA - Inclusionary Contract Services $27,500 $8,250 $35,750 62300 Housing Fund Professional 14018760- CDA - Housing Contract Services $20,000 $6,000 $26,000 62300 Authority - Professional City Council 21 - 6 4/19/2022 Renewal Agreement with InfoSend, Inc. April 19, 2022 Page 7 Vouchers ADM 01118017- CDA - Service Contract Services $10,000 $3,000 $13,000 62300 Enhancement Professional 01118810- CDA - Economic Contract Services $5,000 $1,500 $6,500 62300 Development Professional 01113230- PRCSA - Recreation & Misc. Operating $25,000 $7,500 $32,500 63001 Comm. Svs. Expenses 01113250- PRCSA - Contract Services $25,000 $7,500 $32,500 63200 Park Facilities Professional FMSA- 01110130- Treasury & Contract Services $288,462 $86,538 $375,000 62300 Customer Professional Service 01110017- FMSA - Service Contract Services $48,077 $14,424 $62,501 62300 Enhancement Professional 06017642- PWA Water - Miscellaneous Treasury/Accounting $384,615 $115,384 $499,999 65220 Expenses Services Charges 06917640- PWA - Refuse Collection Contract Services $50,000 $15,000 $65,000 2023- 62300 Service Professional 24 01103010- CMO - Contract Services $20,000 $6,000 $26,000 62300 General Professional 01105015- CMO - General Non- Contract Services $20,000 $6,000 $26,000 62300 Departmental Professional 18103013- CMO - Revive Contract Services $20,000 $6,000 $26,000 62300 Fund Professional 01114401- SAPD - Fiscal Misc. Operating $50,000 $15,000 $65,000 63001 & Budget Expenses City Council 21 - 7 4/19/2022 Renewal Agreement with InfoSend, Inc. April 19, 2022 Page 8 41718820- CDA - Inclusionary Contract Services $27,500 $8,250 $35,750 62300 Housing Fund Professional CDA - 14018760- Housing Authority- Contract Services $20,000 $6,000 $26,000 62300 Vouchers Professional ADM 01118017- CDA - Service Contract Services $10,000 $3,000 $13,000 62300 Enhancement Professional 01118810- CDA - Economic Contract Services $5,000 $1,500 $6,500 62300 Development Professional 01113230- PRCSA - Recreation & Misc. Operating $25,000 $7,500 $32,500 63001 Comm. Svs. Expenses 01113250- PRCSA - Contract Services $25,000 $7,500 $32,500 63200 Park Facilities Professional FMSA- 01110130- Treasury & Contract Services $288,462 $86,538 $375,000 62300 Customer Professional Service 01110017- FMSA - Service Contract Services $48,077 $14,424 $62,501 62300 Enhancement Professional 06017642- PWA Water - Miscellaneous Treasury/Accounting $384,615 $115,384 $499,999 2024- 65220 Expenses Services Charges 25 06917640- PWA - Refuse Contract Services 62300 Collection Professional $50,000 $15,000 $65,000 Service 01103010- CMO - Contract Services $20,000 $6,000 $26,000 62300 General Professional 01105015- CMO - General Non- Contract Services $20,000 $6,000 $26,000 62300 Departmental Professional City Council 21 - 8 4/19/2022 Renewal Agreement with InfoSend, Inc. April 19, 2022 Page 9 18103013- CMO - Revive Contract Services $20,000 $6,000 $26,000 62300 Fund Professional 01114401- SAPD - Fiscal Misc. Operating $50,000 $15,000 $65,000 63001 & Budget Expenses 41718820- CDA - Inclusionary Contract Services $27,500 $8,250 $35,750 62300 Housing Fund Professional CDA - 14018760- Housing Authority- Contract Services $20,000 $6,000 $26,000 62300 Vouchers Professional ADM 01118017- CDA - Service Contract Services $10,000 $3,000 $13,000 62300 Enhancement Professional 01118810- CDA - Economic Contract Services $5,000 $1,500 $6,500 62300 Development Professional 01113230- PRCSA - Recreation & Misc. Operating $25,000 $7,500 $32,500 63001 Comm. Svs. Expenses 01113250- PRCSA - Contract Services $25,000 $7,500 $32,500 63200 Park Facilities Professional FMSA- 01110130- Treasury & Contract Services $288,462 $86,538 $375,000 62300 Customer Professional Service 01110017- FMSA - Service Contract Services $48,077 $14,424 $62,501 2025- 62300 Enhancement Professional 26 06017642- PWA Water - Miscellaneous Treasury/Accounting $384,615 $115,384 $499,999 65220 Expenses Services Charges 06917640- PWA - Refuse Collection Contract Services $50,000 $15,000 $65,000 62300 Service Professional City Council 21 - 9 4/19/2022 Renewal Agreement with InfoSend, Inc. April 19, 2022 Page 10 01103010- CMO - Contract Services $20,000 $6,000 $26,000 62300 General Professional 01105015- CMO - General Non- Contract Services $20,000 $6,000 $26,000 62300 Departmental Professional 01114401- SAPD - Fiscal Misc. Operating $50,000 $15,000 $65,000 63001 & Budget Expenses 41718820- CDA - Inclusionary Contract Services $27,500 $8,250 $35,750 62300 Housing Fund Professional CDA - 14018760- Housing Authority- Contract Services $20,000 $6,000 $26,000 62300 Vouchers Professional ADM 01118017- CDA - Service Contract Services $10,000 $3,000 $13,000 62300 Enhancement Professional 01118810- CDA - Economic Contract Services $5,000 $1,500 $6,500 62300 Development Professional 01113230- PRCSA - Recreation & Misc. Operating $25,000 $7,500 $32,500 63001 Comm. Svs. Expenses 01113250- PRCSA - Contract Services $25,000 $7,500 $32,500 63200 Park Facilities Professional FMSA- 01110130- Treasury & Contract Services $288,462 $86,538 $375,000 62300 Customer Professional Service 2026- 27 01110017- FMSA - Service Contract Services $48,077 $14,424 $62,501 62300 Enhancement Professional 06017642- PWA Water - Miscellaneous Treasury/Accounting $384,615 $115,384 $499,999 65220 Expenses Services Charges City Council 21 - 10 4/19/2022 Renewal Agreement with InfoSend, Inc. April 19, 2022 Page 11 06917640- PWA - Refuse Collection Contract Services $50,000 $15,000 $65,000 62300 Service Professional 01103010- CMO - Contract Services $20,000 $6,000 $26,000 62300 General Professional 01105015- CMO - General Non- Contract Services $20,000 $6,000 $26,000 62300 Departmental Professional 01114401- SAPD - Fiscal Misc. Operating $50,000 $15,000 $65,000 63001 & Budget Expenses 41718820- CDA - Inclusionary Contract Services $27,500 $8,250 $35,750 62300 Housing Fund Professional CDA - 14018760- Housing Authority- Contract Services $20,000 $6,000 $26,000 62300 Vouchers Professional ADM 01118017- CDA - Service Contract Services $10,000 $3,000 $13,000 62300 Enhancement Professional 01118810- CDA - Economic Contract Services $5,000 $1,500 $6,500 62300 Development Professional 01113230- PRCSA - Recreation & Misc. Operating $25,000 $7,500 $32,500 63001 Comm. Svs. Expenses 01113250- PRCSA - Contract Services $25,000 $7,500 $32,500 63200 Park Facilities Professional FMSA- 01110130- Treasury & Contract Services $288,462 $86,538 $375,000 62300 Customer Professional 2027- Service 28 FMSA - 01110017- Service Contract Services $48,077 $14,424 $62,501 62300 Enhancement Professional City Council 21 - 11 4/19/2022 Renewal Agreement with InfoSend, Inc. April 19, 2022 Page 12 06017642- PWA Water - Miscellaneous Treasury/Accounting $384,615 $115,384 $499,999 65220 Expenses Services Charges 06917640- PWA - Refuse Collection Contract Services $50,000 $15,000 $65,000 62300 Service Professional 01103010- CMO - Contract Services $20,000 $6,000 $26,000 62300 General Professional 01105015- CMO - General Non- Contract Services $20,000 $6,000 $26,000 62300 Departmental Professional 01114401- SAPD - Fiscal Misc. Operating $50,000 $15,000 $65,000 63001 & Budget Expenses 41718820- CDA - Inclusionary Contract Services $27,500 $8,250 $35,750 62300 Housing Fund Professional CDA - 14018760- Housing Authority- Contract Services $20,000 $6,000 $26,000 62300 Vouchers Professional ADM 01118017- CDA - Service Contract Services $10,000 $3,000 $13,000 62300 Enhancement Professional 01118810- CDA - Economic Contract Services $5,000 $1,500 $6,500 62300 Development Professional 01113230- PRCSA - Recreation & Misc. Operating $25,000 $7,500 $32,500 63001 Comm. Svs. Expenses 01113250- PRCSA - Contract Services $25,000 $7,500 $32,500 63200 Park Facilities Professional FMSA- 2028- 01110130- Treasury & Contract Services $288,462 $86,538 $375,000 29 62300 Customer Professional Service City Council 21 - 12 4/19/2022 Renewal Agreement with InfoSend, Inc. April 19, 2022 Page 13 01110017- FMSA - Service Contract Services $48,077 $14,424 $62,501 62300 Enhancement Professional 06017642- PWA Water - Miscellaneous Treasury/Accounting $384,615 $115,384 $499,999 65220 Expenses Services Charges 06917640- PWA - Refuse Collection Contract Services $50,000 $15,000 $65,000 62300 Service Professional 01103010- CMO - Contract Services $20,000 $6,000 $26,000 62300 General Professional 01105015- CMO - General Non- Contract Services $20,000 $6,000 $26,000 62300 Departmental Professional 01114401- SAPD - Fiscal Misc. Operating $50,000 $15,000 $65,000 63001 & Budget Expenses 41718820- CDA - Inclusionary Contract Services $27,500 $8,250 $35,750 62300 Housing Fund Professional CDA - 14018760- Housing Authority- Contract Services $20,000 $6,000 $26,000 62300 Vouchers Professional ADM 01118017- CDA - Service Contract Services $10,000 $3,000 $13,000 62300 Enhancement Professional 01118810- CDA - Economic Contract Services $5,000 $1,500 $6,500 62300 Development Professional 01113230- PRCSA - Recreation & Misc. Operating $25,000 $7,500 $32,500 63001 Comm. Svs. Expenses 01113250- PRCSA - Contract Services $25,000 $7,500 $32,500 63200 Park Facilities Professional City Council 21 - 13 4/19/2022 Renewal Agreement with InfoSend, Inc. April 19, 2022 Page 14 FMSA- 01110130- Treasury & Contract Services $150,000 $45,000 $195,000 62300 Customer Professional Service 01110017- FMSA - Service Contract Services $25,000 $7,500 $32,500 62300 Enhancement Professional 06017642- PWA Water - Miscellaneous Treasury/Accounting $187,500 $56,250 $243,750 65220 Expenses Services Charges 06917640- PWA - Refuse Collection Contract Services $25,000 $7,500 $32,500 62300 Service Professional 01103010- CMO - Contract Services $10,000 $3,000 $13,000 62300 General Professional 01105015- CMO - General Non- Contract Services $10,000 $3,000 $13,000 62300 Departmental Professional 2029- 30 01114401- SAPD - Fiscal Misc. Operating $25,000 $7,500 $32,500 63001 & Budget Expenses 41718820- CDA - Inclusionary Contract Services $13,750 $4,126 $17,876 62300 Housing Fund Professional CDA - 14018760- Housing Authority- Contract Services $10,000 $3,000 $13,000 62300 Vouchers Professional ADM 01118017- CDA - Service Contract Services $5,000 $1,500 $6,500 62300 Enhancement Professional 01118810- CDA - Economic Contract Services $2,500 $750 $3,250 62300 Development Professional 01113230- PRCSA - Recreation & Misc. Operating $12,500 $3,750 $16,250 63001 Comm. Svs. Expenses City Council 21 - 14 4/19/2022 Renewal Agreement with InfoSend, Inc. April 19, 2022 Page 15 01113250- PRCSA - Contract Services $12,500 $3,750 $16,250 63200 Park Facilities Professional Subtotal: Subtotal: Grand Total: $8,387,982 $2,516,394 $10,904,376 EXHIBIT(S) 1. InfoSend, Inc. Renewal Agreement Submitted By: Kathryn Downs, CPA, Executive Director of Finance & Management Services Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager City Council 21 — 15 4/19/2022 CONSULTANT RENEWAL AGREEMENT WITH INFOSEND, INC. TO PROVIDE BILL PRINTING, MAIL SERVICES, AND PAYMENT PROCESSING SERVICES TO CITY OF SANTA ANA THIS CONSULTANT RENEWAL AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into on this 19th day of April 2022, by and between InfoSend, Inc., a California corporation (hereinafter "Consultant"), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California (hereinafter "City"), collectively "the Parties". RECITALS A. The City desires to retain a consultant having special skill and knowledge in the field of municipal bill printing and mailing services and electronic bill presentment and payment processing. B. The City acknowledges that it has received prior Municipal Utility Services, Business License Tax, Dog License, Proactive Residential Enforcement Program, and other miscellaneous ancillary bill printing and mailing services as well as Dog License electronic bill presentment and payment processing services from Consultant prior to the date of this consultant renewal agreement ("this Agreement") and City intends that any unpaid sums receivable by Consultant for prior services shall be covered under this Agreement. C. In undertaking the performance of this Agreement, Consultant represents that it is knowledgeable in its field and that any services performed by Consultant under this Agreement will be performed in compliance with such standards as may reasonably be expected from a professional consulting firm in the field. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual and respective promises, and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the Parties agree as follows: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES Consultant shall provide paper bill processing, printing and mailing services along with electronic bill presentment and payment services, and other related professional services as detailed in the scopes of services attached hereto as Exhibit A (Scope of InfoSend Primary Services) and Exhibit C (Professional Services) and hereby incorporated herein by reference. Scope of Services shall also include: a. Data Processing, Printing and Mailing (DPPM) Services. The paper bill processing, printing and mailing (DPPM) process consists of data processing, address validation and postal bar coding, printing documents, mail preparation, applying presorted postage and sending via the United States Postal Service for the City's: (1) Municipal Utility Services bills; water conservation program notices, water quality program City Council 21 — 16 4 13 notices, Municipal Utility Services rate change advisories, awareness & education campaign notices, advanced meter infrastructure notices and advisories, penalty and/or collection notices, and other related miscellaneous notices, form correspondence and advisories including paramedic subscription notices; (2) Business License Tax bills, renewal statements, certificates and licenses, penalty/and or collection notices, and other related miscellaneous notices, form correspondence and advisories; (3) Dog License Bills, rabies reminders, certificates, penalty/and or collection notices, and other related miscellaneous notices, form correspondence and advisories; (4) Proactive Residential Enforcement Program (PREP) bills, renewal statements, certificates, penalty/and or collection notices, and other related miscellaneous notices, form correspondence and advisories; and (5) assorted public notices, postcards, community advisories, outreach program letters, associated form correspondence, as well as City newsletters and a variety of other miscellaneous independent City agency communications and program literature. b. Basic Electronic Bill Presentment and Payment (EBPP) Services. Basic Electronic Bill Presentment and Payment (EBPP) services consists of: (i.) Maintaining an online customer payment portal and presenting Dog License bills online and accepting payment transaction information to facilitate ACH or credit card payment via Consultant's merchant processing provider, EPX (EPX Acquisition Company, LLC, and successor to Phoenix Payment Systems, Inc.). City's right to bifurcate agreement and terminate DPPM and Basic EBPP services for Dog License billing. During the Term of this Agreement and any extension hereto, but beginning not sooner than January 1, 2023, City may upon one hundred -twenty days (120) days prior written notice by the City's Executive Director of Finance and Management Services, terminate DPPM and Basic EBPP services for Dog License billing, plus associated merchant processing services currently provided by Consultant's contracted merchant processor, Electronic Payment Exchange, Inc. (hereinafter "EPX"). Whereupon City shall have the right to continue Consultant's DPPM services for Dog License Billing for the term of this Agreement or City may continue either Consultant's DPPM and/or Basic EBPP services for Dog License Billing on a month -to -month basis and terminate the DPPM and Basic EBPP portion of the Agreement in connection with Dog License Billing, with no termination penalty or fees applied by Consultant by providing fifteen (15) days written notice of its intent to terminate said DPPM and Basic EBPP portion of the Agreement. c. Electronic Bill Data Conversion and Graphical Document File Presentment for Third - Party Enhanced EBPP Services Provider. Electronic Bill Data Conversion and Graphical File Presentment services consists of- (i) Receiving graphical bill data file information from an integrated City billing application ("enQuesta") maintained by a designated billing application provider ("Systems and Software, Inc.") and converting said graphical bill data file information into a graphical document file and presenting said file to a designated Third -Party Enhanced EBPP Services Provider ("Invoice Cloud, Inc."). City Council 21 — 17 4W5 13 2. COMPENSATION a. City agrees to pay, and Consultant agrees to accept as total payment for its services, the rates and charges identified in Exhibit B (InfoSend Fees) and Exhibit C (Professional Services which are hereby incorporated herein by this reference. b. The total sum to be expended under this Agreement shall not exceed $10,904,376, inclusive of any unpaid sums receivable by Consultant for prior services commencing July 1, 2021, and shall not exceed: 1. $1,330,750 for the fiscal year period beginning July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022; 2. $1,291,750 for each succeeding annual fiscal year beginning July 1, 2022 and ending June 30, 2025; 3. $1,265,750 for each succeeding annual fiscal year beginning July 1, 2025 and ending June 30, 2029; and thereafter 4. $635,375 for the period beginning July 1, 2029 and ending December 31, 2029. i. Payment by City shall be made within forty-five (45) days following receipt of proper invoice evidencing work performed, subject to City accounting procedures. City shall pay 1/2% per month late interest on any balance past due. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standards of performance set forth in the Recitals which may reasonably be expected by City. Billing or invoice statements shall be presumed to have been received three (3) days after they are mailed or twenty- four (24) hours after being electronically transmitted in accordance with the provisions of Section 10 of this Agreement ("NOTICE"). ii. City shall be responsible for payment related to United States Postal Service postage including rate increases. City will be invoiced by contractor for postage including the amount charged for overweight and foreign mail. 3. CHANGE ORDER — CONTINGENCY FUNDS — COMPENSATION CAP During the term of this Agreement, City may request optional services of Consultant at mutually agreed upon scope and fees. a. Change Order No extra work may be undertaken unless a written "Change Order" is first given by the Contract Officer or his/her designee, to Consultant, incorporating therein any material change in the scope, fees and/or administration of this Agreement proposed by City. City Council 21 — 18 4W5 13 b. Additional Work or Services 1. Extra Work or Services / Carry Forward of Unspent Contingencies Funds City shall have the right at any time during the performance of the work or services set forth in this Agreement, without invalidating said Agreement or any amendments thereto, to elect to exercise any existing option specified in the Scope of Services for extra work or services or to order extra work or services pursuant to a duly executed Change Order or to expend previously appropriated, but unspent contingency funds authorized to be carried forward by the Executive Director of Finance and Management Services to cover expenses for work or services agreed to by the parties but exceeding any annual City fiscal year compensation amount cap initially specified under the Compensation provisions of this Agreement or thereby make changes by altering, adding to or deducting from said work or services. 2. Maximum Contract Compensation Cap Net total compensation to Consultant shall not, as the result of any Change Order, exceed the maximum contract compensation amount set forth under Section 2("COMPENSATION"), subsection b. of this Agreement, unless an increase in maximum contract compensation is agreed to by the Parties pursuant to a duly executed amendment of this Agreement. C. Coordination of Work or Services 1. Representative of Consultant The following officer of Consultant is hereby designated as being the representative of Consultant authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith: InfoSend, Inc. Russ Rezai Representative President It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the foregoing officer & representative is a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the foregoing representative shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. For purposes of this Agreement, the foregoing officer & representative may not be replaced nor may their responsibilities be substantiallyreduced by Consultant without the express written approval of City. d. Contract Officer The Contract Officer shall be the person designated hereunder by City. It shallbe Consultant's responsibility to assure that City's Contract Officer is kept City Council 21 — 19 4TW5 13 informed of the progress of the performance of the consulting services set forth in this Agreement and Consultant shall refer any decisions which must be made by City to the Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall have authority to enter into Change Orders with Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. The Contract Officer shall have authority to sign all documents on behalf of City required hereunder to carry out the terms of this Agreement. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer. City of Santa Ana Kristine Ridge, City Manager Contract Officer or designee 4. TERM This Agreement shall commence on the date first written above and terminate on December 31, 2025, with one (1) three (3) year term extension option, and one (1) one-year term extension option, the first commencing January 1, 2026 and ending December 31, 2028, and the second commencing January 1, 2029 and ending December 31, 2029, unless terminated earlier in accordance with Section 13, below. This Agreement shall cover all services provided by Consultant since July 1, 2021. 5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR Consultant shall, during the entire term of this Agreement, be construed to be an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. This Agreement is not intended nor shall it be construed to create an employer -employee relationship, a joint venture relationship, or to allow the City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Consultant performs the services which are the subject matter of this Agreement; however, the services to be provided by Consultant shall be provided in a manner consistent with all applicable standards and regulations governing such services. Consultant shall pay all salaries and wages, employer's social security taxes, unemployment insurance and similar taxes relating to employees and shall be responsible for all applicable withholding taxes. 6. INSURANCE Prior to undertaking performance of work under this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain and shall require its subcontractors, if any, to obtain and maintain insurance as described below: a. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an "occurrence" basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. b. Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Form Number CA 0001 covering, Code 1 (any auto), or if Consultant has no owned autos, Code 8 (hired) and 9 (non - City Council 21 — 20 4 13 owned), with limit no less than $4,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. c. Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer's Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. (Not required if consultant provides written verification it has no employees). d. Cyber Liability Insurance, with limits not less than $5,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $5,000,000 aggregate. Coverage shall be sufficiently broad to respond to the duties and obligations as is undertaken by Consultant in this agreement and shall include,but not be limited to, claims involving security breach, system failure, data recovery, business interruption, cyber extortion, social engineering, infringement of intellectual property, including but not limited to infringement of copyright, trademark, trade dress,invasion of privacy violations, information theft, damage to or destruction of electronic information, release of private information, and alteration of electronic information. The policy shall provide coverage for breach response costs, regulatory fines and penalties as well as credit monitoring expenses. e. Technology Professional Liability Errors & Omissions Technology Professional Liability Errors and Omissions Insuranceappropriate to the Consultant's profession and work hereunder, with limitsnot less than $2,000,000 per occurrence. Coverage shall be sufficiently broad to respond to the duties and obligations as is undertaken by the Consultant in this agreement and shall include, but not be limited to, claims involving security breach, system failure, data recovery, business interruption, cyber extortion, social engineering, infringement of intellectual property, including but not limited to infringement of copyright, trademark, trade dress, invasion of privacy violations, information theft, damage to or destruction of electronic information, release of private information, and alteration of electronic information. The policy shall provide coverage for breach response costs, regulatory fines and penalties as well as credit monitoring expenses. The Policy shall include, or be endorsed to include, property damage liability coverage for damage to, alteration of, loss of, or destruction of electronic data and/or information "property" of the Agency in the care, custody, or control of the Consultant. If not coveredunder the Consultant's liability policy, such "property" coverage of theAgency may be endorsed onto the Consultant's Cyber Liability Policy as covered property as follows: "If the Consultant maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by the contractor. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City." f. Other Insurance Provisions The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: City Council 21 — 21 M95 13 i. Additional Insured Status The City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers shall be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Consultant's insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 1185 or both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 forms if later revisions used). ii. Primary Coverage For any claims related to this contract, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary. Coverage for commercial liability shall be at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respectsthe City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of theConsultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. iii. Notice of Cancellation Each insurance policy required above shall state that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the City. iv. Waiver of Subrogation Consultant hereby grants to City a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said Consultant may acquire against the City by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. Consultant agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer. v. Self -Insured Retentions Self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. The City may requirethe Consultant to provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide,or be endorsed to provide, that the self - insured retention may be satisfied by either the namedinsured or City. vi. Acceptability of Insurers Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the state with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A-:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. vii. Claims Made Policies If any of the required policies provide coverage on a claims -made basis: 1. The Retroactive Date must be shown and must be before the date of the contract or thebeginning of contract work. 2. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at leastfive (5) years after completion of the contract of work. City Council 21 — 22 4M65 13 3. If coverage is canceled or non -renewed, and not replaced with another claims -made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the contract effective date, the Consultant must purchase "extended reporting" coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of contract work. viii. Verification of Coverage Consultant shall furnish the City with original Certificates of Insurance includingall ll required amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause) and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsement Page of the CGL policy listing all policy endorsements to the City before work begins. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Consultant's obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time. ix. Subcontractors Consultant shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Consultant shall ensure that City is an additional insured on insurance required from subcontractors. X. Special Risks or Circumstances City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature ofthe risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances. 7. INDEMNIFICATION Consultant agrees to and shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees, consultants, special counsel, and representatives from liability: (1) for personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief arising out of claims for personal injury, including health, and claims for property damage, which may arise from the direct operations of the Consultant or its contractors, subcontractors, agents, employees, or other persons acting on their behalf which relates to the services described in section 1 of this Agreement. The Consultant further agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and pay all costs for the defense of the City, including fees and costs for special counsel to be selected by the City, regarding any action by a third party challenging the validity of this Agreement, or asserting that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief due to personal or property rights arises by reason of the terms of, or effects arising from this Agreement. City may make all reasonable decisions with respect to its representation in any legal proceeding. Consultant shall not be liable for indirect, special or inconsequential damages even if Consultant has been advised of the possibility of such potential claim, loss or damage. Consultant shall not be responsible for delays in receipt of client information or processing client information because of causes beyond its reasonable control, including, without limitation, failure or limitations on the availability of third party telecommunications or other transmission facilities and City's failure to properly enter and/or transmit information. City Council 21 — 23 4 13 8. CONFIDENTIALITY If Consultant receives from the City information which due to the nature of such information is reasonably understood to be confidential and/or proprietary, Consultant agrees that it shall not use or disclose such information except in the performance of this Agreement, and further agrees to exercise the same degree of care it uses to protect its own information of like importance, but in no event less than reasonable care. "Confidential Information" shall include all nonpublic information. Confidential information includes not only written information, but also information transferred orally, visually, electronically, or by other means. Confidential information disclosed to either party by any subsidiary and/or agent of the other party is covered by this Agreement. The foregoing obligations of non-use and nondisclosure shall not apply to any information that (a) has been disclosed in publicly available sources; (b) is, through no fault of the Consultant disclosed in a publicly available source; (c) is in rightful possession of the Consultant without an obligation of confidentiality; (d) is required to be disclosed by operation of law; or (e) is independently developed by the Consultant without reference to information disclosed by the City. 9. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CLAUSE Consultant covenants that it presently has no interests and shall not have interests, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with performance of services specified under this Agreement. 10. NOTICE Any notice, tender, demand, delivery, or other communication required or made pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly given if delivered in person or mailed by first class or certified mail, postage prepaid, or by express mail courier (i.e. FedEx, UPS, etc.), or sent by fax or email communication in the manner providedin this section. Any such notice shall be addressed to the other party at the address set forth below. Consultant invoice/billing statement notices to City shall be sent to City's Primary Representative/Project Manager or designees. All notices, including invoiceibilling statement notices and notices of address changes, provided under this Agreement are deemed received on the third day after mailing if sent by regular mail, or the next day if sent by overnight delivery. If sent by fax, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given twenty-four (24) hours after the time set forth on the transmission report issued by the transmitting facsimile machine, addressed as set forth above. If sent by email, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given twenty-four (24) hours after the time set forth on the delivery time stamp notated by the internet service provider, addressed as set forth above. For purposes of calculating these time frames, weekends, City Hall closure dates, federal, state, County or City holidays shall be excluded. If to City: Clerk of the City CouncilCity of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702-1988 Fax:714- 647-6956 City Council 21 —24 4W5 13 If to Consultant: With courtesy copies to: Executive Director Finance and Management Services Agency City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-17) Santa Ana, CA 92702 Phone: (714) 647-6960 Fax: (714) 647-5414 InfoSend, Inc. Attn: Russ Rezai, President 4240 E. La Palma Anaheim, CA 92807 Phone: (714) 993-2690 Fax: (714) 993-1306 Email: russ.rkinfosend.com Representative or designees: Consultant Primary Representative/Project Manager shall be: Russ Rezai, President Phone: (714) 993-2690 E-mail: russ.rAinfosend.com Representative or designees: City Primary Representative/Project Manager and Designee shall be: CITY Primary Representative/Project Manager shall be: Willard Holt, Treasury and Customer Services Manager 20 Civic Center Plaza, Room 1105 Santa Ana, CA 92701 Phone: (714) 647-5456 Email: wholt&santa-ana.org CITY Primary Representative/Project Manager Designee shall be: Alejandra Gutierrez, Senior Management Analyst 20 Civic Center Plaza, Room 1103 Santa Ana, CA 92701 Phone: (714) 647-5497 Email: agutierreznsanta-ana.org A party may change its address or representative or designees by giving notice in writing to the other party. Thereafter, any communication shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address and/or new representative or designees. City Council 21 — 25 4 f 13 11. EXCLUSIVITY AND AMENDMENT This Agreement represents the complete and exclusive statement between the City and Consultant, and supersedes any and all other agreements, oral or written, between the parties. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and any attachments hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. This Agreement may not be modified except by written instrument signed by the City and by an authorized representative of Consultant. The parties agree that any terms or conditions of any purchase order or other instrument that are inconsistent with, or in addition to, that terms and conditions hereof, shall not bind or obligate Consultant nor the City. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not embodied herein. 12. ASSIGNMENT Inasmuch as this Agreement is intended to secure the specialized services of Consultant, Consultant may not assign, transfer, delegate, or subcontract any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City and any such assignment, transfer, delegation or subcontract without the City's prior written consent shall be considered null and void. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit the City's ability to have any of the services which are the subject to this Agreement performed by City personnel or by other consultants retained by City. 13. TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated by the City or Consultant upon one -hundred and twenty (120) days written notice of termination. In such event, Consultant shall be entitled to receive and the City shall pay Consultant compensation for all services performed by Consultant prior to receipt of such notice of termination, subject to the following conditions: a. If City has requested custom forms/envelopes, City will purchase the remaining supplies of requested forms/envelopes upon termination of the Agreement, or at the time City requests a change in the design of the forms/envelopes. b. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standard of performance specified in the Recitals of this Agreement which may reasonably be expected by City. 14. DISCRIMINATION Consultant shall not discriminate because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, age, national origin, ancestry, or disability, as defined and prohibited by applicable law, in the recruitment, selection, training, utilization, promotion, termination or other employment related activities. Consultant affirms that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. City Council 21 — 26 4WMf 13 15. JURISDICTION - VENUE This Agreement has been executed and delivered in the State of California and the validity, interpretation, performance, and enforcement of any of the clauses of this Agreement shall be determined and governed by the laws of the State of California. Both parties further agree that Orange County, California, shall be the venue for any action or proceeding that may be brought or arise out of, in connection with or by reason of this Agreement. 16. PROFESSIONAL LICENSES Consultant shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, maintain all necessary licenses, permits, approvals, waivers, and exemptions necessary for the provision of the services hereunder and required by the laws and regulations of the United States, the State of California, the City of Santa Ana and all other governmental agencies. Consultant shall notify the City immediately and in writing of its inability to obtain or maintain such permits, licenses, approvals, waivers, and exemptions. Said inability shall be cause for termination of this Agreement. 17. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS a. Whenever the terms of this Agreement conflict directly with terms of any Exhibit incorporated herein by reference, then the terms and intent of this Agreement shall prevail solely with respect to any such directly conflicting provisions, or portions thereof and shall be controlling. b. Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature herein below has the power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall indemnify City fully, including reasonable costs and attorney's fees, for any injuries or damages to City in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn. c. This Agreement must be signed below and may be signed in counterpart and delivered by fax, emailed as a PDF (Portable Document Format) file attachment, or by other means that displays the original or a copy of the signatures. Any subsequent amendments may be signed and delivered in the same manner. {Signatures on following page} City Council 21 — 27 4 f 13 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and yearfrst above written. ATTEST: Daisy Gomez Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho City Attorney By: Rya40.d AssiAttorney RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: Kathryn Downs Executive Director Finance and Management Services Agency CITY OF SANTA ANA Kristine Ridge City Manager CONSULTANT: InfoSend, Inc. Russ Rezai, President City Council 21 — 28 Page 13 of 13 4/19/2022 Exhibit A - Scope of InfoSend Primary Services This Exhibit A is an integral part of and is subject to the terms and conditions of the Master Service Agreement (the "Agreement") between InfoSend, Inc. ("InfoSend") and City of Santa Ana ("Client"). This Exhibit A provides the Services which InfoSend shall deliver to Client to permit Client's customers ("Users") to use the products and services to view and pay their bills. To the extent that any term is not expressly defined herein, it shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement. Client will select one or more of InfoSend's Primary Services from the list below by checking the box next to the Primary Service name. Any Primary Services not selected prior to the execution of this Agreement can be added at a later date via an Agreement Amendment. 0 Data Processing, Printing and Mailing Service ("DPPM Service"): During the term of this Agreement, InfoSend will provide data processing, printing and mailing services. The Service consists of processing data, printing documents, mail preparation, applying postage (where applicable) and sending via the United States Postal Service. Document types include but are not limited to bills, postcards and letters. Section 1. Data Processing, Printing and Mailing (DPPM) Service Description A. Data Transfer and Processing • Client to transmit data to InfoSend in an agreed upon format. Should Client make changes to data file format after initial setup is complete, it agrees to pay for the professional services required to accommodate the new file format. See Exhibit C — Professional Services —for information on initial setup and ongoing programming changes. • Client will monitor transfer confirmation emails to ensure InfoSend is in receipt of the data. Client acknowledges that InfoSend will not be responsible or liable for any transferred data which does not result in a confirmation receipt to Client. • A File Transfer Report will be emailed to the Client representatives who have opted -in to this email. A copy of this report is also available to download from the InfoSend website. • Client will have access to an online Job Tracking application that shows the progress of each file as it is processed and becomes a batch of documents to be printed and mailed. Client can see both the original input file name and the InfoSend-assigned "Job Code". • InfoSend will process the mailing addresses and perform the following functions: o Apply CASS-certified address validation o Comply with USPS requirements to obtain pre-sort automation rates for qualified client mail pieces o Stay current with all USPS regulations required to mail presorted first-class mail • InfoSend will optionally provide proofs of the final print -ready PDF files to Client to be reviewed and approved before printing begins (if requested). B. Document Printing and Mailing • Batches are printed by InfoSend using a high-speed production process onto the agreed upon forms. • Printed documents are put through a quality control process and then released to the mailing department to be inserted into outgoing envelope. A return envelope and any applicable inserts are included as defined by client workflow. • After a batch of mail is completed in InfoSend's system it will be marked as such in the online Job Tracker and a Process Confirmation Report will be emailed to the Client representatives who have opted -in to this email. A copy of this report is also available to download from the InfoSend website. InfoSend ExhibgjJMQuncil 21 — 29 4/19/2022 Rev. 01.28.2021 Exhibit B - InfoSend Fees This Exhibit B is an integral part of and is subject to the terms and conditions of the Master Service Agreement (the "Agreement") between InfoSend, Inc. ("InfoSend") and City of Santa Ana ("Client"). This Exhibit B provides the Fees which InfoSend shall bill to Client in exchange for Services. To the extent that any term is not expressly defined herein, it shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement. Section 1. Price Escalations to InfoSend Fees InfoSend Fees can be adjusted once every twelve (12) months to account for increases in the cost of materials, labor, and other overhead costs. InfoSend reserves the right to increase InfoSend Fees on a yearly basis (starting with the first anniversary of the Agreement date not to exceed the Federal Bureau of Labor Statistics CPI for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) for the Los Angeles -Long Beach -Anaheim, California area, Base Period: 1982-84 = 100. This information can currently be found at https://www.bls.gov/cpi/). The Client will be notified, in writing, at least thirty (30) days prior to such price increase. An amendment to the Agreement will not be required if the Fees are changed, unless the terms or conditions of the Agreement have otherwise changed. Postage fees can change at any time per USPS regulations and do not require an amendment to the Agreement. In addition to this, if Client uses the Printing and Mailing Service, it accepts that InfoSend reserves the right to pass on any extraordinarily high increases to the cost of forms or envelopes at any time. The Client will be notified, in writing, at least thirty (30) days prior to such price increase. InfoSend pricing is predicated on Client representations of Client and Client User transactional usage. Should Client's actual continuous volume and/or recurring frequency deviate by more than thirty percent (30%) from what Client has represented to InfoSend in Section 2 below, then InfoSend reserves the right to invalidate the Fees listed in this Agreement. Should this rare situation arise then InfoSend will notify Client immediately and negotiate with Client in good faith to pass on any increased costs to Client, in line with actual Client and Client User transactional usage. Should InfoSend and Client fail to agree upon updated Fees, InfoSend reserves the right to terminate this Agreement with one hundred and eighty (180) days' notice. Section 2. Client Representations Client Volume Assumptions SNL — Notice of Dog Licensing Fee Approximately 1000 documents per month SNR — Rabies Reminder Notice Approximately 100 documents per month SN9 — Inspection Fee Letter Approximately 4200 documents per year SNT Business License Tax and SNN Estimated Business License Tax SNT — approximately 2800 documents per month SNN — twice yearly, approximately 2500 documents each run SNF — Annual Paramedic Subscription Monthly runs, volume fluctuates but averages 300-350 documents per month SND — Municipal Utility Services Statement data processing only Data processing only, approximately 300 documents per month SNC — Municipal Utility Services Statement Approximately 18,000 documents per month InfoSend Exhib'KsltYlVfSAuncil 21 —30 4/19/2022 Rev. 01.28.2021 Section 3. DPPM Fees: InfoSend Data Processing, Print and Mail Pricing Document Production Summary SNL — Notice of Dog Licensing Fee $0.1706 per document 2/1 print, recycled letter size paper, recycled #10, standard #9, SNR — Rabies Reminder Notice $0.1500 per document 1/0 print, recycled letter size paper, recycled #10, standard #9 SN9 — Inspection Fee Letter $0.2541 per document 2/1 print, letter size standard paper, standard #10, standard #9 SNT — Business License Tax $0.2323 per document 1/1 print, letter size standard paper, standard #10, standard #9 SNN — Estimated Business License Tax $0.2360 per document 1/1 print, legal size standard paper, standard #10, standard #9 SNF — Annual Paramedic Subscription $0.1223 per document 2/0 print, letter size standard paper, standard #10, standard #9 SND — Municipal Utility Services Statement $0.0720 per document Data Processing only job SNC — Municipal Utility Services Statement $0.1618 per document 2/1 print, legal size recycled paper, standard #10, recycled #9 Finished mail pieces are delivered to the USPS within one (1) business day. If samples (proofs) are requested then the mailing will be completed within one day of sample approval. File upload deadline for next -day mailing is 3:00PM local time at the production facility designated for your account. If samples are required then they must be approved by 5:30PM local time for the file to be mailed by the next business day. The below table provides the components of the summary price given above. All pricing is based on "Client Volume Assumptions " listed below and excludes applicable sales tax. Data Processing and Service Fee Data Processing Fee (per document), all document types $0.0100 Monthly DPPM platform fee $250.00 InfoSend EXmbgjjMQuncil 21 - 31 4/19/2022 Rev. 01.28.2021 Printing and Mailing Service SNL — Notice of Dog Licensing Fee $0.1000 2/1 print, recycled letter size paper SNR — Rabies Reminder Notice $0.0794 1/0 print, recycled letter size paper SN9 — Inspection Fee Letter $0.2069 2/1 print, letter size standard paper SNT — Business License Tax $0.1751 1/1 print, letter size standard paper SNN — Estimated Business License Tax $0.1751 1/1 print, legal size standard paper SNF — Annual Paramedic Subscription $0.0804 2/0 print, letter size standard paper SND — Municipal Utility Services Statement $0.072 (inclusive of all data Data Processing only job processing fees) SNC — Municipal Utility Services Statement $0.0856 2/1 print, legal size recycled paper USPS Postage Pass -through A postage deposit will be required prior to starting service. Batch Fee (per mailing batch under 200 mail pieces) $5.00 Excess Pages Handwork Surcharge (per mail piece) $0.35 Address Updates $0.50 NCOA $0.50 ACS Materials Standard Letter Size Paper Stock — 8.5" x I I" (per sheet) $0.0154 Standard Legal Size Paper Stock — 8.5" x 14" (per sheet) $0.0190 Standard Outgoing #10 Envelope * $0.0164 Standard Return #9 Envelope * $0.0154 Outgoing Flat Envelope — used for mail pieces with excess pages $0.1700 Insert Services InfoSend Produced Quoted based on specification Envelope Messaging (Snipes) Quoted based on specification Electronic Inserts $0.01 per insert Inserting Fee $0.01 per insert Optional Document Services Professional Services Rate (per hour) $175 Returned Mail Handling $0.50 per reported returned mail piece Remit Tracking $100 monthly support fee InfoSend Exhib9sltYQund1 21 — 32 4/19/2022 Rev. 01.28.2021 Section 3.1. Custom Forms/Envelopes If Client has selected the Printing and Mailing Service and at any time requests that InfoSend Fees include the cost of custom Client - specific materials (either in this Agreement or since its execution), then Client understands and accepts that these materials will be purchased in bulk to achieve the lowest possible per -unit cost. Client agrees to purchase any remaining supplies of requested custom materials (normally forms or envelopes) if Client stops using InfoSend's Service for any reason. Client agrees to purchase the remaining supply of custom forms/envelopes upon Client's request to change the custom forms/envelopes before the supply has been depleted. Section 3.2. USPS Postage Rates Postage rates are determined by the United States Postal Service. All postage rate changes are determined directly by USPS and are independent of any InfoSend service or materials fees. In no event shall any change in the postage rates affect the InfoSend service or materials fees. The Client will be invoiced the amount of excess for overweight and foreign mail. Section 3.3. Postage Deposit InfoSend purchases the postage needed to mail Client documents on the day of mailing. The postage charges are later invoiced to Client based on the Client's payment terms. InfoSend requires Client to submit a postage deposit prior to the first mailing to facilitate the payment terms. This amount will remain in deposit for the duration of the Agreement. Upon Agreement expiration or termination Client must pay in full any outstanding invoices from InfoSend for payables created under this Agreement; the postage deposit will be refunded within fifteen (15) days of the date that the last open invoice is paid. The postage deposit is subject to an annual review and may be adjusted to account for changes to Client average mailing volume or changes to USPS postage rates. There will be no more than one adjustment requested per year, if at all. Client's current postage deposit on hand is $13,040.00. Section 3.4. Receivables Finance Charge InfoSend applies a past due finance charge of 0.5% per month for receivables past due based on the Client's payment terms. Note: * - SFI® (Sustainable Forestry Initiative) Certified Paper Envelopes: for all clients that use standard envelopes, InfoSend's standard double window #10 and single window #9 envelopes are sustainably produced and are provided at no additional cost to clients. The Sustainable Forestry Initiative ensures materials are sourced from sustainably managed forests. Please visit www.s 1program.org or more information.* InfoSend Exhib9sltYQund1 21 — 33 4/19/2022 Rev. 01.28.2021 Exhibit C — Professional Services This Exhibit C is an integral part of and is subject to the terms and conditions of the Master Service Agreement (the "Agreement") between InfoSend, Inc. ("InfoSend") and City of Santa Ana ("Client"). This Exhibit C provides InfoSend's Professional Services Fees which InfoSend shall bill to Client in exchange for Professional Services. To the extent that any term is not expressly defined herein, it shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement. Section 1. Price Escalations to InfoSend Professional Services Fees InfoSend Professional Services Fees can be adjusted once every twelve (12) months to account for increases to the cost of providing these services. InfoSend reserves the right to increase Professional Services Fees on an annual basis, starting with the first anniversary of the Agreement date, if needed. The Client will be notified, in writing, at least thirty (30) days prior to such price increase. An amendment to the Agreement will not be required if the Professional Services Fees are changed, unless the terms or conditions of the Agreement have changed. Section 2. Definition of Professional Services InfoSend Professional Services are the technical services that are required to perform the initial setup of the InfoSend Primary Services defined in Exhibit A and the technical services required to make changes to these Primary Services after the initial setup is complete. Once any Primary Service is live and operational Professional Services will not be required unless Client requests a change or makes changes to its data file format or business rules which necessitates a change to InfoSend's system configuration or programming. Examples of InfoSend Professional Services: • Project requirements gathering and analysis hours • Project management and/or consulting hours • Software development and system configuration hours related to the processing of Client's data • Software development and system configuration hours related to document design, web portal setup, business rule configuration, or any other applicable technical services • Application testing and deployment hours Section 3. Professional Services Fee and Process for Approval and Payment of Fee The current Professional Services Fee is $175.00 per hour. In the event that a project will incur billable Professional Services hours, Client will be informed before work begins. InfoSend and Client will execute a Statement of Work for the project that Client wants InfoSend to undertake. The payment terms for the project depend on the size and scope of the project. The Statement of Work can include payment terms that are different than the terms listed in this Agreement for InfoSend Fees, otherwise these terms will apply and the project fees will be invoiced upon project completion. Small projects that incur less than five (5) hours of Professional Services can be initiated without a Statement of Work if Client accepts and executes a Programming Quote for this work. Any project that will take more than five (5) hours of Professional Services work will require both parties to execute a formal Statement of Work. Depending on the nature of the work required, InfoSend will provide one of the following quotation methods: • Fixed Quote — a fixed project cost will be set. InfoSend may elect to waive this cost in some circumstances. Client understands and accepts that it must accept the terms and conditions of the Statement of Work for the project and that changes made to the project requirements, data file structure, etc., after the Statement of Work and any amendments to it have been finalized will require Client to pay for these changes on a Time and Materials basis. Client will be notified immediately if this scenario arises and will be given an option to keep the original project specifications to keep the fixed quote in place. • Time and Materials Quote — should it not be possible to provide a fixed quote due to the nature of a Client's requested project, then InfoSend will provide an estimated number of hours to complete the project and bill the hours on a Time and Materials basis. The Statement of Work will include the terms and conditions for these project types and Client will be invoiced weekly for the hours spent on the project. Section 4. Initial Setup Cost: InfoSend Primary Services The Initial Setup cost for the InfoSend Primary Services selected in Exhibit A are listed in Exhibit B. These costs have been provided using a Fixed Quote process, explained in Section 3 above. Client understands and agrees to these terms, and to the project -specific terms and conditions that will be provided in the Statement of Work that will be created to capture Client's specific requirements and data types. InfoSend Exhib'K&lVfSAuncil 21 - 34 4/19/2022 Rev. 01.28.2021 Public Works Agency www.santa-ana.org/pw Item # 22 o`7, City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report April 19, 2022 TOPIC: Digital Billboards and Digital Banners AGENDA TITLE Approve an Agreement with Outfront Media LLC for the Design, Construction, Maintenance, and Operation of Digital Billboards and Digital Banners at City -owned Properties throughout the City for a 25-Year Term (General Fund) RECOMMENDED ACTION Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Outfront Media LLC to design, construct, maintain, and operate digital billboards at City -owned freeway locations and digital banners throughout the City, and to share advertising revenue from digital billboards and digital banners, for a 25-year period beginning April 19, 2022 and ending April 18, 2047, with an option to extend for a period of ten years, subject to non - substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. DISCUSSION The City has identified digital billboards and digital banners as revenue generators to support right-of-way operations and improvements. A Request for Proposals (RFP) for Design, Construction, Maintenance, and Management of Digital Billboards and Management of Bus Shelters and Bus Stops (Exhibit 1) was released on November 12, 2020, and the City received four proposals. The RFP solicited proposals from outdoor advertising companies that develop digital billboards and banners, as well as bus stop maintenance and advertising. However, after reviewing the proposals, it was determined that it was in the best interest of the City to separate the RFP components and award the design, construction, maintenance, and management of digital billboards and digital banners separately from the management of bus shelters and bus stops. Of the four proposals received, three vendors submitted proposals for the design, construction, maintenance, and management of digital billboards and digital banners. These proposals were evaluated and rated by a four -member committee and based upon company and team experience, understanding of need, schedule, references, and projected revenue. After evaluating the proposals, the committee ranked the proposals as follows: City Council 22 — 1 4/19/2022 Digital Billboards and Digital Banners April 19, 2022 Page 2 Firm City Rank Outfront Media, LLC New York, NY 1 Clear Channel Outdoor Torrance, CA 2 Lamar Advertising Company Los Angeles, CA 3 Based upon ranking and proposed advertising revenue -sharing with the City, staff recommends that Outfront Media be awarded an agreement for the design, construction, maintenance, and management of digital billboards and digital banners for a 25-year period, with a ten-year extension option, for a potential total agreement term of 35 years (Exhibit 2). First -year revenue is estimated at $550,000 in bonus payments while the billboards and banners are being constructed (a period of up to one year per site). Once operational, the City will receive annual payments of 40 percent of the estimated net advertising revenue of $830,304, or the minimum annual guarantee of $1,180,000, whichever is greater. Revenues will be utilized to support various right-of-way programs and improvements. The agreement includes the development of a comprehensive community outreach and communication plan for each location. Outfront Media will be required to hold community meetings for each location and to address all questions and concerns raised by the community to the satisfaction of the City. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT The City will determine the level of environmental review required based on the initial study performed by Outfront Media. Outfront Media will be responsible for the preparation, at its own cost, of any required environmental review and documentation. FISCAL IMPACT Revenues from this Digital Billboards and Digital Banners Management agreement will be generated as billboards and banners are installed and advertising revenue streams are established. Revenue will be received and utilized for the sole purpose of maintaining the public right-of-way in Fiscal Year 2022-23, and in perpetuity. Funds (revenue and expenditure) will be budgeted and made available in the following accounts. Fiscal Accounting Unit Fund Accounting Unit, Amount Year - Account # Description Account Description Public Works Revenues, 2022-23 01117002-57797 General Fund PWA Digital $550,000 Billboards/Banners City Council 22 — 2 4/19/2022 Digital Billboards and Digital Banners April 19, 2022 Page 3 Fiscal Accounting Unit Fund Accounting Unit, Amount Year - Account # Description Account Description Public Works Right-of- 2022-23 01117622-66220 General Fund Way, Improvements $550,000 Other Than Building EXHIBIT(S) 1. Request for Proposal 20-139 2. Agreement with Outfront Media LLC Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director — Public Works Agency Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager City Council 22 — 3 4/19/2022 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND MANAGEMENT OF BUS SHELTERS AND STOPS RFP NO.: 20-139 CITY OF SANTA ANA PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY 20 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701 Christy Kindig Projects Manager Office (714) 647-5088 ckindig@santa-ana.org for Release: KEY RFP DATES (Subiect to change at the discretion of the City): Issue Date: Letter of Intent: Deadline for Requests for Information Answers to Questions Proposal Due Date: Presentation/Interviews (optional): Projected Award Date: Christy Kindig Projects Manager Administrative Services Division Thursday, November 12, 2020 Wednesday, November 25, 2020 Wednesday, December 9, 2020 Monday, December 21, 2020 Thursday, January 21, 2021; 2:00 p.m. Week of February 8, 2021 Tuesday, March 16, 2021 City Council 22 — 4 4/19/2022 NOTICE INVITING PROPOSALS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that proposals will be received from qualified companies for the design, construction, maintenance and management of digital billboards and digital banners and for the maintenance and management of bus stops and bus shelters. Responses to this Request for Proposals (RFP) will be accepted until Thursday, January 21, 2021 at 2:00 p.m. Proposals received after this date/time will not be considered. It is the responsibility of the proposer to ensure that any sent proposal has sufficient time to be received by the City of Santa Ana prior to this proposal due date and time. Proposals shall be enclosed in a sealed envelope and marked clearly with the following information, formatted as follows: "SEALED PROPOSAL FOR RFP NO.20-139 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND MANAGEMENT OF BUS SHELTERS AND STOPS IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DO NOT OPEN WITH REGULAR MAIL." City of Santa Ana Attn.: Christy Kindig Public Works Agency 20 Civic Center Plaza; 4th Floor Reception, Ross Annex Santa Ana, CA 92701 Proposals shall be mailed, hand delivered, or sent by courier service. Proposals shall NOT be sent via telegraphic, electronic, or facsimile. All notifications, updates and addenda will be posted on the City's RFP Bid page at www.santa-ana.org/bids-rfps. Proposers shall be responsible for monitoring the site to obtain information regarding this solicitation. Failure to respond to required updates may result in a determination of a nonresponsive proposal. LETTER OF INTENT: Interested companies shall submit a Letter of Intent of their pending proposal to the noted Project Manager by the required date as shown on the cover page of this RFP. Letters shall be forwarded via email or certified mail. City Council 22 — 5 4/19/2022 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. GENERAL.......................................................................................................................................................................... 5 II. PROPOSAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.....................................................................................................................8 A. EXAMINATION................................................................................................................................................... 8 B. EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT......................................................................................................................... 8 C. PROPOSAL VALIDITY....................................................................................................................................... 8 D. PRE -CONTRACTUAL EXPENSES.....................................................................................................................8 E. JOINT OFFERS/SUBCONTRACTRORS............................................................................................................8 III. PERPETUALS TO PROPOSERS....................................................................................................................................9 A. CITY RESPONSIBILITIES.................................................................................................................................. 9 B. PROPOSER RESPONSIBILITIES........................................................................................................................ 9 C. REQUEST FOR INFORMATION OR CLARIFICATION.................................................................................. 9 D. ADDENDA............................................................................................................................................................9 E. LICENSES & PERMITS.......................................................................................................................................9 F. INSURANCE.......................................................................................................................................................10 G. ESTABLISHMENT OF BOND PAYMENT INFORMATION PACKET.........................................................10 H. PRE -PROPOSAL MEETING..............................................................................................................................10 I. CITY RIGHT TO REJECT..................................................................................................................................10 J. PROTESTS..........................................................................................................................................................10 IV. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS.................................................................................................................................. I I A. GENERAL ........................................................................................................................................................... I I 1. NUMBER OF COPIES AND SIGNATURE........................................................................................11 2. DEADLINE...........................................................................................................................................11 B. PROPOSAL CONTENTS.................................................................................................................................... I I 1. COVER LETTER..................................................................................................................................11 2. TABLE OF CONTENT.........................................................................................................................12 3. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...................................................................................................................12 4. COMPANY AND TEAM EXPERIENCE............................................................................................12 5. STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS................................................................................................12 6. COMPANY IDENTIFICATION AND EXPERIENCE........................................................................12 7. REFERENCES......................................................................................................................................13 8. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING............................................................................................................13 9. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL.............................................................................................................13 10. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE.......................................................................................14 11. BUSINESS PROPOSAL AND FINANCIAL PLAN............................................................................14 12. CERTIFICATIONS...............................................................................................................................17 V. PROPOSAL REVIEW (SELECTION OF PROPOSER).............................................................................................17 A. EVALUATION AND RATING..........................................................................................................................17 B. SELECTION........................................................................................................................................................17 Vl. AWARD OF AGREEMENT...........................................................................................................................................17 A. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION................................................................................................................17 B. EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT.......................................................................................................................17 VII. IMPLEMENTATION......................................................................................................................................................18 A. KICK-OFF MEETING........................................................................................................................................18 B. NOTICE TO PROCEED......................................................................................................................................18 VIII. PUBLIC RECORDS........................................................................................................................................................18 APPENDIX ATTACHMENT 1: SCOPE OF WORK ATTACHMENT 2: STANDARD AGREEMENT City Council 22 — 6 4/19/2022 ATTACHMENT 3: PROPOSED BUS SHELTER DESIGN ATTACHMENT 4: CERTIFICATIONS ATTACHMENT 5: POTENTIAL SITES FOR DIGITAL BILLBOARDS ATTACHMENT 6: LOCATION OF BUS STOPS AND BUS SHELTERS City Council 22 — 7 4/19/2022 I. GENERAL The City of Santa Ana ("Santa Ana" or "City") is the county seat and second most populous city in Orange County, California. The United States Census Bureau estimated its 2011 population at 329,427, making Santa Ana the 57th most -populous city in the United States. Santa Ana is located in Southern California, adjacent to the Santa Ana River, about 10 miles away from the California coast. Founded in 1869, the city is part of the Greater Los Angeles Area, the second largest metropolitan area in the United States with almost 18 million residents in 2010. Santa Ana is a very densely populated city, ranking fourth nationally in that regard among cities of over 300,000 residents (trailing only New York City, San Francisco, and Boston). In 2011 Forbes ranked Santa Ana the fourth safest city of over 250,000 residents in the United States. Santa Ana is interested in generating new revenue from City -owned land parcels for the installation and operation of two-sided digital billboards along freeways and digital banners on City streets by an outdoor advertising company. The parcels are located along three freeways, namely, the Santa Ana (I- 5) Freeway; the Garden Grove (SR-22) Freeway; and the Costa Mesa (SR-55) Freeway. In addition to billboards and banners, Santa Ana is requesting that the selected outdoor advertising company provide continuous maintenance service and advertising at City bus shelters. This Request for Proposals (RFP) is to solicit offers from outdoor advertising companies that develop billboards and banners to work with the City on new digital billboards and digital banners, to maintain bus stops, bus shelters and advertising panels and all associated furniture and to share with the City the profit from advertisements on billboards, banners and panels. Objective Through this RFP, the City aims to identify a partner for the design, construction, maintenance, and management of digital billboards along freeways and digital banners within the City to benefit the community in many ways. The city can run Public Service Announcements, such as AMBERTM Alerts, FBI bulletins, severe weather warnings and emergency response programs. Smaller local businesses can use this powerful advertising medium because a digital board offers more advertising spots. In addition, advertisement will have a financial impact and will bring additional revenue to the City. Moreover, the City envisions, upgrading some of the existing bus shelters and bus stops and adding new ones to not only provide shade, safety and comfort to transit riders and pedestrians but to also improve the quality of life, for those who live and work in and visit the City, by delivering these services through thoughtful, efficient design and implementation. At the core of that vision is to expand the use of transit, active transportation, and shared mobility as well as to foster economic growth that helps strengthen neighborhoods. This is in line with the Santa Ana vision to create a street furniture program that serves as a focal point to shared mobility facilities and provides directions and suggestions through wayfinding and interactive information and promotes commerce through digital and interactive advertising. The use of emerging technology, especially digital, wireless and 5G that can be supported by or work City Council 22 — 8 4/19/2022 Page 5 of 20 collaboratively with street furniture will be an important aspect of this RFP and the proposers are encouraged to address that in their proposals. Nature of Work: The City is seeking a qualified outdoor advertising company (Company) to design, construct, maintain and operate digital billboards at locations adjacent to freeways and digital banners within the City. The RPF also includes the requirement for the preparation of a preliminary feasibility study to determine the optimal number of locations along freeways (I-5, SR-22 and SR-55) and City streets for billboards and banners, respectively, and the projected annual revenue from all advertisement on billboards, banners and panels (at bus shelters and bus stops). In addition to billboards at freeway and banners at street locations, the City is requesting that the outdoor advertisement company provide continuous maintenance and advertisement services at bus shelters and bus stops. A detailed Scope of Work is included in ATTACHMENT 1: SCOPE OF WORK in the Appendix of this RFP. Number of Proposals and Signature: The submittal shall include four (4) bound hard copies, one (1) unbound hard copy and one (1) digital file on a labeled USB Flash Drive (or equivalent). One of the hard copies shall be marked as "ORIGINAL" and shall be signed by a company official with the power to bind the company and submitted to the City of Santa Ana. Proposal Evaluation and Rating: The criteria for evaluating the proposals will take the following items into consideration: • Company/Team Experience 25% • Understanding of Need 25% • Schedule 10% • References 10% • Projected Revenue 30% The City has established a proposal review committee to evaluate the proposals based on the response to the RFP, which includes adherence to outlined directions and format, and the City evaluation criteria set forth above. A final score will be calculated for each submitted proposal and used to rank the proposals. Prevailing Waizes: In accordance with the California State Labor Code, prevailing wage rates apply. Copies of the prevailing rate of per diem wages are on file with the Public Works Agency and shall be made available to any interested party on request. Term of Contract Agreement: The term of the exclusive agreement shall be for twenty-five (25) years with the possibility for up to two five (5) year extensions or as agreed on during the contract negotiations. City Council 22 — 9 4/19/2022 Page 6 of 20 Additional terms of agreement are outlined in the Standard Agreement, as contained in ATTACHMENT 5: in the Appendix of this RFP. In addition to the Standard Agreement, to be considered, the Company must meet the following minimum requirements applicable to digital billboards, digital banners, bus shelters and bus stops. The Company shall pay City twenty-five (25%) of the advertising revenue realized from all signs associated with the digital billboards, digital banners and bus shelter panels developed pursuant to an agreement between the Company and City. The City is willing to negotiate the above -stated percentage of the advertising gross revenue if other substantial benefits to the City and community are presented. Company shall make the signs and banners available for up to 10% of the advertising time for public service messaging, at no cost to City, spread over each operational day. Company shall allow the City or other designated authorities to preempt digital advertisements with emergency alerts or information at no cost. The Company shall also offer a 50% discount during 20% of the advertising time spread over each operational day for local businesses wishing to advertise their products and services on the City banners. This discount does not apply to freeway billboards. The Company shall, at least four (4) times per year, for at least twenty-eight (28) calendar days each time, display at least one (1 ) public service announcement in lieu of paid advertising in up to sixteen (16) bus shelters identified by the City or 10% of the total number of bus shelters under the agreement. In addition, the Company must meet the following minimum requirements applicable to digital billboards and digital banners as well as to bus shelters and bus stops. a. Digital Billboards and Digital Banners Company shall include a "City of Santa Ana" identification sign on each side of the sign structure in a form approved by the City, which must also be maintained for the term of the agreement. The proposed digital billboards and digital banners shall continue to be maintained and upgraded to the most current technology throughout the term of the agreement. In addition, a schedule shall be included for the replacement of the proposed digital billboards and digital banners. b. Bus Shelters and Bus Stops The City reserves the right to install additional bus shelters and furniture as funding becomes available. New shelters with advertisement panels will be added to the inventory of bus shelters and they would be subject to the terms of the agreement. A detailed design for the proposed shelters is included as ATTACHMENT 1: SCOPE OF WORK in the Appendix of this RFP. Whenever a reference is made to bus shelters or bus stops throughout this REP document, it should be understood that all of the associated furniture items listed below could be included: • Benches • Trash receptacles • Ad panels City Council 22 — 10 4/19/2022 Page 7 of 20 • Free standing kiosks • Outdoor advertising displays, both static and digital Furthermore, the same original contractual terms entered between the City and the Company would apply to the additional new bus shelters. The City expects the Company to determine the anticipated financial impact and additional income revenue from new or replaced bus shelters. The Company shall arrange, at its own cost and expense, for production, service, and installation of the public service announcements upon consultation with the City. The City shall be entitled to specify certain public service messages to be displayed and shall approve all public service messages. II. PROPOSAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS By submitting a Proposal, the Proposer acknowledges that it has thoroughly examined and accepts the Terms and Conditions of this RFP as described below: A. EXAMINATION Proposer represents that it has thoroughly examined and become familiar with the services and responsibilities required in this RFP and that it is capable of effectively and efficiently performing quality work to achieve the City's objectives. Any attachments referenced herein, or any interpretations, clarifications or amendments subsequently posted in relation to this RFP are fully incorporated. B. EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT The City and the Company will enter into an Agreement similar to that included in ATTACHMENT 5: in the Appendix of this RFP. If a Company is unwilling or unable to execute an Agreement within thirty (30) days after being notified of selection under this RFP, the City reserves the right to select the next most qualified Company or call for new Proposals, whichever the City deems most appropriate. C. PROPOSAL VALIDITY Services, pricing and warranties indicated in a respondent's Proposal must be valid for a period of 120 days after the submission of the Proposal. D. PRE -CONTRACTUAL EXPENSES The City of Santa Ana shall not, in any event, be liable for any pre -contractual expenses incurred by Proposers in the proposal preparation. E. JOINT OFFERS/SUBCONTRACTRORS Where two or more Proposers desire to submit a single Proposal in response to this RFP, they should do so on a prime sub -consultant basis. The City intends to contract with only one single Company and not with multiple companies doing business as a joint venture. All sub -contractors are subject to approval by the City. Should the use of sub -contractors be offered, the Proposer shall provide the same assurances of competence for the sub-contractor(s) plus the demonstrated ability to manage and supervise the subcontracted work. Sub -contractors shall not be allowed to further City Council 22 — 11 4/19/2022 Page 8 of 20 subcontract with others for work under the Agreement. The provisions of the Agreement shall apply to all sub -contractors in the same manner as they do for the Company. III. PERPETUALS TO PROPOSERS A. CITY RESPONSIBILITIES The City will provide information in its possession relevant to the preparation of required information in the RFP. The City will provide only the staff assistance and documentation specifically referred to herein. B. PROPOSER RESPONSIBILITIES Point of Contact: The Proposer shall assume responsibility for all services in its proposal. The Proposer shall identify a sole point of contact with the greatest knowledge regarding the required service operations and contractual matters, including payment of any and all charges resulting from the Agreement. Evidence of Financial Capacity: Proposer may be requested to submit its most recent audited financial statement, evidencing Proposer's financial capacity to fully perform the required services, including provision of equipment and personnel expenses over a ninety (90) day period. If said financial statement does not reflect full ninety (90) day operational capacity, Proposer may include a letter of credit as evidence of supplemental capacity. C. REQUEST FOR INFORMATION OR CLARIFICATION All questions or requested clarifications shall be made in writing within PlanetBids to the Project Manager (contact information as noted on the cover page to this RFP) by or before the "Deadline for Requests for Information" date noted on the cover page of this RFP. No verbal requests or responses will be accepted. All interpretations or clarifications will be addressed via addenda to this RFP, as indicated below in SUB -SECTION III.D "ADDENDA". D. ADDENDA Any changes in the RFP from the date of release to date of submittal will result in an addendum or amendment. Notification of such addendum or amendment shall be posted on PlanetBids as they become available. E. LICENSES & PERMITS The Company shall be required to obtain a City of Santa Ana Business license within ten (10) business days of selection and must provide a copy to the City Project Manager or designee prior to commencing any work in Santa Ana. Additionally, Company will be responsible for obtaining any licenses/permits required by the Scope of Work. For new billboards, Proposers should be aware of the City permitting and approval requirements. New digital billboards projects require the following: Approval of the Development Project Plan by the Director of Planning and Building Agency, and City Council 22 — 12 4/19/2022 Page 9 of 20 • Approval of an Operating Agreement by the City Manager. F. INSURANCE The Company shall provide the required evidence of insurance coverage as set forth in the standard agreement within ten (10) business days after receipt of notice of award. G. ESTABLISHMENT OF BOND PAYMENT INFORMATION PACKET The Company shall establish a bond in the sum of $1,000,000 within forty-five (45) days after the effective date of entering into an agreement with the City. This is to insure faithful performance of the Company's covenants for the construction, maintenance and repair of the digital billboards and digital banners, for the maintenance and repair of the bus shelters and bus stops, and for the timely payment of all revenues due to the City under the agreement between the Company and the City. The bond shall be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney and issued by a company licensed to do business in the State of California. The bond shall be maintained throughout the term of the agreement between the Company and the City. The Company shall restore to the bond any amount the City withdraws as liquidated damages, within thirty (30) days after the City withdraws the funds. H. PRE -PROPOSAL MEETING There will be no pre -proposal meeting in connection with this RFP. I. CITY RIGHT TO REJECT The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals submitted, and no representation is made hereby that any agreement will be awarded pursuant to this RFP or otherwise. The City reserves the right to accept or reject the combined or separate components of the proposal in part or in its entirety or to waive any minor inconsistency, informality, or technical defect in the proposal. The City reserves the right to reject and approve any and all subcontractors. All subcontractor(s) shall be identified in the response to the REP. Subcontractors shall be the responsibility of the successful Proposer and the City shall assume no liability of such subcontractors. J. PROTESTS Proposers with concerns or rebuttal of any staff determination of non -responsiveness or non - instruction may submit, in writing within five (5) business days, to the Project Manager, any concerns regarding the RFP process or staff determination. Such writing shall be considered by the City Manager or his designated representative and may be acted upon within five (5) business days. If no action is taken within such time, there shall be no change to the staff determination. The exercise by Proposer of its right to submit written concerns shall be a condition precedent to seeking judicial review of any award of a contract hereunder. City Council 22 — 13 4/19/2022 Page 10 of 20 IV. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS A. GENERAL 1. NUMBER OF COPIES AND SIGNATURE Refer to SECTION I "GENERAL" above. 2. DEADLINE Proposals are due to the City of Santa Ana, at the date, time, and location set forth above in the Notice Inviting Proposals. B. PROPOSAL CONTENTS A responsive proposal shall contain the following documentation: 1. Cover Letter 2. Table of Contents 3. Executive Summary 4. Company Information 5. Statement of Qualifications 6. Company Identification and Experience 7. References 8. Project Understanding 9. Development Proposal 10. Proposed Development Schedule 11. Business Proposal and Financial Plan 12. Certifications Font size shall be minimum 11-point Arial. Proposal exhibits shall be maximum I I" x 17" 1. COVER LETTER A cover letter serves as an introduction of the Company and a brief summary of the Company's capabilities in outdoor advertising. In the cover letter, the Proposer should also highlight the reasons the City should select it for the design, construction, maintenance and management of its digital billboards and banners and the management of its bus shelters and bus stops. The cover -letter shall include a statement outlining concurrence or concerns with any and all provisions as contained in the Standard Agreement attached as ATTACHMENT 2: STANDARD AGREEMENT in the Appendix of this RFP and shall be signed by a principal City Council 22 — 14 4/19/2022 Page 11 of 20 or authorized representative who can make legally binding commitments for the entity. 2. TABLE OF CONTENT The format of the table of content should be straight forward, with each section followed by a page number. 3. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This section should be limited to a brief narrative highlighting the Company's proposal. The summary should be free of technical language and should illustrate the benefits and possibilities offered by the Proposer. It should be between one (1) and five (5) pages long. There should be no mention of the projected revenue in this section. 4. COMPANY AND TEAM EXPERIENCE Proposal shall include a profile of the company's experience. Resumes of project team/sub- contractors that outline their technical and design experience should be included. At a minimum, this should include the project manager/principal agent, associates in charge when project manager/principal agent is unavailable, key personnel, firm size, and an organization chart identifying only those who will perform work for the proposed project and the percentage of each individual's time devoted to this project. The project manager/principal agent shall be the primary contact person to represent the company. Proposers must provide the following information about their company that demonstrates its stability and ability to support the commitments set forth in the RFP. Proposers should outline the company's background, including: a. How long the company has been in business. b. A brief description of the company size and organization. c. Number of customers in California. d. Total number of customers. e. Company organizational chart. f. Financial data, including the most recent audited financial statements (MARKED "CONFIDENTIAL"). 5. STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS The Statement of Qualifications shall be limited to a MAXIMUM of (10) DOUBLE -SIDED PAGES (excluding front and back covers, section dividers and attachments such as resumes, forms). 6. COMPANY IDENTIFICATION AND EXPERIENCE a. The name, address, and telephone numbers of the Company, along with resumes and a description of background experience of each person with whom the City must communicate. City Council 22 — 15 4/19/2022 Page 12 of 20 b. The type of legal entity with which the City would contract (e.g., individual, corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited -liability company). c. Documentation demonstrating that the Company is qualified to undertake the proposed project, including but not limited to the following: d. Overall experience with large, multi -site, digital -billboard development e. Experience with public/private development, including references of public partners f. Access to financial resources consistent with project requirements g. A track record of superior design h. The identity of the principal person within the Company who is authorized to negotiate on its behalf (the "Key Negotiator") and the authority the Key Negotiator possesses should be provided. If the Key Negotiator has limited authority, the process required to obtain authorization should be described. The Key Negotiator's resume must indicate that he or she is qualified to serve as Key Negotiator, with success in negotiating public/private partnerships and developing the type of development being proposed (include references that can validate the Key Negotiator's role in the prior projects). 7. REFERENCES Proposal shall include references for three public entities for which Proposer has performed similar work within the past five (5) years. Proposer shall provide references for a minimum of five (5) completed government installations that use the proposed system in a comparable environment. Where possible, at least one such reference should be in the state of California. The information should include municipality name, address, contact name, telephone number, date of installation, and a list of applications. Proposal shall include a list of relevant projects which the Company or personnel have completed within the last five (5) years, including significant work with public agencies. Project information should include project description, contract value, year completed, client name, along with a person to contact and their telephone number. 8. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING Proposal shall include an outline which demonstrates understanding of the scope of work. This outline should include anticipated approach, tasks necessary for successful completion, and suggestions or special concerns that the City should be made aware of. 9. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL Proposer must submit Proposal for all locations where a digital billboard and a digital banner are feasible and financially profitable. For freeway locations that are not feasible or financially profitable, the Proposer must state the reason(s) such as physical limitations, low return on investment, etc., for not selecting them. For each of the selected locations, Proposer must submit the following: a. A description of the proposed digital billboard and digital banner project, including identification of sites and anticipated installation schedule. City Council 22 — 16 4/19/2022 Page 13 of 20 b. The individual digital billboard and digital banner designs, with sufficient detail to illustrate the scale, size, and mix of design elements. At a minimum, the following design information shall be included in schematic form: • Site Plan • Elevations • High -resolution graphic renderings • Animation or video of installation with same quality, technology and scale c. Information pertaining to each proposed digital billboard and digital banner in sufficient detail to verify conformance with the specifications and requirements outlined in this RFP. Proposal shall include a Scope of Services which details the work phases to be completed, the tasks to be accomplished and the deliverables to be provided. Scope of Services shall be incorporated into the schedule to complete the project based on the requested Scope of Work as detailed in ATTACHMENT 1: SCOPE OF WORK in the Appendix of this RFP. 10. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE A preliminary schedule shall be submitted for the development of the proposed digital billboards and digital banners that addresses, at a minimum, preparation of sealed foundation, structural and design documents, projected approval dates, commencement and completion of construction, and operation of the digital billboards and digital banners. The City expects that construction of the digital billboards and digital banners will commence within six (6) months of execution of the Agreement with the commissioning of operation within eighteen (18) months. The schedule shall also include a timeline for the replacement of billboards and banners. The schedule shall include a written statement which provides information on current workload and how this project would be accommodated. 11. BUSINESS PROPOSAL AND FINANCIAL PLAN Proposer's projected revenue to City shall include the Company's best estimate of the revenue from advertising and the City's portion of that revenue based on a 25% share of the Company's estimated revenue. The revenue that the City can anticipate from contracting the services is part of the evaluation criteria. The bases and assumptions used to estimate the total projected gross revenue per year and over twenty-five (25) years shall be presented as part of the proposal. In addition, the anticipated number and location of the proposed digital billboards along the freeways as well as the number and location of digital banners within the City shall be provided based on a preliminary feasibility study. Similarly, the bases for the revenue from advertising at bus stops and bus shelters shall be estimated. The revenue from digital billboards, digital banners, bus stops and bus shelters shall be presented as three (3) separate line items with the associated bases and assumptions used in City Council 22 — 17 4/19/2022 Page 14 of 20 the calculation of the revenue for each. In addition, the following tables shall be completed and submitted as part of the Proposal to provide additional details. Table 1. Justification for the Selection of Billboard Sites and Projected Advertising Revenue. Potential Digital Billboard Advantages and Projected Projected Comments(3) Locations Disadvantages(') Annual Gross Gross Revenue Revenue(�) Over 25 Years WELL 38 (SANTA ANA ZOO) SANTA ANA WATER TOWER SANTIAGO CREEK AT BROADWAY RIVERVIEW LA VETA PARK WELL 28 (SANTIAGO ARCHERY RANGE), BACK TO NATIVES, CROOKE RESERVOIR SA-7 AT RICHEY WEST OF WARNER AT SR-55 FULLER LOT NORTHWEST OF GRAND AND I-5 WEST OF SANT ACLARA AT 1-5 SOUTHWEST OF MCFADDEN AT SR-55 WEST OF ALTON AT SR-55 (1) The basis for the selection of the top revenue generating sites taking into account other considerations such as environmental and esthetic impacts, assurance for the adherence to City requirements and compliance with all rules and regulations for electronic signs adopted by the Federal Highway Administration, United States Department of Transportation and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). (2) Total gross revenue in US dollars from advertising as projected per year. (3) Any additional justification for the selected sites and the increase in the annual gross revenue over twenty-five (25) years. City Council 22 — 18 4/19/2022 Page 15 of 20 Table 2. Justification for the Selection of City Banners Sites and Projected Advertising Revenue. Proposed Location for Basis for Projected Projected CommentsM Digital BannersM Selection(2) Annual Gross Gross RevenueM Revenue Over 25 Years Location 1: Location 2: Location 3: Location 4: �l The City has envisioned the installation of up to four new digital banners within the City. However, if Company recommends adding banners in addition to the four envisioned by the City, justifications must be presented. (2) The basis for the selection of the top revenue generating sites taking into consideration other considerations such as environmental and esthetic impacts, assurance for the adherence to City's requirements and compliance with all rules and regulations for electronic signs adopted by the Federal Highway Administration and the United States Department of Transportation. Traffic studies are available and can be provided upon request. (3) Total gross revenue in US dollars from advertising as projected per year. (4) Any additional justification for the selected sites, any potential concern from local associations for the proposed locations of the digital banners and the increase in the annual gross revenue over twenty-five (25) years. Table 3. Projected Advertising Revenue from Bus Shelters. Projected Gross RevenueM Comments(2) Per Year Over 25 Years Per Bus Shelter Total gross revenue in US dollars from advertising as projected per year, over 25 years and per bus shelter. (2) Any additional comments in support of the projected gross revenue from advertising. City Council 22 — 19 4/19/2022 Page 16 of 20 Proposer's best estimate of the projected revenue to City shall be submitted (along with the completed three (3) tables presented above) concurrently with the technical proposal, but in a separately sealed envelope, clearly labeled as "PROJECTED REVENUE". This shall include the Proposer's best estimate of the revenue from advertising and the City's portion of that revenue based on a 25% share of the advertisement projected revenue. The bases and assumptions used to estimate the total revenue shall be presented as part of the proposal. In addition, Proposer shall provide the recommended number and location of digital billboards along the freeways as well as the number and location of digital banners within the City. Similarly, the bases for the revenue from advertising at bus shelters shall be provided. The proposal for the projected revenue to the City will be opened and reviewed following a review of the proposal and independently of the rest of the proposal, and it will be weighted per the percentage identified in SECTION I "General" above. 12. CERTIFICATIONS The forms listed below and included in ATTACHMENT 4: CERTIFICATIONS in the Appendix of this RFP, shall be signed and included as part of the proposal submittal package: a. Non -Collusion Affidavit b. Non -Lobbying Certification c. Non -Discrimination Certification V. PROPOSAL REVIEW (SELECTION OF PROPOSER) A. EVALUATION AND RATING Refer to SECTION I "GENERAL" above. B. SELECTION The committee may interview the top-ranking proposers. The City will recommend award of the agreement to the Company that will provide the best quality and value to the City. City reserves the right to begin negotiations and to enter into an agreement without interview or further discussions. VI. AWARD OF AGREEMENT A. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Following evaluation and rating by the review committee, the Executive Director will recommend award of an agreement to the proposer providing the best quality and value to the City. B. EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT A standard agreement is included as ATTACHMENT 5: in the Appendix of this RFP. "Proposer" will hereinafter be referred to as "Company" in the standard agreement. The term of the agreement City Council 22 — 20 4/19/2022 Page 17 of 20 will begin after the agreement is fully executed, and all required bonds and insurance documents have been received and approved. VII. IMPLEMENTATION A. KICK-OFF MEETING A kick-off meeting will be held after award of contract. Company and its team will meet with City of Santa Ana staff to conduct introductions, discuss scope of services, and implementation process. B. NOTICE TO PROCEED Following the kick-off meeting, a formal Notice to Proceed (NTP) may be issued after the agreement is fully executed, and all insurance documents have been received and approved. VIII. PUBLIC RECORDS All responses to the RFP shall become the property of the City, and proposals will become public record after award of agreement. Proposer information identified as proprietary information shall be maintained confidential, to the extent allowed under the California Public Records Act. City Council 22 — 21 4/19/2022 Page 18 of 20 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 20-139 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND MANAGEMENT OF BUS SHELTERS AND STOPS Appendix ATTACHMENT 1: SCOPE OF WORK City Council 22 — 22 4/19/2022 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 20-139 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND MANAGEMENT OF BUS SHELTERS AND STOPS SCOPE OF WORK INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND The City of Santa Ana ("City" or "Santa Ana") is interested in generating new revenue from City -owned land parcels through the installation and operation of two-sided digital billboards along freeways and two-sided digital banners within the City. The land parcels available for the billboards are located along three freeways, namely, the Santa Ana (I-5) Freeway; the Garden Grove (SR-22) Freeway; and the Costa Mesa (SR-55) Freeway. For digital banners, the City is envisioning the installation and operation of four banners at four locations on major streets within Santa Ana. In addition to billboards and banners, the City is requesting that the Company provide continuous bus stop and bus shelter maintenance service and advertising to generate additional revenue. The City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency is in the process of updating the City's current Off -Premise Commercial Advertising Signs ("billboards") ordinance, last updated in 1987, to allow digital billboard displays adjacent to I-5, SR-22 and SR-55. The goal of the ordinance is to eliminate nonconforming billboards from the City, particularly in residential zones and other sensitive areas, allow the reconstruction of existing static billboards to digital billboards, and allow the construction of new digital billboards. DESCRIPTION OF WORK The work by the Company consists of the design, construction, maintenance and operation of digital billboards at freeway locations and digital banners within the City. In addition, the work consists of providing continuous bus shelter and bus stop maintenance service and advertising. Each of the three components of the work will be addressed below in a dedicated section. The City intends to contract with one company exclusively that specializes in outdoor advertising and not with multiple firms doing business as a joint venture. Where two or more firms desire to submit a single proposal in response to this RFP for work associated with the digital billboards, digital banners, bus shelters and bus stops, they should do so on a prime sub -consultant basis. 1. Digital Billboards a. Site Location The City has identified thirteen (13) City -owned sites as potential locations for the proposed digital billboards. A listing of the potential sites is included in ATTACHMENT 1: SCOPE OF WORKin the Appendix of this RFP. The selected locations for the billboards should ensure optimum return on investment and rapid results through an effective marketing strategy. The Company will be responsible for the evaluation of all potential sites for the freeway digital billboard locations. The evaluation and the determination shall not be limited to a determination of the sites with maximal revenue generating potential based on visibility along the freeway and dwell time near the City Council 22 — 23 4/19/2022 Page 1 of 18 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 20-139 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND MANAGEMENT OF BUS SHELTERS AND STOPS boards but shall also take into consideration environmental and esthetic impacts, assurance for the adherence to City's requirements and compliance with all rules and regulations for electronic signs adopted by the Federal Highway Administration, United States Department of Transportation and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). The Company will be responsible for the preparation of an Initial Study in association with the freeway digital billboards and any subsequent environmental documentation, site selection, utility easements if any, and any other encumbrance responsibilities. The City will determine the level of environmental review required. The Company will be responsible for all costs associated with such review and compliance, if any, including noticing costs, filing fees, staff costs, and consultant fees. b. Specifications: i. Current best available digital -billboard technologies are required, including but not limited to the following: • Remote diagnostic and maintenance capability • "Amber Alert" capability • Automatic brightness adjustment to ambient lighting conditions • UL and IEC approved • Color calibration to ensure consistent image quality • Remote shutdown capability • Screen sizes and pixel dimensions • Unless otherwise specified in the proposal, it is assumed that each digital billboard will be double -sided ii. The City is in the process of writing an off -premises commercial advertising signs ordinance. The requirements that are anticipated to be included in the ordinance are presented below in sections c through h. In developing the proposal, the proposer should take these requirements into consideration, as well as the requirements generally encountered on similar projects. iii. Construction and operation requirements: • Regularly scheduled onsite maintenance • Internal service access for safety and improved appearance (no visible catwalks) • Constructed to comply with all applicable Caltrans codes • Engineered foundation, anchoring mechanism, and support system City Council 22 — 24 4/19/2022 Page 2 of 18 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 20-139 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND MANAGEMENT OF BUS SHELTERS AND STOPS iv. The Agreement will require the Company to maintain, repair, and upgrade the digital billboards as needed to provide the best available digital -billboard technologies during the term of the Agreement. c. Application Requirements Every application for the construction a new digital billboard will be filed with the written consent of the City on forms required by the Planning Division and shall be, at a minimum, accompanied by the following information: i. A pictorial representation of, and other information about, the proposed digital billboard, disclosing overall dimensions, dimensions of letters and figures, colors, materials, copy, and illumination characteristics. ii. A plan of the site on which the proposed digital billboard will be located, indicating the precise location of the billboard, existing and proposed landscaping, other site improvements, and proximity to the edge of pavement of an adjacent freeway. iii. A vicinity map depicting the location of all existing and proposed billboards, any landmarks as designated on the General Plan that are within one thousand (1,000) feet of the proposed digital billboard, and the zoning designation of all sites within five hundred (500) feet of the boundaries of the subject property. iv. Photo simulations of all proposed digital billboards showing daytime and nighttime conditions. v. A three-dimensional (3D) massing study depicting proposed digital billboard. The 3D study will include any existing buildings and advertising signs within one thousand (1,000) feet of the proposed digital billboard. vi. Such other information as the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency deems appropriate to determine compliance with the provisions of the application requirements. d. Development Standards The City has developed the following requirements for digital billboards: i. All digital billboards shall comply with standards established by Caltrans that are in effect at the time the permit is issued. Among other provisions, these standards may prohibit the construction of digital billboards in landscaped areas and/or in zones where residential uses are permitted, may limit the size and height of digital billboards and may require separation between billboards. ii. The development standards in Table 1 shall be applicable to all new billboards. City Council 22 — 25 4/19/2022 Page 3 of 18 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 20-139 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND MANAGEMENT OF BUS SHELTERS AND STOPS Table 1 — Digital Billboard Development Standards St and Maximum Sign Area/Face As allowed by Caltrans Maximum Number of Faces Two (2) Maximum Height 60 feet(') Spacina Between Billboards 1,000 feet (2) Number of Vertical Supports One Vertical Support (3) Notes: 1. Measured from nearest adjacent curb level on the site on which the sign is constructed. 2. The minimum separation between billboards shall be one thousand (1,000) feet or standards established by the Caltrans in effect at the time the permit is issued, whichever is greater. 3. Only one architecturally concealed vertical support. e. Design Standards The City has the following design requirements for digital billboards: i. The words "Santa Ana" shall permanently appear on the billboard structure in a size large enough to be visible to drivers using the freeway. The precise location, size and font of the words shall be determined by the approval authority. ii. All ground -mounted equipment shall be screened from view at street level. The entire site occupied by the billboard shall be appropriately landscaped with groundcover and shrubs to the satisfaction of the approval authority. iii. Each billboard must be oriented primarily for viewing from the freeway and shall be oriented, and adequately shielded if necessary, to prevent the trespass of light and glare upon any residential land use, including those in mixed -use districts, as exists on the date of building permit issuance. iv. The billboard shall utilize an innovative billboard format, shall creatively use the latest in technology to ensure digital image quality, and shall use innovative architectural features and materials. v. All billboards shall plainly display and be visible from no less than one hundred (100) feet, the name of Company maintaining contact information for said Company, and the billboard's identification number. vi. Billboards projecting over a driveway or drive aisle shall have a minimum clearance of sixteen (16) feet between the lowest point of the sign and the driveway grade. vii. No part of any billboard shall cross onto an adjacent property. City Council 22 — 26 4/19/2022 Page 4 of 18 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 20-139 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND MANAGEMENT OF BUS SHELTERS AND STOPS viii. Billboards projecting over a pedestrian walkway shall have a minimum clearance of twelve (12) feet between the lowest point of the sign and the walkway grade. ix. All billboards not projecting over drive areas or pedestrian walkways shall have a minimum clearance of twelve (12) feet between the lowest point of the billboard and ground level. f. Lighting and Display Requirements The following lighting and display requirements apply to the digital billboards: i. Signs shall produce a maximum 0.3 foot-candles over ambient light levels. ii. The display brightness shall be controlled by a photocell or light sensor that adjusts the brightness to the required level based on ambient light conditions without the need for human input. Use of other brightness adjustment methods, such as timer- or calendar - based systems, shall only be used as a backup system. iii. The display shall be factory -certified as capable of complying with the above brightness standards. Such certification shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or his/her designee. iv. The sign owner shall provide to the City, upon request, certification by or compensation for an independent Company to verify that the brightness levels of the electronic billboard are in compliance with the requirements of this Section. v. All signs shall be equipped with a control system that, in the event of a display or control malfunction, "freezes" the display on either a single, unchanging message, or a blank screen. vi. Any sign area not comprising the electronic display panel is prohibited. This area includes, but is not limited to, static sign area, appendages, cutout letters, and figures. A frame surrounding the display panel up to twelve (12) inches in width shall be permitted; it shall not contain any sign copy or graphics and shall not count toward the sign area. vii. Where screen transitions are used, such transitions shall not give the appearance of moving text or images, and should use smooth effects, such as fades, rather than abrupt transitions. The sign copy shall not use flashing, intermittent or moving lights or produce the optical illusion of movement. viii. Each sign copy shall be displayed for a minimum of four (4) seconds. The still images may not move or present the appearance of motion and may not use flashing, scintillating, blinking, or traveling lights or any other means not providing constant illumination. Transition or blank screen time between one still image and the next may not exceed one (1) second. City Council 22 — 27 4/19/2022 Page 5 of 18 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 20-139 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND MANAGEMENT OF BUS SHELTERS AND STOPS ix. All digital billboards must comply with all applicable laws and regulations concerning brightness, including, without limitation, California Vehicle Code Section 21466.5, and as amended. g. Prohibited Features Digital billboards shall not contain any of the following features: i. Moving parts. ii. Appendages, cutout letters, or figures that protrude beyond the flat surface of the sign face. iii. Lights that flash, shimmer, glitter or give the appearance of flashing, shimmering or glittering. Exceptions to this restriction include time, temperature and smog index units. iv. Walls or screens at the base of the sign which create a hazard to public safety or provide an attractive nuisance. V. Copy which simulates any traffic sign in a manner which confuses the public. vi. Copy which duplicates any other content displayed on the sign. vii. Devices which emit audible sound, or odor or particulate matter. h. Maintenance and Monitoring All digital billboards shall be equipped with immediate shut off functionality to allow the sign to be disabled in the event of a malfunction. No person shall allow any digital billboard located on property owned, occupied, or controlled by such person to remain in a condition of disrepair for a period of more than fifteen (15) days. A billboard shall be deemed to be in a condition of disrepair if it is in need of replacement of defective or missing parts, has a broken or damaged sign face, or is in need of repainting or cleaning in order to be brought into a reasonably slightly and legible condition. ii. All billboard operators shall submit a Lighting Monitoring Report to the Planning Division upon installation, and at three-year intervals thereafter to confirm conformance with the lighting requirements, herein. iii. Complaints about lighting will be investigated by the City, and if determined necessary by the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, the billboard operator shall provide an updated Lighting Monitoring Report within 72 hours of the notice from the City. The City shall reserve the right to conduct digital City Council 22 — 28 4/19/2022 Page 6 of 18 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 20-139 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND MANAGEMENT OF BUS SHELTERS AND STOPS billboard lighting measurements. If the measured luminance and/or illuminance exceed the data presented in operator's Lighting Monitoring Report, the findings of the City report shall prevail. All costs shall be borne by the operator. 2. MOW Banners a. Site Location The City desires to install up to four (4) digital banners in selected locations within the City targeting residents and local traffic. Company will be requested to select the locations for the installation of up to four (4) eye-catching and attractive digital banners that provide responsive communication through the display of messages in real time. Currently, there are no proposed sites within the City for new digital banners. The locations selected by the Company for the banners should ensure optimum return on investment and rapid results through an effective marketing strategy. The City will share any available information that is pertinent for the selection of banner locations, including most recent traffic studies. In selecting the locations for the street digital banners, the evaluation and the determination by the Company shall not be limited to a determination of the sites with maximal revenue generating potential based on visibility along City streets and dwell time near the banners but shall also take into consideration environmental and esthetic impacts, assurance for the adherence to City's requirements and compliance with all rules and regulations for electronic signs adopted by the Federal Highway Administration and the United States Department of Transportation. In addition, the Company shall take into consideration any input and address any concern from local associations and special interest groups for the proposed locations of the digital banners and to work cooperatively with local associations and special interest groups. The Company will be responsible for the preparation of an Initial Study in association with the City digital banners and any subsequent environmental documentation, site selection, utility easements if any, and any other encumbrance responsibilities. The City will determine the level of environmental review required. The Company will be responsible for all costs associated with such review and compliance, if any, including noticing costs, filing fees, staff costs, and consultant fees. b. Specifications: i. Current best available digital -banner technologies are required, including but not limited to the following: • Remote diagnostic and maintenance capability • "Amber Alert" capability • Automatic brightness adjustment to ambient lighting conditions • UL and IEC approved City Council 22 — 29 4/19/2022 Page 7 of 18 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 20-139 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND MANAGEMENT OF BUS SHELTERS AND STOPS • Color calibration to ensure consistent image quality • Remote shutdown capability • Screen sizes and pixel dimensions • Unless otherwise specified in the proposal, it is assumed that each digital banner will be double -sided ii. The City is in the process of writing an off -premises commercial advertising signs ordinance. The requirements that are anticipated to be included in the ordinance are presented below in sections c through h. In developing the proposal, the proposer should take these requirements into consideration, as well as the requirements generally encountered on similar projects. iii. Construction and operation requirements: • Regularly scheduled onsite maintenance • Internal service access for safety and improved appearance (no visible catwalks) • Constructed to comply with all applicable City codes • Engineered foundation, anchoring mechanism, and support system iv. The Agreement will require the Company to maintain, repair, and upgrade the digital banners as needed to provide the best available digital banner technologies during the term of the Agreement. c. Application Requirements Every application for the construction of a new digital banner will be filed with the written consent of the City on forms required by the Planning Division and shall be, at a minimum, accompanied by the following information: i. A pictorial representation of, and other information about, the proposed digital banner, disclosing overall dimensions, dimensions of letters and figures, colors, materials, copy, and illumination characteristics. ii. A plan of the site on which the proposed digital banner will be located, indicating the precise location of the banner, existing and proposed landscaping, other site improvements, and proximity to the edge of pavement of an adjacent freeway or sidewalk. iii. A vicinity map depicting the location of all proposed banners, any landmarks as designated on the General Plan that are within one thousand (1,000) feet of the proposed City Council 22 — 30 4/19/2022 Page 8 of 18 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 20-139 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND MANAGEMENT OF BUS SHELTERS AND STOPS digital banner, and the zoning designation of all sites within five hundred (500) feet of the boundaries of the subject property. iv. Photo simulations of all proposed digital banners showing daytime and nighttime conditions. v. A three-dimensional (313) massing study depicting proposed digital banner. The 3D study will include any existing buildings and advertising signs within one thousand (1,000) feet of the proposed digital banner. vi. Such other information as the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency deems appropriate to determine compliance with the provisions of the application requirements. d. Development Standards The City has not developed standards for the development of digital banners and is relying on the proposer to adhere to general development standards for digital banners. e. Lighting and Display Requirements The following lighting and display requirements apply to the digital banners: i. Signs shall produce a maximum 0.3 foot-candles over ambient light levels. ii. The display brightness shall be controlled by a photocell or light sensor that adjusts the brightness to the required level based on ambient light conditions without the need for human input. Use of other brightness adjustment methods, such as timer- or calendar - based systems, shall only be used as a backup system. iii. The display shall be factory -certified as capable of complying with the above brightness standards. Such certification shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or his/her designee. iv. The sign owner shall provide to the City, upon request, certification by or compensation for an independent Company to verify that the brightness levels of the electronic banner are in compliance with the requirements of this Section. v. All signs shall be equipped with a control system that, in the event of a display or control malfunction, "freezes" the display on either a single, unchanging message, or a blank screen. City Council 22 — 31 4/19/2022 Page 9 of 18 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 20-139 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND MANAGEMENT OF BUS SHELTERS AND STOPS vi. Any sign area not comprising the electronic display panel is prohibited. This area includes, but is not limited to, static sign area, appendages, cutout letters, and figures. A frame surrounding the display panel up to twelve (12) inches in width shall be permitted; it shall not contain any sign copy or graphics and shall not count toward the sign area. vii. Where screen transitions are used, such transitions shall not give the appearance of moving text or images, and should use smooth effects, such as fades, rather than abrupt transitions. The sign copy shall not use flashing, intermittent or moving lights or produce the optical illusion of movement. viii. Each sign copy shall be displayed for a minimum of four (4) seconds. The still images may not move or present the appearance of motion and may not use flashing, scintillating, blinking, or traveling lights or any other means not providing constant illumination. Transition or blank screen time between one still image and the next may not exceed one (1) second. ix. All digital banners must comply with all applicable laws and regulations concerning brightness, including, without limitation, California Vehicle Code Section 21466.5, and as amended. f. Prohibited Features Digital banners shall not contain any of the following features: i. Moving parts. ii. Appendages, cutout letters, or figures that protrude beyond the flat surface of the sign face. iii. Lights that flash, shimmer, glitter or give the appearance of flashing, shimmering or glittering. Exceptions to this restriction include time, temperature and smog index units. iv. Walls or screens at the base of the sign which create a hazard to public safety or provide an attractive nuisance. V. Copy which simulates any traffic sign in a manner which confuses the public. vi. Copy which duplicates any other content displayed on the sign. vii. Devices which emit audible sound, or odor or particulate matter. City Council 22 — 32 4/19/2022 Page 10 of 18 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 20-139 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND MANAGEMENT OF BUS SHELTERS AND STOPS g. Maintenance and Monitoring i. All digital banners shall be equipped with immediate shut off functionality to allow the sign to be disabled in the event of a malfunction. No person shall allow any digital banner located on property owned, occupied, or controlled by such person to remain in a condition of disrepair for a period of more than fifteen (15) days. A banner shall be deemed to be in a condition of disrepair if it is in need of replacement of defective or missing parts, has a broken or damaged sign face, or is in need of repainting or cleaning in order to be brought into a reasonably slightly and legible condition. ii. All banner operators shall submit a Lighting Monitoring Report to the Planning Division upon installation, and at three-year intervals thereafter to confirm conformance with the lighting requirements, herein. iii. Complaints about lighting will be investigated by the City, and if determined necessary by the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, the banner operator shall provide an updated Lighting Monitoring Report within 72 hours of the notice from the City. The City shall reserve the right to conduct digital banner lighting measurements. If the measured luminance and/or illuminance exceed the data presented in operator's Lighting Monitoring Report, the Endings of the City report shall prevail. All costs shall be borne by the Company. 3. Bus Shelters and Bus Stops In addition to the design, construction, maintenance and operation of digital billboards at freeway locations and digital banners within the City, the scope of work includes advertising at bus shelters and the operation, maintenance, cleaning of bus shelters and bus stops located within the boundaries of the City of Santa Ana. The Company will be responsible for repairing and maintaining existing bus shelters, bus stops and all associated furniture. A design of the proposed shelter with all components, including the advertisement panel, is included in ATTACHMENT 3: PROPOSED BUS SHELTER DESIGN in the Appendix of this RFP. The installation of City -supplied new bus shelter and bus stop furniture shall be the responsibility of the Company from the day the Agreement goes into effect. Currently, the City has 119 advertising bus shelters, 42 non -advertising bus shelters and 496 non - advertising bus stops, with at least one associated trash container at each shelter or bench. Some of the bus stops have only a trash container. A detailed inventory of the current bus stops and bus shelters is included in ATTACHMENT 1: SCOPE OF WORK in the Appendix of this RFP. The goal of the City is to provide at least one shelter or one bench at each Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) bus stop in the City. The inventory could change and may not be exactly the same at the time of the Agreement. The inventory should be field verified prior to the signing of the Agreement. City Council 22 — 33 4/19/2022 Page 11 of 18 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 20-139 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND MANAGEMENT OF BUS SHELTERS AND STOPS From the 161 shelters, 119 are old and 42 are new. The old shelters will be replaced by the City when funds become available and the Company will be responsible for their maintenance, repair and operation. The installation of any shelters in addition to the current 161 shelters will be the responsibility of the Company and their advertising, maintenance, repair, and operation will be the responsibility of the Company. In its design of bus stop and bus shelter program elements, the City's focus has been and remains on the fundamentals, namely, shelter, shade, safety, and comfort. The City believes that thoughtful design can respond to needs and provide multiple benefits for all those who share the sidewalks in the City of Santa Ana. Design should be scalable considering site -specific space constraints and varying levels of transit ridership. The installation of any device by Company without City's prior approval is forbidden. The Company should address the latest state-of-the-art amenities and the feasibility of implementing them at the City's bus shelters and bus stops in their proposal. Furthermore, the Company shall be responsible for all necessary coordination with OCTA to obtain any required approvals by OCTA for the location of shelters and benches. Company will be responsible for obtaining all electrical service permits from Southern California Edison (SCE) and for all metered electrical charges. a. Design Standards i. The Company shall conform to and abide by all City and Orange County ordinances, OCTA bus stop standards (including the (2004) Bus Stop Safety and Design Guidelines) and all applicable state and federal laws (including the requirements in the (2007) Caltrans's Bus Rapid Transit Handbook for Partners). Where permits and/or licenses are required, it is the responsibility of the Company to first obtain them from the regulatory agency having jurisdiction. ii. The Company shall permanently affix in a conspicuous area on each shelter and/or bench an owner identification tag which includes the Company's business name and 24-hour service telephone number. iii. The Company shall conform to and abide by all applicable City regulations. iv. Company shall employ or subcontract, for services, adequate personnel to competently and timely meet all agreed on obligations. If the City determines, at any time that the conduct of an employee or representative of the Company or an authorized and approved subcontractor of the Company, while in performance of its obligations, in the reasonable belief of the City, detrimental to the interest of the City or the public, the City shall give written notice thereof to the Company. Following the City's written notice therefor, the Company shall take all reasonable actions necessary to correct such conduct and prevent it from occurring in the future including, but not limited to terminating such employee's work assignment within the City of Santa Ana. City Council 22 — 34 4/19/2022 Page 12 of 18 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 20-139 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND MANAGEMENT OF BUS SHELTERS AND STOPS b. Advertising Standards Bus shelter advertising shall be limited to one two-sided, back to back, backlit ad panel per shelter. Alternative advertising panel designs as required on a site by -site basis will require prior approval by the City. Any proposed advertising to be located on the shelter ad panels shall not: i. Display the words "STOP", "DRIVE-IN", "DANGER", or any other word, phrase, symbol or character which may interfere with, mislead, confuse, or direct vehicular traffic. ii. Be comprised of rotating, revolving, or flashing lighting devises. iii. Promotes material which the City in its sole discretion deems offensive to community standards of good taste. iv. Promotes alcohol, cannabis and/or tobacco products of any kind within 1,000 feet of any school. v. Contains "off -site business identification signs" or "political advertisements". For the purpose of this Agreement, "off -site identification signs" are defined as ad panels that give specific direction to an advertiser's place of business other than the site's address. The City will make the final determination on unacceptable advertising. In the event that an advertisement is determined to be unacceptable, he Company agrees to remove said advertisement within twenty -hour (24) hours of official notification, which may be made by telephone, thereafter said telephonic notice shall be confirmed in writing by U.S. Mail and/or facsimile. c. Site Relocation In the event that a bus route or stop is altered or deleted such that any bus shelter will no longer serve as an active bus stop location, the Company shall, within thirty (30) days after notification from the City, relocate the bus shelter and appurtenances to a new location designated by the City. The vacated location shall be restored to its original condition, including complete replacement of the affected sidewalk sections, within that same time period by the Company at its own cost and expense. In the event the City constructs or causes to be constructed a new facility or roadway improvement impacting a bus shelter or advertising thereon, this agreement between the City and the Company will continue in full force and effect. The Company shall cooperate with the City in the event the construction affects the shelter by vacating, removing, and reinstalling the shelter at its own cost and expense for such period as required by the construction of the new facilities. Upon completion of the new facility, the Company shall resume its operations within thirty (30) days. City Council 22 — 35 4/19/2022 Page 13 of 18 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 20-139 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND MANAGEMENT OF BUS SHELTERS AND STOPS d. Cleaning Company shall be responsible for performing the following cleaning activities: i. Removal and disposal of all trash in each trash receptacle, and in the vicinity of each Site Area, and the replacement of trash bags in each trash receptacle at each location. The Company shall remove, three (3) times per week, all debris, trash, refuse, and other associated undesirable items from the area within twenty (20) feet from all directions of the bus shelter or bus stop and dispose of such legally and properly, to the City's satisfaction, at the Company's expense, and if needed, wash down the affected area to eliminate any remaining residue. ii. Approximately thirty (30) sites require daily cleaning. The sites are typically along the most heavily used bus routes and are referred to as "hot spots". City will provide a list of the hot spots to the Company. The list will be updated in January of every year. iii. Cleaning all interior and exterior visible metal and concrete surfaces at each location, including all glass and Plexiglas surfaces. The Company shall clean the entire bus stop/shelter (including but not limited to bus furniture, shelter structure, trash receptacles, posts and signs). iv. In the event that new or additional City -owned equipment is installed at a stop, the Company shall be responsible for obtaining and adhering to manufacturer's General Maintenance guidelines. V. Sweeping off the sidewalk/boarding area, removing trash or debris from the gutter, removing unsanitary items or materials, wiping down dirty benches, or other miscellaneous items. vi. Cleaning solar panels to remove dust and grime build up (no pressure washing), cleaning the LED display, cleaning the aluminum case and replacing the polycarbonate screen protector in the event that the solar panel is vandalized. Replacement poly -carbonate screen protectors will be provided by the City to the Company for installation. Company shall use steam to clean the bus stops one (1) time each month. Prior to any steam cleaning, the Company shall block or seal all storm drains and clean accumulated debris and remove blocking materials when finished. Wash water shall be contained and pumped up or vacuumed and properly disposed of. The Company shall furnish all labor, materials, water, equipment, clean-up, disposal, and services required to perform the services set forth herein. The area associated with a bus stop includes all area within twenty (20) feet of the outer edges of all bus stop furniture/fixtures at each location and from right-of-way to curb face, all furniture/fixtures (shelters, benches, receptacles, signs (including LED solar signs), posts, City Council 22 — 36 4/19/2022 Page 14 of 18 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 20-139 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND MANAGEMENT OF BUS SHELTERS AND STOPS improvements, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, pavement, etc.) within the bus stop associated area; and only that area which is part of the public right-of-way (e.g., sidewalks and streets open to public access). e. Maintenance and Repair The Company shall be responsible for all maintenance and repair, including the replacement of parts, at its own expense. The Company shall be required to report, to the City, on its maintenance and repair activities and to perform the following activities: i. Replacement poly -carbonate screen protectors shall be provided to the Company for installation by the Company in the event that an LED solar panel is vandalized. ii. Company shall spray for weed control within 20 feet of the outer edges of benches. iii. Traffic control shall be provided by Company to ensure that no personnel, equipment, and/or vehicles block lanes without proper warning signs and all required safety measures. Graffiti removal from all bus stop amenities, including but not limited to, bus stop signs, bus stop poles, shelters, benches, trash receptacles, bike racks, etc., is the responsibility of the City. The City is committed to removing graffiti within 24 hours of notification. L Painting All non -galvanized (green) bus shelters shall be painted, by Company, within six months after the execution of Agreement and as determined by the City based on the condition of the bus shelter, thereafter. All bus shelters, except for the galvanized bus shelters, shall also be painted, by the Company, at an interval determined by the City. For the purpose of this RFP, Company shall plan on painting half of the current inventory of bus shelters on odd years. g. Cleaning and Maintenance Schedule The frequency for cleaning and performing maintenance (including painting) at bus shelters and bus stops is presented in Table 2 below. —For non -routine cleaning, receiving notifications and for associated task management, the selected proposer shall subscribe to the "mySantaAna" app. City Council 22 — 37 4/19/2022 Page 15 of 18 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 20-139 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND MANAGEMENT OF BUS SHELTERS AND STOPS Table 2. Frequency for Cleaning and Maintenance at Bus Shelters and Bus Stops. Fre uenc Three Within Required Tasks/Activities(l) Daily(2) times per Monthly First Odd As week Six Years Required Months Unlock and open trash container. Empty trash and replace trash bag. Close and lock trash container. x x Use disinfecting cleaners (approved by the Environment Protection Agency for its effectiveness against COVID-19) to wipe down trash cans, trash can covers and entire benches. x x Clean by sweeping all Site Area and remove all litter (including cigarette butts), waste material, debris, etc. x x Remove gum from Site Area and from concrete pads and sidewalks. x x Touch up paint at bus shelters, bus stops and associated furniture and fixtures(4). x Test power to all lighting fixtures and ad panels. x Spray for weed control within 20 feet of the outer edges of benches. x Inspect ad panel plexyglass. x Steam cleaning of bus shelters and bus stops. x Paint all non -galvanized (green) bus shelters. x Paint half of the current inventory of bus shelters. x Board up damaged ad panels. x Repair damaged plexyglass ad panels. Repair and replace light fixtures and ad panel lights. x City Council 22 — 38 4/19/2022 Page 16 of 18 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 20-139 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND MANAGEMENT OF BUS SHELTERS AND STOPS Fre uenc Three Within Required Tasks/Activities(') Daily(2) times per Monthly First Odd As week Six Years Required Months (1) If any safety issues or hazards are found, all necessary measures shall be taken to minimize or eliminate the potential risks to the workers and public. If required, the City will be notified as soon as possible, but no later than 24 hours after the bus stop has been serviced. (2) Company to maintain approximately thirty (30) sites clean requiring daily cleaning. The sites are typically along the most heavily used bus routes and are referred to as "hot spots". City will provide a list of the hot spots to Company. The list will be updated by City in January of every year. (3) One Site Area is equivalent to one Bus Shelter or Bus Stop. The Site Area includes all area within twenty (20) feet of the outer edges of all bus stop furniture/fixtures at each location and from right-of-way to curb face, all furniture/fixtures within the Site Area and only that area which is part of the public right of way. (') Bus shelters and bus stops furniture/fixtures include benches, trash receptacles, information map cases, schedule holders, free standing kiosks, outdoor advertising displays (both static and digital), secure bicycle racks, news stand corrals. The hours for maintenance, repairs and replacement of bus shelters and bus stops are between 7 a.m. and 6 p.m. every day of the week. The hours for cleaning bus shelters and bus stops are between 6 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and between 8 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday. 4. Digital Signage Network Security The Company is expected to effectively control access to the digital signage network and address security concerns for the digital system through a multi -layer effort with controlled physical access and an operating system to establish and maintain a hacker -resistant system. In its Proposal, the Company is expected, at a minimum, to address the following areas of digital signage network security: a. Physical Security i. Restricting physical access to the network's devices. ii. Securing all screens, attachments, and public players iii. Securing all PC ports and connections iv. Security and password protection for the BIOS to prevent the boot order from being changed. b. Operating System Security i. Restricting operating system access. ii. Installation of firewall to block unwanted incoming traffic. iii. Staying up to date with all security updates. City Council 22 — 39 4/19/2022 Page 17 of 18 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 20-139 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND MANAGEMENT OF BUS SHELTERS AND STOPS c. Application Security i. Ensuring that implemented solutions are not using insecure protocols like HTTP or FTP for critical information. ii. Keeping data secure by working with applications that have SSL certificates or the selection of applications that also add their own layer of encryption to all data. iii. Working with a software suite that uses a client -pull technology and disable listening on all ports. iv. Working with companies that undergo regular security tests and audits to ensure they are following current best practices. City Council 22 — 40 4/19/2022 Page 18 of 18 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 20-139 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND MANAGEMENT OF BUS SHELTERS AND STOPS Appendix ATTACHMENT 2: STANDARD AGREEMENT City Council 22 — 41 4/19/2022 Page 1 of 1 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 20-139 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND MANAGEMENT OF BUS SHELTERS AND STOPS STANDARD AGREEMENT CITY OF SANTA ANA THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of , 2020 by and between , ("Company"), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California ("City"). RECITALS A. The City desires to retain a Company having special skill and knowledge in the field of - Briefly describe expertise sought and the scope of work the consultant (engineering) services will perform. B. Company represents that Company is able and willing to provide such services to the City. C. In undertaking the performance of this Agreement, Company represents that it is knowledgeable in its field and that any services performed by Company under this Agreement will be performed in compliance with such standards as may reasonably be expected from a professional consulting firm in the field. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual and respective promises, and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES Company shall perform during the term of this Agreement, the tasks and obligations including all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidental customary work required to fully and adequately complete the services described and set forth in Scope of Services - Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 2. COMPENSATION Company agrees to pay to City percent of the advertising revenue for the term of this Agreement. Payment shall be made payable to the City of Santa Ana, following each month, no later than the loth of the subsequent month, at the following address: Public Works Agency, City of Santa Ana M-21, Administrative Services Manager, 20 Civic Center Plaza, PO Box 1988, Santa Ana, CA 92702. A late charge of ten percent (10%) shall be applied to any payment hereunder due but unpaid after the loth of the month. Compensation shall be subject to a CPI adjustment annually utilizing the most recently published annual average, on the anniversary of the Effective Date during the term hereof. City Council 22 — 42 4/19/2022 Page 1 of 9 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 20-139 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND MANAGEMENT OF BUS SHELTERS AND STOPS 3. TERM This Agreement shall commence on [enter a Start Date or "the date first written above"] for a number (#) year term with the option for the City to grant up to a number (#)-year renewals, exercisable by a writing by the City Manager and the City Attorney, unless terminated earlier in accordance with Section 16, below. 4. LICENSE The City hereby grants to Company an exclusive license for the right to enter and use the Properties (billboard sites, banner locations, bus shelters and bus stops) beginning on the Effective Date, for the Permitted Uses, upon the terms and conditions set forth herein in this Agreement, subject to Company's performance of all of its obligations under this Agreement. This Agreement is intended and shall be construed only as a revocable license to use the Properties and not as a lease or grant of any possessory or other interest. Company shall not use, and shall prohibit its Agents or Invitees from using, the Property other than for the Permitted Uses. The term "Agents" shall mean Company's officers, directors, members, agents, employees, invitees, subcontractors and any employees of such parties. The term "Invitees" shall mean Licensee's invitees, guests, customers, tenants, or business visitors. 5. PREVAILING WAGES Company is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the services being performed are part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Company agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. Company shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. 5. INDEPENDENT COMPANY Company shall, during the entire term of this Agreement, be construed to be an independent Company and not an employee of the City. This Agreement is not intended nor shall it be construed to create an employer -employee relationship, a joint venture relationship, or to allow the City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Company performs the services which are the subject matter of this Agreement; however, the services to be provided by Company shall be provided in a manner consistent with all applicable standards and regulations governing such services. Company shall pay all salaries and wages, employer's social security taxes, unemployment insurance and similar taxes relating to employees and shall be responsible for all applicable withholding taxes. City Council 22 — 43 4/19/2022 Page 2 of 9 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 20-139 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND MANAGEMENT OF BUS SHELTERS AND STOPS 6. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Company under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Company shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Company represents and warrants that Company has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Company makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were provided to Company by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk. 7. INSURANCE Prior to undertaking performance of work under this Agreement, Company shall maintain and shall require its subcontractors, if any, to obtain and maintain insurance as described below: a. Commercial General Liability Insurance. Company shall maintain commercial general liability insurance naming the City, its officers, employees, agents, volunteers and representatives as additional insured(s) and shall include, but not be limited to protection against claims arising from bodily and personal injury, including death resulting therefrom and damage to property, resulting from any act or occurrence arising out of Company's operations in the performance of this Agreement, including, without limitation, acts involving vehicles. The amounts of insurance shall be not less than the following: single limit coverage applying to bodily and personal injury, including death resulting therefrom, and property damage, in the total amount of $1,000,000 per occurrence, with $2,000,000 in the aggregate. Such insurance shall (a) name the City, its officers, employees, agents, and representatives as additional insured(s); (b) be primary and not contributory with respect to insurance or self-insurance programs maintained by the City; and (c) contain standard separation of insureds provisions. b. Business automobile liability insurance, or equivalent form, with a combined single limit of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. Such insurance shall include coverage for owned, hired and non -owned automobiles. C. Worker's Compensation Insurance. In accordance with the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code, Company, if Company has any employees, is required to be insured against liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self-insurance. Prior to commencing the performance of the work under this Agreement, Company agrees to obtain and maintain any employer's liability insurance with limits not less than $1,000,000 per accident. d. If Company is or employs a licensed professional such as an architect or engineer: Professional liability (errors and omissions) insurance, with a combined single limit of not less than $1,000,000 per claim with $2,000,000 in the aggregate. City Council 22 — 44 4/19/2022 Page 3 of 9 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 20-139 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND MANAGEMENT OF BUS SHELTERS AND STOPS e. The following requirements apply to the insurance to be provided by Company pursuant to this section: i. Company shall maintain all insurance required above in full force and effect for the entire period covered by this Agreement. ii. Certificates of insurance shall be furnished to the City upon execution of this Agreement and shall be approved by the City. iii. Certificates and policies shall state that the policies shall not be canceled or reduced in coverage or changed in any other material aspect without thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City. iv. Company shall supply City with a fully executed additional insured endorsement. b. If Company fails or refuses to produce or maintain the insurance required by this section or fails or refuses to furnish the City with required proof that insurance has been procured and is in force and paid for, the City shall have the right, at the City's election, to forthwith terminate this Agreement. Such termination shall not affect Company's right to be paid for its time and materials expended prior to notification of termination. Company waives the right to receive compensation and agrees to indemnify the City for any work performed prior to approval of insurance by the City. City Council 22 — 45 4/19/2022 Page 4 of 9 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 20-139 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND MANAGEMENT OF BUS SHELTERS AND STOPS 8. INDEMNIFICATION Company agrees to defend, and shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees, special counsel, and representatives from liability: (1) for personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief arising out of claims for personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage, which may arise from the negligent operations of the Company, its subcontractors, agents, employees, or other persons acting on its behalf which relates to the services described in section 1 of this Agreement; and (2) from any claim that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief is due by reason of the terms of or effects arising from this Agreement. This indemnity and hold harmless agreement applies to all claims for damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of the events referred to in this Section or by reason of the terms of, or effects, arising from this Agreement. The Company further agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and pay all costs for the defense of the City, including fees and costs for special counsel to be selected by the City, regarding any action by a third party challenging the validity of this Agreement, or asserting that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief due to personal or property rights arises by reason of the terms of, or effects arising from this Agreement. City may make all reasonable decisions with respect to its representation in any legal proceeding. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Company's services are subject to Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Company. 9. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEMNIFICATION Company shall defend and indemnify the City, its officers, agents, representatives, and employees against any and all liability, including costs, for infringement of any United States' letters patent, trademark, or copyright infringement, including costs, contained in the work product or documents provided by Company to the City pursuant to this Agreement. 10. RECORDS All financial records of Company shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and auditing standards for government institutions. Company shall make available for examination and copying such construction books and records. Company shall keep and maintain all such construction books and records separate and distinct from other records and accounts and shall maintain such books and records for at least seven (7) years after acceptance by City, or such longer period during which any legal proceeding with respect to the work may be pending. 11. CONFIDENTIALITY If Company receives from the City information which due to the nature of such information is reasonably understood to be confidential and/or proprietary, Company agrees that it shall not use or disclose such information except in the performance of this Agreement, and further agrees to exercise the City Council 22 — 46 4/19/2022 Page 5 of 9 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 20-139 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND MANAGEMENT OF BUS SHELTERS AND STOPS same degree of care it uses to protect its own information of like importance, but in no event less than reasonable care. "Confidential Information" shall include all nonpublic information. Confidential information includes not only written information, but also information transferred orally, visually, electronically, or by other means. Confidential information disclosed to either party by any subsidiary and/or agent of the other party is covered by this Agreement. The foregoing obligations of non-use and nondisclosure shall not apply to any information that (a) has been disclosed in publicly available sources; (b) is, through no fault of the Company disclosed in a publicly available source; (c) is in rightful possession of the Company without an obligation of confidentiality; (d) is required to be disclosed by operation of law; or (e) is independently developed by the Company without reference to information disclosed by the City. 12. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CLAUSE Company covenants that it presently has no interests and shall not have interests, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with performance of services specified under this Agreement. 13. DISCRIMINATION Company shall not discriminate because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, age, national origin, ancestry, or disability, as defined and prohibited by applicable law, in the recruitment, selection, training, utilization, promotion, termination or other employment related activities. Company affirms that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. 14. EXCLUSIVITY AND AMENDMENT This Agreement represents the complete and exclusive statement between the City and Company, and supersedes any and all other agreements, oral or written, between the parties. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and any attachments hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. This Agreement may not be modified except by written instrument signed by the City and by an authorized representative of Company. The parties agree that any terms or conditions of any purchase order or other instrument that are inconsistent with, or in addition to, the terms and conditions hereof, shall not bind or obligate Company or the City. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which is not embodied herein. 15. ASSIGNMENT Inasmuch as this Agreement is intended to secure the specialized services of Company, Company may not assign, transfer, delegate, or subcontract any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City and any such assignment, transfer, delegation or subcontract without the City's prior written consent shall be considered null and void. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit the City's ability to have any of the services which are the subject to this Agreement performed by City personnel or by other companies retained by City. City Council 22 — 47 4/19/2022 Page 6 of 9 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 20-139 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND MANAGEMENT OF BUS SHELTERS AND STOPS 16. TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated by the City upon thirty (30) days written notice of termination. In such event, Company shall be entitled to receive, and the City shall pay Company compensation for all services performed by Company prior to receipt of such notice of termination, subject to the following conditions: a. As a condition of such payment, the Executive Director may require Company to deliver to the City all work product(s) completed as of such date, and in such case such work product shall be the property of the City unless prohibited by law, and Company consents to the City's use thereof for such purposes as the City deems appropriate. b. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standard of performance specified in the Recitals of this Agreement. C. Earned revenue from advertising shall be prorated and paid to City. 17. WAIVER No waiver of breach, failure of any condition, or any right or remedy contained in or granted by the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the party waiving the breach, failure, right or remedy. No waiver of any breach, failure or right, or remedy shall be deemed a waiver of any other breach, failure, right or remedy, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver unless the writing so specifies. 18. JURISDICTION - VENUE This Agreement has been executed and delivered in the State of California and the validity, interpretation, performance, and enforcement of any of the clauses of this Agreement shall be determined and governed by the laws of the State of California. Both parties further agree that Orange County, California, shall be the venue for any action or proceeding that may be brought or arise out of, in connection with or by reason of this Agreement. 19. PROFESSIONAL LICENSES Company shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, maintain all necessary licenses, permits, approvals, waivers, and exemptions necessary for the provision of the services hereunder and required by the laws and regulations of the United States, the State of California, the City of Santa Ana and all other governmental agencies. Company shall notify the City immediately and in writing of its inability to obtain or maintain such permits, licenses, approvals, waivers, and exemptions. Said inability shall be cause for termination of this Agreement. 20. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS a. Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature herein below has the power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement, City Council 22 — 48 4/19/2022 Page 7 of 9 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 20-139 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND MANAGEMENT OF BUS SHELTERS AND STOPS and shall indemnify City fully, including reasonable costs and attorney's fees, for any injuries or damages to City in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn. b. All Exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto shall be incorporated as if fully set forth in the body of this Agreement. 21. NOTICE Any notice, tender, demand, delivery, or other communication pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly given if delivered in person or mailed by first class or certified mail, postage prepaid, or sent by fax or other telegraphic communication in the manner provided in this Section, to the following persons: To City: Clerk of the City Council City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702-1988 Fax: 714- 647-6956 With courtesy copies to: Nabil Saba Executive Director, Public Works Agency City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-21) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, California 92702 Fax: 714- 647-5635 To Company: First & Last Name Title Consultant Firm Name Address City, State, Zip Fax: Sonia R. Carvalho City Attorney City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-29) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, California 92702 Fax: 714- 647-6515 A party may change its address by giving notice in writing to the other parry. Thereafter, any communication shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address. If sent by mail, communication City Council 22 — 49 4/19/2022 Page 8 of 9 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 20-139 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND MANAGEMENT OF BUS SHELTERS AND STOPS shall be effective or deemed to have been given three (3) days after it has been deposited in the United States mail, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as set forth above. If sent by fax, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given twenty-four (24) hours after the time set forth on the transmission report issued by the transmitting facsimile machine, addressed as set forth above. For purposes of calculating these time frames, weekends, federal, state, County or City holidays shall be excluded. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written. ATTEST: Daisy Gomez Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM: SONIA R. CARVALHO City Attorney By: John Funk Assistant City Attorney RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: NABIL SABA Executive Director Public Works Agency CITY OF SANTA ANA Kristine Ridge City Manager COMPANY: (name) (title) Tax ID# City Council 22 — 50 4/19/2022 Page 9 of 9 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 20-139 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND MANAGEMENT OF BUS SHELTERS AND STOPS APPENDIX ATTACHMENT 3: PROPOSED BUS SHELTER DESIGN City Council 22 — 51 4/19/2022 GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, SHALL BE ASTM A-36, MINIMUM YIELD STRENGTH 36,000 PSI, 2. ALL STRUCTURAL ALUMINUM MEMBERS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, SHALL BE OF ALLOY 6063-T5 OR GREATER. 3. ALL HOLES TO BE DRILLED OR PUNCHED. 4. STEEL WELDING SHALL CONFORM TO AMERICAN WELDING SOCIETY STANDARD Di. 1-10. ELECTRODES SHALL CONFORM TO AWS 5.1, CLASS E70S-5. 5. ALUMINUM WELDING SHALL CONFORM TO AMERICAN WELDING SOCIETY STANDARD D1.2-08. ELECTRODES SHALL CONFORM TO AWS/SFA 5.10 CLASS ER4043. 6. ALL WELDING TO BE DONE AT TOLAR MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC. FACILITY. 7. ALL CORPORATE PROCEDURES, INCLUDING FABRICATION, MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH TOLAR MANUFACTURING CO. INC'S QUALITY CONTROL MANUAL. 8. THE CONCRETE PAD SIZES SHOWN ARE STANDARD MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS AND ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. THE PAD MAY NEED TO BE REINFORCED OR ENLARGED DEPENDING ON LOCAL CODES AND LOADING CONDITIONS. M 5'-9 3/16" 3'-9 3/4" V.O. 07� GRAPHIC SIZE: 47-1/4 X 68-1/4 8'-51/2" 8'-101 11/16"V.0. GLASS SIZE: 3/16"X 47-5/16X 68-5/16 7-19/16" B SIDE VIEW SGLE112"=}-0" 11'-5 3/8" - PANELS, 1/8 THK ALUMINUM (3) USC SOLAR LIGHTING SYSTEM TBD BY SIZING 32. GAL. STRAP TRASH CAN W/ HINGE DOOR, HASP LOCK (PADLOCK BY OTHERS), FIAT LID OPTION WITH TAMPER PROOF SCREWS REAR WALL TUBING WELDMENT, aw Rom SI w 2-1/2 ROUND ALUMINUM TUBE ENCAPSULATING 1/8 THK ALUMINUM PERE /2" i 10'-9 1/2" (ALUMINUM EXTRUSION) 6'-9" MIN, CLEARANCE 006660606069 � ;A[ sA14a'wwrrw j FRONTVIEW ALUMINUM ESCUTCHEON COVERS s[4IE1/z°=1'-0" 6' CUSTOM SANTA ANA STEEL STRAP BENCH WITH (2) SEAT DELINEATORS SIDE VIEW 1/2" LOGO PLATE DECAL BOTH SIDES TWORK PROVIDED BY STOMER 13'-3 3/8" MINIMUM CONCRETE SLAB (SEE NOTE 8.) 2"X 2" X 1/4" THK ALUMINUM TUBE STN X4TZ 1'-0" 11'-3 3/8" 1'-0" STL ANCHORS ORRS (4 PER POST) INSTALLED PER ESR-1917 r—-------------------- —r 09 X 1/2 THK ALUMINUM SHOE FLANGE ADA 30 X 48 __ 1'-10 5/8' 31/2" MINIMUM EMBEDMENT 2'-311/16" (SEE NOTE 8.) \ 6'-0" MINIMUM CONCRETE SNB 0 ®! DETAIL A e T (SEE NOTE 6.) 1` A SGLEa"=1-0^ o ' 6. D 1 D-o e D n e ry ETEu�aGU PROPEMOFTOUR a TOLARMANUFACTURINGCOMPAN Y, L------------------------- Nm9EALF`_C6E�Roo EP__' oE��1LA ----J TOL 258 MenaM1 Circle, Corona CA.929T9 DETAIL B SHOE i LDMENT CHORING me,�CON ENTIF Tout— IZADSUNSETSNELTER Cz= eiuncil 22 —5 NEE osA/2 a. n a.e AN. PNA CA sCAlE U2"=1'-0' °oiscREReuciES TOmuRMFO.. pE vueiEs a37884-00 PORTION OF BEFORE COMMENCING NTH TxnTREUTO'XcO NOTED "' 6115I2020 ­ RFarr 2 I 1 T:\Inventor\SheRers\Ad Custom Dome\37884-00.idw CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 20-139 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND MANAGEMENT OF BUS SHELTERS AND STOPS APPENDIX ATTACHMENT 4: CERTIFICATIONS City Council 22 — 53 4/19/2022 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 20-139 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND MANAGEMENT OF BUS SHELTERS AND STOPS NON -COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT (Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and Public Contract Code Section 7106) In conformance with Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and Public Contract Code 7106 the PROPOSER declares that the bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the bid is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the PROPOSER has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other PROPOSER to put in a false or sham bid, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any PROPOSER or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the PROPOSER has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the PROPOSER or any other PROPOSER, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other PROPOSER, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the contract of anyone interested in the proposed contract; that all statements contained in the bid are true; and, further, that the PROPOSER has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid. Note: The above Non -collusion Affidavit is part of the Proposal. PROPOSERS are cautioned that making a false certification may subject the certifier to criminal prosecution. Signed State of California County of Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this day of , 20_, by , proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) who appeared before me Notary Public Signature Notary Public Seal City Council 22 — 54 4/19/2022 Page 1 of 1 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 20-139 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND MANAGEMENT OF BUS SHELTERS AND STOPS NON -LOBBYING CERTIFICATION The prospective participant certifies, by signing and submitting this bid or proposal, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that: (1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. (2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure of Lobbying Activities," in conformance with its instructions. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. The prospective participant also agrees by submitting his or her bid or proposal that he or she shall require that the language of this certification be included in all lower tier subcontracts, which exceed $100,000 and that all such subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. Signed: Title: Firm: Date: City Council 22 — 55 4/19/2022 Page 1 of 1 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 20-139 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND MANAGEMENT OF BUS SHELTERS AND STOPS NON-DISCRIMINATION CERTIFICATION The undersigned Company or corporate officer, during the performance of this contract, certifies as follows: The Company shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The Company shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without, regard to their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The Company agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. 2. The Company shall, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Company, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. 3. The Company shall send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he/she has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or workers' representatives of the Company's commitments under this section, and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment. 4. The Company shall comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor. 5. The Company shall furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his/her books, records, and accounts by the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation, to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders. 6. In the event of the Company's non-compliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, the contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the Company may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts or federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Execution Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulations, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law. City Council 22 — 56 4/19/2022 Page 1 of 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 20-139 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND MANAGEMENT OF BUS SHELTERS AND STOPS 7. The Company shall include the portion of the sentence immediately preceding paragraph (1) and the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (7) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to Section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontract or purchase order as the administering agency may direct as means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance; provided, however, that in the event the Company becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a subcontractor or proposer as a result of such direction by the administering agency, the Company may request that the United States enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States. 8. Pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1735, as added by Chapter 643 Stats. 1939, and as amended, no discrimination shall be made in the employment of persons upon public works because of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicaps, mental condition, marital status, or sex of such persons, except as provided in Section 1420, and any company of public works violating this Section is subject to all the penalties imposed for a violation of the Chapter. Signed: Title: Firm: Date: City Council 22 — 57 4/19/2022 Page 2 of 2 CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 20-139 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND MANAGEMENT OF BUS SHELTERS AND STOPS Appendix ATTACHMENT 5: POTENTIAL SITES FOR DIGITAL BILLBOARDS City Council 22 — 58 4/19/2022 CITY OF SANTA ANA PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY POTENTIAL SITES FOR DIGITAL BILLBOARDS G[?E ALL-AMERICO CITY SHEET INDEX SHEET LOCATION DESCRIPTION APN NO. TITLE SHEET 1 1 WELL 38 )SANTA ANA ZOO) 402-212-01 2 2 SANTA ANA WATER TOWER 398-151-01 3 3 SANTIAGO CREEK AT BROADWAY 002-180-57 4 4 RIVERVIEW 002-231-41 5 5 LA VETA PARK N/A 6 6.7.8 WELL 28 (SANTIAGO ARCHERY RANGE) BACK TO NATIVES CROOKE RESERVOIR 390-71-08 390-091-01 390-691-08 7 9 SA-7 AT RITCHEY 403-072-01 8 10 WEST OF WARNER AT SR-55 403—-1 016—072 151 —00001 9 11 FULLER LOT 398-092-14 10 12 NORTHWEST OF GRAND AND I-5 398-084-001 11 13 WEST OF SANTA CLARA AT 1-5 396-141-001 12 14 SOUTHWEST OF MCFADDEN AT SR-55 402-111-001 13 15 WEST OF ALTON AT SR-55 N/A Underground Service Alert msamem rainomN CALL: TOLL Fri 911 TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR PURBUANT TO ASSEABLY BILL 3p19 . E11A.71. PEBW/T /5 9AL1p UNLESS THE CONTRACTBR CONTACTS ANO OBTAINS N INQUIRY I.O. NUIBER FRCW 'UNOEROROUNO SERVICE ALERT' (1-BOB-1zi-1 /I31 AT LEAST TYO MBBXINB BAYS PRIOR TO CO NCING EXCAVATION. 4/19/2022 FRS' �i m L-J 10 E1stSt E1stSt p E1stSt - E 1st St E 1st St _ _ E 1st St E 1st St o G o 0 o , i 01ALAI _ t <y 202 214 zzo 245 ✓.'- ' J — a7r J224 212 \ ,� Pi�n+, . Park anta Ana Zoo at Prent y�e t ' -. - - 322 m -1D4 • Wj, . G f y E Chest... — o 4 ChPstnutke LL E.Main St E Main St E Main Sit Main St Main St 0 nut Ave _ .,.r. _ 0 d � E O niyn 15202 La7�5V Aso nda ' ® oo .c t: 33.74439 Lon:-117.84552 'td,:' - !r L,� Q�c �, 1 '` j gv.n-e�•a.zoz0neaeza �wcor�rwo� o Tom_— E 17th St `' E 17th St E 17th St E 17th St , E 17th St p q ". .. 1614 , - (7 Dgrrnan- ley, y 1 1G15 \- .� L 1622 1623 1610 - ' c P 1618 1619 o lsoa g999yyyy � � ■ y.: 315 1603 ��\. 7 '+615 1614 �'. 1,615��.. �. 1610 Z 1609 1" £ 1609 ` ,E 16th St O 1528160;1 1605 1606 Z 1665 ;� 15za °�r 1so1 lsoz i6o1 1 N 1623 ``��� •ate 1 _ 152 P Dorman j 1518,Ws - 1518 c ` }1 14519 'p `� St 4 151,4 157 1_16 Z o..V, 1516 -1509 1512 i 1515 - y -----I __. �1p`6 - 151 �..,, 1506 M I 1 C' d��� ' i 15C2 o a 150: r S'70� ��Cla` �1rSr �' 15g3 m 1502 1422 E lsth St P 1428 1424 !� 1418 ialo 1404 �on 1 Ave En9r-1Lat33.7571 Lan-117.8,"?to—r 1 1418 1ai1 N 1356 1335 1d10 Q p o 1406,, 1340 n rr 1314 �� -•s - (1338 1337 1310 13t7 = 1332 1329 - . 7P �,. •:1306' .131 Y. - nd 1324 13130 95 9 1325� ••213 ,19C2 13 j3i',7 ,o - p 1300 n . a 71�1�328 1321 .,1322 iI L=..1317 1318 r� 13121 ow 1312,- i 10 171 0 Y _ j' 1ro1 r� — E Washington Ave E Washington Ave, •, •• ., _, 1s ington1 _. - . � • �Tt'.1---t_`'iT-1 . '. �"'�I- I E`_'_l.�v �R \ rn 0 0 � \ e� ''� � I � ♦ 'L t - _ — r2700 - - i c \\\ _—Main Place: Dr - - - - _ - Mein P_ikl fDrLl `- �; Main P lace Dr Z N 4 ` 2677 I 401 e _roo — MAIN -MAIN PLACE R 2660 402La _t► 5 _ 12651 1, 1 00 I�� 50 ket � ?Oiler Bn tat 3377364 Lon_-11786943 \\ ,mom,®z�a�pp'pM�z zoH .€zozo it n ,aon arms e� — — — a _ c Santa Ana -Rive` �! r rr `� � �, _ �• � t. � far 1. B RI STOL-H ESPERIAN l a Santa Ana NPSperian Way—`= Hesperlan Way y 17 6 a CIO it 4 •t 7 Santa Ana m M 1 .00 Q r - tirD 41 , 'r 50 yet r• �Ilm._ ) Bing —Lat. 33.77845 Lon.-117.8891� _ / � �, � nv . i lagirg, r_-,zp o nen szozo rn��.�n Comm aon Terms 'wr 'wgw/1 Ypv ice/ _ ` c 011'424 QO O 425 o O bO t °O A°4�0 b �- 435 434.. A p0 O,p 0 P' — 445 ,p . LL' 444 .r. / w W 1N Qrchard Ave fFAPWe ve �yay r'I elan y ,q NNW E ,fie : 1 2944 ' 1 m n m rn�, m m rn �yn ar rn 2938� q - - Y E 2934 Sherwood Ln Sherwood Ln m '.m v o co N m t• o a rL9 'l IL Hesperian Way, � 3 � 2s3o 0 8N 2s2s r, ti9. m 2920 o_ 1919 ,\ Y . F �zsis Fairbrook Ln„', Fairbrook Ln Fairbrook Ln �6 ti91� ,00f r ism V'7 � Lat: 33.78055 Lon:-117-8854 �o�.� ` St S W ➢_ti 2 4 ' �A ,1 .m. n •N Ni "-N •� n' ";N �' 'F V N2 RES'7LeA'M ft C.,,rs9=tF,m 660 15.- n1-4 and Town W n Cou Iry Rd No .. 721A fA -aL j - 600 ,,,�'" fA _ s �c s. '2 l 2740 Z 2731 w 2 2720 / N,p \e�e�,P n 21�2 �r 7b - - 2727 2710, G- 9 21 s - Sen' , w� .2l f_ / Bm9 Lat: 33.7766 Lan:-117.86138 2651 �09 �� N 3 f �' °q� 27i ' ' eI I nab o Eg 202 M wre Pb paaaen re_s " g1 `o r i> Q 21 64 u �a zzoz z R is i ..,.� i2,14 3 , i 2230SIL f/ 0 1'S25 RitchOt Ritcheist .. MMII f r—E-Warner Ave s EWarner Avel� I 1-�— r------ - I I E Warner.Ave - 7NARNER'BROOKHOCLOW-P—M LH 1536 4, 0Bing Lat:33.71625Lon: -11784777 / _ Ave_ 0 ®20@OT T@2020HERE,®202DP&mwftCowaffonTmsms tm l7 2214 • ® _•�WJ � ` O h L Ritchey t -_ Ritchey St O AM IA - � N •,l w 1/1 ♦ / t_ -Warner Ave F Warner Ave E_byamerq�e- �I o v• dr ' e .♦ P o o ,� ♦ the 00, 1.6 Bin Lat: 33.71689 Lon:-117.84755 / _ ° i ® H�2D. 134 0 r. 1338 f, 1332 1330 ;;1121Z �I N m lacy T - -, N ry �i m m 1404 , 1aD4 o o o '� ^ ��`� 1 Z. N _• � r� 1a02 .. N• N.. N -,o ••. E 14th St _ 1314 - E i4th St c ch O O O J n v y a 1330 131C - w m p1�•• E 14th St - ' 1306 �..,I3-1 � ! L �c ,_ a n rn Washm ton PI •` 9302 . 43C2 1 1326 1218 > 41, io a. 131,e a �� 'r f `{ "' Q p 4 rhd�n90° 1314 ° -�� — — �dsh Y. ■ a. � > 1 � � '1214 S �. 1314 3 w 1313 � � — Z y j � `' z 01/ 5 1202 As . ''t Washington,Pl 1122 114, 1� IT I , 1114 _�;,y,t/•OL V *2g" OZ5 \ 1020 1019 %4 r 1018 1017 - lozz �• V tiO� 1018 • 4016 1015' :. r �'; Santa Ana Blvd �dhP Z i 1 01. 2 8 > g 006 c r 1012 O�Ja p Sly 1• _ _ rrl nt Pna Lg� enP rk 1001 - a sa c 1013I Staff grd St .,..• „ ,. � �� 9 � / CNo m m r -!`oCent og o a o o35 orb • o9: ! "Q a I. � sae - . 5 9zG '� ,-�a Pn.- 1 • Stafford 5t t� , � � • sz5 � 2 92� g22 g17— •• �2(! lack., 25m Blr,� Lat 33 75583 Lon:-117.55839 - o7n .a ���• ` l 2ozo ramr «co�rum re_ms 1314 1313 1307 .r,.T 13C 2 ,31� .0 1314 cn � L W � j� .�AF • a Wosh�ngon Pl. z 7 Y aye • /$ ` i SAN7A ANA-GRAND W Y - O_ i E Santa Ana Blvd 1II \\ b Bing ; Lat 33.75513 Lon:-117.85434 13312 MWIf 4 _ 13321 img 13322 i v+ J 13341�I N 13342 3 Z m c1 — $ 13351L °'ishall Ln Marshall • • • PPP • V) O N _ _ i m w E Santa Clara Ave , E Santa. Clara Ave E Santa Clara Ave E Santa Clara Ave E Santa Clara Ave I, 223G a, ti 222° 222 G� ■ N - _0 . , 2221 - o a ` 9 E Santa Clara Ave 2226 Z 2225 2216 2217 N J 13522 1351.r 2222 2212 - 2213 `0 _2221 2212_" 2213 :ra V o I1 _ 1354.1 22071 13542 - Z E Buffalo Ave 2217 2208 , E Buffalo Ave E Buffalo Ave Q Q 13562 13561 r � N " • a N a ° � ' U U O N �' ,2213 22G4 -' .ii A 15731 15761 15761 - - - - c 15762- j � ` w _Aj Q fi -t c v W ' a 3 Medallion Ave 17045 m C � o +J - MCFADDEM-PASADEMA Q" WL tta au ame E McFadden Ave E McFadden Ave _ McFadden Ave McFadden Ave T, W 01 - i C Q _ c Log Irm -- 15811 hB r -22D0 � _ , E Alton Ave _ �r Ni { v 3131 VA _.� / ,• u. 3213201 0 / y �•'� U Sr OWL .9. y -- _ yP ®v 'fe 'rnicm�<uzo son corym,nn CITY OF SANTA ANA RFP NO.: 20-139 DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND MANAGEMENT OF BUS SHELTERS AND STOPS Appendix ATTACHMENT 6: LOCATION OF BUS STOPS AND BUS SHELTERS City Council 22 — 73 4/19/2022 OCTA - BUS STOPS REPORT CITY OF SANTA ANA OCTA ID STREET of TRAVEL BUS STOP LOCATION Type Bench Trash Bins Ad Pannel New or Old Design 5255 SB FAIRVIEW ST OPP EDNA DR Bench 1 1 5891 EB WESTMINSTER AVE FS EUCLID ST Bench 1 1 5892 EB WESTMINSTER AVE OPP ROSITA ST (300ft) Bench 1 1 5893 IEB WESTMINSTER AVE FS NEWHOPE ST Bench 1 1 5894 EB WESTMINSTER AVE OPP WEST ST Bench 1 0 5895 EB WESTMINSTER AVE FS HARBOR BLVD Shelter 2 2 New 5896 EB WESTMINSTER AVE OPP LAUREL ST Bench 1 1 5897 EB WESTMINSTER AVE NS FAIRVIEW ST Shelter 2 2 New 5898 EB 17TH ST FS KING ST Bench 0 1 5900 EB 17TH ST FS COLLEGE AVE Bench 1 1 5901 IEB 17TH ST FS ENT SANTA ANA COLLEGE Shelter 2 2 1 New 5902 EB 17TH ST FS BRISTOL ST Shelter 1 2 Old 5904 EB 17TH ST NS FREEMAN ST Bench 0 0 5905 EB 17TH ST NS FLOWER ST Bench 2 2 5906 EB 17TH ST NS ROSS ST Bench 1 0 5907 IEB 17TH ST FS BROADWAY Bench 1 11 5908 EB 17TH ST FS MAIN ST Shelter 2 2 New 5909 EB 17TH ST FS SPURGEON ST Bench 0 0 5910 EB 17TH ST OPP SANTIAGO ST Bench 1 0 5911 EB 17TH ST NS LINCOLN AVE Shelter 1 1 Old 5913 EB 17TH ST NS GRAND AVE Shelter 1 1 Old 5915 EB 17TH ST FS CONCORD ST Bench 1 1 5916 IEB 17TH ST NS CABRILLO PARK DR Bench 1 1 5917 EB 17TH ST FS WILLIAMS ST Bench 1 1 5918 EB 17TH ST NS TUSTIN AVE Shelter 1 1 Old 5919 WB 17TH ST FS TUSTIN AVE Shelter 1 2 Old 5920 WB 17TH ST OPP WILLIAMS ST Bench 1 1 5921 WB 17TH ST FS SHERRY LN Bench 1 1 5922 WB 17TH ST OPP CONCORD ST Bench 0 1 5924 WB 17TH ST FS GRAND AVE Shelter 2 2 New &nbsp; City Council &nbsp;22 &ndash;&nbsp;74 4/19/2022 &nbsp; OCTA ID STREET of TRAVEL BUS STOP LOCATION Type Bench Trash Bins Ad Pannel New or Old Design 5925 WB 17TH ST NS LINCOLN AVE Shelter 1 1 Old 5926 WB 17TH ST NS SANTIAGO ST Bench 0 1 5927 WB 17TH ST OPP PENN WAY Bench 1 1 5928 WB 17TH ST NS MAIN ST Shelter 1 2 Old 5929 WB 17TH ST NS BROADWAY Bench 0 1 5930 jWB 17TH ST NS ROSS ST Bench 11 2 5931 WB 17TH ST NS FLOWER ST Bench 1 1 5932 WB 17TH ST OPP FREEMAN ST Bench 1 1 5933 WB 17TH ST FS BAKER ST Bench 0 0 5934 WB 17TH ST FS BRISTOL ST Shelter 1 2 Old 5935 jWB 17TH ST FS BRISTOL MARKET PLACE Shelter 11 2 Old 5936 WB 17TH ST FS COLLEGE AVE Shelter 0 2 Old 5938 WB 17TH ST FS ENGLISH ST Bench 1 1 5939 WB WESTMINSTER AVE FS FAIRVIEW ST Shelter 1 1 Old 5940 WB WESTMINSTER AVE NS NANCY LN Shelter 1 0 Old 5942 EB 1ST ST FS COOPER ST Bench 1 1 5943 EB 1ST ST FS EUCLID ST Bench 1 1 5945 EB 1ST ST FS NEWHOPE ST Bench 1 1 5946 EB 1ST ST VFS SHANNON ST Bench 1 1 5947 EB 1ST ST FS HARBOR BLVD Shelter 0 2 Old 5948 EB 1ST ST NS JACKSON AVE Bench 1 1 5949 EB 1ST ST VNS FAIRVIEW ST Bench 1 1 5950 EB 1ST ST FS FAIRVIEW ST Shelter 2 2 New 5951 EB 1ST ST FS SULLIVAN ST Bench 1 1 5952 IEB 1ST ST FS CENTER ST Shelter 0 0 Old 5954 EB 1ST ST NS RAITT ST Bench 1 1 5956 EB 1ST ST FS PACIFIC AVE Bench 0 0 5957 EB 1ST ST FS BRISTOL ST Shelter 2 2 New 5961 EB 1ST ST FS FLOWER ST Bench 1 1 5962 1 EB 1ST ST OPP ROSS ST Bench 1 1 5964 EB 1ST ST FS MAIN ST Shelter 2 2 New 5965 EB 1ST ST NS MAPLE ST Shelter 1 1 Old 5966 EB 1ST ST NS HICKORY ST Bench 0 0 &nbsp; City Council &nbsp;22 &ndash;&nbsp;75 4/19/2022 &nbsp; OCTA ID STREET of TRAVEL BUS STOP LOCATION Type Bench Trash Bins Ad Pannel New or Old Design 5967 EB 1ST ST NS CEDAR ST Bench 0 0 5968 EB 1ST ST FS GRAND AVE Shelter 1 1 Old 5969 EB 1ST ST NS LYON ST Bench 1 1 5970 EB 1ST ST OPP CABRILLO PARK DR Bench 1 1 5971 EB 1ST ST OPP GOLDEN CIRCLE DR Shelter 1 1 Old 5972 jWB 1ST ST FS GOLDEN CIRCLE DR Shelter 1 1 Old 5973 WB 1ST ST FS CABRILLO PARK DR Bench 1 1 5974 WB 1ST ST FS LYON ST Bench 1 1 5975 WB 1ST ST FS GRAND AVE Shelter 2 2 New 5976 WB 1ST ST FS STANDARD AVE Bench 1 0 5978 jWB 1ST ST FS LACY ST Bench 0 1 5980 WB 1ST ST FS DOWNTOWN PLAZA Shelter 1 1 Old 5981 WB 1ST ST FS MAIN ST Shelter 4 2 New 5983 WB 1ST ST FS ROSS ST Bench 1 1 5984 WB 1ST ST FS FLOWER ST Bench 1 1 5987 WB 1ST ST FS BRISTOL ST Shelter 2 2 New 5988 WB 1ST ST FS PACIFIC AVE Bench 1 1 5990 jWB 1ST ST FS RAITT ST Bench 1 1 5992 WB 1ST ST OPP CENTER ST Bench 1 0 5993 WB 1ST ST FS SULLIVAN ST Bench 1 0 5994 WB 1ST ST FS FAIRVIEW ST Bench 0 0 5995 WB 1ST ST VFS FAIRVIEW ST Bench 1 1 5996 WB 1ST ST NS JACKSON ST Bench 1 1 5997 WB 1ST ST FS HARBOR BLVD Shelter 0 2 Old 5998 jWB 1ST ST OPP SHANNON ST Bench 1 1 5999 WB 1ST ST NS NEWHOPE ST Bench 1 0 6001 WB 1ST ST FS EUCLID ST Bench 1 1 6002 WB 1ST ST FS COOPER ST Bench 1 1 6029 EB ALTON AVE FS MAIN ST Bench 1 1 6030 IEB ALTON AVE FS MAPLE ST Bench 1 0 6031 EB ALTON AVE NS HALLADAY ST Bench 0 1 6033 WB ALTON AVE FS OAK ST Bench 1 0 6034 WB ALTON AVE NS MAIN ST Bench 1 0 &nbsp; City Council &nbsp;22 &ndash;&nbsp;76 4/19/2022 &nbsp; OCTA ID STREET of TRAVEL BUS STOP LOCATION Type Bench Trash Bins Ad Pannel New or Old Design 6035 NB BRISTOL ST FS SUNFLOWER AVE Shelter 1 2 Old 6036 NB BRISTOL ST FS CALLENS COMMON Shelter 1 1 Old 6037 NB BRISTOL ST FS MACARTHUR BLVD Bench 1 2 6038 NB BRISTOL ST NS ALTON AVE Bench 1 1 6039 NB BRISTOL ST FS SEGERSTROM AVE Shelter 1 1 Old 6040 NB BRISTOL ST FS HEMLOCK WAY Shelter 1 1 Old 6041 NB BRISTOL ST FS CENTRAL AVE Bench 0 1 6042 NB BRISTOL ST NS WARNER AVE Shelter 0 2 Old 6043 NB BRISTOL ST FS SAINT GERTRUDE PL Bench 1 1 6045 NB BRISTOL ST FS SAINT ANDREW PL Bench 0 0 6046 NB BRISTOL ST FS EDINGER AVE Shelter 1 3 Old 6047 NB BRISTOL ST FS WILSHIRE AVE Bench 1 1 6048 NB BRISTOL ST FS MCFADDEN AVE Shelter 4 2 New 6050 NB BRISTOL ST FS BISHOP ST Bench 1 1 6052 NB BRISTOL ST FS 1ST ST Shelter 2 2 New 6053 NB BRISTOL ST FS SANTA ANA BLVD Bench 1 1 6054 NB BRISTOL ST NS CIVIC CENTER DR Bench 1 1 6056 NB BRISTOL ST NS WASHINGTON AVE Bench 0 0 6057 NB BRISTOL ST FS 17TH ST Shelter 1 2 Old 60S8 NB BRISTOL ST OPP 21ST ST Bench 1 1 6059 NB BRISTOL ST FS SANTA CLARA AVE Bench 0 1 6061 NB BRISTOL ST FS MEMORY LN Bench 1 1 6062 NB BRISTOL ST OPP RIVERGLEN LN Bench 1 1 6063 SB BRISTOL ST NS HESPERIAN WAY Bench 1 1 6064 ISB BRISTOL ST FS RIVERGLEN LN Bench 1 1 6065 SB BRISTOL ST FS PARK LN Bench 0 1 6066 SB BRISTOL ST VNS SANTA CLARA AVE Bench 0 1 6067 SB BRISTOL ST NS BRISTOL MARKETPLACE Bench 1 1 6068 SB BRISTOL ST FS 17TH ST Shelter 1 1 Old 6069 ISB BRISTOL ST FS WASHINGTON AVE Bench 0 0 6071 SB BRISTOL ST FS CIVIC CENTER DR Bench 1 1 6072 SB BRISTOL ST FS SANTA ANA BLVD Bench 1 1 6073 SB BRISTOL ST FS 1ST ST Shelter 4 2 New &nbsp; City Council &nbsp;22 &ndash;&nbsp;77 4/19/2022 &nbsp; OCTA ID STREET of TRAVEL BUS STOP LOCATION Type Bench Trash Bins Ad Pannel New or Old Design 6075 SB BRISTOL ST FS WILLITS ST Bench 1 2 6077 SB BRISTOL ST FS MCFADDEN AVE Shelter 3 4 Old 6078 SB BRISTOL ST FS WILSHIRE AVE Bench 0 1 6079 SB BRISTOL ST FS EDINGER AVE Shelter 2 2 New 6080 SB BRISTOL ST FS SAINT ANDREW PL Bench 1 1 6082 ISB BRISTOL ST VNS WARNER AVE (400ft) Shelter 11 1 Old 6083 SB BRISTOL ST FS WARNER AVE Bench 1 2 6084 SB BRISTOL ST FS CENTRAL AVE Bench 1 1 6085 SB BRISTOL ST OPP HEMLOCK WAY Bench 1 1 6086 SB BRISTOL ST FS SEGERSTROM AVE Bench 1 1 6088 ISB BRISTOL ST FS ALTON AVE Shelter 1 1 Old 6089 SB BRISTOL ST FS MACARTHUR BLVD Shelter 0 2 Old 6090 SB BRISTOL ST NS CALLENS COMMON Shelter 1 1 Old 6091 SB BRISTOL ST NS SUNFLOWER AVE Shelter 1 1 Old 6107 NB CENTER ST FS EDINGER AVE Bench 1 1 6108 NB CENTER ST FS WILSHIRE AVE Bench 1 1 6109 NB CENTER ST NS MCFADDEN AVE Bench 1 0 6110 ISB CENTER ST FS MCFADDEN AVE Bench 1 1 6111 SB CENTER ST FS WILSHIRE AVE Bench 0 0 6112 EB CHESTNUT AVE FS MAIN ST Bench 1 1 6113 EB CHESTNUT AVE FS ORANGE AVE Bench 1 1 6114 EB CHESTNUT AVE FS OAK ST Bench 1 1 6115 EB CHESTNUT AVE FS HALLADAY ST Bench 1 1 6119 WB CHESTNUT AVE FS STANDARD AVE Bench 1 1 6120 WB CHESTNUT AVE NS HICKORY ST Bench 0 0 6121 WB CHESTNUT AVE FS MAPLE ST Bench 1 1 6122 WB CHESTNUT AVE NS MAIN ST Bench 1 1 6124 EB CIVIC CENTER DR FS PACIFIC AVE Bench 1 1 6128 EB CIVIC CENTER DR OPP PARTON ST Shelter 1 1 Old 6129 EB CIVIC CENTER DR FS ROSS ST Shelter I 1 0 Old 6130 EB CIVIC CENTER DR NS BROADWAY Bench 1 0 6131 WB CIVIC CENTER DR FS BIRCH ST Bench 1 1 6132 WB CIVIC CENTER DR NS VAN NESS AVE Bench 1 1 &nbsp; City Council &nbsp;22 &ndash;&nbsp;78 4/19/2022 &nbsp; OCTA ID STREET of TRAVEL BUS STOP LOCATION Type Bench Trash Bins Ad Pannel New or Old Design 6134 WB CIVIC CENTER DR FS FLOWER ST Bench 0 0 6138 WB CIVIC CENTER DR FS PACIFIC AVE Bench 1 1 6167 EB DYER RD NS PULLMAN ST Shelter 1 1 Old 6168 WB DYER RD FS RED HILL AVE Bench 0 1 6169 WB DYER RD NS PULLMAN ST Bench 0 0 6192 IEB EDINGER AVE OPP MOHAWK DR Bench 1 1 6193 EB EDINGER AVE FS FAIRVIEW ST Shelter 1 2 Old 6194 EB EDINGER AVE OPP SULLIVAN ST Bench 1 1 6195 EB EDINGER AVE FS GREENVILLE ST Bench 1 2 6196 EB EDINGER AVE FS CENTER ST Bench 0 1 6197 IEB EDINGER AVE NS RAITT ST Bench 1 1 6198 EB EDINGER AVE NS PACIFIC ST Bench 1 2 6199 EB EDINGER AVE FS BRISTOL ST Shelter 1 2 Old 6200 EB EDINGER AVE FS PARK DR Bench 0 0 6201 EB EDINGER AVE NS FLOWER ST Bench 1 2 6202 EB EDINGER AVE FS VAN NESS AVE Bench 1 1 6204 EB EDINGER AVE NS MAIN ST Shelter 2 2 New 6205 EB EDINGER AVE FS MAPLE ST Bench 1 1 6206 EB EDINGER AVE FS KILSON ST Bench 0 1 6208 EB EDINGER AVE FS STANDARD AVE Bench 1 1 6209 EB EDINGER AVE FS GRAND AVE Shelter 1 1 Old 6210 EB EDINGER AVE NS LYON ST Shelter 1 1 Old 6211 EB EDINGER AVE FS RITCHEY ST Bench 0 0 6213 WB EDINGER AVE FS AUTO MALL DR Bench 1 0 6214 jWB EDINGER AVE FS RITCHEY ST Bench 11 2 6215 WB EDINGER AVE FS LYON ST Bench 1 2 6217 WB EDINGER AVE NS GRAND AVE Bench 0 1 6218 WB EDINGER AVE FS STANDARD AVE Shelter 1 1 Old 6219 WB EDINGER AVE FS KILSON DR Bench 1 1 6220 jWB EDINGER AVE FS MAPLE ST Bench 11 1 6221 WB EDINGER AVE FS MAIN ST Shelter 2 2 New 6223 WB EDINGER AVE FS VAN NESS AVE Bench 1 1 6224 WB EDINGER AVE FS FLOWER ST Bench 1 1 &nbsp; City Council &nbsp;22 &ndash;&nbsp;79 4/19/2022 &nbsp; OCTA ID STREET of TRAVEL BUS STOP LOCATION Type Bench Trash Bins Ad Pannel New or Old Design 6225 WB EDINGER AVE FS TOWNER ST Bench 1 1 6226 WB EDINGER AVE FS ROSEWOOD AVE Bench 1 1 6227 WB EDINGER AVE FS BRISTOL ST Bench 1 2 6228 WB EDINGER AVE FS PACIFIC AVE Bench 1 1 6229 WB EDINGER AVE FS CENTER ST Bench 1 1 6230 jWB EDINGER AVE FS RAITT ST Bench 1 1 6231 WB EDINGER AVE FS SULLIVAN AVE Bench 0 1 6232 WB EDINGER AVE FS FAIRVIEW ST Bench 1 0 6233 WB EDINGER AVE FS MOHAWK DR Bench 1 1 6234 WB EDINGER AVE FS NEWHOPE ST Bench 0 0 6235 jWB EDINGER AVE FS CORTA DR Bench 11 0 6236 NB EUCLID ST NS ROBERTS DR Bench 1 1 6237 NB EUCLID ST FS MCFADDEN AVE Bench 1 1 6238 NB EUCLID ST OPP BARBETTE AVE Bench 1 1 6239 NB EUCLID ST FS 1ST ST Shelter 1 1 Old 6240 NB EUCLID ST FS 5TH ST Bench 1 1 6241 NB EUCLID ST FS HAZARD AVE Bench 1 1 6242 INB EUCLID ST FS OAKFIELD AVE Bench 1 1 6243 SB EUCLID ST NS 4TH ST Bench 1 0 6244 SB EUCLID ST FS 1ST ST Bench 1 0 6245 SB EUCLID ST NS BARBETTE AVE Bench 0 0 6247 SB EUCLID ST FS MCFADDEN AVE Bench 1 1 6248 SB EUCLID ST OPP ROBERTS DR Bench 1 1 6250 NB FAIRVIEW ST FS SUNFLOWER AVE Shelter 1 1 Old 6251 INB FAIRVIEW ST FS MACARTHUR BLVD Shelter 1 1 Old 6252 NB FAIRVIEW ST NS ALTON AVE Shelter 1 1 Old 6253 NB FAIRVIEW ST OPP GARRY AVE Bench 1 1 6254 NB FAIRVIEW ST FS SEGERSTROM AVE Shelter 1 1 Old 6256 NB FAIRVIEW ST OPP CENTRAL AVE Bench 1 1 6257 INB FAIRVIEW ST FS WARNER AVE Bench 1 2 6258 NB FAIRVIEW ST FS HARVARD ST Bench 1 1 6259 NB FAIRVIEW ST FS SAINT ANDREW PL Bench 1 1 6260 NB FAIRVIEW ST NS EDINGER AVE Shelter 1 2 Old &nbsp; City Council &nbsp;22 &ndash;&nbsp;80 4/19/2022 &nbsp; OCTA ID STREET of TRAVEL BUS STOP LOCATION Type Bench Trash Bins Ad Pannel New or Old Design 6261 NB FAIRVIEW ST FS BORCHARD AVE Bench 1 1 6262 NB FAIRVIEW ST FS DAHL LN Bench 1 1 6263 NB FAIRVIEW ST FS MCFADDEN AVE Shelter 1 2 Old 6264 NB FAIRVIEW ST OPP HIGHLAND ST Bench 1 1 6265 NB FAIRVIEW ST FS WILLITS ST Bench 1 1 6266 NB FAIRVIEW ST FS 1ST ST Shelter 1 0 Old 6267 NB FAIRVIEW ST FS 5TH ST Shelter 1 0 Old 6268 NB FAIRVIEW ST FS CIVIC CENTER DR Bench 1 0 6270 NB FAIRVIEW ST FS WESTMINSTER AVE Bench 1 1 6271 NB FAIRVIEW ST NS EDNA DR Bench 1 1 6272 NB FAIRVIEW ST NS TRASK AVE Bench 0 0 6273 NB FAIRVIEW ST FS DOWNIE PL Bench 1 1 6275 SB FAIRVIEW ST FS WESTMINSTER AVE Shelter 4 2 New 6276 SB FAIRVIEW ST VFS 12TH ST (400ft) Bench 1 0 6278 SB FAIRVIEW ST OPP CIVIC CENTER DR Bench 1 1 6279 SB FAIRVIEW ST FS 5TH ST Bench 0 0 6280 SB FAIRVIEW ST FS 1ST ST Bench 1 2 6281 ISB FAIRVIEW ST FS WILLITS ST Bench 1 1 6282 SB FAIRVIEW ST FS HIGHLAND ST Bench 1 1 6283 SB FAIRVIEW ST FS MCFADDEN AVE Bench 1 1 6284 SB FAIRVIEW ST FS DAHL LN Bench 1 1 6285 SB FAIRVIEW ST NS EDINGER AVE Shelter 1 2 Old 6286 SB FAIRVIEW ST FS CENTENNIAL RD Bench 0 0 6287 SB FAIRVIEW ST FS HARVARD ST Bench 0 0 6288 ISB FAIRVIEW ST FS WARNER AVE Shelter 1 1 Old 6289 SB FAIRVIEW ST FS CENTRAL AVE Bench 1 1 6291 SB FAIRVIEW ST FS SEGERSTROM AVE Shelter 1 1 Old 6292 SB FAIRVIEW ST NS GARRY AVE Bench 1 1 6293 SB FAIRVIEW ST NS ALTON AVE Bench 1 1 6294 SB FAIRVIEW ST FS MACARTHUR BLVD Shelter 0 1 Old 6295 NB FLOWER ST NS MACARTHUR BLVD N/A 0 0 0 N/A 6296 NB FLOWER ST INS ALTON AVE Bench 11 1 6297 NB FLOWER ST INS DYER RD 113ench 10 0 &nbsp; City Council &nbsp;22 &ndash;&nbsp;81 4/19/2022 &nbsp; OCTA ID STREET of TRAVEL BUS STOP LOCATION Type Bench Trash Bins Ad Pannel New or Old Design 6298 NB FLOWER ST OPP CENTRAL AVE Bench 0 0 6299 NB FLOWER ST FS WARNER AVE Bench 1 1 6300 NB FLOWER ST FS SAINT GERTRUDE PL Bench 1 1 6301 NB FLOWER ST FS SAINT ANDREW PL Bench 1 1 6302 NB FLOWER ST NS EDINGER AVE Bench 1 1 6303 1 NB FLOWER ST FS WILSHIRE AVE Bench 1 1 6304 NB FLOWER ST NS MCFADDEN AVE Bench 1 1 6305 NB FLOWER ST FS RICHLAND ST Bench 1 1 6306 NB FLOWER ST FS MYRTLE ST Bench 1 1 6307 NB FLOWER ST FS 1ST ST Bench 1 1 6308 INB FLOWER ST FS SANTA ANA BLVD Bench 1 1 6309 NB FLOWER ST FS 6TH ST Shelter 1 1 Old 6311 NB FLOWER ST FS 10TH ST Bench 1 1 6312 NB FLOWER ST FS WASHINGTON AVE Bench 1 1 6313 NB FLOWER ST FS 15TH ST Bench 1 1 6314 SB FLOWER ST FS 15TH ST Bench 1 1 6315 SB FLOWER ST NS WASHINGTON AVE Bench 1 1 6316 ISB FLOWER ST FS 10TH ST Bench 1 1 6319 SB FLOWER ST FS 6TH ST Bench 1 1 6321 SB FLOWER ST NS WALNUT ST Bench 1 1 6322 SB FLOWER ST FS CHESTNUT AVE Bench 1 1 6323 SB FLOWER ST OPP RICHLAND ST Bench 1 1 6324 SB FLOWER ST FS MCFADDEN AVE Bench 1 1 6325 SB FLOWER ST FS WILSHIRE AVE Bench 0 0 6326 ISB FLOWER ST FS EDINGER AVE Bench 1 1 6327 SB FLOWER ST FS BERKELEY ST Bench 1 1 6328 SB FLOWER ST FS SAINT ANDREW PL Bench 1 1 6329 SB FLOWER ST FS SAINT GERTRUDE PL Bench 1 1 6330 SB FLOWER ST FS WARNER AVE Bench 1 1 6331 ISB FLOWER ST FS CENTRAL AVE Bench 1 1 6332 SB FLOWER ST FS SEGERSTROM AVE Bench 1 1 6333 SB FLOWER ST FS ALTON AVE Bench 1 1 6334 SB FLOWER ST FS COLUMBINE AVE Bench 0 1 0 Old &nbsp; City Council &nbsp;22 &ndash;&nbsp;82 4/19/2022 &nbsp; OCTA ID STREET of TRAVEL BUS STOP LOCATION Type Bench Trash Bins Ad Pannel New or Old Design 6335 SB FLOWER ST FS MACARTHUR BLVD Bench 1 1 6336 SB FLOWER ST FS KELLER AVE Bench 1 1 6338 NB GRAND AVE FS BROOKHOLLOW DR Bench 1 1 6339 NB GRAND AVE FS WARNER AVE Bench 1 1 6340 NB GRAND AVE FS SAINT GERTRUDE PL Bench 1 1 6341 jNB GRAND AVE FS SAINT ANDREW PL Bench 1 11 6342 NB GRAND AVE FS EDINGER AVE Shelter 1 1 Old 6343 NB GRAND AVE OPP WILSHIRE AVE (350ft) Bench 1 1 6345 NB GRAND AVE FS MCFADDEN AVE Bench 1 1 6346 NB GRAND AVE OPP WAKEHAM AVE Bench 1 1 6347 jNB GRAND AVE NS CHESTNUT AVE Bench 1 1 6348 NB GRAND AVE FS 1ST ST Bench 1 1 6350 NB GRAND AVE FS 4TH ST Bench 1 1 6351 NB GRAND AVE FS ENT ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER Shelter 1 1 Old 6354 NB GRAND AVE NS 14TH ST Bench 1 1 6356 NB GRAND AVE FS 17TH ST Bench 1 1 6357 NB GRAND AVE OPP 21ST ST (300ftS) Bench 1 1 6358 INB GRAND AVE NS SANTA CLARA AVE Bench 1 1 6359 NB GRAND AVE OPP GROVEMONT ST Bench 0 1 6360 NB GRAND AVE FS FAIRHAVEN AVE Bench 1 1 6361 SB GRAND AVE FS FAIRHAVEN AVE Bench 1 1 6362 SB GRAND AVE FS GROVEMONT ST Bench 1 1 6363 SB GRAND AVE FS SANTA CLARA AVE Shelter 1 1 Old 6364 SB GRAND AVE FS 21ST ST Shelter 1 1 Old 6365 ISB GRAND AVE NS 17TH ST Shelter 1 2 Old 6366 SB GRAND AVE FS 15TH ST Bench 1 1 6367 SB GRAND AVE FS SANTA ANA BLVD Bench 1 1 6369 SB GRAND AVE NS 6TH ST Bench 1 1 6370 SB GRAND AVE FS 4TH ST Bench 1 1 6371 ISB GRAND AVE FS 1ST ST Shelter 0 1 Old 6372 SB GRAND AVE FS CHESTNUT AVE Bench 0 1 6373 SB GRAND AVE FS WAKEHAM AVE Bench 1 1 6374 SB GRAND AVE FS MCFADDEN AVE Shelter 1 1 Old &nbsp; City Council &nbsp;22 &ndash;&nbsp;83 4/19/2022 &nbsp; OCTA ID STREET of TRAVEL BUS STOP LOCATION Type Bench Trash Bins Ad Pannel New or Old Design 6375 SB GRAND AVE NS WILSHIRE AVE Bench 0 1 6376 SB GRAND AVE FS EDINGER AVE Bench 1 1 6377 SB GRAND AVE FS POMONA ST Bench 1 2 6378 SB GRAND AVE FS SAINT ANDREW PL Bench 1 1 6379 SB GRAND AVE FS SAINT GERTRUDE PL Bench 1 1 6380 ISB GRAND AVE FS WARNER AVE Bench 0 1 6381 SB GRAND AVE FS HOTEL TERRACE DR Bench 0 1 6382 NB GREENVILLE ST FS PENDLETON AVE Bench 1 1 6383 NB GREENVILLE ST FS SAINT GERTRUDE PL Bench 1 0 6384 NB GREENVILLE ST FS GLENWOOD PL Bench 1 1 6386 INB GREENVILLE ST NS POMONA ST Bench 0 0 6387 SB GREENVILLE ST NS STANFORD ST Bench 1 1 6388 SB GREENVILLE ST FS OCCIDENTAL ST Bench 0 0 6389 SB GREENVILLE ST NS CASTOR ST Bench 1 1 6390 SB GREENVILLE ST FS CAMDEN PL Bench 1 0 6391 SB GREENVILLE ST VNS PENDLETON AVE Bench 1 1 6392 NB HALLADAY ST @ 2929 HALLADAY ST Bench 0 0 6393 INB HALLADAY ST FS DYER RD Bench 1 2 6394 NB HALLADAY ST NS EMMETT ST Bench 1 1 639S NB HALLADAY ST NS CENTRAL AVE Bench 0 0 6397 SB HALLADAY ST FS WARNER AVE Bench 1 1 6398 SB HALLADAY ST NS CENTRAL AVE Bench 0 1 6399 SB HALLADAY ST NS GOETZ AVE Bench 1 1 6400 SB HALLADAY ST NS DYER RD Bench 1 1 6401 ISB HALLADAY ST @ 3020 HALLADAY ST Bench 0 0 6402 NB HARBOR BLVD FS SUNFLOWER AVE Shelter 1 1 Old 6403 NB HARBOR BLVD FS LAKE CENTER DR Shelter 1 1 Old 6404 NB HARBOR BLVD FS MACARTHUR BLVD Shelter 1 2 Old 6405 NB HARBOR BLVD FS GARRY AVE Bench 1 1 6407 INB HARBOR BLVD FS SEGERSTROM AVE Shelter 1 1 Old 6408 NB HARBOR BLVD FS WARNER AVE Shelter 1 1 Old 6409 NB HARBOR BLVD FS KENT AVE Bench 1 1 6410 NB HARBOR BLVD FS MCFADDEN AVE Shelter 2 2 New &nbsp; City Council &nbsp;22 &ndash;&nbsp;84 4/19/2022 &nbsp; OCTA ID STREET of TRAVEL BUS STOP LOCATION Type Bench Trash Bins Ad Pannel New or Old Design 6411 NB HARBOR BLVD FS CAMILLE ST Bench 1 0 6412 NB HARBOR BLVD NS 1ST ST Shelter 1 2 Old 6413 NB HARBOR BLVD FS 5TH ST Bench 0 0 6414 NB HARBOR BLVD FS HAZARD AVE Bench 1 1 6415 NB HARBOR BLVD FS WASHINGTON AVE Shelter 1 1 Old 6416 NB HARBOR BLVD NS WESTMINSTER AVE Shelter 1 1 Old 6417 SB HARBOR BLVD FS WESTMINSTER AVE Shelter 2 2 New 6418 SB HARBOR BLVD OPP WASHINGTON AVE Shelter 1 1 Old 6419 SB HARBOR BLVD FS HAZARD AVE Shelter 1 1 Old 6420 SB HARBOR BLVD NS 5TH ST Bench 1 1 6421 SB HARBOR BLVD FS 1ST ST Shelter 1 1 Old 6422 ISB HARBOR BLVD OPP CAMILLE ST Bench 1 1 6423 SB HARBOR BLVD FS MCFADDEN AVE Shelter 1 2 Old 6424 SB HARBOR BLVD NS KENT AVE Shelter 1 1 Old 6425 SB HARBOR BLVD FS WARNER AVE Shelter 1 0 Old 6427 SB HARBOR BLVD FS SEGERSTROM AVE Bench 1 1 6428 SB HARBOR BLVD FS GARRY AVE Bench 0 1 6432 NB MACARTHUR PL OPP SANDPOINTE AVE Bench 0 0 6433 INB LAWSON ST FS MEMORY LN Bench 1 1 6444 EB MACARTHUR BLVD FS HARBOR BLVD Bench 1 1 6445 EB MACARTHUR BLVD FS HOME DEPOT Bench 1 2 6446 EB MACARTHUR BLVD FS SUSAN ST Bench 0 1 6447 EB MACARTHUR BLVD FS FAIRVIEW ST Bench 1 1 6448 IEB MACARTHUR BLVD FS GREENVILLE ST Bench 1 2 6449 EB MACARTHUR BLVD FS RAITT ST Bench 1 1 6450 EB MACARTHUR BLVD FS TWILIGHT Bench 1 1 6451 EB MACARTHUR BLVD FS BEAR ST Bench 0 0 6452 EB MACARTHUR BLVD FS PLAZA DR Bench 1 1 6453 EB MACARTHUR BLVD FS BRISTOL ST Bench 0 1 6454 EB MACARTHUR BLVD FS ENT 1000 MACARTHUR VILLAGE APT Shelter 0 0 Old 6455 IEB MACARTHUR BLVD OPP TOWNER ST Bench 10 10 6456 EB MACARTHUR BLVD FS FLOWER ST Bench 1 10 6457 JEB MACARTHUR BLVD FS PARTON ST Bench 1 11 &nbsp; City Council &nbsp;22 &ndash;&nbsp;85 4/19/2022 &nbsp; OCTA ID STREET of TRAVEL BUS STOP LOCATION Type Bench Trash Bins Ad Pannel New or Old Design 6458 EB MACARTHUR BLVD FS BIRCH ST Bench 1 1 6459 EB MACARTHUR BLVD FS MAIN ST Shelter 1 1 Old 6461 WB MACARTHUR BLVD FS MACARTHUR PLACE Bench 0 1 6462 WB MACARTHUR BLVD FS MAIN ST Shelter 1 1 Old 6463 WB MACARTHUR BLVD FS BIRCH ST Shelter 1 1 Old 6464 jWB MACARTHUR BLVD FS PARTON ST Bench 1 1 6465 WB MACARTHUR BLVD FS FLOWER ST Shelter 1 1 Old 6466 WB MACARTHUR BLVD FS TOWNER ST Bench 0 1 6468 WB MACARTHUR BLVD FS BRISTOL ST Shelter 1 1 Old 6469 WB MACARTHUR BLVD INS PLAZA DR Shelter 1 1 Old 6470 jWB MACARTHUR BLVD FS GREENVILLE ST Bench 1 1 6471 WB MACARTHUR BLVD FS FAIRVIEW ST Bench 1 1 6472 WB MACARTHUR BLVD FS SUSAN ST Bench 0 1 6473 WB MACARTHUR BLVD VNS HARBOR BLVD HARBOR BUSINESS Bench 1 1 6474 WB MACARTHUR BLVD FS HARBOR BLVD Shelter 1 1 Old 6475 WB MACARTHUR BLVD FS CRODDY WAY Bench 0 1 6476 WB MACARTHUR BLVD OPP HYLAND AVE Shelter 1 1 Old 6477 INB MAIN ST OPP SUNFLOWER AVE Bench 1 11 6478 NB MAIN ST FS SANDPOINTE DR Bench 1 1 6479 NB MAIN ST FS MACARTHUR BLVD Bench 0 0 6480 NB MAIN ST FS ALTON AVE Shelter 1 1 Old 6481 NB MAIN ST FS DYER RD Shelter 1 1 Old 6483 NB MAIN ST INS CENTRAL AVE Bench 0 0 6484 NB MAIN ST FS WARNER AVE Shelter 2 2 New 6486 INB MAIN ST INS SAINT GERTRUDE PL Shelter 2 2 1 New 6487 NB MAIN ST INS SAINT ANDREW PL Bench 1 1 6488 NB MAIN ST FS BERKELEY ST Bench 1 1 6490 NB MAIN ST FS EDINGER AVE Shelter 2 2 New 6493 NB MAIN ST FS MCFADDEN AVE Shelter 2 2 New 6496 INB MAIN ST FS BISHOP ST Shelter 2 2 New 6497 NB MAIN ST INS CHESTNUT AVE Shelter 2 1 New 6498 NB MAIN ST INS 1ST ST Shelter 4 2 New 6499 NB MAIN ST FS 4TH ST Shelter 2 2 New &nbsp; City Council &nbsp;22 &ndash;&nbsp;86 4/19/2022 &nbsp; OCTA ID STREET of TRAVEL BUS STOP LOCATION Type Bench Trash Bins Ad Pannel New or Old Design 6500 NB MAIN ST FS CIVIC CENTER DR Bench 0 1 6501 NB MAIN ST NS 10TH ST Shelter 0 0 Old 6502 NB MAIN ST NS WASHINGTON AVE Bench 1 1 6503 NB MAIN ST NS 15TH ST Bench 1 1 6504 NB MAIN ST FS 17TH ST Shelter 1 1 Old 6505 INB MAIN ST FS 20TH ST Bench 1 1 6506 NB MAIN ST OPP BUFFALO AVE Shelter 1 1 Old 6508 NB MAIN ST FS MEMORY LN Shelter 1 1 Old 6509 SB MAIN ST FS MAIN PLACE DR (N.LEG) Shelter 1 2 Old 6510 SB MAIN ST FS MAIN PLACE DR (S.LEG) Bench 0 0 6511 ISB MAIN ST FS BUFFALO AVE Shelter 1 1 Old 6512 SB MAIN ST FS 20TH ST Bench 0 1 6513 SB MAIN ST NS 17TH ST Shelter 2 2 Old 6514 SB MAIN ST NS 15TH ST Bench 0 1 6515 SB MAIN ST NS WASHINGTON AVE Shelter 1 1 Old 6516 SB MAIN ST FS 10TH ST Shelter 1 1 Old 6517 SB MAIN ST NS CIVIC CENTER DR Shelter 1 1 Old 6519 ISB MAIN ST FS 5TH ST Shelter 14 3 New 6521 SB MAIN ST FS 1ST ST Shelter 2 2 New 6522 SB MAIN ST FS CHESTNUT AVE Shelter 2 2 New 6523 SB MAIN ST NS BISHOP ST Bench 0 0 6529 SB MAIN ST NS EDINGER AVE Bench 1 1 6530 SB MAIN ST FS POMONA ST Shelter 2 2 New 6531 SB MAIN ST FS SAINT ANDREW PL Shelter 2 2 New 6532 ISB MAIN ST FS SAINT GERTRUDE PL Shelter 12 2 New 6534 SB MAIN ST FS WARNER AVE Bench 1 1 6535 SB MAIN ST OPP CENTRAL AVE Bench 0 0 6537 SB MAIN ST FS DYER RD Bench 0 0 6538 SB MAIN ST OPP ALTON AVE Bench 0 0 6539 ISB MAIN ST FS COLUMBINE AVE Bench 1 1 6540 SB MAIN ST FS MACARTHUR BLVD Bench 1 1 6541 SB MAIN ST FS MURPHY AVE Bench 1 1 6542 EB MCFADDEN AVE FS SAIL ST Bench 1 1 &nbsp; City Council &nbsp;22 &ndash;&nbsp;87 4/19/2022 &nbsp; OCTA ID STREET of TRAVEL BUS STOP LOCATION Type Bench Trash Bins Ad Pannel New or Old Design 6543 EB MCFADDEN AVE NS MAXINE ST Bench 1 1 6544 EB MCFADDEN AVE FS EUCLID ST Bench 1 0 6545 EB MCFADDEN AVE OPP HARMON ST Bench 0 1 6546 EB MCFADDEN AVE NS NEWHOPE ST Bench 1 1 6547 EB MCFADDEN AVE FS SHANNON ST Bench 1 0 6548 EB MCFADDEN AVE FS HARBOR BLVD Shelter 4 2 New 6549 EB MCFADDEN AVE OPP JACKSON ST Bench 1 2 6550 EB MCFADDEN AVE NS MOHAWK DR Bench 1 1 6551 EB MCFADDEN AVE FS FAIRVIEW ST Shelter 2 2 New 6552 EB MCFADDEN AVE NS SULLIVAN ST Bench 1 2 6553 EB MCFADDEN AVE NS CENTER ST Bench 1 1 6554 EB MCFADDEN AVE NS RAITT ST Bench 1 1 6555 EB MCFADDEN AVE OPP PACIFIC ST Bench 0 0 6556 EB MCFADDEN AVE NS BRISTOL ST Shelter 1 2 Old 6558 EB MCFADDEN AVE FS SHELTON ST Bench 0 1 6559 EB MCFADDEN AVE NS FLOWER ST Bench 1 0 6560 EB MCFADDEN AVE FS VAN NESS AVE Bench 1 1 6562 EB MCFADDEN AVE NS HICKORY ST Bench 1 11 6563 EB MCFADDEN AVE NS STANDARD AVE Bench 0 2 6S64 EB MCFADDEN AVE OPP HATHAWAY ST Bench 0 1 6565 EB MCFADDEN AVE FS GRAND AVE Bench 1 1 6566 EB MCFADDEN AVE NS WRIGHT ST Bench 0 1 6567 EB MCFADDEN AVE FS LYON ST Bench 1 2 6568 EB MCFADDEN AVE NS RITCHEY ST Bench 1 1 6569 IEB MCFADDEN AVE OPP WILLIAMS ST Bench 1 1 6570 EB MCFADDEN AVE NS VILLAGE WAY Bench 1 1 6571 WB MCFADDEN AVE FS RAITT ST Bench 1 1 6572 WB MCFADDEN AVE FS LYON ST Bench 0 2 6573 WB MCFADDEN AVE NS LINWOOD AVE Bench 0 1 6574 jWB MCFADDEN AVE FS GRAND AVE Shelter 11 2 Old 6575 WB MCFADDEN AVE FS HATHAWAY ST Bench 0 2 6576 WB MCFADDEN AVE FS STANDARD AVE Shelter 2 2 6577 WB MCFADDEN AVE NS CEDAR ST Bench 1 1 &nbsp; City Council &nbsp;22 &ndash;&nbsp;88 4/19/2022 &nbsp; OCTA ID STREET of TRAVEL BUS STOP LOCATION Type Bench Trash Bins Ad Pannel New or Old Design 6578 WB MCFADDEN AVE NS OAK ST Bench 1 1 6579 WB MCFADDEN AVE FS SYCAMORE ST Shelter 4 2 New 6580 WB MCFADDEN AVE FS BIRCH ST Bench 1 1 6581 WB MCFADDEN AVE NS VAN NESS AVE Bench 1 1 6582 WB MCFADDEN AVE NS FLOWER ST Bench 1 1 6583 IWB MCFADDEN AVE NS SHELTON ST Bench 0 0 6585 WB MCFADDEN AVE FS BRISTOL ST Shelter 2 2 New 6586 WB MCFADDEN AVE FS PACIFIC AVE Bench 1 1 6587 WB MCFADDEN AVE FS CENTER ST Bench 1 2 6588 WB MCFADDEN AVE FS SULLIVAN ST Bench 0 1 6589 IWB MCFADDEN AVE NS FAIRVIEW ST Bench 11 2 6590 WB MCFADDEN AVE VFS MOHAWK DR Bench 1 0 6591 WB MCFADDEN AVE OPP RIVERVIEW MARKET PLACE Bench 0 1 6592 WB MCFADDEN AVE NS HARBOR BLVD Shelter 1 2 Old 6593 WB MCFADDEN AVE FS DENNIS ST Bench 0 1 6594 WB MCFADDEN AVE OPP SHANNON ST Bench 0 1 6595 WB MCFADDEN AVE FS NEWHOPE ST Bench 0 1 6596 IWB MCFADDEN AVE @ CORTA DR Bench 11 1 6597 WB MCFADDEN AVE FS EUCLID ST Bench 1 2 6598 WB MCFADDEN AVE FS MAXINE ST Bench 1 1 6599 WB MCFADDEN AVE NS SAIL ST Bench 1 1 6601 EB MEMORY LN FS MAIN ST Bench 1 1 6603 WB MEMORY LN FS BRISTOL ST Bench 1 2 6626 NB RAITT ST FS MCFADDEN AVE Bench 0 0 6627 INB RAITT ST FS WISTERIA PL Bench 0 0 6628 NB RAITT ST FS WILLITS ST Bench 1 1 6629 NB RAITT ST FS CHESTNUT AVE Bench 0 1 6630 NB RAITT ST FS WALNUT ST Bench 0 1 6631 NB RAITT ST NS SANTA ANA BLVD Bench 1 1 6636 ISB RAITT ST NS 3RD ST Bench 1 1 6637 SB RAITT ST FS 1ST ST Bench 1 0 6638 SB RAITT ST FS PINE ST Bench 1 1 6639 SB RAITT ST FS WILLITS ST Bench 1 1 &nbsp; City Council &nbsp;22 &ndash;&nbsp;89 4/19/2022 &nbsp; OCTA ID STREET of TRAVEL BUS STOP LOCATION Type Bench Trash Bins Ad Pannel New or Old Design 6640 SB RAITT ST OPP WISTERIA PL Bench 0 0 6641 SB RED HILL AVE FS WARNER AVE Shelter 1 1 Old 6642 SB RED HILL AVE FS CARNEGIE AVE Shelter 1 1 Old 6644 SB RED HILL AVE FS DYER RD Bench 0 1 6645 SB RED HILL AVE FS DEERE AVE Shelter 0 1 Old 6648 INB ROSS ST NS 3RD ST Shelter 11 1 Old 6649 NB ROSS ST NS 4TH ST Bench 1 1 6651 SB ROSS ST FS SANTA ANA BLVD Shelter 1 1 Old 6652 SB ROSS ST FS 3RD ST Bench 1 1 6666 EB SAINT GERTRUDE PL NS SANTA FE ST Bench 1 1 6668 IWB SAINT GERTRUDE PL NS EASTWOOD ST Bench 1 1 6669 WB SAINT GERTRUDE PL OPP SANTA FE ST Bench 1 1 6676 EB SANTA ANA BLVD VFS SANTIAGO ST Bench 1 1 6677 EB SANTA ANA BLVD FS FULLER ST Bench 1 1 6679 WB SANTA ANA BLVD FS GRAND AVE Bench 1 1 6681 WB SANTA ANA BLVD NS SANTIAGO ST Bench 0 0 6696 NB STANDARD AVE FS SAINT GERTRUDE PL Bench 1 1 6698 INB STANDARD AVE OPP SAINT ANDREW PL Bench 1 1 6699 NB STANDARD AVE OPP OCCIDENTAL ST Bench 1 1 6700 NB STANDARD AVE FS EDINGER AVE Bench 1 1 6701 NB STANDARD AVE NS WILSHIRE AVE Bench 1 1 6702 NB STANDARD AVE NS MCFADDEN AVE Bench 1 2 6703 NB STANDARD AVE FS WAKEHAM AVE Bench 1 1 6704 NB STANDARD AVE FS BISHOP ST Bench 1 1 6705 ISB STANDARD AVE FS CHESTNUT AVE Bench 1 1 6706 SB STANDARD AVE FS BISHOP ST Bench 1 1 6707 SB STANDARD AVE FS WAKEHAM AVE Bench 1 1 6708 SB STANDARD AVE FS MCFADDEN AVE Bench 0 1 6709 SB STANDARD AVE FS HOBART ST Bench 1 1 6710 ISB STANDARD AVE FS EDINGER AVE Bench 0 1 6711 SB STANDARD AVE NS OCCIDENTAL ST Bench 1 1 6712 SB STANDARD AVE FS SAINT ANDREW PL Bench 1 1 6713 WB SUNFLOWER AVE FS MAIN ST Bench 1 1 &nbsp; City Council &nbsp;22 &ndash;&nbsp;90 4/19/2022 &nbsp; OCTA ID STREET of TRAVEL BUS STOP LOCATION Type Bench Trash Bins Ad Pannel New or Old Design 6714 WB SUNFLOWER AVE OPP ANTON BLVD Bench 1 1 6715 WB SUNFLOWER AVE FS BRISTOL ST Shelter 2 2 Old 6716 WB SUNFLOWER AVE FS PLAZA DR Shelter 0 1 Old 6717 WB SUNFLOWER AVE NS RAITT ST Bench 1 1 6718 WB SUNFLOWER AVE OPP SMALLEY RD Bench 1 1 6719 IWB SUNFLOWER AVE FS GREENVILLE ST Bench 10 1 6720 WB SUNFLOWER AVE FS FAIRVIEW ST Bench 1 1 6721 WB SUNFLOWER AVE FS SUSAN ST Bench 1 1 6722 WB SUNFLOWER AVE VNS HARBOR BLVD (600ft) Bench 0 0 6724 NB TUSTIN AVE FS 4TH ST Shelter 1 1 Old 6726 INB TUSTIN AVE OPP FRUIT ST Bench 1 1 6727 NB TUSTIN AVE OPP WELLINGTON AVE (150ftN) Bench 1 1 6728 NB TUSTIN AVE FS CATALINA AVE Bench 1 1 6729 NB TUSTIN AVE FS SANTA CLARA AVE Bench 1 1 6730 NB TUSTIN AVE FS FRANZEN AVE Shelter 1 1 Old 6731 SB TUSTIN AVE OPP FRANZEN AVE Shelter 1 1 Old 6732 SB TUSTIN AVE FS SANTA CLARA AVE Bench 1 1 6733 ISB TUSTIN AVE FS CATALINA AVE Bench 1 1 6734 SB TUSTIN AVE FS 17TH ST Shelter 0 1 Old 6736 SB TUSTIN AVE FS WELLINGTON AVE Bench 1 1 6737 SB TUSTIN AVE FS FRUIT ST Bench 0 1 6738 SB TUSTIN AVE NS 6TH ST Bench 1 1 6739 SB TUSTIN AVE FS 4TH ST Bench 1 1 6740 EB WARNER AVE FS HARBOR BLVD Shelter 1 1 Old 6741 IEB WARNER AVE OPP YALE ST Bench 1 11 6742 EB WARNER AVE NS SUSAN ST Bench 1 0 6743 EB WARNER AVE FS FAIRVIEW ST Shelter 1 2 Old 6744 EB WARNER AVE FS GREENVILLE ST Bench 1 1 6745 EB WARNER AVE FS DIAMOND ST Bench 1 1 6746 IEB WARNER AVE FS RAITT ST Bench 1 1 6748 EB WARNER AVE FS PACIFIC AVE Bench 1 1 6749 EB WARNER AVE FS BRISTOL ST Shelter 1 1 Old 6750 EB WARNER AVE OPP ROSEWOOD AVE Bench 1 1 &nbsp; City Council &nbsp;22 &ndash;&nbsp;91 4/19/2022 &nbsp; OCTA ID STREET of TRAVEL BUS STOP LOCATION Type Bench Trash Bins Ad Pannel New or Old Design 6751 EB WARNER AVE FS FLOWER ST Bench 1 1 6753 EB WARNER AVE OPP VAN NESS AVE Bench 0 0 6754 EB WARNER AVE FS BIRCH ST Bench 1 1 675S EB WARNER AVE FS MAIN ST Bench 1 2 6756 EB WARNER AVE FS MAPLE ST Bench 0 1 6757 IEB WARNER AVE NS HALLADAY ST Bench 0 11 6758 EB WARNER AVE OPP STANDARD AVE Bench 0 0 6759 EB WARNER AVE FS GRAND AVE Bench 1 1 6760 EB WARNER AVE NS BROOKHOLLOW DR Bench 1 1 6761 EB WARNER AVE FS PULLMAN ST Bench 1 1 6763 jWB WARNER AVE FS WRIGHT AVE Bench 1 1 6764 WB WARNER AVE FS GRAND AVE Bench 1 2 6765 WB WARNER AVE FS HATHAWAY ST Bench 1 1 6766 WB WARNER AVE FS STANDARD AVE Bench 1 1 6767 WB WARNER AVE NS HALLADAY ST Bench 0 1 6768 WB WARNER AVE NS MAPLE ST Bench 1 1 6769 WB WARNER AVE FS MAIN ST Bench 1 2 6770 jWB WARNER AVE OPP BIRCH ST Bench 0 1 6771 WB WARNER AVE FS FLOWER ST Bench 1 1 6772 WB WARNER AVE FS SHELTON ST Bench 1 1 6773 WB WARNER AVE FS BRISTOL ST Shelter 1 1 Old 6774 WB WARNER AVE FS PACIFIC AVE Bench 1 1 6775 WB WARNER AVE FS RENE DR Bench 1 1 6777 WB WARNER AVE FS RAITT ST Bench 1 1 6778 jWB WARNER AVE FS CENTER ST Bench 1 1 6779 WB WARNER AVE FS GREENVILLE ST Bench 1 1 6780 WB WARNER AVE FS FAIRVIEW ST Shelter 1 1 Old 6781 WB WARNER AVE FS SUSAN ST Bench 0 1 6782 WB WARNER AVE NS YALE ST Bench 0 1 6783 WB WARNER AVE FS HARBOR BLVD Shelter 1 1 Old 6800 NB THE DEPOT RDWY @ DOCK 1 N/A 0 0 0 N/A 6801 INB THE DEPOT RDWY @ DOCK 2 N/A 10 10 10 1 N/A 6802 INB THE DEPOT RDWY @ DOCK 3 N/A 10 10 10 1 N/A &nbsp; City Council &nbsp;22 &ndash;&nbsp;92 4/19/2022 &nbsp; OCTA ID STREET of TRAVEL BUS STOP LOCATION Type Bench Trash Bins Ad Pannel New or Old Design 6803 WB THE DEPOT RDWY @ DOCK 10 N/A 0 0 0 N/A 6804 WB THE DEPOT RDWY @ DOCK 9 N/A 0 0 0 N/A 7684 NB PLAZA DR FS SUNFLOWER AVE Bench 1 1 Bench 7685 WB SANDPOINTE AVE FS MACARTHUR PL Bench 0 0 Bench 7787 SB MAIN ST FS MCFADDEN AVE Shelter 2 2 New 7788 EB FRUIT ST NS TUSTIN AVE (ZONE 1) N/A 0 0 10 N/A 7789 EB FRUIT ST NS TUSTIN AVE (ZONE 2) N/A 0 0 0 N/A 7791 EB MCFADDEN AVE FS MAIN ST Shelter 2 2 New 7792 WB MCFADDEN AVE FS ORANGE AVE Bench 1 1 Bench 7794 EB MCFADDEN AVE NS BIRCH ST Bench 1 1 Bench 7795 EB MCFADDEN AVE FS ORANGE AVE Bench 1 1 Bench 7903 WB MACARTHUR BLVD FS RAITT ST Bench 0 1 Bench 7994 WB SAINT ANDREW PL FS LYON ST Bench 1 1 Bench 7996 EB SAINT ANDREW PL FS GRAND AVE Bench 1 1 Bench 7997 NB LYON ST FS SAINT ANDREW PL Bench 1 1 Bench 8013 EB CIVIC CENTER DR FS RAITT ST Bench 1 1 Bench 8017 EB CIVIC CENTER DR FS GARFIELD ST Bench 0 0 Bench 8018 ISB SANTIAGO AVE FS CIVIC CENTER DR Bench 0 0 1 Bench 8020 WB CIVIC CENTER DR FS SANTIAGO AVE Bench 0 0 Bench 8021 WB CIVIC CENTER DR FS GARFIELD ST Bench 0 0 Bench 8023 WB CIVIC CENTER DR NS MAIN ST Bench 0 0 Bench 8131 EB GARDEN GROVE BLVD OPP THE CITY DR Bench 1 0 0 Old 8132 WB MACARTHUR BLVD FS BEAR ST Bench 1 1 Bench 8147 NB SANTA ANA BASE INTERIOR RDWY @ LAYOVER ZONE N/A 0 0 0 N/A 8169 INB FIRST AMERICAN WAY VNS COLUMBINE AVE Bench 11 0 10 Old 8170 SB FIRST AMERICAN WAY VFS COLUMBINE AVE Bench 1 0 0 Old 848S SB RAITT ST FS CIVIC CENTER DR Bench 1 1 Bench 8550 WB 4TH ST NS CABRILLO PARK DR Bench 0 0 Bench 8551 EB 4TH ST FS CABRILLO PARK DR Bench 0 0 Bench 8606 NB BRISTOL ST FS WASHINGTON AVE Bench 10 0 1 Bench 8612 EB CIVIC CENTER DR IFS MAIN ST 113ench 11 11 1 Bench &nbsp; City Council &nbsp;22 &ndash;&nbsp;93 4/19/2022 &nbsp; :00011:11110 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AND OUTFRONT MEDIA FOR THE PROVISION FOR DIGITAL BILLBOARDS AND DIGITAL BANNERS This Agreement is made and entered into this 19th day of April 2022 ("Effective Date") by and between Outfront Media LLC ("Company") and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California ("City"). City and Company may at times be referred to individually as a Party, and collectively as Parties. RECITALS A. The City desires to retain a company having special skill and knowledge in the field of selling advertising through out -of -home media assets — specifically, the development, maintenance and operation of advertising -supported digital billboards and digital banners. B. The City is authorized to enter into agreements for the development, maintenance, and operation of digital billboards and digital banners and otherwise regulate the use of public property and encroachments onto public property and into the public -right-of-way within the City's boundaries by virtue of its Charter, by its police powers, by its authority over its public rights of way and by other City powers and authority. C. Company represents that Company is able and willing to provide such services to the City and that it has the financial, legal and technical ability to provide the services, facilities and equipment as set forth in this Agreement. D. Company has agreed to comply with the applicable regulations pertaining to digital billboard and banner advertising services, including but not limited to applicable provisions of the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code and the California Department of Transportation ("CalTrans"). E. In undertaking the performance of this Agreement, Company represents that it is knowledgeable in its field and that any services performed by Company under this Agreement will be performed in compliance with such standards as may reasonably be expected from a professional firm in the field. F. The Parties wish to enter into an arrangement pursuant to which Company shall develop, maintain, and operate advertising -supported digital billboards and digital banners throughout the City and shall sell advertising and share revenue with the City, from all digital billboards and digital banners developed in the City pursuant to this Agreement (collectively, the "Advertising Inventory"). NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual and respective promises, and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the Parties agree as follows: City Council 22 — 94 4/19/2022 Page 1 of 31 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES During the Term of this Agreement, Company shall perform the tasks and obligations necessary to install, on mutually agreed sites, new digital billboards along freeways and digital banners throughout the City (each an "Advertising Site"), including all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidental customary work required to fully and adequately complete the services described and set forth in the Scope of Services - Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 2. TERM & COMMENCEMENT The Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and continue for a period of twenty-five (25) years (the "Term"), unless terminated earlier in accordance with Section 18, with the option for the City to grant a one (1) ten (10) year renewal (the "Renewal Term"), provided that Company has paid the City at least $50,000,000 in Revenue Share (as defined in Section 4 below) over the Term of the Agreement. The Renewal Term must be exercised in writing by the City Manager and the City Attorney. 3. LICENSE The City hereby grants to Company an exclusive license for the right to install, construct, maintain, and operate digital billboards and digital banners at Advertising Sites beginning on the Effective Date, for the performance of the Scope of Services, upon the terms and conditions set forth herein in this Agreement, subject to Company's performance of all of its obligations under this Agreement. This Agreement is intended and shall be construed only as a revocable license to use the properties and not as a lease or grant of any possessory or other interest. Each Advertising Site shall be further subject to a separate, written "Advertising Site License Agreement" between the Parties that is consistent with the terms of this Agreement (each, an "ASLA") and that may be approved by the City Manager or his or her designee. Company shall not use, and shall prohibit its Agents or Invitees from using, the Advertising Inventory other than performing the Scope of Services. The term "Agents" shall mean Company's officers, directors, members, agents, employees, invitees, subcontractors and any employees of such parties. The term "Invitees" shall mean Company's invitees, guests, customers, tenants, or business visitors. 4. COMPENSATION TO CITY Company shall pay the City the greater of the Revenue Share generated from the Advertising Inventory or the minimum annual guarantee ("MAG"). The "Revenue Share" is defined as 40% of the Net Advertising Revenue. Net Advertising Revenue shall be defined as gross revenue received from the sale of the Advertising Inventory less bad debt only (not to exceed 2% of gross revenue). MAG payments and a nonbinding forecast of revenue based on each Advertising Site to be developed is provided in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated by reference. The MAG shall be increased by three percent (3%) annually. If at any time during the Term, Company and City agree to add additional Advertising Sites after the Effective Date, the Parties shall mutually agree on the MAG payments, bonus payments, and a forecast of revenue for each additional Advertising Site. City Council 22 — 95 4/19/2022 Page 2 of 31 Company shall not derive revenue from any other sources other than the sale of advertising ("Ancillary Revenue") without prior approval from the City Manager or their designee. In the event of such approval, Ancillary Revenue shall be referred to as "Approved Ancillary Revenue." The terms of any Approved Ancillary Revenue shall be mutually agreed on by the Parties by a separate writing, provided that the revenue share for Approved Ancillary Revenue shall not be less than 40% of gross ancillary revenue received less bad debt only (not to exceed 2% of gross ancillary revenue). Company will have the exclusive right to add telecommunications devices to the Advertising Sites, including, without limitation, third party telecommunications and computing devices (Telecommunication Hardware). City shall approve third party telecommunications and computing devices; such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld and shall comply with the applicable federal, state laws, regulations, and City Ordinance requirements. Revenue received by Company in consideration of third -party Telecommunication Hardware installed on any Advertising Site, shall constitute Approved Ancillary Revenue and will be subject to a revenue share with the City as mutually agreed upon by the Parties by a separate writing, provided that such revenue share will not be less than 40% of gross ancillary revenue received less bad debt only (not to exceed 2% of gross ancillary revenue). 5. PAYMENTS MAG payments related to each Advertising Site shall commence when such Advertising Site becomes operational, but no later than 12 months from the date each respective ASLA is fully executed, provided there are no significant delays. "Significant Delay" shall refer to (i) delays with any required approvals and permits including those granted by CalTrans; or (ii) any delay resulting from acts of God; fire; earthquake; flood; explosion; action of the elements; war; invasion; insurrection; riot; mob violence; sabotage; malicious mischief, inability (notwithstanding good faith and diligent efforts) to procure (or general shortage of) labor, equipment, facilities, materials, or supplies in the open market; failure of transportation; strikes (other than any strike resulting from acts of Company); lockouts; action of labor unions; condemnation laws; requisition or order of government or civil or military or naval authorities; or any other similar cause to those stated above, not within Company's reasonable control. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in no event shall financial inability constitute Significant Delay. On a quarterly basis, Company shall pay the MAG amount within fifteen (15) days of the end of each calendar quarter (the "MAG Payment"). The first MAG Payment will be prorated based on when the Advertising Site became operational in the quarter. In the event the cumulative Revenue Share is greater than the cumulative MAG for a given calendar year, Company shall pay the difference between the Revenue Share and the MAG within fifteen (15) days of the end of each calendar year (the "True -Up Payment"). Company shall pay an upfront one-time Bonus Payment equal to fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) for each digital billboard face installed on an Advertising Site and an upfront one-time Water Tower Bonus Payment of two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000) specifically for the Water Tower site. The Bonus Payment for each digital billboard Advertising Site associated with each fully executed ASLA shall be paid within fifteen (15) days from the date that Company receives required approvals from all government agencies including CalTrans. The Bonus Payment for any future digital billboard sites shall equal a minimum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) for each digital billboard face. There City Council 22 — 96 4/19/2022 Page 3 of 31 shall not be a Bonus Payment for digital banner Advertising Sites. Bonus Payments shall be non- refundable. Payments shall be made payable to the City at the following address: City of Santa Ana Public Works Agency, City of Santa Ana M-21, Administrative Services Manager, 20 Civic Center Plaza, PO Box 1988, Santa Ana, CA 92702. A late charge of ten percent (10%) shall be applied to any payment hereunder due but unpaid after the 15"' of the month. 6. PREVAILING WAGES Company is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the services being performed are part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Company agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. Company shall defend, indemnify, and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. 7. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR Company shall, during the entire term of this Agreement, be construed to be an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. This Agreement is not intended, nor shall it be construed to create an employer -employee relationship, a joint venture relationship, or to allow the City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Company performs the services which are the subject matter of this Agreement; however, the services to be provided by Company shall be provided in a manner consistent with all applicable standards and regulations governing such services. Company shall pay all salaries and wages, employer's social security taxes, unemployment insurance and similar taxes relating to its employees and shall be responsible for all applicable withholding taxes. 8. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded electronically, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Company specifically for the City under this Agreement (Documents & Data). Company shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Company represents and warrants that Company has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Company makes no such representation and warranty regarding Documents & Data which were provided to Company by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk. City Council 22 — 97 4/19/2022 Page 4of31 9. INSURANCE Prior to undertaking performance of work under this Agreement, Company shall maintain and shall require its subcontractors, if any, to obtain and maintain insurance as described below: a. Minimurn Scope and Limit of Insurance Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an "occurrence" basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregatelimit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2. Automobile Liability: ISO Form Number CA 00 01 covering any auto (Code 1), or if Contractor has no owned autos, hired, (Code 8) and non -owned autos (Code 9), with limits no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3. Workers' Compensation: as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer's Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. 4. Broader Coverage: If Company maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by Company. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City. b. Other Insurance Provisions Additional Insured Status: The City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of Company including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to Company's insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 1185 or if not available, through the addition of both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 2037 if a later edition is used). 2. Primary Coverage: For any claims related to this Agreement, Company's insurance coverage shall be primary coverage at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its City Council 22 — 98 4/19/2022 Page 5 of 31 officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of Company's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 3. Notice of Cancellation: Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the City. 4. Waiver of Subrogation: Company hereby grants to City a waiver of any right to subrogation that any insurer of said Company may acquire against the City by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. Company agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer. 5. Self -Insured Retentions: Self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. The City may require Company to purchase coverage with a lower retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self -insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or City. 6. Acceptability of Insurers: Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the state with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. 7. Verification of Coverage: Company shall furnish the City with original Certificates of Insurance including all required amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage requiredby this clause) and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsement Page of the CGL policy listing allpolicy endorsements to City before work begins. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive Company's obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time. Subcontractors: Company shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Company shall ensure that City is an additional insured on insurance required from subcontractors. 9. Special Risks or Circumstances: City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances. City Council 22 — 99 4/19/2022 Page 6 of 31 10. INDEMNIFICATION Company agrees to defend, and shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees, special counsel, and representatives from liability: (1) for personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief arising out of claims for personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage, which may arise from the negligent operations of the Company, its subcontractors, agents, employees, or other persons acting on its behalf which relates to the services described in Exhibit A of this Agreement; and (2) from any third party claim that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief is due by reason of a breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Company, its subcontractors, agents, employees, or other persons acting on its behalf. This indemnity and hold harmless agreement apply to all claims for damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of the events referred to in this Section. City may make all reasonable decisions with respect to its representation in any legal proceeding. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Company's services are subject to Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Company. 11. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEMNIFICATION Company shall defend and indemnify the City, its officers, agents, representatives, and employees against any and all liability, including costs, for infringement of any United States' letters patent, trademark, or copyright infringement, including costs, contained in the work product or documents provided by Company to the City pursuant to this Agreement. 12. RECORDS All financial records of Company relating to this Agreement shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and auditing standards for government institutions. Company shall make available for examination and copying such financial books and financial records. City shall have the right to access and examine such financial books and financial records, without charge, during normal business hours. City shall further have the right to audit such financial books and financial records, to make transcripts therefrom and to inspect all program data, documents, proceedings, and activities. City may exercise the audit and examination rights in this paragraph no more than once annually and in each case upon at least ten (10) days' prior written notice to Company. Company shall keep and maintain all such books and records separate and distinct from other records and accounts and shall maintain such books and records for at least seven (7) years after acceptance by City, or such longer period during which any legal proceeding with respect to the work may be pending. City Council 22 — 100 4/19/2022 Page 7 of 31 13. CONFIDENTIALITY If Company receives from the City information which due to the nature of such information is reasonably understood to be confidential and/or proprietary, Company agrees that it shall not use or disclose such information except in the performance of this Agreement, and further agrees to exercise the same degree of care it uses to protect its own information of like importance, but in no event less than reasonable care. "Confidential Information" shall include all nonpublic information. Confidential information includes not only written information, but also information transferred orally, visually, electronically, or by other means. Confidential information disclosed to either party by any subsidiary and/or agent of the other party is covered by this Agreement. The foregoing obligations of non-use and nondisclosure shall not apply to any information that (a) has been disclosed in publicly available sources; (b) is, through no fault of the Company disclosed in a publicly available source; (c) is in rightful possession of the Company without an obligation of confidentiality; (d) is required to be disclosed by operation of law; or (e) is independently developed by the Company without reference to information disclosed by the City. 14. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CLAUSE Company covenants that it presently has no interests and shall not have interests, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with performance of services specified under this Agreement. 15. DISCRIMINATION Company shall not discriminate because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, age, national origin, ancestry, or disability, as defined and prohibited by applicable law, in the recruitment, selection, training, utilization, promotion, termination or other employment related activities. Company affirms that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. 16. EXCLUSIVITY AND AMENDMENT Company shall be the exclusive construction and advertising partner to the City for all digital billboards and digital banners on City -owned or City -designated properties. Furthermore, Company shall have the exclusive right to represent, manage, and sell the Advertising Inventory. This Agreement does not include digital community kiosks that provide information of interest to residents and tourists and/or any stops or infrastructure related to the OC Streetcar that is scheduled to begin service at some time following the Effective Date of this Agreement, nor does it include digital advertising kiosks at bus shelters and bus stops. This Agreement represents the complete and exclusive statement between the City and Company, and supersedes any and all other agreements, oral or written, between the parties. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and any attachments hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. This Agreement may not be modified except by written instrument signed by the City Manager or their designee and by an authorized representative of Company. The parties agree that any terms or City Council 22 — 101 4/19/2022 Page 8 of 31 conditions of any purchase order or other instrument that are inconsistent with, or in addition to, the terms and conditions hereof, shall not bind or obligate Company or the City. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which is not embodied herein. 17. ASSIGNMENT City and Company acknowledge that Company was chosen for this Agreement due in part to its particular experience and expertise in the construction and management of digital billboards and digital banners and selling advertising on them. Inasmuch as this Agreement is intended to secure the specialized services of Company, Company may not assign, transfer, delegate, or subcontract any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City and any such assignment, transfer, delegation or subcontract, without the City's prior written consent, shall be considered null and void. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit the City's ability to have any of the services which are the subject to this Agreement performed by City personnel or by other companies retained by City. 18. TERMINATION a. Upon the occurrence of any one or more of the events of default hereinafter described, this Agreement shall be subject to termination. As a condition precedent thereto, the City will give Company such notice as provided below, by certified mail or personal delivery of the date set for termination. 1. The failure of the Company to punctually make the payments herein when due, where the delinquency continues beyond ten (10) days following written notice for payment thereof. 2. The failure of the Company to operate in the manner required by this Agreement, where such failure continues for more than thirty (30) days after written notice from the City to correct the condition therein specified. 3. The failure of the Company to construct an Advertising Site and/or other related improvements pursuant to mutually agreed upon construction dates, where such failure is not due to City and/or CalTrans approvals or other causes outside of Company's control and continues for more than thirty (30) days after service of notice by the City as provided above. 4. The failure of the Company to meet the intended objective of this Agreement in constructing and operating at least one Advertising Site within three (3) years from the Effective Date. 5. The failure to maintain an Advertising Site and the required improvements pursuant to this Agreement in the state of repair required, and in a clean, sanitary, safe and satisfactory condition, where such failure continues for more than thirty (30) days after written notice from the City for correction thereof, provided that where fulfillment of such obligation requires activity over a period of time and Company shall have immediately, following receipt of such notice, commenced to perform whatever may be required to cure the particular default and continues such performance diligently, said time limit may be waived in the manner and to the extent allowed by the City. 6. The failure of Company to keep, perform, and observe all other promises, covenants, conditions, and agreements set forth in this Agreement, where such failure continues for more than thirty (30) days after written notice from the City for correction thereof, provided that where fulfillment of City Council 22 — 102 4/19/2022 Page 9 of 31 such obligation requires activity over a period of time and Company shall have commenced to perform whatever may be required to cure the particular default within ten (10) days after such notice and continues such performance diligently, said time limit may be waived in the manner and to the extent allowed by the City. 7. The filing of a voluntary petition in bankruptcy by the Company; the adjudication of Company as bankrupt; the appointment of any receiver of Company's assets; the making of a general assignment for the benefit of creditors; a petition or answer seeking an arrangement for the reorganization of the Company under any Federal Reorganization Act, including petitions or answers under Chapters X or XI of the Bankruptcy Act; the occurrence of any act which operates to deprive the Company permanently of the rights, powers, and privileges necessary for the proper conduct and operation of the Advertising Sites; the levy of any attachment or execution which substantially interferes with the Company's operations under this Agreement and which attachment or execution is not vacated, dismissed, stayed or set aside within a period of ninety (90) days. This Agreement may be terminated by the City for any of the above -listed events of default after providing written notice to Company and if the event of default is not cured within the specified cure period provided in this Section. City shall be entitled to receive, and the Company shall pay City earned revenue from advertising in the form of the pro -rated MAG payment and/or the Revenue Share (if greater) up to the date of termination. b. Notwithstanding Section 18.a, an ASLA may be terminated for convenience by the City upon one hundred eighty (180) days written notice of termination, provided that (i) such termination cannot occur within the initial ten (10) years from the Effective Date of such ASLA, and (ii) such termination is to redevelop the site for another purpose at City's sole discretion. In such event, City shall be entitled to receive, and the Company shall pay City compensation for all pro -rated MAG Payments and/or the Revenue Share (if greater) due to the City up to the termination date. For the avoidance of doubt, any termination of a particular ASLA does not affect the Term of the Agreement. The Parties agree that the terms of this Section 18.b. shall appear in each ASLA between the parties. C. At the end of the Term, Renewal Term, or an ASLA, or if the Agreement or ASLA is earlier terminated, Company shall remove the digital billboards and digital banners at its own cost and return the Advertising Sites to their original condition. 19. SECURITY FOR PERFORMANCE The Company shall establish a bond in the sum of $500,000 for each Digital Billboard Advertising Site and $150,000 for each Digital Banner Advertising Site, within thirty (30) days after full execution of each respective ASLA, to insure faithful performance of Company's covenants for construction, maintenance, repair or replacement of the digital billboards and digital banners, timely payment of all revenues due the City under this Agreement, and restoration of the Advertising Sites to the condition existing prior to the construction of the digital billboards and digital banners. The bond shall be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney and issued by a company licensed to do business in the State of California. Company shall not commence any work until the surety required herein is/are supplied to and approved by the City. City Council 22 — 103 4/19/2022 Page 10 of 31 20. WAIVER No waiver of breach, failure of any condition, or any right or remedy contained in or granted by the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the party waiving the breach, failure, right or remedy. No waiver of any breach, failure or right, or remedy shall be deemed a waiver of any other breach, failure, right or remedy, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver unless the writing so specifies. 21. JURISDICTION - VENUE This Agreement has been executed and delivered in the State of California and the validity, interpretation, performance, and enforcement of any of the clauses of this Agreement shall be determined and governed by the laws of the State of California. Both parties further agree that Orange County, California, shall be the venue for any action or proceeding that may be brought or arise out of, in connection with or by reason of this Agreement. In the event suit is brought by either Party to enforce the terms and provisions of this Agreement or to secure the performance hereof, each Party shall bear the cost of its own attorney's fees. 22. PROFESSIONAL LICENSES Company shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, maintain all necessary licenses, permits (including but not limited to encroachment permits), approvals, waivers, and exemptions necessary for the provision of the services hereunder and required by the laws and regulations of the United States, the State of California, the City of Santa Ana, the California Department of Transportation, and all other governmental agencies. Company shall notify the City immediately and in writing of its inability to obtain or maintain such permits, licenses, approvals, waivers, and exemptions. Said inability shall be cause for termination of this Agreement. 23. NON -LIABILITY OF CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES No officer, official, employee, agent, representative, or volunteer of the City shall be personally liable to the Company, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the City, or for any amount which may become due to Company or its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement. 24. FORCE MAJEURE The time within which the Company is obligated to commence and to complete performance of Company's obligations under this Agreement shall be extended for a period of time equal in duration to, and performance shall be excused on account of and for, and during the period of, any delay caused by strikes, threat of strikes, lockouts, war, threats of war, insurrection, invasion, acts of God, calamities, pandemics, public health emergencies, violent action of the elements, fire, delays in electrical service provider permit issuance, action or adoption of any regulation, law or ordinance by any governmental agency, precluding Company's performance. If such a cause materially adversely impacts Company's ability to generated revenue from the Advertising Inventory or renders any Advertising Inventory City Council 22 — 104 4/19/2022 Page 11 of 31 incapable of displaying advertising, the MAG for such Advertising Inventory will be equitably adjusted for the duration of the effect of such cause in proportion to its impact. 25. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS A. Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature herein below has the power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall indemnify City fully, including reasonable costs and attorney's fees, for any injuries or damages to City in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn. B. All exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto shall be incorporated as if fully set forth in the body of this Agreement. 26. NOTICE Any notice, tender, demand, delivery, or other communication pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly given if delivered in person or mailed by first class or certified mail, postage prepaid, or sent by fax or other telegraphic communication in the manner provided in this Section, to the following persons: To City: Clerk of the City Council City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702-1988 Fax: 714-647-6956 With courtesy copies to: Executive Director, Public Works Agency City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-21) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, California 92702 Fax: 714- 647-5635 City Attorney City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-29) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, California 92702 Fax: 714- 647-6515 City Council 22 — 105 4/19/2022 Page 12 of 31 To Company: Katie Metz Real Estate Outfront Media LLC 5870 W. Jefferson Blvd Los Angeles, CA 90016 With a copy to: Legal Department Outfront Media LLC 405 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10174 A party may change its address by giving notice in writing to the other party. Thereafter, any communication shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address. If sent by mail, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given three (3) days after it has been deposited in the United States mail, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as set forth above. If sent by fax, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given twenty-four (24) hours after the time set forth on the transmission report issued by the transmitting facsimile machine, addressed as set forth above. For purposes of calculating these time frames, weekends, federal, state, County or City holidays shall be excluded. