My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 07 - Ordinance Prohibiting Residential Real Property & Mobilehome Rental Rate Increases
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
10/19/2021 Regular and Special
>
Item 07 - Ordinance Prohibiting Residential Real Property & Mobilehome Rental Rate Increases
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2024 11:04:22 AM
Creation date
8/17/2023 8:49:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
7
Date
10/19/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Orozco, Norma <br />From: Opittek <eopittek@cox.net> <br />Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2021 5:24 PM <br />To: eComment <br />Subject: Re: SA Rent Control <br />Categories: Correspondence <br />I hope you have taken this into consideration <br />On Oct 1, 2021, at 1:28 PM, Opittek <eopittekkcox.net> wrote: <br />My opinion for consideration. Our family has owned a small apartment building in Santa Ana <br />for over 70 years, kept our rents low and have had no evictions to my knowledge. We worked <br />with one tenant and received some Covid rent relief funds. We are totally against rent control <br />since it has been shown in studies to result in property degradation, slums and stops future <br />development investment. And this at a time when there is a housing shortage in CA. If you are <br />hell bent on passing this, consider a 1-2 year sunset and collect data such as # units , bldg. age, <br />rents, sales, values, code violations, building permits, etc., then reconsider at the end of that <br />period. Also your rent increase cap is too low, consider CPI or 3% whichever is greater. I have <br />read that 70% of residential bldgs are over 50 yrs old (probably older in SA) and you know all <br />costs, but especially maintenance costs, have significantly increased. <br />Also it is noteworthy that besides the ever encroaching government cancer on our property rights, Mother <br />Nature is taking her toll on our buildings. Years ago I read that over 70% of OC residential buildings are over <br />50 yrs old requiring ever increasing maintenance and repairs expense; new roofs, repipe, rewire etc. I even had <br />to repair a sinking settling slab. These are 10's of thousands of dollars in expense. And you all think it is <br />reasonable to disinsentivize new building investment with this crazy move. The State rent control is bad <br />enough but it seems more targeted at owners that really over charge. I don't think we have ever increased our <br />rents over 8%. We try to get closer to market <br />at turnover. Maybe that's how to avoid evictions. Consider these thoughts and the sunset and data collection <br />ideas. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.