My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - #37
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2022
>
07/19/2022 Special and Regular & Special HA
>
CORRESPONDENCE - #37
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2024 10:53:37 AM
Creation date
7/18/2022 5:12:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
7/19/2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
285
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 20, Item 2: I am glad to see that an amnesty program will be implemented so as to not criminalize <br />unpermitted units which might lead to displacement of families and residents in the city. I learned recently that <br />in the 1980s Santa Ana attempted to implement an agressive code enforcement program which threatened to <br />displace mostly lower income Mexican families at the time. I am glad to see that we are attempting to learn <br />from mistakes of the past. <br />Page 32, Item 33: It is applaudable that the City will implement the necessary framework and administrative <br />infrastructure necessary to enforce the RSO and JCEO. Since the enactment of the two ordinances, tenants and <br />landlords in Santa Ana must rely upon expensive, slow, and inaccessible court processes to seek remedy in <br />tenant -landlord disputes. Local enforcement and administration has been discussed by community groups <br />previously and policy recommendations have been submitted to the public record leading up to the enactment of <br />the RSO and JCEO. <br />Page 33, Item 34: While it is applaudable that the city aims to assist first time homebuyers with down payments <br />on a mortgage, it is still a loan which many in Santa Ana may struggle to make payments on. While I <br />understand that any outstanding balance is forgiven after 40 years of on time payments, and that the intent of <br />making it a zero interest loan is to ensure sustainability of the funds, there needs to be a coupling of this <br />program with incentives of current property owners to sell current units at or below market rates to those who <br />qualify for the first time homebuyer loans or to community based organizations focused on permanent housing <br />affordability such as a CLT. $120,000 will continue to constitute a smaller and smaller percentage of the sales <br />prices if/as inventory remains low in Santa Ana and thus prices perpetually increasing. <br />Page 36, Item 43: It is applaudable that the city aims to increase the supply of units by streamlining the ADU <br />process. However, there is still no incentive to ensure that already dense neighborhoods aren't made even more <br />dense while others increase the number of properties with Historical protections thus remaining as lower density <br />neighborhoods in perpetuity. Landlords of properties in the historically highly dense Lacy neighborhoods and <br />French Park neighborhoods are now utilizing streamlined ADU processes to increase housing supply at the <br />expense of parking and green space while rents of already existing units continue to increase without a similar <br />increase in quality (nay - a decrease at that with the loss of parking and green space). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.