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written. 0.11.11is" Daisy Gomez Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM: SONIA R. CARVALHO City Attorney By: John M. Funk Sr. Assistant City Attorney CITY OF SANTA ANA Kristine Ridge City Manager CIA 1611►VA City Council 22 — 106 4/19/2022 Page 13 of 31 RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: Nabil Saba Executive Director Public Works Agency City Council 22 — 107 4/19/2022 Page 14 of 31 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES The Scope of Services includes the design, construction, maintenance, and operation of digital billboards at freeway locations and digital banners within the boundaries of the City of Santa Ana, as well as managing and selling the City's Advertising Inventory at all Advertising Sites. 1. Digital Billboards A. Site Location a. The City and the Company have identified five (5) City -owned sites as potential locations for the development of digital billboards. The City maintains the right to eliminate, substitute or add locations at its own discretion, provided that the placement of any new or substituted locations is mutually agreed upon by the Parties. The City has discretion to allow additional locations provided that any new locations shall be mutually agreed upon by the Parties. A listing of the selected sites is included in Table 1, Digital Billboard Sites Considered for Development, below. These selected sites for digital billboards have the potential to ensure optimum return on investment and rapid results through an effective marketing strategy. b. The Company shall be responsible for the evaluation of all potential sites for the freeway digital billboard locations. The evaluation and the determination shall include but are not limited to the following: i. Before the commencement of demolition, construction or development of any structures, digital billboards or other work of improvement upon an Advertising Site, the Company shall perform a Complete CEQA Review, subject to final approval by City. The Company shall be responsible the preparation of an Initial Study in association with the freeway digital billboards and any subsequent environmental documentation. The City shall determine the level of environmental review required. The Company shall be responsible for all costs associated with such review and compliance, if any, including noticing costs, filing fees, staff costs, administrative costs and consultant fees. ii. The Company shall comply with the City's requirements and all rules and regulations for electronic signs adopted by the Federal Highway Administration, United States Department of Transportation and CalTrans, and all other applicable regulations. iii. The Company's selection of Advertising Sites shall not be limited to a determination of the sites with maximal revenue generating potential based on visibility along the freeway and dwell time near the boards but shall also take into consideration environmental and aesthetic impacts, site selection, utility easements if any, and encumbrance responsibilities. City Council 22 — 108 4/19/2022 Page 15 of 31 c. The Company shall develop a comprehensive community outreach and communication plan for each location. The plan shall include three (3) or more community meetings for each location. The Company will cooperate with the City regarding the date, time, and location of each meeting and shall prepare and produce all needed outreach material and provide all necessary equipment and technology to conduct the meetings at neighborhood association locations or at various field locations. The Company shall report to the City all issues and concerns expressed by the community immediately. The Company shall address, to the satisfaction of the community and City, all questions and concerns raised at the meetings and shall document the resolution reached between the Company and the community representatives and the neighborhood association members. C. Specifications: a. Current best available digital -billboard technologies are required, including but not limited to the following: i. Remote diagnostic and maintenance capability ii. "Amber Alert" capability iii. Automatic brightness adjustment to ambient lighting conditions iv. UL and IEC approved v. Color calibration to ensure consistent image quality vi. Remote shutdown capability vii. Screen sizes and pixel dimensions viii. Unless otherwise specified in the proposal, it is assumed that each digital billboard will be double -sided with the exception of the water tower, which is considered a special case due to the circular nature of the structure. b. Construction and operation requirements: i. Regularly scheduled onsite maintenance of all components of the billboard structure and surrounding area to include the entire dedicated parcel of land ii. Annual inspections, at a minimum, of all components of the billboard for structure integrity iii. Internal service access for safety and improved appearance (no visible catwalks). iv. Constructed to comply with all applicable CalTrans codes v. Engineered foundation, anchoring mechanism, and support system vi. The City reserves the right to reasonably modify construction and operation requirements at its sole discretion as necessary to comply with legal requirements c. Company shall maintain, repair, and upgrade the digital billboards as needed to provide the best available digital -billboard technologies during the term of the Agreement. i. Company shall maintain the digital billboards in good working order and will upgrade or refresh the LED hardware as necessary during the Term to maintain adequate brightness and functionality. ii. As new technology becomes available, Company shall upgrade the digital billboards from time -to -time but not less than every 9 years. City Council 22 — 109 4/19/2022 Page 16 of 31 d. At the time of this Agreement, the City is in the process of revising its off -premises commercial advertising signs ordinance ("Ordinance"). The requirements that are anticipated to be included in the Ordinance are presented below in sections C through H. Company shall comply with these requirements, as well as the requirements generally encountered on similar projects of size and scope. Once adopted, the Company shall abide by the Ordinance in effect. C. Application Requirements a. Every application for the construction of a new digital billboard shall be filed with the written consent of the City on forms required by the Public Works Agency and shall be, at a minimum, accompanied by the following information: i. A pictorial representation of, and other information about, the proposed digital billboard, disclosing overall dimensions, dimensions of letters and figures, colors, materials, copy, and illumination characteristics. ii. A plan of the site on which the proposed digital billboard will be located, indicating the precise location of the billboard, existing and proposed landscaping, other site improvements, and proximity to the edge of pavement of an adjacent freeway. iii. A vicinity map depicting the location of all existing and proposed billboards, any landmarks as designated on the General Plan that are within one thousand (1,000) feet of the proposed digital billboard, and the zoning designation of all sites within five hundred (500) feet of the boundaries of the subject property. iv. Photo simulations of all proposed digital billboards showing daytime and nighttime conditions. v. A three-dimensional (313) massing study depicting proposed digital billboard. The 3D study will include any existing buildings and advertising signs within one thousand (1,000) feet of the proposed digital billboard. vi. Such other information as the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency deems appropriate to determine compliance with the provisions of the application requirements. b. Each billboard will comply with City, County and State requirements. The City must approve each billboard design, and such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. c. Company shall prepare all construction documents necessary to construct digital billboards. d. Company shall be responsible for obtaining all the necessary approvals and will construct the digital billboards at its own cost, at the mutually agreed upon Advertising Site. D. Development Standards a. The City has developed the following requirements for digital billboards: i. All digital billboards shall comply with standards established by CalTrans that are in effect at the time the permit is issued. Among other provisions, these standards may prohibit the construction of digital billboards in landscaped areas and/or in zones where residential uses are permitted, may limit the size and height of digital billboards and may City Council 22 — 110 4/19/2022 Page 17 of 31 require separation between billboards. ii. The development standards in Table 2, Digital Billboard Development Standards, below shall be applicable to all new billboards. b. Development and commissioning of each Advertising Site shall be completed no later than 12 months from the date that each respective ASLA is fully executed, provided there are no Significant Delays. E. Design Standards a. The City has the following design requirements for digital billboards: i. The words "Santa Ana" shall permanently appear on the billboard structure in a size large enough to be visible to drivers using the freeway. The precise location, size and font of the words shall be determined and approved by the City. ii. All ground -mounted equipment shall be screened from view at street level. The entire site occupied by the billboard shall be appropriately landscaped with groundcover and shrubs to the satisfaction of the City. iii. Each billboard must be oriented primarily for viewing from the freeway and shall be oriented, and adequately shielded, if necessary, to prevent the trespass of light and glare upon any residential land use, including those in mixed -use districts, as exists on the date of building permit issuance. iv. The billboard shall utilize an innovative billboard format, shall creatively use the latest in technology to ensure digital image quality, and shall use innovative architectural features and materials. v. All billboards shall (1) plainly display and be visible from no less than one hundred (100) feet, the name of Company and the billboard's identification number; and (2) display at the base of the sign the contact information for the Company. vi. Billboards projecting over a driveway or drive aisle shall have a minimum clearance of sixteen (16) feet between the lowest point of the sign and the driveway grade. No part of any billboard shall cross onto an adjacent property. vii. Billboards projecting over a pedestrian walkway shall have a minimum clearance of twelve (12) feet between the lowest point of the sign and the walkway grade. viii. All billboards not projecting over drive areas or pedestrian walkways shall have a minimum clearance of twelve (12) feet between the lowest point of the billboard and ground level. F. Lighting and Display Requirements a. The following lighting and display requirements apply to the digital billboards: i. Signs shall produce a maximum 0.3 foot-candles over ambient light levels. ii. The display brightness shall be controlled by a photocell or light sensor that adjusts the brightness to the required level based on ambient light conditions without the need for human input. Use of other brightness adjustment methods, such as timer- or calendar - based systems, shall only be used as a backup system. iii. The display shall be factory -certified as capable of complying with the above brightness standards. Such certification shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Executive City Council 22 — 111 4/19/2022 Page 18 of 31 Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or his/her designee. iv. Company shall provide to the City, upon request, certification by or compensation for an independent Company to verify that the brightness levels of the electronic billboard are in compliance with the requirements of this Section. v. All signs shall be equipped with a control system that, in the event of a display or control malfunction, "freezes" the display on either a single, unchanging message, or a blank screen. vi. Any sign area not comprising the electronic display panel is prohibited. This area includes, but is not limited to, static sign area, appendages, cutout letters, and figures. A frame surrounding the display panel up to twelve (12) inches in width shall be permitted; it shall not contain any sign copy or graphics and shall not count toward the sign area. vii. Where screen transitions are used, such transitions shall not give the appearance of moving text or images, and should use smooth effects, such as fades, rather than abrupt transitions. The sign copy shall not use flashing, intermittent or moving lights or produce the optical illusion of movement. viii. Each sign copy shall be displayed for a minimum of four (4) seconds. The still images may not move or present the appearance of motion and may not use flashing, scintillating, blinking, or traveling lights or any other means not providing constant illumination. Transition or blank screen time between one still image and the next may not exceed one (1) second. ix. All digital billboards must comply with all applicable laws and regulations concerning brightness, including, without limitation, California Vehicle Code Section 21466.5, and as amended. G. Prohibited Features a. Digital billboards shall not contain any of the following features: i. Moving parts ii. Appendages, cutout letters, or figures that protrude beyond the flat surface of the sign face iii. Lights that flash, shimmer, glitter or give the appearance of flashing, shimmering, or glittering. Exceptions to this restriction include time, temperature, and smog index units iv. Walls or screens at the base of the sign, which create a hazard to public safety or provide an attractive nuisance v. Copy, which simulates any traffic sign or traffic control device in a manner that confuses the public vi. Copy, which duplicates any other content, displayed on the sign vii. Devices, which emit audible sound, or odor or particulate matter H. Maintenance and Monitoring a. Company is responsible for maintaining each Advertising Site as initially permitted and shall comply with City, County and State requirements. b. Company shall ensure that the digital billboards are operational and will guarantee the digital billboards have an uptime of 92.5%. City Council 22 — 112 4/19/2022 Page 19 of 31 c. All digital billboards shall be equipped with immediate shut off functionality to allow the sign to be disabled in the event of a malfunction. d. Company shall not allow any digital billboard operated and maintained by the Company to remain in a condition of disrepair. Company will use commercially reasonable efforts to repair or replace the damaged billboard within three (3) business days, but in no event, more than fifteen (15) days. A billboard shall be deemed to be in a condition of disrepair if it is in need of replacement of defective or missing parts, has a broken or damaged sign face, or is in need of repainting or cleaning. e. Company shall submit a Lighting Monitoring Report to the Public Works Agency upon installation, and at three-year intervals thereafter to confirm conformance with the lighting requirements, herein. f. Complaints about lighting will be investigated by the City, and if determined necessary by the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, the Company shall provide an updated Lighting Monitoring Report within 72 hours of the notice from the City. The City shall reserve the right to conduct digital billboard lighting measurements. If the measured luminance and/or illuminance exceed the data presented in the Company's Lighting Monitoring Report, the findings of the City report shall prevail. All costs related to lighting measurements and/or adjustments or repairs shall be borne by the Company. Table 1 — Digital Billboard Sites Considered for Development Number of Number of Average Occupancy Location Description Faces (1) Spots (2) Rate (3) (a) 1 Santa Ana Water Tower Special g $14,941.03 75% design 2 Well 38 (Santa Ana Zoo) 1 8 $5,355.77 80% 3 SW of McFadden at SR- 2 8 $4,995.79 80% 55 4 Well 28 (Santiago 2 8 $4,635.22 80% Archery) 5 W/O Alton at SR-55 2 8 $4,995.79 80% Notes: 1) The number of sides of the billboard / banner that will display advertising 2) The number of advertisements that will be sold and will run in a 4-week period 3) The average selling price of one advertising spot that will run over a 4-week period City Council 22 — 113 4/19/2022 Page 20 of 31 4) The percent of ad spots sold out of the total ad spots available to sell Table 2 — Digital Billboard Development Standards Maximum Sign Area/Face As Allowed by CalTrans Maximum Number of Faces Two (2) Maximum Height As permitted by CalTrans(l) Spacing Between Billboards 1,000 Feet (2) Number of Vertical Supports One (1) Vertical Support (3) Notes: 1) Measured from nearest adjacent curb level on the site on which the sign is constructed. 2) The minimum separation between billboards shall be one thousand (1,000) feet or standards established by the CalTrans in effect at the time the permit is issued, whichever is greater. 3) Only one architecturally concealed vertical support. 2. Digital Banners A. Site Location a. The City and the Company have identified four potential (4) digital banner as locations within the City targeting residents and local traffic. The City maintains the right to eliminate, substitute or add locations at its own discretion, provided that the placement of any new or substituted locations is mutually agreed upon by the Parties. A listing of the potential locations is included in Table 3, Digital Banner Sites Considered for Development, below. These selected locations for digital banners have the potential to ensure optimum return on investment through an effective marketing strategy. b. Selected street digital banner locations shall not be limited to a determination of the sites with maximal revenue generating potential based on visibility along City streets and dwell time near the digital banners but shall also take into consideration environmental and aesthetic impacts, assurance for the adherence to City's requirements and compliance with all rules and regulations for electronic signs adopted by the Federal Highway Administration and the United States Department of Transportation and any other applicable regulations. c. In addition, the Company shall take into consideration any input and address any concern from local associations and special interest groups for the proposed locations of the digital banners and to work cooperatively with local associations and special interest groups. d. Before the commencement of demolition, construction or development of any structures, digital banners or other work of improvement upon an Advertising Site, the Company shall perform a Complete CEQA Review, subject to final approval by City. The Company shall be responsible the preparation of an Initial Study in association with the freeway digital City Council 22 — 114 4/19/2022 Page 21 of 31 billboards and any subsequent environmental documentation. The City shall determine the level of environmental review required. The Company shall be responsible for all costs associated with such review and compliance, if any, including noticing costs, filing fees, staff costs, administrative costs and consultant fees. e. The Company shall develop a comprehensive community outreach and communication plan for each location. The plan shall include three (3) or more community meetings for each location. The Company shall coordinate with the City regarding the date, time, and location of each meeting and shall prepare and produce all needed outreach material and provide all necessary equipment and technology to conduct the meetings at neighborhood association locations or at various field locations. Company shall report to the City all issues and concerns expressed by the community immediately. The Company shall address, to the satisfaction of the community and City, all questions and concerns raised at the meetings and shall document the resolution reached between the Company and the community representatives and the neighborhood association members. B. Specifications a. Current best available digital -banner technologies are required, including but not limited to the following: i. Remote diagnostic and maintenance capability ii. "Amber Alert" capability iii. Automatic brightness adjustment to ambient lighting conditions iv. UL and IEC approved v. Color calibration to ensure consistent image quality vi. Remote shutdown capability vii. Screen sizes and pixel dimensions viii. Unless otherwise specified in the proposal, it is assumed that each digital banner will be single -sided b. At the time of this Agreement, the City is in the process of revising its off -premises commercial advertising signs ordinance ("Ordinance"). The requirements that are anticipated to be included in the Ordinance are presented below in sections C through G. Company shall comply with these requirements, as well as the requirements generally encountered on similar projects of size and scope. Once adopted, the Company shall abide by the Ordinance in effect. C. Construction and operation requirements: i. Regularly scheduled onsite maintenance in accordance with manufacturers' recommendations ii. Annual inspections, at a minimum, of all components of the banner for structure integrity iii. Internal service access for safety and improved appearance (no visible catwalks) iv. Constructed to comply with all applicable City codes v. Engineered foundation, anchoring mechanism, and support system vi. The City reserves the right to reasonably modify construction and operation City Council 22 — 115 4/19/2022 Page 22 of 31 requirements at its sole discretion as necessary to comply with legal requirements d. The Agreement will require the Company to maintain, repair, and upgrade the digital banners as needed to provide the best available digital banner technologies during the term of the Agreement. i. Company shall maintain the digital banners in good working order and will upgrade or refresh the LED hardware as necessary during the Term to maintain adequate brightness and functionality. ii. As technology becomes updated, Company shall upgrade the digital banners from time - to -time but not less than every 9 years. C. Application Requirements a. Every application for the construction of a new digital banner will be filed with the written consent of the City on forins required by the Public Works Agency and shall be, at a minimum, accompanied by the following information: i. A pictorial representation of, and other information about, the proposed digital banner, disclosing overall dimensions, dimensions of letters and figures, colors, materials, copy, and illumination characteristics. ii. A plan of the site on which the proposed digital banner will be located, indicating the precise location of the banner, existing and proposed landscaping, other site improvements, and proximity to the edge of pavement of an adjacent freeway or sidewalk. iii. A vicinity map depicting the location of all proposed digital banners, any landmarks as designated on the General Plan that are within one thousand (1,000) feet of the proposed digital banner, and the zoning designation of all sites within five hundred (500) feet of the boundaries of the subject property. iv. Photo simulations of all proposed digital banners showing daytime and nighttime conditions. v. A three-dimensional (313) massing study depicting proposed digital banner. The 3D study will include any existing buildings and advertising signs within one thousand (1,000) feet of the proposed digital banner. vi. Such other information as the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency deems appropriate to determine compliance with the provisions of the application requirements. b. Each banner will comply with city, county and state requirements. The City must approve each banner design, such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. c. Company shall be responsible for obtaining all the necessary approvals and will construct the digital banners at its own cost, at the mutually agreed upon Advertising Site. D. Development Standards a. Company shall adhere to general development and design standards for digital banners. Company shall obtain City approval prior to development of any banners City Council 22 — 116 4/19/2022 Page 23 of 31 b. Development and commissioning of each Advertising Site shall be completed no later than 12 months from the date that each ASLA is fully executed, provided there are no Significant Delays. E. Lighting and Display Requirements a. The following lighting and display requirements apply to the digital banners: i. Signs shall produce a maximum 0.3 foot-candles over ambient light levels. ii. The display brightness shall be controlled by a photocell or light sensor that adjusts the brightness to the required level based on ambient light conditions without the need for human input. Use of other brightness adjustment methods, such as timer- or calendar - based systems, shall only be used as a backup system. iii. The display shall be factory -certified as capable of complying with the above brightness standards. Such certification shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, or his/her designee. iv. Company shall provide to the City, upon request, certification by or compensation for an independent Company to verify that the brightness levels of the electronic banner are in compliance with the requirements of this Section. v. All signs shall be equipped with a control system that, in the event of a display or control malfunction, "freezes" the display on either a single, unchanging message, or a blank screen. vi. Any sign area not comprising the electronic display panel is prohibited. This area includes, but is not limited to, static sign area, appendages, cutout letters, and figures. A frame surrounding the display panel up to twelve (12) inches in width shall be permitted; it shall not contain any sign copy or graphics and shall not count toward the sign area. vii. Where screen transitions are used, such transitions shall not give the appearance of moving text or images, and should use smooth effects, such as fades, rather than abrupt transitions. The sign copy shall not use flashing, intermittent or moving lights or produce the optical illusion of movement. viii. Each sign copy shall be displayed for a minimum of four (4) seconds. The still images may not move or present the appearance of motion and may not use flashing, scintillating, blinking, or traveling lights or any other means not providing constant illumination. Transition or blank screen time between one still image and the next may not exceed one (1) second. ix. All digital banners must comply with all applicable laws and regulations concerning brightness, including, without limitation, California Vehicle Code Section 21466.5, and as amended. F. Prohibited Features a. Digital banners shall not contain any of the following features: i. Moving parts. ii. Appendages, cutout letters, or figures that protrude beyond the flat surface of the sign face. iii. Lights that flash, shimmer, glitter or give the appearance of flashing, shimmering or glittering. Exceptions to this restriction include time, temperature and smog index units. City Council 22 — 117 4/19/2022 Page 24 of 31 iv. Walls or screens at the base of the sign, which create a hazard to public safety or provide an attractive nuisance. v. Copy that simulates any traffic sign or traffic control device in a manner that confuses the public. vi. Copy that duplicates any other content, displayed on the sign. vii. Devices, which emit audible sound, or odor or particulate matter. G. Maintenance and Monitoring a. Company is responsible for maintaining each Advertising Site as initially permitted and shall comply with City, County and State requirements. b. Company shall ensure that the digital banners are operational and will guarantee the digital banners have an uptime of 92.5%. c. All digital banners shall be equipped with immediate shut off functionality to allow the sign to be disabled in the event of a malfunction. d. Company shall not allow any digital banners operated and maintained by the Company to remain in a condition of disrepair. Company will use commercially reasonable efforts to repair or replace the damaged banners within three (3) business days, but in no event, more than fifteen (15) days. A banner shall be deemed to be in a condition of disrepair if it is in need of replacement of defective or missing parts, has a broken or damaged sign face, or is in need of repainting or cleaning. e. Company shall submit a Lighting Monitoring Report to the Public Works Agency upon installation, and at three-year intervals thereafter to confirm conformance with the lighting requirements, herein. f. Complaints about lighting will be investigated by the City, and if determined necessary by the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency, the Company shall provide an updated Lighting Monitoring Report within 72 hours of the notice from the City. The City shall reserve the right to conduct digital banner lighting measurements. If the measured luminance and/or illuminance exceed the data presented in the Company's Lighting Monitoring Report, the findings of the City report shall prevail. All costs related to lighting measurements and/or adjustments or repairs shall be borne by the Company. City Council 22 — 118 4/19/2022 Page 25 of 31 Table 3 — Digital Banner Sites Considered for Development Location Description Number of Faces (1) Number of Spots (2) Average Rate (3) Occupancy (4) A 420 North Main Street 1 8 $1,029.49 75% B 310 North Birch Street 1 8 $1,029.49 75% C 300 East 5"' Street 1 8 $1,029.49 75% D 201 West 34 Street 1 8 $1,029.49 75% E Sunflower Ave & Bristol 1 8 $1,029.49 75% F Dyer Road & SR-55 1 8 $1,029.49 75% Notes: 1) The number of sides of the billboard / banner that will display advertising 2) The number of advertisements that will be sold and will run in a 4-week period 3) The average selling price of one advertising spot that will run over a 4-week period 4) The percent of ad spots sold out of the total ad spots available to sell 3. Digital Signage Network Security A. Company shall control access to the digital signage network and address security concerns for the digital system through a multi -layer effort with controlled physical access and an operating system to establish and maintain a hacker -resistant system. Company shall address the following areas of digital signage network security: a. Physical Security i. Restricting physical access to the network's devices. ii. Securing all screens, attachments, and public players iii. Securing all PC ports and connections iv. Security and password protection for the BIOS to prevent the boot order from being changed. b. Operating System Security i. Restricting operating system access. ii. Installation of firewall to block unwanted incoming traffic. iii. Staying up to date with all security updates. City Council 22 — 119 4/19/2022 Page 26 of 31 c. Application Security i. Ensuring that implemented solutions are not using insecure protocols like HTTP or FTP for critical information. ii. Keeping data secure by working with applications that have SSL certificates or the selection of applications that also add their own layer of encryption to all data. iii. Working with a software suite that uses a client -pull technology and disable listening on all ports. iv. Working with companies that undergo regular security tests and audits to ensure they are following current best practices. 4. Advertising Services and Standards A. Company shall use commercially reasonable efforts to maximize the revenue generated from the Advertising Inventory. a. All ad campaigns in the Advertising Inventory must have a revenue component based on market rates. b. Company shall not use the Advertising Inventory to bonus ads to clients that are not purchasing ads in the Advertising Inventory. B. Any proposed advertising to be located on the Advertising Inventory shall not: a. Display the words "STOP", "DRIVE-IN", "DANGER", or any other word, phrase, symbol, or character which may interfere with, mislead, confuse, or direct vehicular traffic. b. Be comprised of rotating, revolving, or flashing lighting devises. c. Promote material which the City in its sole discretion deems offensive to community standards. d. Contain "off -site business identification signs" or "political advertisements." For the purpose of this Agreement, "off -site identification signs" are defined as ad panels that give specific direction to an advertiser's place of business other than the site's address. C. Company shall not accept ads or run ads in the Advertising Inventory with content that is deemed unacceptable by the City in accordance with Section 5 below. The Parties will agree to an ad approval process for advertising that Company believes may be potentially deemed in violation of the City's ad standards. D. The City shall have the right to remove advertising that contains Unacceptable Content upon request. Company shall remove any prohibited content within six (6) hours upon notice from the City. E. If there is a dispute between Company and City as to whether any such content is prohibited, Company shall remove the disputed content until the dispute is resolved. The Executive Director of Public Works will make the final determination on unacceptable advertising. In the event that an advertisement is determined to be unacceptable, Company agrees to remove said advertising within six (6) hours upon notice from the City. City Council 22 — 120 4/19/2022 Page 27 of 31 5. Unacceptable Content Company shall not accept or run advertising on the Advertising Inventory that contains Unacceptable Content, as determined by the City. Unacceptable Content includes but is not limited to the following: A. Is lewd, profane, obscene, or indecent, including any content that is violent or pornographic, explicit violent or sexual material, or depictions of violent or sexual acts. B. Contains gruesome, graphic, or disgusting accounts or imagery. C. Promotes the sale of products that are designed to explode and could cause damage to nearby people or property. D. Promotes the sale of firearms or sporting or recreational guns that can cause serious harm if misused, or that appear to be real guns. E. Promotes the sale of other weapons that are designed or promoted as products that can be used to injure an opponent in sport, self-defense, or combat. F. Is harassing, threatening, abusive, inflammatory or otherwise objectionable. G. Is unlawful or that could facilitate the violation of any applicable law, regulation or governmental rule or guidance. H. Offers or disseminates any fraudulent goods, services, schemes or promotions. I. Demeaning or disparaging matter - Contains images, copy or concepts that actively denigrate, demean or disparage any individual or group. J. Vulgarity - Contains images, copy or concepts that are obscene, vulgar, crude, sexually suggestive, indecent, profane or scatological. K. Promotes the sale and use of tobacco and tobacco -related products. Tobacco means: (1) any product containing, made, or derived from tobacco or nicotine that is intended for human consumption, whether smoked, heated, chewed, absorbed, dissolved, inhaled, snorted, sniffed, or ingested by any other means, including, but not limited to cigarettes, cigars, little cigars, chewing tobacco, pipe tobacco, snuff, and (2) any electronic device that delivers nicotine or other substances to the Person inhaling from the device, including, but not limited to, an electronic cigarette, electronic cigar, electronic pipe, or electronic hookah. L. Promotes the sale and use of cannabis or cannabis product, medicinal/medical cannabis, or commercial cannabis activity and business as defined in Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 40-2. M. Promotes the sale and use of alcohol. N. Political endorsements — Contains messages that are political in nature, including messages of political advocacy, that support or oppose any candidate or referendum, or that feature any current political office holder or candidate for public office, or take positions on issues of public debate. City Council 22 — 121 4/19/2022 Page 28 of 31 O. Contains images, content or copy related to religion or religious ideas or viewpoints. P. Promotes products or services marketed as facilitating recreational drug use. Q. Is libelous, defamatory, knowingly false or misrepresented an individual, company or entity. R. Infringes upon the intellectual property rights of any third party, including copyrights, trademarks, trade names, trade secrets, or patents of such third party. S. Contains images, copy or concepts that actively denigrate public transportation or have negative connotations about public transportation. T. Contains images, copy or concepts that depict unsafe behaviors aboard buses or trains, or in or around transit stations or railroad tracks. U. Is harmful to the City of Santa Ana, its neighboring cities, or Orange County. 6. City Ads A. Company shall provide the City with free ad space equal to 15% of the Advertising Inventory, for City use. City Ads shall run evenly throughout the day in all day parts. B. Company shall provide design services for City Ads at no cost. C. Ad lead times shall be no longer than two (2) weeks - ad designed, approved, and placed in Advertising Inventory. D. Company shall provide the City the equivalent of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) of media on its billboards throughout Southern California to promote the City and/or City events. 7. Public Service Messages A. When requested by the City, Company shall allow the City and other authorities to preempt ads with emergency alerts and/or Public Service Announcements (PSAs) at no cost. B. Company shall arrange, at its own cost and expense, for design and production of the PSAs upon consultation with the City or relevant authorities. C. The City shall be entitled to specify certain public service messages to be displayed and shall approve all public service messages. 8. Discounts for City Businesses A. Company shall provide a discount of 50% to businesses operating and physically located in the City that have an active, current business license. B. Company shall provide to City Businesses up to 20% of the Advertising Inventory for discounted ad space. City Council 22 — 122 4/19/2022 Page 29 of 31 C. Discounted ad space shall be equally distributed across all day parts. 9. Reporting A. Company shall provide quarterly reports with each quarterly MAG Payment within thirty (30) days from the end of each calendar quarter. Each report shall detail by Advertising Site the revenue Cr generated from the Advertising Inventory, MAG payment associated ad rates, occupancy rates, and/or the True -Up Payment. The Parties shall mutually agree on the format and content of the quarterly reports. 10. Account Executive A. Company shall assign an Account Executive to be the City's single point of contact for this partnership. The Account Executive shall be replaced upon the City's request. 11. Meetings A. At the City's discretion, the Parties shall meet on an as needed basis to discuss Advertising Sites to be developed. B. At the City's discretion, the Parties shall meet on a quarterly basis to review sales performance and any other matter related to the services provided by Company. City Council 22 — 123 4/19/2022 Page 30 of 31 I0:4:i13Yall] PAYMENTS AND FORECAST OF REVENUE Operational Year 1 Operational 25 Year Total Billboard Locations (1) (2) Projected Gross Revenue City will receive Revenue Share or MAG, whichever is greater Projected Gross Revenue City will receive Revenue Share or MAG, whichever is greater Projected Revenue Share MAG Projected Revenue Share MAG 1 $1,165,400 $466,160 $300,000 $42,489,600 $16,995,850 $10,937,780 2 $445,600 $178,240 $125,000 $16,246,200 $6,498,500 $4,557,410 3 $831,300 $332,520 $250,000 $30,308,600 $12,123,430 $9,114,820 4 $771,300 $284,520 $165,000 $25,933,500 $10,373,390 $6,015,780 5 $831,300 $332,520 $250,000 $30,308,600 $12,123,430 $9,114,820 Banner Locations (3) A $80,300 $32,120 $15,000 $2,927,680 $1,171,070 $546,890 B $80,300 $32,120 $15,000 $2,927,680 $1,171,070 $546,890 C $80,300 $32,120 $15,000 $2,927,680 $1,171,070 $546,890 D $80,300 $32,120 $15,000 $2,927,680 $1,171,070 $546,890 E $80,300 $32,120 $15,000 $2,927,680 $1,171,070 $546,890 F $80,300 $32,120 $15,000 $2,927,680 $1,171,070 $546,890 Notes: 1) The Water Tower billboard sign will be approximately 40'x 65' and billboard signs at locations 2 through 5 will be 14'x48' 2) The digital billboard Bonus Payment for location 1, Water Tower is $200,000 and the Bonus Payments for locations 2 through 5 are $50,000 per Face = for a total of $550,000 for the above listed digital billboard locations 3) There are no Bonus Payments for the above listed digital banner locations City Council 22 - 124 4/19/2022 Page 31 of 31 Public Works Agency www.santa-ana.org/pw Item # 23 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report April 19, 2022 TOPIC: Agreement for Santa Ana Main Library Renovation AGENDA TITLE Approve Agreement with Group 4 Architecture, Research + Planning, Inc. in an Amount Not to Exceed $2,158,565 for a Three -Year Term (Project No. 22-1380) (Revive Santa Ana Program) RECOMMENDED ACTION Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Group 4 Architecture, Research + Planning, Inc. to provide full design services for the Santa Ana Main Library's renovation project, in the amount of $2,158,565, for a three-year term beginning April 19, 2022 and expiring April 18, 2025, with an option for two, one-year extensions, subject non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney. DISCUSSION In Fiscal Year 2021-22, the City Council approved a combined total of $8,500,000 in Revive Santa Ana funding for the Main Library Transformation Project. The renovation would be the first major capital improvement project the Library has undergone since 1989. The project scope focuses on modernizing the Main Library to incorporate multi - generational play and learning experiences, new programming spaces, technology labs, meetings rooms, and early education activity areas. On October 11, 2021, the Public Works Agency released Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 21-118, by which it sought the design services of a qualified firm for the Main Library Transformation Project. The RFP was advertised on the City's online procurement management and publication system, with proposals due on November 16, 2021. Twelve proposals were received and evaluated by a selection committee. Based on criteria outlined in the RFP, the following summarizes the responding firms and their ranking: City Council 23 — 1 4/19/2022 Agreement with April 19, 2022 Page 2 Group 4 Architecture, Research + Planning, Inc. Firm City Rank Group 4 Architecture, Research + Planning, Inc. San Francisco 1 Johnson Favaro Culver 2 Noll & Tam Architects Berkeley 3 Domusstudio Architecture San Diego 4 SVA Architects Santa Ana 5 Hawkins\Brown Architects Culver City 6 Little Diversified Architectural Consulting Newport Beach 7 TR Design Group, Inc. Riverside 8 Gruen Associates Los Angeles 9 AEPC Group, LLC Santa Clarita 10 YNG Architects Inc. Santa Ana 11 Donald Krotee Partnership, Inc. Santa Ana 12 Staff recommends awarding an agreement (Exhibit 1) to Group 4 Architecture, Research + Planning, Inc. to provide design services for the Main Library Transformation Project. Their proposal demonstrated they have the necessary capacity and expertise to complete the required services. The firm rates are reasonable and within industry standard, the team qualifications are appropriate, and the proposal was determined to provide the best value for the City following interviews with the top -three scoring proposers from the preliminary evaluation. In the hopes of expanding the scope of the project, the City Council approved a Resolution on March 15, 2022 authorizing the submittal of a $10,000,000 grant application to the California State Library to address critical maintenance and infrastructure needs. If awarded, the grant would supplement the Revive Santa Ana funding and would be utilized for critical maintenance and public safety projects that include replacement of fire detection/alarm/sprinkler systems, ADA improvements, window restoration, restoration of the exterior marble fagade, etc. The California State Library will announce grant awards in the Spring 2022. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with the action. FISCAL IMPACT The table below indicates the estimated expenditures per the contract. Any remaining balances not expended at the end of the agreement term will be carried forward for expenditure into subsequent years in the event the optional extension periods are exercised. The base contract is $1,962,332 with a 10-percent contingency in the amount of $196,233, for a total Agreement amount not to exceed $2,158,565. City Council 23 — 2 4/19/2022 Agreement with April 19, 2022 Page 3 Group 4 Architecture, Research + Planning, Inc. Accounting Fund Accounting Unit - Fiscal Year Unit - Account Description Account No. Amount No. Description Agreement Term 2021-22 18111013-66220 American ARPA-FMSA, (April -June) (22-1380) Rescue Plan Improvements Other $191,331 Act Than Building 2022-23 18111013-66220 American ARPA-FMSA, (July -June) (22-1380) Rescue Plan Improvements Other $1,128,047 Act Than Building 2023-24 18111013-66220 American ARPA-FMSA, (July -June) (22-1380) Rescue Plan Improvements Other $639,187 Act Than Building 2024-25 18111013-66220 American ARPA-FMSA, (July -April) (22-1380) Rescue Plan Improvements Other $200,000 Act Than Building TOTAL: $2,158,565 EXHIBIT(S) 1. Agreement with Group 4 Architecture, Research + Planning, Inc. Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director — Public Works Agency and Brian Sternberg, Executive Director — Library Services Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager City Council 23 — 3 4/19/2022 AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE FULL DESIGN FOR THE SANTA ANA MAIN LIBRARY RENOVATION THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into on this 196 day of April, 2022, by and between Group 4 Architecture, Research + Planning, Inc., a California corporation ("Consultant"), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California ("City"). RECITALS A. On October 11, 2021, the city issued Request for Proposal No. 21-118 ("RFP"), by which it sought a Consultant having special skill and knowledge in the field of library renovation to prepare full conceptual plans for the City of Santa Ana Main Library. B. Consultant represents that Consultant is able and willing to provide such services to the City. C. The City intends to utilize funds provided under the American Rescue Plan Act ("ARPA") for this Agreement. ARPA was signed into law in March 2021. ARPA provides funding for a number of different programs, including the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund ("SLFRF"), to provide monetary support to local governments to respond to, mitigate, and recover from the COVID-19 public health emergency. D. In undertaking the performance of this Agreement, Consultant represents that it is knowledgeable in its field and that any services performed by Consultant under this Agreement will be performed in compliance with such standards as may reasonably be expected from a professional consulting firm in the field. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual and respective promises, and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES Consultant shall perform during the term of this Agreement the tasks and obligations, including all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidental customary works required to fully and adequately complete the services described in the Scope of Work as negotiated and attached as Exhibit A, that was based on the City's RFP, a true and correct copy of which, as amended, is attached herewith as Exhibit B and as more specifically delineated in Consultant's Proposal, which is attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated in full. In cases of conflict between Exhibits A, B & C, Exhibit A, as negotiated, shall govern. 2. COMPENSATION a City agrees to pay, and Consultant agrees to accept as total payment for its services for City, the rates and charges identified in Exhibit D attached hereto. The total amount to be expended under this Agreement shall not exceed $2,158,565 during the term ofthis Agreement, including any extension periods exercised under Section 3. The sum is City Council 23 — 4 4/19/2022 Non -Fed Funding (6.1.2020) Page 2 of 10 comprised of. (1) the base amount of $1,962,332; and, (2) a 10% contingency in the amount of $196,233 for additional services at the City's sole discretion. b Payment by City shall be made within 45 (forty-five) days following receipt of proper invoice evidencing work performed, subject to City accounting procedures. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standards of performance set forth in the Recitals and section 6, which may reasonably be expected by City. c. As the recipient of ARPA SURF funds, Consultant will be required to comply with any and all compliance requirements for the use of SURF funds, any and all reporting requirements for expenditures of SURF funds, as well as compliance with 2 CFR 200.332 regarding pass -through entities. 3. TERM This Agreement shall commence on the date first written above and terminate on April 18th, 2025, unless terminated earlier in accordance with Section 17 below. The term of this Agreement may be extended for up to two (2). one (1) year periods upon a writing executed by the City Manager and City Attorney. 4. PREVAILING WAGES Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the services being performed are part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. 5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR Consultant shall, during the entire term of this Agreement, be construed to be an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. This Agreement is not intended norshall it be construed to create an employer -employee relationship, a joint venture relationship, or to allow the City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Consultant performs the services which are the subject matter of this Agreement; however, the services to be provided by Consultant shall be provided in a manner consistent with all applicable standards and regulations governing such services. Consultant shall pay all salaries and wages, employer's social security taxes, unemployment insurance and similar taxes relating to employees and shall be responsible for all applicable withholding taxes. City Council 23 — 5 4/19/2022 Non -Fed Funding (6.1.2020) Page 3 of 10 6. STANDARD OF CARE In providing services under this Agreement, the Consultant shall perform in a manner consistent with that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the same profession currently practicing under similar circumstances at the same time or similar locality. 7. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Consultant shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk. The City shall not reuse or make any modification to the Consultant's construction documents without the prior written authorization of the Consultant. The Consultant shall bear no responsibility or liability related to the unauthorized resuse of any instruments of service prepared by the Consultant. Under no circumstances shall the transfer of ownership of the Consultant's drawings, specifications, electronic files or other instruments of service be deemed a sale by the Consultant, and the Consultant makes no warranties, express or implied, of merchantability and fitness for any particular purpose. 8. INSURANCE Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. a MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE Coverage shall be at least as broad as: Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an "occurrence" basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit City Council applies, either the general aggrMate6limit shall apply sepWjcf*022this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. Non -Fed Funding (6.1.2020) Page 4 of 10 2. Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Form Number CA 0001 covering, Code 1 (any auto), or if Consultant has no owned autos, Code 8 (hired) and 9 (non -owned), with limit no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (Not required if Consultant does not require a vehicle to perform scope of services) 3. Workers' Compensation: Insurance as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer's Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. (Not required if Consultant provides written verification it has no employees) 4. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions): Insurance appropriate to the Consultant's profession, with limit no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $2,000,000 aggregate. 5. If the Consultant maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by the Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City. b Other Insurance Provisions — The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: Additional Insured Status: The City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Consultant's insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 1185 or both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 forms if a later revisions used). 2. Primary Coverage: For any claims related to this contract, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary coverage at least as broad as ISO CG 20 0104 13 as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 3. Notice of Cancellation: Each insurance policy required above shall state that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the City. 4. Waiver of Subrogation: Consultant hereby grants to City a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said Consultant may acquire against the City by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. Consultant agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer. City Council approved by the City. The City mapCq-Jire the Consultant to purcci� ��C� ra9 Non -Fed Funding (6.1.2020) Page 5 of 10 with a lower retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self - insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or City. 6. Acceptability of Insurers: Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the state with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. 7. Claims Made Policies: If any of the required policies provide coverage on a claims -made basis: 1. The Retroactive Date must be shown and must be before the date ofthe contract or the beginning of contract work. 2. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work. If coverage is canceled or non -renewed, and not replaced with another claims -made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the contract effective date, the Consultant must purchase "extended reporting" coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of contract work. 8. Verification of Coverage: Consultant shall furnish the City with original Certificates of Insurance including all required amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause) and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsement Page of the CGL policy listing all policy endorsements to City before work begins. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Consultant's obligation to provide them. City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time. 9. Subcontractors: Consultant shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Consultant shall ensure that the City is an additional insured on insurance required from subcontractors. 10. Special Risks or Circumstances: City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances. 9. INDEMNIFICATION Consultant agrees to defend, and shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees, contractors, special counsel, and representatives from liability: (1) for personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief arising out of claims for personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage, which may arise from the neglinP„t op -rations of the Consultant its enhrnntrartnre anante cwplop-cs or other pareons City Council 23 — 8 4/19/2022 Non -Fed Funding (6.1.2020) Page 6 of 10 acting on its behalf which relates to the services described in section 1 of this Agreement; and (2) from any claim that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief is due by reason of the terms of or effects arising from this Agreement. This indemnity and hold harmless agreement applies to all claims for damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of the events referred to in this Section or by reason of the terms of, or effects, arising from this Agreement. The Consultant further agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and pay all costs for the defense of the City, including fees and costs for special counsel to be selected by the City, regarding any action by a third party challenging the validity of this Agreement, or asserting that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief due to personal or property rights arises by reason of the terms of, or effects arising from this Agreement. City may make all reasonable decisions with respect to its representation in any legal proceeding. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Consultant's services are subject to Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant. 10. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEMNIFICATION Consultant shall defend and indemnify the City, its officers, agents, representatives, and employees against any and all liability, including costs, for infringement of any United States' letters patent, trademark, or copyright infringement, including costs, contained in the work product or documents provided by Consultant to the City pursuant to this Agreement. 11. RECORDS Consultant shall keep records and invoices in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to the costs incurred under this Agreement and any services, expenditures, and disbursements charged to the City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement. All such records and invoices shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of the City to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement during regular business hours. Consultant shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to this Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement. 12. CONFIDENTIALITY If Consultant receives from the City information which due to the nature of such information is reasonably understood to be confidential and/or proprietary, Consultant agrees that it shall not use or disclose such information except in the performance of this Agreement, and further agrees to exercise the same degree of care it uses to protect its own information of like importance, but in no event less than reasonable care. "Confidential Information" shall include all nonpublic information. Confidential information includes not only written information, but also information transferred orally, visually, electronically, or by other means. Confidential inf red City Council 2 — 9 4/ 9/2022 Non -Fed Funding (6.1.2020) Page 7 of 10 by this Agreement. The foregoing obligations of non-use and nondisclosure shall not apply toany information that (a) has been disclosed in publicly available sources; (b) is, through no fault of the Consultant disclosed in a publicly available source; (c) is in rightful possession of the Consultant without an obligation of confidentiality; (d) is required to be disclosed by operation of law; or (e) is independently developed by the Consultant without reference to information disclosed by the City. 13. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CLAUSE Consultant covenants that it presently has no interests and shall not have interests, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with performance of services specified underthis Agreement. 14. NON-DISCRIMINATION Consultant shall not discriminate because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, gender, medical conditions, genetic information, military and veteran status, age, national origin, ancestry, or disability, as defined and prohibited by applicable law, in the recruitment, selection, teaching, training, utilization, promotion, termination or other employment related activities or any services provided under this Agreement. Consultant affirms that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. 15. EXCLUSIVITY AND AMENDMENT This Agreement represents the complete and exclusive statement between the City and Consultant, and supersedes any and all other agreements, oral or written, between the parties. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and any attachments hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. This Agreement may not be modified except by written instrument signed by the City and by an authorized representative of Consultant. The parties agree that any terms or conditions of any purchase order or other instrument that are inconsistent with, or in addition to, the terms and conditions hereof, shall not bind or obligate Consultant or the City. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which is not embodied herein. 16. ASSIGNMENT Inasmuch as this Agreement is intended to secure the specialized services of Consultant, Consultant may not assign, transfer, delegate, or subcontract any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City and any such assignment, transfer, delegation or subcontract without the City's prior written consent shall be considered null and void. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit the City's ability to have any of the services which are the subject to this Agreement performed by City personnel or by other consultants retained by City. City Council 23 — 10 4/19/2022 Non -Fed Funding (6.1.2020) Page 8 of 10 17. TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated by the City upon thirty (30) days written notice of termination. In such event, Consultant shall be entitled to receive and the City shall pay Consultant compensation for all services performed by Consultant prior to receipt of such notice of termination, subject to the following conditions: a As a condition of such payment, the Executive Director may require Consultant to deliver to the City all work product(s) completed as of such date, and in such case such work product shall be the property of the City unless prohibited by law, and Consultant consents to the City's use thereof for such purposes as the City deems appropriate. City use of Consultant's instruments of services shall be governed by section 6 above. b Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standard of performance specified in the Recitals and section 6 of this Agreement. 18. WAIVER No waiver of breach, failure of any condition, or any right or remedy contained in or granted by the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the party waiving the breach, failure, right or remedy. No waiver of any breach, failure or right, or remedy shall be deemed a waiver of any other breach, failure, right or remedy, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver unless the writing so specifies. 19. JURISDICTION - VENUE This Agreement has been executed and delivered in the State of California and the validity, interpretation, performance, and enforcement of any of the clauses of this Agreement shall be determined and governed by the laws of the State of California. Both parties further agree that Orange County, California, shall be the venue for any action or proceeding that may be brought or arise out of, in connection with or by reason of this Agreement. 20. PROFESSIONAL LICENSES Consultant shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, maintain all necessary licenses, permits, approvals, waivers, and exemptions necessary for the provision of the services hereunder and required by the laws and regulations of the United States, the State of California, the City of Santa Ana and all other governmental agencies. Consultant shall notify the City immediately and in writing of its inability to obtain or maintain such permits, licenses, approvals, waivers, and exemptions. Said inability shall be cause for termination of this Agreement. 21. NOTICE Any notice, tender, demand, delivery, or other communication pursuant to this Agreement shal0Kqyi@6y1Mg and shall be deemed to be propef gige1n if delivered in perso4/qigt2@LW by first class or certified mail, postage prepaid, or sent by fax or other telegraphic communication in Non -Fed Funding (6.1.2020) Page 9 of 10 the manner provided in this Section, to the following persons: To City: Clerk of the City Council City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702-1988 Fax: 714- 647-6956 With courtesy copies to: Nabil Saba Executive Director, Public Works Agency City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-21) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, California 92702 Fax: 714-647-5635 To Consultant: GROUP 4 ARCHITECTURE, RESEARCH + PLANNING, INC. 211 Linden Avenue South San Francisco, CA 94080 Tel: 650-871-0709 Attn: David Schnee, Principal A party may change its address by giving notice in writing to the other party. Thereafter, any communication shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address. If sent by mail, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given three (3) days after it has been deposited in the United States mail, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as set forth above. If sent by fax, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given twenty-four (24) hours after the time set forth on the transmission report issued by the transmitting facsimile machine, addressed as set forth above. For purposes of calculating these time frames, weekends, federal, state, County or City holidays shall be excluded. 22. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS a Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature herein below has the power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall indemnify City fully, including reasonable costs and attorney's fees, for any injuries or damages to City in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn. b. All Exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto shall be incorporated as if fully set forth in the body of this Agreement. City Council 23 — 12 4/19/2022 Non -Fed Funding (6.1.2020) Page 10 of 10 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written. ATTEST: Daisy Gomez Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM: SONIA R. CARVALHO City Attorney By: /a I Ryan O. dg Assistant City Attorney RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: Nabil Saba Executive Director Public Works Agency CITY OF SANTA ANA Kristine Ridge City Manager CONSULTANT: GROUP 4 ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH + PLANNING, INC. David Schnee Principal City Council 23 — 13 4/19/2022 CITY OF SANTA ANA LIBRARY RENOVATION RFP NO.21-118 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND The City of Santa Ana is soliciting proposals for Architectural/Engineering, Interior Design, and Construction Administration services ("the Services") for a renovation of the historic Main Library. By this Request for Proposals (RFP), the City of Santa Ana is requesting proposals from firms with substantial architectural, engineering and construction administration experience on similar types of public works improvements for the renovation of the Santa Ana Main Library. The Main Branch of the Santa Ana Public Library was completed in May 1, 1960. The exterior for the building has remained relatively the same since inception; however, the interior of the building received an extensive renovation in 1990. The City would like to restore some of the character lost in the previous renovation while also performing an update that better meets the evolving needs of the community and makes the library central to early childhood learning. The Main Library building consists of 39,790 square feet and has two floors and a below grade basement. The Santa Ana Main Library is an integral partner with the community, providing educational resources to connect and enrich a community of over 335,000 residents. This renovation should further these goals in the most cost effective and environmentally friendly manner possible. The Children's Library/Early Learning Center will be the focal point of the project with key upgrades and expansion to the area and services that will be provided to the community. Design will include "Play-brary" types of designs with interactive walls, etc. A generalized description of areas that may be addressed with City/community/potential consultant input are as follows. See Attachment 4 for as-builts and general layout of work areas. 1. Exterior a. Marble siding i. Clean all marble exterior surfaces ii. Repoint joints between marble panels iii. Replace/repair cracked marble panels 1. Explore replacing existing stone on 1990 addition with new Italian Marble to match original structure b. Provide architecturally appropriate exterior lighting fixtures on building and in landscaping c. Flashing cap needed on parapet cornice d. Upgrade to new LED Security and Pathway Lighting e. Replace all landscaping around building (turf to remain) i. Low planting — no hiding areas 1. Planting materials to deter camping and/or sleeping 2. Ground surface to be DG or similar City Council 23 — 14 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK ii. Remove trees adjacent to building face that present potential structural or other issues to the building iii. Drought Tolerant with low voltage spot lighting f. North Entrance i. New doors to match original design (or propose new architecturally appropriate design) ii. Clean up entrance building lettering & stone iii. Replace walkway connecting north entrance to sidewalk on Civic Center Dr. iv. Restore dedication plaque on north entrance sidewalk. g. East Entrance i. Make secondary public entrance at current staff access to fenced patio ii. Create parking area along east or south side of building for library exclusively iii. Keep as many trees as feasible iv. Create a drive-thru window considering circulation on/off of Ross St. 1. If feasible, ensure it does not detract from historic nature of the building h. South Entrance i. Return to a bookmobile area with garage/carport and the back of house loading area ii. Patio area just east of south entrance 1. Remove panels/walls that block the patio adjacent to entrance that create a hiding space in this area 2. Activate this area iii. Remove book drop — replace with new book drops at north and east entrances iv. Blend proposed landscaping with new landscaping to south i. Children's Library — single story addition on the west side of the Main Library building i. Provide vines or other low maintenance plant material on east side of building to prevent graffiti ii. Patio renovation completed under separate contract j. Provide comprehensive exterior security cameras and necessary low voltage cabling k. Coordinate with IT to provide no low voltage cat 6 cabling/trays throughout the building along with new access points 1. The old freight elevator from the late 1950's should be removed as it is not functional and no longer needed in. Identify opportunities to allocate square footage for additional meeting/study room space if possible n. A new roof was recently completed 1. Interior a. General building i. Consider elevator relocation with modern elevator ii. Review/consider replacing all building systems iii. Include technology in all meeting rooms iv. Replace all flooring throughout v. Upgrade all restrooms. May need to adjust access or location of restrooms to accommodate new layout that is more in line with original plans. They were modified and relocated in 1990. vi. Shelving needs assessment/shelving program — Replace all book stacks vii. New lighting plan to ensure new improvements do not create shadows and dark areas viii. Replace all furniture in public and private spaces City Council EXHIBIT A Page ,�t-2 15 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK 1. Furniture should have a mid-century modern or similar style in line with the historical time period of when the building was constructed ix. Ceiling system was recently upgraded. Modifications may be required depending on results of shelving analysis. x. Repair Exterior windows in Main Library building and Children's Library addition xi. Provide a comprehensive signage plan for the Main Library in keeping with the historic nature of the building xii. ADA compliance/Accessible path of travel b. Main Floor i. Refinish wood/metal elements ii. South side back of house 1. Combine information and circulation desks a. To match the original design and historic nature of the building, move circulation to the north entrance b. Two large half circle desks flanking each side of the door in front of the windows c. Staff Area where south entrance is currently - Bookmobile and circulation work/ loading area iii. Reimagining of Children's Library 1. Focus on early childhood learning 2. Flexible/programmable space 3. Tutoring/interactive 4. Can be expanded into main library area as needed 5. Feature interactive experiences: a. Wall interactives, b. Climbing areas c. Other children's museum style spaces iv. East entrance 1. Widen hallway 2. Create teen space along the east side of building v. Reactivate the fireplace area 1. Non-functional fireplace (not wood or gas burning) Second Floor i. Refinish wood/metal elements ii. Create additional public spaces 1. Remove majority of admin space on second floor a. 4 admin staff will remain b. Relocate the Santa Ana History Room and create a small gallery 2. Small meeting room as space permits 3. Create Bookstore: a. Explore enclosing the hallway behind the second floor shelving and other rooms staff rooms along the south side of the building to create a new bookstore iii. Meeting rooms/tech lab — add glass toward main library iv. Dumbwaiter — ideas to reactivate or other use v. Relocate majority of staff to the basement d. Basement i. Staff spaces to replace teen center and storage areas ii. Possible drop ceiling iii. 26 full-time staff (cubicles) City Council EXHIBIT A Page .�1'3_ 16 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK iv. 72 part-time staff (share 10 — 15 spaces Building Mechanicals and Critical Maintenance/ i. Bring stairwells and emergency exits up to code if required. Explore opportunities for LEED certification and/or green building materials. ii. Include potentially life-saving improvements or replacement of original fire detection and sprinkler systems, plumbing, seismic retrofit, antiquated HVAC system, and all electrical and plumbing systems from the late 1950's. Scope of Work Architectural and engineering services shall consist of, but not be limited to the following: review of the Main Library building program, prepare schematic design, construction plans and specifications, submit design documents to the City of Santa Ana staff for review and submit final design documents to the City of Santa Ana Building & Safety Division for plan check. These services also include responding to all plan check corrections until final approval has been given by Building & Safety. Finally, construction administration services during bid and construction phases would also need to be provided. I. Consultant Responsibilities as Part of Basic Services The Consultant's responsibilities shall include the following project tasks: Consultant is responsible for providing all design and engineering as required for all components within the project scope of work. This includes but is not limited to survey, civil design, geotechnical investigation and report (for soils analysis), infiltration testing, architectural design, landscape architectural design, parking and site improvements design, street improvement design (new driveway/access points), structural design, interior design including bookshelf layout plans, furniture selection, electrical engineering, mechanical and plumbing engineering, etc. Consultant will also be responsible for facilitating up to three (3) meetings with City Staff to obtain input and finalize concept plan. Additionally, up to three (3) meetings to coordinate for or present to the Historic Resources Commission (HRC). Consultant shall provide review sets in .pdf format. Final plans shall be provided in AutoCAD or Microstation format, and .pdf format. Task 1: Pre -Design Preliminary design shall include Kick-off meeting with City Staff (representatives from Public Works Agency and Santa Ana Library) to discuss scope of work, project goals and objectives, potential elements and issues, schedule, review of existing information and site investigation. ➢ Deliverables shall include a • Work Task Plan and Schedule, that will include key milestones and highlight tasks associated with Historic Resources Commission (HRC) review. • Geotechnical Assessment of the east side of the building, • Four test holes to characterize the soil and determine potential ground water impacts, infiltration rates, excavation and compaction requirements for hardscape elements and soil corrosivity. • Geotechnical Report • Geotechnical review of construction drawings • Hazardous Building Materials Survey (HBMS) including up to • Asbestos (PLM) up to 95 samples City Council EXHIBIT A Page,� 17 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK • Lead Paint (FAAS) up to 20 samples • Lead Ceramic (TTLC) up to 10 samples • PCB caulking (GC) up to samples • HBMS Report • Air monitoring and Mitigation Observation — one 8 hr shift and a single report is included in Basic Services, and • Site Survey. • Base Drawings. Consultant shall prepare a digital base model of the existing building in Autodesk BIM 360 using the dimensions shown or may be graphically scaled from the 1990 drawing set. The dimensions will be understood to be approximate, requiring field verification by contractors as part of construction. • Preliminary Project Budget Options. Consultant shall prepare alternate budget options using rule -of -thumb cost/sf for different project extents. The budgets shall endeavor to be as comprehensive as possible, including contingencies and other City costs. City shall evaluate budget ranges and give guidance to the Consultant on appropriate options to continue into Task 2. ➢ Summary of Task 1 Meetings and Trips: • Consultant will meet with a City Project Management Team (PMT) up to two times via virtual meeting. • Consultant team will have one -trip for an site day where the Consultant shall tour the building and meet with City Staff ➢ Summary of Task 1 Consultant Included Expenses: Expenses for travel by car, plane, including ground transit and parking and consultant meals Task 2: Concept Design Concept design shall include up to three (3) meetings with City Staff to brainstorm and review potential layouts. Additionally, outreach shall be conducted in up to three (3) public meetings to provide the community an opportunity to review the concept designs and provide input. Please provide creative methods used to engage the community on needs and priorities while keeping the project on schedule. i.e. workshops, online polls. ➢ Deliverables shall include up to three (3) schematic concept designs, with a minimum of six (6) perspective drawings/renderings for each the following: exterior from Civic Center Dr., main level.book stacks, kid's area, teen space, Santa Ana History Room and east entrance from exterior for fundraising and use in presentations to potential library donors, would also be required. ➢ Children's Thematics Discovery & Concept Design • Thematics Orientation Meeting. Consultant will lead meeting to discuss the Santa Ana Library's play and learning objectives and the intended visitor experience. Explore creative priorities to be translated into design elements, concepts, and designs that will inform your overall project budget and meet playspace safety standards. • Children's Thematics Conceptual Design: Consultant will research benchmark examples and develop preliminary visual concepts for presentation to the Santa Ana Library project team. We will create three-dimensional models of the spaces. We will also review and determine graphic requirements, including donor elements, wayfinding, and safety signage. • Budget Consultant shall prepare an estimate of probable cost for children's tematics design elements. ➢ Updated Project Budgets for each of up to three schematic concept designs. ➢ Final Concept and budget shall be approved by City Staff ➢ Summary of Task 2 Meetings and Trips: • Consultant will meet with a City Project Management Team (PMT) up to four times via City Council EXHIBIT A Page ,�t-5_ 18 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK virtual meeting. • Consultant team will have three trips for on -site meetings and/or meetings with local agencies. Two trips may include an evening community meeting. ➢ Summary of Task 2 Consultant Included Expenses: • Travel expenses for included meetings and trips,including meals and lodging related to an overnight stay for a trip with an evening meeting. • Color hard copy handouts (up to 10 sets per meeting) • Plotting for up to one set of color presentation drawings • Mounting of one set of the preferred design to support fundraising purposes. Task 3: Design Development (50% plans) Design development will involve the schematic development of plans based on the approved conceptual design plan, which shall include but is not limited to survey, civil design, geotechnical investigation and report (for soils analysis), infiltration testing„ architectural design, landscape architectural design, structural design, interior design, furniture selection, electrical engineering, mechanical and plumbing engineering, draft technical specifications and "opinion of estimated cost'. ➢ Deliverables shall include a 50% set of plans, including site section studies, draft specification, "Opinion of Probable Cost". ➢ Summary of Task 3 Meetings and Trips: • Consultant will meet with a City Project Management Team (PMT) up to four times via virtual meeting. • Consultant team will have three -trips for in -person meetings with City Staff or project stakeholders ➢ Summary of Task 2 Consultant Included Expenses:: Travel expenses for included meetings and trips, color hard copy handouts (up to 10 sets per meeting) and plotting for up to one set of color presentation drawings of the selected option and views. Task 4: Construction Documents (90% and 100%plans) Construction Documents (CDs) shall include finalizing approved deliverables from the Design Development phase. This includes the provision of detailed engineering and construction drawings that will serve as the basis for both bidding and construction by ageneral contractor. ➢ Deliverables shall include 90% and 100% plans, structural calculations, CASP report, final technical specifications, finalized "Opinion of Probable Cost". 100% plans will go through a constructability review that could lead to comments and recommendations that should also be addressed and completed as part of this deliverable. ➢ Summary of Task 4 Meetings and Trips: • Consultant will meet with a City Project Management Team (PMT) up to six times via virtual meeting. • Consultant team will have three -trips for in -person meetings with City Staff or project stakeholders ➢ Summary of Task 2 Consultant Included Expenses: Travel expenses for included meetings and trips, color hard copy handouts up to 11x17 (up to 10 sets per meeting) and plotting for up to one set of wet -signed drawings of the selected option and views. Plans: Plans shall include, but are not limited to the following: City Council EXHIBIT A Page .�1�6_19 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK • Title Sheet • Civil Engineering o Site Erosion Plan o Parking lot along Ross Street with Access Control (parking meters, gate, bollards, etc.) o Horizontal and Vertical Control Plan o Grading And On -Site Drainage Plan o Site Utility Plan • Landscape Architectural o Site Layout/Construction Plans And Details (including plumbing) o Site Sections, as applicable o Planting Plans/Details/Notes o Irrigation Plans/Details/Calculations/Notes • Architectural o Demolition Plans (Basement, 1st, & 2'Floors) o Construction Plans (Basement, 1st, & 2'Floors) o Reflected Ceiling Plans (Basement, 1st & 2'Floors) o Furniture Plans (Basement, 1st, & 2"dFloors) and Furniture schedule and budget o Shelving Plans, and Schedules o Exterior Elevations o Interior Elevations o Mechanical and Plumbing Plans/T-24 o Electrical Plans, as applicable o Architectural Details o Structural Calculations o Door/Window/Finish Schedules, as applicable o ADA Path of Travel design and/or o Code Rquired signage Plan Structural Engineering o Structural Design and Detailing Mechanical Engineering & Plumbing Electrical Engineering o Electrical Site Plan to include walkway/parking lot lighting, irrigation. o Photometrics. o Location of panels, switchgear, meters o Schedules o Details o Notes, specifications Plan Check & Permits: Construction drawings shall be in accordance with the 2019 California Building Code and will require review/approval by the City Planning and Building Agency. Additionally, this would be subject to review by the Historic Resources Commission. City Council EXHIBIT A Page ,2'8�z 20 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK Historic Resources Commission (HRC) Pursuant to our Historic Ordinance, major exterior modifications to a historic structure requires the approval of the HRC through a duly noticed public hearing and issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness. Therefore, the property owner would need to apply for a Historic Exterior Modification Application (HEMA). The cost for this application is $2,348.83. Prior to presenting the application to the HRC city staff will ensure that any proposed exterior modifications are consistent with the Secretary of Interior's Standards for rehabilitation and consistent with our Historic Ordinance. Staff recommends the proposal identify a historic consultant to provide a compliance statement ensuring consistency with the standards. This compliance statement would help streamline the review process and help with staff recommendation for approval. The timeframe for the HEMA will also vary as we only have four regularly scheduled HRC meetings throughout the year (January, April, July, and October). It will be important to coordinate this effort proactively with the Planning department staff to determine the submittal deadline for the next available HRC meeting. As a condition of plan check approval, plans, specifications and structural calculations must be signed by a California licensed architect / landscape architect /civil engineer/structural engineer as appropriate. Additionally, the architect will be encouraged to identify their historic consultant to address questions and concerns related to the historical preservation of the building. Plans shall be organized so that they can be segregated cleanly for distribution to the various plan checking entities. Construction drawings shall be submitted at 90% completion for review by Public Works CIP Engineering and Santa Ana Library staff and revised per their comments. The 100% complete construction drawing package will then be submitted for final City review to the following City Agencies: • Library Services Agency • Planning and Building Agency • Historic Resources Commission • Public Works Agency CIP Engineering Division The Public Works Agency Project Manager will coordinate the submittal and review process. Once complete, the consultant will revise the Contract Documents Technical Specifications Technical specifications for all components listed above shall be provided by Consultant, or their Sub - consultants, to the City in CSI (Construction Specifications Institute) format. Consultant shall coordinate language between the general and technical specifications to ensure conflicts are minimized. City Staff will combine these specifications with the City Boiler Plate which together, will become the Project Manual. Final Opinion of Probable Cost Consultant shall provide updated opinion of probable construction cost which shall reflect finalized plans, materials, systems, details of construction, and known or anticipated changes in the bidding market relative to the project. Should project scope exceed available budget, project plans/specifications will be phased as appropriate. Task 5: Bid Advertisement, Construction Administration, Record Drawings: Bid Advertisement Consultant shall provide support to the City during the Bidding phase by assisting with questions, City Council EXHIBIT A Page ,�t-8- 21 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK requests for information/clarification, or conflicts arising out of the bidding process. Consultant shall also attend pre -bid meeting, if scheduled. Construction Administration Consultant shall provide support to the City during the Construction Administration phase by assisting with questions, requests for information/clarification, and/or reviewing submittals. Consultant's Basic Service includes bi-weekly participation in Owner Architect Contractor (OAC meetings by web conference, and monthly attendance on -site for in -person participation in OAC meetings and to observe the progress of the construction limited to the duration shown below in section IV. Record Drawings /As -built Plans: Upon construction completion, consultant shall incorporate as -built information, as provided by the General Contractor, into the drawing files to provide record drawings for City archives. FFE Selection and Procurement Services Consultant shall provide support to the City during the Bidding phase by assisting with questions, requests for information/clarification, or conflicts arising out of the bidding process. Consultant shall also attend pre -bid meeting, if scheduled. Task 5: ARPA, or other Funder Compliance Administration Consultant's responsibilities for ARPA, or other fonder, compliance reporting shall be limited to monthly delineation of percent complete by task included in Consultant's monthly invoicing. Additional reporting or documentation of the Consultant or any subconsultants shall be Additional Services. City Responsibilities The City will be responsible for the following items: • Provision of available plans and existing documentation on file. • Provision of electronic design file with City title block and title sheet (24" x 36") • Provision of standard City boilerplate specifications. • Acting as liaison with the appropriate decision making bodies, as necessary. • Coordination and processing of plans and documents with governmental agencies having jurisdiction over the project. • Support for community and stakeholder meetings including arranging venues, publicity, room setup and breakdown, provision of projection and amplification, refreshments, translation services (live and/or in print) • If Hazardous Building Material Sampling is done on any parts of the roof the City will engage the services of a qualified roofing contractor to repair the roof as necessary. • Services of a Construction Manager (CM) that may be either City staff or third party consultant hired by the City) to monitor and coordinate contractor services, facilitate and record OAC meetings, maintain RFI, ASI, CO logs, monitor contractor's schedule performance, review pay applications, and coordinate. • Paying permit and/or plan check or other fees to the City or other Authorities having jurisdiction over the project. II. PRE -NEGOTIATED OPTIONAL SERVICES City Council EXHIBIT A Page /�1�9-22 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK The following services are not included in the Consultant's Scope of Basic Services and shall be provided if requested by the Client. The Consultant shall be compensated for Optional and Additional Services in addition to compensation for Basic Services and Reimbursable Expenses as described in Exhibit C. Optional Services 1: Children's Thematics Schematic Design / Procurement Package The Consultant shall prepare a schematic design package that describes the design intent and fabrication methodology, select details, and specifications that can be used by the City to procure fabrication services from a design -build exhibit contractor. Optional Services 2: Elevator Design Services Task 3-5. As part of Tasks 1 and Task 2 in Basic Services. the Consultant shall consider options for a new, replacement, or relocated elevator. At the end of Task 2, if the City selects a preferred design with a new, replacement, or relocated elevator the Consultant shall provide the architectural and engineering services required in Tasks 3-5 when Optional Services 2 are authorized. III. ADDITIONAL SERVICES The following services are not included in the Consultant's Scope of Basic Services, or Pre -negotiated Optional Services and shall be provided if requested by the Client. The Consultant shall be compensated for Additional Services in addition to compensation for Basic Services, Optional Services and Reimbursable Expenses as described in Exhibit C. 1. Field measured architectural as-builts (horizontal, elevation, and/or vertical dimensions), and/or LiDAR scanning. 2. Underground surveys including electronic or pothole utility investigation. 3. Existing utility capacity studies. 4. Storm drain connection permits if required. 5. Structural assessments or materials testing of the existing structural framing. 6. Seismic retrofit of the existing structure including but not limited to strengthening of the existing roof framing, Strengthening, replacement or upgrade of the existing structural framing gravity or lateral resisting elements. 7. Arborist services. 8. MEP system replacements. 9. Fire Protection and fire alarm design. 10. Audio-visual system design for areas not described in Basic Services above. 11. Specialized low voltage systems not included in basic services including but not limited to: a. Voice/Speech Lift Systems, b. Satellite Television Reception Systems. Communications Systems: c. LAN/WAN Systems Hardware, including Routers, Firewalls, d. General Purpose Network Switches, General Purpose Servers, Disk and Tape Backup Systems, Wireless Access Points, Rackmount UPS, General Purpose Computer Workstations, Printers and Related, e. Microwave Communications Systems, VoIP/PBX Telephone Systems, Emergency Radio Responder Coverage (ERRC)/Public Safety Radio Repeater Systems, and/or Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS)/Cellular Telephone Repeater Systems. Outside Plant Engineering — £ Design of Communications Ductbanks or outside plant communications cabling infrastructure more than 500 feet beyond the furthest face of the Project building(s), conduit proofing or documentation of existing underground communications ducts, their fill and remaining capacity for use by this Project. g. Mass Nofication/Mass Communications Systems: Two-way Communications Systems, Emergency Alert Systems and/or Master Clock Systems. Electronic Security and Safety Systems: Risk Assessment Study, Campus Bluelight Telephone Systems. 12. Roofing, parapet, access, fall restraint, drainage assessment and design of repairs, modifications or replacement, except for repairs as needed by any Basic Services work that impacts the existing roof. City Council EXHIBITA Page,�t-1D23 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK 13. Work related to the Children's patio. 14. Support to place building on historic registry 15. Marble inspection/survey. 16. Historic Exterior Modification Application (HEMA) application cost. 17. EIR services including any other environmental studies. 18. Children's Thematics Design Build Fabrication Services 19. Children's Thematics shop drawing review and installation observation and punch list services when the children's tematics are obtained by a third -part fabricator/installer. 20. Additional meetings beyond those identified in Basic Services 21. Traffic engineering 22. The services of consultants other than those included in the proposal and those identified in Exhibit B plus those of Omega Environmental. 23. Hazardous material air monitoring and mitigation observation by Consultant beyond a single eight - hour shift. 24. Physical Scale models 25. Promotional and fundraising materials beyond the renderings included in Basic Services 26. Assistance with grant applications including, but not limited to, CA State Library, and Southern California Edison 27. Third party estimate reconciliation 28. Life cycle costs analyses. 29. Value Engineering, Integrated Design Workshops 30. Inclusion of bid alternates greater than 1% of project budget. 31. Increases in scope of services related to a construction budget above $17.9M. 32. Preparing multiple bid packages beyond those defined in Task 4. 33. Making revisions to drawings, designs, or other documents when such revisions are inconsistent with approvals or directions previously given by the Client, made necessary by determination by the Client or its other consultants, or made necessary by the Client's failure to render decisions in a timely manner. 34. Remobilization costs, to resume the project if the City suspends the project for longer than one month. 35. Design of any temporary facilities. 36. LEED Certification — including USGBC registration fees and Consultant costs to design unique LEED credits not otherwise included in the design and services to document and obtain certifications 37. ARPA, or other finder, compliance documentation administrative costs. 38. Any other service not included in Section I. Basic Services. IV. SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE LA Consultant shall complete all Basic Services Tasks 1 through 5, according to the following preliminary durations to be refined in Basic Services Task 1 Task 1 Pre -Design 2 months Surveys may be delivered by the Consultant during Task 2 Task 2 Concept Design 3 months Includes preliminary meeting with HRC Task 3 Design Development (50% plans) 4 months Includes preliminary meeting with HRC Task 4 Construction Documents (90% and 100% plans) Preparation of 90% Permit Submittal 4 months City Building Department Review Back -check —100% set 1 month City Council EXHIBIT A Page ,2t124 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK Task 5 Bid Advertisement, Construction Administration, Record Drawings: Bid and Award 4 months Construction Administration 12 months Record Drawings 2 months FFE Design intent and bid package — concurrent with Task 5 Signage Design Intent and bid package — concurrent with Task 5 LB The schedule for the project overall or any phase(s) may be adjusted upon mutual agreement of the City and the Consultant to meet changing project needs. City Council EXHIBIT A Page ,2'8�1225 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT - B REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) FOR SANTA ANA LIBRARY RENOVATION RFP NO.: 21-118 OlANOF eDuN1T B FAT Di THE 00 L0EN CITY FOUNDED '$69 CITY OF SANTA ANA Public Works Agency 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-36 Santa Ana, CA 92701 Jason Gabriel Principal Civil Engineer (714) 647-5664 Office JGabriel(& santa-ana.orl! for Release: Jason Gabritl incipal Civil Engineer Public Works Agency KEY RFP DATES (Subiect to chanffe at discretion of Cit Issue Date: October 11, 2021 Job Walk: October 27, 2021 at 9am at Library North Entrance Deadline for Requests for Information: November 4, 2021 Proposal Due Date: November 12, 2021 at 2pm Projected Award Date: December 21, 2021 City Council 23 — 26 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT - B NOTICE INVITING PROPOSALS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that proposals will be received from qualified firms for the Santa Ana Library Renovation. Responses to this Request for Proposals (RFP) must be submitted electronically to the PlanetBids system no later than November 12, 2021 at 2:00 p.m. Proposals received after this date/time will not be considered. It is the responsibility of the proposer to ensure that any proposals submitted have sufficient time to be received by the City of Santa Ana prior to this proposal due date and time. Additionally, it is a requirement that hard copy proposals also be sent by courier service, mailed, or hand delivered in an enclosed sealed envelope and marked clearly with the following: "SEALED PROPOSAL FOR SANTA ANA LIBRARY RENOVATION RFP NO.21-118 IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DO NOT OPEN WITH REGULAR MAIL." City of Santa Ana Attn.: Jason Gabriel Public Works Agency; M-36 20 Civic Center Plaza; Ross Annex Santa Ana, CA 92701 For further instructions regarding hard copy submission of proposals, refer to PlanetBids. All notifications, requests for information, updates and addenda will be posted online on PlanetBids at httns://www.Rlanetbids.com/portal/portal.cfm?CoMMID=20137. Proposers shall be responsible for monitoring the site to obtain information regarding this solicitation. Failure to respond to required updates may result in a determination of a nonresponsive qualification. City Council 23 — 27 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT - B TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION / PROJECT DESCRIPTION 4 II. INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS 6 A. CITY RESPONSIBILITIES B. PROPOSER RESPONSIBILITIES C. REQUEST FOR INFORMATION OR CLARIFICATION D. ADDENDA E. LICENSES & PERMITS F. INSURANCE G. INFORMATION PACKET H. CITY RIGHT TO REJECT I. BID PROTESTS III. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 8 A. GENERAL B. PROPOSAL CONTENTS 1. STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES AND SCHEDULE 3. FEE PROPOSAL 4. CERTIFICATIONS IV. PROPOSAL REVIEW (CONSULTANT SELECTION) 10 A. EVALUATION AND RATING B. SELECTION V. CONTRACT AWARD A. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION B. EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT VI. IMPLEMENTATION A. KICK-OFF MEETING B. NOTICE TO PROCEED VII. PUBLIC RECORDS 1I/IIImo\9>0101]►:/ ATTACHMENT 1: SCOPE OF WORK ATTACHMENT 2: AGREEMENT ATTACHMENT 3: CERTIFICATION ATTACHMENT 4: PROJECT ATTACHMENTS 10 10 11 City Council 23 — 28 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT - B I. INTRODUCTION / PROJECT DESCRIPTION Nature of Work: The City of Santa Ana Public Works Agency (City) desires to enter into an agreement with a qualified consulting firm to lead efforts to renovate the historic Santa Ana Main Library. Number of Proposals and Signature: Five (5) hard copies are required to accompany an electronic submittal of the complete proposal package on PlanetBids. One of the hard copies shall be marked as "ORIGINAL" and be signed by a company official with the power to bind the company, and submitted to the City of Santa Ana. Please be explicit in identifying the appropriate person with legal authority to bind the company. The Statement of Qualifications shall be limited to a maximum of (10) double -sided pages (excluding front and back covers, section dividers and attachments such as resumes, forms). Font size shall be minimum 11-point Arial. Proposal exhibits shall be maximum 11" x 17". Proposal Evaluation and Rating: The criteria for evaluating the REP submitted will take the following items into consideration: • Firm/Team Experience 25% • Understanding of Need 30% • Relevant Project Experience 30% • Schedule of Delivery 10% • References 5% The City has established a proposal review committee to evaluate proposers based on the response to this RFP, which includes adherence to outlined directions and format, and the City evaluation criteria set forth above. A final score will be calculated for each submitted proposal and used to rank the proposers. City Council 23 — 29 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT - B Project Funding_: Funding sources for each project may vary requirements. Special conditions may apply the Appendix of this RFP. Term of Contract Agreement: and shall comply with the funding agency's . Refer to Attachment 1 (Scope of Work) in The City desires to enter into a contract with the top scoring firm for an initial three (3) year term with a City option for two (2) one (1) year extension period. This term is outlined in the Standard Consultant Agreement, as contained in the Appendix of this RFP as Attachment 2. City Council 23 — 30 4/19/2022 In A. CITY RESPONSIBILITIES The City will provide information in its possession relevant to preparation of required information in this RFP. The City will provide only the staff assistance and documentation specifically referred to herein. B. PROPOSER RESPONSIBILITIES Point of Contact: The selected proposer will assume responsibilities for all services in its proposal. The selected proposer shall identify a sole point of contact with the greatest knowledge concerning the required service operations and contractual matters, including payment of all charges resulting from the Agreement. Contact information such as email and phone number must be included into the proposal. Evidence of Financial Capacity: Proposer may be requested to submit its most recent audited financial statement, evidencing proposer's financial capacity to fully perform the required services, including provision of equipment and personnel expenses over a ninety (90) day period. If said financial statement does not reflect full ninety (90) day operational capacity, proposer may include a letter of credit as evidence of supplemental capacity. C. REQUEST FOR INFORMATION OR CLARIFICATION All questions or requested clarifications shall be made only in writing to the Q&A section located in PlanetBids no fewer than five (5) calendar days prior to the date and time set for opening of proposals. No verbal requests or responses will be accepted. Significant interpretations or clarifications will be addressed via addenda to this RFP. D. ADDENDA Any changes in RFP from the date of release to date of submittal will result in an addendum or amendment. Notification of such addendum or amendment shall be posted on PlanetBids at https://www.nlanetbids.com/aortal/nortal.cfm?ComDanvID=20137 as set forth in the Notice Inviting Proposals. Addenda shall become part of the agreement documents. E. LICENSES & PERMITS The selected proposer shall be required to obtain a City of Santa Ana Business license within ten (10) business days of selection and must provide a copy to the City's project manager or designee prior to commencing any work in Santa Ana. Additionally, Proposer will be responsible for obtaining any licenses/permits required by the Scope of Work. City Council City of Santa Ana Rff2,3J 18 4/19/2022 Page 6 In F. INSURANCE The Selected Proposer shall provide the required evidence of insurance coverage as set forth in the Scope of Work within ten (10) business days after receipt of notice that the contract has been awarded. Failure to provide the required insurance certificates shall be cause for the annulment of the award and the forfeiture of the proposal guaranty. The City will provide the Selected Proposer with a "New Vendor Checklist", which outlines insurance requirements. G. PAYMENT INFORMATION PACKET The selected proposer shall return a completed payment information packet within ten (10) business days after the successful proposer has received notice that the contract has been awarded. H. PRE -PROPOSAL MEETING Should a pre -proposal meeting be scheduled, the date, time, and location is identified on the cover page of this RFP. The meeting will include discussion of the project scope and a question -and -answer session. It is highly recommended that the Proposer's key team members attend this meeting. Significant interpretations or clarifications will be addressed via addenda to this RFP, as described above in "Section D: Addenda." I. CITY RIGHT TO REJECT The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals submitted and no representation is made hereby that any contract will be awarded pursuant to this RFP or otherwise. The City reserves the right to accept or reject the combined or separate components of this proposal in part or in its entirety or to waive any minor inconsistency, informality or technical defect in the proposal. The City reserves the right to reject, replace, and approve any and all subcontractors. All subcontractor(s) shall be identified in response to this RFP. Subcontractors shall be the responsibility of the successful proposer and the City shall assume no liability of such subcontractors. J. BID PROTESTS Proposers with concerns or rebuttal of any staff determination of non -responsiveness or non- responsibility may submit, in writing within five (5) business days, to the Project Manager, any concerns regarding the RFP process or staff determination. Such writing shall be considered by the City Manager or her designated representative, and may be acted upon within five (5) business days. If no action is taken within such time, there shall be no change to the staff determination. The exercise by the Proposer of its right to submit written concerns shall be a condition precedent to seeking judicial review of any award of a contract hereunder. City Council City of Santa Ana Rf 2,�118 4/19/2022 Page 7 III. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS A. GENERAL 1. The number of Proposal Copies and signature is specified in: RFP SECTION I - INTRODUCTION / PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2. Deadline: Proposals are due to the City of Santa Ana at the date, time, and location specified in the Notice Inviting Proposals. B. PROPOSAL CONTENTS The proposal format and page limitation, if any, is specified in: RFP SECTION I - INTRODUCTION / PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS a. Cover Letter: Proposals shall include a letter signed by a principal or authorized representative who can make legally binding commitments for the entity. b. Contract Agreement Statement: Proposal shall include a statement outlining your concurrence or concerns with any and all provisions contained in the Agreement attached herein as Attachment 2 in the Appendix. c. Firm and Team Experience: Proposal shall include a profile of the firm's experience. Include resumes of project team/sub-consultants that will be providing services which outline their technical and design experience. At a minimum, this should include the project manager/principal agent, associates in charge when project manager/principal agent is unavailable, key personnel, firm size, and an organization chart identifying only those who will perform work for the proposed project and the percentage of each individual's time devoted to this project. The project manager/principal agent shall be the primary contact person to represent your firm and will be the person to conduct the presentation, if invited for an interview. City Council City of Santa Ana Rff213118 4/19/2022 Page 8 d. Understanding of Need: Proposal shall include an outline which demonstrates the firm's understanding of the work. This outline should include anticipated approach, tasks necessary for successful completion, deliverables, and suggestions or special concerns that the City should be made aware of. Identify any assumptions and/or exclusions used in preparation of the scope of work and associated fee estimate. Relevant Project t Experience: Proposal shall include a list of relevant projects, which your firm or personnel have completed within the last 5 years, including significant work with public agencies. Project information should include project description, project location, year completed, client name and contact information, and name of consultant project manager. City of Santa Ana staff may conduct site visits at select projects. f. References: Proposals shall include a listing of relevant projects with references for three public entities with valid current emails for which Proposer has performed similar work within the past five (5) years. 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES AND SCHEDULE: Proposal shall include a Scope of Services and Schedule which details the work phases to be completed, the tasks to be accomplished, the deliverables to be provided, and the schedule / timeline to complete the project, based upon the requested Scope of Work detailed in Attachment 1 of this RFP. 3. FEE PROPOSAL: The fee proposal shall be submitted separate and concurrently with the technical proposal, both submitted electronically in PlanetBids and as a hard copy in a separately sealed envelope, clearly labeled as "Fee Proposal." This shall include the firm's Standard Hourly Fee Schedule, a table outlining the tasks and team hourly effort for each of the major tasks, and a Project Fee Schedule as outlined in the Scope of Work. The fee proposal will not be opened until the proposals have been evaluated by the proposal selection committee. The City will select the consultant based on qualifications, and then negotiate a contract price based on available funding. 4. CERTIFICATIONS: The following forms shall be signed and included as part of the proposal submittal package: • Attachment 3-1: Non -Collusion Affidavit City Council City of Santa Ana Rf 2-3418 4/19/2022 Page 9 In • Attachment 3-2: Non -Lobbying Certification • Attachment 3-3: Non -Discrimination Certification IV. PROPOSAL REVIEW (CONSULTANT SELECTION) A. EVALUATION AND RATING The criteria for evaluating the proposals are specified in: RFP SECTION I - INTRODUCTION / PROJECT DESCRIPTION. B. SELECTION The selection committee will be comprised of at least (3) City staff from multiple departments. The committee may interview the top ranking proposers. The City will recommend award of contracts to the proposers who will provide the best value to the City. The City reserves the right to begin negotiations and enter into a contract without interview or further discussions. V. CONTRACT AWARD A. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Following evaluation and rating by the proposal review committee and acceptance from Funding agency following financial audit, the Project Manager will recommend award contracts to the three top-ranking proposers that will provide the best value to the City. B. EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT The Scope of Services, Schedule, and Fees submitted in the proposal will be the basis of any negotiation of final terms, which will lead to a completed agreement ready for execution based on the standard Agreement attached herein as Attachment 2 in the Appendix. VI. IMPLEMENTATION A. KICK-OFF MEETING A kick-off meeting will be held after award of contracts. Consultants and their team will meet with City of Santa Ana staff to conduct introductions, discuss scope of services, and implementation processes. B. NOTICE TO PROCEED Prior to issuance of a formal Notice to Proceed (NTP), Consultants shall provide all required bonds, insurance documents, and contents of the Information Packet for review and approval by the City. City Council City of Santa Ana Rf 2'3618 4/19/2022 Page 10 In For "On -Call" contracts, individual City Project Managers will request project/task specific proposals from Consultants on an as -needed basis. Proposals will then be evaluated by City staff and written NTPs will be issued accordingly per each task order. VII. PUBLIC RECORDS All data, documents and other products used, developed, or produced during response preparation of this RFP will become property of the City. All responses to this RFP shall become property of the City. Proposer information identified as proprietary information be maintained confidential, to the extent allowed under the California Public Records Act. Proposals will become public record after award of contract. Proposer information identified as proprietary information shall be maintained confidential, to the extent allowed under the California Public Records Act. City Council City of Santa Ana Rf 213$18 4/19/2022 Page 11 EXHIBIT - B Appendix ATTACHMENT 1 SCOPE OF WORK CITY OF SANTA ANA REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR LIBRARY RENOVATION RFP NO.21-118 INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND The City of Santa Ana is soliciting proposals for Architectural/Engineering, Interior Design, and Construction Administration services ("the Services") for a renovation of the historic Main Library. By this Request for Proposals (RFP), the City of Santa Ana is requesting proposals from firms with substantial architectural, engineering and construction administration experience on similar types of public works improvements for the renovation of the Santa Ana Main Library. The Main Branch of the Santa Ana Public Library was completed in May 1, 1960. The exterior for the building has remained relatively the same since inception; however, the interior of the building received an extensive renovation in 1990. The City would like to restore some of the character lost in the previous renovation while also performing an update that better meets the evolving needs of the community and makes the library central to early childhood learning. The Main Library building consists of 39,790 square feet and has two floors and a below grade basement. The Santa Ana Main Library is an integral partner with the community, providing educational resources to connect and enrich a community of over 335,000 residents. This renovation should further these goals in the most cost effective and environmentally friendly manner possible. The Children's Library/Early Learning Center will be the focal point of the project with key upgrades and expansion to the area and services that will be provided to the community. Design will include "Play-brary" types of designs with interactive walls, etc. A generalized description of areas that may be addressed with City/community/potential consultant input are as follows. See Attachment 4 for as-builts and general layout of work areas. 1. Exterior a. Marble siding i. Clean all marble exterior surfaces ii. Repoint joints between marble panels iii. Replace/repair cracked marble panels 1. Explore replacing existing stone on 1990 addition with new Italian Marble to match original structure b. Provide architecturally appropriate exterior lighting fixtures on building and in landscaping c. Flashing cap needed on parapet cornice d. Upgrade to new LED Security and Pathway Lighting e. Replace all landscaping around building (turf to remain) i. Low planting — no hiding areas 1. Planting materials to deter camping and/or sleeping 2. Ground surface to be DG or similar City Council City of Santa Ana Fff21!118 4/19/2022 Page Al-1 EXHIBIT - B ii. Remove trees adjacent to building face that present potential structural or other issues to the building iii. Drought Tolerant with low voltage spot lighting f. North Entrance i. New doors to match original design (or propose new architecturally appropriate design) ii. Clean up entrance building lettering & stone iii. Replace walkway connecting north entrance to sidewalk on Civic Center Dr. iv. Restore dedication plaque on north entrance sidewalk. g. East Entrance i. Make secondary public entrance at current staff access to fenced patio ii. Create parking area along east or south side of building for library exclusively iii. Keep as many trees as feasible iv. Create a drive-thru window considering circulation on/off of Ross St. 1. If feasible, ensure it does not detract from historic nature of the building h. South Entrance i. Return to a bookmobile area with garage/carport and the back of house loading area ii. Patio area just east of south entrance 1. Remove panels/walls that block the patio adjacent to entrance that create a hiding space in this area 2. Activate this area iii. Remove book drop — replace with new book drops at north and east entrances iv. Blend proposed landscaping with new landscaping to south i. Children's Library — single story addition on the west side of the Main Library building i. Provide vines or other low maintenance plant material on east side of building to prevent graffiti ii. Patio renovation completed under separate contract j. Provide comprehensive exterior security cameras and necessary low voltage cabling k. Coordinate with IT to provide no low voltage cat 6 cabling/trays throughout the building along with new access points 1. The old freight elevator from the late 1950's should be removed as it is not functional and no longer needed m. Identify opportunities to allocate square footage for additional meeting/study room space if possible n. A new roof was recently completed 2. Interior a. General building i. Consider elevator relocation with modern elevator ii. Review/consider replacing all building systems iii. Include technology in all meeting rooms iv. Replace all flooring throughout v. Upgrade all restrooms. May need to adjust access or location of restrooms to accommodate new layout that is more in line with original plans. They were modified and relocated in 1990. vi. Shelving needs assessment/shelving program — Replace all book stacks vii. New lighting plan to ensure new improvements do not create shadows and dark areas viii. Replace all furniture in public and private spaces City Council City of Santa Ana W21,�818 4/19/2022 Page Al-2 EXHIBIT - B 1. Furniture should have a mid-century modern or similar style in line with the historical time period of when the building was constructed ix. Ceiling system was recently upgraded. Modifications may be required depending on results of shelving analysis. x. Repair Exterior windows in Main Library building and Children's Library addition xi. Provide a comprehensive signage plan for the Main Library in keeping with the historic nature of the building xii. ADA compliance/Accessible path of travel b. Main Floor i. Refinish wood/metal elements ii. South side back of house 1. Combine information and circulation desks a. To match the original design and historic nature of the building, move circulation to the north entrance b. Two large half circle desks flanking each side of the door in front of the windows c. Staff Area where south entrance is currently - Bookmobile and circulation work/ loading area iii. Reimagining of Children's Library 1. Focus on early childhood learning 2. Flexible/programmable space 3. Tutoring/interactive 4. Can be expanded into main library area as needed 5. Feature interactive experiences: a. Wall interactives, b. Climbing areas c. Other children's museum style spaces iv. East entrance 1. Widen hallway 2. Create teen space along the east side of building v. Reactivate the fireplace area 1. Non-functional fireplace (not wood or gas burning) Second Floor i. Refinish wood/metal elements ii. Create additional public spaces 1. Remove majority of admin space on second floor a. 4 admin staff will remain b. Relocate the Santa Ana History Room and create a small gallery 2. Small meeting room as space permits 3. Create Bookstore: a. Explore enclosing the hallway behind the second floor shelving and other rooms staff rooms along the south side of the building to create a new bookstore iii. Meeting rooms/tech lab — add glass toward main library iv. Dumbwaiter — ideas to reactivate or other use v. Relocate majority of staff to the basement d. Basement i. Staff spaces to replace teen center and storage areas ii. Possible drop ceiling iii. 26 full-time staff (cubicles) City Council City of Santa Ana Pff21,018 4/19/2022 Page Al-3 EXHIBIT - B iv. 72 part-time staff (share 10 — 15 spaces e. Building Mechanicals and Critical Maintenance/ i. Bring stairwells and emergency exits up to code if required. Explore opportunities for LEED certification and/or green building materials. ii. Include potentially life-saving improvements or replacement of original fire detection and sprinkler systems, plumbing, seismic retrofit, antiquated HVAC system, and all electrical and plumbing systems from the late 1950's. Scope of Work Architectural and engineering services shall consist of, but not be limited to the following: review of the Main Library building program, prepare schematic design, construction plans and specifications, submit design documents to the City of Santa Ana staff for review and submit final design documents to the City of Santa Ana Building & Safety Division for plan check. These services also include responding to all plan check corrections until final approval has been given by Building & Safety. Finally, construction administration services during bid and construction phases would also need to be provided. Consultant Responsibilities The Consultant's responsibilities shall include the following project tasks: Consultant is responsible for providing all design and engineering as required for all components within the project scope of work. This includes but is not limited to survey, civil design, geotechnical investigation and report (for soils analysis), infiltration testing, architectural design, landscape architectural design, parking and site improvements design, street improvement design (new driveway/access points), structural design, interior design including bookshelf layout plans, furniture selection, electrical engineering, mechanical and plumbing engineering, etc. Consultant will also be responsible for facilitating up to three (3) meetings with City Staff to obtain input and finalize concept plan. Additionally, up to three (3) meetings to coordinate for or present to the Historic Resources Commission (HRC). Consultant shall provide review sets in .pdf format. Final plans shall be provided in AutoCAD or Microstation format, and .pdf format. Task 1: Pre Design Preliminary design shall include Kick-off meeting with City Staff (representatives from Public Works Agency and Santa Ana Library) to discuss scope of work, project goals and objectives, potential elements and issues, schedule, review of existing information and site investigation. ➢ Deliverables shall include a Work Task Plan, Schedule, Geotechnical Report and Site Survey. Work Plan should include key milestones and highlight tasks associated with historical registry requirements. Task 2: Concept Design Concept design shall include up to three (3) meetings with City Staff to brainstorm and review potential layouts. Additionally, outreach shall be conducted in up to three (3) public meetings to provide the community an opportunity to review the concept designs and provide input. Please provide creative methods used to engage the community on needs and priorities while keeping the project on schedule. i.e. workshops, online polls. ➢ Deliverables shall include up to three (3) schematic concept designs, with a minimum of six (6) perspective drawings/renderings for each the following: exterior from Civic Center Dr., main level City Council City of Santa Ana W2Itb18 4/19/2022 Page Al-4 EXHIBIT - B book stacks, kid's area, teen space, Santa Ana History Room and east entrance from exterior for fundraising and use in presentations to potential library donors, would also be required. ➢ Final Concept shall be approved by City Staff Task 3: Design Development (50% plans) Design development will involve the schematic development of plans based on the approved conceptual design plan, which shall include but is not limited to survey, civil design, geotechnical investigation and report (for soils analysis), infiltration testing„ architectural design, landscape architectural design, structural design, interior design, furniture selection, electrical engineering, mechanical and plumbing engineering, draft technical specifications and "opinion of estimated cost'. ➢ Deliverables shall include a 50% set of plans, including site section studies, draft specification, "Opinion of Probable Cost". Task 4: Construction Documents (90% and 100% plans) Construction Documents (CDs) shall include finalizing approved deliverables from the Design Development phase. This includes the provision of detailed engineering and construction drawings that will serve as the basis for both bidding and construction by a general contractor. ➢ Deliverables shall include 90% and 100% plans, structural calculations, CASP report, final technical specifications, finalized "Opinion of Probable Cost". 100% plans will go through a constructability review that could lead to comments and recommendations that should also be addressed and completed as part of this deliverable. Plans: Plans shall include, but are not limited to the following: • Title Sheet • Civil Engineering o Site Erosion Plan o Parking lot along Ross Street with Access Control (parking meters, gate, bollards, etc.) o Horizontal and Vertical Control Plan o Grading And On -Site Drainage Plan o Site Utility Plan • Landscape Architectural o Site Layout/Construction Plans And Details (including plumbing) o Site Sections, as applicable o Planting Plans/Details/Notes o Irrigation Plans/Details/Calculations/Notes • Architectural o Demolition Plans (Basement, 1st, & 2nd Floors) o Construction Plans (Basement, 1st, & 2nd Floors) o Reflected Ceiling Plans (Basement, 1st, & 2nd Floors) o Furniture Plans (Basement, 1st, & 2nd Floors) o Exterior Elevations o Interior Elevations o Mechanical and Plumbing Plans/T-24 o Electrical Plans, as applicable o Architectural Details o Structural Calculations o Door/Window/Finish Schedules, as applicable City Council City of Santa Ana Pff2I4118 4/19/2022 Page Al-5 EXHIBIT - B o ADA Path of Travel design and/or signage Plan Structural Engineering o Structural Design and Detailing Mechanical Engineering & Plumbing Electrical Engineering o Electrical Site Plan to include walkway/parking lot lighting, irrigation. o Photometrics. o Location of panels, switchgear, meters o Schedules o Details o Notes, specifications Plan Check & Permits: Construction drawings shall be in accordance with the 2019 California Building Code and will require review/approval by the City Planning and Building Agency. Additionally, this would be subject to review by the Historic Resources Commission. Historic Resources Commission (HRC) Pursuant to our Historic Ordinance, major exterior modifications to a historic structure requires the approval of the HRC through a duly noticed public hearing and issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness. Therefore, the property owner would need to apply for a Historic Exterior Modification Application (HEMA). The cost for this application is $2,348.83. Prior to presenting the application to the HRC city staff will ensure that any proposed exterior modifications are consistent with the Secretary of Interior's Standards for rehabilitation and consistent with our Historic Ordinance. Staff recommends the proposal identify a historic consultant to provide a compliance statement ensuring consistency with the standards. This compliance statement would help streamline the review process and help with staff recommendation for approval. The timeframe for the HEMA will also vary as we only have four regularly scheduled HRC meetings throughout the year (January, April, July, and October). It will be important to coordinate this effort proactively with the Planning department staff to determine the submittal deadline for the next available HRC meeting. As a condition of plan check approval, plans, specifications and structural calculations must be signed by a California licensed architect / landscape architect /civil engineer/structural engineer as appropriate. Additionally, the architect will be encouraged to identify their historic consultant to address questions and concerns related to the historical preservation of the building. Plans shall be organized so that they can be segregated cleanly for distribution to the various plan checking entities. Construction drawings shall be submitted at 90% completion for review by Public Works CIP Engineering and Santa Ana Zoo staff and revised per their comments. The 100% complete construction drawing package will then be submitted for final City review to the following City Agencies: • Library Services Agency • Planning and Building Agency • Historic Resources Commission • Public Works Agency CIP Engineering Division City Council City of Santa Ana Pff2I4218 4/19/2022 Page Al-6 EXHIBIT - B The Public Works Agency Project Manager will coordinate the submittal and review process. Once complete, the consultant will revise the Contract Documents Technical Specifications Technical specifications for all components listed above shall be provided by Consultant, or their Sub - consultants, to the City in CSI (Construction Specifications Institute) format. Consultant shall coordinate language between the general and technical specifications to ensure conflicts are minimized. City Staff will combine these specifications with the City Boiler Plate which together, will become the Project Manual. Final Opinion of Probable Cost Consultant shall provide updated opinion of probable construction cost which shall reflect finalized plans, materials, systems, details of construction, and known or anticipated changes in the bidding market relative to the project. Should project scope exceed available budget, project plans/specifications will be phased as appropriate. Task 5: Bid Advertisement, Construction Administration, Record Drawings: Bid Advertisement Consultant shall provide support to the City during the Bidding phase by assisting with questions, requests for information/clarification, or conflicts arising out of the bidding process. Consultant shall also attend pre -bid meeting, if scheduled. Construction Administration Consultant shall provide support to the City during the Construction Administration phase by assisting with questions, requests for information/clarification, and/or reviewing submittals. Record Drawings /As -built Plans: Upon construction completion, consultant shall incorporate as -built information, as provided by the General Contractor, into the drawing files to provide record drawings for City archives. Fee Proposal: In addition to Section IV.B.3 (Submittal Requirements: Fee Proposal) fee schedule shall be structured to correspond to the above mentioned tasks as follows: Task 1: Pre -Design Task 2: Concept Design Task 3: Design Development Task 4: Construction Documents Task 5: Bid Advertisement, Construction Administration, Record Drawings Total Fee: Fee schedule for each task should include an hourly breakdown that corresponds to the task total. City Responsibilities The City will be responsible for the following items: • Provision of available plans and existing documentation on file. • Provision of electronic design file with City title block and title sheet (24" x 36") • Provision of standard City boilerplate specifications. • Acting as liaison with the appropriate decision making bodies, as necessary. City Council City of Santa Ana Fff2Jt3l8 4/19/2022 Page Al-7 EXHIBIT - B • Coordination and processing of plans and documents with governmental agencies having jurisdiction over the project. City Council City of Santa Ana Pff2-4418 4/19/2022 Page Al-8 EXHIBIT - B Appendix ATTACHMENT 2 STANDARD AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of , 2021 by and between ("Consultant"), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California ("City"). RECITALS A. The City desires to retain a consultant having special skill and knowledge in the field of - Library renovation for the Santa Ana Library. B. Consultant represents that Consultant is able and willing to provide such services to the City. C. In undertaking the performance of this Agreement, Consultant represents that it is knowledgeable in its field and that any services performed by Consultant under this Agreement will be performed in compliance with such standards as may reasonably be expected from a professional consulting firm in the field. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual and respective promises, and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES Consultant shall perform during the term of this Agreement, the tasks and obligations including all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidental customary work required to fully and adequately complete the services described and set forth in Scope of Services - Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 2. COMPENSATION a. City agrees to pay, and Consultant agrees to accept as total payment for its services for City, the rates and charges identified in Compensation - Exhibit B. The total amount to be expended under this Agreement shall not exceed $ during the term of this Agreement, including any extension periods exercised under Section 3. b. Payment by City shall be made within 45 days (forty-five) days following receipt of CU Council 23 — 45 4/1 N20222f 10 Non -Fed unding (6.1.2020) EXHIBIT - B proper invoice evidencing work performed, subject to City accounting procedures. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standards of performance set forth in the Recitals which may reasonably be expected by City. 3. TERM This Agreement shall commence on the date first written above for a with the option for the City to grant up to a renewals, exercisable by a writing by the City Manager and the City Attorney, unless terminated earlier in accordance with Section 16, below. 4. PREVAILING WAGES Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the services being performed are part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. 5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR Consultant shall, during the entire term of this Agreement, be construed to be an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. This Agreement is not intended nor shall it be construed to create an employer -employee relationship, a joint venture relationship, or to allow the City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Consultant performs the services which are the subject matter of this Agreement; however, the services to be provided by Consultant shall be provided in a manner consistent with all applicable standards and regulations governing such services. Consultant shall pay all salaries and wages, employer's social security taxes, unemployment insurance and similar taxes relating to employees and shall be responsible for all applicable withholding taxes. 6. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Consultant shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all CU Council 23 — 46 4/19#2022af 10 Non -Fed unding (6.1.2020) EXHIBIT - B Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk. 7. INSURANCE Prior to undertaking performance of work under this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain and shall require its subcontractors, if any, to obtain and maintain insurance as described below: a. Commercial General Liability Insurance. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance naming the City, its officers, employees, agents, volunteers and representatives as additional insured(s) and shall include, but not be limited to protection against claims arising from bodily and personal injury, including death resulting therefrom and damage to property, resulting from any act or occurrence arising out of Consultant's operations in the performance of this Agreement, including, without limitation, acts involving vehicles. The amounts of insurance shall be not less than the following: single limit coverage applying to bodily and personal injury, including death resulting therefrom, and property damage, in the total amount of $1,000,000 per occurrence, with $2,000,000 in the aggregate. Such insurance shall (a) name the City, its officers, employees, agents, and representatives as additional insured(s); (b) be primary and not contributory with respect to insurance or self-insurance programs maintained by the City; and (c) contain standard separation of insureds provisions. b. Business automobile liability insurance, or equivalent form, with a combined single limit of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. Such insurance shall include coverage for owned, hired and non -owned automobiles. C. Worker's Compensation Insurance. In accordance with the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code, Consultant, if Consultant has any employees, is required to be insured against liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self- insurance. Prior to commencing the performance of the work under this Agreement, Consultant agrees to obtain and maintain any employer's liability insurance with limits not less than $1,000,000 per accident. d. If Consultant is or employs a licensed professional such as an architect or engineer: Professional liability (errors and omissions) insurance, with a combined single limit of not less than $1,000,000 per claim with $2,000,000 in the aggregate. e. The following requirements apply to the insurance to be provided by Consultant pursuant to this section: i. Consultant shall maintain all insurance required above in full force and effect for the entire period covered by this Agreement. ii. Certificates of insurance shall be furnished to the City upon execution of this Agreement and shall be approved by the City. iii. Certificates and policies shall state that the policies shall not be canceled or reduced in coverage or changed in any other material aspect without thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City. CiCouncil 23 — 47 4/1 9#2022af 10 Non -Fed unding (6.1.2020) EXHIBIT - B iv. Where the amounts or coverage provided by the certificates of insurance provides coverage greater than those listed by this Agreement, the amounts provided by the certificates of insurance shall be incorporated by reference into the Agreement. V. Consultant shall supply City with a fully executed additional insured endorsement. f. If Consultant fails or refuses to produce or maintain the insurance required by this section or fails or refuses to furnish the City with required proof that insurance has been procured and is in force and paid for, the City shall have the right, at the City's election, to forthwith terminate this Agreement. Such termination shall not affect Consultant's right to be paid for its time and materials expended prior to notification of termination. Consultant waives the right to receive compensation and agrees to indemnify the City for any work performed prior to approval of insurance by the City. 8. INDEMNIFICATION Consultant agrees to defend, and shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees, contractors, special counsel, and representatives from liability: (1) for personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief arising out of claims for personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage, which may arise from the negligent operations of the Consultant, its subcontractors, agents, employees, or other persons acting on its behalf which relates to the services described in section 1 of this Agreement; and (2) from any claim that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief is due by reason of the terms of or effects arising from this Agreement. This indemnity and hold harmless agreement applies to all claims for damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of the events referred to in this Section or by reason of the terms of, or effects, arising from this Agreement. The Consultant further agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and pay all costs for the defense of the City, including fees and costs for special counsel to be selected by the City, regarding any action by a third party challenging the validity of this Agreement, or asserting that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief due to personal or property rights arises by reason of the terms of, or effects arising from this Agreement. City may make all reasonable decisions with respect to its representation in any legal proceeding. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Consultant's services are subject to Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant. 9. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEMNIFICATION Consultant shall defend and indemnify the City, its officers, agents, representatives, and employees against any and all liability, including costs, for infringement of any United States' letters patent, trademark, or copyright infringement, including costs, contained in the work product or documents provided by Consultant to the City pursuant to this Agreement. 10. RECORDS CU Council 23 — 48 4/19P202Zf 10 Non -Fed unding (6.1.2020) EXHIBIT - B Consultant shall keep records and invoices in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to the costs incurred under this Agreement and any services, expenditures, and disbursements charged to the City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement. All such records and invoices shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of the City to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement during regular business hours. Consultant shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to this Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement. 11. CONFIDENTIALITY If Consultant receives from the City information which due to the nature of such information is reasonably understood to be confidential and/or proprietary, Consultant agrees that it shall not use or disclose such information except in the performance of this Agreement, and further agrees to exercise the same degree of care it uses to protect its own information of like importance, but in no event less than reasonable care. "Confidential Information" shall include all nonpublic information. Confidential information includes not only written information, but also information transferred orally, visually, electronically, or by other means. Confidential information disclosed to either party by any subsidiary and/or agent of the other party is covered by this Agreement. The foregoing obligations of non-use and nondisclosure shall not apply to any information that (a) has been disclosed in publicly available sources; (b) is, through no fault of the Consultant disclosed in a publicly available source; (c) is in rightful possession of the Consultant without an obligation of confidentiality; (d) is required to be disclosed by operation of law; or (e) is independently developed by the Consultant without reference to information disclosed by the City. 12. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CLAUSE Consultant covenants that it presently has no interests and shall not have interests, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with performance of services specified under this Agreement. 13. NON-DISCRIMINATION Consultant shall not discriminate because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, gender, medical conditions, genetic information, or military and veteran status, age, national origin, ancestry, or disability, as defined and prohibited by applicable law, in the recruitment, selection, teaching, training, utilization, promotion, termination or other employment related activities or any services provided under this Agreement. Consultant affirms that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. 14. EXCLUSIVITY AND AMENDMENT CU Council 23 — 49 4/19#2022'f 10 Non -Fed unding (6.1.2020) EXHIBIT - B This Agreement represents the complete and exclusive statement between the City and Consultant, and supersedes any and all other agreements, oral or written, between the parties. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and any attachments hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. This Agreement may not be modified except by written instrument signed by the City and by an authorized representative of Consultant. The parties agree that any terms or conditions of any purchase order or other instrument that are inconsistent with, or in addition to, the terms and conditions hereof, shall not bind or obligate Consultant or the City. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which is not embodied herein. 15. ASSIGNMENT Inasmuch as this Agreement is intended to secure the specialized services of Consultant, Consultant may not assign, transfer, delegate, or subcontract any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City and any such assignment, transfer, delegation or subcontract without the City's prior written consent shall be considered null and void. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit the City's ability to have any of the services which are the subject to this Agreement performed by City personnel or by other consultants retained by City. 16. TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated by the City upon thirty (30) days written notice of termination. In such event, Consultant shall be entitled to receive and the City shall pay Consultant compensation for all services performed by Consultant prior to receipt of such notice of termination, subject to the following conditions: a. As a condition of such payment, the Executive Director may require Consultant to deliver to the City all work product(s) completed as of such date, and in such case such work product shall be the property of the City unless prohibited by law, and Consultant consents to the City's use thereof for such purposes as the City deems appropriate. b. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standard of performance specified in the Recitals of this Agreement. 17. WAIVER No waiver of breach, failure of any condition, or any right or remedy contained in or granted by the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the party waiving the breach, failure, right or remedy. No waiver of any breach, failure or right, or remedy shall be deemed a waiver of any other breach, failure, right or remedy, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver unless the writing so specifies. 18. JURISDICTION - VENUE CU Council 23 — 50 4/19#20�2'f 10 Non -Fed unding (6.1.2020) EXHIBIT - B This Agreement has been executed and delivered in the State of California and the validity, interpretation, performance, and enforcement of any of the clauses of this Agreement shall be determined and governed by the laws of the State of California. Both parties further agree that Orange County, California, shall be the venue for any action or proceeding that may be brought or arise out of, in connection with or by reason of this Agreement. 19. PROFESSIONAL LICENSES Consultant shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, maintain all necessary licenses, permits, approvals, waivers, and exemptions necessary for the provision of the services hereunder and required by the laws and regulations of the United States, the State of California, the City of Santa Ana and all other governmental agencies. Consultant shall notify the City immediately and in writing of its inability to obtain or maintain such permits, licenses, approvals, waivers, and exemptions. Said inability shall be cause for termination of this Agreement. 20. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS a. Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature herein below has the power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall indemnify City fully, including reasonable costs and attorney's fees, for any injuries or damages to City in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn. b. All Exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto shall be incorporated as if fully set forth in the body of this Agreement. 21. NOTICE Any notice, tender, demand, delivery, or other communication pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly given if delivered in person or mailed by first class or certified mail, postage prepaid, or sent by fax or other telegraphic communication in the manner provided in this Section, to the following persons: To City: Clerk of the City Council City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702-1988 With courtesy copies to: Nabil Saba Executive Director, Public Works Agency City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-21) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, California 92702 CU Council 23 — 51 4/19#20 zf 10 Non -Fed unding (6.1.2020) EXHIBIT - B To Consultant: First & Last Name Title Consultant Firm Name Address City, State, Zip Fax: A party may change its address by giving notice in writing to the other party. Thereafter, any communication shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address. If sent by mail, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given three (3) days after it has been deposited in the United States mail, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as set forth above. If sent by fax, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given twenty-four (24) hours after the time set forth on the transmission report issued by the transmitting facsimile machine, addressed as set forth above. For purposes of calculating these time frames, weekends, federal, state, County or City holidays shall be excluded. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written. ATTEST: Daisy Gomez Clerk of the Council APPROVED AS TO FORM: SONIA R. CARVALHO City Attorney By: John Funk Sr. Assistant City Attorney RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: Nabil Saba Executive Director Public Works Agency CITY OF SANTA ANA Kristine Ridge City Manager CONSULTANT: (name) (title) CU Council 23 — 52 4/19#20`22'f 10 Non -Fed unding (6.1.2020) EXHIBIT - B EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES City Council 23 — 53 4/19/2622� 9 of 10 Non -Fed Funding (6.1.2020) EXHIBIT - B EXHIBIT B COMPENSATION Fee Proposal including hourly rates if applicable City Council 23 — 54 4/19/�22 to of to Non -Fed Funding (6.1.2020) EXHIBIT - B NON -COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT (Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and Public Contract Code Section 7106) To the CITY OF SANTA ANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS In accordance with Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and Public Contract Code 7106 the BIDDER declares that the bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the bid is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the BIDDER has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other BIDDER to put in a false or sham bid, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived or agreed with any BIDDER or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the BIDDER has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the BIDDER or any BIDDER, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other BIDDER, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the contract of anyone interested in the proposed contract; that all statements contained in the bid are true; and, further, that the BIDDER has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid. Note: The above Non -collusion Affidavit is part of the Proposal. Signing this Proposal on the signature portion thereof shall also constitute signature of this Non -collusion Affidavit. BIDDERS are cautioned that making a false certification may subject the certifier to criminal prosecution. Signed State of California County of Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this day of , 20, by proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) who appeared before me. Notary Public Signature Notary Public Seal City Council 23 — 55 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT - B The prospective participant certifies, by signing and submitting this bid or proposal, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that: No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal contract, the making of any federal grant, the making of any federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. 2. If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence any officer or employee of any federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this federal contract, grant loan, loan or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit a "Disclosure of Lobbying Activities". This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U. S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. The prospective participant also agrees by submitting his or her bid or proposal that he or she shall require that the language of this certification be included in all lower tier subcontracts, which exceed $100,000 and that all such sub recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. Firm Signed and Printed Name: Title Date City Council 23 — 56 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT - B The undersigned consultant or corporate officer, during the performance of this contract, certifies as follows: 1. The Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The Consultant shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without, regard to their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The Consultant agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. 2. The Consultant shall, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Consultant, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. 3. The Consultant shall send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he/she has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or workers' representatives of the Consultant's commitments under this section, and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment. 4. The Consultant shall comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor. 5. The Consultant shall furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his/her books, records, and accounts by the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation, to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders. 6. hi the event of the Consultant's non-compliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, the contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the Consultant may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts or federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Execution Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulations, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law. 7. The Consultant shall include the portion of the sentence immediately preceding paragraph (1) and the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (7) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted City Council 23 — 57 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT - B by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to Section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontract or purchase order as the administering agency may direct as means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance; provided, however, that in the event the Consultant becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a sub -consultant or vendor as a result of such direction by the administering agency, the Consultant may request that the United States enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States. 8. Pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1735, as added by Chapter 643 Stats. 1939, and as amended, No discrimination shall be made in the employment of persons upon public works because of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicaps, mental condition, marital status, or sex of such persons, except as provided in Section 1420, and any consultant of public works violating this Section is subject to all the penalties imposed for a violation of the Chapter. Signed: Title: Firm: Date: City Council 23 — 58 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT - B Appendix ATTACHMENT 4 AS -BUILT PLANS Please see attached below. City Council 23 — 59 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT - B MAYOR Vicente Sanniento MAYOR PRO TEM David Penaloza COUNCILMEMBERS Phil Bacerra Johnathan Ryan Hernandez Jessie Lopez Nelida Mendoza Thai Viet Phan CITY OF SANTA ANA PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-36 • P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, California 92702 www.santa-ana.or4 October 22, 2021 ADDENDUM No. ONE SUBJECT: RFP NO.21-118: SANTA ANA LIBRARY RENOVATION The following changes/clarifications have been made to the submittal requirements of the subject RFP: NOTICE INVITING PROPOSALS Page ii; 2" Paragraph. Modify Items• 1. PROPOSAL DUE DATE: EXTENTION OF TIME CITY MANAGER Kristine Ridge CITY ATTORNEY Sonia R. Carvalho CLERK OF THE COUNCIL Daisy Gomez Responses to this Request for Proposals (RFP) must be submitted electronically to the PlanetBids system no later than November 16, 2021 at 2:00 PM. The Online Q&A timeframe in PlanetBids system was extended accordingly. APPENDIX; ATTACHMENTS Al 4 2. SCOPE OF WORK UPDATED — LEED Certification There is desire for at least LEED Certified level of certification, but it will be dictated by scope and budget. The RFP document has been updated and re -uploaded to Planetbids to reflect these updates. This addendum includes one page. ALL OTHER ITEMS REMAIN FOR THE CITY OF SANTA ANA Edwin "William" Gal City Engineer SANTA ANA CITY COUNCIL Vicente Sar niento David era oza ai ie an a sie opez Nolida Mendoza Mayor C It�y1 o and 2 yy S Ward 3 'Z 60 ward 4 j(# 2Q,22 Ward 6 ysanniento{r3santa-ana oro z- ozam-ana-org 4ohan(adsanta-ana.ora iessielooez(d!santa-ana.o phacerraOsanta-ana.org iryanhemande _ s Z nmendozaCv�santa-ana.om EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL Santa Ana Library Renovation Proposal 116 November 2021 G R o U P 4 City Council 23-61 4NA 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL G R O U P 4 A R C H I T E C T U R E R E S E A R C H r P L A N N I N G. I N C 211 LINDEN AVENUE SO. SAN FRANCISCO C A 9 4 0 8 0 U S A T- 6513.871 .0709 P2021-980 City Council 23 — 62 4/19/2022 V) z LL CY LL 0 • z LU LU EXHIBIT C'PROPOSAL EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL G R o u P 4 15 November 2021 A R C H I T E C T U R E Jason Gabriel, Principal Civil Engineer R E S E A R C H+ CITY OF SANTA ANA PLANNING, INC 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-36 Santa Ana CA 92701 2 1 1 LINDEN AVENUE Re: SANTA ANA LIBRARY RENOVATION SO. SAN FRANCISCO Dear Mr. Gabriel and Members of Evaluation Committee: CA 94080 USA T : 6 s 0.8 7 1 •0 7 0 9 Group 4 Architecture, Research + Planning, Inc. is pleased to submit this proposal for F:650.871.7911 architectural, engineering, and interior design services for the renovation of Santa Ana's historic Main Library. This project represents a significant opportunity to upgrade this w w w . g 4 a r c h . c o m cherished building for 2I't century library service while restoring its original character and strengthening its links to Santa Ana's community history. The Group 4 team brings decades of design experience with forward -looking, beautiful, and sustainable community projects — including modern libraries in historic mid-century structures. Recent examples include our award -winning restoration and sensitive expansion of Palo Alto's historic Main Library; our revitalization of the Georgina Cole Library in JONATHAN HARTMAN Carlsbad; and our expansion of Dayton's original Main Library into a 21't century A R C H I T E C T destination for culture, creativity, and community. In each case, our designs preserve and DAWN E. MERKES celebrate the character of the original buildings while providing vibrant, flexible, and A R C H I T E C T technology -rich spaces for 2I't century library programming. DAVID SCHN E E Our proposed Group 4 key personnel collaborated on each of these and other relevant A R C H I T E C T projects such as the multiple award -winning Yorba Linda Library and Cultural Arts Center. A N D R E A G I F F O R D Principal -in -charge David Schnee has led the design of dozens of library design projects A R C H I T E C T nationwide, and will ensure that City, Library, and community goals are realized. Andrea Gifford will bring her deep understanding of libraries and great sense of style to the conceptual design and interior transformations. Orange County native Jonathan Hartman C A R O L Y N C A R L B E R G will oversee the technical integration of modernized infrastructure and proven sustainable A R C H I T E C T design strategies with sensitive restoration of the building's character -defining features. G A R Y C H I N G A R C H I T E C T We are also pleased to propose a talented and experienced team of engineers and specialty consultants for the Santa Ana Library renovation project. Consulting preservation H A R D I N G D O W E L L architects Page & Turnbull bring unparalleled experience with historic structures, A R C H I T E C T including the Old Orange County Courthouse in Santa Ana and the transformation of J I L L E Y R E S Riverside's original mid-century Main Library into a new museum. A R C H I T E C T Luci Creative utilizes an amazing experiential design approach that will bring to SAPL DANIEL LAROSSA A R C H I T E C T next generation children's library spaces. Their custom installations for Group 4's Spokane Central Library and branches celebrate local cultures and landmarks with constructive, W I L L I A M L I M imaginative, and large motor play. A R C H I T E C T T E R E S A R O M A R C H I T E C T City Council 23 — 65 4/19/2022 m:\proposals\2021 \980 Santa ana 1ibrary\proposa1\1-0 121-sal.docx EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL (74 Jason Gabriel, Principal Civil Engineer Page 2 KPFF (structural and civil), TBD Consultants (cost), and Smith, Fause & McDonald (acoustics, AV, and security) all were core members of the Yorba Linda Library design team. Our team brings great value to the Santa Ana Main Library renovation project. LIBRARY INNOVATON: The Group 4 team brings unparalleled design experience with dozens of library projects throughout California and across the nation, including historically significant libraries both large and small. Our award -winning portfolios encompass renovations, expansions, and interior makeovers as well as new construction. PRESERVATION EXCELLENCE: We see the mid-century architectural legacy as a unique and treasured resource that reinforces a unique sense of place and pride. We can make this an asset that enhances the library customer experience for longtime Santa Ana residents and newcomers alike. PARTNERSHIP FOR SUCCESS: Group 4 is renowned for its ability to collaborate with City staff, commissions, and city councils to achieve and deliver projects of the greatest value. We have helped our clients obtain more than $2 billion in new library funding through support of capital campaigns, ballot measures and grants. We will work with Santa Ana to apply for significant grants from the California Building Forward library grant program to further enhance the project. We recognize this is a very important project for the City of Santa Ana, the Santa Ana Public Library, and the Santa Ana community — and the Group 4 team is prepared to make an extraordinary commitment to its success. We look forward to the opportunity to review our qualifications, proposal, and interest in this project with you. Sincerely, GROUP 4 ARCHITECTURE, RESEAR H PLANNING, INC. ti David Schnee, Principal Jon an Hartman, Principal A re Gifford rincipal 415-845-0916 650-766-6248 650-871-0709 dschnee@g4arch.com jhartman@g4arch.com agifford@g4arch.com All signers above are authorized to bind Group 4. David Schnee is the sole point of contact with the greatest knowledge concerning the required service operations and contractual matters, including payment of all charges resulting from the Agreement. We have reviewed the City's sample Agreement and would appreciate the opportunity to discuss some minor modifications with the City. We acknowledge receipt ofAddendum I dated October 22, 2021. City Council 23 — 66 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL GROUP 4 ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH + PLANNING Group 4 is a full -service architecture firm dedicated to creating vibrant public places that cultivate dynamic communities. Since 1974, our inspired and talented staff has provided quality services to public clients and the cities, counties, and districts they serve. Our distinctly inclusive design process engages staff, stakeholder, and citizens in shaping the future of their communities. Exceeding our clients' expectations for facilities that reflect and celebrate their vision of community is a key reason behind our project success. We are proud of the long-term relationships we build with our clients through excellence in design and planning. Our staff includes licensed architects, planners, interior designers, and technical and construction support specialists. Based in South San Francisco CA, Group 4 has satellite offices in Lexington KY, Philadelphia PA, and Seattle WA. We are active in professional organizations such as the Urban Libraries Council, the California Library Association, ALA, PLA, NEXT Library, the American Institute of Architects, and the Environmental Design Research Association. Group 4 Architecture, Research + Planning, Inc. Group 4's headquarters is in the old Royal Theatre David Schnee, Principal building, built a century ago in thriving downtown 211 Linden Avenue, South San Francisco, CA 94080 South San Francisco. Our office is less than 70 I Airport (415) 845- t�0pe@g4arch.com 23 - 67 and it is a short flight to S44942022 W V Z W Ix W d X CW C a W H 0 Z a U. Z O a V LL J a D a LL O Z W W H a r m a w U w U Q D O M EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL W V Z W Ix W d X CW C a W H 0 Z a U. Z O a V U_ J a D a U_ O Z CW C W H a tA r m a w 01-1 U w U V Q O oe 0 LEADERSHIP IN PUBLIC LIBRARY DESIGN Group 4 is a leader in the planning and design of public libraries, with experience on hundreds of libraries nationwide. Libraries are community destinations for learning, collaboration, and civic engagement, with ample space for people and programs as well as resources and technology. We have designed small branches, large main libraries, and all sizes in between. In addition to new construction, our library design portfolio includes historic building expansions and adaptive reuse projects —all of which became modern, flexible, and sustainable libraries that will serve their communities well into the future. As buildings that will serve their communities for decades, modern libraries are designed to be highly flexible and adaptable for changing needs and services over time. Group 4 employs strategies such as raised flooring for conditioned air distribution and reconfigurable power, furniture with casters, and collaboratively developed space adjacency studies to ensure that facilities remain flexible enough to serve their communities for decades to come. These kinds of strategies also helped our clients stay agile and resilient during COVID; for example, furniture could be easily moved and rearranged for safe social distancing. City Council v 23 — 68 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL We work with our clients to design highly functional and operationally efficient libraries that streamline workflow, integrate public- and staff -side technology, and empower customers to manage their own library experience through self-service and clear wayfinding. We also promote the ability to operate libraries in multiple modes that extend hours of service and better serve community needs. Many of Group 4's library designs have received honors from professional organizations and the design community, as well as enthusiastic praise from library staff and community members. W V Z W Ix W d X CW C a W H 0 Z a U. Z O a V U- J a D a U- O Z W W H a r m a w U w H U Q 0 City Council 23-69 4/19/2022 Ln EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL W V Z W Ix W d X CW C a W 1-- In Z a U. Z O a V J Q O' U_ O H Z W W a r m a w U w H U Q o_ O oe 0 WORK WITH HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT BUILDINGS The new north wing Renovation and expansion of important historic buildings is a significant part of of the Milpitas Library Group 4's practice. We have worked creatively and sensitively on dozens of historically (above) created a new entry plaza and significant structures. We bring a creative approach to renovating cherished community barrier -free access buildings based on extensive successful experience. Examples include: into the library. This enabled the formal For Palo Alto's original Main Library, we paired the historic Edward Durell Stone steps of the historic structure with a contemporary new wing. Design details in the award -winning new grammar school building, such as a dynamic sunshade at the community room, were inspired by building to remain in their original the distinctive elements of the original building. state rather than be modified with ramps. Our remodeling and expansion of the 1930 Burlingame Library is recognized as the centerpiece of the community and was featured on the cover of American Libraries as "the jewel of Burlingame." • Our new Milpitas Public Library incorporates a 1916 school building for use as learning and community spaces, creating a focal point of learning and culture for the North Main Street neighborhood. The new north wing created a new plaza and seamlessly accessible entry into the library, and also enabled the formal steps of the grammar school building to remain rather than be modified with ramps. • We designed the transformation of a historic mid-century manufacturing warehouse into the LEED-NC Platinum Environmental Innovation Center — a showcase for the City of San Jose's Green Vision. The project features retail and R&D tenant spaces, co -working offices and conference space for City and partner use, and Santa Clara County's newest household hazardous waste collection facility. No City Council 23-70 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL COMMITMENT TO SUSTAINABLE DESIGN Sustainable design for Group 4 is a holistic concept: we believe that successful green architecture not only minimizes harmful ecological impacts, but also serves the client for decades to come by uniting functional, aesthetic, and operational project requirements. Our Group 4 team members are leaders in environmentally responsible and sustainable design. Our design portfolio includes zero -net -energy (ZNE) projects as well as LEED-certified projects at all levels. We work with our clients to choose the optimal level of sustainable design and LEED certification. We use goal -setting exercises and apply life cycle cost methodologies to determine the best strategies that fit within a balance of first time capital budget and long-term operating budget. Our award -winning expansion of the historic Main Library in Palo Alto achieved LEED-NC Silver certification as well as local and state recognition for excellence in historic design and preservation. Our LEED-NC Platinum Mitchell Park Library and Community Center was named a New Landmark Library by the Library Journal in recognition of its comprehensive sustainable design, including its innovative partnership model for programs and operations. Rinconada Library, Palo Alto LEED-NC Silver; AIA San Mateo Honor Award; California Preservation Fdn. Preservation Award; PAST Institutional Restoration & Remodel Award; APWA Silicon Valley Project of the Year; ASHRAE Golden Gate Chapter First Place Award; W V Z W Ix W d X CW C a W H 0 Z a U. Z O a V U_ J a CJ U_ O Z W W H a r m a w CY U w U Q o_ O Cie City Council 23-71 4/19/2022 N EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL W V Z W 72 W d x W a W H 0 Z a U. Z O a V U_ J a CJ U_ O Z CW C W a tA r m a w U w U Q O oe O SUBCONSULTANTS PAGE & TURNBULL Historic LUCI CREATIVE Children's Thematics TERRAIN INTEGRATION Landscape Design TBD CONSULTANTS Cost Consulting KPFF CONSULTING ENGINEERS Structural Civil MEP CALIFORNIA MEP/Fire NINYO & MOORE Geotech SMITH, FAUSE & McDONALD Acoustics, AV, Security INTRODUCTION TO THE TEAM Our proposed key personnel for the renovation of the Santa Ana Main Library include Group 4 leadership and senior staff who bring extensive experience in library design, working with historically significant structures, and delivering well -managed projects for public clients. David Schnee AIA LEED AP will oversee the design team as principal -in charge. David is an award -winning public library architect whose vision, creativity, and commitment to modern, beautiful, and sustainable public buildings will guide the revitalization of Altadena's libraries. David will commit approximately 35% of his time to this project. Andrea Gifford RA LEED will be the principal project manager and library design lead, including programming, interiors, and FFE. Andrea has developed designs for many award -winning, historically significant libraries and other cherished community buildings. Andrea will commit approximately 30% of her time to this project. Jonathan Hartman RA LEED will lead the technical design and improvements to the site and building. Jonathan brings deep experience incorporating modern systems and sustainable design strategies into historic structures. Jonathan will commit approximately 25% of his time to this project. Resumes for proposed Group 4 key architectural personnel appear on the following pages, along with resumes and information about our proposed consultant team members, who are listed in the organization chart at left. 00 City Council 23-72 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL DAVID SCHNEE AIA LEED PRINCIPAL -IN -CHARGE / DESIGN DIRECTOR David Schnee has led the design of innovative, forward - thinking, and beautiful libraries across the country, from small branches to large, complex main libraries. He led the design of the expansion of the Dayton Main Library, which transformed a mid-century modern building into a community - wide destination for 21st century library service. He also was the principal -in -charge for the award -winning new Yorba Linda Library and Cultural Arts Center. EDUCATION AND REGISTRATION Master of Architecture, University of California, Berkeley Master of City Planning, University of California, Berkeley Bachelor of Architecture, Cornell University Registered Architect, State of California, C27893 LEED Accredited Professional BD+c REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS Yorba Linda Library and Cultural Arts Center • Principal -in -Charge and Design Director for new library and community recreation center campus. Dayton Main Library Expansion • Library Design Lead for multiple projects in its citywide capital program, including the award -winning Main Library expansion (with LWC Inc.). Spokane Public Library • Principal -in -Charge and Library Design Lead for design of four libraries, including revitalization of the downtown Central Library and expansion of the Shadle Branch (with Integrus Architecture). Milpitas Library • Design Principal for award -winning expansion of historic 1916 grammar school building into 60,000 SF public library branch. Oakland 81st Avenue Branch Library • Principal -in -Charge and Design Director for LEED- NC Gold joint -use 21,000 SF library with co -located elementary schools. Olathe Public Library Indian Creek Branch • Library Design Lead for adaptive reuse of retail building into award -winning 45,000 SF branch library (with Gould Evans). San Lorenzo Library • Principal -in -Charge and Design Director for expansion and modernization of a 40-year-old library to a 19,500 SF library. Walnut Creek Library • Desi N LCCLJ-1 NA_ UUIU '+Z,000 OF 23 — 73 multi -use and flexible spaces. David Schnee — 23 years with Group 4 Dayton Main Library AIA Dayton Honor Award F_ Shadle Library Expansion with Luci Creative 4/19/2022 W U Z W W a x W a W Z W W a Ln r m a w af U Lu F___ _ U Q O W V Z W 79 W d X W a W 0 Z a U. Z O a V U_ J a O' U_ O Z W W H a tA r m a w o' U w U Q o_ O o' O Jonathan Hartman — 18 years with Group 4 Rinconada Library Expansion, Palo Alto California Preservation Foundation Award PAST Institutional Restoration Award AIA San Mateo County Honor Award APWA Silicon valley Project of the Year ASHRAE Golden Gate First Place Award Yorba Linda Library + Cultural Arts Center ENR Best Project Award ASCE Orange County Outstanding Project APWA Southern California BEST Award EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL JONATHAN HARTMAN RA LEED PRINCIPAL ARCHITECT Jonathan Hartman leads Group 4's technical design and construction administration team, helping clients and designers evaluate and incorporate innovative and proven sustainable design elements on complex public projects such as the multiple award -winning Yorba Linda Library and Cultural Arts Center; LEED Platinum Mitchell Park Library and Community Center in Palo Alto; and LEED Platinum Environmental Innovation Center in San Jose. His projects are characterized by excellent budget and schedule performance, and he builds effective and collaborative partnerships with consultant and construction teams. EDUCATION AND REGISTRATION Master of Architecture, University of California, Berkeley Bachelor of Architecture, Cal Poly Pomona Registered Architect, State of California, C30361 LEED Accredited Professional BD+C REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS Palo Alto City Library Rinconada Library • Principal architect for the 26,000 SF renovation + 4,000 SF expansion of a historic midcentury library by Edward Durell Stone. Palo Alto Mitchell Park Library and Community Center • Principal architect for new LEED-NC Platinum 56,000 SF joint -use facility replacing small, separate library and community center facilities. Yorba Linda Library and Cultural Arts Center • Principal architect for new library and community recreation center campus. San Jose Environmental Innovation Center ■ Senior architect for transformation of historically significant warehouse into new LEED-NC Platinum research, development, and demonstration facility for energy conservation and sustainable design. Carlsbad Cole and Dove Library Renovations ■ Principal architect for renovation of City's main library and a mid-century modern branch. Anaheim Euclid and Sunkist Branch Renovations ■ Principal architect for renovation of two branch libraries. Burlingame Recreation Center ■ Principal architect for new NZE community recreation center in Washington Park. West Sacramento Community Center �e;tee�44 � q P 14, P"q;ty center. City Council 23 — 74 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL ANDREA GIFFORD RA LEED PRINCIPAL / DIRECTOR OF INTERIORS Andrea Gifford is instrumental in the transformation of projects from architectural vision to articulated buildings aligned with client and community goals. Andrea has a keen understanding of functional building use, fluid user circulation, and simple aesthetic design solutions. She has developed unique and elegant designs for many award -winning projects. The Library Journal has featured Andrea's work on numerous occasions, including a new branch of the Chula Vista Public Library in a "Best of the Past and Present" libraries feature and the Mitchell Park Library & Community Center which was named a "New Landmark Library." EDUCATION AND REGISTRATION Bachelor of Science, Architectural Studies, University of Illinois, Urbana -Champaign Registered Architect, State of California, C32830 LEED Accredited Professional iD+C REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS Yorba Linda Library and Cultural Arts Center • Interior designer for new library and community recreation center campus. Palo Alto Rinconada Library • Interior design for the 26,000 SF renovation + 4,000 SF expansion of a historic midcentury library by Edward Durell Stone. Palo Alto Mitchell Park Library and Community Center • Interior designer for award -winning new 56,000 SF joint - use library and community center. Milpitas Library • Interior designer for award -winning expansion of historic 1916 grammar school building into 60,000 SF public library branch. Olathe Public Library Indian Creek Branch • Programming and interior design for award -winning 45,000 SF branch library (with Gould Evans). Dayton Main Library • Programming and interior design for expansion of Main Library and four other Phase 1 projects in DML's capital program. San Lorenzo Library • Interior design for modernization and expansion of a 1960s library to 9,500 SF. Yuba County Library Renovation Andrea Gifford — 21 years with Group 4 Indian Creek Library, Olathe KS AIA Central States Honor Award AIA San Mateo County Honor Award San Pablo Library APWA N. California Public Works Project of the Year • Designer for modernization of a 45-year-old library including acces0tl tt"ung le maintenance, and library service reMea75 4/19/2022 upgrades. W V Z W Ix W d X W a W 0 Z a U. v7 Z O a V U_ J Q CJ U_ O Z LU C W H a r m a w CY U w U Q o_ O Cie EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL W V Z W Ix W d X CW C a W fn Z a U. w U w H 2 U Q O oe O FIRM PROFILE Page & Turnbull is interested in the intersection AT -A -GLANCE between the built environment we have inherited and the way we live now. Our mission is to imagine change within historic environments through LEGAL NAME OF FIRM design, research, and technology. Page &Turnbull, Inc. OFFICES Page &Turnbull was one of the first architecture firms in California to Los Angeles, Sacramento, dedicate our practice to historic preservation and we are among the San Francisco longest -practicing such firms in the country. We approach projects with imagination and flexibility and are committed to the conservation of HEADQUARTERS significant resources —where these resources can be made to function for 170 Maiden Lane, 5th Floor present and future needs. Our services are oriented to our clients' needs San Francisco, CA 94108 415.362.5154 and budget. All our professional staff meet or exceed the Secretoryof the Interior's Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards. SIZE 47 full-time employees ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SERVICES We emphasize the re -use of existing buildings and the thoughtful application of new design. Solutions for ESTABLISHED / INCORPORATED new construction respect existing architectural values and the context 1973 / 1975 of neighboring structures. When analyzing buildings we are skilled in PRIMARY EXPERTISE the assessment and treatment of the most significant architectural and Architectural Design, Historic historical spaces and elements. We welcome the challenge of solving Preservation, Historic Architecture, problems of repair, seismic strengthening, and integrating new systems. Planning & Research, Preservation Technology, Materials Conservation, PLANNING & RESEARCH Everything we do begins with a deep Urban Planning understanding of historic and cultural resources. The Cultural Resources Studio completes evaluations for historic significance, Historic Structure CERTIFICATIONS State of California Small Business Reports, National and California Register nominations, Section 106 and Small Business Enterprise (LA and LA California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) clearance, Historic American Harbor) Buildings Surveys, Historic Building Preservation and Maintenance Plans Other Business Enterprise (LA) and a variety of surveys, studies and planning reports. Many of these are for repeat clients such as the National Park Service, California Department E www.page-turnbull.com of Parks & Recreation and the University of California. PRESERVATION TECHNOLOGY The work of this studio ranges from condition surveys to materials analysis, sequential dating, and adding to the historical record by uncovering the buried work of early craftspersons. of Parks & Recreation and the University of Calltornla. PRESERVATION TECHNOLOGY The work of this studio ranges from condition surveys to materials analysis, sequential dating, and adding to the historical record by uncovering the buried work of early craftspersons. City Council 23 — 76 4/19/2022 PACE&TtJRNBULL P&T EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL JOHN LESAK, AIA, FAPT, LEED AP Historic Architect EDUCATION Verona, Italy, Coursework in the conservation of stone and marble, 2002 University of Illinois, Urbana -Champaign, Master of Architecture (Structures Option), 1993 University of Illinois, Urbana -Champaign, Bachelor of Science, Architecture, 1990 Versailles, France Study Program, 1989-1990 LICENSES California Architect: C26607 AFFILIATIONS City of South Pasadena Planning Commission, 2017 to Present (Vice -Chair 2020) City of South Pasadena Cultural Heritage Commission 2005-2014, 2017 (Chair 2009, 2010, 2014) AIA ILA Historic Resource Committee, Chair (2016-2017) APT West Coast Chapter, Past President (2003-2009) APT College of Fellows Preservation Action, CA Board Representative, 2018 - present. Los Angeles Mayor Villaraigosa's Design Advisory Panel, 2010-2013 AWARDS Old Orange County Courthouse - Facade Rehabilitation, Santa Ana, CA. 2021 Preservation Design Award from the California Preservation Foundation PAGE 8 ,IIIYUN8U66I John D. Lesak, AIA, LEED AP, FAPT, is a Principal with Page &Turnbull and manager of the Los Angeles area office. With an interdisciplinary education in architecture, engineering, and materials science,John has specialized in the preservation, rehabilitation, repair, and reuse of historic structures since 1 993John meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for Architecture and Historic Architecture. He served as a historic architect on a number of award -winning preservation projects - including the exterior rehabilitations of the Old Orange County Courthouse, Wisconsin State Capital, Los Angeles City Hall, the relocation of the Cape Hatteras Lighthouse, and the restoration of the spire at the Frank Lloyd Wright -designed Marin County Civic Center. John also teaches a course on sustainable historic preservation within the USC School of Architecture's Masters of Heritage Conservation program. Select Project Experience ■ Powell Library, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA • Improvements Study I Historic Preservation Consultant ■ Restroom Rehabilitation I Historic Architect • Presidio Branch Library- Rehabilitation and Repair of Carnegie Library, San Francisco, CA I Consulting Principal/Historic Architect ■ Chinatown Branch Library- Exterior Rehabilitation and Repair During Construction, San Francisco, CA I Consulting Principal/Historic Architect ■ CheechMarinCenterforChicanoArts&Culture -Adaptive Reuse ofthe Riverside Main Library, Riverside, CA I Executive Architect & Historic Architect ■ Old Orange County Courthouse - Facade Rehabilitation, Santa Ana, CA I Architect & Historic Architect ■ Greek Theater in Griffith Park- Rehabilitation & Historic Structures Report, Los Angeles, CA I Historic Architect ■ Charlotte & Robert Disney House - Rehabilitation & Reconstruction, Los Angeles, CA I Architect & Historic Architect ■ The Magic Castle - Facilities Improvement Master Plan & Exterior Rehabilitation, Hollywood, CA I Architect & Historic Architect ■ Crest Theater/ UCLA'sNimoyTheatre- Rehabilitation& Adaptive Reuse, Westwood, CA I Historic Preservation Consultant ■ Antelope Valley Indian Museum - Rehabilitation & Systems Upgrades, Lancaster, CA I Architect & Historic Architect ■ Former U.S. Federal Courthouse - multiple projects, 312 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA I Historic Architect ■ Los Angeles City Hall -Terra Cotta Cladding Repair & Restoration, Los Angeles, CA Materials Conservation Consultant (with prior firm) ■ Carson Block Building- Rehabilitation & Facade Restoration, Eureka, CA Architect & Historic Architect 23 — 77 4/19/2022 P&T W V Z W 79 W a X W a W H 0 Z a U. N Z O H a V U_ J a CJ U_ O Z W W a H r m a w CY U w 2 U Q O tie EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL FIRM PROFILE luci CREATIVE Luci Creative is a full -service design studio empowering the world's leading cultural and civic institutions to realize their goals through immersive experiences and exhibits. We are driven by our key values of collaboration, advocacy, and spark to support our clients, tell their stories, and attract and engage their visitors. Founded in 2011, and with over sixty completed projects, Luci Creative has built a reputation among clients, and in the industry, as a valued "thought partner." We have developed a roadmap to success for our clients, which includes interpretive planning, discovery, design, media and interactive production, budget analysis and forecasting, and fabrication management. Your idea, your story, your passion and legacy — Luci Creative's curious and driven historians, strategists, and designers know how to make it real. Our diverse team of more than 30 graphic designers, exhibit developers, museum experts, strategists, architects and project managers enable us to provide our clients with a deeply experienced and unique perspective on every project. From master planning to complete design, and through fabrication and installation oversight, our team brings solid know-how and leadership at every step along the way. Many of our team members have worked as designers and managers at large, top -tier museums, and they are familiar with the needs and challenges of complex cultural attractions. Their input on visitor behaviors, operational considerations, and budget constraints brings a valuable eye to our team and design process. As part of our design and master planning efforts, we carefully consider motivations, goals, and outcomes, and synthesize these elements to create tailored solutions that elevate the visitor experience. We create exhibitions that evolve to meet the changing needs of both our clients and their visitors. City Council 23 — 78 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL KEY PERSONNEL AJ GOEHLE Luci Creative I CEO & Partner As CEO, AJ leads the company's efforts working with clients to conceptualize, design and produce highly ambitious projects. Her project work includes managing the content and design team while focusing on client engagement and alignment with key project stakeholders. AJ is responsible for oversight of the creative strategy, content development, visitor experience planning, design, and development for all projects, while also ensuring the integration of all graphic elements. She works with clients and the design team to facilitate, develop, and maintain the experience aesthetic for projects; and to ensure that the stories are communicated and dimensionalized with direction and impact. AJ is an active member of AAM, ASTC, AIGA, SEGD, and the Women Presidents' Organization, serves as co-chair of AAM's Traveling Exhibitions Network, and is an Eastern Board Member for the Themed Entertainment Association. She has worked with a diverse group of clients including the Chicago Children's Museum, Robert R. McCormick Foundation, DuPage Children's Museum, Museum of Science and Industry, Spokane Public Library, First Church of Christ - Scientist, John Deere, Exelon, MacArthur Foundation, Field Museum, National Music Museum, Buffalo History Museum, Milwaukee Public Museum, among many others. EDUCATION BFA Communications Design, Syracuse University KEVIN SNOW Luci Creative I Executive Creative Director Kevin is our creative lead, bringing clients' stories to life using his theatrical and cultural design background to create immersive environments. Leveraging the diversity of his experience has enabled him to look at the dimensionalized story in ways that put the visitors inside. He has led teams on hundreds of projects including immersive museum exhibits, civic spaces, and corporate environments. He works closely with our creative team, ensuring seamless coordination between architecture, general contractors, and museum facilities staff. He also pays close attention to Universal Design practices ensuring all of our projects are designed and built for all visitors. As our in-house exhibit lighting designer, he specifies equipment and systems that best serve each project and he creates dramatic lighting concepts time, and time again. Kevin is a member of numerous industry associations, including AAM, ASTC, and TEA. Kevin has led exhibit design teams for more than two decades for a diverse group of clients, including Saint Louis Science Center, Ford House, Chicago's Museum of Science and Industry, Spokane Public Library, Dolores Kohl Education Foundation, Field Museum, National Music Museum, First Division Museum, and Indiana State Museum. EDUCATION BFA Lighting Design, DePaul University W V Z W Ix W d X CW C a W I- 0 Z a U. N Z O H Q V U_ J a CJ U_ O I- Z W W a N r m a w ry U w H 2 U Q 0 Cie MBA ExecCely ftwVdbnt, University of Illinois 23-79 4/19/2022 LUCI CREATIVE EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL W V Z W Ix W a x W a W H Ill Z a U. Z O Q V u_ J a O' u_ O Z W W a tA Mconsultants more value, less risk CONTACT US OUR PROFILE San Francisco, CA We are a certified small business enterprise dedicated to the 111 Pine Street, Suite 1315 provision of excellence in construction cost management and San Francisco, CA 94111 project management services to owners and their professional Phone: (415) 981-9430 consultants. Fax: (415) 981-9434 Los Altos, CA We specialize in developing construction cost estimates based 2063 Grant Road on the most conceptual information as well as the detailed and Los Altos, CA 94024 complex later stages of design. We are also expert in project Phone: (650) 386-1728 delivery, schedule analysis, and project controls services. Sacramento, CA Our clients rely on our ability to provide them with defensible 6518 Lonetree Boulevard and reliable information at all stages of their project. They also Suite164 depend on our expertise to control time and budget and Rocklin, CA 95765 manage risks throughout the project, from inception to Phone: (916) 742-1770 completion. San Diego, CA 8910 University Center Lane Suite 1100 San Diego, CA 92122 Phone : (619) 814-6793 Seattle, WA 8538 173rd Avenue NE Redmond, WA 98052 Phone : (206) 571-0128 Los Angeles, CA 7083 Hollywood Blvd, 4th floor Los Angeles, CA 90028 Phone : (424) 343-2652 Dublin, Ireland 00 78 Heathervue, Greystones, Wicklow, A63Y997 Phone : +353 86-600-1352 IU WEBSITE: U www.tbdconsultants.com U w H = EMAIL: U info@tbdconsultants.com ry Q a- D O O OUR PROJECT & COST MANAGEMENT EXPERIENCE • Cost Management • Project Management • Project Controls • Scheduling OUR PROJECT EXPERIENCE • Health Care Facilities • K-12 & Higher Education Facilities • Research Laboratories • Hi -Tech Office Facilities & Data Centers • Multi -Family & Luxury Residential • Constructability Reviews • Claims Settlement • Dispute Resolution • Quantity Surveys/Audits • Hospitality & Entertainment Facilities • Aviation Facilities • Museums & Art Galleries • Commercial Office Buildings • Industrial & Manufacturing Facilities City Council Project Management I aSIr>C1Ction Cost Management 4/19/2022 San Francisco -Los Angeles -Sacramento -Los Altos -San Diego -Seattle -Dublin (Ireland) EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL PROFILE Gary Holland is a Principal for TBD Consultants working on all aspects of Cost Planning focusing on Public, Healthcare and Institutional sectors. Prior to joining TBD, he was an Associate Director and Senior Estimator at Davis Langdon and AECOM, where he spent 32 years working for the worldwide construction cost planning and management firm providing cost management services to architects, design professionals, owners, institutions and government agencies throughout the United States. Gary has a proven track record for providing quality and accurate cost estimates CONTACT PHONE: (916)-742-1770 W EBSITE: www.tbdconsultants.com EMAIL: Gholland@tbdconsultants.com ADDRESS: 1 1 1 Pine Street, Ste. 1315, San Francisco, CA, 94111 Econsultants more value, less risk GARY HOLLAND Project Manager EDUCATION Architecture and Construction Management, West Valley College, Saratoga, California, 1982 CERTIFICATIONS/AFFILIATONS Certified Professional Estimator (CPE) with the American Society of Professional Estimators (ASPE) Member of the American Institute of Architects (AIA) REFERENCES Dawn Merkes, Group 4 Architecture, Research + Planning, Inc. (650)-871-0709 Jason Hull, Anderson Brule' Architects (408)-298-1885 Brian Wright, TLCD Architecture (707)-525- 5600 Relevant Experience Milpitas Library, Milpitas, California* Walnut Creek Library and Parking Garage, Walnut Creek, California* Yorba Linda Library and Cultural Arts Center, Yorba Linda, California* Mitchell Park Library and Community Center, Palo Alto, California* Downtown Library, Palo Alto, California* Rinconada Library, Palo Alto, California* Environmental Innovation Center, San Jose, California* Cambrian Branch Library, San Jose, California Pearl Branch Library, San Jose, California Education Park Library, San Jose, California Tully Branch Library, San Jose, California Bascom Avenue Library and Community Center, San Jose, California Redwood Shores Library, Redwood City, California Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Library, City of San Jose/San Jose State University Saratoga Civic Theater Master Plan, Saratoga, California City of Campbell, Civic Center Master Plan, Campbell, California * with Group 4 City Council Project Management I Construg1 Cat Management 4/19/2022 San Francisco Los Angeles • Sacramento • Los Altos an Diego Seattle - Dublin (Ireland) W V z W Ix W d X W a W 0 z a LL w U w U Q o_ O W U Z W W a X W Q W H Z Q U. w f— U w f- 2 U Q o_ O oe smith, � Fause McDonald Inc. AM. 351 8th Street, San Francisco, CA94103 _—_ (415) 255.9140 Fax (415) 255-9100 www.sfmi.cnm infoOdmi.com EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL Telecommunications & Information Technology Data, Voice and Video Systems & Infrastructure Audio -Visual, Security, Broadcast and Acoustics PETER A. McDONALD, PRESIDENT Principal in Charge Peter McDonald is the founding Principal of the firm with 39 years of experience in programming, design and construction administration services of state of the art telecommunications systems and information technologies, audio visual systems, electronic security systems and engineering acoustics for universities, community colleges, student unions,libraries, civic and community centers. His expertise is in design of telecommunications infrastructure, state of the art audiovisual systems, digital technology, distance and collaborative learning, video media servers, VolP, library OPAC and supporting technologies, electronic security and CCTV surveillance, engineering acoustics including HVAC noise control and vibration, sound isolation and room acoustics. Relevant Experience - Partial List Education Berkeley Main Public Library Renovation - Historic Site Berkeley Temporary Public Library Construction UCLA School of Berkeley Claremont Branch Library Renovation Engineering and Applied Berkeley North Branch Public Library Renovation Science, Master of Berkeley South Branch Public Library Renovation Science, 1984 Berkeley West Branch Public Library Renovation Burlingame Main Public Library Renovations - Historic Site UCLA School of Yorba Linda New Library & Community Center Engineering and Applied Palo Alto Main Public Library Renovation Science, Bachelor of Palo Alto Downtown Library Renovation Science, 1982 Palo Alto Mitchell Park Library Renovation San Francisco Public Library Teen Center Addition Contact Information Lafayette Main Public Library Renovation Milpitas Main Public Library Renovation Peter6a)sfmi.com Milpitas Temporary Public Library Construction Tel: 415-255-9140 San Jose Berryessa Public Library Renovation Fax: 415-255-9180 Santa Clara Main Public Library Renovation Santa Clara Temporary Public Library Construction Walnut Creek Branch Library Renovation Experience San Leandro Public Library Renovation 35 years at SFMI Pickleweed Park Library Renovation San Pablo Library Renovation Sacramento Carmichael Library Renovation Mountain View Public Library Renovation San Pablo Public Library Relocation and Upgrades Oakland 81It Branch Library Renovation Spokane Washingon, Downtown Public Library Renovation Spokane, Washington, Libby/The Hive Library Renovation Spokane, Washington, Liberty Park Public Library Renovation Spokane, Washington Shadle Public Library Renovation Spokane, Washington, Indian Trail Library Renovation Spokane, Washington, South Hill Library Renovation Supreme Court of California, Los Angeles, Supreme Court of California, San Francisco, Historic Site Supreme Court of California, Sacramento, Historic Site San Francisco City Hall 1997 Renovations - Historic Site St James Cathedral, Seattle, Washington, Historic Site South San Francisco Civic Center and Library Sunnyvale Civic Center Elk Grove Civic Center and Commons San Jose Community Center City Council Daly City Mar memorial ITLUR4/19/2022 EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL FIRM INTRODUCTION Background - Firm Profile We are a diverse group of mechanical, electrical and plumbing engineers who deliver solutions grounded in sustainability and efficiency. We envision the future of the built environment as a way to promote health and wellbeing, to provide affordable and clean energy, and to practice engineering with responsible consumption in mind. We use ingenuity to produce long-term, pragmatic outcomes, always considering the lifetime of a building, and employing ethical and carbon neutral strategies. We work with institutions and architects throughout the western region, staying abreast of rapidly -changing codes and regulations in California, Arizona and Nevada. With over three decades of design and building experience, we relish the parameters and challenges of each project. As generalists who cross-pollinate ideas between building sectors, our buildings operate efficiently, embracing the latest technologies, within the budget and goals of our clients. We are dedicated to the success and prosperity of our clients, making an impact for them with our expertise, and we are always striving to be better than we were yesterday, every day. MEP California Engineering Corporation is a certified small business. W U Z W W a X W a W H Z CW C W H a H N r m Q f.. W af U w H _ U Q O 83 4/19/202 M kEP EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL r m a w U w U Q D O oe O HENRIK HERTZ Principal In his early career, Henrik worked as an electrician, operating and maintaining buildings' systems. Now, as a Principal, with two decades of experience and an understanding of all aspects of mechanical, electrical and plumbing engineering, he is responsible for the day-to- day management of projects from the initial planning stages to the final construction support services. Henrik's highly collaborative approach, sharing knowledge to develop an integrated design, has enabled his teams to create highly sustainable engineering solutions. As the higher education sector leader, Henrik has worked on over 250 projects for education institutions. He also has significant experience in other project sectors including corporate, commercial, retail, hospitality, civic, and residential. Henrik is experienced in all phases of construction document preparation, energy compliance documentation, comprehensive specifications, estimating and construction field support. Project Experience • Santa Monica High School Library Renovation. • UCLA Powell Library Upgrade. • UCLA Southern Region Library MCC Replacement. • UCLA Young Research Library Basement Renovations. • Nixon Library Electrical System Upgrade. • Ladera Park Historic Building Renovation, Los Angeles, California • Huntington Library Visitor and Education Center* • Miro Row DTLA, Building 2, Los Angeles, California • Vantage Point Storage Infrastructure, San Diego, California • Wildwood School, Los Angeles, California MEP CALIFORNIA E a Engineering Corp Education Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering, Engineering College of Copenhagen - Copenhagen, Denmark, 2006 Certified Electrician, Installation Technique, Frederiksberg Technical School, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2001 *ExperclEs lefJo dflus firm 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL JOSEF NEJAT, PE, CBCP Principal With over four decades of experience in MEP design nationally and internationally, Josef is a leader in construction administration, project management, and commissioning. He supervises an interdisciplinary team across the engineering process from concept to occupation. A former lecturer in math and physics, Josef brings progressive ideas that incorporate technology, cost, and global environmental sustainability to ensure that projects reduce energy and water consumption while minimizing operation and maintenance costs. Josef has provided high performance building systems to 300 projects, bringing his team -oriented approach to sectors including healthcare, science and technology, aviation, education (both higher education and K12), civic, cultural and retail, as well as commercial. Project Experience OMEP CALIFORNIA Engineering Corp Education BS Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland Registrations Licensed Professional Mechanical Engineer, California #M32207 • Santa Monica College Library, Santa Monica, California* • Seattle Central Library, Seattle, Washington* Certified Building • Hammer Museum, Los Angeles, California* Commissioning • Guggenheim Museum, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates* Professional (CBCP) • Children's Discovery Museum of the Desert, Palm Desert, California* • Fresno Metropolitan Museum, Fresno, California* Professional • Getty Villa Museum, Renovation and Central Plant, Malibu, California* Affiliations • Los Angeles County Museum of Art, Los Angeles, California* • Paramount Picture Film Archive, Los Angeles, California* Member, ASHRAE • Denver Art Museum Addition, Hamilton Building, Denver, Colorado* Member, American • UC Riverside Sciences Library, Revrerside, California. Society of Mechanical • UCLA Broad Art Center, Los Angeles, California* Engineers • Riverside Community Collage, Digital Library and Learning Resource Member, Association of Center, Riverside, California Energy Engineers • Arizona State University, Millennium Commons, Tempe, Arizona* Member, American • Community College of Southern Nevada, Science Classroom Building, Las Society of Civil Vegas, Nevada* Engineers (ASCE) • CSU Channel Islands, John Spoor Broome Library, Camarillo, California* Member, Strathmore's • USC Leavey Library, Los Angeles, California* Who's Who • University of Notre Dame, Marie DeBartolo Performing Arts Center, Notre DnmP. Indiana* p24 • SgLYstQe%1fWvRer for the Arts, Costa Mesa, California* 23 — 85 4/19/2022 r m a EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL 18400 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 600 Irvine, CA 949.252.1022 kpff.com lq3ff Firm Profile Founded in 1960, KPFF Consulting Engineers is one of the largest civil and structural engineering v firms on the West Coast. We successfully leverage the resources of our firm while maintaining the Z personal contact we view as essential. With over 1,000 employees nationwide, our offices are `U located in Seattle, Tacoma, Lacey, Portland, Eugene, San Francisco, Sacramento, Los Angeles, Long Ix u, Beach, Irvine, San Diego, Boise, Salt Lake City, St. Louis, Chicago, Louisville, Des Moines, New York, a x and Washington, D.C. W :E Civil and Structural Engineering ,a KPFF provides civil and structural engineering services on a wide variety of project types. The scope ~ of civil engineering services may include due diligence (site assessment) study, master planning, Z infrastructure study & design, entitlement, grading & drainage design, hydrology study, Q implementation of storm water quality & quantity, SWPPP (QSP & QSD), site accessibility (ADA) :E study & upgrades, sustainability (LEED) design, parking lots and trails. In addition, our civil 99 — engineering group serves as a prime consultant to private and government clients for management U. and design of private, transportation, airports, waterfront, site improvements and major utility projects. KPFF provides structural engineering services, utilizing the building materials and technologies suitable for each particular project, whether it be steel, concrete, wood, masonry, Z p base isolation, viscous damping or non -linear seismic analysis. Other structural services include the analysis of special structures for vibration, heavy loads and response to wind, wave, seismic, and a other dynamic forces and design for building cladding systems. Historic Renovation Experience a KPFF has extensive experience with the renovation, rehabilitation and preservation of historic a structures and sites. Our approach on historic preservation projects is to first develop a U. comprehensive understanding and analysis of the building's and site's history by reviewing 0 available record drawings, previous studies and reports, and conducting a site investigation. Z Typically, KPFF will interview the facilities and maintenance staff to receive an insight into past and Z g LU current building and site related issues and recent upgrades/improvements to the building framing LU and site infrastructure. KPFF will verify existing accessible paths of travel and parking stalls for a compliant with ADA guidelines. KPFF will review the code requirements and standards as they relate to the preservation, restoration, and rehabilitation of the historic structure. KPFF will assist in the selection and prioritization of a renovation plan best suited to meet the owner's m expectations, project goals and budget. KPFF understands that historic preservation often requires innovative and non-invasive techniques to preserve and protect the historic features of the building LU and site. KPFF possesses both the depth of experience and breadth of technical expertise required af for projects of this nature. LU LULibraries and Museums = KPFF's design experience includes dozens of libraries, museums, and many other specialized public rZ buildings. One unique characteristic for library projects is that it gives us (the design team) an Q opportunity to work jointly with the local jurisdiction/City to produce a project that helps exemplify the surrounding community. KPFF is particularly well qualified to solve any complex problems O because of our specialized design experience, our ability to understand the needs of other disciplines, and our philosophy of being a proactive member of the design team. City Council 23 — 86 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL 18400 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 600 Irvine, CA 92612 949.252.1022 kpff.com William H. Thorpe, S.E. Principal, Structural Engineering As a Managing Principal with the Irvine office, Mr. Thorpe is responsible for client contact, establishment of fees and schedules, supervision of engineering and drafting personnel, project design and production, overall project coordination and construction administration. Mr. Thorpe has 35 years of experience as a structural engineer and has been with KPFF for 23 years. Mr. Thorpe has had experience with essential facilities projects that require significant coordination with clients, users and other disciplines as well as sophisticated analysis and design. He has been involved in complex structural rehabilitation projects and new construction projects that require cost effective systems to respond to limited budgets. Listed below are representative projects for which Mr. Thorpe has been responsible: Yorba Linda Public Library and Arts and Community Center, Yorba Linda, CA City of Hope Graff Medical & Scientific Library, HVAC Upgrades, Duarte, CA Mission Bell Elementary School MPR and Library, Jurupa, CA Nogales High School — Library Modernization, Rowland Heights, CA Garfield Elementary School — Historic Pacific Electric Railway Substation No. 14, Santa Ana, CA Beverly Vista Elementary School — Seismic Upgrade of Historic Auditorium and Bell Tower, Beverly Hills, CA County of Orange - Historic George Key Ranch, Placentia, CA Arden Modjeska Historic Home Garden Pedestrian Bridge, Modjeska Canyon, Orange County, CA Fern Elementary School Historic Building, Torrance, CA Finney's Crafthouse Retrofit and Tenant Improvement, Orange, CA City of Santa Ana On -Call Constructability Review, Santa Ana, CA Orange County Public Works Child Support Services, Santa Ana, CA City of Santa Ana - First Street Bridge — Fire Damage Review and Repairs, Santa Ana, CA City of Santa Ana On -Call Contract — San Lorenzo Sewer Lift Station Constructability Review, Santa Ana, CA Telecom Carrier Hotel/Data Center Seismic Upgrade, Santa Ana, CA Education B.S. Civil Engineering Texas Tech University, Lubbock Registration Structural Engineer: CA (3866) UT(11972965-2203) Professional Civil Engineer: CA (44980) CO (0055741) MN (55097) NM (26580) OR (94653) TX (139488) WA (55076) WI (47030-6) Professional Associations Structural Engineers Association of California American Society of Civil Engineers American Institute Steel Construction W U Z W W a X W Q W H H Z W W H Q H N r m Q F— w H U w H 2 U Q o_ O Cie CD City Council 23 — 87 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL W U Z W W a X W Q W Z Q rY LL (A Z O H a U LL J a LL 0 I- Z CW C W Q I- N r m Q w U w H 2 U CL- 0 oe 18400 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 600 Irvine, CA 92612 949.252.1022 kpff.com Ali Khamsi, S.E. Principal, Civil Engineering As Principal -in -Charge, Mr. Khamsi will be responsible for supervising the activities of civil engineering personnel. Mr. Khamsi will also be responsible for client contact, establishment of fees and schedules, project design, production, quality assurance, overall project coordination and construction administration. Mr. Khamsi has been with KPFF for 23 years and has more than 29 years of experience in civil engineering. Ali has been responsible for managing design and construction of a wide range of project types and scales for both private sectors and public agencies. The project types include: commercial, healthcare, ADA upgrades, educational, civic, transportation, hospitality, historical, and parks and recreational facilities. Ali's areas of practice include: EIR support, master planning, entitlement, permitting, construction documents, construction administration and project close-out. Ali's areas of experience include: site development, grading, drainage, transportation, hydrology, hydraulics, storm water management, water quality, and utilities design. Listed below are representative projects for which Mr. Khamsi has been responsible: Yorba Linda Public Library and Arts and Community Center, Yorba Linda, CA Orange County Public Library Addition, San Juan Capistrano, CA Chino Hills Civic Center —County Library, Chino Hills, CA UCLA William Andrews Clark Memorial Historic Library Seismic Renovation, Los Angeles, CA California State University Dominquez Hills - Library Addition, Dominguez Hills, CA LAUSD, Fremont High School Library and Student Union, Los Angeles, CA Wilshire Boulevard Temple — Historic School Wing and Temple Renovation, Los Angeles, CA Historic Millard House - Restoration, Pasadena, CA Greystone Historic Estate Site Improvements, Beverly Hills, CA LA County Sheriff's Department Emergency Vehicle Operations Center, Castaic, CA (Design -Build) City of Santa Ana ADA Ramp, Santa Ana, CA City of Tracy - New City Hall, Tracy, CA City of Indio — Economic Development Agency Parking Structure, Indio, CA Education B.A.Sc. Civil Engineering University of Waterloo, Canada Registration Professional Civil Engineer: CA (C74768) NV (021251) AZ (C60789) NM (23115) TX (141792) WA (54736) Ontario, Canada (90379835) British Columbia (38359) Alberta, Canada (166620) Certified QSD/QSP (00130) Cal OES Safety Assessment Evaluator (82003) Professional Associations DBIA'" Certification City Council 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL TERRAIN INTEGRATION 143 S. Olive St Company Description Licensure/ Education Affiliations Relevant Projects Orange I CA 1 92866 1 714-724-9814 1 www.terrainintegration.com Terrain Integration is a landscape architectural firm located in the historic district of Old Town Orange, CA. This location allows us, on a day to day basis, to identify the importance of cohesively linking the public to usable and lively spaces by honoring historical referencing but addressing current design trends. Our goal is to create for our clients site -specific design solutions that encapsulate functionality, equitability, and beauty. We design for sustainability, whether its water conservation or healthy communities, and we relish the opportunities that historical sites have to offer, in that every building has a story to be told and preserved. Established 2014 Contact: Stephanie Shermoen, President, 714-724-9814, stephanie@terrainintegration.com State of California Architects Board Licensed Landscape Architect #5231 University of California, Irvine B.A. Environmental Analysis & Design University of California, Irvine Certificate in Landscape Architecture American Society of Landscape Architects USGBC - Orange County Chapter National Association of Professional Women SOUTH COAST CHINESE CULTURAL CENTER - UPGRADES 9 Truman Street, Irvine, CA 92620 ST. JOHN'S LUTHERAN CHURCH- UPGRADES (Historic) 185 s. Center St., Orange, CA 92866 OLD TOWN GATEWAY- NEW CONSTRUCTION + UPGRADES (Historic) North Block of Chapman between Atchison & Cypress, Orange, CA 92866 ORANGE PACKING HOUSE- NEW CONSTRUCTION + UPGRADES (Historic) Between Palmyra Ave & Almond and S. Cypress & Railroad, Orange, CA 92866 CHOC CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL CAMPUS - NEW CONSTRUCTION & UPGRADES 1201 W La Veta Ave, Orange, CA 92868 W U Z W W a x CW G Q W H w af U w H _ U CI- D O City Coun it VILLA PARK KNOWLES - UPGI&D-E§9 4/19/2022 North Wanda Rd., Villa Park, CA 92861 EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL COMPANY PROFILE Ninyo & Moore, a California Corporation, is a minority -owned, multidisciplinary consulting firm that provides high - quality geotechnical and environmental consulting services. The firm was incorporated in 1986 to provide consulting services in geotechnical engineering, construction inspection and testing, engineering geology, hydrogeology, hazardous waste remediation and environmental assessment. We are committed to being responsive, thorough, technically sound, and active in the business community. Ninyo & Moore serves its clients through 16 offices in California, Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, Texas, and Utah. The quality of Ninyo & Moore's personnel base of 500 employees is widely recognized. Our staff of professionals UJI includes experienced and registered geotechnical engineers, civil engineers, environmental engineers, engineering U geologists, hydrogeologists, environmental scientists, certified technicians and field inspectors, and hazardous waste Z W and regulatory compliance specialists. The experience of Ninyo & Moore's geotechnical staff encompasses projects throughout the southwestern United States, including commercial and municipal structures, educational, medical and a recreational tacflltles, railroads, bridges, roads, highways, tunnels, treatment plants, power plants, dams, waste-to- x energy facilities, tanks, reservoirs, pipelines, pump stations, sewers, transmission towers, harbors and offshore "' structures, airports, low- and high-rise structures, landfills, and other public and private works. Our environmental staff has diverse experience in environmental assessment and audits, hazardous material assessment, surface and W subsurface sampling, asbestos, and lead -based paint sampling and analysis, cost estimates, contamination studies, ~ soil and groundwater contamination studies, site remediation, emergency response to hazardous spills, abatement, ° and redevelopment activities and projects. Z a In addition, Ninyo & Moore has five fully -equipped, certified geotechnical laboratory facilities in California supervised by registered engineers. Our laboratories are certified by AASHTO, Caltrans, the Division of the State Architect, the U. City of Los Angeles, and the City of San Diego. Relevant Experience: Yorba Linda Library and Arts Center Project, Anaheim Central Library Outdoor Space Project, Z Manhattan Beach Library Project, Lawndale Library Bond Act, Artesia Library Construction Project, County of Los 0 Angeles Topanga Library Project, 29 Palms Public Library Project, Orange USD Library Building Renovation, and Civic Center Library, Park and Recreation Center. a U U_ REFERENCES J a Patrick Schmidt, Division Manager/Geotechnical Engineering Group City of Los Angeles Or patrick.schmidtRIacity.org U. (213) 847-0535 Z W Rick Yee, Assistant City Engineer W City of Yorba Linda a ryee()yorba-linda.org Ln (714)961-7171 w U w H _ U V Q o /�ir�yo�/oore (D Geotechnical 8 Environmental S e s City Council 23 - 90 'CVn� EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL PROJECT UNDERSTANDING The Santa Ana Public Library is a department of the City of Santa Ana. It provides Santa Ana's diverse community of more than 330,000 residents with robust programs and services that contribute to a high quality of life. SAPL operates two full -service library facilities — the Main Library and the Newhope Learning Center — and also delivers service through outreach, partnerships, and online channels. Santa Ana's Main Library was originally built in 1960 during a particularly strong period of community growth. The distinctive midcentury building is an integral part of the fabric of downtown Santa Ana. In 1990 it was renovated and expanded to its current size of nearly 40,000 square feet — a project that added much -needed space but also materially changed some of the character and features of the original building. Since that time, the Santa Ana community has seen yet more significant growth and change, and its needs and expectations for library services and programs have expanded as well. Now, it is once again time to renovate the Main Library building. The City and Library have a variety of project goals and objectives. One objective is to improve the interior of the library to better align with the community's needs — for example, by revitalizing the Children's Library for increased early learning, discovery, and play opportunities. Another objective is to prepare the building for the next 20-30 years of service by addressing deferred maintenance needs and modernizing building systems. The City also would like to take this opportunity to restore some of the original character and features of the site and building where possible. In achieving all of these goals, the City and Library seek to incorporate the voices of staff, stakeholders, and the community in the process. The City has not yet confirmed the budget for the renovation project, which will begin with a Pre -Design phase to evaluate options and opportunities, establish priorities, and develop the scope, budget, and schedule for design and construction. The City and Library seek an architectural team with demonstrated experience working on similar projects, including the design of 21st century libraries, renovation of historic structures, and work with diverse communities on high -profile public projects. 0 Z_ Z Q N W 0 Z H V W O a N Z O a V J Q CJ U_ O Z W W H a N r m a w CY U w U Q O Cie City Council 23 - 91 4/19/2022 a EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL 0 Z_ Z Q N W a Z H V W O a N Z O a V J Q CJ U- O Z W W H a N r m a w U w U Q O oe O RENEWED HISTORIC LEGACY Page & Turnbull will support Group 4 in providing historic consulting and preservation architect services. The historic preservation portion of the project includes identifying the Character -Defining Features (CDFs) — i.e., the materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships that are historically significant to the building. We will identify options for their renewal and will prepare architectural drawings and specifications to repair, rehabilitate, and/or restore the Main Library's CDFs. Design of this work will be coordinated with design of interior reorganization and building system upgrades. We will provide information to the City's project team, the Historic Resources Commission (HRC), and other regulatory bodies and public groups, as necessary, regarding the preservation aspects of this rehabilitation. We understand that major exterior modifications to a historic structure require the approval of the HRC through a duly notice public hearing and issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness. We will review the project to help ensure that prior to presenting the application to the HRC, any proposed exterior modifications are consistent with the Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and consistent with Santa Ana's Historic Ordinance. We understand that there are four regularly scheduled HRC meetings per year. We will coordinate with City staff, the Planning Department, and HRC to determine the submittal deadlines for HRC meetings. City Council 23 - 92 0 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL I bilb-;- ENGAGING PROCESS Broad and effective engagement of staff, stakeholders, and the community is a fundamental component of our interactive planning and design process. Managed participation effectively develops support and clear direction for projects, leading to successful project implementation and delivery of a comprehensive vision incorporating prior studies, community needs, and staff and stakeholder feedback. It is important to engage the community directly in the design process, which is why the City's requested scope includes three community engagement activities. Early community engagement will allow us to hear from the community about their vision and priorities for the program and experiential qualities of the Santa Ana Main Library. We are proposing three meetings/workshops with library staff on topics including the customer experience vision, program concepts, operations, and FFE. We will work with the City and the Library to design staff, stakeholder, and community engagement strategies that will be both COVID-safe and successful in Santa Ana. TASKS, DELIVERABLES, EXCLUSIONS More detail about our proposed work plan, tasks, deliverables, schedule, and exclusions/optional services is included in Tab 2. City Council 23 - 93 4/19/2022 0 Z_ Z Q N W 0 Z D H V W O a N Z O a V U- J Q D a U- O Z W W H a N r m a w CY U w U Q O Cie EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL 0 Z_ Z Q N W a Z H V W O a N Z O a V U_ J Q CJ U_ O Z CW C W a N WELL -MANAGED PROJECTS Group 4 has an excellent record of successfully managing the entire project delivery process, including complex projects with modest budgets and accelerated time schedules. Group 4's team provides effective planning, programming, design, construction and post -construction phase services to move projects efficiently through the design and construction phases and deliver high -quality results. • As we specialize in high -profile public projects, we understand our clients' duty to ensure that the community receives good value. • We have highly -qualified staff and low turnover, ensuring continuity of staffing on projects and building our in-house expertise and skill base. • We have strong project management systems during the design phases that keep our projects on schedule and on budget. • Effective construction administration systems allow us to manage costs during construction and keep achange order costs low, which is especially crucial for public projects because of the nature of public ~ funding. w U w H U Q D O oe • We have an excellent record of partnering with the client and the contractor in order to ensure a high - quality project that meets the client's schedule and budget requirements. Foundational to our project management approach is the Project Management Team (PMT), a core project working group that meets regularly to review project progress. For the Santa Ana Library renovation project, we envision the PMT to include the City's project manager, key representatives from the Library and Public Works (and other departments as may be appropriate), and the Group 4 project team. During the design phases, we will meet with the PMT approximately twice per month to monitor progress and keep the project mnvinn fnr\A/ArH cffiricntk/ Fnr affirinnry anrJ rn\/If%i PMT mcctinnc wall nenej'Ly/Le held via webconfeQjh�9,'9iM@0they are scheduled to coincide wit2%ttl&4design team on -site vA 19/2022 EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL RELEVANT RECENT GROUP 4 EXPERIENCE The table below includes project information and references for relevant projects completed within the past five years, as requested in the Request for Proposals. Several of these projects are profiled in more detail on the following pages. We will be happy to provide additional information and examples of our team's relevant experience upon request. PROJECT NAME, LOCATION, AND DATE PROJECT AND TEAM DESCRIPTION CONTACT Yorba Linda Library Award -winning new 4.7 acre civic campus Peggy Huang, Mayor and Arts Center including 46,000 SF library and 14,000 SF City of Yorba Linda (2016-2020) cultural arts center. (714) 875-1505 Yorba Linda, CA David Schnee - Principal -in -Charge phuang@yorbalindaca.gov Jonathan Hartman - Principal Architect/PM Andrea Gifford - Director of Interiors Dayton Main Library Award -winning major renovation and Tim Kambitsch, Exec. Director Expansion expansion of mid-century Main Library (retired) (2014-2017) building to introduce modern library services, Dayton Metro Library Dayton, OH spaces, and service model (with local AOR). (937) 901-8477 David Schnee - Library Design Lead tkambitsch@gmail.com Andrea Gifford - Interior Design Lead Jonathan Hartman - Consulting Architect Cincinnati Main Reorganization and redesign of 500,000 SF Paula Brehm-Heeger, Director Library Revitalization Main Library building to introduce modern Cincinnati -Hamilton County Public (2020-in progress) library services, spaces, and service model Library (CHPL) Cincinnati, OH (with local AOR). Group 4 has also provided Paula.Brehm-Heeger@ design consultant services on other CHPL cincinnatilibrary.org projects including expansion of the Walnut (513) 369-6972 Hills and Price Hill branches, both Carnegie - era library buildings. David Schnee - Library Design Lead Andrea Gifford - Interior Design Lead Spokane Shadle Renovation and expansion of branch library Andrew Chanse, Executive Dir. Library Expansion to 30,000 SF (with local AOR). Group 4 was Spokane Public Library (2019-2021) the library design and interiors lead for (509) 444-5305 Spokane, WA the project, as well as for revitalization of achanse@spokanelibrary.org Spokane's 90,000 SF downtown main library. Luci Creative developed themed children's experiences for both projects. David Schnee - Library Design Lead Andrea Gifford - Interior Design Lead Jonathan Hartman - Consulting Architect Georgina Cole Renovation of 24,000 SF mid-century modern Patrick McGarry Library Renovation library. Project Director, Red Brick (2014-2016) Jonathan Hartman - Principal Architect/PM Consulting Carlsbad, CA Andrea Gifford - Director of Interiors (Former Civic Projects Manager, David Schnee - Consulting Principal City of Carlsbad) City Counci 23 - 95 4/19/2022 W U Z W W a x W Z Q W J W Ix w U w _ U rZ Q O M EXHIBIT CPROPOSAL Z W W Q Ln r m Q w U w U Q O oe v COMPLETED 2015 PROJECT TEAM David Schnee, Design Director Jonathan Hartman, Principal Architect Andrea Gifford, Director of Interiors CLIENT CONTACT Colette Chew Public Works Engineering Services Div. City of Palo Alto (650) 329-2482 col ette.ctft (i &oaIto. org RINCONADA LIBRARY EXPANSION PALO ALTO CA Edward Durell Stone's 1958 Rinconada Library exemplifies the architect's trademark of interacting interior and exterior spaces. A permeable, patterned terracotta "veil" encloses the building and two generous reading courtyards. A vast double - pitched and deep-eaved roof caps the building, drawing itself into a high clerestory ridge framed by a low sea of luminous ceiling panels that echo the terracotta pattern. Great care was taken to modernize the library while preserving its historical significance. Original character -defining features were refreshed. New furniture and finishes complement the Modernist language, while new services and spaces, variety and delight create an architectural dialogue responsive to Stone's vision while ensuring ongoing excellence in library service. Original yellowed and brittle luminous panels were studied and recreated; new panels brightened the space significantly. Old growth maple boards were demounted from interior columns and sequenced for identical reinstallation. Remodels from the 1980s were removed, restoring Stone's original architectural intent. Furniture and finishes were carefully selected to meet the community's current and future needs and enliven the space while respecting the historic design. A dedicated teen space om pods were introduced a ong the perimeter, using/a per orated metal screen that echoed the terracotta pattern. EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL GEORGINA COLE LIBRARY RENOVATION CARLSBAD CA The City of Carlsbad commissioned Group 4 to renovate two of its three libraries to modernize library service, improve operations, and freshen the library experience while preserving the desirable qualities of the two buildings. The 24,000 SF Georgina Cole Library, located next to City Hall, was built in 1967. The design introduced a variety of new spaces for collaborative work, community meeting and gathering, and expanded programs almost entirely within the mid-century building's existing walls. Group 4's redesign capped the central courtyard and incorporated it into a contiguous library interior. This dramatically opened up the inside of the library, improved circulation and wayfinding, and established stronger connections between the two floors. Modernization included reconfiguration of technology and stacks as well as replacement of furniture, finishes, and carpets. The project also addressed lifecycle maintenance and accessibility upgrades, including exterior repairs, ADA improvements, and modern mechanical, low voltage, and fire prevention systems. COMPLETED 2016 PROJECT TEAM Jonathan Hartman, Principal Architect Andrea Gifford, Principal Designer David Schnee, Design Director CLIENT CONTACT Patrick McGarry Project Director, Red Brick Consulting (Former Civic Projects Manager, City of Carlsbad) (760) 802-4521 W U Z W W a X W H Z Q W J W N Z O Q V U_ J Q CJ U_ O Z W W a tA r m a w ry U w U Q O Cie City Council 23-97 4/19/2022 Ln EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL w U w 2 U Q O oe COMPLETED 2017 PROJECT TEAM David Schnee, Design Director Andrea Gifford, Director of Interiors MAIN LIBRARY REVITALIZATION DAYTON OH The original Main Library in Dayton, Ohio was a dark, inwardly - focused mid-century modern structure. Group 4's design gutted the interior of the former building doubled its size with a new, three-story wing. The expanded library is the flagship of the Dayton Metro Library system — a new landmark and community destination at the intersection of the downtown commercial core and cultural district. The revitalized building fully integrates into its downtown context and embraces the adjacent park. The old building and new wing are connected by a stunning three-story, light - filled atrium criss-crossed by bridges that provide places of engagement and collaboration. The existing underground floors were converted to parking, and the public and operations functions were moved up into the light. Jonathan Hartman, Consulting Principal Destination features of the expanded Main Library include more than 30 spaces for gathering and collaboration, ranging CLIENT CONTACT in capacity from four to 400 people. The black box theater and Tim Kambitsch multi -configurable forum support creative and performing arts Executive Director (retired) as well as large library and community programs. The library Dayton Metro Library has become a destination for weddings, concerts, cultural (937) 901-8477 events, and other community gatherings and celebrations. tkambitsch@gmail.com Group 4's AOR partner for the Main Library project was LWC City Council Inc. The pr4gct_ 9geived an Honor Awa4J1*MVA Dayton Chapter. EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL YORBA LINDA LIBRARY + CULTURAL ARTS CENTER Responding to the combination of a years -long effort to expand library services and to expand space for arts and community programming, the City of Yorba Linda commissioned Group 4 to develop a joint use project creating a "civic heartbeat" adjacent to a new Town Center shopping district. The 4.7 acre campus positions a two story, 46,000 SF library and a 14,000 SF arts center to share a pedestrian paseo of outdoor rooms. The project stands out due to its contemporary modern design with plenty of natural ambient lighting through the extensive use of glazed curtain wall systems and skylights. The roof line has multiple slopes and angles to mimic the foothills when seen from a distance. A palette of timeless, natural materials provides an inviting warmth while embellishing the civic stature of the buildings and site. The library provides a full range of community spaces and activities, including traditional collections for all ages, reading areas, and a range of collaborative spaces capable of supporting programs and groups large and small. The arts center provides gallery space, dance studios, a black box theater, and an outdoor amphitheater. The campus connects COMPLETED 2020 PROJECT TEAM David Schnee, Design Director Jonathan Hartman, Principal Architect Andrea Gifford, Director of Interiors visitors to the various public amenities, gardens, art, and other CLIENT CONTACT features on site, and to the Town Center across the street. Peggy Huang, Mayor City of Yorba Linda To date, tha e n\ni Ynrha I inch a I ihrary nrd ('iiltiiml Arts C'antar City has been GilY`i�GOWt)lASCE Orange County Chapter; AR&A99 phuang@yorbalinda11 g/o022 Southern California Chapter; and ENR Magazine. w U w U V Q O Cie EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL W U Z W Ix W a X W H Z Q W J W Z O a U U_ J Q Or U. O Z W W Q N m Q w IV U w U Q O oe O IN PROGRESS PROJECT TEAM David Schnee, Library Design Lead Andrea Gifford, Interior Design Lead CLIENT REFERENCE Paula Brehm-Heeger, Library Director Cincinnati -Hamilton County Public Library Paula. Brehm-Heeger@cincinnatilibrary. o rg (513) 369-6972 City Council MAIN LIBRARY REVITALIZATION CINCINNATI OH Group 4 is the design lead for revitalization of the Main Library in Cincinnati. Group 4's design will improve service and enhance the customer experience as well as address life cycle maintenance needs in the 500,000 square foot, two city block complex. Group 4 worked with Cincinnati -Hamilton County Public Library (CHPL) leadership and staff to develop a comprehensive new vision for the Main Library, including reorganized public services and operations. Phase 1 of the redesign includes a new cascading stair in the five -story atrium that connects all public floors for improved navigation and wayfinding. The children's library moves to the first floor of the south building, providing expanded space for children's programming as well as improved technology and collections. The "Teen Spot" will move closer to the children's library as well to better support use by siblings and families who come to the library together. The redesign of the entry plaza will increase visibility and connectivity in the south building, and significantly expand opportunities for outdoor programming and events. Elevator and skylight upgrades round out the maintenance improvements in this first phase. 