Laserfiche WebLink
Resolution — Programs that are longer than one year should use whatever cohort is graduating <br />in the year to determine if they meet continued eligibility. <br />Comment #43 — How do Local Boards determine which programs are up for continued <br />eligibility? <br />Resolution — ETPL programs in CaIJOBS have a Subsequent Review Due Date (SRDD), which is <br />the date that Local Boards must review a program by. If a program is not reviewed by the <br />SRDD, the program will automatically be removed from the ETPL. Programs that are 60 days <br />from their SRDD will have a REAPP icon, indicating they are in need of review. The Detailed <br />Report > Provider > by Program Reapplication allows Local Board to see which programs on <br />the ETPL are due for review, <br />Comment #44 — How do Local Boards keep track of programs during continued eligibility, aside <br />from reports? What if there are issues with how the reports function? <br />Resolution — ETPL staff accounts allow for notifications to be sent to staffs email regarding <br />new programs, changes to existing programs, and other changes in the ETPL module. If there <br />are any issues regarding notifications, please reach out to the CaIJOBS Operations Unit at <br />caljobsadmin@edd.ca.gov. The state is also working to revise provider reports to be more <br />useful to ETPL staff. If ETPL staff would like to request updates to reports (new filters, new <br />columns, etc.), they can email the ETPL box at wsbetpl@edd.ca.gov. <br />Comment #45 — Will we be using the most recent data available in ETP Report for our <br />continued eligibility or waiting until a new year is submitted? <br />Resolution —You would use the most recently available performance data to determine if a <br />provider is eligible. <br />Comment #46 — Reviewing year-round instead of at one specific time may seem like a more <br />efficient method, but in reality, it puts an onerous burden on ETPL coordinators. Couldn't it be <br />possible to make the review at a set time during the year? Or Local Boards should have the <br />option to review at a minimum, once per year, or every 2 years if programs are longer than a <br />year? <br />Resolution —After the program becomes initially eligible and is added to the CA ETPL, they <br />must be reviewed annually for continued eligibility (i.e. a program is added to the ETPL on <br />10/22/2020, the Local Board ETPL Coordinator must review the program again priorto <br />10/22/2021). For the local ETPL, Local Boards can do continued eligibility every two years. <br />Local Boards can determine the time frame in which they review and complete continued <br />eligibility as long as it is done within the required timeframes. <br />Cost Information <br />Comment #47 = What should the cost information for an ETPL program be matched to? <br />Resolution —The cost in the Cost Details tab of the program wizard should match the cost a <br />Page 10 of 25 <br />