My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence- #25
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2022
>
10/04/2022 Special and Regular
>
Correspondence- #25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2022 11:31:52 AM
Creation date
10/4/2022 10:12:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
12/1/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Middleton, Samuel <br />From: Aaron Peluso <cchcorp@gmail.com> <br />Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2022 12:45 PM <br />To: eComment <br />Subject: 10/04 Council Agenda Item 25 - Adoption of Ordinance Amending Rent Control <br />Ordinance <br />Hello, <br />I am writing as a representative of the ownership of Bali Hi Mobile Home Park located at 432 S Harbor Blvd. <br />I am writing in support of Sue Loftins 9/30/22 letter to the city. <br />I would specifically like to voice my opposition to the Tenant Impact Report provision prior to sale. <br />I remain unclear on the Capital Improvement/NOI rent application process and function. Parks established in <br />the mid 50+ years ago require significant maintenance and upkeep. <br />As Loftin details, there does not seem to be any city assistance helping property owners navigate this needless <br />rapidly evolving bureaucracy Meanwhile the city has actively whipped Tenant's into a frenzy over this issue <br />and even offers legal advice to Tenants...? <br />This rent issue seemed to come to the city's attention following a Tenant activist organization mobilizing our <br />Tenant's after we raised rents to $799 for all Tenants. In a handful of cases this resulted in a large single year <br />adjustment, to bring all long term Tenants to the same rental rate. This large adjustment was not repeated and it <br />is worth noting that the $799 rate was below the Section 8 standard of affordability that year. How can it be <br />abusive if its under the Section 8 guideline? The city performed a rental survey and found that we were among, <br />if not the cheapest mobile home park in the city, after the rent adjustment. <br />As Loftin details, there never was a need for a rent stabilization program in the first place. There was no <br />evidence of abusive rent increases then, nor since. <br />Sincerely, <br />Aaron Peluso <br />CCH Management LLC <br />949-295-3247 (mobile) <br />949-831-1040 (office) <br />cchcorp@gmail.com <br />Manager <br />949-495-3321 (fax) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.