23 — 100 4/19/2022 00 EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL WALT DISNEY FAMILY MUSEUM :I Buildings 104, 122, and 108 were rehabilitated and converted into the archives of the Walt Disney Family Foundation and a museum designed to honorthe life of Walt Disney. Building 104, built as a military barrack, now houses museum exhibits, a children's learning center, and a cafe, with a new 20,000 s.f. addition that infills the U-shaped courtyard to accommodate additional exhibit space and a state-of-the-art auditorium. Building 122, the former Post Gymnasium, accommodates art registration, research, offices, archival storage, and a restored double -height gallery for temporary and traveling exhibitions. Building 108, originally used as a munitions shed, now serves as a mechanical facility. The site was landscaped and developed with perimeter planting around buildings, surface parking, and pedestrian walkways. The museum allows for innovative, 21 st-century museum presentations while also preserving the exterior look and feel of the original buildings. LOCATION San Francisco, California SIZE 80,000 SF SCOPE Rehabilitation + New Addition REFERENCE Josh Bagley, Associate Director of Business Operations The Presidio Trust jbagley@presidiotrust.gov 415-561-5322 V) z O a V U_ J a CJ U_ O z CW C W H a tA r m a w U w H 2 U Q O C� PAGFQffj-Ua0MULL 23 - 101 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL Ln W U Z W W W LL W 99 w U w 2 U Q o_ O oe Top and above: The Cheech Marin Center for Chicano Art, Culture, and Industry Historic architecture specialists Page & Turnbull were retained by the City of Riverside and a partner architect to program and design the adaptive reuse of the former Riverside Public Library building into a new art museum showcasing one of the largest private collections of Chicano art. Page & Turnbull's work included a conditions assessment that informed the Basis of Design as well as collaboration with the City, Cheech Morin, and other stakeholders to develop a meaningful program. The Basis of Design integrates architectural programming with the infrastructure needs of a modern museum. Phase II is underway. GROUP 4 REFERENCES Listed below are selected client references representing public agencies with whom Group 4 has worked during the past five years on the design of public libraries and other community projects. These references can also speak to our commitment to excellent client service, our ability to deliver well -managed projects on time and within budget, and our passion for collaborating with diverse staff, stakeholders, community members, and design partners. Additional references are available upon request. • Andrew Chanse, Executive Director Spokane Public Library (509) 444-5305 1 achanse@spokanelibrary.org • Paula Brehm-Heeger, Director Cincinnati -Hamilton County Public Library (513) 369-6972 1 paula.brehm-heeger@cincinnatilibrary.org • Tim Kambitsch, Exec. Director (retired) Dayton Metro Library (937) 901-8477 1 tkambitsch@gmail.com • Peggy Huang, Mayor, City of Yorba Linda (714) 875-1505 1 phuang@yorbalindaca.gov City Council 23 — 102 0 N 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL fz rmom,7 00 i I !91 6s rp a 4/19/2022 ■ 5 15 k-MO.0 g V,'T .A 4�1 EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL PROPOSED PROJECT WORK PLAN Our proposed work plan for the Santa Ana Library Renovation project is summarized in the following narrative and graphic schedule. We have not yet had the opportunity to review our proposed approach with the City or the Library and look forward to working with you to tailor this to meet the project's scope, budget, and timeline needs. TASK l: PRE -DESIGN We will kick off the project with a meeting with the Project Management Team (PMT) to confirm project goals and objectives, the work plan and schedule, communications protocols, and the proposed plan for staff, stakeholder, and community engagement. These project controls will be updated and used throughout the project. During the Pre -Design phase we will work with the City and the Library to confirm the alignment of the project scope, program, and budget with staff, stakeholder, and community expectations. Clearly defining these project parameters will be important for scoping and evaluating the feasibility of design options such as the drive-thru window and replacement of outdated building systems. We will review the Library's current program and objectives for materials, seating, technology, and programming as well as the City's and Library's proposed preliminary project program for the building renovation. We will meet with Library staff to review potential program concepts and priorities within the context of community needs, library trends and best practices, and the opportunities presented by the Santa Ana Library building and site. Concurrent with programming, we will assess current site and building conditions to identify opportunities and constraints of current building systems. We will tour the library wittrltyr rdering consultants and Library facili123naiqi0&ance staff, as well 4/19/2022 as review facility drawings, previous site and building assessments, and other available information. LL O W d O U CA N m a w U w U Q O O N EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL LL O W d O U N N m a w U w H U Q O oe O We will work with the City, the Library, and our consultant team to develop a comprehensive cost model to inform early decision -making about the project scope and design options. We will strive to identify and include all hard costs of construction (including demolition, site preparation and development, building construction, sustainable design features, utility connections/upgrades as applicable, etc.); public and staff FFE and shelving; technology infrastructure; graphics and signage; and other real — and significant — costs associated with public projects. We will build in assumptions for soft costs, permits, testing, PM/CM services (if any), and even costs for moving and temporary storage as appropriate. We will also build in realistic contingencies and escalation factors. Task 1 Meetings and Deliverables • Project work task plan and schedule • Pre -Design summary report • Preliminary project cost model • Two (2) PMT meetings including kickoff • One (1) focus group with Library staff TASK 2: CONCEPT DESIGN Based on the City's confirmed scope and budget established in Task 1, we will develop up to three (3) conceptual design options for the Santa Ana Library renovation. We will work closely with the PMT to review and refine the options for presentation to Library staff and the community. Community engagement events (up to three) may include a combination of open house/public meetings, pop-up surveys in community locations, a digital survey, etc. Using our project cost model, we will prepare a project budget for each option. We will work with the PMT to analyze and evaluate the conceptual options, taking into account staff and community input, to select the preferred conceptual option. During this phase, Luci Creative will lead a collaborative discovery process to reimagine the Children's Library with a focus on children's learning, flexible programming space, interactive areas, museum style spaces, wall graphics, and signage to be integrated holistically within the redesigned Children's Library. We will conduct a technical meeting with the City's Planning and Building Agency to confirm the preliminary code analysis and other relevant requirements relative to the proposed scope of work. We will refine the preferred conceptual design based on staff and community input, the results of the IDW, and input from our technical meetings with City staff. We will develop renderings of the exterior and interior renovations, and prepare the Concept (Schematic) Design drawings. We will prepare narratives describing the building and options for major systems. We will meet with the Historic Resources Commission to confirm the historical project requirements established in the previous phase and present preliminary exterior design recommendations. At the City's option, we also present the project to other City oversight bodies (e.g., the Planning Commission) and/or City Council. City Council 23 — 106 N N 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL We will develop a Concept Design report summarizing the project scope, program, and budget including: • Building envelope and finishes evaluation and recommendations for repair/ replacement; • Civil and landscape evaluation of site and feasibility of new outdoor amenities and parking; • Electrical system (utility and emergency power) capacity for current and anticipated future loads, and recommendations for any needed replacements and upgrades; • Mechanical/ plumbing/ fire system conditions and loads, and recommendations for any needed replacements and upgrades; • Low voltage and audio/video conditions and recommendations for upgrades; • Structural system assessment to determine opportunities in the building and renovation and options for voluntary upgrades; ■ Geotechnical investigation to determine ground tolerances and soil conditions for structural requirements for the proposed addition; and • ADA accessibility compliance and requirements of renovated and reconfigured spaces; • Proposed strategies for rearranging spaces for adapting the building to support the proposed program; and • Historic Preservation Treatment Plan description of Character -Defining Features (i.e., exterior building envelope, historic windows and doors, cement plaster, and interior dining room buffet and pocket doors) and treatment recommendations. Task 2 Meetings and Deliverables ■ Concept (Schematic) Design report and package for refined preferred conceptual design option, including drawings, narratives, and up to six (6) perspective renderings ■ Conceptual project budget ■ Civil site survey ■ Geotechnical investigation and report ■ Up to four (4) PMT meetings ■ Up to three (3) community outreach events/equivalent activities (e.g., pop-up surveys, community meeting) ■ One (1) focus group with Library staff ■ Up to two (2) conceptual design options ■ One (1) Technical Meeting (Planning and Building) • One (1) Historic Resources Commission working session LL O W a O U CA N 00 a w U w H 2 U Q D O C� City Council 23 — 107 4/19/2022 M N EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL U- O W d O U N N m a w U w U Q D O oe O TASK 3: DESIGN DEVELOPMENT (50% PLANS) We will develop the 50% Design Development package including plans, elevations, building sections, renderings, and other documents that will describe the character and scale of the project components based on the approved concept design. We will conduct a second Integrated Design Workshop (IDW), where we will confirm selection of major building systems, cost analysis, maintenance requirements, and functional performance. Landscape, civil, structural, mechanical, plumbing, electrical, fire alarm/ fire protection, and telecommunications/data consultants will refine the design of the site and building systems with close coordination between disciplines. We will provide an estimate of probable construction cost to reflect decisions made in this phase. We will work closely with the historic consultant and the Historic Resources Commission to ensure the exterior rehabilitation, as further refined in the design development phase, complies with the Secretary of the Interior's Standard for Rehabilitation. We will work with the PMT to set the furniture budget, develop furniture concepts, and select furniture that enhances the architectural design concept. Group 4 will work interactively with Library staff to translate program items (seating types, etc.) into specific furniture items and designs. We will meet with Library staff to review furniture options. Task 3 Meetings and Deliverables • Design Development (50%) package, including drawings and outline specifications • Estimate of probable construction cost • Up to four (4) PMT meetings • One (1) focus group with Library staff • One (1) Technical Meeting (Planning and Building) • One (1) Historic Resources Commission presentation TASK 4: 90% PLAN CHECK DOCUMENTS AND 100% BACKCHECK/BID SET In this phase the building systems and design concepts will be developed with details and calculations. All building systems, including structural, mechanical, electrical, lighting design, interior design concepts, and finishes will be documented. We will conduct PMT meetings throughout this phase to ensure continued project team involvement in design decisions as the project is developed and conduct our third Integrated Design Workshop to confirm and coordinate the details of specified systems. As part of this phase, we will support the City in preparing the Historic Exterior Modification application for presentation to the Historic Resources Commission. We will assist in the preparation of the permit application. The Plan Check set will be submitted to the Library and Public Works CIP Engineering for review. This set will be the basis for the 90% estimate of probable construction cost. We will revise the construction documents to reflect City and Library plan check review comments. We will prepare the Backcheck/Bid Set for submittal to the Library, Planning and Building, the Historic Resources Commission, and Public Works CIP City Council 23 — 108 4/19/2022 v N EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL We will update the estimate of probable construction cost as needed to reflect the Backcheck/Bid Set documents. We will assist the City and Library with FIFE bid/procurement packages. Task 4 Meetings and Deliverables • Plan Check package • Backcheck/Bid Set, including drawings, specifications (CSI format), and structural calculations • Historic Compatibility Analysis • Assist with Historic Exterior Modification Application • 90% and final estimates of probable construction cost • Up to five (5) PMT meetings • One (1) Technical Meeting (Planning and Building) • One (1) Historic Resources Commission presentation • Optional presentation to City Council TASK 5: BIDDING, CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION, AND CLOSEOUT We will assist the City in advertising the project, responding to contractors' questions, preparing project addenda, evaluating bids, notifying the successful bidder, and collecting and reviewing bonds, insurance certificates, and construction schedules. We will prepare for and conduct the preconstruction conference; help the Library monitor and document the project's progress for quality, cost, and liability control; and inform the City and the Library about project progress. We will respond to RFIs, review product submittals and shop drawings, analyze and assist in negotiation of change orders as needed, review pay requests, review the punch list, prepare final inspection reports, and attend regular construction meetings. Group 4 will complete applicable certificates, review the contractor's record drawings, and collect and coordinate written warranties and maintenance manuals required of the contractor. Task 5 Meetings and Deliverables • Prebid meeting • Preconstruction meeting • Project addenda as needed • Project conformed set • Monthly construction site visits • Responses to RFIs and Substitution Requests; ASIs, RFIs, submittals, etc. • Compile record documents • Optional City Council meeting — Award of Contract U- O W a O Ln N m a f- w af U w H U V Q O City Council 23 — 109 4/19/2022 Ln N EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL SERVICES H Additional participation other than specifically included in Basic Services c • Additional City Council, commission meetings Z Z • Additional community meetings to Focus groups, interviews U Community survey (online, paper -based, etc.) > Friends of the Library meetings °; LEED documentation, application, and certification -related services `" Design and fabrication services for children's thematics LL 0 Historic Resource Evaluation Report Ui CASp / ADA assessment/report pCEQA-related services U Hazardous materials assessment and/or abatement Grant application/ grant -writing services (e.g., California State Library grants; m utility grants) a LU Additional assumptions, exclusions, and optional additional services are included with our proposed fees. See separate fee proposal package. U w H 2 U Q D O City Council �0 N 23 — 110 4/19/2022 -S A N TA A N A LIBRARY R E N D VAMNROPOSAL -WDRAFT WORK PLAN ■ Project controls and ■ Conceptual design op ions communication tools ■ Interior design values ■ Review available ■ Children's Library visior ing documents and ■ Refine preferred desigt option information ■ Interior/exterior render ngs ■ Site and building ■ Building system narrati es assessment ■ Preliminary code analy is ■ Preliminary project ■ Technical meetings cost model ■ Updated project cost model ■ Program verification ■ Confirm project scope and budget ■ Confirm applicable historic registry requirements Project Management Teham (PMT) ■ Develop 50% design package — drawings, outline specific tions ■ Technic I meetings ■ 50% estimate of probable construction cost ■ Develop 90% plan check package — all disciplines ■ Technical meetings ■ 90% estimate of probable construction cost ■ Submit plan check set for Public Works CIP Engineering and Library staff review Staff + Technical Llbr Staff LStaff TM: Planning ibra Lib TM: Planning TM: Planning and Building and Building and Building Stakeholders + 0 1� HRC City Council 23 - 111 H0 ■ Develop 100% backcheck/bid set ■ Submit backcheck set to Library, Planning and Building, HRC, Public Works CIP Engineering ■ FIFE procurement package ■ Updated estimate of probable construction cost G R 0 U P 4 ■ Pre -bid ■ Attend pre -construction meeting meeting, jobsite meetings + ■ Respond job inspection visits to bidders' ■ Respond to RFIs questions ■ Review contractor submittals ■ Addenda ■ Punch list review ■ Review furniture installation ■ Compile certificates, record drawings, warranties, manuals, etc. Construction Meetings 0000000000000000000 GROUNDBREAKING 4/19/2022 0 HRC City Council RE -OPENING EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FOR PAGINATION W J W V N Z Q N W V W U- O W a O V N N 00 a F- w H U w H 2 U Q O oe O City Council 23 — 112 4/19/2022 00 N . 4 i r, 4 ` 1 t t .00 r _ # EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL FEE PROPOSAL We have prepared a proposal schedule of fees for renovation of the Santa Ana Library based on our understanding of the project, the City's requested scope, and our experience on similar projects. Our proposed fees are included under separate cover along with our hourly rates and other related information. We welcome the opportunity to review our proposal in detail with you and to adjust it as needed to align with the City's needs and budget. J a O a O a W W U- M 00 a w ry- w H 2 U Q D O C� City Council 23 — 115 4/19/2022 o• N EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FOR PAGINATION w H U w H 2 U Q O oe O City Council 23 — 116 4/19/2022 0 M LL lop. H W V f AlAL -• I- w FF EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL Appendix ATTACHMENT 3-1: NON -COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT CERTIFICATIONS NON -COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT (Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and Public Contract Code Section 7106) To the CITY OF SANTA ANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS In accordance with Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and Public Contract Code 7106 the BIDDER declares that the bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the bid is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the BIDDER has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other BIDDER to put in a false or sham bid, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived or agreed with any BIDDER or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the BIDDER has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the BIDDER or any BIDDER, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other BIDDER, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the contract of anyone interested in the proposed contract; that all statements contained in the bid are true; and, further, that the BIDDER has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid. Note: The above Non -collusion Affidavit is part of the Proposal. Signing this Proposal on the signature portion thereof shallAlso constitute signature of this Non -collusion Affidavit. BIDDERS are cautioned that�*in a f se certification may subject the certifier to criminal prosecution. Signed State of California County of 5A.sv MdE qpe Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this day of 20 , by , proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) who appeared before me. Notary Public Signature see next page Notary Public Seal City of Santa Ana RFP City Council 23 — 119 4/19/2022 w U w H 2 U Q O C� M EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CIVIL CODE § 1189 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California County of CeIKI Ji-i 9— On J5-, D-Dz J before me, Date Here Insert Name an T tle of the personally appeared /� SC�1) -- Name(s) of Signer(s) who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. *my MARTS R. JIMENEZ Notary Public - California San Mateo County Commission # 2310276 Comm, Expires Nov 18, 2023 Place Notary Seal Above I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature Signature of Notary ublic OPTIONAL Though this section is optional, completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: '?�U�� ('p //ri5 Tan 0f9IdGc r Mcument Number of Pages: � Signer's) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Partner — -1 Limited 11 General ❑ Individual Ll Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee Fi Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: Date: —, fy Signer's Name: Ll Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Partner — i-.' Limited [_1 General ❑ Individual 1 1 Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee 1 Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: 02014 National Notary Association • www.NationaINotary.org • 1-800-US NOTARY (1-800-876-6827) Item 45907 City Council 23 — 120 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL Appendix ATTACHMENT 3-2: NON -LOBBYING CERTIFICATION CERTIFICATIONS The prospective participant certifies, by signing and submitting this bid or proposal, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that: No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal contract, the making of any federal grant, the making of any federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. 2. If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence any officer or employee of any federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this federal contract, grant loan, loan or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit a "Disclosure of Lobbying Activities". This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U. S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. The prospective participant also agrees by submitting his or her bid or proposal that he or she shall require that the language of this certification be included in all lower tier subcontracts, which exceed $100,000 and that all such sub recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. Firm Group 4 Architecture, Research + Planning, Inc. Signed and Printed Name: Title Principal Date 15 November 2021 CA Z O a U U. W U Iq m a w U w H 2 U V Q D O C� City Council 23 — 121 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana RFP Page A3-2 M M EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL CA z 0 a U LL W U Iq m a w U w U V Q D O oe O Appendix ATTACHMENT 3-3: NON-DISCRIMINATION CERTIFICATION CERTIFICATIONS The undersigned consultant or corporate officer, during the performance of this contract, certifies as follows: The Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The Consultant shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without, regard to their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The Consultant agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. 2. The Consultant shall, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Consultant, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The Consultant shall send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he/she has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or workers' representatives of the Consultant's commitments under this section, and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment. 4. The Consultant shall comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor. 5. The Consultant shall furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his/her books, records, and accounts by the administering agency to ascertain compliance with such rules, and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation regulations, and orders. 6. In the event of the Consultant's non-compliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, the contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the Consultant may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts or federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Execution Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulations, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law. 7. The Consultant shall include the portion of the sentence immediately preceding paragraph (1) and the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (7) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted City Council 23 — 122 4/19/2022 M City of Santa Ana RFP Page A3-3 EXHIBIT C - PROPOSAL by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to Section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontract or purchase order as the administering agency may direct as means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance; provided, however, that in the event the Consultant becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a sub -consultant or vendor as a result of such direction by the administering agency, the Consultant may request that the United States enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States. 8. Pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1735, as added by Chapter 643 Stats. 1939, and as amended, No discrimination shall be made in the employment of persons upon public works because of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicaps, mental condition, marital status, or sex of such persons, except as provided in Section 1420, and any consultant of public works violating this Section is subject to all the penalties imposed for a violation of the Chapter. Signed: Title: Principal Firm: Group 4 Architecture, Research + Planning, Inc. Date: 15 November 2021 w U w H 2 U Q O C� City Council 23 — 123 4/19/2022 Ln City of Santa Ana RFP Page A3-4 EXHIBIT D COMPENSATION 1. COMPENSATION FOR BASIC SERVICES LA Compensation to the Consultant for Basic Services described in Exhibit A, shall be a stipulated sum of One Million Six Hundred Twenty Four Thousand, One Hundred and Thirty Two Dollars ($1,624,132.00). Consultant shall invoice the City monthly on a percent complete basis for work completed to date. Basic Compensation per project phase shall not exceed the following portions of the Basic Services compensation by Phase unless approved by the City. Task 1 Pre -Design $ 93,214.00 Task 2 Schematic Design $ 241,724.00 Task 3 Design Development (50%) $ 322,300.00 Task 4 Construction Documents (90%/100%) $ 564,023.00 Task 5 Bidding, CA, Record Documents $402,873.00 Total Basic Compensation (Tasks 1-5) $1,624,132.00 At the start of this project the City has not yet determined a project or construction budget. The Consultant based the above fee for architectural, engineering, and related design services on an estimated construction budget of approximately $17,900,000 (which was calculated using an allowance of $450/sf applied across the full 39,790 existing square feet). This budget is intended to be an allowance for site, building envelope, interior architecture, building systems upgrades, FFE and related services. The fee and scope can be adjusted down or up to correspond to available funding and established project budget. 2. COMPENSATION FOR OPTIONAL SERVICES 2.A Compensation to the Consultant for Optional Services described in Exhibit A are not included in the Consultant's Scope of Basic Services. When authorized in writing by the City, the Consultant shall be compensated for Optional Services in addition to compensation for Basic Services and Reimbursable Expenses. Option 1: Children's Thematics -Schematic Design/Procurement Package $ 65,000.00 Option 2: Elevator Design and Consulting Services Task 3-5 $ 38,200.00 Maximum Compensation for Pre -negotiated Optional Services $103,200.00 3. COMPENSATION FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES 3.A Compensation to the Consultant for Additional Services described in Exhibit A is in addition to compensation for Basic Services and Optional Services and shall be either at the hourly rates in Exhibit B2 or made as a negotiated stipulated sum. The rates in Exhibit B2 will be in effect through December 315t, 2022 and are subject to annual revisions at the start of each calendar year. 3.B Additional Services Contingency. This Agreement includes an allowance for other City authorized Additional Services: Additional Services Allowance $200,000.00 4. COMPENSATION FOR REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 4.A Customary Reimbursable expenses described in Exhibit A are included in the compensation for Basic or Optional Services. Exhibi Ity� OUC1Clyn w e 7771777 ocx 23 — 124 4/19/26F " 3 EXHIBIT D COMPENSATION 4.13 Additional Reimbursable Expenses, related to the Project, when authorized by the City, whether for consultant, subconsultant, or City use, and are billable at 1.10 times direct cost. Reimbursable expenses are in addition to compensation for Basic Services, Optional Services and Additional Services in Exhibit A and shall not exceed Additional Reimbursable Expense Allowance $ 35,000.00 5. CONTRACT CONTINGENCY 5.A This Agreement includes a Contract Contingency Allowance that may be applied to Additional Services, Additional Reimbursable Expenses or other services or costs as approved by the City and mutually agreed to be the Consultant. Contract Contingency $ 196,233 Maximum Compensation for Basic Services, Optional Services, Additional Services Allowance, Additional Reimbursable Expense Allowance, and Contract Contingency shall not exceed $2,158,565 without written authorization of the City. Exhibi Ity7OUC1Clyn 7 e 7771777 ocx 23 — 125 4/19/26�Y of 3 Parks, Recreation, and Community Services www.santa-ana.org/parks fl Item # 24 or City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report April 19, 2022 TOPIC: Resolution Establishing the Joint School Collaboration City Council Standing Subcommittee AGENDA TITLE: Adopt a Resolution Establishing the Joint School Collaboration City Council Standing Subcommittee between the City of Santa Ana and the Santa Ana Unified School District RECOMMENDED ACTION Adopt a resolution establishing the joint school collaboration City Council standing subcommittee between the City of Santa Ana and the Santa Ana Unified School District. DISCUSSION In January 2013, the City Council established a joint Santa Ana Unified School District ("SAUSD") and City Council Committee. The Committee was disbanded in February 2020, along with all other subcommittees in effect at the time. On September 7, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2021-051 to establish the School Collaboration City Council Standing Subcommittee. Currently, the School Collaboration City Council Standing Subcommittee is the only established standing subcommittee of the City Council and it includes collaboration between all schools and school districts and the City. On March 1, 2022, a majority of the City Council discussed support for an additional School Collaboration City Council Standing Subcommittee between the City and the SAUSD. To establish an additional School Collaboration City Council Standing Subcommittee, specifically between the City and the SAUSD, staff has prepared a resolution for consideration by the City Council to establish a new standing subcommittee entitled the "Joint School Collaboration City Council Standing Subcommittee." ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with this action. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. City Council 24 — 1 4/19/2022 Resolution Establishing the Joint School Collaboration City Council Subcommittee April 19, 2022 Page 2 EXHIBIT(S) 1. Resolution Submitted By: Lisa Rudloff, Executive Dir. of Parks, Recreation and Community Services Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager Standing City Council 24 — 2 4/19/2022 Exhibit 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2022-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA ESTABLISHING THE JOINT SCHOOL COLLABORATION CITY COUNCIL STANDING SUBCOMMITTEE BETWEEN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AND THE SANTA ANA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: A. By resolutions approved in the past, the City Council had created City Council standing subcommittees for the purpose of focusing greater City Council attention on key priorities coming before the City Council in the future; B. In January 2013, the City Council established a joint Santa Ana Unified School District ("SAUSD") and City Council Committee. The Committee was disbanded in February 2020, along with all other subcommittees in effect at the time; C. On September 7, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2021-051 to establish the School Collaboration City Council Standing Subcommittee. Currently, the School Collaboration City Council Standing Subcommittee is the only established standing subcommittee of the City Council and it includes collaboration between all schools and school districts and the City; D. On March 1, 2022, a majority of the City Council discussed support for an additional School Collaboration City Council Standing Subcommittee between the City and the SAUSD; and E. The City Council seeks to establish an additional School Collaboration City Council Standing Subcommittee between the City and the SAUSD entitled the Joint School Collaboration City Council Standing Subcommittee. Section 2. From and after the date hereof, there shall be a Joint School Collaboration City Council Standing Subcommittee. The purpose of the Joint School Collaboration City Council Standing Subcommittee would be to discuss issues of mutual interest between the City and SAUSD focusing on youth services and including but not limited to, joint use of SAUSD and City facilities; library facilities; educational programs; and other topics related thereto. City Council 24 — 3 Resolution RK e AX of 3 9 Exhibit 1 Section 3. The Joint School Collaboration City Council Standing Subcommittee shall consist of two (2) or three (3) councilmembers and two (2) SAUSD board members. The City Councilmembers on the standing subcommittee shall be appointed by a majority of the entire City Council at a public meeting. SAUSD board members on the standing subcommittee shall be appointed by a majority of the entire SAUSD Board at a public meeting. Section 4. Standing subcommittee members do not receive additional stipends or compensation for serving on a standing subcommittee. Each standing subcommittee member shall serve on the standing subcommittee for a two-year term commencing with the first meeting of each newly installed City Council following a general election, but each Councilmember shall continue to serve on his or her standing subcommittee until replaced. Section 5. The standing subcommittee shall meet monthly, if there are items to discuss, or less often if dictated by their bylaws, and are encouraged to alternate meeting locations between City facilities and SAUSD facilities. Section 6. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by City Council and the Clerk of Council shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this resolution. ADOPTED this day of April, 2022. Vicente Sarmiento Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho City f Attorney n Laura A. Rossini Chief Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers Resolution No. 2022-XXX PagWuntlil 24 — 4 4/19/2022 Exhibit 1 CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, DAISY GOMEZ, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2022- to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on April 2022. Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana City Council 24 — 5 Resolution RK e AX of 3 9 Community Development Agency santa-ana.org/cd Item # 25 or City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report April 19, 2022 TOPIC: Appropriation Adjustment to Recognize Homeless Housing, Assistance and Prevention Program Funds AGENDA TITLE: Approve Appropriation Adjustment to Recognize Initial Disbursement of Homeless Housing, Assistance and Prevention Program Funds (Non -General Fund) RECOMMENDED ACTION Approve appropriation adjustment recognizing $2,058,070.34 in funds from the State of California, Business, Consumer Services and Housing Agency revenue account and appropriate the same amount to expenditure account to address homelessness in Santa Ana. (Requires five affirmative votes) DISCUSSION The Homeless Housing, Assistance and Prevention Program (HHAP) was signed into law on July 31, 2019 by Governor Newsom. HHAP Round 1 was a $650 million grant that provided local jurisdictions with funds to support regional coordination and expand or develop local capacity to address their immediate homelessness challenges. The City of Santa Ana was awarded $8,422,162.84. The lion share of these funds were used for the tenant improvements at the Homeless Navigation Center. HHAP Round 2 was a $300 million grant that supported previous funding to respond to homelessness. The City of Santa Ana was awarded $3,981,386. Similar to Round 1 funds, the lion share of funds were used for tenant improvements at the Homeless Navigation Center. HHAP Round 3 is a $1 billion block grant that supports both HHAP Round 1 and Round 2 funding. The City of Santa Ana has received an initial disbursement of $2,058,070.34 from this grant award. To receive the remaining portion of the grant award, totaling $8,232,281, the State of California requires that an application be submitted by June 30, 2022. This application will be placed on the June 7, 2022 City Council meeting agenda. The initial disbursement of the HHAP Round 3 grant award is anticipated to be needed for the tenant improvements at the Homeless Navigation Center. City Council 25 — 1 4/19/2022 Appropriation Adjustment Program Funds April 19, 2022 Page 2 to Recognize Homeless Housing, Assistance and Prevention FISCAL IMPACT Approval of the appropriation adjustment will recognize $2,058,070.34 in funds from the State of California, Business, Consumer Services and Housing Agency in revenue account (no. 12218002-52025) and appropriate the same amount to expenditure account (nos.12218717-various) for projected expenditures as follows: Fiscal Accounting Fund Description Accounting Unit, Amount Year Unit -Account Account Description FY 21-22 12218717- Homeless Housing HHAP3, Various $2,058,070.34 various Assistance and Prevention 3 Total $2,058,070.34 Any funds not used in fiscal year 2021-2022 will be carried over to the next fiscal year. All funds are to be used by June 30, 2026. EXHIBIT(S) 1. HHAP Initial Disbursement Award Letter Submitted By: Steven Mendoza, Assistant City Manager Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager City Council 25 — 2 4/19/2022 C&UPOIRK�& EXHIBIT 1 HOMELESS COORDINATING AND FINANCING COUNCIL Business, Consumer Services and Housing Agency Gavin Newsom, Governor I Lourdes M. Castro Ramirez, Secretary December 10, 2021 City of Santa Ana Attn: Terri Eggers 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-25, Santa Ana, CA 92701 RE: HHAP-3 Initial Disbursement Announcement— City of Santa Ana Agreement # 22-HHAP-10004 Initial Disbursement: $2,058,070.34 Dear Terri Eggers: The Business, Consumer Services and Housing Agency's (BCSH) Homeless Coordinating and Financing Council (HCFC) is pleased to announce that the City of Santa Ana has been awarded a Homeless Housing, Assistance and Prevention Round 3 (HHAP-3) Initial Disbursement in the amount of $2,058,070.34. This letter constitutes notice of the initial award of HHAP-3 funds. The City of Santa Ana will receive its initial disbursement of funds after the Initial Disbursement Contract for Funds is fully executed. Please be advised that this award is subject to the terms and conditions of the Initial Disbursement Contract for Funds enclosed with this award packet. Failure to sign and return the Initial Disbursement Contract for Funds within 30 days of receipt from BCSH may result in a delay of disbursement of funds. The City of Santa Ana will receive its remainder disbursement in the amount of $8,232,281.35 after approval of the HHAP-3 application and full execution of the Remainder Disbursement Contract for Funds. Congratulations on receiving your initial HHAP-3 award. For further information or if you have any questions, please contact the HCFC grants team at HHAP(a)bcsh.ca.gov. Sincerely, c5rV I, DWt,0�. Victor Duron, Grants Director City Co i api o Mall, ui e - acram o, - 9/2022 www.bcsh.ca.gov/he c Community Development Agency santa-ana.org/cd Item # 26 or City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report April 19, 2022 TOPIC: Increase Spending Capacity for the Homeless Navigation Center Construction AGENDA TITLE: Approve Increase in Spending Capacity with Dyer 18 LLC for Unforeseen Tenant Improvement Costs Relating to the Homeless Navigation Center (Non -General Fund) RECOMMENDED ACTION Authorize the City Manager to increase spending capacity with Dyer 18, LLC for tenant improvements at the Homeless Navigation Center, in the amount of $1,200,000. DISCUSSION On March 2, 2021, the City Council approved a lease agreement with Dyer 18 LLC for an industrial building located at 1815 Carnegie Avenue to be used as a homeless navigation center. This lease agreement included tenant improvements (construction), as well as a purchase option. The original tenant improvement costs were estimated as $8,500,000 with an additional contingency of $850,000. On February 15, 2022, the City Council approved an additional $2,000,000 to complete the project when it became apparent that the original tenant improvement estimate would be insufficient to complete the work on this site. Since this time, unforeseen conditions have continued and have impacted costs. Pandemic -related supply chain costs and changes to scope have had the greatest impact to the increased costs. Not only was there a disruption in service when goods were unavailable, but there was also an increase in costs of materials. The totality of issues at the site have created these unforeseen financial impacts and necessitate increased expenditures. The contractor reports remaining tenant improvement costs to be $2,017,391. At the onset of the agreement with the contractor the City payed a retainer of $850,000, which was to be used at the conclusion of construction. The total additional spending authority needed will be the anticipated costs, minus the retainer requiring an increase in spending authority in the amount of $1,200,000, for a total construction of $12,550,000 to complete tenant Improvements and allow occupancy. City Council 26 — 1 4/19/2022 Increase Spending Capacity for the Homeless Navigation Center Construction April 19, 2022 Page 2 At this project's onset, the general contractor made assumptions that certain portions of work had been completed by the prior contractor when estimating tenant improvement costs. As the construction progressed, it was determined that many of the items believed to have been addressed by the prior contractor had not been completed and needed to be added to the scope of work for current tenant improvements. Those costs, coupled with both increased labor and materials costs, have escalated total costs. FISCAL IMPACT Funds in the amount of $1,200,000 will be available, pending City Council approval for appropriation adjustment, in the Homeless Housing, Assistance and Prevention Program (HHAP) 3 grant, Payment to Subagent account (no. 12218717-66200) for expenditure in the current fiscal year. EXHIBIT(S) 1. Lease including Addendum 2. Schedule of Values Matrix Submitted By: Steven Mendoza, Assistant City Manager Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager City Council 26 — 2 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 �,H� - -L�UIRF irJ 'C 0CE' MAR 0 9 2021 A-2021-028 p : CDR Cr) (T-ta-1 A I R C R 9 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL SINGLE -TENANT LEASE - NET (DO NOT USE THIS FORM FOR MULTI -TENANT BUILDINGS) 1. ewlcProvIdont("BaslcProvisions"). L1 Parties. This lease ('lease'), dated for reference purposes only .MarCh 2, 2021. , Is made by and between -DYER _ B LLLC• ('Lessor") and THE CITY OF SANTA ANA ('Latsee'), (conectively tha "Partin," or IndividuaItya "Party'), 11 Premises: That cenaln real property, Including all Improvements thereln or to be provided by Lessor under the terms of this Lease, commonly known as (street address, city, state, tip): 1815 EA5T CARNEGIE AVENUE, 5ANTA ANA. CA 92705 ("Premises'). The Premises are locatedlnthe County of .ORANGE_ , and are genera llydescrbed as(descelbe briefly the nature of the property and, If applicable, the "Project," If the property Is located within a Project): AN APPROXIMATE 29,503 SQUARE FOOT FREESTANDING INDUSTRIAL BUILDING . (See also Paragraph 2) 1.3 Term: 1S years and _ months ("Original Term") commencing—MarCtt 2021 ('Commencement Date") and ending _January 31,- 2036 ("Expiration Date'). (See also Paragraph 3) 1.4 Early Possesslon: lithe Premises are available lessee may have non-excluslve possesslon of the Premises commencing N/A ("Early Possuslon Data'). (See also Paragraphs3.2 and 3.3) 1.5 Bass Rant: $61,666.00 per month (" 0ase Rent"), payable on the 1ST day of each month commencing SEE ADDENDUM , (See also Paragraph 4) ❑ If this box Is checked, there are provisions in this Lease for the Base Rent to be adjusted. See Paragraph .SEE ADDENDUM 1.6 Base Rent and Other Monies Paid Upon Execution: (a) Base Rant: $61,666.00_ for the period 1ST MONTH RENT,. (b) Security Doposlt:-$20Q.000,00 ("Security Deposit'). (See also Paragraph 5) (c) Association fees: for the perlod (d) Other: for (el Total Due Upon Execution of this Lease: 261,666 . 1.7 Agreed Use: EMERGENCY HOMELESS SHELTER AND ANCILLARY USES . (see also Paragraph 6) 1.0 Insuring Parry. Lessor Is the "InsuringParty" unlessothervtse stated herein. (See also Paragraph B) 1-9 _ Real Estate Broken. (See also Paragraph 15 and 25) (a) Representation: Each Party acknowledges receiving a OlWosure Regarding Real Estate Agency Relationship, conflrms and consents to the following agency relationships in thls Lease with the foil owing reaI estate brokers ('Brokar(s)') and/or their agents ("Ag�enIN'): Lessor's Brokerage Firm N/A Ucense No. _ Is the broker of (check one): the Lessor; or L--s both the Lessee and Lessor(dual agent). Lessor's Agent N/A Llcense No. _ Is (check one): ❑ the Lessor's Agent (salesperson or broker associate); or 171 both the Lessee's Agent and the Lessor's Agent (dual agent). Lessee's 0rokerage Firm N/A License No. ` Is the broker of icheck one): 11 the Lessee; or ❑ both the Lessee and Lessor (dual agent). Lessee's Agent N/A License No. _ Is (checkone): El the lessee's Agent (salesperson or broker assoclate); or both the Lessees Agent and the Lessor's Agent (dual agent). (b) Payment to Broken. Upon execution and delivery of this Lease by both Parties, Lessor shall pay to the Broken the brokerage fee agreed to Ina separate written agreement (or If there is no such agreement, the sum of _ or i % of the total Base Rent) for the brokerage services rendered by the Brokers. 1.10 Guarantor. N/A ("Guarantor"). (See also Paragraph37) 1.11 Attachments. Attached hereto are the following, allof which constitute a partof this Lease: Qan Addendum consisting of Paragraphs S1 through 70 El aplot plan depleting the Premises; acurrent setof the Rules and Regulations; El a Work Letter; olher(speclfy): 2. Premises. 2.1 letting. Lessor herebyleases to Lessee, and Lessee hereby leases from Lessor, the Premises, for the tenn, at the rental, and upon aliof the terms, covenants and conditions set forth In this Lease. While the approximate square footage of the Premises may have been used fn the marketing of the Premises for purposes of comparison, the Base Rent stated hereln Is NOT tied to square footage and Is not sub)ect to adjustment should the actual sloe be determined lobe different. NOTE: Lessee Is advised to verify the actual slte prior to executingthls Lease. 2.2 Cmdltsaa lescoachalldelluaF.CtwAceasicosSaJPcae4hceaas<laaa•awd•lsaealdabrkvaibe-GeasmaacaraeasaatevcYha-GoatyAouxcloa�lata wt ctwwrr "t•occ4at{-suaOSW4.a4460kag4&"Xo4uicadsa04c4ccaUa4Udacca1lwd•Ja.Rxa6QisbJ L4bjbalova.ar4ahWaadbyU"44�4ad4aoUQa +lWiaihAc ,dsya kUawlagibaSiactllate,-wacaaWe tivttheaxktlagalaacka4-Plumbing,fico4pdaLl4r, 4hdag,4aatla9,•uaatilaCa8.aadak aaadlOoalag cyciaaoa 42HUAC=},soaAW doors,-sum>l pum pc, ll. gay,.aad all ptAat.such.ofaroaau-la-iha Raamitacrethos-W as tiwta ceaatauciadb} lgcsaa,-stvall;>ala goadapasasiag-coadltloava-uiddata,- INITIALS INITIALS m 2019 AIR CRE. All RighLs Reserved. Last Edited: 2/25/2021 9:S3 AM 5TN-27.30, Revised 11-25-2019 Page 1 of 16 City Council 26 — 3 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 tAatt64-cuvctwalaromaAwas#,.ocoof,•bwFiag wa4v^�z�^^•^- .��Laa}Dulfdkrgt-aatbv•RF4m3sai�4ba=Ji.utldla�'-}tbaULp•twpnlFaaLDFiat,doblcttra�nd tbaiitta GramicOt•d4-rwLooAtala-b»arda,tlauolaoFaaymo3d acivagl d4ttaadatsoxk-uad4FapputabratsawastDdasatlaw.-1tsAaA•coAapUaAcawtttr ptd-+,�quaaty� a>tktcac of tbaStaNt>atD,•ostlana atia<# tyci4miasalvawatsihartLd maUuactloa-ac#ltwtWta lbaapprapclaivyur+aatyrpealad,taGa. ibaU,-aG all 006 4 ataabsigatsoa w La 1,049004o"-matle;,4xcaptaf•4U*PAGaprovW44la-ihaiLaDif.pcomg3ly91116;W pc4lwFI40-A09lGfFomtaciavaWagtartivNkA•tpot131ctyLtwwLu4aAd- aFLaAtot •wGh S;OA• tAiApkaMA,•n4atrtfaGdaA 4r la4ararFaGpl•) Laraa•i11.4tiat'L axpoAt4-•TAe4Faf:aatY ptirlodi•ihailb9 il•tat3a: ws(i}b awAllu•a4ta Lha-ttlt�iyLtamir• aad+[�•10 dayG..utoihaFVFaalalaggat.outs-gndottur-Gom4altoE tha.8ulldtn�leLauavdoas RaLgkcD lvieoN3s►trqutFictAottse•NJtbla-Lp4appFVPFbiLD-wacraaty. pasiod,torr4ctioaolaayiucb aanoompAaacoTAlaEfarncdoA oFliuurgsbaAbv-tltaobllBatkDnaf•LatsYa•at•Lauoe`i141v cDctaAd4oiPa0146-3 atiaraito-watraais,ihyt ualaseothaavW-cpocdi4diA a�crtdaB,L,attaF3i.uA;waca-ot• {!} Pay Focordvd11oi1sroc•ot-t?abuk-u3gttlagttwFtamlta}{U} Pay doNAgavnLawouAttOw aadvF.aaµ.lgan- fatur4dtry-CtaaAwaslwtiaad+Ul}aaytfaakcupttyptvcaadla$.aflacriAg tAa-Rr4fstltsi 1.2—ComPftaaca�t,attoowauiALc thaLao lAvJavtt•at kikaauEvdg4tbaktuprouwaDall• 4n•tk4•Atvaakac WmAA�� LhabuUcUagradac; apP.Uca!>IloSawcr ca wruattoc wttskdo"04Gcacd, t»agtclatlo"AdordtAiricss 4'ApQUcsbta-Rag+il+uaeasi'}LAatxwu 3naU4ctatiba4w4,that4a4hlraprov4mont,"PAW on- tA4raab�•ras aaaslra4 tad�S old warsaAiyda4i riot apply tq 1#P U[a tDwhktslvtt4aw44Qutiha Rr4mk4iraladlacatlaAG.wblCh.may [?a 44gW" by 444AAwriwaiwitts Oaab4ktatAUaraay.tlatUaatarucas4wtcdiofLauaa'[too(mastaPagcapb-444c-Uq"444atiom-otAA114-twO444nt+asdegQQd•kaparabwpbz4(44ma14acto- b4,naao-t}yt4t1YY dso LaCa4tt4i{!Qq{lt7t•t4.Kd.3.r,INk+lae wrt.tti.coGiwL.Q4A111111C+141 4.244414POM4911r00d=41116211Y. lht ian►ne, an apP%w4 owe tw. Loctao'i1Fr1ortladuoo,♦adai3raosalad*"4W"1*4+rtNot444-POGM &&-TAaIAa•loaparba4U Wb&L-tlthoFr4aJGstc4Gv 4"*Rly4AI4wtd•xaauaaty,•J*&wr-LhaU,- oxcapt ai•4lheaNtf4Pr4Nidad, 7�^^r�^I'if14rNCalpt•Df=,GfRLAn-ADtIG9lrOiti-Lai6O4tgLQlr1�a01til•M'lillLpaG:tLGiLy thQAsiYiOiAdYKLDaiatinFChADFhiaiAPGant4,.aadfY- ih4t3rAia-sU gitOr•`i�lfQQaW.-J�LOLN6dDaC A9L✓�a-1<itiar• wr3tt4AA011ii-ati A4A•GOAip1E?AGaNsLtti��i��lVaFFaalrj4Fltl1la5AlAntiC-faEtOr4la�tl14it7ri Data,- coutxgoa•aEt3utaou•compUaaw thaUAathoabUgalWaattatt4wi•testae'uolaGot6aad�paoie.-ttttwAppUabiD RagsFiranaoalc-xahor4afiaachaagvdaoxt-to- requiq dueiagtha t4rm-oith3tLaaea tba caoctruu{aa plsa addtnoo to-aw-aA alsarailert ottha F,evrwUat-aadrtaF-W+Gd1ag,. Uw rrrwodlipoA 4l-aay ttaaraiaut: SubuaAevr attire-r4lataFCariaaAL as athoiQltyt4cataHIdittt ►1tGA-Of l#b.ttal4, plWti{iAL.'aAd,�Mi,4itdtag�=fftptlil�MdltLFa"},.iptwc• aad.Lacivvit>a3t•aUow totbacottal cucl� uwrksc-foltow� (a+--Subjactto•FarlgrtpA•2.3{cj>wk>+tlt;4ch Caplial gxp4aditus4saa•ragtdfad•at sLviuii o62bcCP4thiicaAd•valqusacv.afia•ta,ram4aclavlvctaa.at. wAapaFod�Nit#.utai•bytvaautt lAgonorafrt.vicvashaU•bY•lu4y�-Lotpaaslak-tactkccoct• WaFoaE, pjtuwdad,3wwrvv4r,lhatlLwch•Ca{+ltal &rtwadkus'alcsvqulrad.duFLag. tha.lati3ywrt-ai lhk L4atvaAdttw cocF thowvl•aawodc imaat#t�4ac4RaatTl,vttvo mvf-iacLvadLaaAlaato this LW,tauw14cs1aGwF•aotUi4c14uaarMavciUagr ssdlhlsl.ladalklalat.t> C41ro(1osiea.'S.tQEWIJp41lun.acLUM1l.4assor.has.elAtalltopaythedlNnrmcnbetumvut6r,acI-)mtf.lbretcof.Dadan.amnunte4ud.to& AapatAttltisaRaAt 1E14tt44tlaCLCtirHAtraattaM101604tbaplAtmvdlals3Ycax►tiwutoDitbatUarAtwcwb3cl-wgulwc•NIG#t:iplti3SxWAdituwaaddaUtwttal4Kac- wxitt4aaoilcotpaciF/iagat4casYtatioaaftiaattvau-04drfatk4ctaltrr.—A'ihLvrminaU4a datN GhaUriK++�+Duot,aA ao4vvAt-ha aacU4F•ttuaih4lacidaytha+tt4ciaa• coutdlogalfY utlUa4iha�r4raltei+.dtiu;wLcotaaAVAda&aGrchtapltal-EMpaAdttuca (b}-7LcuGb CapkaliapvadUuwicAotLtwraacEtat•4h4ip4ciUwnd.ualquat�tadlhaRromkaibyl4tsgv}wthatr�0000gawatail,pasaadatvdcakmtc- wodtflutfoacl thva 14ct4 thawgaytoG w4h,Q*14 litawia"h moat dwlaotha r4AaakidaCattkaspraaollbitlaar7- af say4xtvattoa tbatfwl. as ikadata• Lltai•anit�bicAih4 isaia Aaaik dwraA-araouai aovalia-iti4Atb of tkaP�oa of -stub coitc-raasoaably-ater3bulaWo-to Zrb4 psamieaeri4ct4atAi31 iFayrtaLaaaat 4A•tlso balaaev-httt Puy PwPaY at abUgarioA-at aaY itma-dr Ao rovarrtueh Capital-i>tpondltuw k sag4k4dduFiag ihclast-�yoar� al [bit• laat4 r>t• 3t 14tiotroasaaably. doiosmlAaf-that 14k Act aco»omkaJly-toot Wtv to ¢ay -its LtaFq iharaalr lattactpail-ba�o 4haopttpato. torr#aata ihfa"ataa,{stw. Sirldays Qriorwdts4A-aossco u Laccoa uaWcsl4Gta4-aoUdail4twrr lauaidag,aFlib3a aOdayt-afivP sauipLatLacioc'itatatiaotlOa-aouwl�tutl4ctoawAly.iµ.lortuc#.• Capkal.tx},eadk4ra-ttl4atar. dwt AD4 �14GiiO•tarmhFitarsad• laity w taAdvr. kt-s#ua•alanyr•itub Gapltilgxp4adUtua,laK� mayradwae4 Guth ftu4ieaaddaduit iiAaa,.rrlltb•Mtaia[t,:WAt•tlQatYAULiftWF�i•CtFiFItOt tttGlFGot" 4"4-6" yGa A"Wilaaw oi•ifis u•duo• Pad payabta Los-t#?t4malYWaPatihii ttiatek-aab LSIft1G3aAi lof+dly.ulwstwstvlaGcvDowaAoffivt•badcrl,vciayshsUhiustt3ta4 i�gbi.ta tara>iaatatbEt lease upoa34 days wdU" Aobrai Ao J,"w- (t;-sIPaMlibisaAdlan�h4abover"OPo+riiaFst•GOACQ64;j%Ca Uai i&Kpegajl rotar4tat4ndadtoaDsal'roaiy30-r1Qa�414sF1#ijrytFniMj?Q4t4drindaeM APfrUcablo/ia4ulumvalt-!t•tb4GapltalLrpaadllucat aV lanced- Wggorad LylAcwa asa coc4ko[ an-acictaLvapropoudohaAgv-3nutv,.d>aagv lninLt�aUtY.af+wv.•o,r- awdillcatioa to. Ah*UtoallLpL then,andla-thatAwntrLett4ochsU okAva: (1} im4,nodl41i43y. caaWI sac# chaagod 4w.or.'AsaaAsy�Ct•uG4aad joFLak4 st+cA othaF• cWpiat. Asaybo�4toswF>rev-oBFptaaWttwm4uloamMAt4astwh-C40WUpa;4044ra,-or{4kaasptatnsuch cap,4 gatpaaaturaallts.0ualaxpaAiv-l4Giaa-t3nitaot,baww+a;• belle-aAy-Ft$hita•Lasalipata i1ttL 10afa. ZA Acknowledgaments. Lessee acknowledges that: Wit has been given an oppoitualty to Inspect and measure the Premises, (b) it has been advised by Lessor and/or Pickers to satisfy itself with respect to the sire and condition of the Premises lincluding but not limited to die electrical, WAC and fire sprinkler systems, security, environmental aspects, and compliance with Applicable Requlfements and the Americans with Disabilities Act), and their suitability for lessee's Intended use, (c)Lessee has made such investigation as It deems necessaryw4h reference to tuck matters and assumes ail responsiblllty therefor as die same relate tolls occupancy of the Premises, (dj it Is not relylne on any representation as to the slceof the Premises made by Brokers or Lassa, (el the square footage of the Premises was not material to lessee's decision to lease the Premises and pay the Rent stated herein, and Qj nelther tesso , Lessor's agents, nor Brokers have made any oral or written representations or warranties with respect to sold matters other than as set forth In this Lease. In addition, Lessor acknowledges that (1) Brokers have made no representations, promises or wait anttes conc"ng Le ssee's ablllty to honor the lease or suitability to occupy the Premises, and Ui) it is lessor's sole responsibility to investigatethe financlal capability and/or sultablUty of all proposed tenants. 2.5 testers as Pilot Owner/Occupant, Thewarranties made by Lessor In Paragraph 2 shalt 6e of no forty or effect If Immediately prior to the start Cote Lessee was the owner or occupant of the Premises. in such event, Lessee shall be responsible for any necessary corrective work. 3. Term. 3.1 Term, The Commencement Date, Expiration Date and Original Term of this lease areas specified in Paragraph 1.3. 3.2 Early Possession. Any provision herein granting Lessee Early Possrisslon oftho Premises Is subject to and conditioned upon the Premises being ava liable for such posseuion prior to the Commencement Date. Any grant of Early Possession only conveys a non-exclusive right to occupy the Premises, if Lessee totally or partially occupies the Pmrrlses prior to the Commencement Date, the obligation to pay Base went shall be abated for the period of such Early Possession, All other terms of this [-ease (including but not limited to the obllgations to pay Beat Property Taxes and Insurance premiums and to maintain the Premises) shall be in effect during such period. Any such Early Possession shall not affect the Expiration Date, 3,3 Delay In Possession. Lessor agrees to use Its best commercially reasonable efforts to deliver possession of the Premises to Lessee by the Commencement Date. 11, despite said efforts, lessor Lt unable to deliver possession by such date, Lester shag not be lub{act to anyllablllly, therefor, nor shall such feliure affect the validltyof this Lease or change the Expiration Date. Lessee shall not, however, be obliga led to pay Bent or perform its other obligations until Lessor delivers possession of the Premises and any period of rent abatement that Lessee would otherwlse have enjoyed shalT run from the date of dellvery of possession and continue for aperiod equal to what Lessee would otherwise have enjoyed under the terms hereof, but minusany days of delay caused bytheac.tsoremissions o1 Less e, if possession Is not delivered within 60 days after the Commencement Date, as t be extended under the terms of any Work Letter executed by INITIALS V 2019 AIR CRE. All Rights Reserved, Last Edited; 2/25/2021 9:53 AM STN-27,30, Revised 11-25.2019 Page 2 of 15 City Council 26 — 4 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Parties, Lessee may, at Its option, by notice In wrlHng within 10 days after the and of such 60 day period, cancel this Lease, in which event the Parties shall be discharged from all obligations here under, If such written notice Is not received by lessor within said 10day period, Lessee's rlght to cancel shall wrminale. if possessloo of the Premises is not delivered within 120 days afler the Commencement Date, this Lease shall terminate unless other agreements are tea shed between lessor and Lessee, In writing. 3.4 Lessee Compliance. Lessor shall not be required to tender possession of the Premises to Lessee until lessee compiles with Its obligation to provide evidence of Insurance (Paragraph 8.5), Pending dellveryof such evidence, Lessee shalt be required to perform all of itsobilgations under this teaser from and afterthe Start Date, including the payment of Rent, notwithstanding Lessor's eletrlanto withhold possession pending receipt of such evtdence of Insurance. Furiher, if Lessee Is required to perform any other conditions prior to or concurrent with the Start Date, the Start Dateshall occur but Lessor may elect to withhold possession until such conditlonsare satisfied. 4. Rent. 4.1 Rem Defined. All monetary obligations of Lessee to Lessor under the terms of this Lease (except for the Security Deposit) are deemed to be rent ("Rent"), 4.2 Paymant Lessee shah oust: paymentof Bent lobe received by Lessorin lawful moneyof the United States, without offset or deduction (except as specifically permitted In this lease), on or before the day on which it Is due. All monetary amounts shall be rounded lathe nearest whole dollar. In the event that any Invalce prepared by Lessor Isinacturate such inaccuracy shalf not constitute a waiver and Lossee shag be obligated to pay the amount set forth in this Lease, Rent for any period during the tram hereof which Is for loss than one full calendar month shall be prorated based upon the actual number of days of said month. Payment of Rentshall bemade to Lessor at its address stated herein ortosuch other persons or placeas Lessor may from timoto time designate Inwiling. Acceptance of a paymentwhich Mess than the amount then due shall not be a walver of Lessor's rights to the balance of such Rant regardless of Lessor's endorsement of any check so stating. In the event that any check, draft, or other Instrument of payment given by Lessee to Lessor is dishonored for any reason, lessee agrees to pay to lessor the sum of $25 In addition to any late Charge and Lesso, at Its optlon, may require all future Rent be paid by tashler's check, Paymentswlll be applied first to accrued late charges i M attorney's fees, second to accrued Interest, then to Base Rent, Insurance and Real Property Taxes, and any remaining amount to any other outstanding charges oncosts. 4.3 Assoclation Fees. Intentionally Omitted.•tn ea,nnu V equal ioau>po—ge, arauciatWn ar-coadwala[ura coat rev bad ac auassad•a6a ust•csw-suwataas—Sob• asoalaa shalt-"im"t at 4he taaaa ilmaaari ta lira catna+su aaneaac-3ha8asa go". S. Security Depmlt. Lessee shall deposit with lessor upon execution hereof the Security Depositas security for Lessee's faithful perfarmance of Its obllgatlons under this Lease. If Lessee falls topay Rent, or otherwise Defaults under this Lease, Lessor may use, apply or retain all or any portion of said Security Deposit tot the payment of any amount already due Lessor, for Rents which wind be due In the future, and/or to reimburse orcompensate Lessorfor any Ilabllity, expense, loss or damage which Lessor may suffer orincur by reason thereof. If Lessor uses or applies all or any portion of theSectirlty, Deposit, lessee shalt within 10 days after written request therefor deposit modes with lessor sufficient to restore said SecuiltyDe posit to the full amount requlred by this lease, ff Me ease Rent Increases during file term of thlslease, Lessee shall, upon written request from tcssor. deposit additional monies with lessor so that the total amount of the Security Deposit shall atoll times bear the same proportion to the Increased Base Rent as the Initial Security Deposit bore to the Initial Base Rent. Should the Agreed Use be amended to accom modate a material change In the business of Lessee or to accommodate a sublessee or assignee, Lessor shall have the right to Increase the Security Deposit to the extent necessary, In Letsor's reasonable judgment, to account for anyincfeased wear and tear that the Premises may suffer as a resuft thereof, if a change in control of Lessee occurs duringthls tease and following such change the financialcondliton oftessee It, In Lessor's reasonable judgment, slgnificanity reduced, Lessee shall deposit such additional monies with Lessor as shall be sufficient to cause the Security Deposit to be at a commercially reasonabhs level based on such change in financial condition. Lessor shag not be required to beep the Security Deposit separate from [is general accounts, Within 00 days after the expiration or termination of this Lease, lessor shall return that portion of the Security Deposit not used or appkd by Lessor- Lessor shall upon wthitun request provide Lessee with an accounting showing how that portion of the Security Deposit that was not returned was applied, No part of the SacurityDeposlt shall be toruldeted to be held in trust, to bear interest or to be prepayment for any monies to be paid by Lessee under thislease, THE SECURITY WPOSITSHALL HOt BE USlD BY LESSEE IN LIEU OF PAYMENT OF THE LAST MONTH'S RENT, 6. Use, 6.1 Use lessee shall use and occupy the Premises only for the Agreed use, or arty other legal use which Is reasonably comparable thereto, and for no other purpose. Lessee shall not use or permit the use of the Premises In a manner that Is unlawful, creates damage, waste or a nuisance, or that disturbs occupants of or causesdamage to neighboring premises or properties, Othaa-thaw-gultle,-algnalsndceokgrye>ZarlarwaatsaU-awtJwapar-aUaualaihAFewnkoaaa fpeu.aalassaic,- Wrda,ttsA,a:.cepUiac Lessor shall not unreasonably withhold or delay itsconsent to any written request for a modification of the Agreed the, so long as the same will not Impair the structural Integrity ofthe Improvements on the premises or the mechanical or electrical systems therein, andfor Is not slgnlfttamly more burdensome to the Premises. If Lessor elects to withhold consent, Lessor shall within 7 days after such request give written notification of same,whlch notice shall include an explanation of Lessor's objections to the change In the Agreed Use. 6.2 Hazardous Substances, (a) Reportable Uses Require Consent. The term "Hwardous Substance" as used In this tease shall mean anyproduct, substance, or waste whose presence, use, manufacture, disposal, transportation, or release, either by itself or In combination with other materials expected to be on the Premises, Is either., (I) potentially injurious to the publichealth, safety or welfare, the environment or the Premises, (fs) rogulaled or monitored by any governmental authority, or (IR) a basis lot potential liability of Lessor to any governmental agency or third party under any applicable statute or common law theory. Hazardous Substances shall include, but not be limited to, hyd(ocarbons, petroleum, gasoline, and/or crude allot anypfoducts, by-products orfractiom thereof. Lessee shall not engage In any activity In or on the Premises which constitutes a Reportable Use of Hazardous Substances without the express pnarwritten consent oflessot and timely compliance (at Lessee's expense) with all Applicable Requirements, "Reportable Use" shall mean if) the Installation or useof any above or below ground storage tank, ill) the generation, possession, storage, use, transporlatlon, ordlsposalof a Hazardous Substance that requires a permit from, or with respect to which a report, notice, registration of businessplan Is required to be hied with, any governmental authoilty, and/or till) the presence at the Premisesof a Hazardous Substance with respect to which any Applicable Requirements requires that a notice be given to persons entering or occupvingthe Premises or neighboring properttes. Notwithstanding the foregoing, lessee may use arty ordinary and customary materials reasonably required to be used In the normal course ofthe Agreed Use, ardinoryofflcesupplies (copler toner, liquid p R, glue, etc.) and common ho usehold cleaning materials, so long as such use Isin compliance with all Applicable Requirements, is not a Reportable Use, and does not expbsethe Premisesor neighboring property to any meaningful risk of contamination ordamage or expose Lessor to any lability therefor, In addition, Lessotmay condition its consent toarry Reportable Use upon receiving suchaddltionalassurances as Lessor reasonably deems necessary toproteCt Itself, the publlc, the Premises andforthe environment against damage, contamination, injury and/or liability, Including, but not limited to, the installation (and removal on or before tease explraton or termination) of protective modifications (such as concrete encasements) and/or Increasing the Security Deposit. (b) bury to Inform lessor. It lessee knows, or has reasonable cause to believe tit t a HatardotuSubstancehascome to be located in, on, under er INITIALS lIl © 2019AIR CRE, All Rights Reserved, Last Edited: 2/25120219:53 AM STN-27,30, Revised 11-25.2019 Page 3of 16 City Council 26 — 5 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 about the Premises, other than as previously consented to by tessoy Lassoa thall Immediately give written notice of such fact to lessor, and provide Lessorwlth a Copy of any report, notice, clalmor other documentation which It has concerning the presence of such HazardousSubslance. (c) lessee Remodlation. Lessee shall not cause or permit any Hazardous Substance to be spilled or released In, on, under, or about the Premises (inciuding through the plumbing or sanitary sewer system) and shalt promptty, at Lessee's expense, comply with all Applicable Requirements and take all Investigatory and/or remedial action reasonably recommended, whether or not formally ordered or required, for the cleanup of any eontaminatlon of, and for them aintenance, secur3y and/or monitoring of the Premises or neighboring properties, that was caused or malerialty sontributed to by Lessee, or pertaining to or Involving any Hatardous,Substance brought onto the Premisesduring thetermofthls Lease, byor lot Lessee, or any third party. (d) Lessee Indemnification. Lessee shall indemnify, defend and hold Lessor, Its agents, employees, fenders and ground Lessor, harry„ harmless from and against arty and all loss of rents and/or damages, Il►blllties, Judgments, claims, expenses, pen antes, and attorneys' and consultants' fees arlsingout of or Involving any Hazardous Substance brovahtanto the Premises by or for lessee, or any third party (provided, however, that lessee shall nave no tlabdltyunder this lease with respect to undecground mlgradon of any Hazardous Substance under the Premises from ►diatent properties not caused or contributed to byLesteel. Lessee's obligations shall Include, but not be limited to, the effects of any contamination or Injury to person, property or the erwlronmew created or sulfated by lessee, and the Cost of Investigation, removal, remedlalion, restoration and/or abatement, and shall survive the expiration or termination of this Lease, No ttrmlrnation, cancellation or release agreement entered into by Lessor and Lemes %hall rsleast Lessee from its obligations under this lease with respect to Hazardous Substances, unless tpeciNcaliyto agreed by Lassor In writing at the time of such agreement, (e) Castor indemnlOatlon. Except as otherwise provided In paragraph 9.7, Lessor and Its successors and assigns shall Indemn7y, defend, reimburse and hold Lessee, its employees and lenders, harmless from and agalnst any and all environmental damages, Including the cost of remedlation, which result from Hazardous Substances which existed on the Premises prior to Lessee's occupancy or which are caused by the gross negligence orwlllfut misconduct of Lessor, its agents or employees. Lessor's obligations, as and when required by theAppiicabla Requirements, shall include, but not be limited to, the cost of Investigation, removal, remedlation, restoration and/or abatement, and shallsurvNvethe expiration or termination of this Lease. (f) InveiH¢attons and Rernedlattoru. Lessor shall retain the responsibility and pay for any Investigations or remedlation measures required by governmental emtiltes having jurisdiction with respect to the existence of Hazardous Substances on the Premises prior to Lessee's occupancy, unless such remedlation measure Is required as aresultof Lessee'suse (Vncludina'Alterations", asdollnedIn paragraph7.3(a) below) of the Premises, In which event Lessee shall be responsible for suth payment. Lessee shalt cooperate fully In a ray suthactivitiesat the request of Lessor, Including allowing Lessor and Lessor's agents to have reasonable access to the Premises at reasonable times In crderto cacryout Lessor's Investigadveand remedial responsibilities. Jill Lessor Termination Option. If aHazardous Substance Condition (see Paragraph 9.1(e)) occurs during the teemof this Lease, unless Lessee Is iegsily responsible therefor (Inwitith case Lessee ;hall make the Investigation and remedlation thorvof required by the Applicable Requirements and this Lease shall continue In full force and effect, but subject to Lessor's rights under Paragraph 6.2(d) and Paragraph 13), Lessor may, at Lessa'soplion, either (11 Investigate and remediate such Hazardous Substance Condition, If required, as soon as reatonably possible at Lessor's expense, In which event this lease shall continue In full force and effect, or (11) If the estimated cost to remedlate such condition exceeds 12 times the then monthly Base Rent or $200,000, whichever Is greater,give written notice to Lessee. within 30 days after receipt by Lessorof knowledge of the occurrence ofsuch Hazardous Substance Condition, of Lessor's desire to terminate this lease as of the date 60 days following the date of such notice. in the event Lessor elects to give a termination notice, lessee may, within 10days thereafter, glue written notice to lessor al Lessee's commitment to pay the amountby which the cost of the rernediatfon of such Hazardous SubstanceConciltion exceeds an amount equal to 12 times the then monthly Use Rent or $200,000, whichever Is greater. Lessee shall provide lessor with said funds of Ptttfactory assurance thereofwithin 30 days following such commitment. In such event, Ws Lease shall continue In full foiceandelfecl, and Lessor shall proceed to make such remedlation as soon as reasonably possible after the required funds are available. It Lessee does not give such notice and provide the required fundsor assurance thereof within the time provided, this Lease shall terminate as ofthe date specified In Lessor's notice of tecmination. 6.3 Lessee's Compliance with Applicable Requirements, fxwpias otbettµVFe{uavWed lalAkiwcp, Lessee shall, at Lessee's sole expense, fully, dlilgently and Ina timely manner, materially comply with allAppllcabte Requirements, the requirements ofany applicable Ore Insurance undetwrlter or rating bureau, and the recommendations of Lasso r's engineers and/or consultantswhich relate in any manner to the premises, withoutregard to whether said Applicable Requbaments ate nowin effector besomeeffective after the Start Rate Lessee shall, within 10days after receipt of lessor's written request, provide Lessor with copies of all permits and other documents, and other Infurmadon evidencing Lessae's compliance with any Applicable Rcqultements specified byLessor, and shall Immediately upon receipt, notify Lessor In writing (witheoples of any documents involved) of any threatened or actual claim, notice, citation, xaming, complaint or report pertaining to or Involving tho failure of Lessee or the Premises to comply with any Applicable Requirements, Ukewlse, Lessee shall Immedlately give written notice to Lessor of: (1) any water damage to the Premises and any suspected seepage, pooling, dampness or other condition conducive to the production of mold; or (f) any mustiness or other odors that might indicate the presence of mold In the Premises. In addldon, Lessee shall provide copies o fall relevant material safety data sheets (MSDSI to Lessor within 10days o (the tecelpt of a written request therefor. In addition, Lessee shall psovlde lessor with enples of its business licence, cerdllcate o foccupancy andior any similar document within 10days of the receipt of awritten request therefor. GA Inspection; Compllance, Lessor and Lessor's "tender" (as defined in Paragraph 301 and consultants authorized by Lessor shall have the right to enter into Premises at any time, In the case of en emergency, and otherwis,eal reasonable tlmesafter reasonable notice, for the purpose of Inspecting and/or testing the condition of the Premises and/or forverilyfng compliance by Lessee with this Lease, The cost of any such Inspections shall be paid by Lessor, unless aviolation of Applicable Requirements, or a Hazardous Substance Condition (see paragraph M) Is toured to exist tat be imminent or the Inspection Is requestod o i ordered b v a governmentalautitoffty. In such.case, Lessee shall upon request reimburse Lessor for the cost of suth Inspection, so long as such Inspection It reas.onablyrelated to the vsolatlon or contamination. In addition, Lessee shall provide copies of all relevant materlalsafety data sheets (MSGS) to Lessor within 10 days of the rocefpt of a written request therefor. Lessee acknowledges that any (allure on its part to allow such Inspections or testing will expose lessor to risks and potentially cause Lessor to Incur costs not contemplated bythls Lease, the extent of which will be extremely difhtult to ascertain. Accordingly, should the lessee improperly or unreasonably fall to allow such inspections and/or testing Ina timely fashion Lesseeshall pay to Lessor a fee in the amount of ��OOthe baseAeetshaN•irsa+riaasat#ail{y ltrcreased,�vitlwutanrrequkesnaaQ%r-neileeta.leabeerbyan-anwunt ekua4ta i.49taJlhea tbeaexlaetiagRasaileao car. AArwhitttcverl59aaatewfoFtlso+amafn4aFao-LhQJwta. The Parties agree that such and reasonable compensation for the additional rile/coststhat lessor will Incur by reason of Lessee's failure to allow such Inspectoon and/or testing. Such a„° a " shall in no event constitule a waiver of Lessee's Default or Breach with respect to such fagure nor prevent the exercise of any ofthts other rlghtsand remediesgranted hereunder. 7. Maintenance; Repairs; Utility Installattons; Trade fhdurm and Alterations. 7.1 Lessee's Obllgatforu• 1act�(a) In General. subject toltwpzaultlaat ttos►},a.2{tampu Wu Raqukstatarstt},x1 sObilgalaoasy-4jllaruagearCattwcttoal,andis{Caadamnagan� Lessee shall, at Re ole expense, keep the Premises. Utility Installations (intended for INITIALS R1 2019 AIR CRE. All Rights Reserved. Last Edited: 2/25/2021 9:53 AM STN.27.30, Revised 11-25-2019 Page A of 16 City Council 26 — 6 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Lessee's excluslve use, no matter where located), and Alterations In goad order, condition and repair (whether or not the portion of the Premises requiring repairs, or the means of repairing the, ame, are reasonably or readily accessible to Lessee, end whether ce not the need for such repairs occurs as a restrtt of Lessee's use, any prier use, the elements or theege of such portion of the Premises), Including, but not limited to,all equipment or facilides, such as plumbing, NVAC equipment, electrlcal,110ting faclildes,bolleis, pressufavessels, Are protection system, Rxlums,walls (intodorand exi0rior), foundations, tetlings, roofs, roof drainage systems, floors, windows, doors, plate glass, skylights, landscaping, driveways, parking lots, fences, feialning walls, signs, side"lksand parkways located In, on, or adjacent to the Premises. Lessee, In keepingthe Premises In good order, condition and repair, shalt exercise and perform good maintenance practices, specifically including the procurement and maintenance of the service contracts required by Paragraph 7.1(b) below, lessee's obligations shall Include restorations, replace menns or renewals when necessary to keep the Premises and all Improvements thereon or a part thereof In good order, condition and State of repair. Lessee shall, during the term of this wain, koep the exterior appeatanco of the Building In a first-class condition (Inc;u dine, e.g, graffiti removal) consistentwith the exterior appearkme of other similar facllitiasof comparable age and site In thevldnity, Including, when necessary, theexterlor repalnting or the Building, (b) Service Contracts. Lessee shall, at Laisee's sole expense, procure and maintain contracts,with copies to Lessor, In customary formand substance for., and with contractors speclallring and experienced in the rnalotenance of the following equipment and Improvements, If any, Ifand when liutelled on the Premises: (1) 14VACequipment, (R)boller, and pressure vessels, (III) fire extinguishing systems, including fire alarm and/or smoke detection, (hr)Iandscaping and Irrigation systems, (vl roof coveringand drains, and [A) clarifiers. However, lessor reserves the right, upon notice to Lessee, to procure and malntain any or ail of suchservlce contracts, and lessee shall reimburse Lessor, upon dernwd, for the cost thereof. (c) Failure to Perform. If lessee falls to perform LOssee'sobligations under this Paragraph 7.1, Lessor may enter upon thePremisesaher 10days' prior written notice to lessee (except In the case of an emer6oricy, In which case no notice shall be requlred), perform such obligations on lessee's behalf, and put the Premises in good order, condition and repair, and lessee shall promptly payia Lessor a sum equal to 115% of the cost thereof. (d) Replacement Subject to lessee's indemnification of lessor as set forth in Paragraph 8,7 below, and without relieving lessee of Itabllity resulting from Lessee'sfallure to exerclse and performgood malntenance practices, if an item described In Paragraph 7,1(b) cannot be repaired other than at acost which Is in excess of 50% of the cost of replacing such Item, then such Item shall be replaced by lessor, and the cost thereof shall be prorated between the Parties and Lessee shill only be obligated to pay,, each month during she remainder of the term of this Lease or any extension thereof, on the date on which Base Rent Is due, an amount equal to the product of multiplying the cost of such replacement bya (raction, the numerator ofwhich is one, and the deeominrtor of whkh is 144 (Le, 1/144thof the cost per month), Lessee shall pay Interest on theunamortited balance but may prepay Its obligation at any time. 7.1 tinsor's Obilgations. Strbiecllo tillnresvlslortt�i PataRoahS22 ({ 13ttam up nn,m) 3(Bamign nrnstsn rrsnnl anA id�rnnAe�,n�r;�. t� Itis Intended by the Parties heretothat Lassor haven obllgatfon,In any manner whatsoever, to repair and mointaln the Premises, or the equipment therein, all of which obligations are intended to be that of the Lessee. It Is the intention ofthe Parties that the terms of this lease govern the respective obligations of the Parties as to ma Intenance and repair of the Premises. 7.3 UNRty installations; Trade Fixtures; Alterations, (a) Definitions, The term -Utility installations" refers to all floor and window coverings, air and/or vacuum lines, power panels, electrical distribution, security and fire protection systems, communication cabllne, ilghtingfixtures, NV,ACequipment, plumbing, and fencing In or on the Premises, The term "Trade Fixtures' shall mean Lessee's machinery and equipment plat can be removed without doing material damage to the Premises. The term "Alterations' shall mean any modification of the Improvements, other than Utility Installations or Trade Pbnures, whether by addition or deletion. "Lessee Owned Alterations and/or Utility Installations" are defined as Altetatlen$and/or Utility Inslalatians made by lessee that are not yet owned by Lessor pursuant to Paragraph 7.4(a), (b) Consent. Lessee shall notmake any Alterations or Utility Installations to the Premises without Lessors prlorwritten consent. Lessee may, however, make non•stmcturalARerations or Utility Inslallatlonsto the interior of the Premises (excluding the roof) without suchconsentbut upon notice to Lessor, as long as they are not visible from theoulside, do not involve puncturing, raiocatingorremoving the toot or any existing walls, will nil effect the electrical, plumbing, NVAC, and/or life safety systems, do sxd trigger the requirement for add Ilional modifications and/or improvements to the Premises resulting from Applicable Requirements, such as compliance with Title 24, and the Cumulative cost thereof during this Lease as extended does not exceed a sum equal to•3 month's (lase Rent in the aggregate ora sum equal to one month's Base Rent in any one year. Notwlthstandlog the foregoing, Lessee shall not"Ve or permit any roof penetrations and/or Install anything on the roof without theprlor written approval of tessor, Lessor may, as a precondition togranting such approval, require Lesseo to Willa a contractor chosen and/or approved by Lessor, Any Alterations or Utility Installations that Lessee shall desire to malra and which require the consentof the lessor shall be presented to Lessor In writtenformvrRh detaged plans. Consent shall be deemed conditioned upon Lessee's: (1) acquirlog all applicable governmental permits, (II) furnishing Lessor with copies of both the permits and the plans andspedficatiom prior to commencement of the work, and (Ill) compliance with all conditions of said permits and other Applicable Requirements in a prompt and expedhious manner, AnyAlteratlons or Utility Installationsshill be performed in a workmanlike manner with good and sufficient materials. Lessee shall promptly, upon completion furnish Lessorwith as -built plans and specifications. for work which costs an amount in excess of one month's Base Rent, Lessor maycondltlon llsconsent upon Lessee providing a lien and completion bond in in amount equal to 150% of the estimated cost o(suthAlteration of Utility installation and/or upon lessee's posting an additional Security Oeposit with Lessor. fc)f Liens; Bonds, Lessee shall pay, when due, ail clalmsfor labor or materials furnished or alleged to have been furnished to or for lessee at or for use on the Premises, which claims are or may be secured by any mechanlc's or materialmen`s lien agalnst the Premises or any Interest therein. Lessee shall give Lessor nor less than 10 days notice prior to We commencement of any work In, on of about the Premises, and Lessor shall have the right to post noticesof non -responsibility, If Lessee shall contest the valldityof any such lien, claim or demand, then Lessee shall, at Its sole expense defend and protect Itself, Lessor and the Promises against the same and shall pay and sadsty any such adverse judgment that may be rendered thereon berate the enforcement thereof, If Lessor shall require, Lessee shall furalsh a surety bond In an amount equal to 150% of the amount of such contested lien, claim or demand, indemnifying Lessor agatAst liability for thesame, If Les for elects to participate In any such action, Lessee shall pay lassor's attorneys' fees and costs. 7.4 Ownership; Removal; Surrender, and Restoration. (a) ownership. Subject to Lessor's right to require removal or elect ownership as hereinafter provided, all Alterations and Udlltyinstallatlons made by Lessee shall he the property of lessen, but considered a part of the Premises. Lessor may„ at any time, elect Inwrltlng to be the owner of all or any specified part of the Lessee Owned Alterations and Utility installations, Unless otherwise Instructed per paragraph 7.4(b) hereof,all Lessee Owned Alterations and Utility ;nstallations shall. at the expiration or termination of thltLease, become the property of lessor and be surrendered by Lessee with the Premises, (b) Removal. By deltyety to Lessee of written notice from Lessor not earlier than 90 and not later than 30 days prior to the end of the term of this Lease, Lessor may require that any or all Lessee Owned Alterations or U611tylnstallations be removed by the expiratlon or termination of this Lease, Lessor may require the removal at any time of all or any part of any Lessee Owned Alterations or Utility installations made without the required consent. (cl Surrender; Restoration. Lessee shall surrender the Premise sby the Fxpkalfon Pate or any eaflleT termination date, with all of the Improvements, parts and surfaces thereof broom clean and free of debris,and In good operating ord er, condition and state of repair.ordlnary wear and tear excepted. "Ordinary wear and tear` shall not include any damage or deterioration that would have been prevented by good maintenance practlee. Notwithstanding the foregoing and the provisions of Paragraph 7.1(a), If the Lessee occupies the Premises for 12 months or less, then Lessee shall surrender the Premises In the same condition as delivered IV — INITIALS (S PS gl 2019 AIR CRC:, All Rights Reserved, Last Edited: 2/25/2021 9:51 AM STN-27.30, Revised 11-25.2019 Page 5 of 16 City Council 26 — 7 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 to Lessee on the Start pate with NO allowance for ordinary wear and tear, Lessee shall repair any damago occaslonod by the Installation, maintenance or removal of Trade Fixtures, Lessee owned Alterations and/or UUtlty Installations, furnishings, and equipment os well as the removal of arty storage Iankinstalled byor for Lessee. Lessee shall also remove from the Premises any and all Hazardous Subslances brought onto the Premises byor for lessee, or any thltd party (except Hazardous Substances which weredeposhed via underground migration Iiomare as outside of the Premises) to tholevel specified In Applicable Requirements. Trade Fixtures shall remain the properly of Lessee and shall be removed by Lessen, Any personal property of Lessee not removed on or before the Expiration Date or any ear for terminatlondate shaftbe deemed to have been abandoned by Lessee and maybe disposed of or retalnedby Lessor as Lessor may desire. The falIure by Lessee to time Iyvacale the Premises pursuanttothIs Paragraph 7,4(c) without the expresswrltten consent oflessor shall constitute a holdoverunder the provlslonsol Paragraph 26 below. 8, Insurance; Indemnity. 8.1 Payment For Insurance, lessen shall pay for all Insurance requlred under Paragraph 8 except to the extent ofthe cost attributable to liability insurance carried by lessor under Paagraph 8.2(b) In exmssof $2,0(50,000 per occurrence, Premiums for polity periods commencing prior to or extending beyond the Lease tatm shall be prorated to cer(aspond to the Lease term Payment shall be made by lessee to Lessor within 10 days following receipt of an Invoice, 82 liability Insurance, la) Carried by lessee, lessee shall obtain and keep In force a Commercial General Ltabllky polloyofinsurance protecting Lessee and Lessor as an additional Insured agalnstclalms for bodily Injury, personal Injury and property damage based upon or arising out of the ownership, use, occupancy or maintenance of the Premises and all areas appurtenant thereto. Such Insurance shall be on an occurrence basis providing singiegmtt coverage In an amount not less than $1,000,ODO per occurrence with an annualaggregate of not less than $2,000,000. Lessee shall add Lesser as an addtonal insured by means of an endorsement at least as broad as the Insuranceservlco Organlzatlon's"Additional Insured•Managem orteisorsof Premises" Endorsement. The policy shall not contain any Intra-Insured excluslons as between insured persons or orga nitat Inns, but shall include coverage for liability assumed under this Lease as an "Insured contnici far the performance of Lessee's Indemnity obligations under this Leasa, The limits or sold Insurance shall not, however, limit the liability of lessee not relieve lessee of any obligation hereunder, Lessee shall provide an endorsement onus IN bliltypolicyfles) which provides that itslnsurance sha€! be primary to and not contributory with any similar insurance carried by Lesso,whose Insurance shall be considered excess Insurance only. (b) Carried by Lessor. Lessor shall maintain liability Insurance asdescrlbed in Paragraph8.2(a), in addition to, and not in lieu of, the Insurance required to be maintained by lessee. Lessee shall, to the extent available, riot be named as an additional insured therein. The City of Santa Ana, and its officers, employees, Agent and representatives, shall to the extent no costis incurred with respect thereto and to the extent reasonably available to Lessor shall be additional insureds with respect to any general liability or auto liability policy obtained by Lessor, by endorsement, and all such insurance policies shall be primary and non-contributory. Lessor shall send certificates of such insurance to Lessee to Its Risk Management Division, qth Floor, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana 92701, 8.3 Property Insurance - Building, improvements and Rental value. (a) Building and Improvements, The insuring Parry shall obtain and keep in force a policy orpolicies in the name of Lessor with loss payable to Lessor, any ground -lessor, and to any Lender Insuring loss or damage to the Premises. The amount of such Insurance shall be equal to the full nsurable repiacementcost of the Premises, as the some shall exist from time to time, or the amount requlrsad by any Lender, but in no event more than the commerclalty reasonable and available insurable value thereof. Lessee Owned Alterations and Utility Installations, Trade Flxturos,and Lessoe's personal property shall be insured by lessee not by lessor. If the coverage Is avallable and commeicialiv appropriate, such policy or policies shall insure against all risks of direct physical loss or damage (eacept the perils of flood ondjor earthquake unless required by a Lender}, including coverage for debris removal and the enforcement of any Applicable Requirements requiring the upgrading, demolition, reconstructfoA or replacement of anyportion of the Premises as theresult of a covered loss, Sold policy or policies shall also contain an agreed valuation provision In lieu of anytoinsurance c1suse, waiver of subrogation, and Inflation gu and protection causing an Increase In the annual property Insurance coverage amount by a factor of not less than the adjusted U.S, Department of Labor Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers for the city nearest to where the Premises are looted, if such Insurance coverage has a deductible clause, the deductible amount shall not exceed $5,000 per occurrence, and lessee shall be liable For such deductible amount In the event of an Insured Loss, (b) Rental Value. The Insuring Party shall obtain and keep In force a policy or policies In the name of Lessor with loss payable to Lessor and any Lender, Insuring the loss of the full Rent for one yearwlth an extended period of Indemnity loran additional Wodays ("Rental value Insurance"), said insurance shall contain an agreed valuation provision In lieuof anycolnsurance clause, and the a mountof coverage shalt be adjusted annually toreflect the projected Rent otherwise payable by lessee, for the next 12 month period. lessee shall be liable for anydeductlble amount in the event of such loss, (c) AdjatentPtemises. If the Premises are part of a larger building, prof agroup ofbuildkngsowned by Lessor which are adjacent to the Premises, the Lessee shall pay far anyinctease In the premiums for the property Insurancti of such building of buildings If said Increase Is caused by Lessea's acts, omisslons, use or occupancy of the Premises. 8.4 Lessee's Property; Business interruption Insurance; Worker's Compensation Insurance. (al Property Damage. Lessee shall obtain and maintain insurance coverage on allot Lessee's personal property, Trade FBtturts, and Lessee owned Alterations and Utility installations. Such huuranco shalt bo full replacement cost covenagewith a deductible of not to exceed $t,(xio per occurrence. The proceeds Irom any such Insurance shall be used by Lessee for the replacement of personal property, Trade Fixtures and Lessee Owned Alterations and Utility instailatioti (b) Business Interruption. Lessee shall obtain and maintain loss of Income and extra expense Insuronceln amounts as will reimburse Lessee for direct or Indirect loss of earnings attrlbulabie to all perlls commonly Insured against by prudent lessees In the business of lessee or attributable to prevention of access to the Ptemisesas aresult of such perils, (c) Worker's Compensation Insurance. Lessee shall obtain and maintain Worker's Componsation Insurance in such amount as may be required by Applicable Requirements- Such policy shall include a'Walver of Subtogadon' endorsement. Lessee shall provide Lessor with a copy of such endorsement along with the certificate of Insurance or copy of the policy squired by paragraph It.5. (d) No Representation of Adequate Coverage. Lessor makes no mpresentatlan that the lin itsor forms of coverage of insurance speclRed herein are adequate to cover Lessee's property, business operations or obligations under this Least. 8.5 Insurance Policies. Insurance required herein shall be by companies maintaining during the pollcyterm a'General Policyholders Rating" of at least A•,vh, as set forth In the most cu rrent issue of "8est's Insurance Gulde", or such other rating as maybe required by a lender. Lesseashan not do or permit to be done I g which Imrelldates the required Insurance policies, Lessee shall, prior (o the Start Date, deliver to Lessor certified copies of policies of such insurance or INITIALS AWS 0 2019 AIR CRE, All Rights Reserved. Last Edited; 2/25/2021 SIMAM STN-27,30, Revised 11.25.2019 Page 6 of 16 City Council 26 — 8 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 certilicateswlth copies of the required endorsements evidencing the existence and amounts of the requlred Insurance. No such policy shall be canretabie or subject to modification except after 30days prior written notice to Lesser, lessee sha% at least 10days prior to the expiration of such policies, furnish Los so( with Qvldence of renewals or "Insurance binders' evidencing renewal thereof, or Lessor may Incream his 110111ty lnsuIance coverage and chargo the Cost thereof to Lessee, which amount shall be payable by Lessee to Lessor upon demand, Such pollcks shall be far a term cf at ]tail one year, or the length of the remaining term of this lease, whichever Is less. If either Party shallfall to procure and maintain the insurance required to be carried by It, the other party may, but shall not be required to, procure and maintain the same, 8.6 Waiver ofSubroltation, W"out affecting any other rlghtsor remedies, levee and Lessor each hereby release and relieve the other, and waive thelrentire right to recover damages against the other, fortoss of or damage to its property arising out ofor hxldentto the perils required to be Insured agalnstherein. The effect of such releases and waivers Is not limped by the amount of Insurance carried or required, or by any deductibles applicable hereto. Tha parties agree to have their respective propertydamage Insurante carrleu waive any right to subrogation that such companies may have against Lessor or Lessee, as the case may be, so long as the Insurance is not Invalidated thereby. 8,7 Indemnity, Except for Lessor's gross negligence or wlllful misconduct, lessee shall indeirnffy, protect, defend and hold harmless the Prefelses, Lessor and Its agents, Lessor'smmiler orground lessor, partners and Lenders,fram and against any and all claims, lessor rents and/or damages, liens, Judgments, penalties, attorneys' and consultants' fees, expenses and/or liabilities arlsing out of, Im,olvlrlg, or Inconnectfon with,a Breach ofthe Lease by Lessee and/or the useand/or occupantyof the Premises and/or Project by Lessee and/or by lessee's employees, con tractors or invitees, If any action or proceeding Is brought against Lessorby reason of any of the foregoing matters, lessee shall upon notice defend the same at Lessee's expense by counsel reasonably satisfactory to Lessor and Lessor shall cooperate with Lesseeln such defense, Lessor need not have flrstpald any such claim in order to be defended or indemnified. BA Exemption of Lotor and Its Aganu from Llabhlty, Notwithstanding the negligence or breach of this Lease by lesser or hs agents, neither Lessor nor Its agenssshall be liablQ under any circumstances for. (1) injury or damage to the person or goods, wares, merchandise orother property of Lessee, Lessee's employees, contractors, Invitees, customers, or any other person In or about the Premises, whether such damage or Injury is caused byor results from fire, steam, electricity, gas, water or rain, indoor a1r quailth the presence of mold or from the breakage, leakage, obstruction or other defects of pipes, fire sprinklers, wires, appliances, plumbing, RVAC or fighting fixtures, or fromany other cause, whether the said Injuryor damage results from cmdllionsarising upon the Premises or upon other portions of the bulldl ng of which the Premises are a part, or from other sources or places, (ill any damages arising from any ad or neglect of any other tenant of Lessor or from the fallureof Lessor or lit agents to enforce the provtslons of any other lease Inthe Project, or;Rl(tnjuryto Lessee's business or forany lossof Income orprolit therefrom. Instead, It Is intended that Lessea%sole recourse In the event of such damages or injury be to his a claim on the insurance palicy(;es) that Lessee Is required to maintain pursuant to the "loons of paragraph 8, 89 failure toProvlde Insurance. Lessee acknowledges that anyfallure on Its pan to obtain or maintain the Insurance required herein will expose Lessor to risks and potentially cause Lessor to incur costs not contemplated by this Lease, the extent of which will be extremely difficult to ascertain. Accordingly, for any month or portion thereof that Lessee does not maintabn the required Insurance and/or does not provide lesser with the required binders or certificates evldencingthQ axttence of the requlred insurance after notice and resaonable opportunity to cure, Lessee shall pay to Lessor a fee Olrs$500,-iheI4kenQxiWARga66Re4l or$a09rwhlehererisgreater,Thepxtiesagree that such fee•lnew ewQaseReedrepresentsfalrandreasonablecompensationfortheadditionalrisk(coststhat Lessor will Incur by reason of Lessee's failure to maintain the required Insurance, Such Increase In Base Rent shallln no event constitute a waiver of Lessee's Default or Rreach wllhfespect to the failure to maintain such Insurance, prevent the exercise of any of theolher rightsand remedies granted hereunder, nor mileve Lessee of itsobllation to maintain the Insurance specified in this Lease. 9, 0amage or Oestruction, 9.1 Definitions. (al "Pre mlies Pardal0amatM" shatimean damage or destruction to the Improvementson the Premises, other than Lessee Owned Alterations and utility Installations, which can reasonably be repalred in 6 months or less Irom the date of the damage or destruction. lessor shallnotify lessee In writing within 30 days from the date of the da mage or destruction as to whether or not the damage is Partial or Total. (b) "Prsmisgs7otai 0estructlon' shall mean damage of destruction to the Premises, other than Lessee Owned Alterations and Utility installations and Trade Fixtures, which cannot reasonably be repaired ks 6 months or less from the dale of the damage or destruction. Lessor shall notify Lessee In wthingwlthln 30 days from the date of the damage ordestructlon es to whether or not the damage Is Partial er rotal, (c) "Insured toss" shall mean damago or destruction to improvements on the Premises, other than Lessee Owned Alterations and Utility Installations and Trade Fixtures, which wat caused by an event requlred lobe covered by the Insurance deserlbed In Paragraph 8.3(a), Irrespeltive of anydeductible amounts at coverage limits Involved. (d) "Iteplacement Cost" shall mean the cost to repairer rebuild the improvements owned by Lessor at the time of the occurrence to thelrcondleon existing immediately prior thereto, Including demolition, debris removal and upgrading requlred by lheoperatloo of Appficable Requirements, and without deduction fordepreclWon, (e) "Harardous Substance Condition's haIf mean the occurrence or discovery of a mnditloa involuing the prosenco of, or a contamination by a llaaardousSubstance, In, on, or under the premises which requires restoration. 0.2 Partial Damage - insured Loss, If a Promises Partial Damage tha t Is an insured Lossoccurs, then Lessor shall, at lessor's expense, repalrsuch damage (but not Lessee's Trade Fixtures or i.esseeOwned Alterations and UdlltyInstallations) as soon as reasonably possible and this lease shall continue Infull force and effect; provided, however, that Lessee shall, at Lessor's electlon, make the repair of any damage or destruction the total cost to repair of whkh Is $10,000or less, and, In such event, lessor shall make any applicable insurance proceeds evsfiable to Lessee on a reasonable basis for that Purpose, Notwithstanding the foregoing.ff the requlred Insurance was not in force orthe Insurance proceeds are not sufflcientto effect such repair. the Insuringparty shall promptly, contribute the shortage in proceeds (except as to the deductible which is Lessee'sresponslbility) as and when required to complato said repairs. In the event however, such shortage was due to the fact that by reason of the unique nature of the Improvements, full replacement cost insurance coverage was not tommerclally reasonable and available, Lessor shall have no obligation to pay [of the shortage In insurance proceedsor to fully restore the unique aspects of the Premises unless Lessee provides Lessor with the funds to coves same, or adequate assurance thereof, wlthin 10 days following receipt of written notice of such shortage and request therefor. If Lessor receives said funds or adequate assurance thereof wlthln said 10 day period, the party respoesibte for making the repaks shall complete them as soon as reasonably possible and this Lease shall remain In full f orceand effect If suchfunds or assurance are not received, Lessor may neveriheless elect by written notice to Lessee within 10days thereafter to; (1) make such restoration and repair as A commercially reasonable with Lessor pbying any shortage In proCveds, In which case this Lease shall remain In full force and effect, or (It) have this Lease terminate 30 days thereafter, Lessee sha1 not be entitled to reimbursement of any funds contributed by Lessee to repair any such damage or destruction, Premises Partial Damage due to flood or earthquake shill be subject to Paragraph 9.3, notwithstanding that them tray be some Insurance —vR but the net proceed s of any such insurance shallbe made avallabie for the repalts it made by either Party. INITIALS S 0 2019 AiR CRE. All Rights Reserved. Last Edited: 2PS/20219:53 AM STN-27,30, Revised 11-25.2019 Page 7 of 16 City Council 26 — 9 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 9.a Partial Damso*. Uninsured Lon, Ifa Premises Partiat Damage that Is not an Insured Loss occurs, unless caused by a negligent orwxlful act of Lessee (In which avant Lessee shall make the repairs at Lessee's expense), tassor may elthert (I) repair such damage as soon as reasonably possible at Lessor's expense, in which event INs Lease&hot I continue Infuli force and effect, or (11) terminate this Lea seby glvingwrllten notice to Lessee wlihIn 3Odays after receipt by Lessor of knowledge of the occurrence of such damage, Such termination shalt be effective 60 days following the date of such notice, In the event Lessor elects to terminate this Lease, Lessee shall have the right within 10 days after recalitt of the termination notice to give written notice to Lessor of Leiwo% commitment to pay for the repair of such damage without m1mbursementfrosn lessor. Lessee shall provide Less or with said funds or tat Ishctory assurance thereof within 30 days after making such commitment. In such event this Lease shag continue in full force and effect, and Lessor shall proceed to make such repairs as soon as reasonably possible after the required funds are ovallable, IF Lessee does not make the required Commitment, INS Lease shall terminate as of the date specified In the tdrmination notice. 9.4 Total Dust rut ton, Notwithstanding any other provision hereof, If a Premises Total Destruction occurs, this Lease shall terminate 60dar" following such Destruction. lithe damage ordeslruction was caused by the gross negligence or willful misconduct of lessee, Lessor shall have the right to recover Lessor's damages from lessee, except as provided in Paragraph 8.6. 9.S Damage Near End of Term. If at any time during the last 6.months of this Lease there Is damage for which the cost to repair exceeds one month's Base Rent, whether or not an Insured Loss, tensor may terminate this Lease effective gO days following the date of occurrence of such damage by giving a written termination notice to Lessee within 30days after the date of occurrence of such damage. Notwithstanding the foregoing, If Lessee atthat time has an exercisable option to extend this tease or to purchase the Premises, then Lessee may preserve this lease by, (a) exercising such option and (b) providing Lessorwith any shortage inlnsurance p roceeds (or adequate assurance thereof) needed to make the repairs on or beforethe earlier of (I) the date which Is 10 days after Lessee's receipt of Lessor's written notice purporting to terminate this Lease, or (ti) the day prlorto thedsto upon which such option expires. If Lessee duly exertisassuch option during such period and provides fluor with funds joradequate assurancethereol') to tovnrany shortageto Insurance proceeds, Lessor shall, at Lessor's commercially reasonable expense, repair such damage as soon as reasonably possible and this Lease shall continue in fun force and effect iflesseefalfs to exercise such option and provide such Fundsor assurance during such period, then this lease shall terminate on the date specified In the terrain Won notice and Lessee's option shall be extinguished, 9.6 Abatement of Rent; tmest's Remedies. (aj Abatement. In the event of Premises Partial Damage or Premises Total Destruction or a Hazardous Substance Condition for which Lessee is not responsible under this Lease, the Rent payable by Lessee for the period required for the repair, remedlation or restoration of such damage &tall be abated In proportion to the degree to which Lessee's use of the Premises Is Impaired, but not to exceed the proceeds received from the Rental Value insurance. All other obligations of Lessee hereunder shall be performed by Lessee, and Lessor shall have no liability for any wch dame Be, destruction, remedlatlon, repair or restoration except as provide dhe(ein. I b) Ramedles, If Lessor Isobltgated to repab or restore the Premises and does not commence, In a substantial and meaningful way, such repair or restoration within 90 days after such obligation shag accrue, Lessee may at anytime prtorto the commencement of such repair or restoration, give written notice to Lessor and to any lenders of which Lessee has actual notice, of Lessee's election to terminate this lease on a data not less than 6Odays following the giving of such notice. If Lessee gives such n otice and such repairor restoration is not comnnersced within 30days thereafter, this lease shalltarminate as of the date specified Insaid notice. if the repair or restoration acommenced within such 30days, thls Lease shalt continue In full force and effect. "Commence" shall meaneftherthe unconditional authorhation ofthe preparation of the required plans, or the beginning of the actual workon the Premises, whichever first occurs. 9.7 Termination; Advance Payments. Upon termination of this Lease pursuant to Paragraph 5.2(g) or Paragraph 9, are equitable ad)ustment shall be made concerning advance ease Rent and any other advance payments made by lessee to Lessor, Lessor shall, in addition, return to Lessee so much of Lessee's Security Deposit as has not been, or Is not then required to be, usedby lessor. 10, Neal Property Taxes. 20.1 Deflnition, As used herein, the term"Real Property Taxes" shall Include any form of assessment; real estate, general, special, ordinary or extraordinary, or rental levy or tax (otherthan Inheritance, personal Income cremate taxes); Improvement bond; and/or license fee Imposed upon or levied against any legal or equitable interest of Lessor In the Premises or the Project, Lessor's right to other Income th erefrom, and/or Lessor's business of teasing, byany authority having the directorIirditactpowertotaxandwherethefundsaregeneratedwithreferencetotheBuildingaddress. Real Property Taxes shot) also Include any tax, fee, levy, assessment or charge, or anyincrease therein: (1) Imposed by reason of events occurring during the term of this lease, Including but not limited to, a change In the ownership of the Premises, and (11) levied or assessed on machinery or equipment provided by lessor to Lessee pursuant to this Lease, 10.2 Payment of Taxes, in addition to ease Renq Lessee shell payto Lessor an amount equal to the Real Property Tax Installment due at least 20 days prior to the applicable delinquency date. if any such Installment shall cover any period of time prior to or after the expli atlon or termination of this lease, lesteo's share of such Installment shall be prorated. In theevent Lessee Incurs a latecharge on any Rent payment, Lessor mayestlmte the current Real PropettyTaxes, and require that such taxes be paid in advance to Lessor by lessee monthly In Wwte with the payment of the Rase Rent. Suchmonihfy paynimtsshall bean amount equal to the amount of the estimated installment of taxes divided by the number of months remaining before the month in which said Installment becomes deilnquent, When the actual amount of the appilcable tax bill Is known, the amount of such equal monthly advance payments shall be adjustsad as required to provide the funds needed to pay the applicable taxes. if the amount collectedby lossorls Insufficient to pay such Real Property Taxes when due, Lesweshall pay Lessor, upon demand, such additional sum as Is necessar}t Advance payments maybe Intermingled w4th other Moneys of Lessor and shall not bear interest. In the event of a8reach by lessee In the performance of Its obligations under this tease, then any such advance payments may be treated by Lessor as an additional Security Deposit. 10.3 Joint Assessment if the Premises are not separately assessed, lessee's liability shall be an equitable proportion of the Real Property Tares for all of the land and improvements Included Wlbin the tax parcel assessed, such proportion to be conclusively determined by Lessor from the respective valuedons assigned In the assessor's work sheets orsuch other Informatlon as may be reasonably available. 10A Personal Property Taxes. Lessee shall pay, prior to delinquency. ail taxes assessed against and levied upon Lessee Owned Alterations, Utility Installations, Trade Fixtures, furnishings, equipment and all personal property of Lessee. W hen possible, Lessee shall cause its Lessee Owned AlteradOnsand Utility Installations, Trade Fboures, furnishings, equipment and another personal property to be assessed and billed separately from the real property of lessor. If any of Lessee's said properly shall be assessed with Lessor's real property, Lessee shall pay Lessorthe taxes attributable to terse e's propertywithln 10 days after receipt of a written statement setting foiththe taxes applkobte to Lessee's property. 1t, Utilities and Servkea. Lessee shall pay for all water, gas, heat, light, power, telephone, trash disposal and other utilities and servlcessupplied to the Premises, together with any taxes thoreon. If any such services are not separately metered or billed to Lessee, Lessee shall pay a reasonable proportion, to be determined by Lessor, of all charges Jointly metered or billed. There shall be no abatement of rent and Lessor shall not be ;table Inane respect whatsoever forthe Inadequacy, stoppage, interruption or discontinuance of any utility or service due to dot, strike, labor dispute, breakdown, accident, repair or other cause beyond Lessor's reasonable control or In cooperation with governmental request or dlrecdons, thl fteendaysofLessor'swrittenrequest,LesseeagreestodelivertoLessorsuchInformation,documentsand)orauthorizatfonastessorneedsInorderfor 1 INITIALS t 2019 AIR CRE, All Rights Reserved, last Edited: 2/25/20219t53 AM STN•27.30, Revised 11-25-2019 Page 8 of Ifa City Council 26 — 10 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Lessor to comply with new or existing Applicable Requirements relating to commercial bOding energy usage, ratings, and/or the reDotttog thereof. 17�-1,tLlgrstAoat-and SulslottiA$• 4446tcWr' Coc)tatsOKegulrod (a1—LVKaesbalLaPt uvtuRtarJl y.ocby •a4ougoa af• lawa�ulga•xcaRtit4crmortEcigoa oawa+bQs i+h `�IRaa.aHi�wwAe"} of swt►lot•altorast- PDrtal Lostoa'sJataratlw4Wt6WLaarinlbaoccmlutwlthcu4lauoc'spdoi.tloao�n�N. (b}--llntaulAtwa-sca4oapaattoaaadttc rtocklt•µrlhildy-Lrad+doA-aaatlanat,vtociaaxch+ng4ra•chsago•In-3M-wai+ot•aG4atwothalGCaRLStwt4aa awlgnmonswquWae•Soot.ba4--.Yka•LrsatieJ,PA•iwm,+{i11va-batliraG•1.tK armirs•at tho.uattpgW46-PU40t0. jc}-xhoM>rrDlM OrAAAI-ati9tLQY-Pc ltb�iNtL-W Day, LqAiaGitApriW i0t1Yt4tlRiaLaCti0r1L �iy' Lr?y q�1�Irr'iatYr3GQlaChtOArHRaRC4Rgr• tq WttOG.ti�+afa�Gd- bryya+Lar.ottNw9ta{, wholbae-aapta ioa+uilaaVgamoal.pc.4vµpotpotat{PA-at4bSaioitoor•4atsw'sattatG4eeutlr+t�Gt+toutl4toe•+NlUasw41A•zAzduetsoAokha Nalr4NQ4h-at tocwa bN anamauRtgcoato4thaa•16aLot scab•Slotluoriback 4uasaaproctAtod ab ibsticasai Lbaorasangaripftltltlaau ac.aGibatGcao akttw.Aaott cOWAas1164M At dtnRtaedoAartr3AgeGoRtsoRvatvtiag-wcbc4duafloat�++bScb4uDwisor7t lautLudiag2asµ guaatntau}4uabSfibod-uad4s-gDa4railµattoptadat.ca•+attRgprSAGipSot. {d►—AAau;gAwaatow�Liwtag.+rltbo�u4asutatsbaklratlotsatit-opttoR, Lai Dofisdtsurabla-altaL Aoaca.patAawgtapAl�,lW�,.ocaaoRcuraUJaitcucl>_ vdtho�a.;h4 AKgtiity at a.ayaatic4 aqd-gcacs poriod-!t laccac ikuL to•tra3ttuGh-untpfuoscodautgnmoRt cF sualkdAgacanoncYrabloAtasGbrLettaFinay.4Whsr; (ij• iatmlaato ibis LtaGPros•Nµ++P�•g4daowNrittoa• Aaticar iacsozco•tls9 asvatk3+� 4aLo BARL.io. L10si ottk4 Wba Ao+sL tSwA lA aft�t,-FuLWartiA Ahawo+tt aEstikA tiroaub. pr�sJD:,ity.�-attsct,aad {It}aitUxadaad AorsttfOd rOAtal•ad}ustauatc•scboduloddudAg iha•u•azilAd4cot•ibo loacatoua stsalt 6alaccoacodio.LLA9i.nt.tbo.cchadulod ad}uc4ad rsAt. lal— Lacw4'GsamadylocaaY�wob�E AaragLaph lZl br L4Lfo+ abyh-bt IlmR.d 4p c0atpoRsztPpµdaRaagpc aad(uc la}unit4w•toAat. {4—J.—ot-44cyw40slalsi U;h d10PIGAI40•aWQpoLadatt+gaca" 0f4Vbtopiag41 otaw!c-JAA4twlLu.11w.ttaDo4oAuaAttLL4gaackd Ig)—•t0n twistutawdtag sba tuwgaiag,-aUrwrSAga ds Adntm k yacuoa• eltha-Rtpralro c,la.J4tq�urakoi .atSott,ta Srotk4d.hµaJdtLd paetyiwRdar, lA. taARas traAivStA tA4iRLuuauoa atao.RdtraB,•rwcb4sa aL•piypborw sbau• aa4 cuALlituto a tubw4tlAa 1a.1-A►tRu•saltt CawdtttoasApP�+kiNo,�sit4Alo.Rt•aAd>iuh{.tx►RM' (al, aegicdtest.ntla ssnsi.coacent.aaass�ament—hlafflng chauYjkj.ba.ettecsfrrra_udttsou:.theaapmsL•rcrwaa.aLsssmpsim.�eucct�aulaas subWctaaat• iba oLUgitioru-ottatwt undoL-4hk S oicor{Ujrokaca ttusooat aAy obllgatiaasbipr Iadoc •ac{SYvalfor-41Npiteazal+•iiaOUlgrptiecc4akL.kw pa�aRoatot liORkaF fOFtIW pad0<Asance otaMt-Oti+aL DtillgitlORf•:Pt>6$aitOrAiKI-liyLYLi69. [o)-14,40 Q4 y-444W404k 4;+*90i44 Are 446""t 94ii83UOiWUO=apy.{SztYOp.a1h4R thiA•4M$" itiigAAi4AG- NoStltota dola µ 4t•itaspproual or• ditapprouat of•aucb-stdgAmwst rwsilsaatGapioR4o•at ttoat•or {sadarmaac4 thaJL aoa sikutoawahroracattop,Pal. otlattoL•'s•dghl to. axatUtoJu•LaWOdlat totlotC94'tIIolaul4pL•iLwzcb. lc}-Latsac's GOAt4Rt-taa,Ay-atLigAaaaAtor tDblwtiag cbaUAat cPacdsuiascaac4at to•ar�subtoqupA13uigAauaat •grLublattJag. td}-•-1rFib4 ovoat aEaayaotauA ac•&roacbby.louao, lzuot.oxarµ pLouad cSro4xSy-agaiauiauaa•.sAY Guariatwt•oc-aayarw atW+. catpaAtlbta lac4b4 pottoraaaA<a at lacvao'sabUgattoac uRdocihk Laico� lncludlag aAyatLlgaop aFsulitosto 4, udiUgwt Ursa• aKbalutSaga�►iLPds+Dmediosa6aiActa�ayr. aUwapiwDaar aatilyretpoAclbla •thorotPc tc-LottoR, Pr•aRy catucpM #abd•bY S,octor- Ep;'-%7iA•i4Q�+Ott-taFiORiaRt•Sa3Rari1gAA10ALPt-4+�t110WAg-GtiaJlbWlA t4riilAg,•?CGOR1paRlGd•byl lRtOHA7t7aR fY:OWAtW1Ai i<katirrtYiPitiPR Ali-t0-{Ib4- Uaixial aad-apaaatlaAai rlstpoAttG{ttgs aadaPpwpciitotuctot 4tsaprapowd- auSgrwaar-t'abiatiao.iAtludinghu4-AotltmsN41lo•thatatagdad-1+telaad/ca aoq+llro4 modiNcatiaA-aLW4rtroruSt4s,1f iAy tvg4thacwJW a ta4ol 45W acto4adatadoA fot lostar•'L-coavdaclAg and Om""lag siSd-coRD4ct-lauaoaggat W p aDs+ldz laruw witU•tuch• Dlhar.ar•addiUoA3GlAlauAadWtaadstDvdacuRwDtatbaa,Dmaµb4 i►arowhiys Laq+ratud•{Sao•aJLo-uuagrapb•� {GI.•-�l�Ajl3tLigAYY-OG,•Ai•dY�iitLPOJ1Rd8t+•.thtLlAla:4L/loll,-bV-FOiG0A4taLGOptiAgLLLCb ALrigAMpclty AAtOtjgF}-iai,D iLdM N�bI4iL1T 4tYAtitlAgtR{a �0GL4WIaf1• Oliha• Rtamlcat ac o A'�QPNi00./b4tOpt�-b0 dMRIOd to-Gta4O-ar131A10d3ad>BcY4d-Z040AGOtAt iRd4a{R p%j�1ItJF •OiCti �111d AY W�I4OFM, 40�FORaAtrOaAdttfOA.DAd atiG&itJDo• horpla4vbaobtor+god•wc•po4i4cm4dbM•LtuaodutfagaAotKacalsatdattAgAmaRt-ocsubloac4,-otSaof LbaAbuGta•obttgadoAtaL-aracoRtrat�2aaFSaaRciLtaRt•-w4th• prOOitjORLof•aAaKigAR+aai o4Wbloit9la-Wti1CA�.aiGOi-t{#iL�iOGiiiGali�!•GORLiA14dt4W W;itlAg. tg�loµoe+t eoaloAtu-artµseeigsussgRt o! eubiptttag Lbaq-a,ot•seaattaato•ttw a.uSgROP or iublDLeoo aAy OpgoR$caaWd 1P ib4 origiAaLlatspp bytSslGLaaHe- "44" chtaadeslttpoclk*consoAtrtdtobytor4Pc•iRuAdag-{saaRiagapl> 3p•21 UI-Addk$oOA TaraiG.RAd•."OAdltioM,ilppAtibt4SD Fible0%-1t14 tA13a4dA�tOLtPi and.LpAditlagti�iatl-appt/tO-iAMLGbiP'KiRg t>µtaiL440t�1�•OLaRµ{:isiOk- liatltaraisal-usdaball-ho doamadS.ArlsldrdJA-aD.subLDasatuadoc tb1i14itolvhalFuiL•oruotorpratitykuarpoutrdthawlA: {i�-lOitOtbGFOby7LCi$AiaAik4riAGtori •tp-LP W atatGPi.LbLlAil4•1RtiLtittA3uAeAtyli",�7blo•aR3Ay4Y�laiWriAdIWKtM-itlly7• GOtIKG4WCb R4alaadapply�. wrw.taward tAlipo'G abllgauaat uadoF thk lwcpy-grao:Wud, Sww4u zyttsat awt11• aYLoacq sbzU 4CG4F SA-tlsapadorraaAco.aG Lotiso'b a011gaUon Lr iaU44 ata� uvtsact- taidAOpL-hs•4iw41swni3baF4twarRouAt40UaGwd-Gyla{bOLpxGDildi Lauoa'i-thaAausttaAdlgg 0tlilgiitaAG+i+ay�45rGti•474CQ{Littitt•iYpWkilAd4dkPLficO4•-liWOLt�NiG Rat, by .saatort Dktp4torigaiagar-aay astSgaa4tatalsvL.b• wbloato, slorks�roacor+a!-tbo caUctcklaAPl 13eAtr bo dooawd ttabls 4o thatubIciLa4 lasaaµ lalluca• atlaLtoo- toJadocai.444compiy.wlihaaµa1-LALtoo!t•aW 3UOA4404u4h•fill' orl4GWoAawbySrrouaGab4ywtkDriiosaadtiirock•air,sutbsubialvDorupoA•cacaipiaE� writtoA•aatiw.twmlotsoc•Ltutagil+aia•ALaacb-arktt• ba t4 a µadonmaoca otla uao�- abUgattaAc uadoz-tAis loac4,to payto-4ouac 3URaA4 dw-4a botomt dw, uadortho4ubloasa SuWautoshiuioWupaasRYlueAm4ealswaloetoeaad-tbsU•payaURoatrtoloatoFurlihavtaWtgrtiaaorsighiaatRquktas•toui+eitwc wah Yroach..oxitit.Rot4taLhiWadJcsg aRy+clWRz from lusoo 30 lhacauLaa}. {W-SA.ttw�wAcotaY.aut+bY-Lwc+ao:wcca•rwy, aitca•uPtiaR.c4q++k4-tubtouaa•to-uiDrwkrlascLot,•JAwbkA•a��aatLouosslaaU•�adactakotAa DDltgattaAL otitwstrtstoLtoc-++AdoLsusbstsbtwta tLorAttw-tkaaak Cbao+larGltaotsitduptiaA.satlwaxpiwdaarats.uGb•4uWoiGq; prowd� hawovoc� loLao4stuU Aotbo Uablo.tosaay<ptopifd•wists4LwwsJ4>fdapocRpaidbµtucbsubtoLi4oLoLurh Gubtlutorar•toraRppciof8ofiuticar proaGhvGQ4tuGt�wWocivr• {c}�ARYmattaxtogtdLiAgtl+aGOAwataltho•iWJlatuu•wuWr•a.ivbitaLo•shiStaltosaquloo ttwconwaFotlattac• �}—lJo.tDOtatw!•thaliturtSLoL a'rilgAacsubtot•aUoo-aRppart of ihaRcwalLoc+r.4tbautiottor'cpdaFu�.rktorscauoru. io;.._lotttu.idaii.dDJwoca aopy+ai•awyaotica.niJaaia�dr.os ar4achbys Littoa4oLlw-tubloww,avha ibali tuw4lwAgbs to-ca+csth4 Gitautt Dt linos -within. thaggco-pariod,lL3Ay, tpaciliod JA tuchuotko-Sba-cc Ciottoe tbaUbaua arigAt at•roimbutroR+saiaAd aftsot ltarA-iRdagairtu lecbw fac• aaybu�b DoianliL•cw40 hY• tbu-tubSoLLpa 11. Default; Breach; Remedies. 13A Default; Stench, A "Default" Is dellned as a failure by the Lessee to comply with or perform any of the terms, covenants, conditions or Rules and Regulations under this Lease. A'91eath' Is delved as the ouurrence of one or more of the following Defaults, and the falltueof Lesseeto cure such Oebult within a applicable grace period! RTIALS la ® 2019 AIR CRE. Ail Rights Reserved. STN-27,30, Revised i1•25.2019 Last Edited: 2/25/20219:53 AM Page 9of 15 City Council 26 — 11 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 (al The abandonment of the Premises; or the vacating of the Premises without providing a commorclafly reasonable level of security, or where the coverage of the property Insurance described In 94ragraphB,3 Is leopard lied asa,result thor,'Df,or without providing reasonable assurances to minlmlte potential vandalism. (b) The fallura of lessee to make any payment of Rent or any Securlly Deposit required to be made by Lessee hereunder, whether Lo lessor or to a third party. when due, to provide reasonable evidence of Insurance or surety bond, or to Fulfill any obligation under this leasewhlch endangers or threatens IIle or property, where such failure continues for a period of 3 business days followingwrltten notice to lessee. THE ACCEPTANCE BY LESSOR OF A PAATIAL PAYMENT OF RENT OR SECURITY DEPOSIT SNAIL NOT CONSTIME A WAIVER OF ANY OF LESSOR'S RIGHTS, INCUIOING LESSOR'S RIGHT TO RECOVER POSSESSION OF THE PREMISES. (ci The failure of lessee to allow Lessor and/or its agents access to the Premises or the commission of waste, actor acts constituting public or private nuisance, and/or an Illegal actsvliyon the Pramises by Lessee,where such actions continue lot a period of 3 business days following written notice to lessee, In the event that lessee commits waste, a nuisance or an Illegal activity a second time then, the lessor may elect to treat such conduct as a non -curable Breach rather than a Default. (dj The failure by lessee to provide (1) reasonable written evidence of compliance wlthAppflcable Requirements, (III the service contracts, jlll)tho rescission of an unauthorized assignment or subletting, (Iv) an Estoppel Certificate or financial statements, (v) a requested subordination, (0) evidence concerning any guaranty and/or Guarantor, (vh) any document requested under Paragraph 42, (vlll) matoriat safely data sheets tMSDS), or (Ix) any other documentation or Information which Lessor may reasonably require of Lestoe under the terms of this Leese, where aity such failure continues for a period of 10 days following written notice to lessee, (e) A Default by Lessee as to the terms, covenants, conditions or provisions of thlslease, or cf the rules adopted under Paragraph 40 hereof, other than prose described In Subparagraphs 134(a), jb), (c) orjd), above, whens such Default continues for a period of 30 daysafter written notice; provided, however, that If the nature of lessee's Default Is such that more than 30 days are reasonably required for Itscure, then it shall not be deemed to ba a Breach If Le&seo commences such cure within said 90 day period and thereafter dirgently prosecutes such cure to completion. (I1 The occurrence of any of the followingevents: (1) the making of any general arrangement of assignment forthe benefit of creditors; (11) becoming a 'debtor' as defined In 11 U.S.C. 4 101 or anysuctessor statute thereto (unless, in the case of a petition filed agalt4t lessee, the same is dismissed within 50days); jBl) the appointment of a trustee or receiver to take possession of substantially all of Lessee's assets located at the Premises or of lessee's }Merest lnthis lease, where possession Is not restored to tasiee within 30 days; of (iv) the attachment, execution orother judicial seizure of substantially all of Lessee's assets located at the Premises or of Lessee's Interest tit thls Leine, where such seizure Is not discharged within 30 days; provided, however, in the event that any provision of this subparagraph Is contrary to any applicable law, such provision shall be of no force or effect, and not affect the validity of the temainlog provisions. (g) The discovery that any financial statement of lessee or of any Guaranty given to Lessor was materially false, (h) if the performance cf Lessee's obligations under this Lease Is guaranteed: (I) the death of a Guaran tor, (It) the termination of a Guarantor's liability with respect to this tease other than in accordance with the terms of such guaranty, (nl) a Guarantor's becoming insolvent or the subject of a bankruptcy filing, tiv) a Guarantor's refusal to honor the guaranty, or (v) a Guarantor's breach of its guaranty obligation on an anticipatory basis, and lessee's failure, within 60 days following written notice of arty such event,to provide wr Itten alternative assurance or security, which, when coupled with the then exliting resources of lessee, equals or exceeds the combined financial resources of Lessee and the Guarantors that existed at the time of eKecutforsofthis Lease, 13.2 Remedies. If lessee fallsto perform any of its affirmative duties or obligations, within 10 days after written notice jot Incase of anemergency, without notice), lessor may, at its option,perform such duty or obligation on lessee's behalf, Including but not limited to the obtaining of reasonably required bonds, insurance policies, or governmental Ilcenses, permltsor approvals. Lessee shall pay to Lessor an amount equal to 115% of the costs and expenses incurred by Lessor In such performance upon receipt of an Invoice therefor. In the event of a Breath, Lessor may, with or without furtheraotfceot demand, and without limiting Lessor In the exercise of any right or remedy which Lessor may have byreason of such preach; (a) Terminate Lessee's fight topossesslon of the Premises by any lawful means, In which case this Leaseshall terminate and Lessee shall Immedlataty surrender possession to Lessor, in such event Lessor shall be entitled to recover from lessee: (I) the unpaid Rent which had been earned at the limo of termination; (If) the worth at the limeof award of the amount bywhlch the unpaid rent which would have been earned after termination until the time ofasvard exceediihe amount of such rental loss thatthe lessee proves could have been reasonably avoided; (IIQ the worth at the time of award of the arnounthy which the unpaid rent for the balance of the term after the lime of award exceeds the amount of such rental toss that the Lessee proves could be reasonably avoided; and IN) any otheramoant necessary to compensate lessor for all the detriment proximately caused by the lessee's failure to perform Its obligations under this lease orwhlch In the ordinary course of thing.s would be likelyto resuittherefrom, including but not ilmlled to the cost of recovering possession of the Premises, expenses of retetting, Including necessary renovation and altetstion of the Premises, reasonable attorneys' fees, and that portion of any leasing commission paid by Lessorlo connection with this Lease applicable to the unexpired term of this Lease. The worth at the time of award of the amount referred to In provision (III) of the Immediately preceding irnience shall be computed bydlscounting such amount at the discount rate of the Federal Reserve Bank of the District within which the Premises are located at the time of award plus one percent, Efforts by Lessor to mitigate damages caused by Lessee's Breach of this Lease shall not waive Lessor's right to recover any damages to which lessor Is otherwise entitled. If termination of this lease Is obtained through the provisional remedy of unlawful delainer, lessor shall have the right to recover In such proceeding any unpaid Rent and damages as are recoverable therein, or Lessor may reserve the right to recover all or any part thereof In aseparate suit, it a notice and grace period required under Paragraph 13.1 was not previously given, a notice to pay rent o r quit, or to perform or quit given to Lessee under the unlawful detalner statute shall also constitute the notice requlred by Paragraph 13.1. in such case, the applicable grace period required by Paragraph 13.1 and the untawful detalnef statute shall tun concunerift and the fa0ure of lessee to cure the Default within the greater of the two such grace periods shall constitute both an unlawful detalner and a Breach of this Lease entitling lessor to the remedies provided for In this lease and/or by said statute. jbt Continue the Lease and Lessee's right to possession and recover the Rent as It becomes due, In which event Lesseemay sublet or assign, subjectonty to reasonable limitations. Acts of maintenance, effortsto rebel, and/or the appointment of a receiver to protect the Lessor's Interests, shall not constitute a terminaton of the lessee's right to possession. (c) Pursueany other remedy now orhereafter available under the laws or judicial decisions of the state wherein the Premises are located. The expiration or termination ohhis Lease and/or the termination of lessee'sright to possesslon shall not relieve Lessee from liability under any Indemnity provisions of this Lease as to matters occurring or accruingduring the term hereof or by reason of Lessee's occupancy of the Premises. 11.3 Inducement Recapture, Any agreement for free orabaied rent or other charges, the cost of tenant improvements for Lessee paid for or performed by l.essor, or for the giving or paying by Lessor to or forlessee of any cash or other bonus, Inducement or consideration for lessee's entering Into this Lease, all of which concessions are hereinafter referred to u"hrducement Provisions," shall be deemed conditioned upon Lessee`s full and h Ithful performance of all of the terms, covenants and conditioos of this lease. Upon Breach of this Leaseby Lessee, any such inducement Provision shall automatically be deemed deleted from thlslease and of no further force orelfett, and any rent, other tharge,bonus, inducement or consideration theretofore abated, g"n or paid by lessor under such an d meni Provision shall be immediately due and payableby lessee to Lessor, notwithstanding any subsequent cure ofsald Breach by Lessee. The acceptance by INITIALS �y 0 2019 AIR CRE, All Rights Reserved. Last Edited., 2/25/2021 9.53 AM STN-27,30, RevlSed 11-25-2019 Page 10 of 15 City Council 26 — 12 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Lessor of renter the cure of the Breach which Initiated the operation of this paragraph shalt not be deemed a waiver by Lessor of the provisions of this paragraph unless spedheally so stated in writing by Lessor at the time of such acceptance. 13.4 late charges, lessee hetaby etknowledges that late payment by Lessee of Rent will cause lessor to Incur costs not contemplated bythls lease, the exact amount of which will be extremely difficult to ascertaln. Such costs Include, but are not limited to, processing and accounting charges, and late charges which maybe Imposed upon Lessor by any tender. Accordingly, if any pent shall not be recelved by Lessorwittdn s days after such amountshall bedue, then, without any requirement for notice to lessee, Lesseeshag immediately pay to lessor a one-timelate charge equal to 10%of each such overdue mount or S100, whichever h greater. The Parties hereby agree that such late charge represents a fair and reasonabte estimate ofthe costs Lessorwlll Incur by reason ofsuch late payment, Acceptance of such late charge by lessor shalt in no event constitute a waiver of tessee's Oefauft or Breach with reipect to such overdue amount, not prevent the exercise of any of the other rights and remedies granted hereunder. InAs dLnrrxs ti ••• L ,"w'• t e.. refs ee rt—Al—tedlta,3.00464,uomq taatracy,-rtaaa4taa4 chah,•al tassar•c apttoar becamrtduwAd payiWa•quartarheus advaAca, 13.5 Interest. Any monetary payment due Lessor hereunder, other than late charges, not received by lessor, wilen due shall bear interest from the 3tst day after It was dua. The Interest ('Interest"( charged shallbe computed at the rate of 1o%per annum but shall notexceed the maximum rate allowedby law. Interest It payable In addition to the potential late thorgeprovtded farm Paragraph 13.4, 0.6 Breach by Lessor. (a) Notice ofgreach. Lessor shall not be deemed in breach ofthls Lease unless Lessor falls within a reasonable time to perform an obligation required to be performed by Lessor. For purposes of this Paragraph, a reasonable time shall In no event be less than 30 days after receipt by Lessor, and any Lender whose name and address shall have been furnished to Lessee in writing for such purpose, of written notice spetifyingwherelnsuch obilgationof Lessor has not been performed; provided, however, that If the nature of lessor's obligation Is such that more than 30days ate reasonably required for its performance, then lessor shall not be In breach If performance is commenced within such 30 day period and lhereafterdlggontlypursued tocompieffon, (b) Performanceby Lessee on Behalf oftessor. in the event that neither lessor nortander curessald breads within 30 days after receipt of said notice, orll having commented said cure they do not diligently Pursue ittocompletion, then lessee may electto cure said breach at Lessee's expense and offset from Rent the actual and reasonable cost to perform suchture, provided, however, thatsuch offset shall not exceed an amovnt equal to the greater of one month's Base Rent a the Security Deposit, reserving lessee's right to seek reimbursement from Lessor for anysuch expense In excenof such offset. Lesseesha6 document the cast of said cure and supply said documentation to Lessor. 14. Condemnation. 0 the Premises or any portion thereof are taken under the power of eminent domain or sold under the threat of the exercise of said pourer (oollecttvety"Condemnation'), this lease shallterminate as to the part taken as of the date the condemning authority takes dtleor possession, whichever first occurs. If more than 10% of the Building, or more than 25% of that portion of the Premises not occupied by any building, Is taken byCondemnation, Lessee may, at Lessee's option, to be exercised in writing within 10days after lessor shall have given Lessee written notice of such taking (at In the absence ofsuch noth•.e, within 10 days eater the candemaingauthorlty shall have taken possesslon)terminate this tease mof the date the condemning authority takes such possession. It Lessee does not terminatethls Leaseln accordance with the faregoing, this Lease shag remain In full forceand affectas to the portion ofthe Promises temaining,except that the Base Rantshall be reduced In proportion to the reduction In utility of the Premises caused by such Condemnation. Condemnation awards and1or payments shall be the property of Lessor, whether such award shrill be made as compensation far d Iminutlon In value of the leasehold, the value o f the part taken, or for severance damages; provlded, however, that tcsseeshall be entitled to any compensation paid by the condemnor for lessee's relocation expenses, loss of business goodwill and/or Trade Fixtures, without regard towhether or not this Lease Is terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Paragraph, All Alterations and utility Installations made to the Premfses by lessee, for purposes of Condemnation only, shall beconsldered the property of the lessee and Lessee shall be entitled toany and all compensation which is payable therefar. in the event that this Lease Is net terminated by reason of the Condemnation, Lessor shall repair any damage to the Premises caused bysuch Condemnation. iS.—arolurraaa•r"aaa 35.1•Addittocrl CarwakataA--10 #ddlttoatathe pa yawAicaur4d•purtuuatta-Raraggph3-0•abouarinrtaf agrwa Wsto-ja}•l4taapaa�ciiNs#ajt-Gariggritlf �- toscaaar•aayoaaapivatad•vvtfEssar•w�tacqulws•aayrights to4NaRraatsaaoFWraacprasnlaarwvAad•byletsaaFaA4WeatadwRhiA-ttssnanw Rra}aecrJLarsyv w4ttua wbkb•iha-JrrtrAsaa4k• 4o Galati"{c}4E.tasiaa•aeasaiap ia.puswxcloA•oE2kaRsamiwc,-urith.Lhf cowwAt etc asaobaEWettraaxp{raq�sn-ofttric•4aaca,ard�d}if.aact• Raatk. Pacraacad,+whathscDyagaaamsni+rr+sparatssraaE•area"aatastnractaup#rawia,ihaoyLKcaRcpalspaylirokarsafoeJr►icwrdaaonw�R#tlw fact ccAadrda-aEiho- Bcclwrs to atlactaLihatlrrw laa.Laasarr+aa aaacufad.-IAa•pns+rklarrcaEitds•paraerapt► arolaWntivd-io-cupartada tho-ptwktonaot-aayaartiaaagaw�rsai/a ttse•caatra+�. 1,i,i-Auuwytloa-of44RM.HaAa�Auytinarez:-nutraAsfarrracitocsor'e GaNrwtJathfalaasa•sul>aUlaadaamadioAwa aRwraadiascaa's.Waligau oa AnrauAdK". &etas ndtagbPihttdpaAytlsaAtHciariaaaE she{uouisiruu-aEAatag+xpbs•�.0..3,fir23arad7l—tEtascoc tactile• fsayLoarokars•aay as»a•natc-tluoaa aAdtor:boolrarag► Eaas. PCB4oihitlaaca-vAteadu% then such amounts cEsailaocnsaUgow4t.-ta•ad&Aoo,IE1,eiwrfapc4P(>aM arnGNMelalasc+sa'sCrakarwdn*a•dutylarwa�c Broker•may.aead•vuigaa•ap41ca4aituw•sAdlacsN afaucN•fathwaadJE•LacsalaAs•4apaysucb #auruak�IGrlatJiO�dayr•aEsar; saldAatica.lartaasbattyayuld r»oAliti4.ltr•:iakAFiAfi•Q�Ni4iw<t�•ima4Att•aBaPRit-RY Ai�•Lr17ddhkinri i4nkariEr:tlJFilPeeAladtag ba+iltdrit f aCga. bMhaRi:ai>1rLiinj�•LQA}iN:KiQ1l i&raarAeat• aautari.tacabynaadlar•baiMawa4,aaeac aad 4asWr"e&aka"-for eba7tmlwdpurposa aE caltacttagaayJarotwa9alw-eased. u•.�•R.paw.ntaaaAa• aad4naefaAl4Ns•ei•Brokae.Ratatiartahipa�toaaaaaars 4afataaaach r4pras;stat.aAdaarragt 4ottw-alhea Hsasll-baG4sad• Rlydaa4Ags•wkh•an f- paweA,.lirm,-hrukarr•agaALar•dadar {atiWr•lhaa•4ha-Jlrakoa aad-Agaatrr�aayJ-lnconaac3foa tut;A4hlFtnaea,•aad tbat•Ao oga ohhat-thee aats#tsnmadurokara aad Ayagtek-aruttladia•aAyaarpralatloaor•9ndar�-fat4n4oaaadtaa4earowltft •laws aadlaswc•ds►eachAaeabyagraolo tndamatEy,pocks",•daiawtaad bald thsothw haradtsc frem•aadagataes.Jtabtusyloaeampanrauon.oc.eNargos.suAlch may.#►actalnwd JrysaMwabuaAaarMt; tNaPNrandtr• W atl�• alraGae pMgr3y=+Baser oft -ray drngpgc oracttorsGaE ihafadaaraUytegRarty,-tadnrdkr�n� fawns,�paAcas,•atiaraaydlwa raaroaabknr•iacurrad+�+kh�a6prcl-ttwrtla 16. Estoppel certificates. (a) Each Party(as "Respanding Party") shall within 10 days after wrlitennotice from the other Party (the "Requesting Party -)execute, acknowledge and deliver to the Requesting Party a statement In writing In form simltartothe then most current'Estoppel Certificate" form published Bf AIR CRE, plus such additional Information, confirmation and/or statements as maybe reasonably requested by the Requesting Party. (b) If the RespondingParty shall fall to execute or deliver the Estoppel Certificate within stKit 10 day petlod, the Requesting Party may execute an Estoppel Certificate stating that: (i) the tease is in f ullforceand effect without modification except as maybe represented by the Requesting Party, (10 there are no uncured defaults In the Requesting Iraftyrsparformance, and (1111 if lessor is the Requesting Party, not more than me month'stent has been paid in advance. Prospective purchasers and eacumbrancers may rely upon lheFlequesting Party's Estoppel Certificate, and the Responding Party shall bo estopped fromdenying the truth of the facts contained In said Casrtlflcate, inaddidon, lessee acknowledges that any fallure an Its part to provide such an Estoppel Certillcatewill expose Lessor )and potentially cause Lessor to Inturcosts not contemplated by this Lease, the extent of which will be extremely difffcuti to ascertain. Accordingly should the INITIALS �Ad)S W 2019AIR CU. All Rights Reserved. Last Edited; 2/25/20219:53 AM S M-27,30, Reylsed 11.25-2019 Page 11 of 16 City Council 26 — 13 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Lessee fall to execute and/or deliver a requested Estoppel Certi scale In a timely fashion, Lesser shall pay to Lessor a fee of $5oo- - BaFo apnt -^ �F �- _-lawaadoity sacca•ued.wl+hcwt-any raqukarnaat far•aoUea+o L""o, 3heaNsl4ttag aa4�tlopsae.jLAO,. wAklwua+4r-gseatw lot csasaiadaa•of+halauo The Pardes agree that such Increaseln Base ftenI represents fair and reasonable compensation forth e additional rlsh/costs that Lestor will Incur by reason of tessee's failure I provide the Estoppel Certificate, Such Increasa In Base Rent.shall In no event constitute a waiver of Lessee's aelault or Breach wllh respect to (lie failure to provide the Estoppel Ceralicate nor prevent the exercise at any of the other rights and remedies granted hereunder. (c) If Lessor desires to finance, refinance, or sell the Premises, or any pan thereof, Lessee and all Guarantors shall within 10 days alter written notice from Lessor deliver to any potential lender or purchaser designated by Lessor such financial statements as maybe reasonably required by such lender or purchaser, Including but not limited to Lassee's fins nclai statements for the past 3 years. All such finanalal statements shall be received by lessor and such lender or purchaser In confidence and shall txi used only for the purposes herein set forth. 17, Definition of Lessor. The term "Lessor" as used herein shill mean the owner or ownersat the time In question of the feelitie to the Premises, or,lf this is a sublease, of the Lessee's Interest In the prior lease. In the event of a transfer of Lessor's title or Interest In the Premises or this Lease, Lessor shaft deliver to the transferee or assignee(In cash or by credit) any unused Security Deposit held by Lessor.. Upon such transfer or assignment and delivery of the Security Deposit, as aforesaid, the prior Lessor sholibereileved of all IlabAltywlth respectlo the obligations and/or covenants under this Leasethereaher to be performed by the Lessor, Subject to the foregoing, the obllgaeonsand/•or covenants in this Lease to be performed by the Lessorshall he binding only upon the Lestor as herainaboye defined. 10, 3everabRity. The Invallcityrot any provision of this Lease, as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, shall In no wayalfect the validity ofany other pwvislon hereof. i9, Days. Unless otherwise specifically Indicated to the contrary, theword 'days' as used In lhlstease shall mean and refer to calendar days. 20, tim"tion on Uebllky. The obligations oftessur under this Lease shall not constitute personal obligations of tensor, orits partners, members, directors, officers or shareholders, and Lessee shall look to the Premises, and to no other assets of Lessor, for the satisfaction of a ny liability of lessor with respect to this Lease, and shall not seek recourse againstLessor'spartners, members, directors, officers or shareholders, or any of their personalassetsfor such satisfection. 21, Time of f Bence. Time Is of the essence withrespect to the performance of all obligations to be performed orobserved by the Parties under this tease. 22. No Pilot or Other Agreements; Broker Disclaimer. This Lease contains a Ilage"ments between the Partleswlth respect to any matter mentioned herein, and no other prior or contemporaneous agreement or under;tanding shall be effective. Lessor and lessee each represents and warrants to the Brokers that it has made, and is retying solelyupon, hsown Investigation as to the nature, quality, character and financial responslbillty of the other Party to this tease and as to the use, nature, quality, and character of the Premises. Bro! ors have no responsibility with respectthereto or with respect to any default or breach hereof by either Party. U - Notke, ]],1• tiatisF Rsgals«rurais�AltAa+icacavqul4ad-cFr-pvrmliWti-b1+ 3biFtAaia• at apPi�o lawtba4ba J natutdn8 a,nrs aaayho•dafi�aad• In• �raow;hyha+rd-oaby taaufaF) oF-rnayba tept.bµ+agulu,-ca4tiEiW or.aa;ictoradmait vcls5-Aorta+tFr�rA-lixpsa4i •AiaU, withgwtagaprapausror•bµi34•AralbLraa4raiuWnrocbµ-aas><ilrind. +hall ba-dsamadwfAelantly gbFoaJiWroad-lna�swaaot+paeitWd�'+r t33k• we►�aph.2i-lta-addFaeoveaoaod ad}aoantto aFaF�4tlgga4aq. an this• L*aw ahatl Jw•+haR Rady�F addaou-feed Wuaay-a maWagcLpagc�4-Gktsac W4eyataapDy,anitian•uDticoaa+haatisvccp4ctly.,a.dtl4anantaddwukcaadce,-natApi tbu++pvfliauea'a FahlaBpoFcatdor4 of li,a-Apmisaarthaitra,ukaa•.thaatanatl{uta LsuYa'saddrou.la4+wtica� Atvpy� 4lag wwtlws-tvls4tor.--tkaU bo.cancwcaatfy-irantmlittd to.+uch pxtµor•parti,a4 ><-ouch addrasuu au:laswsasawfram tuna to tursabaaafNr•daNgF►ata►Irs�cWarg. 322•tue►of Nodta.-AayFuattte-toot bµragk4a4ad000aAlRod-Fuailrratusa•:oceipt raquvttvd, 4hait badaFwedbuwaoarthada4aakdelkreq thownaa•:ir4 racglp4a a4d,•Otaf a0 dailvorµdato il• 4lt owr4rttrapottmack 4hvraoa-9 taatb)L tagulacasotl thF►ao>rw 4Aa11•b�deamsd givaa-a2• hours-aftaF tea♦ saFr+a+4 addaat4ad-O4• r6quir6dhorata-andm4Lad-with Pottle raWid•-t+odtu•doihwosodtsµUAW btata4twtpra+t-futa W0AMIGh4cosFrJacthnteuarinWrra•rseFr4day do"PjF "be. doomedl7Gaan-�Ghowt-aka4dotbrarye6L iLataRl4tPLtra RaLi7i SaPrI000+G taU+l�i.••i+tacit/idatiW/ad.t)y-tiai�dJCF•3#aAirA4t4Ydtr'FF faC41rni1a+ga4WIti10l1Oi4tlyanlilt- haRba•46iamad4alivarod kip oaacluatrasokp4w14nod k•aycaivWon4Sa4ar"*cuadaVaotepai•hdA,&%.144hall.bo4voAi"sccA44ad•an0a,"Mbust""day,• �.3•-OptioaarptohulthcWtdtag-Uwiorogaiag,•Sa acdor.+o-pworet4a• gay Cytbat#so*•paragrayh 3P)r•LtwNvtieq•awttba4eat•byGaWticdMaq•tWtutnaDcesp4. revise.44vd)ra.>tProwldaJl{stgnalure rrqultod�rcauclvR{4tgaaWra• 4a�tslr4d�at-some•otla+atuwttwdoiagythaLyroulctoFssaWtpt•etL7bti4Air+g Wrl•viaW33wnoiS4o-vru. 14. Waivers, (a) No walvorby Lessor of the Default or Breach of any term, covenant or condition hereof by Lessee, shall be deemed a waiver of any other term, covenant or condition hereof, or of any subsequent Default or Breach by Lessee of the same or of any other term, covenant or to4bon hereof. Lessor's consent to, or approval of, any act shot[ not be deemed to render unnecessary the obtaining of lessor's consent to, or approval of, any subsequent or similar act by tessee, or be construed as the basis ofan woppel to enforce the provision or provisions of this Lease requiring suchconsenl. (b) The acceptance of Rent bytesslot shall not boa waNvr of any Default or Breach hV Lessee. Any Payment by Lessee may be accepted by Lessor on account of monies or damages due Lessor, notwithstanding arty quatryina statements or conditions made by Lessee h connection therewith, which such statements andlor condidons shall be of no force or effect whatsoever unless spoclhcally agreed to In writing by Lessor at or before the time of deposit of such payment. (c) THE PARTIES AGREE THAT THE TERMS OF THIS LEASE SHALL GOVERN WITH REGARDi0 ALL MATTERS RELATEDTHERETO AND HERE11Y WAIVE THE PROVISIONS OF ANY PRESENT OR FUTURE STATi1TE TO THE EXTENT THAT SUCH STATUTE IS INCONSISTENT WITH THIS LEASE. jib-�ilbaFaootadag le+a-atGscuuion •wkh•a real �4tatsFageflt+aea+ding ar4a.La;tatauaatactiwt,.aLvs4ory,G Lo4rva•shauld�wwuihil4u4totarudgrs4and uhaL4µPoofagaagr-w ta0iomhip i44)t@4raA+aGif4n-La4sor7nt11efiiP34kaawlvdbabolnBad✓lWdby4w•4solwr4-4a• Wk trawsa4tivar acloUa uu (ij—.LKtac',tAyRgt,-A1s44o+'4 agaa4 und+u3:is+ingagwoFrinat�suliA +Ao•1duaKycetu•thu-agoatiorbha Losuar-ady+-,4 La4ws'ca�gawsor• eubsgaat- haatlw talluw4aaaffiFaaatlua�Wlaa3i4no4:-To tAs3a4wua ltlldueiuvdup,Fat+aaaotteuo�uu4arltvhonoctvtand•tovalteria-dasUuacrv1t1414a ig4soa #ttaa tareuap+s diccb4waitbui.kaowntathaagaal-motalallyafEactin8-chow-,a•acdacSrabUlgror•tAapwper+y.4hat awmo4-Aauwa•+v,•acyFltblr4tlWdgigawt-a4Wntion.and. ob+a�vatiw4atrtfwPartia4•-Aaagt+nt•L4uat-abilga+adtvaawlto okAoc•Paaa}agsycvoAtWnisallaf4µnatfvn obialacdkdawifw cthvr• Paciµwhiclydoa4+svL uswtuotha aitur? k,e4uU" wRfartlrabova U. INITIALS m 2019AIR CRE. All Rights Reserved, Last Edited: 2/25120219:53AM STN•17,30, Revised 11.25-2019 Page 12 of 16 City Council 26 — 14 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 6U;--tarsga'cA,�t--Anxpaat<anagraatvacixagaattor•lhalacwaoaty._iR.tt+ar4aituaurrocitra�ganikaatt�halauaFasgealrAuea-ltby. agceamaatshwsgaat ava><tatalaraca aipaaadaRfor catwkec►aadaradrNshaalafuilsa• lrapaaL tFaapllW �Anaga+�xURgonlylocaLauaa•ttat WaIaJW�Wa� attirmsti+wobligstloas-#l+-AAdutiary-dvty.af• utaraiirarartRLegrfly,-1toWescydaad•foyatty4wdaaffagr•.vatA•t!w•Correa•?adhaJauaaaadthalatios:-�a{- IAngeP4ttM414eftaacataa6kr•ckfilt•�Rdsaw•lei•pttdota>aaoao4thaagoat't�tuttacr4b�AdutyoiltpAfttl3adfaltdol4ngaadGe4d•#attic 4�Adutµlo•dittlotoalllutc• knavaF So -the agent• anatarsalbµatl4cda� Nuwluaoc-doskabtgty 4l the• pcopaatµ lhat•ar�flallraaarp-� 4Far1i tUia •tba dWliaat atseadaaaad• 4btaPvatton aE, thaRartfat.- Aaagaat fir os obfegatad to raaaf Lu aithut FartVan yeoafidartifallalormat3aaahtaLwd-item lhiattwr-RaFtyaublW dnn4aa� l auobq tha attiFarativa• dutWe�at SaRh itA�+tgevfRnacrrsaglfnaWFKAla[locoadlaisao-Ay4 tbaagaat ofboth.tf:alauFaFaadlh4laua•✓<a;•Lrancactfaa,i A v{tlsu dlAtbaknaur1adge•oadcawtaat•o4 botb•tiraJxasoca Rd thaLascoa-Jae dual agoaW.alWattan,- ttwagaratAusha iaUawiae attiaaatvraahilgattoru-Saboth•sfsalyttor-aacillwiwaer={s;likcuGtsA� i'GRubraoct-cuylnWt3 ty k4'atty!A-,he daalfagc With Ndwc lassaFaF•rite-LA4�4Y•^{b)$ihnf•d+ltfat W-tha.lauar SnGtlty.IaGtu-ibif atad#�GWa IA WbpiCa8pj3h4 oF•{f:.�3a•WQFaiAPI�R(3 bOf7bLafiatafKl•lessee,-Xd4. agoar may riot,wftltout.sltoaxpsaeF paraueeiaaotthe-Fapaekva aarty,•dlubteto thaotbeF W Fry-9oandaRUal7�RloFm atiaRr laelwdiag,•fxet.natJl+akwtiw,iaele+alattag io•aUhrwlauaa'sao-Lauasft Ra�RctaigosigaR,-meant,bar@aEasssg•fvxltioa,ocntluupartaaatlniamattoa theta+aKlmp�ctcaat,lacludfagluioc'c•x,dhfcgrwaL.ta accapt4-rantMuta shag rice UuiaQ card -vs latsaa'cualJlkignats-tapayr teat-graataa:tbaa •aria FaaLoftasad.-:ttaaaba•a dutlasof YAa agaat- ia3 coat asgla Ksntactiaa-da oat 144aiw ap agcaameau w aiawa that tkFap 4-4—fafPwcow Rua41144 W aka abwa-Faalecww� Jt apt or• cox• adufcok dau•ad,-COP"- atoapaWalpcolauloaal�serifSatsosaadLattwshas+ldat4aagly-40"kie4."U AllJax-athdca-fwaaacomPataatProlastloaatbocauta-ihaladaul•andtwotax. raruaquanusoLatraasa,ctias caR bawrrrpWx-aad•ctsb}au-W caanga• (bi---awkau have -no racpaaclatU ty wftp raePact,ta. aay.dafauti ar bwub tvoFaaf bµnitlraF A.irAy.- iA4RaFtiatagfaa• kulaaluwtak•nFoibaF.legai• pr4caedlag kaaolsagg-aaybraash• af• dciy,•arroF•oFaaifssfoA• Fa3adRg w• chit laaromsy ba luauglrt- agalast sFolsacraara-than orw `� abet. ehaitart Alta arad shot -IA a tiabilliy{iaetudlag•souFtsaet«aadattaFaEyt faatl afaaµ&okar-withwtpau-2oanysueU•iawcuttsadjockgslgcoevadlagihsunataxeaadttwfwceeaAadby.such. Brolafpuru,aa�4 So3l>la..laata; proulslod,• bowauar,-lbat•Sh,a. foragofwgltraliattaa-aa each O.Fokai a• IlabWtytna4-unlba appUcabM-to artygeouaegttgaaca aFv dUfut cnstcoadauof tushsrokas,• fbl-� LAitaFarld iattlatiaWa �OIdap4✓'y W-'QWkarb aa^+.HRGde#1at� i1W-GGRKa1rRf WifriltOFiRf�FKlatf4n• gIWR AFGi44FF Lhaf• 1L iORifda"a----�.r`�!• Q•��"1^ he•toufideadal. 26. No Right To Holdover. Lessee has no right to retain possession of the Premises or any part thereof beyond the expiradanor termination of this lease. In the event that lessee holds over, then the Base Rent strati b6 Int;reased to 190% oft he Base Rent applicable Immediately preceding the expiration or termination. Holdover Base Rent shall be calculated on monthiybasls. Nothing contained herein shall be construed as consent by Lessor to any holding over by Lessee. 27. Cumulative Remedies. No remedy or elaltfon hereunder shall be deemed exclusive but shall, wherever possible, becumutative with all other remedies at law or in equity. 28. Covenants and Conditions; Construction of Agreement, All provisions or this base to be observed or performed by lessee are both covenants and conditions. In construing this Lease, all headings and titles are for the asrurenlen+ce of the Parties only and shall not he considered a part of this Lease. Whenever required bythe context, the singularshalt include theplural and vice versa. Thlslease shall not be construed asif pteparedby one of the Pa rtles, but rather according to its Fair meanlog as a whole, as if both Parties had prepared It. 29. Binding Effect; Choice of Low, ihlsLeaseshallbebindingupontheParties,thelrpersonalrepresentatives,tuccessorsandasstgnsandbegovwriodbythelaws of the State In which the premises are located. Any iltigation between the Parties hereto concerning this Lease shall be Initialed In the countyln which the Premises are located. Signatures tothls Lease accomplished by meant of electronic signature or slmllartechnology shall be legal and binding. 30. Subordination; Attomment; Non Oisturbsnce, 30.1 Subordination. Thit tease and any Option granted hereby shall be subject and subordinate to any ground lease, mortgage, deed of trust, or other hypothecation or security device (collectively, "Securlty Device"), now or hereafter placed upon the Premises, to any and all advances made on the securltythereof, and to all renewals, modifications, and extensions thereof. tesseeagrees that the holders of any such Security Devices (ln this leasetogetherieferred to as "Lender") shall have no liability orobllgation to perrorm any of the obligations of Lessor under this Lease. Any lender may elect to have this lease and/or any Option granted hereby superior to the lien of Its Sea rlty Devict by giving written notice thereof to lessee, whereupon this Lease and such Options shall be deemed prior to such Security Device, notwithstanding the relative datesof the documentation or recordation thereol, 30.2 Attomment. In the event that lessor transfers title to the Premises, or the Premises are acquired by another upon the foreclosure or termination of a Security Device to wh Ich this lease Is subordinated (1) Lessee shall, subject lathe non -disturbance provisions of Paragrapti 30,3, atlnm to such new owner, and upon request, enter into a new lease, containingall of the terms sod provisions of this tease, with such new ownertot the remainder of the term hereof, or, at the election of the new owner, this leasewill automatically btco me a new lease between Lessee and such newowner, and (ll) lessor shall thereafter be relieved of any further obllgationtheeeander and such newowner shah assume all of Lessors obligations, except that such new owner shalloot: (a) he liable lot any actor omission of any prior lessor orwith respect to events occurring prior to acquisition of ownership; (b) be subject to any offsets or defenses which Lesseemlght haveagalnst any print lessor, (c) be bound by prepayment of more than one month's rent, or (d) be Rabic for the return of any seturltydeposit paid to any prior lustor which was not paid or credited to such new owner. 30.3 Non-Dhturbanca, With respect to Security Devices entered Into by lessor after the execution of this Lease, Lessee's subordination of this Lease shall be subject to receiving comma rdallyreasonable non•dlstu(bance agreement (a "Non-OlsturbanceAgreement") from the Lender which Non -Disturbance Agreement provides that Lessee's possession of the Premises, and this Lease, Including any options to extend the term hereof, will not be dlsturbcd So long as lessee Is not in Breach hereof and ati ores to the record oweerof the Premises. rurther,w)lhln 60 days after the execution ofthfs Lease, Lessor shall, If requested by Lessee, use its commercially reasonable efforlsto obtain a Non -Disturbance Agreement From theholder of anypre-existing Security Device whkhls secured by the Premises. In the event that Lessor is unable to provide the Non-Olsturbante Agreement within said 60days, then Lessee may, at LOStee'a option, directly contact tender and attempt to negotiale for the mcecution and delivery of a Non -Disturbance Agreement. 30,A Self -Executing, the agreements contained In this Paragraph 30 shall be effative without the execution of any further documents; provlded, however, that, upon written request from Lossoror a lender In connection with a sale, financing or refinancing of the Premises, Lessee and Lessor shall execute such further writings as may be reasonably required to separately document any subordination, attomment and(-orNon-Olsturbance Agreement provided For herein. 31. Attorneys' Fees, If any Party or Broker bringsan action or proceeding Involving the Premises whether founded to tort, oontract or equlty, or to declare rights 11gvreoer, the Prevailing Party (as hereafter defined) In any such proceeding, action, or appeal thereon, shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees, such fees may Mr— l INITIALS AL5 LD 2019 AIR CAL All Rights Reserved, Last Edited; 2/25/20219!53 AM Sf N-27,30, Revised 11.25-2019 Page 13 of 15 City Council 26 — 15 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 be awarded In the some suit or recovered Inasepalate suit, whether or not such action or proceeding Is pursued to declslon or judgment. The terns, "Prevailing Party" shall Include, without Ilmltatlon, a Party or Broker who substantially obtains or defeats the rellei sought, as toe case maybe, whether by compromise, settlement, judgment, or the abandonment by the other Party or Broker of Its claim or defense, The attorneys' fees award shall not be computed in accordance with any court fee schedule, but shall be suchas to fully reimburse all attorneys' tees reasonably Incurred, In addition, Lessor shall be entitled to attorneys' fees, costs and expenses incurred in the preparation and service of notices of Default and consultations in connectlontherewlth, whether or not a legal action Is subsequently tommenced in connoction with such Default or resulting Breach ($200 is a reasonable minimum per occurrence for such services and consultation), 32, Lessor's Access; Showing Pr4m1m; Repaim Lessorand Lessor's agents shall havexhe r1ght to enivr1he Premises at any time, Inthecaso of an emergency, and otherwise at reasonable times after reasonable prior notice for thepurpose of showingthe same to prospective purchasers, lenders, or tenants, and making such alteration, repairs, Improvements or addltium to the Premises as lessor may deem necessary or deslrable and the erecting, using and maintaining of utilities, services, pipes and conduits through the Premises and/or other premiset as long as there fine material adverse effect on Lessee's use of the Premises. All such activltles shall be without abatement of rent or (}ability to Lessee. 33. Auctions, Lessee shall not candmt, nor permit to be conducted, anyauction upon the Premises withautLessor's prior written consent. Lessor %hail not be obligated to exercise any standard of reasonableness In determining whether to permit an auctton. 34. Signs. Lessor may place on the Premises ordinary "For Sale" signs at any time and ordlnary"For Lease` signs during the last 6 months of the term hereof. Except for ordinary "for sublease" signs, Lessee shall not place any sign upon the Premises without Lessor's prior wiliten consent. All signs must comply with all Applicable Requirements, 33, Tetmination;Merger. Unles4 specifically stated otherwise In writing by Lessor, ihevolunta,y or other surrender of thls-Leaseby Lessee,tho mutual Wmination or cancellation hereof, or a terminadon hereof by Lessor for Breach by lessee, shall automaticallyterminate any sublease or lesser estate in the Premises; provided, however, that Lessor may elect to continue any one or all exlsdng subtenancles, Letter's failure within 10 days followingany such event to elect to the contrary by written notice to the holder of any such lesser interest, shall constitute Lessor's aleCden to have such event Constitute the terminadon of such interest. 36. Corients, All requests for consent shall be in vrritfng. Except it otherwise, provided herein, wherever hi this Least the consent of a Party Is required to an act by or for the other Parry, such consent shill not be unreasonabiy withheld or delayed. Lessor's actual reasonable costs and expenses (Including but not limited to architects', attorneys', englneere and other consultants' fees) incurred in the consideration of, or response to, a request by Lessee for any lessor consent, including but not limited to consents to on assignment, a subletting or the presence or use of a Hazardous Substance, shall be paid by Lessee upon receipt of an Invoice and suppordng documentation therefor, Lessor'sconsent to any act, asslgnme nt or subletting shall not constitute an acknowledgment that no Default or Breach by Lessee of this tease exists, nor shall such consent be deemed a waiver of any then existing Default or Breach, except as may be otherwise specifically stated in writing by Lessor at the time of such consent. The failure to specify herein any partcular condition to lessor's consent shall rot preclude the Imposition by Lessor at the time of consent of such further or other conditions as are then reasonable with reference to the particular matter for which consent Is being glyen. In the event that either Party disagrees with any determination made by theother hereunder and reasonably requests the reasons for such determination, the determining party shattfurnish Its reasons In writing and In reasonable detallwithln 10 business days following such request, 37. Guarantor. 37.1 Execution. The Guarantors, Ifa ny, shall each execute a guaranty In the form most recently published BY AIR CAF, and each such Guarantor shall have the same obligations as Lessee under this Lease, 372 Default It shall constitute a Oelaultof the Lessee If any Guarantor falls er refuses, upon request to provide. (a)evidence of the oxecudon of lho guaranty, Including the authority of the party signing on Guarantor's behalf to obfgate Guarantor, and In the case of a corporate Guarantor, acertlfied copy of a resolution of tts board of directors authotizing the making of tech guaranty, (b) current financial statements, (c) an Estoppel Certificate, or (d) written confirmation that the guaranty Is still In effect. 38. quiet Possession, Subject to payment by lessee of the Rent and performance of all oithe covenants, conditions and provisions on lessee's part to be observed and performed under this Lease, Lessee shall havequiel possession and quiet enjoyment of the Premises during the term hereof, 39. Options, If Lessee Is granted any Option, as defined below, then the following proulsions shall apply. 39A Deflnition, "Option' shall mean: (al the right to extend or reduce the term of or renew this lease or to extend or reduce the term or or renew any tease that Lessee has on other p roperty of Lessor; (b) the right of first refusal orfirst offer to lease either the Promises or other property of Lessor,(c) the right to purchase, the right of first offertepurchase or the rightof first refusal to purchase the Promises of other p(opertyof Lessor, 39.2 options Personal To Original lessee. Any Option granted to Lessee In Chit Lease Is personal to the orlginal Lessee, and cannot be assigned or exerclsed by anyone other then said orlglnal lessee and onlywhile the oNgInA Lessee Is In full possession of the Premises and, If requested by Lessor, with Lessen certifying that Lessee has no intention of thereafter aSSlgning or subletting, 39.3 Multiple Options. In the event that Lessee has any multiple Options to extend or renew this tease, a later Optlon cannot be exercised unless the prior Options have beenvalldly errerclsed. 39.4 Effect of Defaulton Options, (a) lessee shall have no right to exercise an Option; (I)d uring the period commencing with the giving of any notice of Default and continuing until sald Default is cured, (11) during the period of time any Rent Is unpaid (without regard to whether notteethereof Is given Lessee),(lil) during the time Lessee Is 0 Breach of this Lease, or IN) In the event that Lessee has been given 3 or mare notices of separataDefault, whothefor not the Defaults are cured, during the 22month period Immediately preceding the exercise ofthe Option. (b) The period of time within which an Option may be exercised shall not be extended or enlarged by reason of Lessee's inability to exercise anOption because of the provisions of Paragraph 39.4(a). (c) An Option shall terminate and beef no further force or effecl, notwithstanding Lessee's due and timely exercise of the Option, If, after such exerclse and prior to the commencement ofthe extended term orcompletion of this purchase, (1) Lessee falls to pay Rent for a parlor[ of 30days after such Rent becomes due (without any necessity of Lessor to give notice thereof), or (4) if Lessee commits a Breach of this lease, 40. Multiple Oulfdings, lithe Premises are a part of a groupof bulldingscontrofied by Lessor, Lessee agrees that it willabide by and conform to all reasonable rules and regulations which lessor may make from time to time for the management, safely, and care ofsald properties, Including the care and cleanliness of the grounds and including the parking, loading and unloading of vehicles, and to cause Its employees, suppliers, shippers, Customers, contractors and Invitees to so abide and W ssee al%p agrees to pay Its lair share of common expenses Incurred in Connection with such rules and regulatlons. iNITIALS- 0 2019AiR CRE, All Rights Reserver!, Last Edited; 2/25/2021 9;53 AM STN•27.30, Revlsed 11.25-2019 Page 14 of 16 City Council 26 — 16 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 41, Security Measures. Lessee hereby acknowledges that the Rent payable to Lessor hereunder does not include the sort ofguard service or other security measures, and that lessor shall have no obligation whatsoever to provide same. Lessee assumes all responsibility for the protection of the Premises. Lessee, Its agents and invitees and thelr propertVIronn the acts of third parties. 42. Reservations. Lessor reserves to Itself the right, from time to time, to gra ntwllhout the consent or joinder of Lessee, such easements, rights and dedications that Lessor deems necessary, and to cause the recordation of parcel maps and restrictions, so long as such easaments, rights, dedications, maps and restrictions do not unreasonably Interfere with the use of (he Premises by lessee. Lessee agrees to sign any documents reasonably requested by lessor to effectuate any such easamontrights, dedkatlon, map orrestrlctions. 43. Performance Under Protest, If at anytime a dispute shall arise as to any amount or turn of money to be paid by one Party to the other under the provlslons hereof, the Paftyagatnst whom the obligation to pay the money is asserted shall have the right to make payment "under protest" and such payment shall not be regarded as a voluntary payment and there shall survive the right on the part of said Party to institute suit for recovery of such sum. It It shall be adjudged that there was no legal obligation on the part of said Party to pay such sum or any part thereof, said Party shall be entitled to recover such sum or so much thereof as it was not legally required to pay, A Party who does not Initiate suit for the recovery of sums paid "under protest' within 6 months shall be deemed to have waived its right to protest such payment 44. Authority; Multiple Parties; Execution. (a) IfeltherPatty hereto Is corporation, trust, limited I',ablilty aompany,partnership. of similar entity, eachindividual executing this Lease an behalf of tuchtnmy represents and warrants that he or she IsduN authorized to execute and deliver thlit.ease on its irthall. Each Party shall, within 30 days after reques4 deliver to the other Party satisfactory e0dence of such authority. (b) If this lease Is executed by more than one person or entity as "lessee", each such person or entity shall be jointly and severally liable hereunder, it Is agreed that anyone of the named Lessecs shall beempowered to execute any amendment to this Lease,or other document ancillary thereto and bind all of the named Lessees, and Lessor may reiyon Use same as IF all of the named lessees had executed such document. (c) This Laase may be executed by the Parties In counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute one and the same Instrument. 45. Conflict. Any conflict between the printed provisions ofthis Lease and the typewritten or handwritten provisions shall be controlled bythe typewritten or handwritten provisions, ( 46. Offer. Preparation of this tease by either Partyor their agent and submission of same to the other Party shall not be deemed an offer to lease to the other Party. This lease Is not Intended to be binding undl executed and delivered by all Parties hereto. 47. Amendments. This Lease maybe modified only In wilting, signed by the Partiesin Interest at the time of the modification. As long as they do not materially change Lessee's obligations hereunder. Lessee agrees to make such reasonable non•monelary modifications to this Lease as may be reasonably required by a lender in connection with the obtaining of normal financing or raflnandng of the Premises. 48. Waiver of luryTrfal. THE PARTIES HEREBY WAIVE THEIR RESPECTIVE RIGHTS TO TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING tNVOLVING THE PROPERTY DR ARISING OUT OF THIS AGREEMENT. 49. Arbitration of Disputes. An Addendum requiring the Arbitration of all disputes between the Parties and/or Brokers arising out of this Lease o IS M Is not attached to this Lease. SQ. Accettibtilty;Amerlcanswlth Disabi4ft3Act. (a) The Premises; have not undergone an inspection by a Certified Access Specialist (CASp). NOW A CerbfieclAcce ss Specialist (CASp{ con Inspect the subject premises and determine whether Use subject premises comply with all of the applicable comtructiomretoted accessibility standards under state law. Although state law does not require a CASp Inspection of the subject premises, the commercial property owner or lessor may not prohibit the lessee or tenant from obtaining a CASp Inspection of the subject premises for the occupancy or potential occupancy of the lessee or tenant, It requested bythe lessee or tenant. The parties shall mutually agree an the arrangements for the time and manner of the CASp Inspection, the payment of the fee for the CAS p Inspection, and the cost of making any repairs necessary to correctvlolations of construction -related a cesslbl IILy standards within the premises. have und ergone an inspection by aCerdhed Accessspeciallst (CASpI and It wasdetermined that the Premises met ail applicable construction -related accessibillty standards pursuant to Calllomla Civil Code §55.51 et seq. Lessee acknowledges that It received a copy of the inspectlon report at least 48 hours prior to executing this Lease end agreesto keep such report confidential. El have undergone an Impaction by a Certified AccessSpedallst (CASp) and Itwas determined that the Premises did not meetall applicable conStructiomrelated accesslblilly standards pursuant to California Civil Code §55.5t et seq. Lessee acknowledges that It received a copy of the Inspection report at least48 hours prior to executing this Lease and agrees to keep such report confidential except as necessity to complete repairs and corrections of violations of construction related accessibility standards. In the eventthat the Premises have been Issued an inspection reporttsy a CASp the Lessor shall provide a copy of the dlmblllty access inspection certificate to Lessee within y days of theexecution of thlslease. jb) Since compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and other slate and local accessibility statutes aredependent upon tessee'sspeciBc use of the Premises, Lessor makes no warranty or representation as to whether or not the Premises comply with ADA or anyslingaf legistaUon. In the avent that Lessee's use of the Premises requires modlfications or additions to the Premises In order to be in compliance with ADA or other actessibliitystatutes, Lessee agrees to make any such necessary modifications and/or additions at Lessee's expense. LESSOR AND LESSEE HAVE CAREFULLY READ AND REVIEWEDTHIS tEASEAND EACH TERM AND PROVISION CONTAINED HEREIN, AND BY THE EXet1fT1ON OF Tilts LEASE SHOW THEIR INFORMED AND VOLUNTARY CONSENT THERETO. THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE THAT, ATTHE 11MET1itSLEASE I$ EXECUTED, THE TERMS OF THIS LEASE ARECOMMLSRCiALLY REASONABLEAND EFFECTUATE THE INTENT AND PURPOSE Of LESSDR AND LESSEEWIT'H RESPECTTOTHE PREMISES, ENTIONt NO REPRESENTATION OR RECOMMENDATION 15 MADE BY AIR CAE OR BY ANY BROKERAS TOTHE LEGAL SUFFSCIENCY, LEGAL EFFECT, OR TAX INITIALS SZP C 2019 AIR CRE. All Rights Reserved. Last Edited- 2/25/20219:53AM STN"27.30, Revised 11-25.2019 Page 15 of 16 City Council 26 — 17 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 CONS£QUENORS OF THIS LIASE ON T111TRANSAC71ON TO WHICH fT RSI.M0, THE PARTIES ARE URGEO TOt 1. SEER ADVICE Of COWILAS TO THE ILWAL AND TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THIS LEASE, 2. RETAIN APPROPRIATE CONSULTANTSTOUVittvANDINVISTWAR!MECONDITION OFTHE PREMISE$. $AID INVESTIOATIONSNOULDt4CLUDEDUTNOT LIE LIMITBDTO: THt POSSIBIR PREkNCE OFItWoDOUS SUBSTANCES,THE tONINOOFTHE PREMiSFA,Tilt STRUCTURAIINTE0Rk1Y, THE CONDITION OF THE R00' AND 0 PLEATING 5Y5TEM& AND THE SUITA01trtV OF THE PREMISES FOR 1ESSIE'S INTENDED USE, WARNINet IPTHE PRIMISESARE LOCATED IN A STATEOTHER THAN CAUFORNIA, CIATAIN PROVISIONS OF THE 4MEMAY NEED TO BE REVISED70 COMPLY WITH THELAW$ OF THE STAIR IN WHICH THRPREMISES ARE LOCATED. Theparktas hereto have executed INS Iaota at the plact and or,&a datos specified aA+we their raspocdvo fignatures. Eraeculedat, ixarutadat., On; _ On: By US By Im E£t 3vs Bv; NemaPtik t NamePdritedt lLttes Title: Phooas Phone; Fait Fax• EmaNI emat AVI 6y: - NamePtintedi — Hama Prteted: Title; _,__ Phenet ,�,.,• tltiel Phone: See attached City of Santa Ana Fix. _,.., ____ signature EmFoRail: page Addtass: T federal ID No VROXER —WA— Aft. Title:.„., Address: Phone; Fax: Fadoml ID No.i OroWDAEUtenr ll; — ABantDRE ticente HI AtMresa: _ WOW IDNo.1 BROKER 9- Atte: Adlltess: Phow _ WOOL 10Noa, , Drokt DRE lkensa n; Agent ORE UcenteM AIRERE + hapst/lwww.atrare.aam 4' 211-897•OM • ContMQt1QAlreracam NOTICEt No part oMase woAx maybe reprodut:ad to a►ytarm wlthout parntirslon to wrtttng. INITIALS iAL © 2019 AIR CRE, All Rights Reserved, Last Edited: 2/2S/20219;5S AM STN•2730, Revised 11-25.2019 Page 28 of 16 I ti i City Council 26 — 18 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 A-2021-028 Lessee City of Santa Ana Signature Page to: Addendum to Standard Industrial/Commercial Single -Tenant Lease — Net For Certain Premises Commonly Known as 1815 East Carnegie, Santa Ana, California 92705 March 1, 2021 CITY OF SANTA ANA: pristine Ridge City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho City ttorney Ryan O,Hodge Assistant City Attorney ATTEST: -/Daisy Gomez _Clerk of the Council RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: Steven Nlendoza Executive Director Community Development Agency City Council 26 — 19 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 ADDENDUM TO STANDARD INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL SINGLE -TENANT LEASE -NET FOR CERTAIN PREMISES COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1815 EAST CARNEGIE, SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92?05 MARCH 1, 2021 This Addendum (this "Addendum") is being executed concurrently with and is made a part of that certain )ease titled "Standard IndustHal/Commercial Single -Tenant -Net" dated March 1, 2021 (the "Form [.ease") by and between dyer 18, LLC ("Lessor") and The City of Santa Ana ("Lessee" and sometimes herein the "City") and this Addendum shall control in the event of any inconsistency with the provisions of such Form Lease. The Section and Paragraph Numbers of this Addendum are new added Sections and Paragraphs to the Form Lease. As used herein, the "Lease" shall mean the Form Lease as supplemented and amended by this Addendum. Uniess otherwise defined in this Addendum, any defined word contained in this Addendum has the some meaning as it is defined in the Form Lease. 51, Intentionally Omitted, 52, Rent Commencement. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in this Lease, Base Rent shall commence, and the first monthly payment of Base Rent shall be paid, on the Commencement Date. If the Commencement Date is not the First day of a calendar month, then such first monthly payment of Base Rent shall be in an amount equal to the aggregate of a prorated Base Rent payment (based on a 30 day month) from such day to the end of that calendar month plus the amount of the full Base Rent payment for the next consecutive calendar month. 53. Rent AdiustmenM On July 1, 2021 ("First Rent Adjustment bate"), the monthly Base Rent payable under this Lease shall automatically increase by 3.01/o from the monthly Base Rent amount due and payable during the immediately preceding year. Thereafter, on each anniversary of the First Rent Adjustment Date (each being a "Subsequent Rent Adjustment Date") during the Term hereof, the monthly Base Rent payable under this Lease shall further automatically increase by 3.0% from the monthly Base Rent amount due and payable during the immediately preceding year from the then last immediately preceding Subsequent Rent Adjustment Date. 54. Lessee's Improvements. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in this Lease, all Utility Installations, Trade Fixtures and Alterations, including Lessen Owned Alterations and/or Utility Installations, shall be free and clear of any and all liens and/or encumbrances in favor of any third -party and shall be available, without limitation, to secure Lessee's faithful performance of its obligations as set forth in this Lease. Upon any default or breach of this Lease by Lessee whereby Lessor elects to terminate the Lease, such Utility Installations, Trade Fixtures and Alterations, including Lessee Owned Alterations and/or Utility Installations, shall remain upon and be surrendered by Lessee to Lessor with the Premises, subjeot to Lessee's right to remove the same, at Lessee's sole cost and expense, as set forth below, The Premises shall otherwise be returned to Lessor in the same condition as of the date of this Lease, reasonable wear and tsar excepted. After the Commencement Date, and thereafter from time to time at the reasonable request of Lessor, Lessee hereby agrees to execute certain security instruments, including, but not limited to, a UCC Form-1 or other filing, in order to create and/or perfect Lessor's security interest in such Utility Installations, Trade Fixtures and Alterations, as set forth herein, which security instruments will be prepared by Lessor and submitted to Lessee, and recorded by Lessor, at Lessor's sole cost and expense. Upon any termination or earlier expiration of this Lease not resulting from the default or breach of this Lease by Lessee, all Utility Installations, Trade Fixtures and Alterations, including Lessee Owned Alterations and/or Utility Installations, located in the Premises shall remain upon and be strtrendercd by Lessee with the Premises, subject to 1292" 7.1 City Council 26 — 20 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Lessee's right to remove the same, at Lessee's sole cost and expenses, as set forth below, The Premises shall otherwise be returned to Lessor in the same condition as of the date of this Lease, reasonable wear and tear excepted, Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon any termination or expiration of this Lease not resulting from the default or breach of this Lease by Lessee, Lessee, at Lessee's option, shall have the right to remove any such Utility Installations, Trade Fixtures and Alterations, including Lessee Owned Alterations and/or Utility Installations, at Lessee's sole cost and expense, provided that (a) all such Utility Installations, Trade Fixtures and Alterations, including Lessee Owned Alterations and/or Utility Installations shall be removed by Lessee within 15 days after such termination or expiration of this Lease and (b) Lessee shall, at its sole cost and expense, repair any damage to the Premises caused by such removal. 55, Lessor's Obligati nc Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in the Lease, Lessor shall not be required to (a) rcmediate or rectify any future non-compliance with governmental regu lations or (b) provide ADA upgrades to the Premises or the Project resulting from the specific and unique use of the Premises (including without limitation, the Shelter) by Lessee or resulting from any Utility Installations, Trade Fixtures and Alterations, including Lessee Owned Alterations and/or Utility Installations, or other alternations or improvements to the Premises, made by Lessee or Lessor, unless such remediation or upgrades are required as part of the "Work" as set forth in Section 62 herein below prior to occupancy of the Premises and to the extent required to permit Lessee's occupation and use of the Premises and then, such costs shall be included as part of the "Cost of the Work" as set forth in said Section 62 below, Except as otherwise specifically set forth in this Section S 5 below, Lessor shall not be required to make or incur any capital expenditures or commence or complete any remediation of Hazardous Substances or any non-compliance with governmental regulations now In effect; provided, however, the foregoint is not intended to and shall not impose upon Lessee or Lessor any obligation to rcmediate any Hazardous Substances located on the Premises as of the date hereof unless such remediation is required with any work, improvements or Alterations made or being made by or on behalf of Lessee or Lessor to the Premises prior to occupancy of the Premises to the extent required to permit Lessee's occupation and use of the Premises and then, such costs shall be included as part of the "Cost of the Work" as set forth in said Section 62 below, Furthertnore, notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in the Lease, it is the intent of Lessor and Lessee that Lessor shall have no responsibility or obligation whatsoever, for the maintenance, repair or replacement of all or any portion of the Premises, Building, or Project, including, without limitation, the roof and the HVAC system, such responsibility and obilgations being that of Lessee. Lessee shall properly use, operate and safeguard the Premises, including, if applicable, any landscaping, furniture, fu mishing and appliances, and all mechanical, electrical, boilers, refrigeration equipment, gas and plumbing fixtures, HVAC and other building systems, and smoke detectors and fire alarms, and keep them and the Premises clean, sanitary and well ventilated and all drains free from blockages or stoppages, Lessee shall be responsible to pay for all utilities, sewer charges and any roof repairs caused by Lessee's use or misuse of the roof or otherwise, Lessee shall properly insure all of the Premises and all of Lessee's and its guests', patients' and invitees' personal property. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in this Lease, Lessee is solely responsible for any and all upgrades to the existing "VAC system (including, without limitation repair, replacement or additions) and any current repairs or replacements of the roof to accommodate and permit Lessee's use of the Premises as a Shelter and its required occupancy -and usage of the Premises, all of which shall be completed prior to Lessee's opening of the Shelter at the Premises, at Lessee's sole cost and expense and then, such costs shall be included as part of the "Cost of the Work" as set forth in said Section 62 below; provided, further, Lessee hereby affirms and agrees that (a) the current HVAC system in the Premises is acceptable to Lessee in its current condition, (b) the roof is acceptable to Lessee in its current condition, and (c) the current structural portions of the Premises are acceptable to Lessee 12926447,1 City Council 26 — 21 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 in their current condition Nothing in this Section 55 shall be deemed or construed as modifying or amending Lessee's obligations for the regular and timely maintenance and repair of the Premises, roof and HVAC system. 56. Neighborhood Conditions. Lessee represents and warrants to Lessor that it is aware of neighborhood or area conditions, including schools, proximity and adequacy of law enforcement, crime statistics, proximity of registered felons or offenders, fire protection, other governmental services, availability adequacy and cost of an speed -wired, wireless intemet connections or other telecommunications or other technology services and installations, proximity to commercial, industrial or agricultural activities, existing and proposed transportation, construction and development that may affect noise, view, or traffic, airport noise, noise or odor from any source, wild and domestic animals, other nuisances, hazard or circumstance, cemeteries, facilities and condition of common areas, conditions and influences of significance to certain cultures and/or religions, and personal needs, requirements and preferences of Lessee. 57. Condition of. Premises. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Lease, Lessor shall deliver the Premises in its current "as is" condition as of the date hereof, and Lessee shall, and does hereby, accept delivery of the Premises as of the date hereof ("Delivery Date", "Effective Date" or "Commencement Date"). Lessee shall provide Lessor a copy of Lessee's certificate(s) of liability insurance concurrently with the execution hereof; provided, however, the failure to do so shall not extend the Delivery Date. The Premises are hereby leased to Lessee "as is", without representation or warranty by the Lessor (except as otherwise expressly provided in this Lease), and Lessee hereby accepts the Premises in the condition thereof existing as of the date hereof subject to all applicable zoning, municipal, county, state and federal laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, orders, restrictions of record and requirements now or hereafter in effect during the Term (colleotively, "Applicable Requirements", "Applicable Laws" or just"Laws"). Therefore, notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in this Lease, Lessee represents and warrants that Lessee has inspected the Premises, and that Lessee is familiar with the general and specific condition(s) of the Premises and that Lessor shall have no responsibility or liability (except as otherwise expressly provided in this Lease) with respect to the general or any specific condition of the Premises or any system (including, without limitation, HVAC, electrical, plumbing, refrigeration and fire sprinkler) and that Lessee represents and warrants that, except as expressly set forth herein, Lessee is acting, and will act only, upon information known to, or obtained by, Lessee directly from Lessee's own knowledge and inspection of the Promises (except as otherwise expressly provided in this Lease). Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Lease, Lessor hereby makes no claims, representations or warranties as to the suitability or lack of suitability of the Premises for any proposed or intended use, or availability or lack of availability of (a) permits or approvals of governmental or regulatory authorities, or (b) easements, licenses or other rights with respect to any such proposed or intended use of the Premises or (c) any condition of the Premises, and the availability or lack of availability shall not affect the rights or obligations of the Lessee hereunder. Therefore, AS A MATERIAL PART OF THE CONSIDERATION FOR T141S LEASE AND THE AMOUNT OF RENT TO BE PAYABLE HEREUNDER, LESSEE AGREES THAT, EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE EXPRESSLY SET FORTH HEREIN, LESSEE LEASES AND ACCEPTS THE PREMISES ON AN "AS IS" AND "WHERE IS" BASIS, WITH ALL FAULTS, EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE EXPRESSLY SET FORTH HEREIN, NO WARRANTY, REPRESENTATION OR GUARANTEE OF ANY TYPE (EXPRESSED, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, WRITTEN OR ORAL) HAS OR IS MADE BY LESSOR WITH RESPECT TO THE PREMISES, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, AS TO ANY OF THE FOLLOWING- (1) FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE, (it) MERCHANTABILITY, (1I1) CONDITION OR WORKMANSHIP, (IV) ABSENCE OF DEFECTS OR FAULTS, (V) PRESENCE OR 12926447.1 City Council 26 — 22 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 ABSENCE OF HAZARDOUS OR TOXIC SUBSTANCES, (VI) OPERATION OR PERFORMANCE OF THE PREMISES OR SYSTEMS THEREIN OR THE HABITABILITY OF THE PREMISES, (VII) COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES OR REGULATIONS (FEDERAL, SATEOR LOCAL) and, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THOSE RELATING TO HEALTH, SAFETY, AND THE'ENVIRDNMENT, AS THEY MAY APPLY TO THE CURRENT CONDITION OF THE PREMISES OR LESSEE'S INTENDED USE OR (Vlll) ANY GOVERNMENT LIMITATION OR RESTRICTION, OR ABSENCE THEREOF, PERTAINING TO THE PREMISES. LESSEE ACKNOWLEDGES THAT LESSEE HAS ENTERED INTO THIS LEASE RELYING UPON ITS OWN 1NVESTIGATIDN OF THE PHYSICAL, ENVIRONMENTAL AND COMPLIANCE CONDITION OF THE PREMISES AND THAT LESSEE IS NOT NOW RELYING, AND WILL NOT LATER RELY, UPON ANY REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES MADE BY LESSOR OR ANYONE ACTING OR CLAIMING TO ACT, BY, THROUGH OR UNDER OR ON LESSOR'S 1SEHALF CONCERNING THE PREMISES. Lessee is familiar with the Premises and their suitability for Lessee's Intended use, All documents which have been given to Lessee by Lessor have been delivered as an accommodation to Lessee and withuut any representation or warranty as to the sufficiency, accuracy, completeness, validity, truthfulness, enforceability, or assignability of any of the documents, all of which Lessee relies on at its own risk, 58, Release. Lessee shall rely solely upon Lessee's own knowledge of the Premises based on its investigation of the Premises and its own inspection of the Premises in determining the Premises' physical condition. Lessee and anyone claiming by, through or under Lessee hereby waives its right to recover from and fully and irrevocably releases Lessor and its respective members, employees, officers, directors, partners, shareholders, beneficiaries, trustees, fiduciaries, representatives, agents, servants, attorneys, affiliates, parent, subsidiaries, successors and assigns, and all persons, firnis, corporations and organizations acting in their behalf ("Released Parties") from any and all claims that it may now have or hereafter acquire against any of the Released Parties for any costs, loss, liability, damage, expenses, demand, action or cause of action arising from or related to any construction defects, errors, omissions or other conditions, latent or otherwise, including environmental matters, affecting the Premises or any portion thereof. This release includes claims of which Lessee is presently unaware or which Lessee does not presently suspect to exist which, if known by Lessee, would materially affect Lessee's release to Lessor. In tltis connection and to the fullest extent permitted by law, Lessee hereby agrees, represents and warrants that Lessee realizes and acknowledges that factual matters now unknown to it may have given or may hereafter give rise to causes of action, claims, demands, debts, controversies, damages, costs, losses and expenses which are presently unknown, unanticipated and unsuspected, and Lessee further agrees, represents and warrants that the waivers and releases herein have been negotiated and agreed upon in light of that realization and that, as a material portion of the consideration given to Lessor by Lessee in exchange for Lessor's performance hereunder, Lessee nevertheless hereby intends to release, discharge and acquit Lessor from any such unknown causes of action, claims, demands, debts, controversies, damages, costs, losses and expenses which might in any way be included. Lessor has given Lessee material concessions regarding this transaction in exchange for Lessee agreeing to the provisions of this Paragraph, The releases set forth above are full and complete releases of all the persons and entities described above of and from any and all liability of any nature whatsoever for all damage, injury, loss, expense, including any consequential expense, loss or damage, whether the same are now known or unknown to the parties, expected or unexpected by said parties, and all rights under Section 1542 of the California Civil Code are hereby waived and relinquished. Section 1542 of the Civil Code provides as follows; 12926441.1 City Council 26 — 23 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 "A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS THAT THE CREDITOR OR RELEASING PARTY DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS OR HER FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM OR HER WOULD HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS OR HER SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR OR RELEASED PARTY." L sec's Initials Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, the foregoing release in this Section 58 is not intended to and does not cover (i) any claims arising from a breach by Lessor of any Lessor's obligations under this Lease, or (lii) any gross negligence, willful misconduct or fraud committed by Lessor. 59. Reservations. Lessee agrees to consent to Lessor's (i) grant of such easements, rights and dedications that Lessor deems necessary, (0) recordation of parcel maps and restrictions, and (ili) creation and/or installation of new utility raceways, only if such easements, rights, dedications, maps, restrictions, and utility raceways shall not, in Lessee's reasonable discretion, unreasonably interfere with the use of the Premises by Lessee or otherwise materially negatively impact Lessee's use or occupation of the Premises; and in such event, Lessee agrees to sign any documents reasonably requested by Lessor to effectuate such rights so long as such documents do not impose any cost or liability on Lessee which is non-de-Minimis, Lessor further reserves the right to change the name by which the Building or the Project (if any) is called with Lessee's prior written consent which shall not be unreasonably withheld. 60, Assignment and Subletting. Lessee shall have no right to, and shall not, assign, sublet or otherwise transfer all or any portion of the Premises or its rights under and to this Lease without the prior written consent of Lessor, which such consent may be given or denied in Lessor's sole and absolute discretion (and which such consent may be conditioned upon Lessee entering into a lease guaranty ("Lease Guaranty") in favor of Lessor (upon terms and- conditions reasonably acceptable to Lessor), whereby Lessee guaranties the performance by such assignee, Any assignment, subletting or transfer without such consent shall be a non -curable Default and Breach hereunder, without any prior notice need being given. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Lessee shall have the right to enter into one or more agreements (collectively, with any extension, renewal, amendment or replacement thereof, the "City Agreements") with an established third party operator of similar situated homeless navigation centers as the Shelter ("Third Party Operator), provided, however, that Lessee shall have first provided the name of such propused Third Party Operator, and the terms of the City Agreements and provided further, that no such City Agreement shall modify or amend Lessee's obligations under this Lease. 61, insurance, Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in the l:urm Lease, Lessee shall carry and maintain, at its sole cost and expense, the following insurance: (i) Commercial General Liability Insurance (occurrence form) including coverage for death, bodily injury, with coverage for vandalism and malicious mischief, broad form property damage, contractual liability, owner's protective, host liquor liability and prod ucts/eomp leted operations with coverage limits as reasonably required by Lessor from time to time, but in no event less than Five Million Dollars ($5,000,000.00), combined each occurrence and in the aggregate insuring against any and all liability of the Lessee with respect to the Premises and all areas appurtenant thereto or arising out 12926447,1 City Council 26 — 24 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 of the maintenance, use or occupancy thereof (Lessee may satisfy any portion of this requirement with umbrella liability coverage); (ii) Insurance covering any and all improvements, including Lessee's furniture, fixtures and equipment and any Alterations permitted hereunder, and ail personal property, in an amount not less than their full replacement cost providing protection against any peril included within the classification "Special Form" including fire, vandalism and malicious mischief; (iii) Automobile liability insurance for all motor vehicles operated by or for Lessee, including owned, hired and non -owned vehicles, with minimum combined single limit coverage for bodily injury and property damage as reasonably required by Lessorfrom time to time, but in no event less than tale Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for each occurrence, (iv) full replacement cost plate glass insurance and business interruption insurance in such amount as will reimburse Lessee for direct or indirect loss of earnings for up to 12 months attributable to all such perils insured against herein or any other cause, (v) Workers' Compensation, including employer's liability insurance, in compliance with all laws governing worker's compensation. If Lessee falls to maintain such insurance, Lessee shall be deemed to have assumed the risk of all losses which would have been covered by such insurance and Lessor shall have no liability for any such losses. All of Lessee's policies of Insurance shall be issued by insurance companies with general policyholder's rating of not less than A and a financial rating of not less than Class A VI as rated in the most current available "Nest's" Insurance Reports and qualified to do business in the State of California. All policies shall name Lessor, its related or affiliated entities, parents, subsidiaries, partnerships, joint ventures, limited liability companies, members, trusts and assigns of every tier (as identified by Lessor), and each of their respective directors, officers, partners, agents, employees, volunteers, members, managers, trustees, shareholders and any successors or assigns of the foregoing, as well as Lessor's management company and if requested by Lessor, Lessor's first mortgagee or beneficiary as additional insureds (to the extent Lessor gives written notice to Lessee of the names and addresses of such parties), Certificates for all policies shall be delivered to Lessor prior to delivery of possession of the Premises to Lessee, and thereafter within thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the term of each such policy. Until Lessee has delivered to Lessor such certificates of insurance, Lessor shall not be obligated to deliver keys to the Premises to Lessee, and Lessee shall not be entitled to take occupancy of the Premises notwithstanding the fact the Term of the Lease and Lessee's obligation to pay rent hereunder may have already commenced. All policies of insurance must contain a provision that Lessor will receive thirty (30) days' advanced written notice ofany cancellation, lapse or reduction in the amounts of insurance. All public liability, property damage and other casualty policies shall be written as primary policies, not contributing with or in excess of coverage which Lessor may carry. Ali of Lessee's insurance policies shall contain the following provisions; severability of interest, cross liability, and contingent liability and builder's risk, with respect to improvements and alterations required or permitted to be made by Lessee under this Lease. The limits of said insurance shall not, however, limit the liability of Lessee hereunder, if Lessee fails to maintain or procure such insurance, Lessor shall havethe right, but not the obligation, to procure and maintain the same, at Lessee's sole cost and expense. Lessee and Lessor each hereby waive any and all rights of recovery against the other, or against the officers, employees, agents and representatives of die other, for lass of or damage to such waiving party or its property or the property of others under its control to the extent that such loss or damage is insured against under any insurance policy required to be carried under this lease. Each patty shall, upon obtaining the policies of insurance required hereunder, give notice to the insurance carrier or carriers that the foregoing mutual waiver of subrogation is contained in this Lease, and shal I obtain any special endorsements required at the insuring parry's cost, if any. The parties agree in the event of any damage to Lessee, the Premises, Lessee's property, and/or any loss to Lessee's employees or inv itces each shall resort to insurance coverage prior to asserting any claim or demand against the other or its assets. Nothing in this Section shall be deemed to constitute a waiver by the 12926447.1 City Council 26 — 25 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 respective insurance carriers of either Lessee or Lessor of any other remedies available to said carriers 62. Initial Improvements and Work, Lessor, through the "General Contractor" (as defined below), shall construct, furnish and install within the Premises, Including outside yard area, those items of construction (the "Work") shown on the "Plans" (as defined below), It is the intent and agreement of the parties that the Work is comprised of all work (including all hard and soft costs associated with the design and construction of improvements for the Premises, but excluding any costs for furniture, fixtures, Trade Fixtures and other such similar personal property used in connection with the operation of the Shelter) to enable Lessee to furnish and install the Shelter and comprehensive supportive services, which such facility shall contain sleeping areas, restrooms, showers, laundry rooms, kitchen and storage areas, common areas, and offices, and all other ancillary improvements in connection therewith to enable Lessee to operate the Shelter. The architectural, structural, grading, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, sewer and fire/life safety standards that shall be applicable to the construction required to complete the Work, shall be subject to Lessor's rules and regulations applicable to the performance of the Work (collectively, the "Work Standards"j. Lessor hereby appoints Jeremy ogulnick as Lessor's representative ("Lessor's Representative") to act for Lessor in all matters in connection with the Work. Lessee hereby appoints as Lessee's representative(s) ("Lessee'a Representatives)") to act for Lessee in all matters in connection with the Work and Lessee shall be responsible for all costs authorized by Lessee's Representative(s). All inquiries, requests, Instructions, authorizations and other communications with respect to the Work shall be made to Lessor's Representative or Lessee's Representative(s), as the case may be. Authorizations made by Lessee's Representative(s) shall be binding on Lessee. Authorizations made by Lessor's Representative shall be binding on Lessor. Either party may change its representatives under this Section 62 at any time by written notice to the other party, but any such change shall be effective only upon receipt by the other party. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no event shall any direction by Lessor's Pw-presentative or Lessee's Representative(s) constitute a change in the terms or conditions of the Lease, unless the Lease is expressly modified In a writing executed by both Lessor and Lessee, All work shall be done pursuant to those architectural, electrical, mechanical, plumbing, life safety and structural drawings and specifications (including all finishes) for the Work, which shall be approved by Lessor and Lessee (collectively, the "Plans"), Lessee may not make any material changes, modifcations or alterations in the Plans (collectively, "Lessee Changes') at any time without Lessor's prior written approval thereof which shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed and the cost of any such Lessee Changes shall be added to the Cost of the Work and shall not be included in the "Contingency Amount" (as defined below) and in the event of any such approved Lessee Changes, the Cost Estimate shall be increased by the amount of such lessee Changes. Lessor may from time to time during the prosecution of the Work require reasonable modifications or amendments to the Plans due to unforeseeable conditions or to the extent changes are required to comply with applicable Laws ("Lessor Changes') and the cost of any such Lessor Changes shall be included In the "Contingency Amount" (as defined below), unless it is considered a "Change order" (as defined below) approved by Lessee, Lessor acknowledges and agrees that Lessor shall be solely responsible for causing the Work to be constructed and maintained, in accordance with all applicable Laws, including, without limitation, the provisions of the American with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 12101 et seq. and any governmental regulations with respect thereto (the "ADA") and other similar Laws. Additionally, to the extent applicable to the Work, Lessor shall be responsible for complying with all pertinent prevailing wage laws pursuant to California Labor Code sections 1720, et seq, Lessee shall pay the entire "Cost of the Work". As used herein, the terra "Cost of the Work" means all costs and expenses in connection with the design, furnishing, construction and installation of the Work, including without limitation; (a) all architectural, W2i447,1 City Council 26 — 26 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 engineering and consultant fees associated with the preparation of the Plans; (b) governmental agency plan review, permit, license and other fees (including, without limitation, any charges required by any governmental entity or authority having jurisdiction over the Premises); (c) sales and use taxes; (d) insurance costs and expenses; (e) testing and inspecting costs; (f) costs and expenses of material and labor, including without limitation, General Contractor's profit and general overhead; (g) costs and expenses associated with the compliance with applicable Laws; (h) costs and expenses of alterations of the Premises and all lire safety systems necessitated by any applicable Law; (i) costs and expenses associated with any modification or addition to the Premises or any street or public right of way; t j) all costs and expenses of construction work required to complete the Work; (k) costs and expenses of Lessee signage, if any, (1) costs and expenses associated with the placement of any new, additional or supplemental mechanical, electrical, plumbing or life safety systems on the Premises, including, without limitation, costs associated with any repair or replacement of any HVAC units or systems, and running piping and conduit to such systems (the location for such piping and conduit shall be selected by Lessor); (m) costs and expenses associated with any Lessee Changes or Lessor Changes; and (n) any out- of-pocket costs and expenses incurred by Lessor or Lessor's consultants associated with the review of the Plans. Lessor proposed that the entire Cost of Work would be $ 8, 500,000 for the completion of the Work ("Cost Estimate"). Any changes to the scope of Work that would increase the "Cost Estimate" must be approved in writing by Lessee prior to commencement of such extra Work ("Change Order") provided, however, that Lessor and Lessee also agree to a 10% contingency amount equal to $850,000 ("Contingency Amount"), which such Contingency Amount may be incurred in connection with any Lessor Change, and is to be paid and reimbursed to Lessor by Lessee, without such prior written approval or Lessee. Concurrently upon the execution of this Lease, Lessee shall deposit with Lessor, the sum of$850,000, which such amount shall be a "retainer" against fees and costs incurred by Lessor in connection with Lessor's completion of the Work. All Work shall be completed by a general contractor chosen by Lessor but approved by Lessee, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed (the "General Contractor"). Lessor shall be required to obtain the required permits for the Work, with any costs and expenses included within the Cost Estimate. Lessee hereby approves Bentley Construction as the General Contractor. Lessee must arrange with an insurance company to provide the coverage required under the Lease, the cost of which is not included in the Cost Estimate. Prior to the start of Work, Lessor must receive the certificates of insurance required under the Lease. Such certificate of insurance shall name Lessor as additional insured. Lessor shall cause the General Contractor to perform all Work in a good and workmanlike manner and in accordance with good industry practice, applicable Laws and the Lessor's Work Standards, and in material compliance with the Plans. Lesscr shall deliver to Lessee a request for payment from the General Contractor, approved by Lessor, showing the schedule, by trade, of percentage of completion of the Work and the cost of tabor rendered and materials delivered to the Premises fbr which such payment is being requested, which such request for payment may be submitted weekly and on or before the seventh (7th) Business Day after receipt of such request for payment, Lessee shall deliver a check to Lessor trade payable to hither Lessor or General Contractor, the amounts so requested by Lessor. Duringthe construction of the Work, Lessor's Representative and Lessee's Representative shall meet as often as deemed reasonably necessary by Lessor and/or Lessee to discuss construction progress. For purposes hereof, "Substantial Completion" (and any correlative variations thereof) of the Work shall mean completion of construction of the Work in material compliance with the Plans, with the exception of any Punch List Items. For the purposes hereof, the terra "punch List Items" shall mean minor details of construction or decoration or meohanical adjustments that can reasonably be completed after the date Lessee commences its operations within the Premises without causing substantial interference with Lessee's operations at the Premises. Lessor shall use its good faith efforts to 1292644 7,1 City Council 26 — 27 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 correct (or cause General Contractor to correct) all Punch List Items within thirty (30) days after Substantial Completion of the Lessee Work. 63. Operations/Use. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in the Form Lease, Lessee agrees that at all times, the Premises (and the navigation center ("Shelter')) shall be operated (a) in complete compliance with the attached Exhibit B, (b) In a first class manner, consistent with the highest quality standards of case, cleanliness and safety for employees, guests, patients, invitees and neighbors, and with proper levels of experienced management and staffing, to enable the provision of appropriate programs and assistance for homeless individuals in the City, and (c) In full compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations. Furthermore, Lessee covenants and agrees that it (and any Third Party Operator) shall not discriminate against any person or group of persons on account of race, disability, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, national origin, or ancestry, in the use, occupancy, tenure, or enjoyment of the Shelter. Lessee (and any Third Party Operator) shall refrain from restricting the use of the Shelter on the basis of the race, age, disability, color, religion, creed, gender, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, ancestry, or national origin of any person, nor shall Lessee, any Third Party Operator or any person claiming under or through Lessee orany Third Party Operator, establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination with reference to the selection, location, number, use, or occupancy of the Shelter. Lessee and any Third Party Operator shall comply with the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970,29 U.S.C. section 651 et seq., and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C, section 12101 et seq„ and any analogous legislation in California (collectively, "the Acts"), to the extent that the Acts apply to the Shelter and any activities thereon. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Lessee covenants to maintain all non-structural portions of the Shelter including working areas, all machinery, electrical facilities and the like upon the site in a condition that fully complies with the requirements of the Acts. 64. Indemnity. Lessee shall indemnify, protect, defend (with counsel satisfactory to Lessor) and hold harmless Lessor and the Released Parties, from and against any and all claims arising out of, involving, or in connection with, the use and/or occupancy of the Premises by Lessee, any Third Party Operator or any Lessee's or any Third Party Operator's employees, customers, patients, guests, invitees, directors, trustees, fiduciaries, representatives, agents, servants, subsidiaries, successors and assigns, and all persons, firms, corporations and organizations acting in their behalf of the Lessee and any Third Party Operator (collectively, "Lessee Parties") or any act, omission or negligence of any Lessee and/or any of the Lessee Parties or any Default and/or Breach by Lessee of any covenants, terms and/or conditions set forth in this Lease, either prior to, during, or after the expiration of the Term and including any claims brought or arising out of any civil tort or criminal activity; provided however, that the foregoing indemnification shall not apply to the extent arising out of the gross negligence or willful misconduct of Lessor or the Released Parties. if any action or proceeding is brought against Lessor by reason of any of the foregoing matters, Lessee shall upon notice defend the same at Lessee's sole cost and expense by counsel reasonably satisfactory to Lessor and Lessor shall reasonably cooperate with Lessee in such defense. If Lessor In its sole discretion shall determine that it is in Lessor's interest to have separate legal counsel, Lessee shall indemnify Lessor for any legal fees and costs incurred by Lessor for the defense of any such claims. Lessor need not have first paid any such claims in order to be defended or indemnified hereunder, Lessor shall indemnify, protect, defend (with counsel satisfactory to Lessee) and hold harmless Lessee and the Lessee Patties, from and against any and all claims arising out of, involving, or in connection with, the gross negligence or willful misconduct of Lessor relating to the Premises either prior to, during, or after the expiration of the Tenn and Including any claims brought or 0 12926447.1 City Council 26 — 28 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 arising out of any civil tort or criminal activity; provided however, that the foregoing indemnification shall not apply to the extent arising out of the gross negligence or willful misconduct of Lessee or the Lessee Parties, if any action or proceeding is brought against Lessee by reason of any of the foregoing matters, Lessor shall upon notice defend the same at Lessor's sole cost and expense by counsel reasonably satisfactory to Lessee and Lessee shall reasonably cooperate with Lessor in such defense. If Lessee in its sole discretion shall determine that it is in Lessee's interest to have separate legal counsel, Lessor shall indemnify Lessee for any legal fees and costs incurred by Lessee for the cl&nse of any such claims, Lessee need not have first paid any such claims in order to be defended or indemnified hereunder. 65, Notices. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Form Lease, all notices, requests, or demands herein provided to be given or made, or which may be given or made by either party to the other, shall be given or made only in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given: (i) upon delivery, or if delivery is rejected when delivery was attempted, of U.S. Certified Mail, properly addressed, postage prepaid with return receipt requested; or (ii) upon delivery, or if delivery is rejected when delivery was attempted, when sent via overnight or express mail courier, properly addressed and postage prepaid; (iii) when delivered personally at the address listed below their respective signatures (signature required), or (iv) by e-mail, and if so sent, (a) the subject line of the e-mail shall state "URGENT: NOTICE TO [LESSEE] [LESSOR]" (or substantially similar thereto) and (b) followed within one (1) business day by a copy sent by a method prescribed in (i), (ii) or (iv) above; provided however, that nil deliveries or attempted deliveries shall only be made or attempted to be made on a Business Day. Notwithstanding the prescribed methods of delivery set forth above, actual receipt of written notice by a party designated below shall constitute notice given in accordance with the Agreement on the date received, unless deemed earlier given pursuant to the foregoing methods of delivery. The proper address to which notices, requests or demands may be given or made by either party shall be the address set forth for such party as set forth in the Form Lease, or to such other address or to such other person as any party shall designate in writing, such address may be changed by written notice given to the other party In accordance with this Paragraph. 66, ADA Ui)wades. Except with respect to the Work as set forth in Section 62 above, Lessor shall not be required to provide ADA upgrades to the Premises. 67, Intentionally Omitted. 68. Inspections. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in the Form Lease, upon reasonable notice to Lessee, Lessor shall have the right to inspect the Premises, or cause the Premises to be inspected by a third party chosen by Lessor, to verify that Premises are at all times being operated in full compliance with the terms of Paragraph 61 of this Addendum and as otherwise required by this Lease. In the event that any such inspection reveals any such non. compliance, the same shall be, at the option of Lessor, a Default and or Breach by Lessee under the Lease, As additional consideration for Lessor's entering into this Lease, Lessee shall reimburse and pay to Lessor. in addition to Base Rent and other Rent due hereunder, the cost of any such inspection, up to $500 per inspection but no more than once each calendar month, to help offset the cost of such inspections, such amounts to be paid by Lessee to Lessor within 5 days after Lessee's receipt from Lessor of a copy of the applicable inspection report and invoice therefor, and all such amounts being deemed Rent under this Lease. 69. Ontion to Purchase. Lessor hereby grants to Lessee an option (the "Purchase Option") during the Purchase Option Period (as defined herein below) to purchase the Premises upon the following terms; 10 12926447.1 City Council 26 — 29 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 69.1, Purchase Price. The Purchase Price for the Premises shall be equal to the sum of $9,200,000 (the "Initia) Price") plus the Increase Amount (as defined below) (said Initial Price plus the Increase Amount, if any, being the "Purchase Price"), payable in cash at Closing (as defined below); provided, however, that the Initial Price is based in part upon Lessor's original purchase price of the Premises and in the event that Lessor receives any monies back in respect thereof from its seller as set forth in its original purchase agreement, the Initial Price shall be reduced by said amount so received. The "Increase Amount" shall be the amount equal to 50% of the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers for the Los Angeles -Anaheim -Riverside area, all items published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (1982- 84-1.00) ("Index") from May 2020 ("Base Index") to the date of the Notice of Exercise (as defined below); such increase to be calculated by taking the Initial Price and multiplying it by a fraction, the numerator being the Base Index, and the denominator being the Index published for the month in which the Notice of Exercise is delivered. If the Index is changed so the Index differs fYom that used as of the date hereof, the Index shall be converted under the conversion factor published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. If the index Is discontinued or revised during the Lease Term, such other governmental Index or computation with which it is replaced shall be used to obtain substantially the same results as would be obtained if the Index had not been discontinued or revised. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Increase Amount shall not increase the Initial Price by an amount equal to more than 1.S°/a per year (non -compounding), Additionally, in the event Lessor receives funds for the Regulatory Safety Permit, the Purchase Price shall be reduced by $1,000,000 or the amount of such funds that are received by Lessor, provided, however, that any interest collected by Lessor in connection with such Regulatory Safety Permit amount shall not be included in the reduction of such Purchase Price. 69.2. Term -of Purchase Option. The term of the Purchase Option shall commence upon the Ia day of the W1 month of the Term of the Lease (the "Purchase Option Commencement Date") and shall expire on the earlier of (a) the five (5) year anniversary of the Commencement Date and (b) the expiration or termination of this Lease for any reason whatsoever (the "Purchase Option Termination Date"), The period between the Purchase Option Commencement Date and the Purchase Option Termination Date shall be referred to herein as the "Purchase Option Period" In the event lessee fails to timely exercise the Purchase Option within the Purchase Option Period, the Purchase Option, and all rights of Lessee, shall immediately and automatically cease and terminate, and the Purchase Option shall in that event be null and void and be of no further force or effect whatsoever. Lessee may exercise the Purchase Option only in the manner provided in Section 69.4 below. 69.3. Investigations. During the Purchase Option Period, Lessee shall be permitted to investigate the Premises and undertake all actions that it deems necessary or desirable to ascertain the condition of the Premises which includes, but is not limited to, the environmental condition of the Premises, status of title to the Promises, and the condition of the improvements on tite Premises. Accordingly, during the Purchase Option Period, Lessee shall have, in addition to its rights as the tenant of the Premises hereunder, and is hereby granted, the right to make and conduct such non-invasive surveys, studies, tests, investigations, and inspections (environmental and otherwise) as Lessee deems reasonably necessary or convenient; provided that Lessee may make such invasive surveys, studies, tests, investigations or inspections as it deems reasonably necessary or convenient only upon the prior written consent of Lessor which shalt not be unreasonably 12926441.1 City Council 26 — 30 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 withheld, All such surveys, studies, tests, investigations and inspections shall be performed at the sole cost and expense of Lessee and Lessee shall Indemnify, defend and hold Lessor harmless from and against any and all cost, expense, liability arising from or in connection with any such surveys, studies,tests, investigation and inspections. 69.4, Exerclse.of purchase 0 tR ion. To exercise the Purchase Option, Lessee shall serve written notice of exercise upon Lessor or Lessor's legal representatives at any time after the Purchase Option Commencement Date but prior to the Purchase Option Termination Date ("Notice of Exercise"), which such Notice of Exercise shall be accompanied by a cash or cash equivalent in the amount of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000,00) ("Deposit"). The Deposit shall be invested by Escrow Holder (as defined below) in a federally Insured interest -bearing account with any interest accruing thereon to be paid or credited to Lessee. At the Close of Purchase Option Escrow, the Deposit and any accrued interest thereon shall be applied and credited toward payment of the Purchase Price. The Notice of Exercise shall provide at least 90-120 days for Lessor to locate an exchange property prior to the Closing of the Purchase Option Escrow. 69.5. Escrow. If Lessee timely exercises the Purchase Option by the timely delivery of the Notice of Exercise and the Deposit, Lessor and Lessee shall immediately open an escrow ("Option Escrow") with Chicago Title Company ("Escrow Holder", the specific escrow officer being chosen by Lessor, or Lessor may choose such other escrow or title company in its reasonable discretion upon written notice to Lessee, which such escrow or title company shall be subject to Lessee's approval, which will not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed), whereupon the Deposit shall be delivered to Escrow Holder, This Agreement shall constitute joint escrow instructions to Escrow Holder with respect to the purchase and sale of the Premises. The parties shall execute such additional escrow instructions which are not inconsistent with the provisions of this Agreement and which may be required by Escrow Holder in order to close such escrow. 69.6. Payrnent, The Purchase Price shall be paid in cash upon the Close of Purchase Option Escrow (as defined below). 69.7. Closing. The close of the Purchase Option Escrow for the purchase and sale of the Premises shall occur on or before the date which is thirty (30) days ("Scheduled Closing Date") after the date of delivery of the Notice of Exercise by Lessee to Lessor (the "Close of Purchase Option Escrow" or "Closing"). For purposes hereof, the Close of Purchase Option Escrow (and Closing) shall be the date on which the Grant Deed conveying the Premises to Lessee is recorded. a) if, following Lessee's timely and proper exercise of the Purchase Option, the Closing fails to occur as a result of Lessor's breach or default and if Lessor should retrain in default in any material respect in the performance of any of Lessor's obligations under the Lease with respect to the sale of the Premises after the fifth (5th) Business Day following the delivery by Lessee to lessor of written notice of such default, Lessee shall be entitled, as its sole and exclusive remedy for any such default, to elect any one of the following remedies (so long as title to the Premises has not been further encumbered involuntarily or by or with the consent of Lessor, and Lessor elects not to remove such encumbrance on or prior to Closing): (i) terminate its Purchase Option and receive the retuni of the Deposit, and, thereafter, the parties shall have no further rights or obligations hereunder except that if applicable, the Lease shall continue thereafter in full 12 12926447.1 City Council 26 — 31 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 force and effect, or for obligations which expressly survive dte termination of the Purchase Option; or (ii) bring and pursue an action for specific performance of the Purchase Option; or (Ili) waive the default and proceed to close the transaction contemplated herein, As a condition precedent to Lessee exercising any right it may have to bring an action for specific performance hereunder, Lessee must commence such an action within thirty (30) days after the occurrence of Lessor's default. Lessee agrees that its failure to timely commence such an action for specific performance within such thirty (30) day period shall be deemed a waiver by it of its right to commence an action for specific performance as well as a waiver by it of any right it may have to file or record a notice of lis pendens or notice of pendency of action or similar notice against the Premises. b) If, following Lessee's timely and proper exercise of the Purchase Option, the Closing falls to occur as a result of Lessee's breach or default, and if Lessee should remain in default in any material respect in the performance of any of Lessee's obligations with respect to the purchase of dte Premises after the fifth (5th) Business Day following the delivery by Lessor to Lessee of written notice of such default, THEN AND IN SUCH EVENT, NOTWITHSTANDING ANYTHING HEREIN TO THE CONTRARY, LESSEE AND LESSOR AGREE THAT LESSOR WILL INCUR DAMAGES BY REASON OF SUCH DEFAULT BY LESSEE, WHICH DAMAGES SHALL BE IMPRACTICAL AND EXTREMELY DIFFICULT, IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE, TO ASCERTAIN. LESSEE AND LESSOR, IN A REASONABLE EFFORT TO ASCERTAIN WHAT LESSOR'S DAMAGES WOULD BE rN THE EVENT OF SUCH DEFAULT BY LESSEE HAVE AGREED BY PLACING THEIR INITIALS BELOW THAT THE AMOUNT OF THE DEPOSIT SHALL BE DEEMED TO CONSTITUTE A REASONABLE ESTIMATE OF LESSOR'S DAMAGES UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 1671 OF THE CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE AND THE PAYMENT AND RETENTION OF SUCH AMOUNT AS LIQUIDATED DAMAGES IS NOT INTENDED AS A FORFEITURE OR PENALTY WITHIN THE MEANING OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE SECTIONS 3275 OR 3369, IN THE EVENT OF AND FOR SUCH DEFAULT BY LESSEE; LESSOR SHALL RETAIN THE DEPOSIT AS LIQUIDATED DAMAGES AS LESSOR'S SOLE REMEDY THEREFOR, UNLESS LESSEE WRONGFULLY REFUSES TO CAUSE ESCROW HOLDER TO CANCEL THE ESCROW OR TO RELEASE THE DEPOSIT TO LESSOR, IN WHICH INSTANCE LESSOR SHALL ALSO BE ENTITLED TO ALL COSTS AND EXPENSES, INCLUDING ACTUAL ATTORNEYS' FEES INCURRED BY LESSOR WITH RFSPECT TO THOSE CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, IF ANY, WHICH MAY BE INCURRED BY LESSOR, AFTER THE CLOSING DATE OR OTHER TERMINATION OF THIS AGREEMENT OR CANCELATION OF THE TRANSACTIONS HEREIN CONTEMPLATED BY REASON OF THE CLOUD ON TITLE TO THE PROPERTY WHICH MAY RESULT FROM LESSEE'S WRONGFUL FAILURE TO CANCEL THE ESCROW AND THIS AGREEMENT. ESCROW HOLDER IS HEREBY INSTRUCTED TO IMMEDIATELY RELEASE THE DEPOSIT TO LESSOR IN THE EVENT OF A BREACH BY LESSEE HEREUNDER, 1N ADDITION, IF LESSEE WRONGFULLY FAILS TO CAUSE SUCH SUM TO BE DELIVERED TO LESSOR AS HERETOFORE PROVIDED, INTEREST SHALL ACCRUE THEREON AT THE MAXIMUM RATE ALLOWED BY 13 City Council 26 — 32 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 LAW FROM THE DATE OF LESSOR'S WRITTEN NOTICE OF DEFAULT AND TERMINATION UNTIL PAYMENT THEREOF. IN ADDITION, LESSEE SHALL PAY ALL TITLE AND ESCROW CANCELLATION CHARGES. FURTHERMORE AND NOT WITHSTANDING THE FOREGOING, THIS PARAGRAPH PERTAINS ONLY TO A DEFAULT BY LESSEE WITH RESPECT TO THE PURCHASE OPTION AND SHALL NOT RESTRICT, LIMIT, MODIFY, ALTER OR AMEND, IN ANY MANNER WHATSOEVER, ANY RIGHT OR REMEDY OF LESSOR IN THE EVENT OF A WEB T BY LESSEE UNDE ,T 111 LEASE, Le nitiala Lessor's Initials (c) Except as otherwise set forth herein, either party shall not be liable for consequential or speculative damages in connection with such party's breach or default hereunder. (d) Additionally, and notwithstanding the foregoing, if following Lessee's timely and proper exercise of its Purchase Option, the Premises suffer a material casualty (which, for purposes hereof shall mean damage with a cost to repair in excess of$100,000 not caused by Lessee or any employee, resident, guest or invitee of Lessee), then Lessee shall have the right to either (i) proceed with the Close of Escrow (in which case, if there were such a material casualty Lessee shall be entitled to receive all available insurance proceeds and rcceiva a reduction of the Purchase Price in an amount equal to the deductible amount and any required co-insurance payment with respect to the insurance, and there shall be no other reduction in the Purchase Price),or (u) rescind the Notice of Exercise, in which case the Deposit shall be returned to Lessee, the Lease shall continue in full force and effect (including Lessee's right to later re -exercise the Purchase Option), and Lessee shall not be liable for any costs incurred by Lessor with respect to the failod Closing; provided, however that each of Lessee and Lessor shall pay one-half of the Escrow Holder's costs and fees in connection with the Option Escrow and its cancellation. (e) Additionally, and notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Closing is unable to occur for a reason other than a breach or default by Lessee or Lessor, then Lessee shall have the right to rescind the Notice of Exercise, in which case the Deposit shall be returned to Lessee, the Lease shall continue in full force and effect (including Lessee's right to later re -exercise the Purchase Option), and Lessee shall not be liable for any costs Incurred by Lessor with respect to the failed Closing-, provided, however that each of Lessee and Lessor shall pay one- half of the Escrow Holder's costs and fees in connection with the Option Escrow and its cancellation. 69.8. Condition of Property. Lessee represents and warrants that Lessee has, or shall have inspected and conducted tests and studios of the Premises, and that Lessee is familiar with the general condition of the Premises. Lessee understands and acknowledges that the Premises may be subject to earthquake, fire, Hoods, erosion, high water table, dangerous underground soil conditions, hazardous materials and similar occurrences that may alter its condition or affect its suitability for any proposed use. Except as otherwise 14 12926447.1 City Council 26 — 33 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 expressly provided in the Lease, Lessor shall have no responsibility or liability with respect to any such occurrence. Lessee represents and warrants that, except for Lessor's express representations and warranties herein, Lessee is acting, and will act only, upon information obtained by Lessee directly from Lessor's own inspection of the Premises. Lessor hereby makes no claims, representations or warranties as to the suitability or lack of suitability of the Premises for any proposed or intended use, or availability or lack of availability of (a) permits or approvals of governmental or regulatory authorities, or (b) easements, licenses or other rights with respect to any such proposed or intended use of the Premises shall not affect the rights or obligations of the Lessee hereunder. 69.9. "As Is". Lessee expressly agrees that if it completes the purchase of the Premises (1) that it is purchasing the Premises on an "As Is" basis and based on its own investigation of the Premises, (ii) that, except as expressly set forth herein, neither Lessor nor Lessor's employees, agents, brokers, representatives, managers, property managers, asset managers, officers, principals, beneficiaries, trustees, attomeys or contractors (collectively, "Lessor's Representatives") have made any warranty, representation or guarantee, expressed, implied or statutory, written or oral, including, without limitation, any implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for any use or purpose or of reasonably workmanship, concerning the Premises or any of the products or improvements located thereon or therein,, (III) that, except as otherwise expressly set forth herein, neither Lessor nor Lessor's Representatives have made any warranty, representation, or guarantee, expressed, implied or statutory, written or oral, pertaining to the Premises' compliance with any laws, ordinances, rules or regulations, federal, state or local and (iv) except as otherwise expressly set forth herein, that neither Lessor nor Lessor's Representatives have made any warranty, representation or guarantee, expressed, Implied or statutory, written or oral, as to any government limitation or restriction, or absence thereof, pertaining to the Premises, oral to the presence or absence of any latent defect, subsurface soil condition, environmental condition, hazardous substance, toxic waste or any other matter pertaining to the physical condition (title, mapping, grading, construction, or otherwise) of the Premises. Lessee is or as of the Close of Purchase option Ncrow will be familiar with the Premises and their suitability fir Lessee's intended use. All documents which have been given to Lessee by Lessor, or Lessor's Representatives, have been delivered as an accommodation to Lessee and without any representation or warranty as to the sufficiency, accuracy, completeness, validity, truthfulness, enforceability, or assignability of any of the documents, all of which Lessee relies on at its own risk. Lessee acknowledges and agrees that, except as otherwise expressly set forth herein, Lessee's only recourse for any defect in title shall be against the title company and not Lessor. 69,10. Release. Lessee shall rely solely upon Lessee's own knowledge of the Premises based on its investigation of the Premises and its own inspection of the Premises in determining the Premises' physical condition. Effective upon the Close of Escrow, Lessee and anyone claiming by, through or under Lessee hereby waives its right to recover from and fully and irrevocably releases Lessor and its respective members, employees, officers, directors, partners, shareholders, beneficiaries, trustees, fiduciaries, representatives, agents, servants, attorneys, affiliates, parent, subsidiaries, successors and assigns, and all persons, firms, cirporations and organizations acting in their behalf ("Released Parties") from any and all claims that it may now have or hereafter acquire against any of the Released Parties for any costs, loss, liability, damage, expenses, demand, action or cause of action arising from or related to any construction defects, errors, omissions or other conditions, latent or otherwise, including environmental matters, affecting the Premises 15 129264 41.1 City Council 26 — 34 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 or any portion thereof. This release includes claims of which Lessee is presently unaware or which Lessee does not presently suspect to exist which, if known by Lessee, would materially affect Lessee's release to Lessor. In this connection and to the fullest extent permitted by law, Lessee hereby agrees, represents and warrants that Lessee realizes and acknowledges that factual matters now unknown to it may have given or may hereafter give rise to causes of action, claims, demands, debts, controversies, damages, costs, losses and expenses which are presently unknown, unanticipated and unsuspected, and Lessee further agrees, represents and warrants that the waivers and releases herein have been negotiated and agreed upon in light of that realization and that, as a material portion of the consideration given to Lessor by Lessee in exchange for Lessor's performance hereunder, Lessee nevertheless hereby intends to release, discharge and acquit Lessor from any such unknown causes of action, claims, demands, debts, controversies, damages, costs, losses and expenses which might in any way be included. Lessor has given Lessee material concessions regarding this transaction in exchange for Lessee agreeing to the provisions of this Section. 69,11. Additional Release, The releases set forth in Section 69.10 above and this Section 69.11 are full and complete releases of all the persons and entities described above of and from any and all liability of any nature whatsoever for all damage, injury, loss, expense, including any consequential expense, loss or damage, whether the same are now known or unknown to the parties, expected or unexpected by said parties, and all rights under Section 1542 of the California Civil Code are hereby waived and relinquished. Section 1542 of the Civil Code provides as follows. "A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS THAT THE CREDITOR OR RELEASING PARTY DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS OR HER FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE AND THAT, IF KNOWN BY HIM OR HER WOULD HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS OR HER SETTLEMENT WITH THE DE ASED PARTY." L4ssee"Aials Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, the foregoing releases in Section 69.10 and this Section 69.11 are not intended to and do not cover (i) any claims arising from a breach by Lessor of any Lessor's obligations under this Lease, or (iii) any gross negligence, willful misconduct er fraud committed by Lessor. 69.12, Permissible Title Exceptions. Upon the Close of Purchase Option Escrow, Lessor shall convey the Premises to Lessee by a grant deed (the "Grant Deed"). The Grant Deed shall be subject only to the following (collectively, the "Permitted Exceptions")-. a) Current Matters of Record. Those matters of record identified on the attached Exhibit b) LeLaM This Lease. c) Luturee lion-Monetaa Exceptions. All monetary and non -monetary encumbrances placed against the Premises or which may appear of record after the date hereof as the result of any action or inaction of Lessee (including any 16 1292W7,1 City Council 26 — 35 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 monetary encumbrances appearing of record as a result of any action or inaction by Lessee during the Purchase Option Term). d) Taxes. Non delinquent general, special and supplemental real property taxes and assessments; provided however, all delinquent taxes and assessments relating to the period following the Commencement Date of the Lease are the responsibility of Lessee pursuant to this Lease and shall be paid by Lessee at Closing. e) Printed..Exceptlons. Matters shown as printed exceptions in the standard form of Owner's Policy of Title Insurance. Title insuranec, Lessor shall cause to be delivered to Lessee upon the Close of Purchase Option Escrow, an ALTA standard coverage owner's policy of title insurance on the Premises issued by Escrow Holder with policy limits equal to the Purchase Price and insuring title to the Premises in the condition set forth above and otherwise vested in Lessee. Lessee shall have the right to request issuance of an ALTA extended coverage owner's policy of title insurance and any endorsements it may require, but the Closing shall not be delayed or conditioned on the issuance of same, Lessee shall obtain, at its sole cost and expense, any survey required to obtain any such extended coverage Title insurance, and the obtaining or failure to obtain any such survey shall not delay the Closing. 69.13. Additional Closing Documents. As part of the Closing, the parties shall execute and deliver the following additional documents to the Escrow Holder: a) Lessor and Lessee shall execute and deliver an Assignment and Assumption of Lease; b) Lessor shall execute and deliver a Bill of Sale and General Assignment; c) Lessor shall execute and deliver a Transferor's Certification of Non -Foreign Status, together with a California Form 593-C, reflecting that no tax withholding is required; and d) Lessor and Lessee shall deliver such additional, customary escrow closing documents and instruments as Escrow Holder shall reasonably require, including appropriate evidence of authority and a customary owner's affidavit. The Grant Deed and those documents specified in Paragraphs 69.9 (a), (b) and (c) shall be prepared by Lessor and delivered to Lessee for review and approval not later than ten (10) days prior to the Scheduled Closing hate. The exact form and content of such documents shall be subject to good faith negotiation by Lessor and Lessee and the failure of Lessor and Lessee to agree upon the forth of such documents not later than 2 Business Days prior to the Scheduled Closing Date shall constitute the failure of a.condition of closing, and either parry shall then have the right to terminate the Purchase Option and the sale of the Premises. 69.14. Prorations and Credits. Pursuant to the terms of the Lease, all real property taxes and assessments and utilities are to be paid by Lessee and as such no prorations for the same are to be made, 17 12926447.1 City Council 26 — 36 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 69.15. Closing Costs. Lessor shall pay for (a) all premiums for the ALTA standard coverage portion of the Title Policy, (b) one-half ('/2) of all Escrow fees and costs, (c) all sales and gross receipts taxes, (d) all documentary transfer and/or stamp taxes, if any, and (e) Lessor's share of prorations, if any. Lessee shall pay for (i) all premiums for the ALTA extended coverage portion of the Title Policy and any endorsements requested by Lessee, (ii) all costs relating to the survey and all reports, studies, inspections, investigations and all other costs and expenses incurred by Lessee in connection with its review of any materials, documents, materials, the Premises and other such due diligence conducted by Lessee, (iii) any document recording fees and charges, (iv) one-half (%2) of all Escrow fees and costs, and (v) Lessee's share of prorations, if any. Lessor and Lessee shall each pay for all of its respective legal and professional fees and fees of other consultants incurred by such respective party, and if Lessee shall finance any of the Purchase Price, Lessee shall pay all costs and expenses incurred or arising in connection with such financing. All other normal and customary closing costs and expenses shall, except as otherwise herein set forth, be allocated between Lessor and Lessee in accordance with the customary practice in the County in which the Project is situated. 69.16. Purchase Option Assignment. The Purchase Option is personal to Lessee and may not be assigned in whole or in part at any time. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Lessee may assign the Purchase Option to any other governmental entity approved by the City to whom this Lease is assigned as set forth in Section 60 herein above. (remainder of page left intentionally blank) 129i14Y Council 26 — 37 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 70, QgOggeallo, The Form Lease and Addendum may each be executed fn multiple countorparts and by separate parties on separate couaterpwis and delivered via fhosimile orothor moans of electronic image transmission, each of which shall be deemed an origlpal fbr all purposes, but all of which, together, shall constitute one and the same instrument, LESSOR: LBSSU: DYER K LLC Syt Na et t 'I: Un 6►r See attached City of Santa Ana signature page 19 12926447.1 City Council 26 — 38 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Lessee City of Santa Ana Signature Page to: Addendum to Standard Industrial/Commercial Single -Tenant Lease — Net For Certain Premises Commonly Known as 1815 East Carnegie, Santa Ana, California 92705 March 1, 2021 CITY OF SANTA ANA: Kristine Ridge City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho Citottorney Ryan O. Hodge Assistant City Attorney ATTEST: aisy Gomez Clerk of the Council RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: Steven Mendoza Executive Director Community Development Agency City Council 26 — 39 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 EXHIBIT "A" -- IJST OF PERMITTED EXCEPTIONS See attached 20 12926447.1 City Council 26 — 40 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 EXHIBIT "B" -- DESCRIPTION OF LESSEE USES 'Che property will be used as an emergency homeless shelter and ancillary uses thereto are center, health clinic, and ancillary office space, Services to be provided include case management, housing navigation, behavioral health and substance use counseling, healthcare coordination, and job development. Outdoor property perimeter will be covered with screened fences to limit visibility into the area. Outdoor facilities will include client storage area, pet accommodations, smoking area, outdoor common area, recreational area, and temporary modular housing. There will be 2417 security guard presence at the property to promptly resolve any security issues that may arise, In addition, this property is not a walk-in facility. All client transportation to and from the facilities will be provided. In addition, there is a Good Neighbor Policy which will be implemented by Lessee (and Its 'Third Party Operator) to promote positive communication and relationship with neighbors on an ongoing basis. 21 12926447.1 City Council 26 — 41 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 2 Project Number: CAR-1 Current Dyer 18, LLC- 1815 Carnegie January 2022 Drawn as of Outstanding Revised Budget as Remaining Funds Reason for Change Comments Schedule of Values' Budget 3/22/22 Invoices (not of 3/22/22 Needed *At time conceptual bid was provided, the budget drawn on) was an educated guess as plans were not yet generated. - Increase in sewer line size from 4 inches to 6. The original "as -built" plans from Gensler showed the existing condition as 6 inches. -Additional plumbing for the pump in the back yard. - Public Works required replacement of Fire and Domestic water in the street. - Increase in material cost Rough Plumbing $ 792,240 $ 773,386 $ $ 843,386 $ 70,000 Unforeseen Circumstance and Change of Scope - Overtime - Emergency lighting changes -Additional bug -eye - Redo lounge room 105 electrical per City's request - Additional underground conduits that were not expected - Rework dorm lighting Electrical $ 1,089,046 $ 1,032,170 $ $ 1,074,170 $ 42,000 Unforeseen Circumstance and Change of Scope -Overtime Switchgear $ $ 34,665 $ $ 34,665 $ Unforeseen Circumstance and Change of Scope - Switchgear needed to be expedited per the City's request - Framed upstairs which was not part of the original scope -Framing Square footage increased substantially due to framing of the mezzanine. - Original assumptions had us using ICF, however we needed to use wood framing which increased material cost by 25% - Lumber prices have greatly increased in the past year - Fire treated wood had to be used at the front that we were not anticipating to have to use. Never had to use on any other project. Rough Framing $ 880,000 $ 946,191 $ 18,589.79 $ 974,469 $ 9,688 Change of Scope and increase in material cost - Overtime - Increase in cabinetry scope (after 1st round of plans were produced) Finished Carpentry $ 110,948 $ 89,629 $ 1,730.80 $ 112,860 $ 21,500 Change of Scope - Front entrance area reception doors needed to be changed from original plan HVAC $ 785,O0O $ 607,590 $ 89,019.00 $ 785,O0O $ 88,391 Change of Scope and increase material cost - Increase in material cost and change in scope (after 1st set of plans were produced) HVAC Engineering $ $ $ $ 8,682 $ 8,682 Change of Scope -Needed to re -engineer the ducting runs HVAC Freight for RUUD Equipment $ $ $ $ 5,O0O $ 5,O0O Change of Scope - Needed to expedite per the City's request Captiveaire Equipment $ $ $ $ 23,500 $ 23,500 Change of Scope - Not part of original scope - Required to protect the unused upstairs area, which was not part of 1st set of plans Fire Alarm System $ 204,000 $ 4,967 $ 183,874.45 $ 208,968 $ 20,126 Change of Scope - Upgraded to a voice activated system Fire Sprinklers $ 245,700 $ 151,070 $ $ 259,070 $ 108,000 Unforeseen Circumstance and Change of Scope - Increase in sprinkler heads because of conflict with lighting system and bathroom plumbing -Fire safety requirement - Upsizing of fire water line Underground Utilities $ 225,000 $ 213,574 $ 25,564.50 $ 264,138 $ 25,000 Unforeseen Circumstance and Change of Scope - Public works required replacement of Fire and Domestic Water main in the street. Edison $ 181,967 $ 200,677 $ $ 200,677 $ - Underestimated overall cost of work needed to be done - Rains caused sub to need to recondition the soil Concrete Work (Interior & Exterior) $ 475,O0O $ 600,905 $ 60,651.79 $ 783,435 $ 121,878 Change of Scope and increase material cost - Rebar cast significantly increased Light Post $ $ 6,000 $ $ 6,000 $ Shade Sales - Concrete $ $ 18,000 $ $ 18,000 $ Paving $ 125,000 $ $ $ 140,000 $ 140,000 Change of Scope and increase material cost - Patch work requested by Public Works Roofing $ 139,500 $ 48,825 $ $ 143,825 $ 95,000 Elevator $ 206,700 $ 206,700 $ $ 218,700 $ 12,000 Increase in Labor Cost - Potential change order for prevailing wage Architect $ 432,275 $ 429,212 $ $ 429,212 $ Civil Engineer $ 22,000 $ 23,987 $ $ 23,987 $ - Engineering needed for roof work - Cut in for rear exit door Structural Engineer $ 36000 $ 46,448 $ 1,923.75 $ 57,371 $ 9,000 Change of Scope - Roof screening engineering Demo/Excavation/Shoring $ 325:000 $ 337,267 $ 13,663.77 $ 375,931 $ 25,000 Change of Scope - Excavation for additional concrete work Consulting $ 37,723 $ 29,017.80 $ 2,901.78 $ 37,723 $ 5,804 Extended Timeline - Timeline for project extended Shoring Tower Rentals $ 12,000 $ 15,506.70 $ $ 27,905 $ 12,398 Unforeseen Circumstance -Assumed Turelk's original contract after taking over which included an unknown dismantle charge of$12,398 Equipment Rental $ 17,843 $ 16,745.92 $ 1,547.18 $ 21,387 $ 3,094 Extended Timeline - Timeline for project extended Permit/Fees $ 439,391 $ 439,391.40 $ $ 439,891 $ 500 Change of Scope - Permit fee for shade structure Security Services (up to June 151h) $ 38,660 $ 39,546.00 $ $ 39,546 $ - Because we were not allowed to use ICF construction method, scope of the drywall/insulation project was increased by 25%. - Framed upstairs which was an increase in scope -Framing Square footage increased substantially due to framing of the mezzanine. Drywall/Insulation $ 900,000 $ 1,143,308.63 $ 191,414.59 $ 1,528,104 $ 193,381 1 Change of Scope and increase in material cost -Third layer of drywall was required by building and safety in all of the corridors causing a large increase in material and labor Sleeping Cubbies/FRP $ $ 10,000.00 $ $ 40,451 $ 30,451 Change of Scope - Changed from melamine to FRP Bathroom/FRP $ $ 13,356.45 $ $ 13,356 $ Change of Scope - Changed from melamine to FRP Fireproofing $ $ 9,962.12 $ 8,967.26 $ 33,636 $ 14,707 Change of Scope Shaft Wall Framing/Drywall/Wallboard $ $ $ 92,316 31 $ 92,6 Change of Scope Tile $ 150,000 $ 154,603 $ 1,573.79 $ 156,177 $ Second Floor Tile $ $ $ $ 20,000 $ 20,000 1 Change of Scope City Council 26 - 42 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 2 Doors/Windows $ 297,000 $ 280,579 $ 41,341.91 $ 390,121 $ 68,200 Change of Scope The following doors were added to the scope: - Wood doors (City decision to upgrade material) - 2 hour glass door - Dining room accordion door - Rollout door - Glass bifold door - City requested to order more doors due to previous order being late Fold -Up Door $ 49,000 $ $ 6,960.53 $ 6,961 $ Change of Scope CMU Block Wall $ 160,000 $ 199,202 $ $ 199,202 $ Change of Scope and increase in material cost - Significant increase in material cost Stucco for CMU Block Wall $ $ 20,000 $ 15,021.24 $ 65,021 $ 30,000 Change of Scope - Preferred method of ICF was rejected by building and safety Shade Structures $ 100,000 $ 40,333 $ 10,618.81 $ 120,952 $ 70,000 Increase in material cost - Steel prices have increased dramatically over the life of the project Shade Sales $ $ 10,000 $ $ 10,000 $ Interior Finishes(Floor/Wall) $ 300,000 $ 65,467 $ 126,191.09 $ 215,258 $ 23,600 Change of Scope Interior Paint $ $ 60,004 $ 45,710.48 $ 105,714 $ Upstairs Carpeting $ $ $ $ 24,230 $ 24,230 Change of Scope - Looking for less expensive substitutes Upstairs Vinyl $ $ $ $ 77,389 $ 77,389 Change of Scope - Looking for less expensive substitutes Grind and Seal $ $ $ 73,074 $ 73,074 $ Change of Scope Epoxy Kitchen $ $ $ 21,555 $ 21,555 $ Change of Scope Exterior Finishes/Landscaping $ 25,000 $ 27,031 $ $ 27,031 $ Playground/Fencing $ $ $ 11,470 $ 13,470 $ 2,000 Change of Scope Exterior Fencing $ $ $ $ 4,000 $ 4,000 Change of Scope Plant/Tree Allowance $ $ $ $ 13,000 $ 13,000 Change of Scope Pea Gravel $ $ $ $ 4,000 $ 4,000 Change of Scope Fiber Glass Bender Board $ $ $ $ 600 $ 600 Change of Scope Backyard Turf $ $ $ $ 4,500 1 $ 4,500 Change of Scope Irrigation $ $ $ $ 5,000 $ 5,000 Change of Scope Sod Grass $ $ $ $ 5,000 $ 5,000 Change of Scope Exterior Painting $ 75,000 $ $ $ 64,286 $ 64,286 Change of Scope - Recently added to the scope as there was additional work to repair and complete work not completed by the former contractor Camera/Security System $ 140,000 $ 72,436.85 $ 12,752.73 $ 152,440 $ 67,250 Change of Scope - Not part of original scope (part of FF&E) Lighting Package $ 200,520 $ 221,335.09 $ $ 228,335 $ 7,000 - Needed to substitute lights because of back order and new lights were more expensive Roof Screening $ 76,146 $ $ $ 76,146 $ 76,146 Change of Scope - City permitting process required roof screening Roof Framing Allowance $ 300,000 $ $ 21,225.70 $ 300,000 $ 78,774 Change of Scope Column Replacement $ 25,000 $ $ $ $ Unforeseen Circumstance and Change of Scope Miscellaneous $ 100,000 $ $ $ 100,000 $ 100,000 - Per City, amount determined per discussions with City Staff. COVIDTesting $ $ $ 3,380.00 $ 3,380 $ Site Cleanup $ $ $ 8,000.00 $ 28,000 $ 20,000 Unforeseen Circumstance - PWA mandating cleanup at the site Rolling Gates and operators $ $ $ $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Change of Scope - Planned to use existing gates, but deemed unusable Rec Area Gates and Hardware $ $ $ $ 25,000 $ 15,000 Change of Scope and increase in material cost Subtotal $ 9,643,660 $ 8,639,089 $ 998,724 $ 11,655,203 $ 2,017,391 General Conditions $ 1,055,923 $ 1,066,077 $ $ 1,055,923 $ Extended Timeline - Timeline for project finish date extended due to design and permitting delays; scope of work increased Overhead/Main Office $ 269,077 $ 258,923 $ $ 269,077 $ Extended Timeline - Timeline for project finish date extended due to design and permitting delays; scope of work increased Total $ 10,968,660 $ 9,964,089 $ 998,724 $ 12,980,203 $ 2,017,391 City Council 26 - 43 4/19/2022 Public Works Agency www.santa-ana.org/pw Item # 27 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report April 19, 2022 TOPIC: Ceremonial Street Naming Policy AGENDA TITLE Ordinance Amending Chapter 33 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code Related to the Ceremonial Naming of Streets RECOMMENDED ACTION Approve first reading of an ordinance amending Chapter 33 of the Municipal Code by adding Article XI relating to the ceremonial naming of streets. DISCUSSION On January 18, 2022, the City Council expressed an interest in recognizing outstanding individuals who have made a significant impact on their community through the commemorative or honorary naming of streets. To allow for the recognition of individuals and philanthropic organizations that are of particular importance to the City of Santa Ana or have made significant contributions to improving the quality of life in the city, the proposed ordinance (Exhibit 1) amends Section 33 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code by adding Article XI to create regulations allowing the ceremonial naming of streets. In conjunction with the municipal code amendment, a ceremonial street naming application (Exhibit 2) has been developed, which will be submitted to the Public Works Agency by the applicant, along with the corresponding processing, fabrication, and installation fees. The proposed Santa Ana Municipal Code amendments were developed by an Ad Hoc Committee of the Environmental Transportation Advisory Commission (ETAC) composed of the ETAC Chair, Brain Germain, and Commissioners Nathanial Greensides and Dorian Romero. On March 8, 2022, ETAC voted to approve the proposed amendments and to present them to the City Council for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact is associated with the action. