My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence- #25
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2022
>
10/04/2022 Special and Regular
>
Correspondence- #25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2022 11:31:52 AM
Creation date
10/4/2022 10:12:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Date
12/1/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
work with property owners, specifically mobilehome park owners, to address the numerous deficiencies with <br />the amended ordinance. <br />In the past year, my organization, WMA, was never contacted to seek input into the final product under <br />consideration. Some members of our industry have had to litigate to get concerns resolved. I refer to the <br />September 30, 2022 letter from the Loftin Bedell Law Firm representing Kingsley Management in their lawsuit <br />with the City of Santa Ana. In their very technical letter, the Loftin Bedell Firm outlines the numerous conflicts <br />with state law applicable to mobilehome parks and Santa Ana's ordinance. WMA and mobilehome park owners <br />join Kinsley Management's concerns about the requirement of a "tenant impact report" prior to a property sale <br />and defining a sale as a "change of use" and the needed clarifications as to how Fair Rate of Return/MNOI and <br />Capital Improvements applications will be determined with the application of the amended ordinance. <br />Rent Board Make U <br />One of the final outstanding items for the Council to consider is the make-up of the rent board. The only <br />obvious solution would be same number of tenants to landlords, which uphold both party's due process. In fact, <br />any quorum of the board should include a balance of tenants to landlords. The discussion at the September 6th <br />City Council meeting to have more tenants than landlords will place a finger on the scale of balance. This biased <br />approach permits a future council to stack the board with all landlords since impartiality and equity aren't <br />principles at the center of Santa Ana's ordinance. <br />Mobilehome park owners are not a required party to serve on the rent board, yet every other stakeholder is <br />represented. Council gave direction that one of the tenant representatives should be from a mobilehome park. <br />Yet, mobilehome owners are not to be included on the board? Owning and operating mobilehome communities <br />is a unique and specialized form of rental property ownership and the City of Santa Ana and the future rent <br />board would be well served with this expertise reviewing applications. <br />Options like use of administrative law judges and hearing officers have never been discussed or considered. <br />Also, perhaps mobilehome applications have a separate board to hear mobilehome matters? There are other <br />options than a myopic solution currently offered. <br />We respectfully request delaying this action to receive further input from various stakeholders —especially <br />mobilehome community owners —to be considered by the city. <br />Sincerely, <br />Julie Paule, Regional Representative <br />Western Manufactured Housing Communities Association <br />Sacramento Office: 455 Capitol Mall Suite 800, Sacramento, CA 95814 1 (916) 448-7002 <br />Regional Office: 40335 Winchester Rd. #E165, Temecula, CA 92596 1 (951) 704-2427 1 julie@pauleconsulting.com <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.