My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Packet_8-22-22
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Planning Commission (2002-Present)
>
2022
>
8-22-22
>
Packet_8-22-22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/23/2022 2:43:39 PM
Creation date
8/23/2022 2:40:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
352
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Community Plan Exemption Checklist <br />City of Santa Ana Gary Avenue Business Park Project <br /> <br />53 <br />equipment that would be less energy efficient compared with other similar construction sites in other parts of <br />the State. Therefore, construction-related fuel consumption by the Project would not result in inefficient, <br />wasteful, or unnecessary energy use compared with other construction sites in the region, and there would <br />be no new impacts. <br /> <br />Operation <br />The State of California provides a minimum standard for building design and construction standards through <br />Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR). Compliance with Title 24 is mandatory at the time new <br />building permits are issued by local governments. The City’s administration of the Title 24 requirements <br />includes review of design components and energy conservation measures that occurs during the permitting <br />process, which ensures that all requirements are met. Typical Title 24 measures include insulation; use of <br />energy-efficient heating, ventilation and air conditioning equipment (HVAC); energy-efficient indoor and <br />outdoor lighting systems; reclamation of heat rejection from refrigeration equipment to generate hot water; <br />and incorporation of skylights, etc. <br /> <br />As previously described, the site is currently developed with three office buildings that total 103,031 square <br />feet, and the Project would result in a smaller 91,500 square foot building, reducing the area that needs <br />energy resources. Also, due to implementation of new technology and compliance with current Title 24 <br />requirements, the Project would improve energy efficiency over the existing aged structures that were <br />developed between 1972 and 1974. Thus, no wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy <br />would occur with implementation of the proposed Project. <br /> <br /> <br />b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? <br /> <br />No New Impact. The proposed Project would be required to meet the CCR Title 24 energy efficiency <br />standards in effect during permitting. The City’s administration of the CCR Title 24 requirements includes <br />review of design components and energy conservation measures that occurs during the permitting process, <br />which ensures that all requirements are met. In addition, the Project would not conflict with or obstruct <br />opportunities to use renewable energy, such as solar energy. The non-residential building would be solar <br />ready would have infrastructure as required by CCR Title 24 requirements. Thus, the proposed Project would <br />not obstruct use of renewable energy or energy efficiency. Overall, the proposed Project would not conflict <br />with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency, and no new impacts would <br />occur. <br /> <br />Conclusion <br />With regards to the issue area of energy, the following findings can be made: <br />1. No peculiar impacts to the Project or its site have been identified. <br />2. There are no potentially significant off-site and/or cumulative impacts which were not discussed by <br />the GPU EIR. <br />3. No substantial new information has been identified which results in an impact which is more severe <br />than anticipated by the GPU EIR. <br /> <br />Uniformly Applied Development Policies or Standards (DP/S) <br />Title 24 energy efficiency standards <br /> <br />GPU EIR Mitigation Measures Applicable to the Project <br />None. <br /> <br />8/22/2022 <br />Planning Commission 2 – 92
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.