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. City Council 27 — 1 4/19/2022 Ceremonial Street Naming Policy April 19, 2022 Page 2 EXHIBIT(S) 1. Ordinance 2. Ceremonial Street Naming Permit Application Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director — Public Works Agency Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager City Council 27 — 2 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 brs ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING CHAPTER 33 OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE (STREETS, SIDEWALKS AND PUBLIC WORKS) BY ADDING ARTICLE XI RELATING TO CEREMONIAL STREET NAMING WHEREAS, the Santa Ana City Council desires to recognize individuals and philanthropic organizations that are of particular importance to the City of Santa Ana or have made significant contributions to improving the quality of life in the City by ceremonially naming sections of public streets in their honor; and WHEREAS, currently, there is no formal policy addressing guidelines for the content or placement of ceremonial street signs; and WHEREAS, a policy is needed to ensure consistency, proper neighborhood outreach, traffic safety, and appropriate sign content; and WHEREAS, this ordinance will amend the Santa Ana Municipal Code to authorize the City Council to confer ceremonial names on public streets and allow for the installation of appropriate signage, which shall be distinct from, and not change or replace, existing legal street names and signs, and recognized neighborhood association neighborhood street designations; and WHEREAS, for ease of administration, these regulations will comprise new Article XI of Chapter 33 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (Streets, Sidewalks and Public Works); and WHEREAS, this ordinance is not intended to apply to the method by which the recognized neighborhood associations of the City currently place their neighborhood street designations. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The recitals above are each incorporated by reference and adopted as findings by the City Council. Section 2. Article XI (Ceremonial Street Naming) is hereby added to Chapter 33 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (Streets, Sidewalks and Public Works) to read in its entirety as follows. ARTICLE XI. - CEREMONIAL STREET NAMING Sec. 33-259. - Purpose. Ordinance No. NS-XXX City Council 27 — 3 4/19/fM1 of brs The purpose of this article is to commemorate the service, lives, and achievements of individuals, philanthropic groups of individuals, or a landmark event, affiliated with the City of Santa Ana where the individual(s) or event has had significant and clearly defined cultural, humanitarian or historic impact on the City by recognizing them with a ceremonial street name that does not cause any disruption of the existing legal street names and abutting uses. Nothing in this article shall pertain to the method by which recognized neighborhood associations place their neighborhood street designations. Sec. 33-260. - General provisions. (a) Only entire blocks of public streets or intersections may be granted ceremonial street names. (b) A ceremonial street naming application may only be initiated by: (1) A resident or owner of a property abutting the street; or (2) Neighborhood or community groups. (c) Candidates for ceremonial street names shall be limited to the name of an individual, philanthropic organization, significant event or landmark. (d) Ceremonial street names shall be in the form of a "Sign Topper," which is a sheet metal sign that is placed on top of the standard City street sign identification and shall adhere to the following specifications: (1) Ceremonial street naming cannot contain a product name or be used for a commercial purpose. (2) Ceremonial street naming must be a name of an individual, philanthropic organization, landmarks or an event. (3) A ceremonial street Sign Topper must include the word "Honorary." (4) No more than one ceremonial Sign Topper per street block. (5) Only one Sign Topper may be placed on any pole. (6) Sign Toppers shall not be attached to traffic signal mast arms. (7) Ceremonial names shall not duplicate any currently existing official street names. (8) Up to five (5) Sign Toppers may be located at any one intersection, coincident with existing street name signs. Ordinance No. NS-XXX City Council 27 — 4 4/19/fn,�2 of 7 brs (9) Sign Toppers may not be attached to traffic signal poles. (10) No one candidate may receive City Council approval for a Sign Topper recognition on more than one street or intersection. Sec. 33-261. - Criteria for Ceremonial Street Naming. (a) Candidates for ceremonial street names must exhibit a minimum of 10 years of community involvement or demonstrated an extraordinary, consistent and voluntary commitment to the community, or have had contributed significantly to the City of Santa Ana. Significant historic events or City of Santa Ana landmarks may also be considered if supported by significant and clearly defined cultural, humanitarian, or historical impact to the City. (b) An Individual to be honored must have been dead for at least two years prior to the date of application. (c) Candidates, who have already been honored on one street, whether ceremonial or official, may not be honored on another street. (d) Ceremonial street names cannot be an ideology or a commercial interest. Sec. 33-262. - Application Process. (a) Application. An application for a ceremonial street naming must be filed with the Public Works Agency on an application form furnished by the Agency. The application must include all of the following: (1) A statement addressing the criteria for ceremonial street naming set forth in this article. (2) A map showing the proposed location of the entire street block(s) receiving the ceremonial street name. No fractions of a street block may receive the ceremonial street name. (3) If a ceremonial name is proposed for an intersection, a map showing the proposed intersection. No more than five (5) locations at an intersection may receive the ceremonial name. (4) Documentation indicating that two-thirds of the residents or owners of the lots abutting the street or intersection are in support of the ceremonial street name. A. For the purposes of this section, only one (1) adult signature per address, either owner or renter, will be counted. Ordinance No. NS-XXX City Council 27 — 5 4/19/f02Y of brs B. Documentation shall be within 60 days from the date of the application. C. Documentation shall be submitted on a form provided by the Director of Public Works. (b) Fees. The following fees are required for a ceremonial street naming. (1) An application fee, as established by resolution of the City Council, must be paid at the time the application is submitted. (2) If approved by the City Council, fees for sign production, hardware costs and installation fees, as established by resolution of the City Council, must be paid prior to sign installation. (c) Notice of Application. Within ten (10) calendar days of acceptance by the City of the ceremonial street application, the applicant must provide written notice to the legal owners of the property abutting the proposed ceremonial street or intersection by depositing the notice, properly addressed and postage paid in the United States mail to such owners. (1) The written notice shall include the following: A. The proposed name of the street or intersection; and B. The location of the proposed street or intersection. (2) The City shall provide the addresses of the owners of record of the properties abutting the proposed ceremonial street block(s) or intersection. (3) Applicant will be responsible for paying postage and mailing such notices using the United States mail system. (d) Public Hearing. The City Council shall consider the application based on the testimony presented at a public hearing and a determination that the application meets the ceremonial street naming criteria standards. (1) If a written protest against the ceremonial street naming has been signed by the residents or owners of twenty percent (20%) of all lots abutting the street, then a favorable vote of three -fourths of all City Council members is required. (2) Otherwise, a ceremonial street application may be approved by a majority vote of City Council members. (e) Resolution. Approval of the ceremonial street naming shall be made by City Council resolution. Ordinance No. NS-XXX City Council 27 — 6 4/19/fn0 4 of 7 brs Sec. 33-263. - Effective date of ceremonial street name and end date. (a) The ceremonial street name shall end ten (10) years after the date of the resolution approving the ceremonial street name. (b) An applicant may re -apply for the ceremonial street name by the same process detailed in this article. Sec. 33-264. - Installation and replacement. (a) Installation. The Director of the Public Works Agency, or his or her designee, is responsible for the fabrication and installation of the ceremonial Sign Toppers. (b) Replacement and Removal. Any ceremonial Sign Topper that has become torn, damaged, defaced, or destroyed shall be repaired, replaced, or removed by the City at the sole cost of applicant following written notice to applicant. Sec. 33-265. - Authority of the Director. The Director of Public Works is authorized to establish rules and procedures and to produce signs, forms and other materials necessary or appropriate to implement the provisions of this article. Section 4. The City Council finds and determines that this ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, as there is no possibility it will have a significant effect on the environment and it is not a "project", as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines. Section 5. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its adoption. Section 7. The Clerk of the Council shall certify the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. Ordinance No. NS-XXX City Council 27 — 7 4/19/f0 Y of 7 brs ADOPTED this day of , 2022. Vicente Sarmiento Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By: randon Salvatierra Deputy City Attorney AYES: NOES: Councilmembers Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers Ordinance No. NS-XXX City Council 27 — 8 4/19/fMY of 7 brs CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, Daisy Gomez, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and Ordinance No. NS- to be the original ordinance Council of the City of Santa Ana on , and tha Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana t Ordinance No. NS-XXX City Council 27 — 9 4/19/2M,�' of i T rib air j r- - r — dL- C hei st nut �E Sanfa11, 00 T APPLICATION FOR CEREMONIAL STREET SIGN TOPPERS Applicant's Name: Applicant Contact Person: Applicant Street Address: Office Phone: Mobile Phone: Contact Email Address: Full Name of Honoree: (as it would appear on street sign) Full Name of Street: (to be designated) Full name of each intersecting street within the boundary where the designation begins and ends: Please check all below. Include a brief explanation of each applicable criteria (if you require more space, please provide information as an attachment): ❑ Cultural Impact on the City: ❑ Historical Impact on the City: ❑ Humanitarian Impact on the City: ❑ Connection to/Association with the City: ❑ Connection to Geographical Area of Designated Street: ❑ Additional Supporting Documents & Attachments Application Check List Complete the application, together with the required items indicated below: ❑ Completed Application ❑ Application Fee ❑ Design of Sign Topper per City standards ❑ Petition and supporting documents ❑ Map showing boundary & portion of street proposed for ceremonial street naming You will be contacted by phone or email when application has been forwarded to and assigned to a Public Works Agency staff member. Signature of Applicant: RECEIVED BY: ---IMPORTANT--- Date: DATE: INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED AND WILL BE RETURNED TO THE APPLICANT. Work may begin only AFTER the City has issued the Permit and appropriate fees are paid. City Manager Office www.santa-ana.org/cm Item # 28 or City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report April 19, 2022 TOPIC: Fireworks AGENDA TITLE: Charter Review Ad Hoc Committee's Recommendation on Fireworks RECOMMENDED ACTION Accept informational report and provide direction to staff. DISCUSSION Background At the December 21, 2021 City Council meeting, Mayor Pro Tern Bacerra, Councilmember Mendoza, and Councilmember Phan added the following councilmember requested item: Discuss and Consider Directing City Manager to Direct Staff to Introduce an Ordinance for a Ban on the Use, Possession and Sale of All Fireworks. There was consensus among the City Council to have the Charter Review Ad Hoc Committee consider a Charter amendment prohibiting all fireworks in Santa Ana. Legislative History The term "fireworks" has appeared in the Santa Ana Municipal Code since as early as 1984. Specifically, on April 16, 1984, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-1727, adopting the 1982 Edition of the Uniform Fire Code as amended. Of significance, the ordinance defines and prohibits "dangerous fireworks," defines "safe and sane fireworks," and expressly allows discharging of safe and sane fireworks as specified. These regulations are found in Chapter 14, Article II of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. Definition of Dangerous Fireworks (1) "Dangerous fireworks" includes all of the following: (a) Any fireworks which contain any of the following: (1) Arsenic sulfide, arsenates, or arsenites. (2) Boron (3) Chlorates, except: (A) In colored smoke mixture in which an equal or greater amount of sodium bicarbonate is included. City Council 28 — 1 4/19/2022 Fireworks April 19, 2022 Page 2 (B) In caps and party poppers. (C) In those small items (such as ground spinners) wherein the total powder content does not exceed 4 grams of which not greater than 15 percent (or 600 milligrams) is potassium, sodium, or barium chlorate. (4) Gallates or Gallic acid. (5) Magnesium (magnesium -aluminum alloys, called magnalium, are permitted). (6) Mercury salts. (7) Phosphorus (red or white except that red phosphorus is permissible in caps and party poppers). (8) Picrates or picric acid. (9) Thiocyanates. (10) Titanium, except in particle size greater than 100-mesh. (11) Zirconium. (b) Firecrackers. (c) Skyrockets and rockets, including all devices which employ any combustible or explosive material and which rise in the air during discharge. (d) Roman candles, including all devices which discharge balls of fire into the air. (e) Chasers, including all devices which dart or travel about the surface of the ground during discharge. (f) Sparklers more than 10 inches in length or one-fourth of one inch in diameter. (g) All fireworks designed and intended by the manufacturer to create the element of surprise upon the user. These items include, but are not limited to, autofoolers, cigarette loads, exploding golf balls, and trick matches. (h) Fireworks known as devil -on -the -walk, or any other fireworks which explodes through means of friction, unless otherwise classified by the State Fire Marshal pursuant to this part. (i) Torpedoes of all kinds which explode on impact. 0) Fireworks kits. (k) Such other fireworks examined and tested by the State Fire Marshal and determined by him, with the advice of the State Board of Fire Services to possess characteristics of design or construction which make such fireworks unsafe for use by any person not specially qualified or trained in the use of fireworks. Definition of Safe and Sane Fireworks "Safe and sane fireworks" means any fireworks which do not come within the definition of "dangerous fireworks" or "exempt fireworks". When Safe and Sane Fireworks May Be Discharged Sales and discharging are allowed during the following times: • July 1st: 12 p.m. to 10 p.m. • July 2nd: 10 a.m. to 10 p.m. • July 3rd: 10 a.m. to 10 p.m. • July Fourth: 10 a.m. to 9 p.m. City Council 28 — 2 4/19/2022 Fireworks April 19, 2022 Page 3 Additional elements of the City's fireworks regulations includes the following: • Establishes a permitting process for fireworks booths • Capped at 85 • Permits issued using a lottery • Establishes a fee • Prescribes regulations for temporary stands • Establishes public display permits • Outlines storage and disposal requirements • Declares that an individual cannot discharge fireworks toward any other person or in any other manner which threatens the safety of persons or property The City's fireworks regulations have been amended four times, each time as part of the City Council adopting by reference updates to the State's Uniform Fire Code. Below is an overview of changes to the City's fireworks regulations as part of this process: Date Changes May 7, 1990 Discharge of fireworks February 3, 2003 Application for permit; Stand location on premises November 15, 2010 Sale of safe and sane fireworks; hours of sale; Permits, issuance; Application for permit; Fee; Clean premises deposit; Electric circuits; Trash removal; Fireworks; public display; Exceptions; Prohibited areas November 18, 2013 Application for permit; Regulations for temporary stands; Clean premises deposit; Stand location on premises; No smoking on premises; Electric circuits; Fireworks; public display; Seizure of fireworks Implementation and Enforcement Fireworks is a cross -departmental effort that encompasses several City departments. The Santa Ana Police Department enforces fireworks regulations, the Orange County Fire Authority responds to fires and injuries, and the Planning and Building Agency implements the permitting process for fireworks booths. City Council 28 — 3 4/19/2022 Fireworks April 19, 2022 Page 4 Police Department Regarding fireworks, the Fourth of July Program includes education/outreach and enforcement/confiscation efforts. Field enforcement activity consists of undercover activity and uniformed enforcement. Prior to dedicated/assigned uniformed enforcement, Directed Patrol and regular patrol officers conduct a variety of sting operations and field fireworks -related calls for service. The majority of fireworks seizures occur prior to the Fourth of July holiday weekend. Throughout the listed operations periods below, dedicated/assigned officers worked in both marked and unmarked police vehicles to respond to fireworks -related calls for service and enforce observed fireworks violations via confiscation and the issuance of administrative citations. These officers also handled a variety of music and party calls related to the Fourth of July holiday period. The list below includes the respective year, operational period, total overtime hours, and total overtime cost for the Fourth of July operational period from 2017-2021. Year Operational Period Total Overtime Hours Total Overtime Costs 2017 313 $22,536 2018 6/30 — 7/4 152 $10,944 2019 6/29 — 7/5 45 $3,975 2020 6/29 — 7/5 1,234.5 $113,574 2021 6/28 — 7/5 616 $59,203 Below is a by -year breakdown of the calls for service for the entire calendar year (note that the reporting period below differs from the table above): Year Calls for Service 2017 1,156 2018 1,128 2019 1,165 2020 2,673 2021 1,777 Fire Department: Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) OCFA is unable to sort fireworks -related expenditure data into specific itemized unit costing of fireworks -related calls for service, including investigations and fire prevention services. This is because OCFA provides a base annual contract price to the City that includes all necessary services such as emergency response, fire investigations, and fire prevention services that is inclusive of all call types. In short, OCFA's regional delivery system is one price that covers all services. However, OCFA prepares annual After Action City Council 28 — 4 4/19/2022 Fireworks April 19, 2022 Page 5 Reports that depict fireworks -related activity for each year. The After Action Reports for calendar years 2017 through 2021 are attached to this staff report (Exhibit 1). In summary, from 2017 to 2021, OCFA responded to 335 fireworks -related calls for service: Year Calls for Service 2017 74 2018 75 2019 69 2020 62 2021 55 Planning and Building Agency The Planning and Building Agency's Building Division administers the lottery and issues permits relating to fireworks stands. The cost to administer this program is approximately $7,000 to $8,500 per year. This cost includes staff time to issue permits, schedule and perform inspections, review fireworks applications, update the City website, handout materials, hold safety meetings, and correspond with vendors. To illustrate their activity, below is a table with a by -year breakdown of electrical permits issued associated with fireworks stands under this program, along with revenue generated for that year: Year Electrical Permits Issued Electrical Permit Fees Received 2017 70 $ 6,643.70 2018 49 $ 4,806.90 2019 67 $ 6,827.97 2020 58 $ 6,142.78 2021 53 $ 5,819.40 Fireworks Stands It is important to note that the City does not collect information relating to revenues received by organizations that operate fireworks stands. Environmental Impacts Fireworks are classified as hazardous by the Federal Hazardous Substances Act because they can have dangerous adverse effects, including fires, injury, and death. Further, fireworks explosions emit gaseous sulfur dioxide, carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide, hazardous trace elements (such as aluminum, manganese, and cadmium), and particulate matter (PM). Exposure to PM is associated with adverse health effects, most of which affect the respiratory and cardiovascular systems. For example, breathing fine particulate matter can lead to a wide variety of cardiovascular and respiratory health effects, such as heart attacks, asthma aggravation, decreased lung function, coughing, or difficulty breathing, and may lead to premature death in people with heart or lung disease. City Council 28 — 5 4/19/2022 Fireworks April 19, 2022 Page 6 At the national level, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sets national ambient air quality standards for PM. In a 2015 study, Dian Seidel and Abigail Birnbaum (2015) found that hourly PM2.5 (fine particulate matter with diameters that are generally 2.5 micrometers and smaller) concentrations during the evening of July 4 and morning of July 5 are higher than on the two preceding and following days in July. The national average increase is largest (21 mg/m3) at 9-10 p.m. on July 4 and drops to zero by noon on July 5 (p. 197). This same study cites that PM levels in the South Coast Air Basin (which comprises all of Orange County and the urban portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties) are higher during this same period when compared to other sites that were included in their study. At the local level, the South Coast Air Quality Management District (South Coast AQMD) monitors local air quality and regulates stationary sources of air pollution in the South Coast Air Basin. Data from South Coast AQMD's monitors have found that air quality in the South Coast Air Basin was substantially worse during the 2020 Fourth of July weekend than any year in the last decade. Based on video footage and the cancellation of most large public events, South Coast AQMD staff suspects that it is likely that a combination of increased use of safe and sane fireworks and stagnant air led to trapped air pollution that lingered for longer than usual. Overall average concentrations of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in the South Coast Air Basin were 70 percent higher than in previous years between 7 p.m. on July 4 to 7 a.m. on July 5. Monitors picked up an even greater increase in the maximum hourly measurements of PM2.5, with the highest concentrations detected at the Central Los Angeles, North Hollywood and Anaheim stations. Some instruments were found to have so much particulate matter residue on them that it resulted in readings so high the data could not be properly validated. Fireworks Used for Religious Celebrations While fireworks are commonly used to commemorate cultural celebrations, such as the Fourth of July in the United States, Fiestas Patrias in Hispanic America, Lunar New Year in East and Southeast Asian countries, the Lantern Festival and Spring Festival in China, and New Year's celebrations worldwide, they are sometimes used for religious celebrations. Examples of religious celebrations that typically are accompanied by the use of fireworks include Diwali in India and Taoism in China. Although the Santa Ana Municipal Code does not define "Exempt Fireworks," it is important to note that the California Health and Safety Code Section 12508 provides the following definition: "Exempt fireworks" means any special item containing pyrotechnic compositions which the State Fire Marshal, with the advice of the State Fire Advisory Board, has investigated and determined to be limited to industrial, commercial, agricultural use, or religious ceremonies when authorized by a permit granted by the authority having jurisdiction. City Council 28 — 6 4/19/2022 Fireworks April 19, 2022 Page 7 Recommendation from the Ad Hoc Committee: Consider an Ordinance Prohibiting the Sale, Use, Storage, or Possession of All Fireworks for Either City Council Consideration or to be Presented to the Voters Attached for discussion only is a draft ordinance (Exhibit 2) prohibiting the sale, use, storage, or possession of all fireworks. The Ad Hoc Committee recommends that the City Council either consider an ordinance for City Council consideration or an ordinance to be submitted to the voters as a ballot measure for the November 8, 2022 general municipal election. An ordinance for City Council consideration means that the ordinance can be approved, amended, and repealed by a majority vote of the City Council, whereas an ordinance presented to and approved by a majority of voters can only be amended or repealed by the voters. Below is a summary of the provisions of the draft ordinance: • Declares that it shall be unlawful for any person to possess, store, offer for sale, expose for sale, sell at retail, or use or explode any fireworks. • Maintains the definition of fireworks (the same as defined California Health and Safety Code section 12511). • Defines "Host" and declares that no host shall allow any person to violate a provision of the Fireworks Regulations on the host's private property. • Declares that the Police Chief, Fire Chief, or their designee may seize fireworks at the fireworks owner's expense. • Declares that violation of the Fireworks Regulations shall constitute grounds for issuance of an administrative citation, designated as an infraction, and assessment of a fine. • References the existing fine amount of $1,000. • References a fireworks disposal fee of $250. • Declares that any person who violates the Fireworks Regulations shall be liable for the response costs (costs associated with law enforcement, fire, medical, or other emergency personnel responding to, remaining at, and leaving the scene of a gathering). o Response costs include, but are not limited to, the following: salaries and benefits of law enforcement, fire, medical, or other emergency personnel, administrative costs, medical treatment costs, costs of using City equipment, cost of repairing damaged City equipment or property, and other costs associated with enforcing the Fireworks Regulations. The draft ordinance text may be used in either format (an ordinance for City Council consideration and an ordinance to be presented to the voters). City Council 28 — 7 4/19/2022 Fireworks April 19, 2022 Page 8 Draft Resolution with Ballot Question Language For discussion, and should the City Council desire to direct staff to prepare an ordinance to be presented to the voters, attached is a draft resolution (Exhibit 3) giving notice of a general municipal election with the following ballot question: Shall Chapter 14 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code be amended to ban the sale and use of fireworks within the City of Santa Ana? The draft ordinance to be presented to the voters, in its final form, would accompany the ballot measure. Options The City Council has the following options relating to this matter: 1. Concur with the Ad Hoc Committee and direct staff to return to the City Council with an ordinance prohibiting the sale, use, storage, or possession of all fireworks for City Council consideration. 2. Concur with the Ad Hoc Committee and direct the City Attorney and Clerk of the Council to prepare necessary documents to place an ordinance prohibiting the sale, use, storage, or possession of all fireworks on the ballot for November 8, 2022 general municipal election. 3. Take no action. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT There is no environmental impact associated with this action. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. EXHIBIT(S) 1. OCFA After -Action Reports for 2017 through 2021 2. Draft Ordinance (for discussion only) 3. Draft Resolution with ballot language (for discussion only) Submitted By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager City Council 28 — 8 4/19/2022 ORANGE COUNTY 2017 Independence Day After Action Report Prepared by the Orange County Fire Authority Irvine, CA City Council 28 — 9 4/19/2022 Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Background and Methodology 4 Fireworks Policy in Orange County 5 Historical Fireworks Injury Trends 6 Types of Fireworks Involved in Injuries 7 Spatial Analysis 8 Fireworks -Related Fire Incidents and Property Loss 9110 Public Display Incidents 11 Confiscated Fireworks 12 National Statistics Comparison 13-15 Appendix A: Injuries by Emergency Care Facility 16 City Council 28 — 10 4/19/2022 Executive Summary Ten Orange County cities permitted the sale of safe and sane fireworks in 2017, for a total of 254 stands throughout the County. A total of 33 public fireworks displays provided safe celebration options for the communities within Orange County. This year, there were no reported injuries as a result of a public display firework show. A few safety concerns were raised by some displays within OCFA (Orange County Fire Authority) jurisdiction that will be addressed for the upcoming 2018 Independence Day festivities. In 2017, the injuries associated with fireworks decreased to 29 total injuries. Last year, Orange County reported 39 injuries that were related to fireworks. In comparison to the Consumer Product Safety Commission's (CPSC) 2016 fireworks injury statistics, Orange County's total fireworks injuries are less than expected for our population. Safe and sane fireworks did not contribute to any injuries that were reported this year. Illegal fireworks contributed to 45% of Orange County's reported injuries while 55% of reported injuries were caused by an unknown type of firework. Mortars were the firework type that caused the most injuries in 2017. As in previous years, a majority of the reported injuries within Orange County were burns on the hands and fingers. Firework injuries reported by hospital emergency rooms and urgent care facilities were mapped and compared to areas where the sale of safe and sane fireworks has been permitted. Results are a clear indication that hospitals near the cities where safe and sane firework sales are permitted, reported more fireworks -related injuries. This year, California experienced very heavy rainfall during the winter months. The rainfall elevated wildfire danger as it contributed to the substantial growth of vegetation that eventually dried out and became foliage that can catch fire and spread quickly. Fireworks safety is more critical than ever to prevent dangerous fires and injuries. While Orange County's reported injuries decreased this year, there was a considerable uptick in several other areas. Orange County experienced a significant increase in estimated property loss; almost tripling from last year's $53,600 to $147,121 this year. The acreage lost due to fireworks -related fires was higher than it has been in the past 4 years. Additionally, the amount of both consumer and illegal fireworks that were confiscated this year far surpasses the confiscation numbers of the last 4 years. We would like to take this opportunity to thank all of the fire departments and medical providers in Orange County who contributed data to the analysis in this report. City Council 28 — 11 4/19/2022 3 Background and Methodology Each year following the Independence Day holiday, the Orange County Fire Authority gathers data in order to analyze the overall impact of fireworks throughout Orange County. The information included in this report was contributed by hospital emergency rooms, urgent care facilities and Orange County Fire Departments to supplement OCFA's own fireworks data. Injury data was solicited from a total of 24 hospital emergency rooms and 31 urgent care facilities throughout Orange County for the study period of June 28-July 5, 2017. This year, we received responses from 0 urgent care facilities and 18 hospital emergency rooms, for an overall response rate of 32%. OCFA's own Emergency Medical Services data was also analyzed for injuries related to fireworks. The fireworks injuries contained in this report are only those that were reported to us; it is likely many more injuries occurred that were either not treated or not reported. National statistics extracted from the most recent 2016 CPSC Fireworks Report were also used for a comparison study. Fireworks -related fire incident and property loss information was gathered from all 11 Orange County municipal fire departments, for a response rate of 100%. Narratives from the 57 fireworks - related fire incidents that OCFA responded to were analyzed for qualitative information regarding the impact of these incidents within Orange County communities. Local newspaper and social media sources were also utilized for information regarding fireworks -related injuries and various fire -related incidents that were caused by fireworks. City Council 28 — 12 4/19/2022 4 Fireworks Policy in Orange County In 2017, ten Orange County cities permitted the sale of safe and sane fireworks for a total of 254 retail consumer fireworks stands throughout the County. city Quantity Anaheim 16 Buena Park 30 Costa Mesa 35 Fullerton 15 Garden Grove 45 Huntington Beach 15 Santa Ana 74 Stanton 6 Villa Park 3 Westminster 15 Total 254 This year, the City of Anaheim revamped their fireworks program by allowing only 16 stands to operate booths in the City. For the past 2 years, Anaheim allowed every nonprofit to participate, but for 2017, applications were accepted into a lottery for 8 slots. Another 8 slots were reserved for Anaheim high schools. Although this limited the number of nonprofits allowed to participate, it meant that those nonprofits that were selected would stand to make much more in profits this year as opposed to previous years. In Santa Ana, illegal mortars and rockets were fired all night across streets and were being aimed at people and cars. More than 5,700 illegal fireworks were seized between the hours of 8pm and 2am. There were close to 400 calls that came in to police and the holiday resulted in 16 arrests, each with a $1,000 fine. Santa Ana experienced close to $40,000 in property/content losses due to several building and vehicle fires that took place as a result of firework activity within the city. City Council 28 — 13 4/19/2022 5 Historical Fireworks Injury Trends In 2017, Orange County hospital emergency rooms reported 29 injuries that were directly caused by fireworks. This is a decrease in comparison to 2016, when 39 injuries were reported and also a decrease from 2015 when 35 injuries were reported. Over the past 5 years, Orange County averaged close to 34 fireworks -related injuries around the Independence Day holiday (June 28th_ July 5tn) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 0-7 14 4 9 3 2 8-16 9 4 13 10 5 17-21 5 3 3 8 5 Adult 11 16 10 18 15 Unknown 0 0 0 0 2 TOTAL 39 27 35 39 29 The number of fireworks -related injuries for adult patients was the highest this year; although it was a slight decrease from 2016 when 18 adult patients were reported. Reported injuries for patients under the age of 21 (age brackets 0-7, 8-16 and 17-21) decreased this year by almost half. Orange County Fireworks Injuries by Age Historical 5 Year Trends 45 See Appendix A for detailed information about injuries reported by emergency rooms and urgent care facilities. City Council 28 — 14 4/19/2022 6 Types of Fireworks Involved in Injuries OC 2017 Fireworks Injuries by Type 16 5 3 3 1 1 0- T q 1 , . �o Legal Status of Injury Causing Fireworks for 2017 0% Safe and Sane Illegal Unknown ■ Safe and Sane ■ Illegal Unknown This year in Orange County, illegal fireworks accounted for 45% of all fireworks -related injuries while the remaining 55% of injuries were caused by an unknown type. While there were a significant number of "unknown" type of fireworks, Mortars were the type of illegal fireworks that caused the most reported injuries in 2017. Interestingly, Safe and Sane fireworks did not cause any reported injuries in 2017. City Council 28 — 15 4/19/2022 7 Spatial Analysis of Fireworks Injuries This map displays the locations of the Orange County hospitals that have reported fireworks - related injuries in 2017. The red stars indicate the cities that allowed the sale of safe and sane fireworks. The mustard hospital bag marker indicates hospitals that reported between 1-4 injuries and the purple ambulance marker indicates hospitals that reported 5 or more injuries during the study period of June 28, 2017 through July 5, 2017. St. Joseph's Hospital was the only hospital to report 5 fireworks -related injuries this year. This information does not conclude that the sale of fireworks caused more injuries, but the spatial relationship of fireworks -related injuries that were treated in and around the safe and sane cities is indicative of an on -going trend that injuries are still happening very near to the safe and sane cities. i k\ La Habra 6 L8 Mirada Brea Chino Fulls ram, Slate Park Norwalk _ arba Linda 39� 1� Buena rk Fullerton pl cer•tia 41, Cerritos 41 � 41 4NAH EIM �II_LS p Aeirn 5T Cypress villa PSrlt Orange za1 LTI T °n aranri � Park Acres W +` gp�Modena Gard*Grove p L� North Tustin Sn rniaga + Canyon ������ � Silverado Rach Tustin xa1 Limestone Canyon rUNSE- 9EAC-1 EOLOONWE xb1 Regional Park Founta ITJy Wh+trflgRanCh WiOerness Irvine Q Park 4 JHuntton T3 241 Beach jW :R`1.Nr snEc-RLl.1 Costa M0Sl TURTLE KCN C:ENI rR Lake Forest Ranch Ma rc 5 N NEWPDRT Beach CENTER Laglfna p 1 i3 woods NA R� L.MA� T3 Mission Viejo Co, (D 133� Alisa Viejo Ladera Ranch Laquna Beach Rancho City Council 28 — 16 4/19/2022 8 Fireworks -Related Fire Incidents and Property Loss Historical P operty Loss 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Property Loss $220,050 $9,580 $300,540 $53,600 $147,121 Acreage Lost .40 acres .02 acres .025 acres 1.21 acres 4.38 acres In comparison to 2016, reported fireworks -related property loss increased considerably in Orange County for 2017. Additionally, reported acreage that was lost due to fireworks -related fires, was significantly much higher than in the past 4 years. Illegal fireworks ignited a building fire in Placentia which resulted in an estimated $27,000 in damages. Fireworks caused a vehicle fire in Santa Ana which caused $20,000 in property loss. Newport Beach reported a $10,000 loss due to a structure fire. This year, Santa Ana had an incident count of 30 while in 2016, the incident count was only 6. There were 72 incident counts reported for Anaheim alone this year. In Orange County Fire Authority's jurisdiction, 57 fireworks -related incidents were reported this year. Incident Calls/Type of Fire Roof/Structure Fire 8 Lawn Fire 0 Trash Fire 15 Tree Fire 8 Brush/Acre Fire 14 Vehicle Fire 1 Other 11 California experienced heavy rainfall during the past year which resulted in thick vegetation that has dried in the summer months. This dry brush combined with the continued use of illegal fireworks has elevated wildfire and fire danger within Orange County, which was evident in the 164 incident counts that were reported by Orange County fire departments. City Council 28 — 17 4/19/2022 9 2017 FIREWORKS -RELATED PROPERTY LOSS Note: Red denotes cities that permit the sale of safe and sane fireworks CITY COUNT $ LOSS ACREAGE COMMENTS Aliso Viejo 2 1.00 0 1 trash, 1 other Anaheim 72 0 3.0 N/A Brea 7 0 0 N/A Buena Park 9 1,120 0.2 2 brush, 2 trash, 1 other, 4 tree Costa Mesa 2 0 0 N/A Cypress 0 0 0 N/A Dana Point 0 0 0 N/A Fountain Valley 0 0 0 N/A Fullerton 7 0 0 N/A Garden Grove 10 0 0 4 tree, 6 trash Huntington Beach 4 500 0 1 vehicle Irvine 2 0 0 2 other Ladera Ranch 0 0 0 N/A La Palma 0 0 0 N/A Laguna Beach 1 0 0 N/A Laguna Hills 1 0 0.1 1 brush Laguna Niguel 0 0 0 N/A Laguna Woods 0 0 0 N/A Lake Forest 0 0 0 N/A Los Alamitos 0 0 0 N/A Mission Viejo 0 0 0 N/A Orange 3 55,000 0 N/A Newport Beach 1 10,000 0 1 structure Placentia 3 29,000 0.1 1 structure, 1 brush, 1 other Rancho Santa Margarita 0 0 0 N/A San Clemente 0 0 0 N/A San Juan Capistrano 0 0 0 N/A Santa Ana 30 39,000 0.19 5 building, 8 trash, 4 tree, 7 brush, 1 vehicle, 5 other Seal Beach 0 0 0 N/A Stanton 2 0 0 2 other Tustin 1 800 0 1 trash Unincorporated OC 7 11,700 0.78 1 building, 3 trash, 3 brush Villa Park 0 0 0 N/A Westminster 0 0 0 N/A Yorba Linda 0 0 0 N/A COUNTY TOTAL 164 $147,121 4.38 Note that incidents reported on this list are only the incidents that were reported with a potential property or acreage loss. City Council 28 — 18 4/19/2022 10 Public Display Incidents There were 33 public displays in Orange County this year. OCFA took part in 22 of those public displays. Of the 22 public displays, there were no injuries and no fires reported as a result of the public displays. There was 1 violation reported for a carnival in San Juan Capistrano where the pyrotechnics technician allowed family members within the established fallout zone. OCFA is working with the city to eliminate this issue for next year's public display. Orange County shows outside of OCFA areas included: 1 in Anaheim, 2 in Costa Mesa, 1 in Fullerton, 1 in Huntington Beach, 3 in Laguna Beach, and 3 in Newport Beach. The following table details the malfunctions/injuries/fires that occurred at 5 Orange County Independence Day firework display shows: City Injuries Health & Fires Malfunctions/Comments Safety Violations San Juan Capistrano 0 1 0 15 shells misfired Mission Viejo 0 0 0 (3) 3" shells misfired Rancho Santa Margarita 0 0 0 2/3 of the show did not fire — fire board shorted Laguna Niguel 0 0 0 (15) 4" shells, (5) 6" shells, (12) 3" shells misfired Santa Ana 0 0 0 60 shells misfired City Council 28 — 19 4/19/2022 11 Confiscated Fireworks Each year, Orange County Fire Authority measures the amount of fireworks confiscated over the Independence Day holiday. In 2017, the amount of confiscated fireworks was significantly higher than the past 4 years. Brea and Fullerton confiscated more fireworks this year than ever before. Costa Mesa confiscated well over 2,500 pounds of fireworks while Huntington Beach confiscated a little over 1,700 pounds of fireworks. The following tables represents this information, along with data provided by Orange County fire departments. PIKE ARTME CONSUMER TOTAL Anaheim Fire & Rescue 50 lbs 0 50 lbs Brea Fire Department 75 lbs 0 75 lbs Costa Mesa Fire Department 2000 lbs 587 lbs 2587 lbs Fountain Valley Fire Department 0 0 0 Fullerton Fire Department 100 lbs 0 100 lbs Garden Grove Fire Department 300 lbs 0 300 lbs Huntington Beach Fire Department 1715 lbs 3 lbs 1718 lbs Laguna Beach Fire Department 0 0 0 Newport Beach Fire Department 26.6 lbs 23.2 lbs 49.8 lbs Orange City Fire Department 100 lbs 0 100 lbs Orange County Fire Authority 274.5 lbs 13.5 lbs 288 lbs ORANGE COUNTY TOTAL 4641.1 lbs 626.7 lbs 5267.8 lbs Confiscated Ille al Fireworks 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Consumer 35lbs* None 52.4lbs** 30lbs*** 626.7lbs Dangerous/Illegal 209lbs* 824.5lbs 877lbs** 3104lbs*** 4641.1 lbs *Huntington Beach statistics included **Newport Beach, Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley statistics included ***Anaheim and Laguna Beach statistics NOT included City Council 28 — 20 4/19/2022 12 National Statistics Comparison According to the 2016 CPSC Annual Fireworks Report, fireworks were involved in an estimated 11,100 injuries treated in US hospital emergency departments during calendar year 2016. Orange County's average number of fireworks injuries was 29 in 2017 which was a decrease from the 39 injuries reported in 2016. The same ten cities allowed for the sale of safe and sane fireworks in 2017 as they did in 2016. In comparison to the national average of injuries reported, Orange County seems to be significantly lower in average injuries. This difference could be attributed to the fact that the sale of safe and sane fireworks is limited to 10 Orange County cities, while 47 US states allow the sale of consumer and/or safe and sane fireworks (with various local restrictions). 2016 CPSC Gender Breakdown ■ Male ■ Female OC 2017 Gender Breakdown ■ Male ■ Female ■ Unknown 7% Nationally, 61% of fireworks injuries were experienced by males and 39% of fireworks injuries were experienced by females. This year in Orange County, the gender breakdown was very closely aligned with the national average, with 55% of fireworks injuries experienced by males, 38% of fireworks injuries experienced by females while 7% of the gender of firework injuries remains unknown. City Council 28 — 21 4/19/2022 13 CPSC 2016 TYPE OF INJURIES ■ Burns ■ Fractures/Sprains ■ Contusion/Laceration ■ Other Othe 18% Contusion/Laceration 11% Fractures/Sprains 2% 141 Burns 69% OC 2017 TYPE OF INJURIES ■ Burns ■ Fractures/Sprains ■ Contusion/Laceration ■ Other Contusion/Laceratic 21% Fractures/Sprain 3% The type of injuries reported within Orange County this year very closely aligns with the national average. As with previous years, burns make up the majority of fireworks -related injuries in Orange County, at 62% this year. This year, the percentage is lower than the national rate of 69% for burns. Orange County experienced very few fractures and sprains this year, which aligns with the national average of 2%. City Council 28 — 22 4/19/2022 14 CPSC 2016 BODY REGIONS INJURED ■ Arm ■ Eye ■ Head/Face/Ear ■ Hand/Finger ■ Leg ■ Trunk/Other Trunk/Other rm 12% 8% 0 Leg 18% Head/Face/E 20% Hand/Finger 33 % r OCFA 2017 BODY REGIONS INJURED ■ Arm ■ Eye ■ Head/Face/Ear ■ Hand/Finger ■ Leg Arm 3% ye Leg 28 % Head/Face/Ear 10% Hand/Finger In Orange County, most injuries were to the hands or fingers. While eye, hand/finger and leg percentages for Orange County were slightly higher than the national averages, the arm, trunk/other and head/face/ear categories came in lower than the national percentages reported by CPSC for 2016. City Council 28 — 23 4/19/2022 15 Appendix A 2017 INJURIES BY EMERGENCY CARE FACILITY AGE GENDER DESCRIPTION OF INJURY CARE FACILITY 44 M Watching neighbor's fireworks from 8-10 feet away Orange Coast Memorial 18 M Tried to light fuse and firework exploded Orange Coast Memorial 49 F Burned by neighbor's fireworks St. Joseph Hospital 24 M Holding roman candle in hand St. Joseph Hospital 27 M Mortar fell over and exploded St. Joseph Hospital 17 M Mortar went off and hit left leg St. Joseph Hospital 55 F Struck by firework from neighbor's house St. Joseph Hospital 42 M Sparkler backfired to left hand Placentia Linda Hospital 5 F Unknown firework caused burns Fountain Valley Regional 20 F Unknown firework caused burns to foot Fountain Valley Regional 10 F Bottle rocket caused burn to leg Fountain Valley Regional 27 M Unknown firework exploded Fountain Valley Regional 51 F Sparkler caused burns Kaiser -Anaheim 10 M Firecracker caused burns to thumb OC Global Medical Center 30 M Firework exploded in hand OC Global Medical Center 19 M Mortar blew up in hand OC Global Medical Center 53 F Unknown firework caused burn to foot OC Global Medical Center 18 M Mortar went off in backpack HOAG Memorial 12 M Unknown firework hit eye while on ladder HOAG Memorial 13 M Unknown firework caused burn to leg HOAG Memorial 29 F Unknown firework exploded in hand UCI 39 F Unknown firework caused laceration to eye Los Alamitos Medical Center 48 M Fell off roof while watching firework public display Chapman Global 38 F Firecracker that was thrown caused burn to leg South Coast Global Medical 14 M Mortar exploded in hand La Palma Intercommunity N/A F Unknown firework caused burn to hand St. Jude Medical Center N/A M Unknown firework caused burn to hand St. Jude Medical Center 29 F Unknown firework exploded in hand West Anaheim Medical 6 M Sparkler went into eye West Anaheim Medical City Council 28 — 24 4/19/2022 16 Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Background and Methodology 4 Fireworks Policy in Orange County 5 Historical Fireworks Injury Trends 6 Types of Fireworks Involved in Injuries 7 Spatial Analysis 8 Fireworks -Related Fire Incidents and Property Loss 9110 Public Display Incidents 11 Confiscated Fireworks and Citations 12 National Statistics Comparison 13-15 Appendix A: Injuries by Emergency Care Facility 16 City Council 28 — 26 4/19/2022 Executive Summary Ten Orange County cities permitted the sale of safe and sane fireworks in 2018, for a total of 229 stands throughout the County. A total of 25 public fireworks displays provided safe celebration options for the communities within Orange County. In 2018, the injuries associated with fireworks increased to 38 total reported injuries. Last year, Orange County reported 29 injuries that were related to fireworks. In comparison to the Consumer Product Safety Commission's (CPSC) 2017 fireworks injury statistics, Orange County's total fireworks injuries are less than expected for our population. While last year, there were no reported Safe and Sane fireworks -related injuries, this year, Safe and Sane injuries accounted for 13% of reported county -wide injuries. 19% of fireworks -related injuries were due to illegal fireworks while the outstanding 68% of injuries remain unknown. As in previous years, a majority of the reported injuries within Orange County were burns to the eyes, hands and fingers. Firework injuries reported by hospital emergency rooms and urgent care facilities were mapped and compared to areas where the sale of Safe and Sane fireworks has been permitted. Results are a clear indication that hospitals near the cities where Safe and Sane firework sales are permitted, did not necessarily report more injuries than those hospitals that are not near those same cities. Orange County experienced a slight decrease in estimated property loss this year. The acreage lost due to fireworks -related fires was also lower than it was last year. Additionally, the amount of both consumer and illegal fireworks that were confiscated (by local fire departments) this year has gone down over 2,300 pounds compared to 2017. With devastating wildfires forcing evacuations and destroying thousands of homes, wildfires have become a major concern for many Southern California citizens. Fireworks have become a wildfire liability and there is deliberation about the possibility of an outright ban on fireworks in fire -prone California. There have been more than 2,350 wildfires in California within the first half of 2018. This year, many wildfire -plagued cities across America have turned to drones as an alternative to fireworks. While this has not yet become the norm for California, it could very well be on the horizon as the future for holiday festivities. Orange County has yet to see a drone show, but it would be no surprise if one were to take place in the near future. We would like to take this opportunity to thank all of the fire departments and medical providers in Orange County who contributed data to the analysis in this report. City Council 28 — 27 4/19/2022 3 Background and Methodology Each year following the Independence Day holiday, the Orange County Fire Authority gathers data in order to analyze the overall impact of fireworks throughout Orange County. The information included in this report was contributed by hospital emergency rooms, urgent care facilities and Orange County Fire Departments to supplement OCFA's own fireworks data. Injury data was solicited from a total of 25 hospital emergency rooms and 103 urgent care facilities throughout Orange County for the study period of June 30th-July 5, 2018. This year, we received responses from 3 urgent care facilities and 11 hospital emergency rooms, for an overall response rate of 9%. OCFA's own Emergency Medical Services data was also analyzed for injuries related to fireworks. The fireworks injuries contained in this report are only those that were reported to us; it is likely many more injuries occurred that were either not treated or not reported. National statistics extracted from the most recent 2017 CPSC Fireworks Report were also used for a comparison study. Fireworks -related fire incident and property loss information was gathered from 10 out of 11 Orange County municipal fire departments, for a response rate of 90%. Narratives from the 69 fireworks -related fire incidents that OCFA responded to were analyzed for qualitative information regarding the impact of these incidents within Orange County communities. Local newspaper and social media sources were also utilized for information regarding fireworks -related injuries and various fire -related incidents that were caused by fireworks. City Council 28 — 28 4/19/2022 4 Fireworks Policy in Orange County In 2018, 10 Orange County cities permitted the sale of safe and sane fireworks for a total of 229 retail consumer fireworks stands throughout the County. city Quantity Anaheim 16 Buena Park 28 Costa Mesa 33 Garden Grove 39 Huntington Beach 15 Santa Ana 75 Stanton 5 Villa Park 3 Westminster 15 Total 229 Anaheim Fire and Rescue experienced a 16% increase in firework related calls this year. Also, citations increased from 2 in 2017 to 17 in 2018. There was a garage fire in Anaheim that is still under investigation but most likely caused by illegal fireworks. Although no injuries were reported, the fire did displace a family. Garden Grove had an OCSD Bomb Squad response call involving a man on a mini -bike pulling a trailer that was assembled to set off illegal fireworks as he rode up the street. There were over 200 calls received regarding illegal fireworks. Garden Grove had 37 officers deployed on fireworks watch this year. Additionally, there were a total of 71 citations (each for $1000) issued for illegal fireworks. Stanton's Police Department received 34 calls for services for fireworks this year, which is a 28% decrease in calls from 2017. Overall, the City of Stanton found that there was less firework debris on the streets this year. For 2019, the City of Stanton is considering options to decrease response times, alter deployment models and utilize undercover enforcement to assist with future firework enforcement efforts. City Council 28 — 29 4/19/2022 5 Historical Fireworks Injury Trends In 2018, Orange County hospital emergency and urgent care rooms reported 38 injuries that were directly caused by fireworks. This is an increase in comparison to 2017, when 29 injuries were reported. Over the past 5 years, Orange County averaged close to 34 fireworks -related injuries around the Independence Day holiday (June 30th-July 51h) 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 0-7 4 9 3 2 9 8-16 4 13 10 5 4 17-21 3 3 8 5 7 Adult 16 10 18 15 18 Unknown 0 0 0 2 0 TOTAL 27 35 39 29 38 The number of fireworks -related injuries for adult patients was the highest this year. Most years, the adult category seems to yield the highest number of injuries. Reported injuries for patients under the age of 21 (age brackets 0-7, 8-16 and 17-21) increased from 12 to 20 this year. 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Orange County Fireworks Injuries by Age: Historical 5 Year Trends 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Age 0-7 Age 8-16 Age 17-21 Adult Unknown Total See Appendix A for detailed information about injuries reported by emergency rooms and urgent care facilities. City Council 28 — 30 4/19/2022 6 Types of Fireworks Involved in Injuries OC 2018 Fireworks Injuries by Type 28 Unknown 68' 6 Sparkler Firecracker Legal Status of Injury Causing Fireworks for 2018 13% ■ Safe and Sane 19% ■ Illegal ■ Unknown ■ Unknown ■ Illegal ■ Safe and Sane This year in Orange County, fireworks -related injuries were caused by both illegal and Safe and Sane fireworks. Illegal fireworks accounted for 19% of all fireworks -related injuries while Safe and Sane fireworks accounted for 13% of fireworks -related injuries. The remaining 68% of injuries were caused by an unknown type. While there were a significant number of "unknown" type of fireworks, Firecrackers were identified as the type of illegal firework that caused the most reported injuries this year and Sparklers were the type of Safe and Sane firework that caused the most reported injuries this year. City Council 28 — 31 4/19/2022 7 Spatial Analysis of Fireworks Injuries This map displays the locations of the Orange County hospitals that have reported fireworks - related injuries in 2018. The red stars indicate the cities that allowed the sale of Safe and Sane fireworks. The mustard hospital bag marker indicates hospitals that reported between 1-4 injuries and the purple ambulance marker indicates hospitals that reported 5 or more injuries during the study period of June 30, 2018 through July 5, 2018. There were 4 hospitals that reported 5 or more injuries this year (compared to 1 hospital with 5 injuries last year). This information does not conclude that the sale of fireworks caused more injuries. The spatial relationship of fireworks - related injuries that were treated in and around the Safe and Sane cities is not necessarily indicative of an on -going trend that injuries are happening near to the Safe and Sane cities. Reported injuries seem to be spread out throughout the county, regardless of firework sales. rreservar+on La Habra La Mirada 57 chino Hills C�D Brea Stale Park �� �'nrba:Linda Placentia EYpr Buena* Fullerton � 9i S L s ItOS _ _ •I .�$kh 41 a gT ,:NAll Clhd II�LS Q Areim 57 Cy'Dress Villa P9rR ,itos 51kt Orange 2y, 33 el IE; Park Acres Lc`R• -' ge El Modena Gard*Grove _ WesY�inster © North Tustin 5aniiago Canyon 7[ Midway city Siireradc San Ana Tustin xb, limestone cariyor, ACi seLOLrv.v rs- ze, Regional Park Fuunta n 5S + Noc- lurono Whiting Rah, Valley ��,�. g 33 wiidemeS2 Irvine Q Park HunAton 71 1 Beach T —NE ::"EC'RIiM Costa ML.* T11-LCIC: - ENTER Lake Forest F yySS) NIT rt NE'lVPORT Bt?aCh CENTER Laguna Q 133 Woods CJ3 ivlission Viejo DEELL MAR AR Crystal Gave State Park City Council 28 — 32 4/19/2022 8 Fireworks -Related Fire Incidents and Property Loss Historical P operty Loss 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Property Loss $9,580 $300,540 $53,600 $147,121 $115,975 Acreage Lost .02 acres .025 acres 1.21 acres 4.38 acres 1.19 acres In comparison to 2017, reported fireworks -related property loss decreased slightly in Orange County for 2018. Additionally, reported acreage that was lost due to fireworks -related fires, was significantly lower than in 2017. Illegal fireworks ignited a building fire in Aliso Viejo which resulted in an estimated $10,000 in damages. Fireworks caused a vehicle fire in Santa Ana which caused $21,500 in property loss. There was a $37,000 loss in Tustin for 4 vehicles (in a single incident) that burned due to illegal fireworks. One building and one vehicle sustained minor damage due to rubbish fires that caused an estimated $4,000 worth of damage in Huntington Beach. This year, Laguna Beach had an incident count of 17 while in 2017, the incident count was only 1. There were 757 incident counts reported for Anaheim alone this year (includes police department calls). In Orange County Fire Authority's jurisdiction, 69 fireworks -related incidents were reported this year. Incident Calls/Type of Fire Roof/Structure Fire 4 Lawn Fire 2 Dumpster (or Trash) Fire 28 Tree Fire 6 Brush/Acre Fire 5 Vehicle Fire 3 Other 21 As California continues to face another season of drought and wildfires, fireworks safety is critical to prevent dangerous fires and injuries. Dry brush combined with the continued use of illegal fireworks has elevated wildfire and fire danger within Orange County, which was evident in the 878 incident counts that were reported by Orange County fire departments. City Council 28 — 33 4/19/2022 9 2018 FIREWORKS -RELATED PROPERTY LOSS Note: Red denotes cities that permit the sale of safe and sane fireworks CITY COUNT $ LOSS ACREAGE COMMENTS Aliso Viejo 2 10,100 0 1 building, 1 dumpster Anaheim 757* 0 0 5 tree, 6 dumpster, 746 other Brea 1 0 0 1 unknown Buena Park 2 0 0.010 1 tree, 1 dumpster Costa Mesa 16 5,000 0 N/A Cypress 0 0 0 N/A Dana Point 2 100 0.010 1 tree, 1 other Fountain Valley 0 0 0 N/A Fullerton 8 0 0 2 tree, 5 dumpster 1 other Garden Grove 4 0 0 2 dumpster, 1 tree, 1 other Huntington Beach 5 4,000 0.1 1 vehicle, 1 structure, 3 other Irvine 2 0 0.010 1 brush, 1 other Ladera Ranch 0 0 0 N/A La Palma 0 0 0 N/A Laguna Beach 17 0 0 17 other Laguna Hills 0 0 0 N/A Laguna Niguel 0 0 0 N/A Laguna Woods 0 0 0 N/A Lake Forest 2 50 0 1 dumpster, 1 other Los Alamitos 0 0 0 N/A Mission Viejo 2 200 0 1 dumpster, 1 other Orange 4 200 0 2 dumpster, 2 other Placentia 2 0 0.010 1 brush, 1 other Rancho Santa Margarita 0 0 0 N/A San Clemente 0 0 0 N/A San Juan Capistrano 0 0 0 N/A Santa Ana 32 32,200 1.13 1 building, 2 tree, 2 vehicle, 19 dumpster, 1 brush, 2 grass, 2 other, 3 unknown Seal Beach 0 0 0 N/A Stanton 4 0 0 1 other, 3 unknown Tustin 6 37,000 0.010 1 vehicle, 1 dumpster, 4 other Unincorporated OC 2 25 0 1 tree, 1 brush Villa Park 1 0 0 1 other Westminster 5 100 0 1 dumpster, 3 other, 1 unknown Yorba Linda 2 40,000 0.010 1 building, 1 tree COUNTY TOTAL 878 $128,975 1.29 Note that incidents reported on this list are only the incidents that were reported with a potential property or acreage loss. (*Police Department statistics included) City Council 28 — 34 4/19/2022 10 Public Display Incidents There were 25 public displays in Orange County this year. OCFA took part in 22 of those public displays. Of the 22 public displays, there were no injuries reported. At the Monarch Beach Resort in Dana Point, there was 1 ornamental vegetation fire that was extinguished by the pyro crew. There was 1 violation issued for the Dana Point Barge where the mortars were not buried correctly. Orange County shows outside of OCFA areas included: 1 in Orange, 1 in Costa Mesa and 1 in Huntington Beach. The following table details the malfunctions/injuries/fires that occurred at various Orange County Independence Day firework display shows: City Injuries Health & Fires Malfunctions/Comments Safety Violations Irvine 0 0 0 1 shell misfired San Juan Capistrano 0 0 0 15 shells misfired Dana Point 0 0 1 Minor fire in ornamental vegetation. Dana Point Harbor 0 1 0 Mortars not buried correctly and unstable. Violation notice issued. Ladera Ranch 0 0 0 Significant amount of misfires -total of 85 shells, 136 displays, 5 cakes. Altercation between pyro crew members resulted in poor show. Mission Viejo 0 0 0 4 shells misfired, recommend closing trails for site security. Rancho Santa Margarita 0 0 0 2 cakes misfired Tustin 0 0 0 6 shells, 2 cakes misfired, recommend portable fencing for site security. Laguna Hills 0 0 0 12 shells misfired Laguna Niguel 0 0 0 29 shells misfired Aliso Viejo 0 0 0 1 shell, 1 cake misfired Laguna Woods 0 0 0 5 shells misfired Lake Forest 0 0 0 1 shell misfired Santa Ana 0 0 0 60 shells misfired Orange 0 0 2 2 cakes caught fire after firing. Technicians extinguished the fire. 1 shell misfired when fired after the show. City Council 28 — 35 4/19/2022 11 Confiscated Fireworks and Citations Each year, Orange County Fire Authority measures the amount of fireworks confiscated over the Independence Day holiday. In 2018, the amount of reported confiscated fireworks (to local fire departments) was significantly lower than the past couple of years, however, there was no shortage of confiscation activity for local law enforcement. In Stanton, deputies confiscated over 30 pounds of illegal fireworks which resulted in an arrest and several citations. Westminster Police reported several arrests and the confiscation of hundreds of pounds of illegal fireworks. Costa Mesa Police Department seized 1,300 pounds of illegal fireworks in the two weeks leading up to the Independence Day holiday. Newport Beach Police Department confiscated more than 631 pounds of illegal fireworks. The following tables represents the information provided by Orange County fire departments. FIRE DEPARTMENT NAME ILLEGAL CONSUMER TOTAL CITATIONS Anaheim Fire & Rescue 200 lbs 0 200 lbs 18 Brea Fire Department 0 0 0 0 Costa Mesa Fire Department 1300 lbs 0 1300 lbs 0 Fountain Valley Fire Department 0 0 0 0 Fullerton Fire Department 300 lbs 0 300 lbs 1 Garden Grove Fire Department 60 lbs 0 60 lbs 71 Huntington Beach Fire Department 198 lbs 0 198 lbs 16 Laguna Beach Fire Department 5 lbs 0 5 lbs 0 Orange City Fire Department 120 lbs 25 lbs 145 lbs 0 Orange County Fire Authority 146 lbs 2 lbs 148 lbs 0 ORANGE COUNTY TOTAL 2329 lbs 27 lbs 2356 lbs 106 Confiscated Illegal Fireworks 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Consumer None 52.4lbs* 30lbs** 626.7lbs 271bs*** Dangerous/Illegal 824.5lbs 877lbs* 3104lbs** 4641.1 lbs 23291bs*** *Newport Beach, Huntington Beach and Fountain Valley statistics included **Anaheim and Laguna Beach statistics NOT included ***Newport Beach statistics NOT included City Council 28 — 36 4/19/2022 12 National Statistics Comparison According to the 2017 CPSC Annual Fireworks Report, fireworks were involved in an estimated 12,900 injuries treated in US hospital emergency departments during calendar year 2017. Compared to the 11,100 injuries treated during calendar year 2016, there were 1800 more injuries treated in calendar year 2017. Orange County's average number of reported fireworks injuries was 38 in 2018 which is an increase from the 29 injuries reported in 2017. The same 10 cities allowed for the sale of Safe and Sane fireworks in 2018 as they did in 2017. In comparison to the national average of injuries reported, Orange County seems to be significantly lower in average injuries. This difference could be attributed to the fact that the sale of Safe and Sane fireworks is limited to 10 Orange County cities, while 47 US states allow the sale of consumer and/or Safe and Sane fireworks (with various local restrictions). Another contributing factor is that not all injuries may have been reported to hospitals and not all hospitals may have provided us with their reported injuries. 2017 CPSC Gender OC 2018 Gender Breakdown Breakdown 399 61% 10% ■ Male ■ Female ■ Male ■ Female Nationally, 70% of fireworks injuries were experienced by males and 30% of fireworks injuries were experienced by females. This year in Orange County, the gender breakdown was very closely aligned with the national average, with 61% of fireworks injuries experienced by males and 39% of fireworks injuries experienced by females. City Council 28 — 37 4/19/2022 13 CPSC 2017 TYPE OF INJURIES ■ Burns ■ Contusions/Lacerations ■ Other ■ Fractures/Sprains Other, Contusions/Laceration 26 % Fractures/Sprains, 3% OC 2018 Type of Injuries Burns, 53% ■ Burns ■ Contusions/Lacerations ■ Other ■ Fractures/Sprains Fractures/Sprains 0% Other 32 % Contusions/Laceral 10% Burns 58 % The type of injuries reported within Orange County this year very closely aligns with the national average. As with previous years, burns make up the majority of fireworks -related injuries in Orange County, at 58% this year. This year, the percentage is slightly higher than the national rate of 53% for burns. Orange County experienced no reported fractures and sprains this year, which aligns with the national average of 3%. City Council 28 — 38 4/19/2022 14 CPSC 2017 BODY REGIONS INJURED ■ Hand/Finger ■ Head/Face/Ear ■ Leg ■ Eye ■ Trunk/Other ■ Arm Arm, 6% Trunk/Other Eye, 14% Leg and/Finger, 31% nt:du/rdCe/Ear, 2210 OC 2018 Body Regions Injured ■ Hand/Finger ■ Head/Face/Ear ■ Leg ■ Eye ■ Trunk/Other Arm Eye 32% Arm Trunk/nthar Leg 5% I/Finger !9% Face/Ear A% In Orange County this year, eye injuries were quite high. At 32%, this is more than double the national average of 14%. While hand/finger, head/face/ear and arm percentages for Orange County were on par with the national averages, the trunk/other and leg categories came in lower than the national percentages reported by CPSC for 2017. City Council 28 — 39 4/19/2022 15 Appendix A 2018 INJURIES BY EMERGENCY CARE FACILITY AGE GENDER DESCRIPTION OF INJURY CARE FACILITY 48 M Digit amputation with chest and abdominal burns HOAG Memorial 23 M Second degree burns HOAG Memorial 42 F Fireworks shot in her direction HOAG Memorial 7 F Firework spark hit eye St. Jude Medical Center 9 F Sparkler burned down to hand/fingers St. Jude Medical Center 15 M Placed firecracker by way of buttocks, fell and landed on firecracker Kaiser Permanente Irvine 5 F Foreign body sensation and burning to eyes Kaiser Permanente Irvine 25 M Firework blew up in hand while lighting St. Joseph Hospital 19 M Debris got in eye while watching fireworks St. Joseph Hospital 55 F Ashes got in eye from fireworks St. Joseph Hospital 20 M Firework launched into head St. Joseph Hospital 38 M Firework that was lit struck left eye St. Joseph Hospital 63 M Struck in eye by falling firework St. Joseph Hospital 39 M Tried to stop lit container of fireworks from falling St. Joseph Hospital 14 M Firecracker exploded in hand St. Joseph Hospital 6 F Burn occurred at neighbor's house OC Global Medical Center 48 F Firework flew up from ground OC Global Medical Center 5 F Eye became irritated while watching fireworks OC Global Medical Center 17 M Firework blew up in hand OC Global Medical Center 18 M Burned while lighting a firework OC Global Medical Center 32 M Burned while lighting a firework OC Global Medical Center 25 F Firework flew in Fountain Valley Hospital 5 M Foreign body in eye Fountain Valley Hospital 5 M Debris fell into eye Fountain Valley Hospital 20 F Firecracker exploded on shoulder Fountain Valley Hospital 32 F Firecracker exploded on ear Fountain Valley Hospital 4 M Held towards eye accidentally Kaiser Permanente Anaheim 19 M Firecracker exploded in hand Kaiser Permanente Anaheim 23 M Hit by firework while watching fireworks Kaiser Permanente Anaheim 29 M Picked up firework Kaiser Permanente Anaheim 18 F Firework went off in hand while lighting Kaiser Permanente Anaheim 23 M Pain and redness after watching fireworks Kaiser Permanente Anaheim 3 M Firework exploded while lighting Placentia Linda Hospital 23 F Firework exploded while lighting Placentia Linda Hospital 5 M Burn to foot Memorial Care HB 10 F Watching fireworks when something hit eyelid South Coast Global 29 M Checked on firework he thought did not light and burned palm South Coast Global 44 M Firework exploded in hand OCFA transfer to UCI City Council 28 — 40 4/19/2022 16 • L k. GMI Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Background and Methodology 4 Fireworks Policy in Orange County 5 Historical Fireworks Injury Trends S Types of Fireworks Involved in Injuries 7 Spatial Analysis S Fireworks -Related Fire Incidents and Property Loss 9910 Public Display Incidents 'I'I Confiscated Fireworks and Citations 12 National Statistics Comparison 13-15 Appendix A: Injuries by Emergency Care Facility 16 City Council 28 — 42 4/19/2022 Executive Summary Ten Orange County cities permitted the sale of safe and sane fireworks in 2019, for a total of 241 stands throughout the County. A total of 32 public fireworks displays provided safe celebration options for the communities within Orange County. In 2019, the injuries associated with fireworks decreased to 24 total reported injuries. Last year, Orange County reported 38 injuries that were related to fireworks. In comparison to the Consumer Product Safety Commission's (CPSC) 2018 fireworks injury statistics, Orange County's total fireworks injuries are less than expected for our population. Last year, of all reported injuries, 13% were Safe and Sane fireworks -related injuries, 19% were due to illegal fireworks, and an outstanding 68% of injuries remain unknown. This year, only 12% of fireworks -related injuries were known to be Safe and Sane fireworks, 44% were reported to be illegal, and 44% of the firework types were unknown. The majority of the reported injuries this year were to the hand/finger or trunk/other. The firework related injuries reported by hospital emergency rooms and urgent care facilities were mapped and compared to areas where the sale of Safe and Sane fireworks has been permitted. Results are a clear indication that hospitals near the cities where Safe and Sane firework sales are permitted, did not necessarily report more injuries than those hospitals that are not near those same cities. Orange County experienced a radical decrease in the numbers of reported counts of property loss, however had a drastic increase in estimated property loss this year. The acreage lost due to fireworks -related fires was also lower than it was last year. Additionally, the amount of both consumer and illegal fireworks that were confiscated (by local fire departments) this year has gone up by over 3,600 pounds compared to 2018. With devastating wildfires forcing evacuations and destroying thousands of homes, Wildfires have become a major concern for many Southern California citizens. Fireworks have become a wildfire liability and there is deliberation about the possibility of an outright ban on fireworks in fire -prone California. There have been more than 2,500 wildfires in California within the first half of 2019 and more than 21,000 acres of land were affected. Many wildfire -plagued cities across America have turned to drones as an altemauve to fireworks. While this has not yet become the norm for California, it could very well be on the horizon as the future for holiday festivities. Orange County has yet to see a drone show, but it would be no surprise if one were to take place in the near future. We would like to take this opportunity to thank all of the fire departments and medical providers in Orange County who contributed data to the analysis in this report. 3 City Council 28 — 43 4/19/2022 Background and Methodology Each year following the Independence Day holiday, the Orange County Fire Authority gathers data in order to analyze the overall impact of fireworks throughout Orange County. The information included in this report was contributed by hospital emergency rooms, urgent care facilities and Orange County Fire Departments to supplement OCFA's own fireworks data. Injury data was solicited from a total of 25 hospital emergency rooms and 103 urgent care facilities throughout Orange County for the study period of .Tune 30th-July 5, 2019. This year, we received responses from 5 urgent care facilities and 8 hospital emergency rooms, for an overall response rate of 10%. OCFA's own Emergency Medical Services data was also analyzed for injuries related to fireworks. The fireworks injuries contained in this report are only those that were reported to us; it is likely many more injuries occurred that were either not treated or not reported. National statistics extracted from the most recent 2018 Consumer Product Safety Commission's Fireworks Report were also used for a comparison study. Fireworks -related fire incident and property loss information was gathered from all 11 Orange County municipal fire departments. Narratives from the 76 fireworks -related fire incidents that OCFA responded to were analyzed for qualitative information regarding the impact of these incidents within Orange County communities. Local newspaper and social media sources were also utilized for information regarding fireworks -related injuries and various fire -related incidents that were caused by fireworks. 4 City Council 28 — 44 4/19/2022 rob% Fireworks Policy in Orange County In 2019, 10 Oraoge Counly cities perrnfkled Hwi sale of safe and sane firewofiks for a totai of 235 retail consumer fireworks stands Ihmughoiit the County - CRY 1 � Anaheim JBuena Park 25 Costar WFO _ 32 Fullerton 15 Carden Grove 37 Hurpti 2glon Beech 15 Banta Ana 09 Stanton S Villa Park 3 estm inster 15 — Total 230 Overall, there was a decrease in retail eonsurner fireworks starids, ex"Pt in the cities of Anahei rn, H unting ton Beach, Villa'Ps rk, and Westminster, all who kePt W-O sarrMe number -of 51ands they had In 2015. Anaheim Fire and fescue experienced a 16% deor-ase in firewwk relarled cal Is DO also a decrease In citations iswad from 17 in 2018 down to 11 this year. Although (here Wer-e no studure fires, there were dumpsterand Im flm that resulted in an estimated loss of $3.2-00- Qa n Gram hW 2 less stands this year than in 2018. They received two significant cMliao Injuries due to rrnortars exploding; one in a Actn'% hand and one in the cheat and face. Qrange had an incident during peak hours on July 41h When an officer was assaulted WO a firework (mortar) Being 1hrown al hire rich drew the rnaj t`Y of the dOPLartment rasou ws for several hours. 5 City Council 28 - 45 4/19/2022 Historical Fireworks Injury Trends In 2019. OraNe Cou my hospital ernergenCy and urgent care rooms rep -Dried 24 injuries that were direo'dy caused by firewDrks. This is a decirwaa in oomparEson to 2018. when 38 injuries were reported. Over Mhe past :5 years, Orange County averaged abut 33 fireworks -related Injuries around fe Independence Day holiday (June 30"-duly 5')_ 201S 2616 2017 2018 -.2019. 8-7 9 3 2 g 2 8-16 13 10 5 4 4 17-21 3 8 5 7 2 Ad u It 10 18 is 18 16 UrAnorwn 0 0 39 2 29 0 0 TQTAL 1 36 38 24 On an average, the adult ca Legory tend to yield the h ighest number of injuries. Reported Inj0es for pMems under the age of 21 (age bracket& p-7- 8-16 and 17-21) deceased from 20 to 8 this year. 45 to 35 M — 25 - au 0 Chart Tit le M 5 ZO]5 301* 701E Z414 7-7—Pf-Awi 11-21 =Adylc UrApiowel TWT 4L See Appein dix A for detai lead i nforrnation about inju ries reported by emergency roorn s @ad urgent care faciHas. 6 City Council 28 — 46 4/19/2022 Types of Fireworks Involved in Injuries CC 2019 Fireworks Injuries by Type f Sate and Sane i un6naxn Illetm We aIWJ 50ri! [Jn6mi -".-i Legal Status of Injury Causing Fireworks for 2019 12% - JILegai * halt red Sint ■ Unlno m Th is year in Orange CourLty, Fi orks,-related i nju ries were ca used by both illegal a nd Safe a0d SAne firewvorhs, The Illegal fireworks acmunted for 441/6 of all fiFework$-related injuries as well as the unknown types, whilo Safe and Sane fireworks accounted for 12%. There were a significant rl urn bei cvf "unknown" type of f reworks; however, firecrackers were still identi fed as the type -Df illegal firework that caused the most reported injuries this year. There were o rrly 2 reported fi rework- related injuries this year caused by Spa Mom. which ich is a type of Safe ion d Sane firework. W City Council 28 — 47 4/19/2022 Spatial Analysis of Fireworks Injuries This map dlspta}s Use IocaRon-@ of Uie nge Cou6ty hospitals that have reported firewvorfss-related i rijurie5 i ri 2019. The fi rearacker markers indicate the Gitiras that allowed the sale of Safe and San$ fireworks. The hospital bag markers iodicato ho:�pitets that reported between 1-4 injuries and the hospital marker indicates the hospital that reported 5 or rnofe injures dodnq the study period of June 30, 2019 through :July 5, 2019_ There was only one hospital that reported .5 or more injuries this year (compared to 4 hospilals with :5 or inure injuries la,:t year), Thi-s information does not con-clude that the sale -of fire' arks caused mm injuries. The spatial relalion-ship -of fireworks -related fnj:uries that were gated in and around the Safe and Sane cities is -AOt n-ecessarily indicative of an ori•going trend that injuries are happening rear to the Safe and Sartre cities. Repaid injuries seem to he spread out throughout the county, regardless of firework sales. v y V a City Council 28 — 48 4/19/2022 Fireworks -Related Fire Incidents and Property Loss MistorlceI TE"k17 Loss 201 2016 2018 2019 Pro ert Loss $300,540 1 $53, 0 1 0147.121 1 S115.975 $913.705 A,oreaae Lost _025 acres 1 1,21 acres I 4,36acre 1,19 acres 14 acmes In cornparisen (o 2018, reported ftworkwelated property less i-n creased <*nsiderahly in Orange County f4or 2019. A total of ,14 acres loss due to fPre+nrorks-related fires were reported this }ter_ A building fire in Villa Park rewlted in an estimated $700,000 in damages, Mu4iple rriivvOlaneous fireworks -related fires In $ants Ana rosulted in a Total damage of about 3127,950 'in property and contents loss. This year, Irvine had an incident count of 8, incres sing from 2 in 2018; Santa Ana demised from 32 counts last year to 17 this year. In Oran-ge Caunly Fire Authority's jurisdiction, 7$ freWOrksrrelatad incidents were repwted this year, Incident Callsjypa of Fire RMU tructu re Fpre 1 I L, vwn Fire arj4star or Trash Fire 9 29 Tree Fire 0 BrushlAcre Fire 10 Vehicle Fire 0 ether 17 California experienced a wall winter resulting in are extraordinary shDw of vegetation growth. Fireworks safety is critical Ro prevent dangerous fires and injuries. High qua nli ter of dry brush � karn the wet wi nter) 00rnbiri ed With 1h e oontin ued 4i Se Of it legal fire-Nork 5 has elavated wildfire and fire danger within Orange County. City Council 28 — 49 4/19/2022 019 FiRE ORKS- BELATED PROPERTY LOSS Note, Red denotes cities th at permit the sale of safe s nd sane fl rewarks CITY ANT $ LOSS ACREAGE COMM ENTS Aliso Viejo 1 2,500 0 Ras&e-ngorvehicle fire .Anaheim T 3.250 0 Misr, dumpster, Ir"fires, v�l�+cle npne $rea 0 0 0 Buena Park 3 5 0 S Iraslfrubbdsh flre Costa Mesa 3 0 0 bone press 1 0 0 1 rubblsh flre Dana Point a I 0 0 none Fountain Valley 2 0 0 1 bruswgraS5, 1 y FIM Fullerton 2 0 0 M?M G"en Groan 11 250 0 5.6umpstars, 1 bash can, 3 bvaWtres fir" Huntlri tat1 Beach 4 5 1-D0 0 1 rubbish1trash Fire Irvino B 14.425 0 1 bulldirrg, 3 cocking, 1 dumpmr, i wogeiawn, 2 vohicle firs Laguna Niguel 3 200 0 1 bui;dN. I brr OIAt ras-s. 1 trwFa*mte fires Laguna Woods 0 0 0 NiA take Forest 4 1.5 A 1 Qxking, 2 nAZiah. 1 bruWAra firs Los Alamitos 1 1,000 0 1 dumtpmer fire Mission Via]* 1 451 0 1 vehicle fife Nowport $each 0 0 0 Nona Orange Park 0 0 ,01 rye Ranc Fro Santa I�l�r �rILB 0 a 0 NIA San Clemente 1 0 0 1 buildirn W San Juan Capistrano 2 1 7 000 D a rota Ana 17 127,9 .02 5 dumpster, B buildings. rubbish, 3 vegotatiorl, 1 brush. 2 athef Tustin 3 4.500 0 1 grass, 1 eq uipmenl- 3 ~vehicle fires Unincorporatm-d 5 0 0 2 brLn1dNrLd, :2 rubbish,irash 1 olhw Will a Park 1 70.0,000 0 1 building WestMinSter 0 1.000 ,01 2 dusrnpsl,er, 2 rtbblsh, 1 hrush, 1 other Yorba Linda 0 Cl 0 NIA ICOUNTYTOTAL 628 j $9221305 J4 Mara 1haf lndidenrt goMed of+ f!L$ fisf we c)nly fhe fn&darks filar swam 7�?d Mh a pa4enjygrpr000rfy of a g* W.S. e"RP 60* DepW*rrrenr sra(isdM8 ?narudtied) 10 City Council 28 — 50 4/19/2022 rMa Public Display Incidents There were 32 public displays in Orange County this year. OCFA took part in 23 of those public displays. Of the 23 public displays, there were 2 injuries reported, one of which was not reported until July 10, 2019. There was no violation issued and no fire resulted from any malfunction or misfiring. Orange County shows outside of OCFA areas included: 1 in Anaheim, 3 in Costa Mesa, 1 in Fullerton, 1 in Huntington Beach, and 3 in Newport Beach. The following table details the malfunctions/injuries/fires that occurred at various Orange County Independence Day firework display shows: City Injuries Health & Safety Fires Malfunctions/Comments Violations Aliso Viejo 0 0 0 2 Roman Candies, 3-2.5" and 2-2.5" single shot not fired. Buena Park 0 0 0 10-3" not fired and 1-3" dud. Show stopped w/ 10 min left due to Cypress 0 0 0 wind pushing burning debris out of secured fallout zone. Ladera Ranch 1 0 0 Injury reported 7/10, hit in face with cardboard tube. 5 cakes not fired. Laguna Hills 0 0 0 60-3" and 6 4" not fired. Single shell burst in mortar, caused Laguna Woods 0 0 0 surrounding shells to fire. 16 shells loaded incorrectly, subsequently reloaded red. 10 cakes and 2 Roman Candles Lake Forest 0 0 0 were not fired. Recommend no larger than 2" shells at this site. Lake Mission Viejo 0 0 0 1 low burst and 18-3", 10-4", 15-5" not fired. Mission Viejo CC 0 0 0 1-2" dud. 6 low breaks, 1 caused a person to Rancho Santa 1 0 0 be hit with a cardboard insert in the Margarita crowd, treated onsite. 1 cake and 18 shells not fired. San Clemente 0 0 0 4 low breaks. Shell burst in mortar causing rack to San Juan 0 0 0 fail and shoot 2 other shells on finale Capistrano chain horizontally. 3" finale chain and 2 cakes not fired. Tustin 0 0 0 2-2" not fired and 2-2` duds Yorba Linda 0 0 0 1 finale chain and 1 cake not, rewired and shot with no issues. 11 City Council 28 — 51 4/19/2022 Confiscated Fireworks and Citations Each year. Orange County Fire Authority measures the amount d f rewft conflsoated over (he Independence Day holiday. In 2019. the amount o4 reported cor&scated fireworks (to ICI fire departments) was signif ica-rilly greater than ft peat couple of years. In Gosle Mesa, deputies oonfiscated 4.550 pounds of ill of firemrls which resulted in 40 citations. Anaheim Police reported 50% decrease in confiscation of illegal fireworks this year from last year. FuWrton and Orange Police had a d raritic demiaw this year. Orange County Flre Authority inomased in confiscation from 140 pounds of illegal fireworks to 750 pounds. The following tables represents the irdormali-on provaded by Orange County fire departmants. RTIVIENT INIAI IE 8wheiin Fire & Rescue LLE 100. lam, 0 100 111115, 11 Ores Fire Deportment 20 lb$, 0 20 lbs. I costa Mesa Pro Deparirnarit 4650 lbs, 30 lbs. 4ffiO lbs. 40 Fountain VaII&V Fim Department N A NIA NIA N)A Full;ertorr Fire Departrneni 40 lbs. 0 40 lbs. 0 Garden Gmve Fire Depart meat 25 Iw. 0 25 lbs. 74 Huntington Dearh Fire Npaftmont 292 lbs. a 292 lbs. 0 Laguna Beach Fro Dspartment 5 lbs. S lbs. 10 Ibs, 0 Dredge Oily Fire Departme-nt 50 lbs. 10 Ibs, 60 Ibs, 0 Orange County Fire Auftrity 750 lb& 4 lbs. 754 Ibs, 0 Newport Peach Fire DRwrbrnonl 33 lbs. 15 fly$. 40 lbs. 0 ORANGE COUNTY TOTAL 8 84 0s. 8029 lbs. 126 Confiscated ]Ile al Fir works 2016 2016 2017 2018 2019 Can:sumer 52A lbs_' 30 lbs.*' 626-7 lbs. 27 lbs."' 64 b5.1 papgereus1lifeal I 8TTlbe,' 3104Ibs." M641.1 lbs, 2329Ibs."■ I 6 Ibs.'rrf .NaM50M gewh. H mbn9linn EkmLch and r- „-Un aim valwy 61811slics iIcouded "Anah4m;+hd L +a Beach sW ishcs NOTmdudod —'NAW`IMdSeSM Statd,iM NOT in&udad 'FuuM n W114p WgiWkA MOT indu*d 12 City Council 28 — 52 4/19/2022 National Statistics Comparison Accordi ng to the 2018 C-onsume r Product Safety Comm iss ion's Annual Fireworks Report, fireworks were involved in an estimated 9,100 injuries treated in US hospital emergency departments during calendar year 2018. Compared 10 the 12.900 injuries Ireated during ca lerndar year 2017, there were 3800 lei injuries treated in caleodar year 2018. Orange Coun ty's average number -of reported fireworks injuries was 24 in 2019 which i!s a diacraiase from the 38 injtrh s reported in 2G1 &. The same 10 r+Pos allowed for the sale of Bade and Sane Frewofks in 2019 as they did irn 2018. In c-amparisoo tG the nafteal average of injuries reported. Orange Counter 5eerns to be significantly lower in average injuries. This difference could he a1W �uW to the faot that the dale of Safe and Sane fire -works is limited t-o 10 Orange QountV cities, while 47 US states allow Ihu sale Qf consumer an&or Safe aid Sane Crew s (Wth various local restriclions�). Anolher cOntribuling fa-CtOr is that Plot all irjiuriea May have been reported to h050ital:a and not al hospitals mioy havo provided us with their reported injufts- 2018 CPSC GENDER BREAKDOWN • r.J 4 ■ FefWq Femil 35% u arse 69% OC 2019 Gender Breakdow n FUM 4q + Maim * Firmale Male 79}. Nationally, -134¢16 or fireworks injuries were experienced by males and 35% of firaworks injuries were experienced by ferrules. This year in Orange County, the gender breakdown chang@d significantly campared with the national average. with 79% of fire works injuries experian d by niale-s a nd 21 % of fireworks inju ries experienmd by fern ales - City Council 28 — 53 4/19/2022 CRSC 2-131$ TV OF INJURIES ■ 9uins ■ Co-1Iuhiorii & la{eoAlioM ■ fracluresE *amp w Odret Fractures & Sprpilnz 6% Ganlu;Qo Lactrad 25% 9urna 4-S% 0 C 2019 Ty p e of Injuries I urni ■ Contusions 1.lacerslidila ■ Frpceunes $ 5pra*i1 + 06W fttadureti 0 pgntutlons. $ lateraiions 31 yr Burns i:B% The type of injuries reported Wthin Orange County khIs year very closely aligns with the national -average. As with previous years. bums Irlake up the majority Of fireworks -related injuries; Orange Count} had rernoined at 58% this year, which is higher than Ih-0 notion@I rate of 45116 for burns. Orrange County experien d no reported fractures and Sprains this gear. which does not align with the national average of 8% in 2018. 14 City Council 28 — 54 4/19/2022 CPSC 2019 130Dy REGI01`45 1NAJRED + 1#rndMrVr t HtadPuet 1.3 krrti leg ■ Eye ■ TrunVOL119r + ALrrr% 4% rnu Eva IL9 x to y+ dlfwav 29% HeWRm*I"r 15N 0C 203-9 Body RegiDm Injured Arrn 9% TeurikA Nor go% Leg 14% Jn u FM Ear 17% 1n Orange Counter this year, trunkAother and arm injuries. at 21 arid n, respKtively. had more than doubled the national average .0110%and 4%, respecliv-My, Han&finger injury catagory incraio-sed by only 1 % from last year, putting Drange County 3% above Ih o national average. Headtfacofear percentages were on par wilh the national averages; however. leg injury ca, egoq had increased to 15% thIs year ar7cl aye injuries drastically decremed from 32% last year to 9% N5 yeat, Orange County average skill came in tower than the national percentages reported by CPS C for 2018. City Council 28 — 55 4/19/2022 Appendix A —2019 INJURIES BY EMERGENCY CARE FACILITY AGE C E NU E-R DESCRIPTI0M OF INJURY CARE FACILM 7 rAo$ M Lefk fops w¢i born" by Ljnknowf4 illjg4l fr-roWk Qi&" Reerrmente Arwhelm I 11 M 9urrk&aCvation tq# a4 Ieg:lyv Firecracker Kaiser Kerr-mmente Amheinn 48 M Burn to the handwkenfiffecracker was &rowrr 9live ice DC Glolml Medical Aver ___ � Global Mad Kai Ccnt-er 8 F 6uro to the arrn, frrecraderbackfired 12 M &jrn to the neck~ Emcracker was throhyn In air 0C Global Medical Cenlw 26 M Rur-v to khe eye, firecracker brew up rn the face CC Global Medical QrAeF so F 1VI wr hurn to the neck; novelti-m (flreworlrsj inacentla Linda Hospital la werslions to hWWvkft#}; lortle robe blew tip Ili hand Uci Medical Center 29 M 8umjL RAv%Asion to refs Mnd; MGrwr, blew upirr hand UC1 Medical Censer 35 V! &urVkaueradon Ibafamkhesl , M50 e4piosian to the face U0 Medical Leaser 23 M Own to left wrist; r'Qke , tum!N rkiht slde up wh.le lit it went 0 UO Medical Cancer 16 M BunnAxEration tor�&t hahMacelchesl;; Mortar, Rlaoed 04%X9lie iMis hityy WP UCI Medical Center 23 F Laceration toLeft hand; poman candrq, Last o-ne didn't N of} W*n w4bodto itk h5nd UCI MediLaI Center J-2 M Lacerai:lonAlurnto ri&htlaand; Unkn*wn tWper wamwalkiq, it in 1'&Md UO Medical C7enter 27 M Laceratlon torW hand; unknown tym, lit rt, wa&setting it down a*it sx I*dad UCI Medical Censer 62 # Aur-n to left hand, gmriklam way Wdinga bunco Df theme+ & sonve ne lit thorn 01 at once UO Medic* Center 91 M &in to left haand; sp"err holding bundle & all went off UCI Medlcbl Center .44 rd Abrmlonto right eye�left wart unknown type, rre-4hbors firework slot Into hip-"rd UCM Medical Center i M Bunn to left leg; Flower tyrve St. kWe FierRtage Modal-G vap AG F &,rn t8 left ear; udkndwn firework VW St lade Heritage Medical -Group 22 M Burn to thebac�; yrtkdowry firework type tmsrom ig0vit4t-Mftyipnvlejp 28 M INUFY talawerabdo,rr m above pimic ankr%own Firework e SLJude Me6c,1 C"ftr Fv,llertgn 26 M Bum t-D faceleyes; unknown firework t1yp% Firework broke, ahem e+d to re " t - basira1 imam r, St, Jude Medical Cemw FRAIr<,rCon 19 LKEbrwiom and bwnw to palrns and darNIS Vl lisft and right hand. 1' laceration tD the bridge of his nose and left knee and abraalo5 to hls rot forearm, bottterixket fir tw4 rk. Flaag HmPilaI - N eWport 9each City Council 28 — 56 4/19/2022 ORANGE COUNTY 2020 Independence Day After Action Report Prepared by the Orange County Fire Authority Irvine, CA City Council 28 — 57 4/19/2022 Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Background and Methodology 4 Fireworks Policy in Orange County 5 Historical Fireworks Injury Trends 6 Types of Fireworks Involved in Injuries 7 Spatial Analysis 8 Fireworks -Related Fire Incidents and Property Loss 9110 Public Display Incidents 11 Confiscated Fireworks and Citations 12 National Statistics Comparison 13-15 Appendix A: Injuries by Emergency Care Facility 16 City Council 28 — 58 4/19/2022 Executive Summary All across the country, the COVID-19 pandemic affected the Independence Day celebrations in 2020. Social distancing, facial masks, sanitizing, working from home, and various levels of quarantines have become the new societal norm for most residents in Orange County. 10 Orange County cities permitted the sale of safe and sane fireworks in 2020, for a total of 208 stands throughout the County. A total of 4 public fireworks displays provided safe celebration options for the communities within Orange County. In 2020, the injuries associated with fireworks increased to 32 total reported injuries. Last year, Orange County reported 24 injuries that were related to fireworks. In comparison to the Consumer Product Safety Commission's (CPSC) 2019 fireworks injury statistics, Orange County's total fireworks injuries are less than expected for our population. While in 2019, reported Safe and Sane fireworks -related injuries accounted for 12% of total injuries, this year, Safe and Sane injuries accounted for only 6% of reported county -wide injuries. 25% of fireworks -related injuries were due to illegal fireworks while the outstanding 69% of injuries remain unknown. As in previous years, a majority of the reported injuries within Orange County were burns to the hands and fingers. Firework injuries reported by hospital emergency rooms and urgent care facilities were mapped and compared to areas where the sale of Safe and Sane fireworks has been permitted. Results are a clear indication that hospitals near the cities where Safe and Sane firework sales are permitted, did not necessarily report more injuries than those hospitals that are not near those same cities. Orange County experienced a decrease in estimated property loss this year. However, the acreage loss due to fireworks -related fires was significantly higher than it was in previous years. Additionally, the reported amount of both consumer and illegal fireworks that were confiscated (by local fire departments) this year has gone down over 1,700 pounds compared to 2019. We would like to take this opportunity to thank all of the fire departments and medical providers in Orange County who contributed data to the analysis in this report. City Council 28 — 59 4/19/2022 3 Background and Methodology Each year following the Independence Day holiday, the Orange County Fire Authority gathers data in order to analyze the overall impact of fireworks throughout Orange County. The information included in this report was contributed by hospital emergency rooms, urgent care facilities and Orange County Fire Departments to supplement OCFA's own fireworks data. Injury data was solicited from a total of 26 hospital emergency rooms and 126 urgent care facilities throughout Orange County for the study period of June 30th-July 5, 2020. This year, we received responses from 13 hospital emergency rooms and 4 urgent care facilities, for an overall response rate of 11 %. OCFA's own Emergency Medical Services data was also analyzed for injuries related to fireworks. The fireworks injuries contained in this report are only those that were reported to us; it is likely many more injuries occurred that were either not treated or not reported. National statistics extracted from the most recent 2019 CPSC Fireworks Report were also used for a comparison study. Fireworks -related fire incident and property loss information was gathered from 10 out of 11 Orange County municipal fire departments, for a response rate of 90%. Narratives from the 76 fireworks -related fire incidents that OCFA responded to were analyzed for qualitative information regarding the impact of these incidents within Orange County communities. Local newspaper and social media sources were also utilized for information regarding fireworks -related injuries and various fire -related incidents that were caused by fireworks. City Council 28 — 60 4/19/2022 4 Fireworks Policy in Orange County In 2020, 10 Orange County cities permitted the sale of safe and sane fireworks for a total of 208 retail consumer fireworks stands throughout the County. city Quantity Anaheim 16 Buena Park 21 Costa Mesa 30 Fullerton 15 Garden Grove 29 Huntington Beach 15 Santa Ana 62 Stanton 2 Villa Park 3 Westminster 15 Total 208 Pandemic lockdowns and social distancing put a damper on many public celebratory traditions this year. With various new safety measures in place, sales of "Safe and Sane" fireworks skyrocketed as most Orange County professional displays went dark. With most local businesses, restaurants, attractions, and public beaches closed this year, the pandemic did help Orange County residents to become more creative in finding new ways to celebrate with drive -through and virtual gatherings. While most professional displays were cancelled due to COVID-19, Orange County had no shortage of bootleg firework shows. The large number of unsanctioned fireworks combined with unfavorable weather conditions resulted in the worst air quality that Southern California has seen for the Independence Day holiday in over a decade. Orange County Sheriff's Department reported that illegal fireworks calls were up nearly 300% across Orange County compared to the holiday statistics from last year. With the pandemic restrictions in place, many residents may have tried to recreate their own fireworks celebrations at home, which led to the influx of fireworks -related emergency calls. Newport Beach reported over 330 fireworks -related complaints registered to code enforcement and police this year. Orange City reported 353 fireworks -related calls this year. The city of Fullerton had a surge in the use of illegal fireworks for 2 months leading up to the Independence Day holiday. As of July 3, 2020, the Fullerton Police Department issued at least 17 citations for the use of illegal fireworks. City Council 28 — 61 4/19/2022 5 Historical Fireworks Injury Trends In 2020, Orange County hospital emergency and urgent care rooms reported 32 injuries that were directly caused by fireworks. This is an increase in comparison to 2019, when 24 injuries were reported. Over the past 5 years, Orange County averaged close to 32 fireworks -related injuries around the Independence Day holiday (June 30th-July 51h) 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 0-7 3 2 9 2 8 8-16 10 5 4 4 4 17-21 8 5 7 2 8 Adult 18 15 18 16 12 Unknown 0 2 0 0 0 TOTAL 39 29 38 24 32 Similar to previous years, the number of fireworks -related injuries for adult patients was the highest again this year. Most years, the adult category seems to yield the highest number of fireworks -related injuries. Reported injuries for patients under the age of 21 (age brackets 0-7, 8- 16 and 17-21) increased from 10 injuries in 2019 to 20 injuries this year. Orange County Fireworks Injuries by Age: Historical 5 Year Trends 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Age 0-7 Age 8-16 —Age 17-21 Adult Unknown Total See Appendix A for detailed information about injuries reported by emergency rooms and urgent care facilities. City Council 28 — 62 4/19/2022 6 Types of Fireworks Involved in Injuries OC 2020 Fireworks Injuries by Type 18 An ■ Unknown 4 4 ■ Illegal 139001011 ■ Safe and Sane 11 oho tNZ sec z`at aye wa�� o a �a o Lam �o te° �o Legal Status of Injury Causing Fireworks for 2020 6% 69! ■ Safe and Sane ■ Illegal ■ Unknown This year in Orange County, fireworks -related injuries were caused by both illegal and Safe and Sane fireworks. Illegal fireworks accounted for 25% of all fireworks -related injuries while Safe and Sane fireworks accounted for 6% of fireworks -related injuries. The remaining 69% of injuries were caused by an unknown type. While there were a significant number of "unknown" type of fireworks, Firecrackers were identified as the type of illegal firework that caused the most reported injuries this year and Fountains were the type of Safe and Sane firework that caused the most reported injuries this year. City Council 28 — 63 4/19/2022 7 Spatial Analysis of Fireworks Injuries This map displays the locations of the Orange County hospitals that provided data regarding reported fireworks -related injuries in 2020. The red stars indicate the cities that allowed the sale of Safe and Sane fireworks. The mustard hospital bag marker indicates hospitals that reported between 1-4 injuries and the purple ambulance marker indicates hospitals that reported 5 or more injuries during the study period of June 30, 2020 through July 5, 2020. There were 2 hospitals that reported 5 or more injuries this year (compared to 1 hospital with 11 injuries in 2019). This information does not conclude that the sale of fireworks caused more injuries. The spatial relationship of fireworks -related injuries that were treated in and around the Safe and Sane cities is not necessarily indicative of an on -going trend that injuries are happening near to the Safe and Sane cities. Reported injuries seem to be spread out throughout the county, regardless of firework sales. 4v State Park 71 arba Linda A VBuena 41 Park Fullerton Placentia 1), ExR'r+ssta s rltos 41 _ 91 �� 1eo ca' AA17E IM li �ii1 E5 Q Anaheim 57 Disneyland Park fi Cypress *efmporariiy closed Villa Park niLos Stantun PLA-Ie, ll hl Orange rRIANGEEPark Aces IA1 39 AN� ar'.A. � nge El Modena Garde _ rave Westminster hSonh Tustin Santiago r Canyon SllVerado. Midway City Santa Ana Tustin E Limestone Canyon Regiana! Park I ACr1; 01 I.-E T: Y1 f.;l FaL[iltaE 55 NORTHWOOQ Modjeska VVY ,ulr cups p Canyon L�}JJ 3s Irvine Whiting Ranch C' Wilderness, Huntington Costa Mesa , _ rr, Park , Beach Lake Forest RancF¢ Ma rg Negri Nr. GP G R T BEach [ EU TER Laguna to 133 �OOds COL 6EL WAR AP. 73 Mission Viejo cm. Crystal Cove State Park Alisa Viejo L3d..I ,.h Laguna Beach City Council 28 — 64 4/19/2022 8 Fireworks -Related Fire Incidents and Property Loss Historical P operty Loss 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Property Loss $53,600 $147,121 $115,975 $913,705 $42,100 Acreage Lost 1.21 acres 4.38 acres 1.19 acres 0.14 acres 26.1 acres In comparison to 2019, reported fireworks -related property loss decreased significantly in Orange County for 2020. However, reported acreage that was lost due to fireworks -related fires, was considerably higher than in previous years. Fireworks were the suspected cause of a 21 acre vegetation fire that prompted the temporary closure of Irvine Regional Park. Although there were no injuries, more than 100 firefighters helped to contain that fire. Fireworks also ignited a brush fire near a condominium complex in Mission Viejo that resulted in an estimated property loss of $4,000. In Lake Forest, an arrest was made when illegal fireworks were discharged that ignited an ornamental vegetation fire. An area of Unincorporated Tustin suffered about $200 of property damage when fireworks caused an ornamental vegetation fire on a hillside. A residential area in Los Alamitos had a trash fire that cause about $15,500 worth of damage to a home, a gas meter, electric meter and an electrical panel. Fullerton had a 5 acre vegetation fire that caused over $10,000 in property losses and law enforcement took 4 suspects into custody for arson related to that vegetation fire. Huntington Beach reported one injury to a police officer who was burned by embers from a box of fireworks that exploded as he approached. There was also a fire in Newport Beach that caused $10,000 worth of damage to surrounding vegetation and fences. In Orange County Fire Authority's jurisdiction, 76 fireworks -related incidents were reported this year. Incident Calls/Type of Fire Roof/Structure Fire 3 Lawn Fire 3 Dumpster (or Trash) Fire 28 Tree Fire 0 Brush/Acre Fire 24 Vehicle Fire 3 Other 15 City Council 28 — 65 4/19/2022 9 2020 FIREWORKS -RELATED PROPERTY LOSS Note: Red denotes cities that permit the sale of safe and sane fireworks CITY COUNT $ LOSS ACREAGE COMMENTS Aliso Vie' 0 0 0 None Anaheim 60 0 0 Trees/dumpster/trash fires — no significant loss identified Brea 1 $600 0 1 injury, 1 trash Buena Park 11 0 0 1 injury, 6 trash/dumpster, 4 vegetation Costa Mesa 12 0 0 12 brush/trash/other fires — no significant loss identified Cypress 1 0 0 1 brush Dana Point 1 0 0 1 dumpster Fountain Valley 0 0 0 None Fullerton 8 $10,100 5 1 trash, 5 tree Garden Grove 16 0 0 8 dumpster, 5 brush, 1 building, 2 other Huntington Beach 4 $1,000 0 1 dumpster Irvine 0 0 0 None Ladera Ranch 0 0 0 None La Palma 0 0 0 None Laguna Beach 29 0 0 No significant loss identified Laguna Hills 2 0 0 2 other Laguna Niguel 1 $500 0.02 1 vegetation Laguna Woods 0 0 0 None Lake Forest 2 $200 0 1 vegetation, 1 other Los Alamitos 1 $15,500 0 1 building Mission Viejo 1 $4,000 0.08 1 brush Newport Beach 1 $10,000 0 1 brush Orange 3 0 0 1 trash, 2 brush Placentia N/A N/A N/A N/A Rancho Santa Margarita 1 0 0 1 trash San Clemente 1 0 0 1 other San Juan Capistrano 1 0 0 1 brush Santa Ana 27 0 0 9 brush, 1 building, 8 dumpster, 3 car, 6 other Seal Beach 0 0 0 None Stanton 4 0 0 2 dumpster, 1 brush, 1 other Tustin 0 0 0 None Unincorporated OC 6 $200 21 4 brush, 1 building, 1 trash Villa Park 0 0 0 None Westminster 0 0 0 None Yorba Linda 1 0 0 1 building COUNTY TOTAL 192 $42,100 26.1 Note that incidents reported on this list are only the incidents that were reported with a potential property or acreage loss. City Council 28 — 66 4/19/2022 10 Public Display Incidents Due to COVID-19 safety precautions, there were only 4 public displays in Orange County this year. OCFA took part in 3 of those public displays. There were no injuries, fires or violations reported. There were no other Orange County shows outside of OCFA's jurisdiction. The following table details the malfunctions/injuries/fires that occurred at various Orange County Independence Day firework display shows: City Injuries Health & Fires Malfunctions/Comments Safety Violations Dana Point (Monarch Beach) 0 0 0 10 shells/1 cake rewired, 100% of product discharged. Los Alamitos N/A N/A N/A No OCFA Inspector assigned as shoot takes place on Joint Forces Base. San Clemente 0 0 0 4 shells rewired, 100% of product discharged. San Juan Capistrano 0 0 0 2 shells rewired, 100% of product discharged. City Council 28 — 67 4/19/2022 11 Confiscated Fireworks and Citations Each year, Orange County Fire Authority measures the amount of fireworks confiscated over the Independence Day holiday. In 2020, the amount of reported confiscated fireworks (to local fire departments) was lower than last year, however, there was no shortage of confiscation activity for local authorities. The following tables represents the information provided by Orange County fire departments. IRE DEP RTMENT NA LLEGAL CONSUMER TOTAL CITATIONS Anaheim Fire & Rescue 100 lbs 0 100 lbs 0 Brea Fire Department 54 lbs 0 54 lbs 0 Costa Mesa Fire Department 1082 lbs 0 1082 lbs 0 Fountain Valley Fire Department 0 0 0 0 Fullerton Fire Department 1400 lbs 0 1400 lbs 17* Huntington Beach Fire Department 1196 lbs 0 1196 lbs 0 Laguna Beach Fire Department 4 lbs 12 lbs 16 lbs 0 Newport Beach Fire Department 30 lbs 15 lbs 45 lbs 0 Orange City Fire Department 0 0 0 0 Orange County Fire Authority 200 lbs 150 lbs 350 lbs 0 Placentia Fire Department N/A N/A N/A N/A ORANGE COUNTY TOTAL 4066lbs 177lbs 4243 lbs 17 *Law enforcement statistics included Confiscated Illegal Fireworks 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Consumer 30 lbs* 626.7 lbs 27 lbs** 64 lbs *** 177 lbs **** Dangerous/Illegal 3104 lbs* 4641.1 lbs 2329 lbs** 5965 lbs *** 4066 lbs **** *Anaheim and Laguna Beach statistics NOT included **Newport Beach statistics NOT included ***Fountain Valley statistics NOT included ****Placentia statistics NOT included City Council 28 — 68 4/19/2022 12 National Statistics Comparison According to the 2019 CPSC Annual Fireworks Report, fireworks were involved in an estimated 10,000 injuries treated in US hospital emergency departments during calendar year 2019. Compared to the 9,100 injuries treated during calendar year 2018, there were 900 more injuries treated in calendar year 2019. Orange County's number of reported firework -related injuries was 32 in 2020 which is an increase from the 24 injuries reported in 2019. The same 10 cities allowed for the sale of Safe and Sane fireworks in 2020 as they did in 2019. In comparison to the national average of injuries reported, Orange County seems to be significantly lower in average injuries. This difference could be attributed to the fact that the sale of Safe and Sane fireworks is limited to only 10 Orange County cities. Another contributing factor is that not all injuries may have been reported to hospitals and not all hospitals may have provided us with their reported injuries. A special consideration for 2020 is that with the COVID-19 pandemic, many people may have intentionally avoided going to hospitals and/or urgent cares for fear that they may risk exposure to the virus. 3z 2019 CPSC Gender OC 2020 Gender Breakdown Breakdown 38' 66 % ■ Male ■ Female ■ Male ■ Female 62% Nationally, 66% of fireworks injuries were experienced by males and 34% of fireworks injuries were experienced by females. This year in Orange County, the gender breakdown was very closely aligned with the national average, with 62% of fireworks injuries experienced by males and 38% of fireworks injuries experienced by females. City Council 28 — 69 4/19/2022 13 CPSC 2019 TYPE OF INJURIES ■ Burns ■ Contusions/Lacerations ■ Other ■ Fractures/Sprains Other, 19' Contusions/Lacerations 18% Fractures/Sprains, 6% OC 2020 Type of Injuries Burns, 57% ■ Burns ■ Contusions/Lacerations ■ Other Other Contusions/Laceration 22% Burns 56% The type of injuries reported within Orange County this year very closely aligns with the national average. As with previous years, burns make up the majority of fireworks -related injuries in Orange County, at 56% this year. This percentage is right on par with the national rate of 57% for burns. Orange County's reported contusions/lacerations in 2020 are slightly higher than the national average; sitting at 22% versus the national average of 18%. Orange County experienced no reported fractures and sprains this year. City Council 28 — 70 4/19/2022 14 CPSC 2019 BODY REGIONS INJURED ■ Hand/Finger ■ Head/Face/Ear ■ Leg ■ Eye ■ Trunk/Other ■ Arm Trunk/Other, Eye, 15% Arm, 10% Leg, 23% and/Finger, 30% I/Face/Ear, 16% OC 2020 Body Regions Injured ■ Hand/Finger ■ Head/Face/Ear ■ Leg ■ Eye ■ Trunk/Other ■ Arm Arm Trunk/Other 9% 3% Eye Hand/Finger 16%Ill 41% Leg 19% Head/Face/Ear 12% In Orange County this year, hand/finger injuries were quite high. At 41 %, this is higher than the national average of 30%. While eye and arm percentages for Orange County were on par with the national averages, the head/face/ear, trunk/other and leg categories came in lower than the national averages. City Council 28 — 71 4/19/2022 15 Appendix A 2020 INJURIES BY EMERGENCY CARE FACILITY AGE GENDER DESCRIPTION OF INJURY CARE FACILITY 1 F Touched end of sparkler CHOC 11 M Lit firework was unintentionally aimed toward patient by relative CHOC 12 F Firework hit patient in the eye CHOC 4 M Relative holding firework turned around and hit patient's eye CHOC 4 M Patient playing too close to fireworks CHOC 3 M Relative threw firework and accidentally hit patient Kaiser LIC — Santa Ana 27 M Got hit from across the street while watching fireworks Kaiser Permanente - Anaheim 9 M Spark from a sparkler flew into eye Kaiser Permanente — Anaheim 18 F Firework thrown and got caught in clothing OCGMC 18 M Exploded in hand OCGMC 10 M Firework hit cheek while flying through the air OCGMC 19 M Left hand severely mangled from firecracker OCGMC 47 F Injury from sparkler OCGMC 30 F Injury from fountain OCGMC 6 F Box of fireworks caught fire by thrown sparkler OCGMC 33 F Injured while lighting fireworks Memorial Care Medical Group 2 M Patient grabbed sparkler with hand Placentia -Linda Hospital 1 M Firework exploded on left arm Anaheim Regional 17 M Injury from M80 Mission Hospital 5 F Firework fell over and hit patient in eye Mission Hospital 47 M Fireworks in a box ignited and hit patient's thigh Hoag Newport 27 F Firework tipped over and hit foot Fountain Valley Hospital 28 F Firework fell from sky Fountain Valley Hospital 58 M Firework exploded UCI 37 M Firework exploded St. Jude Medical Center 38 F Patient hit on top of head while watching fireworks Kaiser Permanente - Irvine 17 M M80 exploded in hand OCFA 17 M Patient holding mortar over head when it exploded OCFA 19 F Firework exploded in hand OCFA 48 M Firework injury to eye OCFA 33 M Struck in leg by firework OCFA 58 M Roman candle backfired in hand OCFA City Council 28 — 72 4/19/2022 16 Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Background and Methodology 4 Fireworks Policy in Orange County 5 Historical Fireworks Injury Trends 6 Types of Fireworks Involved in Injuries 7 Spatial Analysis 8 Fireworks -Related Fire Incidents and Property Loss 9110 Public Display Incidents 11 Confiscated Fireworks 12 National Statistics Comparison 13-15 Appendix A: Injuries by Emergency Care Facility 16, 17 City Council 28 — 74 4/19/2022 Executive Summary As coronavirus cases continue to drop across California, Independence Day celebrations began to transition back to normal in 2021. With Orange County starting to open back up along with the rest of the state, many venues returned and hosted celebration events this year. 10 Orange County cities permitted the sale of safe and sane fireworks in 2021, for a total of 201 stands throughout the County. A total of 28 public fireworks displays provided safe celebration options for the communities within Orange County. In 2021, the injuries associated with fireworks increased to 46 total reported injuries. Last year, Orange County reported 32 injuries that were related to fireworks. In comparison to the Consumer Product Safety Commission's (CPSC) 2020 fireworks injury statistics, Orange County's total fireworks injuries are less than expected for our population. While in 2020, reported Safe and Sane fireworks -related injuries accounted for 6% of total injuries, this year, Safe and Sane injuries accounted for only 4% of reported county -wide injuries. 50% of fireworks -related injuries were due to illegal fireworks while the outstanding 46% of injury origins remain unknown. The majority of reported injuries within Orange County were contusions/lacerations and burns to the head, face, ears, hands and fingers. Firework injuries reported by hospital emergency rooms and urgent care facilities were mapped and compared to areas where the sale of Safe and Sane fireworks has been permitted. Results are a clear indication that hospitals near the cities where Safe and Sane firework sales are permitted, did not necessarily report more injuries than those hospitals that are not near those same cities. Orange County experienced an increase in estimated property loss this year. However, the acreage loss due to fireworks -related fires was significantly lower than it was in previous years. Additionally, the reported amount of both consumer and illegal fireworks that were confiscated by local fire departments during the Independence Day holiday remained very consistent with the numbers from 2020. We would like to take this opportunity to thank all the fire departments and medical providers in Orange County who contributed data to the analysis in this report. City Council 28 — 75 4/19/2022 3 Background and Methodology Each year following the Independence Day holiday, the Orange County Fire Authority gathers data in order to analyze the overall impact of fireworks throughout Orange County. The information included in this report was contributed by hospital emergency rooms and Orange County fire departments to supplement OCFA's own fireworks data. Injury data was solicited from a total of 25 hospital emergency rooms and 118 urgent care facilities throughout Orange County for the study period of June 30th-July 5, 2021. This year, we received responses from 15 hospital emergency rooms and 2 urgent care facilities, for an overall response rate of 11 %. OCFA's own Emergency Medical Services data was also analyzed for injuries related to fireworks. The fireworks injuries contained in this report are only those that were reported to us; it is very likely that many more injuries occurred that were either not treated or not reported. National statistics extracted from the most recent 2020 CPSC Fireworks Report were also used for a comparison study. Fireworks -related fire incident and property loss information was gathered from 11 out of 11 Orange County municipal fire departments, for a response rate of 100%. Narratives from the 51 fireworks -related incidents that OCFA responded to were analyzed for qualitative information regarding the impact of these incidents within Orange County communities. Local online and social media sources were also utilized for information regarding fireworks -related injuries and incidents in 2021. City Council 28 — 76 4/19/2022 4 Fireworks Policy in Orange County In 2021, 10 Orange County cities permitted the sale of safe and sane fireworks for a total of 201 retail consumer fireworks stands throughout the County. city Quantity Anaheim 16 Buena Park 21 Costa Mesa 31 Fullerton 15 Garden Grove 29 Huntington Beach 15 Santa Ana 55 Stanton 2 Villa Park 3 Westminster 14 Total 201 With COVID-19 restrictions slowly easing for the Independence Day holiday, most public display shows returned in full force. The number of reported noise and illegal fireworks complaints handled by law enforcement across Orange County decreased in 2021 as spectators flocked to professional pyrotechnic events. Orange County Sheriff's Deputies responded to 299 fireworks - related calls this year. In comparison to the 558 fireworks -related calls responded to in 2020, this was a drastic decrease in reported fireworks -related calls. In Anaheim, police responded to 331 calls involving reports of illegal fireworks, which was a significant drop from the 549 reports officers handled in 2020. While the return of sanctioned events may have encouraged more people to ditch the DIY firework shows, there were still some neighborhoods that reported serious incidents this year. Fountain Valley Regional Hospital reported a man who had fingers amputated as a result of a firework exploding in his hand. In Garden Grove, an adult male was charged with several felonies related to the detonation of illegal fireworks that resulted in the injuries of 9 people; several of the injured were children. In Anaheim, 2 women were critically injured while watching fireworks from a sidewalk, when a man driving a truck lost control and drove into them. Laguna Beach Fire Department reported 2 arrests, 1 arson fire investigated, and 1 explosive device confiscated this year. Huntington Beach Fire Department had 2 significant civilian injuries that resulted in major hand trauma and critical eye injuries. Orange City Police Department had 375 service calls (down 44% from last year) related to fireworks with the holiday resulting in 5 arrests. City Council 28 — 77 4/19/2022 5 Historical Fireworks Injury Trends In 2021, Orange County hospital emergency rooms and urgent care facilities reported 46 injuries that were directly caused by fireworks. This is an increase in comparison to 2020, when 32 injuries were reported. Over the past 5 years, Orange County averaged close to 34 fireworks -related injuries around the Independence Day holiday (June 30th-July 5th) Age Range 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 0-7 2 9 2 8 8 8-16 5 4 4 4 6 17-21 5 7 2 8 3 Adult 15 18 16 12 29 Unknown 2 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 29 38 24 32 46 As in previous years, the number of reported fireworks -related injuries for adult patients was the highest for 2021. Most years, the adult category seems to yield the highest number of fireworks - related injuries. Reported injuries for patients under the age of 21 (age brackets 0-7, 8-16 and 17- 21) decreased from 20 injuries in 2020 to 17 injuries this year. Orange County Fireworks Injuries by Age: Historical 5 Year Trends 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 S 0 L 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Age 0-7 Age 8-16 Age 17-21 Adult Unknown Total See Appendix A for detailed information about injuries reported by emergency rooms and urgent care facilities. City Council 28 — 78 4/19/2022 6 Types of Fireworks Involved in Injuries OC 2021 Fireworks Injuries by Type zz 9 ■ Unknown 7 4 ■ Illegal . ■ Safe and Sane �� met yet aye ago at �e� Legal Status of Injury Causing Fireworks for 2021 4% 46% ■ Safe and Sane ■ Illegal ■ Unknown SO% This year in Orange County, most of the fireworks -related injuries were caused by illegal or an unknown type of firework. Safe and Sane fireworks accounted for a very small percentage of reported injuries. Reported illegal fireworks accounted for 50% of all fireworks -related injuries while reported Safe and Sane fireworks accounted for a mere 4% of fireworks -related injuries. The remaining 46% of injuries were caused by an unknown type. While there were a significant number of "unknown" type of fireworks, Firecrackers were identified as the type of illegal firework that caused the most reported injuries this year. City Council 28 — 79 4/19/2022 7 Spatial Analysis of Fireworks Injuries This map displays the locations of the Orange County hospitals that provided data regarding reported fireworks -related injuries in 2021. The red stars indicate the cities that allowed the sale of Safe and Sane fireworks. The mustard hospital bag marker indicates hospitals that reported between 1-4 injuries and the purple ambulance marker indicates hospitals that reported 5 or more injuries during the study period of June 30, 2021 through July 5, 2021. There were 4 hospitals that reported 5 or more injuries this year (compared to 2 hospitals in 2020). This information does not conclude that the sale of fireworks caused more fireworks -related injuries. The spatial relationship of fireworks -related injuries that were treated in and around Safe and Sane cities is not necessarily indicative of an on -going trend that injuries are happening near to the Safe and Sane cities. Reported injuries seem to be spread out throughout the county, regardless of firework sales. Yorba Linda 0 g, Buena Park, Fullerton Placentia Coronita Corona �rrii05 91 41 _ � ANAHL�iM HILLS 09 Anaheim Cypress sneyland Park Villa Park 3f7ilto5 Stanton Dranp 4, Park Acras 39 Ah ArE Garden rove *J Nonh Tustin Santiago Westminster N Canyon Silverada Midway City Santa Ana Tustin Limes`rtoe�e LOWER PETERL Canyon 'REACH � CANYON Regional Park Fo�u.rIlItairl ■ , ss Madjeska lf �- Y 56L,TH COAST TUSTIN LkGACY 00 Canyon ME7R4 ! ORANGE 3 ItYJf1e Q EAT PA WhiIing =hE GREAT PAAN Wilderness Trabuco Huntington Costa Mesa Park Canyon 'f � } I Beach .: 1. C1 P.11 � �:[N-ER Lake Forest Rancho Santa 5 Margarita Na Beach San Joaquin La una �(D J Hilts 133 4r'loods col reA 73 MisSiOn Vle b uIE r,:P J Coto deCaaa Crystal Cave State Park GaII Aliso Viejo �'J Q Ladera Ranth Laijuna Beach Rolla) City Council 28 — 80 4/19/2022 8 Fireworks -Related Fire Incidents and Property Loss Historical P operty Loss 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Property Loss $147,121 $115,975 $913,705 $42,100 $114,032 Acreage Lost 4.38 acres 1.19 acres 0.14 acres 26.1 acres 0.27 acres In comparison to 2020, reported fireworks -related property loss increased in Orange County for 2021. However, reported acreage that was lost due to fireworks -related fires, was considerably lower this year. Fireworks were the cause of a dumpster fire in Buena Park that resulted in over $8,000 worth of damages. In Cypress, 2 homes incurred $15,250 worth of damage due to a fire where a trash can was utilized to dispose of recently ignited fireworks. Discarded fireworks in a residential trash can also ignited a home fire in Garden Grove, resulting in over $25,000 worth of damages. Another Garden Grove fire caused about $15,000 in firework -related damages to cypress trees and a parked vehicle. In Stanton, security cameras showed a firework landing and igniting material that was stored in the bed of a truck. This fire resulted in the loss of that truck and damage to a nearby vehicle with an estimated loss around $33,000. About $500 worth of damages were reported in Mission Viejo when a home's solar panel roof caught fire due to suspected fireworks being set off in the nearby area. Costa Mesa had $500 in damages to a clothing recycling bin caused by fireworks. Anaheim reported an estimated $8,300 loss due to miscellaneous dumpster and tree fires. With California's intensely dry conditions, Orange County was very fortunate to avoid having significant vegetation fires this year. There were 4 small vegetation fires in Santa Ana that, combined, resulted in less than an acre lost. In Orange County Fire Authority's jurisdiction, 51 fireworks -related incidents were reported this year. Incident Calls/Type of Fire Roof/Structure Fire 4 Lawn Fire 0 Dum ster or Trash Fire 24 Tree Fire 3 Brush/Acre Fire 7 Vehicle Fire 1 Other 12 City Council 28 — 81 4/19/2022 9 2021 FIREWORKS -RELATED PROPERTY LOSS Note: Red denotes cities that permit the sale of safe and sane fireworks CITY COUNT $ LOSS ACREAGE COMMENTS Aliso Viejo 0 0 0 None Anaheim 7 $8,300 0 6 dumpster/trash, 1 tree Brea 0 0 0 None Buena Park 11 $8032 0 7 dumpster/trash, 3 tree, 1 other Costa Mesa 2 $500 0 Damage to clothing recycling bin Cypress 2 $15,250 0 1 structure, 1 trash Dana Point 1 0 0 1 other Fountain Valley 0 0 0 No incidents in Fountain Valley Fullerton 7 $6,000 0 Various dumpster/trash, brush, other Garden Grove 12 $40,750 0 1 structure, 3 dumpster/trash, 3 brush, 5 other Huntington Beach 6 0 0 No significant loss identified Irvine 2 0 0 1 dumpster/trash, 1 other Ladera Ranch 0 0 0 None La Palma 0 0 0 None Laguna Beach 21 0 0 No significant loss identified Laguna Hills 0 0 0 None Laguna Niguel 0 0 0 None Laguna Woods 0 0 0 None Lake Forest 0 0 0 None Los Alamitos 0 0 0 None Mission Viejo 2 $500 0 2 other Newport Beach 0 0 0 None Orange 0 0 0 No significant loss identified Placentia 0 0 0 None Rancho Santa Margarita 0 0 0 None San Clemente 0 0 0 None San Juan Capistrano 0 0 0 None Santa Ana 14 $1,600 0.27 1 structure, 8 dumpster/trash, 4 brush, 1 other Seal Beach 0 0 0 None Stanton 2 $33,000 0 1 vehicle, 1 dumpster/trash Tustin 0 0 0 None Unincorporated OC 1 0 0 1 other Villa Park 0 0 0 None Westminster 4 $100 0 1 structure, 3 dumpster/trash Yorba Linda 0 0 0 None COUNTY TOTAL 94 $114,032 0.27 Note that incidents reported on this list are only the incidents that were reported with a potential property or acreage loss City Council 28 — 82 4/19/2022 10 Public Display Incidents There were 28 public displays in Orange County this year. OCFA took part in 18 of those public displays. There were no injuries, fires or violations reported. Orange County shows outside of OCFA areas included: 3 in Laguna Beach, 1 in Costa Mesa, 1 in Huntington Beach, 3 in Newport Beach, 1 in Orange and 1 in Anaheim. The following table details the malfunctions and recommendations that occurred at nine Orange County Independence Day firework display shows: City Injuries Health & Fires Malfunctions/Comments Safety Violations Buena Park (Knotts Berry Farm) 7/3 0 0 0 Significant fallout on OCFA Station 61 Buena Park (Knotts Berry Farm) 7/4 0 0 0 Traffic stopping to watch fireworks affected apparatus departing from Station 61 Cypress (Cypress College) 0 0 0 Recommendation to relocate firing area to 25' south of the fallout Irvine (Woodbridge Village) 0 0 0 47 shells returned Laguna Hills (High School) 0 0 0 5 shells misfired, recommendations: (1) larger security presence to deter trespassers into fallout area (2) downsizing or relocating due to fallout adjacent to homes Mission Viejo (Lake MVO) 0 0 0 3 shells unused, 62 shells returned San Clemente (Pier) 0 0 0 4" shell detonated in rack, 14 shells misfired San Juan Capistrano 0 0 0 Burning cake fired out at (San Juan Sports Park) operator standing 6-8 ft away Tustin (High School) 0 0 0 5 shells misfired, 1 dud, and a 3" 25 shot multi device returned City Council 28 — 83 4/19/2022 11 Confiscated Fireworks Each year, Orange County Fire Authority measures the amount of fireworks confiscated over the Independence Day holiday. In 2021, the amount of reported confiscated fireworks to local fire departments and law enforcement agencies was very similar to confiscation numbers in 2020 (4247.8 lbs this year versus 4243 lbs in 2020). There was no shortage of confiscation activity for local authorities. The following tables represents the information provided by various Orange County fire departments. NAM ILLEGAL CONSUMER TOTAL Anaheim Fire & Rescue 72 lbs 1.5 lbs 73.5 lbs Brea Fire Department 50 lbs 0 50 lbs Costa Mesa Fire Department 1706 lbs 0 1706 lbs Fountain Valley Fire Department 0 15 lbs 15 lbs Fullerton Fire Department 500 lbs 100 lbs 600 lbs Huntington Beach Fire Department 901 lbs 0 901 lbs Laguna Beach Fire Department 17.4 lbs 37.4 lbs 54.8 lbs Newport Beach Fire Department 8.5 lbs 4 lbs 12.5 lbs Orange City Fire Department unknown unknown unknown Orange County Fire Authority 200 lbs 600 lbs 800 lbs Placentia Fire Department 35 lbs 0 35 lbs ORANGE COUNTY TOTAL 3489.9 lbs 757.9 lbs 4247.8 lbs *Law enforcement statistics included when provided Confiscated III e al Fireworks 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Consumer 626.7 lbs 27 lbs* 64 lbs** 1771bs *** 3489.9 lbs Dangerous/Illegal 4641.1 lbs 2329 lbs* 5965 lbs ** 4066 lbs *** 757.9 lbs *Newport Beach statistics NOT included **Fountain Valley statistics NOT included ***Placentia statistics NOT included City Council 28 — 84 4/19/2022 12 National Statistics Comparison According to the 2020 CPSC Annual Fireworks Report, 66% of fireworks -related injuries occurred in the month around the Independence Day holiday. While there was a total of 15,600 fireworks - related injuries during the entire 2020 calendar year, fireworks were involved in an estimated 10,300 injuries treated in US hospital emergency departments during the single month special study period between June 21, 2020 and July 21, 2020. Compared to the 7,300 injuries treated during the special study period in 2019, there were 3,000 more injuries treated during the same period in 2020. Orange County's number of reported firework -related injuries was 46 in 2021 which is an increase from the 32 injuries reported in 2020. The same 10 cities allowed for the sale of Safe and Sane fireworks in 2021 as they did in 2020. In comparison to the national average of injuries reported, Orange County seems to be significantly lower in average injuries. This difference could be attributed to the fact that the sale of Safe and Sane fireworks is limited to only 10 Orange County cities. Another contributing factor is that not all injuries may have been reported to hospitals and not all hospitals may have provided us with their reported injuries. A special consideration for 2021 is that with the continuation of the COVID-19 pandemic, many people may have intentionally avoided going to hospitals and/or urgent cares for fear that they may risk exposure to the virus. 2020 CPSC Gender Breakdown 1% OC 2021 Gender Breakdown ■ Male ■ Female ■ Male ■ Female 67% Nationally, 71% of fireworks injuries were experienced by males and 29% of fireworks injuries were experienced by females. This year in Orange County, the gender breakdown was very closely aligned with the national average, with 67% of fireworks injuries experienced by males and 33% of fireworks injuries experienced by females. City Council 28 — 85 4/19/2022 13 CPSC 2020 TYPE OF INJURIES ■ Burns ■ Contusions/Lacerations ■ Other ■ Fractures/Sprains Fractures/Sprains, 8% Other, 28% Burns, 44% Contusions/Lacerations, 20% OC 2021 Type of Injuries ■ Burns ■ Contusions/Lacerations ■ Other Other 11% Contusions/Laceratic 48% Burns 41% The percentages for the type of injuries reported within Orange County this year deviates slightly from the national averages. This year, contusions/lacerations made up the majority of fireworks - related injuries in Orange County, at 48% this year. This percentage is significantly higher than the national rate of 20% for contusions/lacerations. Orange County's reported burns in 2021 are on par with the national average, sitting at 41 % versus the national average of 44%. Orange County experienced no reported fractures and sprains this year. City Council 28 — 86 4/19/2022 14 CPSC 2020 BODY REGIONS INJURED ■ Hand/Finger ■ Head/Face/Ear ■ Leg ■ Eye ■ Trunk/Other Arm Arm, 12% Trunk/Other, 7 Eye, 15% and/Finger, 30% .,..ce/Ear, 22% OC 2021 Body Regions Injured ■ Hand/Finger ■ Head/Face/Ear ■ Leg ■ Eye ■ Trunk/Other Arm Arm Trunk/Other 7% Eye 20% Li 9' d/Finger 30% Head/Face/Ear 30% In Orange County this year, head/face/ear injuries and hand/finger injuries were the highest. Both injury percentages came in at 30%. This percentage aligns with the national hand/finger injury average of 30% but deviates slightly from the 22% head/face/ear injury percentage. Eye injuries in Orange County also came in a tad higher than the national injury percentages. Leg, trunk/other and arm categories came in at lower percentages this year. City Council 28 — 87 4/19/2022 15 Appendix A 2021 INJURIES BY EMERGENCY CARE FACILITY AGE GENDER DESCRIPTION OF INJURY CARE FACILITY 6 M Base of firework hit head CHOC 8 F Unspecified firework injury CHOC 6 M Firework backfired to face CHOC 3 F Firework backfired and hit face CHOC 47 F Sparks flew across and hit face Mission Hospital 5 F Sparkler flash got into eye Kaiser Anaheim ED 10 M Firework hit face Kaiser Anaheim ED 48 F Firework was thrown on patient Kaiser Anaheim ED 67 F Patient lit firework in hand OC Global Medical Center 37 M Patient lit multiple at once and one exploded OC Global Medical Center 8 M Hit in the face with projectile firework OC Global Medical Center 35 M Box of fireworks thrown in the street OC Global Medical Center 7 F Box of fireworks thrown in the street OC Global Medical Center 2 M Box of fireworks thrown in the street OC Global Medical Center 20 M Firecracker exploded next to face OC Global Medical Center 23 M Firecracker fuse went off in hand OC Global Medical Center 30 M Firework landed in yard and exploded Kaiser Irvine ED 11 F Singed hair while pulling back firework to throw Kaiser Irvine ED 23 M Firework exploded in face Kaiser Irvine ED 28 M Sparklers burned too quickly in hand Kaiser Irvine ED 25 F Lit firework exploded Kaiser Irvine ED 14 M Held firework with no fuse HOAG Newport Beach 11 F Sparkler in hand HOAG Newport Beach 26 F Firework flew from across the street HOAG Newport Beach 24 F Firework flew from across the street HOAG Newport Beach 29 M Firework blew up in hand Fountain Valley Hospital 4 M Firework blasted onto face while watching fireworks Fountain Valley Hospital 41 M Firecracker exploded while lighting it Fountain Valley Hospital 29 M Firework exploded while lighting it resulting in amputation of fingers Fountain Valley Hospital 36 M Unspecified firework injury Fountain Valley Hospital 29 M Burn to the hand by touching "firework dust" UCI 27 M Picked up mortar and it exploded UCI 19 F Firework to eye as fireworks were being set up in the street UCI 22 M Firework exploded in hand UCI 40 M Hit by fireworks that went off 6 feet away UCI 30 M Firework exploded in face UCI 31 M Firework exploded in face UCI 6 M Struck by firework while walking through the neighborhood UCI City Council 28 — 88 4/19/2022 16 40 M Unspecified firework injury UCI 20 F Firework sparks flew into eye St. Joseph Hospital 49 M Explosive fireworks from neighbor St. Joseph Hospital 51 M Firework got into shoe Memorial Care FV Urgent Care 35 F Projectile launch of firework hit patient Memorial Care FV Urgent Care 49 M Firework sparks flew into eye Memorial Care FV Urgent Care 54 M Unspecified firework injury Hospital name not disclosed 41 M Firework that was ignited on both ends exploded in hand Hospital name not disclosed City Council 28 — 89 4/19/2022 17 ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA REPEALING AND REENACTING IN ITS ENTIRETY ARTICLE II OF CHAPTER 14 OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE CONCERNING FIREWORKS REGULATIONS AND CREATING CERTAIN PROHIBITIONS AGAINST POSSESSION OR USE OF FIREWORKS \� WHEREAS, during the past several years, the City of Santa Ana has experienced a significant increase in the use of Fireworks leading to an increased strain on dmergency services and the overall quality of life of its residents; and G' WHEREAS, during the 24-hour period of July 4, 2021, the City's Police dispatch center staff received 1,577 calls, which included 9-1-1 calls VIA, calls to the non - emergency line, and resulted in 419 Fireworks -related calls -for -slice. By comparison, on an average day, the City's Police dispatch center handles approximately 933 calls, both 9-1-1 and non -emergency calls, resulting in roughly 3�2 calls -for -service. This was a 69% increase over average daily calls and a 19% incre4s over average daily calls -for - service. During the peak time of 8:30 p.m. to 9:15 p.m,�on July 4, 2021, the City's Police dispatch center received 191 calls, both 9-1-1 andAi li_emergency calls, which was an average of 4.2 calls per minute; and S. . L^ WHEREAS, the use of illegal Fireworks begins well before July 4th and continues well after New Year's celebrations and as increasingly occurred in times of the year outside of the periods immediately ping and following these major holidays; and 1 WHEREAS, a 2021 study by scientists at UC Irvine found that Independence Day Fireworks spark plumes of pollutants that can pose significant health risks; and WHEREAS, the same 2021 study found that peak Fireworks pollution was two times higher in communities with lower socioeconomic status, larger underrepresented group populations and" higher asthma rates; and WHEREAS, the use of illegal Fireworks constitutes a substantial fire safety risk as well as causes a disproportionate adverse impact on military veterans, pets, and other vulnerable populations; and 4N ?VHEREAS, the use of "safe and sane Fireworks" significantly contributes to fire, h� and safety risk; and WHEREAS, the City now seeks to take robust action to protect its residents, their pets, and their property from the use of all Fireworks by generally prohibiting them; and WHEREAS, it is therefore necessary to repeal the City's existing regulations governing Fireworks, appearing as Article II of Chapter 14 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, and enact new regulations. Ordinance No. NS-XXX City Council 28 — 90 4/19/fM1 of NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The recitals above are each incorporated by reference and adopted as findings by the City Council. Section 2. Article II (Fireworks Regulations) of Chapter 14 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (Fire Protection and Prevention and Emergency Services) is her y repealed in its entirety. O ��-Section 3. Article II (Fireworks Regulations) of Chapter 14 of the ta Ana Municipal Code (Fire Protection and Prevention and Emergency Services) is hereby reenacted in its entirety to read as follows: O ARTICLE II. — FIREWORKS REGULATIONS Sec. 14-51. - Definitions. 11�z� (a) "Fireworks" means the same as California Frith and Safety Code section 12511, which defines that term as "any device con�hining chemical elements and chemical compounds capable of burning independ of the oxygen of the atmosphere and producing audible, visual, mechanical, or rmal effects which are useful as pyrotechnic devices or for entertainment" anGj o include without limitation "devices designated by the manufacturer as Fireworks` torpedoes, skyrockets, roman candles, rockets, Daygo bombs, sparklers, party poppers, paper caps, chasers, fountains, smoke sparks, aerial bombs, and firework IiitC5For purposes of this article, "Fireworks" also includes both "dangerous Firework " and "safe and sane" Fireworks as defined in the California Health and Safety Code. (b) "Host" include is not limited to: (1) Thlterson(s) who owns, rents, leases, or otherwise has possession or use of the proper Or (2)AS0 The person(s) in immediate control of the property; or N, (3) The person(s) who organizes, supervises, sponsors, conducts, allows, attends, controls, or controls access to the Fireworks on the property. ^� (4) A government entity, including, but not limited to, a municipal co oration, school district, and/or political subdivision, is not a Host. (c) "Response Costs" means costs associated with law enforcement, fire, medical, or other emergency personnel responding to, remaining at, and leaving the scene of a gathering, including but not limited to: Ordinance No. NS-XXX City Council 28 — 91 4/19/fnC 2 of 7 (1) Salaries and benefits of law enforcement, fire, medical, or other emergency personnel; (2) Administrative costs; (3) The cost of any medical treatment of injuries to any law enforcement, fire, medical or other emergency personnel; (4) The cost of using any City equipment; '� �(5) The cost of repairing any damaged city equipment or pFQ y; and (6) Any other costs related to enforcement of this artic Sec. 14-52. - General prohibition against sale, use, storoie, or possession of Fireworks.1T It shall be unlawful for any person to possess, store, offer for sale, expose for sale, sell at retail, or use or explode any Fireworks, provided tkgA the City shall have the power to conduct or contract for supervised public displays, f Fireworks by the City at times designated by the City, subject to all applicable?egulations, permits, and protocols governing the same. C) Sec. 14-53. - Host's liability. 'Q (a) No Host shall allow any person to violate a provision of this article on the Host's private property. (1) Whenever a Host is present at the private property while another person violates a provision of this article, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the Host knew or should have known of the violation. (2) The provisions of this section shall not apply to a Host who initiates contact with law enforcement or fire officials to assist in removing any person from the property or terminating the activity in order to comply with this article, if the request for assistance is made before any other person contacts law enforcement or fire officials to complain about the violation of this article. (b) No Host shall aid or abet another person's violation of a provision of this article in a public right-of-way adjacent to the Host's private property. A Host aids and abets another person's violation of a provision of this article if he or she knows of the other person's unlawful purpose and the Host specifically intends to, and does in fact, aid, facilitate, promote, encourage, or instigate the other person's commission of that violation. Sec. 14-54. - Seizure of Fireworks. Ordinance No. NS-XXX City Council 28 — 92 4/19/f0Y of The Police Chief, Fire Chief, or his or her designee, may seize, take, remove, or cause to removed, at the expense of the owner, all Fireworks possessed or displayed in violation of this article. Sec. 14-55. - Violation and penalties. (a) Violation of this article shall constitute grounds for issuance of an administrative citation, designated as an infraction, and assessment of a fine. The City's procedures on imposition of administrative fines, as described in Chapter 1 of thide, are hereby incorporated in their entirety, as modified from time to time, ands all govern the imposition, enforcement, collection, appeal, and review of administra ivL citations issued under this section. Other remedies allowed by law may be used, including civil action or prosecution as misdemeanor. 0- (b) In accordance with the City's administrative fine schE.) le for violations of Article II of Chapter 14, as set forth in Resolution No. 2016-03r each violation, the amount of the penalty shall be One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00). y (c) In the event the Fireworks are confiscat",&Hd must be disposed of by the Police Chief, Fire Chief, or their designees, there shall 'be an additional charge of Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($250.00) assessed for dispaskal fee. (d) Each day of recurrence of an ation shall constitute a separate offense and may be treated as such pursuant to thi ection. (e) Any person who violatV ection 14-52 and any Host who violates section 14-53 shall be liable for the Response Costs relating to the violation. (1) All Hoso violate section 14-53 in the same incident are jointly and severally liabl�b' 1- the Response Costs relating to the violation. IN (2) person who violated this article is a minor, the responsible parent(s) aoor guardian(s) of the minor and the minor themselves shall be jointly and sex ly liable for the response costs incurred pursuant to this article. A��(3) The amount of Response Costs constitutes a debt owed to the City. 0 (4) Notice of the Response Costs shall be served by first-class mail on the person(s) and/or Host(s) liable for such costs. The notice shall contain the following information: Response Costs; (A) The name of the person(s) and/or Host(s) that is liable for the (B) The address of the property where the incident occurred; Ordinance No. NS-XXX City Council 28 — 93 4119/SOY of (C) The date and time of the response; (D) The law enforcement, fire, or other emergency response personnel who responded; and (E) An itemized list of the Response Costs. (5) Payment for Response Costs shall be remitted to the City wit arty (30) calendar days of the date of the notice. The payment of any such costs hall be stayed upon the filing of a timely appeal. (6) A person or Host charged with Response Costs nay appeal the Response Costs in the manner described in Chapter 1 of this Code. (f) Violations of this article are hereby declared to e?a public nuisance. (g) All remedies prescribed under this articled cumulative and the election of one or more remedies does not preclude the City fr 1ie pursuit of any other remedy to enforce this article. Sec. 14-56. - Application of state la~ Nothing in this article shall liMi�ny of the penalties provided in the California Health and Safety Code or the California Penal Code with regard to the offer for sale, exposing for sale, sale at retail, use or discharge of any Fireworks. Secs. 14-57-14-89. �erved. 9Z Section 4. Tt ity Council finds and determines that this Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15061(b)(3) and ,15308 of the State CEQA Guidelines because it can be seen with certainty that tWireworks regulations, as provided for in this Ordinance, will not have a significant effect on the environment and that the regulations represent actions by a regulatory gency for the protection of the environment. 41ction 5. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordiOnce is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any coati of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Ordinance No. NS-XXX City Council 28 — 94 4/19/fOY of Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its adoption. Section 7. The Clerk of the Council shall certify the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. ADOPTED this day of , 2022. Vicente Sarmiento Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney IN Brandon Salvatierra Deputy City Attorney AYES: OA�N 0 .01 A~ IS, Councilmemb-1 NOES: CouncilmerI ABSTAIN: Cou�c(�iembers NOT PRESENT: S. Incilmembers O, �O CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, Daisy Gomez, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Ordinance No. NS- to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on , and that said ordinance was published in accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana. Ordinance No. NS-XXX City Council 28 — 95 4/19/fM' of Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Ordinance No. NS-XXX City Council 28 — 96 4/19/fMY 0 7 RESOLUTION NO. 2022-XXX RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA GIVING NOTICE OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA ON NOVEMBER 8, 2022 FOR THE SUBMISSION OF A BALLOT MEASURE TO THE QUALIFIED VOTERS OF A PROPOSED ORDINANCE BANNING THE SALE OF FIREWORKS IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AND PROVIDING FOR THE FILING OF ARGUMENT AND REBUTTAL STATEMENTS BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. By Resolution No. 2022-, the City Council has declared that a General Municipal Election shall be held on November 8, 2022 for the election of municipal officers. Section 2. The California Elections Code directs the City Council approve the form of the ballot question to be submitted to the voters and the City of Santa Ana desires, on its own motion, to submit to the voters a question of whether the City should place on the ballot a measure for a proposed Ordinance regarding a ban on the sale of fireworks within the City of Santa Ana, to be submitted to the voters at the General Election to be held on Tuesday, November 8, 2022. Section 3. The ballot question for the proposed Ordinance shall be as follows, with identification as determined in accordance with the California Elections Code: MEASURE # Yes Shall Chapter 14 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code be amended to ban the sale and use of fireworks within the City of Santa Ana? No Section 3. Should said measure be approved by the requisite vote, the Ordinance repealing and reenacting Article II of Chapter 14 attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference shall be enacted. Section 4. That the text of the Ordinance to be submitted to the voters is attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference ("Ordinance"). City Council 28 — 97 4/19/2022 Section 5. That pursuant to Elections Code Section 9280, the City Council hereby directs the Clerk of Council to transmit a copy of the Ordinance to the City Attorney to prepare an impartial analysis of the Ordinance which shall not exceed 500 words in length. Section 6. That pursuant to Elections Code Section 9282, the City Council, or a member or members of the City Council authorized by the City Council, or an individual voter who is eligible to vote on the measure, or bona fide association of citizens or combination of voters and associations, may file a written argument for or against any the Ordinance in accordance with Article 4, Chapter 3, Division 9 of the Elections Code. An argument shall not exceed 300 words in length. Section 7. That pursuant to Elections Code Section 9287, if more than one argument for or more than one argument against the Ordinance is submitted to the Clerk of Council within the time prescribed by law, he or she shall select one of the arguments in favor and one of the arguments against the Ordinance for printing and distribution to the voters, giving preference in such selection in the following order: 1. The City Council, or a member or members of the City Council authorized by the City Council. 2. Bona fide association of citizens. 3. Individual voters who are eligible to vote on the measure. Section 8. That pursuant to Elections Code Sections 9220 and 9285, when the Clerk of Council has selected the arguments for and against the Ordinance which will be printed and distributed to the voters, the Clerk of Council shall send copies of the argument in favor of the Ordinance to the author or authors of the argument against, and copies of the argument against the Ordinance to the author or authors of the argument in favor. The author or authors may submit a rebuttal argument to the direct argument not exceeding 250 words. Rebuttal arguments shall be printed in the same manner as the direct arguments and shall immediately follow the direct argument, which it seeks to rebut. All previous resolutions providing for the filing of rebuttal arguments for City measures are repealed, and this Section shall only apply to the election on the Ordinance to be held on November 8, 2022. Section 9. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity of any other provision or applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Resolution and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or provision thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more City Council 28 — 98 4/19/2022 sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases or provisions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 10. Pursuant to California Elections Code section 9295, this Resolution and the attached Ordinance will be available for public examination for no fewer than ten (10) calendar days prior to being submitted for printing in the sample ballot. The examination period will end on the day that is seventy-five (75) days prior to the date set for the election. Section 11. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by a majority of the City Council. Section 12. The Clerk of Council of the City of Santa Ana is hereby directed to certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the Board of Supervisors of Orange County and the Registrar of Voters of Orange County at least eighty-eight (88) days before the date of the election. ADOPTED this day of , 2022: Vicente Sarmiento Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho City Attorney IS Laura A. Rossini Chief Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY City Council 28 — 99 4/19/2022 I, DAISY GOMEZ, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2022 -XXX to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on )2022. Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana City Council 28 — 100 4/19/2022 Community Development Agency santa-ana.org/cd Item # 29 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report April 19, 2022 TOPIC: Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan and Budgets for CDBG, HOME and ESG Programs AGENDA TITLE: Public Hearing — Approve the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan and budgets for the Community Development Block Grant, HOME Investment Partnerships Grant, and Emergency Solutions Grant, and authorize submission to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Hold a public hearing to receive resident and stakeholder comments on funding priorities and needs for activities funded with the Community Development Block Grant, HOME Investment Partnerships Grant, and Emergency Solutions Grant programs for the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Annual Action Plan. 2. Approve the Fiscal Year 2022 - 2023 Annual Action Plan and authorize the submission of the Fiscal Year 2022 - 2023 Annual Action Plan to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. 3. Approve the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 budgets for the Community Development Block Grant Program in the total amount of $8,294,360 that includes $5,640,635 from Grant Year 2022 allocation and a re -allocation of $2,653,725 in prior year program funds and program income; HOME Investment Partnerships grant in the amount of $1,706,231 from the Grant Year 2022 allocation and a re -allocation of $9,428,513 in prior year program funds; and Emergency Solutions Grant in the amount of $489,141 from the Grant Year 2022 allocation. All proposed activities' budgets will be proportionally increased or decreased from the estimated funding levels to match actual allocation amounts. 4. Direct the City Attorney to finalize and authorize the City Manager to execute memorandums of understanding with various city departments and agreements with non-profit public service providers awarded funds as part of the approved Community Development Block Grant program budget for a two-year term beginning July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2024, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, and direct the Risk Manager or designee to determine the necessary insurance requirements applicable for each project. City Council 29 — 1 4/19/2022 FY 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan and Budgets for CDBG, HOME and ESG Programs April 19, 2022 Page 2 5. Direct the City Attorney to finalize and authorize the City Manager to execute a memorandum of understanding with the Santa Ana Police Department and agreements with non-profit homeless service providers awarded funds as part of the approved Emergency Solutions Grant program budget for a term beginning July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023, subject to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, and direct the Risk Manager or designee to determine the necessary insurance requirements applicable for each project. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION At its Regular Meeting on March 23, 2022, the Community Development Commission (CDC) held a public hearing to receive resident and stakeholder comments on funding priorities and needs for activities funded with the Community Development Block Grant, HOME Investment Partnerships grant, and Emergency Solutions Grant programs in the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Annual Action Plan. No comments were received during the meeting. The Community Development Commission recommended approval of the Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan and Budgets for CDBG, HOME and ESG Programs to the City Council by a vote of 6:0. DISCUSSION Every five years, the City of Santa Ana (City) must submit its Five -Year Consolidated Plan to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in order to receive funding for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), the HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME), and the Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) programs. These federal funds provide for the development of affordable housing, street improvements, park and public facilities improvements, economic development, code enforcement, public services, the expansion and retention of businesses, and the delivery of services for individuals experiencing homelessness. In general, the Five -Year Consolidated Plan describes how the City will invest and allocate these limited federal funds for and on behalf of the community. In May of 2020, the Five -Year Consolidated Plan for the period of July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2025 was submitted to HUD. As part of this five-year strategic planning process, the City is required to submit an Annual Action Plan each year that describes how the City will achieve the goals stated in the Five -Year Consolidated Plan. This document establishes a one-year investment plan that outlines the intended use of resources in the forthcoming fiscal year. The proposed Annual Action Plan covers Fiscal Year (FY) 2022-2023 and seeks to allocate funding where programs and resources will have the maximum positive impact (Exhibit1).The Annual Action Plan describes the intended use of the City's federal entitlement grants specifically for FY 2022-2023. For FY 2022-2023, the City anticipates to receive $5,640,635 in CDBG program funds, $1,706,231 in HOME program funds, and $489,141 in ESG program funds from HUD: City Council 29 — 2 4/19/2022 FY 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan and Budgets for CDBG, HOME and ESG Programs April 19, 2022 Page 3 Program Allocation CDBG $5,640,635 HOME $1,706,231 ESG $ 489,141 TOTAL $7,836,007 In addition, the City will re -program a total of $2,653,725 in prior -year CDBG program resources that includes program income in the amount of $103,041 and $2,550,684 of prior year resources. The various projects and programs covered under the FY 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan are designed to serve low-income residents. The FY 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan includes the program budgets described in detail below for the CDBG, HOME, and ESG programs respectively. Community Development Block Grant Program Budget The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program provides funds to improve low to moderate -income neighborhoods eliminate blight and create a more stable economic base. These funds may be used for a diverse range of programs, including affordable housing, street improvements, park and public facilities improvements, economic development, code enforcement, and public services. The City's expected CDBG allocation for Grant Year (GY) 2022, FY 2022-2023, is $5,640,635. The proposed FY 2022-2023 CDBG Program and Funding Plan consists of the Community Development Commission funding recommendations for nonprofit public service programs and staff's funding recommendations for administration and planning, code enforcement, City capital improvements, and housing. The CDBG Program and Funding Plan can be summarized in two general categories: 1) CDBG Program Funding Plan/Capital Projects; and 2) Public Services. A summary of the process and allocation for the FY 2022-2023 CDBG Program is provided below for both general categories. CDBG Program Funding Plan/Capital Projects The FY 2022-2023 CDBG Program Funding Plan includes the funding allocations for administration and planning, code enforcement in low- to moderate -income areas of the city to address health and safety violations, economic development to provide small business grants, nonprofit public services, City capital improvement projects, single- family rehabilitation grants and down payment assistance loans (Exhibit 2). The CDBG allowable cap of 20 percent for administration and fair housing services is estimated to be $1,128,127 for FY 2022-2023. Administration is necessary for staffing, compliance, reporting, fiscal management, and monitoring of the entire program. Fair housing is necessary due to CDBG requirements that the City affirmatively further fair housing. The following capital improvement projects are recommended for funding in the plan: 1) $408,041 Police Athletic & Activities League ADA restrooms (design only) 2) $1,896,959 for residential street improvement in the Heninger Park neighborhood 3) $800,000 for Phase III of the Santa Anita Park Improvements project City Council 29 — 3 4/19/2022 FY 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan and Budgets for CDBG, HOME and ESG Programs April 19, 2022 Page 4 4) $407,233 for sidewalk improvements in CDBG eligible areas 5) $531,250 for Newhope Library roof and windows replacement 6) $506,250 for active transportation safety improvements to enhance the safety of the local community with the installation of pedestrian hybrid rapid flashing beacons 7) $ 131,500 for neighborhood improvement ivy installation The proposed programs and capital improvement projects have been determined to be of highest priority and need by the Executive Directors of the Parks, Recreation and Community Services Agency, Public Works Agency, and the Community Development Agency, following the City's internal application process. 2022 CDBG Program Budget General Activity Funding Amount CDBG Program Administration & Fair Housing $ 1,128,127 Economic Development $100,000 Public Facility improvements, Streets & Parks $ 4,681,233 Housing Rehabilitation — Single -Family Rehabilitation and Down Payment Assistance $ 740,000 Code Enforcement - Enforcement of Housing & Municipal Building Codes $ 800,000 Non -Profit Public Services $ 845,000 TOTALI $ 8,294,360 City Department 2022-2023 Award Community Development Agency - Administration of the CDBG Program. Proposed funding amount calculated based on 20 % $1,068,127 administrative cap less Fair Housing amount. Orange County Fair Housing Council Inc. - Provides fair housing education, landlord tenant counseling and enforcement services to combat housing discrimination and city administrative support for the $60,000 residents of the City of Santa Ana. A commitment to affirmatively further fair housing is a requirement of CDBG funding and the City's Housing Element. Economic Development - Micro Enterprise Grants $100,000 Code Enforcement - Community Preservation Services $800,000 Parks, Recreation, Community Services Agency - Santa Anita $800,000 Park Phase III (Ward 1) Public Works Agency — PAAL Center ADA restrooms (design only); Residential street improvement in the Heninger Park neighborhood; $3,881,233 Phase III of the Santa Anita Park Improvements; sidewalk improvements in CDBG eligible areas; Newhope Library roof and City Council 29 — 4 4/19/2022 FY 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan and Budgets for CDBG, HOME and ESG Programs April 19, 2022 Page 5 windows replacement; active transportation safety improvements to enhance the safety of the local community with the installation of pedestrian hybrid rapid flashing beacons, neighborhood improvement ivy installation Housing — $25,000 rehabilitation grants for single-family homes; $740,000 down payment assistance (citywide) TOTAL $7,522,401 Public Services A maximum of 15 percent of CDBG funding for FY 2022-2023 ($845,000) and 15 percent for FY 2023-2024 ($845,000) may be used for public services. For FY 2022-2023 and FY 2023-2024, the City is providing the entire estimated public service allocation to nonprofit organizations for programs with an emphasis on crime prevention, intervention, and/or suppression for children, youth, and families, economic development, tenant services assistance and programs, health services, and senior services (Exhibit 3). Following approval by the City Council on November 2, 2021, the City solicited applications from nonprofit organizations from November 3, 2021 to December 20, 2021. Marketing of the CDBG application process and nonprofit outreach efforts included a press release, use of social media via the City's Facebook and Instagram pages, a -mails to an internal non-profit e-mail distribution list, an e-mail to non -profits on the City's business license list, an e-mail to nonprofits on the 2-1-1 Orange County contact list, and a dedicated CDBG webpage at www.santa-ana.org/cdbg with information on the non- profit CDBG application process. A total of 33 applications were received from 31 non-profit organizations (two non-profit submitted two applications). The applications were submitted to the Community Development Commission (CDC) Ad Hoc Committee for review and rating based on the following criteria: COMMUNITY NEEDS 1. Did organization identify nature of ■ Applicant identifies the nature of the program and the program and demonstrated demonstrated need for targeted group. = 10 Pts. community need for target . Applicant doesn't identify the nature of the program and population group (i.e. youth, did not demonstrated need for targeted group. = 5 Pts. seniors, disabled) Q.8, 12, 14, 15 . Applicant only identifies State or National data = 0 10 Points Pts. 2. Did applicant meet a specific City ■ Applicant met a specific City strategic plan goal and strategic plan goal and strategy strategy and was correlation to proposed program was and stated correlation to clea. r= 10 Pts. proposed program? Q. 10 ■ Applicant met a specific city strategic plan goal and 10 Points strategy but did not clearly state the correlation to proposed program. = 5 Pts. ■ Applicant did not meet any plan goal or strategy. = 0 Pts. City Council 29 — 5 4/19/2022 FY 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan and Budgets for CDBG, HOME and ESG Programs April 19, 2022 Page 6 CAPACITY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC SERVICES 3. Did the organization provide a 0 Organization provided summary and staff listing of all summary and listing of the admin and program to fully execute proposed program = admin and program 20 Pts. staff? Q. 20 and Staff Listing E Organization did not provide both summary and staff 20 Points listing of all admin and program staff. =10 Pts. ■ Organization provided summary and staff listing of all admin and program staff but does not have the capacity to fully execute proposed program. = 5 Pts. ■ Organization did not provide summary and staff listing of all Admin and program. = 0 Pts. EXPERIENCE 4. Years of experience providing 0 5 or more years of experience providing proposed the proposed program? Q. 9 program. =10 Pts. 10 Points ■ 2-4 years of experience providing proposed program. = 5 Pts. ■ 1 year of experience providing proposed program = 3 Pts. ■ 0 years of experience providing proposed program. = 0 Pts. 5. Does the applicant have ■ Applicant has experience administering CDBG and experience administering Federal Grant programs. = 10 Pts. CDBG and/or any other ■ Applicant only has experience administering CDBG Federal Grants? Q.19 programs = 5Pts. 10 Points ■ Applicant has no experience administering CDBG and/or Federal Grant programs = 0 Pts. 6. Did organization meet prior ■ Applicant met 90% annual goals and expended all grant year's performance and funds 3 of 3 years. =10 Pts. expenditure goals. (Staff ■ Applicant met 90% annual goals and/or expended all Spread Sheet) grant funds for 2 of 3 years. = 5Pts. 10 Points ■ Applicant met 90% annual goals and/or expended all grant funds for 1 of 3 years. = 3 Pts. ■ Applicant did not meet annual goal and/or expended all grant funds for 3 years. = 0 Pts. EFFECTIVE & EFFICIENT USE OF FUNDS 7. Are the majority of ■ 100% to 80% of program participants are City residents. unduplicated participants from = 10 Pts. Santa Ana? Q.1 ■ 79.9% to 60% of program participants are City residents. (Q1a/Q1=_%) = 5 Pts. 10 Points ■ 59.9% to 30% of program participants are City residents. = 0 Pts. 8. Did the organization describe the ■ Measurable performance outcomes with qualitative and measurable performance quantitative tracking. = 10 Pts. outcomes and how outcomes 0 Measurable performance outcomes but no qualitative and will be qualitatively and quantitative tracking. = 5 Pts. quantitatively tracked? Q.17, 18 0 No measurable performance outcomes and qualitative 10 Points and quantitative tracking. = 0 Pts. City Council 29 — 6 4/19/2022 FY 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan and Budgets for CDBG, HOME and ESG Programs April 19, 2022 Page 7 9. Does the organization have 0 Organization partners and/or collaborates with 3 or more active partnerships and/or community organizations. = 10 Pts. collaborations in order to 0 Organization partners and/or collaborates with 2 effectively and efficiently carry out proposed program? 0.16 community organizations. = 5 Pts. 10 Points 0Organization partners and/or collaborates with 1 community organization. = 1 Pts. ■ Organization partners and/or collaborates with 0 community organization. = 0 Pts. Representatives from each organization were invited to present their proposed public service programs for funding consideration at two Community Development Commission public hearings held on January 25 and 27, 2022 from 3 to 7:00 p.m. on both days. The CDC Ad Hoc Committee finalized the application review and recommendations on February 9, 2022, and the funding recommendations are summarized in Exhibit 3. The recommended funding amounts for the nonprofit organizations are for a two-year contract period for a total allocation of $1,690,000 from July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2024, with the exclusion of the Orange County Fair Housing Council Inc., which is funded out of program administration, as in previous years, and is not subject to the 15-percent public service cap. A brief summary of all 33 applications are shown in Exhibit 3. Once the City receives the actual CDBG allocations for FY 2022-2023 and FY 2023-2024 from HUD, the approved CDBG public service allocation will be increased or decreased in proportion to the actual grant allocation. Should the increase in funding be enough to fund additional nonprofits at the minimum funding level, funds will be allocated to the next highest scoring organization(s). Any remainder will be distributed to already high - performing organizations in proportion to their actual grant allocation. Public Service Organizations 2022-2024 Award AIDS Services Foundation of OC dba Radiant Health Centers — HIV $60,000 Care Services America on Track — Brighter Futures for Children of Prisoners $60,000 Boys & Girls Club of Santa Ana — College Bound $60,000 Casa de la Familia — Santa Ana Family Justice Center $60,000 Community Action Partnerships of OC — Economic Empowerment - $60,000 Your Money Your Goals Community Health Initiative Orange County — Provides outreach, education, enrollment, and case management services to vulnerable $60,000 populations Community Legal Aid SoCal — Provides free, holistic legal assistance $60,000 to survivors of domestic violence Delhi Center/Public Law Center — Family Economic Success Initiative $80,000 Program City Council 29 — 7 4/19/2022 FY 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan and Budgets for CDBG, HOME and ESG Programs April 19, 2022 Page 8 Delhi Center — Teens Engaged in Learning and Leadership Program $80,000 Fristers — Wraparound Programming for Adolescent Parents and Children $60,000 Girl's Inc. of Orange County — Literacy Lab $60,000 Human Options — Assisting Domestic Violence Victims $60,000 Hurtt Family Clinic — Santa Ana Mental Health Program $60,000 Lutheran Social Services of So. Cal. — Victims Intervention Program $60,000 MOMs of OC — Healthy Beginnings and Brighter Futures for Expecting Mothers $80,000 Nati's House (dba Neutral Ground) — Gang Prevention $100,000 Nati's House (dba Neutral Ground) — Summer Night Lights $60,000 OC Human Relations Council — Community - Based Alternative Dispute Resolution $60,000 OC Children's Therapeutic Arts Center — WILLARD Neighborhood Crime Prevention and Intervention $70,000 Public Law Center — Affordable Housing & Homelessness Prevention $80,000 StandUp for Kids — On Campus Mentoring for Homeless Youth $60,000 Taller San Jose Hope Builders — Business Applications $80,000 The Cambodian Family — Plan Ahead Youth Program $100,000 WISEPlace — Steps to Independence $60,000 Working Wardrobes — Jobs for Santa Ana Seniors $60,000 TOTAL $1,690,000 HOME Investment Partnerships Grant Program Budget The HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) program provides funds for a wide range of housing -related activities including building, buying, and/or rehabilitating affordable housing for rent or homeownership, or providing direct tenant -based rental assistance to low-income residents. The program's flexibility allows HOME funds to be used for grants, direct loans, loan guarantees or other forms of credit enhancements, or tenant -based rental assistance or security deposits. At least 15 percent of HOME funds must be set aside for specific activities to be undertaken by a special type of nonprofit called a Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO). A CHDO is a private nonprofit, community -based organization that has staff with the capacity to develop affordable housing for the community it serves. In order to qualify for designation as a CHDO, the organization must meet certain City Council 29 — 8 4/19/2022 FY 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan and Budgets for CDBG, HOME and ESG Programs April 19, 2022 Page 9 requirements pertaining to their legal status, organizational structure, and capacity and experience. The City's HOME allocation for GY 2022, is expected to be $1,706,231. The proposed Annual Action Plan for the HOME Program consists of the GY allocation, program income and prior year HOME resources. The large carryover of prior year resources ($9,428,513) is due to the lengthy development process for affordable housing developments. While funds may be pre -committed for a project, they may not be fully committed and disbursed until certain requirements are met including underwriting, subsidy layering, and project assessment requirements. In this Annual Action Plan, funds are proposed for affordable housing development and rehabilitation. The funds for affordable housing development and rehabilitation include a pre -commitment of funds for two affordable housing projects in pre -development: $3,007,489 for the construction of 16 HOME -assisted units at the Crossroads at Washington project, and $2,003,705 for the construction of nine HOME -assisted units at the Westview House project, as already approved by the City Council. The remaining funds will be allocated through a Request for Proposals for Affordable Housing Development to be issued during FY 2022-2023. The budget below only includes those funds that are being budgeted for FY 2022-2023: 2022 HOME Program Budget General Activity Funding Amount HOME Program Administration $ 170,623 HOME CHDO Set -Aside $ 255,935 Affordable Housing Development and Rehabilitation $1,279,673 Prior Year Resources $9,428,513 TOTAL $11,134,744 The FY 2022-2023 HOME Program Funding Plan is not attached as an exhibit because the funding plan is described in the table above. Emergency Solutions Grant The Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) program provides funds to assist sheltered and unsheltered homeless individuals, as well as those at risk of homelessness, to quickly regain stability in permanent housing after experiencing a housing crisis and/or homelessness. Recipients of ESG funding in Orange County include the following entitlement jurisdictions: County of Orange, City of Anaheim, City of Irvine, City of Santa Ana, and City of Garden Grove. Collectively, this group is referred to as the Orange County ESG Collaborative that was formed over five years ago. On November 7, 2019, three member cities of the Orange County ESG Collaborative released a combined ESG Request for Proposals (RFP) to support the Orange County Continuum of Care' s goal to end homelessness (the County of Orange and City of Irvine allocated their funding independent of the Collaborative this funding cycle). The Collaborative accepted City Council 29 — 9 4/19/2022 FY 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan and Budgets for CDBG, HOME and ESG Programs April 19, 2022 Page 10 applications until December 10, 2019, with supplemental applications and requirements for both the City of Santa Ana and Anaheim. The RFP included a provision for up to four one-year renewals that could be exercised independently by each Collaborative member. The City chose to exercise this renewal option for FY 2022-2023. Specifically, while funding recommendations are made collaboratively, ESG funds are to be used to provide eligible activities within each jurisdiction in which they are funded. Subrecipients awarded funding in FY 2021-2022 and interested in FY 2022-2023 funding, were required to re- submit a budget and program summary for FY 2022-2023 ESG funding. The City's ESG allocation for GY 2022, FY 2022-2023 is anticipated to be $489,141. The proposed FY 2022-2023 ESG Program and Funding Plan includes a list of recommended homeless service providers for FY 2022-2023 (Exhibit 4). The funding recommendations are based upon applications received during the 2019 RFP process, and the performance and current needs as identified by staff. The budget below is broken down by category to provide more detail on funds allocated to eligible ESG activities: 2022 ESG Program Budget General Activity Funding Amount ESG Program Administration $ 36,686 Homeless Street Outreach $ 51,880 Homeless Emergency Shelter $ 110,000 Homeless Prevention $ 25,000 Rapid Re -housing $ 125,000 ESG Data Collection Management $ 140,575 TOTAL $ 489,141 Outreach and Engagement In accordance with the regulations at 24 CFR Part 91, the City of Santa Ana's Citizen Participation Plan requires two public hearings to be conducted annually for the development of the Annual Action Plan. The first public hearing was held before the Community Development Commission on March 23, 2022 to accept public comments on the funding priorities for the upcoming year that would be included in the draft Annual Action Plan; and the second public hearing is being held before the Santa Ana City Council on April 19, 2022 to accept public comments on the draft Annual Action Plan. In addition, the federal regulations for HUD requires that the draft Annual Action Plan be made available for a 30-day public review and comment period. On March 10, 2022, a public notice was published in the Orange County Register, La Opinion in Spanish, and Nguoi Viet in Vietnamese, that the draft Annual Action Plan was available for review and comment. The 30-day public comment period will conclude on April 10, 2022. All comments received, including all funding recommendations made by the City Council, will be included in the final document. The deadline for submission of the FY 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan to HUD is no later than May 15, 2022, 45-days before the end of the City's Fiscal Year. City Council 29 — 10 4/19/2022 FY 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan and Budgets for CDBG, HOME and ESG Programs April 19, 2022 Page 11 FISCAL IMPACT Funds will be budgeted and available in the following grant account (nos. 13518780, 13518782, 13518783, 13018780, and 13518785,) upon execution of a grant agreement between the City and HUD and adoption of the FY 2022-2023 annual budget: Fiscal Year Grant Accounting Fund Description Accounting Unit, Amount Year Unit -Account Account Description 13518780- Community FY 2022-23 2022 Development Block CDBG Administration $1,128,127 various Grant 13518782- Community FY 2022-23 2022 Development Block CDBG Housing $740,000 various Grant 13518783- Community FY 2022-23 2022 Development Block CDBG Programs $3,772,508 various Grant 2016- 13518783- Community FY 2022-23 2021 66220 Development Block CDBG Programs $2,653,725 Grant Total for FY 2022-2023 $8,294,360 Fiscal Year Grant Year Accounting Unit -Account Fund Description Accounting Unit, Account Description Amount FY 2022-23 2022 13018780- HOME Investment HOME Program $1,706,231 various Partnership Grant FY 2022-23 2015- 13018780- HOME Investment HOME Program $9,428,513 2021 various PartnershipGrant Total for FY 2022-2023 1 $11,134,744 1 Fiscal Year Grant Accounting Fund Description Accounting Unit, Amount Year Unit -Account Account Description FY 2022-23 2022 13518785- Emergency ESG Grant $489,141 various Solutions Grant Total for FY 2022-2023 1 $489,141 1 EXHIBIT(S) 1. FY 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan 2. CDBG FY 2022-2023 Program Funding Plan 3. CDBG FY 2022-2023 Program Summaries 4. ESG FY 2022-2023 Program Funding Plan Submitted By: Steven Mendoza, Assistant City Manager Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager City Council 29 — 11 4/19/2022 ANN JULY 1, 2022 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2023 i 1� Building, buying, and/or rehabilitating affordable housing. Developing viable urban communities. Improving the number and quality of emergency shelters for homeless individuals and families. SANTA ANA EXHIBIT 1 This page intentionally left blank City of San Action Plan City Council 29 — 13 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Table of Contents ExecutiveSummary...........................................................................................................................- 1 - AP-05 Executive Summary - 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b)............................................................. 1 - PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies — 91.200(b).......................................................................... - 4- AP-1 0 Consultation — 91.100, 91.200(b), 91.215(I).......................................................................... 5- AP-1 2 Participation — 91.105, 91.200(c)....................................................................................... - 32 - ExpectedResources........................................................................................................................ - 33 - AP-15 Expected Resources — 91.220(c)(1,2)............................................................................... - 35 - Annual Goals and Objectives...........................................................................................................- 38 - AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives............................................................................................ - 39 - AP-35 Projects — 91.220(d).......................................................................................................... - 41 - AP-38 Project Summary............................................................................................................... - 44 - AP-50 Geographic Distribution — 91.220(f)................................................................................... - 54 - AffordableHousing.......................................................................................................................... - 56 - AP-55 Affordable Housing — 91.220(g)......................................................................................... - 56 - AP-60 Public Housing — 91.220(h)............................................................................................... - 58 - AP-65 Homeless and Other Special Needs Activities — 91.220(i)................................................. - 59 - AP-75 Barriers to affordable housing — 91.2200).......................................................................... - 61 - AP-85 Other Actions — 91.220(k).................................................................................................. - 62 - Program Specific Requirements....................................................................................................... 64 - AP-90 Program Specific Requirements — 91.220(I)(1,2,4)............................................................ - 64 - Action Plan Tables Table 1 — Responsible Agencies........................................................................................................ - 4- Table 2 - Agencies, groups, organizations who participated............................................................ - 30 - Table 3 - Other local/regional/ federal planning efforts.....................................................................- 31 - Table 4 — Citizen Participation Outreach.......................................................................................... - 33 - Table 5 - Expected Resources — Priority Table................................................................................ - 37 - Table6 — Goals Summary ............................................................................................................... - 40 - Table7 - Goals Description............................................................................................................. - 41 - Table 8 - Project Information............................................................................................................- 42 - Table 9 - Geographic Distribution....................................................................................................- 55 - Table 10 - One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Requirement ................................... - 56 - Table 11 - One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Type ............................................... - 56 - City of San Action Plan City Council 29 — 14 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 City of San Action Plan City Council 29 — 15 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Version History No. Summary of .- Published Draft for Public Comment: 3/10/22 Sent to HUD for Approval: CDC 1 Conducted Public Hearing: 3/ 3/ 2 Approved by HUD: TBD 4/ 19/22 Original 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan. Published Draft for Public Comment: Sent to HUD for Approval: 2 Conducted Public Hearing: Approved by HUD: Amendment 1 (Substantial / Non -Substantial): Published Draft for Public Comment: Sent to HUD for Approval: 3 Conducted Public Hearing: Approved by HUD: Amendment 2 (Substantial / Non -Substantial): Published Draft for Public Comment: Sent to HUD for Approval: 4 Conducted Public Hearing: A proved by HUD: Amendment 3 (Substantial / Non -Substantial): Published Draft for Public Comment: Sent to HUD for Approval: 5 Conducted Public Hearing: Approved by HUD: Amendment 4 (Substantial / Non -Substantial): City of San Action Plan City Council 29 — 16 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Executive Summary AP-05 Executive Summary - 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b) Introduction The 2022-23 Action Plan is the City of Santa Ana's Annual Plan for the investment of annual allocations of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Home Investment Partnerships (HOME) and Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The Fiscal Year 2022-23 Action Plan (Action Plan) represents the third year of the City of Santa Ana Consolidated Plan (Con Plan) for the Fiscal Years 2020-2024 (Con Plan) as ratified by the City Council and approved by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). These grant programs are consistent with HUD's national strategy to provide decent housing opportunities, a suitable living environment and economic opportunities —particularly for low- and moderate -income people. In consideration of finite grant resources, the goals and projects within this Action Plan outline the areas and population segments with the greatest level of need for a particular program or activity and intends to invest grant resources in high leverage opportunities where data suggests that the City will be able to maximize the impact of every dollar. The Action Plan utilizes the priority needs identified in the 2020 — 2024 Consolidated Plan process, which identified the City's priority needs, including the rationale for establishing allocation priorities and specific measurable goals to be addressed during the five-year period. HUD has not yet announced the FY2022 allocations and the budgets listed in this Annual Action Plan are estimates based on the FY2021 allocation. The City of Santa Ana will proportionally adjust each project allocation in accordance with the final allocation announcements from HUD. Summarize the objectives and outcomes identified in the Plan HUD's Community Planning and Development (CPD) Outcome Performance Measurement Framework classifies objectives in three categories: decent housing, a suitable living environment, and economic opportunity. In Santa Ana's 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan, the City identified six high priority needs to be addressed through the implementation of activities aligned with seven Strategic Plan goals. The priority needs for Santa Ana include: • Expand the supply of affordable housing • Preserve the supply of affordable housing • Access to and supply of public services • Increase access to and supply of homeless services and facilities City of Sants Action Plan City Council 29 — 17 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 • Promote economic opportunity • Improve City public facilities and infrastructure Consistent with HUD's national goals for HUD CPD programs to provide decent housing opportunities, maintain a suitable living environment and expand economic opportunities for low- and moderate -income residents, the priority needs listed above will be addressed through the implementation of HUD funded activities aligned with the following seven measurable Strategic Plan goals: • Affordable Housing Development, Maintenance, and Preservation • Code Enforcement • Public Service Programs • Homeless Services and Facilities • Economic Development Program • Public Facilities and Infrastructure • Program Administration and Fair Housing Services Evaluation of past performance During the 2021 program year, the City of Santa Ana prioritized program activities to address the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic within the City of Santa Ana. Activities included rental assistance, small and microbusiness support, homeless prevention, and targeted public service activities. Additionally, during the 2021 program year, the City funded the following activities: 1. Street improvements that included installation of ADA accessible curbs and installation of pedestrian hybrid and rectangular rapid flashing beacons at key areas identified as highest priority based on need. 2. Rehabilitation of park facilities at Santa Anita Park. 3. Public service activities to support youth, seniors, disabled individuals, and low- and moderate - income residents within the City 4. Code enforcement in targeted neighborhoods 5. Homeless services and prevention activities 6. Single family housing rehabilitation activities to low- and moderate -income households 7. Down payment assistance to low- and moderate -income households City of Sants 2 _422-A;�,-K-Artion Plan City Council 29 — 18 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Summary of Citizen Participation Process and consultation process Each year, the city prepares the Action Plan listing the activities to be taken with Community Planning and Development (CPD) funds. In addition to residents, the City ensures that members of the public (including City staff) and private agencies that provide the services will be consulted in the development of the Action Plan: • Health service providers, • Social services for: children, elderly, disabled, homeless and persons with AIDS • State and local health agencies • Adjacent local governments • Santa Ana and orange County Housing Authority. The draft Action Plan incorporating the City's proposed uses of CDBG, HOME, and ESG funds and was made available for public review for a 30-day period. Summary of public comments Summary of comments or views not accepted and the reasons for not accepting them City of Sants 2- -422-A;�,-H-F-Action Plan City Council 29 — 19 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 PR-05 Lead 9 Responsible Agencies — 91.200(b) 1. Agency/entity responsible for preparing/administering the Consolidated Plan The following are the agencies/entities responsible for preparing the Annual Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source. CDBG Administrator FSANTA ANA Community Development Agency HOME Administrator SANTA ANA Community Development Agency ESG Administrator SANTA ANA Community Development Agency Table 1 — Responsible Agencies Narrative The City of Santa Ana Community Development Agency is the lead agency for overseeing the development of the Consolidated Plan. This Department is also responsible for the preparation of the Annual Action Plan, Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) and CDBG, HOME, and ESG program administrations. CDBG Administrator — Brenda Vega ESG Administrator — Holli Safran HOME Administrator — Holli Safran Consolidated Plan Public Contact Information David Flores Senior Community Development Analyst Community Development Agency dflores(a)santa-ana.org 714-647-6561 City of Sant; 4 zP-22,4, %%Action Plan City Council 29 — 20 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 AP-10 Consultation — 91.100, 91.200(b), 91.215(I) 1. Introduction As part of the 5-year Consolidated Planning process, the City of Santa Ana consulted with representatives from multiple agencies, groups, and organizations involved in the development of affordable housing, creation of job opportunities for low- and moderate -income residents, and/or provision of services to children, elderly persons, persons with disabilities, persons with HIV/AIDS and their families, and homeless persons. To facilitate this consultation, the City solicited feedback through the following methods: • Stakeholder/resident surveys • Individual stakeholder consultations • Community meetings • Public hearings • 30-day public comment period • Receipt of written comments To gather the greatest breadth and depth of information, the City consulted with a wide variety of agencies, groups and organizations concerning the housing, community and economic development needs of the community. Each of the agencies, groups or organizations consulted is represented below. The input received from these consultation partners helped establish and inform the objectives and goals described in the Strategic Plan. Provide a concise summary of the jurisdiction's activities to enhance coordination between public and assisted housing providers and private and governmental health, mental health and service agencies (91.215(1)). The City recognizes the importance of careful coordination and alignment among various service providers to maximize the effectiveness of the CDBG program. As a result, during the development of this Consolidated Plan, the City consulted with organizations that provide assisted housing, health services and other community -focused programs. Outreach efforts included surveys including specific questions associated with coordination, invitations to community meetings and follow-up phone interviews where appropriate. The City further recognizes the importance of continued coordination and alignment during the upcoming five-year planning period with these organizations and agencies. The City will strengthen relationships and alignment among these organizations in the implementation of the NOFA process for CDBG funds and through technical assistance provided to subrecipients of CDBG funds each year. City of Sants 5- _422-A;�,-M-Artion Plan City Council 29 — 21 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Describe coordination with the Continuum of Care and efforts to address the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth) and persons at risk of homelessness Orange County's homeless Continuum of Care (CoC) is comprised of a network of public, private, faith - based, for -profit, and non-profit service providers who utilize several federal, state and local resources to provide services and facilities for homeless people. The region's municipalities, including the City of Santa Ana, also provide resources for services that assist the homeless and those at -risk of becoming homeless. Non-profit service and facility providers play a critical role in the current CoC system and in addressing homeless needs within Santa Ana. These organizations provide a range of services throughout the County ranging from job training to creating permanent supportive housing opportunities. These services are available to homeless individuals and households. The CoC guides the development of homeless strategies and the implementation of programs to end homelessness throughout the region. In conducting the City's Needs Assessment, Santa Ana carefully reviewed the CoC's current strategy and planning documents to ensure coordination in goals and objectives. Additionally, the City provided a questionnaire to the CoC as well as key service providers operating in Santa Ana to identify the CoC's perceived needs in the county and its objectives to address the needs of different homeless persons populations, specifically chronically homeless families and individuals, families with children, veterans, unaccompanied youth and persons at risk of homelessness. The City will continue to actively work with the CoC as well as its partners throughout the County to coordinate on the planning and implementation of homeless services and programming. Describe consultation with the Continuum(s) of Care that serves the jurisdiction's area in determining how to allocate ESG funds, develop performance standards and evaluate outcomes, and develop funding, policies and procedures for the administration of HMIS In the development of the Consolidated Plan, the City of Santa Ana consulted with numerous housing, social service, and homeless service providers whose work intersects with the goal of reducing and ending homelessness in Orange County and/ or Santa Ana. This consultation provided input on allocation methodologies and approach for ESG programs. The City of Santa Ana regularly coordinates with the Orange County CoC to align performance standards, evaluate outcomes of current initiatives, coordination program policies and procedures related to program design and HMIS administration. In addition, The City of Santa Ana participates in the Orange County ESG Collaborative, which includes Santa Ana, Anaheim, Garden Grove, and the County of Orange. The Collaborative works very closely with the Continuum of Care. To ensure funds are leveraged to create maximum impact, the Orange County ESG Collaborative has developed aligned values and priorities and makes ESG funding decisions. City of Sant; P 2P_22,4 R,_4Action Plan City Council 29 — 22 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 2. Describe Agencies, groups, organizations and others who participated in the process and describe the jurisdictions consultations with housing, social service agencies and other entities 1 Agency/Group/Organization Santa Ana Housing Authority Agency/Group/Organization Type Public Housing Housing What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Need Assessment Consultation? Public Housing How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by email outreach, data of the consultation or areas for improved validation, and the web -based coordination? survey. Through this consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development planning in the jurisdiction. Santa Ana sought specific input, feedback, and recommendations related to the topics highlighted above from this stakeholder. 2 Agency/Group/Organization ALBI Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -Children What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Housing Community Consultation? Development How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by email outreach and the web - of the consultation or areas for improved based survey. Through this coordination? consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development planning in the jurisdiction. Santa Ana sought specific input, feedback, and recommendations related to the topics highlighted above from this stakeholder. City of Sant; 7 =4RR-4Action Plan City Council 29 — 23 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 3 Agency/Group/Organization Regional Center of Orange Count Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -Persons with Disabilities Regional Or anization What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Housing Community Consultation? Development How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by email outreach and the web - of the consultation or areas for improved based survey. Through this coordination? consultation, San to Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development planning in the jurisdiction. Santa Ana sought specific input, feedback, and recommendations related to the topics highlighted above from this stakeholder. 4 Agency/Group/Organization HIV Planning Council Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -Persons with HIV/AIDS What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Housing Community Consultation? Development HOPWA Strategy How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by email outreach and the web - of the consultation or areas for improved based survey. Through this coordination? consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development planning in the jurisdiction. Santa Ana sought specific input, feedback, and recommendations related to the topics highlighted above from this stakeholder. 5 Agency/Group/Organization America on Track Agency/Group/Organization Type Services — Children What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Housing Community Consultation? Development City of Sants ARFE R_ 2_P22-A;�,-M-Artion Plan City Council 29 — 24 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by email outreach and the web - of the consultation or areas for improved based survey. Through this coordination? consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development planning in the jurisdiction. Santa Ana sought specific input, feedback, and recommendations related to the topics highlighted above from this stakeholder. 6 Agency/Group/Organization Orange ounty CoC Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -homeless What section of the Plan was addressed by Homelessness Strategy Consultation? Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless Homeless Needs - Families with children Homelessness Needs - Veterans Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by email outreach, data of the consultation or areas for improved validation, and the web -based coordination? survey. Through this consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development planning in the jurisdiction. Santa Ana sought specific input, feedback, and recommendations related to the topics highlighted above from this stakeholder. 7 Agency/Group/Organization Santa Ana Chamber of Commerce Agency/Group/Organization Type Business and Civic Leaders What section of the Plan was addressed by Economic Development Consultation? Market Analysis City of Sants PH 2_P22-A;�,-M-Artion Plan City Council 29 — 25 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by email outreach, phone of the consultation or areas for improved interview and the web -based coordination? survey. Through this consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development planning in the jurisdiction. Santa Ana sought specific input, feedback, and recommendations related to the topics highlighted above from this stakeholder. 8 Agency/Group/Organization The GREEN Foundation Agency/Group/Organization Type Services — Health Services — Education What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Housing Community Consultation? Development How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by participation in a community/ of the consultation or areas for improved stakeholder meeting. Through coordination? this consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community 9 Agency/Group/Organization Habitat for Humanity of OC Agency/Group/Organization Type Services — Housing Housing What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment Consultation? City of Sants Is 2_P22-A;�,-M-Artion Plan City Council 29 — 26 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by participation in a community/ of the consultation or areas for improved stakeholder meeting. Through coordination? this consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development planning in the jurisdiction. Santa Ana sought specific input, feedback, and recommendations related to the topics highlighted above from this stakeholder. 10 Agency/Group/Organization Community Health Initiative Agency/Group/Organization Type Services — Health What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Housing Community Consultation? Development How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by participation in a community/ of the consultation or areas for improved stakeholder meeting. Through coordination? this consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development planning in the jurisdiction. Santa Ana sought specific input, feedback, and recommendations related to the topics highlighted above from this stakeholder. 11 Agency/Group/Organization Latino Health Access Agency/Group/Organization Type Services — Health What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Housing Community Consultation? Development City of SantsIRFE ARR, 4ktion Plan City Council 29 — 27 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by participation in a community/ of the consultation or areas for improved stakeholder meeting. Through coordination? this consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development planning in the jurisdiction. Santa Ana sought specific input, feedback, and recommendations related to the topics highlighted above from this stakeholder. 12 Agency/Group/Organization Neighborworks of Orange County Agency/Group/Organization Type Services — Housing Housing What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment Consultation? How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by participation in a community/ of the consultation or areas for improved stakeholder meeting. Through coordination? this consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community 13 Agency/Group/Organization Orange County Labor Foundation Agency/Group/Organization Type Regional Organization Services — Employment What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Housing Community Consultation? Development Market Analysis Economic Development How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by participation in a community/ of the consultation or areas for improved stakeholder meeting. Through coordination? this consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community City of Sants p 2_P22 A;�,-K-Artion Plan City Council 29 — 28 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 14 Agency/Group/Organization Greater Light Family Church Agency/Group/Organization Type Other What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Housing Community Consultation? Development Needs Anti -Poverty Strategy How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by participation in a community/ of the consultation or areas for improved stakeholder meeting. Through coordination? this consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community 15 Agency/Group/Organization The Kennedy Commission Agency/Group/Organization Type Services — Housing Housing What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment Consultation? How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by participation in a community/ of the consultation or areas for improved stakeholder meeting. Through coordination? this consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community 16 Agency/Group/Organization Second Baptist Church of Santa Ana Agency/Group/Organization Type Other What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Housing Community Consultation? Development Needs Anti -Poverty Strategy How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by participation in a community/ of the consultation or areas for improved stakeholder meeting. Through coordination? this consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community 17 Agency/Group/Organization HUMAN OPTIONS, INC. City of Sants 42 2_P22-A;�,-M-Artion Plan City Council 29 — 29 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -Children Services -Elderly Persons Services -Persons with Disabilities Services -Persons with HIV/AIDS Services -Victims of Domestic Violence Services -homeless Services -Employment What section of the Plan was addressed by Homeless Needs - Chronically Consultation? homeless Homeless Needs - Families with children Public Services How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by participation in a community/ of the consultation or areas for improved stakeholder meeting. Through coordination? this consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community 18 Agency/Group/Organization Community Legal Aid — Southern California Agency/Group/Organization Type Services — Fair Housing Services — Victims Services - Housing What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Housing Community Consultation? Development How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by participation in a community/ of the consultation or areas for improved stakeholder meeting. Through coordination? this consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community 19 Agency/Group/Organization Heritage Museum of Orange County Agency/Group/Organization Type Services — Children Services - Education What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Housing Community Consultation? Development City of Sant; AR., 14 =� 4RR;4Action Plan City Council 29 — 30 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by participation in a community/ of the consultation or areas for improved stakeholder meeting. Through coordination? this consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community 20 Agency/Group/Organization Chispa OC Agency/Group/Organization Type Civic Leader What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Housing Community Consultation? Development Housing Needs Assessment How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by participation in a community/ of the consultation or areas for improved stakeholder meeting. Through coordination? this consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community 21 Agency/Group/Organization YMCA Agency/Group/Organization Type Services — Children What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Housing Community Consultation? Development How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by participation in a community/ of the consultation or areas for improved stakeholder meeting. Through coordination? this consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community 22 Agency/Group/Organization Community Action Partnership of Orange Count Agency/Group/Organization Type Regional Organization What section of the Plan was addressed by Anti -Poverty Strategy Consultation? City of Sant; R., 15 2P_22,4 R,_4Action Plan City Council 29 — 31 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by participation in a community/ of the consultation or areas for improved stakeholder meeting. Through coordination? this consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community 23 Agency/Group/Organization WISE PLACE Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -Victims of Domestic Violence Services - Homeless What section of the Plan was addressed by Homelessness Strategy Consultation? Homeless Needs — Families with Children Homeless Needs — Chronically Homeless How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by email outreach, phone of the consultation or areas for improved interview and the web -based coordination? survey. Through this consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development planning in the jurisdiction. Santa Ana sought specific input, feedback, and recommendations related to the topics highlighted above from this stakeholder. 24 Agency/Group/Organization CSU - Fullerton Agency/Group/Organization Type Services — Education Business Leaders What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Housing Community Consultation? Development Meeting City of Sant; R., I 2P_22,4 R,_4Action Plan City Council 29 — 32 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by participation in a community/ of the consultation or areas for improved stakeholder meeting. Through coordination? this consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community 25 Agency/Group/Organization Santa Ana Downtown Inc. Agency/Group/Organization Type Business Leaders What section of the Plan was addressed by Market Analysis Consultation? Economic Development How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by phone interview. Through this of the consultation or areas for improved consultation, Santa Ana opened coordination? or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development planning in the jurisdiction. Santa Ana sought specific input, feedback, and recommendations related to the topics highlighted above from this stakeholder. 26 Agency/Group/Organization Mercy House Agency/Group/Organization Type Services — Homeless What section of the Plan was addressed by Homeless Strategy Consultation? Homeless Needs — Veterans Homeless Needs — Chronically Homeless Homeless Needs — Unaccompanied Youth Homeless Needs — Families with Children City of Sants Affls p -ARR-w4ction Plan City Council 29 — 33 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by email outreach and the web - of the consultation or areas for improved based survey. Through this coordination? consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development planning in the jurisdiction. Santa Ana sought specific input, feedback, and recommendations related to the topics highlighted above from this stakeholder. 27 Agency/Group/Organization City Net Agency/Group/Organization Type Services - Homeless What section of the Plan was addressed by Homeless Strategy Consultation? Homeless Needs — Veterans Homeless Needs — Chronically Homeless Homeless Needs — Unaccompanied Youth Homeless Needs — Families with Children Non -Homeless Special Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by phone interview. Through this of the consultation or areas for improved consultation, Santa Ana opened coordination? or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development planning in the jurisdiction. Santa Ana sought specific input, feedback, and recommendations related to the topics highlighted above from this stakeholder. 28 Agency/Group/Organization Orange County Emergency Management City of Sants ARFE IR 2-P-4 A;�,-M-Artion Plan City Council 29 — 34 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Agency/Group/Organization Type Agency — Emergency Management Agency — Managing Flood Prone Areas What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Housing Community Consultation? Development How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by email outreach. Through this of the consultation or areas for improved consultation, Santa Ana opened coordination? or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development planning in the jurisdiction. Santa Ana sought specific input, feedback, and recommendations related to the topics highlighted above from this stakeholder. 29 Agency/Group/Organization Boy's and Girl's Club of Central Orange Coast Agency/Group/Organization Type Services — Children What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Housing Community Consultation? Development How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by email outreach and the web - of the consultation or areas for improved based survey. Through this coordination? consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development planning in the jurisdiction. Santa Ana sought specific input, feedback, and recommendations related to the topics highlighted above from this stakeholder. 30 Agency/Group/Organization Building ealthy Communities Agency/Group/Organization Type Planning — Organization Services — Health City of Sants 1P 2_P22-A;�,-K-Artion Plan City Council 29 — 35 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment Consultation? Lead -based Paint Strategy Non -Housing Community Development How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by email outreach and the web - of the consultation or areas for improved based survey. Through this coordination? consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development planning in the jurisdiction. Santa Ana sought specific input, feedback, and recommendations related to the topics highlighted above from this stakeholder. 31 Agency/Group/Organization CASA of Orange Count Agency/Group/Organization Type Foster Care Agency/Facility Services — Children Child Welfare Agency What section of the Plan was addressed by Homeless Strategy Consultation? Homeless Needs — Unaccompanied Youth Non -Homeless Special Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by email outreach and the web - of the consultation or areas for improved based survey. Through this coordination? consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development planning in the jurisdiction. Santa Ana sought specific input, feedback, and recommendations related to the topics highlighted above from this stakeholder. 32 Agency/Group/Organization Charitable Ventures of Orange County City of Sants zP_ 2_P22-A;�,-M-Artion Plan City Council 29 — 36 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Agency/Group/Organization Type Regional Organization What section of the Plan was addressed by Market Analysis Consultation? Anti -Poverty Strategy How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by email outreach and the web - of the consultation or areas for improved based survey. Through this coordination? consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development planning in the jurisdiction. Santa Ana sought specific input, feedback, and recommendations related to the topics highlighted above from this stakeholder. 33 Agency/Group/Organization Com-Link Agency/Group/Organization Type Civic Leader What section of the Plan was addressed by Anti -Poverty Strategy Consultation? Housing Needs Assessment How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by email outreach and the web - of the consultation or areas for improved based survey. Through this coordination? consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development 34 Agency/Group/Organization Delhi Center Agency/Group/Organization Type Services — Elderly Persons Services — Health Services — Education What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment Consultation? Non -Homeless Special Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by email outreach and the web - of the consultation or areas for improved based survey. Through this coordination? consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development City of Sant; �� z_22,4 R,_4Action Plan City Council 29 — 37 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 35 Agency/Group/Organization Fair Housing Council of Orange Count Agency/Group/Organization Type Services — Fair Housing Regional Or anization What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment Consultation? Market Analysis Anti -Poverty Strategy Lead -based Paint Strategy How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by email outreach and the web - of the consultation or areas for improved based survey. Through this coordination? consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development 36 Agency/Group/Organization Goodwill Tierney Center Agency/Group/Organization Type Services — Veterans Services — Homeless What section of the Plan was addressed by Homeless Needs — Veterans Consultation? Homeless Needs —Chronically Homeless How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by email outreach and the web - of the consultation or areas for improved based survey. Through this coordination? consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development 37 Agency/Group/Organization Interval House Agency/Group/Organization Type Services — Homeless Services — Victims Services — Domestic Violence What section of the Plan was addressed by Homeless Needs — Families Consultation? with Children Homelessness Strategy City of Sant; R., 22 2P_22,4 R,_4Action Plan City Council 29 — 38 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by email outreach and the web - of the consultation or areas for improved based survey. Through this coordination? consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development 38 Agency/Group/Organization KidWorks Agency/Group/Organization Type Services - Education What section of the Plan was addressed by Economic Development; Consultation? Non -Housing Community Development How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by email outreach and the web - of the consultation or areas for improved based survey. Through this coordination? consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development 39 Agency/Group/Organization Lutheran Social Services of Southern California Agency/Group/Organization Type Services — Housing Services — Homeless Services — Health Services — Employment Services — Education What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment Consultation? Economic Development Anti -Poverty Strategy How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by email outreach and the web - of the consultation or areas for improved based survey. Through this coordination? consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development 40 Agency/Group/Organization Mental Health Agency of Orange Count City of Sant; R., 22- 2P_22,4 R,_4Action Plan City Council 29 — 39 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Agency/Group/Organization Type Health Agency Services — Health Services — Persons with Disabilities Publicly Funded Institution What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment Consultation? Non -Housing Community Development How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by email outreach and the web - of the consultation or areas for improved based survey. Through this coordination? consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development 41 Agency/Group/Organization Neutral Ground Agency/Group/Organization Type Services — Children Services — Education What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Housing Community Consultation? Development Needs How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by email outreach and the web - of the consultation or areas for improved based survey. Through this coordination? consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development 42 Agency/Group/Organization OC Partnership Agency/Group/Organization Type Services - Homeless What section of the Plan was addressed by Homeless Needs —Chronically Consultation? Homeless Homeless Needs — Families with Children Homeless Needs — Veterans Homeless Needs — Unaccompanied Youth City of Sant; R., 24 =� 4RR;4Action Plan City Council 29 — 40 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by email outreach and the web - of the consultation or areas for improved based survey. Through this coordination? consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development 43 Agency/Group/Organization OneOC Agency/Group/Organization Type Regional Organization What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Housing Community Consultation? Development How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by email outreach and the web - of the consultation or areas for improved based survey. Through this coordination? consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development 44 Agency/Group/Organization Orange County Business Council Agency/Group/Organization Type Business Leaders What section of the Plan was addressed by Economic Development Consultation? Market Analysis How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by email outreach and the web - of the consultation or areas for improved based survey. Through this coordination? consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development 45 Agency/Group/Organization Orange County Children's Therapeutic Art Center Agency/Group/Organization Type Services — Children Services — Persons with Disabilities What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Housing Community Consultation? Development City of Sant; R., 25- 2P_22,4 R,_4Action Plan City Council 29 — 41 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by email outreach and the web - of the consultation or areas for improved based survey. Through this coordination? consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development 46 Agency/Group/Organization Orange County Health Care Agency Agency/Group/Organization Type Heath Agency Publicly Funded Institution What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Housing Community Consultation? Development Lead -based Paint Strategy How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by email outreach and the web - of the consultation or areas for improved based survey. Through this coordination? consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development. 47 Agency/Group/Organization Orange County Social Services Agency Agency/Group/Organization Type Child Welfare Agency What section of the Plan was addressed by Homeless — Unaccompanied Consultation? Youth Lead -based Paint Strategy Non -Housing Community Development How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by email outreach and the web - of the consultation or areas for improved based survey. Through this coordination? consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development. 48 Agency/Group/Organization Orange County Water District Agency/Group/Organization Type Agency — Management of Public Land or Water Resources What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Housing Community Consultation? Development City of Sant; R., 2P z_22,4 R,_4Action Plan City Council 29 — 42 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by email outreach and the web - of the consultation or areas for improved based survey. Through this coordination? consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development. 49 Agency/Group/Organization Public Law Center Agency/Group/Organization Type Services — Housing Services — Victims Services — Fair Housing What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Housing Community Consultation? Development How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by email outreach and the web - of the consultation or areas for improved based survey. Through this coordination? consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development. 50 Agency/Group/Organization Santa Ana Police Department Agency/Group/Organization Type Agency — Emergency Management What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Housing Community Consultation? Development How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by email outreach and the web - of the consultation or areas for improved based survey. Through this coordination? consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development. 51 Agency/Group/Organization Santa Ana Senior Center Agency/Group/Organization Type Services — Elderly What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Housing Community Consultation? Development City of Sant; R., 2; =� 4RR,4Action Plan City Council 29 — 43 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by email outreach and the web - of the consultation or areas for improved based survey. Through this coordination? consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development. 52 Agency/Group/Organization Santa Ana Workforce Investment Board Agency/Group/Organization Type Planning Organization Services — Employment What section of the Plan was addressed by Economic Development Consultation? Market Analysis How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by email outreach and the web - of the consultation or areas for improved based survey. Through this coordination? consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development. 53 Agency/Group/Organization Second Chance Orange County Agency/Group/Organization Type Services — Persons with Disabilities Services — Health What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment Consultation? Anti -Poverty Strategy How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by email outreach and the web - of the consultation or areas for improved based survey. Through this coordination? consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development. 54 Agency/Group/Organization Small Business Development Center Agency/Group/Organization Type Services — Employment What section of the Plan was addressed by Economic Development Consultation? Market Analysis City of Sant; R., zR- z-22,4 R;-4Action Plan City Council 29 — 44 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by email outreach and the web - of the consultation or areas for improved based survey. Through this coordination? consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development. 55 Agency/Group/Organization Taller San Jose Hope Builders Agency/Group/Organization Type Services — Employment What section of the Plan was addressed by Economic Development Consultation? Market Analysis How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by email outreach and the web - of the consultation or areas for improved based survey. Through this coordination? consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development. 56 Agency/Group/Organization Templo Calvario CDC Agency/Group/Organization Type Services — Education What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Housing Community Consultation? Development How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by email outreach and the web - of the consultation or areas for improved based survey. Through this coordination? consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development. 57 Agency/Group/Organization VAMC Agency/Group/Organization Type Services — Homeless What section of the Plan was addressed by Homeless Needs — Veterans Consultation? How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by email outreach and the web - of the consultation or areas for improved based survey. Through this coordination? consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development. 58 Agency/Group/Organization The Cambodian Family Agency/Group/Organization Type Services — Immigrant Families City of Sant; R., 2P_ 2P_22,4 R,_4Action Plan City Council 29 — 45 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Non -Housing Community Development Needs Housing Needs Assessment How was the Agency/Group/Organization The organization was consulted consulted and what are the anticipated outcomes by email outreach and the web - of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? based survey. Through this consultation, Santa Ana opened or preserved lines of communication between the stakeholder and the City to be an active participant in housing and community development. Table 2 - Agencies, groups, organizations who participated Identify any Agency Types not consulted and provide rationale for not consulting The City maintains a list of agencies, organizations and other stakeholders that have expressed an interest in City's CDBG program and invited representatives from each entity to participate at multiple points in the planning process. All agencies were strongly encouraged to attend meetings and participate in surveys. Any agency or organization that was not consulted and would like to be included in the City's list of stakeholders, the agency or organization may contact the Community Development Department at the contact information provided for this Consolidated Plan. Other local/regional/state/federal planning efforts considered when preparing the Plan Plan Lead Organization How do the goals of your Strategic Plan overlap of goalsName with the CEDS Orange County Both the CEDS and Strategic Plan identify a goal of Community improving economic opportunities for low- and Investment Board moderate -income residents 2019 CoC Funding Orange County CoC The CoC application identifies a strategy to continue to Application address homelessness through a coordinated and aligned approach Plan Lead Organization How do the goals of your Strategic Plan overlap of goalsName with the 10 Year Plan to Orange County CoC Both the 10-Year Plan and Consolidated Plan End Homelessness emphasize a comprehensive and coordinated approach to address homelessness Name of Plan Lead Organization How .. the goals of your Strategic Plan overlap goalswith the City of Sant; R., 2-9 2P_22,4 R,_4Action Plan City Council 29 — 46 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Table 3 - Other local/regional/ federal planning efforts Describe cooperation and coordination with other public entities, including the State and any adjacent units of general local government, in the implementation of the Consolidated Plan (91.215(I)) The City invited regional planning organizations, state agencies and adjacent units of local government to participate in the City's surveys and community meetings. Additionally, Santa Ana conducted email outreach to all adjacent units of local government to share in the identification of regional housing and community development needs. Throughout the implementation of the Consolidated Plan process, the City of Santa Ana consults and coordinates activities with local units of government and monitors state programs and regulations to leverage local HUD funding. City of Sant; AR., 2-1. z-22-ARR---4 otion Plan City Council 29 — 47 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 AP-12 Participation — 91.105, 91.200(c) 1. Summary of citizen participation process/Efforts made to broaden citizen participation Summarize As part of the Annual Action Plan process, the City of Santa Ana actively encouraged residents from across the City to participate in identifying needs and issues to inform the housing and community development needs assessment. In an effort to broaden engagement, the City facilitated two public hearings to gather feedback on annual needs and programming. FY 2022/23 Annual Action Plan Citizen Participation The City of Santa Ana has a citizen participation plan to guide the City's CDBG citizen participation process. All of Santa Ana's citizens are encouraged to participate in the planning, development, and implementation of the Annual Action Plans. Organizations receiving direct CDBG funding are in regular contact with City staff. Other organizations are consulted as needed or have been present at various public hearings held by the City. Two public hearings are held each year by the City to discuss issues related to the Consolidated Plan as well as the Annual Action Plan. The first hearing focuses on the needs of the community and development of the Annual Action Plan and provides citizens with an opportunity to comment on the draft Annual Action Plan. The second public hearing focuses on performance as they relate to housing, homelessness, accessibility, and community development needs, such as infrastructure and public services. In all cases, a Notice of Public Hearing is published at least 15 days prior to the hearing to provide residents with adequate notice. A draft 2022/23 Annual Action Plan was available for public comment for a minimum 30-day period (March 10 — April 10, 2022). The Community Development Commission held a public hearing on March 23, 2022 providing residents and interested parties another opportunity to comment on the 2022/23 Annual Action Plan prior to approval by the City Council on April 19, 2022 and submittal to HUD The table on the subsequent page documents the City's approach to resident engagement. City Council 29 — 48 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Citizen Participation Outreach Table 4 — Citizen Participation Outreach Sort Order Mode of Outreach Target of Outreach Summary of response/attendance Summary of comments received Summary of comments URL (If applicable) 1 Public Hearing Non- The City Facilitated a Not applicable Not applicable. Not applicable targeted/broad public hearing before the community Community Development Commission on March 23, 2022 and before the regular Council meeting on April 19, 2022 to hear comments on the priority needs for the AAP. City Council 29 — 49 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 2 Newspaper Ad Non- A newspaper Written comments Not applicable. targeted/broad advertisement was received during the community published on March 10, public input period 2022 soliciting public comment on the Draft FY are included in the 2022/23 AAP and notified Appendix. he public of the two required a public hearings to approve the Plan scheduled for March 19, 2022 and April 19, 2022. 3 Other — Non -targeted/ An AAP Workshop and No comments made. No comments made. N/A Annual broad community first Public Hearing was Action Plan held during the regular Workshop Community Development Commission meeting on March 23, 2022. City Council 29 — 50 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Expected Resources AP-15 Expected Resources — 91.220(c)(1,2) Introduction HUD has not yet announced the FY2022 allocations and the budgets listed in this Annual Action Plan are estimates based on the FY2021 allocation. The City of Santa Ana will proportionally adjust each project allocation in accordance with the final allocation announcements from HUD. The City of Santa Ana anticipates that it will continue to receive CDBG, HOME, and ESG funding during the duration of this Consolidated Plan cycle. When accounting for program income and prior year resources, the City anticipates that it will have the following funding to target to its strategic goals and priorities: • CDBG: $5,640,635 • HOME: $1,706,231 • ESG: $489,141 The City of Santa Ana intends to issue two HOME, pre -commitment loans totaling $5,111,417.88 during FY 2022-2023. 