My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 22 - Resolution Adopting Local CEQA Guidelines Resolution
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2023
>
08/01/2023 Regular and HA
>
Item 22 - Resolution Adopting Local CEQA Guidelines Resolution
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2024 4:21:46 PM
Creation date
8/9/2023 3:44:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
22
Date
8/1/2023
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
208
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Local Guidelines for Implementing the <br />California Environmental Quality Act (2023) AFFORDABLE HOUSING <br /> <br /> <br />2023 City of Santa Ana Local Guidelines 9-15 ©Best Best & Krieger LLP <br />Consultation shall also recognize the tribes' potential needs for confidentiality with <br />respect to places that have traditional tribal cultural importance. A lead agency shall <br />consult the tribal consultation best practices described in the “State of California <br />Tribal Consultation Guidelines: Supplement to the General Plan Guidelines” <br />prepared by the Office of Planning and Research. <br /> <br />(B) “Scoping” means the act of participating in early discussions or <br />investigations between the local government and California Native American tribe, <br />and the development proponent if authorized by the California Native American <br />tribe, regarding the potential effects a proposed development could have on a <br />potential tribal cultural resource, as defined in Section 21074 of the Public <br />Resources Code, or California Native American tribe, as defined in Section 21073 <br />of the Public Resources Code. <br /> <br />(b) (viii) This subdivision (b) shall not apply to any project that has been <br />approved under the streamlined, ministerial approval process provided under this section <br />before September 25, 2020. <br /> <br />(c) (i) If a local government determines that a development submitted <br />pursuant to this section is consistent with the objective planning standards specified in <br />subdivision (a) and pursuant to paragraph (iii) of this subdivision, it shall approve the <br />development. If a local government determines that a development submitted pursuant to <br />this section is in conflict with any of the objective planning standards specified in <br />subdivision (a), it shall provide the development proponent written documentation of <br />which standard or standards the development conflicts with, and an explanation for the <br />reason or reasons the development conflicts with that standard or standards, as follows: <br /> <br />(A) Within 60 days of submittal of the development to the local government <br />pursuant to this section if the development contains 150 or fewer housing units. <br /> <br />(B) Within 90 days of submittal of the development to the local government <br />pursuant to this section if the development contains more than 150 housing units. <br /> <br />(ii) If the local government fails to provide the required documentation pursuant <br />to paragraph (1), the development shall be deemed to satisfy the objective planning <br />standards specified in subdivision (a). <br /> <br />(iii) For purposes of this section, a development is consistent with the objective <br />planning standards specified in subdivision (a) if there is substantial evidence that would <br />allow a reasonable person to conclude that the development is consistent with the objective <br />planning standards. The local government shall not determine that a development, <br />including an application for a modification under subdivision (g), is in conflict with the <br />objective planning standards on the basis that application materials are not included, if the <br />application contains substantial evidence that would allow a reasonable person to conclude <br />that the development is consistent with the objective planning standards. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.