My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Packet_8-22-22
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Planning Commission (2002-Present)
>
2022
>
8-22-22
>
Packet_8-22-22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/23/2022 2:43:39 PM
Creation date
8/23/2022 2:40:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
352
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2 <br />kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 <br /> <br />Verbal Response: There is no set timeline as of now, we are still in the application <br />process with the City. Once we have gotten the approvals, which we estimate to be <br />about six months from now, we will look at setting some dates and timelines. <br />2. Chat Question: How many trucks a day? <br />Verbal Response: Since there are currently no tenants for the building as of now and <br />we are still going through with our approvals to spec build the building, we don’t know <br />the what the hours of operation are and what they might entail until we get a tenant in <br />the building. <br />3. Chat Question: San Clemente facility similar size 11 per day not 2 <br />Verbal Response: This is about an Amazon site that Greenlaw is involved with in San <br />Clemente. This project is not an Amazon location and Amazon will not be a tenant. <br />Verbal Comments and Discussion: Participant comment about if this is a similar size <br />facility, wouldn’t the truck frequency match that of the Amazon location. <br />Verbal Response: Rob of Greenlaw responded that this is not an Amazon project, <br />nor affiliated with a sub-contractor of Amazon. They do not know who the tenant will <br />be and have no prospects at the time of this meeting. <br />Verbal Comments and Discussion: Participant comment about the location of the <br />pin on the flyer and possible exclusion of nearby tenants due to the pin being to the <br />right and not in the center. <br />Verbal Response: The developer’s response is that they are willing to set up any <br />future calls or meetings for anyone who may have been missed in proximity due to the <br />pin location on the flyer. The developer was not aware of how the pin was placed on <br />the flyer or any details about the pin. <br />Verbal Comments and Discussion: Discussion about the orientation and location of <br />the docks for the trucks in the proposed development. <br />Verbal Response: The developer explained the reasoning behind the location of the <br />docks and their consideration of the views of the freeway. <br />Verbal Comments and Discussion: Community participant had concerns about <br />trucks on the nearby streets. Community participant concern about the zone change <br />from office to light industrial, specifically concerns about the easement in place. <br />8/22/2022 <br />Planning Commission 2 – 194
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.