1. Crossroads at Washington Pre -Commitment Loan - Project Admin 2% = $3,067,638.78 Approved by our City Council on 7/2/2019 2. Westview House Pre -Commitment Loan - Project Admin 2% = $2,043,779.10 Approved by our City Council on 4/7/2020. The table on the following page provides more detail on anticipated funding for the 2022 program year. In April 2021, HUD approved and processed the City's HOME Admin waiver request for FY 2019 and FY 2020 to increase the admin allocation from 10% to 15%. Those amounts are included in the HOME Prior Year Resources of this Action Plan. City Council 29 — 51 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Amount Available Year 1 Expected program SourceExpected Annual Prior Year Total: Amount Available Narrative ' • • Funds$ Allocation: Income: $ Resources: $ $ Remainder Description of ConPlan CDBG Federal Acquisition $5,640,635 $103,041 $2,550,684 $8,294,360 $13,096,659 Funding to Admin and support Planning housing, Economic community Development and economic Housing development Public activities Improvements throughout Public Services Santa Ana. HOME Federal Acquisition $1,706,231 $682,247 $8,746,266 $11,134,744 $3,862,334 Funding to Homebuyer support the assistance development Homeowner and rehab preservation Multifamily rental of affordable new construction housing Multifamily rental throughout rehab Santa Ana. New construction for ownership TBRA City Council 29 — 52 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 ESG Federal Conversion and $489,141 U 0 $489,141 $978,282 Funding to rehab for support the transitional development housing of homeless Financial facilities and Assistance the delivery of Overnight shelter services to Rapid re -housing homeless and (rental those at -risk assistance) of becoming Rental homeless in Assistance Santa Ana. Services Transitional housing Table 5 - Expected Resources — Priority Table City Council 29 — 53 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied The City recognizes that the City's annual entitlement is not sufficient to meet all of the needs of the community. It is therefore important to leverage resources to achieve the goals of the City. The City works diligently with private, state and local partners to leverage the City's HUD CPD funds. For the ESG program, matching requirements are passed to sub -recipients who demonstrate matching dollars prior to funding as well as at each quarterly invoice. ESG funds are leveraged by working with the OC Collaborative and considering other funding opportunities for various programs for the homeless population. This will include leveraging with both Housing Choice Voucher Program funding and HOME funds. The City administration recognizes that the City's annual entitlement and formula allocations are not sufficient to meet all of its needs, and that leveraging resources is critical to achieving the City's goals. The City continues to cultivate funding partners who can match the City's investment of CDBG, HOME, and ESG funds. The need remains great, and additional funds are sought to ensure that more affordable housing and important programs and activities are available for those in need. To that end the City seeks funds from the State and grants from other entities, both public and private. Matching requirements have been satisfied with other eligible financial resources and/or in -kind services, and the City will continue to seek this type of matching as well as financial matches. If appropriate, describe publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan The Santa Ana Housing Authority owns the parcel at 302 E. Twenty -Second Street. This parcel is approximately 27,817 square feet in size. It is currently zoned R1 for single family residences, which allows one house per lot. The vacant, undeveloped lot was purchased from CalTrans and was a remnant parcel from a freeway -widening project. The property is irregular in shape and below the minimum lot size for a residential lot. The City and Housing Authority are currently assessing the necessary variances and other approvals necessary to support development on this lot. In addition, Santa Ana will comply with new State requirements under AB1486 and AB1255 to inventory and support developers to access and utilize surplus municipal and state land for the construction of affordable housing. If such sites are identified, the City will consider the use of HUD or other resources to assist with site preparation. City of Santm 2- _R 2_P22-A;�,-K-Artion Plan City Council 29 — 54 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives Sort Goal Name Start End Category Geographic Needs Addressed Funding Goal Outcome Indicator Order Year Year Area 1 Program 2020 2024 All Citywide All CDBG: Other: 1 Administration & $1,128,127 Fair Housing Services HOME: $206,027 2 Affordable 2020 2024 Affordable Citywide Expand the supply HOME: Rental Units Constructed: Housing Housing of affordable $10,367,533 0 Development, housing; Preserve Units constructed (HOME) Maintenance, & the supply of CDBG: Preservation affordable housing $740,000 Rental Units Rehabbed: 5 Units rehabilitated (HOME) Homeowner Units Rehabbed: 25 units rehabilitated (CDBG) Down payment assistance: 3 households CDBG 3 Code 2020 2024 Affordable Citywide Preserve the supply CDBG: Housing Code Enforcement Housing of affordable $800,000 Enforcement/ Foreclosed housing Property Care: 2,500 housing units 4 Economic 2020 2024 Economic Citywide Micro Enterprise CDBG: Economic Development: Development Development Grants/Businesses $100,000 16 businesses assisted Assisted City Council 29 — 55 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Sort Goal Name Start End Category Geographic Needs Funding Goal Outcome Indicator Order Year Year Area Addressed 5 Public Service 2020 2024 Non- Citywide Access to and CDBG: Public Service activities other Programs Homeless supply of $845,000 than Low/Moderate Income Special public services Housing Benefit: Needs; Non- 2,500 persons Housing Community Development 6 Homeless 2020 2024 Homeless Citywide Increase ESG: $489,141 Homeless Person Overnight Services & access to and Shelter: 150 persons Facilities supply of assisted homeless services and Homelessness Prevention: facilities 35 persons assisted Tenant -Based Rental Assistance / rapid rehousing: 25 Households assisted 7 Public Facilities 2020 2024 Non -Housing Citywide Improve City CDBG: Public Facility or Infrastructure & Infrastructure Community public facilities $4,801,233 Activities other than Development and Low/Moderate Income infrastructure Housing Benefit: 4,500 persons Table 6 - Goals Summary Goal Descriptions City Council 29 — 56 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Goal Name Description Program Administration and Fair Ensure the management of a compliant and efficient HUD programs and provide funding Housing Services to promote the implementation of fair housing services and activities throughout the City. Affordable Housing Development, Provide funding for the acquisition, construction, rehabilitation and provision of affordable Maintenance, and Preservation rental and ownership housing. Code Enforcement Support code enforcement activities to ensure residential properties are safe and suitable for habitation Economic Development Support workforce training and development and business assistance via training, technical assistance and general support to microbusinesses operating in Santa Ana. Public Service Programs Working with local and regional nonprofits and service providers, Santa Ana will provide funding to ensure the provision of critical services and activities to low- and moderate - income residents and special needs populations throughout the City. Homeless Services and Facilities Working together with local and regional stakeholders, Santa Ana will continue to promote the implementation of a cohesive and coordinated homeless system. In doing so, Santa Ana will invest in projects that ensure that homeless households from all sub - populations are supported to return to permanent housing as quickly as possible; receive strength -based services that emphasize recovery, as needed; receive only what they need to be returned to housing quickly and to be as self-reliant as possible; and are assisted in preventing homeless from occurring in the first place. Public Facilities and Infrastructure In collaboration with other city agencies, rehabilitate public facilities and streets to increase ADA accessibility, improve facilities and infrastructure to better meet the needs of residents, and implement measures to mitigate and reduce vandalism and graffiti in the City. Table 7 - Goals Description City Council 29 — 57 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 AP-35 Projects— 91.220(d) Introduction During Program Year 2022, the City of Santa Ana will prioritize and fund the projects listed below. HUD has not yet announced the FY2022 allocations and the budgets listed in this Annual Action Plan are estimates based on the FY2021 allocation. The City of Santa Ana will proportionally adjust each project allocation in accordance with the final allocation announcements from HUD. Projects # 1 Project Name CDBG Program Administration 2 CDBG Fair Housing 3 CDBG Code Enforcement 4 CDBG Economic Development 5 CDBG Street Improvements 6 CDBG Sidewalk Improvements 7 CDBG Parks and Public Facilities Improvements 8 CDBG Housing Rehabilitation 9 CDBG Public Services 10 ESG PY22 — Homeless Activities 11 HOME Program Administration 12 HOME Rehabilitation 13 HOME Affordable Housing 14 HOME CHDO Table 8 - Project Information Describe the reasons for allocation priorities and any obstacles to addressing underserved needs Santa Ana uses a place -based strategy during the planning period. The geographic distribution of funding is predicated somewhat on the nature of the activity to be funded. It is the City's intent to fund activities in the areas most directly affected by the needs of low-income residents and those with other special needs. The Annual Action Plan directs investment geographically to an area benefit neighborhood. The City will continue to work closely with its partners to identify and overcome any obstacles to address the needs of underserved populations. City of Santi; R., 42 2P_22,4 R,_,4Action Plan City Council 29 — 58 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 City of Sants ARFS 42-422-A;�,-M-Aotion Plan City Council 29 — 59 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 AP-38 Project Summary Project Summary Information 1 Project Name CDBG Program Administration Target Area n/a — The City does not use target areas for CPD funding Goals Supported All Needs Addressed All Funding CDBG: $1,068,127 Description Overall administration of the CDBG Program including: completion of grant application, oversight of citizen participation process, development of annual funding contracts with agencies, set up of projects in HUD funds disbursement system and draw down funds, implementation of projects and compliance with HUD reporting requirements. Eligibility of this activity is based on Section 105(a)(13) of HUD's regulation. Target Date 6/30/2023 Estimate the number n/a and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Citywide Planned Activities Planning and Administration of the CDBG Program 2 Project Name CDBG Fair Housing Target Area n/a — The City does not use target areas for CPD funding Goals Supported Program Administration and Fair Housing Services Needs Addressed Expand the supply of affordable housing; preserve the supply of affordable housing Funding CDBG: $60,000 City of Sant; 44 2P-22,4 R;-4Action Plan City Council 29 — 60 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Description Provide funding and resources to the Fair Housing Council of Orange County to promote fair housing and combat housing discrimination within the City of Santa Ana. The Fair Housing Services Program will provide fair housing education, counseling, and enforcement services to Santa Ana residents. This program helps the City to comply with HUD's regulatory requirements to affirmatively further fair housing and includes counseling on landlord/tenant law and other aspects of housing. Target Date 6/30/2023 Estimate the number 500 persons assisted through various fair housing activities. and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Citywide Planned Activities Provide funding for administrative and program staff to complete fair housing education, tenant counseling, and fair housing enforcement activities in Santa Ana. 3 Project Name CDBG Code Enforcement Target Area n/a — The City does not use target areas for CPD funding Goals Supported Code Enforcement Needs Addressed Preserve the supply of affordable housing Funding CDBG: $800,000 Description Support the Community Preservation Division's goal of improving neighborhoods through a number of facets including enforcement of laws that create life safety risks and contribute to neighborhood blight. Target Date 6/30/2023 Estimate the number 2,500 households will benefit from this proposed activity. and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities City of Sant; 45 2P-22,4 R---4Action Plan City Council 29 — 61 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Location Description This activity will be carried out citywide in CDBG eligible neighborhoods. Planned Activities Provide funding to city staff to conduct code enforcement activities in CDBG eligible geographies. Eligible rehabilitation and preservation activities under 24 CFR 570.202 such as but not limited to Code Enforcement, Historic Preservation, and Residential Rehabilitation. 4 Project Name CDBG Economic Development Target Area n/a — The City does not use target areas for CPD funding Goals Supported Economic Development Activities Needs Addressed Economic Development Funding CDBG: $100,000 Description Provide economic development assistance to businesses. Target Date 6/30/2023 Estimate the number and type of businesses that will benefit from the proposed activities 16 Location Description This activity will be carried out citywide in CDBG eligible neighborhoods. Planned Activities See description 5 Project Name CDBG Street Improvements Target Area n/a — The City does not use target areas for CPD funding Goals Supported Public Facilities and Infrastructure Needs Addressed Improve City public facilities and infrastructure Funding CDBG: $2,506,250 City of Sant; R., 4P 2P-22,4 %%Action Plan City Council 29 — 62 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Description 1. Improve transportation safety by installing pedestrian hybrid beacon on Main Street (at Walnut Street) and the installation of rectangular rapid flashing beacons at key areas identified as highest priority based on city analysis. 2. Residential street repair in Heninger Park neighborhoods. Target Date 6/30/2023 Estimate the number 2,000 and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Activities will occur in CDBG eligible areas as described in the Description Planned Activities See description 6 Project Name CDBG Sidewalk Improvements Target Area n/a — The City does not use target areas for CPD funding Goals Supported Public Facilities and Infrastructure Needs Addressed Improve City public facilities and infrastructure Funding $407,233 Description Project involves replacement of existing damaged concrete sidewalks in neighborhoods and will include the removal and replacement of adjacent damaged concrete curbs, gutter and driveways. Project will focus on areas with the highest concentration of needed repairs, to help mitigate trip and fall hazards and reducing potential of liability claims and assist in complying with regulations set forth by the American with Disabilities Act. After the sidewalk concrete repairs within the public right of way are completed, the public will have enhanced pedestrian and multi - modal mobility through the improved neighborhoods. For at least 50% of Santa Ana's low-income population, bicycle is the primary mode of transportation. Therefore, properly maintaining the residential sidewalks that currently have no other viable revenue source, is a direct service City of Sant; R., 4; =� 4RR,4Action Plan City Council 29 — 63 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Target Date 6/30/2023 Estimate the number 2,000 and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Activities will occur in CDBG eligible areas as described in the Description Planned Activities See description 7 Project Name CDBG Parks and Public Facilities Improvements Target Area n/a — The City does not use target areas for CPD funding Goals Supported Public Facilities and Infrastructure Needs Addressed Improve City public facilities and infrastructure Funding CDBG: $1,887,750 Description 1. Conduct improvements to Santa Anita Park to ensure it continues to adequately meet the needs of Santa Ana residents. 2. Improvements to the Newhope Library to include total replacement of the roof and windows. 3. Removal of ADA barriers to the PAAL Center restrooms to bring the public facility in compliance with ADA for the use of all patrons. 4. Installation of artificial ivy to serve as a graffiti deterrent, increase the privacy of local residents from the active rail line and help increase the aesthetics of the Logan neighborhood. Target Date 6/30/2023 Estimate the number 2000 low- and moderate -income residents will benefit from this and type of families activity. that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Public parks and open spaces in CDBG eligible areas. City of Sant; R., 4R_ 2P_22,4 %%Action Plan City Council 29 — 64 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Planned Activities The project will expand the parking lot, remove the handball court and relocate the basketball court and playground. The project will also include additional security/parking lot lighting on the eastside of the park. 8 Project Name CDBG Housing Rehabilitation Target Area n/a — The City does not use target areas for CPD funding Goals Supported Affordable Housing Development, Maintenance, and Preservation Needs Addressed Preserve the supply of affordable housing Funding CDBG: $740,000 Description 1. Provide financial grants for the rehabilitation of single-family owner properties for residential purposes. 2. Provide down payment assistance to eligible households Target Date 6/30/2023 Estimate the number 25 units will be rehabilitated through this project and 3 households and type of families will be assisted via down payment assistance; benefitting 28 low - that will benefit from and moderate -income households. the proposed activities Location Description Activities will be conducted citywide. Planned Activities CDBG funds to support the rehabilitation of owner and rental units within the City; down payment assistance will be offered through the City's existing Down Payment Assistance Loan Program to income - eligible households to help meet down payment and closing cost requirements. 9 Project Name CDBG Public Services Target Area n/a — The City does not use target areas for CPD funding Goals Supported Public Service Programs Needs Addressed Access to and supply of public services Funding $845,000 City of Sant; R., 4P 2P_22,4 %%Action Plan City Council 29 — 65 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Description The City will fund a series of nonprofits that target critical services and benefits for low- and moderate -income residents and special need residents (elderly, youth, homeless, victims of domestic violence, disabled, and other vulnerable populations) in the community. Target Date 6/30/2023 Estimate the number 2,500 low- and moderate -income residents will benefit from these and type of families activities that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Citywide through multiple nonprofit and community -oriented organizations. Planned Activities The City will provide funding for staff and organizations to provide and deliver a range of services and functions to low- and moderate - income and special need residents throughout the City. 10 Project Name ESG PY22 — Homeless Activities Target Area n/a — The City does not use target areas for CPD funding Goals Supported Homeless Services and Facilities Needs Addressed Increase access to and supply of homeless services and facilities Funding ESG: $489,141 Description Emergency Solutions Grant project activities including Street Outreach and Engagement, Emergency Shelter, Homeless Prevention, Rapid Re -Housing, Data and Administration oversight and monitoring. Target Date 6/30/2023 Estimate the number 210 homeless and/ or at risk of becoming homeless households will and type of families benefit from these activities that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description n/a — The City does not use target areas for CPD funding City of Sant; R., 17tl z_22,4, %%Action Plan City Council 29 — 66 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Planned Activities The City will fund the following eligible services: • Street Outreach: $50,000 • Shelter Operations and Essential Services: $110,000 • Homeless Prevention: $25,000 • Rapid Rehousing: $125,000 • HMIS: $142,455 • Administration: $36,686 11 Project Name HOME Program Administration Target Area n/a — The City does not use target areas for CPD funding Goals Supported Program Administration and Fair Housing Services Needs Addressed Preserve the supply of affordable housing; expand the supply of affordable housing Funding HOME: $238,847 Description Ensure compliant and efficient oversight of all HOME funded activities. The estimated funding amount includes program income Target Date 6/30/2023 Estimate the number N/A and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description N/A Planned Activities Provide funding to staff and city agencies to oversee and manage the HOME program to ensure compliance with HUD rules and regulations. 12 Project Name HOME Rehabilitation Target Area n/a — The City does not use target areas for CPD funding Goals Supported Affordable Housing Development, Maintenance, and Preservation City of Sant; R., 5-1. zP-22,4, %%Action Plan City Council 29 — 67 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Needs Addressed Preserve the supply of affordable housing Funding HOME: $100,000 Description The City will provide funding to complete critical rehabilitation activities to rental units or rental unit properties. Target Date 6/30/2023 Estimate the number 5 renter units will be rehabilitated through this activity; benefiting 5 and type of families households. that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Applications are open for residents citywide. Planned Activities Conduct critical rehabilitation to rental units to ensure properties are safe and suitable and meet Federal HQS standards and health, safety, and applicable building standards. 13 Project Name HOME Affordable Housing Target Area n/a — The City does not use target areas for CPD funding Goals Supported Affordable Housing Development, Maintenance, and Preservation Needs Addressed Preserve the supply of affordable housing; expand the supply of affordable housing Funding HOME: $10,367,533 Description HOME funds will be used for activities related to new construction or acquisition and rehabilitation of affordable rental or ownership housing and provide financial assistance to low-income homebuyers. Target Date 6/30/2023 Estimate the number Through this project, 24 income -eligible households will benefit from and type of families new construction and rehabilitation activities that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description The City will identify eligible projects citywide. City of Santi; R., 5-2 2P_22,4 R,_4Action Plan City Council 29 — 68 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Planned Activities Through an RFP process, identify eligible new construction, acquisition, or rehabilitation activities to increase the supply of affordable housing within the City of Santa Ana. Projects that are tentatively identified for HOME assistance include: Crossroads at Washington — new multi -family apartment complex consisting of 85 units of affordable rental housing for households earning 30% or less of AMI. Construction is currently scheduled to be completed in December 2023. HOME assistance of approximately $3,007,489 will support the construction of 16 HOME - assisted units. Westview House — new multi -family apartment complex consisting of 85 units for large families and permanent supportive housing. Construction is currently scheduled to be completed in September 2023. HOME assistance of approximately $2,003,705 will support the construction of 9 HOME -assisted units. 14 Project Name HOME CHDO Target Area n/a — The City does not use target areas for CPD funding Goals Supported Affordable Housing Development, Maintenance, and Preservation Needs Addressed Preserve the supply of affordable housing; expand the supply of affordable housing Funding HOME: $255,935 Description HOME funds will be used for CHDO-qualified projects within the City of Santa Ana. Target Date 6/30/2023 Estimate the number 4 households will benefit from the development or rehabilitation of and type of families rental housing. that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description The City will identify eligible projects citywide. Planned Activities In collaboration with an eligible CHDO, the City will support the acquisition, development, or rehabilitation of affordable rental housing. City of Sants Imo] 2_P22-A;�,-K-Action Plan City Council 29 — 69 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 AP-50 Geographic Distribution — 91.220(f) Description of the geographic areas of the entitlement (including areas of low-income and minority concentration) where assistance will be directed HUD resources will be prioritized throughout the City with the primary objective of meeting the needs of low- and moderate -income residents in the City. When evaluating potential projects and programs, the City will ensure that projects are structured to prioritize areas where there is a higher concentration of low- and moderate -income residents. The map below indicates Census block groups in which at least 51 % of the residents are low- or moderate -income residents. The City will prioritize funding in these block groups. V9.0 0203 City of Santa Aria J J" M04 F_: City of Sant; AR., 54 z_22-ARR,_4Action Plan City Council 29 — 70 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Geographic Distribution Table 9 - Geographic Distribution Rationale for the priorities for allocating investments geographically The City will spend more than 70 percent of its entitlement funds in areas or for persons that are predominately low and moderate income. All CDBG-funded public service programs and HOME - funded affordable housing projects will be available to eligible persons citywide. The City identified community needs such as improvements to public facilities, insufficient social and homeless related services, and dilapidated housing conditions within these neighborhoods. The entitlement funds will help address these community needs. Discussion The City of Santa Ana does not use specific target areas to guide the allocation of funding. The City prioritizes funding that meets community needs and complies with HUD regulations/ requirements. City of Santm 5-5- 2-P-4 A;�,-M-Artion Plan City Council 29 — 71 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Affordable Housing AP-55 Affordable Housing — 91.220(g) Introduction The Annual Action Plan specifies goals for the number of homeless, non -homeless, and special needs households to be provided affordable housing within the program year. The plan also indicates the number of affordable housing units that will be provided by program type, including rental assistance, production of new units, rehabilitation of existing units, or acquisition of existing units. For the purpose of this section, the term "affordable housing" is defined in the HOME regulations at 24 CFR 92.252 for rental housing and 24 CFR 92.254 for homeownership. The City of Santa Ana does not prioritize specific housing programs for special needs populations but serves these populations through all housing programs. One Year Goals Supported for the Number of Households to be Homeless 0 Non -Homeless 30 Special -Needs 0 Total 30 Table 10 -One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Requirement One Year Goals for the Number of Households Supported Through Rental Assistance 25 The Production of New Units 0 Rehab of Existing Units 5 Acquisition of Existing Units 0 Total 30 Table 11 - One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Type City of Sant; R., 5- P 2P_22,4,;%4ktion Plan City Council 29 — 72 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 City of Sants AIRFS 57 ='A;�,�Aotion Plan City Council 29 — 73 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 AP-60 Public Housing — 91.220(h) Introduction The Santa Ana Housing Authority administers 1,793 Housing Choice Vouchers and does not own or operate and public housing units. The Santa Ana Housing Authority was consulted during this consolidated planning process. It is the intention of the Authority to continue to provide safe, attractive affordable housing to its HCV clients. Actions planned during the next year to address the needs to public housing Not applicable, the City of Santa Ana does not manage public housing developments. Actions to encourage public housing residents to become more involved in management and participate in homeownership SAHA increases resident involvement through resident involvement in presentations at community meetings, online communication, public notices, and public hearings. A broad citizen participation process is maintained with traditional and electronic communication being used to notify the community of ongoing planning efforts. The City of Santa Ana maintains coordination with public agencies, private entities, and community residents through the City of Santa Ana's Neighborhood Initiatives Program (NIP). This assists more than 60 neighborhood associations in Santa Ana by providing a conduit for two- way communication between residents and the City. Grant funding is administered to increase housing availability and accessibility to residents to encourage greater participation in homeownership. If the PHA is designated as troubled, describe the manner in which financial assistance will be provided or other assistance Not applicable. City of Sant; 17d 2P-22,4 R;-4Action Plan City Council 29 — 74 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 AP-65 Homeless and Other Special Needs Activities — 91.220(i) Introduction The needs of individuals experiencing homelessness and persons with special needs are complex and require a wide range of specialized services. Numerous agencies are typically involved in the care of these individuals, providing distinct services such as housing, mental health counseling, employment training, and case management services. A number of activities and services are funded to help the needs of individuals experiencing homelessness and other special needs populations. Overall, these services address the high priority of reducing homelessness and the threat of becoming homeless, as well as providing necessary supportive services. Describe the jurisdictions one-year goals and actions for reducing and ending homelessness including reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs Reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs Through this Action Plan, the City of Santa Ana will continue to prioritize support and assistance to homeless persons and those at imminent risk of becoming homeless. Through HUD and non -HUD resources, the City will continue to: 1. Prioritize street outreach through Quality of Life Teams 2. Preserve existing and increase the supply of permanent supportive housing 3. Preserve existing and increase the supply of affordable housing 4. Provide housing services and assistance to special needs populations 5. Improve critical services to low-income and special needs populations 6. Coordinate services within the City as well as regionally in collaboration with the Continuum of Care 7. Collaborate with all communities in Orange County to address homelessness with coordinated, regional approaches Addressing the emergency shelter and transitional housing needs of homeless persons The County of Orange operates a year-round emergency shelter in the Civic Center of Santa Ana that provides safe sleep and emergency shelter for over 400 individuals each night, and food and supportive services for over 600 individuals on a daily basis. The ESG funded HEART outreach team, City Net and Illumination Foundation organizations provide outreach and engagement services in and around the shelter as well as other locations in the City. The County also runs an emergency cold -weather shelter City of Santm 5- P_ 2_P22-A;�,-M-Artion Plan City Council 29 — 75 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 in Santa Ana during the winter for approximately 200 individuals. In addition to these shelters, the one year actions will address the needs of individuals who are homeless that includes unaccompanied women, victims of domestic violence, chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth. The range of services include emergency shelter, transitional housing and permanent supportive housing. ESG funds will provide assistance for street outreach services, homeless prevention and rapid re -housing. Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were recently homeless from becoming homeless again The City supports a number of programs to assist low-income individuals and families to avoid becoming homeless, including Section 8 Housing Choice vouchers. Other support services, such as job and training assistance, food assistance, and counseling are also available to help individuals recover from homelessness and to avoid becoming homeless. The City works closely with the Continuum of Care who provides oversight for the Vulnerability Index - Service Prioritization Decision Assistance Tool (VI- SPDAT) to prioritize the most vulnerable chronically homeless individuals. Case management services are offered in all programs to help prevent individuals from falling back into homelessness. In addition, the Housing Authority of the City of Santa Ana has recently been awarded VASH project -based vouchers for permanent supportive housing for Veterans experiencing homelessness. These 100 vouchers are in addition to the current Vouchers with two projects already in the pipeline. An RFP will be released shortly for these additional vouchers. Helping low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely low- income individuals and families and those who are: being discharged from publicly funded institutions and systems of care (such as health care facilities, mental health facilities, foster care and other youth facilities, and corrections programs and institutions); or, receiving assistance from public or private agencies that address housing, health, social services, employment, education, or youth needs The goals listed above will help these individuals and families to avoid becoming homelessness. The ESG program will fund homelessness prevention programs including utility and security deposit assistance as well as rental assistance. The HEART program, funded by ESG provides bus tickets for individuals interested in returning to their home; often following a release from a correctional facility. Additionally, the County of Orange is equipped to serve people discharged from publicly funded institutions or systems of care such as health care facilities or correction programs City of Sant; R., PP z_22,4, %%Action Plan City Council 29 — 76 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 AP-75 Barriers to affordable housing — 91.220Q) Introduction The City evaluated barriers and constraints to the development of affordable housing as a critical component of the Housing Element. A variety of barriers exist which make increasing the affordable housing stock in Santa Ana difficult: 1. Income and wages are not keeping pace with rising housing costs and the overall cost of living. 2. Federal resources for programs, such as the federal Section 8 Program, do not match the need experienced. 3. Homeownership is out of reach for the majority of residents. 4. Low housing vacancy rates are contributing to higher rents. 5. The cost of land is high and there is a lack of vacant land for future growth. 6. Impediments to Fair Housing. The California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) is currently in the process of reviewing the City's Housing Element for the 6th cycle. The Housing Element will be brought before City Council for adoption in May 2022 and then subsequently sent to HCD for certification which is expected Summer of 2022. Actions it planned to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve as barriers to affordable housing such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting the return on residential investment Santa Ana will continue to actively fund the development and preservation of affordable housing as well as identify opportunities to leverage and utilize additional state, local, or non -governmental funding resources to develop and preserve additional housing throughout the City. Through the City's compliance with AB 1486 (Surplus Lands Act) as well as a constant monitoring of state land made available through Executive Order N-06-19, the City will look to identify potential parcels of underutilized land that can be leveraged for potential affordable housing development. With the update for the 6tn cycle Housing Element, the City has incorporated AB 686 requirements for fair housing into an Assessment of Fair Housing appendix. Through this process, the City has identified a set of city -specific and regional goals and approaches to address barriers to affordable housing and affirmatively further fair housing in the City. The goal of this assessment is to ensure that people have fair housing choice. The assessment has two main purposes —prevent discrimination and reverse housing segregation. The City will continue to work to meeting the goals and objectives set forth in the Assessment of Fair Housing. City of Sants 2_P22-A;�,-K-Artion Plan City Council 29 — 77 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 AP-85 Other Actions — 91.220(k) Introduction The City of Santa Ana will undertake a range of activities targeted to address the needs of the City's low - and moderate -income and underserved individuals and households. Underserved individuals includes elderly, persons with a disability, youth, homeless, veterans, victims of domestic violence, and extremely low-income households. The City will continue to prioritize a holistic and targeted approach to address homelessness in the City through dedicated City staff, the continued use of Quality of Life Teams, and a close partnership with local and regional organizations and stakeholders. Actions planned to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs To effectively address the obstacles to meeting the needs of underserved individuals, the City will work closely with its network of local and regional partners and nonprofits to continually identify the most pressing needs and barriers to effectively delivering public services, housing and other programs. Building off this input, the City will prioritize public and social service programs that most align with the needs of these populations. The City will rely on its partners to assist in communication and messaging to ensure that underserved households are able to access and utilize these programs and services. Actions planned to foster and maintain affordable housing To foster and maintain affordable housing in the City, Santa Ana will focus on programs and activities that support the development and preservation of affordable housing activities. Wherever possible, the City will work to leverage additional resources (including other federal, state, and local resources) to more effectively and efficiently foster and maintain affordable housing. Activities include: • Construction of new rental and homeownership units • Rehabilitation and/ or preservation of existing rental units • Homeowner rehabilitation programs for low- and moderate -income households Actions planned to reduce lead -based paint hazards To address and reduce the problems caused by exposure to lead -based paint, the City has implemented a lead paint hazard identification and notification process as part of its housing programs. This process been designed to comply with HUD's lead -based paint hazard regulations (Title X) which became effective in September 2000 and was implemented in Santa Ana in January 2002. All owner -occupied housing units rehabilitated or constructed prior to 1979 are inspected for lead -based paint hazards. If the inspection finds potential lead -based paint hazards, the subject property is tested - the average cost per test is $450. The procedures to comply with Title X has added approximately 30 days to the typical housing rehabilitation project. City of Sants P2 _422-A;�,-M-Artion Plan City Council 29 — 78 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Actions planned to reduce the number of poverty -level families The underlying objective of this Consolidated Plan is focused on reducing the number of families and households in poverty and lessening the impact of poverty on those households. The City will take a multi -faceted approach to reduce the number of poverty -level families located within the City and improve the quality of life for extremely low-income households in the City. 1. Partner with and leverage local job training programs focused on supporting residents prepare for and access living wage job opportunities. 2. Through the City's housing programs, it will reduce the number of cost burdened households living in the City, allowing them to allocate personal resources to other critical household needs. 3. Public services will be targeted to address critical needs of low-income and vulnerable residents through the provision of programming, transportation, education, childcare and other key needs that are identified by the City and its stakeholders. Services such as these are components to assist individuals to be better suited to secure and retain living wage employment. 4. Homeless assistance, including prevention, will provide critical services to extremely low-income households in need of immediate assistance and support to be better suited and able to take steps to identify sustainable housing and employment options. 5. Improving public facilities eliminates existing facilities and infrastructure that negatively impacts residential neighborhoods. Actions planned to develop institutional structure To continue to develop the institutional structure among the City, nonprofit stakeholders and other local and regional stakeholders, the City will regularly communicate and coordinate program objectives, services and activities with all stakeholders. The City will work to expand the coordination and communication among partners through invitations to participate in the Consolidated and Action Plan process as well as working to create synergies and partnerships between different service providers during the implementation of programs and activities. Actions planned to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies Through the ESG program, the City will continue to partner closely with neighboring jurisdictions as well as service and housing providers operating in the City and County. The City will continue to strive to encourage a unified approach to the development and delivery of housing and social service programs to effectively address the needs of homeless and extremely low-income households in the community. In the coming year, the City will continue to build off these successes to integrate additional service and housing providers into this coordinated partnership. City of Sants P 2- 2_P22-A;�,-M-Artion Plan City Council 29 — 79 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 Program Specific Requirements AP-90 Program Specific Requirements — 91.220(I)(1,2,4) Introduction In the implementation of programs and activities under the 2021 Annual Action Plan, the City of Santa Ana will follow all HUD regulations concerning the program elements of the CDBG, HOME, and ESG programs. Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) Reference 24 CFR 91.220(1)(1) Projects planned with all CDBG funds expected to be available during the year are identified in the Projects Table. The following identifies program income that is available for use that is included in projects to be carried. 1. The total amount of program income that will have been received before 130,566 the start of the next program year and that has not yet been reprogrammed 2. The amount of proceeds from section 108 loan guarantees that will be 0 used during the year to address the priority needs and specific objectives identified in the grantee's strategic plan 3. The amount of surplus funds from urban renewal settlements 0 4. The amount of any grant funds returned to the line of credit for which the $482,213 planned use has not been included in a prior statement or plan. 5. The amount of income from float -funded activities Total Program Income 612,779 Other CDBG Requirements 1. The amount of urgent need activities 1 0% City of Santm P4 ='A;�,�Action Plan City Council 29 — 80 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOME) Reference 24 CFR 91.220(1)(2) 1. A description of other forms of investment being used beyond those identified in Section 92.205 is as follows: The City of Santa Ana does not use HOME funds in any other manner other than those described in Section 92.205(b). 2. A description of the guidelines that will be used for resale or recapture of HOME funds when used for homebuyer activities as required in 92.254, is as follows: The City incorporates a recapture requirement into written agreements and long-term affordability covenants for homebuyer assistance activities administered by the City as required by 24 CFR 92.254. For any homebuyer assistance activity implemented by subrecipients or CHDOs, this recapture requirement shall also be used. HOME affordability requirements are imposed based on the amount of direct HOME subsidy pursuant to HUD regulations as follows: Assistance under $15,000: 5-year affordability period Assistance between $15,000 - $40,000: 10-year affordability period Assistance over $40,000: 15-year affordability period The amount subject to recapture is the direct HOME subsidy received by the homebuyer. Direct HOME subsidy includes the HOME investment that enabled the homebuyer to purchase the property. This includes down payment assistance, closing costs, or other HOME assistance provided directly to the homebuyer and/or the difference between the fair market value of the property (as determined by appraisal) and a reduced sales price attributable to HOME development assistance. The recapture provision ensures that the entire amount of the City's direct HOME subsidy to homebuyers is recaptured if the housing does not continue to be the principal residence of the family for the duration of the applicable period of affordability (e.g., the home is sold, the home is foreclosed, the assisted owner is no longer residing in the assisted residence, or for any other breach of the agreement with the City). The HOME -assisted homebuyer may sell their unit at any time during the period of affordability, to any willing buyer, and at the price the market will bear. The recapture provision requires that the City's direct HOME subsidy and any interest due under the HOME loan (that has not previously been repaid) is returned to the City from net proceeds first, subject to the limitation that if there are no net proceeds or the net proceeds are insufficient to repay the HOME investment due, the City may only recapture the net proceeds, if any. Net proceeds are defined as the sales price minus superior loan repayment (other than HOME funds), and any closing costs. In the event of a mortgage default, a provision in the written agreement and long-term affordability covenant stipulates that the City has the right of first refusal before foreclosure and may use City of Sants R5 _422-A;�,-K-Artion Plan City Council 29 — 81 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 additional HOME funds or other resources to acquire the housing in order to preserve the housing's affordability. Recaptured funds may be used for any HOME eligible activity. These recaptured funds are identified in the City's accounting system by a unique recaptured revenue object number. Any recaptured funds will be used by the City before any additional HOME funds. 3. A description of the guidelines for resale or recapture that ensures the affordability of units acquired with HOME funds? See 24 CFR 92.254(a)(4) are as follows: See above. 4. Plans for using HOME funds to refinance existing debt secured by multifamily housing that is rehabilitated with HOME funds along with a description of the refinancing guidelines required that will be used under 24 CFR 92.206(b), are as follows: N/A — the City will not be using HOME funds for this activity. If the City elects to refinance existing debt, it will provide its policies and procedures as part of an amendment to its Action Plan. Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) Reference 91.220(1)(4) Include written standards for providing ESG assistance (may include as attachment) ESG funds will be used for eligible activities under five program components: street outreach, emergency shelter, homelessness prevention, rapid re -housing assistance, and Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) costs, as well as allowable administrative costs and activities. ESG applications go through an open and transparent proposal process. The Community Development Agency is responsible for ensuring that the ESG program is implemented in accordance with all Federal rules and regulations. 2. If the Continuum of Care has established centralized or coordinated assessment system that meets HUD requirements, describe that centralized or coordinated assessment system. Orange County, in collaboration with the CoC and other ESG entitlement jurisdictions including the City of Santa Ana will utilize assessment and evaluation instruments developed in consultation with the HIMIS lead agency and previously funded HPRP grantees. The County ensures ongoing coordination of program design and eligibly standards. The City will provide funding for the administration of the HMIS data entry system. 3. Identify the process for making sub -awards and describe how the ESG allocation available to private nonprofit organizations (including community and faith -based organizations). On November 7, 2019, the City of Anaheim released a combined ESG Request for Proposals (RFP) in partnership with the City of Santa Ana and City of Garden Grove to support the Orange County Continuum of Care's goal to end homelessness. This RFP was marketed to nonprofit organizations (including community and faith -based organizations) operating throughout Orange County. To minimize duplication of effort in the application process, Garden Grove accepted applications until December 10, 2019, with supplemental applications and requirements for both Santa Ana and Anaheim. The RFP included four possible one-year renewals. Should the OC Collaborative determine to exercise these annual renewals past the end of FY 20-21, an RFP will not be released. Current subrecipients awarded funding in FY 21-22 will be required to submit a new budget and program summary. New forms and information will be provided by the Collaborative at that time. In addition, the Collaborative reserves the right to redistribute funding City of Sants PP - -K .A.�,-K-Artion Plan City Council 29 — 82 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 1 and/or issue a new RFP at its discretion 4. If the jurisdiction is unable to meet the homeless participation requirement in 24 CFR 576.405(a), the jurisdiction must specify its plan for reaching out to and consulting with homeless or formerly homeless individuals in considering policies and funding decisions regarding facilities and services funded under ESG. The City consults and works with the County and CoC homeless services staff as well as local homeless service providers, advocacy groups, facilities and other stakeholders in determining its strategic approach, policies and funding decisions. A previously homeless individual participated on the ESG funding review panel. Individuals who were previously homeless provide assistance in outreach and engagement services and provide feedback to Staff. In addition, the CoC's strategy reflects the participation of all 34 cities in Orange County as well as individuals who are homeless or previously homeless, schools, and a host of other organizations and stakeholders. 5. Describe performance standards for evaluating ESG. The City utilizes the HUD Monitoring ESG handbook to monitor each program's performance to ensure that goals are on track and funds are used for eligible activities. On a quarterly basis, invoices are reviewed to ensure program compliance. In addition, the quarterly financial invoices are monitored by City Accounting staff. On -site monitoring of non-profit organizations is done by staff and by consultants for both program and financial records on an as -needed basis, or at least every three years. The City works closely with the CoC and other ESG jurisdictions in the County to standardize processes and approaches as much as possible. City of Sants Affls 6a ='A;�,�Artion Plan City Council 29 — 83 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 2 Program Recommendation 2022-2023 CDBG Funding Plan PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION AND PLANNING Administration and Planning Fair Housing Council of OC CODE ENFORCEMENT Community Preservation Code Enforcement Community Preservation Legal Services ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT New Business Start-Up/Micro Enterprise Grants NONPROFIT PUBIC SERVICES AIDS Services Foundation of OC dba Radiant Health Centers America on Track Boys & Girls Club of Santa Ana Casa de la Familia Community Action Partnership of Orange County Community Health Initiative Orange County Community Legal Aid SoCal (Domestic Violence Prevention Project) Delhi Center/PLC (Family Economic Success Initiative) Delhi Center (Teens Engaged in Learning and Leadership) Fristers Girls Inc of Orange County (Literacy Lab) Human Options Hurtt Family Health Clinic Lutheran Social Services of So. Cal. MOMS OC Nati's House (dba Neutral Ground) SNL Nati's House (dba Neutral Ground) Gang Prevention Orange County Human Relations Council OC Children's Therapeutic Arts Center (Willard) Public Law Center (Housing) StandLIP for Kids OC Taller San Jose Hope Builders The Cambodian Family WISEPlace Working Wardrobes FJ RECOMMENDED FY 22-23 1,128,127 1,068,127 60,000 800,000 775,000 25,000 100,000 100,000 845,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 40,000 40,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 40,000 30,000 50,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 30,000 30,000 City Council 29 - 84 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 2 CITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS $ 4,681,233 PRCSA - Santa Anita Park $ 800,000 Newhope Library $ 531,250 PWA - Heninger Residential Street Imp $ 1,896,959 PWA - Sidewalk Imp $ 407,233 PWA - Neighborhood Imp $ 131,500 PWA - PAAL Center ADA Restroom (Design) $ 408,041 PWA - Traffic Engineering $ 506,250 HOUSING $ 740,000 Single Family Rehab -City 480,000 Multi Family Rehab Homebuyer Down Payment Assistance 260,000 TOTAL $ 8,294,360 City Council 29 — 85 4/19/2022 FY 2022-2024 CDBG Funding Plan - Program Summaries EXHIBIT 3 Administration Organization & Planning Project Title One-year award Description City of Santa The program will provide for the overall administration of the CDBG Program, to include: preparation and Ana CDBG Program submission of required contracts with HUD, submission of all reporting requirements, provision of individual Community Administration $1,068,127 project oversight, monitoring of all project implementation and ongoing completion, and fiscal management and Development oversight. Program Administration is performed by a combination of staff and professional consultant(s). Agency (CDA) Proposed funding amount calculated based off 20% admin cap less Fair Housing amount. Fair Housing Santa Ana Fair The program will provide fair housing education, landlord /tenant counseling and enforcement services to combat Council Housing Education, $60,000 housing discrimination and city administrative support for the residents of the City of Santa Ana. Funds will go Orange County C Counseling & toward administrative/program staff and service contracts. A commitment to further fair housing is a requirement Enforcement of CDBG funding. Nonprofit Two-year Organization Project Title award Description AIDS Services Foundation OC DBA Radiant Health Centers (RHC) will provide low-income residents living AIDS Services HIV Care Services with HIV in the City of Santa Ana with wraparound HIV care services. Participants will receive the support Foundation OC $60,000 and resources needed to remain in medical care, maintain their health, and achieve viral suppression. Brighter Futures $60,000 Children of prisoners deserve the chance to discover a brighter future, which is why America On Track "College America On Track for Children of provides them with trained, caring mentors, STEM workshops, a is For Me Too!" camp, free books, Prisoners and special outings, as well as nutrition seminars and wraparound services for the families. Boys and Girls Club of College Bound provides at -risk Santa Ana teens with academic instruction and mentors to help graduate Santa Ana College Bound $60,000 high school on time, prepare for secondary education, technical school, or military and set career goals; this also prevents teens from engaging in activities that could otherwise derail their path. Santa Ana Family Justice Center SAFHC Full -Time Victim Advocate will offer more comprehensive services to victims than before allowing Casa de la Familia Full -Time Victim $60,000 victims to reach necessary resources previously almost inaccessible. Providing a full-time advocate helps Advocate victims manage all services needed through one person, easing the access. City Council 29 — 86 4/19/2022 FY 2022-2024 CDBG Funding Plan - Program Summaries EXHIBIT 3 Community Action Economic Empowerment — Economic empowerment services for low-income adults and youth in and around Santa Ana; workshops Partnership of Orange Your Money, Your $60,000 include Your Money Your Goals curriculum, which covers banking, spending plans, and money County Goals management by providing tools for participants to develop habits to increase their financial wellbeing. Community Health Community Health $60,000 CHIOC helps City of Santa Ana residents to access health and social service programs by providing Initiative Orange County Access Program outreach, education, enrollment, and case management services to vulnerable populations. We strive to ensure that clients acquire, retain, and utilize community resources effectively. Santa Ana Community Legal Aid SoCal (previously known as The Legal Aid Society of Orange County) will provide Community Legal Aid Domestic Violence $60,000 free, holistic legal assistance to Santa Ana survivors of domestic violence to help them escape abuse and SoCal Prevention Project break the cycle of violence. Priority is given to service in the areas of family law, immigration, and healthcare advocacy. Family Economic $80,000 A collaborative case management strategy to help low-income families fill vocational, educational, and Delhi Center Success Initiative financial service gaps, so they can make better decisions to earn more, keep more of what they earn, and move up the economic ladder. Teens Engaged in A leadership development program that trains teens to take an active role in designing and implementing Delhi Center Learning and $80,000 educational and team building activities in their community that teach younger children about gang Leadership prevention, problem solving, conflict resolution, avoiding risk and making safe choices. Wraparound Fristers provides preventation and intervation services for adolecent parents, vulnerable population, to help Programming for $60,000 them meet basic needs, improve their parenting competencies, relational skills, academic and econimic Fristers Adolecents Parents opportunities, ensure safe, stable, nurturing relationships and environments for their children, and help and Children prepare their children for Kindergarten by building school readiness skills. Girl's Inc. of Orange $60,000 Literacy Lab ensures that 120 elementary school girls per year in Santa Ana reach grade level reading by County Literacy Lab fourth grade. Small group reading with mentors and educators, engaging activities, a summer camp, and family literacy nights build a love of reading and a strong educational foundation. Assisting Domestic $60,000 The project will provide intensive case management services to Santa Ana residents who self -report Human Options Violence Victims domestic violence or who are referred by the Domestic Violence Response Team. Case management services will include safety planning, assessment of needs and linkages to needed resources. Hurtt Santa Ana By hiring a 2nd PNP to our mental health program , Hurtt will add more capacity in treating additional Santa Hurtt Family Health Mental Health $60,000 Ana residents. The PNP will: assess, diagnose, treat those with behavioral health conditions: help patients Clinic Program prevent, identify, manage symptoms resulting from psychitric or substance disorders; and is an expert in psychiatric medications. City Council 29 - 87 4/19/2022 FY 2022-2024 CDBG Funding Plan - Program Summaries EXHIBIT 3 Lutheran Social Services Victims Intervention $60,000 The Victims Intervention Project (VIP) will provide women who are victims of crime with evidence -based of Southern California Program (VIP) recovery services — direct mental health services, rental assistance, hotel/motel vouchers, intensive case (LSSSC) management, transportation, life skills training and other supportive services. Santa Ana residents will be provided monthly prenatal and infant home visitation, health education, and MOMs OC Healthy Beginnings $80,000 mental health support, that measurebly improves the health status and birth outcomes of mothers, fathers, and Bright Futures and babies living in proverty. We will provide mental health support, education, and prevention strategies for anxiety and depression (including perinatal mood and anxiety disorders). Neutral Ground will provide Summer Night Lights for 40 nights during the summer. Parks and recreation Nati's House dba Neutral Neutral Ground $60,000 centers will be open late so that families can enjoy safe spaces, meet neighbors, find new opportunities and Ground SNL resources, and create relationships with the City and County agencies that serve them. Nati's House dba Neutral Neutral Ground $100,000 Neutral Ground will provide after school programming and mentoring to youth; focusing on violence Ground Gang Prevention prevention, gang intervention, restorative practices, mentoring, and drug and alcohol prevention. Neutral Ground also provides street outreach and programming for parents and community. Community -Based OCHR proposes to enhance community -based dispute resolution inclusive of community -oriented policing. OC Human Relations Alternative Dispute $60,000 The program will empower community members before, during, and after community crisis, promote mutual Council Resolution understanding among community stakeholders, and create safer, more inclusive places in the Townsend/Myrtle neighborhoods. Crime Prevention Orange County and Intervention $70,000 OCCTAC proposes to continue our Crime Prevention & Intervention Program with Willard Middle school Children's Therapeutic Program for Willard youth, and expand to all Willard Neighborhood families, to provide life -changing opportunities for youth and Arts Center (OCCTAC) Middle School & parents through After School Arts, Tutoring, Family Counseling, and Parenting Classes. Neighborhood Consumer & Community $80,000 Public Law Center seeks to provide cradle through retirement legal services to Santa Ana low-income Public Law Center Organizations residents to spur economic development by helping clients, especially seniors, keep their hard earned Legal Assistance money; and helping client develop child & dependent care businesses that will expand the local workforce. Project On Campus The program provides homeless students with a personalized path to self-sufficiency. A trained StandUp for StandUp for Kids Mentoring $60,000 Kids case manager and mentor meets with each youth at school, twice a week. They receive basic Orange County services, adult mentorship, and tutoring in order to graduate and become self-sufficient. city uounal 29 — 88 4/19/2U22 FY 2022-2024 CDBG Funding Plan - Program Summaries EXHIBIT 3 Hope Builders seeks to provide 50 Santa Ana youth, ages 18-28, who are out -of -school and out -of -work with Taller San Jose Hope Business $80,000 the mentoring, job training and life skills support that meet the needs of employers. Upon training completion, Builders Applications Hope Builders will place youth in high -demand industries that offer family -sustaining wages and career ladders for growth. Plan Ahead Youth $100,000 The Plan Ahead Youth Program will help 120 of Santa Ana's low-income youth and parents from immigrant The Cambodian Family Program families thrive in the areas of academics, leadership and parenting skills so that they are able to be engaged in more positive after school activities, stay off the streets, and avoid destructive or gang related activity. Steps to independence provides safe emergency shelter and rapid rehousing for unaccompanied homeless WISEPIace Steps to $60,000 women. Women are led through the "WISEPIace Way" which includes comprehensive trauma informed Independence p support, legal advocacy and housing placement to help rebuild their lives and heal their traumas. Jobs for Santa Ana Jobs for Santa Ana Seniors will address the employment challenges faced by seniors and provide Working Wardrobes Seniors $60,000 workforce development services to assist low-income Santa Ana residents ages 55 and over to find and maintain employment and contribute to their economic stability and self-sufficiency. City Council 29 - 89 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT 4 City of Santa Ana Emergency Solutions Grant FY 2022-2023 Funding Nonprofit Organizations Santa Ana Category of Eligible SAPD Interval Second 2-1-1 Orange Subtotal Homeless Mercy House WISEPlace ESG Activity HEART House Chance OC County Shelter* Street Outreach $ 51,880.00 $ 51,880.00 Emergency Shelter - $ Operations Emergency Shelter - $ 110,000.00 $ 80,000.00 $ 30,000.00 Essen tiai Services Homeless Prevention $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 Rapid Rehousing $ 125,000.00 $ 75,000.00 $ 50,000.00 HMIS Data Collection $ 140,575 $ 140,575 Santa Ana Admin - 7.5% $ 36,686 $ 489,141 $ 51,880.00 $ 80,000.00 $ - $ 100,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 140,575 City Council 29 — 90 4/19/2022 Planning and Building Agency www.santa-ana.org/pb Item # 30 City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 Staff Report April 19, 2022 TOPIC: EIR No. 2020-03 and GPA No.2020-06 Santa Ana General Plan Update AGENDA TITLE Public Hearing - Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report No. 2020-03 and General Plan Amendment No. 2020-06 for Santa Ana General Plan Update RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Adopt a resolution certifying Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report No. 2020-03 (SCH No. 2020029087), including adoption of environmental findings of fact pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adoption of a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. 2. Adopt a resolution approving General Plan Amendment No. 2020-06. 3. Adopt a resolution of findings to overrule the John Wayne Airport Orange County Airport Land Use Commission's determination that the Proposed General Plan Update is inconsistent with the Airport Environs Land Use Plan. BACKGROUND On February 15, 2022, the City Council considered the adoption of the City of Santa Ana General Plan Update. While the City Council did not reach a final decision during the meeting, the City Council discussed and commented on the draft document as well as the proposed policies and implementation actions. The City Council also encouraged the public to submit written comments to the City. In summary, staff documented over 150 comments received from local environmental justice (EJ) stakeholders and from the various City Councilmembers regarding the draft General Plan Update after the February 15, 2022 City Council meeting. Exhibit 1 is a catalog of the documented comments with a City response to each. After reviewing and responding to the comments, staff met on several occasions with the EJ stakeholders (MPNA, OCEJ, Rise Up Willowick, THRIVE Santa Ana, UCI) to provide the opportunity for follow-up clarifications and where appropriate, discussed further refinements of the draft policies and implementation actions related to the various environmental justice topics. At the conclusion of the most recent meeting held with the City Council 30 — 1 4/19/2022 EIR No. 2020-03 and GPA No.2020-06 Santa Ana General Plan Update April 19, 2022 Page 2 group on April 4, 2022, the stakeholders expressed their support for the General Plan. Staff also followed up with each Councilmember to obtain final input on the draft Plan. As a result of the additional input, over 60 modifications and refinements responsive to the comments received from the City Council and from the community are being recommended for incorporation into the draft General Plan Update. The recommended changes are as shown in Exhibit 2. Inclusive in the recommended changes are several clarifications and refinements put forth by staff. If the changes are approved and adopted as recommended, they will be incorporated into the April 2022 draft of the General Plan Update (Exhibit 3) to form the adopted City of Santa General Plan — Golden City and Beyond. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION AND COMMUNITY OUTREACH Project notifications were posted, published, and mailed in accordance with City and State regulations. General Plan interested parties were emailed and/ or mailed a notice of this public hearing to consider the General Plan Update and Program Environmental Impact Report (GPEIR). In addition, courtesy notices were mailed to property owners and occupants located within the five Land Use Focus Areas and within 500 feet of their boundaries. EXHIBIT(S) 1. Catalog of Comments Received Post February 15, 2022 2. Recommended Clarifications to the Draft April 2022 General Plan Update 3. Draft April 2022 General Plan Updated - Web Link: https://www.santa- ana.org/general-plan/draft-documents 4. February 15, 2022 City Council Staff Report - Web Link: Item No. 26 - PrimGov 5. EIR Resolution, including Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) 6. General Plan Amendment Resolution 7. Orange County Airport Land Use Commission Override Resolution 8. Final Recirculated Environmental Impact Report - Web Link: https://www.santa- ana.org/general-plan/general-plan-environmental-documents 9. November 8, 2021 Planning Commission Report - Web Link: Item No. 3 — PrimeGov Portal 10. List of Parcel with General Plan Land Use Designation Changes Submitted By: Minh Thai, Executive Director, Planning and Building Agency Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager City Council 30 — 2 4/19/2022 Catalog of City of Santa Ana Draft General Plan Update Comments Received Post February 15, 2022 q Public Comments/Concerns Draft Policies and Implementation Actions Addressing Comments/Concerns City Response Source of Comment 1 Suggested Policy Change: Policy CM-1.2: Community Input- Engage residents Recommended Policy Change: CM-1.2: Community Input. Engage residents and community facility The proposed policy is intended to foster meaningful engagement in the decision -making Collaborative Letter and community facility users with meaningful and effective participation to users with meaningful and effective participation to provide input and involve them in the decision- process related to improvements to public recreation facilities and programming. The policy (MPNA, OCEJ, provide input for facility improvements and programming. Assure potentially making process for community facility improvements and programming. has been modified to clarify the intent and to reflect the spirit of the recommended changes THRIVE, & Rise Up affected community residents that they have opportunities to participate in by including suggested language to foster meaningful engagement and to involve users in the Willowick) received decisions that affect their environment and health, and that the concerns of decision -making process. 3.14.2022 all participants involved will be considered in the decision -making process. 2 Add Policy: Policy CM-1.2a: Hold meetings, workshops, and public comment 1) Existing Action: PS-3.15: Agenda Management. Consider enhancements to the agenda Existing Action PS-3.15, with target implementation year of 2022, will consider further Collaborative Letter periods at times and locations that are convenient for community members to management system to ensure public meetings run smoothly, increase internal efficiency, enhancements to address City meeting agenda and related public engagement. In addition, (MPNA, OCEJ, attend, especially those that may be directly affected by a particular decision. document decisions proficiently, and maintain public transparency. Action CM 1.2 provides for a survey tool as an opportunity for community input on best THRIVE, & Rise Up Include community input and feedback when determining meeting time and 2) Recommended Action Change: CM-1.2: Community Conversation. Plan for and conduct a practices for residents to engage in City meetings, workshops, and the decision making Willowick) received location. Manage agendas so that items with community input are addressed community survey every two years related to community health, pollution concerns, parks, process. This action has also been modified to include suggested changes where appropriate. 3.14.2022 at a reasonable hour. community engagement, and community service needs, with focused outreach to environmental justice priority areas utilizing various platforms, such as social media and school events, to encourage substantial survey participation. 3 Suggested Policy Change: Policy CM-3.3: Health Residential Programs - Invest Recommended Policy Change: CM-3.3: Health Residential Programs. Invest in programs and public The comment is noted and is recommended to be included in its entirety. Collaborative Letter in programs and public improvements that educate residents about improvements that educate residents about opportunities to increase their physical activity and (MPNA, OCEJ, opportunities to increase their physical activity and improve their health, improve their health, especially in environmental justice communities with higher risk of negative THRIVE, & Rise Up especially in areas with higher risk of negative public health outcomes. public health outcomes. Willowick) received 3.14.2022 4 Add Policy CM-3.11 or Action CM-3.9: Establish a permanent staff position Recommended New Action: CM-3.9: Environmental Justice Staff. Identify funding and hire a full- The community comment is in alignment with comments provided by members of the City Collaborative Letter and City office focused on environmental justice, responsible for 1) collecting time Environmental Justice staff member to collaborate with the community to gu duke Council. Staff has prepared a recommended action to identify funding and hire a full-time EJ (MPNA, OCEJ, and disseminating information relevant to environmental justice in Santa Ana staff person per Council's input. Action revised in response to OCEJ comment that THRIVE, & Rise Up 2) serving as a liaison between the City, community organizations, and the collaboration on environmental health studies, pursuing grants, and coordination with federal, implementation of EJ policies and actions should be a collaboration and guided by the Willowick) received state, and local agencies regarding environmental concerns in the City. Agency: CMO/PBA and multiple government agencies responsible for some aspect of environmental community. 3.14.2022 Target Year: 2022. justice 3) coordinating the City's environmental justice programs 4) planning community meetings and ensuring follow through. 5 Suggested Action Change: Action CM-1.2: Community Conversation - Plan for Recommended Action Change: CM-1.2: Community Conversation. Plan for and conduct a The intent of the draft action is to continually receive feedback from the community and is Collaborative Letter and conduct a yearly community survey eveFy `hme eaFs related to community survey every two years related to community health, pollution concerns, parks, recommending conducting a targeted EJ survey that focuses on community health, pollution (MPNA, OCEJ, community health, air quality pollution concerns, parks, and community community engagement, community service needs, with focused outreach to environmental justice concerns, parks, service needs and City community engagement best practices. The timeframe THRIVE, & Rise Up service needs, with focused outreach to environmental justice priority areas. priority areas utilizing various platforms, such as social media and school events, to encourage has been revised to every two years. Two years will provide the needed time to formulate Willowick) received Undertake substantially more outreach on various platforms, including social substantial survey participation. surveys, provide sufficient time to respond, collect data, analyze data, report findings, and 3.14.2022 media and school events, to inform residents about the community outreach formulate actions to address feedback. meetings and to encourage substantial survey participation. 6 Suggested Action Change: Action CM-3.6: Fresh and Healthy Foods - Pursue Recommended New Action: CM-3.6A: Food Deserts. Collaborate with Orange County Health Care Food deserts were researched as part of the development of the draft General Plan. That Collaborative Letter programs, incentives, and/or grants to encourage urban agriculture and small Agency (OCHCA) to gather and map food desert data, and share publicly through the City's research revealed that no food desert areas currently exist in Santa Ana. To monitor and (MPNA, OCEJ, Environmental Quality webpage. grocery or convenience stores to sell fresh foods in the city, especially those visualize this data, staff recommends adding a new action to collaborate with OCHCA to gather THRIVE, & Rise Up within environmental justice area boundaries. Conduct a study to identify and map data and make it available to the public through the Environmental Quality webpage Willowick) received areas of the City that lack access to fresh and healthy foods. Examples include (webpage is proposed as part of Action CN-1.10). Once the data is gathered and mapped, 3.14.2022 grants or loans to purchase updated equipment, publicity, or directories of funds and effort resulting from Action CM-3.6 to create a program to expand fresh and healthy healthy food outlets, or cod deserts overtime. local, or organic food. Page 1 Catalog of City of Santa Ana Draft General Plan Update Comments Received Post February 15, 2022 q Public Comments/Concerns Draft Policies and Implementation Actions Addressing Comments/Concerns City Response Source of Comment 7 Suggested Policy Change: Policy EP-3.3: Mitigate Impacts - Promote the Recommended Policy Change: EP-3.3: Mitigate Impacts. Promote the development of sustainable Policy has been modified to emphasize health and economic impacts to environmental justice Collaborative Letter development of sustainable and equitable new land use plans that proactively and equitable new land use plans that proactively reduce negative health and economic impacts on communities. (MPNA, OCEJ, reduces negative impacts on existing residents and businesses and avoids existing residents and businesses, especially in environmental justice communities. THRIVE, & Rise Up negative impacts on environmental justice communities, with an emphasis on Willowick) received public health. 3.14.2022 8 Suggested Policy Change: Policy M-1.7: Proactive Mitigation - Proactively Recommended Policy Change: M-1.7: Proactive Mitigation. Proactively mitigate existing and new Policy has been revised to clarify that it will apply to existing and new potential impacts and Collaborative Letter mitigate potential air quality, noise, congestion, safety, and other impacts potential air quality, noise, congestion, safety, and other impacts from the transportation network place greater emphasize on environmental justice communities. Maintaining preparedness for (MPNA, OCEJ, from the transportation network on residents and business, preventing new on residents and business, especially in environmental justice communities. hazardous chemical releases and other emergencies is already addressed in the draft General THRIVE, & Rise Up or increasing negative impacts on environmental justice communities. Plan through draft Action S-1.8 Hazard Mitigation Plan, which requires the City to prepare a Willowick) received Proactively reduce potential and maintain preparedness for hazardous plan for such events and to update it so it addresses changing conditions every two to three 3.14.2022 chemical releases from mobile sources. years. 8.2 Suggested Polity Change: Policy M-4.9: Air Pollution Mitigation -Gems deF Use Recommended Policy Change: Policy M-4.9: Air Pollution Mitigation - GensideUtilize land use, Community comment is noted and has been included in the revised proposed policy. Collaborative Letter land use, building, site planning, and technology solutions to mitigate building, site planning, and technology solutions to mitigate exposure to transportation -related air (MPNA, OCEJ, exposure to transportation -related air pollution, especially in environmental pollution, especially in environmental justice focus areas. THRIVE, & Rise Up justice focus areas. Willowick) received 3.14.2022 9 Suggested Policy Change: Policy PS-2.11: Resilient Facilities And Infrastructure 1) Recommended Policy Change: PS-2.11: Resilient Facilities and Infrastructure. Coordinate with The community comment is covered in two separate areas of the existing draft General Plan. Collaborative Letter Coordinate with utilities and public agencies to develop, maintain, relocate, utilities and public agencies to develop, maintain, relocate, and/or upgrade critical local and As noted, the comment has been incorporated to be fully addressed between recommended (MPNA, OCEJ, and/or upgrade critical local and regional public facilities and infrastructure regional public facilities and infrastructure systems to ensure their resiliency during times of changes to Policy PS-2.11 and Action S-1.11. THRIVE, & Rise Up systems to ensure their resiliency during times of extreme weather, toxic extreme weather, natural disasters, or toxic emission release. Willowick) received emission, or natural disasters. Develop and educate vulnerable communities 2) Recommended Action Change: S-1.11: Public Education. Continue to disseminate information on 3.14.2022 about hazard response plans, resources, and best practices for maintaining flooding, flood control on private property, floodplains, apd flood preparedness, man made health. Ensure that emergency plans (including communication plans) are hazards, hazard response plans, resources, and best practices in disaster events to the public robust and up-to-date. through the City website, social media, and at City offices. 10 Suggested Action Change: Action PS-2.5: Crime Data -Explore options for Existing Action: CN-1.10: Interagency Team. Establish an environmental quality interagency team to Action PS-2.5 is specific to crime data. The proposed added language is not appropriate. Collaborative Letter making crime, and environmental pollution violation data publicly available evaluate, monitor, and make recommendations to address air quality and environmental hazard Bringing environmental violations to the forefront is already covered under other actions, such (MPNA, OCEJ, through the City s website. issues, with a special focus on environmental justice areas. Publish results and information on the as CN-1.5 and CN-1.10, which aim to monitor permits and violations and share environmental THRIVE, & Rise Up City's website through a dedicated Santa Ana Environmental Quality webpage. justice related information through the creation of a dedicated Santa Ana Environmental Willowick) received Quality webpage. 3.14.2022 11 Suggested Action Change: Action PS-3.15: Agenda Management - Consider 1) Existing Action: PS-3.15: Agenda Management. Consider enhancements to the agenda Existing Action PS-3.15, with target implementation year of 2022, will consider further Collaborative Letter enhancements to the agenda management system to ensure public meetings management system to ensure public meetings run smoothly, increase internal efficiency, enhancements to address City meeting agenda and related public engagement. In addition, (MPNA, OCEJ, run smoothly, proactively and meaningfully engage residents in decisions that document decisions proficiently, and maintain public transparency. Action CM-1.2 provides for a survey tool as an opportunity for community input on best THRIVE, & Rise Up impact their neighborhoods, increase internal efficiency, document decisions 2) Recommended Action Change: CM-1.2: Community Conversation. Plan for and conduct a practices for residents to engage in City meetings, workshops, and the decision making Willowick) received proficiently, and maintain public transparency. community survey every two years related to community health, pollution concerns, parks, process. 3.14.2022 community engagement, community service needs, with focused outreach to environmental justice priority areas utilizing various platforms, such as social media and school events, to encourage substantial survey participation. 12 Suggested Policy Change: CN-1.1: Regional Planning Efforts - Coordinate air Recommended Policy Change: CN-1.1: Regional Planning Efforts. Coordinate air quality planning The comment is noted and is recommended to be included in its entirety. Collaborative Letter quality planning efforts with local and regional agencies to meet or exceed efforts with local and regional agencies to meet or exceed state and federal ambient air quality (MPNA, OCEJ, State and Federal ambient air quality standards in order to educate the standards in order to educate the community on and protect all residents from the health effects of THRIVE, & Rise Up community on and protect all residents from the health effects of air air pollution. Willowick) received pollution. 1 1 13.14.2022 City Council 30-4 4/19/2022 Page 2 Catalog of City of Santa Ana Draft General Plan Update Comments Received Post February 15, 2022 q Public Comments/Concerns Draft Policies and Implementation Actions Addressing Comments/Concerns City Response Source of Comment 13 Suggested Policy Change: Policy CN-1.5: Sensitive Receptor Decisions - Recommended Policy Change: CN-1.5: Sensitive Receptor Decisions. Study the impacts of Policy has been revised to specify the need to study impacts of emission sources on existing Collaborative Letter AeFTest, monitor, and mitigate patentiai impacts of stationary and stationary and nonstationary emission sources on existing and proposed sensitive uses and and proposed sensitive uses so that data collected can inform future regulations to avoid siting (MPNA, OCEJ, nonstationary emission sources on existing and proposed sensitive uses and opportunities to minimize health and safety risks. Develop and adopt new regulations avoiding the of facilities that potentially emit increased pollution near sensitive receptors in environmental THRIVE, & Rise Up opportunities to minimize health and safety risks. Develop and adopt new siting of facilities that potentially emit increased pollution near sensitive receptors within justice areas. The City is not the appropriate agency to regulate, test, monitor or mitigate Willowick) received regulations en avoiding the siting of facilities that might sgni€ieantlyincrease environmental justice area boundaries. stationary and nonstationary sources. By partnering with regulating agencies the City can 3.14.2022 pollution near sensitive receptors within environmental justice area facilitate such agencies to identify, monitor, and address air quality and other hazards. boundaries. Provide residents within the range of stationary and Comment to provide residents information related to emissions is already covered in nonstationary emission source informative and educational resources and proposed actions CN-1.5 and CN-1.11 as is making such data available to the public through best practices to maintain health and mitigate public health risks. the Environmental Quality webpage (webpage is proposed as part of Action CN-1.10). 14 Suggested Action Change: OS-1.1: Park Needs Assessment And Master Plan - Recommended Action Change: OS-1.1: Park Needs Assessment and Master Plan. Create, adopt, and The community comment to increase the ratio in acres per 1,000 residents is in alignment Collaborative Letter Create, adopt, and implement a park needs assessment and master plan implement a park needs assessment and master plan, based on community input, defining park with comments provided members of City Council. Policy has been revised to increase the (MPNA, OCEJ, defining park service areas according to best practices, establishing a service service areas according to best practices, establishing a service area for each park facility, creating a ratio to three (3) acres per 1,000 residents. A member of MPNA advocated to increase park THRIVE, & Rise Up area for each park facility, creating a tool to evaluate needs and prioritize tool to evaluate needs and prioritize improvements by quadrant or appropriate geographic ratio to 4 acres per 1,000 residents during March 28, 2022 roundtable. Staff recommends no Willowick) received improvements by quadrant or appropriate geographic subarea, and subarea, and maintaining a list of priorities for the expansion and improvement of open space and further revsions based on comment. 3.14.2022 maintaining a list of priorities, created and led by community input, for the recreational facilities in each quadrant or geographic subarea to attain a park land standard of 3 expansion and improvement of open space and recreational facilities in each acres per 1,000 residents. quadrant or geographic subarea to attain a park land standard of 4 4 acres per 1,000 residents. 15 Suggested Polity Change: Policy S-2.1: Regional Collaboration - Consult and Recommended Policy Change: S-2.1: Regional Collaboration. Consult and collaborate with federal, Policy has been revised to reflect the spirit of the suggested edits, however, the proposed Collaborative Letter collaborate with federal, state, and regional agencies to identify and regulate state, and regional agencies to identify and regulate the use, storage, and disposal of hazardous language changes at end of the draft policy is not recommended. Emergency preparedness for (MPNA, OCEJ, the use, storage, and disposal and storage of hazardous materials, prevent the materials, prevent the illegal transportation and disposal of hazardous waste, and facilitate the hazards already covered through the Hazard Mitigation Plan (see Action S-1.8 Hazard THRIVE, & Rise Up illegal transportation and disposal of hazardous waste, and facilitate the cleanup of contaminated sites. Mitigation Plan) and workplace safety measures are outside of the City's purview and is Willowick) received cleanup of contaminated sites, and prepare for possible hazardous chemical regulated by Cal/OSHA. 3.14.2022 releases in workplaces and into the community. Promote transparency and accountability by informing local emergency response personnel and impacted communities about hazardous chemical use, disposal or cleanup near them, ensuring that emergency personnel and communities both have plans for dealing with worse -case scenarios. 16 Suggested Policy Change: Policy S-2.2: Hazardous Waste Generators - Recommended Policy Change: S-2.2: Hazardous Waste Generators. Collaborate with appropriate Policy has been revised to reflect the spirit of the suggested edits. Collaborative Letter Collaborate with appropriate agencies to identify and inventory all users and agencies to identify and inventory all users and handlers of hazardous materials to proactively (MPNA, OCEJ, handlers of hazardous materials to proactively mitigate potential impacts. mitigate potential impacts. Promote transparency and accountability by publishing city, regional, THRIVE, & Rise Up Promote transparency and accountability by publishing data on toxic spills, and state data and resources on toxic spills, water pollution, illegal discharges, industrial and Willowick) received commercial air violations on a dedicated Santa Ana Environmental Quality webpage. water pollution, illegal discharges, industrial and commercial air violations, 3.14.2022 maintain and publish statistics related to complaints and violations the City receives from residents or community advocates regarding Industrial Violations and hazardous waste generators. City Council 30-5 4/19/2022 Page 3 Catalog of City of Santa Ana Draft General Plan Update Comments Received Post February 15, 2022 q Public Comments/Concerns Draft Policies and Implementation Actions Addressing Comments/Concerns City Response Source of Comment 17 Suggested Policy Change: Policy S-2.4: Planning and Remediation - Determine 1) Existing Action: CM-3.3: Health Metrics. Engage with the Orange County Health Care Agency and The community comment is already addressed through proposed Action CM-3.3 and Collaborative Letter the presence of hazardous materials and/or waste contamination prior to other stakeholders to monitor key health indicators to measure the success of the outcome of recommended changes to proposed Action LU-3.26. Per March 28, 2022 roundtable, new (MPNA, OCEJ, approval of new uses and require that appropriate measures be taken to General Plan policies and the implementation plan, including reduction in incidence in asthma and revisions related to soil and air included in response to MPNA comments to broaden collection THRIVE, & Rise Up protect the health and safety of site users and the community. Study and low birth weight of infants. of baseline conditions. Reference to 80 ppm added in response to OCEJ comments in context Willowick) received provide annual statistics for public health outcomes in environmental justice 2) Recommended Action Change: LU-3.26: Health Conditions. Work with state agencies including of pursuing grant funding. 3.14.2022 areas potentially impacted by pollution as a baseline. Create goals to Department of Toxic Substances Control and South Coast Air Quality Management District, Orange County Health Care Agency, and local stakeholders including Orange County Environmental Justice continuously improve public health outcomes related to environmental hazards based on established baseline levels. and UC Irvine Public Health to identify baseline conditions for lead soil and air contamination in Santa Ana, routinely monitor indicators of lead such contamination, and measure positive outcomes. Collaborate with these organizations to secure grant funds for soil and air testing, remediation (e.g., bioremediation, covering, removing, air filtration), and prevention activities for residential properties in proximity to sites identified with high sell levels of soil pollution (including sites identified with soil lead levels of 80 porn or higher), and air pollution, with a focus on communities disproportionately affected by soil contamination. 18 Suggested Policy Change: Policy S-2.5: Education and Best Practices - Promote Existing Action: CN-1.10: Interagency Team. Establish an environmental quality interagency team to The community comment is already addressed through Action CN-1.10, which will create the Collaborative Letter public awareness of best practices for and participation in household evaluate, monitor, and make recommendations to address air quality and environmental hazard Environmental Quality webpage (webpage is proposed as part of Action CN-1.10) where (MPNA, OCEJ, hazardous waste management and disposal. Designate an online issues, with a special focus on environmental justice areas. Publish results and information on the reports, data, maps, and other resources will be made publicly accessible. THRIVE, & Rise Up informational resource for residents and community members to educate City's website through a dedicated Santa Ana Environmental Quality webpage. Willowick) received themselves on the hazards of potential pollution exposure from residential, 3.14.2022 commercial, or industrial violations. 19 Suggested Polity Change: Policy S-3.4: Multiagency Education Campaign - Recommended Policy Change: S-3.4: Multiagency Education Campaign. Develop cooperative The comment is noted and is recommended to be included in its entirety. Collaborative Letter Develop cooperative partnerships and strengthen communication among partnerships and strengthen communication among public agencies, residents, nonprofit (MPNA, OCEJ, public agencies, residents, nonprofit organizations, community groups, and organizations, community groups, and businesses to promote sharing of educational information THRIVE, & Rise Up businesses to promote sharing of educational information regarding seismic regarding seismic and geologic hazards and safety. Willowick) received and geologic hazards and safety. 3.14.2022 20 Suggested Polity Change: Policy LU-3.11: Air Pollution Buffers - Promote 1) Recommended Policy Change: LU-3.11: Air Pollution Buffers. Work with the Environmental Policy has been revised to indicate that landscape buffer will be implemented. The actual Collaborative Letter landscaping and other buffers to separate existing sensitive uses by at least a Justice Action Committee to develop and implement landscaping and other local land use and distance will not be included until such time that analysis proposed under Action LU-3.2 to (MPNA, OCEJ, distance of 1,000 feet from rail lines, heavy industrial facilities, and other zoning buffer strategies, guided by the California Air Resources Board and the Southern California conduct a study to evaluate, inform, and establish appropriate minimum distances is THRIVE, & Rise Up Air Quality Management District best practices, to separate existing sensitive uses from rail lines, emissions sources. As feasible, aApply more substantial buffers within completed. Including a distance before such study is complete would not take local conditions Willowick) received environmental justice area boundaries. Collaborate with the rail companies to heavy industrial facilities, and other emissions sources. As feasible, apply more substantial buffers into account and would be arbitrary. New Action LU-4.9. is proposed to address rail lines. 3.14.2022 renovate the walls between communities and rail lines that provide the within environmental justice area boundaries. Including a buffer stated as priority by members of MPNA. Staff recommends changes to maximum protection for the community and public health. Develop strategies 2) Recommended New Action: LU-4.9: Collaborate with rail road right-of-way owners and operators policy based on March 28, 2022 and subsequent roundtables. to reduce air and noise pollution. to renovate the walls between communities and rail lines that provide the maximum protection for the community and public health, including strategies to reduce air and noise pollution. 21 Suggested Action Change: Action CM-3.8 - Environmental Soil And Human Recommended Action Change: CM-3.8: Environmental Soil and Human Health Screening. Action has been modified to reflect the spirit of the comment and to be inclusive of all persons Collaborative Letter -Ith Screening. Collaborate with Orange County Health Care Agency and Collaborate with Orange County Health Care Agency and local stakeholders, such as Orange County residing in Santa Ana regardless of group affiliation, legal status, or insurance type or lack (MPNA, OCEJ, local stakeholders, such as Orange County Environmental Justice and UC Environmental Justice and UC Irvine Public Health, in efforts to provide increased healthcare there of. Additionally, Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA) programs do not make a THRIVE, & Rise Up Irvine Public Health, in efforts to provide increased healthcare services (i.e., services (i.e., blood lead testing, treatment) for residents, especially those that reside in distinction of anyone's legal or insurance status when providing services related to lead. Willowick) received environmental iustice communities. Additionally, collaborate to advocate for adjustment of the blood lead testing, treatment) for residents of environmental justice 3.14.2022 communities, including undocumented, uninsured, and under -insured County and State policies for health and environmental screening levels to promote healthy residents living in neighborhoods impacted by soil lead contamination and to outcomes related to lead contamination as recommended by health experts. agree upon locally acceptable and enforceable safety thresholds for lead exposure and contamination. Additionally, collaborate to advocate for adjustment of the County and State policies for health and environmental screening levels to pro as recommended by hea to Page 4 Catalog of City of Santa Ana Draft General Plan Update Comments Received Post February 15, 2022 q Public Comments/Concerns Draft Policies and Implementation Actions Addressing Comments/Concerns City Response Source of Comment 22 Suggested Agency/Time Frame Change: PBA / M2-2 Ongoing Recommended Agency/Time Frame Change: PBA / Ongoing The comment is noted and is recommended to be included in its entirety. Collaborative Letter (MPNA, OCEJ, THRIVE, & Rise Up Willowick) received 3.14.2022 23 Suggested Action Change: Action CN-1.10:'n"Fagenc; Team Environmental Recommended New Action: CM-3.9: Environmental Justice Staff. Identify funding and hire a full- The community comment is in alignment with comments provided by members of the City Collaborative Letter Justice Office. Establish an environmental quality MeFageney team justice time Environmental Justice staff member to collaborate with the community to ReWe4he- Council. Staff has prepared a recommended action to identify funding and hire a full-time EJ (MPNA, OCEJ, implemente6eff-ef the environmental justice policies and actions including community outreach, office with at least one public health expert on staff to ensure community staff person per Council's input. Action revised in response to OCEJ comment that THRIVE, & Rise Up collaboration on environmental health studies, pursuing grants, and coordination with federal, capacity to play a leadership role in implementation of policy, implementation of EJ policies and actions should be a collaboration and guided by the Willowick) received state, and local agencies regarding environmental concerns in the City. Agency: CMO/PBA and implementation, and decisions involving environmental quality and community. 3.14.2022 Target Year: 2022. environmental justice issues; to coordinate across agencies to implement environmental justice aspects of the General Plan and to evaluate, monitor, and make recommendations to address air quality and environmental hazard issues, with a special focus on environmental justice areas; Ppublish results and information on the City's website through a dedicated Santa Ana Environmental Quality web page. 24 Suggested Action Change: Action CN-1.11: Public Education - Augment Existing Action: CN-1.10: Interagency Team. Establish an environmental quality interagency team to Community comment is already addressed through proposed Action CN-1.10 which will create Collaborative Letter existing outreach programs to improve public awareness of State, regional evaluate, monitor, and make recommendations to address air quality and environmental hazard the Environmental Quality webpage portal to publish data, maps, and resources. (MPNA, OCEJ, and local agencies' roles and resources to identify, monitor, and address air issues, with a special focus on environmental justice areas. Publish results and information on the THRIVE, & Rise Up quality and other environmental hazards in the community; provide regular City s website through a dedicated Santa Ana Environmental Quality webpage. Willowick) received reports to residents and environmental justice stakeholders that identify air 3.14.2022 quality and other environmental hazards as well as strategies for risk mitigation; provide accessible reporting tools and facilitate quarterly forums for community members to raise concerns about heretofore unidentified environmental health issues and environmental hazards in their neighborhoods. 25 Suggested Action Change: Action CN-1.13: Community Survey On Health Recommended Action Change: CN-1.13: Community Survey On Health Lifestyles. Plan for and Action has been revised to address the spirit of the suggestions. Through actions such as CN- Collaborative Letter Lifestyles - Plan for and conduct a community survey of residents related to conduct a community survey of residents every two years related to community health, pollution , 1.10, results of surveys, analysis, and outcomes will be publicly accessible through the (MPNA, OCEJ, community health, air quality, parks, and community services; with focused parks, community engagement, and community services; with focused outreach for environment Environmental Quality webpage. THRIVE, & Rise Up outreach for environment justice concerns and priority areas (tie into other justice concerns and priority areas. Report findings of survey through the various media platforms Willowick) received City efforts like Strategic Plan, park and recreation planning, community and utilize input to inform periodic evaluation and update of General Plan. 3.14.2022 benefits, etc.). Report findings to surveyed communities, and collaborate with residents and community stakeholders to shape policy and implement environmental and public health interventions to address issues identified through the survey. 26 Suggested Agency/Time Frame Change: CMO / M-2Ongoing Recommended Agency/Time Frame Change: CMO / Every Two Years The timeframe has be modified to correlate with the survey proposed to take place every two Collaborative Letter years (Action CM-1.2). (MPNA, OCEJ, THRIVE, & Rise Up Willowick) received 3.14.2022 City Council 30-7 4/19/2022 Page 5 Catalog of City of Santa Ana Draft General Plan Update Comments Received Post February 15, 2022 q Public Comments/Concerns Draft Policies and Implementation Actions Addressing Comments/Concerns City Response Source of Comment 27 Suggested Action Change: Action CN-1.14: Expanded Interactions - Identfy- Recommended Action Change: CN-1.14: Expanded Interactions. Identify opportunities to expand Action has been modified to reflect the spirit of the edits. Collaborative Letter Conduct regular meetings attendance and support neighborhood associations and community groups to hold regular (MPNA, OCEJ, meetings with City staff and decision -makers in neighborhoods within environmental justice organized by City staff to be attended regularly by City staff and decision- THRIVE, & Rise Up makers in neighborhoods within environmental justice area boundaries, so communities so that residents, community organizations, and businesses can communicate their Willowick) received that residents, community organizations, and businesses can more easily unique issues and needs, as well as their recommendations on how best to implement 3.14.2022 communicate their unique issues and needs, as well as their environmental quality, environmental health, and environmental justice policies. Arrange for recommendations on how best to implement environmental quality, language interpretation services as needed at these meetings so that all residents can participate. environmental health, and environmental justice policies. Include a translafer(s) language interpreter(s) at these meetings so that all residents can engage. Ensure that these meetings bring together residents and multiple community -based organizations whose work focuses on environmental justice. 28 Add Action: Action CN-2.6: Lead Contamination - Work with local and regional Recommended Action Change: S-2.4: Lead Contamination. Work with state local and regional Action addressing lead contamination already exists in the Safety Element (S-2.4) and Collaborative Letter partners, such as Orange County Environmental Justice, Orange County partners, such as the Department of Toxic Substances Control, South Coast Air Quality District, duplication is not necessary. (MPNA, OCEJ, Health Care Agency and University of California at Irvine Public Health, to Orange County Environmental Justice, Orange County Health Care Agency and University of THRIVE, & Rise Up understand the prevalence, sources, and implications of lead contamination California at Irvine Public Health, to understand the prevalence, sources, and implications of lead Willowick) received of soil across Santa Ana. Collaborate with such local and regional partners and contamination of soil across Santa Ana. Collaborate with such state agencies, local and regional 3.14.2022 environmental justice stakeholders in proposing, selecting, and implementing partners and environmental justice stakeholders in proposing, selecting, and implementing solutions to mitigate (i.e., remove, cover, and remediate) hazardous lead- measures to mitigate (i.e., remove, cover, and remediate) hazardous lead -contaminated soils in contaminated soils in the city in a manner that includes benchmarks the city in a manner that includes key benchmarks and routine monitoring of soil lead levels to (including but not limited to time benchmarks) and routine monitoring of soil measure and track effectiveness of selected approach. lead levels to measure and track effectiveness of selected programs. 29 Add Agency/Time Frame Change: PBA / Ongoing N/A Collaborative Letter (MPNA, OCEJ, THRIVE, & Rise Up Willowick) received 3.14.2022 30 Suggested Action Change: Action CN-2.4: Preservation Of Natural And Historic Recommended Action Change: CN-2.4: Preservation of Natural and Historic Resources. Collaborate Action has been modified to address community comment within a framework that complies Collaborative Letter Resources - Collaborate with local indigenous tribes (specifically the with local indigenous tribes and other stakeholders to identify and evaluate potential incentives in with laws related to property rights. (MPNA, OCEJ, Acjachemen and Tongva tribes) to identify, protect, and enhance natural and the municipal code to encourage protection and enhancement of natural and historic resources. THRIVE, & Rise Up historic resources across Santa Ana; lidentify and evaluate potential incentives Willowick) received in the municipal code to encourage protection and enhancement of natural 3.14.2022 and historic resources. 31 Suggested Agency/Time Frame Change: PBA / 242-2 Ongoing Suggested Agency/Time Frame Change: PBA / Ongoing The comment is noted and is recommended to be included in its entirety. Collaborative Letter (MPNA, OCEJ, THRIVE, & Rise Up Willowick) received 3.14.2022 City Council ffew-P 4/19/2022 Page 6 Catalog of City of Santa Ana Draft General Plan Update Comments Received Post February 15, 2022 # Public Comments/Concerns Draft Policies and Implementation Actions Addressing Comments/Concerns City Response Source of Comment 32 Suggested Action Change: Action S-2.4: Lead Contamination - Work with local Recommended Action Change: S-2.4: Lead Contamination. Work with gac local and regional Action has been modified to address community comment. Collaborative Letter and regional partners, such as Orange County Environmental Justice, Orange partners, such as the Department of Toxic Substances Control, South Coast Air Quality District. (MPNA, OCEJ, County Health Care Agency and University of California at Irvine Public Health, Orange County Environmental Justice, Orange County Health Care Agency and University of THRIVE, & Rise Up to understand the prevalence, sources, and implications of lead California at Irvine Public Health, to understand the prevalence, sources, and implications of lead Willowick) received contamination of soil across Santa Ana. Collaborate with such local and contamination of soil across Santa Ana. Collaborate with such state agencies, local and regional 3.14.2022 regional partners and environmental justice stakeholders in proposing, partners and environmental justice stakeholders in proposing, selecting, and implementing selecting, and implementing solutions to mitigate (i.e., remove, cover, and measures to mitigate (i.e., remove, cover, and remediate) hazardous lead -contaminated soils in remediate) hazardous lead -contaminated soils in the city and with in a the city in a manner that includes key benchmarks and routine monitoring of soil lead levels to manner that includes benchmarks (including but not limited to time measure and track effectiveness of selected approach. benchmarks) and routine monitoring of soil lead levels to measure and track effectiveness of selected programs. 33 Suggested Agency/Time Frame Change: PBA & CDA /2822Ongoing Suggested Agency/Time Frame Change: PBA & CDA / Ongoing The comment is noted and is recommended to be included in its entirety. Collaborative Letter (MPNA, OCEJ, THRIVE, & Rise Up Willowick) received 3.14.2022 34 Suggested Action Change: Action LU-3.6: Lead Paint Abatement - Coordinate Recommended Action Change: LU-3.26: Health Conditions. Work with state agencies including Community comment to pursue funding for lead paint abatement is already addressed in Collaborative Letter with County of Orange Health Care Agency and community organizations to Department of Toxic Substances Control and South Coast Air Quality Management District, Orange proposed Action LU-3.26, and in the draft Housing Element. Funding to assist low-income (MPNA, OCEJ, strengthen local programs and initiatives to eliminate lead -based paint County Health Care Agency, and local stakeholders including Orange County Environmental Justice property owners is included in Proposed Action in Housing Element: HE-1 Single -Family Home THRIVE, & Rise Up hazards, with priority given to residential buildings located within and UC Irvine Public Health to identify baseline conditions for lead soil and lead contamination in Rehabilitation: Provide grants of up to $25,000 for the repair and rehabilitation of single-family Willowick) received environmental justice area boundaries. Pursue funding to establish programs Santa Ana, routinely monitor indicators of lead such contamination, and measure positive homes, prioritizing applicants in R/ECAP and TCAC census tracts, and low-income households. 3.14.2022 to assist low-income property owners in covering the cost of lead paint outcomes. Collaborate with these organizations to secure grant funds for soil and air testing, Seek to augment funding and program reach by tracking and applying for grants as abatement, as well as programs to assist rental property owners in covering remediation (e.g., bioremediation, covering, removing, air filtration), and prevention activities for opportunities arise. Proposed Action in Housing Element: HE-2 Mobile Home Repair: Provide residential properties in proximity to sites identified with high seillead levels of soil pollution the cost of temporary lodging for tenants who must leave their homes during grants of up to $25,000 for the repair and rehabilitation of mobile homes, prioritizing lead paint abatement. (including sites identified with soil lead levels of 80 ppm or higher), and air pollution, with a focus applicants in R/ECAP and TCAC census tracts, low-income households, and seniors. Seek to on communities disproportionately affected by soil contamination. augment funding and program reach by tracking and applying for grants as opportunities arise. Proposed Action in Housing Element: HE-3 Multiple -Family Rental Rehabilitation: Provide low -interest loans to assist in the rehabilitation of rental properties occupied by low- income and family households, prioritizing applicants in R/ECAP and TCAC census tracts. Seek to augment funding and program reach by tracking and applying for grants as opportunities arise. Per March 28, 2022 roundtable, new revisions related to soil and air included in response to MPNA comments to broaden collection of baseline conditions. Reference to 80 ppm added in response to OCEJ comments in context of pursuing grant funding. 35 Suggested Agency/Time Frame Change: CDA/2924 Ongoing Recommended Agency/Time Frame Change: CDA / Ongoing The comment is noted and is recommended to be included in its entirety. Collaborative Letter (MPNA, OCEJ, THRIVE, & Rise Up Willowick) received 3.14.2022 City Council E 4/19/2022 Page 7 Catalog of City of Santa Ana Draft General Plan Update Comments Received Post February 15, 2022 q Public Comments/Concerns Draft Policies and Implementation Actions Addressing Comments/Concerns City Response Source of Comment 36 Add Action: Action LU-3.XX: Protect Worker's Health During Lead Paint N/A Workplace safety is already regulated by Cal/OSHA and is outside of the City's regulatory Collaborative Letter Abatement. Provide appropriate protective gear and equipment for workers authority. (MPNA, OCEJ, certified as lead renovators when conducting renovation activities. Ensure THRIVE, & Rise Up that trained workers have reasonable workloads and time frames for Willowick) received completion of renovation activities. 3.14.2022 37 Add Agency/Time Frame Change: PBA & CDA/ Ongoing N/A N/A Collaborative Letter (MPNA, OCEJ, THRIVE, & Rise Up Willowick) received 3.14.2022 38 Suggested Action Change: Action LU-3.18: Renovations and Lead Prevention - N/A Workplace safety is already regulated by Cal/OSHA and is outside of the City's regulatory Collaborative Letter Require contractor training and/or authority. (MPNA, OCEJ, certification for safe work practices to conduct residential renovations for pre- THRIVE, & Rise Up 1978 structures that may contain existing lead paint. When conducting lead Willowick) received paint abatement, ensure that workers have proper physical protections; 3.14.2022 safeguard other areas of the abated building or residence from lead or other toxins that may be res-suspended in the air, soil, and dust; provide support for temporary relocation of residents during abatement process; and monitor lead levels for workers, residents, and the indoor and outdoor environment of the residence that was abated. 39 Suggested Agency/Time Frame Change: PBA & CDA / 242-2. Ongoing N/A N/A Collaborative Letter (MPNA, OCEJ, THRIVE, & Rise Up Willowick) received 3.14.2022 40 Suggested Action Change: LU-3.19: Promote Health - Partner with local Recommended Action Change: LU-3.19: Promote Health. Partner with local organizations (e.g., OC Action has been modified to include additional groups such as OCEJ and Garden Grove School Collaborative Letter organizations (e.g., OC Health Care Agency, Latino Health Access, Santa Ana Health Care Agency, Latino Health Access, Santa Ana Unified School District, Garden Grove Unified District. Specific program information and approach changes overtime and can be addressed (MPNA, OCEJ, Unified School District, Orange County Environmental Justice, and the School District, Orange County Environmental Justice, and the Coalition of Community Health through program development and implementation. THRIVE, & Rise Up Coalition of Community Health Centers) to increase blood lead testing, Centers) to increase blood lead testing, outreach, education, and referral services through a Willowick) received outreach, education, and referral services through a'promotora' or 'promotora' or community peer outreach model that addresses the root causes of elevated blood 3.14.2022 community peer outreach model that addresses the root causes of elevated lead levels impacting Santa Ana residents, with special focus in environmental justice communities blood lead levels impacting Santa Ana residents, with special focus in and for children living in pre-1978 housing. environmental justice communities and for children living in pre-1978 housing. Through the promotora program, inform residents of their test results, and coordinate with these organizations and other community health providers to ensure residents exposed to lead have access to comprehensive health care services. 41 Suggested Agency/Time Frame Change: PBA /20K Ongoing Suggested Agency/Time Frame Change: PBA / Ongoing The comment is noted and is recommended to be included in its entirety. Collaborative Letter (MPNA, OCEJ, THRIVE, & Rise Up Willowick) received 3.14.2022 City Council 30 — 10 4/19/2022 Page 8 Catalog of City of Santa Ana Draft General Plan Update Comments Received Post February 15, 2022 q Public Comments/Concerns Draft Policies and Implementation Actions Addressing Comments/Concerns City Response Source of Comment 42 Suggested Action Change: Action LU-3.21: Prevention Education - Collaborate Recommended Action Change: LU-3.21: Prevention Education. Collaborate with local organizations Action has been modified to reflect community comment. Specific program information and Collaborative Letter with local organizations such as Orange County Health Care Agency and State such as Orange County Health Care Agency, State Environmental Protection Agency, and approach changes overtime and can be addressed through program development and (MPNA, OCEJ, Environmental Protection Agency and community -based environmental community -based environmental justice organizations to identify funds and create a Santa Ana implementation. THRIVE, & Rise Up justice organizations and identify funds to create a Santa Ana Prevent Lead Prevent Lead Poisoning Education Program, with special focus on disadvantaged communities and Willowick) received Poisoning Education Program, with special focus on disadvantaged pre-1978 housing stock. 3.14.2022 communities and pre-1978 housing stock. Implement mechanisms for local community -based environmental justice organizations to guide the Santa Ana Prevent Lead Poisoning Education Program and provide annual reports regarding fund activities and allocation of resources. 43 Suggested Agency/Time Frame Change: PBA / 202-2 Ongoing Recommended Agency/Time Frame Change: PBA / Ongoing The comment is noted and is recommended to be included in its entirety. Collaborative Letter (MPNA, OCEJ, THRIVE, & Rise Up Willowick) received 3.14.2022 44 Suggested Action Change: Action LU-3.22: Public Health Outcomes - Support Recommended Action Change: LU-3.22: Public Health Outcomes. Support the Orange County Action has been modified to reflect community comment. Collaborative Letter the Orange County Health Care Agency in their role in investigating public Health Care Agency in their role in investigating public complaints regarding unsafe lead work (MPNA, OCEJ, complaints regarding lead hazards, through investigation of resident- practices and lead hazards wherein children are present, through enforcement of local housing THRIVE, & Rise Up identified concerns and enforcement of local housing and soil standards to standards to assure healthy outcomes including for individuals and households presenting with Willowick) received assure healthy outcomes, including for individuals and households presenting concerns about lead exposure and/or with confirmed lead levels of>3.5 ug/dL, which the Centers 3.14.2022 with concerns about lead exposures and/or with confirmed blood lead levels for Disease Control and Prevention indicates as the threshold for follow-up and case management of >3.5ug/dL, which the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indicates in children. as the threshold for follow-up and case management. 45 Suggested Agency/Time Frame Change: PBA / 2W42022 & Ongoing Recommended Agency/Time Frame Change: PBA / 2022 & Ongoing Collaborative Letter (MPNA, OCEJ, THRIVE, & Rise Up Willowick) received 3.14.2022 46 Suggested Action Change: Action LU-3.25: Engage EJ Communities: Work with Recommended New Action: CM-3.9: Environmental Justice Staff. Identify funding and hire a full- The community comment is in alignment with comments provided by members of the City Collaborative Letter community serving organizations, neighborhood leaders, and residents to time Environmental Justice staff member to collaborate with the community to ¢ctihe Council. Staff has prepared a recommended action to identify funding and hire a full-time EJ (MPNA, OCEJ, implemente#en-ef the environmental justice policies and actions including community outreach, form an Environmental Justice Office with at least one public health expert staff person per Council's input. Action revised in response to OCEJ comment that THRIVE, & Rise Up collaboration on environmental health studies, pursuing grants, and coordination with federal, staffAd H,._Committee to develop ongoing EJ Community Engagement implementation of EJ policies and actions should be a collaboration and guided by the Willowick) received state, and local agencies regarding environmental concerns in the City. Agency: CMO/PBA and programs for existing and new disadvantaged EJ communities, including community. 3.14.2022 Target Year: 2022. multilingual communication protocols. Host biannual or quarterly Roundtable meetings with local stakeholders to guide and evaluate implementation of environmental justice policies and the environmental justice -related roles and responsibilities of any potential Public Health Director or Public Health Department. 47 Suggested Agency/Time Frame Change: PBA / 29.4 Ongoing Recommended Agency/Time Frame: CMO/PBA / 2022 Collaborative Letter (MPNA, OCEJ, THRIVE, & Rise Up Willowick) received 3.14.2022 City Council 30 — 11 4/19/2022 Page 9 Catalog of City of Santa Ana Draft General Plan Update Comments Received Post February 15, 2022 q Public Comments/Concerns Draft Policies and Implementation Actions Addressing Comments/Concerns City Response Source of Comment 48 Suggested Action Change: Action LU-3.26: Health Conditions - Work with Recommended Action Change: LU-3.26: Health Conditions. Work with state agencies including Action has been modified to address frequency of soil monitoring, examples of remediation Collaborative Letter Orange County Health Care Agency and local stakeholders including Orange Department of Toxic Substances Control and South Coast Air Quality Management District. Orange and emphasis on communities disproportionally affected by soil contamination. Actionable (MPNA, OCEJ, County Health Care Agency, and local stakeholders including Orange County Environmental Justice County Environmental Justice and UC Irvine Public Health to identify baseline thresholds are legally established by state and federal agencies. Public reporting of findings THRIVE, & Rise Up conditions for lead contamination in Santa Ana, routinely monitor indicators and UC Irvine Public Health to identify baseline conditions for lead soil and air contamination in and resources related to soil contamination, pollution, and environmental justice is already Willowick) received of lead contamination, and measure positive outcomes. Collaborate with Santa Ana, routinely monitor indicators of lead such contamination, and measure positive addressed in Action CN-1.10, which aims to share environmental justice related information 3.14.2022 these organizations to secure grant funds for soil testing, and remediation outcomes. Collaborate with these organizations to secure grant funds for soil and air testing, through the creation a dedicated Santa Ana Environmental Quality webpage. Per March 28, (e.g., bioremediation, covering, removing), and prevention activities for remediation (e.g., bioremediation, covering, removing, air filtration) and prevention activities for 2022 roundtable, new revisions related to soil and air included in response to MPNA residential properties in proximity to sites identified with high seillead levels of soil pollution residential properties in proximity to sites identified with high soil lead levels comments to broaden collection of baseline conditions. Reference to 80 ppm added in of 80 ppm or higher, with a focus on EnviFenme-"' justiEe eensu"•aets (including sites identified with soil lead levels of 80 ppm or higher), and pollution, with a focus on response to OCEJ comments in context of pursuing grant funding. communities disproportionately affected by soil contamination. communities disproportionately affected by soil contamination and other forms of environmental burden. Publicly report findings from regular monitoring of soil lead levels and remediation and prevention activities. 49 Suggested Agency/Time Frame Change: PBA / 2022-Ongoing Recommended Agency/Time Frame Change: PEA / Ongoing The comment is noted and is recommended to be included in its entirety. Collaborative Letter (MPNA, OCEJ, THRIVE, & Rise Up Willowick) received 3.14.2022 50 Suggested Action Change: Action LU-3.28: Tenant Protections - Provide tenant Recommended Action Change: LU-3.28: Tenant Protections. Provide information to residential Tenant protections are addressed by state law, and the City of Santa Ana has taken additional Collaborative Letter protections for renters living in low- and moderate -income census tracts (or tenants regarding Landlord Tenant Laws in the State, such as AB 1481, and Santa Ana's Just Cause steps to ensure tenants are protected through its Just Cause Eviction and Rent Stabilization (MPNA, OCEJ, households), as defined by HUD, where environmental hazards such as lead For Tenant Eviction and Rent Stabilization ordinances that provide protections against evictions for ordinances. Additionally, Action HE-52 in the proposed Housing Element Update includes THRIVE, & Rise Up contamination have been discovered. Tenant protections include rent control those who seek action to improve substandard housing and hazardous conditions. holding annual small apartment managers' workshop to train and educate property owners, Willowick) received and protection against unjust evictions and will continue during and following HOAs, property managers, and tenants of best practices in property management, 3.14.2022 remediation of lead contamination. Provide information to residential tenants neighborhood safety, and landlord/tenant responsibilities; and partnering with legal regarding Landlord Tenant Laws in the State, such as AB 1481, that provide assistance organizations to provide legal clinics for tenants on tenants' rights and recourse for protections against evictions for those who seek action to improve intimidation and unjust evictions. Together, the proposed actions already in the drafts will substandard housing and hazardous conditions. provide the protections being suggested. 51 Suggested Action Change: Action LU-3.29: Development Site History -Update N/A Making development project related documents public is vital to maintaining a transparent Collaborative Letter the City's Development Review application process to require developers to development process. As such, this is already required by the City's Sunshine Ordinance. (MPNA, OCEJ, provide information regarding the prior use of the site and history of Development projects are required to create project specific webpages where plans, reports, THRIVE, & Rise Up hazardous materials on the property, in order to identify potential for site and renderings are published and available for public review. If the draft General Plan Update Willowick) received contamination from hazardous materials or soil lead contamination to be is approved and development site history reports are required, reports generated will be 3.14.2022 remediated. Make development site history publicly accessible. posted to the project webpage like the other documents. Suggested language is not needed as making such data publicly available is already required. 52 Suggested Action Change: Action LU-4.3: Public Improvements In Activity Recommended Action Change: LU-4.3: Public Improvements in Activity Nodes and Focus Area. Soil contamination reduction is an important issue facing Santa Ana communities. As such, Collaborative Letter Nodes And Focus Area - Create a public realm plan for each activity node and Create a public realm plan for each activity node and focus area to establish a unified vision for long there are numerous policies and actions specific to that issue. Augmenting soil contamination (MPNA, OCEJ, focus area to establish a unified vision for long-term improvements to streets, term improvements to streets, sidewalks, plazas, other public spaces, and placemaking elements. to this action, which is to formulate a vison and plan for public improvements at activity THRIVE, & Rise Up sidewalks, plazas, other public spaces, and placemaking elements. Identify soil Identify public improvement priorities and pilot projects for each focus area and include them in nodes, is not germane or necessary. Action has been modified for clarity. Willowick) received contamination reduction opportunities and other public improvement the City's Capital Improvement Program.'------ pFiefity improvements and -"-` pfejeEts Me the 3.14.2022 priorities and pilot projects for each focus area. [Sic) Program priority improvements and pilot projects into the City's Capital Improvement Program. City Council 30 — 12 4/19/2022 Page 10 Catalog of City of Santa Ana Draft General Plan Update Comments Received Post February 15, 2022 # Public Comments/Concerns Draft Policies and Implementation Actions Addressing Comments/Concerns City Response Source of Comment 53 Suggested Agency/Time Frame Change: PBA / 2022 & Ongoing Suggested Agency/Time Frame Change: PEA / 2022 & Ongoing The comment is noted and is recommended to be included in its entirety. Collaborative Letter (MPNA, OCEJ, THRIVE, & Rise Up Willowick) received 3.14.2022 54 Suggested Action Change: Action LU-4.7: Construction Improvements - N/A The suggested edits pertaining to soil contamination and worker safety are not germane to the Collaborative Letter Identify best practices and communication tools to reduce soil contamination nature of this policy. Soil issues are exhaustively covered in draft policies and actions of the (MPNA, OCEJ, and monitor mitigation measures and oversight of private and public Plan (example actions include S-2.4, LU-3.6, LU-3.17, LU-3.18, LU-3.19, LU-3.20, LU-3.21, LU- THRIVE, & Rise Up construction improvements to protect the health and safety of workers, the 3.22, LU-3.24, LU-3.26, LU-3.29, and CM-3.8) and worker safety is covered and enforced by Willowick) received community, and the soil, with focus on environmental justice areas. Cal/OSHA. The Policy was specifically drafted to ensure identification and implementation of 3.14.2022 best construction practices as a component of the CEQA review and implementation process. 55 Suggested Action Change: Action HP-1.5: Historic Design Standards - Update N/A Action HP-1.5 is strictly related to design. While lead contamination is an important issue Collaborative Letter historic design standards for preserving historic setting and context, facing Santa Ana communities, it is not germane to this actions and is already being addressed (MPNA, OCEJ, incorporating best practices related to landscape design, front yard fences, through other policies and actions such as action LU-3.6 Lead Paint Abatement and action S- THRIVE, & Rise Up other property features, and remediation of lead -based paint and lead- 2.4 Lead Contamination. Willowick) received contaminated soil. 3.14.2022 56 Suggested Action Change: Action HP-1.6: Historic Resources Survey -Survey Recommended New Action: HP-2.7: Native American Cultural Significance. Consult with affiliated A new action has been added in the Historic Preservation element to address community Collaborative Letter all City -owned historic resources to identify condition, maintenance and tribes listed with the California Native American Heritage Commission to identify sites of cultural, comment. (MPNA, OCEJ, spiritual, and/or historical significance to their tribes, and work with them to preserve, restore or repair needs, and sources of funding for upgrades. Consult with local THRIVE, & Rise Up celebrate these sites, where feasible. indigenous tribes (Juaneno/Acjachemen and Gabrieleno/Tongva) to identify Willowick) received sites of cultural, spiritual, and/or historical significance to their tribes, and 3.14.2022 work with them to preserve and/or restore these sites. Work with local tribes to hear and implement proposals to ensure continued indigenous access and custodianship of these sites. 57 Suggested Agency/Time Frame Change: PRCSA & PWA / 2022 & Ongoing Recommended Agency/Time Frame Change: PEA / 2023 & Ongoing Collaborative Letter (MPNA, OCEJ, THRIVE, & Rise Up Willowick) received 3.14.2022 58 Suggested Action Change: Action HP-1.7: Oral History - Seek funding to N/A Action HP-1.7 is meant to include all historic and cultural histories regardless of group Collaborative Letter reinstate local oral history program to capture Santa Ana's historic and affiliation, which includes indigenous tribes. Incorporating suggested language will narrow the (MPNA, OCEJ, cultural narrative. Work with local tribes (Juaneno/Acjachemen and focus of the action and not be as inclusive as intended. THRIVE, & Rise Up Gabrieleno/Tongva) to contribute knowledge on indigenous history (pre- Willowick) received colonization to present) to the oral history program. 3.14.2022 59 Suggested Action Change: Action HP-3.2: Historic Properties - Update and Recommended New Action: HP-2.7: Native American Cultural Significance. Consult with affiliated A new action has been added in the Historic Preservation element to address community Collaborative Letter expand citywide Historic Properties Survey Program to identify potential tribes listed with the California Native American Heritage Commission to identify sites of cultural. comment. (MPNA, OCEJ, spiritual, and/or historical significance to their tribes, and work with them to preserve, restore or historic resources for placement on local Register and those that are at risk of THRIVE, & Rise Up losing their historic value, with the first phase to include resource evaluation celebrate these sites, where feasible. Willowick) received of the Focus Areas. Consult with local indigenous tribes (Juaneno/Acjachemen 3.14.2022 and Gabrieleno/Tongva) to identify sites of cultural, spiritual, and/or historical significance to their tribes, and work with them to preserve and/or restore these sites. Work with local tribes to hear and implement proposals to ensure continued indigenous access and custodianship of these sites. City Council 30 — 13 4/19/2022 Page 11 Catalog of City of Santa Ana Draft General Plan Update Comments Received Post February 15, 2022 q Public Comments/Concerns Draft Policies and Implementation Actions Addressing Comments/Concerns City Response Source of Comment 60 Suggested Action Change: Action HP-3.3: Historical Places - Proactively Recommended New Action: HP-2.7: Native American Cultural Significance. Consult with affiliated A new action has been added in the Historic Preservation element to address community Collaborative Letter nominate all properties that potentially qualify for placement on the Santa tribes listed with the California Native American Heritage Commission to identify sites of cultural. comment. (MPNA, OCEJ, spiritual, and/or historical significance to their tribes, and work with them to preserve, restore or Ana Register of Historical Places. Consult with local indigenous tribes THRIVE, & Rise Up celebrate these sites, where feasible. (Juaneno/Acjachemen and Gabrieleno/Tongva) to identify and nominate sites Willowick) received of cultural, spiritual, and/or historical significance to their tribes. 3.14.2022 61 Suggested Action Change: Action HP-3.4: Community Engagement - Prepare a Recommended Action Change: HP-3.4: Community Engagement. Prepare a community Action has been modified to reflect the spirit of the community comment. Collaborative Letter community engagement plan that targets communities with historic resources engagement plan that targets communities with historic resources that have low participation rates (MPNA, OCEJ, that have low participation rates in historic preservation programs. Prepare a in historic preservation programs including hard to reach communities and affiliated tribes listed THRIVE, & Rise Up specific community engagement plan focused on local indigenous tribes with the California Native American Heritage Commission. Willowick) received (Juaneno/Acjachemen and Gabrieleno/Tongva), their historic resources, and 3.14.2022 their efforts to preserve these resources. 62 Suggested Action Change: Action HP-3.6: Historic Resources Commission - N/A Historic Resources Commissioners are appointed by City Council with minimum qualifications Collaborative Letter Establish minimum qualifications for participation on the Historic Resources enumerated in the SAMC. The Action as drafted provides a flexible but specific mandate (MPNA, OCEJ, Commission. Include at least one Acjachemen/Juaneno elder/recognized requiring minimum qualifications germane to the Commission and can grow and change to THRIVE, & Rise Up culture keeper, and at least one Tongva/Gabireleno elder/recognized culture reflect the values of the community. Willowick) received keeper on the Historic Resources Commission. 3.14.2022 63 Suggested Action Change: Action HP-3.10: Public Awareness - Participate in Recommended Action Change: HP-3.10: Public Awareness. Participate in and support efforts of The comment is noted and is recommended to be included in its entirety. Collaborative Letter and support efforts of preservation organizations, indigenous preservation preservation organizations, affiliated tribes listed with the California Native American Heritage (MPNA, OCEJ, organizations and tribes, and business groups to promote public awareness Commission and business groups to promote public awareness and educational opportunities that THRIVE, & Rise Up and educational opportunities that highlight historic preservation. highlight historic preservation. Willowick) received 3.14.2022 64 Establish an Environmental Justice Office to allow for ongoing accountability Recommended New Action: CM-3.9: Environmental Justice Staff. Identify funding and hire a full- The community comment is in alignment with comments provided by members of the City Collaborative Letter and collaboration between local residents, community organizations, and City time Environmental Justice staff member to collaborate with the community to ec+de tie Council. Staff has prepared a recommended action to identify funding and hire a full-time EJ (MPNA, OCEJ, implementa6eff-ef the environmental justice policies and actions including community outreach, staff staff person per Council's input. Action revised in response to OCEJ comment that THRIVE, & Rise Up collaboration on environmental health studies, pursuing grants, and coordination with federal, implementation of EJ policies and actions should be a collaboration and guided by the Willowick) received state, and local agencies regarding environmental concerns in the City. Agency: CMO/PBA and community. 3.14.2022 Target Year: 2022. 65 Improve alignment between Community Considerations, polity goals, and N/A Policies and actions have been revised to reflect the latest round of community comments and Collaborative Letter Implementation actions. considerations. (MPNA, OCEJ, THRIVE, & Rise Up Willowick) received 3.14.2022 66 Suggested Action Change: Action LU-1.2: Community Benefits - Develop a Recommended Action Change: LU-1.2: Community Benefits. Require new development projects Creating community benefits through development is critical to realizing the vision developed Collaborative Letter standard of review for evaluation of a new development project's net proposing a zone change and/or general plan amendment to include as part of the development by the community and included in the draft General Plan Update. As such, community benefits (MPNA, OCEJ, proposal, a community benefit and implementation plan providing a net community benefit as community benefit by identifying types of community benefits desired in are being addressed through a two -facet approach. By right projects are subjected to THRIVE, & Rise Up neighborhoods through public outreach. Assess capital costs and ongoing desired by the City and neighborhoods through public outreach. Example of community benefits established development impact fees and exactions used to benefit the community (i.e. new Willowick) received operations and maintenance costs; conduct a financial feasibility analysis to may include, but is not limited to public realm improvements, dedication of park and open space parks, roadway improvements, etc.). A requirement for additional community benefits 3.14.2022 for public use, expanded economic development opportunities, lob opportunities, new community determine the impacts of community benefits on the feasibility of desired imposed on by -right projects without an impact nexus and at the thresholds recommended is serving businesses and services, and removal of blight and incompatible land uses. Assess capital types of development. Require new developments to provide specific legally not defensible and problematic. However, development projects seeking to develop community benefits identified by local residents. Utilize community benefit costs and ongoing operations and maintenance costs; conduct a financial feasibility analysis to beyond what is permitted by right provide such an opportunity and is the focus of Action LU- agreements for new developments over 2,000 SF or 15 units. Support only determine the impacts of community benefits on the feasibility of desired types of development. 1.2 Community Benefits. The action is being modified for added clarity. new development which provides specific, material community benefits and enhances existing neighborhood character and identity. City Council 30 — 14 4/19/2022 Page 12 Catalog of City of Santa Ana Draft General Plan Update Comments Received Post February 15, 2022 # Public Comments/Concerns Draft Policies and Implementation Actions Addressing Comments/Concerns City Response Source of Comment 67 Suggested Action Change: Action LU-2.8: City -Owned Land - Coordinate future N/A Creating additional home ownership opportunities can be furthered through the creation of Collaborative Letter disposition of City -owned property and remnant parcels, consistent with the community land trust (CLT). However, utilizing City owned parcels of land might prove (MPNA, OCEJ, Surplus Land Act. Utilize public resources including Surplus Land to support challenging due to many having restrictions based on funds used at the time of purchase. The THRIVE, & Rise Up the development of at least one community land trust, to provide draft Housing Element Update includes an action to identify funding and to partner with Willowick) received opportunities for community ownership and permanent affordability. community based organizations to support the creation of a CLT program, which was crafted 3.14.2022 in partnership with community groups. Having CLT related actions in the Housing Element is germane and appropriate. 68 Include language in support of mobile home residents throughout Elements in N/A The draft Housing Element Update includes actions specifically related to supporting mobile Collaborative Letter the General Plan home residents, such as action HE-2 which will provide grants of up to $25,000 for the repair (MPNA, OCEJ, and rehabilitation of mobile homes, prioritizing applicants in R/ECAP and TCAC census tracts, THRIVE, & Rise Up low-income households, and seniors. Additionally, the action will seek to augment funding and Willowick) received program reach by tracking and applying for grants as opportunities arise. No additional action 3.14.2022 related to the broader draft General Plan Update is necessary. 69 The following city -owned parcels should be designated open space, per City N/A The parcels identified along Flower Street and Garnsey Street are not all City owned Collaborative Letter Council direction on 8/17/2021: 915, 921 N Flower St, and 842 N Garnsey St, properties, and therefore the General Plan land use designation cannot be changed at this (MPNA, OCEJ, Santa Ana 92703 (APN#005-142-35, - 47, -58), 925 N Flower, 852 N Garnsey, time. However, City staff is in the process of acquiring the three privately owned parcels to THRIVE, & Rise Up and 848 N Garnsey, Santa Ana 92703 consolidate with City owned parcels and develop the site as a park in the future. The parcel at Willowick) received (APN# 005-142-34, -49, -48). 810 N English St —Artesia Pilar Neighborhood has 810 North English Street is a recently acquired site. Staff is including the parcel for future 3.14.2022 expressed interest in a pocket park at English and Civic Center Blvd. evaluation in the Parks Master Plan to be developed as a potential park in the future. 70 Remove ONE BROADWAY PLAZA DISTRICT CENTER (OBPCD) zoning N/A The One Broadway Plaza District Center is an existing land use designation and is not being Collaborative Letter designation proposed to change. The land use approved by voters in 2005. (MPNA, OCEJ, THRIVE, & Rise Up Willowick) received 3.14.2022 71 Recommend that an Environmental Justice Office is created and falls under Recommended New Action: CM-3.9: Environmental Justice Staff. Identify funding and hire a full- The community comment is in alignment with comments provided by members of the City Collaborative Letter the supervision of the Public Health Director and that a Environmental Justice time Environmental Justice staff member to collaborate with the community to gc+de tie Council. Staff has prepared a recommended action to identify funding and hire a full-time EJ (MPNA, OCEJ, implemente6en-ef the environmental justice policies and actions including community outreach, Standing Committee be form. staff person per Council's input. Action revised in response to OCEJ comment that THRIVE, & Rise Up collaboration on environmental health studies, pursuing grants, and coordination with federal, implementation of EJ policies and actions should be a collaboration and guided by the Willowick) received state, and local agencies regarding environmental concerns in the City. Agency: CMO/PBA and community. 3.14.2022 Target Year: 2022. 72 Suggested Language: Modify the Open Space Element to define "parks" and Recommended Definition Added to GP Glossary: Park and Parkland. Publicly accessible sites and Park and Parkland definition recommended to be included in the General Plan Introduction, Collaborative Letter "parkland" with reference to the Municipal Cod's existing definition of green space that are owned and/or managed by the City of Santa Ana to support recreation and Glossary section. (MPNA, OCEJ, social gathering. "parks": As used in the Open Space Element, "parks" and "parkland" have the THRIVE, & Rise Up same meaning as "parks" as defined in Municipal Code Section 31-1(4). Willowick) received 3.14.2022 / Rise Up Willowick letter dated 9.15.2021 City Council 30 — 15 4/19/2022 Page 13 Catalog of City of Santa Ana Draft General Plan Update Comments Received Post February 15, 2022 q Public Comments/Concerns Draft Policies and Implementation Actions Addressing Comments/Concerns City Response Source of Comment 73 Suggested Language: Modify the Open Space Element to define "open space" Recommended Definition Added to GP Glossary: Open Space. Recreational and green spaces, Open Space definition recommended to be included in the General Plan Introduction, Glossary Collaborative Letter as follows: As used in the Open Space Element, "open space" means "any including parks, commercial open space, manicured landscaped areas, and public facilities such as section. (MPNA, OCEJ, trail corridors, water channels and rail infrastructure. publicly -accessible parcel or area of land or water, whether publicly or THRIVE, & Rise Up privately -owned, that is reserved for the purpose of preserving natural Willowick) received resources, for the protection of valuable environmental features, or for 3.14.2022 / Rise Up providing outdoor recreation or education." Willowick letter dated 9.15.2021 74 Amend the Municipal Code to include this definition of "open space," which is Recommended Definition Added to GP Glossary: Open Space. Recreational and green spaces, The definitions used in the Municipal Code will be amended for consistency after the General Collaborative Letter not currently defined in the code. including parks, commercial open space, manicured landscaped areas, and public facilities such as Plan Update, Parks Master Plan, and Residential Fee analyses are completed. (MPNA, OCEJ, trail corridors, water channels and rail infrastructure. THRIVE, & Rise Up Willowick) received 3.14.2022 / Rise Up Willowick letter dated 9.15.2021 75 Suggested Language: Modify the Open Space Element to define "park Recommended Definition Added to GP Glossary: Park Deficient Area. Areas of the community that Park Deficient Area definition recommended to be included in the General Plan Introduction, Collaborative Letter deficient area" as follows: As used in the Open Space Element, "park deficient are outside the standard public parkland service radius such as 1/2 mile for Community Parks and % Glossary section. (MPNA, OCEJ, area" means "a geographic area which is located more than 0.25 miles from mile for Neighborhood Parks, respectively. THRIVE, & Rise Up the nearest public park of 5 acres or less and more than 0.5 miles from the Willowick) received nearest public park larger than 5 acres as measured along the shortest 3.14.2022 / Rise Up available pedestrian route." Willowick letter dated 9.15.2021 76 Suggested Language: Modify the Open Space Element to define Recommended Definition Change: Environmental Justice Community. A disadvantage community Definition needs to be consistent with Public Resources Code. Collaborative Letter "environmental justice area" as follows: As used in the Open Space Element, as defined by Government Code Section 65302(h)(4)(A), which is an area identified by the California (MPNA, OCEJ, Environmental Protection Agency pursuant to Section 39711 of the Health and Safety Code or a low- "environmental justice area" means "a disadvantaged community as defined THRIVE, & Rise Up income area that is disproportionately affected by environmental pollution and other hazards that by Government Code Section 65302(h)(4)(A), i.e. a low-income area that is Willowick) received can lead to negative health effects, exposure, or environmental degradation. The City uses a disproportionately affected by environmental pollution and other hazards 3.14.2022 / Rise Up that can lead to negative health effects, exposure, or environmental mapping tool from CaIEPA called CalEnviro5creen (CES) to identify the most vulnerable and Willowick letter dated degradation, or an area identified by the California Environmental Protection disadvantaged areas in Santa Ana (in the context of SB 1000). The CES tool measures indicators for 9.15.2021 Agency pursuant to Section 39711 of the Health and Safety Code." every census tract in California related to people's exposure to pollution and quality of life. The- Fesultc feF caeh _..nsus.Fact and Fed against Fy tact are eemb:ned measLi eve ether eenS..c ftern 'east iffilaaeted predueing a earnpesite seeFe that ranks eensus tFaets the te the Mast 77 Suggested New Policy: Policy OS-1.14: No Net Loss of Open Space. There shall N/A Action OS-1.4 already addresses this and no additional policy is recommended. Collaborative Letter be no net loss of Open Space in the city, excluding any acreage of a golf (MPNA, OCEJ, course that is redeveloped solely for 100% below -market rate housing. Any THRIVE, & Rise Up Open Space lost due to development shall be replaced at a ratio of at least Willowick) received 1:1. 3.14.2022 / Rise Up Willowick letter dated 9.15.2021 City Council 30 — 16 4/19/2022 Page 14 Catalog of City of Santa Ana Draft General Plan Update Comments Received Post February 15, 2022 q Public Comments/Concerns Draft Policies and Implementation Actions Addressing Comments/Concerns City Response Source of Comment 78 Suggested Action Change: Action OS-1.4: No Net Loss of Parkland Open Space. Recommended Action Change: OS-1.4: No Net Loss of Public Parkland. Establish land use provisions Action has been modified to address community comment and maintain the focus on public Collaborative Letter Establish land use provisions in the Municipal Code that pFevent prohibit in the Municipal Code that prevent a no net loss in the City of Santa Ana. Require at least a 1:1 park land that is used to calculate the City's level of service level for park services. For (MPNA, OCEJ, development that causes a net loss of iublie parkland Open Space in the city, replacement if there is any loss of public parkland or City owned open space due to public or reference, the recommended definition for "Park and Parkland" is as follows: Publicly THRIVE, & Rise Up including City parks as well as other public and private land designated as private development. accessible sites and green space that are owned and/or managed by the City of Santa Ana to Willowick) received Open Space under the General Plan or the zoning code, but excluding any support recreation and social gathering. 3.14.2022 / Rise Up acreage of a golf course that is redeveloped solely for 100% below -market Willowick letter dated rate housing. Require that any loss of Open Space be replaced at a ratio of at 9.15.2021 & City least If theFe is 1055 due to Council a-1:1 FeplaEeFaent any Of PUbliE PaNkland PANE eF private ent., that loss of public parks be replaced by new public parks, and that replacement Open Space (including public parks) be located within 0.5 miles walking distance from the lost Open Space. Require that a plan for replacement, including specific location of replacement land, be approved before or as part of approval of any project that would change the use of existing parks or Open Space. Require that development of replacement parks or Open Space occur prior to the closure or redevelopment of the lost parks or Open Space. 79 Suggested Policy Change: Policy OS-1.3: Park Standard. Establish and maintain 1) Recommended Action Change: OS-1.1: Park Needs Assessment and Master Plan. Create, adopt, The community comment to increase the ratio in acres per 1,000 residents is in alignment Collaborative Letter public open space and recreation requirements for new residential and and implement a park needs assessment and master plan, based on community input, defining with comments provided by members of the City Council. The ratio has been revised to three (MPNA, OCEJ, nonresidential development to provide sufficient opportunities for Santa Ana park service areas according to best practices, establishing a service area for each park facility, (3) acres per 1,000 residents. In addition, prioritizing the creation of new parkland over THRIVE, & Rise Up residents and visitors. StFiVe to attaiFi The City shall achieve a minimum creating a tool to evaluate needs and prioritize improvements by quadrant or appropriate impact fees is addressed in Policy OS-1.9. Willowick) received citywide park ratio of twe--three acres of Parkaand per 1,000 residents In the geographic subarea, and maintaining a list of priorities for the expansion and improvement of open 3.14.2022 / Rise Up Gty. For new residential development in Focus Areas, the City shall prioritize space and recreational facilities in each quadrant or geographic subarea to attain a park land Willowick letter dated the creation and dedication of new public parkland over the collection of standard of 3 acres per 1,000 residents. 9.15.2021 impact fees. 2) Recommended Policy Change: Policy OS-1.3: Park Standard - Establish and maintain public parks, open space, and recreation requirements for new residential and nonresidential development to provide sufficient opportunities for Santa Ana residents and visitors. Attain a minimum of 3 acres of land per 1,000 persons residing in the City of Santa Ana. 80 Suggested New Action: Action OS-1.16. Park Standard. Amend Municipal Code Recommended Action Change: OS-1.6. Development Fees. Update the City's Acquisition and Action has been modified to include updating the Acquisition and Development Ordinance Collaborative Letter Chapter 35, Article IV to require that the City achieve a minimum citywide Development Ordinance to increase the parkland dedication requirements to meet 3 acres of found in Chapter 35 of the Municipal code to be consistent with proposed park ratio of the 3 (MPNA, OCEJ, parkland per 1,000 residents. Require that fees collected in place of parkland dedication to be park ratio of three acres per 1,000 residents. acres per 1,000 residents. THRIVE, & Rise Up utilized to acquire or expand facilities within geographic proximity to new development or in Willowick) received parkland deficient areas. 3.14.2022 / Rise Up Willowick letter dated 9.15.2021 81 Suggested Policy Change: Policy OS-1.4. Park Distribution. Ensure the -that all Recommended Policy Change: OS-1.4: Park Distribution. Ensure that all City residents have access The comment is noted and is recommended to be included in its entirety. Collaborative Letter City residents have access to public OF private parks, recreation facilities, er- to public parks, recreation facilities, or trails within a 10 minute walking and biking distance of their (MPNA, OCEJ, and trails within a 10 monute0.5 mile walking and biking distance of heme homes. Prioritize park provision, programs, and partnerships in park deficient and environmental THRIVE, & Rise Up their homes. Prioritize park provision, programs, and partnerships in park justice areas. Willowick) received deficient and environmental justice areas. 3.14.2022 / Rise Up Willowick letter dated 9.15.2021 City Council 30 — 17 4/19/2022 Page 15 Catalog of City of Santa Ana Draft General Plan Update Comments Received Post February 15, 2022 q Public Comments/Concerns Draft Policies and Implementation Actions Addressing Comments/Concerns City Response Source of Comment 82 Suggested Policy Change: Policy OS-1.8. Land Acquisition and Equitable Recommended Policy Change: OS-1.8: Land Acquisition and Equitable Distribution. Acquire The comment is noted and is recommended to be included in its entirety. Collaborative Letter Distribution. Acquire available lands for available lands for parks, open space, greenways and trail corridors, with priority given to sites that (MPNA, OCEJ, parks, open space, greenways and trail corridors, with priority given to sites are within park deficient erand environmental justice areas. THRIVE, & Rise Up that are within park deficient eFand environmental justice areas. Willowick) received 3.14.2022 / Rise Up Willowick letter dated 9.15.2021 83 Suggested Policy Change: Policy OS-1.10. Creative Solutions for Deficiencies. Recommended Policy Change: OS-1.10: Creative Solutions for Deficiencies. Develop creative and Policy has been revised to address community comments. Collaborative Letter Develop creative and flexible solutions to provide greenspace and recreation flexible solutions to provide greenspace and recreation activities in park -deficient neighborhoods (MPNA, OCEJ, activities in park -deficient neighborhoods wheFe t•,a'tienal parks are not wheFe t•,a'tienal parks aFe net feasible. Encourage public, private, and commercial recreational THRIVE, & Rise Up feasible. Prioritize public parks and recreational facilities in park -deficient facilities in areas that 8Fe PaFIE deflement. that are open to the public, are physically accessible and Willowick) received areas. Encourage pt4k, private, and commercial recreational facilities i4- affordable to residents of surrounding neighborhoods, and serve community needs. 3.14.2022 / Rise Up aFeas that aFe paFIE defi - . that are open to the public, are physically Willowick letter dated accessible and affordable to residents of surrounding neighborhoods, and 9.15.2021 serve community needs. 84 Suggested Action Change: Action OS-1.10: New parkland. Create new public Recommended Action Change: OS-1.10: New parkland collaborative. Coordinate with property Action has been modified to address community comments and clarify action's focus on Collaborative Letter parkland in park- deficient areas via purchase or land dedication. In addition, owners to provide public access and programming on privately -owned open space in park deficient collaboration with private property owners to identify new public parkland and open space (MPNA, OCEJ, Goordinate with property owners to explere eptensto provide public access areas, including options to acquire land through purchase, land dedication, and obtain easements, opportunities. THRIVE, & Rise Up and programming on privately -owned open space in park deficient areas, and land leases that would allow for permanent or temporary public use of land for open space and Willowick) received Elul'__ __tiers t. aEqu re 'and thFaugh purchase 'and dedication and recreational opportunities. 3.14.2022 / Rise Up obtain easements, --and or land leases that wetdd allow for permanent or Willowick letter dated temporary public use of land -such open space for recreational eppertunities. 9.15.2021 85 Suggested Policy Cange: Policy OS-1.9 New Development. Require that FRSHFe Recommended Policy Change: OS-1.9: New Development. Require all new development to provide Policy has been revised to address community comments and to strengthen language and be Collaborative Letter all new development e _etive:•, :nt.=offl`:: Pa -!ES, open space, and provide adequate parks and open space, including via parkland dedication or development fees, in order to less ambiguous. (MPNA, OCEJ, adequate parks and open space, including via parkland dedication or meet the City's park standard. Ensure that new development includes pedestrian and multi- modal THRIVE, & Rise Up development fees, in order to meet the City's park standard. Ensure that new travelways to promote a quality living environment. For new development within park deficient Willowick) received development includes pedestrian and multi- modal travelways to promote a and environmental justice areas, prioritize the creation and dedication of new public parkland over 3.14.2022 / Rise Up quality living environment. For new development within park deficient and the collection of impact fees. Willowick letter dated environmental justice areas, prioritize the creation and dedication of new 9.15.2021 public parkland over the collection of impact fees. 86 Implementation Action OS-1.6. Development fees. E alua`e the fees FequiFed Recommended Action Change: 05-1.6: Development Fees. Update the City's Acquisition and Action has been revised to be consistent with new recommended goal of three (3) acres of Collaborative Letter by Update the City's Acquisition and Development Ordinance and adjust them Development Ordinance to increase the parkland dedication requirements to meet 3 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. (MPNA, OCEJ, to bet4er reflect current cents and needs. Update to increase the parkland parkland per 1,000 residents. Require that fees collected in place of parkland dedication to be THRIVE, & Rise Up utilized to acquire or expand facilities within geographic proximity to new development or parkland dedication requirements --o=-a`-o wheFe fees aFe spent for new Willowick) received deficient areas. development projects consistent with the dedication requirements specified 3.14.2022 / Rise Up in Implementation Action OS-1.7. Require that fees collected in place of Willowick letter dated parkland dedication for specific development projects be utilized to acquire, 9.15.2021 expand, or improve facilities within 0.5 miles walking distance from the project for which the fee was collected. City Council 30 — 18 4/19/2022 Page 16 Catalog of City of Santa Ana Draft General Plan Update Comments Received Post February 15, 2022 q Public Comments/Concerns Draft Policies and Implementation Actions Addressing Comments/Concerns City Response Source of Comment 87 suggested Action change: Action OS-1.7. Public parklands requirements #er'argeF Recommended Action Change: OS-1.7: Public Parklands Requirements for Larger Residential Action has been revised to state the size of projects that would quality under this action, but Collaborative Letter Projects. Update the Residential Development Fee Ordinance for large residential projects, which does not recommend providing the details included in the community comment. Specificity, (MPNA, OCEJ, include projects of 100 residential units or more, to require public parkland within the City limits such as in the suggested language, is too specific to include in the General Plan and would be THRIVE, & Rise Up Res dent a' PFejects tO FeqU Fe pub! e parkland v! th n a 10 FA nute walking d e of the new •e -t-. Amend Municipal Code Chapter 34, Article VIII to require and a 10-minute walking distance of the new residential projects. addressed where feasible through the development of the Parks Master Plan as subsequent Willowick) received that subdivision map approvals for residential subdivisions of more than 50 parcels revisions to the City's Acquisition and Development Ordinance. 022 / Rise Up dedicate parkland sufficient to provide three acres of park area per 1,000 people residing in the subdivision, consistent with Polity OS-1.3. Amend Municipal Code W3. Willowick Willowick letter dated Chapter 35, Article IV to require that pro jects including 100+ residential units that are 9.15.2021 80 percent market -rate or more and do not require a subdivision dedicate three acres of new public parkland concurrent with the completion of and within a 0.5-mile walking radius of the new residential project, and to require non -subdivision projects of 50 to 99 residential units that are 80 percent market -rate or more to dedicate two acres of public parkland concurrent with the completion of and within a 0.5 mile walking radius of the project. lam Establish provisions that allow these projects to reduce all onsite private and common open space requirements by 50 percent if new public parkland is provided within a 0.5-mile walking radius and by 80 percent ifthe new public parkland is immediately adjacent to or on the residential project property. To the greatest extent possible, parkland created via this dedication process shall be located in park - deficient neighborhoods and environmental justice areas. Incentivize the creation of public parks that exceed City requirements, especially within park deficient and environmental justice areas. Establish incentives for coordination between two or more residential project (of any size) to create larger and/or more centralized public park space, such as a housing density bonus for the provision of open space as a public benefit and leveraging of Residential Development fees to partner with developers to create public open space. 88 Suggested Policy Change: Policy OS-1.11: Funding SOURes: Explore and pursue Recommended Policy Change: OS-1.11: Funding Sources: Explore and pursue all available funding, Action has been modified to address community comment and new recommended goal of Collaborative Letter all available funding, including nontraditional funding sources, for park including nontraditional funding sources, for park acquisition, facility development, programming, three (3) acres per 1,000 residents. (MPNA, OCEJ, acquisition, facility development, programming, and maintenance of existing and maintenance of existing and new parks, to increase park investment per resident and meet the THRIVE, & Rise Up and new parks, in order to increase park investment per resident and meet City's Park Standard of 3 acres per 1,000 residents. Set aside park funding to have monies on hand Willowick) received the City's Park Standard of three acres per 1,000 residents (Policy OS-1.3). Set to acquire and develop parkland when opportunities arise and to leverage grant options. 3.14.2022 / Rise Up aside park funding to have monies on hand to acquire and develop parkland Willowick letter dated when opportunities arise and to leverage grant options. 9.15.2021 89 Suggested New Policy: Policy OS-1.14: Park Investment Per Resident. Increase Funding and allocation priorities are determined by the City through the budget process. Collaborative Letter per -resident investment in park maintenance and upgrades in order to ensure (MPNA, OCEJ, equitable access to well- maintained neighborhood parks for all City residents, THRIVE, & Rise Up and increase per -resident investment on new park acquisition and Willowick) received development to a level sufficient to achieve the City's Park Standard of three 3.14.2022 / Rise Up acres per 1,000 residents (Policy OS-1.3). Willowick letter dated 9.15.2021 City Council 30 — 19 4/19/2022 Page 17 Catalog of City of Santa Ana Draft General Plan Update Comments Received Post February 15, 2022 q Public Comments/Concerns Draft Policies and Implementation Actions Addressing Comments/Concerns City Response Source of Comment 90 Suggested Language: Rise Up Willowick recommends a strong commitment to the N/A The General Plan update land use designation of Willowick Golf Course is Open Space and is Rise Up Willowick reuse of Willowick Golf Course forthe purpose thatthis community has consistently not proposing any changes to this designation. This land is not owned by the City. Should the letter dated wanted: parkland and affordable housing. The General Plan should advance this City Council desire to make changes to its designation, it should be addressed as a separate 3.18.2022 commitment by creating a separate designation for Willowick in Figure LU-4 and General Plan Amendment. Table LU-3, "Open Space/Affordable Housing (OS-AH)." The OS-AH designation would allow open space and park uses, along with a limited amount of housing deed - restricted to be offered at cost below market rates. It would allow a density of 30 dwelling units/acre, and allow housing and ancillary improvements to occupy up to 12 acres of the Willowick site. It would have a typical maximum height of four stories. The General Plan description of the designation would read as follows: The Open Space -Affordable Housing designation ensures that the Willowick Golf Course site is developed to help meet Santa Ana's needs for parkland and affordable housing. As of the adoption of this General Plan Update, the City of Garden Grove owns Willowick, but intends to close the golf course and redevelop the site. This offers Santa Ana a rare opportunity to guide the development of a large tract in the West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area, very close to Cesar Chavez Campesino Park and single-family home neighborhoods (designated LR-7 and LMR-11) to the north and northwest Open Space -Affordable Housing allows for the entire site to be kept in open space, with a wide variety of public uses available, including passive parkland, playgrounds, ballfields, and park -related structures. It also allows, but does not require, development of a portion of the site with relatively dense housing, which must be restricted to units provided at rates affordable to lower income households pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 50079.5. Such housing may occupy no more than 12 acres and must be in a contiguous area (not scattered among parkland). The height and density limits ensure that any housing will be constructed at a scale to provide a transition from the adjacent single -family -home neighborhoods to the new parkland, while maintaining the open space character of the majority of the acreage. 91 Suggested New Policy: Policy LU-XX: Support, with City funds as necessary and N/A The General Plan update land use designation of Willowick Golf Course is Open Space and is Rise Up Willowick prudent, and encourage development on the Willowick Golf Course site not proposing any changes to this designation. This land is not owned by the City. Should the letter dated consistent with the OS-AH designation, which would bring substantial public City Council desire to make changes to its designation, it should be addressed as a separate 3.18.2023 benefit. Change the land's designation or allowed uses with caution and only General Plan Amendment. upon a finding, supported by strong evidence, that the proposed new use will provide equal or greater benefits to the city and people of Santa Ana. 92 Suggested Action Change: Action S-2.4: Lead contamination - Work with local Recommended Action Change: S-2.4: Lead Contamination. Work with state local and regional Action has been modified to address community comment. Alana M.W. LeBron, and regional partners, such as Orange County Environmental Justice, Orange partners, such as the Department of Toxic Substances Control, South Coast Air Quality District, et.al., UCI letter County Health Care Agency and University of California at Irvine Public Health, Orange County Environmental Justice, Orange County Health Care Agency and University of dated March 11, 2022 to understand the prevalence, sources, and implications of lead California at Irvine Public Health, to understand the prevalence, sources, and implications of lead contamination of soil across Santa Ana. Collaborate with such local and contamination of soil across Santa Ana. Collaborate with such state agencies, local and regional regional partners and environmental justice stakeholders in proposing, partners and environmental justice stakeholders in proposing, selecting, and implementing selecting, and implementing solutions to mitigate (i.e., remove, cover, and measures to mitigate (i.e., remove, cover, and remediate) hazardous lead -contaminated soils in remediate) hazardous lead -contaminated soils in the city in a manner that the city in a manner that includes key benchmarks and routine monitoring of soil lead levels to includes benchmarks (including but not limited to time benchmarks) and measure and track effectiveness of selected approach. routine monitoring of soil lead levels to measure and track effectiveness of selected programs. City Council 30 — 20 4/19/2022 Page 18 Catalog of City of Santa Ana Draft General Plan Update Comments Received Post February 15, 2022 q Public Comments/Concerns Draft Policies and Implementation Actions Addressing Comments/Concerns City Response Source of Comment 93 Suggested Agency/Time Frame Change: Action S-2.4: PBA & CDA / Target Recommended Agency/Time Frame Change: PBA/CDA / Ongoing The comment is noted and is recommended to be included in its entirety. Alana M.W. LeBron, Year: 242-2Ongoing et.al., UCI letter dated March 11, 2022 94 Suggested Action Change: Action CM-3.8: Environmental soil and human Recommended Action Change: CM-3.8: Environmental Soil and Human Health Screening. Action has been modified to reflect the spirit of the comment and to be inclusive of all persons Alana M.W. LeBron, health screening measures - Collaborate with Orange County Health Care Collaborate with Orange County Health Care Agency and local stakeholders, such as Orange County residing in Santa Ana regardless of group affiliation, legal status, or insurance type or lack et.al., UCI letter Agency and local stakeholders, such as Orange County Environmental Justice Environmental Justice and UC Irvine Public Health, in efforts to provide increased healthcare there of. Additionally, Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA) programs do not make a dated March 11, 2022 and UC Irvine Public Health, in efforts to provide increased healthcare services services (i.e., blood lead testing, treatment) for residents, especially those that reside in distinction of anyone's legal or insurance status when providing services related to lead. environmental justice communities. Additionally, collaborate to advocate for adjustment of the (i.e., blood lead testing, treatment) for residents of environmental justice communities, including undocumented, uninsured, and under -insured County and State policies for health and environmental screening levels to promote healthy residents living in neighborhoods impacted by soil lead contamination and to outcomes related to lead contamination as recommended by health experts. agree upon locally acceptable and enforceable safety thresholds for lead exposure and contamination; collaborate to advocate for adjustment of the County and State policies for health and environmental screening levels to promote healthy outcomes related to lead contamination as recommended by health experts. 95 Suggested New Action: Action CN-XX: Lead contamination - Work with local Recommended Action Change: S-2.4: Lead Contamination. Work with state local and regional Action addressing lead contamination already exists in the Safety Element (S-2.4) and need not Alana M.W. LeBron, and regional partners, such as Orange County Environmental Justice, Orange partners, such as the Department of Toxic Substances Control, South Coast Air Quality District, be duplicate in different. et.al., UCI letter County Health Care Agency and University of California at Irvine Public Health, Orange County Environmental Justice, Orange County Health Care Agency and University of dated March 11, 2022 to understand the prevalence, sources, and implications of lead California at Irvine Public Health, to understand the prevalence, sources, and implications of lead contamination of soil across Santa Ana. Collaborate with such local and contamination of soil across Santa Ana. Collaborate with such state agencies, local and regional regional partners and environmental justice stakeholders in proposing, partners and environmental justice stakeholders in proposing, selecting, and implementing selecting, and implementing solutions to mitigate (i.e., remove, cover, and measures to mitigate (i.e., remove, cover, and remediate) hazardous lead -contaminated soils in remediate) hazardous lead -contaminated soils in the city in a manner that the city in a manner that includes key benchmarks and routine monitoring of soil lead levels to includes benchmarks (including but not limited to time benchmarks) and measure and track effectiveness of selected approach. routine monitoring of soil lead levels to measure and track effectiveness of selected programs. 96 Suggested Action Change: Action LU-3.6: Lead paint abatement - Coordinate N/A Workplace safety is already regulated by Cal/OSHA and is outside of the City's regulatory Alana M.W. LeBron, with County of Orange Health Care Agency and community organizations to authority. et.al., UCI letter strengthen local programs and initiatives to eliminate lead -based paint dated March 11, 2022 hazards, with priority given to residential buildings located within environmental justice area boundaries. When conducting lead paint abatement, ensure that workers have proper physical protections; safeguard other areas of the abated building or residence from lead or other toxins that may be re -suspended in the air, soil, and dust; provide support for temporary relocation of residents during abatement process; and monitor lead levels for workers, residents, and the indoor and outdoor environment of the residence that was abated. 97 Suggested New Action: Action LU-XX: Protect workers' health during lead N/A Workplace safety is already regulated by Cal/OSHA and is outside of the City's regulatory Alana M.W. LeBron, paint abatement - Provide appropriate knowledge and protective gear and authority. et.al., UCI letter equipment for workers certified as lead renovators when conducting dated March 11, 2022 renovation activities. Ensure that trained workers have reasonable workloads and time frames for completion of renovation activities. 98 Suggested Action Change: Action LU-3.18: Renovations and lead prevention - Existing Action: LU-3.18: Renovations and Lead Prevention. Evaluate the feasibility of requiring Training for contractors should only be implemented once full analysis of costs and benefits to Alana M.W. LeBron, Require contractor training and/or certification for safe work practices to contractor training and/or certification for safe work practices to conduct residential renovations the community have been thoroughly analyzed and already a part of the draft action. et.al., UCI letter conduct residential ren dated March 11, 2022 existing lead paint. Page 19 Catalog of City of Santa Ana Draft General Plan Update Comments Received Post February 15, 2022 # Public Comments/Concerns Draft Policies and Implementation Actions Addressing Comments/Concerns City Response Source of Comment 99 Suggested Action Change: Action LU-3.19: Promote health - Partner with local Recommended Action Change: LU-3.19: Promote Health. Partner with local organizations (e.g., OC Action has been revised to include the Garden Grove Unified School District and Orange Alana M.W. LeBron, organizations (e.g., OC Health Care Agency, Latino Health Access, Santa Ana Health Care Agency, Latino Health Access, Santa Ana Unified School District, Garden Grove Unified County Environmental Justice, but does not recommend detailing the types of services et.al., UCI letter Unified School District, and the Coalition of Community Health Centers, School District, Orange County Environmental Justice, and the Coalition of Community Health provided in the community comment, nor does it believe it is within the City's role to provide dated March 11, 2022 Orange County Environmental Justice, and other environmental justice Centers) to increase blood lead testing, outreach, education, and referral services through a medical consultations and advice. Whatever service the City will be providing, should be left to organizations) to increase blood lead testing, outreach, education, and Ipromotora' or community peer outreach model that addresses the root causes of elevated blood be explored and agreed upon through the partnership with the listed agencies and groups referral services through a'promotora' or community peer outreach model lead levels impacting Santa Ana residents, with special focus in environmental justice communities through implementation of this draft action. that addresses the root causes of elevated blood lead levels impacting Santa and for children living in pre-1978 housing. Ana residents, with special focus in environmental justice communities and for children living in pre-1978 housing. Follow-up with households regarding the results of blood lead tests, discuss the meaning of the tests results, and share resources that individuals and households can leverage to address and prevent lead exposures. 100 Suggested Action Change: Action LU-3.20: Safe housing - Require all N/A Tenant protections are addressed by state law. The City of Santa Ana has taken additional Alana M.W. LeBron, residential rehabilitation projects that use local, or HUD federal funds to steps to ensure tenants are protected through its Just Cause Eviction and Rent Stabilization et.al., UCI letter comply with the Lead Safe Housing Rule, to remove lead paint hazards, ordinances. Additionally, Action HE-52 in the proposed Housing Element Update includes dated March 11, 2022 depending on the nature of work and the dollar amount of federal investment holding annual small apartment managers' workshop to train and educate property owners, in the property. Ensure that low-income residents and renters are able to HOAs, property managers, and tenants of best practices in property management, participate in remediation and abatement programs. Provide protection from neighborhood safety, and landlord/tenant responsibilities; and partnering with legal retaliation by landlords for renters seeking lead assessments and/or assistance organizations to provide legal clinics for tenants on tenants' rights and recourse for remediation. Remove lead -soldered joints when replacing older joints. intimidation and unjust evictions. Additionally, Action LU-3.28: Tenant Protections will provide information to residential tenants regarding Landlord Tenant Laws in the State, such as AB 1481, and Santa Ana's Just Cause For Tenant Eviction and Rent Stabilization ordinances that provide protections against evictions for those who seek action to improve substandard housing and hazardous conditions. Together, the proposed actions already in the drafts will provide the protections being suggested. 101 Suggested Action Change: Action LU-3.21: Prevention education - Collaborate Recommended Action Change: LU-3.21: Prevention Education. Collaborate with local organizations Action has been revised to include suggested edit, but does not include the specificity Alana M.W. LeBron, with local organizations such as Orange County Health Care Agency and State such as Orange County Health Care Agency, State Environmental Protection Agency, and suggested by community comment for program. That level of program specificity will be et.al., UCI letter Environmental Protection Agency and community -based environmental community -based environmental justice organizations to identify funds and create a Santa Ana addressed once the program is developed and funding for its implementation secured. dated March 11, 2022 justice organizations and identify funds to create a Santa Ana Prevent Lead Prevent Lead Poisoning Education Program, with special focus on disadvantaged communities and Poisoning Education Program, with special focus on disadvantaged pre-1978 housing stock. communities and pre-1978 housing stock. Implement mechanisms for local community -based environmental justice organizations to guide the Santa Ana Prevent Lead Poisoning Education Program and provide annual reports regarding fund activities and allocation of resources. 102 Suggested Action Change: Action LU-3.22: Public health outcomes. Support Recommended Action Change: LU-3.22: Public Health Outcomes. Support the Orange County Action has been revised to include suggested language. Alana M.W. LeBron, the Orange County Health Care Agency in their role in investigating public Health Care Agency in their role in investigating public complaints regarding unsafe lead work et.al., UCI letter complaints regarding lead hazards, through investigation of resident- practices and lead hazards wherein children are present, through enforcement of local housing dated March 11, 2022 identified concerns and enforcement of local housing and soil standards to standards to assure healthy outcomes including for individuals and households presenting with assure healthy outcomes, including for individuals and households presenting concerns about lead exposure and/or with confirmed lead levels of>3.5 ug/dL, which the Centers with concerns about lead exposures and/or with confirmed blood lead levels for Disease Control and Prevention indicates as the threshold for follow-up and case management in children. of >3.Sug/dL, which the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indicates as the threshold for follow-up and case management based on the latest recommendation on May 14, 2021. City Council 30 — 22 4/19/2022 Page 20 Catalog of City of Santa Ana Draft General Plan Update Comments Received Post February 15, 2022 q Public Comments/Concerns Draft Policies and Implementation Actions Addressing Comments/Concerns City Response Source of Comment 103 Suggested Action Change: Action LU-3.26: Health conditions - Work with Recommended Action Change: LU-3.26: Health Conditions. Work with state agencies including Action has been revised to include suggested language, but does not include addition of new Alana M.W. LeBron, Orange County Health Care Agency and local stakeholders including Orange Department of Toxic Substances Control and South Coast Air Quality Management District. Orange sentence at the end of action. Action CN-1.10 already addresses community comments related et.al., UCI letter County Health Care Agency, and local stakeholders including Orange County Environmental Justice County Environmental Justice and UC Irvine Public Health to identify baseline to making any environmental hazard or site history information public through publishing such dated March 11, 2022 conditions for lead contamination in Santa Ana, routinely monitor indicators and UC Irvine Public Health to identify baseline conditions for lead soil and air contamination in reports on the Environmental Quality webpage (webpage is proposed as part of Action CN- of lead contamination, and measure positive outcomes. Collaborate with Santa Ana, routinely monitor indicators of lead-suchcontamination, and measure positive 1.10). Per March 28, 2022 roundtable, new revisions related to soil and air included in these organizations to secure grant funds for soil testing, remediation (i.e., outcomes. Collaborate with these organizations to secure grant funds for soil and air testing, response to MPNA comments to broaden collection of baseline conditions. Reference to 80 bioremediation, covering, removing), and prevention activities for residential remediation (e.g., bioremediation, covering, removing, air filtration), and prevention activities for ppm added in response to OCEJ comments in context of pursuing grant funding. residential properties in proximity to sites identified with high sell ead levels of soil pollution properties in proximity to sites identified with high soil lead levels, with a focus on Environmental Justice census tracts. Publicly report findings from (including sites identified with soil lead levels of 80 ppm or higher), and air pollution with a focus on communities disproportionately affected by soil contamination. regular monitoring of soil lead levels and remediation and prevention activities. 104 Suggested Action Change: Action LU-3.29: Development site history - Update N/A Making development project related documents is vital to maintaining a transparent Alana M.W. LeBron, the City's Development Review application process to require developers to development process. As such, and as already required by the City's Sunshine Ordinance, et.al., UCI letter provide information regarding the prior use of the site and history of development projects are required to create project specific webpages where plans, reports, dated March 11, 2022 hazardous materials on the property, in order to identify potential for site and renderings are published and available for public review. If the draft General Plan Update contamination from hazardous materials or soil lead contamination to be is approved and development site history reports are required, reports generated will be remediated. Make development site history publicly accessible. posted to the project webpage like the other documents. Suggested language is not needed as making such data publicly available is already required. 105 Suggested Action Change: Action HP-1.5: Historic design standards - Update N/A Action HP-1.5 is strictly related to design. While lead contamination is an important issue Alana M.W. LeBron, historic design standards for preserving historic setting and context, facing Santa Ana communities, it is not germane to this actions and is already being addressed et.al., UCI letter incorporating best practices related to landscape design, front yard fences, through other policies and actions such as action LU-3.6 Lead Paint Abatement and action S- dated March 11, 2023 other property features, and remediation of lead -based paint and lead- 2.4 Lead Contamination. contaminated soil. 106 Suggested Action Change: Action LU-4.3: Public improvements in activity Recommended Action Change: LU-4.3: Public Improvements in Activity Nodes and Focus Area. Soil contamination reduction is an important issue facing Santa Ana communities. As such, Alana M.W. LeBron, nodes and focus areas - Create a public realm plan for each activity node and Create a public realm plan for each activity node and focus area to establish a unified vision for long there are numerous policies and actions specific to that issue. Augmenting soil contamination et.al., UCI letter focus area to establish a unified vision for long-term improvements to streets, term improvements to streets, sidewalks, plazas, other public spaces, and placemaking elements. to this action, which is to formulate a vison and plan for public improvements at activity dated March 11, 2024 sidewalks, plazas, other public spaces, and placemaking elements. Identify soil Identify public improvement priorities and pilot projects for each focus area and include them in nodes, is not germane or necessary. Additional edits have been added to action for clarity. contamination reduction opportunities and other public improvement the City's Capital Improvement Program. priorities and pilot projects for each focus area. [Sic ] Program priority Go's `',-"al Impre ement PregFam improvements and pilot projects into the City's Capital Improvement Program. Suggested Language, LU-4, IA 4.7: Construction improvements. Identify best practices and communication tools to reduce soil contamination and monitor mitigation measures and oversight of private and public construction improvements to protect the soil, health and safety of workers, the community, and the soil, with focus on environmental justice areas. City Council 30 — 23 4/19/2022 Page 21 Catalog of City of Santa Ana Draft General Plan Update Comments Received Post February 15, 2022 q Public Comments/Concerns Draft Policies and Implementation Actions Addressing Comments/Concerns City Response Source of Comment 107 Suggested Action Change: Action CN-1.10: Environmental Justice Office Recommended New Action: CM-3.9: Environmental Justice Staff. Identify funding and hire a full- The community comment is in alignment with comments provided by members of the City Alana M.W. LeBron, InterageneyTeam - Establish an environmental justice office with at least one time Environmental Justice staff member to collaborate with the community to guide the Council. Staff has prepared a recommended action to identify funding and hire a full-time EJ et.al., UCI letter implementatleff-ef the environmental justice policies and actions including community outreach, public health expert on staff to ensure capacity to play a leadership role in staff person per Council's input. Action revised in response to OCEJ comment that dated March 11, 2025 collaboration on environmental health studies, pursuing grants, and coordination with federal, implementation of policy, implementation, and decisions involving implementation of EJ policies and actions should be a collaboration and guided by the state, and local agencies regarding environmental concerns in the City. Agency: CMO/PBA and environmental quality and environmental justice issues; to coordinate across community. Target Year: 2022. agencies and engage residents to implement environmental justice aspects of the General Plan and qWlity iMeFageREY team to evaluate, monitor, and make recommendations to address air quality and environmental hazard issues, with a special focus on environmental justice areas; publish results and information on the City's website through a dedicated Santa Ana Environmental Quality web page. 108 Suggested Action Change: Action LU-3.25: Engage EJ Communities - Work with Recommended New Action: CM-3.9: Environmental Justice Staff. Identify funding and hire a full- The community comment is in alignment with comments provided by members of the City Alana M.W. LeBron, community serving organizations, neighborhood leaders, and residents to time Environmental Justice staff member to collaborate with the community to gu de the Council. Staff has prepared a recommended action to identify funding and hire a full-time EJ et.al., UCI letter implementefien-ef the environmental justice policies and actions including community outreach, form an Environmental Justice Office with at least one public health expert on staff person per Council's input. Action revised in response to OCEJ comment that dated March 11, 2026 staff to ensure capacity to play a leadership role in implementation of policy, collaboration on environmental health studies, pursuing grants, and coordination with federal, implementation of EJ policies and actions should be a collaboration and guided by the state, and local agencies regarding environmental concerns in the City. Agency: CMO/PBA and implementation activities, and decisions involving environmental quality and community. Target Year: 2022. environmental justice issues and to develop ongoing EJ Community Engagement programs for existing and new disadvantaged EJ communities, including multilingual communication protocols. Host biannual or quarterly Roundtable meetings with local stakeholders to guide and evaluate implementation of environmental justice policies. 109 Suggested Action Change: Action CN-1.1: Public Education - Augment existing Recommended Action Change: CN-1.13: Community Survey On Health Lifestyles. Plan for and The intent of the draft public education action is to improve public awareness of state, Alana M.W. LeBron, outreach programs to improve public awareness of State, regional and local conduct a community survey of residents every two years related to community health, pollution , regional, and local agencies' roles and resoures. Action CN-1.13 provides an opportunity for et.al., UCI letter agencies' roles and resources to identify, monitor, and address air quality and parks, community engagement, and community services; with focused outreach for environment community members to raise community health, pollution concerns, parks, service needs in dated March 11, 2027 other environmental hazards in the community; to provide regular reports to justice concerns and priority areas. Report findings of survey through the various media platforms their neighborhood. The timeframe of the survey has been revised to every two years. Two residents and environmental justice stakeholders that identify air quality and and utilize input to inform periodic evaluation and update of General Plan. years will provide the needed time to formulate surveys, provide sufficient time to respond, other environmental hazards as well as strategies for risk mitigation; and to collect data, analyze data, report findings, and formulate actions to address feedback. Through allow space for community members to raise concerns about heretofore proposed actions, such as CN-1.10, results of surveys, analysis, and outcomes will be publicly unidentified environmental health issues and environmental hazards in their accessible through the Environmental Quality webpage. neighborhoods. 110 Suggested Action Change: Action CN-1.13: Community survey on healthy Recommended Action Change: CM-1.2: Community Conservation. Plan for and conduct a The intent of the draft Action is to obtain continually receive feedback from the community Alana M.W. LeBron, lifestyles - Plan for and conduct a community survey of residents related to community survey every two years related to community health, pollution concerns, parks, and is recommending conducting a targeted EJ survey that focuses on community health, et.al., UCI letter community health, air quality, parks, and community services; with focused community engagement, and community service needs, with focused outreach to environmental pollution concerns, parks, service needs and City community engagement best practices. The dated March 11, 2028 outreach for environment justice concerns and priority areas (tie into other justice priority areas utilizing various platforms, such as social media and school events, to timeframe has been revised to every two years. Two years will provide the needed time to City efforts like Strategic Plan, park and recreation planning, community encourage substantial survey participation. formulate surveys, provide sufficient time to respond, collect data, analyze data, report benefits, etc.). Collaborate with environmental justice organizations to design findings, and formulate actions to address feedback. As previously mentioned, the and interpret community survey findings and ensure that residents have Environmental Quality webpage proposed by action CN-1.10 will be the home of such survey several options for how to complete the survey (e.g., online, in -person, results and summaries. phone). Make surveys and summaries of survey findings available in multiple languages. City Council 30-24 4/19/2022 Page 22 Catalog of City of Santa Ana Draft General Plan Update Comments Received Post February 15, 2022 q Public Comments/Concerns Draft Policies and Implementation Actions Addressing Comments/Concerns City Response Source of Comment 111 Suggested Action Change: Action CN-1.14: Expanded interactions - Conduct Recommended Action Change: CN-1.14: Expanded Interactions. Identify opportunities to expand Action has been revised to address comment. Alana M.W. LeBron, regular meetings organized by City staff and invite decision -makers in attendance and support neighborhood associations and community groups to hold regular et.al., UCI letter meetings with City staff and decision -makers in neighborhoods within environmental justice neighborhoods within environmental justice area boundaries. In these dated March 11, 2029 meetings residents, community organizations, and businesses should be given communities so that residents, community organizations, and businesses can communicate their a platform to easily communicate their unique issues and needs, as well as unique issues and needs, as well as their recommendations on how best to implement their recommendations on how best to implement environmental health, and environmental quality, environmental health, and environmental justice policies. Arrange for environmental justice policies. Include a language interpreter(s) at these language interpretation services as needed at these meetings so that all residents can participate. meetings so that all residents can engage. Ensure that these meetings bring together residents and multiple community -based organizations whose work focuses on environmental justice. 112 Suggested Policy Change: Policy PS-2.7: Staffing Level - Recommended Policy Change: PS-2.7: Staffing Level. Increase staffing levels for sworn peace The comment is noted and is recommended to be included in its entirety. City Council Mainta+n Increase staffing levels for sworn peace officers, fire fighters, officers, fire fighters, emergency medical responders, code enforcement, and civilian support staff emergency medical responders, code enforcement, and civilian support staff to provide quality services and maintain an optimal response time citywide, as resources become to provide quality services and maintain an optimal response time citywide, as available. resources become available. 113 Suggested Policy Change: Policy M-2.1: Interstate Freeways - Support Caltrans Recommended Policy Change: M-2.1: Interstate Freeways. Support Caltrans and OCTA efforts to The comment is noted and is recommended to be included in its entirety. City Council and OCTA efforts to ^-dernae and an ' improve freeways-byirnprey safety, improve freeway safety, while addressing impacts to neighborhoods. , while addressing impacts to neighborhoods. 114 Suggested Policy Change: Policy M-2.2: Transit Services - Support OCTA, Recommended Policy Change: M-2.2: Transit Services. Support OCTA. Caltrans, and other regional The comment is noted and is recommended to be included in its entirety. City Council Caltrans, and other Werk with regional and local transportation providers to and local transportation providers to enhance existing transit services to provide residents, enhance existing transit services entities to provide residents, workers, and workers, and visitors with safe, affordable, accessible, convenient, reliable, and attractive transit visitors with safe, affordable, accessible, convenient, reliable, and attractive services. transit services. 115 Suggested Policy Change: Policy M-4.5: Land Use Development Design - Recommended Policy Change: M-4.5: Land Use Development Design. Ensure that building The comment is noted and is recommended to be included in its entirety. City Council Ensure that building placement and design features create a desirable and placement and design features create a desirable and active streetscape, by prioritizing pedestrian active streetscape, by prioritizing pedestrian access directly from the street access directly from the street and placing parking lots to the rear of a development site. and placing parking lots to the rear of a development site. 116 Suggested Action Change: Action M-1.2: MPAH - Coordinate with external Recommended Action Change: M-1.2: MPAH. Coordinate with external agencies to ensure the The comment is noted and is recommended to be included in its entirety. City Council agencies to ensure the OCTA Master Plan of Arterial Highways accommodates OCTA Master Plan of Arterial Highways accommodates current and future demand for all users current and future demand for all users while prioritizing the safety of people while prioritizing the safety of people utilizing non -automobile modes of transportation. utilizing non -automobile modes of transportation. 117 Suggested Language: Change the first sentence of Page 05-1 to read as Recommended Revision to Text: The purpose of the Open Space Element is to identify, preserve, The comment is noted and is recommended to be included in its entirety. City Council follows: The purpose of the Open Space Element is to identify, and preserve, and add open space areas that provide value to the community and enrich the quality of life. and add open space areas that provide value to the community and enrich the quality of life. 118 Suggested Policy Change: Policy OS-1.3: Park Standard - Establish and Recommended Policy Change: OS-1.3: Park Standard. Establish and maintain public parks, open The comment is noted and is recommended to be included in its entirety. City Council maintain public parks, open space, and recreation requirements for new space, and recreation requirements for new residential and nonresidential development to provide residential and nonresidential development to provide sufficient sufficient opportunities for Santa Ana residents and visitors. Attain a minimum of 3 acres of land opportunities for Santa Ana residents and visitors. Attain a minimum of twe- per 1,000 persons residing in the City of Santa Ana. three acres of land per 1,000 persons residing in the City of Santa Ana. 119 Suggested Action Change: Action OS-1.16: Acquisitions to meet park standard. Recommended Action Change: OS-1.16: Acquisitions to Meet Park Standard. Using the Park Master The comment is noted and is recommended to be included in its entirety. City Council Using the Park Master Plan as guidance, identify and acquire property within Plan as guidance, identify and acquire property within the City for park and open space use which the City for park and open space use which will focus on bringing the park and will focus on bringing the park and recreation system to 3 acres of land per 1,000 residents with a recreation system to 2 1 acres of land ner 1000 residents with a glan to keep I plan to keep gace with future urban growth. pace with future urban Page 23 Catalog of City of Santa Ana Draft General Plan Update Comments Received Post February 15, 2022 q Public Comments/Concerns Draft Policies and Implementation Actions Addressing Comments/Concerns City Response Source of Comment 120 Suggested Agency/Time Frame Change: Action S-2.5: PBA & CDA / Target Recommended Agency/Time Frame Change: Action S-2.5: PBA & CDA / Target Year: Ongoing The comment is noted and is recommended to be included in its entirety. City Council Year: 2G24 Ongoing 121 Suggested New Action: Add an Implementation Action that establishes a Recommended New Action: CM-3.9: Environmental Justice Staff. Identify funding and hire a full- The community comment is in alignment with comments provided by members of the City City Council permanent Environmental Justice staff person whose responsibilities are to time Environmental Justice staff member to collaborate with the community to gu de the Council. Staff has prepared a recommended action to identify funding and hire a full-time EJ implementatien-ef the environmental justice policies and actions including community outreach, make sure that the goals and implementation actions related to improving the staff person per Council's input.Action revised in response to OCEJ comment that environment for our communities are being implemented and followed collaboration on environmental health studies, pursuing grants, and coordination with federal, implementation of EJ policies and actions should be a collaboration and guided by the state, and local agencies regarding environmental concerns in the City. Agency: CMO/PBA and through, such as following through on a truly collaborative process to identify community. Target Year: 2022. solutions to address lead contaminated soil, and coordinating with State agencies, such as AQMD, DTSC, etc. to make sure that they are following through on complaints filed on offenders here in Santa Ana and that those agencies are not issuing an overconcentrated amount of pollution -producing permits. 122 Recommended Agency/Time Frame: Action CM-3.9: CMO & PBA / Target Year: 2022. City Council 123 Suggested Action Change: Action LU-2.7: Fiscal Impact Model-Cfeete Develop Recommended Action Change: LU-2.7: Fiscal Impact Model. Develop a fiscal impact analysis model This is a Staff revision to clarify the intent of the fiscal impact mode and its applicability. Staff a prefect'eyel fiscal impact analysis model and that incorporates the that incorporates the appropriate mix of land uses to achieve fiscal sustainability, or at minimum, fiscal neutrality to make informed land use decisions. Require the completion of this analysis in appropriate mix of land uses to achieve fiscal sustainability, or at minimum, reqUiFeffleFAS that Flew deVe'Opffielit he fiscally neutrality OF beneficial te the mixed -use land use designations and in proposed conversion of commercial uses to residential or to make informed land use decisions. mixed -use proiects. 124 Suggested Action Change: Action LU-4.8: Mixed Use Lifestyles-C-xpleFe Recommended Action Change: LU-4.8: Mixed Use Lifestyles. Establish and implement thresholds in Staff is proposing these changes to clarify the intent of this action and its applicability to Staff esta Establish and implement thresholds in the Zoning Code toidentify the Zoning Code to require minimum percentage of commercial uses to be included in mixed -use certain projects. require minimum percentage of commercial uses to be included in mixed use land use designations and in proposed conversion of commercial uses to residential or mixed -use land use designations, and in rp ojects. proposed conversion of commercial uses to residential or mixed use projects. 125 There are no provisions for the City to engage in soil -lead testing in residential Recommended Action Change: S-2.4: Lead Contamination. Work with state agencies including Action has been modified to address community comment. Patricia Flores, OCEJ neighborhoods, and no clear process or agreed upon safety thresholds for Department of Toxic Substances Control and South Coast Air Quality Management District, local letter dated February and regional partners, such as Orange County Environmental Justice, Orange County Health Care identifying lead contaminated properties. 15, 2022 Agency and University of California at Irvine Public Health, to understand the prevalence, sources, and implications of lead contamination of soil across Santa Ana. Collaborate with such state agencies, local and regional partners and environmental justice stakeholders in proposing, selecting, and implementing measures to mitigate (i.e., remove, cover, and remediate) hazardous lead -contaminated soils in the city in a manner that includes key benchmarks and routine monitoring of soil lead levels to measure and track effectiveness of selected approach. City Council 30 — 26 4/19/2022 Page 24 Catalog of City of Santa Ana Draft General Plan Update Comments Received Post February 15, 2022 q Public Comments/Concerns Draft Policies and Implementation Actions Addressing Comments/Concerns City Response Source of Comment 126 While implementation Action 2.4 of the Safety Element expresses a Recommended Action Change: S-2.4: Lead Contamination. Work with state agencies including Action has been modified to address community comment. Patricia Flores, OCEJ commitment to working with our organization to understand the prevalence Department of Toxic Substances Control and South Coast Air Quality Management District, local letter dated February and regional partners, such as Orange County Environmental Justice, Orange County Health Care of environmental lead contamination in Santa Ana and to proposing solutions 15, 2022 and measurements of effectiveness, there is not an actual expressed Agency and University of California at Irvine Public Health, to understand the prevalence, sources, commitment to remediating the lead. What's more, the timeline limits the and implications of lead contamination of soil across Santa Ana. Collaborate with such state action to 2022--with a problem as widespread as soil -lead contamination, on agencies, local and regional partners and environmental justice stakeholders in proposing, year is not enough time to effectively address the crisis. selecting, and implementing measures to mitigate (i.e., remove, cover, and remediate) hazardous lead -contaminated soils in the city in a manner that includes key benchmarks and routine monitoring of soil lead levels to measure and track effectiveness of selected approach. 127 There is no commitment to collaborating with the Orange County Health Care Recommended Action Change: CM-3.8 - Environmental Soil and Human Health Screening. Action has been modified to reflect the spirit of the comment and to be inclusive of all persons Patricia Flores, OCEJ Agency to provide healthcare services for undocumented and uninsured Collaborate with Orange County Health Care Agency and local stakeholders, such as Orange County residing in Santa Ana regardless of group affiliation, legal status, or insurance type or lack letter dated February residents living in neighborhoods impacted by soil- lead contamination. Environmental Justice and UC Irvine Public Health, in efforts to provide increased healthcare there of. Additionally, Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA) programs do not make a 15, 2022 services (i.e., blood lead testing, treatment) for residents, especially those that reside in distinction of anyone's legal or insurance status when providing services related to lead. environmental justice communities. Additionally, collaborate to advocate for adjustment of the County and State policies for health and environmental screening levels to promote healthy outcomes related to lead contamination as recommended by health experts. 128 Accessibility of Public Comment: MPNA requests that residents be able to N/A This comment/suggestion does not relate to the GP Update, rather, protocols for City Council MPNA Attachment III, speak promptly and early on in City Council Meetings. meetings. 2.18.22 129 Meaningful Consideration of Public Comment: MPNA requests that public N/A This comment/suggestion does not relate to the GP Update, rather, to how City Council MPNA Attachment III, comments be taken seriously by Council members. Ideally, the City partners members communicate their decision making process in relation to public comments. 2.18.22 with the community in decision -making, including the development of alternatives and identifying solutions. 130 Community Meetings MPNA requests that the City hold EJ Community Recommended Action Change: CN-1.14: Expanded Interactions. Identify opportunities to expand Action has been modified to reflect the spirit of the edits. MPNA Attachment III, Meetings twice each year. a) The El Community Meetings should focus on attendance and support neighborhood associations and community groups to hold regular 2.18.22 meetings with City staff and decision -makers in neighborhoods within environmental justice educating the community about environmental issues in their neighborhoods, engaging communities, and obtaining feedback for future and concurrent city communities so that residents, community organizations, and businesses can communicate their planning goals. unique issues and needs, as well as their recommendations on how best to implement environmental quality, environmental health, and environmental justice policies. Arrange for language interpretation services as needed at these meetings so that all residents can participate. 131 Roundtable Meetings. MPNA requests that the City hold Roundtable Meetings Existing Action: CN-1.10: Interagency Team. Establish an environmental quality interagency team to The Draft General Plan contains various policies and implementation actions related to MPNA Attachment III, with EJ community leaders, Government Agencies, and City Officials evaluate, monitor, and make recommendations to address air quality and environmental hazard increasing community engagement and participation regarding environmental justice issues. 2.18.22 throughout the year. a) This will increase communication, accountability, and issues, with a special focus on environmental justice areas. Publish results and information on the Existing Action CN-1.10 will establish an interagency team to evaluate, monitor, and make transparency between residents and government agencies. b) Agencies City's website through a dedicated Santa Ana Environmental Quality webpage. recommendations to address EJ related issues. Through the formulation of this team and the should include AQMD, DTSC, and OC Public Health. c) Experts from UC Irvine environmental justice staff person proposed under new action CM-3.9, details such as and representatives of SAUSD should be included. d) City officials must be frequency of meetings, workshops, outreach, and participants will be analyzed and developed. present and should provide public health updates and compliance issues. 132 Progress Reports. City officials and attending agencies should provide Existing Action: CM-3.3: Health Metrics. Engage with the Orange County Health Care Agency and Action CM-3.3 Health Metrics provides a mechanism by which city staff will engage with MPNA Attachment III, progress reports with specific metrics for how pollution and contamination is other stakeholders to monitor key health indicators to measure the success of the outcome of Orange County Health Care Agency to monitor health indicators to track the progress and 2.18.22 being addressed and resolved in EJ communities during EJ Community General Plan policies and the implementation plan, including reduction in incidence in asthma and effectiveness of related actions. Further, implementation of Action CN-1.10 Interagency Team Meetings and Roundtable Meetings. low birth weight of infants. will create evaluation and monitoring team and webpage to publicize data related to health metrics and other environmental health related data. --i Page 25 Catalog of City of Santa Ana Draft General Plan Update Comments Received Post February 15, 2022 q Public Comments/Concerns Draft Policies and Implementation Actions Addressing Comments/Concerns City Response Source of Comment ENVIRONMENTAL RISK & REMEDIATION 133 Clearer data visualizations for EJ impacts: MPNA requests a better Recommended Action Change: CN-1.14: Expanded Interactions. Identify opportunities to expand Through the collaboration of local and regional stakeholders, community groups and the City MPNA Attachment II, understanding of the cumulative and overlapping environmental impacts on attendance and support neighborhood associations and community groups to hold regular (proposed Action CN-1.10 Interagency Team) and increased participation in community 2.18.22 meetings with City staff and decision -makers in neighborhoods within environmental justice EJ communities at risk of pollution exposure. a) Understandable visuals help meetings, additional mapping tools to assist with communication, visualization, and outreach communicate the gravity of EJ issues in each community to residents. b) communities so that residents, community organizations, and businesses can communicate their will be developed in accordance with community needs. The City will continue to monitor Residents should know the City understands the extent of the pollution unique issues and needs, as well as their recommendations on how best to implement data and revise visualizations to be user-friendly and accessible. In addition, links to the problem, and is addressing the EJ issues residents face. c) A clear environmental quality, environmental health, and environmental justice policies. Arrange for California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) website and map understanding between residents and City officials provides a baseline for language interpretation services as needed at these meetings so that all residents can participate. viewer which identifies EJ tracts and provides map layers based on indicators utilized in measuring progress on remediation goals. determining EJ scores are published in the Environmental Quality webpage to assist residents in locating the information. 134 Cumulative Impact Analyses: MPNA requests that the City incorporate into Existing Action: CN-1.10: Interagency Team. Establish an environmental quality interagency team to The designation of a census tract as an EJ area is the result of a cumulative analysis of all of the MPNA Attachment II, the General Plan Update maps and other visualizations depicting the overlap evaluate, monitor, and make recommendations to address air quality and environmental hazard indicators that the CalEnviro5creen methodology uses. Additionally, as the numerous 2.18.22 of water, soil, and air pollution and hazardous and toxic waste sites in Santa issues, with a special focus on environmental justice areas. Publish results and information on the programs to address EJ are undertaken, tailored visualizations for topical area or geographic Ana. a) Existing maps from CalEnviro5creen (CES) in the EJ Background City's website through a dedicated Santa Ana Environmental Quality webpage. area will be provided as needed. Moreover, designation of census tracts as EJ and census tract Appendix of the DPEIR show the Madison Park Neighborhood faces pollution scores will continue to change based on new data and updates to the CalEnviroScreen. As exposure from air quality, toxic cleanup sites, groundwater threats, hazardous such, providing up to date maps with the latest data and designations on the City's waste, and lead. b) The City should include details (zoomed -in versions) of Environmental Quality webpage is a more optimal solution to providing the community up to these maps for every EJ Community in Santa Ana. c) These maps should be date information. periodically updated for EJ Community Meetings. d) These results should distinguish between existing emissions, ongoing emitters, and newly planned emission sites. 135 Maps of Emitters: MPNA requests maps marking where the current permit- Existing Action: CN-1.10: Interagency Team. Establish an environmental quality interagency team to The California Department of Toxic Substances provides an interactive map viewer where MPNA Attachment II, holders for emissions of any kind of pollution are located. Similarly, there evaluate, monitor, and make recommendations to address air quality and environmental hazard members of the public can view location of permit holders, contaminated sites, and status of 2.18.22 should be separate map details for each EJ Community. a) Along with these issues, with a special focus on environmental justice areas. Publish results and information on the permits, with the option of only viewing permits in EJ tracts. https://dtsc.ca.gov/ Through maps, there should be explanations for how development will likely change City's website through a dedicated Santa Ana Environmental Quality webpage. the creation of the Environmental Quality webpage, this resource and others like it will be the area over the next 25 years. published on the City's webpage for ease of access and awareness. EMISSION STUDIES / PLANNED REMEDIATION IN EJ COMMUNITIES 136 The Plan should aim to reduce and eliminate existing emissions / toxic sites, A number of policies and actions address this comment. The Draft Plan includes a number of policies and actions that directly seek to reduce and/or MPNA Attachment II, and limit or avoid new sources of emissions and toxics. The current plan fails eliminate heavy industrial uses near residences through development standards, incentives 2.18.22 by not fully addressing remediation goal and amortization programs, creation of new land use designations that, if adopted, will no longer permit heavy industrial (Industrial Flex --South Main Street Focus Area and West Santa Ana Blvd.), and examining the feasibility of implementing new laws to prohibit heavy industry near homes. In addition, there are a number of actions that if adopted will lead to the City working more closely with air pollution regulating agencies to reduce pollution emissions. To see related actions see draft actions LU-3.2, LU-3.3, LU-3.4, LU-3.15, LU-3.23, LU-4.6, CN-1.1, CN-1.4, CN-1.5, CN-1.6, CN-1.7,CN-1.9, CN-1.12, CN-1.17, S-2.1, S-2.2, M-5.8, and draft policies m-1.7, CN-1.1, CN-1.3, CN1.15, CN-1.16, CN-1.18, OS-2.5, LU-3.12, and LU-4.3. City Council 30 — 28 4/19/2022 Page 26 Catalog of City of Santa Ana Draft General Plan Update Comments Received Post February 15, 2022 q Public Comments/Concerns Draft Policies and Implementation Actions Addressing Comments/Concerns City Response Source of Comment 137 Lead Action Plan. MPNA requests that the City create an aggressive action A number of policies and actions address this comment. The Draft Plan includes numerous actions aimed at addressing lead based contamination in MPNA Attachment II, plan to address the soil -lead contamination in Santa Ana EJ Communities that the community, which were developed in partnership with community stakeholders. Lead 2.18.22 is backed with clear, enforceable measures. a) While the City plans to address contamination from non stationary sources like automobiles is a statewide problem and some aspects of lead -based paint contamination, it has neglected historical especially acute in urban environments where vehicle traffic is heaviest. The plan includes emissions of leaded gasoline. 2. Mitigation Measures. MPNA requests that the actions to help identify the exact cause of the pollution and to then seek funds to assist with City analyze and provide mitigation measures for the increased soil- remediation. The plan also includes actions to provide education related to renovations and contamination that can occur from the demolition or removal of existing construction on buildings that may have lead based products to reduce risk of lead poisoning. buildings that contain lead -based paint. Actions addressing lead contamination include S-2.4, LU-3.6, LU-3.17, LU-3.18, LU-3.19, LU- 3.20, LU-3.21, LU-3.22, LU-3.24, LU-3.26, and LU-3.29. 138 Mitigation Measures. MPNA requests that the City analyze and provide Recommended Action Change: LU-3.26: Health Conditions. Work with state agencies including Action has been modified to address frequency of soil monitoring, examples of remediation MPNA Attachment II, mitigation measures for the increased soil -contamination that can occur from Department of Toxic Substances Control and South Coast Air Quality Management District, Orange and emphasis on communities disproportionally affected by soil contamination. Per March 28, 2.18.22 County Health Care Agency and local stakeholders including Orange County Environmental Justice the demolition or removal of existing buildings that contain lead -based paint. 2022 roundtable, new revisions related to soil and air included in response to MPNA and UC Irvine Public Health to identify baseline conditions for lead soil and air contamination in comments to broaden collection of baseline conditions. Reference to 80 ppm added in Santa Ana, routinely monitor indicators of lead such contamination, and measure positive response to OCEJ comments in context of pursuing grant funding. outcomes. Collaborate with these organizations to secure grant funds for soil and air testing, remediation (e.g., bioremediation, covering, removing, air filtration), and prevention activities for residential properties in proximity to sites identified with high seal lead levels of soil pollution (including sites identified with soil lead levels of 80 ppm or higher), and air pollution, with a focus on communities disproportionately affected by soil contamination. 139 Baseline Pollution studies and Progress Reports. MPNA requests that the City Existing Action: CN-3.3: Health Metrics. Engage with the Orange County Health Care Agency and Once established through proposed Action CN-1.10, an interagency team focused on EJ issues MPNA Attachment II, publish data establishing a clear baseline of pollution that exists today that other stakeholders to monitor key health indicators to measure the success of the outcome of can evaluate all existing studies, monitoring and reporting systems conducted by established 2.18.22 affects communities, specifically EJ communities. 3 a) The data should be General Plan policies and the implementation plan, including reduction in incidence in asthma and hazardous material regulating agencies relevant to Santa Ana, and publish through proposed published yearly to track the effectiveness and weaknesses of the GPU and low birth weight of infants. Environmental Quality webpage and start to evaluate health indicators to track effectiveness. should be presented at EJ Community Meetings. 140 1,000 Feet Minimum Buffer -Zones. MPNA requests that the City commit to Existing Action: LU-3.2: Design Guidelines and Standards. Update the zoning code's development Further analysis is required to determine what the appropriate buffer should be. If adopted, MPNA Attachment II, creating buffer zones of at least 1,000 feet between industrial uses and and operational standards for industrial zones to address incompatibility with adjacent uses, Action LU-3.2 will establish a process by which to study relevant data and best practices, to 2.18.22 sensitive receptors. a) Currently POLICY LU-3.11 states "Promote landscaping including minimum distance requirements to buffer heavy industrial uses from sensitive receptors. arrive at an appropriate distance, not simply choosing an arbitrary distance. and other buffers to separate existing sensitive uses from rail lines, heavy Conduct a study to evaluate and establish appropriate minimum distances and landscape buffers industrial facilities, and other emissions sources. As feasible, apply more between polluting industrial uses from sensitive receptors such as residences, schools, day care, substantial buffers within environmental justice area boundaries." However, and public facilities. the policy has no detailed, enforceable language. b) The GPU should explicitly require this 1,000 feet minimum buffer -zone. 141 Air Quality Enforceability. MPNA requests that the City incorporate language Existing Action: LU-3.3: Healthy Lifestyles. Collaborate with residents and industry stakeholders to There are 75 actions directly addressing EJ issues in the Draft Plan. The action/program table MPNA Attachment II, into the GPU that: a) Prioritizes EJ Communities b) Commits to create a program to incentivize and amortize the removal of existing heavy industrial uses adjacent states what the City is committing to and when the action/program is expected to be 2.18.22 initiate/implement its actions c) Defines when these actions would be to sensitive uses. completed. The Draft Plan also commits to establishing a buffer between heavy industrial uses triggered d) Commits to address incompatible land uses with EJ Communities. and residences, and exploring incentives/amortization program to reduce conflicts between the two uses. 142 The City must ensure the implementation of the GPU reduces and eliminates A number of policies and actions address this comment. As depicted in the CalEnviroScreen tool, air pollution is not contained within city borders, MPNA Attachment II, air emissions in EJ Communities. a) These problems are described in more rather, is shaped by regional forces as well as topographical variations. As such, there are 2.18.22 detail in "Attachment A— MPNA Comments on the GPU" from our letter regional and state agencies tasked with tackling air pollution. There are numerous policies and submitted as public comment titled "Comments on the City of Santa Ana's actions in the Draft Plan to ensure Santa Ana is doing its part locally and regionally to reduce General Plan Update" from October 29, 2020. air pollution. To see related actions see draft actions LU-3.2, LU-3.3, LU-3.4, LU-3.15, LU-3.23, LU-4.6, CN-1.1, CN-1.4, CN-1.5, CN-1.6, CN-1.7,CN-1.9, CN-1.12, CN-1.17, S-2.1, S-2.2, M-5.8, and draft policies m-1.7, CN-1.1, CN-1.3, CN1.15, CN-1.16, CN-1.18, OS-2.5, LU-3.12, and LU- 4.3. vILy vWu 1v 1 T/ I�/LWL Page 27 Catalog of City of Santa Ana Draft General Plan Update Comments Received Post February 15, 2022 q Public Comments/Concerns Draft Policies and Implementation Actions Addressing Comments/Concerns City Response Source of Comment TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY 143 EJ Progress Reports: The City should stay up to date on recommendations of Existing Action: LU-3.25: Engage EJ Communities. Work with community serving organizations, The City has received communication from DOJ stating that the Draft Plan complies with SB MPNA Attachment II, the California DOJ Bureau of Environmental Justice with regard to neighborhood leaders, and residents to form an Environmental Justice Action Committee Ad Hee 1000 requirements. As indicated in action CN-1.10, an interagency team will be formed to 2.18.22 Environmental Justice Goals and Implementation strategies, then update the ' enin*`-- to develop ongoing EJ Community Engagement programs for existing and new work with stakeholders to address EJ issues and determine most effective ways to community with new information. a) At EJ Community Meetings, the City disadvantaged EJ communities, including multilingual communication protocols. Host biannual eF communicate with community members. Additionally, action LU-3.25 will build on the robust should explain how it plans to implement its recommendations as part of the quarterly Roundtable meetings with local stakeholders to guide and evaluate implementation of engagement strategy implemented during the General Plan Update to continue engaging EJ requested progress reports. environmental justice policies. communities after the plan is adopted. Biannual removed in response to OCEJ comment during March 28, 2022 roundtable. 144 Identify pollution violations. MPNA requests a complete list of companies that N/A This is not a policy/program recommendation for the General Plan Update. Information MPNA Attachment II, require special permits related to pollution and their history of violations related to permits and violations can be requested through pertinent regulating regional, 2.18.22 between 2011-2021 state, or federal agencies. 145 Collaborate on community information requests. MPNA requests the City be N/A This is not a polity/program recommendation for the General Plan Update. The City maintains MPNA Attachment II, forthcoming on new permits and approvals for industrial activity by a transparent development review process, maintaining websites for development projects, a 2.18.22 facilitating information and data requests pertaining to industrial land use master development list online, requires all developers comply with noticing and meeting requirements in the Sunshine Ordinance, and responds to public records request in a timely manner. GREENSPACE / LAND PRESERVATION 146 MPNA requests that the City incorporate provisions using permits to Recommended Policy Change: OS-1.9: New Development. Require all new development to provide Policy has been modified to address community comments and to clarify and strengthen MPNA Attachment II, incentivize developers to create or preserve greenspace. adequate parks and open space, including via parkland dedication or development fees, in order to language. 2.18.22 meet the City's park standard. Ensure that new development includes pedestrian and multi- modal travelways to promote a quality living environment. For new development within park deficient and environmental justice areas, prioritize the creation and dedication of new public parkland over the collection of impact fees. 147 MPNA requests the ratio of parkland to resident be at least 4 acres per 1,000 Recommended Policy Change: OS-1.3: Park Standard. Establish and maintain public parks, open The community comment to increase the ratio in acres per 1,000 residents is in alignment MPNA Attachment II, residents, similar to neighboring communities. a) The GPU has a goal of only 2 space, and recreation requirements for new residential and nonresidential development to provide with comments provided by members of City Council. This ratio has been increased to three 2.18.22 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. (1) Newport general plan: 5 acres per sufficient opportunities for Santa Ana residents and visitors. Attain a minimum of 3 acres of land (3) acres per 1,000 residents. 1,000 residents (2) Irvine general plan: 5 acres per 1,000 residents (3) per 1,000 persons residing in the City of Santa Ana. Fullerton general plan:4 acres per 1,000 resident 148 We demand that the city establish a permanent Environmental Justice office Recommended New Action: CM-3.9: Environmental Justice Staff. Identify funding and hire a full- The community comment is in alignment with comments provided by members of the City MPNA, Leonel Flores, with a public health expert on staff, to conduct regular meetings with time Environmental Justice staff member to collaborate with the community to _" Council. Staff has prepared a recommended action to identify funding and hire a full-time EJ February 10, 2022 implementatierref the environmental justice policies and actions including community outreach, residents and community organizations to guide implementation of these staff person per Council's input. Action revised in response to OCEJ comment that letter collaboration on environmental health studies, pursuing grants, and coordination with federal, policies, give regular reports on local environmental health issues, and ensure implementation of EJ policies and actions should be a collaboration and guided by the state, and local agencies regarding environmental concerns in the City. Agency: CMO/PBA and a relationship of accountability and transparency between the city and the community. Target Year: 2022. community. City Council 30 — 30 4/19/2022 Page 28 Catalog of City of Santa Ana Draft General Plan Update Comments Received Post February 15, 2022 q Public Comments/Concerns Draft Policies and Implementation Actions Addressing Comments/Concerns City Response Source of Comment 149 Santa Ana Suggests: Policy CN-1.1 Regional Planning Efforts "Coordinate air A number of policies and actions address this comment. The GHG reduction plan in San Pablo's General Plan draws on baseline and projected MPNA Attachment IV, quality planning efforts with local and regional agencies to meet State and inventories from the State and regional air quality boards and agencies. Taking a similar 2.18.22 Federal ambient air quality standards in order to protect all residents from the approach, the Santa Ana GP Update actions seeks to collaborate with air pollution regulators health effects of air pollution." Santa Ana Is Missing: A policy to test, measure, to gather local data and create strategies to address emissions at the local level. See actions record, maintain, and reduce air pollution emissions. Santa Ana Could Adopt: CN-1.1, CN-1.3, CN-1.6, CN-1.12, CN-1.19, and policies CN-1.3, S-1.2, CN-1.13, CN-1.15, and LU- A policy more like that of the City of San Pablo's Policy OSC-1-17 Prepare a 4.5. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Plan to include a "baseline inventory of all known or reasonably discoverable sources of greenhouse gases (GHGs) that currently exist in the city and sources that existed in 1990... [a] projected inventory of the GHGs that can reasonably be expected to be emitted in the city in the year 2030 in accordance with discretionary land use decisions pursuant to this General Plan update and foreseeable communitywide and municipal operations... [a] target for the reduction of emissions... from those identified sources reasonably attributed to the City's discretionary land use decisions and municipal operations... [and a] list of feasible GHG reduction measures... whose purpose shall be to meet the established local reduction target, including energy conservation and "green building" requirements in municipal buildings and private development" (textin red added by Citystaff for context) 150 Santa Ana Suggests: Action OS-1.1 Park Needs Assessment and Master Plan Recommended Action Change: OS-1.1: Park Needs Assessment And Master Plan. Create, adopt, Draft General Plan Action 1.1 identifies a needs assessment, master plan and mechanisms to MPNA Attachment IV, "Create, adopt, and implement a park needs assessment and master plan and implement a park needs assessment and master plan, based on community input, defining guide all future park development and establish a methodology to prioritize park 2.18.22 defining park service areas according to best practices, establishing a service park service areas according to best practices, establishing a service area for each park facility, improvements, evaluation of needs and measures of how those needs are met. Both the San area for each park facility, creating a tool to evaluate needs and prioritize creating a tool to evaluate needs and prioritize improvements by quadrant or appropriate Pablo example and the actions included in Santa Ana's Draft Plan achieve the same goal, improvements by quadrant or appropriate geographic subarea, and geographic subarea, and maintaining a list of priorities for the expansion and improvement of open establishing a system by which to rank or prioritize park improvements and developments. maintaining a list of priorities for the expansion and improvement of open space and recreational facilities in each quadrant or geographic subarea to attain a park land Moreover, the Action has been modified OS-1.1 to emphasize community input and increasing space and recreational facilities in each quadrant or geographic subarea to standard of 3 acres per 1,000 residents. the park standard to three (3) acres per 1,000 residents. attain a park land standard of 2 acres per 1,000 residents." Santa Ana Is Missing: A policy that identifies more specific implementation plans Santa Ana Could Adopt: A policy more like that of the City of San Pablo's Policy HEA-1-5 "Link park facility improvement priorities to a ranking system keyed to public health and recreational goals... a performance -based priority system establishes a ranking scale that measures each component (e.g. pool, court, bench, or trail) of its system against the scale related to public health. For example, it might be a one -to -three scale in which one is below expectations, two indicates that the component can meet its intended function for a given period of time, and three means that it exceeds expectations.." City Council 30-31 4/19/2022 Page 29 Catalog of City of Santa Ana Draft General Plan Update Comments Received Post February 15, 2022 q Public Comments/Concerns Draft Policies and Implementation Actions Addressing Comments/Concerns City Response Source of Comment 151 Santa Ana Suggests: Action CM-3.6 Fresh and healthy foods. "Pursue Recommended New Action: CM-3.6A: Food Deserts. Collaborate with Orange County Health Care Food deserts were researched as part of the development of the draft General Plan. That MPNA Attachment IV, programs, incentives, and/or grants to encourage urban agriculture and small Agency (OCHCA) to gather and map food desert data, and share publicly through the City's research revealed that no food desert areas currently exist in Santa Ana. To monitor and 2.18.22 Environmental Quality webpage. grocery or convenience stores to sell fresh foods in the city, especially those visualize this data, staff recommends adding a new action to collaborate with OCHCA to gather within environmental justice area boundaries. Examples include grants or and map data and make it available to the public through the Environmental Quality webpage loans to purchase updated equipment, publicity, or directories of healthy (webpage is proposed as part of Action CN-1.10). Once the data is gathered and mapped, food outlets, or connecting stores to wholesale sources of healthy, local, or funds and effort resulting from Action CM-3.6 to create a program to expand fresh and healthy organic food" Santa Ana Is Missing: A policy to measure and increase fresh food options in the City and can be tailored and targeted at any areas that may develop into and healthy food access for environmental justice communities Santa Ana food deserts over time. Could Adopt: A policy more like that of the City of Chino's Policy P4 "In areas identified as underserved with healthy food sources, the City shall consider financial incentives to attract grocery store -anchored retail centers" with Actions A2-A5 to "Conduct a study to identify areas of the City that are underserved by grocery stores... attract retail that is currently lacking, such as grocery stores, work with brokers and existing stores to identify sites that could be appropriate for a specific store... Monitor vacancy rates and sales tax performance for retail areas in the City... [and] Actively recruit retail stores by marketing available sites and devoting staff time to working with potential tenants" 152 Santa Ana Suggests: Policy CM-3.2 Healthy Neighborhoods "Continue to A number of policies and actions address this comment. Providing healthy neighborhoods, specifically safe and sanitary housing as referenced in the MPNA Attachment IV, support the creation of healthy neighborhoods by addressing public safety, comment, is of great importance and is addressed in both the General Plan Update and the 2.18.22 use conflicts, hazardous soil contamination, incompatible uses, and Housing Element Update. The General Plan Update provides actions to help build and maintaining building code standards." Santa Ana Is Missing: A policy that strengthen community, while the Housing Element Update provides actions related funding identifies how such public safety issues will be identified and addressed Santa for rehabilitation and maintenance, facilitating workshops for owners and renters to Ana Could Adopt: A policy more like that of the City of Alameda's Policy 4.2 understand landlord -tenant responsibilities, and ensuring neighborhood safety and "Stimulate neighborhood and community improvement by providing financial infrastructure are addressed through the Capital Improvement Plan. See actions CM-1.7, CM - and technical assistance in the form of low interest loans, technical assistance 1.8, OS-2.2, OS-3.2, LU-4.3, M-1.5, PS-1.6, HE-1, HE-2, HE-3, HE-4, HE-10, HE-11, and HE-12. and code enforcement," Policy 4.9 "to support programs designed to rehabilitate deteriorated units and encourage the maintenance and minor repair of structurally sound housing units," and Policy 4.13 "to provide ongoing infrastructure maintenance in existing residential neighborhoods through the capital improvement program" 153 Santa Ana Suggests: Policy CM-3.3 Healthy Residential Programs "Invest in A number of policies and actions address this comment. Community engagement has been instrumental in the development of the General Plan MPNA Attachment IV, programs and public improvements that educate residents about Update and will continue to be instrumental to the decision making process moving forward. 2.18.22 opportunities to increase their physical activity and improve their health" To that end, the Draft General Plan includes implementation actions to make community Santa Ana Is Missing: A policy to educate the public on healthy residential engagement and collaboration central to community education and decision making programs Santa Ana Could Adopt: A policy more like that of the City of South processes. See actions CM-1.1, CM-1.2, CM-1.3, LU-3.25. Gate's Policy P.3 "Information about community events should continue to be distributed to a wide range of community organizations including churches, senior facilities, schools, etc. using existing city -sponsored platforms such as the City website City Council 30 — 32 4/19/2022 Page 30 Catalog of City of Santa Ana Draft General Plan Update Comments Received Post February 15, 2022 q Public Comments/Concerns Draft Policies and Implementation Actions Addressing Comments/Concerns City Response Source of Comment 154 Santa Ana Suggests: Action S-2.4 Lead Contamination "Work with local and Existing Action: LU-3.29: Development Site History. Update the City's Development Review The Draft Plan includes numerous actions aimed at addressing lead based contamination in MPNA Attachment IV, regional partners, such as Orange County Environmental Justice, Orange application process to require developers to provide information regarding the prior use of the site the community, which were developed in partnership with community stakeholders. Lead 2.18.22 County Health Care Agency and University of California at Irvine Public Health, and history of hazardous materials on the property, in order to identify potential for site contamination from non stationary sources like automobiles is a statewide problem and to understand the prevalence, sources, and implications of lead contamination from hazardous materials or soil lead contamination to be remediated. especially acute in urban environments where vehicle traffic is heaviest. The Draft Plan contamination of soil across Santa Ana. Collaborate with environmental includes actions to help identify the exact cause of the pollution and to then seek funds to justice stakeholders in proposing solutions to remove hazardous assist with remediation. The Draft Plan also includes actions to provide education related to lead -contaminated soils in the city and with benchmarks to measure and track renovations and construction on buildings that may have lead based products. Actions effectiveness of proposed programs." Santa Ana Is Missing: A policy to test, addressing lead contamination include S-2.4, LU-3.6, LU-3.17, LU-3.18, LU-3.19, LU-3.20, LU- measure, record, maintain, reduce, and eliminate existing lead contamination, 3.21, LU-3.22, LU-3.24, LU-3.26, and LU-3.29. especially in areas disproportionately impacted by existing lead contamination. Ensure contaminated sites are remediated before new development occurs Santa Ana Could Adopt: A policy more like that of the City of Richmond's Policy HL-40 "Ensure that contaminated sites in the city are adequately remediated before allowing new development. Engage the community in overseeing remediation of toxic sites and the permitting and monitoring of potentially hazardous industrial uses. Develop a response plan to address existing contaminated sites in the city..." and Action HW9.K for "standards dealing with the safe management of hazardous substances... [that] should require soil testing at development sites where contamination is suspected..." 155 Santa Ana Suggests: Polity CM-1.2 Community Input "Engage residents and A number of policies and actions address this comment. The Draft General Plan contains various policies and implementation actions related to MPNA Attachment IV, community facility users to provide input for facility improvements and increasing community engagement and participation, with a focus on increasing participation 2.18.22 programming." Santa Ana Is Missing: A policy that effectively involves from community members that reside in environmental justice areas and historically community members in the decision -making process Santa Ana Could Adopt: marginalized groups. See actions OS-1.15, OS-2.8, CM-1.2, CN-1.3, CN-1.11, CN-1.14, CN-1.15, A policy more like that of the City of National City's Goal HEJ-1 "Meaningful LU-3.25, and policies LU-3.2, and CM-1.2. and effective participation, promotion of community capacity building, and fair treatment of all segments of the public in the process of creating a healthy environment and developing, adopting, implementing, and enforcing environmental laws, regulations, and policies" with Policy HEJ-1.1 "Facilitate the involvement of community residents, businesses, and organizations in the development, adoption, and implementation of community health initiatives and consider their input throughout the decision making process" Policy HEJ- 1.2 to "Consider environmental justice issues as they are related to potential health impacts..." Policy HEJ-1.3 "Consider environmental justice issues as they are related to the equitable provision of desirable public amenities..." Policy HEJ-1.5 "Assure potentially affected community residents that they have opportunities to participate in decisions that affect their environment and health, and that the concerns of all participants involved will be considered in the decision -making process" and Policy HEJ-1.6 "Hold meetings and workshops at times and locations that are convenient for community members to attend, especially those that may be directly affected by a particular decision" City Council 30 — 33 4/19/2022 Page 31 Catalog of City of Santa Ana Draft General Plan Update Comments Received Post February 15, 2022 q Public Comments/Concerns Draft Policies and Implementation Actions Addressing Comments/Concerns City Response Source of Comment 156 Santa Ana Suggests: Policy LU-3.11 Air Pollution Buffers "Promote landscaping Existing Action: LU-3.2: Design Guidelines and Standards. Update the zoning code's development Further analysis is required to determine what the appropriate buffer should be. If adopted, MPNA Attachment IV, and other buffers to separate existing sensitive uses from rail lines, heavy and operational standards for industrial zones to address incompatibility with adjacent uses, Action LU-3.2 will establish a process by which to study relevant data and best practices, to 2.18.22 industrial facilities, and other emissions sources. As feasible, apply more including minimum distance requirements to buffer heavy industrial uses from sensitive receptors. arrive at an appropriate distance, not simply choosing an arbitrary distance. substantial buffers within environmental justice area boundaries." Santa Ana Conduct a study to evaluate and establish appropriate minimum distances and landscape buffers Is Missing: A policy to designate appropriate distances or standards for buffer between polluting industrial uses from sensitive receptors such as residences, schools, day care, zones Santa Ana Could Adopt: A policy more like that of the City of East Palo and public facilities. Alto's Policy 10.3 "Plant landscape buffers between Highway 101 and residential areas..." which designates specific locations for buffer zones or CARB's suggestion that sensitive land uses be separated from industrial uses by at least a distance of 1,000 feet. 157 South Bristol Street Land Use Focus Area: Redesignate the eastern block of Amend General Plan Land Use Map Map has been modified to reflect City Council. City Council Bristol Street between MacArthur and Alton Ave to UN-40 instead of DC-2. The designation is a better transition with the adjacent neighborhood to the east. 158 Recommended Action: LU-2.15: Community Serving Commercial Retail & Recommended Action: LU-2.15: Community Serving Commercial Retail & Service Diversity Impact Staff is proposing the Action to maintain the avialability and a balanced mix of community Staff Service Diversity Impact Analysis. Implement a requirement for mixed -use Analysis. Implement a requirement for mixed -use projects or proposals to convert commercial and serving commercial retail and service uses within the City. projects or proposals to convert commercial and other non-residential uses to other non-residential uses to residential or mixed -use projects to complete a community serving commercial retail & service diversity impact analysis to inform the decision making process and to residential or mixed -use projects to complete a community serving ensure availability and diversity of commercial retail and service uses in Santa Ana as part of the commercial retail & service diversity impact analysis to inform the decision development proposal. making process and to ensure availability and diversity of commercial retail and service uses as part of the development proposal. City Council 30-34 4/19/2022 Page 32 Recommended Clarifications to the Draft April 2022 General Plan (11k, 9 beyonYy ASN D-10Ni BAMSA ANA The following represents recommendations proposed by the community and City staff to the April 2022 version of the Draft General Plan. The updated content is shown by element, with policy and implementation actions displayed with tracked changes, with new content noted as underlined. INTRODUCTION: The following definitions under the Glossary section of the Introduction are proposed to be included as follows: Open Space. Recreational and green spaces, including parks, commercial open space, manicured landscaped areas, and public facilities such as trail corridors, water channels and rail infrastructure. Park and Parkland. Publicly accessible sites and green space that are owned and/or managed by the City of Santa Ana to support recreation and social gathering. Park Deficient Area. Areas of the community that are outside the standard public parkland service radius such as 1/2 mile for Community Parks and % mile for Neighborhood Parks, respectively. COMMUNITY ELEMENT: The following Community Element policies/implementation actions are proposed to be amended as follows: Community Input. Policy CM-1.2, Page CM-04 Engage residents and community facility users with meaningful and effective participation to provide input and involve them in the decision -making process for community facility improvements and programming. Healthy Residential Programs. Policy CM-3.3, Page CM-09 Invest in programs and public improvements that educate residents about opportunities to increase their physical activity and improve their health, especially in environmental justice communities with higher risk of negative public health outcomes Engage EJ Communities on Recreation and Cultural Programs. Action CM-1.1, Page CM-14 Incorporate community stakeholders from environmental justice communities to form an Environmental Justice Action CommitteeiRte existiRg . Rd/ Rel.v ^d "^^ ^^ *+^^^ to guide the identification of recreational and cultural programing needs and desires. Agency/Time Frame: PRCSA & PBA/2023 Community Conversation. Action CM-1.2, Page CM-14 Plan for and conduct a community survey every tree two years related to community health, aiF quality pollution concerns, parks, community engagement, and community service needs, with focused outreach to environmental justice priority areas, utilizing various platforms, such as social media and school events, to encourage substantial survey participation. Agency/Time Frame: CMO/2492-3-Every Two Years Environmental Soil and Human Health Screening Measures. Action CM-3.8, Page CM-15 Collaborate with Orange County Health Care Agency, and local stakeholders such as Orange County Environmental Justice and UC Irvine Public Health, in efforts to provide increase healthcare services (i.e, blood City Council 30 - 35 4/19/2022 lead testing, treatment) for residents, especially those that reside in environmental justice communities, Additionally, collaborate to advocate for adjustment of the County and State policies for health and environmental screening levels to promote healthy outcomes related to lead contamination as recommended by health experts. Agency/Time Frame: PBA/242-3 Ongoing Food Deserts. Action CM-3.6A, Page CM-15 Collaborate with Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA) to gather and map food desert data, and share publicly through the City's Environmental Quality webpage. Agency/Time Frame: PBA/2024 Environmental Justice Staff. Action CM-3.9, Page CM-15 & CM-16 Identify funding and hire a full-time Environmental Justice staff member to collaborate with the community to implement the environmental justice policies and actions including community outreach, collaboration on environmental health studies, pursuing grants, and coordination with federal, state, and local agencies regarding environmental concerns in the City. Agency/Time Frame: CMO/2022 MOBILITY ELEMENT: The following Mobility Element policies/implementation actions are proposed to be amended as follows: Proactive Mitigation. Policy M-1.7, Page M-04 Proactively mitigate existing and new potential air quality, noise, congestion, safety, and other impacts from the transportation network on residents and business, especially in environmental iustice communities. Interstate Freeways. Policy M-2.1, Page M-14 Support Caltrans and OCTA efforts to improve freeway safety, GapaGity, se„venience of aeeess, and epeFatienare#Te+e-ne+eS7 while addressing impacts to neighborhoods. Transit Services. Policy M-2.2, Page M-14 Support OCTA, Caltrans, and other `"'erk with regional and local transportation providers to enhance existing transit services eAtitier, to provide residents, workers, and visitors with safe, affordable, accessible, convenient, reliable, and attractive transit services. Land Use Development Design. Policy M-4.5, Page M-16 Ensure that building placement and design features create a desirable and active streetscape, by prioritizing pedestrian access directly from the street and olacine oarkine lots to the rear of a development site. Air Pollution Mitigation. Policy M-4.9, Page M-16 CA1q';0derUtilize land use, building, site planning, and technology solutions to mitigate exposure to transportation -related air pollution, especially in environmental iustice focus areas. MPAH. Action M-1.2, Page M-21 Coordinate with external agencies to ensure the OCTA Master Plan of Arterial Highways accommodates current and future demand for all users while prioritizing the safety of people utilizing non -automobile modes of transportation. Agency/Time Frame: PWA/202-12-2035 ECONOMIC PROSPERITY ELEMENT The following Economic Prosperity Element policy is proposed to be amended as follows: Mitigate Impacts. Policy EP-3.3, Page EP-09 Promote the development of sustainable and equitable new land use plans that proactively reduces negative health and economic impacts on existing residents and businesses, especially in environmental iustice City Council 30 — 36 4/19/2022 2 PUBLIC SERVICES ELEMENT The following Public Services Element policies are proposed to be amended as follows: Staffing Levels. Policy PS-2.7, Page PS-08 Maintain TIncrease staffing levels for sworn peace officers, fire fighters, emergency medical responders, code enforcement, and civilian support staff to provide quality services and maintain an optimal response time citywide, as resources become available. Resilient Facilities and Infrastructure. Policy PS-2.11, Page PS-09 Coordinate with utilities and public agencies to develop, maintain, relocate, and/or upgrade critical local and regional public facilities and infrastructure systems to ensure their resiliency during times of extreme weather or natural disasters, or toxic emission release. CONSERVATION ELEMENT The following Conservation Element policies/implementation actions are proposed to be amended as follows: Regional Planning Efforts. Policy CN-1.1, Page CN-05 Coordinate air quality planning efforts with local and regional agencies to meet or exceed State and Federal ambient air quality standards in order to educate the community on and protect all residents from the health effects of air pollution. Sensitive Receptor Decisions. Policy CN-1.5, Page CN-05 r^^.-„d potential Study the impacts of stationary and nonstationary emission sources on existing and proposed sensitive uses and opportunities to minimize health and safety risks. Develop and adopt new regulations ergavoiding the siting of facilities that potentially emit increased pollution might significantly ^^" *a^^ near sensitive receptors within environmental justice area boundaries. Community Survey on Healthy Lifestyles. Action CN-1.13, Page CN-20 Plan for and conduct a community survey of residents every two years related to community health, pollution aip quality, parks, community engagement, and community services; with focused outreach for environment justice concerns and priority areas (tie into other City efforts like Strategic Plan, park and recreation planning, community benefits, etc.). Report findings of survey through the various media platforms and utilize input to inform periodic evaluation and update of the General Plan. Agency/Time Frame: CMO/242-2- y Two Years Expanded Interactions. Action CN-1.14, Page CN-20 Identify opportunities to expand regular attendance and support neighborhood associations and community groups to hold regular meetings with ef-City staff and decision -makers in at meetings fe+ neighborhoods within environmental justice a "A-und-, communities, so that residents, community organizations, and businesses can ,;tee easily communicate their unique issues and needs, as well as their recommendations on how best to implement environmental quality, environmental health, and environmental iustice polices. Arrange for language interpretation services as needed Include _A *raRSIa F(s) at these meetings so that all residents can eegage-participate. Agency/Time Frame: PBA & CMO/Ongoing Preservation of Natural and Historic Resources. Action CN-2.4, Page CN-21 Identify and evaluate Collaborate with local indigenous tribes and other stakeholders to identify and evaluate potential incentives in the municipal code to encourage protection and enhancement of natural and historic resources. Agency/Time Frame: PBA/242-3 Ongoing City Council 30 — 37 4/19/2022 3 OPEN SPACE ELEMENT The Introduction section on Page OS-01 of the Open Space Element is proposed to be amended as follows: The purpose of the Open Space Element is to identify, a4+6 preserve, and add open space areas that provide value to the community and enrich the quality of life. Such lands or waters provide value in the form of recreation, health, biodiversity, wildlife conservation, and aesthetics. Additionally, open spaces are used for climate change mitigation and adaption, flood risk reduction, managed natural resources production, agricultural production, and protection from hazardous conditions. The Open Space Element will guide the City in its efforts to plan for open space lands in what is largely a built -out, urban environment. The following Open Space Element policies/implementation actions are proposed to be amended as follows: Park Standard. Policy OS-1.3, Page OS-05 Establish and maintain public parks, open space, and recreation requirements for new residential and nonresidential development to provide sufficient opportunities for Santa Ana residents and visitors. Attain a minimum of twe three acres of land per 1,000 persons residing in the City of Santa Ana. Park Distribution. Policy OS-1.4, Page OS-05 Ensure t#e that all City residents have access to public OF pFivate parks, recreation facilities, or trails in the City of Santa Ana, within 10-minute walking and biking distance of their homes. Prioritize provision, programs, and partnerships in park deficient in environmental justice areas. Land Acquisition and Equitable Distribution. Policy OS-1.8, Page OS-06 Exple.^ ^^*;^^r f.,.- the -,cquisitie, of Acquire available lands for parks, open space, greenways and trail corridors, with priority given to sites that are within park deficient of and environmental justice areas. New Development. Policy OS-1.9, Page OS-06 Ensure Require all new development to provide adequate parks and open space, including via parkland dedication or development fees, in order to meet the City's park standard. Ensure that new development includes e4eet+vely=iRtegFatespaFRs, epen space, a„a pedestrian and multi -modal travelways to promote a quality living environment. For new development within park deficient and environmental justice areas, prioritize the creation and dedication of new public parkland over the collection of impact fees. Creative Solutions for Deficiencies. Policy OS-1.10, Page OS-06 Develop creative and flexible solutions to provide greenspace and recreation activities in park -deficient neighborhoods yihe.re tr_aditieRal pad(s _are RA_* feasible. Encourage publie, private; and commercial recreational facilities iR areas that aFe paF!( defieim^ are physically open to the public and are affordable to residents of surroundine neiehborhoods. and serve communitv needs. Funding Sources. Policy OS-1.11, Page OS-06 Explore and pursue all available funding, including nontraditional funding sources, for park acquisition, facility development, programming, a-R4 maintenance of existing and new parks, and to increase investment per resident and meet the City's park standard of three acres per 1,000 residents. Set aside park funding to have monies on hand to acquire and develop parkland when opportunities arise and to leverage grant options. Park Needs Assessment and Master Plan. Action OS-1.1, Page OS-16 Create, adopt, and implement a park needs assessment and master plan, based on community input, defining park service areas according to best practices, establishing a service area for each park facility, creating a tool to evaluate needs and prioritize improvements by quadrant or appropriate geographic subarea, and maiMaiRiAg a list of f@F the expapsiei4 ai4d imppevemei# of epei4 spa@@ @Ad Fernpeatiepal ilities in City Council 30 — 38 4/19/2022 4 each quadrant or geographic subarea to attain a park land standard of 2-three acres per 1,000 residents. Agency/Time Frame: PRCSA/2022 No -Net -Loss of Public Parkland. Action OS-1.4, Page OS-16 Establish land use provisions in the Municipal Code that prevent a net loss of public parkland in the City of Santa Ana. Require at least a 1:1 replacement if there is any loss of public parkland or City owned open space due to public or private development. Agency/Time Frame: PRCSA/2022 Development Fees. Action OS-1.6, Page OS-16 EvaluateUpdate the fees requiFed by the City's °^Sid e-FAi^' Deyel^"rnent F^^ Acquisition and Development Ordinance and adjust th to increase the parkland dedication requirements to meet three acres of parkland per 1,000 residents -I ^{'^^* EUFFent Gests ^nd needds Require that fees collected in place of parkland dedication to be utilized to acquire or expand facilities within geographic proximity to new development or parkland deficient areas 'mate FequiFements FegaFding whe.re fees —are —spent. Agency/Time Frame: PRCSA/2022 Public Parkland Requirements for Residential Projects. Action OS-1.7, Page OS-06 Update the Residential Development Fee Ordinance for large residential projects, which include proiects of 100 residential units or more, to require public parkland within the City limits and a 10-minute walking distance of the new residential projects. Agency/Time Frame: PRCSA & PBA/2022 New Parkland Collaborative. Action OS-1.10, Page OS-17 Coordinate with property owners to explore options to provide public access and programming on privately - owned open space in park deficient areas, including options to acquire land through purchase, land dedication, easements, and land leases that would allow for permanent or temporary public use of land for open space and recreational opportunities. Agency/Time Frame: PRCSA/2022 & Ongoing Acquisitions to Meet Park Standard. Action OS-1.16, Page OS-17 Using the Park Master Plan as guidance, identify and acquire property within the City for park and open space use which will focus on bringing the park and recreation system to 2- three acres of land per 1,000 residents with a plan to keep pace with future urban growth. Agency/Time Frame: PRCSA/2022 SAFETY ELEMENT The following Safety Element policies/implementation actions are proposed to be amended as follows: Regional Collaboration. Policy S-2.1, Page 5-07 Consult and collaborate with federal, state, and regional agencies to identify and regulate the use, storage and disposal and ge of hazardous materials, prevent the illegal transportation and disposal of hazardous waste, and facilitate the cleanup of contaminated sites. Hazardous Waste Generators. Policy S-2.2, Page S-07 Collaborate with appropriate agencies to identify and inventory all users and handlers of hazardous materials to proactively mitigate potential impacts. Promote transparency and accountability by publishing city, regional. and state data and resources on toxic spills, water pollution. illeeal discharees. industrial and commercial air violations on a dedicated Santa Ana Environmental Qualitv webaa Multiagency Education Campaign. Policy 5-3.4, Page 5-08 Develop cooperative partnerships and strengthen communication among public agencies, residents, nonprofit organizations, community groups, and businesses to promote sharing of educational information regarding seismic and geologic hazards and safety. City Council 30 — 39 4/19/2022 5 Lead Contamination. Action 5-2.4, Page 5-15 Work with state, local and regional partners, such as the Department of Toxic Substances Control, South Coast Air Quality District, Orange County Environmental Justice, Orange County Health Care Agency and University of California at Irvine Public Health, to understand the prevalence, sources, and implications of lead contamination of soil across Santa Ana. Collaborate with such state agencies, local and regional partners and environmental justice stakeholders in proposing, selecting, and implementing measures to mitigate (i.e., remove, cover, and remediate) Selu+i^„_s to Fernev„ hazardous lead -contaminated soils in the city in a manner that includes key „benchmarks and routine monitoring of soil lead levels to measure and track effectiveness of selected approach. Agency/Time Frame: PBA & CDA/2022 8t Ongoing Business Education. Action 5-2.5, Page 5-15 Collaborate with state and county agencies and trade organizations to educate and inform industrial business owners about permit regulations required for safe facility operations and about best practices. Agency/Time Frame: PBA & CDA/'^'�2 Ongoing Public Education. Action 5-1.11, Page S-15 Continue to disseminate information on flooding, flood control on private property, floodplains, a-r4 flood preparedness, man-made hazards, hazard response plans, resources, and best practices in disaster events to the public through the City website, social media, and at City offices. Agency/Time Frame: CMO & PD/2022 LAND USE ELEMENT The following Land Use Element policies/implementation actions are proposed to be amended as follows: Air Pollution Buffers. Policy LU-3.11, Page LU-07 Premete Work with the Environmental Justice Action Committee to develop and implement landscaping and other local land use and zoning buffers strategies, guided by the Air Resources Board and the Southern California Air Quality Management District best practices, to separate existing sensitive uses from rail lines, heavy industrial facilities, and other emissions sources. As feasible, apply more substantial buffers within environmental justice area boundaries. Community Benefits. Action LU-1.2, Page LU-69 Develop a Standard of f„.- eval-Hati,,„ f ^ Require new development project's proposing a general plan amendment and/or a zone change to include as part of the development proposal, a a_4 community benefit and implementation plan providing a net community benefits as desired by the City and +e neighborhoods through public outreach. Example of community benefits may include, but is not limited to public realm improvements, dedication of park and open space for public use, expanded economic development opportunities, job opportunities, new community serving businesses and services, and removal of blight and incompatible land uses. Assess capital costs and ongoing operations and maintenance costs; conduct a financial feasibility analysis to determine the impacts of community benefits on the feasibility of desired types of development. Agency/Time Frame: PBA & CDA/2022 & Ongoing Community Serving Commercial Retail & Service Diversity Impact Analysis. Action LU-2.15. Page LU-70 Implement a requirement for mixed -use proiects or proposals to convert commercial and other non- residential uses to residential or mixed -use projects to complete a community serving commercial retail & service diversity impact analysis to inform the decision making process and to ensure availability and diversity of commercial retail and service uses in Santa Ana as part of the development proposal. Agency/Time Frame: PBA & CDA/2022 Fiscal Impact Model. Action LU-2.7, Page LU-70 Create Develop a del fiscal impact analysis model a44d that incorporates the appropriate mix of land ti5eqCit y ounce — 40 /19/2022 calf 0 neutrality to make informed land use decisions ^r "^^^{i^','t the Gity inn the deve'^^.. ent ffeeess. Require the completion of this analysis in mixed -use land use designations and in proposed conversion of commercial uses to residential or mixed -use protects. Agency/Time Frame: PBA & CDA/2022 Promote Health. Action LU-3.19, Page LU-72 Partner with local organizations (e.g., OC Health Care Agency, Latino Health Access, Santa Ana Unified School District, Garden Grove Unified School District, Orange County Environmental Justice, and the Coalition of Community Health Centers) to increase blood lead testing, outreach, education, and referral services through a 'promotora' or community peer outreach model that addresses the root causes of elevated blood lead levels impacting Santa Ana residents, with special focus in environmental justice communities and for children living in pre-1978 housing. Agency/Time Frame: PBA/2022 & Ongoing Prevention Education. Action LU-3.21, Page LU-72 Collaborate with local organizations such as Orange County Health Care Agency, a+4 State Environmental Protection Agency, and community -based environmental justice organizations to identify funds and t-e create a Santa Ana Prevent Lead Poisoning Education Program, with special focus on disadvantaged communities and pre-1978 housing stock. Agency/Time Frame: PBA/2022 & Ongoing Public Health Outcomes. Action LU-3.22, Page LU-72 Support the Orange County Health Care Agency in their role in investigating public complaints regarding unsafe lead work practices and lead hazards wherein children are present, through enforcement of local housing standards to assure healthy outcomes including for individuals and households presenting with concerns about lead exposure and/or with confirmed lead levels of >3.5 ug/dL, which the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indicates as the threshold for follow-up and case management in children. Agency/Time Frame: PBA/2022 & Ongoing Engage EJ Communities. Action LU-3.25, Page LU-72 Work with community serving organizations, neighborhood leaders, and residents to form an Ad HAC, Environmental Justice Action Committee to develop ongoing EJ Community Engagement programs for existing and new disadvantage EJ communities, including multilingual communication protocols. Host quarterly Roundtable meetings with local stakeholders to guide and evaluate implementation of environmental justice policies. Agency/Time Frame: PBA/2022 Health Conditions. Action LU-3.26, Page LU-72 Work with state agencies including the Department of Toxic Substances Control and South Coast Air Qualitv District, Orange County Health Care Agency, and local stakeholders including Orange County Environmental Justice and UC Irvine Public Health to identify baseline conditions for soil and air contamination in Santa Ana, routinely monitor indicators of such contamination, and measure positive outcomes. Collaborate with these organizations to secure grant funds for soil and air testing, an4 remediation (e.g., bioremediation, covering, removing, air filtration), and prevention activities for residential properties in proximity to sites identified with high se+1 lead levels of soil pollution (including sites identified with soil lead levels of 80 ppm or higher), and air pollution, with a focus on E vire meRt,l ee—As„s tFaets communities disproportionally affected by soil contamination. Agency/Time Frame: PBA/2022 Tenant Protections. Action LU-3.28, Page LU-73 Provide information to residential tenants regarding Landlord Tenant Laws in the State, such as AB 1481, and Santa Ana's Just Cause for Tenant Eviction and Rent Stabilization ordinance that provide protections against evictions for those who seek action to improve substandard housing and hazardous conditions. Agency/Time Frame: PBA/2022 & Ongoing City Council 30 — 41 4/19/2022 7 Public Improvements in Activity Nodes and Focus Areas. Action LU-4.3, Page LU-73 Create a public realm plan for each activity node and focus area to establish a unified vision for long-term improvements to streets, sidewalks, plazas, other public spaces, and placemaking elements. Identify public improvement priorities and pilot projects for each focus area and include them in PregFam pre ^ is and p;l^t ffeje,.ts onto the City's Capital Improvement Program. Agency/Time Frame: PBA & PWA/2022-2827-& Ongoing Mixed Use Lifestyle. Action LU-4.8, Page LU-73 €mere Establish and implement establishing thresholds in the Zoning Code to require ilenti€y minimum percentage of commercial uses to be included in mixed use land use designations and in proposed conversion of commercial uses to residential or mixed use protects. , as supperted by ^ ^d f;.-,.. l studio-. Agency/Time Frame: PBA/2022 - 2027 Collaboration with Rail -Road Companies. Action LU-4.9, Page LU-73 Collaborate with rail road right-of-way owners and operators to renovate the walls between communities and rail lines that provide the maximum protection for the community and public health, including strategies to reduce air and noise pollution. Agency/Time Frame: PBA/2022 & Ongoing Land Use Designation 55 Freeway and Dyer Road, Table LU-7. Page LU-56 Revise table to include a note stating the following: "Hotels are permitted in the Industrial/Flex 3.0 land use designation at Brookhollow Specific Development (SD) Plan No. 8." Land Use Maps. Revise the land use designation for eastern block of Bristol Street between MacArthur Boulevard and Alton Ave of District Center (DC-2) to Urban Neighborhood Medium Low (UN-40). This change will be reflected in following maps: Land Use Map Figure LU-1, Page LU 12, Density and Intensity Map Figure LU-4, Page LU 16, Land Use Map South Bristol Street Figure LU -20, Page LU 62. Land Use Designation South Bristol Street, Table LU-8. Page LU 62 Revise table to include UN-40 Urban Neighborhood as one of the allowable designations for South Bristol Street as follows: Urban Medium -high density urban neighborhoods with a mix of attached single- and UN-d0 1.5FAR or 5 Neighborhood 40 multifamily housing; mixed use residential with ground floor retail, services, and -Med iurn dujac stories restaurants; cultural uses; public and open spaces South Bristol Street Land Use and Urban Form narrative description to be revised per below, Page 63. Left column, 2nd Paragraph, revision includes: "The majority of the corridor north of "'+^^Avewc;e MacArthur Boulevard is planned with Urban Neighborhood land use designation..." Right column text below the Urban Neighborhood photo and title: The Urban Neighborhood district between Warner and AltAiq MacArthur allows medium- to medium -high density housing as well as commercial; and cultural projects up to three (UN-30) and five (UN-40) stories tall along Bristol corridor. City Council 30 — 42 4/19/2022 W HISTORIC PRESERVATION ELEMENT The following Historic Preservation Element policies/implementation actions are proposed to be amended as follows: Community Engagement. Action HP-3.4, Page HP-14 Community engagement. Prepare a community engagement plan that targets communities with historic resources that have low participation rates in historic preservation programs including hard to reach communities and affiliated tribes listed with the California Native American Heritage Commission. Agency/Time Frame: PBA/2023 Public Awareness. Action HP-3.10, Page HP-14 Participate in and support efforts of preservation organizations, affiliated tribes listed with the California Native American Heritage Commission, and business groups to promote public awareness and educational opportunities that highlight historic preservation. Agency/Time Frame: PBA/Ongoing Native American Cultural Significance. Action HP-2.7, Page HP-13 Consult with all affiliated tribes listed with the California Native American Heritage Commission to identify sites of cultural, spiritual, and/or historical significance to their tribes, and work with them to preserve, restore or celebrate these sites, where feasible. Agency/Time Frame: PBA/2023 & Ongoing S:\Planning\General Plan 2016\Documents\EJ Materials\GP Matrix EJ\2022 Reponses\Ex 2 Recommended Clarifications to GP _ 4.8.2022.docx City Council 30 — 43 4/19/2022 0 RESOLUTION NO. 2022-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA (1) CERTIFYING THE FINAL RECIRCULATED PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE, (2) ADOPTING ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS OF FACT AND A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, (3) ADOPTING THE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM, AND (4) APPROVING THE PROJECT WHEREAS, the City of Santa Ana seeks to approve the City of Santa Ana General Plan Update; and WHEREAS, the General Plan Update identified the following five focus areas for potential change and new growth: South Main Street, Grand Avenue/17th Street, West Santa Ana Boulevard, 55 Freeway/Dyer Road, and South Bristol Street; and WHEREAS, the total long-term potential growth within these focus areas is estimated at 17,575 new housing units, 2,263,130 non-residential building square footage, and 6,616 jobs; and WHEREAS, the General Plan Update ("project") requires, among other things: (1) adoption of the Santa Ana General Plan Update; (2) certification of a Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report; (3) adoption of Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations; (4) adoption of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and (5) adoption of any ordinances, guidelines, standards, programs, actions, or other mechanisms that implement the Santa Ana General Plan update; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 21067 of the Public Resources Code, and CEQA Guidelines Section 15367, the City of Santa Ana is the lead agency for the project; and WHEREAS, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15063(a), the City as lead agency determined that a program EIR was required for the project, and therefore did not prepare an initial study; and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15082, on February 26, 2020, the City sent to the Office of Planning and Research and each responsible and trustee agency a Notice of Preparation —which was also published in the Orange Resolution No. 2022-XXX Page 1 of 7 City Council 30 — 44 4/19/2022 County Register, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Santa Ana —stating that an environmental impact report would be prepared; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.9 and CEQA Guidelines Sections 15082(c) and 15083, the City held a duly noticed scoping meeting on March 5, 2020, to solicit comments on the scope of the environmental review of the proposed project; and WHEREAS, a Draft Program Environmental Impact Report ("Draft PEIR") (State Clearinghouse No. 2020029087) was prepared for the proposed project addressing comments received in response to the Notice of Preparation and evaluating the proposed project's potentially significant environmental impacts; and WHEREAS, the Draft PEIR identified five significant and unavoidable impacts associated with the project that pertain to Air Quality, Cultural Resources, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Noise, and Population and Housing; and WHEREAS, the Draft PEIR further determined that the proposed project would require mitigation related to air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, and tribal cultural resources; and WHEREAS, consistent with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15087(e), the Draft PEIR was circulated for review and comment to the public, City Council, Planning Commission, local, regional and state agencies, and interested parties for a 45-day review period, from August 3, 2020, to September 16, 2020, a period that was extended thereafter to October 6, 2020; and WHEREAS, the City released the Final PEIR, which consists of the Draft PEIR, all technical appendices prepared in support of the Draft PEIR, all written comment letters received on the Draft PEIR, errata to the Draft PEIR and technical appendices; and WHEREAS, on November 9, 2020, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Final PEIR and General Plan Update, at which the Planning Commission voted not to certify the Final PEIR and continue work on the General Plan Update to a future date to allow additional time for outreach to Santa Ana's environmental justice (EJ) communities and in view of the COVID-19 pandemic; and WHEREAS, in 2021, a Recirculated Draft Program Environmental Impact Report ("Recirculated Draft PEIR") was prepared as a supplemental analysis to the original Draft PEIR to reflect updates to the project and based on an intensive, extended community outreach program conducted by the City between January and May 2021; Resolution No. 2022-XXX Page 2of7 City Council 30 — 45 4/19/2022 and WHEREAS, the Recirculated Draft PEIR provided an update of the project description, and environmental setting and impact analyses for Air Quality, Hazards, and Recreation; incorporated a new alternative; and identified an additional significant unavoidable adverse environmental impact that pertains to Recreation; and WHEREAS, consistent with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15087(e), the Recirculated Draft PEIR was circulated for a 45-day public review period, from August 6, 2021, to September 20, 2021; and WHEREAS, during the public comment period, copies of the Recirculated Draft PEIR were available for review and inspection at City Hall, on the City's website, and at the Santa Ana Public Library; and WHEREAS, during the public comment period, Planning Commission work- study sessions were held on August 9, 2021 and August 23, 2021, and a public hearing held on September 13, 2021; and WHEREAS, during the public comment period, the City consulted with and received comments from all responsible and trustee agencies, other regulatory agencies, and others pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15086; and WHEREAS, on November 2, 2021, the City released the Final Recirculated PEIR, attached hereto as Exhibit A, which consists of the Recirculated Draft PEIR, all technical appendices prepared in support thereof, all documents incorporated by reference (including the Final PEIR), all written comment letters received on the Recirculated Draft PEIR, written responses to all written comment letters and verbal comments received on the Recirculated Draft PEIR, revisions to the Recirculated Draft PEIR and technical appendices, and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and WHEREAS, on November 8, 2021, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Final Recirculated PEIR and General Plan Update. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public, and the City's consultant team, the Planning Commission voted to recommend that the City Council certify the Final Recirculated PEIR, adopt the findings of fact, the statement of overriding considerations, and the mitigation monitoring and reporting program, and approve the project; and WHEREAS, on December 7, 2021, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Final Recirculated PEIR and General Plan Update, which hearing was successively continued to the City Council meetings on December 21, Resolution No. 2022-XXX Page 3 of 7 City Council 30 — 46 4/19/2022 2021, January 18, 2022, and February 15, 2022, respectively; and WHEREAS, on February 15, 2022, the City Council heard the matter and afforded members of the public an opportunity to comment. No action on the item resulted; and WHEREAS, on April 19, 2022, and based on further comments received by City staff, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Final Recirculated PEIR, at which hearing members of the public were afforded an opportunity to comment and the project was fully considered; and WHEREAS, all potentially significant adverse environmental impacts were sufficiently analyzed in the Final Recirculated PEIR; and WHEREAS, as contained herein, the City Council has endeavored in good faith to set forth the basis for its decision and recommendations on the project; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements of the Public Resources Code and the State CEQA Guidelines have been satisfied by the City in connection with the preparation of the Final Recirculated PEIR, which is sufficiently detailed so that all of the potentially significant environmental effects of the project have been adequately evaluated; and WHEREAS, all of the findings and conclusions made by the City Council pursuant to this Resolution are based upon the oral and written evidence presented to it as a whole and the entirety of the administrative record for the project, which are incorporated herein by this reference, and not based solely on the information provided in this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the project's environmental impacts that are less than significant without implementation of project -specific mitigation measures, as identified in the Final Recirculated PEIR, are described in Section IV of the Findings of Fact, attached hereto as Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the project's impacts that, without mitigation, would result in significant adverse impacts, and that upon implementation of the mitigation measures provided in the Final Recirculated PEIR, would be considered less than significant, are described in Section V of the Findings of Fact, attached hereto as Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the project's impacts that, even with mitigation measures, would remain significant and unavoidable are described in Section V of the Findings of Fact, attached hereto as Exhibit B; and Resolution No. 2022-XXX Page 4 of 7 City Council 30 — 47 4/19/2022 WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the reasonable alternatives to the project are described in Section VI of the Findings of Fact, attached hereto as Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, the Statement of Overriding Considerations that indicates the benefits of the project outweigh the unavoidable significant environmental effects is described in Section VII of the Findings of Fact, attached hereto as Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, all the mitigation measures identified in the Final Recirculated PEIR and necessary to reduce the potentially significant impacts of the project to a level of less than significant are set forth in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), attached hereto as Exhibit C; and WHEREAS, prior to taking action, the City Council has heard, been presented with, reviewed, and considered all of the information and data in the administrative record, including but not limited to the Final Recirculated PEIR and all oral and written evidence presented to it during all meetings and hearings; and WHEREAS, the Final Recirculated PEIR reflects the independent judgment of the City Council and is deemed adequate for purposes of making decisions on the merits of the proposed project; and WHEREAS, no comments made in the public hearing conducted by the City Council and no additional information submitted to the City have produced substantial new information requiring recirculation of the Final Recirculated PEIR or additional environmental review of the project under Public Resources Code Section 21092.1 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5; and WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana as follows: Section 1. The above recitals are true and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2. The City Council hereby finds that it has been presented with the Final Recirculated PEIR, which it has reviewed and considered, and further finds that the Final Recirculated PEIR is an accurate and objective statement that has been completed in full compliance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, and that the Final Recirculated PEIR reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City, acting as lead agency for the project. Resolution No. 2022-XXX Page 5of7 City Council 30 — 48 4/19/2022 Section 3. The City Council declares that no evidence of new significant impacts or any new information of "substantial importance," as defined by State CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5, has been received by the City after circulation of the Final Draft Recirculated PEIR that would require recirculation of the PEIR. Section 4. The City Council hereby: A. Certifies the Final Recirculated PEIR based on the entirety of the record of proceedings. B. Adopts the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit B, after balancing the significant and unavoidable air quality, cultural resources, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, recreation, and population and housing impacts of the proposed project against the benefits of the proposed project. C. Adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit C, consistent with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6; makes implementation of the mitigation measures in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program a condition of approval of the project; and finds that in the event of any inconsistencies between the mitigation measures set forth herein and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program shall control. D. Approves the project, based upon the entire record before it, including the Final Recirculated PEIR, Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations, and all written and oral evidence presented. E. Directs City staff to cause a Notice of Determination to be filed and posted with the County of Orange Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk and the State Clearinghouse within five working days of the City Council's final project approval. Section 5. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the Clerk of the Council shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution. ADOPTED this day of 12022. Vicente Sarmiento Mayor Resolution No. 2022-XXX Page 6of7 City Council 30 — 49 4/19/2022 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By: � �� John M. Funk Sr. Assistant City Attorney AYES: Councilmembers NOES: Councilmembers ABSTAIN: Councilmembers NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers CERTIFICATION OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, DAISY GOMEZ, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2022-XXX to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 2022-XXX Page 7of7 City Council 30 — 50 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT All materials for Exhibit A may be accessed at: https://www.santa-ana.org/general- plan/general-plan-environmental-documents and are also on file and available at the City's Planning and Building Agency. City Council 30 — 51 4/19/2022 Exhibit B CEQA FINDINGS OF FACT FOR THE SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE FINAL RECIRCULATED PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT City of Santa Ana STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2020029087 INTRODUCTION The California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") requires that a number of written findings be made by the lead agency in connection with certification of an environmental impact report ("EIR") prior to approval of the project pursuant to Sections 15091 and 15093 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21081 of the Public Resources Code. The State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091 provides: (a) No public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an EIR has been certified which identifies one or more significant environmental effects of the project unless the public agency makes one or more written findings for each of those significant effects, accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for each finding. The possible findings are: 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the EIR. 2. Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can or should be adopted by such other agency. 3. Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the final EIR. (b) The findings required by subdivision (a) shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. (c) The finding in subdivision (a)(2) shall not be made if the agency making the finding has concurrent jurisdiction with another agency to deal with identified feasible mitigation measures or alternatives. The finding in subsection (a)(3) shall describe the specific reasons for rejecting identified mitigation measures and project alternatives. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 52 4� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -1- c o er 021 (d) When making the findings required in subdivision (a)(1), the agency shall also adopt a program for reporting on or monitoring the changes which it has either required in the project or made a condition of approval to avoid or substantially lessen significant environmental effects. These measures must be fully enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other measures. (e) The public agency shall specify the location and custodian of the documents or other materials which constitute the record of the proceedings upon which its decision is based. (f) A statement made pursuant to Section 15093 does not substitute for the findings required by this section. Public Resources Code Section 21061.1 defines "feasible" to mean "capable of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account economic, environmental, social, and technological factors." CEQA Guidelines section 15364 adds another factor: "legal" considerations. (See Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553, 565 (Goleta ll).) The concept of "feasibility" also encompasses the question of whether a particular alternative or mitigation measure promotes the underlying goals and objectives of a project. (California Native Plant Soc. v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Cal.AppAth 957, 1001 ["an alternative 'may be found infeasible on the ground it is inconsistent with the project objectives as long as the finding is supported by substantial evidence in the record"'].) An alternative may also be rejected because it "would not 'entirely fulfill' [a] project objective." (Citizens for Open Government v. City of Lodi (2012) 205 Cal.AppAth 296, 314-315.) "[l=]easibility" under CEQA encompasses 'desirability' to the extent that desirability is based on a reasonable balancing of the relevant economic, environmental, social, and technological factors." (City of Del Mar v. City of San Diego (1982) 133 Cal.App.3d 410, 417; see also Sequoyah Hills Homeowners Assn. v. City of Oakland (1993) 23 Cal.AppAth 704, 715.) With respect to a project for which significant impacts are not avoided or substantially lessened, a public agency, after adopting proper findings, may nevertheless approve the project if the agency first adopts a statement of overriding considerations setting forth the specific reasons why the agency found that the project's "benefits" rendered "acceptable" its "unavoidable adverse environmental effects." (CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15093, 15043, subd. (b); see also Pub. Resources Code, § 21081, subd. (b).) The California Supreme Court has stated, "[t]he wisdom of approving ... any development project, a delicate task which requires a balancing of interests, is necessarily left to the sound discretion of the local officials and their constituents who are responsible for such decisions. The law as we interpret and apply it simply requires that those decisions be informed, and therefore balanced." (Goleta Il, supra, 52 Cal.3d at p. 576.) When adopting Statements of Overriding Considerations, State CEQA Guidelines Section 15093 further provides: Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of r5 �ac an Statement 230-53 4� /?0021i inonsiderations -2- ober (a) CEQA requires the decision -making agency to balance, as applicable, the economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks when determining whether to approve the project. If the specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of a proposal project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse environmental effects may be considered "acceptable." (b) Where the lead agency approves a project which will result in the occurrence of significant effects which are identified in the final EIR but are not avoided or substantially lessened, the agency shall state in writing the specific reasons to support its action based on the final EIR and/or other information in the record. This statement of overriding considerations shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. (c) If an agency makes a statement of overriding considerations, the statement should be included in the record of the project approval and should be mentioned in the notice of determination. This statement does not substitute for, and shall be in addition to, findings required pursuant to Section 15091. Having received, independently reviewed, and considered the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report ("Draft PEIR"), the Final Program Environmental Impact Report ("Final PEIR), the Recirculated Draft Program Environmental Impact Report ("Recirculated Draft PEIR"), and the Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report ("Final Recirculated PEIR") for the Santa Ana General Plan Update, SCH No. 2020029087 (collectively, the "PEIR"), as well as all other information in the record of proceedings on this matter, the following Findings of Facts ("Findings") are hereby adopted by the City of Santa Ana ("City") in its capacity as the CEQA Lead Agency. These Findings set forth the environmental basis for the discretionary actions to be undertaken by the City for adoption and implementation of the Santa Ana General Plan Update ("Proposed Project"). This action includes the certification of the following: ■ Santa Ana General Plan Update Program Environmental Impact Report, SCH No. 2020029087 A. DOCUMENT FORMAT These Findings have been organized into the following sections: 1) Section I provides an introduction. 2) Section II provides a summary of the project, overview of the discretionary actions required for approval of the project, and a statement of the project's objectives. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE 1 �i i5 4 Fact anStatement30 — 54 4 1c�/ 02 Of ve ri ing onsiderations -3- 6ctober�021 3) Section III provides a summary of previous environmental reviews related to the project area that took place prior to the environmental review done specifically for the project, and a summary of public participation in the environmental review for the project. 4) Section IV sets forth findings regarding the environmental impacts that were determined to be —as a result of the Notice of Preparation (NOP) and consideration of comments received during the NOP comment period —either not relevant to the project or clearly not at levels that were deemed significant for consideration given the nature and location of the proposed project. 5) Section V sets forth findings regarding significant or potentially significant environmental impacts identified in the PEIR that the City has determined are either not significant or can feasibly be mitigated to a less than significant level through the imposition of project design features and/or mitigation measures. In order to ensure compliance and implementation, all of these measures are included in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ("MMRP") for the project and adopted as conditions of the project by the Lead Agency. Where potentially significant impacts can be reduced to less than significant levels through adherence to project design features and/or mitigation measures, these findings specify how those impacts were reduced to an acceptable level. Section V also includes findings regarding those significant or potentially significant environmental impacts identified in the PEIR that will or may result from the project and which the City has determined cannot feasibly be mitigated to a less than significant level. 6) Section VI sets forth findings regarding alternatives to the proposed project. 7) Section VI sets forth the statement of overriding considerations for the proposed project. 8) Section VIII sets forth the resolution regarding certification of the PEIR 9) Section IX sets for the resolution adopting a mitigation and monitoring plan for the proposed project. 10) Section X sets for the resolution regarding custodian of records for the proposed project. B. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS For purposes of CEQA and these Findings, the Record of Proceedings for the proposed project consists of the following documents and other evidence, at a minimum: ■ The NOP and all other public notices issued by the City in conjunction with the proposed project ■ The Draft PEIR for the proposed project ■ The Recirculated Draft PEIR Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 55 4� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -4- c o er 021 ■ The Final PEIR for the proposed project ■ The Final Recirculated PEIR for the proposed project including the Updated Draft PEIR (Volume II and III of the Final Recirculated PEIR) ■ All written comments submitted by agencies or members of the public during the public review comment period on the Draft PEIR ■ All written comments submitted by agencies or members of the public during the public review comment period on the Recirculated Draft PEIR ■ All responses to written comments submitted by agencies or members of the public during the public review comment period on the Draft PEIR ■ All responses to written comments submitted by agencies or members of the public during the public review comment period on the Recirculated Draft PEIR ■ All written and verbal public testimony presented during a noticed public hearing for the proposed project ■ The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ■ The reports and technical memoranda included or referenced in the Response to Comments ■ All documents, studies, EIRs, or other materials incorporated by reference in the Draft PEIR, Recirculated Draft PEIR, Final PEIR and Final Recirculated PEIR ■ The Resolutions adopted by the City of Santa Ana in connection with the proposed project, and all documents incorporated by reference therein, including comments received after the close of the comment period and responses thereto ■ Matters of common knowledge to the City of Santa Ana, including but not limited to federal, state, and local laws and regulations ■ Any documents expressly cited in these Findings ■ Any other relevant materials required to be in the record of proceedings by Public Resources Code Section 21167.6(e) The documents and other material that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings are based are located at the City of Santa Ana Planning Division Counter. The custodian for these documents is the City of Santa Ana. This information is provided in compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6(a)(2) and 14 California Code Regulations Section 15091(e). C. CUSTODIAN AND LOCATION OF RECORDS The documents and other materials that constitute the administrative record for the City's actions related to the project are at the City of Santa Ana Planning Division, 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-20, Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an a emen 30 — 56 4/1c�/ 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -5- ctober021 Santa Ana, CA 92701. The City's Planning Division is the custodian of the administrative record for the project. Copies of these documents, which constitute the record of proceedings, are and at all relevant times have been and will be available upon request at the offices of the Planning Division Counter. This information is provided in compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6(a)(2) and 14 California Code Regulations Section 15091(e). Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of r5 �ac an Statement 2 30-57 4/1ct/ 0 021i inonsiderations -6- oer II. PROJECT SUMMARY A. PROJECT LOCATION Santa Ana is in the western central portion of Orange County, approximately 30 miles southwest of the city of Los Angeles and 10 miles northeast of Newport Beach. Orange County is surrounded by the counties of Los Angeles, San Bernardino, Riverside, and San Diego and is one of six counties comprising the Southern California Region. Santa Ana is bordered by Orange and unincorporated areas of Orange County to the north, Tustin to the east, Irvine and Costa Mesa to the south, and Fountain Valley and Garden Grove to the west. In November 2019, the City annexed the 17th Street Island, a 24.78-acre area in the northeast portion of the city. The 17th Street Island is bounded by State Route 55 to the east, 17th Street to the south, and North Tustin Avenue to the west. The city also includes a portion of the Santa Ana River Drainage Channel in its sphere of influence (SOI). The city and its SOI are defined and referred to herein as the plan area. Regional access to the city is provided by the Garden Grove Freeway (SR-22) and the Orange Freeway (SR-57) on the north, the Santa Ana Freeway (1-5) on the northeast, the Costa Mesa Freeway (SR-55) on the east, and the San Diego Freeway (1-405) on the south. B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION In March 2014, the City Council adopted the Santa Ana Strategic Plan. The Strategic Plan was the result of an extensive community outreach process and established specific goals, objectives, and strategies to guide the City's major efforts. One of the key strategies identified was to complete a comprehensive update of the existing General Plan. The General Plan Update (GPU) will provide long-term policy direction to guide the physical development, quality of life, economic health, and sustainability of the Santa Ana community through 2045. The General Plan Update will identify areas of opportunity and provide options to enhance development potential in key areas of the city. It will also bring the city into compliance with recent State laws, reflect current conditions, and incorporate input from the general public, City staff, and other stakeholders. The proposed GPU is organized into three sections: I, Services and Infrastructure; 11, Natural Environment; and III, Built Environment. The proposed GPU addresses the eight topics required by state law as well as five optional topics. State law gives jurisdictions the discretion to incorporate optional topics and to address any of these topics in a single element or across multiple elements of the general plan. The 12 proposed elements of the GPU will replace the 16 elements of the current General Plan. The GPU will incorporate the current 2014-2021 housing element, and no substantive changes are anticipated. The topic of housing will be addressed as a separate effort in early 2022 in accordance with State law. The topic of environmental justice will be incorporated throughout the GPU, with goals and policies incorporated into multiple elements. The 12 elements of the proposed General Plan update are: Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 58 4� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -7- c o er 021 Mandatory Topics ■ Land Use Element ■ Circulation Element ■ Housing Element ■ Open Space Element ■ Conservation Element ■ Safety Element ■ Noise Element Optional Topics ■ Public Services Element ■ Urban Design Element ■ Community Element ■ Economic Prosperity Element ■ Historic Preservation Element The proposed GPU is comprehensive both in its geography and subject matter. It addresses the entire territory within the plan area's boundary and the full spectrum of issues associated with management of the plan area. The GPU also includes forecasts of long-term conditions and outlines development goals and policies; exhibits and diagrams; and the objectives, principles, standards, and plan proposals throughout its various elements. The GPU can be found online at https://www.santa-ana.org/general-plan. The General Plan Policy Framework can be accessed at https://www.santa-ana.org/sites/default/files/pb/general- plan/documents/General Plan PolicyFrameworkMaster.DRAFT. cmo2.pdf. Coordination and consistency are essential between the elements of the GPU, but in particular with the land use element. The circulation element, which identifies proposed improvements to the transportation system, may impact surrounding land uses and future development. The urban design element sets forth policies and programs to improve the city's design and urban form. The conservation element protects and maintains the city's natural, cultural, and other resources, with a focus on preserving aesthetics and the environmental quality of the city. Both the land use element and the circulation element are described in more depth below. Focus areas and specific plan/special zoning areas are also described. Updated Land Use Element The updated land use element will guide growth and development (e.g., infill development, redevelopment, use, and revitalization/restoration) within the plan area by designating land uses as shown in the proposed land use map. Figure 3-7 of the Updated Draft PEIR (Volume II of the Final Recirculated PEIR) shows the 13 proposed land use designations of the General Plan update, and Table 3-4 gives a general description of the land use designations that are added to the GPU and were not in the current General Plan. Land use designations define the type and nature of development that would be allowed in a given location of the plan area. The land use designations and patterns are intended to provide the basis for more detailed zoning designations and development intensities, requirements, and standards established in the City's development code. It is important to note that the updated land use element is a regulatory document that defines the framework for future growth and development in the plan area but does not directly result in Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an a emen 30 — 59 4/1c�/ 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -8- / ctober021 development in and of itself. Before any project can be developed in the plan area, it must be analyzed for conformance with the General Plan Update, zoning requirements, and other applicable local and state requirements; comply with the requirements of CEQA; and obtain all necessary clearances and permits. Updated Circulation Element The circulation element update is integrally related to federal, state, and regional transportation programs as well as local plans and regulations. The City's role in transportation planning has become increasingly important because recent legislation in the areas of growth management, congestion management, and air quality require more active local coordination to meet regional objectives. Furthermore, the circulation element update is intended to guide future development of the city's transportation system in a manner consistent with the updated land use element. The Master Plan of Streets and Highways (MPSH) details proposed street classifications to reflect buildout of the city's roadway system. The street classifications include Freeway, Major Arterial, Primary Arterial, Secondary Arterial, Divided Collector Arterial, and Collector Arterial. As part of the implementation of complete streets principles,' a series of modifications to the city's roadway network has been identified and includes both the reclassification of roadways and assignment of new MPSH roadway classifications to selected existing streets. A number of proposed roadway reclassifications, adoptions, and removals from the MPSH are as follows: ■ Reclassified as Divided Collector Arterial: Santa Clara Avenue west of Tustin Avenue (currently Secondary Arterial) • Flower Street between Warner Avenue and 1 st Street (currently Secondary Arterial) • Chestnut Avenue between Standard Avenue and eastern city limit (currently Secondary/Primary Arterial) • Raitt Street between Segerstrom Avenue and Santa Ana Boulevard (currently Secondary Arterial) • Civic Center Drive between Fairview Street and Bristol Street (currently Secondary Arterial) • Penn Way between 1-5 on/off ramps and Washington Avenue (currently Secondary Arterial) • Santiago Street between 15th Street and 6th Street (currently Secondary Arterial) • Standard Avenue between 6th Street and Warner Avenue (currently Secondary Arterial) Complete streets are transportation facilities that are planned, designed, operated, and maintained to provide safe mobility for all users, including bicyclists, pedestrians, transit vehicles, truckers, and motorists, appropriate to the function and context of the facility. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of r5 �ac an Statement 2 30-60 4/1cc/ 0 021i inonsiderations -9- oer . Santa Ana Boulevard between French Street and Santiago Street (currently Primary Arterial) . Santa Ana Boulevard between Raitt Street and Flower Street (currently Major Arterial) . Cambridge Street between Fairhaven Avenue and SR-22 freeway (currently Local Arterial) Hazard Avenue between Euclid Street and Harbor Boulevard (currently Secondary Arterial) Halladay Avenue between Warner Avenue and Dyer Road (currently Secondary Arterial) McFadden Avenue between Harbor Boulevard and Grand Avenue (currently Secondary Arterial) Broadway between 1st Street and 17th Street (currently Secondary Arterial) 4th Street between French Street and Grand Avenue (currently Primary/Secondary Arterial) Fairhaven Avenue from Grand Avenue to Tustin Avenue (currently Secondary Arterial) ■ Reclassified as Primary Arterial: . Santa Ana Boulevard between Flower Street and Ross Street (currently a Major Arterial) 1st Street between Bristol Street and Tustin Avenue (currently Major Arterial) ■ Reclassify as Collector Arterial: Civic Center Drive between French Street and Santiago Street (currently a Secondary Arterial) ■ Add the following to the MPSH as Divided Collector Arterial: . Greenville Street between Segerstrom Avenue and Warner Avenue ■ Add the following to the MPSH as Collector Streets: . Civic Center Drive between Spurgeon Street and Santiago Street (currently Local Street) Broadway from Anahurt Street to Main Street (currently Local Road) ■ Remove the following from the MPSH . Memory Lane from the City Center Drive to SR-22 . Wright Street from 14th Street to Fruit Street . 4th Street from French Street to Ross Street . Washington Avenue from Broadway to Main Street 10th street from Broadway to Main Street Columbine Avenue from Main Street to 55 FWY Halladay street from Dyer Road to Alton pkwy Santa Ana General Plan Update CE i �i i5 4 Fact anStatement30 — 61 4 1c�/ 02 Of ve ri ing onsiderations -10- 6ctober�021 The majority of the proposed reclassifications aim to reduce existing rights -of -way for vehicular traffic lanes to make room for bicycle and pedestrian improvements. Landmark streets are also identified within or adjacent to the Santa Ana Downtown Historic District, which is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The circulation element update incorporates the proposed Santa Ana -Garden Grove Fixed Guideway project, which will introduce new transit service to the city. Santa Ana is working with Garden Grove and Orange County Transit Authority to build a fixed guideway system called the OC Streetcar. Expected to begin operations in 2021, the OC Streetcar will link the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center to a new multimodal hub at Harbor Boulevard/Westminster Avenue in Garden Grove. OC Streetcar will serve historic downtown Santa Ana and Civic Center. Along its four -mile route, OC Streetcar will connect with 18 Orange County Transit Authority bus routes and increase transportation options along Santa Ana Boulevard, 4th Street, the Pacific Electric right-of-way, and Harbor Boulevard. Focus Areas 1. South Main Street Focus Area The South Main Street focus area introduces the opportunity for greater flexibility and a more dynamic mix of land uses and urban design along the properties fronting Main Street. The intent is to transition an auto -dominated corridor into a transit- and pedestrian -friendly corridor through infill development without disrupting the surrounding lower -density neighborhoods. The objectives of this focus area are: ■ Facilitate redevelopment and property improvements along Main Street. ■ Create a more active and dynamic streetscape. ■ Protect established residential neighborhoods. ■ Support transit, pedestrian, and nonmotorized travel. The majority of properties fronting Main Street will be designated Urban Neighborhood, allowing for future development to include commercial uses, low- and medium -density housing, or a combination of both in a vertically mixed -use format. South of Warner Avenue, the Industrial/Flex designation will offer new options for small-scale manufacturing, live -work, and retail opportunities. The balance of the focus area will remain designated for Low Density Residential or Institutional to reflect the existing development patterns and land uses. New buildings and spaces will be sensitive to the surrounding low -density neighborhoods while still emphasizing the creation of active and attractive urban spaces. 2. Grand Avenue / 17th Street Focus Area The Grand Avenue / 17th Street focus area will foster the development of an urban mixed -use corridor connecting into the city's downtown and transit core. The intent is to create opportunities Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 62 4� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -11- c o er 021 for a new mix of land uses and design to transition Grand Avenue from a series of auto -oriented shopping plazas to a series of dynamic urban spaces. The objectives of this focus area are: ■ Create mixed -use corridors and urban villages. ■ Promote infill development while respecting established neighborhoods. ■ Foster community spaces and neighborhood -serving amenities. ■ Develop opportunities for live -work, artist spaces, and small-scale manufacturing. ■ Maintain compatible nodes of commercial activity. The majority of land in this focus area is planned for Urban Neighborhood or District Center land use designations, which will allow a blend of residential and commercial uses to develop simultaneously, as market conditions allow. An intense mixed -use area is envisioned adjacent to the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center, along the east side of Grand Avenue south of 1-5. This part of the focus area will support larger, more visually dynamic buildings and urban spaces that complement and benefit from the adjacent regional transit center. North of 1-5, the buildings and spaces will be sensitive to the surrounding low -density neighborhoods but will still emphasize the creation of active and attractive urban spaces. A mix of residential, retail, and office will be interspersed along the frontage of Grand Avenue, with a concentrated node of commercial and mixed -use residential uses at Grand Avenue and 17th Street. A small portion of the focus area is designated for Industrial/Flex and General Commercial to support small-scale manufacturing, live -work, and retail opportunities will be located along 17th Street near the Regional Transportation Center. 3. West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area The West Santa Ana Boulevard focus area connects the Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Specific Plan area and Downtown Santa Ana, and the OC Streetcar Project improvements will create the physical transit link in 2022. The intent is to transition a group of auto -oriented neighborhoods, businesses, and institutions into a series of transit -oriented neighborhoods that support and benefit from future streetcar stops. The objectives of this focus area are: ■ Develop housing and mixed -use opportunities near streetcar stations. ■ Promote infill development while respecting established neighborhoods. ■ Buffer industrial land uses and residential neighborhoods. ■ Create opportunities for clean industrial/maker-type spaces. 4. 55 Freeway / Dyer Road Focus Area The 55 Freeway / Dyer Road focus area will transition from almost exclusively professional office to a range of commercial, industrial/flex, and mixed -use development. The intent is to create opportunities for a truly urban lifestyle with easy access to Downtown Santa Ana, multiple transit options, and the new investments and amenities in adjacent communities. The objectives of this focus area are: ■ Provide housing opportunities at an urban level of intensity at the city's edge. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 63 4� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -12- c o er 021 ■ Enhance opportunities for corporate offices. ■ Attract economic activity into the city from surrounding communities. ■ Protect industrial and office employment base. ■ Maintain hotel and commercial uses. The overall scale and experience of the focus area along the freeway and city boundary will reflect an urban intensity and design, with inspiring building forms and public spaces. At the southeastern edge, the District Center land use designation will facilitate large residential mixed -use developments in structures that incorporate high -density housing, hotels, and complementary expansions of commercial uses. Adjacent to the 55 freeway, the Industrial/Flex land use designation will promote large-scale office -industrial flex spaces, multilevel corporate offices, and research and development uses. The node surrounding the freeway interchange will remain as currently planned for General Commercial uses, with new improvements introducing development and spaces that complement the existing examples and elements. South Bristol Street Focus Area The South Bristol Street focus area represents Santa Ana's southern gateway and is a part of the South Coast Metro area. Between Sunflower and Alton Avenues, the District Center land use designation will create opportunities to transform auto -oriented shopping plazas to walkable, bike - friendly, and transit -friendly urban villages that incorporate a mix of high intensity office and residential living with experiential commercial uses. The objectives of this focus area are: ■ Capitalize on the success of the South Coast Metro area. ■ Introduce mixed -use urban villages and encourage experiential commercial uses that are more walkable, bike friendly, and transit oriented. ■ Provide for mixed -use opportunities while protecting adjacent, established, low -density neighborhoods. Between MacArthur Boulevard and Alton Avenue, the form and intensity will scale down but remain distinctly urban in nature. The redevelopment of the auto -oriented commercial plazas will result in the construction of landmark buildings and structures set in and around spaces accessible to future occupants and the general public. The corridor north of Alton Avenue is planned with the Urban Neighborhood land use designation, allowing for commercial and residential projects, frequently in a mixed -use format, to develop in accordance with market fluctuations. The buildings and spaces in this part of the focus area will be sensitive to the surrounding low -density neighborhoods but will still emphasize the creation of active and attractive urban spaces. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an a emen 30 — 64 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -13- 6c ober021 Soecific Plan/Saecial Zonin There are seven planning areas that represent specific plans and other special zoning areas that were previously adopted: Adaptive Reuse Project Incentive Area (2014), Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan (1991/2018), Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Specific Plan (2014), MainPlace Specific Plan (2019), Metro East Mixed -Use Overlay Zone (2007/2018), Midtown Specific Plan (1996), and Transit Zoning Code Specific Development (2010). The most recent adoption/amendment date for each document is noted in parentheses. Adaptive Reuse Project Incentive Area The Adaptive Reuse Ordinance, Section 41-1651 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, provides alternative building and fire standards for the conversion of eligible buildings, or portions thereof, from nonresidential uses to dwelling units, guest rooms or joint living, and work quarters. Eligible structures are buildings within the Adaptive Reuse project incentive area that were constructed in accordance with building and zoning codes in effect prior to July 1, 1974, or which have been determined to be a Historically Significant. The Project Incentive Area includes properties in the Midtown Specific Plan area; the Transit Zoning Code area; the Metro East Mixed -Use Overlay Zone; the North Main Street Corridor on both sides of Main Street, from 17th Street to the northernmost MainPlace Drive; and the East 1 st Street Corridor on both sides of 1 st Street from Grand Avenue to Elk Lane. Residential uses are allowed in the Project Incentive Area irrespective of the underlying zoning as part of an approved Adaptive Reuse Project. Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Specific Plan The Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Specific Plan covers the 2.5-mile segment of Harbor Boulevard on the west side of Santa Ana. The approximately 305-acre planning area includes parcels adjacent to Harbor Boulevard between Westminster Avenue and Lilac Avenue as well as parcels along Westminster Avenue, 1st Street, and 5th Street. The Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Specific Plan creates the zoning necessary to take advantage of the regional and local transit investments made along and around Harbor Boulevard. The plan expands development options to include residential alongside or integrated into a mix of nonresidential uses. MainPlace Specific Plan The purpose of the MainPlace Specific Plan is to transform MainPlace mall into a family -oriented retail, entertainment, and dining destination. The plan creates a mixed -use urban village with a revitalized mall at its central core. The Specific Plan area is on the north edge of Santa Ana, between Main Street on the east and SR-22 and 1-5 to the north and west. The property is identified in the current General Plan land use element as District Center. The District Center designation includes the major activity areas of the city, designed to serve as anchors to the city's commercial corridors and to accommodate major development activity. No General Plan amendment is required for the specific plan, and the MainPlace Specific Plan is the zoning for the property and defines the allowable uses within its boundaries. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an a emen 30 — 65 4� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -14- c o er 021 Metro East Mixed -Use Overlay Zone The Metro East Mixed Use (MEMU) Overlay Zone consists of an original MEMU Overlay Zone and an expansion component. The original MEMU Overlay Zone is largely developed with commercial and office uses and comprises approximately 200 acres immediately east of the 1-5 and immediately west of SR-55. It is bounded by 1-5 on the west and south, Tustin Avenue on the east, and East Sixth Street on the north. The MEMU expansion area added 33.52 acres or approximately 48 parcels to the original MEMU Overlay Zone area. The additional project area extends west primarily along First Street and is generally bounded by the 1-5 to the east, Grand Avenue to the west, East Chestnut Avenue to the south, and Fourth Street to the north. The overall objectives of the MEMU Overlay Zone are to encourage a more active commercial and residential community, provide an expanded economic base, maximize property sales tax revenues, improve the jobs/housing balance within the city, and provide for a range of housing options identified in the 2014 housing element. Midtown Specific Plan The Midtown Specific Plan area is generally bounded by 17th Street to the north, Civic Center Drive to the south, North Ross Street to the west, and North Spurgeon Street to the east. The Midtown area is readily accessible from the Santa Ana Freeway (1-5). Midtown is envisioned as an integrated district of civic, business, cultural, and retail activity with a small residential component. Transit Zoning Code Specific Development The City adopted a Transit Zoning Code to provide zoning for the integration of new infill development into existing neighborhoods; to allow for the reuse of existing structures; to provide for a range of housing options, including affordable housing; and to provide a transit -supportive, pedestrian -oriented development framework to support the addition of new transit infrastructure. The code encompasses an area in the central urban core of Santa Ana that comprises over 100 blocks and 450 acres. The area is west of 1-5 and bounded by First Street on the south, Flower Street on the west, Grand Avenue on the east, and Civic Center Drive on the north. General Plan Buildout Scenario In general, many areas currently designated for General Commercial and Professional Office will expand opportunities for residential development by a proposed change in General Plan land use designation to Urban Neighborhood or District Center. Industrial Flex will be introduced in each of the five focus areas and replace Industrial land use designations that currently exist to allow for cleaner industrial and commercial uses with live -work opportunities. Furthermore, state law allows a graduated density bonus for the inclusion of affordable housing units For an increasing amount of affordable units (by percentage), a project is allowed an increasing ability to exceed the permitted density (up to a cap of 35 percent). Recent updates to state housing law (Assembly Bill 1763, effective January 1, 2020), enables projects that are 100 Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 66 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -15- 6c ober021 percent affordable (either 100 percent lower income or 80 percent lower and 20 percent limited moderate), to obtain a density bonus of 80 percent, or no limit if within one-half mile of a major transit stop. However, not every proposed project pursuant to the GPU would include affordable units, and not every project that includes affordable units would need a density bonus. Proposed projects pursuant to the GPU are not required to build at densities that exceed maximum limits; the law only requires that jurisdictions grant the density bonus if requested. The buildout methodology for the GPU was based on past development trends, current development trends, and a forecast market analysis. These trends accounted for any units approved (density bonus or otherwise), to determine the appropriate density and amount of development to assume. Additionally, the optimal density of affordable units is at or below the density levels assumed for forecasting buildout. Generally, projects beyond 50 to 70 units per acre require Type 1 construction (steel and concrete structure), which is much more expensive than Type V construction (wood structure). Accordingly, affordable projects are rarely greater than 70 units per acre except for very small parcels. The average densities used to calculate projected buildout at 2045 are 50 to 90 units per acre in the three most intense focus areas; 55 Freeway/Dyer Road, Grand Avenue/17th Street, and South Bristol Street focus areas. For the remaining two focus areas, a residential assumption at 30 units per acre was used over a broad area to account for development at or above the maximum density of 30 units per acre. The maximum is 20 units per acre for projects proposed exclusively residential in the South Main Focus Area. The maximum is 30 units per acre for a relatively small part of the West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area. The City's buildout projections are therefore considered to include and account for the application of density bonus provisions of state law to future projects. Furthermore, the potential for development in specific plan and special zoning areas is based on the forecast buildout at the time of the respective zoning document's adoption, minus the amount of new development built between the adoption date and 2019. Growth outside of the focus areas and special planning areas is expected to be incremental and limited. Some growth was projected for the professional office surrounding the Orange County Global Medical Center and along Broadway north of the Midtown Specific Plan. Some growth was also projected for the commercial and retail area south of the West Santa Ana Boulevard focus area. Finally, some additional residential development is expected on a small portion (5 percent) of single-family and multifamily lots through the construction of second units. For the focus areas, the forecast buildout is based on development at approximately 80 percent of the maximum allowed development for each respective land use designation. C. DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS AND APPROVALS Project development requires the following discretionary actions and approvals from the City: ■ Adoption of the Santa Ana General Plan update ■ Certification of PEIR Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 67 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -16- 6c ober021 ■ Adoption of Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations ■ Adoption of the Mitigation Monitoring Program ■ Adoption of any ordinances, guidelines, programs, actions, or other mechanisms that implement the Santa Ana General Plan update D. STATEMENT OF PROJECT OBJECTIVES The updated General Plan is based on a vision statement and core values established as part of an extensive, multiyear community outreach effort. The City has identified the following core values to guide the General Plan Update (GPU): ■ Health. The people of Santa Ana value a physical environment that encourages healthy lifestyles, a planning process that ensures that health impacts are considered, and a community that actively pursues policies and practices that improve the health of our residents. ■ Equity. Residents value taking all necessary steps to ensure equitable outcomes, expanding access to the tools and resources that residents need, and balancing competing interests in an open and democratic manner. ■ Sustainability. Santa Ana values land use decisions that benefit future generations, plans for the impacts of climate change, and incorporates sustainable design practices at all levels of the planning process. ■ Culture. The Santa Ana's community values efforts that celebrate our differences as a source of strength, preserve and build upon existing cultural resources, and nurture a citywide culture of empowered residents. ■ Education. Santa Ana values the creation of lifelong learners, the importance of opening up educational opportunities to all residents, and investing in educational programs that advance residents' economic well-being. These core values were used as the basis to define more specific project objectives to aid decision makers in their review of the GPU and associated environmental impacts. The objectives include: 1. Promote infill development while respecting and protecting established neighborhoods. 2. Optimize high density residential and mixed -use development that maximizes potential use of mass transit. 3. Provide locations for new housing development that maximizes affordable housing opportunities to achieve both City and regional housing goals. 4. Facilitate new development at intensities sufficient to generate community benefits and attract economic activity. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an a emen 30 — 68 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -17- 6c ober021 5. Provide housing and employment opportunities at an urban level of intensity at the City's edge. g. Introduce mixed -use urban villages and encourage experiential commercial uses that are more walkable, bike -friendly, and transit -oriented. 7. Develop opportunities for live/work, artist spaces, and small-scale manufacturing. Santa Ana General Plan Update Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 69 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -18- 6c ober021 III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS In conformance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Santa Ana CEQA Guidelines, the City conducted an extensive environmental review of the proposed project. ■ The City of Santa Ana concluded that a PEIR should be prepared, and the Notice of Preparation (NOP) was released for a 30-day public review period from February 26, 2020, through March 27, 2020. The NOP was posted at the Orange County Clerk's Office on February 26, 2020. The notice was published in the Orange County Register, a newspaper of general circulation. Under CEQA, a lead agency may proceed directly with preparation of a PEIR without preparation of an Initial Study if it is clear that a PEIR will be required (State CEQA Guidelines § 15060[d]). The City of Santa Ana made such a determination for this project and did not prepare an Initial Study. ■ Completion of a scoping process, in which the public was invited by the City of Santa Ana to participate. The scoping meeting for the PEIR was held on March 5, 2020, at 6:00 p.m. at the Santa Ana Police Community Room at 60 Civic Center Plaza in Santa Ana. The notice of a public scoping meeting was included in the NOP distributed on February 26, 2020. ■ Preparation of a Draft PEIR by the City of Santa Ana, which was made available for a 45- day public review period (August 3, 2020, through September 16, 2020) and extended to October 6, 2020. The Notice of Availability (NOA) for the Draft PEIR was sent to all persons, agencies, and organizations on the list interested persons, sent to the State Clearinghouse in Sacramento for distribution to public agencies, and published in the August 3, 2020, Orange County Register. The NOAwas posted at the Orange County Clerk's Office on August 3, 2020. Copies of the Draft PEIR were made available for public review at the City of Santa Ana, Planning Division Counter at 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-20, Santa Ana, CA 92701, and the City of Santa Ana Public Library at 26 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. The Draft EIR was also available for review and download on City website: https://www.santa- ana.org/general-plan. ■ The Final PEIR contained comments on the Draft PEIR, responses to those comments, revisions to the Draft PEIR, if any, and appended documents. The Final PEIR was released for a 10-day agency review period prior to certification of the Final PEIR. ■ At its November 91 2020, public hearing, the Planning Commission voted not to certify the Final PEIR and continue work on the GPU to a future date to allow additional time for outreach to Santa Ana's environmental justice (EJ) communities. ■ The City performed an intensive, extended community outreach program conducted between January and May 2021 as described in Section 2.4 of the Updated Draft PEIR (Volume II of the Recirculated Final PEIR). ■ Pursuant to Draft PEIR comments, the Planning Commission public hearing, and an expanded EJ community outreach program, the City made the decision to prepare a Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an a emen 30 — 70 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -19- 6c ober021 Recirculated Draft PEIR to discuss and evaluate impacts related to environmental justice, to conclude that the recreation -related impacts of the proposed GPU would result in a significant impact, and to define a new project alternative to reduce recreational impacts. ■ The City recirculate the Draft PEIR chapters that had been revised and the NOAwas released for a 45-day public review period from August 6, 2021 through September 20, 2021. The NOA directed reviewers to only submit comments on the revised Draft PEIR chapters included in the Recirculated Draft PEIR since the comments in the Final PEIR adequately addressed comments received on portions of the Draft PEIR that had not been recirculated. ■ One September 13th, the City conducted a Planning Commission Study Session to discuss the Recirculated Draft PEIR. Verbal comments from the public, received during the Study Session were addressed in the Final Recirculated PEIR. ■ After considering the PEIR and in conjunction with making these findings, the City of Santa Ana hereby finds that, pursuant to Section 15092 of the CEQA Guidelines, approval of the project will result in significant effects on the environment; however, the significant effects will be eliminated or substantially lessened where feasible, and the City has determined that remaining significant effects are acceptable under Section 15093. ■ The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is hereby adopted to ensure implementation of feasible mitigation measures identified in the PEIR. The City of Santa Ana finds that these mitigation measures are fully enforceable conditions on the project and shall be binding upon the City and affected parties. ■ The City of Santa Ana finds that the project is in the public interest and is necessary for the public health, safety, and welfare. ■ The City of Santa Ana hereby certifies the Final Recirculated PEIR in accordance with the requirements of CEQA. ■ Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15095, staff is directed as follows: a) copy of the Final Recirculated PEIR and CEQA Findings of Fact shall be retained in the project files; b) copy of the Final Recirculated PEIR and CEQA Findings of Fact shall be provided to all CEQA "responsible" agencies. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of i i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 71 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -20- 6c ober021 IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES THAT WERE DETERMINED NOT TO BE POTENTIALLY AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT A. IMPACTS DETERMINED TO BE LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT DURING THE SCOPING PROCESS Based on the public scoping process (including review of NOP responses and input at the public scoping meeting), in addition to analysis prepared for the Draft PEIR, the City determined, based upon the threshold criteria for significance, that the project would have no impact or a less than significant impact on the following potential environmental issues (see Updated Draft PEIR, Chapter 8, Impacts Found Not to Be Significant). It was determined, therefore, that these potential environmental issues would be precluded from detailed discussion in the Draft PEIR. Based upon the environmental analysis presented in the Draft PEIR, and the comments received by the public on the Draft PEIR, no substantial evidence was submitted to or identified by the City which indicated that the project would have an impact on the following environmental areas: (a) Agriculture and Forestry Resources: The City does not have any significant agricultural resources. Additionally, Santa Ana has no land designated or zoned for agricultural use and does not have any land subject to a Williamson Act contract. Santa Ana does not have any land designated or zoned for forestland, timberland, or zoned Timberland Production. (b) Wildfire: According to CAL FIRE, the nearest fire hazard severity zone (FHSZ) in an SRA to the City of Santa Ana is a high FHSZ about 4.0 miles east along the western edge of Loma Ridge. The nearest FHSZ in an LRA is about 3.8 miles away at the southern tip of the Peters Canyon Regional Park. The city is not in or near SRAs or lands classified as very high FHSZs. Additionally, no area in the city is on the wildland-urban interface. All other topical areas of evaluation included in the Environmental Checklist were determined to require further assessment in the Draft PEIR. B. IMPACTS DETERMINED TO BE LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IN THE PEIR This section identifies impacts of the proposed project determined to be less than significant without implementation of project -specific mitigation measures. This determination, however, does assume compliance with existing regulations, as detailed in each respective topical section of Chapter 5 in the Updated Draft PEIR. (a) Aesthetics: Buildout under the GPU will be at a greater intensity/density in all five focus areas compared to existing conditions. While maximum height would generally be similar to existing buildings, the overall increase in allowed intensity and height across the focus areas would lead to a visually denser urban setting and alter Santa Ana's existing skyline. Buildout under the GPU would not have a substantial adverse effect on scenic vistas (such as the Santa Ana River and Santiago Creek) since these existing open space parcels would remain unchanged. Additionally, no state scenic highways, eligible or officially designated, traverse the city nor are located near the city. Therefore, the GPU would not damage scenic resources, including rock outcroppings, trees, and historic buildings within state scenic Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an a emen 30 — 72 4� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -21- c o er 021 highways. The GPU would also create new sources of light or glare in the project area, but adverse impacts would be minimized with compliance to building codes. (b) Biological Resources: Development pursuant to the GPU would not impact riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities. Additionally, the GPU would not impact wetlands and jurisdictional waterways. The GPU would not conflict with an adopted NCCP/HCP as the City is not within a NCCP/HCP area and would not conflict with local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources. (c) Cultural Resources: The likelihood that human remains may be discovered during clearing and grading activities is considered extremely low. In the unlikely event human remains are uncovered, impacts would be less than significant upon compliance with California and Safety Code Section 7050.5. (d) Energy: Implementation of proposed policies under the GPU, in conjunction with and complementary to regulatory requirements, will ensure that energy demand associated with growth under the GPU would not be inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary. Additionally, the GPU would not conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. (e) Geology and Soils: The plan area's location and underlying geology make it likely to experience seismic hazards, including strong seismic ground shaking, and secondary hazards, like liquefaction. No active surface faults are mapped and zoned under the AP Zoning Act in the plan area. Additionally, all structures that would be constructed in accordance with the GPU would be designed to meet or exceed current design standards as found in the latest CBC. Most of the plan area is within an area susceptible to liquefaction; however, all structures constructed under the GPU would be designed in accordance with current seismic design standards as found in the CBC. There are no substantial hazards with respect to slope stability, as the plan area is mostly flat. Unstable geologic unit or soils conditions, including soil erosion, could result from development of the GPU. Mandatory compliance with existing regulations, including the preparation and submittal of a SWPPP and a soil engineering evaluation, would reduce soil erosion impacts to a less than significant level. Implementation of the CBC design code, which has been adopted by the City and requires that structures be designed to mitigate expansive and compressible soils, would reduce impacts to a less than significant level. The probability of subsidence impacts is generally low in the majority of Santa Ana; however, the statutorily required sustainable groundwater management practices of the Orange County Water District would ensure that impacts would be less than significant. Future development in the plan area would require connection to the City's sewer system as the City of Santa Ana does not allow for the installation of septic tanks. (f) Greenhouse Gas Emissions: The GPU would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an a emen 30 — 73 4� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -22- c o er 021 (g) Hazards and Hazardous Materials: Construction and operations under the GPU would involve the transport, use, and/or disposal of hazardous materials; however, compliance with existing regulations would ensure that construction workers and the general public are not exposed to any risks related to hazardous materials during demolition and construction. Furthermore, strict adherence to all emergency response plan requirements set by the Orange County Fire Authority would be required throughout the duration of project construction. GPU buildout is expected to result in some increase in the number of hazardous waste generators; however, hazardous wastes would be stored, transported, and disposed of in conformance with existing regulations of the EPA, US Department of Transportation, CalRecycle, and other agencies. Use, storage, transport, and disposal of hazardous materials in conformance with regulations would reduce both the likelihood of an accidental release and the potential consequences in the event of an accidental release. The plan area includes 555 sites on a list of hazardous materials compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 that could create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. Any development, redevelopment, or reuse on or next to any of these sites would require environmental site assessment by a qualified environmental professional to ensure that the project would not disturb hazardous materials on any of the hazardous materials sites or plumes of hazardous materials diffusing from one of the hazardous materials sites, and that any proposed development, redevelopment, or reuse would not create a substantial hazard to the public or the environment. Santa Ana is in the vicinity of an airport or within the jurisdiction of an airport land use plan. Projects approved under the proposed GPU would be required to comply with FAA airspace protection regulations using the AELUP consistency determination process. The buildout of the GPU would not result in substantial changes to the circulation patterns or emergency access routes, and would not block or otherwise interfere with use of evacuation routes. Buildout would not interfere with operation of the City's Emergency Operations Center and would not interfere with operations of emergency response agencies or with coordination and cooperation between such agencies. Santa Ana is not in a designated fire hazard zone, and implementation of the GPU will not expose structures and/or residences to wildland fire danger. (h) Hydrology and Water Quality: Projects pursuant to the GPU would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality. Development pursuant to the GPU would increase the demand on groundwater use but would not impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin. Development pursuant to the GPU would increase the amount of pervious surfaces in the plan area, but could substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in some focus areas in a manner which would result in flooding off -site or contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems. In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, development pursuant to the GPU would not risk release of pollutants due to project inundation or impede or redirect flood flows. Development Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an a emen 30 — 74 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -23- 6c ober021 pursuant to the GPU would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan. (i) Land Use Planning: Implementation of the GPU would not divide an established community. Additionally, the GPU would be consistent with the Airport Environs Land Use Plan for the John Wayne Airport. Implementation of the GPU would be consistent with the goals of the Southern California Association of Governments' RTP/SCS. Implementation of the GPU would also be consistent with the OCTA Congestion Management Plan. (j) Mineral Resources: Project implementation would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource. (k) Noise: The proximity of the plan area to an airport or airstrip would not result in exposure of future residents and/or workers to excessive airport -related noise. (1) Population and Housing: The proposed GPU would provide more housing opportunities than currently exist. Therefore, implementation of the GPU would not displace people and/or housing. (m) Public Services: The GPU would introduce new structures and allow for up to 22,361 new residents and workers in the OCFA and Santa Ana Police Department service boundaries, thereby increasing the requirement for fire protection facilities and personnel, as well as increasing the service needs for the Main Library and the Newhope Library Learning Center. The GPU would also generate additional students who would impact the school enrollment capacities of the Santa Ana Unified School District, Garden Grove Unified School District, and Orange Unified School District. However, upon implementation of regulatory requirements and standard conditions of approval the project would not create significant impacts related to fire protection services, police protection, library services, or school services. (n) Transportation and Traffic: The GPU is consistent with adopted programs, plans, and policies addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities. Additionally, GPU implementation would result in a reduction of vehicle miles traveled per service population (VMT/SP) in comparison to existing City conditions, and would achieve a VMT/SP at least 15 percent lower than the countywide VMT/SP. Finally, circulation improvements associated with future development that would be accommodated by the GPU would be designed to adequately address potentially hazardous conditions (sharp curves, etc.), potential conflicting uses, and emergency access. (o) Utilities and Service Systems: Development pursuant to the GPU would require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded wastewater facilities. However, Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) has a functioning and effective process in place to ensure the regional sewer infrastructure will support future developments under the Santa Ana GPU. Additionally, OCSD and OC Water District have adequate capacity to serve development pursuant to the GPU in addition to the providers existing commitments. Development Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 75 4� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -24- c o er 021 pursuant to the GPU would require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water facilities. However, the City would have adequate capacity for the proposed increases in water flows across the city under implementation of the GPU and would be able to serve the additional dwelling units and commercial square footage proposed. Furthermore, GPU policies encourage the maintenance and upgrade of water infrastructure through impact fees from new development, and the exploration of other funding sources. Water supply would be adequate to meet development pursuant to the GPU. Existing and/or proposed stormwater drainage facilities would be able to accommodate proposed development pursuant to the GPU. Existing and/or proposed solid waste facilities would be able to accommodate development pursuant to the GPU and comply with related solid waste regulations. Development pursuant to the GPU would require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded electric power and natural gas. However, the net increases in natural gas demands due to the GPU buildout are within the amounts that SoCalGas forecasts that it will supply to its customers, and buildout would not require SoCalGas to obtain increased natural gas supplies over its currently forecast supplies. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of i i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 76 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -25- 6c ober021 V. FINDINGS REGARDING POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS The following potentially significant environmental impacts were analyzed in the PEIR, and the effects of the project were considered. Because of environmental analysis of the project and the identification of relevant General Plan policies; compliance with existing laws, codes, and statutes; and the identification of feasible mitigation measures, some potentially significant impacts have been determined by the City to be reduced to a level of less than significant, and the City has found —in accordance with CEQA Section 21081(a)(1) and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a) (1)—that "Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment." This is referred to herein as "Finding 1." Where the City has determined —pursuant to CEQA Section 21081(a)(2) and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(2)—that "Those changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and have been, or can and should be, adopted by that other agency," the City's finding is referred to herein as "Finding 2." Where, as a result of the environmental analysis of the project, the City has determined that either (1) even with the identification of project design features, compliance with existing laws, codes and statutes, and/or the identification of feasible mitigation measures, potentially significant impacts cannot be reduced to a level of less than significant, or (2) no feasible mitigation measures or alternatives are available to mitigate the potentially significant impact, the City has found in accordance with CEQA Section 21081(a)(3) and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(3) that "Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in the environmental impact report." This is referred to herein as "Finding 3." A. IMPACTS MITIGATED TO LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT The following summary describes impacts of the proposed project that, without mitigation, would result in significant adverse impacts. Upon implementation of the mitigation measures provided in the PEIR, the impacts would be considered less than significant. 1. Air Quality Impact 5.2-6: Industrial land uses accommodated under the General Plan update could create other emissions, such as those leading to objectionable odors, that would adversely affect a substantial number of people. Industrial land uses associated with the GPU may generate potentially significant odor impacts for a substantial number of people. Impacts from potential odors generated from residential and other nonresidential land uses associated with the GPU are considered less than significant. Impacts associated with construction -generated odors are considered less than significant. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 77 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -26- 6c ober021 The Industrial and Industrial Flex land uses are not anticipated to produce odors, and Mitigation Measure AQ-4 would ensure that odor impacts are minimized and facilities would comply with South Coast AQMD Rule 402. Therefore, Impact 5.2-6 would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures AQ-4 Prior to discretionary approval by the City of Santa Ana, if it is determined that a development project has the potential to emit nuisance odors beyond the property line, an odor management plan shall be prepared by the project applicant and submitted to the City of Santa Ana for review and approval. Facilities that have the potential to generate nuisance odors include, but are not limited to: • Wastewater treatment plants • Composting, green waste, or recycling facilities • Fiberglass manufacturing facilities • Painting/coating operations • Large -capacity coffee roasters • Food -processing facilities The odor management plan shall demonstrate compliance with the South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 402 for nuisance odors. The Odor Management Plan shall identify the best available control technologies for toxics (T-BACTs) that will be utilized to reduce potential odors to acceptable levels, including appropriate enforcement mechanisms. T-BACTs may include but are not limited to scrubbers (i.e., air pollution control devices) at the industrial facility. T-BACTs identified in the odor management plan shall be identified as mitigation measures in the environmental document prepared for the development project and/or incorporated into the project's site plan. Finding Finding 1. The City hereby makes Finding 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. 2. Biological Resources Impact 5.3-1: Implementation of the General Plan Update could result in adverse impacts to candidate, sensitive, or special -status species. The inventory of existing conditions determined that no parcels with a proposed land use designation that allows for development (i.e., not an open space designation) currently has Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 78 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -27- 6c ober021 sensitive vegetation. All parcels currently have ruderal vegetation and little to no biological value. Therefore, there is no current indication that future development in accordance with the GPU would have significant unavoidable biological impacts. However, the programmatic analysis prepared for this GPU was not at the detailed, site -specific analysis required for a specific development project. Site -specific analyses could reveal biological resources not identified in the Biological and Natural Resources Report. Therefore, there is a potential for biological impacts associated with implementation of the GPU. Therefore, implementation of the GPU could result in a potentially significant impact. The letter received from CDFW states that the Santa Ana River and its tributaries historically supported federally endangered southern California steelhead. CDFW's letter requests that the Draft PEIR include an analysis of any proposed major stream crossings in the context of fish passage, and states that the analysis should include, but not be limited to, steelhead presence or historic presence, existing conditions including habitat and barrier assessments, any known projects to remove barriers or restore habitat that would affect or be affected by this project, and cumulative impacts to steelhead populations and/or habitat resulting from this project. The GPU does not propose any major stream crossings. If any future development project entails improvements for stream crossings (e.g. Santa Ana River and Santiago Creek), project -level CEQA compliance would require a biological resources report that would address potential impacts to endangered species, including the California steelhead. Impact 5.3-1 would be less than significant with compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local regulations and incorporation of mitigation measure BIO-1. Mitigation Measures BIO-1 For development or redevelopment projects that would disturb vegetated land or major stream and are subject to CEQA, a qualified biologist shall conduct an initial screening to determine whether a site -specific biological resource report is warranted. If needed, a qualified biologist shall conduct a field survey for the site and prepare a biological resource assessment for the project, including an assessment of potential impacts to sensitive species, habitats, and jurisdictional waters. The report shall recommend mitigation measures, as appropriate, to avoid or limit potential biological resource impacts to less than significant. Finding Finding 1. The City hereby makes Finding 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measures above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 79 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -28- 6c ober021 Impact 5.3-4: Implementation of the General Plan Update could result in adverse impacts to candidate, sensitive, or special -status species. The City of Santa Ana is largely urbanized, and migration corridors are generally limited to the Santa Ana River and the Santiago Creek. Development under the GPU would result in the further infill of the city and removal of vacant sites. The GPU would not change land use designations of parcels that encompass the Santa Ana River or the Santiago Creek. However, development under the GPU could further result in vegetation removal, intrusion by humans and pets, and increased noise and air pollutants, which could impact wildlife movement and nesting sites. Therefore, the buildout of the GPU could affect wildlife movement, nesting sites, and migratory birds protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act as well as state law. Impact 5.3-4 would be less than significant with compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local regulations and incorporation of mitigation measure BIO-1. Mitigation Measures Refer to BIO-1 above. Finding Finding 1. The City hereby makes Finding 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. 3. Cultural Resources Impact 5.4-2: Development in accordance with the General Plan Update could impact archaeological resources. Development involving ground disturbance within the plan area has the potential to impact known and unknown archaeological resources. Typically, surface -level and subsurface archaeological sites and deposits can be affected by ground -disturbing activities associated with most types of construction. Based on literature review and records searches, eight archaeological resources have been recorded within the plan area, including four prehistoric sites, one multicomponent site, and three historic isolates. The plan area includes many locations that would have been favorable for prehistoric Native American occupation. While most of the plan area has been developed over the course of the twentieth century, buried resources may remain in areas where developments such as parking lots, parks, or structures with shallow foundations have required only minimal ground disturbance. A review of historical and ethnographic maps indicates a moderate likelihood that intact subsurface archaeological resources would be encountered during redevelopment. Archaeological resources impacts are site specific, but more intensive development can result in cumulative impacts on a regional level and should be considered in addition to individual project Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 80 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -29- 6c ober021 impacts on individual sites. As determined by the respective lead agency on a project by project basis, Phase I Cultural Resources studies would be required before ground disturbances and demolition activities are permitted to occur. The study would identify resources on the affected project sites that are, or appear to be, eligible for listing on the National or California Register. Such studies would also recommend mitigation measures to protect and preserve archaeological and tribal cultural resources. Mitigation Measures CUL-4 through CUL-7 were developed to reduce potential individual and cumulative impacts associated with future development and redevelopment. Mitigation Measure CUL-4 requires an archaeological resources assessment be conducted for future development projects to identify any known archaeological resources and sensitivity of the site. Mitigation Measures CUL-5 through CUL-7 detail the next steps required should the archaeological resources assessment identify known resources or determine the site to have high or moderate resource sensitivity. Upon compliance with Mitigation Measures CUL-4 through CUL-7, individual and cumulative impacts to archaeological resources would be reduced to less than significant levels. Mitigation Measures CUL-4 For projects with ground disturbance—e.g., grading, excavation, trenching, boring, or demolition that extend below the current grade —prior to issuance of any permits required to conduct ground -disturbing activities, the City shall require an Archaeological Resources Assessment be conducted under the supervision of an archaeologist that meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professionally Qualified Standards in either prehistoric or historic archaeology. Assessments shall include a California Historical Resources Information System records search at the South Central Coastal Information Center and of the Sacred Land Files maintained by the Native American Heritage Commission. The records searches will determine if the proposed project area has been previously surveyed for archaeological resources, identify and characterize the results of previous cultural resource surveys, and disclose any cultural resources that have been recorded and/or evaluated. If unpaved surfaces are present within the project area, and the entire project area has not been previously surveyed within the past 10 years, a Phase I pedestrian survey shall be undertaken in proposed project areas to locate any surface cultural materials that may be present. CUL-5 If potentially significant archaeological resources are identified, and impacts cannot be avoided, a Phase II Testing and Evaluation investigation shall be performed by an archaeologist who meets the Secretary of the Interior's Standards to determine significance prior to any ground -disturbing activities. If resources are determined significant or unique through Phase II testing, and site avoidance is not possible, appropriate site -specific mitigation measures shall be undertaken. These might include a Phase III data recovery program implemented by a qualified archaeologist Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 81 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -30- 6c ober021 and performed in accordance with the Office of Historical Preservation's "Archaeological Resource Management Reports (ARMR): Recommended Contents and Format" (OHP 1990) and "Guidelines for Archaeological Research Designs" (OHP 1991). CUL-6 If the archaeological assessment did not identify archaeological resources but found the area to be highly sensitive for archaeological resources, a qualified archaeologist shall monitor all ground -disturbing construction and pre -construction activities in areas with previously undisturbed soil. The archaeologist shall inform all construction personnel prior to construction activities of the proper procedures in the event of an archaeological discovery. The training shall be held in conjunction with the project's initial on -site safety meeting and shall explain the importance and legal basis for the protection of significant archaeological resources. In the event that archaeological resources (artifacts or features) are exposed during ground -disturbing activities, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall be halted while the resources are evaluated for significance by an archaeologist who meets the Secretary's Standards, and tribal consultation shall be conducted in the case of a tribal resource. If the discovery proves to be significant, the long-term disposition of any collected materials should be determined in consultation with the affiliated tribe(s), where relevant; this could include curation with a recognized scientific or educational repository, transfer to the tribe, or respectful reinternment in an area designated by the tribe. CUL-7 If an Archaeological Resources Assessment does not identify potentially significant archaeological resources but the site has moderate sensitivity for archaeological resources (Mitigation Measure CUL-4), an archaeologist who meets the Secretary's Standards shall be retained on call. The archaeologist shall inform all construction personnel prior to construction activities about the proper procedures in the event of an archaeological discovery. The pre -construction training shall be held in conjunction with the project's initial on -site safety meeting and shall explain the importance and legal basis for the protection of significant archaeological resources. In the event that archaeological resources (artifacts or features) are exposed during ground -disturbing activities, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall be halted while the on -call archaeologist is contacted. The resource shall be evaluated for significance and tribal consultation shall be conducted, in the case of a tribal resource. If the discovery proves to be significant, the long-term disposition of any collected materials should be determined in consultation with the affiliated tribe(s), where relevant. Finding Finding 1. The City hereby makes Finding 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measures Santa Ana General Plan Update Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 82 4� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -31- c o er 021 above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measures is feasible, and the measures are therefore adopted. 4. Geology and Soils Impact 5.6-4: Future development that would be accommodated by the General Plan Update could imaact known and unknown aaleontoloaical resources. Paleontological resources are recognized as nonrenewable and therefore receive protection under the California Public Resources Code and CEQA. Adoption of the GPU in itself will not directly affect paleontological resources. Long-term implementation of the GPU land use plan could allow development (e.g., infill development, redevelopment, and revitalization/restoration), including grading, of known and unknown sensitive areas. Grading and construction activities of undeveloped areas or redevelopment that requires more intensive soil excavation than in the past could potentially disturb paleontological resources. Therefore, future development that would be accommodated by the GPU could potentially unearth previously unrecorded resources. Review and protection of paleontological resources are also afforded by CEQA for individual development projects that would be accommodated by the GPU, subject to discretionary actions that are implemented in accordance with the land use plan of the GPU. Fossil localities have been found in the vicinity of the plan area, although not in the plan area itself. Mitigation Measures GEO-1 through GEO-3 prescribe requirements for monitoring based on the sensitivity of sites for paleontological resources. Under GEO-1, areas that range from high to low sensitivity are required to prepare a Paleontological Resources Monitoring and Mitigation Plan. With adherence to mitigation measures GEO-1 through GEO-3, Impact 5.6-4 would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures GEO-1 High Sensitivity. Projects involving ground disturbances in previously undisturbed areas mapped as having "high" paleontological sensitivity shall be monitored by a qualified paleontological monitor on a full-time basis. Monitoring shall include inspection of exposed sedimentary units during active excavations within sensitive geologic sediments. The monitor shall have authority to temporarily divert activity away from exposed fossils to evaluate the significance of the find and, if the fossils are determined to be significant, professionally and efficiently recover the fossil specimens and collect associated data. The paleontological monitor shall use field data forms to record pertinent location and geologic data, measure stratigraphic sections (if applicable), and collect appropriate sediment samples from any fossil localities. GEO-2 Low -to -High Sensitivity. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for projects involving ground disturbance in previously undisturbed areas mapped with "low -to -high" paleontological sensitivity, the project applicant shall consult with a geologist or paleontologist to confirm whether the grading would occur at depths that could encounter highly sensitive sediments for paleontological resources. If confirmed that Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 83 4� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -32- c o er 021 underlying sediments may have high sensitivity, construction activity shall be monitored by a qualified paleontologist. The paleontologist shall have the authority to halt construction during construction activity as outlined in Mitigation Measure GEO-3. GEO-3 All Projects. In the event of any fossil discovery, regardless of depth or geologic formation, construction work shall halt within a 50-foot radius of the find until its significance can be determined by a qualified paleontologist. Significant fossils shall be recovered, prepared to the point of curation, identified by qualified experts, listed in a database to facilitate analysis, and deposited in a designated paleontological curation facility in accordance with the standards of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (2010). The most likely repository is the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. The repository shall be identified and a curatorial arrangement shall be signed prior to collection of the fossils. Finding Finding 1. The City hereby makes Finding 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PER. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measures above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measures is feasible, and the measures are therefore adopted. 5. Noise Impact 5.12-3: Buildout of the individual land uses and projects for implementation of the GPU may expose sensitive uses to excessive levels of groundborne vibration. Construction Vibration Impacts. Construction activity at projects within the plan area would generate varying degrees of ground vibration, depending on the construction procedures and equipment. Operation of construction equipment generates vibrations that spread through the ground and diminish with distance from the source. The effect on buildings in the vicinity of the construction site varies depending on soil type, ground strata, and receptor -building construction. The results from vibration can range from no perceptible effects at the lowest vibration levels, to low rumbling sounds and perceptible vibrations at moderate levels, to slight structural damage at the highest levels. Vibration from construction activities rarely reaches the levels that can damage structures but can achieve the audible and perceptible ranges in buildings close to the construction site. Vibration generated by construction equipment has the potential to be substantial, since it has the potential to exceed the FTA criteria for architectural damage (e.g., 0.12 inches per second [in/sec] PPV for fragile or historical resources, 0.2 in/sec PPV for non -engineered timber and masonry buildings, and 0.3 in/sec PPV for engineered concrete and masonry). Construction details and equipment for future project -level developments under the GPU are not known at this time but may cause vibration impacts. Santa Ana General Plan Update Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 84 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -33- 6c ober021 With implementation of Mitigation Measures N-2, N-3, and N-4, coupled with adherence to associated performance standards, Impact 5.12-3 would be reduced to less -than -significant levels. Specifically, Mitigation Measure N-2 would reduce potential vibration impacts during construction below the pertinent thresholds, and Mitigation Measures N-3 and N-4 (operations - related vibration) would reduce potential vibration impacts from commercial/industrial uses and proposed uses near existing railroads and facilities to less -than -significant levels. No significant and unavoidable vibration impacts would remain. Operational Vibration Impacts. Commercial and industrial operations within the plan area would generate varying degrees of ground vibration, depending on the operational procedures and equipment. Such equipment -generated vibrations would spread through the ground and diminish with distance from the source. The effect on buildings in the vicinity of the vibration source varies depending on soil type, ground strata, and receptor -building construction. The results from vibration can range from no perceptible effects at the lowest vibration levels, to low rumbling sounds and perceptible vibrations at moderate levels, to slight structural damage at the highest levels. In addition, future sensitive receptors could be placed within close proximity to existing railroad lines through buildout in the plan area. Because specific project -level information is not available at this time, it is not possible to quantify future vibration levels at vibration -sensitive receptors that may be near existing and future vibration sources. With implementation of Mitigation Measures N-2, N-3, and N-4, coupled with adherence to associated performance standards, Impact 5.12-3 would be reduced to less -than -significant levels. Specifically, Mitigation Measure N-2 would reduce potential vibration impacts during construction below the pertinent thresholds, and Mitigation Measures N-3 and N-4 (operations - related vibration) would reduce potential vibration impacts from commercial/industrial uses and proposed uses near existing railroads and facilities to less -than -significant levels. No significant and unavoidable vibration impacts would remain. Mitigation Measures N-2 Prior to issuance of a building permit for a project requiring pile driving during construction within 135 feet of fragile structures, such as historical resources, 100 feet of non -engineered timber and masonry buildings (e.g., most residential buildings), or within 75 feet of engineered concrete and masonry (no plaster); or a vibratory roller within 25 feet of any structure, the project applicant shall prepare a noise and vibration analysis to assess and mitigate potential noise and vibration impacts related to these activities. This noise and vibration analysis shall be conducted by a qualified and experienced acoustical consultant or engineer. The vibration levels shall not exceed Federal Transit Administration (FTA) architectural damage thresholds (e.g., 0.12 inches per second [in/sec] peak particle velocity [PPV] for fragile or historical resources, 0.2 in/sec PPV for non -engineered timber and masonry buildings, and 0.3 in/sec PPV for engineered concrete and masonry). If vibration levels would exceed Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 85 4� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -34- c o er 021 this threshold, alternative uses such as drilling piles as opposed to pile driving and static rollers as opposed to vibratory rollers shall be used. If necessary, construction vibration monitoring shall be conducted to ensure vibration thresholds are not exceeded. N-3 New residential projects (or other noise -sensitive uses) located within 200 feet of existing railroad lines shall be required to conduct a groundborne vibration and noise evaluation consistent with Federal Transit Administration (FTA)-approved methodologies. N-4 During the project -level California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process for industrial developments under the General Plan Update or other projects that could generate substantial vibration levels near sensitive uses, a noise and vibration analysis shall be conducted to assess and mitigate potential noise and vibration impacts related to the operations of that individual development. This noise and vibration analysis shall be conducted by a qualified and experienced acoustical consultant or engineer and shall follow the latest CEQA guidelines, practices, and precedents. Finding Finding 1. The City hereby makes Finding 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measures above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measures is feasible, and the measures are therefore adopted. 6. Tribal Cultural Resources Impact 5.17-1: The proposed project could cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource that is listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k). The Sacred Land File search yielded positive results, indicating that known tribal resources exist within the plan area. Further, a CHRIS records search at SCCIC indicates that 23 archaeological resources were previously recorded within 0.5 mile of the plan area. Of these resources, eight archaeological resources were located within the plan area; these include four prehistoric sites with habitation debris and lithic scatters, one multicomponent site, and three historic isolates. The plan area includes many locations that would have been favorable for prehistoric Native American occupation. While the city is urbanized and most of the plan area has been developed, buried resources may remain in areas of minimal ground disturbance, such as parks, parking lots, and structures with shallow foundations. Tribal cultural resources are site specific in nature. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an a emen 30 — 86 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -35- 6c ober021 Implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL-4 through CUL-7 would reduce impacts relating to tribal cultural resources to less than significant. Mitigation Measures Refer to Mitigation Measures CUL-4 through CUL-7 in section A.3, above. Finding Finding 1. The City hereby makes Finding 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measures above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measures is feasible, and the measures are therefore adopted. Impact 5.17-2: The proposed project could cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource that is determined by the lead agency to be significant pursuant to criteria in Public Resources Code Section 5024.1(c). Future development as a result of the implementation of the GPU could include grading in portions of the City with sensitivity to tribal cultural resources. Grading and construction activities that require more intensive soil excavation than in the past could potentially cause disturbance to tribal cultural resources. Future development could potentially unearth previously unknown or unrecorded tribal cultural resources. Because the NAHC SLF search yielded positive results and the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation identified sensitive areas within the city, the buildout of the GPU may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of tribal cultural resources. Earthwork activities may occur with buildout under the GPU that could impact previously undisturbed tribal cultural resources. Implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL-4 through CUL-7 would reduce impacts relating to tribal cultural resources to less than significant. Mitigation Measures Refer to Mitigation Measures CUL-4 through CUL-7 in section A.3, above. Finding Finding 1. The City hereby makes Finding 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measures above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measures is feasible, and the measures are therefore adopted. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 87 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -36- 6c ober021 B. SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS The following summary describes the unavoidable adverse impact of the GPU where mitigation measures were found to be either infeasible or would not lessen impacts to less than significant. The following impacts would remain significant and unavoidable. 1. Air Quality Impact 5.2-1: The additional population growth forecast for the General Plan Update and the associated emissions would not be consistent with the assumptions of the air aualitv manaaement clan. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.2, Air Quality, starting on page 5.2-45 of the Updated Draft PEIR. The GPU would be inconsistent with the South Coast Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) because buildout under the GPU would exceed the population estimates assumed for the AQMP and would cumulatively contribute to the nonattainment designations of the South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB). Buildout of the GPU would exceed current population estimates for the city, and therefore the emissions associated with the additional population are not included in the current regional emissions inventory for the SoCAB. Additionally, air pollutant emissions associated with buildout of the GPU would cumulatively contribute to the nonattainment designations in the SoCAB. Therefore, overall, the GPU would be inconsistent with the AQMP. Incorporation of Mitigation Measure AQ-2 into future development projects for the operation phase would contribute to reduced criteria air pollutant emissions associated with buildout of the GPU. Additionally, goals and policies in the GPU would promote increased capacity for alternative transportation modes and implementation of transportation demand management strategies. However, due to the magnitude and scale of the land uses that would be developed, no mitigation measures are available that would reduce operation and construction impacts below South Coast AQMD thresholds. In addition, the population and employment assumptions of the AQMP would continue to be exceeded until the AQMP is revised and incorporates the projections of the GPU. Therefore, Impact 5.2-1 would remain significant and unavoidable. Mitigation Measure AQ-2 Prior to discretionary approval by the City of Santa Ana for development projects subject to CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) review (i.e., non-exempt projects), project applicants shall prepare and submit a technical assessment evaluating potential project operation phase -related air quality impacts to the City of Santa Ana for review and approval. The evaluation shall be prepared in conformance with South Coast Air Quality Management District (South Coast AQMD) methodology in assessing air quality impacts. If operation -related air pollutants are determined to have the potential to exceed the South Coast AQMD's adopted thresholds of significance, the City of Santa Ana shall require that applicants for new development Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 88 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -37- 6c ober021 projects incorporate mitigation measures to reduce air pollutant emissions during operational activities. The identified measures shall be included as part of the conditions of approval. Possible mitigation measures to reduce long-term emissions could include, but are not limited to the following: • For site -specific development that require refrigerated vehicles, the construction documents shall demonstrate an adequate number of electrical service connections at loading docks for plug-in for the anticipated number of refrigerated trailers to reduce idling time and emissions. • Applicants for manufacturing and light industrial uses shall consider energy storage and combined heat and power in appropriate applications to optimize renewable energy generation systems and avoid peak energy use. • Site -specific developments with truck delivery and loading areas and truck parking spaces shall include signage as a reminder to limit idling of vehicles while parked for loading/unloading in accordance with California Air Resources Board Rule 2845 (13 CCR Chapter 10 § 2485). • Provide changing/shower facilities as specified in Section A5.106.4.3 of the CALGreen Code (Nonresidential Voluntary Measures). • Provide bicycle parking facilities per Section A4.106.9 (Residential Voluntary Measures) of the CALGreen Code. • Provide preferential parking spaces for low -emitting, fuel -efficient, and carpool/van vehicles per Section A5.106.5.1 of the CALGreen Code (Nonresidential Voluntary Measures). • Provide facilities to support electric charging stations per Section A5.106.5.3 (Nonresidential Voluntary Measures) and Section A5.106.8.2 (Residential Voluntary Measures) of the CALGreen Code. • Applicant -provided appliances (e.g., dishwashers, refrigerators, clothes washers, and dryers) shall be Energy Star —certified appliances or appliances of equivalent energy efficiency. Installation of Energy Star —certified or equivalent appliances shall be verified by Building & Safety during plan check. • Applicants for future development projects along existing and planned transit routes shall coordinate with the City of Santa Ana and Orange County Transit Authority to ensure that bus pad and shelter improvements are incorporated, as appropriate. Finding Finding 3. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the GPU that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure above. The City of Santa Ana hereby Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 89 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -38- 6c ober021 finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. However, the City finds that there are no other mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. Impact 5.2-2: Construction activities associated with future development that would be accommodated under the General Plan Update could generate short-term emissions in exceedance of the South Coast Air Quality Management District's threshold criteria. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.2, Air Quality, starting on page 5.2-47 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Buildout of the GPU would occur over a period of approximately 25 years or longer. Construction activities associated with buildout of the GPU could generate short-term emissions that exceed the South Coast AQMD'S significance thresholds during this time and cumulatively contribute to the nonattainment designations of the SoCAB. Implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ-1 would reduce criteria air pollutant emissions from construction -related activities to the extent feasible. However, construction time frames and equipment for site -specific development projects are not available at this time, and there is a potential for multiple development projects to be constructed at one time, resulting in significant construction -related emissions. Therefore, despite adherence to Mitigation Measure AQ-1, Impact 5.2-2 would remain significant and unavoidable. Mitigation Measures AQ-1 Prior to discretionary approval by the City of Santa Ana for development projects subject to CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) review (i.e., non-exempt projects), project applicants shall prepare and submit a technical assessment evaluating potential project construction -related air quality impacts to the City of Santa Ana for review and approval. The evaluation shall be prepared in conformance with South Coast Air Quality Management District (South Coast AQMD) methodology for assessing air quality impacts. If construction -related criteria air pollutants are determined to have the potential to exceed the South Coast AQMD's adopted thresholds of significance, the City of Santa Ana shall require that applicants for new development projects incorporate mitigation measures to reduce air pollutant emissions during construction activities. These identified measures shall be Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 90 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -39- 6c ober021 incorporated into all appropriate construction documents (e.g., construction management plans) submitted to the City and shall be verified by the City. Mitigation measures to reduce construction -related emissions could include, but are not limited to: • Require fugitive -dust control measures that exceed South Coast AQMD's Rule 403, such as: ■ Use of nontoxic soil stabilizers to reduce wind erosion. ■ Apply water every four hours to active soil -disturbing activities. • Use construction equipment rated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as having Tier 3 (model year 2006 or newer) or Tier 4 (model year 2008 or newer) emission limits, applicable for engines between 50 and 750 horsepower • Ensure that construction equipment is properly serviced and maintained to the manufacturer's standards. • Limit nonessential idling of construction equipment to no more than five consecutive minutes. • Limit on -site vehicle travel speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour. • Install wheel washers for all exiting trucks or wash off all trucks and equipment leaving the project area. • Use Super -Compliant VOC paints for coating of architectural surfaces whenever possible. A list of Super -Compliant architectural coating manufactures can be found on the South Coast AQMD's website. Finding Finding 3. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the GPU that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. The City finds that there are no other mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 91 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -40- 6c ober021 technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. Impact 5.2-3: Implementation of the General Plan Update would generate long-term emissions in exceedance of South Coast AQMD's threshold criteria. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.2, Air Quality, starting on page 5.2-48 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Buildout in accordance with the GPU would generate long-term emissions that would exceed South Coast AQMD's regional significance thresholds and cumulatively contribute to the nonattainment designations of the SoCAB. Mitigation Measure AQ-2, in addition to the goals and policies of the GPU, would reduce air pollutant emissions to the extent feasible. The measures and policies covering topics such as expansion of the pedestrian and bicycle networks, promotion of public and active transit, and support to increase building energy efficiency and energy conservation would also reduce criteria air pollutants in the city. Further, compared to existing baseline year conditions, emissions of NOx, CO, and SOx are projected to decrease from current levels despite growth associated with the GPU. However, Impact 5.2-3 would remain significant and unavoidable due to the magnitude of the overall land use development associated with the GPU. Contributing to the nonattainment status would also contribute to elevating health effects associated with these criteria air pollutants. Reducing emissions would further contribute to reducing possible health effects related to criteria air pollutants. It is speculative for this broad -based GPU to determine how exceeding the regional thresholds would affect the number of days the region is in nonattainment, since mass emissions are not correlated with concentrations of emissions, or how many additional individuals in the air basin would suffer health effects. South Coast AQMD is the primary agency responsible for ensuring the health and welfare of sensitive individuals to elevated concentrations of air quality in the SoCAB, and at the present time it has not provided methodology to assess the specific correlation between mass emissions generated and the effect on health in order to address the issue raised in the Friant Ranch case. Ozone concentrations are dependent upon a variety of complex factors, including the presence of sunlight and precursor pollutants, natural topography, nearby structures that cause building downwash, atmospheric stability, and wind patterns. Because of the complexities of predicting ground -level ozone concentrations in relation to the National and California Ambient Air Quality Standards, it is not possible to link health risks to the magnitude of emissions exceeding the significance thresholds. To achieve the health -based standards established by the EPA, the air districts prepare air quality management plans that detail regional programs to attain the ambient air quality standards. However, because cumulative development within the city would exceed the regional significance thresholds, the proposed project could contribute to an increase in health effects in the basin until the attainment standards are met in the SoCAB. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an a emen 30 — 92 4� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -41- c o er 021 Mitigation Measures Refer to Mitigation Measure AQ-2, above. Finding Finding 3. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the GPU that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. The City finds that there are no other mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. Impact 5.2-4: Operation of industrial and warehousing land uses accommodated under the General Plan Update could expose sensitive receptors to substantial toxic air contaminant concentrations. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.2, Air Quality, starting on page 5.2-50 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Buildout of the GPU could expose sensitive receptors to substantial concentrations of toxic air contaminants JAC). Buildout could result in new sources of criteria air pollutant emissions and/or TACs near existing or planned sensitive receptors. Review of development projects by South Coast AQMD for permitted sources of air toxics (e.g., industrial facilities, dry cleaners, and gasoline dispensing facilities) would ensure that health risks are minimized. Additionally, Mitigation Measure AQ-3 would ensure mobile sources of TACs not covered under South Coast AQMD permits are considered during subsequent, project -level environmental review by the City of Santa Ana. Individual development projects would be required to achieve the incremental risk thresholds established by South Coast AQMD, and TACs would be less than significant. However, implementation of the GPU would generate TACs that could contribute to elevated levels in the air basin. Though individual projects would achieve the project -level risk threshold of 10 per million, they would nonetheless contribute to the higher levels of risk in the SoCAB. Therefore, the GPU's cumulative contribution to health risk is significant and unavoidable. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an a emen 30 — 93 4� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -42- c o er 021 Mitigation Measures AQ-3 Prior to discretionary approval by the City of Santa Ana, project applicants for new industrial or warehousing development projects that 1) have the potential to generate 100 or more diesel truck trips per day or have 40 or more trucks with operating diesel - powered transport refrigeration units, and 2) are within 1,000 feet of a sensitive land use (e.g., residential, schools, hospitals, or nursing homes), as measured from the property line of the project to the property line of the nearest sensitive use, shall submit a health risk assessment (HRA) to the City of Santa Ana for review and approval. The HRA shall be prepared in accordance with policies and procedures of the State Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment and the South Coast Air Quality Management District and shall include all applicable stationary and mobile/area source emissions generated by the proposed project at the project site. If the HRA shows that the incremental cancer risk and/or noncancer hazard index exceed the respective thresholds, as established by the South Coast AQMD at the time a project is considered (i.e., 10 in one million cancer risk and 1 hazard index), the project applicant will be required to identify and demonstrate that best available control technologies for toxics (T-BACTs), including appropriate enforcement mechanisms, are capable of reducing potential cancer and noncancer risks to an acceptable level. T-BACTs may include, but are not limited to, restricting idling on -site, electrifying warehousing docks to reduce diesel particulate matter, or requiring use of newer equipment and/or vehicles. T BACTs identified in the HRA shall be identified as mitigation measures in the environmental document and/or incorporated into the site plan. Finding Finding 3. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the GPU that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. The City finds that there are no other mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 94 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -43- 6c ober021 Impact 5.2-5: Development and operation of land uses accommodated by the General Plan Update could generate emissions that exceed the localized significance thresholds and expose sensitive receptors to substantial concentrations of criteria air Dollutants. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.2, Air Quality, starting on page 5.2-53 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Because existing sensitive receptors may be close to project -related construction activities and large emitters of on -site operation -related criteria air pollutant emissions, construction and operation emissions generated by individual development projects have the potential to exceed South Coast AQMD's Local Significance Thresholds (LSTs). Mitigation Measures AQ-1 and AQ-2 would reduce the regional construction and operation emissions associated with buildout of the GPU and therefore also result in a reduction of localized construction- and operation -related criteria air pollutant emissions, to the extent feasible. However, even with the implementation of these mitigation measures, Impact 5.2-5 would remain significant and unavoidable. Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measures AQ-1 and AQ-2 would also be applicable in reducing construction- and operation -related LST impacts. Finding Finding 3. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the GPU that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measures above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measures is feasible, and the measures are therefore adopted. The City finds that there are no other mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 95 4� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -44- c o er 021 2. Cultural Resources Impact 5.4-1: Buildout consistent with the General Plan Update could impact an identified historic resource. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.4, Cultural Resources, starting on page 5.4-26 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Generally, potential impacts to historical resources resulting from future projects developed pursuant to the GPU would be mitigated by the City's fulfillment of its statutory responsibilities under CEQA. However, for certain development pursuant to the GPU, the City may determine that significant impacts to historical resources cannot be avoided. The City shall require, at a minimum, that the affected historical resources be thoroughly documented before issuance of any permits. Though the possible demolition or alteration of a historical resource cannot be mitigated to a less than significant level, recordation of the resource will reduce significant adverse impacts to historical resources to the maximum extent feasible. With fulfillment of the CUL-1 and CUL-2, future development consistent with the GPU would result in a less than significant impact to cultural resources. However, if significant impacts cannot be avoided, the City shall require, at a minimum, that the affected historical resources are documented consistent with Mitigation Measure CUL-3. The Historical Resources Technical Report determined that unavoidable impacts to historical resources resulting from future development under the GPU will be reduced to the maximum extent feasible but will still be significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-3. Therefore, the development under the GPU would result in significant and unavoidable impacts. Mitigation Measures CUL-1 Identification of Historical Resources and Potential Project Impacts. For structures 45 years or older, a Historical Resources Assessment (HRA) shall be prepared by an architectural historian or historian meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards. The HRA shall include: definition of a study area or area of potential effect, which will encompass the affected property and may include surrounding properties or historic district(s); an intensive level survey of the study area to identify and evaluate under federal, State, and local criteria significance historical resources that might be directly or indirectly affected by the proposed project; and an assessment of project impacts. The HRA shall satisfy federal and State guidelines for the identification, evaluation, and recordation of historical resources. An HRA is not required if an existing historic resources survey and evaluation of the property is available; however, if the existing survey and evaluation is more than five years old, it shall be updated. CUL-2 Use of the Secretary of the Interior's Standards. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties shall be used to the maximum extent practicable to ensure that projects involving the relocation, conversion, Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 96 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -45- 6c ober021 rehabilitation, or alteration of a historical resource and its setting or related new construction will not impair the significance of the historical resource. Use of the Standards shall be overseen by an architectural historian or historic architect meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards. Evidence of compliance with the Standards shall be provided to the City in the form of a report identifying and photographing character -defining features and spaces and specifying how the proposed treatment of character -defining features and spaces and related construction activities will conform to the Standards. The Qualified Professional shall monitor the construction and provide a report to the City at the conclusion of the project. Use of the Secretary's Standards shall reduce the project impacts on historical resources to less than significant. CUL-3 Documentation, Education, and Memorial ization. If the City determines that significant impacts to historical resources cannot be avoided, the City shall require, at a minimum, that the affected historical resources be thoroughly documented before issuance of any permits and may also require additional public education efforts and/or memorialization of the historical resource. Though demolition or alteration of a historical resource such that its significance is materially impaired cannot be mitigated to a less than significant level, recordation of the resource will reduce significant adverse impacts to historical resources to the maximum extent feasible. Such recordation should be prepared under the supervision of an architectural historian, historian, or historic architect meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards and should take the form of Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS) documentation. At a minimum, this recordation should include an architectural and historical narrative; archival photographic documentation; and supplementary information, such as building plans and elevations and/or historic photographs. The documentation package should be reproduced on archival paper and should be made available to researchers and the public through accession by appropriate institutions such as the Santa Ana Library History Room, the South Central Coastal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton, and/or the HABS collection housed in the Library of Congress. Depending on the significance of the adversely affected historical resource, the City, at its discretion, may also require public education about the historical resource in the form of an exhibit, web page, brochure, or other format and/or memorialization of the historical resource on or near the proposed project site. If memorialized, such memorialization shall be a permanent installation, such as a mural, display, or other vehicle that recalls the location, appearance, and historical significance of the affected historical resource, and shall be designed in conjunction with a qualified architectural historian, historian, or historic architect. Finding Finding 3. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the GPU that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an a emen 30 — 97 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -46- 6c ober021 changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measures above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measures is feasible, and the measures are therefore adopted. The City finds that there are no other mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. 3. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact 5.7-1: Implementation of the proposed General Plan Update would result in a decrease in GHG emissions in horizon year 2045 from existing baseline but may not meet the long-term GHG reduction goal under Executive Order S-03-05. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.7, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, starting on page 5.7-31 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Implementation of Mitigation Measure GHG-1 would ensure that the City is tracking and monitoring the City's GHG emissions in order to chart a trajectory to achieve the long-term, year 2050, GHG reduction goal set by Executive Order S-03-05. However, at this time, there is no plan past 2030 that achieves the long-term GHG reduction goal established under Executive Order S-03-05. As identified by the California Council on Science and Technology, the state cannot meet the 2050 goal without major advancements in technology. Advancements in technology in the future could provide additional reductions and allow the state and City to meet the 2050 goal, but in the meantime, Impact 5.7-1 would be significant and unavoidable. Mitigation Measures GHG-1 The City of Santa Ana shall update the Climate Action Plan (CAP) every five years to ensure the City is monitoring the plan's progress toward achieving the City's greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction target and to require amendment if the plan is not achieving the specified level. The update shall consider a trajectory consistent with the GHG emissions reduction goal established under Executive Order S-03-05 for year 2050 and the latest applicable statewide legislative GHG emission reduction that may be in effect at the time of the CAP update (e.g., Senate Bill 32 for year 2030). The CAP update shall include the following: Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 98 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -47- 6c ober021 • GHG inventories of existing and forecast year GHG levels. • Tools and strategies for reducing GHG emissions to ensure a trajectory with the long-term GHG reduction goal of Executive Order S-03-05. • Plan implementation guidance that includes, at minimum, the following components consistent with the proposed CAP: ■ Administration and Staffing ■ Finance and Budgeting ■ Timelines for Measure Implementation ■ Community Outreach and Education ■ Monitoring, Reporting, and Adaptive Management ■ Tracking Tools Finding Finding 3. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the GPU that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. The City finds that there are no other mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. 4. Noise Impact 5.12-1: Construction activities associated with buildout of the plan area would result in temporary noise increases at sensitive receptors. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.12, Noise, starting on page 5.12-29 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Implementation of Mitigation Measure N-1 would reduce potential noise impacts during construction to the extent feasible. However, due to the potential for proximity of construction activities to sensitive uses, the number of construction projects occurring simultaneously, and the potential duration of construction activities, construction noise could result in a temporary Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 99 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -48- 6c ober021 substantial increase in noise levels above ambient conditions. Therefore, impacts would remain significant and unavoidable. It should be noted that the identification of this program -level impact does not preclude the finding of less -than -significant impacts for subsequent projects analyzed at the project level. Mitigation Measures N-1 Construction contractors shall implement the following measures for construction activities conducted in the City of Santa Ana. Construction plans submitted to the City shall identify these measures on demolition, grading, and construction plans submitted to the City: The City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency shall verify that grading, demolition, and/or construction plans submitted to the City include these notations prior to issuance of demolition, grading, and/or building permits. • Construction activity is limited to the hours: Between 7 AM to 8 PM Monday through Saturday, as prescribed in Municipal Code Section 18-314(e). Construction is prohibited on Sundays. • During the entire active construction period, equipment and trucks used for project construction shall use the best -available noise control techniques (e.g., improved mufflers, equipment re -design, use of intake silencers, ducts, engine enclosures, and acoustically attenuating shields or shrouds), wherever feasible. • Impact tools (e.g., jack hammers and hoe rams) shall be hydraulically or electrically powered wherever possible. Where the use of pneumatic tools is unavoidable, an exhaust muffler on the compressed air exhaust shall be used along with external noise jackets on the tools. • Stationary equipment, such as generators and air compressors shall be located as far as feasible from nearby noise -sensitive uses. • Stockpiling shall be located as far as feasible from nearby noise -sensitive receptors. • Construction traffic shall be limited, to the extent feasible, to approved haul routes established by the City Planning and Building Agency. • At least 10 days prior to the start of construction activities, a sign shall be posted at the entrance(s) to the job site, clearly visible to the public, that includes permitted construction days and hours, as well as the telephone numbers of the City's and contractor's authorized representatives that are assigned to respond in the event of a noise or vibration complaint. If the authorized contractor's representative receives a complaint, he/she shall investigate, take appropriate corrective action, and report the action to the City. • Signs shall be posted at the job site entrance(s), within the on -site construction zones, and along queueing lanes (if any) to reinforce the prohibition of Santa Ana General Plan Update Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 100 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -49- 6c ober021 unnecessary engine idling. All other equipment shall be turned off if not in use for more than 5 minutes. • During the entire active construction period and to the extent feasible, the use of noise -producing signals, including horns, whistles, alarms, and bells, shall be for safety warning purposes only. The construction manager shall use smart back-up alarms, which automatically adjust the alarm level based on the background noise level or switch off back-up alarms and replace with human spotters in compliance with all safety requirements and laws. • Erect temporary noise barriers (at least as high as the exhaust of equipment and breaking line -of -sight between noise sources and sensitive receptors), as necessary and feasible, to maintain construction noise levels at or below the performance standard of 80 dBA Leq. Barriers shall be constructed with a solid material that has a density of at least 4 pounds per square foot with no gaps from the ground to the top of the barrier. Finding Finding 3. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the GPU that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. The City finds that there are no other mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. Impact 5.12-2: Buildout of the plan area would cause a substantial traffic noise increase on local roadways and could locate sensitive receptors in areas that exceed established noise standards. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.12, Noise, starting on page 5.12-30 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Mitigation Measure N-2 would reduce potential interior noise impacts to future noise -sensitive receptors below the thresholds. However, there are no feasible or practical mitigation measures available to reduce project -generated traffic noise to less than significant levels for existing Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 101 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -50- 6c ober021 residences along affected roadways. No individual measures and no set of feasible or practical mitigation measures are available to reduce project -generated traffic noise to less than significant levels in all cases. Thus, traffic noise would remain a significant and unavoidable impact. It should be noted that the identification of this program -level impact does not preclude the finding of less - than -significant impacts for subsequent projects analyzed at the project level. Mitigation Measures Refer to Mitigation Measure N-2, above. Finding Finding 3. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the GPU that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. The City finds that there are no mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. 5. Population and Housing Impact 5.13-1: The GPU would directly induce substantial unplanned population growth. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.13, Population and Housing, starting on page 5.13-12 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Full buildout of the GPU would result in a population of 431,629, and the city's 2045 population growth would be approximately 20 percent greater than the Orange County Council of Governments' 2045 projections. Furthermore, the city's housing units at buildout would be 115,053, which exceeds the Orange County Council of Governments' projection by 38 percent. There are no feasible mitigation measures to mitigate the population and housing growth at buildout, and impacts would be significant and unavoidable. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 102 4� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -51- c o er 021 Mitigation Measures There are no feasible mitigation measures to mitigate the population and housing growth at buildout. Finding Finding 3. The City finds that there are no mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of r5 �ac an Statement 230-103 4� /?0021i inonsiderations -52- ober 6. Recreation Impact 5.15-1: The General Plan Update would generate additional residents that would increase the use of existing park and recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility could occur or be accelerated. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.15, Recreation, starting on page 5.15-27 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Although required park fees for development could be sufficient to fund new parks and improvements, there is a lack of available land and lack of land designated as Open Space within the General Plan Update to develop new parks or expand existing facilities. The City of Santa Ana is essentially built. Incorporation of Mitigation Measure REC-1 to monitor new residential development within the Dyer/55 Fwy focus area would contribute to reducing impacts to existing public parks within a '/z radius of the focus area. Compliance with this mitigation measure, regulatory requirements, and implementation of proposed GPU policies and implementation actions would reduce the potential impact of the proposed GPU on existing park facilities. However, because of the existing park deficiencies and scale of development in park -deficient areas, the project's impact would be significant and unavoidable. Mitigation Measures REC-1 The City shall monitor new residential development within the Dyer/55 Fwy focus area. Development proposals for projects including 100 or more residential units shall be required to prepare a public park utilization study to evaluate the project's potential impacts on existing public parks within a one half (1/2) mile radius to the focus area. The evaluation shall include the population increase due to the project and the potential for the new resident population to impact existing public parks within the radius. Each study shall also consider the cumulative development in the Dyer/55 Fwy and the potential for a cumulative impact on existing public parks within the radius. If the study determines that the project, or it's incremental cumulative impacts would result in a significant impact (substantial physical deterioration or substantial acceleration of deterioration) to existing public parks, the project shall be required to mitigate this impact. Measures to mitigate the significant impact may include but are not limited to land dedication and fair -share contribution to acquire new or to enhance existing public parks within the radius. Mitigation shall be completed prior to issuance of occupancy permits. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 104 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -53- 6c ober021 Finding Finding 3. The City finds that there are no mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. Impact 5.15-2: Population increases resulting from project implementation would increase recreation demands that would require construction or expansion of recreation facilities that would have potential to result in physical impacts to the environment. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.15, Recreation, starting on page 5.15-29 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Population increases resulting from the implementation of the GPU would increase recreation demands and require construction or expansion of recreation facilities. Although construction and/or expansion of new parks and recreation facilities would be subject to GPU policies and implementation actions; regulatory requirements, and future, project specific environmental review under CEQA, it is still possible that development of such facilities could result in significant unavoidable impacts Mitigation Measures There are no feasible mitigation measures to mitigate the impacts to recreation at buildout. Finding Finding 3. The City finds that there are no mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 105 4� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -54- c o er 021 VI. FINDINGS REGARDING ALTERNATIVES CEQA requires that an EIR include a discussion of reasonable project alternatives that would "feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project but would avoid or substantially lessen any significant effects of the project, and evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives" (CEQA Guidelines § 15126.6[a]). As discussed above, the PEIR identified significant impacts in a number of categories. The following impacts could be mitigated below a level of significance: air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, noise, tribal cultural resources impacts. The following impacts cannot be mitigated below a level of significance: certain air quality, cultural resources, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, noise, population and housing, and recreation impacts. The PEIR analyzed four alternatives to the proposed project that could reduce some, if not all, of the impacts. A. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED AND REJECTED DURING THE SCOPING/PROJECT PLANNING "Among the factors that may be used to eliminate alternatives from detailed consideration in an EIR are: (i) failure to meet most of the basic project objectives, (ii) infeasibility, or (iii) inability to avoid significant environmental impacts" (CEQA Guidelines § 15126.6[c]). Alternative Circulation Element— Roadway Classifications. The proposed circulation element in the GPU evolved over a long process and coordination with the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). During this process, alternative packages of arterial roadway classifications were considered that involved roadways in OCTA's Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH). The majority of reclassifications proposed were identified for bicycle facility safety improvements in the City's Safe Mobility Santa Ana (SMSA) Plan, prepared in 2016. Most of the reclassifications identified were for roadways where bicycle and pedestrian safety improvements would require roadway reconfiguration and a reduction in the number of existing or planned travel lanes. Many of the SMSA recommendations across the city have already been, or are in the process of being, implemented along arterial roadways without reducing the number of lanes. A cursory review of two optional roadway reclassification packages was conducted to determine whether these optional plans would have the potential to eliminate significant impacts of the proposed GPU and meet most the project objectives. It was determined that a detailed evaluation of this alternative was not needed to provide a reasonable range of EIR project alternatives. Transportation/traffic impacts of the proposed project were determined to be less than significant (VMT/SP falls below the significance threshold for the GPU without mitigation). Although these alternatives may have some potential to reduce VMT (by reducing the number of travel lanes for some roadways) and thereby also potentially reduce air quality, greenhouse gas, and traffic noise impacts, these alternatives would also result in more inconsistencies with the MPAH and result in more traffic congestion. Although traffic congestion is no longer a CEQA consideration, the GPU sets forth standards for level of service that will be considered by decision -makers. Moreover, the Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 106 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -55- 6c ober021 Reduced Density and RTP/SCS Consistency alternatives were determined to be meaningful alternatives to consider for the potential of reducing air quality, GHG, and traffic noise impacts. Reduced Traffic Noise Alternative. Since traffic noise was determined to be a significant, unavoidable impact of the proposed GPU, a project alternative designed to eliminate this significant impact was considered. The required reductions in traffic volumes (ADT) were determined along roadways where buildout of the GPU would result in significant noise increases. These estimates were compared to the surrounding land uses that would generate ADTs for those roadway segments. Traffic noise along these roadways would both exceed the noise standard and abut sensitive land uses (e.g., residences, schools, hospitals). Several segments would experience significant, unavoidable traffic noise impacts without the land use changes proposed under the GPU. Since significant traffic noise could not be avoided, further evaluation of this alternative was not deemed to be meaningful. B. ALTERNATIVES SELECTED FOR FURTHER ANALYSIS Given the significant, unavoidable impacts identified for the proposed GPU, project alternatives with the potential to substantially reduce development were identified for further review. Significant GPU impacts to long-term air quality, GHG emissions, population and housing, and recreation all directly relate to the level of development that would occur within the city. At the programmatic level of this GPU PEIR, site -specific information regarding potential significant historical impacts is not available, and therefore, an alternative could not be customized to reduce that impact. A reduced intensity alternative would also be expected to reduce the significant traffic noise impact (as discussed above). A reduced park demand alternative was also analyzed to address the significant and unavoidable impacts to recreation. The following development alternatives to the proposed GPU were chosen for further analysis. No Project / Current General Plan Alternative The evaluation of the No Project alternative is required by CEQA. The No Project alternative is typically defined as the development scenario that would occur if the project as proposed is not adopted. For a General Plan, the No Project alternative is typically represented by the jurisdiction's existing General Plan, including land use plan, circulation master plan, and policies in each General Plan element. Therefore, this alternative assumes that the existing General Plan —with various adoption dates for different elements between 1982 and 2014—would remain in effect. This existing General Plan also reflects amendments, including new Specific Plans and special zoning areas that have been adopted through the Notice of Preparation for this GPU. Finding. The City Council rejects the No Project/Current General Plan Alternative on the basis of policy and economic factors as explained herein. (See Pub. Resources Code, § 21061.1; CEQA Guidelines, § 15364; see also City of Del Mar v. City of San Diego (1982) 133 Cal.App.3d 410, 417; California Native Plant Soc. v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Cal.AppAth 957, 1001; Sequoyah Hills Homeowners Assn. v. City of Oakland (1993) 23 Cal.AppAth 704, 715.) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 107 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -56- 6c ober021 opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible this project alternative identified in the Final Recirculated PEIR. This alternative would result in similar impacts to 11 impact categories, reduced impacts to 5 environmental impacts, and increase impacts to 4 categories. Impacts would be similar for agricultural resources, biological resources, cultural resources, energy, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, mineral resources, noise, tribal cultural resources, and wildfire. This alternative would reduce impacts for aesthetics, population and housing, public services, recreation, and utilities and service systems. Impacts to air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, land use and planning, and transportation would increase. This alternative does not mitigate any of the significant and unavoidable impacts associated with the GPU to a less than significant impact. It would also exceed the City's VMT threshold. Overall, impacts under this alternative would decrease in comparison to the proposed project. The No Project/Current General Plan alternative would not achieve many of the proposed project objectives. The existing land use plan does not provide the opportunities to provide housing and employment at the levels required to meet local and regional goals. Moreover, the No Project alternative would not provide numerous general policies as included in the GPU to achieve these goals and invigorate communities. The current General Plan, however, protects established neighborhoods and several Specific Plans and Special Zoning areas would provide for infill opportunities, protect established neighborhoods, and result in mixed -use villages and bike- and pedestrian -friendly communities. Reduced Intensity Alternative (Reduced capacity for the 55 Freeway/Dyer and South Bristol focus areas) Under the GPU, the only areas that include revisions to land use designations to accommodate new growth are within the five focus areas. The majority of remaining growth would occur within previously approved Specific Plans and Special Zoning areas. A nominal amount of growth is assumed to occur in other areas of the city and would not require land use amendments. The Reduced Intensity Alternative would substantially reduce development capacity within two focus areas, 55 Freeway/Dyer and South Bristol Street, which accommodate approximately 65 percent of the housing unit growth and 72 percent of the nonresidential use (by building square footage) of the growth projected for the combined focus areas under the GPU. For the focus areas, the forecast buildout is based on development at approximately 80 percent of the maximum allowed development for each respective land use designation. For this alternative, development of the 55 Freeway/Dyer and South Bristol focus areas would be reduced to approximately 50 percent of the maximum allowed per the land use designations. This alternative would reduce housing units by a total of 5,383 and would reduce total building square footage by approximately 4.2 million square feet distributed between these two focus areas. This alternative would also reduce population by 19,825 and jobs by 9,184. Overall, this alternative would reduce the housing growth accommodated by the GPU land use changes by approximately 18 percent and reduce nonresidential building square footage by approximately 27 percent. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 108 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -57- 6c ober021 Finding. The City Council rejects the Reduced Intensity Alternative on the basis of policy and economic factors as explained herein. (See Pub. Resources Code, § 21061.1; CEQA Guidelines, § 15364; see also City of Del Mar v. City of San Diego (1982) 133 Cal.App.3d 410, 417; California Native Plant Soc. v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Cal.AppAth 957, 1001; Sequoyah Hills Homeowners Assn. v. City of Oakland (1993) 23 Cal.AppAth 704, 715.) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible this project alternative identified in the Final Recirculated PEIR. This alternative would result in similar impacts to 7 impact categories, reduce impacts to 12 categories, and increase impacts to 1 category. Impacts would be similar for aesthetics, agricultural resources, biological resources, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, mineral resources, and wildfire. This alternative would decrease impacts to air quality, cultural resources, energy, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation, tribal cultural resources, transportation, and utilities and services. It would be expected to increase land use and planning impacts relative to the GPU. As with the GPU, impacts to air quality, cultural resources, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, population and housing, and recreation would remain significant and unavoidable. Overall, impacts under this alternative would be decreased in comparison to the proposed project. The Reduced Density Alternative reduces the level of development for two of the five focus areas (55 Freeway/Dyer Road and South Bristol Street) relative to the GPU. No other changes to the GPU are made for this alternative. It is assumed to include the same General Plan policies and would not modify the circulation element or related improvements. Therefore, this alternative would attain many of the project's objectives. It would not "optimize" high density housing and mass transit opportunities, and so was found not to attain objective No. 2. It would, however, achieve objectives Nos. 3 through 5, but to a lesser extent than the proposed GPU. With the reduced opportunities in the 55 Freeway/Dyer Road and South Bristol focus areas, it would not be as effective in providing affordable housing opportunities, and may not be as economically feasible in terms of funding community benefits. It would provide mixed -use opportunities that are bike and pedestrian friendly and provide opportunities for live -work, artist spaces, and small-scale manufacturing. 2020 RTP/SCS Consistency Alternative (Reduced development for RTP/SCS population/housing consistency) This alternative was developed to evaluate an update to the General Plan that would be consistent with the population and housing projections used to develop the Southern California Association of Governments' (SCAG) most recent Regional Transportation Plan / Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS)—Connect SoCal (adopted May 7, 2020). Connect SoCal is a long-range visioning plan that balances future mobility and housing needs with economic, environmental, and public health goals. The plan embodies a collective vision for the region's future and is developed with input from local governments, county transportation commissions, tribal governments, nonprofit organizations, businesses, and local stakeholders in the counties of Imperial, Los Angeles, Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 109 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -58- 6c ober021 Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura. The proposed GPU would result in a significant population and housing impact because development under the GPU would substantially exceed the projections used in Connect SoCal. SCAG uses locally prepared population and housing projections to develop the regional plan. For the City of Santa Ana, those projections were provided by the Orange County Council of Governments, as prepared by the Center for Demographic Research. The population/housing figures reflected for Santa Ana in the regional plan for 2045 are: population, 360,100; total housing units, 80,100; and total jobs, 176,400. Projections for the RTP/SCS (Connect SoCal) use land use designations as approved in adopted general plans. The employment projections are similar for the GPU and RTP/SCS scenarios, but the RTP/SCS projections for population and housing units are substantially lower than GPU projections (18 percent and 27 percent lower, respectively). The RTP/SCS alternative, therefore, represents the least -development -intensive project alternative evaluated for the PEIR. ■ This alternative would substantially reduce the growth that would be accommodated within the focus areas under the GPU. New growth within the focus areas would total 6,380 housing units and approximately 3.7 million square feet of nonresidential uses, instead of a total additional 23,955 housing units and approximately 15.7 million square feet within the focus areas. This alternative distributes anticipated development through the focus areas and the approved Specific Plans/Special Zoning areas. For purposes of this alternative, it is assumed that a development cap would be used to limit total growth to the projections shown. ■ Subsequent updates of the regional plan would incorporate updated land use from the GPU and resolve the substantial discrepancy between the population and housing projections. Note also that the PEIR concludes that the GPU is consistent with the goals of the RTP/SCS. This alternative has been defined to eliminate the significant impact associated with substantial population growth that is inconsistent with the regional plan, as well as reduce other significant growth -related (AQ/GHG, traffic noise) impacts associated with the GPU as proposed. Finding. The City Council rejects the 2020 RTP/SCS Consistency Alternative on the basis of policy and economic factors as explained herein. (See Pub. Resources Code, § 21061.1; CEQA Guidelines, § 15364; see also City of Del Mar v. City of San Diego (1982) 133 Cal.App.3d 410, 417; California Native Plant Soc. v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Cal.AppAth 957, 1001; Sequoyah Hills Homeowners Assn. v. City of Oakland (1993) 23 Cal.AppAth 704, 715.) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible this project alternative identified in the Final Recirculated PEIR. This alternative would reduce impacts to 12 environmental impacts, result in similar impacts to 6 categories, and increase impacts to 1 category. It would reduce impacts to air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, energy, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation, tribal cultural resources, and utilities and service systems. Impacts would be very similar for aesthetics, agricultural resources, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, mineral resources, and wildfire. It would increase impacts to land use and planning. It would also increase impacts to transportation and Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 110 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -59- 6c ober021 potentially introduce a new significant impact. It is anticipated, however, that under this alternative, transportation could be mitigated to less than significant. Under the GPU, transportation impacts are less than significant without mitigation. As with the GPU, impacts to air quality, cultural resources, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, and recreation would remain significant and unavoidable. The impact to population and housing would be reduced to less than significant. Overall, impacts under this alternative would be reduced in comparison to the proposed project. Due to the substantial reduction in housing opportunities citywide, this alternative is the least effective in achieving the project objectives of the GPU. By setting a development cap to limit housing and nonresidential development to the projections for the city in the 2020 RTP/SCS, this alternative reduces housing units by 31,515 compared to the GPU. It reduces housing development potential within the focus areas by 73 percent in comparison to the GPU, and reduces overall city future development by 27 percent. To achieve this reduction, the development cap would not only limit focus area development but would restrict the entitled housing in Specific Plans/Special Zoning areas (reducing total housing within these areas by almost 14,000 units). This alternative clearly would not optimize high density housing that maximizes mass transit use (objective No. 2) or provide urban -level intensities at the urban edges (objective No. 3). Moreover, it would not facilitate intensities that attract economic activities, particularly since it would not allow the maximum entitlement of approved Specific Plans and Special Zoning areas. It would achieve the remainder of the objectives, but to a lesser extent than the GPU. It would protect established neighborhoods, but not promote infill development as much as the GPU or other alternatives (objective No. 1). It would provide only limited opportunities for live -work and artist spaces and small-scale manufacturing (objective No. 7). Reduced Park Demand Alternative The City's Park standard of 2 acres per 1,000 residents is not achieved under existing conditions and development allowed under the GPU would further exacerbate park and open space shortages. Without new parks, growth in any of the focus areas would exacerbate the current level of park deficiency either in or adjacent to disadvantaged communities. The areas proposed for substantial new residential development under the GPU were compared to the distribution of existing parks —location, size, and demand —to define the Reduced Park Demand Alternative. The Reduced Park Demand Alternative reduces residential growth by 11,225 units by eliminating or reducing residential land uses and intensity in the five focus areas. Overall, nonresidential square footage would be reduced by a total of approximately 2.8 million square feet within the focus areas compared to the proposed GPU. The nonresidential square footage would increase, however, in two of the focus areas: 17th Street/Grand Avenue by 697,000 square feet, and South Bristol by 739,000 square feet. New residential growth under this alternative would largely be in currently planned areas that are generally near a substantial number of existing park facilities. Some residential growth would be introduced into two focus areas at substantially lower intensities to reduce the potential impact on park facilities. Changes to the focus areas are as follows: ■ South Main Street. This focus area would remain as currently planned as a commercial corridor (GC) instead of Urban Neighborhood (UN) and District Center (DC) to reduce intensity Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 111 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -60- 6c ober021 so that there are no additional units constructed beyond existing conditions; there is a significant presence of EJ communities that are served by parks, but the existing parks are very small. ■ South Bristol Focus Area. District Center (DC) changed to Urban Neighborhood (UN) to reduce intensity by 2,273 units on sites that are more than a half mile from existing parks (generally west of Bristol and south of MacArthur Boulevard). ■ Grand Avenue/17th Street. Stay as currently planned as a lower density residential (LR-7) and commercial corridor (GC) to reduce intensity so that there are no additional units constructed beyond existing conditions, because much of the focus area is more than a half mile from existing parks. ■ West Santa Ana Boulevard. This focus area would remain as currently planned with lower density residential (LR-7) instead of Urban Neighborhood (UN) to reduce intensity so that no additional units are constructed beyond existing conditions; there is a significant presence of EJ communities with areas that are farther than a half mile from existing parks in this focus area. ■ 55 Freeway/Dyer Road. District Center (DC) changed to Urban Neighborhood (UN) to reduce intensity by 5,381 units because a majority of the area is more than a half mile from existing parks in Santa Ana; the reduced intensity would also reduce potential impacts on adjacent parkland in Tustin. Finding. The City Council rejects the Reduced Park Demand Alternative on the basis of policy and economic factors as explained herein. (See Pub. Resources Code, § 21061.1; CEQA Guidelines, § 15364; see also City of Del Mar v. City of San Diego (1982) 133 Cal.App.3d 410, 417; California Native Plant Soc. v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Cal.AppAth 957, 1001; Sequoyah Hills Homeowners Assn. v. City of Oakland (1993) 23 Cal.AppAth 704, 715.) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible this project alternative identified in the Recirculated PEIR. This alternative would result in similar impacts to 6 impact categories, reduced impacts to 12 categories, and increased impacts to 2 categories. Impacts would be similar for aesthetics, agricultural resources, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, mineral resources, and wildfire. This alternative would decrease impacts to air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, energy, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation, tribal cultural resources, transportation, and utilities and services. It would reduce the recreation impacts of the proposed GPU, as it was designed to do, and would improve the park acres/resident ratio compared to the proposed GPU. Recreation impacts to disadvantaged communities would also be reduced. Given the lack of available land for new parks, however, it would not eliminate the significant, unavoidable impact of the project. It would be expected to increase land use and planning impacts relative to the GPU. As with the GPU, impacts to air quality, cultural resources, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 112 4� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -61- c o er 021 population and housing, and recreation would remain significant and unavoidable. Overall, impacts under this alternative would be decreased in comparison to the proposed project. This alternative would attain some of the project's objectives. It would promote infill development to a lesser extent than the GPU and would protect established neighborhoods (Objective 1), and would also develop opportunities of live -work, artist spaces, and small-scale manufacturing (Objective 7). Given the substantial reduction in housing units, it was also concluded that it would not meet Objectives 2 and 3, to maximize high density residential development and mixed use proximate to potential mass transit use (Objective 2) and to maximize affordable housing and achieve City and regional housing goals (Objective 3). It would, however, achieve Objectives 4 through 6, but to a lesser extent than the proposed GPU. With new opportunities eliminated in three focus areas and the reduced opportunities in the 55 Freeway /Dyer Road and South Bristol focus areas, it would not be as effective in providing affordable housing opportunities and may not be as economically feasible in terms of funding community benefits. It would provide mixed - use opportunities that are bike and pedestrian friendly and provide opportunities for live -work, artist spaces, and small-scale manufacturing. C. ENVIRONMENTALLY SUPERIOR ALTERNATIVE CEQA requires a lead agency to identify the "environmentally superior alternative" and, in cases where the "No Project" Alternative is environmentally superior to the GPU, the environmentally superior development alternative must be identified. One alternative has been identified as "environmentally superior" to the GPU: ■ The RTP/SCS Consistency Alternative is concluded to be the environmentally superior alternative. The No Project alternative is not environmentally superior to the proposed GPU. Both the Reduced Density and RTP/SCS alternatives reduce environmental impacts in comparison to the GPU, but the RTP/SCS reduces more impacts and eliminates a significant, unavoidable impact of the GPU. This alternative was designed to eliminate the significant population impact of the GPU, but it also reduces potential future development more than any of the other alternatives. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 113 4� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -62- c o er 021 VII. STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS A. INTRODUCTION The City of Santa Ana is the Lead Agency under CEQA for preparation, review and certification of the PEIR for General Plan Update (project). As the Lead Agency, the City is also responsible for determining the potential environmental impacts of the proposed action and which of those impacts are significant, and which can be mitigated through imposition of mitigation measures to avoid or minimize those impacts to a level of less than significant. CEQA then requires the Lead Agency to balance the benefits of a proposed action against its significant unavoidable adverse environmental impacts in determining whether or not to approve the proposed project. In making this determination the City is guided by CEQA Guidelines Section 15093, Statement of Overriding Considerations, which states: a. CEQA requires the decision -making agency to balance, as applicable, the economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks when determining whether to approve the project. If the specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of a proposed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse environmental effects may be considered "acceptable." b. When the lead agency approves a project which will result in the occurrence of significant effects which are identified in the final EIR but are not avoided or substantially lessened, the agency shall state in writing the specific reasons to support its action based on the final EIR and/or other information in the record. The statement of overriding considerations shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. c. If an agency makes a statement of overriding considerations, the statement should be included in the record of the project approval and should be mentioned in the notice of determination. This statement does not substitute for, and shall be in addition to, findings required pursuant to Section 15091. In addition, Public Resources Code Section 21081(b) requires that where a public agency finds that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in an EIR and thereby leave significant unavoidable effects, the public agency must also find that overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of the project outweigh the significant effects of the project. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(b) and the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15093, the City has balanced the benefits of the proposed project against the unavoidable adverse impacts associated with the project and has adopted all feasible mitigation measures Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 114 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -63- 6c ober021 with respect to these impacts. The City also has examined alternatives to the proposed project, none of which both meets the project objectives and is environmentally preferable to the proposed project, for the reasons discussed in the Findings and Facts in Support of Findings. The City of Santa Ana, as the Lead Agency for this project, and having reviewed the PEIR for the GPU, and reviewed all written materials within the City's public record and heard all oral testimony presented at public hearings, adopts this Statement of Overriding Considerations, which has balanced the benefits of the project against its significant unavoidable adverse environmental impacts in reaching its decision to approve the project. B. OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS The City, after balancing the specific economic, legal, social, technological, and other benefits of the project, has determined that the unavoidable adverse environmental impacts identified above may be considered acceptable due to the following specific considerations, which outweigh the unavoidable, adverse environmental impacts of the project, and each of which, standing alone, is sufficient to support approval of the project, in accordance with CEQA Section 21081(b) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15093. The specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of the project are as follows: 1. The community, land use, and public services elements of the project encourage healthy lifestyles, a planning process that ensures that health impacts are considered, and policies and practices that improve the health of residents. The policies also affirm and support a socially and economically diverse community with equitable distribution of resources. 2. Implementation of the GPU fulfills one of the key strategies identified in the Santa Ana Strategic Plan in the completion of a comprehensive update of the existing General Plan. 3. The project improves the jobs -housing balance; the ratio of 1.5 would give the city a more equal distribution of employment and housing. The population growth resulting directly from the proposed GPU would be offset by the level of employment opportunity provided to the city's residents and workers commuting into Santa Ana. 4. The project results in a reduction of vehicle miles traveled per service population (VMT/SP) and a reduction in related traffic congestion, air quality, and greenhouse gas emissions compared with existing conditions because the GPU includes policies that promote the reduction of VMT. Policy 2.5 of the land use element encourages infill mixed -use development at all ranges of affordability to reduce VMT, and policy 4.5 aims to concentrate development along high -quality transit corridors. Policy 4.6 of the circulation element promotes reductions in automobile trips and VMT by encouraging transit use and nonmotorized transportation as alternatives to augmenting roadway capacity. 5. The project provides additional housing to support the regionally forecasted increase in economic activities and employment increases. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 115 4� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -64- c o er 021 6. Implementation of the project would introduce policies and actions that address the importance of protecting the health of residents and the environment by improving air quality, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and encouraging active transportation. 7. The project implements the SCAG Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) land use policies related to population and housing by providing additional housing near employment centers. 8. The project facilitates the economic development of the city by promoting development that is mixed use, pedestrian friendly, transit oriented, and clustered around activity centers through new and infill residential development. Additionally, the proposed project would improve the city's jobs/housing balance by supporting development that provides housing and employment opportunities to enable people to live and work in Santa Ana. 9. Implementation of the project would coordinate air quality planning efforts to meet state and federal ambient air quality standards by considering the goals of the Climate Action Plan in all major decision on land use and public infrastructure investment and investing in low- to zero -emission vehicles. These policies also promote development that meets or exceeds standards for energy -efficient building design, and the consideration of sensitive of potential emission sources on sensitive uses. 10. The project promotes economic growth and diversity within the city. The economic prosperity element of the GPU includes policies related to improving Santa Ana's economy and its role within the region. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 116 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -65- 6c ober021 Vill. RESOLUTION REGARDING CERTIFICATION OF THE PEIR The City of Santa Ana finds that it has reviewed and considered the Final Recirculated PEIR in evaluating the proposed project, that the Final Recirculated PEIR is an accurate and objective statement that fully complies with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, and that the Final Recirculated PEIR reflects the independent judgment of the City. The City of Santa Ana declares that no new significant information, as defined by State CEQA Guidelines, section 15088.5, has been received by the City after circulation of the Recirculated Draft PEIR that would require further recirculation. The City of Santa Ana certifies the PEIR based on the entirety of the record of proceedings, including but not limited to the following findings and conclusions: Findings: The following significant environmental impacts have been identified in the PEIR and will require mitigation as set forth in Section V of this Resolution but cannot be mitigated to a level of insignificance: air quality (project -related and cumulative), cultural resources (project - related), greenhouse gas emissions (project -related), noise (project -related), population and housing (project -related), recreation (project -related). Conclusions 1. Except the impacts (stated above) relating to air quality, cultural resources, greenhouse gas, noise, population and housing, and recreation all significant environmental impacts from the implementation of the proposed project have been identified in the PEIR and, with implementation of the mitigation measures identified, will be mitigated to a level of insignificance. 2. Other alternatives to the proposed project, which could potentially achieve the basic objectives of the proposed project, have been considered and rejected in favor of the proposed project. 3. Environmental, economic, social, and other considerations and benefits derived from the development of the proposed project override and make infeasible any alternatives to the proposed project or further mitigation measures beyond those incorporated into the proposed project. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 117 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -66- 6c ober021 IX. RESOLUTION ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PLAN Pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21081.6, the City of Santa Ana hereby adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. In the event of any inconsistencies between the mitigation measures as set forth herein and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan, the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan shall control. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE 1 �i i5 4 ac an a emen 30 — 118 4� /?b02?2 Of ve ri ing onsiderations -67- c o er 021 X. RESOLUTION REGARDING CONTENTS AND CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings have been based are located at the City of Santa Ana Planning Division Counter. The custodian for these records is the City of Santa Ana. This information is provided in compliance with Public Resources Code section 21081.6. The record of proceedings for the City's decision on the project consists of the following documents, at a minimum: 1. The NOP and all other public notices issued by the City in conjunction with the project. 2. The Draft PEIR for the Santa Ana General Plan Update. 3. All comments submitted by agencies or members of the public during the 45-day comment period on the Draft PEIR and the 20-day extension to the comment period. 4. The Final PEIR for the Santa Ana General Plan Update, including comments received on the Draft PEIR, responses to those comments, and technical appendices. 5. The Recirculated Draft PEIR for the Santa Ana General Plan Update. 6. All comments submitted by agencies or members of the public during the 45-day comment period on the Recirculated Draft PEIR. 7. The Final Recirculated PEIR for the Santa Ana General Plan Update, including comments received on the Recirculated Draft PEIR, responses to those comments, and technical appendices. 8. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan for the project. 9. All findings, resolutions, and ordinances adopted by the City in connection with the General Plan Update, and all documents cited or referred to therein. 10. All reports, studies, memoranda, maps, staff reports, or other planning documents relating to the project prepared by the City, consultants to the City, or responsible or trustee agencies with respect to the City's compliance with the requirements of CEQA and with respect to the City's action on the Santa Ana General Plan Update. 11. All documents submitted to the City by other public agencies or members of the public in connection with the General Plan Update PEIR up through project approval. Matters of common knowledge to the City, including, but not limited to federal, state, and local laws and regulations. 12. Any documents expressly cited or referenced in these findings, in addition to those cited above. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 119 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -68- 6c ober021 13. Any other materials required for the record of proceedings by Public Resources Code section 21167.6, subdivision (e). The following location is where the record may be reviewed: City of Santa Ana, Planning Division Counter 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-20 Santa Ana, CA 92701 This page intentionally left blank. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE i �i i5 4 Fact anStatement30 — 120 4 1c�/ 02 Of ve ri ing onsiderations -69- 6ctober�021 EXHIBIT C October 2021 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Santa Ana General Plan Update City of Santa Ana Prepared for: City of Santa Ana Contact: Melanie G. McCann, Principal Planner 20 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92702 mmccann@santa-ana.org Prepared by: PlaceWorks Contact: JoAnn Hadfield, Principal 3 MacArthur Place, Suite 1100 Santa Ana, California 92707 714.966.9220 info@placeworks.com www.placeworks.com City Council 30 — 121 4/19/2022 City Council 30 — 122 4/19/2022 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Section Page 1. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 PURPOSE OF MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM ............................1 1.2 PROJECT SUMMARY......................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 PROJECT LOCATION....................................................................................................................................... 5 1.4 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM ORGANIZATION........................................................... 6 List of Tables Table Page Table 1-1 Proposed Land Use Designations and Statistics.............................................................................. 3 Table 1-2 Buildout Statistical Summary.............................................................................................................. 5 Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements...................................................................... 7 City Council October 2021 30 — 123 4/19/2022 Page i GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program This page intenlionalyleft blank. City Council Page ii 30 — 124 4/19/2022 PlaceWorks 1. Introduction 1.1 PURPOSE OF MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) has been developed to provide a vehicle to monitor mitigation measures and conditions of approval outlined in the Final Recirculted Program Environmental Impact Report. The MMRP has been prepared in conformance with Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code and City of Santa Ana monitoring requirements. Section 21081.6 states: (a) When making the findings required by paragraph (1) of subdivision subsection (a) of Section 21081 or when adopting a mitigated negative declaration pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) of Section 21080, the following requirements shall apply: (1) The public agency shall adopt a reporting or monitoring program for the changes made to the project or conditions of project approval, adopted in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment. The reporting or monitoring program shall be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation. For those changes which have been required or incorporated into the project at the request of a responsible agency or a public agency having jurisdiction by law over natural resources affected by the project, that agency shall, if so requested by the lead agency or a responsible agency, prepare and submit a proposed reporting or monitoring program. (2) The lead agency shall specify the location and custodian of the documents or other material which constitute the record of proceedings upon which its decision is based. (b) A public agency shall provide that measures to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment are fully enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other measures. Conditions of project approval may be set forth in referenced documents which address required mitigation measures or, in the case of the adoption of a plan, policy, regulation, or other public project, by incorporating the mitigation measures into the plan, policy, regulation, or project design. (c) Prior to the close of the public review period for a draft environmental impact report or mitigated negative declaration, a responsible agency, or a public agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by the project, shall either submit to the lead agency complete and detailed performance objectives for mitigation measures which would address the significant effects on the environment identified by the responsible agency or agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by the project, or refer the lead agency to appropriate, readily available guidelines or reference documents. Any mitigation measures submitted to a lead City Council October 2021 30 — 125 4/19/2022 Page 1 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program agency by a responsible agency or an agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by the project shall be limited to measures which mitigate impacts to resources which are subject to the statutory authority of, and definitions applicable to, that agency. Compliance or noncompliance by a responsible agency or agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by a project with that requirement shall not limit the authority of the responsible agency or agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by a project, or the authority of the lead agency, to approve, condition, or deny projects as provided by this division or any other provision of law. The MMRP will serve to document compliance with adopted/certified mitigation measures that are formulated to minimize impacts associated with future development that would be accommodated by the Santa Ana General Plan. 1.2 PROJECT SUMMARY The GPU is the comprehensive update of the Santa Ana General Plan. The purpose of the General Plan Update is to comprehensively update the 1982 plan to reflect current conditions, establish a shared vision of the community's aspirations, and create the policy direction to guide Santa Ana's long-term planning and growth over the next two decades. The General Plan Update will include the City's future development goals and will provide policy statements to achieve those goals. Implementation actions related to each goal or policy will be included as a separate Implementation Plan to ensure successful monitoring of progress as a community. Furthermore, the GPU will focus on five areas in Santa Ana that are better suited for future development or overall improvement. These focus areas are: ■ South Main Street ■ Grand Avenue/ 17th Street ■ West Santa Ana Boulevard ■ 55 Freeway/Dyer Road ■ South Bristol Street General Plan Update The updated General Plan is organized into three sections: Services and Infrastructure (1), Natural Environment (II), and Built Environment (III). The proposed GPU addresses the seven topics required by state law as well as five optional topics. State law gives jurisdictions the discretion to incorporate optional topics and to address any of these topics in a single element or across multiple elements. The 12 proposed elements of the GPU will replace 16 existing elements. The GPU will incorporate the current 2014-2021 Housing Element, and no substantive changes are anticipated. The topic of housing will be addressed as a separate effort in late 2021 in accordance with State law. The topic of environmental justice will be incorporated throughout the GPU, with goals and policies incorporated into multiple elements. The 12 elements of the proposed GPU are: City Council 30 — 126 4/19/2022 Page 2 PlaceWorks GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANATA ANA Mandatory Topics ■ Land Use Element ■ Circulation Element ■ Housing Element ■ Open Space Element ■ Conservation Element ■ Safety Element ■ Noise Element Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Optional Topics ■ Public Services Element ■ Urban Design Element ■ Community Element ■ Economic Prosperity Element ■ Historic Preservation Element The GPU will guide growth and development (e.g., infill development, redevelopment, and revitalization/restoration) in the plan area by designating land uses in the proposed land use map and through implementation of updated goals and policies of the GPU. Table 1-1 outlines the proposed land use designations under the GPU. Table 1-1 Proposed Land Use Designations and Statistics Land Use Designation Acres % of Total Grand Avenue/17th Street 171.5 - District Center 23.7 13.8 General Commercial 19.9 11.6 Industrial/Flex 7.1 4.1 Open Space 1.1 0.6 Urban Neighborhood 119.7 69.8 55 Freeway/Dyer Road 354.5 - District Center 158.0 44.6 General Commercial 68.0 19.2 Industrial/Flex 127.4 35.9 Open Space 1.1 0.3 South Bristol Street 199.9 - District Center 108.3 54.2 Open Space 6.0 3.0 Urban Neighborhood 85.7 42.9 South Main Street 312.2 - Industrial/Flex 29.0 9.3 Institutional 19.2 6.1 Low Density Residential 162.3 52.0 City Council October 2021 30 - 127 4/19/2022 Page 3 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-1 Proposed Land Use Designations and Statistics Land Use Designation Acres % of Total Urban Neighborhood 101.7 32.6 West Santa Ana Boulevard 481.6 - Corridor Residential 10.0 2.1 General Commercial 21.5 4.5 Industrial/Flex 87.9 18.3 Institutional 45.5 9.4 Low Density Residential 108.1 22.4 Low -Medium Density Residential 6.8 1.4 Medium Density Residential 27.0 5.6 Open Space 133.6 27.7 Professional and Administrative Office 6.2 1.3 Urban Neighborhood 35.0 7.3 Balance of City 11,598.8 - District Center 124.2 1.1 General Commercial 424.2 3.7 Industrial 2,159.6 18.6 Institutional 886.7 7.6 Low Density Residential 6,173.3 53.2 Low -Medium Density Residential 429.0 3.7 Medium Density Residential 335.3 2.9 One Broadway Plaza District Center 4.1 0.0 Open Space 793.8 6.8 Professional and Administrative Office 260.4 2.2 Urban Neighborhood 4.1 0.0 Not Specified 4.1 0.0 Total 13,118.5 100% Source: Figures aggregated and projected by PlaceWorks, 2020. The full buildout scenario is analyzed in comparison to existing conditions. Table 1-2 details buildout statistics. Similarly, the PEIR provides conclusions regarding impact significance for this scenario for both the proposed GPU and project alternatives. City Council 30 - 128 4/19/2022 Page 4 PlaceVorks GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANATA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-2 Buildout Statistical Summary PLANNING AREA BUILDOUT I Housing Units Bldg. Sq. Ft.' Jobs FOCUS AREAS 23,955 15,684,285 35,044 55 Freeway/Dyer Road 9,952 6,142,283 13,302 Grand Avenue/17th Street 2,283 703,894 1,622 South Bristol Street 5,492 5,082,641 11,192 South Main Street 2,308 946,662 2,151 West Santa Ana Boulevard 3,920 2,808,805 6,777 SPECIFIC PLAN / SPECIAL ZONING 20,524 16,958,445 39,702 Adaptive Reuse Overlay Zone2 1,260 976,935 2,567 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan 135 143,139 282 Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Specific Plan 4,622 1,967,982 1,578 MainPlace Specific Plan 1,900 2,426,923 5,380 Metro East Mixed -Use Overlay Zone 5,551 4,685,947 12,258 Midtown Specific Plan 607 1,818,253 4,615 Transit Zoning Code 6,449 4,939,266 13,022 ALL OTHER AREAS OF THE CITY3 70,574 40,325,086 95,670 CITYWIDE TOTAL 115,053 72,967,816 170,416 Source: City of Santa Ana 2020. 1 Only includes nonresidential building square footage. 2 The figures shown on the row for the Adaptive Reuse Overlay represents parcels that are exclusively in the Adaptive Reuse Overlay boundary. Figures for parcels that are within the boundaries of both the Adaptive Reuse Overlay Zone and a specific plan, other special zoning, or focus area boundary are accounted for in the respective specific plan, other special zoning, or focus area. 3 The City has included an assumption for growth on a small portion (5 percent) of residential parcels through the construction of second units, which is distributed throughout the city and is not concentrated in a subset of neighborhoods. Additional growth includes known projects in the pipeline and an increase of 10 percent in building square footage and employment for the professional office surrounding the Orange County Global Medical Center and along Broadway north of the Midtown Specific Plan. 1.3 PROJECT LOCATION The City of Santa Ana is in the western central portion of Orange County, approximately 30 miles southwest of the city of Los Angeles and 10 miles northeast of the city of Newport Beach. The city is bordered by the city of Orange and unincorporated areas of Orange County to the north, the city of Tustin to the east, the cities of Irvine and Costa Mesa to the south, and the cities of Fountain Valley and Garden Grove to the west. In November 2019, the City annexed the 17th Street Island, a 24.78-acre area in the northeast portion of the city. The 17th Street Island is bounded by State Route 55 to the east, 17th Street to the south, and North Tustin Avenue to the west. The city also includes a portion of the Santa Ana River Drainage Channel within its sphere of influence (SOI). The city and its SOI are defined and referred to herein as the plan area. City Council 30 - 129 4/19/2022 October 2021 Page 5 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 1.4 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM ORGANIZATION CEQA requires that a reporting or monitoring program be adopted for the conditions of project approval that are necessary to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment (Public Resources Code 21081.6). The mitigation monitoring and reporting program is designed to ensure compliance with adopted mitigation measures during project implementation. For each mitigation measure recommended in the Draft PEIR and Recirculated Draft PEIR, specifications are made herein that identify the action required and the monitoring and reporting that must occur. In addition, a responsible agency is identified for verifying compliance with individual conditions of approval contained in the MMRP. To effectively track and document the status of mitigation measures, a mitigation matrix has been prepared (see Table 1-3). City Council Page 6 30 — 130 4/19/2022 PlaceWorks GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Responsible Document Location Completion Date Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible I Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor 5.2 AIR QUALITY AQ-1 Prior to discretionary approval by the City of Santa Ana for Prior to Project Applicant City of Santa City of Santa development projects subject to CEQA (California Environmental discretionary and Construction Ana Building Ana Building Quality Act) review (i.e., non-exempt projects), project applicants shall approval Contractor Safety Division Safety prepare and submit a technical assessment evaluating potential project Division construction -related air quality impacts to the City of Santa Ana for review and approval. The evaluation shall be prepared in conformance with South Coast Air Quality Management District (South Coast AQMD) methodology for assessing air quality impacts. If construction -related criteria air pollutants are determined to have the potential to exceed the South Coast AQMD's adopted thresholds of significance, the City of Santa Ana shall require that applicants for new development projects incorporate mitigation measures to reduce air pollutant emissions during construction activities. These identified measures shall be incorporated into all appropriate construction documents (e.g., construction management plans) submitted to the City and shall be verified by the City. Mitigation measures to reduce construction -related emissions could include, but are not limited to: • Require fugitive -dust control measures that exceed South Coast AQMD's Rule 403, such as: • Use of nontoxic soil stabilizers to reduce wind erosion. • Apply water every four hours to active soil -disturbing activities. • Tarp and/or maintain a minimum of 24 inches of freeboard on trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials. • Use construction equipment rated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as having Tier 3 (model year 2006 or newer) or Tier 4 (model year 2008 or newer) emission limits, applicable for engines between 50 and 750 horsepower. • Ensure that construction equipment is properly serviced and maintained to the manufacturer's standards. • Limit nonessential idling of construction equipment to no more than five consecutive minutes. October 2 age 7 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Document Completion Date Responsible Location Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor • Limit on -site vehicle travel speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour. • Install wheel washers for all exiting trucks or wash off all trucks and equipment leaving the project area. • Use Super -Compliant VOC paints for coating of architectural surfaces whenever possible. A list of Super -Compliant architectural coating manufactures can be found on the South Coast AQMD's website. AQ-2 Prior to discretionary approval by the City of Santa Ana for Prior to the Property Owner/ City of Santa City of Santa development projects subject to CEQA (California Environmental discretionary Developer Ana Building Ana Building Quality Act) review (i.e., non-exempt projects), project applicants shall approval Safety Division Safety prepare and submit a technical assessment evaluating potential project Division operation phase -related air quality impacts to the City of Santa Ana for review and approval. The evaluation shall be prepared in conformance with South Coast Air Quality Management District (South Coast AQMD) methodology in assessing air quality impacts. If operation -related air pollutants are determined to have the potential to exceed the South Coast AQMD's adopted thresholds of significance, the City of Santa Ana shall require that applicants for new development projects incorporate mitigation measures to reduce air pollutant emissions during operational activities. The identified measures shall be included as part of the conditions of approval. Possible mitigation measures to reduce long-term emissions could include, but are not limited to the following: • For site -specific development that requires refrigerated vehicles, the construction documents shall demonstrate an adequate number of electrical service connections at loading docks for plug- in of the anticipated number of refrigerated trailers to reduce idling time and emissions. Applicants for manufacturing and light industrial uses shall consider energy storage and combined heat and power in appropriate applications to optimize renewable energy generation systems and avoid peak energy use. Page 8 ace orks GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Responsible Document Location Completion Date Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor • Site -specific developments with truck delivery and loading areas and truck parking spaces shall include signage as a reminder to limit idling of vehicles while parked for loading/unloading in accordance with California Air Resources Board Rule 2845 (13 CCR Chapter 10 § 2485). • Provide changing/shower facilities as specified in Section A5.106.4.3 of the CALGreen Code (Nonresidential Voluntary Measures). • Provide bicycle parking facilities per Section A4.106.9 (Residential Voluntary Measures) of the CALGreen Code and Sec. 41-1307.1 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. • Provide preferential parking spaces for low -emitting, fuel -efficient, and carpool/van vehicles per Section A5.106.5.1 of the CALGreen Code (Nonresidential Voluntary Measures). • Provide facilities to support electric charging stations per Section A5.106.5.3 (Nonresidential Voluntary Measures) and Section A5.106.8.2 (Residential Voluntary Measures) of the CALGreen Code. • Applicant -provided appliances (e.g., dishwashers, refrigerators, clothes washers, and dryers) shall be Energy Star —certified appliances or appliances of equivalent energy efficiency. Installation of Energy Star —certified or equivalent appliances shall be verified by Building & Safety during plan check. • Applicants for future development projects along existing and planned transit routes shall coordinate with the City of Santa Ana and Orange County Transit Authority to ensure that bus pad and shelter improvements are incorporated, as appropriate. October 2 age 9 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Document Completion Date Responsible Location Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor AQ-3 Prior to discretionary approval by the City of Santa Ana, project Prior to future Property Owner/ City of Santa City of Santa applicants for new industrial or warehousing development projects that discretionary Developer Ana Building Ana Building 1) have the potential to generate 100 or more diesel truck trips per day project approval Safety Division Safety or have 40 or more trucks with operating diesel -powered transport Division refrigeration units, and 2) are within 1,000 feet of a sensitive land use (e.g., residential, schools, hospitals, or nursing homes), as measured from the property line of the project to the property line of the nearest sensitive use, shall submit a health risk assessment (HRA) to the City of Santa Ana for review and approval. The HRA shall be prepared in accordance with policies and procedures of the State Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment and the South Coast Air Quality Management District and shall include all applicable stationary and mobile/area source emissions generated by the proposed project at the project site. If the HRA shows that the incremental cancer risk and/or noncancer hazard index exceed the respective thresholds, as established by the South Coast AQMD at the time a project is considered (i.e., 10 in one million cancer risk and 1 hazard index), the project applicant will be required to identify and demonstrate that best available control technologies for toxics (T-BACTs), including appropriate enforcement mechanisms, are capable of reducing potential cancer and noncancer risks to an acceptable level. T-BACTs may include, but are not limited to, restricting idling on -site, electrifying warehousing docks to reduce diesel particulate matter, or requiring use of newer equipment and/or vehicles. T BACTs identified in the HRA shall be identified as mitigation measures in the environmental document and/or incorporated into the site plan. AQ-4 Prior to discretionary approval by the City of Santa Ana, if it is Prior to future Property Owner/ City of Santa City of Santa determined that a development project has the potential to emit discretionary Developer Ana Building Ana Building nuisance odors beyond the property line, an odor management plan project approval Safety Division Safety shall be prepared by the project applicant and submitted to the City of Division Santa Ana for review and approval. Facilities that have the potential to generate nuisance odors include, but are not limited to: • Wastewater treatment plants Page 1 ace ork r GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Responsible Document Location Completion Date Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor • Composting, green waste, or recycling facilities • Fiberglass manufacturing facilities Painting/coating operations • Large -capacity coffee roasters • Food -processing facilities The odor management plan shall demonstrate compliance with the South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 402 for nuisance odors. The Odor Management Plan shall identify the best available control technologies for toxics (T-BACTs) that will be utilized to reduce potential odors to acceptable levels, including appropriate enforcement mechanisms. T-BACTs may include but are not limited to scrubbers (i.e., air pollution control devices) at the industrial facility. T-BACTs identified in the odor management plan shall be identified as mitigation measures in the environmental document prepared for the development project and/or incorporated into the project's site plan. 5.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES BIO-1 For development or redevelopment projects that would disturb Concurrent with Project Applicant/ City of Santa City of Santa vegetated land or major stream and are subject to CEQA, a qualified submittal of site Developer Ana Building Ana Building biologist shall conduct an initial screening to determine whether a site- development plans Safety Division Safety Division specific biological resource report is warranted. If needed, a qualified and prior to the biologist shall conduct a field survey for the site and prepare a issuance of biological resource assessment for the project, including an grading permits assessment of potential impacts to sensitive species, habitats, and jurisdictional waters. The report shall recommend mitigation measures, as appropriate, to avoid or limit potential biological resource impacts to less than significant. 5.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES CUL-1 Identification of Historical Resources and Potential Project Prior to issuance Project City of Santa City of Santa Impacts. For structures 45 years or older, a Historical Resources of grading permits Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building Assessment (HRA) shall be prepared by an architectural historian or Developer Safety Division Safety historian meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Division October 2 age 91 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Document Completion Date Responsible Location Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor Qualification Standards. The HRA shall include: definition of a study area or area of potential effect, which will encompass the affected property and may include surrounding properties or historic district(s); an intensive level survey of the study area to identify and evaluate under federal, State, and local criteria significance historical resources that might be directly or indirectly affected by the proposed project; and an assessment of project impacts. The HRA shall satisfy federal and State guidelines for the identification, evaluation, and recordation of historical resources. An HRA is not required if an existing historic resources survey and evaluation of the property is available; however, if the existing survey and evaluation is more than five years old, it shall be updated. CUL-2 Use of the Secretary of the Interior's Standards. The Secretary of Prior to any Property Owner City of Santa City of Santa the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties shall be disturbance of a or Project Ana Building Ana Building used to the maximum extent practicable to ensure that projects historical resource, Applicant/ Safety Division Safety involving the relocation, conversion, rehabilitation, or alteration of a as determined by Developer Division historical resource and its setting or related new construction will not the intensive -level impair the significance of the historical resource. Use of the Standards historical shall be overseen by an architectural historian or historic architect evaluation of a meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification property Standards. Evidence of compliance with the Standards shall be provided to the City in the form of a report identifying and photographing character -defining features and spaces and specifying how the proposed treatment of character -defining features and spaces and related construction activities will conform to the Standards. The Qualified Professional shall monitor the construction and provide a report to the City at the conclusion of the project. Use of the Secretary's Standards shall reduce the project impacts on historical resources to less than significant. Page 9 ace orks GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Responsible Document Location Completion Date Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor CUL-3 Documentation, Education, and Memorial ization. If the City Prior to the Project City of Santa City of Santa determines that significant impacts to historical resources cannot be issuance of Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building avoided, the City shall require, at a minimum, that the affected historical grading permits, Developer Safety Division Safety resources be thoroughly documented before issuance of any permits and for any Division and may also require additional public education efforts and/or subsequent permit memorialization of the historical resource. Though demolition or involving alteration of a historical resource such that its significance is materially excavation to impaired cannot be mitigated to a less than significant level, recordation increased depth of the resource will reduce significant adverse impacts to historical resources to the maximum extent feasible. Such recordation should be prepared under the supervision of an architectural historian, historian, or historic architect meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards and should take the form of Historic American Buildings Survey (NABS) documentation. At a minimum, this recordation should include an architectural and historical narrative; archival photographic documentation; and supplementary information, such as building plans and elevations and/or historic photographs. The documentation package should be reproduced on archival paper and should be made available to researchers and the public through accession by appropriate institutions such as the Santa Ana Library History Room, the South Central Coastal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton, and/or the HABS collection housed in the Library of Congress. Depending on the significance of the adversely affected historical resource, the City, at its discretion, may also require public education about the historical resource in the form of an exhibit, web page, brochure, or other format and/or memorialization of the historical resource on or near the proposed project site. If memorialized, such memorialization shall be a permanent installation, such as a mural, display, or other vehicle that recalls the location, appearance, and historical significance of the affected historical resource, and shall be designed in conjunction with a qualified architectural historian, historian, or historic architect. October 2 age 13 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Document Completion Date Responsible Location Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor CUL-4 For projects with ground disturbance—e.g., grading, excavation, Prior to the Project City of Santa City of Santa trenching, boring, or demolition that extend below the current grade— issuance of Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building prior to issuance of any permits required to conduct ground -disturbing grading permits Developer Safety Division Safety activities, the City shall require an Archaeological Resources Division Assessment be conducted under the supervision of an archaeologist that meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professionally Qualified Standards in either prehistoric or historic archaeology. Assessments shall include a California Historical Resources Information System records search at the South Central Coastal Information Center and of the Sacred Land Files maintained by the Native American Heritage Commission. The records searches will determine if the proposed project area has been previously surveyed for archaeological resources, identify and characterize the results of previous cultural resource surveys, and disclose any cultural resources that have been recorded and/or evaluated. If unpaved surfaces are present within the project area, and the entire project area has not been previously surveyed within the past 10 years, a Phase I pedestrian survey shall be undertaken in proposed project areas to locate any surface cultural materials that may be present. CUL-5 If potentially significant archaeological resources are identified, and Prior to any ground Project City of Santa City of Santa impacts cannot be avoided, a Phase II Testing and Evaluation disturbing activities Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building investigation shall be performed by an archaeologist who meets the Developer Safety Division Safety Secretary of the Interior's Standards to determine significance prior to Division any ground -disturbing activities. If resources are determined significant or unique through Phase II testing, and site avoidance is not possible, appropriate site -specific mitigation measures shall be undertaken. These might include a Phase III data recovery program implemented by a qualified archaeologist and performed in accordance with the Office of Historical Preservation's "Archaeological Resource Management Reports (ARMR): Recommended Contents and Format" (OHP 1990) and "Guidelines for Archaeological Research Designs" (OHP 1991). Page 14 ace orks GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Responsible Document Location Completion Date Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor CUL-6 If the archaeological assessment did not identify archaeological Prior to Project City of Santa City of Santa resources but found the area to be highly sensitive for archaeological construction Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building resources, a qualified archaeologist and a Native American monitor activities Developer Safety Division Safety approved by a California Native American Tribe identified by the Native Division American Heritage Commission as culturally affiliated with the project area shall monitor all ground -disturbing construction and pre - construction activities in areas of high sensitivity. The archaeologist shall inform all construction personnel prior to construction activities of the proper procedures in the event of an archaeological discovery. The training shall be held in conjunction with the project's initial on -site safety meeting and shall explain the importance and legal basis for the protection of significant archaeological resources. The Native American monitor shall be invited to participate in this training. In the event that archaeological resources (artifacts or features) are exposed during ground -disturbing activities, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall be halted while the resources are evaluated for significance by an archaeologist who meets the Secretary's Standards. This will include tribal consultation and coordination with the Native American monitor in the case of a prehistoric archaeological resource or tribal resource. If the discovery proves to be significant, the long-term disposition of any collected materials should be determined in consultation with the affiliated tribe(s), where relevant; this could include curation with a recognized scientific or educational repository, transfer to the tribe, or respectful reinternment in an area designated by the tribe. October 2 age 15 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Responsible Document Location Completion Date Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor CUL-7 If an Archaeological Resources Assessment does not identify Prior to Project City of Santa City of Santa potentially significant archaeological resources but the site has construction Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building moderate sensitivity for archaeological resources (Mitigation Measure activities Developer Safety Division Safety CUL-4), an archaeologist who meets the Secretary's Standards shall Division be retained on call. The archaeologist shall inform all construction personnel prior to construction activities about the proper procedures in the event of an archaeological discovery. The pre -construction training shall be held in conjunction with the project's initial on -site safety meeting and shall explain the importance and legal basis for the protection of significant archaeological resources. In the event that archaeological resources (artifacts or features) are exposed during ground -disturbing activities, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall be halted while the on -call archaeologist is contacted. The resource shall be evaluated for significance and tribal consultation shall be conducted, in the case of a tribal resource. If the discovery proves to be significant, the long-term disposition of any collected materials should be determined in consultation with the affiliated tribe(s), where relevant. 5.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS GEO-1 High Sensitivity. Projects involving ground disturbances in previously During ground Project City of Santa City of Santa undisturbed areas mapped as having "high" paleontological sensitivity disturbing activities Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building shall be monitored by a qualified paleontological monitor on a full-time Developer Safety Division Safety basis. Monitoring shall include inspection of exposed sedimentary units Division during active excavations within sensitive geologic sediments. The monitor shall have authority to temporarily divert activity away from exposed fossils to evaluate the significance of the find and, if the fossils are determined to be significant, professionally and efficiently recover the fossil specimens and collect associated data. The paleontological monitor shall use field data forms to record pertinent location and geologic data, measure stratigraphic sections (if applicable), and collect appropriate sediment samples from any fossil localities.. Page 16 ace orks GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Document Completion Date Responsible Location Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor GEO-2 Low -to -High Sensitivity. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for Prior to the Project City of Santa City of Santa projects involving ground disturbance in previously undisturbed areas issuance of Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building mapped with "low -to -high" paleontological sensitivity (see Figure 5.6-3), grading permits Developer Safety Division Safety the project applicant shall consult with a geologist or paleontologist to Division confirm whether the grading would occur at depths that could encounter highly sensitive sediments for paleontological resources. If confirmed that underlying sediments may have high sensitivity, construction activity shall be monitored by a qualified paleontologist. The paleontologist shall have the authority to halt construction during construction activity as outlined in Mitigation Measure GEO-3. GEO-3 All Projects. In the event of any fossil discovery, regardless of depth or During ground Project City of Santa City of Santa geologic formation, construction work shall halt within a 50-foot radius disturbing activities Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building of the find until its significance can be determined by a qualified Developer Safety Division Safety paleontologist. Significant fossils shall be recovered, prepared to the Division point of curation, identified by qualified experts, listed in a database to facilitate analysis, and deposited in a designated paleontological curation facility in accordance with the standards of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (2010). The most likely repository is the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. The repository shall be identified and a curatorial arrangement shall be signed prior to collection of the fossils. 5.7 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS GHG-1 The City of Santa Ana shall update the Climate Action Plan (CAP) Every five years City of Santa City of Santa City of Santa every five years to ensure the City is monitoring the plan's progress Ana Building Ana Building Ana Building toward achieving the City's greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction target Safety Division in Safety Division Safety and to require amendment if the plan is not achieving the specified coordination with Division level. The update shall consider a trajectory consistent with the GHG Project emissions reduction goal established under Executive Order S-03-05 Applicant/ for year 2050 and the latest applicable statewide legislative GHG Developer emission reduction that may be in effect at the time of the CAP update (e.g., Senate Bill 32 for year 2030). The CAP update shall include the following: October 2 age 17 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Responsible Document Location Completion Date Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor • GHG inventories of existing and forecast year GHG levels. • Tools and strategies for reducing GHG emissions to ensure a trajectory with the long-term GHG reduction goal of Executive Order S-03-05. • Plan implementation guidance that includes, at minimum, the following components consistent with the proposed CAP: • Administration and Staffing • Finance and Budgeting ■ Timelines for Measure Implementation ■ Community Outreach and Education ■ Monitoring, Reporting, and Adaptive Management ■ Tracking Tools Furthermore, the following measures will be considered when the City updates the Climate Action Plan: • Measures to protect the most vulnerable populations • Measure to increase carbon sinks • Standards for electric vehicle parking • Standards for construction projects 5.12 NOISE _ N-1 Construction contractors shall implement the following measures for Prior to issuance Project City of Santa City of Santa construction activities conducted in the City of Santa Ana. Construction of demolition, Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building plans submitted to the City shall identify these measures on demolition, grading, and/or Developer and Safety Division Safety grading, and construction plans submitted to the City: The City of Santa building permits Architect Division Ana Planning and Building Agency shall verify that grading, demolition, and/or construction plans submitted to the City include these notations prior to issuance of demolition, grading, and/or building permits. • Construction activity is limited to the hours: Between 7 AM to 8 PM Monday through Saturday, as prescribed in Municipal Code Section 18-314(e). Construction is prohibited on Sundays. • During the entire active construction period, equipment and trucks used for project construction shall use the best -available noise control techniques (e.g., improved mufflers, equipment re -design, Page 1 ace ork r GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Responsible Document Location Completion Date Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor use of intake silencers, ducts, engine enclosures, and acoustically attenuating shields or shrouds), wherever feasible. • Impact tools (e.g., jack hammers and hoe rams) shall be hydraulically or electrically powered wherever possible. Where the use of pneumatic tools is unavoidable, an exhaust muffler on the compressed air exhaust shall be used along with external noise jackets on the tools. • Stationary equipment, such as generators and air compressors shall be located as far as feasible from nearby noise -sensitive uses. • Stockpiling shall be located as far as feasible from nearby noise - sensitive receptors. • Construction traffic shall be limited, to the extent feasible, to approved haul routes established by the City Planning and Building Agency. • At least 10 days prior to the start of construction activities, a sign shall be posted at the entrance(s) to the job site, clearly visible to the public, that includes permitted construction days and hours, as well as the telephone numbers of the City's and contractor's authorized representatives that are assigned to respond in the event of a noise or vibration complaint. If the authorized contractor's representative receives a complaint, he/she shall investigate, take appropriate corrective action, and report the action to the City. • Signs shall be posted at the job site entrance(s), within the on -site construction zones, and along queueing lanes (if any) to reinforce the prohibition of unnecessary engine idling. All other equipment shall be turned off if not in use for more than 5 minutes. • During the entire active construction period and to the extent feasible, the use of noise -producing signals, including horns, whistles, alarms, and bells, shall be for safety warning purposes only. The construction manager shall use smart back-up alarms, which automatically adjust the alarm level based on the October 2 age 19 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Document Completion Date Responsible Location Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor background noise level or switch off back-up alarms and replace with human spotters in compliance with all safety requirements and laws. • Erect temporary noise barriers (at least as high as the exhaust of equipment and breaking line -of -sight between noise sources and sensitive receptors), as necessary and feasible, to maintain construction noise levels at or below the performance standard of 80 dBA Leq. Barriers shall be constructed with a solid material that has a density of at least 4 pounds per square foot with no gaps from the ground to the top of the barrier. N-2 Prior to issuance of a building permit for a project requiring pile driving Prior to the Project City of Santa City of Santa during construction within 135 feet of fragile structures, such as historical issuance of Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building resources, 100 feet of non -engineered timber and masonry buildings building permits Developer Safety Division Safety (e.g., most residential buildings), or within 75 feet of engineered concrete Division and masonry (no plaster); or a vibratory roller within 25 feet of any structure, the project applicant shall prepare a noise and vibration analysis to assess and mitigate potential noise and vibration impacts related to these activities. This noise and vibration analysis shall be conducted by a qualified and experienced acoustical consultant or engineer. The vibration levels shall not exceed Federal Transit Administration (FTA) architectural damage thresholds (e.g., 0.12 inches per second [in/sec] peak particle velocity [PPV] for fragile or historical resources, 0.2 in/sec PPV for non -engineered timber and masonry buildings, and 0.3 in/sec PPV for engineered concrete and masonry). If vibration levels would exceed this threshold, alternative uses such as drilling piles as opposed to pile driving and static rollers as opposed to vibratory rollers shall be used. If necessary, construction vibration monitoring shall be conducted to ensure vibration thresholds are not exceeded. N-3 New residential projects (or other noise -sensitive uses) located within Prior to the Project City of Santa City of Santa 200 feet of existing railroad lines shall be required to conduct a issuance of Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building groundborne vibration and noise evaluation consistent with Federal building permits Developer Safety Division Safety Transit Administration (FTA)-approved methodologies. Division Page 2 aceUlorks GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Responsible Document Location Completion Date Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor N-4 During the project -level California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Prior to the Project City of Santa City of Santa process for industrial developments under the General Plan Update or issuance of Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building other projects that could generate substantial vibration levels near building permits Developer and Safety Division Safety sensitive uses, a noise and vibration analysis shall be conducted to Acoustical Division assess and mitigate potential noise and vibration impacts related to the Engineer operations of that individual development. This noise and vibration analysis shall be conducted by a qualified and experienced acoustical consultant or engineer and shall follow the latest CEQA guidelines, practices, and precedents. 5.15 RECREATION REC-1 The City shall monitor new residential development within the Dyer/55 Prior to the Project City of Santa City of Santa Fwy focus area. Development proposals for projects including 100 or issuance of Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building more residential units shall be required to prepare a public park occupancy permits Developer Safety Division Safety utilization study to evaluate the project's potential impacts on existing Division public parks within a one half (1/2) mile radius to the focus area. The evaluation shall include the population increase due to the project and the potential for the new resident population to impact existing public parks within the radius. Each study shall also consider the cumulative development in the Dyer/55 Fwy and the potential for a cumulative impact on existing public parks within the radius. If the study determines that the project, or it's incremental cumulative impacts would result in a significant impact (substantial physical deterioration or substantial acceleration of deterioration) to existing public parks, the project shall be required to mitigate this impact. Measures to mitigate the significant impact may include but are not limited to land dedication and fair -share contribution to acquire new or to enhance existing public parks within the radius. Mitigation shall be completed prior to issuance of occupancy permits. 5.16 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES CUL-4 For projects with ground disturbance—e.g., grading, excavation, Prior to the Project City of Santa I City of Santa I trenching, boring, or demolition that extend below the current grade— issuance of Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building prior to issuance of any permits required to conduct ground -disturbing grading permits Developer Safety Division October 2 age 21 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Document Completion Date Responsible Location Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor activities, the City shall require an Archaeological Resources Safety Assessment be conducted under the supervision of an archaeologist Division that meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professionally Qualified Standards in either prehistoric or historic archaeology. Assessments shall include a California Historical Resources Information System records search at the South Central Coastal Information Center and of the Sacred Land Files maintained by the Native American Heritage Commission. The records searches will determine if the proposed project area has been previously surveyed for archaeological resources, identify and characterize the results of previous cultural resource surveys, and disclose any cultural resources that have been recorded and/or evaluated. If unpaved surfaces are present within the project area, and the entire project area has not been previously surveyed within the past 10 years, a Phase I pedestrian survey shall be undertaken in proposed project areas to locate any surface cultural materials that may be present. CUL-5 If potentially significant archaeological resources are identified, and Prior to any ground Project City of Santa City of Santa impacts cannot be avoided, a Phase II Testing and Evaluation disturbing activities Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building investigation shall be performed by an archaeologist who meets the Developer Safety Division Safety Secretary of the Interior's Standards to determine significance prior to Division any ground -disturbing activities. If resources are determined significant or unique through Phase II testing, and site avoidance is not possible, appropriate site -specific mitigation measures shall be undertaken. These might include a Phase III data recovery program implemented by a qualified archaeologist and performed in accordance with the Office of Historical Preservation's "Archaeological Resource Management Reports (ARMR): Recommended Contents and Format" (OHP 1990) and "Guidelines for Archaeological Research Designs" (OHP 1991). CUL-6 If the archaeological assessment did not identify archaeological Prior to Project City of Santa City of Santa resources but found the area to be highly sensitive for archaeological construction Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building resources, a qualified archaeologist shall monitor all ground -disturbing activities Developer Safety Division Safety construction and pre -construction activities in areas with previously I I I I Division Page 2 ace ork r GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Document Completion Date Responsible Location Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor undisturbed soil. The archaeologist shall inform all construction personnel prior to construction activities of the proper procedures in the event of an archaeological discovery. The training shall be held in conjunction with the project's initial on -site safety meeting and shall explain the importance and legal basis for the protection of significant archaeological resources. In the event that archaeological resources (artifacts or features) are exposed during ground -disturbing activities, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall be halted while the resources are evaluated for significance by an archaeologist who meets the Secretary's Standards, and tribal consultation shall be conducted in the case of a tribal resource. If the discovery proves to be significant, the long-term disposition of any collected materials should be determined in consultation with the affiliated tribe(s), where relevant; this could include curation with a recognized scientific or educational repository, transfer to the tribe, or respectful reinternment in an area designated by the tribe. CUL-7 If an Archaeological Resources Assessment does not identify Prior to Project City of Santa City of Santa potentially significant archaeological resources but the site has construction Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building moderate sensitivity for archaeological resources (Mitigation Measure activities Developer Safety Division Safety CUL-4), an archaeologist who meets the Secretary's Standards shall Division be retained on call. The archaeologist shall inform all construction personnel prior to construction activities about the proper procedures in the event of an archaeological discovery. The pre -construction training shall be held in conjunction with the project's initial on -site safety meeting and shall explain the importance and legal basis for the protection of significant archaeological resources. In the event that archaeological resources (artifacts or features) are exposed during ground -disturbing activities, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall be halted while the on -call archaeologist is contacted. The resource shall be evaluated for significance and tribal consultation shall be conducted, in the case of a tribal resource. If the discovery proves to be significant, the long-term disposition of any October 2 age 23 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Responsible Document Location Completion Date Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor collected materials should be determined in consultation with the affiliated tribe(s), where relevant. Page 24 ace orks GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program This page intentionally left blank. October 2 age 25 RESOLUTION NO. 2022-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2020-06 FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN WHEREAS, Article 5 of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 (commencing with Section 65300) of the Government Code requires the City to prepare and adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of the City; and WHEREAS, in 1982, the City of Santa Ana last completed a comprehensive update to the General Plan; and WHEREAS, various elements of the General Plan have been amended and adopted from time to time; and WHEREAS, the City of Santa Ana seeks to adopt a comprehensive update to the Santa Ana General Plan ("project" or "General Plan Update"); and WHEREAS, the General Plan Update identified the following five focus areas for potential change and new growth: South Main Street, Grand Avenue/17th Street, West Santa Ana Boulevard, 55 Freeway/Dyer Road, and South Bristol Street; and WHEREAS, the total long-term potential growth within these focus areas is estimated at 17,575 new housing units, 2,263,130 non-residential building square footage, and 6,616 jobs; and WHEREAS, the General Plan Update also requires the certification of the Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report and related documents that have been completed for the project, which approval will be concurrent with the approval of the General Plan Update; and WHEREAS, pursuant to SB 1000, the City is required to address Environmental Justice in the General Plan Update due to a number of disadvantaged communities located within the City; and WHEREAS, the goals, policies, and implementation items associated with environmental justice have been selectively placed within the majority of the updated General Plan Update; and WHEREAS, the project as currently proposed entails, among other things, (1) the revision to the State mandated Elements of the General Plan; (2) the inclusion of optional Elements to the General Plan; and (3) approval of General Plan Amendment Resolution No. 2022-XXX City Council 30 — 150 4/19VNTT of 5 (GPA) No. 2020-06, which would result in a comprehensive update to the existing General Plan; and WHEREAS, the General Plan is a community -wide vision document that is intended to address and respond to community needs, with staff conducting outreach with community members about the process to as wide an audience as possible; and WHEREAS, over the past six years, an extensive public outreach campaign to engage the public was conducted to supplement the feedback, input and direction for the comprehensive update to the General Plan. Early public outreach efforts included hosting over 60 community meetings and workshops; hosting individual community workshops within each of the five Focus Areas with over 300 residents, business leaders, and community stakeholders participating in the workshops; distributing an online community survey with over 650 respondents to collect input on the content of the General Plan; the mailing of approximately 44,000 informational flyers to property owners and tenants; presentations at neighborhood Communication Linkages (CommLink) meetings; outreach meetings with Environmental Justice groups (Madison Park Neighborhood Association, Logan Neighborhood Association, Artesia-Pilar Neighborhood Association); and attendance at approximately 100 CARES events within environmental justice communities to discuss the General Plan Update with residents; and WHEREAS, on November 9, 2020, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report ("Draft PEIR") that was prepared for the General Plan Update (State Clearinghouse No. 2020029087), at which the Planning Commission voted not to certify the Draft PEIR and continue work on the General Plan Update to a future date to allow additional time for outreach to Santa Ana's environmental justice (EJ) communities and in view of the COVID-19 pandemic; and WHEREAS, in 2021, a Recirculated Draft Program Environmental Impact Report ("Recirculated Draft PEIR") was prepared as a supplemental analysis to the original Draft PEIR to reflect updates to the General Plan Update and based on an intensive, extended community outreach program conducted by the City between January and May 2021; and . WHEREAS, in collaboration with neighborhood and community serving organizations, the City reached out through direct mailers, yard signs, and social media to promote awareness of the General Plan Update, and participation in an EJ survey and 10 EJ virtual community forums. In August 2021, an in -person Open House was hosted to share results of outreach, EJ partnerships, and proposed General Plan policies and programs focused on improving environmental health and quality of life in EJ communities; and WHEREAS, during the public comment period, Planning work-study sessions were held on August 9, 2021, and August 23, 2021, and a public hearing on September 13, 2021; and Resolution No. 2022-XXX City Council 30 — 151 4/19VM@ of 5 WHEREAS, on November 8, 2021, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Final Recirculated PEIR and General Plan Update. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public, and the City's consultant team, the Planning Commission voted to recommend that the City Council certify the Final Recirculated PEIR, adopt the findings of fact, the statement of overriding considerations, and the mitigation monitoring and reporting program, and approve the project; and WHEREAS, on December 7, 2021, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Final Recirculated PEIR and General Plan Update, which hearing was successively continued to the City Council meetings on December 21, 2021, January 18, 2022, and February 15, 2022, respectively; and WHEREAS, on February 15, 2022, the City Council heard the matter and afforded members of the public an opportunity to comment. No action on the item resulted; and WHEREAS, on April 19, 2022, and based on further comments received by City staff, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Final Recirculated PEIR and General Plan Update, at which hearing members of the public were afforded an opportunity to comment. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public, and the City's consultant team, the City Council voted to certify the Final Recirculated PEIR, adopt the findings of fact, the statement of overriding considerations, and the mitigation monitoring and reporting program, and approve the project. The City Council hereby incorporates by reference, as if fully set forth herein, Resolution No. 2022-XXX certifying the Recirculated PEIR and adopting the findings of fact, statement of overriding considerations and mitigation monitoring and reporting program for the project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana as follows: Section 1. The above recitals are true and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2. The General Plan Amendment consists of amendments to 11 Elements of the General Plan and text updates, as shown in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 3. The City Council has concurrently reviewed, certified and adopted the Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report, the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations, and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for General Plan Amendment No. 2020-06, attached respectively as Exhibits B, C, and D. The City hereby finds and determines that all potential environmental impacts of the project, including the amendments to the General Plan, have been fully analyzed in the PEIR. No new or additional mitigation measures or alternatives are required. There is no substantial evidence in the administrative Resolution No. 2022-XXX City Council 30 — 152 4/19 M� of 5 record to support a fair argument that the project may result in any significant environmental impacts beyond those analyzed in the certified PEIR. Section 4. The General Plan Amendment, Recirculated Final Program Environmental Impact Report and all supporting documents are online, and on file and available for public review at Santa Ana City Hall, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California 92702. Section 5. The City Council hereby finds that the proposed General Plan Amendment is compatible with the objectives, policies, and general plan land use programs specified in the General Plan for the City of Santa Ana. Section 6. The current General Plan will be consolidated into 12 elements, with 11 Elements being comprehensively updated including the Community Element, the Mobility Element, the Economic Prosperity Element, the Public Services Element, the Conservation Element, the Open Space Element, the Noise Element, the Safety Element, the Land Use Element, the Historic Preservation Element, and the Urban Design Element. Section 7. The Housing Element is on a separate update schedule and will be updated in 2022 in compliance with State law. Section 8 The new and updated goals/objectives and policies of the General Plan will be coordinated and consistent throughout the General Plan document. Section 9. The proposed General Plan Amendment will not adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare in that the General Plan Amendment is a comprehensive update to the existing General Plan that is intended to address issues such as incompatible land uses on adjacent properties, inconsistencies between General Plan goals or policies, and will mitigate adverse impacts to the environment. Section 10. The City Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment No. 2020-06 as set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, subject to compliance with the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and upon satisfaction of the conditions set forth below: A. The General Plan Amendment shall not take effect unless and until Environmental Impact Report No. 20200029087 is certified by the City Council. B. General Plan Amendment No. 2020-06 shall not take effect unless and until the City Council overrules the Determination of Inconsistency by the Airport Land Use Commission of Orange County. Section 11. The Clerk of the Council shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution. Resolution No. 2022-XXX City Council 30 — 153 4/19 M� of 5 ADOPTED this day of APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By: John M. Funk Sr. Assistant City Attorney AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: NOT PRESENT Councilmembers Councilmembers Councilmembers Councilmembers Vicente Sarmiento Mayor 2022. CERTIFICATION OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, DAISY GOMEZ, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2022-XXX to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana Resolution No. 2022-XXX City Council 30 — 154 4/19 M� of 5 EXHIBIT All materials for Exhibit A may be accessed at https://www.santa-ana.org/general- plan/draft-documents and are also on file and available at the City's Planning and Building Agency. City Council 30 — 155 4/19/2022 EXHIBIT B All materials for Exhibit B may be accessed at: https://www.santa-ana.org/general- plan/general-plan-environmental-documents and are also on file and available at the City's Planning and Building Agency. City Council 30 — 156 4/19/2022 Exhibit C CEQA FINDINGS OF FACT FOR THE SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE FINAL RECIRCULATED PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT City of Santa Ana STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2020029087 INTRODUCTION The California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") requires that a number of written findings be made by the lead agency in connection with certification of an environmental impact report ("EIR") prior to approval of the project pursuant to Sections 15091 and 15093 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21081 of the Public Resources Code. The State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091 provides: (a) No public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an EIR has been certified which identifies one or more significant environmental effects of the project unless the public agency makes one or more written findings for each of those significant effects, accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for each finding. The possible findings are: 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the EIR. 2. Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can or should be adopted by such other agency. 3. Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the final EIR. (b) The findings required by subdivision (a) shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. (c) The finding in subdivision (a)(2) shall not be made if the agency making the finding has concurrent jurisdiction with another agency to deal with identified feasible mitigation measures or alternatives. The finding in subsection (a)(3) shall describe the specific reasons for rejecting identified mitigation measures and project alternatives. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 157 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -1- Oc ober021 (d) When making the findings required in subdivision (a)(1), the agency shall also adopt a program for reporting on or monitoring the changes which it has either required in the project or made a condition of approval to avoid or substantially lessen significant environmental effects. These measures must be fully enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other measures. (e) The public agency shall specify the location and custodian of the documents or other materials which constitute the record of the proceedings upon which its decision is based. (f) A statement made pursuant to Section 15093 does not substitute for the findings required by this section. Public Resources Code Section 21061.1 defines "feasible" to mean "capable of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account economic, environmental, social, and technological factors." CEQA Guidelines section 15364 adds another factor: "legal" considerations. (See Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553, 565 (Goleta ll).) The concept of "feasibility" also encompasses the question of whether a particular alternative or mitigation measure promotes the underlying goals and objectives of a project. (California Native Plant Soc. v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Cal.AppAth 957, 1001 ["an alternative 'may be found infeasible on the ground it is inconsistent with the project objectives as long as the finding is supported by substantial evidence in the record"'].) An alternative may also be rejected because it "would not 'entirely fulfill' [a] project objective." (Citizens for Open Government v. City of Lodi (2012) 205 Cal.AppAth 296, 314-315.) "[l=]easibility" under CEQA encompasses 'desirability' to the extent that desirability is based on a reasonable balancing of the relevant economic, environmental, social, and technological factors." (City of Del Mar v. City of San Diego (1982) 133 Cal.App.3d 410, 417; see also Sequoyah Hills Homeowners Assn. v. City of Oakland (1993) 23 Cal.AppAth 704, 715.) With respect to a project for which significant impacts are not avoided or substantially lessened, a public agency, after adopting proper findings, may nevertheless approve the project if the agency first adopts a statement of overriding considerations setting forth the specific reasons why the agency found that the project's "benefits" rendered "acceptable" its "unavoidable adverse environmental effects." (CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15093, 15043, subd. (b); see also Pub. Resources Code, § 21081, subd. (b).) The California Supreme Court has stated, "[t]he wisdom of approving ... any development project, a delicate task which requires a balancing of interests, is necessarily left to the sound discretion of the local officials and their constituents who are responsible for such decisions. The law as we interpret and apply it simply requires that those decisions be informed, and therefore balanced." (Goleta Il, supra, 52 Cal.3d at p. 576.) When adopting Statements of Overriding Considerations, State CEQA Guidelines Section 15093 further provides: Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of r5 �ac an Statement 2 30-158 41ct/ 0 021i inonsiderations -2- oer (a) CEQA requires the decision -making agency to balance, as applicable, the economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks when determining whether to approve the project. If the specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of a proposal project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse environmental effects may be considered "acceptable." (b) Where the lead agency approves a project which will result in the occurrence of significant effects which are identified in the final EIR but are not avoided or substantially lessened, the agency shall state in writing the specific reasons to support its action based on the final EIR and/or other information in the record. This statement of overriding considerations shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. (c) If an agency makes a statement of overriding considerations, the statement should be included in the record of the project approval and should be mentioned in the notice of determination. This statement does not substitute for, and shall be in addition to, findings required pursuant to Section 15091. Having received, independently reviewed, and considered the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report ("Draft PEIR"), the Final Program Environmental Impact Report ("Final PEIR), the Recirculated Draft Program Environmental Impact Report ("Recirculated Draft PEIR"), and the Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report ("Final Recirculated PEIR") for the Santa Ana General Plan Update, SCH No. 2020029087 (collectively, the "PEIR"), as well as all other information in the record of proceedings on this matter, the following Findings of Facts ("Findings") are hereby adopted by the City of Santa Ana ("City") in its capacity as the CEQA Lead Agency. These Findings set forth the environmental basis for the discretionary actions to be undertaken by the City for adoption and implementation of the Santa Ana General Plan Update ("Proposed Project"). This action includes the certification of the following: ■ Santa Ana General Plan Update Program Environmental Impact Report, SCH No. 2020029087 A. DOCUMENT FORMAT These Findings have been organized into the following sections: 1) Section I provides an introduction. 2) Section II provides a summary of the project, overview of the discretionary actions required for approval of the project, and a statement of the project's objectives. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE 1 �i i5 4 Fact anStatement30 — 159 4 1c�/ 02 Of ve ri ing onsiderations -3- 6ctober�021 3) Section III provides a summary of previous environmental reviews related to the project area that took place prior to the environmental review done specifically for the project, and a summary of public participation in the environmental review for the project. 4) Section IV sets forth findings regarding the environmental impacts that were determined to be —as a result of the Notice of Preparation (NOP) and consideration of comments received during the NOP comment period —either not relevant to the project or clearly not at levels that were deemed significant for consideration given the nature and location of the proposed project. 5) Section V sets forth findings regarding significant or potentially significant environmental impacts identified in the PEIR that the City has determined are either not significant or can feasibly be mitigated to a less than significant level through the imposition of project design features and/or mitigation measures. In order to ensure compliance and implementation, all of these measures are included in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ("MMRP") for the project and adopted as conditions of the project by the Lead Agency. Where potentially significant impacts can be reduced to less than significant levels through adherence to project design features and/or mitigation measures, these findings specify how those impacts were reduced to an acceptable level. Section V also includes findings regarding those significant or potentially significant environmental impacts identified in the PEIR that will or may result from the project and which the City has determined cannot feasibly be mitigated to a less than significant level. 6) Section VI sets forth findings regarding alternatives to the proposed project. 7) Section VI sets forth the statement of overriding considerations for the proposed project. 8) Section VIII sets forth the resolution regarding certification of the PEIR 9) Section IX sets for the resolution adopting a mitigation and monitoring plan for the proposed project. 10) Section X sets for the resolution regarding custodian of records for the proposed project. B. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS For purposes of CEQA and these Findings, the Record of Proceedings for the proposed project consists of the following documents and other evidence, at a minimum: ■ The NOP and all other public notices issued by the City in conjunction with the proposed project ■ The Draft PEIR for the proposed project ■ The Recirculated Draft PEIR Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 160 4/1c�/ 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -4- ctober021 ■ The Final PEIR for the proposed project ■ The Final Recirculated PEIR for the proposed project including the Updated Draft PEIR (Volume II and III of the Final Recirculated PEIR) ■ All written comments submitted by agencies or members of the public during the public review comment period on the Draft PEIR ■ All written comments submitted by agencies or members of the public during the public review comment period on the Recirculated Draft PEIR ■ All responses to written comments submitted by agencies or members of the public during the public review comment period on the Draft PEIR ■ All responses to written comments submitted by agencies or members of the public during the public review comment period on the Recirculated Draft PEIR ■ All written and verbal public testimony presented during a noticed public hearing for the proposed project ■ The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ■ The reports and technical memoranda included or referenced in the Response to Comments ■ All documents, studies, EIRs, or other materials incorporated by reference in the Draft PEIR, Recirculated Draft PEIR, Final PEIR and Final Recirculated PEIR ■ The Resolutions adopted by the City of Santa Ana in connection with the proposed project, and all documents incorporated by reference therein, including comments received after the close of the comment period and responses thereto ■ Matters of common knowledge to the City of Santa Ana, including but not limited to federal, state, and local laws and regulations ■ Any documents expressly cited in these Findings ■ Any other relevant materials required to be in the record of proceedings by Public Resources Code Section 21167.6(e) The documents and other material that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings are based are located at the City of Santa Ana Planning Division Counter. The custodian for these documents is the City of Santa Ana. This information is provided in compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6(a)(2) and 14 California Code Regulations Section 15091(e). C. CUSTODIAN AND LOCATION OF RECORDS The documents and other materials that constitute the administrative record for the City's actions related to the project are at the City of Santa Ana Planning Division, 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-20, Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 161 4/1c�/ 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -5- ctober021 Santa Ana, CA 92701. The City's Planning Division is the custodian of the administrative record for the project. Copies of these documents, which constitute the record of proceedings, are and at all relevant times have been and will be available upon request at the offices of the Planning Division Counter. This information is provided in compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6(a)(2) and 14 California Code Regulations Section 15091(e). Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of r5 �ac an Statement 2 30-162 4/1ct/ 0 021i inonsiderations -6- oer II. PROJECT SUMMARY A. PROJECT LOCATION Santa Ana is in the western central portion of Orange County, approximately 30 miles southwest of the city of Los Angeles and 10 miles northeast of Newport Beach. Orange County is surrounded by the counties of Los Angeles, San Bernardino, Riverside, and San Diego and is one of six counties comprising the Southern California Region. Santa Ana is bordered by Orange and unincorporated areas of Orange County to the north, Tustin to the east, Irvine and Costa Mesa to the south, and Fountain Valley and Garden Grove to the west. In November 2019, the City annexed the 17th Street Island, a 24.78-acre area in the northeast portion of the city. The 17th Street Island is bounded by State Route 55 to the east, 17th Street to the south, and North Tustin Avenue to the west. The city also includes a portion of the Santa Ana River Drainage Channel in its sphere of influence (SOI). The city and its SOI are defined and referred to herein as the plan area. Regional access to the city is provided by the Garden Grove Freeway (SR-22) and the Orange Freeway (SR-57) on the north, the Santa Ana Freeway (1-5) on the northeast, the Costa Mesa Freeway (SR-55) on the east, and the San Diego Freeway (1-405) on the south. B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION In March 2014, the City Council adopted the Santa Ana Strategic Plan. The Strategic Plan was the result of an extensive community outreach process and established specific goals, objectives, and strategies to guide the City's major efforts. One of the key strategies identified was to complete a comprehensive update of the existing General Plan. The General Plan Update (GPU) will provide long-term policy direction to guide the physical development, quality of life, economic health, and sustainability of the Santa Ana community through 2045. The General Plan Update will identify areas of opportunity and provide options to enhance development potential in key areas of the city. It will also bring the city into compliance with recent State laws, reflect current conditions, and incorporate input from the general public, City staff, and other stakeholders. The proposed GPU is organized into three sections: I, Services and Infrastructure; 11, Natural Environment; and III, Built Environment. The proposed GPU addresses the eight topics required by state law as well as five optional topics. State law gives jurisdictions the discretion to incorporate optional topics and to address any of these topics in a single element or across multiple elements of the general plan. The 12 proposed elements of the GPU will replace the 16 elements of the current General Plan. The GPU will incorporate the current 2014-2021 housing element, and no substantive changes are anticipated. The topic of housing will be addressed as a separate effort in early 2022 in accordance with State law. The topic of environmental justice will be incorporated throughout the GPU, with goals and policies incorporated into multiple elements. The 12 elements of the proposed General Plan update are: Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 163 4/1c�/ 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -7- ctober021 Mandatory Topics ■ Land Use Element ■ Circulation Element ■ Housing Element ■ Open Space Element ■ Conservation Element ■ Safety Element ■ Noise Element Optional Topics ■ Public Services Element ■ Urban Design Element ■ Community Element ■ Economic Prosperity Element ■ Historic Preservation Element The proposed GPU is comprehensive both in its geography and subject matter. It addresses the entire territory within the plan area's boundary and the full spectrum of issues associated with management of the plan area. The GPU also includes forecasts of long-term conditions and outlines development goals and policies; exhibits and diagrams; and the objectives, principles, standards, and plan proposals throughout its various elements. The GPU can be found online at https://www.santa-ana.org/general-plan. The General Plan Policy Framework can be accessed at https://www.santa-ana.org/sites/default/files/pb/general- plan/documents/General Plan PolicyFrameworkMaster.DRAFT. cmo2.pdf. Coordination and consistency are essential between the elements of the GPU, but in particular with the land use element. The circulation element, which identifies proposed improvements to the transportation system, may impact surrounding land uses and future development. The urban design element sets forth policies and programs to improve the city's design and urban form. The conservation element protects and maintains the city's natural, cultural, and other resources, with a focus on preserving aesthetics and the environmental quality of the city. Both the land use element and the circulation element are described in more depth below. Focus areas and specific plan/special zoning areas are also described. Updated Land Use Element The updated land use element will guide growth and development (e.g., infill development, redevelopment, use, and revitalization/restoration) within the plan area by designating land uses as shown in the proposed land use map. Figure 3-7 of the Updated Draft PEIR (Volume II of the Final Recirculated PEIR) shows the 13 proposed land use designations of the General Plan update, and Table 3-4 gives a general description of the land use designations that are added to the GPU and were not in the current General Plan. Land use designations define the type and nature of development that would be allowed in a given location of the plan area. The land use designations and patterns are intended to provide the basis for more detailed zoning designations and development intensities, requirements, and standards established in the City's development code. It is important to note that the updated land use element is a regulatory document that defines the framework for future growth and development in the plan area but does not directly result in Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 164 4/1c�/ 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -8- / ctober021 development in and of itself. Before any project can be developed in the plan area, it must be analyzed for conformance with the General Plan Update, zoning requirements, and other applicable local and state requirements; comply with the requirements of CEQA; and obtain all necessary clearances and permits. Updated Circulation Element The circulation element update is integrally related to federal, state, and regional transportation programs as well as local plans and regulations. The City's role in transportation planning has become increasingly important because recent legislation in the areas of growth management, congestion management, and air quality require more active local coordination to meet regional objectives. Furthermore, the circulation element update is intended to guide future development of the city's transportation system in a manner consistent with the updated land use element. The Master Plan of Streets and Highways (MPSH) details proposed street classifications to reflect buildout of the city's roadway system. The street classifications include Freeway, Major Arterial, Primary Arterial, Secondary Arterial, Divided Collector Arterial, and Collector Arterial. As part of the implementation of complete streets principles,' a series of modifications to the city's roadway network has been identified and includes both the reclassification of roadways and assignment of new MPSH roadway classifications to selected existing streets. A number of proposed roadway reclassifications, adoptions, and removals from the MPSH are as follows: ■ Reclassified as Divided Collector Arterial: Santa Clara Avenue west of Tustin Avenue (currently Secondary Arterial) • Flower Street between Warner Avenue and 1 st Street (currently Secondary Arterial) • Chestnut Avenue between Standard Avenue and eastern city limit (currently Secondary/Primary Arterial) • Raitt Street between Segerstrom Avenue and Santa Ana Boulevard (currently Secondary Arterial) • Civic Center Drive between Fairview Street and Bristol Street (currently Secondary Arterial) • Penn Way between 1-5 on/off ramps and Washington Avenue (currently Secondary Arterial) • Santiago Street between 15th Street and 6th Street (currently Secondary Arterial) • Standard Avenue between 6th Street and Warner Avenue (currently Secondary Arterial) Complete streets are transportation facilities that are planned, designed, operated, and maintained to provide safe mobility for all users, including bicyclists, pedestrians, transit vehicles, truckers, and motorists, appropriate to the function and context of the facility. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of r5 �ac an Statement 2 30-165 4/1cc/ 0 021i inonsiderations -9- oer . Santa Ana Boulevard between French Street and Santiago Street (currently Primary Arterial) . Santa Ana Boulevard between Raitt Street and Flower Street (currently Major Arterial) . Cambridge Street between Fairhaven Avenue and SR-22 freeway (currently Local Arterial) Hazard Avenue between Euclid Street and Harbor Boulevard (currently Secondary Arterial) Halladay Avenue between Warner Avenue and Dyer Road (currently Secondary Arterial) McFadden Avenue between Harbor Boulevard and Grand Avenue (currently Secondary Arterial) Broadway between 1st Street and 17th Street (currently Secondary Arterial) 4th Street between French Street and Grand Avenue (currently Primary/Secondary Arterial) Fairhaven Avenue from Grand Avenue to Tustin Avenue (currently Secondary Arterial) ■ Reclassified as Primary Arterial: . Santa Ana Boulevard between Flower Street and Ross Street (currently a Major Arterial) 1st Street between Bristol Street and Tustin Avenue (currently Major Arterial) ■ Reclassify as Collector Arterial: Civic Center Drive between French Street and Santiago Street (currently a Secondary Arterial) ■ Add the following to the MPSH as Divided Collector Arterial: . Greenville Street between Segerstrom Avenue and Warner Avenue ■ Add the following to the MPSH as Collector Streets: . Civic Center Drive between Spurgeon Street and Santiago Street (currently Local Street) Broadway from Anahurt Street to Main Street (currently Local Road) ■ Remove the following from the MPSH . Memory Lane from the City Center Drive to SR-22 . Wright Street from 14th Street to Fruit Street . 4th Street from French Street to Ross Street . Washington Avenue from Broadway to Main Street 10th street from Broadway to Main Street Columbine Avenue from Main Street to 55 FWY Halladay street from Dyer Road to Alton pkwy Santa Ana General Plan Update CE i �i i5 4 Fact anStatement30 — 166 4 1c�/ 02 Of ve ri ing onsiderations -10- 6ctober�021 The majority of the proposed reclassifications aim to reduce existing rights -of -way for vehicular traffic lanes to make room for bicycle and pedestrian improvements. Landmark streets are also identified within or adjacent to the Santa Ana Downtown Historic District, which is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The circulation element update incorporates the proposed Santa Ana -Garden Grove Fixed Guideway project, which will introduce new transit service to the city. Santa Ana is working with Garden Grove and Orange County Transit Authority to build a fixed guideway system called the OC Streetcar. Expected to begin operations in 2021, the OC Streetcar will link the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center to a new multimodal hub at Harbor Boulevard/Westminster Avenue in Garden Grove. OC Streetcar will serve historic downtown Santa Ana and Civic Center. Along its four -mile route, OC Streetcar will connect with 18 Orange County Transit Authority bus routes and increase transportation options along Santa Ana Boulevard, 4th Street, the Pacific Electric right-of-way, and Harbor Boulevard. Focus Areas 1. South Main Street Focus Area The South Main Street focus area introduces the opportunity for greater flexibility and a more dynamic mix of land uses and urban design along the properties fronting Main Street. The intent is to transition an auto -dominated corridor into a transit- and pedestrian -friendly corridor through infill development without disrupting the surrounding lower -density neighborhoods. The objectives of this focus area are: ■ Facilitate redevelopment and property improvements along Main Street. ■ Create a more active and dynamic streetscape. ■ Protect established residential neighborhoods. ■ Support transit, pedestrian, and nonmotorized travel. The majority of properties fronting Main Street will be designated Urban Neighborhood, allowing for future development to include commercial uses, low- and medium -density housing, or a combination of both in a vertically mixed -use format. South of Warner Avenue, the Industrial/Flex designation will offer new options for small-scale manufacturing, live -work, and retail opportunities. The balance of the focus area will remain designated for Low Density Residential or Institutional to reflect the existing development patterns and land uses. New buildings and spaces will be sensitive to the surrounding low -density neighborhoods while still emphasizing the creation of active and attractive urban spaces. 2. Grand Avenue / 17th Street Focus Area The Grand Avenue / 17th Street focus area will foster the development of an urban mixed -use corridor connecting into the city's downtown and transit core. The intent is to create opportunities Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 167 4� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -11- c o er 021 for a new mix of land uses and design to transition Grand Avenue from a series of auto -oriented shopping plazas to a series of dynamic urban spaces. The objectives of this focus area are: ■ Create mixed -use corridors and urban villages. ■ Promote infill development while respecting established neighborhoods. ■ Foster community spaces and neighborhood -serving amenities. ■ Develop opportunities for live -work, artist spaces, and small-scale manufacturing. ■ Maintain compatible nodes of commercial activity. The majority of land in this focus area is planned for Urban Neighborhood or District Center land use designations, which will allow a blend of residential and commercial uses to develop simultaneously, as market conditions allow. An intense mixed -use area is envisioned adjacent to the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center, along the east side of Grand Avenue south of 1-5. This part of the focus area will support larger, more visually dynamic buildings and urban spaces that complement and benefit from the adjacent regional transit center. North of 1-5, the buildings and spaces will be sensitive to the surrounding low -density neighborhoods but will still emphasize the creation of active and attractive urban spaces. A mix of residential, retail, and office will be interspersed along the frontage of Grand Avenue, with a concentrated node of commercial and mixed -use residential uses at Grand Avenue and 17th Street. A small portion of the focus area is designated for Industrial/Flex and General Commercial to support small-scale manufacturing, live -work, and retail opportunities will be located along 17th Street near the Regional Transportation Center. 3. West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area The West Santa Ana Boulevard focus area connects the Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Specific Plan area and Downtown Santa Ana, and the OC Streetcar Project improvements will create the physical transit link in 2022. The intent is to transition a group of auto -oriented neighborhoods, businesses, and institutions into a series of transit -oriented neighborhoods that support and benefit from future streetcar stops. The objectives of this focus area are: ■ Develop housing and mixed -use opportunities near streetcar stations. ■ Promote infill development while respecting established neighborhoods. ■ Buffer industrial land uses and residential neighborhoods. ■ Create opportunities for clean industrial/maker-type spaces. 4. 55 Freeway / Dyer Road Focus Area The 55 Freeway / Dyer Road focus area will transition from almost exclusively professional office to a range of commercial, industrial/flex, and mixed -use development. The intent is to create opportunities for a truly urban lifestyle with easy access to Downtown Santa Ana, multiple transit options, and the new investments and amenities in adjacent communities. The objectives of this focus area are: ■ Provide housing opportunities at an urban level of intensity at the city's edge. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 168 4� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -12- c o er 021 ■ Enhance opportunities for corporate offices. ■ Attract economic activity into the city from surrounding communities. ■ Protect industrial and office employment base. ■ Maintain hotel and commercial uses. The overall scale and experience of the focus area along the freeway and city boundary will reflect an urban intensity and design, with inspiring building forms and public spaces. At the southeastern edge, the District Center land use designation will facilitate large residential mixed -use developments in structures that incorporate high -density housing, hotels, and complementary expansions of commercial uses. Adjacent to the 55 freeway, the Industrial/Flex land use designation will promote large-scale office -industrial flex spaces, multilevel corporate offices, and research and development uses. The node surrounding the freeway interchange will remain as currently planned for General Commercial uses, with new improvements introducing development and spaces that complement the existing examples and elements. South Bristol Street Focus Area The South Bristol Street focus area represents Santa Ana's southern gateway and is a part of the South Coast Metro area. Between Sunflower and Alton Avenues, the District Center land use designation will create opportunities to transform auto -oriented shopping plazas to walkable, bike - friendly, and transit -friendly urban villages that incorporate a mix of high intensity office and residential living with experiential commercial uses. The objectives of this focus area are: ■ Capitalize on the success of the South Coast Metro area. ■ Introduce mixed -use urban villages and encourage experiential commercial uses that are more walkable, bike friendly, and transit oriented. ■ Provide for mixed -use opportunities while protecting adjacent, established, low -density neighborhoods. Between MacArthur Boulevard and Alton Avenue, the form and intensity will scale down but remain distinctly urban in nature. The redevelopment of the auto -oriented commercial plazas will result in the construction of landmark buildings and structures set in and around spaces accessible to future occupants and the general public. The corridor north of Alton Avenue is planned with the Urban Neighborhood land use designation, allowing for commercial and residential projects, frequently in a mixed -use format, to develop in accordance with market fluctuations. The buildings and spaces in this part of the focus area will be sensitive to the surrounding low -density neighborhoods but will still emphasize the creation of active and attractive urban spaces. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 169 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -13- 6c ober021 Soecific Plan/Saecial Zonin There are seven planning areas that represent specific plans and other special zoning areas that were previously adopted: Adaptive Reuse Project Incentive Area (2014), Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan (1991/2018), Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Specific Plan (2014), MainPlace Specific Plan (2019), Metro East Mixed -Use Overlay Zone (2007/2018), Midtown Specific Plan (1996), and Transit Zoning Code Specific Development (2010). The most recent adoption/amendment date for each document is noted in parentheses. Adaptive Reuse Project Incentive Area The Adaptive Reuse Ordinance, Section 41-1651 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, provides alternative building and fire standards for the conversion of eligible buildings, or portions thereof, from nonresidential uses to dwelling units, guest rooms or joint living, and work quarters. Eligible structures are buildings within the Adaptive Reuse project incentive area that were constructed in accordance with building and zoning codes in effect prior to July 1, 1974, or which have been determined to be a Historically Significant. The Project Incentive Area includes properties in the Midtown Specific Plan area; the Transit Zoning Code area; the Metro East Mixed -Use Overlay Zone; the North Main Street Corridor on both sides of Main Street, from 17th Street to the northernmost MainPlace Drive; and the East 1 st Street Corridor on both sides of 1 st Street from Grand Avenue to Elk Lane. Residential uses are allowed in the Project Incentive Area irrespective of the underlying zoning as part of an approved Adaptive Reuse Project. Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Specific Plan The Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Specific Plan covers the 2.5-mile segment of Harbor Boulevard on the west side of Santa Ana. The approximately 305-acre planning area includes parcels adjacent to Harbor Boulevard between Westminster Avenue and Lilac Avenue as well as parcels along Westminster Avenue, 1st Street, and 5th Street. The Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Specific Plan creates the zoning necessary to take advantage of the regional and local transit investments made along and around Harbor Boulevard. The plan expands development options to include residential alongside or integrated into a mix of nonresidential uses. MainPlace Specific Plan The purpose of the MainPlace Specific Plan is to transform MainPlace mall into a family -oriented retail, entertainment, and dining destination. The plan creates a mixed -use urban village with a revitalized mall at its central core. The Specific Plan area is on the north edge of Santa Ana, between Main Street on the east and SR-22 and 1-5 to the north and west. The property is identified in the current General Plan land use element as District Center. The District Center designation includes the major activity areas of the city, designed to serve as anchors to the city's commercial corridors and to accommodate major development activity. No General Plan amendment is required for the specific plan, and the MainPlace Specific Plan is the zoning for the property and defines the allowable uses within its boundaries. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 170 4� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -14- c o er 021 Metro East Mixed -Use Overlay Zone The Metro East Mixed Use (MEMU) Overlay Zone consists of an original MEMU Overlay Zone and an expansion component. The original MEMU Overlay Zone is largely developed with commercial and office uses and comprises approximately 200 acres immediately east of the 1-5 and immediately west of SR-55. It is bounded by 1-5 on the west and south, Tustin Avenue on the east, and East Sixth Street on the north. The MEMU expansion area added 33.52 acres or approximately 48 parcels to the original MEMU Overlay Zone area. The additional project area extends west primarily along First Street and is generally bounded by the 1-5 to the east, Grand Avenue to the west, East Chestnut Avenue to the south, and Fourth Street to the north. The overall objectives of the MEMU Overlay Zone are to encourage a more active commercial and residential community, provide an expanded economic base, maximize property sales tax revenues, improve the jobs/housing balance within the city, and provide for a range of housing options identified in the 2014 housing element. Midtown Specific Plan The Midtown Specific Plan area is generally bounded by 17th Street to the north, Civic Center Drive to the south, North Ross Street to the west, and North Spurgeon Street to the east. The Midtown area is readily accessible from the Santa Ana Freeway (1-5). Midtown is envisioned as an integrated district of civic, business, cultural, and retail activity with a small residential component. Transit Zoning Code Specific Development The City adopted a Transit Zoning Code to provide zoning for the integration of new infill development into existing neighborhoods; to allow for the reuse of existing structures; to provide for a range of housing options, including affordable housing; and to provide a transit -supportive, pedestrian -oriented development framework to support the addition of new transit infrastructure. The code encompasses an area in the central urban core of Santa Ana that comprises over 100 blocks and 450 acres. The area is west of 1-5 and bounded by First Street on the south, Flower Street on the west, Grand Avenue on the east, and Civic Center Drive on the north. General Plan Buildout Scenario In general, many areas currently designated for General Commercial and Professional Office will expand opportunities for residential development by a proposed change in General Plan land use designation to Urban Neighborhood or District Center. Industrial Flex will be introduced in each of the five focus areas and replace Industrial land use designations that currently exist to allow for cleaner industrial and commercial uses with live -work opportunities. Furthermore, state law allows a graduated density bonus for the inclusion of affordable housing units For an increasing amount of affordable units (by percentage), a project is allowed an increasing ability to exceed the permitted density (up to a cap of 35 percent). Recent updates to state housing law (Assembly Bill 1763, effective January 1, 2020), enables projects that are 100 Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 171 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -15- 6c ober021 percent affordable (either 100 percent lower income or 80 percent lower and 20 percent limited moderate), to obtain a density bonus of 80 percent, or no limit if within one-half mile of a major transit stop. However, not every proposed project pursuant to the GPU would include affordable units, and not every project that includes affordable units would need a density bonus. Proposed projects pursuant to the GPU are not required to build at densities that exceed maximum limits; the law only requires that jurisdictions grant the density bonus if requested. The buildout methodology for the GPU was based on past development trends, current development trends, and a forecast market analysis. These trends accounted for any units approved (density bonus or otherwise), to determine the appropriate density and amount of development to assume. Additionally, the optimal density of affordable units is at or below the density levels assumed for forecasting buildout. Generally, projects beyond 50 to 70 units per acre require Type 1 construction (steel and concrete structure), which is much more expensive than Type V construction (wood structure). Accordingly, affordable projects are rarely greater than 70 units per acre except for very small parcels. The average densities used to calculate projected buildout at 2045 are 50 to 90 units per acre in the three most intense focus areas; 55 Freeway/Dyer Road, Grand Avenue/17th Street, and South Bristol Street focus areas. For the remaining two focus areas, a residential assumption at 30 units per acre was used over a broad area to account for development at or above the maximum density of 30 units per acre. The maximum is 20 units per acre for projects proposed exclusively residential in the South Main Focus Area. The maximum is 30 units per acre for a relatively small part of the West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area. The City's buildout projections are therefore considered to include and account for the application of density bonus provisions of state law to future projects. Furthermore, the potential for development in specific plan and special zoning areas is based on the forecast buildout at the time of the respective zoning document's adoption, minus the amount of new development built between the adoption date and 2019. Growth outside of the focus areas and special planning areas is expected to be incremental and limited. Some growth was projected for the professional office surrounding the Orange County Global Medical Center and along Broadway north of the Midtown Specific Plan. Some growth was also projected for the commercial and retail area south of the West Santa Ana Boulevard focus area. Finally, some additional residential development is expected on a small portion (5 percent) of single-family and multifamily lots through the construction of second units. For the focus areas, the forecast buildout is based on development at approximately 80 percent of the maximum allowed development for each respective land use designation. C. DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS AND APPROVALS Project development requires the following discretionary actions and approvals from the City: ■ Adoption of the Santa Ana General Plan update ■ Certification of PEIR Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 172 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -16- 6c ober021 ■ Adoption of Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations ■ Adoption of the Mitigation Monitoring Program ■ Adoption of any ordinances, guidelines, programs, actions, or other mechanisms that implement the Santa Ana General Plan update D. STATEMENT OF PROJECT OBJECTIVES The updated General Plan is based on a vision statement and core values established as part of an extensive, multiyear community outreach effort. The City has identified the following core values to guide the General Plan Update (GPU): ■ Health. The people of Santa Ana value a physical environment that encourages healthy lifestyles, a planning process that ensures that health impacts are considered, and a community that actively pursues policies and practices that improve the health of our residents. ■ Equity. Residents value taking all necessary steps to ensure equitable outcomes, expanding access to the tools and resources that residents need, and balancing competing interests in an open and democratic manner. ■ Sustainability. Santa Ana values land use decisions that benefit future generations, plans for the impacts of climate change, and incorporates sustainable design practices at all levels of the planning process. ■ Culture. The Santa Ana's community values efforts that celebrate our differences as a source of strength, preserve and build upon existing cultural resources, and nurture a citywide culture of empowered residents. ■ Education. Santa Ana values the creation of lifelong learners, the importance of opening up educational opportunities to all residents, and investing in educational programs that advance residents' economic well-being. These core values were used as the basis to define more specific project objectives to aid decision makers in their review of the GPU and associated environmental impacts. The objectives include: 1. Promote infill development while respecting and protecting established neighborhoods. 2. Optimize high density residential and mixed -use development that maximizes potential use of mass transit. 3. Provide locations for new housing development that maximizes affordable housing opportunities to achieve both City and regional housing goals. 4. Facilitate new development at intensities sufficient to generate community benefits and attract economic activity. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 173 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -17- 6c ober021 5. Provide housing and employment opportunities at an urban level of intensity at the City's edge. g. Introduce mixed -use urban villages and encourage experiential commercial uses that are more walkable, bike -friendly, and transit -oriented. 7. Develop opportunities for live/work, artist spaces, and small-scale manufacturing. Santa Ana General Plan Update Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 174 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -18- 6c ober021 III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS In conformance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Santa Ana CEQA Guidelines, the City conducted an extensive environmental review of the proposed project. ■ The City of Santa Ana concluded that a PEIR should be prepared, and the Notice of Preparation (NOP) was released for a 30-day public review period from February 26, 2020, through March 27, 2020. The NOP was posted at the Orange County Clerk's Office on February 26, 2020. The notice was published in the Orange County Register, a newspaper of general circulation. Under CEQA, a lead agency may proceed directly with preparation of a PEIR without preparation of an Initial Study if it is clear that a PEIR will be required (State CEQA Guidelines § 15060[d]). The City of Santa Ana made such a determination for this project and did not prepare an Initial Study. ■ Completion of a scoping process, in which the public was invited by the City of Santa Ana to participate. The scoping meeting for the PEIR was held on March 5, 2020, at 6:00 p.m. at the Santa Ana Police Community Room at 60 Civic Center Plaza in Santa Ana. The notice of a public scoping meeting was included in the NOP distributed on February 26, 2020. ■ Preparation of a Draft PEIR by the City of Santa Ana, which was made available for a 45- day public review period (August 3, 2020, through September 16, 2020) and extended to October 6, 2020. The Notice of Availability (NOA) for the Draft PEIR was sent to all persons, agencies, and organizations on the list interested persons, sent to the State Clearinghouse in Sacramento for distribution to public agencies, and published in the August 3, 2020, Orange County Register. The NOAwas posted at the Orange County Clerk's Office on August 3, 2020. Copies of the Draft PEIR were made available for public review at the City of Santa Ana, Planning Division Counter at 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-20, Santa Ana, CA 92701, and the City of Santa Ana Public Library at 26 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. The Draft EIR was also available for review and download on City website: https://www.santa- ana.org/general-plan. ■ The Final PEIR contained comments on the Draft PEIR, responses to those comments, revisions to the Draft PEIR, if any, and appended documents. The Final PEIR was released for a 10-day agency review period prior to certification of the Final PEIR. ■ At its November 91 2020, public hearing, the Planning Commission voted not to certify the Final PEIR and continue work on the GPU to a future date to allow additional time for outreach to Santa Ana's environmental justice (EJ) communities. ■ The City performed an intensive, extended community outreach program conducted between January and May 2021 as described in Section 2.4 of the Updated Draft PEIR (Volume II of the Recirculated Final PEIR). ■ Pursuant to Draft PEIR comments, the Planning Commission public hearing, and an expanded EJ community outreach program, the City made the decision to prepare a Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 175 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -19- 6c ober021 Recirculated Draft PEIR to discuss and evaluate impacts related to environmental justice, to conclude that the recreation -related impacts of the proposed GPU would result in a significant impact, and to define a new project alternative to reduce recreational impacts. ■ The City recirculate the Draft PEIR chapters that had been revised and the NOAwas released for a 45-day public review period from August 6, 2021 through September 20, 2021. The NOA directed reviewers to only submit comments on the revised Draft PEIR chapters included in the Recirculated Draft PEIR since the comments in the Final PEIR adequately addressed comments received on portions of the Draft PEIR that had not been recirculated. ■ One September 13th, the City conducted a Planning Commission Study Session to discuss the Recirculated Draft PEIR. Verbal comments from the public, received during the Study Session were addressed in the Final Recirculated PEIR. ■ After considering the PEIR and in conjunction with making these findings, the City of Santa Ana hereby finds that, pursuant to Section 15092 of the CEQA Guidelines, approval of the project will result in significant effects on the environment; however, the significant effects will be eliminated or substantially lessened where feasible, and the City has determined that remaining significant effects are acceptable under Section 15093. ■ The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is hereby adopted to ensure implementation of feasible mitigation measures identified in the PEIR. The City of Santa Ana finds that these mitigation measures are fully enforceable conditions on the project and shall be binding upon the City and affected parties. ■ The City of Santa Ana finds that the project is in the public interest and is necessary for the public health, safety, and welfare. ■ The City of Santa Ana hereby certifies the Final Recirculated PEIR in accordance with the requirements of CEQA. ■ Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15095, staff is directed as follows: a) copy of the Final Recirculated PEIR and CEQA Findings of Fact shall be retained in the project files; b) copy of the Final Recirculated PEIR and CEQA Findings of Fact shall be provided to all CEQA "responsible" agencies. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of i i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 176 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -20- 6c ober021 IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES THAT WERE DETERMINED NOT TO BE POTENTIALLY AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT A. IMPACTS DETERMINED TO BE LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT DURING THE SCOPING PROCESS Based on the public scoping process (including review of NOP responses and input at the public scoping meeting), in addition to analysis prepared for the Draft PEIR, the City determined, based upon the threshold criteria for significance, that the project would have no impact or a less than significant impact on the following potential environmental issues (see Updated Draft PEIR, Chapter 8, Impacts Found Not to Be Significant). It was determined, therefore, that these potential environmental issues would be precluded from detailed discussion in the Draft PEIR. Based upon the environmental analysis presented in the Draft PEIR, and the comments received by the public on the Draft PEIR, no substantial evidence was submitted to or identified by the City which indicated that the project would have an impact on the following environmental areas: (a) Agriculture and Forestry Resources: The City does not have any significant agricultural resources. Additionally, Santa Ana has no land designated or zoned for agricultural use and does not have any land subject to a Williamson Act contract. Santa Ana does not have any land designated or zoned for forestland, timberland, or zoned Timberland Production. (b) Wildfire: According to CAL FIRE, the nearest fire hazard severity zone (FHSZ) in an SRA to the City of Santa Ana is a high FHSZ about 4.0 miles east along the western edge of Loma Ridge. The nearest FHSZ in an LRA is about 3.8 miles away at the southern tip of the Peters Canyon Regional Park. The city is not in or near SRAs or lands classified as very high FHSZs. Additionally, no area in the city is on the wildland-urban interface. All other topical areas of evaluation included in the Environmental Checklist were determined to require further assessment in the Draft PEIR. B. IMPACTS DETERMINED TO BE LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IN THE PEIR This section identifies impacts of the proposed project determined to be less than significant without implementation of project -specific mitigation measures. This determination, however, does assume compliance with existing regulations, as detailed in each respective topical section of Chapter 5 in the Updated Draft PEIR. (a) Aesthetics: Buildout under the GPU will be at a greater intensity/density in all five focus areas compared to existing conditions. While maximum height would generally be similar to existing buildings, the overall increase in allowed intensity and height across the focus areas would lead to a visually denser urban setting and alter Santa Ana's existing skyline. Buildout under the GPU would not have a substantial adverse effect on scenic vistas (such as the Santa Ana River and Santiago Creek) since these existing open space parcels would remain unchanged. Additionally, no state scenic highways, eligible or officially designated, traverse the city nor are located near the city. Therefore, the GPU would not damage scenic resources, including rock outcroppings, trees, and historic buildings within state scenic Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 177 4� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -21- c o er 021 highways. The GPU would also create new sources of light or glare in the project area, but adverse impacts would be minimized with compliance to building codes. (b) Biological Resources: Development pursuant to the GPU would not impact riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities. Additionally, the GPU would not impact wetlands and jurisdictional waterways. The GPU would not conflict with an adopted NCCP/HCP as the City is not within a NCCP/HCP area and would not conflict with local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources. (c) Cultural Resources: The likelihood that human remains may be discovered during clearing and grading activities is considered extremely low. In the unlikely event human remains are uncovered, impacts would be less than significant upon compliance with California and Safety Code Section 7050.5. (d) Energy: Implementation of proposed policies under the GPU, in conjunction with and complementary to regulatory requirements, will ensure that energy demand associated with growth under the GPU would not be inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary. Additionally, the GPU would not conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. (e) Geology and Soils: The plan area's location and underlying geology make it likely to experience seismic hazards, including strong seismic ground shaking, and secondary hazards, like liquefaction. No active surface faults are mapped and zoned under the AP Zoning Act in the plan area. Additionally, all structures that would be constructed in accordance with the GPU would be designed to meet or exceed current design standards as found in the latest CBC. Most of the plan area is within an area susceptible to liquefaction; however, all structures constructed under the GPU would be designed in accordance with current seismic design standards as found in the CBC. There are no substantial hazards with respect to slope stability, as the plan area is mostly flat. Unstable geologic unit or soils conditions, including soil erosion, could result from development of the GPU. Mandatory compliance with existing regulations, including the preparation and submittal of a SWPPP and a soil engineering evaluation, would reduce soil erosion impacts to a less than significant level. Implementation of the CBC design code, which has been adopted by the City and requires that structures be designed to mitigate expansive and compressible soils, would reduce impacts to a less than significant level. The probability of subsidence impacts is generally low in the majority of Santa Ana; however, the statutorily required sustainable groundwater management practices of the Orange County Water District would ensure that impacts would be less than significant. Future development in the plan area would require connection to the City's sewer system as the City of Santa Ana does not allow for the installation of septic tanks. (f) Greenhouse Gas Emissions: The GPU would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 178 4� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -22- c o er 021 (g) Hazards and Hazardous Materials: Construction and operations under the GPU would involve the transport, use, and/or disposal of hazardous materials; however, compliance with existing regulations would ensure that construction workers and the general public are not exposed to any risks related to hazardous materials during demolition and construction. Furthermore, strict adherence to all emergency response plan requirements set by the Orange County Fire Authority would be required throughout the duration of project construction. GPU buildout is expected to result in some increase in the number of hazardous waste generators; however, hazardous wastes would be stored, transported, and disposed of in conformance with existing regulations of the EPA, US Department of Transportation, CalRecycle, and other agencies. Use, storage, transport, and disposal of hazardous materials in conformance with regulations would reduce both the likelihood of an accidental release and the potential consequences in the event of an accidental release. The plan area includes 555 sites on a list of hazardous materials compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 that could create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. Any development, redevelopment, or reuse on or next to any of these sites would require environmental site assessment by a qualified environmental professional to ensure that the project would not disturb hazardous materials on any of the hazardous materials sites or plumes of hazardous materials diffusing from one of the hazardous materials sites, and that any proposed development, redevelopment, or reuse would not create a substantial hazard to the public or the environment. Santa Ana is in the vicinity of an airport or within the jurisdiction of an airport land use plan. Projects approved under the proposed GPU would be required to comply with FAA airspace protection regulations using the AELUP consistency determination process. The buildout of the GPU would not result in substantial changes to the circulation patterns or emergency access routes, and would not block or otherwise interfere with use of evacuation routes. Buildout would not interfere with operation of the City's Emergency Operations Center and would not interfere with operations of emergency response agencies or with coordination and cooperation between such agencies. Santa Ana is not in a designated fire hazard zone, and implementation of the GPU will not expose structures and/or residences to wildland fire danger. (h) Hydrology and Water Quality: Projects pursuant to the GPU would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality. Development pursuant to the GPU would increase the demand on groundwater use but would not impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin. Development pursuant to the GPU would increase the amount of pervious surfaces in the plan area, but could substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in some focus areas in a manner which would result in flooding off -site or contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems. In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, development pursuant to the GPU would not risk release of pollutants due to project inundation or impede or redirect flood flows. Development Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 179 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -23- 6c ober021 pursuant to the GPU would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan. (i) Land Use Planning: Implementation of the GPU would not divide an established community. Additionally, the GPU would be consistent with the Airport Environs Land Use Plan for the John Wayne Airport. Implementation of the GPU would be consistent with the goals of the Southern California Association of Governments' RTP/SCS. Implementation of the GPU would also be consistent with the OCTA Congestion Management Plan. (j) Mineral Resources: Project implementation would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource. (k) Noise: The proximity of the plan area to an airport or airstrip would not result in exposure of future residents and/or workers to excessive airport -related noise. (1) Population and Housing: The proposed GPU would provide more housing opportunities than currently exist. Therefore, implementation of the GPU would not displace people and/or housing. (m) Public Services: The GPU would introduce new structures and allow for up to 22,361 new residents and workers in the OCFA and Santa Ana Police Department service boundaries, thereby increasing the requirement for fire protection facilities and personnel, as well as increasing the service needs for the Main Library and the Newhope Library Learning Center. The GPU would also generate additional students who would impact the school enrollment capacities of the Santa Ana Unified School District, Garden Grove Unified School District, and Orange Unified School District. However, upon implementation of regulatory requirements and standard conditions of approval the project would not create significant impacts related to fire protection services, police protection, library services, or school services. (n) Transportation and Traffic: The GPU is consistent with adopted programs, plans, and policies addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities. Additionally, GPU implementation would result in a reduction of vehicle miles traveled per service population (VMT/SP) in comparison to existing City conditions, and would achieve a VMT/SP at least 15 percent lower than the countywide VMT/SP. Finally, circulation improvements associated with future development that would be accommodated by the GPU would be designed to adequately address potentially hazardous conditions (sharp curves, etc.), potential conflicting uses, and emergency access. (o) Utilities and Service Systems: Development pursuant to the GPU would require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded wastewater facilities. However, Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) has a functioning and effective process in place to ensure the regional sewer infrastructure will support future developments under the Santa Ana GPU. Additionally, OCSD and OC Water District have adequate capacity to serve development pursuant to the GPU in addition to the providers existing commitments. Development Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 180 4� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -24- c o er 021 pursuant to the GPU would require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water facilities. However, the City would have adequate capacity for the proposed increases in water flows across the city under implementation of the GPU and would be able to serve the additional dwelling units and commercial square footage proposed. Furthermore, GPU policies encourage the maintenance and upgrade of water infrastructure through impact fees from new development, and the exploration of other funding sources. Water supply would be adequate to meet development pursuant to the GPU. Existing and/or proposed stormwater drainage facilities would be able to accommodate proposed development pursuant to the GPU. Existing and/or proposed solid waste facilities would be able to accommodate development pursuant to the GPU and comply with related solid waste regulations. Development pursuant to the GPU would require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded electric power and natural gas. However, the net increases in natural gas demands due to the GPU buildout are within the amounts that SoCalGas forecasts that it will supply to its customers, and buildout would not require SoCalGas to obtain increased natural gas supplies over its currently forecast supplies. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of i i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 181 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -25- 6c ober021 V. FINDINGS REGARDING POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS The following potentially significant environmental impacts were analyzed in the PEIR, and the effects of the project were considered. Because of environmental analysis of the project and the identification of relevant General Plan policies; compliance with existing laws, codes, and statutes; and the identification of feasible mitigation measures, some potentially significant impacts have been determined by the City to be reduced to a level of less than significant, and the City has found —in accordance with CEQA Section 21081(a)(1) and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a) (1)—that "Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment." This is referred to herein as "Finding 1." Where the City has determined —pursuant to CEQA Section 21081(a)(2) and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(2)—that "Those changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and have been, or can and should be, adopted by that other agency," the City's finding is referred to herein as "Finding 2." Where, as a result of the environmental analysis of the project, the City has determined that either (1) even with the identification of project design features, compliance with existing laws, codes and statutes, and/or the identification of feasible mitigation measures, potentially significant impacts cannot be reduced to a level of less than significant, or (2) no feasible mitigation measures or alternatives are available to mitigate the potentially significant impact, the City has found in accordance with CEQA Section 21081(a)(3) and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(3) that "Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in the environmental impact report." This is referred to herein as "Finding 3." A. IMPACTS MITIGATED TO LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT The following summary describes impacts of the proposed project that, without mitigation, would result in significant adverse impacts. Upon implementation of the mitigation measures provided in the PEIR, the impacts would be considered less than significant. 1. Air Quality Impact 5.2-6: Industrial land uses accommodated under the General Plan update could create other emissions, such as those leading to objectionable odors, that would adversely affect a substantial number of people. Industrial land uses associated with the GPU may generate potentially significant odor impacts for a substantial number of people. Impacts from potential odors generated from residential and other nonresidential land uses associated with the GPU are considered less than significant. Impacts associated with construction -generated odors are considered less than significant. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 182 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -26- 6c ober021 The Industrial and Industrial Flex land uses are not anticipated to produce odors, and Mitigation Measure AQ-4 would ensure that odor impacts are minimized and facilities would comply with South Coast AQMD Rule 402. Therefore, Impact 5.2-6 would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures AQ-4 Prior to discretionary approval by the City of Santa Ana, if it is determined that a development project has the potential to emit nuisance odors beyond the property line, an odor management plan shall be prepared by the project applicant and submitted to the City of Santa Ana for review and approval. Facilities that have the potential to generate nuisance odors include, but are not limited to: • Wastewater treatment plants • Composting, green waste, or recycling facilities • Fiberglass manufacturing facilities • Painting/coating operations • Large -capacity coffee roasters • Food -processing facilities The odor management plan shall demonstrate compliance with the South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 402 for nuisance odors. The Odor Management Plan shall identify the best available control technologies for toxics (T-BACTs) that will be utilized to reduce potential odors to acceptable levels, including appropriate enforcement mechanisms. T-BACTs may include but are not limited to scrubbers (i.e., air pollution control devices) at the industrial facility. T-BACTs identified in the odor management plan shall be identified as mitigation measures in the environmental document prepared for the development project and/or incorporated into the project's site plan. Finding Finding 1. The City hereby makes Finding 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. 2. Biological Resources Impact 5.3-1: Implementation of the General Plan Update could result in adverse impacts to candidate, sensitive, or special -status species. The inventory of existing conditions determined that no parcels with a proposed land use designation that allows for development (i.e., not an open space designation) currently has Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 183 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -27- 6c ober021 sensitive vegetation. All parcels currently have ruderal vegetation and little to no biological value. Therefore, there is no current indication that future development in accordance with the GPU would have significant unavoidable biological impacts. However, the programmatic analysis prepared for this GPU was not at the detailed, site -specific analysis required for a specific development project. Site -specific analyses could reveal biological resources not identified in the Biological and Natural Resources Report. Therefore, there is a potential for biological impacts associated with implementation of the GPU. Therefore, implementation of the GPU could result in a potentially significant impact. The letter received from CDFW states that the Santa Ana River and its tributaries historically supported federally endangered southern California steelhead. CDFW's letter requests that the Draft PEIR include an analysis of any proposed major stream crossings in the context of fish passage, and states that the analysis should include, but not be limited to, steelhead presence or historic presence, existing conditions including habitat and barrier assessments, any known projects to remove barriers or restore habitat that would affect or be affected by this project, and cumulative impacts to steelhead populations and/or habitat resulting from this project. The GPU does not propose any major stream crossings. If any future development project entails improvements for stream crossings (e.g. Santa Ana River and Santiago Creek), project -level CEQA compliance would require a biological resources report that would address potential impacts to endangered species, including the California steelhead. Impact 5.3-1 would be less than significant with compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local regulations and incorporation of mitigation measure BIO-1. Mitigation Measures BIO-1 For development or redevelopment projects that would disturb vegetated land or major stream and are subject to CEQA, a qualified biologist shall conduct an initial screening to determine whether a site -specific biological resource report is warranted. If needed, a qualified biologist shall conduct a field survey for the site and prepare a biological resource assessment for the project, including an assessment of potential impacts to sensitive species, habitats, and jurisdictional waters. The report shall recommend mitigation measures, as appropriate, to avoid or limit potential biological resource impacts to less than significant. Finding Finding 1. The City hereby makes Finding 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measures above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 184 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -28- 6c ober021 Impact 5.3-4: Implementation of the General Plan Update could result in adverse impacts to candidate, sensitive, or special -status species. The City of Santa Ana is largely urbanized, and migration corridors are generally limited to the Santa Ana River and the Santiago Creek. Development under the GPU would result in the further infill of the city and removal of vacant sites. The GPU would not change land use designations of parcels that encompass the Santa Ana River or the Santiago Creek. However, development under the GPU could further result in vegetation removal, intrusion by humans and pets, and increased noise and air pollutants, which could impact wildlife movement and nesting sites. Therefore, the buildout of the GPU could affect wildlife movement, nesting sites, and migratory birds protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act as well as state law. Impact 5.3-4 would be less than significant with compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local regulations and incorporation of mitigation measure BIO-1. Mitigation Measures Refer to BIO-1 above. Finding Finding 1. The City hereby makes Finding 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. 3. Cultural Resources Impact 5.4-2: Development in accordance with the General Plan Update could impact archaeological resources. Development involving ground disturbance within the plan area has the potential to impact known and unknown archaeological resources. Typically, surface -level and subsurface archaeological sites and deposits can be affected by ground -disturbing activities associated with most types of construction. Based on literature review and records searches, eight archaeological resources have been recorded within the plan area, including four prehistoric sites, one multicomponent site, and three historic isolates. The plan area includes many locations that would have been favorable for prehistoric Native American occupation. While most of the plan area has been developed over the course of the twentieth century, buried resources may remain in areas where developments such as parking lots, parks, or structures with shallow foundations have required only minimal ground disturbance. A review of historical and ethnographic maps indicates a moderate likelihood that intact subsurface archaeological resources would be encountered during redevelopment. Archaeological resources impacts are site specific, but more intensive development can result in cumulative impacts on a regional level and should be considered in addition to individual project Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 185 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -29- 6c ober021 impacts on individual sites. As determined by the respective lead agency on a project by project basis, Phase I Cultural Resources studies would be required before ground disturbances and demolition activities are permitted to occur. The study would identify resources on the affected project sites that are, or appear to be, eligible for listing on the National or California Register. Such studies would also recommend mitigation measures to protect and preserve archaeological and tribal cultural resources. Mitigation Measures CUL-4 through CUL-7 were developed to reduce potential individual and cumulative impacts associated with future development and redevelopment. Mitigation Measure CUL-4 requires an archaeological resources assessment be conducted for future development projects to identify any known archaeological resources and sensitivity of the site. Mitigation Measures CUL-5 through CUL-7 detail the next steps required should the archaeological resources assessment identify known resources or determine the site to have high or moderate resource sensitivity. Upon compliance with Mitigation Measures CUL-4 through CUL-7, individual and cumulative impacts to archaeological resources would be reduced to less than significant levels. Mitigation Measures CUL-4 For projects with ground disturbance—e.g., grading, excavation, trenching, boring, or demolition that extend below the current grade —prior to issuance of any permits required to conduct ground -disturbing activities, the City shall require an Archaeological Resources Assessment be conducted under the supervision of an archaeologist that meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professionally Qualified Standards in either prehistoric or historic archaeology. Assessments shall include a California Historical Resources Information System records search at the South Central Coastal Information Center and of the Sacred Land Files maintained by the Native American Heritage Commission. The records searches will determine if the proposed project area has been previously surveyed for archaeological resources, identify and characterize the results of previous cultural resource surveys, and disclose any cultural resources that have been recorded and/or evaluated. If unpaved surfaces are present within the project area, and the entire project area has not been previously surveyed within the past 10 years, a Phase I pedestrian survey shall be undertaken in proposed project areas to locate any surface cultural materials that may be present. CUL-5 If potentially significant archaeological resources are identified, and impacts cannot be avoided, a Phase II Testing and Evaluation investigation shall be performed by an archaeologist who meets the Secretary of the Interior's Standards to determine significance prior to any ground -disturbing activities. If resources are determined significant or unique through Phase II testing, and site avoidance is not possible, appropriate site -specific mitigation measures shall be undertaken. These might include a Phase III data recovery program implemented by a qualified archaeologist Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 186 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -30- 6c ober021 and performed in accordance with the Office of Historical Preservation's "Archaeological Resource Management Reports (ARMR): Recommended Contents and Format" (OHP 1990) and "Guidelines for Archaeological Research Designs" (OHP 1991). CUL-6 If the archaeological assessment did not identify archaeological resources but found the area to be highly sensitive for archaeological resources, a qualified archaeologist shall monitor all ground -disturbing construction and pre -construction activities in areas with previously undisturbed soil. The archaeologist shall inform all construction personnel prior to construction activities of the proper procedures in the event of an archaeological discovery. The training shall be held in conjunction with the project's initial on -site safety meeting and shall explain the importance and legal basis for the protection of significant archaeological resources. In the event that archaeological resources (artifacts or features) are exposed during ground -disturbing activities, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall be halted while the resources are evaluated for significance by an archaeologist who meets the Secretary's Standards, and tribal consultation shall be conducted in the case of a tribal resource. If the discovery proves to be significant, the long-term disposition of any collected materials should be determined in consultation with the affiliated tribe(s), where relevant; this could include curation with a recognized scientific or educational repository, transfer to the tribe, or respectful reinternment in an area designated by the tribe. CUL-7 If an Archaeological Resources Assessment does not identify potentially significant archaeological resources but the site has moderate sensitivity for archaeological resources (Mitigation Measure CUL-4), an archaeologist who meets the Secretary's Standards shall be retained on call. The archaeologist shall inform all construction personnel prior to construction activities about the proper procedures in the event of an archaeological discovery. The pre -construction training shall be held in conjunction with the project's initial on -site safety meeting and shall explain the importance and legal basis for the protection of significant archaeological resources. In the event that archaeological resources (artifacts or features) are exposed during ground -disturbing activities, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall be halted while the on -call archaeologist is contacted. The resource shall be evaluated for significance and tribal consultation shall be conducted, in the case of a tribal resource. If the discovery proves to be significant, the long-term disposition of any collected materials should be determined in consultation with the affiliated tribe(s), where relevant. Finding Finding 1. The City hereby makes Finding 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measures Santa Ana General Plan Update Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 187 4� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -31- c o er 021 above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measures is feasible, and the measures are therefore adopted. 4. Geology and Soils Impact 5.6-4: Future development that would be accommodated by the General Plan Update could imaact known and unknown aaleontoloaical resources. Paleontological resources are recognized as nonrenewable and therefore receive protection under the California Public Resources Code and CEQA. Adoption of the GPU in itself will not directly affect paleontological resources. Long-term implementation of the GPU land use plan could allow development (e.g., infill development, redevelopment, and revitalization/restoration), including grading, of known and unknown sensitive areas. Grading and construction activities of undeveloped areas or redevelopment that requires more intensive soil excavation than in the past could potentially disturb paleontological resources. Therefore, future development that would be accommodated by the GPU could potentially unearth previously unrecorded resources. Review and protection of paleontological resources are also afforded by CEQA for individual development projects that would be accommodated by the GPU, subject to discretionary actions that are implemented in accordance with the land use plan of the GPU. Fossil localities have been found in the vicinity of the plan area, although not in the plan area itself. Mitigation Measures GEO-1 through GEO-3 prescribe requirements for monitoring based on the sensitivity of sites for paleontological resources. Under GEO-1, areas that range from high to low sensitivity are required to prepare a Paleontological Resources Monitoring and Mitigation Plan. With adherence to mitigation measures GEO-1 through GEO-3, Impact 5.6-4 would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures GEO-1 High Sensitivity. Projects involving ground disturbances in previously undisturbed areas mapped as having "high" paleontological sensitivity shall be monitored by a qualified paleontological monitor on a full-time basis. Monitoring shall include inspection of exposed sedimentary units during active excavations within sensitive geologic sediments. The monitor shall have authority to temporarily divert activity away from exposed fossils to evaluate the significance of the find and, if the fossils are determined to be significant, professionally and efficiently recover the fossil specimens and collect associated data. The paleontological monitor shall use field data forms to record pertinent location and geologic data, measure stratigraphic sections (if applicable), and collect appropriate sediment samples from any fossil localities. GEO-2 Low -to -High Sensitivity. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for projects involving ground disturbance in previously undisturbed areas mapped with "low -to -high" paleontological sensitivity, the project applicant shall consult with a geologist or paleontologist to confirm whether the grading would occur at depths that could encounter highly sensitive sediments for paleontological resources. If confirmed that Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 188 4� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -32- c o er 021 underlying sediments may have high sensitivity, construction activity shall be monitored by a qualified paleontologist. The paleontologist shall have the authority to halt construction during construction activity as outlined in Mitigation Measure GEO-3. GEO-3 All Projects. In the event of any fossil discovery, regardless of depth or geologic formation, construction work shall halt within a 50-foot radius of the find until its significance can be determined by a qualified paleontologist. Significant fossils shall be recovered, prepared to the point of curation, identified by qualified experts, listed in a database to facilitate analysis, and deposited in a designated paleontological curation facility in accordance with the standards of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (2010). The most likely repository is the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. The repository shall be identified and a curatorial arrangement shall be signed prior to collection of the fossils. Finding Finding 1. The City hereby makes Finding 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PER. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measures above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measures is feasible, and the measures are therefore adopted. 5. Noise Impact 5.12-3: Buildout of the individual land uses and projects for implementation of the GPU may expose sensitive uses to excessive levels of groundborne vibration. Construction Vibration Impacts. Construction activity at projects within the plan area would generate varying degrees of ground vibration, depending on the construction procedures and equipment. Operation of construction equipment generates vibrations that spread through the ground and diminish with distance from the source. The effect on buildings in the vicinity of the construction site varies depending on soil type, ground strata, and receptor -building construction. The results from vibration can range from no perceptible effects at the lowest vibration levels, to low rumbling sounds and perceptible vibrations at moderate levels, to slight structural damage at the highest levels. Vibration from construction activities rarely reaches the levels that can damage structures but can achieve the audible and perceptible ranges in buildings close to the construction site. Vibration generated by construction equipment has the potential to be substantial, since it has the potential to exceed the FTA criteria for architectural damage (e.g., 0.12 inches per second [in/sec] PPV for fragile or historical resources, 0.2 in/sec PPV for non -engineered timber and masonry buildings, and 0.3 in/sec PPV for engineered concrete and masonry). Construction details and equipment for future project -level developments under the GPU are not known at this time but may cause vibration impacts. Santa Ana General Plan Update Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 189 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -33- 6c ober021 With implementation of Mitigation Measures N-2, N-3, and N-4, coupled with adherence to associated performance standards, Impact 5.12-3 would be reduced to less -than -significant levels. Specifically, Mitigation Measure N-2 would reduce potential vibration impacts during construction below the pertinent thresholds, and Mitigation Measures N-3 and N-4 (operations - related vibration) would reduce potential vibration impacts from commercial/industrial uses and proposed uses near existing railroads and facilities to less -than -significant levels. No significant and unavoidable vibration impacts would remain. Operational Vibration Impacts. Commercial and industrial operations within the plan area would generate varying degrees of ground vibration, depending on the operational procedures and equipment. Such equipment -generated vibrations would spread through the ground and diminish with distance from the source. The effect on buildings in the vicinity of the vibration source varies depending on soil type, ground strata, and receptor -building construction. The results from vibration can range from no perceptible effects at the lowest vibration levels, to low rumbling sounds and perceptible vibrations at moderate levels, to slight structural damage at the highest levels. In addition, future sensitive receptors could be placed within close proximity to existing railroad lines through buildout in the plan area. Because specific project -level information is not available at this time, it is not possible to quantify future vibration levels at vibration -sensitive receptors that may be near existing and future vibration sources. With implementation of Mitigation Measures N-2, N-3, and N-4, coupled with adherence to associated performance standards, Impact 5.12-3 would be reduced to less -than -significant levels. Specifically, Mitigation Measure N-2 would reduce potential vibration impacts during construction below the pertinent thresholds, and Mitigation Measures N-3 and N-4 (operations - related vibration) would reduce potential vibration impacts from commercial/industrial uses and proposed uses near existing railroads and facilities to less -than -significant levels. No significant and unavoidable vibration impacts would remain. Mitigation Measures N-2 Prior to issuance of a building permit for a project requiring pile driving during construction within 135 feet of fragile structures, such as historical resources, 100 feet of non -engineered timber and masonry buildings (e.g., most residential buildings), or within 75 feet of engineered concrete and masonry (no plaster); or a vibratory roller within 25 feet of any structure, the project applicant shall prepare a noise and vibration analysis to assess and mitigate potential noise and vibration impacts related to these activities. This noise and vibration analysis shall be conducted by a qualified and experienced acoustical consultant or engineer. The vibration levels shall not exceed Federal Transit Administration (FTA) architectural damage thresholds (e.g., 0.12 inches per second [in/sec] peak particle velocity [PPV] for fragile or historical resources, 0.2 in/sec PPV for non -engineered timber and masonry buildings, and 0.3 in/sec PPV for engineered concrete and masonry). If vibration levels would exceed Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 190 4� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -34- c o er 021 this threshold, alternative uses such as drilling piles as opposed to pile driving and static rollers as opposed to vibratory rollers shall be used. If necessary, construction vibration monitoring shall be conducted to ensure vibration thresholds are not exceeded. N-3 New residential projects (or other noise -sensitive uses) located within 200 feet of existing railroad lines shall be required to conduct a groundborne vibration and noise evaluation consistent with Federal Transit Administration (FTA)-approved methodologies. N-4 During the project -level California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process for industrial developments under the General Plan Update or other projects that could generate substantial vibration levels near sensitive uses, a noise and vibration analysis shall be conducted to assess and mitigate potential noise and vibration impacts related to the operations of that individual development. This noise and vibration analysis shall be conducted by a qualified and experienced acoustical consultant or engineer and shall follow the latest CEQA guidelines, practices, and precedents. Finding Finding 1. The City hereby makes Finding 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measures above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measures is feasible, and the measures are therefore adopted. 6. Tribal Cultural Resources Impact 5.17-1: The proposed project could cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource that is listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k). The Sacred Land File search yielded positive results, indicating that known tribal resources exist within the plan area. Further, a CHRIS records search at SCCIC indicates that 23 archaeological resources were previously recorded within 0.5 mile of the plan area. Of these resources, eight archaeological resources were located within the plan area; these include four prehistoric sites with habitation debris and lithic scatters, one multicomponent site, and three historic isolates. The plan area includes many locations that would have been favorable for prehistoric Native American occupation. While the city is urbanized and most of the plan area has been developed, buried resources may remain in areas of minimal ground disturbance, such as parks, parking lots, and structures with shallow foundations. Tribal cultural resources are site specific in nature. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 191 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -35- 6c ober021 Implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL-4 through CUL-7 would reduce impacts relating to tribal cultural resources to less than significant. Mitigation Measures Refer to Mitigation Measures CUL-4 through CUL-7 in section A.3, above. Finding Finding 1. The City hereby makes Finding 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measures above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measures is feasible, and the measures are therefore adopted. Impact 5.17-2: The proposed project could cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource that is determined by the lead agency to be significant pursuant to criteria in Public Resources Code Section 5024.1(c). Future development as a result of the implementation of the GPU could include grading in portions of the City with sensitivity to tribal cultural resources. Grading and construction activities that require more intensive soil excavation than in the past could potentially cause disturbance to tribal cultural resources. Future development could potentially unearth previously unknown or unrecorded tribal cultural resources. Because the NAHC SLF search yielded positive results and the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation identified sensitive areas within the city, the buildout of the GPU may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of tribal cultural resources. Earthwork activities may occur with buildout under the GPU that could impact previously undisturbed tribal cultural resources. Implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL-4 through CUL-7 would reduce impacts relating to tribal cultural resources to less than significant. Mitigation Measures Refer to Mitigation Measures CUL-4 through CUL-7 in section A.3, above. Finding Finding 1. The City hereby makes Finding 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measures above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measures is feasible, and the measures are therefore adopted. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 192 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -36- 6c ober021 B. SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS The following summary describes the unavoidable adverse impact of the GPU where mitigation measures were found to be either infeasible or would not lessen impacts to less than significant. The following impacts would remain significant and unavoidable. 1. Air Quality Impact 5.2-1: The additional population growth forecast for the General Plan Update and the associated emissions would not be consistent with the assumptions of the air aualitv manaaement clan. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.2, Air Quality, starting on page 5.2-45 of the Updated Draft PEIR. The GPU would be inconsistent with the South Coast Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) because buildout under the GPU would exceed the population estimates assumed for the AQMP and would cumulatively contribute to the nonattainment designations of the South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB). Buildout of the GPU would exceed current population estimates for the city, and therefore the emissions associated with the additional population are not included in the current regional emissions inventory for the SoCAB. Additionally, air pollutant emissions associated with buildout of the GPU would cumulatively contribute to the nonattainment designations in the SoCAB. Therefore, overall, the GPU would be inconsistent with the AQMP. Incorporation of Mitigation Measure AQ-2 into future development projects for the operation phase would contribute to reduced criteria air pollutant emissions associated with buildout of the GPU. Additionally, goals and policies in the GPU would promote increased capacity for alternative transportation modes and implementation of transportation demand management strategies. However, due to the magnitude and scale of the land uses that would be developed, no mitigation measures are available that would reduce operation and construction impacts below South Coast AQMD thresholds. In addition, the population and employment assumptions of the AQMP would continue to be exceeded until the AQMP is revised and incorporates the projections of the GPU. Therefore, Impact 5.2-1 would remain significant and unavoidable. Mitigation Measure AQ-2 Prior to discretionary approval by the City of Santa Ana for development projects subject to CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) review (i.e., non-exempt projects), project applicants shall prepare and submit a technical assessment evaluating potential project operation phase -related air quality impacts to the City of Santa Ana for review and approval. The evaluation shall be prepared in conformance with South Coast Air Quality Management District (South Coast AQMD) methodology in assessing air quality impacts. If operation -related air pollutants are determined to have the potential to exceed the South Coast AQMD's adopted thresholds of significance, the City of Santa Ana shall require that applicants for new development Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 193 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -37- 6c ober021 projects incorporate mitigation measures to reduce air pollutant emissions during operational activities. The identified measures shall be included as part of the conditions of approval. Possible mitigation measures to reduce long-term emissions could include, but are not limited to the following: • For site -specific development that require refrigerated vehicles, the construction documents shall demonstrate an adequate number of electrical service connections at loading docks for plug-in for the anticipated number of refrigerated trailers to reduce idling time and emissions. • Applicants for manufacturing and light industrial uses shall consider energy storage and combined heat and power in appropriate applications to optimize renewable energy generation systems and avoid peak energy use. • Site -specific developments with truck delivery and loading areas and truck parking spaces shall include signage as a reminder to limit idling of vehicles while parked for loading/unloading in accordance with California Air Resources Board Rule 2845 (13 CCR Chapter 10 § 2485). • Provide changing/shower facilities as specified in Section A5.106.4.3 of the CALGreen Code (Nonresidential Voluntary Measures). • Provide bicycle parking facilities per Section A4.106.9 (Residential Voluntary Measures) of the CALGreen Code. • Provide preferential parking spaces for low -emitting, fuel -efficient, and carpool/van vehicles per Section A5.106.5.1 of the CALGreen Code (Nonresidential Voluntary Measures). • Provide facilities to support electric charging stations per Section A5.106.5.3 (Nonresidential Voluntary Measures) and Section A5.106.8.2 (Residential Voluntary Measures) of the CALGreen Code. • Applicant -provided appliances (e.g., dishwashers, refrigerators, clothes washers, and dryers) shall be Energy Star —certified appliances or appliances of equivalent energy efficiency. Installation of Energy Star —certified or equivalent appliances shall be verified by Building & Safety during plan check. • Applicants for future development projects along existing and planned transit routes shall coordinate with the City of Santa Ana and Orange County Transit Authority to ensure that bus pad and shelter improvements are incorporated, as appropriate. Finding Finding 3. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the GPU that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure above. The City of Santa Ana hereby Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 194 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -38- 6c ober021 finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. However, the City finds that there are no other mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. Impact 5.2-2: Construction activities associated with future development that would be accommodated under the General Plan Update could generate short-term emissions in exceedance of the South Coast Air Quality Management District's threshold criteria. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.2, Air Quality, starting on page 5.2-47 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Buildout of the GPU would occur over a period of approximately 25 years or longer. Construction activities associated with buildout of the GPU could generate short-term emissions that exceed the South Coast AQMD'S significance thresholds during this time and cumulatively contribute to the nonattainment designations of the SoCAB. Implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ-1 would reduce criteria air pollutant emissions from construction -related activities to the extent feasible. However, construction time frames and equipment for site -specific development projects are not available at this time, and there is a potential for multiple development projects to be constructed at one time, resulting in significant construction -related emissions. Therefore, despite adherence to Mitigation Measure AQ-1, Impact 5.2-2 would remain significant and unavoidable. Mitigation Measures AQ-1 Prior to discretionary approval by the City of Santa Ana for development projects subject to CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) review (i.e., non-exempt projects), project applicants shall prepare and submit a technical assessment evaluating potential project construction -related air quality impacts to the City of Santa Ana for review and approval. The evaluation shall be prepared in conformance with South Coast Air Quality Management District (South Coast AQMD) methodology for assessing air quality impacts. If construction -related criteria air pollutants are determined to have the potential to exceed the South Coast AQMD's adopted thresholds of significance, the City of Santa Ana shall require that applicants for new development projects incorporate mitigation measures to reduce air pollutant emissions during construction activities. These identified measures shall be Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 195 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -39- 6c ober021 incorporated into all appropriate construction documents (e.g., construction management plans) submitted to the City and shall be verified by the City. Mitigation measures to reduce construction -related emissions could include, but are not limited to: • Require fugitive -dust control measures that exceed South Coast AQMD's Rule 403, such as: ■ Use of nontoxic soil stabilizers to reduce wind erosion. ■ Apply water every four hours to active soil -disturbing activities. • Use construction equipment rated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as having Tier 3 (model year 2006 or newer) or Tier 4 (model year 2008 or newer) emission limits, applicable for engines between 50 and 750 horsepower • Ensure that construction equipment is properly serviced and maintained to the manufacturer's standards. • Limit nonessential idling of construction equipment to no more than five consecutive minutes. • Limit on -site vehicle travel speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour. • Install wheel washers for all exiting trucks or wash off all trucks and equipment leaving the project area. • Use Super -Compliant VOC paints for coating of architectural surfaces whenever possible. A list of Super -Compliant architectural coating manufactures can be found on the South Coast AQMD's website. Finding Finding 3. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the GPU that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. The City finds that there are no other mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 196 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -40- 6c ober021 technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. Impact 5.2-3: Implementation of the General Plan Update would generate long-term emissions in exceedance of South Coast AQMD's threshold criteria. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.2, Air Quality, starting on page 5.2-48 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Buildout in accordance with the GPU would generate long-term emissions that would exceed South Coast AQMD's regional significance thresholds and cumulatively contribute to the nonattainment designations of the SoCAB. Mitigation Measure AQ-2, in addition to the goals and policies of the GPU, would reduce air pollutant emissions to the extent feasible. The measures and policies covering topics such as expansion of the pedestrian and bicycle networks, promotion of public and active transit, and support to increase building energy efficiency and energy conservation would also reduce criteria air pollutants in the city. Further, compared to existing baseline year conditions, emissions of NOx, CO, and SOx are projected to decrease from current levels despite growth associated with the GPU. However, Impact 5.2-3 would remain significant and unavoidable due to the magnitude of the overall land use development associated with the GPU. Contributing to the nonattainment status would also contribute to elevating health effects associated with these criteria air pollutants. Reducing emissions would further contribute to reducing possible health effects related to criteria air pollutants. It is speculative for this broad -based GPU to determine how exceeding the regional thresholds would affect the number of days the region is in nonattainment, since mass emissions are not correlated with concentrations of emissions, or how many additional individuals in the air basin would suffer health effects. South Coast AQMD is the primary agency responsible for ensuring the health and welfare of sensitive individuals to elevated concentrations of air quality in the SoCAB, and at the present time it has not provided methodology to assess the specific correlation between mass emissions generated and the effect on health in order to address the issue raised in the Friant Ranch case. Ozone concentrations are dependent upon a variety of complex factors, including the presence of sunlight and precursor pollutants, natural topography, nearby structures that cause building downwash, atmospheric stability, and wind patterns. Because of the complexities of predicting ground -level ozone concentrations in relation to the National and California Ambient Air Quality Standards, it is not possible to link health risks to the magnitude of emissions exceeding the significance thresholds. To achieve the health -based standards established by the EPA, the air districts prepare air quality management plans that detail regional programs to attain the ambient air quality standards. However, because cumulative development within the city would exceed the regional significance thresholds, the proposed project could contribute to an increase in health effects in the basin until the attainment standards are met in the SoCAB. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 197 4� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -41- c o er 021 Mitigation Measures Refer to Mitigation Measure AQ-2, above. Finding Finding 3. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the GPU that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. The City finds that there are no other mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. Impact 5.2-4: Operation of industrial and warehousing land uses accommodated under the General Plan Update could expose sensitive receptors to substantial toxic air contaminant concentrations. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.2, Air Quality, starting on page 5.2-50 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Buildout of the GPU could expose sensitive receptors to substantial concentrations of toxic air contaminants JAC). Buildout could result in new sources of criteria air pollutant emissions and/or TACs near existing or planned sensitive receptors. Review of development projects by South Coast AQMD for permitted sources of air toxics (e.g., industrial facilities, dry cleaners, and gasoline dispensing facilities) would ensure that health risks are minimized. Additionally, Mitigation Measure AQ-3 would ensure mobile sources of TACs not covered under South Coast AQMD permits are considered during subsequent, project -level environmental review by the City of Santa Ana. Individual development projects would be required to achieve the incremental risk thresholds established by South Coast AQMD, and TACs would be less than significant. However, implementation of the GPU would generate TACs that could contribute to elevated levels in the air basin. Though individual projects would achieve the project -level risk threshold of 10 per million, they would nonetheless contribute to the higher levels of risk in the SoCAB. Therefore, the GPU's cumulative contribution to health risk is significant and unavoidable. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 198 4� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -42- c o er 021 Mitigation Measures AQ-3 Prior to discretionary approval by the City of Santa Ana, project applicants for new industrial or warehousing development projects that 1) have the potential to generate 100 or more diesel truck trips per day or have 40 or more trucks with operating diesel - powered transport refrigeration units, and 2) are within 1,000 feet of a sensitive land use (e.g., residential, schools, hospitals, or nursing homes), as measured from the property line of the project to the property line of the nearest sensitive use, shall submit a health risk assessment (HRA) to the City of Santa Ana for review and approval. The HRA shall be prepared in accordance with policies and procedures of the State Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment and the South Coast Air Quality Management District and shall include all applicable stationary and mobile/area source emissions generated by the proposed project at the project site. If the HRA shows that the incremental cancer risk and/or noncancer hazard index exceed the respective thresholds, as established by the South Coast AQMD at the time a project is considered (i.e., 10 in one million cancer risk and 1 hazard index), the project applicant will be required to identify and demonstrate that best available control technologies for toxics (T-BACTs), including appropriate enforcement mechanisms, are capable of reducing potential cancer and noncancer risks to an acceptable level. T-BACTs may include, but are not limited to, restricting idling on -site, electrifying warehousing docks to reduce diesel particulate matter, or requiring use of newer equipment and/or vehicles. T BACTs identified in the HRA shall be identified as mitigation measures in the environmental document and/or incorporated into the site plan. Finding Finding 3. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the GPU that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. The City finds that there are no other mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 199 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -43- 6c ober021 Impact 5.2-5: Development and operation of land uses accommodated by the General Plan Update could generate emissions that exceed the localized significance thresholds and expose sensitive receptors to substantial concentrations of criteria air Dollutants. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.2, Air Quality, starting on page 5.2-53 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Because existing sensitive receptors may be close to project -related construction activities and large emitters of on -site operation -related criteria air pollutant emissions, construction and operation emissions generated by individual development projects have the potential to exceed South Coast AQMD's Local Significance Thresholds (LSTs). Mitigation Measures AQ-1 and AQ-2 would reduce the regional construction and operation emissions associated with buildout of the GPU and therefore also result in a reduction of localized construction- and operation -related criteria air pollutant emissions, to the extent feasible. However, even with the implementation of these mitigation measures, Impact 5.2-5 would remain significant and unavoidable. Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measures AQ-1 and AQ-2 would also be applicable in reducing construction- and operation -related LST impacts. Finding Finding 3. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the GPU that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measures above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measures is feasible, and the measures are therefore adopted. The City finds that there are no other mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 200 4� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -44- c o er 021 2. Cultural Resources Impact 5.4-1: Buildout consistent with the General Plan Update could impact an identified historic resource. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.4, Cultural Resources, starting on page 5.4-26 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Generally, potential impacts to historical resources resulting from future projects developed pursuant to the GPU would be mitigated by the City's fulfillment of its statutory responsibilities under CEQA. However, for certain development pursuant to the GPU, the City may determine that significant impacts to historical resources cannot be avoided. The City shall require, at a minimum, that the affected historical resources be thoroughly documented before issuance of any permits. Though the possible demolition or alteration of a historical resource cannot be mitigated to a less than significant level, recordation of the resource will reduce significant adverse impacts to historical resources to the maximum extent feasible. With fulfillment of the CUL-1 and CUL-2, future development consistent with the GPU would result in a less than significant impact to cultural resources. However, if significant impacts cannot be avoided, the City shall require, at a minimum, that the affected historical resources are documented consistent with Mitigation Measure CUL-3. The Historical Resources Technical Report determined that unavoidable impacts to historical resources resulting from future development under the GPU will be reduced to the maximum extent feasible but will still be significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-3. Therefore, the development under the GPU would result in significant and unavoidable impacts. Mitigation Measures CUL-1 Identification of Historical Resources and Potential Project Impacts. For structures 45 years or older, a Historical Resources Assessment (HRA) shall be prepared by an architectural historian or historian meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards. The HRA shall include: definition of a study area or area of potential effect, which will encompass the affected property and may include surrounding properties or historic district(s); an intensive level survey of the study area to identify and evaluate under federal, State, and local criteria significance historical resources that might be directly or indirectly affected by the proposed project; and an assessment of project impacts. The HRA shall satisfy federal and State guidelines for the identification, evaluation, and recordation of historical resources. An HRA is not required if an existing historic resources survey and evaluation of the property is available; however, if the existing survey and evaluation is more than five years old, it shall be updated. CUL-2 Use of the Secretary of the Interior's Standards. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties shall be used to the maximum extent practicable to ensure that projects involving the relocation, conversion, Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 201 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -45- 6c ober021 rehabilitation, or alteration of a historical resource and its setting or related new construction will not impair the significance of the historical resource. Use of the Standards shall be overseen by an architectural historian or historic architect meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards. Evidence of compliance with the Standards shall be provided to the City in the form of a report identifying and photographing character -defining features and spaces and specifying how the proposed treatment of character -defining features and spaces and related construction activities will conform to the Standards. The Qualified Professional shall monitor the construction and provide a report to the City at the conclusion of the project. Use of the Secretary's Standards shall reduce the project impacts on historical resources to less than significant. CUL-3 Documentation, Education, and Memorial ization. If the City determines that significant impacts to historical resources cannot be avoided, the City shall require, at a minimum, that the affected historical resources be thoroughly documented before issuance of any permits and may also require additional public education efforts and/or memorialization of the historical resource. Though demolition or alteration of a historical resource such that its significance is materially impaired cannot be mitigated to a less than significant level, recordation of the resource will reduce significant adverse impacts to historical resources to the maximum extent feasible. Such recordation should be prepared under the supervision of an architectural historian, historian, or historic architect meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards and should take the form of Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS) documentation. At a minimum, this recordation should include an architectural and historical narrative; archival photographic documentation; and supplementary information, such as building plans and elevations and/or historic photographs. The documentation package should be reproduced on archival paper and should be made available to researchers and the public through accession by appropriate institutions such as the Santa Ana Library History Room, the South Central Coastal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton, and/or the HABS collection housed in the Library of Congress. Depending on the significance of the adversely affected historical resource, the City, at its discretion, may also require public education about the historical resource in the form of an exhibit, web page, brochure, or other format and/or memorialization of the historical resource on or near the proposed project site. If memorialized, such memorialization shall be a permanent installation, such as a mural, display, or other vehicle that recalls the location, appearance, and historical significance of the affected historical resource, and shall be designed in conjunction with a qualified architectural historian, historian, or historic architect. Finding Finding 3. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the GPU that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an a emen 30 — 202 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -46- 6c ober021 changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measures above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measures is feasible, and the measures are therefore adopted. The City finds that there are no other mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. 3. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact 5.7-1: Implementation of the proposed General Plan Update would result in a decrease in GHG emissions in horizon year 2045 from existing baseline but may not meet the long-term GHG reduction goal under Executive Order S-03-05. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.7, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, starting on page 5.7-31 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Implementation of Mitigation Measure GHG-1 would ensure that the City is tracking and monitoring the City's GHG emissions in order to chart a trajectory to achieve the long-term, year 2050, GHG reduction goal set by Executive Order S-03-05. However, at this time, there is no plan past 2030 that achieves the long-term GHG reduction goal established under Executive Order S-03-05. As identified by the California Council on Science and Technology, the state cannot meet the 2050 goal without major advancements in technology. Advancements in technology in the future could provide additional reductions and allow the state and City to meet the 2050 goal, but in the meantime, Impact 5.7-1 would be significant and unavoidable. Mitigation Measures GHG-1 The City of Santa Ana shall update the Climate Action Plan (CAP) every five years to ensure the City is monitoring the plan's progress toward achieving the City's greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction target and to require amendment if the plan is not achieving the specified level. The update shall consider a trajectory consistent with the GHG emissions reduction goal established under Executive Order S-03-05 for year 2050 and the latest applicable statewide legislative GHG emission reduction that may be in effect at the time of the CAP update (e.g., Senate Bill 32 for year 2030). The CAP update shall include the following: Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 203 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -47- 6c ober021 • GHG inventories of existing and forecast year GHG levels. • Tools and strategies for reducing GHG emissions to ensure a trajectory with the long-term GHG reduction goal of Executive Order S-03-05. • Plan implementation guidance that includes, at minimum, the following components consistent with the proposed CAP: ■ Administration and Staffing ■ Finance and Budgeting ■ Timelines for Measure Implementation ■ Community Outreach and Education ■ Monitoring, Reporting, and Adaptive Management ■ Tracking Tools Finding Finding 3. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the GPU that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. The City finds that there are no other mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. 4. Noise Impact 5.12-1: Construction activities associated with buildout of the plan area would result in temporary noise increases at sensitive receptors. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.12, Noise, starting on page 5.12-29 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Implementation of Mitigation Measure N-1 would reduce potential noise impacts during construction to the extent feasible. However, due to the potential for proximity of construction activities to sensitive uses, the number of construction projects occurring simultaneously, and the potential duration of construction activities, construction noise could result in a temporary Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 204 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -48- 6c ober021 substantial increase in noise levels above ambient conditions. Therefore, impacts would remain significant and unavoidable. It should be noted that the identification of this program -level impact does not preclude the finding of less -than -significant impacts for subsequent projects analyzed at the project level. Mitigation Measures N-1 Construction contractors shall implement the following measures for construction activities conducted in the City of Santa Ana. Construction plans submitted to the City shall identify these measures on demolition, grading, and construction plans submitted to the City: The City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency shall verify that grading, demolition, and/or construction plans submitted to the City include these notations prior to issuance of demolition, grading, and/or building permits. • Construction activity is limited to the hours: Between 7 AM to 8 PM Monday through Saturday, as prescribed in Municipal Code Section 18-314(e). Construction is prohibited on Sundays. • During the entire active construction period, equipment and trucks used for project construction shall use the best -available noise control techniques (e.g., improved mufflers, equipment re -design, use of intake silencers, ducts, engine enclosures, and acoustically attenuating shields or shrouds), wherever feasible. • Impact tools (e.g., jack hammers and hoe rams) shall be hydraulically or electrically powered wherever possible. Where the use of pneumatic tools is unavoidable, an exhaust muffler on the compressed air exhaust shall be used along with external noise jackets on the tools. • Stationary equipment, such as generators and air compressors shall be located as far as feasible from nearby noise -sensitive uses. • Stockpiling shall be located as far as feasible from nearby noise -sensitive receptors. • Construction traffic shall be limited, to the extent feasible, to approved haul routes established by the City Planning and Building Agency. • At least 10 days prior to the start of construction activities, a sign shall be posted at the entrance(s) to the job site, clearly visible to the public, that includes permitted construction days and hours, as well as the telephone numbers of the City's and contractor's authorized representatives that are assigned to respond in the event of a noise or vibration complaint. If the authorized contractor's representative receives a complaint, he/she shall investigate, take appropriate corrective action, and report the action to the City. • Signs shall be posted at the job site entrance(s), within the on -site construction zones, and along queueing lanes (if any) to reinforce the prohibition of Santa Ana General Plan Update Of 1 i 5 � Fact an a emen 30 — 205 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -49- 6c ober021 unnecessary engine idling. All other equipment shall be turned off if not in use for more than 5 minutes. • During the entire active construction period and to the extent feasible, the use of noise -producing signals, including horns, whistles, alarms, and bells, shall be for safety warning purposes only. The construction manager shall use smart back-up alarms, which automatically adjust the alarm level based on the background noise level or switch off back-up alarms and replace with human spotters in compliance with all safety requirements and laws. • Erect temporary noise barriers (at least as high as the exhaust of equipment and breaking line -of -sight between noise sources and sensitive receptors), as necessary and feasible, to maintain construction noise levels at or below the performance standard of 80 dBA Leq. Barriers shall be constructed with a solid material that has a density of at least 4 pounds per square foot with no gaps from the ground to the top of the barrier. Finding Finding 3. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the GPU that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. The City finds that there are no other mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. Impact 5.12-2: Buildout of the plan area would cause a substantial traffic noise increase on local roadways and could locate sensitive receptors in areas that exceed established noise standards. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.12, Noise, starting on page 5.12-30 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Mitigation Measure N-2 would reduce potential interior noise impacts to future noise -sensitive receptors below the thresholds. However, there are no feasible or practical mitigation measures available to reduce project -generated traffic noise to less than significant levels for existing Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 206 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -50- 6c ober021 residences along affected roadways. No individual measures and no set of feasible or practical mitigation measures are available to reduce project -generated traffic noise to less than significant levels in all cases. Thus, traffic noise would remain a significant and unavoidable impact. It should be noted that the identification of this program -level impact does not preclude the finding of less - than -significant impacts for subsequent projects analyzed at the project level. Mitigation Measures Refer to Mitigation Measure N-2, above. Finding Finding 3. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the GPU that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the PEIR. These changes are identified in the form of the mitigation measure above. The City of Santa Ana hereby finds that implementation of the mitigation measure is feasible, and the measure is therefore adopted. The City finds that there are no mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. 5. Population and Housing Impact 5.13-1: The GPU would directly induce substantial unplanned population growth. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.13, Population and Housing, starting on page 5.13-12 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Full buildout of the GPU would result in a population of 431,629, and the city's 2045 population growth would be approximately 20 percent greater than the Orange County Council of Governments' 2045 projections. Furthermore, the city's housing units at buildout would be 115,053, which exceeds the Orange County Council of Governments' projection by 38 percent. There are no feasible mitigation measures to mitigate the population and housing growth at buildout, and impacts would be significant and unavoidable. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 207 4� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -51- c o er 021 Mitigation Measures There are no feasible mitigation measures to mitigate the population and housing growth at buildout. Finding Finding 3. The City finds that there are no mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of r5 �ac an Statement 230-208 4� /?0021i inonsiderations -52- ober 6. Recreation Impact 5.15-1: The General Plan Update would generate additional residents that would increase the use of existing park and recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility could occur or be accelerated. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.15, Recreation, starting on page 5.15-27 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Although required park fees for development could be sufficient to fund new parks and improvements, there is a lack of available land and lack of land designated as Open Space within the General Plan Update to develop new parks or expand existing facilities. The City of Santa Ana is essentially built. Incorporation of Mitigation Measure REC-1 to monitor new residential development within the Dyer/55 Fwy focus area would contribute to reducing impacts to existing public parks within a '/z radius of the focus area. Compliance with this mitigation measure, regulatory requirements, and implementation of proposed GPU policies and implementation actions would reduce the potential impact of the proposed GPU on existing park facilities. However, because of the existing park deficiencies and scale of development in park -deficient areas, the project's impact would be significant and unavoidable. Mitigation Measures REC-1 The City shall monitor new residential development within the Dyer/55 Fwy focus area. Development proposals for projects including 100 or more residential units shall be required to prepare a public park utilization study to evaluate the project's potential impacts on existing public parks within a one half (1/2) mile radius to the focus area. The evaluation shall include the population increase due to the project and the potential for the new resident population to impact existing public parks within the radius. Each study shall also consider the cumulative development in the Dyer/55 Fwy and the potential for a cumulative impact on existing public parks within the radius. If the study determines that the project, or it's incremental cumulative impacts would result in a significant impact (substantial physical deterioration or substantial acceleration of deterioration) to existing public parks, the project shall be required to mitigate this impact. Measures to mitigate the significant impact may include but are not limited to land dedication and fair -share contribution to acquire new or to enhance existing public parks within the radius. Mitigation shall be completed prior to issuance of occupancy permits. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 209 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -53- 6c ober021 Finding Finding 3. The City finds that there are no mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. Impact 5.15-2: Population increases resulting from project implementation would increase recreation demands that would require construction or expansion of recreation facilities that would have potential to result in physical impacts to the environment. Support for this environmental impact conclusion is fully discussed in Section 5.15, Recreation, starting on page 5.15-29 of the Updated Draft PEIR. Population increases resulting from the implementation of the GPU would increase recreation demands and require construction or expansion of recreation facilities. Although construction and/or expansion of new parks and recreation facilities would be subject to GPU policies and implementation actions; regulatory requirements, and future, project specific environmental review under CEQA, it is still possible that development of such facilities could result in significant unavoidable impacts Mitigation Measures There are no feasible mitigation measures to mitigate the impacts to recreation at buildout. Finding Finding 3. The City finds that there are no mitigation measures that are feasible, taking into consideration specific economic, legal, social, technological or other factors, that would mitigate this impact to a less -than -significant level, and further, that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the alternatives identified in the PEIR, as discussed in Section G of these Findings (Public Resources Code §§ 21081(a)(1), (3); Guidelines §§ 15091(a)(1), (3)). As described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations, the City has determined that this impact is acceptable because specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including regionwide or statewide environmental benefits, of the GPU outweigh its significant effects on the environment. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 210 4� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -54- c o er 021 VI. FINDINGS REGARDING ALTERNATIVES CEQA requires that an EIR include a discussion of reasonable project alternatives that would "feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project but would avoid or substantially lessen any significant effects of the project, and evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives" (CEQA Guidelines § 15126.6[a]). As discussed above, the PEIR identified significant impacts in a number of categories. The following impacts could be mitigated below a level of significance: air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, noise, tribal cultural resources impacts. The following impacts cannot be mitigated below a level of significance: certain air quality, cultural resources, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, noise, population and housing, and recreation impacts. The PEIR analyzed four alternatives to the proposed project that could reduce some, if not all, of the impacts. A. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED AND REJECTED DURING THE SCOPING/PROJECT PLANNING "Among the factors that may be used to eliminate alternatives from detailed consideration in an EIR are: (i) failure to meet most of the basic project objectives, (ii) infeasibility, or (iii) inability to avoid significant environmental impacts" (CEQA Guidelines § 15126.6[c]). Alternative Circulation Element— Roadway Classifications. The proposed circulation element in the GPU evolved over a long process and coordination with the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). During this process, alternative packages of arterial roadway classifications were considered that involved roadways in OCTA's Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH). The majority of reclassifications proposed were identified for bicycle facility safety improvements in the City's Safe Mobility Santa Ana (SMSA) Plan, prepared in 2016. Most of the reclassifications identified were for roadways where bicycle and pedestrian safety improvements would require roadway reconfiguration and a reduction in the number of existing or planned travel lanes. Many of the SMSA recommendations across the city have already been, or are in the process of being, implemented along arterial roadways without reducing the number of lanes. A cursory review of two optional roadway reclassification packages was conducted to determine whether these optional plans would have the potential to eliminate significant impacts of the proposed GPU and meet most the project objectives. It was determined that a detailed evaluation of this alternative was not needed to provide a reasonable range of EIR project alternatives. Transportation/traffic impacts of the proposed project were determined to be less than significant (VMT/SP falls below the significance threshold for the GPU without mitigation). Although these alternatives may have some potential to reduce VMT (by reducing the number of travel lanes for some roadways) and thereby also potentially reduce air quality, greenhouse gas, and traffic noise impacts, these alternatives would also result in more inconsistencies with the MPAH and result in more traffic congestion. Although traffic congestion is no longer a CEQA consideration, the GPU sets forth standards for level of service that will be considered by decision -makers. Moreover, the Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 211 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -55- 6c ober021 Reduced Density and RTP/SCS Consistency alternatives were determined to be meaningful alternatives to consider for the potential of reducing air quality, GHG, and traffic noise impacts. Reduced Traffic Noise Alternative. Since traffic noise was determined to be a significant, unavoidable impact of the proposed GPU, a project alternative designed to eliminate this significant impact was considered. The required reductions in traffic volumes (ADT) were determined along roadways where buildout of the GPU would result in significant noise increases. These estimates were compared to the surrounding land uses that would generate ADTs for those roadway segments. Traffic noise along these roadways would both exceed the noise standard and abut sensitive land uses (e.g., residences, schools, hospitals). Several segments would experience significant, unavoidable traffic noise impacts without the land use changes proposed under the GPU. Since significant traffic noise could not be avoided, further evaluation of this alternative was not deemed to be meaningful. B. ALTERNATIVES SELECTED FOR FURTHER ANALYSIS Given the significant, unavoidable impacts identified for the proposed GPU, project alternatives with the potential to substantially reduce development were identified for further review. Significant GPU impacts to long-term air quality, GHG emissions, population and housing, and recreation all directly relate to the level of development that would occur within the city. At the programmatic level of this GPU PEIR, site -specific information regarding potential significant historical impacts is not available, and therefore, an alternative could not be customized to reduce that impact. A reduced intensity alternative would also be expected to reduce the significant traffic noise impact (as discussed above). A reduced park demand alternative was also analyzed to address the significant and unavoidable impacts to recreation. The following development alternatives to the proposed GPU were chosen for further analysis. No Project / Current General Plan Alternative The evaluation of the No Project alternative is required by CEQA. The No Project alternative is typically defined as the development scenario that would occur if the project as proposed is not adopted. For a General Plan, the No Project alternative is typically represented by the jurisdiction's existing General Plan, including land use plan, circulation master plan, and policies in each General Plan element. Therefore, this alternative assumes that the existing General Plan —with various adoption dates for different elements between 1982 and 2014—would remain in effect. This existing General Plan also reflects amendments, including new Specific Plans and special zoning areas that have been adopted through the Notice of Preparation for this GPU. Finding. The City Council rejects the No Project/Current General Plan Alternative on the basis of policy and economic factors as explained herein. (See Pub. Resources Code, § 21061.1; CEQA Guidelines, § 15364; see also City of Del Mar v. City of San Diego (1982) 133 Cal.App.3d 410, 417; California Native Plant Soc. v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Cal.AppAth 957, 1001; Sequoyah Hills Homeowners Assn. v. City of Oakland (1993) 23 Cal.AppAth 704, 715.) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 212 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -56- 6c ober021 opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible this project alternative identified in the Final Recirculated PEIR. This alternative would result in similar impacts to 11 impact categories, reduced impacts to 5 environmental impacts, and increase impacts to 4 categories. Impacts would be similar for agricultural resources, biological resources, cultural resources, energy, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, mineral resources, noise, tribal cultural resources, and wildfire. This alternative would reduce impacts for aesthetics, population and housing, public services, recreation, and utilities and service systems. Impacts to air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, land use and planning, and transportation would increase. This alternative does not mitigate any of the significant and unavoidable impacts associated with the GPU to a less than significant impact. It would also exceed the City's VMT threshold. Overall, impacts under this alternative would decrease in comparison to the proposed project. The No Project/Current General Plan alternative would not achieve many of the proposed project objectives. The existing land use plan does not provide the opportunities to provide housing and employment at the levels required to meet local and regional goals. Moreover, the No Project alternative would not provide numerous general policies as included in the GPU to achieve these goals and invigorate communities. The current General Plan, however, protects established neighborhoods and several Specific Plans and Special Zoning areas would provide for infill opportunities, protect established neighborhoods, and result in mixed -use villages and bike- and pedestrian -friendly communities. Reduced Intensity Alternative (Reduced capacity for the 55 Freeway/Dyer and South Bristol focus areas) Under the GPU, the only areas that include revisions to land use designations to accommodate new growth are within the five focus areas. The majority of remaining growth would occur within previously approved Specific Plans and Special Zoning areas. A nominal amount of growth is assumed to occur in other areas of the city and would not require land use amendments. The Reduced Intensity Alternative would substantially reduce development capacity within two focus areas, 55 Freeway/Dyer and South Bristol Street, which accommodate approximately 65 percent of the housing unit growth and 72 percent of the nonresidential use (by building square footage) of the growth projected for the combined focus areas under the GPU. For the focus areas, the forecast buildout is based on development at approximately 80 percent of the maximum allowed development for each respective land use designation. For this alternative, development of the 55 Freeway/Dyer and South Bristol focus areas would be reduced to approximately 50 percent of the maximum allowed per the land use designations. This alternative would reduce housing units by a total of 5,383 and would reduce total building square footage by approximately 4.2 million square feet distributed between these two focus areas. This alternative would also reduce population by 19,825 and jobs by 9,184. Overall, this alternative would reduce the housing growth accommodated by the GPU land use changes by approximately 18 percent and reduce nonresidential building square footage by approximately 27 percent. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 213 4� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -57- c o er 021 Finding. The City Council rejects the Reduced Intensity Alternative on the basis of policy and economic factors as explained herein. (See Pub. Resources Code, § 21061.1; CEQA Guidelines, § 15364; see also City of Del Mar v. City of San Diego (1982) 133 Cal.App.3d 410, 417; California Native Plant Soc. v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Cal.AppAth 957, 1001; Sequoyah Hills Homeowners Assn. v. City of Oakland (1993) 23 Cal.AppAth 704, 715.) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible this project alternative identified in the Final Recirculated PEIR. This alternative would result in similar impacts to 7 impact categories, reduce impacts to 12 categories, and increase impacts to 1 category. Impacts would be similar for aesthetics, agricultural resources, biological resources, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, mineral resources, and wildfire. This alternative would decrease impacts to air quality, cultural resources, energy, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation, tribal cultural resources, transportation, and utilities and services. It would be expected to increase land use and planning impacts relative to the GPU. As with the GPU, impacts to air quality, cultural resources, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, population and housing, and recreation would remain significant and unavoidable. Overall, impacts under this alternative would be decreased in comparison to the proposed project. The Reduced Density Alternative reduces the level of development for two of the five focus areas (55 Freeway/Dyer Road and South Bristol Street) relative to the GPU. No other changes to the GPU are made for this alternative. It is assumed to include the same General Plan policies and would not modify the circulation element or related improvements. Therefore, this alternative would attain many of the project's objectives. It would not "optimize" high density housing and mass transit opportunities, and so was found not to attain objective No. 2. It would, however, achieve objectives Nos. 3 through 5, but to a lesser extent than the proposed GPU. With the reduced opportunities in the 55 Freeway/Dyer Road and South Bristol focus areas, it would not be as effective in providing affordable housing opportunities, and may not be as economically feasible in terms of funding community benefits. It would provide mixed -use opportunities that are bike and pedestrian friendly and provide opportunities for live -work, artist spaces, and small-scale manufacturing. 2020 RTP/SCS Consistency Alternative (Reduced development for RTP/SCS population/housing consistency) This alternative was developed to evaluate an update to the General Plan that would be consistent with the population and housing projections used to develop the Southern California Association of Governments' (SCAG) most recent Regional Transportation Plan / Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS)—Connect SoCal (adopted May 7, 2020). Connect SoCal is a long-range visioning plan that balances future mobility and housing needs with economic, environmental, and public health goals. The plan embodies a collective vision for the region's future and is developed with input from local governments, county transportation commissions, tribal governments, nonprofit organizations, businesses, and local stakeholders in the counties of Imperial, Los Angeles, Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 214 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -58- 6c ober021 Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura. The proposed GPU would result in a significant population and housing impact because development under the GPU would substantially exceed the projections used in Connect SoCal. SCAG uses locally prepared population and housing projections to develop the regional plan. For the City of Santa Ana, those projections were provided by the Orange County Council of Governments, as prepared by the Center for Demographic Research. The population/housing figures reflected for Santa Ana in the regional plan for 2045 are: population, 360,100; total housing units, 80,100; and total jobs, 176,400. Projections for the RTP/SCS (Connect SoCal) use land use designations as approved in adopted general plans. The employment projections are similar for the GPU and RTP/SCS scenarios, but the RTP/SCS projections for population and housing units are substantially lower than GPU projections (18 percent and 27 percent lower, respectively). The RTP/SCS alternative, therefore, represents the least -development -intensive project alternative evaluated for the PEIR. ■ This alternative would substantially reduce the growth that would be accommodated within the focus areas under the GPU. New growth within the focus areas would total 6,380 housing units and approximately 3.7 million square feet of nonresidential uses, instead of a total additional 23,955 housing units and approximately 15.7 million square feet within the focus areas. This alternative distributes anticipated development through the focus areas and the approved Specific Plans/Special Zoning areas. For purposes of this alternative, it is assumed that a development cap would be used to limit total growth to the projections shown. ■ Subsequent updates of the regional plan would incorporate updated land use from the GPU and resolve the substantial discrepancy between the population and housing projections. Note also that the PEIR concludes that the GPU is consistent with the goals of the RTP/SCS. This alternative has been defined to eliminate the significant impact associated with substantial population growth that is inconsistent with the regional plan, as well as reduce other significant growth -related (AQ/GHG, traffic noise) impacts associated with the GPU as proposed. Finding. The City Council rejects the 2020 RTP/SCS Consistency Alternative on the basis of policy and economic factors as explained herein. (See Pub. Resources Code, § 21061.1; CEQA Guidelines, § 15364; see also City of Del Mar v. City of San Diego (1982) 133 Cal.App.3d 410, 417; California Native Plant Soc. v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Cal.AppAth 957, 1001; Sequoyah Hills Homeowners Assn. v. City of Oakland (1993) 23 Cal.AppAth 704, 715.) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible this project alternative identified in the Final Recirculated PEIR. This alternative would reduce impacts to 12 environmental impacts, result in similar impacts to 6 categories, and increase impacts to 1 category. It would reduce impacts to air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, energy, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation, tribal cultural resources, and utilities and service systems. Impacts would be very similar for aesthetics, agricultural resources, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, mineral resources, and wildfire. It would increase impacts to land use and planning. It would also increase impacts to transportation and Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 215 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -59- 6c ober021 potentially introduce a new significant impact. It is anticipated, however, that under this alternative, transportation could be mitigated to less than significant. Under the GPU, transportation impacts are less than significant without mitigation. As with the GPU, impacts to air quality, cultural resources, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, and recreation would remain significant and unavoidable. The impact to population and housing would be reduced to less than significant. Overall, impacts under this alternative would be reduced in comparison to the proposed project. Due to the substantial reduction in housing opportunities citywide, this alternative is the least effective in achieving the project objectives of the GPU. By setting a development cap to limit housing and nonresidential development to the projections for the city in the 2020 RTP/SCS, this alternative reduces housing units by 31,515 compared to the GPU. It reduces housing development potential within the focus areas by 73 percent in comparison to the GPU, and reduces overall city future development by 27 percent. To achieve this reduction, the development cap would not only limit focus area development but would restrict the entitled housing in Specific Plans/Special Zoning areas (reducing total housing within these areas by almost 14,000 units). This alternative clearly would not optimize high density housing that maximizes mass transit use (objective No. 2) or provide urban -level intensities at the urban edges (objective No. 3). Moreover, it would not facilitate intensities that attract economic activities, particularly since it would not allow the maximum entitlement of approved Specific Plans and Special Zoning areas. It would achieve the remainder of the objectives, but to a lesser extent than the GPU. It would protect established neighborhoods, but not promote infill development as much as the GPU or other alternatives (objective No. 1). It would provide only limited opportunities for live -work and artist spaces and small-scale manufacturing (objective No. 7). Reduced Park Demand Alternative The City's Park standard of 2 acres per 1,000 residents is not achieved under existing conditions and development allowed under the GPU would further exacerbate park and open space shortages. Without new parks, growth in any of the focus areas would exacerbate the current level of park deficiency either in or adjacent to disadvantaged communities. The areas proposed for substantial new residential development under the GPU were compared to the distribution of existing parks —location, size, and demand —to define the Reduced Park Demand Alternative. The Reduced Park Demand Alternative reduces residential growth by 11,225 units by eliminating or reducing residential land uses and intensity in the five focus areas. Overall, nonresidential square footage would be reduced by a total of approximately 2.8 million square feet within the focus areas compared to the proposed GPU. The nonresidential square footage would increase, however, in two of the focus areas: 17th Street/Grand Avenue by 697,000 square feet, and South Bristol by 739,000 square feet. New residential growth under this alternative would largely be in currently planned areas that are generally near a substantial number of existing park facilities. Some residential growth would be introduced into two focus areas at substantially lower intensities to reduce the potential impact on park facilities. Changes to the focus areas are as follows: ■ South Main Street. This focus area would remain as currently planned as a commercial corridor (GC) instead of Urban Neighborhood (UN) and District Center (DC) to reduce intensity Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 216 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -60- 6c ober021 so that there are no additional units constructed beyond existing conditions; there is a significant presence of EJ communities that are served by parks, but the existing parks are very small. ■ South Bristol Focus Area. District Center (DC) changed to Urban Neighborhood (UN) to reduce intensity by 2,273 units on sites that are more than a half mile from existing parks (generally west of Bristol and south of MacArthur Boulevard). ■ Grand Avenue/17th Street. Stay as currently planned as a lower density residential (LR-7) and commercial corridor (GC) to reduce intensity so that there are no additional units constructed beyond existing conditions, because much of the focus area is more than a half mile from existing parks. ■ West Santa Ana Boulevard. This focus area would remain as currently planned with lower density residential (LR-7) instead of Urban Neighborhood (UN) to reduce intensity so that no additional units are constructed beyond existing conditions; there is a significant presence of EJ communities with areas that are farther than a half mile from existing parks in this focus area. ■ 55 Freeway/Dyer Road. District Center (DC) changed to Urban Neighborhood (UN) to reduce intensity by 5,381 units because a majority of the area is more than a half mile from existing parks in Santa Ana; the reduced intensity would also reduce potential impacts on adjacent parkland in Tustin. Finding. The City Council rejects the Reduced Park Demand Alternative on the basis of policy and economic factors as explained herein. (See Pub. Resources Code, § 21061.1; CEQA Guidelines, § 15364; see also City of Del Mar v. City of San Diego (1982) 133 Cal.App.3d 410, 417; California Native Plant Soc. v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Cal.AppAth 957, 1001; Sequoyah Hills Homeowners Assn. v. City of Oakland (1993) 23 Cal.AppAth 704, 715.) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible this project alternative identified in the Recirculated PEIR. This alternative would result in similar impacts to 6 impact categories, reduced impacts to 12 categories, and increased impacts to 2 categories. Impacts would be similar for aesthetics, agricultural resources, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, mineral resources, and wildfire. This alternative would decrease impacts to air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, energy, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation, tribal cultural resources, transportation, and utilities and services. It would reduce the recreation impacts of the proposed GPU, as it was designed to do, and would improve the park acres/resident ratio compared to the proposed GPU. Recreation impacts to disadvantaged communities would also be reduced. Given the lack of available land for new parks, however, it would not eliminate the significant, unavoidable impact of the project. It would be expected to increase land use and planning impacts relative to the GPU. As with the GPU, impacts to air quality, cultural resources, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 217 4� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -61- c o er 021 population and housing, and recreation would remain significant and unavoidable. Overall, impacts under this alternative would be decreased in comparison to the proposed project. This alternative would attain some of the project's objectives. It would promote infill development to a lesser extent than the GPU and would protect established neighborhoods (Objective 1), and would also develop opportunities of live -work, artist spaces, and small-scale manufacturing (Objective 7). Given the substantial reduction in housing units, it was also concluded that it would not meet Objectives 2 and 3, to maximize high density residential development and mixed use proximate to potential mass transit use (Objective 2) and to maximize affordable housing and achieve City and regional housing goals (Objective 3). It would, however, achieve Objectives 4 through 6, but to a lesser extent than the proposed GPU. With new opportunities eliminated in three focus areas and the reduced opportunities in the 55 Freeway /Dyer Road and South Bristol focus areas, it would not be as effective in providing affordable housing opportunities and may not be as economically feasible in terms of funding community benefits. It would provide mixed - use opportunities that are bike and pedestrian friendly and provide opportunities for live -work, artist spaces, and small-scale manufacturing. C. ENVIRONMENTALLY SUPERIOR ALTERNATIVE CEQA requires a lead agency to identify the "environmentally superior alternative" and, in cases where the "No Project" Alternative is environmentally superior to the GPU, the environmentally superior development alternative must be identified. One alternative has been identified as "environmentally superior" to the GPU: ■ The RTP/SCS Consistency Alternative is concluded to be the environmentally superior alternative. The No Project alternative is not environmentally superior to the proposed GPU. Both the Reduced Density and RTP/SCS alternatives reduce environmental impacts in comparison to the GPU, but the RTP/SCS reduces more impacts and eliminates a significant, unavoidable impact of the GPU. This alternative was designed to eliminate the significant population impact of the GPU, but it also reduces potential future development more than any of the other alternatives. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 218 4� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -62- c o er 021 VII. STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS A. INTRODUCTION The City of Santa Ana is the Lead Agency under CEQA for preparation, review and certification of the PEIR for General Plan Update (project). As the Lead Agency, the City is also responsible for determining the potential environmental impacts of the proposed action and which of those impacts are significant, and which can be mitigated through imposition of mitigation measures to avoid or minimize those impacts to a level of less than significant. CEQA then requires the Lead Agency to balance the benefits of a proposed action against its significant unavoidable adverse environmental impacts in determining whether or not to approve the proposed project. In making this determination the City is guided by CEQA Guidelines Section 15093, Statement of Overriding Considerations, which states: a. CEQA requires the decision -making agency to balance, as applicable, the economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks when determining whether to approve the project. If the specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of a proposed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse environmental effects may be considered "acceptable." b. When the lead agency approves a project which will result in the occurrence of significant effects which are identified in the final EIR but are not avoided or substantially lessened, the agency shall state in writing the specific reasons to support its action based on the final EIR and/or other information in the record. The statement of overriding considerations shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. c. If an agency makes a statement of overriding considerations, the statement should be included in the record of the project approval and should be mentioned in the notice of determination. This statement does not substitute for, and shall be in addition to, findings required pursuant to Section 15091. In addition, Public Resources Code Section 21081(b) requires that where a public agency finds that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in an EIR and thereby leave significant unavoidable effects, the public agency must also find that overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of the project outweigh the significant effects of the project. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(b) and the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15093, the City has balanced the benefits of the proposed project against the unavoidable adverse impacts associated with the project and has adopted all feasible mitigation measures Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 219 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -63- 6c ober021 with respect to these impacts. The City also has examined alternatives to the proposed project, none of which both meets the project objectives and is environmentally preferable to the proposed project, for the reasons discussed in the Findings and Facts in Support of Findings. The City of Santa Ana, as the Lead Agency for this project, and having reviewed the PEIR for the GPU, and reviewed all written materials within the City's public record and heard all oral testimony presented at public hearings, adopts this Statement of Overriding Considerations, which has balanced the benefits of the project against its significant unavoidable adverse environmental impacts in reaching its decision to approve the project. B. OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS The City, after balancing the specific economic, legal, social, technological, and other benefits of the project, has determined that the unavoidable adverse environmental impacts identified above may be considered acceptable due to the following specific considerations, which outweigh the unavoidable, adverse environmental impacts of the project, and each of which, standing alone, is sufficient to support approval of the project, in accordance with CEQA Section 21081(b) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15093. The specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of the project are as follows: 1. The community, land use, and public services elements of the project encourage healthy lifestyles, a planning process that ensures that health impacts are considered, and policies and practices that improve the health of residents. The policies also affirm and support a socially and economically diverse community with equitable distribution of resources. 2. Implementation of the GPU fulfills one of the key strategies identified in the Santa Ana Strategic Plan in the completion of a comprehensive update of the existing General Plan. 3. The project improves the jobs -housing balance; the ratio of 1.5 would give the city a more equal distribution of employment and housing. The population growth resulting directly from the proposed GPU would be offset by the level of employment opportunity provided to the city's residents and workers commuting into Santa Ana. 4. The project results in a reduction of vehicle miles traveled per service population (VMT/SP) and a reduction in related traffic congestion, air quality, and greenhouse gas emissions compared with existing conditions because the GPU includes policies that promote the reduction of VMT. Policy 2.5 of the land use element encourages infill mixed -use development at all ranges of affordability to reduce VMT, and policy 4.5 aims to concentrate development along high -quality transit corridors. Policy 4.6 of the circulation element promotes reductions in automobile trips and VMT by encouraging transit use and nonmotorized transportation as alternatives to augmenting roadway capacity. 5. The project provides additional housing to support the regionally forecasted increase in economic activities and employment increases. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an a emen 30 — 220 4� /?b02?2 Of v ri ing onsiderations -64- c o er 021 6. Implementation of the project would introduce policies and actions that address the importance of protecting the health of residents and the environment by improving air quality, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and encouraging active transportation. 7. The project implements the SCAG Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) land use policies related to population and housing by providing additional housing near employment centers. 8. The project facilitates the economic development of the city by promoting development that is mixed use, pedestrian friendly, transit oriented, and clustered around activity centers through new and infill residential development. Additionally, the proposed project would improve the city's jobs/housing balance by supporting development that provides housing and employment opportunities to enable people to live and work in Santa Ana. 9. Implementation of the project would coordinate air quality planning efforts to meet state and federal ambient air quality standards by considering the goals of the Climate Action Plan in all major decision on land use and public infrastructure investment and investing in low- to zero -emission vehicles. These policies also promote development that meets or exceeds standards for energy -efficient building design, and the consideration of sensitive of potential emission sources on sensitive uses. 10. The project promotes economic growth and diversity within the city. The economic prosperity element of the GPU includes policies related to improving Santa Ana's economy and its role within the region. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an a emen 30 — 221 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -65- 6c ober021 Vill. RESOLUTION REGARDING CERTIFICATION OF THE PEIR The City of Santa Ana finds that it has reviewed and considered the Final Recirculated PEIR in evaluating the proposed project, that the Final Recirculated PEIR is an accurate and objective statement that fully complies with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, and that the Final Recirculated PEIR reflects the independent judgment of the City. The City of Santa Ana declares that no new significant information, as defined by State CEQA Guidelines, section 15088.5, has been received by the City after circulation of the Recirculated Draft PEIR that would require further recirculation. The City of Santa Ana certifies the PEIR based on the entirety of the record of proceedings, including but not limited to the following findings and conclusions: Findings: The following significant environmental impacts have been identified in the PEIR and will require mitigation as set forth in Section V of this Resolution but cannot be mitigated to a level of insignificance: air quality (project -related and cumulative), cultural resources (project - related), greenhouse gas emissions (project -related), noise (project -related), population and housing (project -related), recreation (project -related). Conclusions 1. Except the impacts (stated above) relating to air quality, cultural resources, greenhouse gas, noise, population and housing, and recreation all significant environmental impacts from the implementation of the proposed project have been identified in the PEIR and, with implementation of the mitigation measures identified, will be mitigated to a level of insignificance. 2. Other alternatives to the proposed project, which could potentially achieve the basic objectives of the proposed project, have been considered and rejected in favor of the proposed project. 3. Environmental, economic, social, and other considerations and benefits derived from the development of the proposed project override and make infeasible any alternatives to the proposed project or further mitigation measures beyond those incorporated into the proposed project. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Fact an Statement 30 — 222 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -66- 6c ober021 IX. RESOLUTION ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PLAN Pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21081.6, the City of Santa Ana hereby adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. In the event of any inconsistencies between the mitigation measures as set forth herein and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan, the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan shall control. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE 1 �i i5 4 ac an a emen 30 — 223 4� /?b02?2 Of ve ri ing onsiderations -67- c o er 021 X. RESOLUTION REGARDING CONTENTS AND CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings have been based are located at the City of Santa Ana Planning Division Counter. The custodian for these records is the City of Santa Ana. This information is provided in compliance with Public Resources Code section 21081.6. The record of proceedings for the City's decision on the project consists of the following documents, at a minimum: 1. The NOP and all other public notices issued by the City in conjunction with the project. 2. The Draft PEIR for the Santa Ana General Plan Update. 3. All comments submitted by agencies or members of the public during the 45-day comment period on the Draft PEIR and the 20-day extension to the comment period. 4. The Final PEIR for the Santa Ana General Plan Update, including comments received on the Draft PEIR, responses to those comments, and technical appendices. 5. The Recirculated Draft PEIR for the Santa Ana General Plan Update. 6. All comments submitted by agencies or members of the public during the 45-day comment period on the Recirculated Draft PEIR. 7. The Final Recirculated PEIR for the Santa Ana General Plan Update, including comments received on the Recirculated Draft PEIR, responses to those comments, and technical appendices. 8. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan for the project. 9. All findings, resolutions, and ordinances adopted by the City in connection with the General Plan Update, and all documents cited or referred to therein. 10. All reports, studies, memoranda, maps, staff reports, or other planning documents relating to the project prepared by the City, consultants to the City, or responsible or trustee agencies with respect to the City's compliance with the requirements of CEQA and with respect to the City's action on the Santa Ana General Plan Update. 11. All documents submitted to the City by other public agencies or members of the public in connection with the General Plan Update PEIR up through project approval. Matters of common knowledge to the City, including, but not limited to federal, state, and local laws and regulations. 12. Any documents expressly cited or referenced in these findings, in addition to those cited above. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE Of 1 i 5 � Factan Statement 30 — 224 4/1 / 02 Of v ri ing onsiderations -68- 6c ober021 13. Any other materials required for the record of proceedings by Public Resources Code section 21167.6, subdivision (e). The following location is where the record may be reviewed: City of Santa Ana, Planning Division Counter 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-20 Santa Ana, CA 92701 This page intentionally left blank. Santa Ana General Plan Update CE i �i i5 4 Fact anStatement30 — 225 4 1c�/ 02 Of ve ri ing onsiderations -69- 6ctober�021 EXHIBIT D October 2021 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Santa Ana General Plan Update City of Santa Ana Prepared for: City of Santa Ana Contact: Melanie G. McCann, Principal Planner 20 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92702 mmccann@santa-ana.org Prepared by: PlaceWorks Contact: JoAnn Hadfield, Principal 3 MacArthur Place, Suite 1100 Santa Ana, California 92707 714.966.9220 info@placeworks.com www.placeworks.com City Council 30 — 226 4/19/2022 City Council 30 — 227 4/19/2022 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Section Page 1. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 PURPOSE OF MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM ............................1 1.2 PROJECT SUMMARY......................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 PROJECT LOCATION....................................................................................................................................... 5 1.4 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM ORGANIZATION........................................................... 6 List of Tables Table Page Table 1-1 Proposed Land Use Designations and Statistics.............................................................................. 3 Table 1-2 Buildout Statistical Summary.............................................................................................................. 5 Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements...................................................................... 7 City Council October 2021 30 — 228 4/19/2022 Page i GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program This page intenlionalyleft blank. City Council Page ii 30 — 229 4/19/2022 PlaceWorks 1. Introduction 1.1 PURPOSE OF MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) has been developed to provide a vehicle to monitor mitigation measures and conditions of approval outlined in the Final Recirculted Program Environmental Impact Report. The MMRP has been prepared in conformance with Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code and City of Santa Ana monitoring requirements. Section 21081.6 states: (a) When making the findings required by paragraph (1) of subdivision subsection (a) of Section 21081 or when adopting a mitigated negative declaration pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) of Section 21080, the following requirements shall apply: (1) The public agency shall adopt a reporting or monitoring program for the changes made to the project or conditions of project approval, adopted in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment. The reporting or monitoring program shall be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation. For those changes which have been required or incorporated into the project at the request of a responsible agency or a public agency having jurisdiction by law over natural resources affected by the project, that agency shall, if so requested by the lead agency or a responsible agency, prepare and submit a proposed reporting or monitoring program. (2) The lead agency shall specify the location and custodian of the documents or other material which constitute the record of proceedings upon which its decision is based. (b) A public agency shall provide that measures to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment are fully enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other measures. Conditions of project approval may be set forth in referenced documents which address required mitigation measures or, in the case of the adoption of a plan, policy, regulation, or other public project, by incorporating the mitigation measures into the plan, policy, regulation, or project design. (c) Prior to the close of the public review period for a draft environmental impact report or mitigated negative declaration, a responsible agency, or a public agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by the project, shall either submit to the lead agency complete and detailed performance objectives for mitigation measures which would address the significant effects on the environment identified by the responsible agency or agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by the project, or refer the lead agency to appropriate, readily available guidelines or reference documents. Any mitigation measures submitted to a lead City Council October 2021 30 — 230 4/19/2022 Page 1 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program agency by a responsible agency or an agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by the project shall be limited to measures which mitigate impacts to resources which are subject to the statutory authority of, and definitions applicable to, that agency. Compliance or noncompliance by a responsible agency or agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by a project with that requirement shall not limit the authority of the responsible agency or agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by a project, or the authority of the lead agency, to approve, condition, or deny projects as provided by this division or any other provision of law. The MMRP will serve to document compliance with adopted/certified mitigation measures that are formulated to minimize impacts associated with future development that would be accommodated by the Santa Ana General Plan. 1.2 PROJECT SUMMARY The GPU is the comprehensive update of the Santa Ana General Plan. The purpose of the General Plan Update is to comprehensively update the 1982 plan to reflect current conditions, establish a shared vision of the community's aspirations, and create the policy direction to guide Santa Ana's long-term planning and growth over the next two decades. The General Plan Update will include the City's future development goals and will provide policy statements to achieve those goals. Implementation actions related to each goal or policy will be included as a separate Implementation Plan to ensure successful monitoring of progress as a community. Furthermore, the GPU will focus on five areas in Santa Ana that are better suited for future development or overall improvement. These focus areas are: ■ South Main Street ■ Grand Avenue/ 17th Street ■ West Santa Ana Boulevard ■ 55 Freeway/Dyer Road ■ South Bristol Street General Plan Update The updated General Plan is organized into three sections: Services and Infrastructure (1), Natural Environment (II), and Built Environment (III). The proposed GPU addresses the seven topics required by state law as well as five optional topics. State law gives jurisdictions the discretion to incorporate optional topics and to address any of these topics in a single element or across multiple elements. The 12 proposed elements of the GPU will replace 16 existing elements. The GPU will incorporate the current 2014-2021 Housing Element, and no substantive changes are anticipated. The topic of housing will be addressed as a separate effort in late 2021 in accordance with State law. The topic of environmental justice will be incorporated throughout the GPU, with goals and policies incorporated into multiple elements. The 12 elements of the proposed GPU are: City Council 30 — 231 4/19/2022 Page 2 PlaceWorks GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANATA ANA Mandatory Topics ■ Land Use Element ■ Circulation Element ■ Housing Element ■ Open Space Element ■ Conservation Element ■ Safety Element ■ Noise Element Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Optional Topics ■ Public Services Element ■ Urban Design Element ■ Community Element ■ Economic Prosperity Element ■ Historic Preservation Element The GPU will guide growth and development (e.g., infill development, redevelopment, and revitalization/restoration) in the plan area by designating land uses in the proposed land use map and through implementation of updated goals and policies of the GPU. Table 1-1 outlines the proposed land use designations under the GPU. Table 1-1 Proposed Land Use Designations and Statistics Land Use Designation Acres % of Total Grand Avenue/17th Street 171.5 - District Center 23.7 13.8 General Commercial 19.9 11.6 Industrial/Flex 7.1 4.1 Open Space 1.1 0.6 Urban Neighborhood 119.7 69.8 55 Freeway/Dyer Road 354.5 - District Center 158.0 44.6 General Commercial 68.0 19.2 Industrial/Flex 127.4 35.9 Open Space 1.1 0.3 South Bristol Street 199.9 - District Center 108.3 54.2 Open Space 6.0 3.0 Urban Neighborhood 85.7 42.9 South Main Street 312.2 - Industrial/Flex 29.0 9.3 Institutional 19.2 6.1 Low Density Residential 162.3 52.0 City Council October 2021 30 - 232 4/19/2022 Page 3 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-1 Proposed Land Use Designations and Statistics Land Use Designation Acres % of Total Urban Neighborhood 101.7 32.6 West Santa Ana Boulevard 481.6 - Corridor Residential 10.0 2.1 General Commercial 21.5 4.5 Industrial/Flex 87.9 18.3 Institutional 45.5 9.4 Low Density Residential 108.1 22.4 Low -Medium Density Residential 6.8 1.4 Medium Density Residential 27.0 5.6 Open Space 133.6 27.7 Professional and Administrative Office 6.2 1.3 Urban Neighborhood 35.0 7.3 Balance of City 11,598.8 - District Center 124.2 1.1 General Commercial 424.2 3.7 Industrial 2,159.6 18.6 Institutional 886.7 7.6 Low Density Residential 6,173.3 53.2 Low -Medium Density Residential 429.0 3.7 Medium Density Residential 335.3 2.9 One Broadway Plaza District Center 4.1 0.0 Open Space 793.8 6.8 Professional and Administrative Office 260.4 2.2 Urban Neighborhood 4.1 0.0 Not Specified 4.1 0.0 Total 13,118.5 100% Source: Figures aggregated and projected by PlaceWorks, 2020. The full buildout scenario is analyzed in comparison to existing conditions. Table 1-2 details buildout statistics. Similarly, the PEIR provides conclusions regarding impact significance for this scenario for both the proposed GPU and project alternatives. City Council 30 - 233 4/19/2022 Page 4 PlaceVorks GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANATA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-2 Buildout Statistical Summary PLANNING AREA BUILDOUT I Housing Units Bldg. Sq. Ft.' Jobs FOCUS AREAS 23,955 15,684,285 35,044 55 Freeway/Dyer Road 9,952 6,142,283 13,302 Grand Avenue/17th Street 2,283 703,894 1,622 South Bristol Street 5,492 5,082,641 11,192 South Main Street 2,308 946,662 2,151 West Santa Ana Boulevard 3,920 2,808,805 6,777 SPECIFIC PLAN / SPECIAL ZONING 20,524 16,958,445 39,702 Adaptive Reuse Overlay Zone2 1,260 976,935 2,567 Bristol Street Corridor Specific Plan 135 143,139 282 Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Specific Plan 4,622 1,967,982 1,578 MainPlace Specific Plan 1,900 2,426,923 5,380 Metro East Mixed -Use Overlay Zone 5,551 4,685,947 12,258 Midtown Specific Plan 607 1,818,253 4,615 Transit Zoning Code 6,449 4,939,266 13,022 ALL OTHER AREAS OF THE CITY3 70,574 40,325,086 95,670 CITYWIDE TOTAL 115,053 72,967,816 170,416 Source: City of Santa Ana 2020. 1 Only includes nonresidential building square footage. 2 The figures shown on the row for the Adaptive Reuse Overlay represents parcels that are exclusively in the Adaptive Reuse Overlay boundary. Figures for parcels that are within the boundaries of both the Adaptive Reuse Overlay Zone and a specific plan, other special zoning, or focus area boundary are accounted for in the respective specific plan, other special zoning, or focus area. 3 The City has included an assumption for growth on a small portion (5 percent) of residential parcels through the construction of second units, which is distributed throughout the city and is not concentrated in a subset of neighborhoods. Additional growth includes known projects in the pipeline and an increase of 10 percent in building square footage and employment for the professional office surrounding the Orange County Global Medical Center and along Broadway north of the Midtown Specific Plan. 1.3 PROJECT LOCATION The City of Santa Ana is in the western central portion of Orange County, approximately 30 miles southwest of the city of Los Angeles and 10 miles northeast of the city of Newport Beach. The city is bordered by the city of Orange and unincorporated areas of Orange County to the north, the city of Tustin to the east, the cities of Irvine and Costa Mesa to the south, and the cities of Fountain Valley and Garden Grove to the west. In November 2019, the City annexed the 17th Street Island, a 24.78-acre area in the northeast portion of the city. The 17th Street Island is bounded by State Route 55 to the east, 17th Street to the south, and North Tustin Avenue to the west. The city also includes a portion of the Santa Ana River Drainage Channel within its sphere of influence (SOI). The city and its SOI are defined and referred to herein as the plan area. City Council 30 - 234 4/19/2022 October 2021 Page 5 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 1.4 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM ORGANIZATION CEQA requires that a reporting or monitoring program be adopted for the conditions of project approval that are necessary to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment (Public Resources Code 21081.6). The mitigation monitoring and reporting program is designed to ensure compliance with adopted mitigation measures during project implementation. For each mitigation measure recommended in the Draft PEIR and Recirculated Draft PEIR, specifications are made herein that identify the action required and the monitoring and reporting that must occur. In addition, a responsible agency is identified for verifying compliance with individual conditions of approval contained in the MMRP. To effectively track and document the status of mitigation measures, a mitigation matrix has been prepared (see Table 1-3). City Council Page 6 30 — 235 4/19/2022 PlaceWorks GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Responsible Document Location Completion Date Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible I Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor 5.2 AIR QUALITY AQ-1 Prior to discretionary approval by the City of Santa Ana for Prior to Project Applicant City of Santa City of Santa development projects subject to CEQA (California Environmental discretionary and Construction Ana Building Ana Building Quality Act) review (i.e., non-exempt projects), project applicants shall approval Contractor Safety Division Safety prepare and submit a technical assessment evaluating potential project Division construction -related air quality impacts to the City of Santa Ana for review and approval. The evaluation shall be prepared in conformance with South Coast Air Quality Management District (South Coast AQMD) methodology for assessing air quality impacts. If construction -related criteria air pollutants are determined to have the potential to exceed the South Coast AQMD's adopted thresholds of significance, the City of Santa Ana shall require that applicants for new development projects incorporate mitigation measures to reduce air pollutant emissions during construction activities. These identified measures shall be incorporated into all appropriate construction documents (e.g., construction management plans) submitted to the City and shall be verified by the City. Mitigation measures to reduce construction -related emissions could include, but are not limited to: • Require fugitive -dust control measures that exceed South Coast AQMD's Rule 403, such as: • Use of nontoxic soil stabilizers to reduce wind erosion. • Apply water every four hours to active soil -disturbing activities. • Tarp and/or maintain a minimum of 24 inches of freeboard on trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials. • Use construction equipment rated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as having Tier 3 (model year 2006 or newer) or Tier 4 (model year 2008 or newer) emission limits, applicable for engines between 50 and 750 horsepower. • Ensure that construction equipment is properly serviced and maintained to the manufacturer's standards. • Limit nonessential idling of construction equipment to no more than five consecutive minutes. October 2 age 7 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Document Completion Date Responsible Location Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor • Limit on -site vehicle travel speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour. • Install wheel washers for all exiting trucks or wash off all trucks and equipment leaving the project area. • Use Super -Compliant VOC paints for coating of architectural surfaces whenever possible. A list of Super -Compliant architectural coating manufactures can be found on the South Coast AQMD's website. AQ-2 Prior to discretionary approval by the City of Santa Ana for Prior to the Property Owner/ City of Santa City of Santa development projects subject to CEQA (California Environmental discretionary Developer Ana Building Ana Building Quality Act) review (i.e., non-exempt projects), project applicants shall approval Safety Division Safety prepare and submit a technical assessment evaluating potential project Division operation phase -related air quality impacts to the City of Santa Ana for review and approval. The evaluation shall be prepared in conformance with South Coast Air Quality Management District (South Coast AQMD) methodology in assessing air quality impacts. If operation -related air pollutants are determined to have the potential to exceed the South Coast AQMD's adopted thresholds of significance, the City of Santa Ana shall require that applicants for new development projects incorporate mitigation measures to reduce air pollutant emissions during operational activities. The identified measures shall be included as part of the conditions of approval. Possible mitigation measures to reduce long-term emissions could include, but are not limited to the following: • For site -specific development that requires refrigerated vehicles, the construction documents shall demonstrate an adequate number of electrical service connections at loading docks for plug- in of the anticipated number of refrigerated trailers to reduce idling time and emissions. Applicants for manufacturing and light industrial uses shall consider energy storage and combined heat and power in appropriate applications to optimize renewable energy generation systems and avoid peak energy use. Page 8 ace orks GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Responsible Document Location Completion Date Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor • Site -specific developments with truck delivery and loading areas and truck parking spaces shall include signage as a reminder to limit idling of vehicles while parked for loading/unloading in accordance with California Air Resources Board Rule 2845 (13 CCR Chapter 10 § 2485). • Provide changing/shower facilities as specified in Section A5.106.4.3 of the CALGreen Code (Nonresidential Voluntary Measures). • Provide bicycle parking facilities per Section A4.106.9 (Residential Voluntary Measures) of the CALGreen Code and Sec. 41-1307.1 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. • Provide preferential parking spaces for low -emitting, fuel -efficient, and carpool/van vehicles per Section A5.106.5.1 of the CALGreen Code (Nonresidential Voluntary Measures). • Provide facilities to support electric charging stations per Section A5.106.5.3 (Nonresidential Voluntary Measures) and Section A5.106.8.2 (Residential Voluntary Measures) of the CALGreen Code. • Applicant -provided appliances (e.g., dishwashers, refrigerators, clothes washers, and dryers) shall be Energy Star —certified appliances or appliances of equivalent energy efficiency. Installation of Energy Star —certified or equivalent appliances shall be verified by Building & Safety during plan check. • Applicants for future development projects along existing and planned transit routes shall coordinate with the City of Santa Ana and Orange County Transit Authority to ensure that bus pad and shelter improvements are incorporated, as appropriate. October 2 age 9 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Document Completion Date Responsible Location Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor AQ-3 Prior to discretionary approval by the City of Santa Ana, project Prior to future Property Owner/ City of Santa City of Santa applicants for new industrial or warehousing development projects that discretionary Developer Ana Building Ana Building 1) have the potential to generate 100 or more diesel truck trips per day project approval Safety Division Safety or have 40 or more trucks with operating diesel -powered transport Division refrigeration units, and 2) are within 1,000 feet of a sensitive land use (e.g., residential, schools, hospitals, or nursing homes), as measured from the property line of the project to the property line of the nearest sensitive use, shall submit a health risk assessment (HRA) to the City of Santa Ana for review and approval. The HRA shall be prepared in accordance with policies and procedures of the State Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment and the South Coast Air Quality Management District and shall include all applicable stationary and mobile/area source emissions generated by the proposed project at the project site. If the HRA shows that the incremental cancer risk and/or noncancer hazard index exceed the respective thresholds, as established by the South Coast AQMD at the time a project is considered (i.e., 10 in one million cancer risk and 1 hazard index), the project applicant will be required to identify and demonstrate that best available control technologies for toxics (T-BACTs), including appropriate enforcement mechanisms, are capable of reducing potential cancer and noncancer risks to an acceptable level. T-BACTs may include, but are not limited to, restricting idling on -site, electrifying warehousing docks to reduce diesel particulate matter, or requiring use of newer equipment and/or vehicles. T BACTs identified in the HRA shall be identified as mitigation measures in the environmental document and/or incorporated into the site plan. AQ-4 Prior to discretionary approval by the City of Santa Ana, if it is Prior to future Property Owner/ City of Santa City of Santa determined that a development project has the potential to emit discretionary Developer Ana Building Ana Building nuisance odors beyond the property line, an odor management plan project approval Safety Division Safety shall be prepared by the project applicant and submitted to the City of Division Santa Ana for review and approval. Facilities that have the potential to generate nuisance odors include, but are not limited to: • Wastewater treatment plants Page 1 ace ork r GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Responsible Document Location Completion Date Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor • Composting, green waste, or recycling facilities • Fiberglass manufacturing facilities Painting/coating operations • Large -capacity coffee roasters • Food -processing facilities The odor management plan shall demonstrate compliance with the South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 402 for nuisance odors. The Odor Management Plan shall identify the best available control technologies for toxics (T-BACTs) that will be utilized to reduce potential odors to acceptable levels, including appropriate enforcement mechanisms. T-BACTs may include but are not limited to scrubbers (i.e., air pollution control devices) at the industrial facility. T-BACTs identified in the odor management plan shall be identified as mitigation measures in the environmental document prepared for the development project and/or incorporated into the project's site plan. 5.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES BIO-1 For development or redevelopment projects that would disturb Concurrent with Project Applicant/ City of Santa City of Santa vegetated land or major stream and are subject to CEQA, a qualified submittal of site Developer Ana Building Ana Building biologist shall conduct an initial screening to determine whether a site- development plans Safety Division Safety Division specific biological resource report is warranted. If needed, a qualified and prior to the biologist shall conduct a field survey for the site and prepare a issuance of biological resource assessment for the project, including an grading permits assessment of potential impacts to sensitive species, habitats, and jurisdictional waters. The report shall recommend mitigation measures, as appropriate, to avoid or limit potential biological resource impacts to less than significant. 5.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES CUL-1 Identification of Historical Resources and Potential Project Prior to issuance Project City of Santa City of Santa Impacts. For structures 45 years or older, a Historical Resources of grading permits Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building Assessment (HRA) shall be prepared by an architectural historian or Developer Safety Division Safety historian meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Division October 2 age 91 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Document Completion Date Responsible Location Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor Qualification Standards. The HRA shall include: definition of a study area or area of potential effect, which will encompass the affected property and may include surrounding properties or historic district(s); an intensive level survey of the study area to identify and evaluate under federal, State, and local criteria significance historical resources that might be directly or indirectly affected by the proposed project; and an assessment of project impacts. The HRA shall satisfy federal and State guidelines for the identification, evaluation, and recordation of historical resources. An HRA is not required if an existing historic resources survey and evaluation of the property is available; however, if the existing survey and evaluation is more than five years old, it shall be updated. CUL-2 Use of the Secretary of the Interior's Standards. The Secretary of Prior to any Property Owner City of Santa City of Santa the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties shall be disturbance of a or Project Ana Building Ana Building used to the maximum extent practicable to ensure that projects historical resource, Applicant/ Safety Division Safety involving the relocation, conversion, rehabilitation, or alteration of a as determined by Developer Division historical resource and its setting or related new construction will not the intensive -level impair the significance of the historical resource. Use of the Standards historical shall be overseen by an architectural historian or historic architect evaluation of a meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification property Standards. Evidence of compliance with the Standards shall be provided to the City in the form of a report identifying and photographing character -defining features and spaces and specifying how the proposed treatment of character -defining features and spaces and related construction activities will conform to the Standards. The Qualified Professional shall monitor the construction and provide a report to the City at the conclusion of the project. Use of the Secretary's Standards shall reduce the project impacts on historical resources to less than significant. Page 9 ace orks GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Responsible Document Location Completion Date Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor CUL-3 Documentation, Education, and Memorial ization. If the City Prior to the Project City of Santa City of Santa determines that significant impacts to historical resources cannot be issuance of Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building avoided, the City shall require, at a minimum, that the affected historical grading permits, Developer Safety Division Safety resources be thoroughly documented before issuance of any permits and for any Division and may also require additional public education efforts and/or subsequent permit memorialization of the historical resource. Though demolition or involving alteration of a historical resource such that its significance is materially excavation to impaired cannot be mitigated to a less than significant level, recordation increased depth of the resource will reduce significant adverse impacts to historical resources to the maximum extent feasible. Such recordation should be prepared under the supervision of an architectural historian, historian, or historic architect meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards and should take the form of Historic American Buildings Survey (NABS) documentation. At a minimum, this recordation should include an architectural and historical narrative; archival photographic documentation; and supplementary information, such as building plans and elevations and/or historic photographs. The documentation package should be reproduced on archival paper and should be made available to researchers and the public through accession by appropriate institutions such as the Santa Ana Library History Room, the South Central Coastal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton, and/or the HABS collection housed in the Library of Congress. Depending on the significance of the adversely affected historical resource, the City, at its discretion, may also require public education about the historical resource in the form of an exhibit, web page, brochure, or other format and/or memorialization of the historical resource on or near the proposed project site. If memorialized, such memorialization shall be a permanent installation, such as a mural, display, or other vehicle that recalls the location, appearance, and historical significance of the affected historical resource, and shall be designed in conjunction with a qualified architectural historian, historian, or historic architect. October 2 age 13 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Document Completion Date Responsible Location Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor CUL-4 For projects with ground disturbance—e.g., grading, excavation, Prior to the Project City of Santa City of Santa trenching, boring, or demolition that extend below the current grade— issuance of Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building prior to issuance of any permits required to conduct ground -disturbing grading permits Developer Safety Division Safety activities, the City shall require an Archaeological Resources Division Assessment be conducted under the supervision of an archaeologist that meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professionally Qualified Standards in either prehistoric or historic archaeology. Assessments shall include a California Historical Resources Information System records search at the South Central Coastal Information Center and of the Sacred Land Files maintained by the Native American Heritage Commission. The records searches will determine if the proposed project area has been previously surveyed for archaeological resources, identify and characterize the results of previous cultural resource surveys, and disclose any cultural resources that have been recorded and/or evaluated. If unpaved surfaces are present within the project area, and the entire project area has not been previously surveyed within the past 10 years, a Phase I pedestrian survey shall be undertaken in proposed project areas to locate any surface cultural materials that may be present. CUL-5 If potentially significant archaeological resources are identified, and Prior to any ground Project City of Santa City of Santa impacts cannot be avoided, a Phase II Testing and Evaluation disturbing activities Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building investigation shall be performed by an archaeologist who meets the Developer Safety Division Safety Secretary of the Interior's Standards to determine significance prior to Division any ground -disturbing activities. If resources are determined significant or unique through Phase II testing, and site avoidance is not possible, appropriate site -specific mitigation measures shall be undertaken. These might include a Phase III data recovery program implemented by a qualified archaeologist and performed in accordance with the Office of Historical Preservation's "Archaeological Resource Management Reports (ARMR): Recommended Contents and Format" (OHP 1990) and "Guidelines for Archaeological Research Designs" (OHP 1991). Page 14 ace orks GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Responsible Document Location Completion Date Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor CUL-6 If the archaeological assessment did not identify archaeological Prior to Project City of Santa City of Santa resources but found the area to be highly sensitive for archaeological construction Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building resources, a qualified archaeologist and a Native American monitor activities Developer Safety Division Safety approved by a California Native American Tribe identified by the Native Division American Heritage Commission as culturally affiliated with the project area shall monitor all ground -disturbing construction and pre - construction activities in areas of high sensitivity. The archaeologist shall inform all construction personnel prior to construction activities of the proper procedures in the event of an archaeological discovery. The training shall be held in conjunction with the project's initial on -site safety meeting and shall explain the importance and legal basis for the protection of significant archaeological resources. The Native American monitor shall be invited to participate in this training. In the event that archaeological resources (artifacts or features) are exposed during ground -disturbing activities, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall be halted while the resources are evaluated for significance by an archaeologist who meets the Secretary's Standards. This will include tribal consultation and coordination with the Native American monitor in the case of a prehistoric archaeological resource or tribal resource. If the discovery proves to be significant, the long-term disposition of any collected materials should be determined in consultation with the affiliated tribe(s), where relevant; this could include curation with a recognized scientific or educational repository, transfer to the tribe, or respectful reinternment in an area designated by the tribe. October 2 age 15 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Responsible Document Location Completion Date Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor CUL-7 If an Archaeological Resources Assessment does not identify Prior to Project City of Santa City of Santa potentially significant archaeological resources but the site has construction Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building moderate sensitivity for archaeological resources (Mitigation Measure activities Developer Safety Division Safety CUL-4), an archaeologist who meets the Secretary's Standards shall Division be retained on call. The archaeologist shall inform all construction personnel prior to construction activities about the proper procedures in the event of an archaeological discovery. The pre -construction training shall be held in conjunction with the project's initial on -site safety meeting and shall explain the importance and legal basis for the protection of significant archaeological resources. In the event that archaeological resources (artifacts or features) are exposed during ground -disturbing activities, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall be halted while the on -call archaeologist is contacted. The resource shall be evaluated for significance and tribal consultation shall be conducted, in the case of a tribal resource. If the discovery proves to be significant, the long-term disposition of any collected materials should be determined in consultation with the affiliated tribe(s), where relevant. 5.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS GEO-1 High Sensitivity. Projects involving ground disturbances in previously During ground Project City of Santa City of Santa undisturbed areas mapped as having "high" paleontological sensitivity disturbing activities Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building shall be monitored by a qualified paleontological monitor on a full-time Developer Safety Division Safety basis. Monitoring shall include inspection of exposed sedimentary units Division during active excavations within sensitive geologic sediments. The monitor shall have authority to temporarily divert activity away from exposed fossils to evaluate the significance of the find and, if the fossils are determined to be significant, professionally and efficiently recover the fossil specimens and collect associated data. The paleontological monitor shall use field data forms to record pertinent location and geologic data, measure stratigraphic sections (if applicable), and collect appropriate sediment samples from any fossil localities.. Page 16 ace orks GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Document Completion Date Responsible Location Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor GEO-2 Low -to -High Sensitivity. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for Prior to the Project City of Santa City of Santa projects involving ground disturbance in previously undisturbed areas issuance of Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building mapped with "low -to -high" paleontological sensitivity (see Figure 5.6-3), grading permits Developer Safety Division Safety the project applicant shall consult with a geologist or paleontologist to Division confirm whether the grading would occur at depths that could encounter highly sensitive sediments for paleontological resources. If confirmed that underlying sediments may have high sensitivity, construction activity shall be monitored by a qualified paleontologist. The paleontologist shall have the authority to halt construction during construction activity as outlined in Mitigation Measure GEO-3. GEO-3 All Projects. In the event of any fossil discovery, regardless of depth or During ground Project City of Santa City of Santa geologic formation, construction work shall halt within a 50-foot radius disturbing activities Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building of the find until its significance can be determined by a qualified Developer Safety Division Safety paleontologist. Significant fossils shall be recovered, prepared to the Division point of curation, identified by qualified experts, listed in a database to facilitate analysis, and deposited in a designated paleontological curation facility in accordance with the standards of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (2010). The most likely repository is the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. The repository shall be identified and a curatorial arrangement shall be signed prior to collection of the fossils. 5.7 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS GHG-1 The City of Santa Ana shall update the Climate Action Plan (CAP) Every five years City of Santa City of Santa City of Santa every five years to ensure the City is monitoring the plan's progress Ana Building Ana Building Ana Building toward achieving the City's greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction target Safety Division in Safety Division Safety and to require amendment if the plan is not achieving the specified coordination with Division level. The update shall consider a trajectory consistent with the GHG Project emissions reduction goal established under Executive Order S-03-05 Applicant/ for year 2050 and the latest applicable statewide legislative GHG Developer emission reduction that may be in effect at the time of the CAP update (e.g., Senate Bill 32 for year 2030). The CAP update shall include the following: October 2 age 17 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Responsible Document Location Completion Date Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor • GHG inventories of existing and forecast year GHG levels. • Tools and strategies for reducing GHG emissions to ensure a trajectory with the long-term GHG reduction goal of Executive Order S-03-05. • Plan implementation guidance that includes, at minimum, the following components consistent with the proposed CAP: • Administration and Staffing • Finance and Budgeting ■ Timelines for Measure Implementation ■ Community Outreach and Education ■ Monitoring, Reporting, and Adaptive Management ■ Tracking Tools Furthermore, the following measures will be considered when the City updates the Climate Action Plan: • Measures to protect the most vulnerable populations • Measure to increase carbon sinks • Standards for electric vehicle parking • Standards for construction projects 5.12 NOISE _ N-1 Construction contractors shall implement the following measures for Prior to issuance Project City of Santa City of Santa construction activities conducted in the City of Santa Ana. Construction of demolition, Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building plans submitted to the City shall identify these measures on demolition, grading, and/or Developer and Safety Division Safety grading, and construction plans submitted to the City: The City of Santa building permits Architect Division Ana Planning and Building Agency shall verify that grading, demolition, and/or construction plans submitted to the City include these notations prior to issuance of demolition, grading, and/or building permits. • Construction activity is limited to the hours: Between 7 AM to 8 PM Monday through Saturday, as prescribed in Municipal Code Section 18-314(e). Construction is prohibited on Sundays. • During the entire active construction period, equipment and trucks used for project construction shall use the best -available noise control techniques (e.g., improved mufflers, equipment re -design, Page 1 ace ork r GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Responsible Document Location Completion Date Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor use of intake silencers, ducts, engine enclosures, and acoustically attenuating shields or shrouds), wherever feasible. • Impact tools (e.g., jack hammers and hoe rams) shall be hydraulically or electrically powered wherever possible. Where the use of pneumatic tools is unavoidable, an exhaust muffler on the compressed air exhaust shall be used along with external noise jackets on the tools. • Stationary equipment, such as generators and air compressors shall be located as far as feasible from nearby noise -sensitive uses. • Stockpiling shall be located as far as feasible from nearby noise - sensitive receptors. • Construction traffic shall be limited, to the extent feasible, to approved haul routes established by the City Planning and Building Agency. • At least 10 days prior to the start of construction activities, a sign shall be posted at the entrance(s) to the job site, clearly visible to the public, that includes permitted construction days and hours, as well as the telephone numbers of the City's and contractor's authorized representatives that are assigned to respond in the event of a noise or vibration complaint. If the authorized contractor's representative receives a complaint, he/she shall investigate, take appropriate corrective action, and report the action to the City. • Signs shall be posted at the job site entrance(s), within the on -site construction zones, and along queueing lanes (if any) to reinforce the prohibition of unnecessary engine idling. All other equipment shall be turned off if not in use for more than 5 minutes. • During the entire active construction period and to the extent feasible, the use of noise -producing signals, including horns, whistles, alarms, and bells, shall be for safety warning purposes only. The construction manager shall use smart back-up alarms, which automatically adjust the alarm level based on the October 2 age 19 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Document Completion Date Responsible Location Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor background noise level or switch off back-up alarms and replace with human spotters in compliance with all safety requirements and laws. • Erect temporary noise barriers (at least as high as the exhaust of equipment and breaking line -of -sight between noise sources and sensitive receptors), as necessary and feasible, to maintain construction noise levels at or below the performance standard of 80 dBA Leq. Barriers shall be constructed with a solid material that has a density of at least 4 pounds per square foot with no gaps from the ground to the top of the barrier. N-2 Prior to issuance of a building permit for a project requiring pile driving Prior to the Project City of Santa City of Santa during construction within 135 feet of fragile structures, such as historical issuance of Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building resources, 100 feet of non -engineered timber and masonry buildings building permits Developer Safety Division Safety (e.g., most residential buildings), or within 75 feet of engineered concrete Division and masonry (no plaster); or a vibratory roller within 25 feet of any structure, the project applicant shall prepare a noise and vibration analysis to assess and mitigate potential noise and vibration impacts related to these activities. This noise and vibration analysis shall be conducted by a qualified and experienced acoustical consultant or engineer. The vibration levels shall not exceed Federal Transit Administration (FTA) architectural damage thresholds (e.g., 0.12 inches per second [in/sec] peak particle velocity [PPV] for fragile or historical resources, 0.2 in/sec PPV for non -engineered timber and masonry buildings, and 0.3 in/sec PPV for engineered concrete and masonry). If vibration levels would exceed this threshold, alternative uses such as drilling piles as opposed to pile driving and static rollers as opposed to vibratory rollers shall be used. If necessary, construction vibration monitoring shall be conducted to ensure vibration thresholds are not exceeded. N-3 New residential projects (or other noise -sensitive uses) located within Prior to the Project City of Santa City of Santa 200 feet of existing railroad lines shall be required to conduct a issuance of Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building groundborne vibration and noise evaluation consistent with Federal building permits Developer Safety Division Safety Transit Administration (FTA)-approved methodologies. Division Page 2 aceUlorks GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Responsible Document Location Completion Date Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor N-4 During the project -level California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Prior to the Project City of Santa City of Santa process for industrial developments under the General Plan Update or issuance of Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building other projects that could generate substantial vibration levels near building permits Developer and Safety Division Safety sensitive uses, a noise and vibration analysis shall be conducted to Acoustical Division assess and mitigate potential noise and vibration impacts related to the Engineer operations of that individual development. This noise and vibration analysis shall be conducted by a qualified and experienced acoustical consultant or engineer and shall follow the latest CEQA guidelines, practices, and precedents. 5.15 RECREATION REC-1 The City shall monitor new residential development within the Dyer/55 Prior to the Project City of Santa City of Santa Fwy focus area. Development proposals for projects including 100 or issuance of Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building more residential units shall be required to prepare a public park occupancy permits Developer Safety Division Safety utilization study to evaluate the project's potential impacts on existing Division public parks within a one half (1/2) mile radius to the focus area. The evaluation shall include the population increase due to the project and the potential for the new resident population to impact existing public parks within the radius. Each study shall also consider the cumulative development in the Dyer/55 Fwy and the potential for a cumulative impact on existing public parks within the radius. If the study determines that the project, or it's incremental cumulative impacts would result in a significant impact (substantial physical deterioration or substantial acceleration of deterioration) to existing public parks, the project shall be required to mitigate this impact. Measures to mitigate the significant impact may include but are not limited to land dedication and fair -share contribution to acquire new or to enhance existing public parks within the radius. Mitigation shall be completed prior to issuance of occupancy permits. 5.16 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES CUL-4 For projects with ground disturbance—e.g., grading, excavation, Prior to the Project City of Santa I City of Santa I trenching, boring, or demolition that extend below the current grade— issuance of Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building prior to issuance of any permits required to conduct ground -disturbing grading permits Developer Safety Division October 2 age 21 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Document Completion Date Responsible Location Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor activities, the City shall require an Archaeological Resources Safety Assessment be conducted under the supervision of an archaeologist Division that meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professionally Qualified Standards in either prehistoric or historic archaeology. Assessments shall include a California Historical Resources Information System records search at the South Central Coastal Information Center and of the Sacred Land Files maintained by the Native American Heritage Commission. The records searches will determine if the proposed project area has been previously surveyed for archaeological resources, identify and characterize the results of previous cultural resource surveys, and disclose any cultural resources that have been recorded and/or evaluated. If unpaved surfaces are present within the project area, and the entire project area has not been previously surveyed within the past 10 years, a Phase I pedestrian survey shall be undertaken in proposed project areas to locate any surface cultural materials that may be present. CUL-5 If potentially significant archaeological resources are identified, and Prior to any ground Project City of Santa City of Santa impacts cannot be avoided, a Phase II Testing and Evaluation disturbing activities Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building investigation shall be performed by an archaeologist who meets the Developer Safety Division Safety Secretary of the Interior's Standards to determine significance prior to Division any ground -disturbing activities. If resources are determined significant or unique through Phase II testing, and site avoidance is not possible, appropriate site -specific mitigation measures shall be undertaken. These might include a Phase III data recovery program implemented by a qualified archaeologist and performed in accordance with the Office of Historical Preservation's "Archaeological Resource Management Reports (ARMR): Recommended Contents and Format" (OHP 1990) and "Guidelines for Archaeological Research Designs" (OHP 1991). CUL-6 If the archaeological assessment did not identify archaeological Prior to Project City of Santa City of Santa resources but found the area to be highly sensitive for archaeological construction Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building resources, a qualified archaeologist shall monitor all ground -disturbing activities Developer Safety Division Safety construction and pre -construction activities in areas with previously I I I I Division Page 2 ace ork r GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Document Completion Date Responsible Location Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor undisturbed soil. The archaeologist shall inform all construction personnel prior to construction activities of the proper procedures in the event of an archaeological discovery. The training shall be held in conjunction with the project's initial on -site safety meeting and shall explain the importance and legal basis for the protection of significant archaeological resources. In the event that archaeological resources (artifacts or features) are exposed during ground -disturbing activities, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall be halted while the resources are evaluated for significance by an archaeologist who meets the Secretary's Standards, and tribal consultation shall be conducted in the case of a tribal resource. If the discovery proves to be significant, the long-term disposition of any collected materials should be determined in consultation with the affiliated tribe(s), where relevant; this could include curation with a recognized scientific or educational repository, transfer to the tribe, or respectful reinternment in an area designated by the tribe. CUL-7 If an Archaeological Resources Assessment does not identify Prior to Project City of Santa City of Santa potentially significant archaeological resources but the site has construction Applicant/ Ana Building Ana Building moderate sensitivity for archaeological resources (Mitigation Measure activities Developer Safety Division Safety CUL-4), an archaeologist who meets the Secretary's Standards shall Division be retained on call. The archaeologist shall inform all construction personnel prior to construction activities about the proper procedures in the event of an archaeological discovery. The pre -construction training shall be held in conjunction with the project's initial on -site safety meeting and shall explain the importance and legal basis for the protection of significant archaeological resources. In the event that archaeological resources (artifacts or features) are exposed during ground -disturbing activities, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall be halted while the on -call archaeologist is contacted. The resource shall be evaluated for significance and tribal consultation shall be conducted, in the case of a tribal resource. If the discovery proves to be significant, the long-term disposition of any October 2 age 23 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Responsible Document Location Completion Date Implementing Responsible (Monitoring Responsible Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Timing Party Monitoring Party Record) Monitoring Party Monitor collected materials should be determined in consultation with the affiliated tribe(s), where relevant. Page 24 ace orks GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CITY OF SANTA ANA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program This page intentionally left blank. October 2 age 25 RESOLUTION NO. 2022-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA OVERRULING THE ORANGE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION'S DETERMINATION THAT THE PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN UPDATE IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE AIRPORT ENVIRONS LAND USE PLAN FOR JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT, INCLUDING SUPPORTIVE FINDINGS WHEREAS, Article 5 of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 (commencing with Section 65300) of the Government Code requires the City to prepare and adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of the City; and WHEREAS, the City of Santa Ana now seeks to adopt a comprehensive update to the Santa Ana General Plan; and WHEREAS, the General Plan Update ("project") also requires the certification of the Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report and related documents that have been completed for the project, which approval will be concurrent with the approval of the General Plan Update; and WHEREAS, the project as currently proposed entails, among other things, (1) the revision to the State mandated Elements of the General Plan; (2) the inclusion of optional Elements to the General Plan; and (3) approval of General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 2020-06, which would result in a comprehensive update to the existing General Plan; and WHEREAS, the City of Santa Ana is also located partially within the area contained within the scope of the Airport Environs Land Use Plan for John Wayne Airport ("AELUP"); and WHEREAS, California Public Utilities Code section 21676(b) requires the City to refer projects requiring a general plan amendment or a zone change to the Airport Land Use Commission for Orange County ("ALUC") for consistency with the AELUP; and WHEREAS, the City submitted the General Plan Update to the ALUC for consistency review on September 17, 2020; and WHEREAS, on October 15, 2020, the ALUC, by vote of 5-0, found the General Plan Update to be inconsistent with the Airport Environs Land Use Plan for John Wayne Airport pursuant to AELUP sections 1.2, 2.1.4, and 3.2.1, and Public Utilities Code section 21674, due to (1) proferred aircraft noise and safety issues relative to the allowed placement of residential units within the flight corridor in the 55 Freeway/Dyer Road Focus Area and (2) proferred building height issues in a portion of the South Bristol Street Focus Area (between MacArthur Boulevard and Sunflower Avenue); and City Council 30 — 255 Resolution NV.12NRRX Page 1 of 11 WHEREAS, pursuant to Public Utilities Code section 21676(b), the City may overrule the ALUC by a two-thirds vote of the City Council if it makes specific findings that the project is consistent with the purpose of the State Aeronautics Act; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Public Utilities Code section 21676(b), on October 16, 2020, with the requisite 45-day notice, the Santa Ana City Council adopted a resolution of intent to overrule the determination of inconsistency by the ALUC, Resolution No. 2020-078, and provided the ALUC with notice thereof, including proposed findings; and WHEREAS, by letter dated November 12, 2020, and in accordance with Public Utilities Code section 21676, the ALUC submitted written comments to the City addressing the City's proposed overruling; and WHEREAS, on November 9, 2020, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Final Program Environmental Report and General Plan Update, at which the Planning Commission voted not to certify the Final PEIR and continue work on the General Plan Update to a future date to allow additional time for outreach to Santa Ana's environmental justice communities and in view of the COVID- 19 pandemic; and WHEREAS, the Santa Ana General Plan Update subsequently underwent revisions that were not materially different from what was originally submitted to the ALUC for review, leaving the Land Use Element unchanged, nor were any new elements added that include changes within the JWA Planning area; and WHEREAS, the written comments received from the ALUC have been included in the public record as required by Public Utilities Code section 21676; and WHEREAS, in 2021, a Recirculated Draft Program Environmental Impact Report was prepared and circulated in accordance with all legal requisites, as a supplemental analysis to the original Draft PEIR to reflect the updates to the project and based on an intensive, extended community outreach program conducted by the City between January and May 2021; and WHEREAS, on November 8, 2021, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Final Recirculated PEIR and General Plan Update. After hearing all relevant testimony from staff, the public, and the City's consultant team, the Planning Commission voted to recommend that the City Council certify the Final Recirculated PEIR, adopt the findings of fact, the statement of overriding considerations, and the mitigation monitoring and reporting program, and approve the project; and WHEREAS, on December 7, 2021, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Final Recirculated PEIR, General Plan Update, and the proposed overruling of the determination of inconsistency by the ALUC, which hearing was successively continued to City Council meetings on December 21, 2021, January 18, 2022, and February 15, 2022, respectively; and City Council 30 — 256 Resolution NV.12NRRX Page 2 of 11 WHEREAS, on February 15, 2022, the City Council heard the matter and afforded members of the public an opportunity to comment. No action on the item resulted; and WHEREAS, on April 19, 2022, and based on further comments received by City staff, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Final Recirculated PEIR, General Plan Update, and the proposed overruling of the determination of inconsistency by the ALUC, at which hearing members of the public were afforded an opportunity to comment and the project was fully considered. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana as follows: Section 1. The City of Santa Ana is required to provide findings of fact supporting the overrule of the ALUC's determination of inconsistency as required by Public Utilities Code section 21676(b). Those findings are attached as Exhibit A and incorporated here by reference as if set forth in full. Section 2. Based on these findings of fact and the associated substantial evidence in the public record, the City Council finds that the proposed action by the City on the General Plan Update is consistent with the purposes of the State Aeronautics Act as stated in PUC Section 21670 and consistent with the AELUP. Section 3. Based on the above evidence and findings made, and the remainder of the record in this matter, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby overrules the Orange County ALUC's determination that the General Plan Update is inconsistent with Airport Environs Land Use Plan for John Wayne Airport. Section 4. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the Clerk of the Council shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution. ADOPTED this day of , 2022. Vicente Sarmiento Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney By: �4 John M. Funk Sr. Assistant City Attorney City Council 30 — 257 Resolution NWAMRX Page 3 of 11 AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: NOT PRESENT Councilmembers Councilmembers Councilmembers Councilmembers CERTIFICATION OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY I, DAISY GOMEZ, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2022-XXX to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on Date: Clerk of the Council City of Santa Ana City Council 30 — 258 Resolution NV.12NRRX Page 4 of 11 EXHIBIT A FINDINGS OF FACT SUBJECT: CITY OF SANTA ANA NOTICE OF INTENT TO OVERRULE THE ORANGE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION'S DETERMINATION OF INCONSISTENCY FOR THE CITY OF SANTA ANA COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE, GOLDEN CITY BEYOND (2045) I. INTRODUCTION The City of Santa Ana ("City") is required to provide findings supporting the overrule of the Orange County Airport Land Use Commission's ("ALUC") determination of inconsistency as required in the California Public Utilities Code ("PUC") Section 21676(b). Based on the following Findings of Fact and the associated substantial evidence in the public record, the proposed action by the City on the General Plan Update, Golden City Beyond (2045) ("Project") is consistent with the purposes of the State Aeronautics Act as stated in PUC Section 21670, which provides, in relevant part: "It is the purpose of this article to protect public health, safety, and welfare by ensuring the orderly expansion of airports and the adoption of land use measures that minimize the public's exposure to excessive noise and safety hazards within areas around public airports to the extent that these areas are not already devoted to incompatible uses." Specifically, the City's proposed action on the Project provides for the orderly development of John Wayne Airport ("JWA"), and its surrounding area and promotes the overall goals and objectives of the State noise standards by avoiding new noise and safety problems, and protecting the public health, safety and welfare through the adoption of land use measures that minimize the public's exposure to excessive noise and safety hazards to the extent that this area is not already devoted to incompatible uses. II. FRAMEWORK It is in the public interest to: (1) provide for the orderly development of each public use airport in this state and the area surrounding these airports so as to (2) promote the overall goals and objectives of the California airport noise standards adopted pursuant to PUC Section 21669 and to (3) prevent the creation of new noise and safety problems. A. To provide for the orderly development of JWA and the area surrounding the airport, the ALUC adopted the 2008 Airport Environs Land Use Plan for John Wayne Airport ("JWA AELUP") on April 17, 2008. The JWA AELUP guides development proposals to provide for orderly development of the airport and the area surrounding the airport through implementation of the standards in Section 2.1 (aircraft noise, safety compatibility zones, building height restrictions). B. The ALUC also adopted a separate Airport Environs Land Use Plan for Heliports ("Heliports AELUP") on June 19, 2008. City Council 30 — 259 Resolution NWARPRRX Page 5 of 11 C. The ALUC is required to use the California Airport Land Use Planning Handbook ("Handbook") that was updated by the California Department of Transportation, Division of Aeronautics ("Caltrans") in 2011. Neither the JWA AELUP nor the Heliports AELUP have been updated to incorporate the Handbook's guidance. Likewise, the JWA AELUP has not been updated with information about the operation and environmental effects of JWA as reflected in its most recent Final Environmental Impact Report ("EIR"), certified by the Orange County Board of Supervisors on June 25, 2019 for the General Aviation Improvement Program ("GAIP"). D. On September 17, 2020, the City of Santa Ana presented the Project to the ALUC for a determination of consistency with the JWA AELUP and Heliports AELUP. E. The ALUC staff report dated October 15, 2020 ("Staff Report") recommends that the ALUC find the Project inconsistent with the JWA AELUP per Sections 1.2, 2.4.1, and 3.2.1 of the JWA AELUP, and per PUC Section 21674, due to 1) proffered aircraft "noise and safety issues" relative to the allowed placement of residential units "within the flight corridor" in the 55 Freeway/Dyer Road Focus Area; and 2) proffered building height issues in a portion of the South Bristol Street Focus Area (between MacArthur Boulevard and Sunflower Avenue). F. The ALUC Staff Report recommends that the ALUC find the Project consistent with the Heliports AELUP, with the condition that the City include a statement in the General Plan Update (Safety Element Policy S-4.4) that any proposals for heliports/helipads within the City be submitted through the City to ALUC for a consistency determination. G. On October 15, 2020, the ALUC held a public hearing and adopted a resolution finding the Project inconsistent with the JWA AELUP for the stated reasons set forth in the Staff Report, and further finding the Project consistent with the Heliports AELUP on the condition set forth in the Staff Report. H. The City of Santa Ana has the general police power to control land use within its territorial jurisdiction. (Cal. Const., art. XI 11, § 7). This constitutional authority is acknowledged in State law (PUC §§ 21670, 21676) and the ALUC process (JWA AELUP § 4.11) allowing for overrule of an ALUC finding of inconsistency. I. Pursuant to PUC Section 21676(b), the City may overrule the commission by a two- thirds vote of the City Council if it makes specific findings that the Project is consistent with the purposes of the State Aeronautics Act, as stated in PUC Section 21670. J. The City finds that the Project is consistent with the JWA AELUP and with the purposes of the State Aeronautics Act based on the following Findings of Fact and substantial evidence. III. FINDINGS OF FACT A. General Plan Update. The Project encompasses the entire City of Santa Ana. The General Plan Update set forth in the Project will change zoning and land use within five (5) geographic Focus Areas within the City. The comments in ALUC's Staff Report and ALUC's determination of inconsistency refer only to changes in land use within these five (5) Focus Areas. 1. The vast majority of the Project falls outside of the JWA AELUP planning area, which is defined in Section 1.7 of the JWA AELUP as "the furthest extent of the 60 CNEL City Council 30 — 260 Resolution NWARPRRX Page 6 of 11 Contour, the FAR Part 77 Notification Surface and the runway safety zones associated with the airport." 2. Both the Grand Ave/171" Street Focus Area and the West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area fall completely outside of the JWA AELUP planning area. 3. The 55 Freeway/Dyer Road Focus Area and South Bristol Focus Area are both located entirely within the JWA AELUP planning area. 4. The South Main Focus Area is located partially within the JWA AELUP planning area. B. Justification for Finding Project Consistent with the Purposes of PUC Section 21670. 1. Noise. The residential and commercial land uses under the proposed Project are consistent with the aircraft noise standards of the JWA AELUP and the requirements of PUC Section 21670. a. The majority of the Project falls outside of the 60 dBA CNEL aircraft noise contour (Exhibit 2). (1) Per the JWA AELUP, all land uses are normally consistent within the 60 dBA CNEL aircraft noise contour using conventional construction methods. No special noise reduction methods are required. See JWA AELUP at 23, Table 1. b. The vast majority of the Project is located outside of the JWA 65 dBA CNEL aircraft noise contour. (1) Per the JWA AELUP, commercial (e.g. retail and office), community facilities (e.g. churches, libraries, schools, preschools, day-care centers, hospitals, nursing/convalescent homes, & other noise sensitive uses), and industrial uses are all normally consistent within the 65 dBA CNEL aircraft noise contour. See JWA AELUP at 23, Table 1. (2) Per the JWA AELUP, single and multifamily residential uses are conditionally consistent within the 65 dBA CNEL aircraft noise contour. c. Of the five (5) Focus Areas that will include a change in zoning and land use designation under the Project, only the 55 Freeway/Dyer Road Focus Area lies partially within the 65 dBA CNEL aircraft noise contour. d. The General Plan Update states, as Policy N-1.3, that it shall be City policy to "[c]ollaborate with local and regional transit agencies and other jurisdictions to minimize regional traffic noise and other sources of noise in the City." e. Consistent with the JWA AELUP, the General Plan Update states, as Policy N- 3.3, that it shall be City policy to "[r]equire all residential land uses in 60 dB(A) CNEL or 65 dB(A) CNEL Noise Contours to be sufficiently mitigated so as not to exceed an interior standard of 45 Db(A) CNEL." f. Based on the foregoing, the Project will not result in the exposure of City residents to excess noise within the meaning of PUC Section 21670. City Council 30 — 261 Resolution NV..!2QRRX Page 7 of 11 2. Safety. The residential and commercial land uses under the proposed project are consistent with the safety standards of the JWA AELUP. a. Section 2.1.2 of the JWA AELUP describes the airport's safety compatibility zones. (1) Per Section 2.1.2 of the JWA AELUP, "Safety and compatibility zones depict which land uses are acceptable and which are unacceptable in various portions of airport environs." (2) The purpose of these zones, per the JWA AELUP, is to "support the continued use and operation of an airport by establishing compatibility and safety standards to promote air navigational safety and to reduce potential safety hazards for persons living, working or recreating near JWA." b. The JWA AELUP identifies the following Safety Zones: (1) Zone 1: Runway Protection Zone (2) Zone 2: Inner Approach/Departure (3) Zone 3: Inner Turning Zone (4) Zone 4: Outer Approach/Departure Zone (5) Zone 5: Sideline Zone (6) Zone 6: Traffic Pattern Zone c. The Project is not in the JWA runway protection zones (RPZ). d. None of the Project Focus Areas are in any of the JWA AELUP safety zones. JWA AELUP Safety Zone 6 overlays a small portion of the City south of MacArthur Boulevard, however the Project does not propose any change in land use or zoning in this area. e. The ALUC Staff Report states that "The proposed changes in Land Use in the 55/Dyer Focus Area would result in 9,952 total residential units within the flight corridor for John Wayne Airport subjecting future residents to noise and safety issues." (1) As noted above and in Section 2.1.2 and Appendix D of the JWA AELUP, the "flight corridor for John Wayne Airport" is not an identified Safety Zone for JWA. Nor is a "flight corridor" a defined, restrictive term in the JWA AELUP, the PUC, or the Federal Aviation Regulations. f. No part of the Project will be inconsistent with the policies set forth in Section 2.1.2 of the JWA AELUP regarding Safety Compatibility Zones. Furthermore, the ALUC did not find, and cannot find, that the Project is inconsistent with Section 2.1.2 of the JWA AELUP. g. Based on the foregoing, the Project will not result in the exposure of City residents to excessive safety hazards within the meaning of PUC Section 21670. City Council 30 — 262 Resolution NWARPRRX Page 8 of 11 3. Height. The residential and commercial land uses under the proposed project are consistent with the height standards of the JWA AELUP, which are stated in the Federal Aviation Regulations, 14 C.F.R. Part 77, relating to Safe, Efficient Use and Protection of the Navigable Airspace. a. The General Plan Update states, as Policy S-4.1 Structures above 200 feet, "[p]roposed projects that would exceed a height of 200 feet above existing grade shall be required to file a Form 7460-1 with the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA"). b. In response to Recommendation 1.b. from the ALUC Staff Report, the General Plan Update is revised to state, as Policy S-4.2 Federal Aviation Regulation Part 77, "[d]o not approve buildings and structures that would penetrate Federal Aviation Regulation ("FAR") Part 77 Imaginary Obstruction Surfaces, unless, consistent with PUC Section 21240, such building or structure is determined by the FAA to pose "no hazard" to air navigation." Additionally, under this Policy, applicants proposing buildings or structures that penetrate the 100:1 Notification Surface will be required to file a Form 7460-1 Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration with FAA and provide a copy of the FAA determination to the City and the ALUC. Referral to FAA for study under its Form 7460-1 process is appropriate because: (1) "The United States Government has exclusive sovereignty of airspace of the United States" (49 U.S.C. § 40103(a)(1)). (2) In order to use this airspace, the FAA Administrator is responsible for: (i) Plans and policy for the safe use of the navigable airspace (49 U.S.C. § 40103(b)(1)); and (ii) "[R]egulations on the flight of aircraft (including regulations on safe altitudes) for (A) navigating, protecting and identifying aircraft; (B) protecting individuals and property on the ground; (C) using the navigable airspace efficiently; and (D) preventing collision between aircraft, between aircraft and land or water vehicle, and between aircraft and airborne objects" (49 U.S.C. § 40103(b)(2)). (3) The FAA's aeronautical studies under FAR Part 77 are the definitive standard for assessing compliance with federal aviation safety laws and regulations (49 U.S.C. § 77.1(c)). This federal authority is recognized in State law. (PUC § sb21240). c. The maximum allowable building heights in the zoning and land use designations proposed in the 55 Freeway/Dyer Road Focus Area range between 6 and 10 stories, or about 60 and 100 feet above ground level ("AGL"). These maximum allowable building heights would not exceed the FAR Part 77 imaginary obstruction surfaces for JWA, including the sloping, three-dimensional 50:1 Departure Surface, the sloping, three-dimensional 20:1 conical surface, and the 206' above mean sea level ("AMSL") horizontal surface. d. The maximum allowable building heights in the zoning and land use designations proposed in the South Bristol Street Focus Area range between 10 and 25 City Council 30 — 263 Resolution NWARPRRX Page 9 of 11 stories, or about 100 to 250 feet AGL. Proponents of future structures exceeding 200 feet AGL and/or structures penetrating the 100:1 Notification Surface will be required to file a Form 7460-1 Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration with FAA and provide a copy of the FAA determination to the City. Per Policy S-4.2, the applicant would be required to obtain an FAA determination of no obstruction or no hazard to air navigation before seeking City approval. e. The maximum allowable building heights in the zoning and land use designations proposed in the South Main Street Focus Area range between 2 and 3 stories, or about 20 to 30 feet AGL. These maximum allowable building heights would not exceed the FAR Part 77 imaginary obstruction surfaces for JWA, including the sloping, three-dimensional 20:1 conical surface, and the 206' AMSL horizontal surface. f. The Project's requirement that future construction and development comply with the FAA's 7460-1 process ensures that building heights within the Project area will not pose a hazard to air navigation. This is consistent with and furthers the purposes of PUC Section 21670 by minimizing the public's exposure to safety hazards. g. The Project is an approval only as to land use designation and zoning. No specific structures are contemplated as part of the Project. Therefore, nothing in the Project will create an obstruction or hazard to air navigation within the meaning of 14 C.F.R. Part 77, and no part of the Project involves the proposed construction or alteration of any structure. Accordingly, no aeronautical study is required as part of the Project. See 49 U.S.C. § 44718; 14 C.F.R. Part 77; FAA Order JO 7400.2M. h. The Project does not create a safety hazard pursuant to PUC Section 21670. 4. Heliports. Heliports are not permitted in any residential (R1, R2, R3, or R4) District pursuant to Santa Ana Municipal Code section 41-621. Outside of residential Districts, heliports are only allowed with a conditional use permit ("CUP"). a. The General Plan Update states, as Policy S-4.4 Heliport/helistop approval and requirements, "Approve the development of a heliport or helistop only if it complies with the ALUP for heliports." Policy S-4.4 further makes it City policy to "[e]nsure that each applicant seeking a conditional use permit or similar approval for the construction or operation of a heliport or helistop complies fully with the state permit recommended by the FAA, by Orange County ALUC, and by Caltrans/Division of Aeronautics. This requirement shall be in addition to all other City development requirements." b. As described in Draft PEIR Section 5.8, any applicant proposing a heliport "shall undergo review by the ALUC, obtain an Airspace Analysis from the FAA as specified in Section 2.1.5 of the JWA AELUP, and confirm consistency with the JWA AELUP prior to construction, as specified in Section 4.7 of the JWA AELUP." c. The Project and existing provisions within the Santa Ana Municipal Code restrict the establishment of heliports within the City. Heliports are only allowed in non- residential districts, and only once the applicant obtains a CUP following FAA City Council 30 — 264 Resolution NV..Ik2�RRX Page 10 of 11 Airspace analysis and other review procedures. These restrictions minimize the public's exposure to excessive noise and safety hazards, in furtherance of the purposes of PUC Section 21670. d. ALUC has determined that the Project is consistent with the Heliports AELUP on condition that the City include a statement in the General Plan Update (Safety Element Policy S-4.4) that any proposals for heliports/helipads within the City be submitted through the City to ALUC for a consistency determination. City Council 30 — 265 Resolution NV.IM22DRRX Page 11 of 11 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ inte ' Focus Area/Location 411-131-22 2720 HOTEL TER GC 1.0 FAR density/intensity GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-131-38 1251 DYER RD GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-063-41 1231 E DYER RD GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-063-42 641 E DYER RD GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-131-06 2620 HOTEL TER GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-131-10 2601 HOTEL TER GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-131-12 2650 S GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-131-15 1351 E DYER RD GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-131-23 2700 HOTEL TER GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-131-28 2651 HOTEL TER GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-131-29 2726 S GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-131-30 1325 E DYER RD GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-131-31 2721 HOTEL TER GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-131-32 2701 HOTEL TER GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-131-33 1261 E DYER RD GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-131-34 1251 E DYER RD GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-131-36 1231 E DYER RD GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-131-37 1221 E DYER RD GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-131-39 1261 E DYER RD GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-131-40 1241 E DYER RD GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-132-01 2701 S GRAND AVE IND 0.45 FAR LU change GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-132-02 2721 S GRAND AVE IND 0.45 FAR LU change GC-1.5 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 411-131-11 ROW ROW LU change 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-04 1504 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-07 1530 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-08 1532 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-09 1534 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-10 1536 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-11 1538 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-13 1560 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-14 1570 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-15 1510 BROOKHOLLOW DR PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-16 1508 BROOKHOLLOW DR PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-17 1506 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-20 1524 BROOKHOLLOW DR PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-22 1528 BROOKHOLLOW DR PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-23 1524 BROOKHOLLOW DR PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-24 1528 BROOKHOLLOW DR PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-25 1506 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-26 1508 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-27 1580 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-28 1580 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-29 1581 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-30 1502 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-31 1500 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-32 1516 BROOKHOLLOW DR PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-33 1518 BROOKHOLLOW DR PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-34 1522 BROOKHOLLOW DR PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-36 1528 BROOKHOLLOW DR PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-38 1518 BROOKHOLLOW DR PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-39 152 - ad City Council 30 - 266 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Addres Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ inte Focus Area/Location 016-221-40 1524 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-41 1520 BROOKHOLLOW DR PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 016-221-42 1540 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-011-01 1801 E CARNEGIE AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-011-02 1749 CARNEGIE AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-011-03 2441 S PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-011-04 2401 S PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-011-05 2331 PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-012-02 2344 PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-012-03 2400 S PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-012-04 2350 PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-021-01 1831 CARNEGIE AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-021-02 1815 CARNEGIE AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-021-03 2321 PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-021-04 2311 S PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-021-05 1830 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-022-02 2322 S PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-022-03 2300 S PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-032-10 2501 S PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-032-11 1824 E CARNEGIE AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-032-17 1840 CARNEGIE AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-032-19 1813 E DYER RD PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-032-23 2601 DAIMLER ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-032-24 2621 S DAIMLER ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-032-25 2511 S DAIMLER ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-032-26 2525 PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-171-05 3050 S DAIMLER ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-171-07 1740 E GARRY AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-171-09 1800 E GARRY AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-173-02 2961 PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-173-04 2933 PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-173-05 2943 PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-173-06 1761 E GARRY AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-173-07 2913 PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-173-08 2901 PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-173-09 1750 E DEERE AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-173-10 2923 PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-173-11 2922 DAIMLER ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-173-12 1800 E DEERE AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-173-13 1830 E DEERE AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-173-14 2912 S DAIMLER ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-173-15 2932 DAIMLER ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-173-16 2938 S DAIMLER ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-173-17 2960 DAIMLER ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-173-18 2952 DAIMLER ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-173-19 2942 S DAIMLER ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-173-20 1811 E GARRY AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-173-21 1801 E GARRY AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-173-22 1751 E GARRY AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-181-16 2801 PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-181-18 1851 11 F QFFRF �AVF PAQ �O-S PAR ____��hangp I El LX-3 XLDgaLagad City Council 30 - 267 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Addres Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ inte Focus Area/Location 430-181-31 2871 PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-181-32 2865 PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-181-33 2851 PULLMAN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-191-07 2901 DAIMLER ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-191-08 2909 DAIMLER ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-191-11 2921 DAIMLER ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-191-12 3001 DAIMLER ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-191-13 3009 DAIMLER ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-222-10 1900 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-222-11 1900 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-031-02 2400 PULLMAN ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-3 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-222-21 1951 CARNEGIE AVE PAO 0.55 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-221-24 1951 E DYER RD DC 1.7 FAR density/intensity DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-032-07 1821 E DYER RD PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-032-16 1805 E DYER RD PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-181-13 PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-181-15 1800 E DYER RD PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-181-23 2001 E DEERE AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-181-24 2801 CATHERINE WAY PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-181-27 2040 E DYER RD PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-181-28 2850 RED HILL AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-182-01 1958 E BLAIR AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-191-14 3030 RED HILL AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-191-15 1940 E DEERE AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-191-16 1900 E DEERE AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-191-20 1901 E ALTON AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-191-21 1921 E ALTON AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-221-14 2510 RED HILL AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-221-15 2540 RED HILL AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-221-17 2530 RED HILL AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-221-18 2500 RED HILL AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-221-22 2001 E DYER RD PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-221-23 2600 S RED HILL PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-222-12 1900 E WARNER AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-222-15 2310 RED HILL AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-222-17 2001 CARNEGIE AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-222-18 2300 RED HILL AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-222-19 2001 CARNEGIE AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-222-20 1951 CARNEGIE AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-222-22 1921 CARNEGIE AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-222-23 1922 CARNEGIE AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-222-07 2300 RED HILL AVE DC 90 du/ac, 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 430-222-16 2310 S RED HILL AVE DC 90 du/ac, 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 55 Fwy/Dyer Road 002-201-20 2800 N MAIN ST DC 2.1 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Adjacent to MainPlace (not in SP) 002-210-34 2700 N MAIN ST DC 2.1 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Adjacent to MainPlace (not in SP) 002-210-40 2700 N MAIN ST DC 2.1 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Adjacent to MainPlace (not in SP) 002-210-44 2701 N MAIN ST DC 2.1 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Adjacent to MainPlace (not in SP) 405-261-17 812 N BAKER ST PAO 1.0 FAR LU change LR-7 Civic Center Specific Dev Plan 405-261-18 808 N BAKER ST PAO 1.0 FAR LU change LR-7 Civic Center Specific Dev Plan 405-261-19 804 N BAKER ST PAO 1.0 FAR LU change LR-7 Civic Center Specific Dev Plan 405-233-19 111 cific Dev Plan City Council 30 - 268 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Addres Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ cus Area/Location 405-233-35 1111 W CIVIC CENTER DR PAO 1.0 FAR LU change INS Civic Center Specific Dev Plan 405-233-36 1112 W CIVIC CENTER DR PAO 1.0 FAR LU change INS Civic Center Specific Dev Plan 415-031-33 4040 W CARRIGE DR IND 0.47 FAR density/intensity IND Add Note GPA 2000-08.47 FAR ex 415-031-37 4140 W GARRY AVE IND 0.47 FAR density/intensity IND Add Note GPA 2000-08.47 FAR ex 400-131-02 1404 N TUSTIN AVE PAO 1.0 FAR LU change LR-7 First St/Tustin Ave 396-211-38 2003 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-211-39 2011 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-211-44 1823 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-211-48 1827 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-211-49 1821 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-211-52 1745 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-211-53 1735 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-211-54 1729 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-211-55 1805 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-211-57 1301 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-211-58 1325 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-162-01 902 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-162-08 1002 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-162-09 1008 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 Grand Ave/17th Street 400-231-01 1300 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 Grand Ave/17th Street 400-231-02 1330 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 Grand Ave/17th Street 400-243-01 1430 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 Grand Ave/17th Street 400-243-02 1618 N LINWOOD AVE GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-02 1104 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-43 1116 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-44 1118 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-58 1108 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-60 1102 E Seventeenth St GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-62 1112 E Seventeenth ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-64 1112 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-66 1120 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-082-33 1124 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-082-39 1124 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-201-02 2201 N GRAND AVE INS 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-191-01 2210 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-191-02 2200 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-201-01 2231 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-232-34 2302 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-241-02 2323 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-241-15 2345 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-083-09 1404 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-083-10 1263 E 14TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-083-11 1259 E 14TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-083-12 1255 E 14TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-083-23 1264 E 15TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-083-26 1258 E 15TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-084-03 1258 E 14TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-084-06 1302 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-084-13 1314 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-084-17 1264 E 14TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 400-261-14 131 - Street City Council 30 - 269 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Addres Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ intensity Focus Area/Location 396-191-33 2110 N OBARR PL LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-191-34 2114 N OBARR PL LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-191-35 2118 N OBARR PL LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-191-36 2122 N OBARR PL LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-191-37 2126 N OBARR PL LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-191-38 2125 N OBARR PL LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-191-39 2121 N OBARR PL LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-191-40 2117 N OBARR PL LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-191-41 2113 N OBARR PL LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-191-42 2109 N OBARR PL LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-191-44 2130 N GRAND AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-201-03 2139 N GRAND AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-201-04 2121 N GRAND AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-201-06 2113 N GRAND AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-201-07 2109 N GRAND AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-201-08 2105 N GRAND AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-201-09 2101 N GRAND AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-232-31 1221 E BEECHWOOD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-232-32 1220 E SANTA CLARA AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-232-35 2320 N GRAND AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-232-36 2330 N GRAND AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-232-37 2340 N GRAND AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-232-38 1221 E BEECHWOOD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 400-261-15 1311 E WASHINGTON PL LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-241-02 2323 N GRAND AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-241-15 2345 N GRAND AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-172-17 1125 E 17TH ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 390-171-03 2701 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 390-171-07 2727 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 390-171-08 2761 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 390-701-01 2702 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 390-701-02 2710 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 390-701-03 2720 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 390-701-04 2740 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-111-58 2530 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-111-59 2510 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-111-60 2520 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-113-10 2428 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-121-24 2650 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-121-27 2626 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-121-28 2610 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-121-29 2602 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-121-31 2630 GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-161-01 1900* N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-161-02 1800 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-161-03 1750 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-161-04 1227 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-161-06 1229 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-161-08 1818 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-161-09 1750 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-172-18 120 AStreet City Council 30 — 270 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Addres Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ intensity Focus Area/Location 396-361-01 2637 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-361-05 2525 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-361-06 2421 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-361-07 2425 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-03 1126 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-04 1136 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-05 1202 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-06 1206 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-15 1602 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-16 1600 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-17 1520 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-48 1500 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-49 1202 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-68 1510 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-70 1244 E 17 TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-71 1248 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-72 1258 E 17TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-73 1268 S Grand ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-071-74 1238 E 17 TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-172-01 125 E 17TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 396-361-02 1300 E FAIRHAVEN AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-30 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-384-03 1314 E 4TH ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-384-04 1320 E 4TH ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-384-05 1328 E 4TH ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-384-06 1330 E 4TH ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-384-07 1332 E 4TH ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-384-08 1334 E 4TH ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-384-01 315 GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-384-02 1310 E 4TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-384-17 309 GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-455-01 1310 E 3RD ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-455-16 1315 E 2ND ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-456-02 1308 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-456-03 1312 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-456-04 1314 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-456-05 1318 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-456-06 1322 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-456-07 1324 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-456-08 1326 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-456-09 1328 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-456-14 1315 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-456-15 1309 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-456-17 1325 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-456-18 107 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-456-19 119 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-384-09 302 N MCCLAY ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-384-11 1315 E 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-384-12 1313 E 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-384-15 1319 E 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-455-02 1318 E 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-455-03 132 - Street City Council 30 - 271 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN L Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ intensity Focus Area/Location 398-455-04 1324 E 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-455-05 1328 E 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-455-06 1334 E 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-455-07 208 N MCCLAY ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-455-08 1327 E 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-455-09 1325 E 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-455-10 1323 E 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-455-11 1321 E 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-40 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-061-07 625 N GRAND AVE GC 1.15 FAR LU change DC-2 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-061-01 839 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-061-02 1300 E FRUIT ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-111-24 909 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-111-26 909 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-111-27 910 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-391-19 501 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-391-20 419 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-391-21 415 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 Grand Ave/17th Street 398-391-22 401 N GRAND AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change DC-2 Grand Ave/17th Street 100-261-33 808 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 100-261-36 820 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 100-261-39 808 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 100-631-03 602 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 100-631-04 520 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 100-631-05 510 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 108-253-10 908 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 108-253-11 930 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 108-253-21 830 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 108-253-24 830 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 108-253-37 822 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 108-722-50 1002 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-301-01 411 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-301-02 417 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-301-03 423 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-301-04 427 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-301-05 3711 W CAMILLE ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-301-06 3705 W CAMILLE ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-303-01 501 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-303-03 3712 W CAMILLE ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-303-04 3706 W CAMILLE ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-303-22 3706 W CAMILLE ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-311-08 313 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-311-11 225 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-311-12 217 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-311-13 217 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-311-14 205 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-311-15 125 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-311-29 329 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-311-34 313 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-351-01 1001 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-351-05 1111 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-351-21 100 - r Specific Plan - C City Council 30 - 272 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ Focus Area/Location 144-351-22 3720 W KENT AVE UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-351-23 3710 W KENT AVE UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-351-25 1103 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-351-26 1107 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-361-60 801 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-361-61 901 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 188-041-06 288 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 188-041-07 324 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 188-041-08 324 S HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 188-051-03 432 S HARBOR UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 188-051-04 420 S HARBOR UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 188-051-05 436 S HARBOR UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 188-071-05 520 S HARBOR UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-011-04 1114 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-011-05 1108 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-011-06 1020 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-011-07 1014 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-011-08 1000 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-011-09 960 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-011-10 914 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-011-11 902 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-011-12 3817 W HAZARD AVE UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-011-15 980 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-011-99 1206 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-043-16 1406 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-043-17 1314 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-051-13 426 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-051-14 410 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-051-15 406 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-051-16 328 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-051-17 322 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-051-18 316 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-051-19 308 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-101-01 1221 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-101-02 3708 W WASHINGTON AVE UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-101-11 3713 W 11TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-101-12 1109 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-101-13 1115 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-101-14 1201 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-101-15 1213 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-02 816 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-03 816 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-06 718 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-07 714 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-08 710 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-09 706 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-10 628 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-11 626 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-12 622 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-13 618 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-14 610 _L�U_��MUFROA �ST !UN �3-0 PAR -rrjPnqjtVjinjPn-qijg UN-S0 Harbor Cnrrud.Qr Specific Plan - C City Council 30 - 273 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address LPlan Current General Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ Focus Area/Location 198-162-15 610 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-16 610 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-17 606 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-18 602 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-19 522 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-20 518 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-24 511 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-25 501 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-26 511 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-27 513 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-28 523 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-29 601 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-30 603 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-31 609 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-32 613 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-35 701 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-36 705 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-37 709 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-42 816 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-43 816 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-44 816 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-45 816 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-46 816 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-47 501 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-49 722 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-50 715 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-162-51 609 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-01 3710 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-02 414 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-03 408 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-04 408 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-05 326 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-06 322 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-07 318 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-08 314 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-09 310 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-10 306 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-11 302 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-12 226 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-13 222 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-14 218 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-15 214 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-16 212 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-17 206 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-18 202 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-24 201 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-25 205 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-26 209 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-27 213 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-28 217 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-29 225 - r Specific Plan - C City Council 30 - 274 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Addres Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ Focus Area/Location 198 182 30 301 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan C 198-182-31 309 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-32 321 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-33 325 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-34 405 N HARBOR UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-35 405 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-182-36 421 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-231-01 1021 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-231-02 3714 W 11TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-231-03 3710 W 11TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-231-15 3713 W HAZARD AVE UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-231-16 913 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-231-17 925 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 198-231-18 1011 N HARBOR BLVD UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - C 144-321-02 101 S GUNTHER ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-321-03 105 S GUNTHER ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-321-04 109 S GUNTHER ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-321-05 113 S GUNTHER ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-321-52 3502 W 1ST ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-321-53 3520 W 1ST ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-322-01 3612 W 1ST ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-322-02 3610 W 1ST ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-341-07 3312 W 1ST ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-551-51 120 KENTON DR UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-161-24 3621 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-161-25 3629 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-161-26 3631 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-171-23 3501 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-171-24 3505 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-171-25 3509 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-171-26 3515 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-171-27 3517 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-172-24 3525 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-172-25 3527 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-172-26 3601 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-172-27 3531 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-181-01 3622 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-181-20 114 N BEWLEY ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-181-25 115 N FIGUEROA ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-181-44 3638 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-181-45 3628 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-181-46 3628 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-241-01 3502 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-241-19 3501 W 1ST ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-241-20 3521 W 1ST ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-241-38 3512 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-241-39 3512 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-241-40 3506 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-241-41 3510 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-242-01 3602 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-242-21 360 - Specific Plan - NT City Council 10 30 - 275 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ Focus Area/Location 198-242-22 3603 W 1ST ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-242-23 3605 W 1ST ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-242-45 3609 W 1ST ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-251-01 3314 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-251-28 3321 W 1ST ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-251-29 3319 W 1ST ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-251-60 3332 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-251-61 3330 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-251-62 3326 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-251-63 3324 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-251-64 3318 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-251-65 3317 W 1ST ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-251-66 3331 W 1ST ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-251-70 3332 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-252-01 3400 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-252-29 3405 W 1ST ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-252-34 3425 W 1ST ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-252-64 3424 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-252-65 3420 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-252-66 3418 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-261-24 3230 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-261-25 3226 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-261-26 3200 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-281-17 3301 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-281-18 3317 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-281-19 3319 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-281-20 3321 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-281-21 3327 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-281-22 3401 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-281-23 3405 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-281-24 3409 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-281-25 3417 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-281-26 3425 W 5TH ST UN 3.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 108-253-02 702 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 108-253-41 762 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 108-253-42 718 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 108-253-43 718 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 108-253-44 724 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 108-253-45 800 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 108-253-46 770 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 108-253-47 770 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 108-253-48 770 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 108-253-49 770 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-291-03 629 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-291-05 3639 W MCFADDEN AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-291-09 3721 W MCFADDEN AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-291-10 525 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-291-11 3701 W MCFADDEN AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-291-12 605 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-311-16 121 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-311-21 103 - - Specific Plan NT City Council 11 30 - 276 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ inte ' Focus Area/Location 144-311-22 3728 W BOLSA AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-311-27 3626 W 1ST ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-311-28 3626 W 1ST ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-311-30 3638 W 1ST ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-311-31 103 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-311-35 117 S FIGUEROA ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-561-01 3600 W MCFADDEN AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-561-04 3710 W MCFADDEN AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-561-07 751 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-561-08 701 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-561-09 3770 W MCFADDEN AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 144-561-10 3760 W MCFADDEN AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 188-041-01 100 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 188-041-02 120 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 188-041-03 3904 W 1ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 188-041-04 150 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 188-041-05 200 S HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 188-071-22 602 S HARBOR DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-031-05 1602 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-031-07 3822 W WESTMINSTER AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-031-08 3802 WESTMINSTER AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-031-09 1602 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-032-07 1526 N CENTURY BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-032-08 1518 N CENTURY BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-032-09 1510 N CENTURY BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-032-10 1500 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-032-12 1610 N CENTURY BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-061-07 4201 W 1ST ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-061-17 228 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-061-18 124 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-061-22 208 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-061-23 200 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-061-24 100 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-061-25 100 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-061-26 100 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-061-27 100 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-061-28 3825 W 1ST ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-061-29 3835 W 1ST ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-061-30 3839 W 1ST ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-061-31 230 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-081-02 1401 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-081-16 1321 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-081-17 1415 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-081-18 1421 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-081-19 1501 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-081-20 1505 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-081-21 1513 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-081-22 1521 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-081-23 3710 W 17TH ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-081-24 3720 WESTMINSTER AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-081-25 372 -s n PAR cip swtv/*ntpns*tg DC-S Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT City Council 12 30 - 277 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address LPlan Current General Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ inte ' Focus Area/Location 198-081-26 3710 W WESTMINSTER AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-081-28 3630 WESTMINSTER AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-081-31 3636 W WESTMINSTER AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-091-52 3500 WESTMINSTER AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-091-53 3514 W WESTMINSTER AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-091-55 3526 W WESTMINSTER AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-091-57 3522 W WESTMINSTER AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-181-21 3621 W 1ST ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-181-22 3625 W 1ST ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-181-23 3635 W 1ST ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-181-24 3701 W 1ST ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-182-19 114 N FIGUEROA ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-182-20 3709 W 1ST ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-182-21 101 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-182-22 115 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-182-23 121 N HARBOR BLVD DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-191-01 3412 W WESTMINSTER AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-191-02 3404 W WESTMINSTER AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-191-03 3400 W WESTMINSTER AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-191-04 3300 W WESTMINSTER AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-191-05 1514 N SUSAN ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-191-06 1502 N HARPER ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-191-07 1501 N SUSAN ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-191-08 1517 N SUSAN ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-191-09 1605 N SUSAN ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-191-10 3230 W WESTMINSTER AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-201-01 3118 W WESTMINSTER AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-201-02 3132 W WESTMINSTER AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-201-03 3216 W WESTMINSTER AVE DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-201-06 14097 N CLINTON ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-201-07 1506 N CLINTON ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-201-08 1550 N CLINTON DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-201-09 1600 N CLINTON ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-201-10 1417 N SUSAN ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-211-01 1424 N SUSAN ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-211-02 1417 N SUSAN ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 198-081-15 1321 N HARBOR ST DC 0.5 - 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Harbor Corridor Specific Plan - NT 411-152-11 3231 S STANDARD DC 2.0 FAR LU change IND MacArthur Place 411-071-05 1 MACARTHUR PL DC 2.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 MacArthur Place 411-071-06 2 MACARTHUR PL DC 2.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 MacArthur Place 411-072-08 201 E MACARTHUR DC 2.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 MacArthur Place 411-072-09 31 MACARTHUR PL DC 2.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 MacArthur Place 411-072-11 3401 S MAIN DC 2.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 MacArthur Place 411-073-01 3 MACARTHUR PL DC 2.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 MacArthur Place 411-073-06 1 E FIRST AMERICAN WAY DC 2.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 MacArthur Place 411-074-03 200 E FIRST AMERICAN WAY DC 2.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 MacArthur Place 411-074-04 1 E FIRST AMERICAN WAY DC 2.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 MacArthur Place 411-074-05 4 FIRST AMERICAN WAY DC 2.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 MacArthur Place 411-074-06 2 FIRST AMERICAN WAY DC 2.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 MacArthur Place 411-074-08 1 FIRST AMERICAN WAY DC 2.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 MacArthur Place 411-074-09 9 - e City Council 13 30 - 278 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Addres L Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ inte cus Area/Location 411-074-10 3 FIRST AMERICAN WAY DC 2.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 MacArthur Place 411-074-11 5 FIRST AMERICAN WAY DC 2.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 MacArthur Place 411-075-01 1 E FIRST AMERICAN WAY DC 2.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 MacArthur Place 411-081-22 201 SANDPOINTE AVE DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 MacArthur Place South 411-081-24 201 SANDPOINTE AVE DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 MacArthur Place South 411-081-28 8 MACARTHUR PL DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 MacArthur Place South 411-081-30 100 E MACARTHUR BLVD DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 MacArthur Place South 411-092-24 7 HUTTON CENTRE DR DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 MacArthur Place South 411-092-25 7 HUTTON CENTRE DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 MacArthur Place South 411-092-29 3 HUTTON CENTRE DR DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 MacArthur Place South 411-092-30 4 HUTTON CENTRE DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 MacArthur Place South 411-092-34 7 HUTTON CENTRE DR DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 MacArthur Place South 411-092-38 3 HUTTON CENTRE DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 MacArthur Place South 411-092-42 9 MACARTHUR PL DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 MacArthur Place South 411-093-03 2 E HUTTON CENTRE DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 MacArthur Place South 411-102-06 5 HUTTON CENTRE DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 MacArthur Place South 411-111-03 3843* S MAIN ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 MacArthur Place South 411-111-08 6 HUTTON CENTRE DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 MacArthur Place South 011-154-01 1406 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 011-154-02 123 S MCCLAY ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 011-154-03 1422 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 011-154-06 1504 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 011-154-10 1406 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 011-154-11 1610 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 011-154-20 206 S LYON ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 011-154-21 210 S LYON ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 011-154-22 214 S LYON ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 011-154-23 220 S LYON ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 011-154-24 224 S LYON ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 011-154-25 310 S LYON ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 011-154-27 322 S LYON ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 011-154-28 1607 E CHESTNUT AVE UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 011-154-33 318 S LYON ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 011-154-37 1530 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 011-154-38 1600 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 011-154-39 1600 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 011-154-42 1620 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 011-154-43 1440 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-421-07 1630 E PALM ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-421-08 1634 E PALM ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-421-09 1636 E PALM ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-421-10 130 N LYON ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-421-11 126 N LYON ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-421-12 124 N LYON ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-421-13 120 N LYON ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-421-14 116 N LYON ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-421-23 1609 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-421-25 109 N WRIGHT ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-421-27 1623 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-421-28 1617 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-431-20 153 - - rlay City Council 14 30 - 279 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ cus Area/Location 398-431-21 1533 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-431-22 1529 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-431-23 1525 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-431-24 1519 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-431-25 1503 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-441-07 1427 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-441-08 1421 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-441-28 1411 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-441-29 1411 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-441-30 1405 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-441-31 111 N MCCLAY ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-441-32 1403 E 1ST ST UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 400-062-01 1801 PARK COURT PL UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 400-062-02 1801 PARK COURT PL UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 400-062-03 1801 PARK COURT PL UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 400-062-04 1801 PARK COURT PL UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 400-062-05 1801 PARK COURT PL UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 400-062-06 1801 PARK COURT PL UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 400-062-07 1801 PARK COURT PL UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 400-062-11 1801 PARK COURT PL UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 400-062-12 1801 PARK COURT PL UN 0.75 - 1.5 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Metro East Overlay 398-422-01 131 N LYON ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 398-422-02 127 N LYON ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 398-422-03 125 N LYON ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 398-422-04 121 N LYON ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 398-422-05 117 N LYON ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 398-422-06 1658 E PALM ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 398-422-07 1662 E PALM ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 398-422-08 1666 E PALM ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 398-422-09 1668 E PALM ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 398-422-10 1661 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 398-422-11 1649 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-041-03 2103 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-041-04 600 PARK CENTER DR DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-041-05 550 PARK CENTER DR DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-042-04 601 PARK CENTER DR DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-043-03 2201 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-043-04 501 PARK CENTER DR DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-043-06 555 PARK CENTER DR DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-051-02 1971 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-051-03 2001 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-051-05 600 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-051-06 601 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-051-09 1901 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-051-13 540 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-051-14 515 CABRILLO PARK DR DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-051-15 525 CABRILLO PARK DR DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-051-16 2021 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-052-01 540 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-061-05 1801 E Fourth ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-061-07 180 - rlay City Council 15 30 - 280 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN I Situs AddresjW Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ inte cus Area/Location 400-061-08 1801 E Fourth ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-071-02 1851 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-071-03 200 CABRILLO PARK DR DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-071-07 1750 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-081-03 1900 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-081-04 2000 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-081-05 250 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-081-06 2001 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-081-09 1901 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-082-02 2030 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-082-04 203 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-082-05 2031 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-091-01 2100 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-091-16 2201 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-091-17 2151 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-091-18 2131 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-091-19 2101 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-091-22 2112 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-091-23 2130 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-251-12 550 N GOLDEN CIRCLE DR DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 402-181-03 2210 W 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 402-181-04 2207 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 402-181-10 2222 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 402-181-11 2222 W 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 402-191-01 2114 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 402-191-02 2020 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 402-191-03 2020 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 402-191-04 2110 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 402-201-05 1900 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 402-201-13 2010 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 402-211-02 1818 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 402-211-03 1814 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 402-211-06 1800 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 402-211-07 1820 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 402-222-01 1660 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 402-222-04 212 S ELK LN DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 400-091-04 2204 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 402-201-07 1900 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Metro East Overlay 005-151-41 1525 N DURANT ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change MR-15 Midtown Plan 398-552-19 1010 N Broadway PAO 0.5 FAR LU change MR-15 Midtown Plan 398-522-11 313 W WASHINGTON AVE PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO Midtown Plan 005-151-40 1610 N BROADWAY GC 0.5 FAR LU change PAO Midtown Plan 398-232-01 720 N SPURGEON ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change PAO Midtown Plan 398-232-04 201 E Civic Center Dr LR7 7 du/ac LU change PAO Midtown Plan 005-151-32 1600 N BROADWAY MR15 15 du/ac LU change PAO Midtown Plan 398-475-01 838 E 1ST ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC Midtown Plan 398-015-04 801 N MAIN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-021-01 1201 N MAIN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-021-02 116 E WASHINGTON AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-021-03 120 E WASHINGTON AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-021-04 100 - City Council 16 30 - 281 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN L Situs Addre 0 Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ inte ' Focus Area/Location 398-022-01 1117 N MAIN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-022-10 1107 N MAIN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-022-11 1111 N MAIN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-023-01 1011 N MAIN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-231-06 712 N BUSH ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-231-07 108 E 8TH ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-231-08 701 N MAIN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-562-01 1200 N MAIN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-562-02 1104 N MAIN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-562-06 1104 N MAIN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-562-10 1010 N MAIN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-011-01 909 N MAIN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-562-09 1000 N MAIN ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change DC-1 Midtown Plan 005-184-01 919 N BROADWAY DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 005-184-02 915 N BROADWAY DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 005-184-03 843 N BROADWAY DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 005-184-04 839 N BROADWAY DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 005-184-07 817 N BROADWAY DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 005-184-08 811 N BROADWAY DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 005-184-09 809 N BROADWAY DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 005-184-10 801 N BROADWAY DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 005-184-14 900 N SYCAMORE ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 005-184-15 912 N SYCAMORE ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 005-184-25 209 W CIVIC CENTER DR DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 005-184-26 818 N SYCAMORE ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 005-184-27 825 N BROADWAY DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 005-184-29 900 N SYCAMORE ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 005-184-30 900 N SYCAMORE ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 005-185-27 902 N MAIN ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 005-185-29 800 N MAIN ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 005-185-30 888 N MAIN ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 005-185-34 921 N SYCAMORE ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 005-185-37 915 N SYCAMORE ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-011-01 909 N MAIN ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-015-01 817 N MAIN ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-015-02 813 N MAIN ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-015-03 809 N MAIN ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-231-01 717 N MAIN ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-231-02 715 N MAIN ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-231-03 711 N MAIN ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-244-01 800 N MAIN ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-244-02 710 N MAIN ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-231-08 701 N MAIN ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 398-015-04 801 N MAIN ST DC 0.5 - 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Midtown Plan 002-161-13 2002 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 002-162-05 110 W 20TH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 002-162-30 1910 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 002-162-31 1906 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 002-162-32 1914 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 002-162-33 1902 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 002-163-30 180 - t City Council 17 30 - 282 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Addres Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ intensity Focus Area/Location 002-163-31 1810 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 002-180-45 2333 N BROADWAY DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 002-180-46 2323 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-03 2034 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-04 2030 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-05 2026 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-06 2022* N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-07 2016 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-08 2014 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-09 2010 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-10 2006 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-11 111 E 20TH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-22 2019 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-25 2015 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-26 2017 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-27 2011 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-28 2025* N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-29 2005 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-30 2033 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-33 2021 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-40 2052 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-41 2056 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-59 2135 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-61 2058 N Bush St DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-63 2119 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-78 2058 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-80 2058 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-113-81 2129 N Main St DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-141-18 1917 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-141-19 1909 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-141-22 1901 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-141-23 1811 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-141-24 1809 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-141-25 1805 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-141-26 1801 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-141-27 1727 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-141-28 1721 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-141-29 1717 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-141-33 210 E 20TH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-141-34 1711 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-141-35 1715 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-141-41 1905 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-142-01 112 E 20TH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-142-02 1910 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-142-03 1904 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-142-04 1900 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-142-05 1820 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-142-17 1903 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-142-18 1909 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-142-19 1905 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-142-22 190 - t City Council IN 30 - 283 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Addres Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ intensity Focus Area/Location 003-142-23 1807 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-142-24 1800 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-143-15 1725 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-143-33 1722 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 399-101-01 2230 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 399-101-02 2222 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 399-101-03 2218* N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 399-101-04 2212 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 399-101-05 2202 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 399-101-06 2208 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 399-101-07 107 W BUFFALO AVE DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 399-101-08 119 W BUFFALO AVE DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 399-102-01 2132 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 399-102-02 2122 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 399-102-03 2116 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 399-102-04 2112* N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 399-102-05 2110 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 399-102-06 2106 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 399-102-07 2100 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 399-102-08 2036 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 399-102-09 2032 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 399-102-22 112 W BUFFALO AVE DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 002-162-06 111 W 19TH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-143-04 1714 N BUSH ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-143-16 1719 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-143-31 1701 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Museum District 003-013-18 2677 N MAIN ST DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 North Main St 411-111-07 200 E SANDPOINTE AVE DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 PacTel Office 411-111-09 200 E SANDPOINTE AVE DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 PacTel Office 411-111-10 Entitlements expired as c DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 Pac Tel Office 411-111-11 200 E SANDPOINTE AVE DC 1.5 FAR density/intensity DC-1.5 PacTel Office 410-223-11 1241 W ALTON AVE MR15 15 du/ac LU change OS South Bristol Street 140-251-02 2910 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 140-251-03 2860 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 140-251-04 2840 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 140-251-05 2850 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-401-05 1212 W CENTRAL AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-401-06 2603 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-401-08 2701 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-401-09 1209 HEMLOCK WAY GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-401-12 2701 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-401-13 2621 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-411-01 2801 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-411-05 2911 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-411-06 2929 N BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-411-20 2823 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-411-21 1216 HEMLOCK WAY GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-411-22 2909 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-421-01 2523 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-421-03 2445 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-421-04 115 - eet City Council 19 30 - 284 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address LPlan Current General Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ intensity Focus Area/Location 410-421-05 1125 W CENTRAL AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-421-28 2501 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-421-29 2511 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-431-01 2303 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-431-02 2311 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-431-03 2401 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-431-04 1030 W WARNER AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-431-05 1120 W WARNER AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-431-06 1100 WARNER AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-462-18 3001 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-462-19 3041 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 412-031-01 3000 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 412-032-01 3200 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 412-032-02 3200 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 412-032-03 3220 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 412-032-04 3220 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 412-191-01 2302 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 412-191-03 2320 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 412-191-04 2402 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 412-191-05 2430 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 412-191-06 1331 W CENTRAL AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 412-201-02 2740 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 412-201-03 2810 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 412-201-04 2650 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 412-201-05 2700 BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 412-201-07 2610 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 412-201-08 2640 S BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-401-12 2701 S BRISTOL ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-462-17 3041 S BRISTOL ST MR15 15 du/ac LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 412-031-03 3050 S BRISTOL ST MR15 15 du/ac LU change UN-30 South Bristol Street 410-222-22 3309 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 South Bristol Street 410-222-24 3313 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 South Bristol Street 410-222-25 3301 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 South Bristol Street 410-222-31 3361 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 South Bristol Street 410-222-32 3329 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 South Bristol Street 412-141-10 3401 S PLAZA DR DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 South Bristol Street 412-141-11 3420 BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 South Bristol Street 412-141-12 3430 BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 South Bristol Street 412-141-13 3500 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 South Bristol Street 412-141-22 3300 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 South Bristol Street 412-141-23 3310 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-2 South Bristol Street 410-301-10 1200 W MACARTHUR BLVD DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 410-301-11 3601 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 410-301-14 3801 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 410-301-15 3811 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 410-301-17 3925 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 410-301-18 3941 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 410-301-21 3929 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 410-301-33 3861 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 410-301-38 3911 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 410-301-39 382 - eet City Council 20 30 - 285 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address LPlan Current General Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ inte ' Focus Area/Location 410-301-40 3611 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 410-301-41 3611 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 410-301-43 3701 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 412-131-12 3730 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 412-131-14 3600 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 412-131-16 3606 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 412-131-17 3610 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 412-131-22 3900 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 412-131-24 3810 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 412-131-25 3820 S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 412-131-26 3814* S BRISTOL ST DC 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 412-131-10 1561 SUNFLOWER AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change DC-5 South Bristol Street 412-131-20 3951 S PLAZA DR GC 0.5 FAR LU change DC-5 South Bristol Street 412-451-01 3811 BEAR ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change DC-5 South Bristol Street 412-451-02 1661 W SUNFLOWER AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change DC-5 South Bristol Street 412-451-03 3851 S BEAR ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change DC-5 South Bristol Street 412-451-04 1641 SUNFLOWER AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change DC-5 South Bristol Street 410-301-42 3701 S BRISTOL ST DC 90 du/ac, 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 412-131-13 3700 S BRISTOL ST DC 90 du/ac, 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 South Bristol Street 403-151-09 2136 S CYPRESS AVE INS 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 South Main Street 403-151-11 2116 S CYPRESS AVE INS 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 South Main Street 015-090-03 2240 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change INS South Main Street 403-151-04 2133 MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change INS South Main Street 403-151-05 2139 MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change INS South Main Street 010-230-01 210 W CUBBON ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change INS South Main Street 016-031-13 2327 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 016-031-32 128 E WARNER AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 016-031-37 124 E WARNER AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 016-031-38 120 E WARNER AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 016-031-51 222 E WARNER AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 016-031-54 2301 S Main St GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 016-032-04 2423 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 016-032-12 100 E CENTRAL AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 016-032-13 125 E CENTRAL AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 016-032-14 2405 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 016-032-18 2405 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 016-032-19 2409 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 016-041-17 2516 S CYPRESS AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 016-041-23 2509 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 016-041-24 2531 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 016-041-25 2515 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 016-041-26 2533 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 016-041-27 2501 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 016-050-08 2541 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 016-050-09 2547 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-371-01 224 WARNER AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-371-02 220 WARNER AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-371-03 2302 S BROADWAY AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-372-01 120 W WARNER AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-372-06 2406 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-372-10 2300 IIS MAIN �ST !GC �O-S PAR ____��Ijangp El LX-L5 Snuth Main StLget City Council 21 30 - 286 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ inte ' Focus Area/Location 410-372-11 2330 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-382-03 2426 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-382-05 2426 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-382-06 2500 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-382-15 2416 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-391-06 2538 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-391-07 2500 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-372-07 2419 S BROADWAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-372-08 2401 S BROADWAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-372-09 2337 S BROADWAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-382-07 2517 S BROADWAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-382-08 2511 S BROADWAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-382-09 2509 S BROADWAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-382-10 2433 S BROADWAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-382-11 2431 S BROADWAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-382-12 2421 S BROADWAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-382-13 2421 S BROADWAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-382-14 2419 S BROADWAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 410-391-05 130 W CENTRAL AVE IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 South Main Street 010-144-18 618 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-144-21 616 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-144-22 602 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-144-23 610 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-144-25 606 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-144-29 630 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-144-30 620 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-154-12 724 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-154-13 107 W RICHLAND ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-154-15 710 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-154-16 714 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-154-17 702 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-154-18 726 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-154-19 704 MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-214-11 812 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-214-13 818 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-214-17 816 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-214-18 822 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-214-27 806 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-214-28 830 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-224-16 910 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-224-17 902 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-224-18 920 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-224-19 906 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-224-20 930 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-224-21 914 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-224-22 926 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-234-11 1026 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-234-12 1030 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-234-13 1022 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-041-23 731 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-041-26 725 - et City Council 22 30 - 287 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ intensity Focus Area/Location 011-041-27 721 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-041-28 809 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-041-29 803 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-041-30 807 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-041-31 701 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-041-32 112 E BISHOP ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-041-34 709 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-051-15 107 E CUBBON ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-051-16 111 E CUBBON ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-051-21 827 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-051-34 925 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-051-36 933 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-051-44 921 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-051-46 917 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-051-47 815 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-051-48 819 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-051-49 827 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-051-51 905 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-061-21 1123 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-061-43 1111 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-061-44 1109 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-061-50 1001 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-061-51 1131 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-061-58 1117 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-061-59 1005 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-061-69 1015 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-061-70 1105 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-154-15 1210 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-154-16 1216 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-154-20 1230 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-154-23 1242 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-154-24 1204 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-154-25 1234 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-154-29 1218 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-164-18 1306 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-164-19 1310 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-173-02 1402 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-173-03 1416 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-173-08 1401 S SYCAMORE ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-173-13 1419 S SYCAMORE ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-173-14 1423 S SYCAMORE ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-173-21 1415 S SYCAMORE ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-173-22 1440 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-173-23 1427 S SYCAMORE ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-173-27 1424 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-173-28 1444 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-183-08 1519 S BROADWAY GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-183-09 1527 S BROADWAY GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-183-10 1603 S BROADWAY GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-183-11 1607 S BROADWAY GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-183-16 151 - et City Council 23 30 - 288 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Addres Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ intensity Focus Area/Location 013-183-17 1518 S SYCAMORE7S11T GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-183-18 1520 S SYCAMORE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-183-19 1524 S SYCAMORE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-183-20 1606 S SYCAMORE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-183-21 1608 S SYCAMORE ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-183-28 1501 S BROADWAY GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-183-29 208 W EDINGER AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-183-30 202 W EDINGER AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-183-31 212 W EDINGER AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-183-32 205 W POMONA ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-183-33 1515 S BROADWAY GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-184-02 1509 S SYCAMORE ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-184-04 155 W POMONA ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-184-08 1508 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-184-09 1516 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-184-10 1522 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-184-11 1606 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-184-12 1614 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-184-13 1622 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-184-14 1626 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-184-15 1517 S SYCAMORE ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-184-17 115 W POMONA ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-184-19 1502 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-184-20 SEC SYCAMORE/EDINGER AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-184-21 1607 S SYCAMORE ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-184-23 1627 S SYCAMORE ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-011-22 1221 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-011-23 1229 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-011-24 1231 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-011-25 1237 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-011-30 1235 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-011-31 1241 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-011-32 1247 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-011-34 1201 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-011-37 1211 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-021-25 1345 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-021-26 1303 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-021-27 1307 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-021-28 1311 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-021-29 1321 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-021-30 1325 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-021-31 1329 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-021-35 1333 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-032-36 1417 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-032-38 1445 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-032-39 1403 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-032-40 1407 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-032-43 1421 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-032-44 1427 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-032-57 1451 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-032-58 147 - et City Council 24 30 - 289 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ intensity Focus Area/Location 014-032-59 1415 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 014-032-60 1465 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-050-09 1812 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-050-10 1820 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-050-11 1808 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-064-08 1914 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-064-09 1922 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-064-17 1926 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-064-18 1906 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-068-07 2002 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-068-10 2014 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-068-11 2020 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-068-12 2022 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-068-15 2012 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-068-16 2010 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-068-17 2008 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-074-14 2026 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-074-17 2036 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-074-18 2040 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-074-24 2058 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-074-25 2064 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-074-26 2064 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-074-28 2054 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-074-29 2050 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-074-30 2030 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-084-27 2130 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-084-38 2116 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-084-39 2120 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-084-40 2140 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-084-41 2102 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-090-19 2222 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-090-21 2202 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-277-09 220 W 1ST ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-284-04 220 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-284-05 210 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-284-06 202 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-288-06 320 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-288-07 316 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-288-08 312 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-288-09 300 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-294-12 520 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-294-13 518 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-294-14 516 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-294-15 510 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-294-16 502 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-294-17 420 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-294-18 418 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-294-19 416 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-294-20 408 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-512-01 104 E 1ST ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-512-02 110 - et City Council 25 30 - 290 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ intensity Focus Area/Location 398-512-03 111 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-512-04 119 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-512-05 127 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-512-06 124 S CYPRESS AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-512-07 120 E 1ST ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-514-05 122 S ORANGE AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-514-06 116 S ORANGE AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-514-07 224 E 1ST ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-514-08 210 E 1ST ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-141-01 2201 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-141-02 2209 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-141-03 2211 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-141-04 2223 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-141-05 2225 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-141-06 2231 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-141-07 2239 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-141-08 2245 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-151-01 2101 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-163-08 1959 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-163-09 1947 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-163-10 1933 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-163-11 1925 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-163-12 1919 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-164-18 2071 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-164-19 2059 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-164-20 2055 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-164-21 2049 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-164-22 2045 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-164-23 2041 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-164-24 2037 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-164-25 2035 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-164-26 2033 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-164-27 2025 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-164-28 2017 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-164-31 2009 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-181-01 1701 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-181-03 124 E POMONA ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-181-04 125 E BERKELEY ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-181-08 1717 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-181-09 1707 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-181-10 1705 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-181-13 120 E POMONA ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-185-01 1801 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-185-06 1812 S CYPRESS AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-185-07 119 E OCCIDENTAL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-185-10 107 E OCCIDENTAL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-185-11 1815 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-186-01 1901 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-186-02 1911 MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-191-01 1501 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-191-02 112 11 F �� FQINGFR �AVF !GC �O-S PAR ____��hangp I Ubl-2Q Snuth Main StLget City Council 26 30 - 291 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address I Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ intensity Focus Area/Location 403-191-09 111 E STANFORD ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-191-11 1511 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-191-12 1515 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-197-01 1601 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-197-02 112 E STANFORD ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-197-09 111 E POMONA ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-197-10 105 E POMONA ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-197-11 1617 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-197-12 1611 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-197-13 1603 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-041-01 401 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-041-02 110 E CHESTNUT AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-041-10 100 E MYRTLE ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-041-11 107 E MYRTLE ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-041-12 105 E MYRTLE ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-041-13 417 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-041-14 411 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-041-15 409 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-044-08 109 CAMILLE ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-044-09 519 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-044-10 515 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-091-01 203 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-091-02 209 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-091-03 215 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-091-04 221 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-091-10 112 E WALNUT ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-096-01 108 E PINE ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-096-02 305 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-096-03 311 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-096-04 315 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-096-05 319 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-101-01 601 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-101-03 611 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-101-04 615 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-101-10 607 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-101-12 609 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-101-13 112 E CAMILLE ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-101-05 631 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-164-16 1322 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 013-164-17 1344 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-164-01 2001 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-044-01 505 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-294-24 406 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-061-53 114 E CUBBON ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-234-16 1010 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-064-04 1918 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-278-01 120 W 1ST ST DC 90 du/ac, 1.0 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-278-02 114 W 1ST ST DC 90 du/ac, 1.0 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-278-03 110 W 1ST ST DC 90 du/ac, 1.0 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-278-04 100 S MAIN ST DC 90 du/ac, 1.0 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-278-05 117 - et City Council 27 30 - 292 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN k Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ intensity Focus Area/Location 398-278-06 114 S MAIN ST DC 90 du/ac, 1.0 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-278-07 120 S MAIN ST DC 90 du/ac, 1.0 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-278-08 123 S MAIN ST DC 90 du/ac, 1.0 FAR LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-234-05 915 S SYCAMORE ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-234-06 919 S SYCAMORE ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-234-07 117 W MCFADDEN AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 010-234-16 1010 S MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-061-53 114 E CUBBON ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-064-01 1901 S SYCAMORE ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-064-02 1905 S SYCAMORE ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-064-03 1909 S SYCAMORE ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-064-04 1918 S MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-064-14 1917 S SYCAMORE ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 015-064-16 1921 S SYCAMORE ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-283-01 201 S BROADWAY LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-283-02 211 S BROADWAY LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-283-16 200 S SYCAMORE ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-284-01 120 W WALNUT ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-284-02 200 S SYCAMORE ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-284-03 200 S SYCAMORE ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-163-07 111 E SAINT ANDREW PL LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-164-01 2001 S MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-164-17 101 E SAINT GERTRUDE PL LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-185-02 114 E BERKELEY ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-185-03 116 E BERKELEY ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-185-04 122 E BERKELEY ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-185-05 126 E BERKELEY ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-185-08 115 E OCCIDENTAL ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-185-09 111 E OCCIDENTAL ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-044-01 505 S MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-091-05 222 S CYPRESS AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-091-06 220 S CYPRESS AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-091-07 210 CYPRESS AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-092-01 208 E WALNUT ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-092-02 203 S CYPRESS AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-092-03 207 S CYPRESS AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-092-04 209 S CYPRESS AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-092-05 215 S CYPRESS AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-092-06 219 S CYPRESS AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-092-07 221 S CYPRESS AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-092-08 213 E PINE ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-092-09 207 ORANGE AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-092-10 207 ORANGE AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-092-11 216 ORANGE AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-092-12 207 ORANGE AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-092-13 202 E WALNUT ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-092-14 214 E WALNUT ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 404-101-05 631 S MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 398-284-05 210 S MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-186-02 1911 MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-186-01 190 - et City Council m 30 — 293 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ intensity Focus Area/Location 403-163-12 1919 S MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-163-11 1925 S MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-163-10 1933 S MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-163-09 1947 S MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-164-28 2017 S MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 403-164-31 2009 S MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-051-21 827 S MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-051-51 905 S MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-051-46 917 S MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 011-061-69 1015 S MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 South Main Street 041-213-04 555 E MEMORY LN DC 1.27 FAR density/intensity DC-1 Town and Country Manor 398-461-06 117 N STANDARD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-473-08 901 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-473-09 907 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-491-21 701 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-491-26 521 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-491-27 521 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-491-32 719 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-491-34 515 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-491-35 607 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-492-11 110 N GARFIELD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-492-12 829 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-492-13 823 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-492-14 823 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-492-18 801 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-473-12 936 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-473-10 938 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-385-01 1206 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-385-02 1212 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-385-03 1222 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-385-04 1225 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-385-05 1221 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-385-06 1219 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-385-07 1215 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-385-08 1211 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-385-09 1207 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-385-10 1203 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-386-01 1102 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-386-02 1108 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-386-03 1110 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-386-04 1114 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-386-05 1124 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-453-05 1214 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-453-06 202 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-453-07 1215 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-454-08 1211 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-454-09 1205 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-454-10 1201 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-454-14 1221 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-454-15 1221 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density intensity UN-40 Transit Zoning Code - CDR 398-234-01 631 - ode - DT & UC City Council 29 30 - 294 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Addres Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ inte ' Focus Area/Location 398-234-04 113 E SANTA ANA BLVD DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-234-06 614 N BUSH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-234-07 601 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-235-01 615 N BUSH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-235-02 620 N SPURGEON ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-235-03 600 N SPURGEON ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-235-04 608 N SPURGEON ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-235-05 608 N SPURGEON DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-243-01 615 N SYCAMORE ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-243-02 600 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-243-04 618 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-252-04 518 N BROADWAY DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-252-05 301 W 5TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-253-06 200 W SANTA ANA BLVD DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-254-01 515 N SYCAMORE ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-254-02 505 N SYCAMORE ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-254-11 520 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-255-19 301 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-255-20 305 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-255-21 309 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-255-30 302 W 5TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-257-01 415 N BROADWAY DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-257-02 409 N BROADWAY DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-257-03 223 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-257-04 221 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-257-05 219 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-257-06 217 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-257-07 215 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-257-08 209 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-257-09 203 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-257-10 213 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-257-11 416 N SYCAMORE ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-258-01 120 W 5TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-258-02 415 N SYCAMORE ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-258-03 117 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-258-04 117 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-258-05 117 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-258-08 117 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-258-09 410 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-258-10 410 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-258-11 410 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-258-12 420 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-258-13 109 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-264-01 117 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-264-02 117 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-264-03 117 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-264-04 117 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-264-05 117 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-264-06 117 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-264-07 117 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-264-09 308 - ode - DT & UC City Council 30 30 - 295 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ inte ' Focus Area/Location 398-264-10 300 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-264-13 201 W 3RD DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-264-14 308 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-264-15 202 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-264-16 214 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-264-17 220 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-264-18 325 N BROADWAY DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-267-01 227 N BROADWAY DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-267-02 217 N BROADWAY DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-267-03 225 N BROADWAY DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-267-04 207 W 2ND ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-267-05 207 W 2ND ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-267-06 207 W 2ND ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-267-09 214 N SYCAMORE ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-273-01 117 N BROADWAY DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-273-02 107 N BROADWAY DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-273-03 102 N SYCAMORE ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-273-04 222 W 2ND ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-274-01 117 N SYCAMORE ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-274-02 115 N SYCAMORE ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-274-03 105 N SYCAMORE ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-274-04 112 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-321-01 517 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-321-02 515 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-321-03 503 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-321-04 501 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-321-05 117 E 5TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-321-06 119 E 5TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-321-07 510 N BUSH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-321-08 520 N BUSH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-322-01 200 E SANTA ANA BLVD DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-323-08 300 E SANTA ANA BLVD DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-325-01 450 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-326-08 325 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-326-10 300 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-326-11 200 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-327-01 204 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-327-06 217-* E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-327-07 217 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-327-08 217 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-327-09 201 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-328-01 421 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-328-02 111 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-501-01 102 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-501-02 104 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-501-03 106 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-501-04 108 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-501-05 112 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-501-06 114 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-501-07 116 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-501-08 118 - ode - DT & UC City Council 31 30 - 296 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ inte ' Focus Area/Location 398-501-09 120 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-501-10 314 N BUSH DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-501-11 308 N BUSH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-501-12 302 N BUSH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-501-13 301 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-501-14 309 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-503-01 200-* E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-503-02 206-* E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-503-03 216 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-503-10 216-* E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-505-04 310 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-505-07 316 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-505-08 318 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-505-09 320 N FRENCH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-505-10 302 N FRENCH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-505-11 302 N FRENCH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-505-12 309 E 3RD ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-505-13 301 N SPURGEON ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-505-15 312-* E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-505-16 300 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-507-08 400 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-507-11 450 E 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-511-09 111 S MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-513-01 202 E 2ND ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-513-02 116 N SPURGEON ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-513-04 211 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-513-06 201 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-513-07 219 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-516-19 301 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-516-20 401 E 1ST ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-591-01 324 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-591-02 318 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-591-03 312 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-591-04 310 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-591-05 302 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-591-06 306 BROADWAY DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-591-07 306 BROADWAY DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-591-08 315 3RD ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-591-09 329 W BIRCH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-591-10 313 BIRCH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-592-07 204 N BROADWAY DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-592-08 116 N BROADWAY ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-592-09 322 W 3RD St DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-593-01 450 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-593-02 414 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-593-03 412 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-593-04 410 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-593-05 406 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-593-06 402 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-593-07 310 N BIRCH ST DC 3.0 FAR density intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-593-08 310 - ode - DT & UC City Council 32 30 - 297 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ inte ' Focus Area/Location 398-601-02 200 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-601-03 200 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-601-04 201 N SYCAMORE ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-602-02 217 N MAIN ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-602-03 220 N BUSH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-602-04 210 N BUSH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-602-07 200 N BUSH ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-603-02 210 E 3RD ST DC 3.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-324-01 402 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR LU change DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-324-02 406 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR LU change DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-324-03 412 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR LU change DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-324-08 409 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR LU change DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-324-09 405 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR LU change DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-324-10 501 N FRENCH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR LU change DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-324-12 510 N MORTIMER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR LU change DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-252-07 400 E SANTA ANA BLVD DC 90 du/ac, 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-3 Transit Zoning Code - DT & UC 398-351-04 1000 E SANTA ANA BLVD DC 5.0 FAR LU change INS Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-093-02 1024 FULLER ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-081-06 1107 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5-1.8FAR density/intensity UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-093-01 1102 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5-1.8FAR density/intensity UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-093-03 1024 N FULLER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Transit Zoning Code -TV 398-093-04 1022 FULLER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Transit Zoning Code -TV 398-093-05 1022 FULLER UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Transit Zoning Code -TV 398-093-06 1020 FULLER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Transit Zoning Code -TV 398-093-07 1016 FULLER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Transit Zoning Code -TV 398-093-08 1012 FULLER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Transit Zoning Code -TV 398-093-13 1006 N FULLER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Transit Zoning Code -TV 398-092-02 1013 N FULLER ST DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-092-08 1037 FULLER ST DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-092-09 1045 FULLER ST DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-092-10 1029 FULLER ST DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-092-11 1021 FULLER ST DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-092-13 1126 E WASHINGTON AVE DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-092-14 1126 E WASHINGTON AVE DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-101-02 940 N GRAND AVE DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-101-03 930 N GRAND AVE DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-101-04 1205 E STAFFORD ST DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-101-05 1201 E STAFFORD ST DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-101-06 1202 E STAFFORD ST DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-101-07 1206 E STAFFORD ST DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-101-08 1210 E STAFFORD ST DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-101-09 1214 E STAFFORD ST DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-101-13 1215 E FRUIT ST DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-101-14 902 N GRAND AVE DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-101-15 1207 E FRUIT ST DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-203-02 1000 E SANTA ANA BLVD DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-204-04 1000 E SANTA ANA BLVD DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-207-01 1111 E FRUIT ST DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-208-01 1143 E FRUIT ST DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-351-07 1000 E SANTA ANA BLVD DC 5.0 FAR density intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-361-01 114 - ode - TV City Council 33 30 - 298 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Addres Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ inte ' Focus Area/Location 398-361-07 1102 E FRUIT ST DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-374-21 1160 E FRUIT ST DC 5.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-351-08 1000 E SANTA ANA BLVD DC 90 du/ac, 1.0 FAR density/intensity DC-5 Transit Zoning Code - TV 398-255-31 411 W 4TH ST DC 3.0 FAR LU change INS Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-315-11 919 E 6TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-341-01 901 E 5TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-341-02 910 E 6TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-341-05 921 E 5TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-341-06 913 E 5TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-341-07 518 N POINSETTIA ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-341-08 920 E 6TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-341-09 920 E 6TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-342-01 1000 E 6TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-342-03 1000 E 6TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-342-18 1039 E 4TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-343-01 902 E 5TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-343-02 417 N GARFIELD ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-343-09 932 E 5TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-352-06 610 N SANTIAGO ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-352-07 620 N SANTIAGO ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-361-02 1061 E 6TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-361-03 1051 E 6TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-361-12 606 N TERMINAL ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-362-01 530 TERMINAL ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-362-02 510 TERMINAL ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-362-03 508 TERMINAL ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-362-04 506 TERMINAL ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-362-05 420 TERMINAL ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-373-05 1110 E 6TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-373-06 1102 E 6TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-374-19 1105 E 6TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-374-20 1101 E 6TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-381-01 531 TERMINAL ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-381-02 415 N TERMINAL ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-381-03 1051 E 4TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-381-04 1064 E 6TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-381-06 416 N SANTA FE ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-381-07 414 N SANTA FE ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-342-08 1020 E 6TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-342-09 941 E 4TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-342-10 941 E 4TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-342-11 941 E 4TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-343-03 906 E 5TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-382-01 1111 E 4TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-342-12 1045 E 4TH ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-361-01 1140 E FRUIT ST DC 5.0 FAR LU change UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-342-05 1020 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-342-15 1020 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-342-15 1029 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-381-05 1064 E 6TH ST DC 5.0 FAR density intensity UN-50 Transit Zoning Code - UC 398-181-06 841 - - ode - UN-1 City Council 34 30 - 299 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address LPlan Current General Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ Focus Area/Location 398-181-09 1328 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-181-10 1330 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-181-11 1332 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-181-14 841 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-181-17 1338 N CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-181-18 1340 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-182-05 1321 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-182-06 1317 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-182-07 1315 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-182-08 1313 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-182-09 901 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-182-10 905 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-182-11 909 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-182-12 915 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-182-13 915 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-182-14 900 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-182-15 1312 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-182-16 1318 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-182-17 1322 N LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-182-21 1326 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-182-22 1325 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-182-25 1331 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-182-26 1329 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-182-28 1337 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-183-07 1019 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-183-13 1313 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-183-14 1011 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-183-17 1312 N LINCOLN AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-183-18 1310 N LINCOLN AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-183-19 1306 N LINCOLN AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-192-06 845 E CIVIC CENTER DR UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-192-07 1018 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-192-08 1020 N CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-192-09 1024 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-192-10 1030 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-192-11 1000 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-192-12 1038 N CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-192-13 826 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-192-14 830 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-192-15 800 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-192-16 836 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-192-17 838 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-01 902 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-02 1000 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-03 1039 N CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-04 1037 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-05 1033 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-06 1027 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-07 1023 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-08 1019 CUSTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-10 903 - - ode - UN-1 City Council 35 30 - 300 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address LPlan Current General Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ Focus Area/Location 398-193-11 907 STAFFORD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-12 1002 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-13 1006 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-15 1016 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-16 1018 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-17 1022 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-18 1026 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-19 1030 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-20 1034 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-21 1038 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-22 1042 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-23 912 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-24 916 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-25 920 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-193-26 1012 N LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-01 1004 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-02 1006 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-03 1008 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-04 1010 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-05 1041 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-06 1035 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-07 1035 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-08 1027 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-09 1021 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-10 1017 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-11 1015 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-12 1001 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-14 1008 LINCOLN AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-15 1018 N LINCOLN AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-16 1022 N LINCOLN AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-17 1024 N LINCOLN AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-18 1026 N LINCOLN AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-19 1030 N LINCOLN AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-20 1032 N LINCOLN AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-21 1042 N LINCOLN AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-22 1014 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-194-23 1002 N LINCOLN AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-202-02 904 STAFFORD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-202-03 906 STAFFORD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-202-04 908 E STAFFORD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-202-05 912 E STAFFORD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-202-06 926 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-202-07 924 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-202-08 922 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-202-09 920 N LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-205-01 935 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-205-02 929 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-205-03 925 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-205-04 923 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-205-05 917 LOGAN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-205-06 920 - ode - UN-1 City Council 36 30 - 301 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Addres Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ Focus Area/Location 398-205-07 922 N LINCOLN AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-205-08 926 N LINCOLN AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-205-09 1016 STAFFORD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-481-13 717 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-481-14 713 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-481-15 711 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-481-16 705 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-481-17 701 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-481-18 623 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-481-19 619 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-481-20 615 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-481-25 604 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-481-27 608 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-02 518 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-03 522 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-04 602 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-05 606 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-06 610 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-07 614 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-08 618 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-09 624 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-10 626 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-11 710 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-12 712 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-13 714 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-14 720 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-15 208 N LACY ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-16 721 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-17 719 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-18 709 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-19 705 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-20 701 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-21 619 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-22 615 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-23 609 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-24 607 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-25 605 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-26 601 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-27 519 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-28 515 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-29 511 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-482-32 430 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-483-08 831 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-483-09 825 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-483-10 823 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-483-13 815 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-483-14 809 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-483-15 805 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-483-16 801 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-483-17 819 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-484-01 802 - - ode - UN-1 City Council 37 30 - 302 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN L Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ Focus Area/Location 398-484-02 213 N LACY ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-484-03 810 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-484-04 814 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-484-06 829 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-484-07 825 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-484-08 821 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-484-09 819 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-484-10 815 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-484-11 801 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-491-04 514 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-491-05 518 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-491-06 606 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-491-07 608 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-491-08 610 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-491-09 612 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-491-10 614 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-491-11 618 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-491-12 620 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-491-13 702 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-491-14 706 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-491-15 710 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-491-16 714 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-491-17 720 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-491-39 510 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-491-40 510 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-492-01 802 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-492-02 808 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-492-03 810 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-492-04 814 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-492-05 818 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-492-06 820 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-492-07 824 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-492-08 826 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-492-09 830 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-492-10 112 N GARFIELD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 Transit Zoning Code - UN-1 398-315-04 901 E 6TH ST UN 5.0 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-033-05 1110 N POINSETTIA ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-034-07 920 N POINSETTIA ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-035-01 1115 N POINSETTIA ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-035-02 1113 N POINSETTIA ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-035-03 1105 N POINSETTIA ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-043-09 715 CIVIC CENTER DR UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-043-10 717 CIVIC CENTER DR UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-043-13 820 N POINSETTIA ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-043-14 830 N POINSETTIA ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-043-15 810 N POINSETTIA ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-150-02 627 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-151-08 1327 N POINSETTIA ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-151-09 1300 N POINSETTIA ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-151-10 615 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-151-11 611 - -in Tramot Zoning Code - UN-2 City Council 38 30 - 303 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address L- Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ Focus Area/Location 398-152-16 627 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-181-16 1315 N SANTIAGO ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-191-02 628 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-191-03 1016 N SANTIAGO ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-191-04 827 E CIVIC CENTER DR UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-191-05 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-191-06 921 N POINSETTIA ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-191-07 911 N POINSETTIA ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-191-08 811 N POINSETTIA ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-192-01 800 E WASHINGTON AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-192-02 1031 N SANTIAGO ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-192-03 1031 SANTIAGO ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-192-04 1025 N SANTIAGO ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-192-05 1001 N SANTIAGO ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-201-11 901 E SANTA ANA BLVD UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-202-01 923 N SANTIAGO ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-236-01 621 N SPURGEON ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-236-02 621 N SPURGEON ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-236-03 708 N FRENCH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-236-04 609 N SPURGEON ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-237-01 625 N FRENCH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-237-02 615 N FRENCH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-237-03 714 MORTIMER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-237-04 710 MORTIMER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-237-05 401 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-238-01 731 MORTIMER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-238-02 725 MORTIMER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-238-03 719 MORTIMER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-238-04 715 MORTIMER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-238-05 711 MORTIMER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-238-06 501 E SANTA ANA BLVD UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-238-07 505 E SANTA ANA BLVD UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-238-08 511 E SANTA ANA BLVD UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-238-09 702 N MINTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-238-10 708 N MINTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-238-11 710 N MINTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-238-12 408 CIVIC CENTER DR UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-301-01 729 N MINTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-301-02 727 N MINTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-301-03 717 N MINTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-301-04 715 N MINTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-301-05 709 N MINTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-301-08 615 E SANTA ANA BLVD UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-301-09 619 E SANTA ANA BLVD UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-301-10 623 E SANTA ANA BLVD UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-301-11 625 E SANTA ANA BLVD UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-301-12 710 N LACY ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-301-13 714 N LACY ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-301-16 724 N LACY ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-301-17 730 N LACY ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-301-20 718 - - ode - UN-2 City Council 39 30 - 304 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Addres Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ Focus Area/Location 398-301-21 601 E SANTA ANA BLVD UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-302-01 608 E CIVIC CENTER DR UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-302-02 717 LACY ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-302-08 729 E SANTA ANA BLVD UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-302-10 724 N GARFIELD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-302-11 730 N GARFIELD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-302-14 711 N LACY ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-302-15 703 N LACY ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-303-01 725 N GARFIELD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-303-02 717 N GARFIELD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-303-03 711 N GARFIELD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-303-04 801 E SANTA ANA BLVD UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-303-05 807 E SANTA ANA BLVD UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-303-06 809 E SANTA ANA BLVD UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-303-07 809 E SANTA ANA BLVD UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-303-08 715 N GARFIELD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-303-09 817 E SANTA ANA BLVD UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-303-10 724 N POINSETTIA ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-303-11 730 N POINSETTIA ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-311-05 607 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-311-21 621 N MINTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-312-10 811 BROWN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-312-11 602 N GARFIELD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-312-21 702 E SANTA ANA BLVD UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-312-22 610 GARFIELD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-312-23 601 N LACY ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-312-24 618 N GARFIELD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-313-03 812 E SANTA ANA BLVD UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-313-06 611 N GARFIELD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-313-11 624 N POINSETTIA ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-313-16 636 POINSETTIA ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-313-17 638 N POINSETTIA ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-313-20 804 E SANTA ANA BLVD UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-315-01 902 BROWN ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-315-09 620 N POINSETTIA ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-315-10 620 N POINSETTIA ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-315-12 901 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-330-01 502 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-330-02 506 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-330-03 510 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-330-04 514 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-330-05 520 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-330-06 519 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-330-07 515 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-330-08 509 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-330-09 507 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-330-10 501 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-331-01 601 MORTIMER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-331-02 512 E SANTA ANA BLVD UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-331-05 515 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-331-06 516 - - ode - UN-2 City Council 40 30 - 305 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN L Situs Addres Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ Focus Area/Location 398-332-04 520 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-332-05 519 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-332-06 515 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-332-10 502 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-332-11 505 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-333-02 610 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-333-07 609 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-333-10 512 N PORTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-333-11 601 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-333-12 621 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-334-01 702 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-334-02 706 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-334-03 710 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-334-04 714 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-334-05 720 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-334-06 713 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-334-07 701 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-337-01 702 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-337-02 708 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-337-03 712 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-337-04 716 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-337-05 416 N LACY ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-337-06 719 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-337-07 713 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-337-11 701 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-337-12 701 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-338-01 602 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-338-06 615 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-338-07 609 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-338-08 601 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-338-09 409 N MINTER ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-338-11 606 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-342-08 1020 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-342-09 1020 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-342-10 1020 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-342-11 941 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-342-12 1035 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-343-03 906 E 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-343-07 929 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-343-08 903 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-352-10 920 E SANTA ANA BLVD UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-01 742 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-02 738 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-03 734 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-04 730 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-05 718 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-06 714 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-07 710 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-08 702 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-09 626 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-10 624 - - ode - UN-2 City Council 41 30 - 306 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Addres Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ Focus Area/Location 398-371-11 620 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-12 616 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-14 600 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-15 601 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-16 609 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-17 615 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-18 617 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-19 621 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-20 623 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-21 629 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-22 703 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-23 707 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-24 711 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-25 715 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-26 717 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-27 721 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-28 725 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-29 731 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-30 735 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-31 739 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-32 1214 E FRUIT ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-33 610 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-371-34 606 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-372-01 516 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-372-02 510 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-372-03 508 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-372-04 511 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-372-05 515 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-372-06 519 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-372-07 1202 E 6TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-373-01 528 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-373-02 524 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-373-07 514 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-374-01 742 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-374-02 740 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-374-03 736 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-374-04 732 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-374-05 728 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-374-06 724 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-374-07 720 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-374-08 716 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-374-09 710 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-374-10 706 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-374-11 704 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-374-12 628 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-374-13 626 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-374-14 622 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-374-15 618 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-374-16 610 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-374-17 606 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-374-18 604 - - ode - UN-2 City Council 42 30 - 307 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address LPlan Current General Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ Focus Area/Location 398-381-08 412 N SANTA FE ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-381-09 412 N SANTA FE ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-381-10 1061 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-381-11 1055 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-381-12 1051 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-381-13 1051 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-382-01 1111 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-382-02 508 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-382-03 506 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-382-04 420 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-382-05 416 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-383-01 507 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-383-02 501 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-383-03 419 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-383-04 411 N EASTWOOD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-383-05 1201 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-383-08 404 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-383-09 416 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-383-10 420 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-383-11 424 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-383-12 502 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-383-13 400 N GRAND AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-386-06 1121 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-386-07 1119 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-386-08 1115 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-386-09 1111 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-386-10 1105 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-451-01 1108 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-451-04 1116 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-451-05 1122 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-451-06 212 N HATHAWAY ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-451-07 208 N HATHAWAY ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-451-08 202 N HATHAWAY ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-452-01 1102 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-452-02 1108 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-452-03 1116 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-452-04 1118 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-452-05 120 N HATHAWAY ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-452-06 108 N HATHAWAY ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-452-07 104 N HATHAWAY ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-452-08 1102 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-453-01 1202 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-453-02 1202 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-453-03 1208 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-453-04 1210 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-453-08 1209 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-453-09 1207 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-453-10 209 N HATHAWAY ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-453-11 1205 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-454-01 117 N HATHAWAY ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-454-02 111 - - ode - UN-2 City Council 43 30 - 308 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Addres Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ Focus Area/Location 398-454-03 1208 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-454-11 107 N HATHAWAY ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-461-03 1002 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-461-07 1044 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-461-18 1030 E 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-461-19 1038 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-471-01 1026 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-471-02 1022 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-471-03 1008 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-471-04 922 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-471-05 924 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-471-06 927 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-471-07 900 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-472-01 1000 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-472-02 1000 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-472-03 928 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-472-04 905 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-472-05 910 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-472-06 905 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-473-04 914 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-473-06 902 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-473-10 938 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-473-12 936 E 2ND ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-481-08 610 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-481-09 612 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-481-10 616 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-481-11 710 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-481-12 716 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-481-24 604 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-481-26 608 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-483-01 802 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-483-02 806 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-483-03 800 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-483-04 818 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-483-05 820 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-483-06 822 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-483-07 832 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-484-05 818 E 3RD ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-342-18 1039 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-362-05 420 TERMINAL ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-381-03 1055 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-342-15 1029 E 4TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 398-461-06 117 N STANDARD AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 Transit Zoning Code - UN-2 198-101-03 3704 W WASHINGTON AVE MR15 15 du/ac LU change LR-7 West Santa Ana Boulevard 198-101-04 1222 N BEWLEY ST MR15 15 du/ac LU change LR-7 West Santa Ana Boulevard 198-101-05 1218 N BEWLEY ST MR15 15 du/ac LU change LR-7 West Santa Ana Boulevard 198-101-07 1122 N BEWLEY ST MR15 15 du/ac LU change LR-7 West Santa Ana Boulevard 198-101-08 1114 N BEWLEY ST MR15 15 du/ac LU change LR-7 West Santa Ana Boulevard 198-101-09 1102 N BEWLEY ST MR15 15 du/ac LU change LR-7 West Santa Ana Boulevard 198-101-10 3625 W 11TH ST MR15 15 du/ac LU change LR-7 West Santa Ana Boulevard 198-101-17 121 - Boulevard City Council 44 30 - 309 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ intensity Focus Area/Location 198-211-04 3424 W WASHINGTON AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change LMR-11 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-222-10 2901 W 1ST ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change MR-15 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-222-12 2767 W 1ST ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change MR-15 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-222-13 2767 W 1ST ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change MR-15 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-161-01 1922 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-161-02 1918 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-161-03 1914 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-161-04 1912 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-161-05 1906 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-161-06 1904 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-161-07 209 N TOWNSEND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-161-08 1921 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-161-09 1917 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-161-10 1915 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-161-11 1911 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-161-12 1907 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-161-13 1901 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-162-01 1924 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-162-02 1918 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-162-03 1916 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-162-04 1912 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-162-05 1906 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-162-06 1904 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-163-02 1826 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-163-03 1822 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-163-04 1818 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-163-05 1814 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-163-07 1837 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-163-08 1831 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-163-10 1819 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-163-11 1815 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-163-12 1809 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-163-13 1805 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-163-14 1801 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-163-15 1821 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-163-16 1825 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-163-17 1832 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-163-18 1834 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-163-19 1810 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-163-21 1802 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-163-22 1806 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-164-01 1832 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-164-02 1826 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-164-03 1824 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-164-04 1820 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-164-05 1816 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-164-06 1810 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-164-07 1808 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-164-08 1802 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-201-02 1724 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-201-03 172 Boulevard City Council 45 30 — 310 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ intensity Focus Area/Location 007-201-04 1718 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-201-06 1706 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-201-07 1702 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-201-14 110 N WESTERN AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-201-17 1716 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-201-18 1712 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-201-28 1732 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-201-29 1728 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-176-01 271 N RAITT ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-176-02 1726 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-176-03 1722 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-176-04 1722 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-176-05 1716 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-176-06 1716 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-176-07 1706 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-176-08 1702 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-176-09 1701 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-176-10 1705 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-176-11 1709 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-176-12 1715 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-176-13 1717 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-176-14 1721 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-176-15 1727 W 2ND ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change CR West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-131-33 1249 W 1ST ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change OS West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-082-19 1225 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-082-20 1217 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-082-21 1213 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-082-22 1211 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-082-23 1207 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-082-24 1201 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-084-11 1139 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-084-12 1131 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-084-13 1129 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-084-14 1127 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-084-26 1107 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-091-07 1222 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-091-08 1218 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-091-09 1214 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-091-10 1210 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-091-11 1206 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-091-12 1202 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-093-01 1140 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-093-05 1120 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-093-08 1106 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-093-09 1102 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-093-23 1128 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-093-24 1114 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-161-01 1076 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-161-02 1070 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-161-08 1042 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-161-39 103 -W Boulevard City Council 46 30 — 311 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Addres I Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ intensity Focus Area/Location 405-161-40 1040 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-161-41 1054 E SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-084-24 1111 E SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR density/intensity PAO-2 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-19 2025 W 1ST ST GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-21 2015 W 1ST ST GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-28 2201 W 1ST ST GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-29 2209 W 1ST ST GC 0.5 FAR density/intensity GC-1 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-21 2317 W 1ST ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-22 2313 W 1ST ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-23 2301 W 1ST ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-24 2301 W 1ST ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-25 2233 W 1ST ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-26 2217 W 1ST ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-022-29 2415 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-100-02 1908 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-100-04 1922 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-100-05 2002 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-100-06 1900 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-100-07 1804 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-110-01 2308 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-110-02 2304 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-110-03 2224 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-110-04 2222 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-110-06 2210 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-110-07 2204 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-110-10 2120 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-110-11 2110 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-110-12 2114 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-110-13 2106 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-110-14 2102 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-110-15 2026 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-110-16 2022 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-110-17 2020 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-110-20 2216 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-110-21 2202 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-24 2400 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-25 2401 CAPE COD WAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-26 2350 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-27 2351 CAPE COD WAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-28 2330 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-32 2231 CAPE COD WAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-33 2221 CAPE COD WAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-34 2220 CAPE COD WAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-35 2230 CAPE COD WAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-36 2300 CAPE COD WAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-37 2310 CAPE COD WAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-38 321 N CLARA ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-39 311 N CLARA ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-40 301 N CLARA ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-41 312 N TOWNSEND ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-43 234 - Boulevard City Council 47 30 - 312 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ inte ' Focus Area/Location 007-120-44 2331 CAPE COD WAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-45 2311 CAPE COD WAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-46 2321 CAPE COD WAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-47 2301 CAPE COD WAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-49 302 N TOWNSEND ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-50 308 N TOWNSEND ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-52 302 N TOWNSEND ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-120-53 304 N TOWNSEND ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-121-01 2430 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-121-02 2410 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-121-03 411 N SULLIVAN ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-121-04 410 NANTUCKET PL IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-121-05 401 N SULLIVAN ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-121-06 400 NANTUCKET PL IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-121-07 321 N SULLIVAN ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-121-08 301 N SULLIVAN ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-121-09 2430 CAPE COD WAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-121-10 2420 CAPE COD WAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-121-11 2400 CAPE COD WAY IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-121-12 300 N CLARA ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-04 302 N SULLIVAN ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-11 2602 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-24 2520 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-26 2518 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-29 408 N SULLIVAN ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-31 406 N SULLIVAN ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-35 412 N SULLIVAN ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-42 402 N SULLIVAN ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-45 2521 W 1ST ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-46 2513 W 1ST ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-47 2603 W 1ST ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-48 2521 W 1ST ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-49 2649 W 1ST ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-50 2655 W 1ST ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-51 2639 W 1ST ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-56 2505 W 1ST ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-66 419 N FAIRVIEW ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-67 401 N FAIRVIEW ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-76 308 N SULLIVAN ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-77 404 N SULLIVAN ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-78 280 N SULLIVAN ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-79 212 N SULLIVAN ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-80 124 N SULLIVAN ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-141-82 201 N Fairview St IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-142-01 2702 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-361-08 200 N CLARA ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-361-09 2323 W 1ST ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-361-10 216 N CLARA ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-361-15 2431 W 1ST ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-361-17 201 N SULLIVAN ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-361-18 242 - Boulevard City Council 48 30 - 313 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ inte ' Focus Area/Location 007-361-19 2420 W 3RD ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-361-20 2411 W 1ST ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-361-21 2421 W 1ST ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-361-22 121 N SULLIVAN ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-03 2309 W 2ND ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-06 2233 W 2ND ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-09 2221 W 2ND ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-10 2217 W 2ND ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-11 2218 W 2ND ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-12 2222 W 2ND ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-13 2226 W 2ND ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-20 201 N CLARA ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-30 2305 W 2ND ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-31 2310 W 2ND ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-32 2302 W 2ND ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-33 2225 W 2ND ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-34 2230 W 2ND ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-362-35 2317 W 2ND St IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-222-05 2808 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-222-06 2812 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-222-07 2818 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-222-14 2828 W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-222-15 2829 W 1ST ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-241-01 2501* W 5TH ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-241-03 501 N FAIRVIEW ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-241-04 601 N FAIRVIEW ST IND 0.45 FAR LU change FLEX-1.5 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-211-02 802 N FAIRVIEW ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-313-15 2237 W 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-313-16 2223 W 5TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-022-04 2334 W 6TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-022-05 2328 W 6TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-022-06 2324 W 6TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-022-07 2318 W 6TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-022-09 2304 W 6TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-022-16 2325 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-022-17 2317 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-022-19 2310 W 6TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-022-23 2338 W 6TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-022-24 2334 W 6TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-022-25 2329 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-022-30 2301 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-022-31 2314 W 6TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-022-32 2301 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-022-33 2315 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-101-01 1924 W 4TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-101-02 1920 W 4TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-101-03 1918 W 4TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-101-04 1910 W 4TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-101-05 1906 W 4TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-101-06 1902 W 4TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-101-07 192 - Boulevard City Council 49 30 - 314 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ intensity Focus Area/Location 007-101-08 1919 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-101-10 1909 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-101-11 1905 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-101-12 1903 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-101-13 1913 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-101-14 1915 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-102-01 1836 W 4TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-102-02 1830 W 4TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-102-03 1824 W 4TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-102-04 1822 W 4TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-102-05 1800 W 4TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-102-06 1812 W 4TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-102-07 1802 W 4TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-102-08 1839 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-102-09 1829 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-102-10 1825 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-102-14 1815 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-102-15 1811 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-102-16 1807 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-102-17 1801 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-102-19 1817 W 3RD St LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-351-01 717 N FAIRVIEW ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-352-46 711 N FAIRVIEW ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-052-03 1730 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-052-04 1728 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-052-05 1724 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-052-06 1722 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-052-07 1710 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-052-08 1706 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-052-09 1702 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-052-10 1701 W SANTA ANA BLVD LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-052-11 1707 W SANTA ANA BLVD LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-052-12 1709 W SANTA ANA BLVD LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-052-13 1717 W SANTA ANA BLVD LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-052-14 1721 W SANTA ANA BLVD LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-052-15 1725 W SANTA ANA BLVD LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-052-16 1727 W SANTA ANA BLVD LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-052-19 1731 W SANTA ANA BLVD LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-052-20 1735 W SANTA ANA BLVD LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-171-02 1720 W SANTA ANA BLVD LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-171-03 1714 W SANTA ANA BLVD LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-171-04 1710 W SANTA ANA BLVD LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-171-05 1706 W SANTA ANA BLVD LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-171-06 1702 E 4TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-171-07 1701 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-171-08 1705 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-171-09 1709 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-171-10 301 N RAITT ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-211-01 730 N FAIRVIEW ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-211-02 802 N FAIRVIEW ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-211-03 720 - Boulevard City Council 50 30 — 315 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Addres Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ intensity Focus Area/Location 405-211-04 804 N FAIRVIEW ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-211-07 2502 W 9TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-211-08 2506 W 9TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-211-09 2510 W 9TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-211-10 2510 W 9TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-211-11 2520 W 9TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-211-36 804 N FAIRVIEW ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-20 West Santa Ana Boulevard 398-212-14 800 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 1.0 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 398-212-15 800 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 1.0 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 398-212-16 888 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 1.0 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 398-212-17 800 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 1.0 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 398-221-19 500 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 1.0 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 398-221-24 600 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 1.0 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 398-221-26 520 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 1.0 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 398-221-27 311 N VAN NESS ST PAO 1.0 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 398-221-28 520 W 4TH ST PAO 1.0 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-064-05 1310 W 5TH ST INS 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-064-14 1314 W 5TH ST INS 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-064-17 410 N BRISTOL ST INS 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-082-16 1235 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-082-17 1233 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-082-18 1231 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-091-03 1240 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-091-04 1236 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-091-05 1230 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-091-06 1226 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 398-221-22 520 W SANTA ANA BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 398-221-23 520 W SANTA AN BLVD PAO 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-183-15 1305 W 3RD ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-183-25 1306 W SANTA ANA BLVD GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-082-01 415 N BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-082-02 415 N BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-082-14 1243 W SANTA ANA BLVD GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-082-15 1241 W SANTA ANA BLVD GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-082-29 1247 W SANTA ANA BLVD GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-091-01 315 N BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-091-02 1244 W SANTA ANA BLVD GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-091-14 1247 W 3RD ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-091-15 1239 W 3RD ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-064-06 418 N BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 405-064-17 410 N BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-183-01 1336 W SANTA ANA BLVD LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-183-02 1332 W SANTA ANA BLVD LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-183-03 1326 W SANTA ANA BLVD LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-183-04 1322 W SANTA ANA BLVD LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-183-05 1318 W SANTA ANA BLVD LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-183-10 305 N HESPERIAN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-183-12 1323 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-183-13 1319 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-183-14 1315 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 007-183-19 133 - Boulevard City Council 51 30 - 316 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ intensity Focus Area/Location 007-183-20 1325 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-082-03 1236 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-082-04 1234 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-082-05 1232 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-091-16 1237 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-091-17 1233 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-091-18 1229 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 008-091-19 1225 W 3RD ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change UN-30 West Santa Ana Boulevard 410-301-28 1000 W MACARTHUR BLVD DC 1.0 FAR LU change LR-7 010-232-18 902 S BROADWAY INS 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 010-232-22 917 S BIRCH ST INS 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 396-261-26 2101 E SANTA CLARA AVE INS 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 396-261-56 2414 N TUSTIN AVE INS/OS/LR-7 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 396-261-38 2109 E SANTA CLARA AVE INS/GC 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 016-045-19 2533 ORANGE AVE OS 0.2 FAR LU change LR-7 396-261-56 2414 N TUSTIN AVE OS 0.2 FAR LU change LR-7 405-261-20 801 N LOUISE ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 405-261-21 807 N LOUISE ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 405-261-22 811 N LOUISE ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 405-312-02 1617 N ROSEWOOD AVE PAO 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 405-321-01 1010 W 17TH ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 405-082-02 1148 W CIVIC CENTER DR PAO 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 405-082-25 1136 W CIVIC CENTER DR PAO 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 396-261-37 2360 N TUSTIN AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 396-261-38 2109 E SANTA CLARA AVE GC 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 398-391-09 526 N MCCLAY ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 398-391-10 522 N MCCLAY ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 398-391-11 518 N MCCLAY ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 398-391-12 514 N MCCLAY ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 398-391-13 510 N MCCLAY ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 398-391-14 506 N MCCLAY ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 398-391-27 530 N MCCLAY ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 405-081-23 611 N BRISTOL ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 398-496-04 113 S HALLADAY ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 410-311-02 2970 S MAIN ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change LR-7 414-012-01 2732 W ORION AVE IND 0.45 FAR LU change LR-7 410-111-02 651 W SUNFLOWER AVE UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR LU change LR-7 407-107-19 3007 W EDINGER AVE MR15 15 du/ac LU change LR-7 407-107-20 3013 W EDINGER AVE MR15 15 du/ac LU change LR-7 407-107-22 3019 W EDINGER AVE MR15 15 du/ac LU change LR-7 407-107-29 3019 W EDINGER AVE MR15 15 du/ac LU change LR-7 407-107-31 3025 W EDINGER AVE MR15 15 du/ac LU change LR-7 407-107-32 3109 W EDINGER AVE MR15 15 du/ac LU change LR-7 412-423-01 1702 W ADAMS ST LU change LR-7 412-423-02 1706 W ADAMS ST LU change LR-7 412-423-03 1710 W ADAMS ST LU change LR-7 412-423-04 1714 W ADAMS ST LU change LR-7 412-423-05 1718 W ADAMS ST LU change LR-7 412-423-06 1722 W ADAMS ST LU change LR-7 412-423-07 1802 W ADAMS ST LU change LR-7 412-423-08 180 - City Council 52 30 — 317 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Addre! I Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ igtensity Focus Area/Location 108-741-03 4918 W 1ST ST GC/LMR11 0.5 FAR/11 du/ac LU change LMR-11 108-741-04 4906 W 1ST ST GC/LMR11 0.5 FAR/11 du/ac LU change LMR-11 108-741-05 4920 W 1ST ST GC/LMR11 0.5 FAR/11 du/ac LU change LMR-11 100-281-07 201 N MOUNTAIN VIEW ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change LMR-11 100-281-09 113 N MOUNTAIN VIEW ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change LMR-11 100-281-11 117 N MOUNTAIN VIEW ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change LMR-11 100-281-12 121 N MOUNTAIN VIEW ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change LMR-11 100-281-16 4326 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change LMR-11 100-281-23 4318 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change LMR-11 100-281-24 4322 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change LMR-11 100-281-26 211 N MOUNTAIN VIEW ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change LMR-11 100-281-28 207 N MOUNTAIN VIEW ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change LMR-11 100-281-29 203 N MOUNTAIN VIEW ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change LMR-11 100-281-30 4330 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change LMR-11 100-281-31 4330 W 5th ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change LMR-11 100-281-32 4310 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change LMR-11 100-281-33 4314 W 5TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change LMR-11 398-431-19 120 N WRIGHT ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change LMR-11 398-441-06 301 N LINWOOD AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change LMR-11 398-441-09 302 N LINWOOD AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change LMR-11 100-281-05 301 N MOUNTAIN VIEW ST MR15 15 du/ac LU change LMR-11 100-281-25 4307 W 1ST ST MR15 15 du/ac LU change LMR-11 100-281-37 321 N MOUNTAIN VIEW ST MR15 15 du/ac LU change LMR-11 100-281-40 243 N MOUNTAIN VIEW ST MR15 15 du/ac LU change LMR-11 100-281-41 409 N MOUNTAIN VIEW ST MR15 15 du/ac LU change LMR-11 402-051-08 727 S LYON ST ROW LU change MR-15 396-261-21 2031 E SANTA CLARA AVE OS 0.2 FAR LU change INS 412-341-01 2701 S RAITT ST OS 0.2 FAR LU change INS 398-391-15 1324 E 4TH ST GC 0.5 FAR LU change INS 016-035-12 417 E CENTRAL AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change INS 109-062-33 1001 S GRAHAM LN LR7 7 du/ac LU change INS 109-064-40 1001 S GRAHAM LN LR7 7 du/ac LU change INS 396-211-40 2019 N GRAND AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change INS 396-201-05 2100 N GRAND AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change INS 405-233-36 1112 W CIVIC CENTER DR LR7 7 du/ac LU change INS 004-070-38 1714 W MARTHA LN LR7 7 du/ac LU change INS 016-090-27 400 E CENTRAL AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change INS 405-121-11 1825 W CIVIC CENTER DR INS 0.5 FAR LU change OS 415-031-16 4501 W MACARTHUR BLVD IND 0.45 FAR LU change OS 016-035-15 417 E CENTRAL AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change OS 390-691-08 2535 N MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change OS 390-691-09 2535 N MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change OS 390-701-07 2535 N MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change OS 390-701-08 2535 N MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change OS 405-121-11 1825 W CIVIC CENTER DR LR7 7 du/ac LU change OS 390-701-07 2535 N MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change OS 390-701-06 2535 N MAIN ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change OS 001-011-22 1817 W 21TH ST MR15 15 du/ac LU change OS 405-251-02 1212 W 17TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change PAO 399-072-17 1139 W 17TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change PAO 405-312-29 112 City Council 53 30 — 318 4/19/2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Plan Update Inventory (December 2021) APN Situs Address fL Current General Plan Current Density/ Intensity Type of Change Proposed Density/ intensity Focus Area/Location 405-312-30 1108 W 17TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change PAO 398-522-24 1324 N BROADWAY MR15 15 du/ac LU change PAO 398-535-10 1024 N ROSS ST MR15 15 du/ac LU change PAO 398-535-11 1032 N ROSS ST MR15 15 du/ac LU change PAO 396-261-30 2360 N TUSTIN AVE INS 0.5 FAR LU change GC 396-261-31 2370 N TUSTIN AVE INS/GC 0.5 FAR LU change GC 396-261-32 2360 N TUSTIN AVE INS 0.5 FAR LU change GC 396-261-35 2360 N TUSTIN AVE INS/GC 0.5 FAR LU change GC 396-261-33 2360 N TUSTIN AVE INS/GC 0.5 FAR LU change GC 396-261-34 2370 N TUSTIN AVE INS/GC 0.5 FAR LU change GC 405-321-02 900 W 17TH ST PAO 0.5 FAR LU change GC 011-263-25 1100 S GRAND AVE IND 0.45 FAR LU change GC 198-132-21 2530 W 17TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR LU change GC 198-132-23 2534 W 17TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR LU change GC 003-161-10 2015 POINSETTIA ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC 099-213-53 502 N EUCLID ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC 099-221-22 414 N EUCLID ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC 099-222-39 306 N EUCLID ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC 099-223-26 202 N EUCLID ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC 099-224-33 114 N EUCLID ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC 099-224-40 122 N EUCLID ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC 099-224-41 118 N EUCLID ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC 399-085-21 1715 N BRISTOL ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC 405-321-02 900 W 17TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC 414-022-20 3730 S GREENVILLE ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC 414-022-37 3730 S GREENVILLE ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC 399-085-16 1223 W 17TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC 399-085-17 1205 W 17TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC 399-085-18 1225 W 17TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC 399-085-19 1227 W 17TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC 002-104-47 521 W 17TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC 099-224-26 5201 W 1ST ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC 004-044-48 1916 W 17TH ST LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC 396-292-01 2101 N TUSTIN AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change GC 100-281-36 4315 W 1ST ST MR15 15 du/ac LU change GC 430-251-14 2100 EDINGER AVE LU change GC 396-314-06 1722 E 17TH ST LU change GC 007-321-02 1526 W 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 007-321-04 1506 W 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 007-321-17 1525 W WALNUT ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 007-321-18 1548 W 1ST ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-30 003-153-48 317 E 17TH ST UN 0.5 - 1.8 FAR density/intensity UN-50 011-251-17 1113 S STANDARD AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change OS 011-251-18 1117 S STANDARD AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change OS 011-251-19 1121 S STANDARD AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change OS 011-251-20 1125 S STANDARD AVE LR7 7 du/ac LU change OS City Council 54 30 — 319 4/19/2022