Laserfiche WebLink
Orozco, Norma <br />From: Patricia Flores <patricia@ocej.org> <br />Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2021 4:00 PM <br />To: eComment <br />Subject: Re: Item 41, Santa Ana General Plan Update and Environmental Impact Report <br />Dear Santa Ana City Council, <br />I am writing to urge you to not pass the Environmental Justice provisions of the General Plan Update, nor the <br />Environmental Impact Report, without addressing the concerns of residents and organizations like Orange <br />County Environmental Justice, Madison Park Neighborhood Association, THRIVE Santa Ana, and Rise Up <br />Willowick regarding the updated Plan's ability to effectively remediate soil -lead contamination, air pollution, <br />and the lack of open space in our city. We do not oppose passing the Housing Element of the General Plan, <br />since there is a strict timeline for that element, but we believe the individual environmental justice <br />policies of the Plan must be revised, as they do not sufficiently address the rampant environmental health <br />issues that are poisoning our communities every day. <br />OCEJ's concerns regarding the soil -lead policies, in particular, are as follows: <br />1. There are no provisions for the city to engage in soil -lead testing in residential neighborhoods, and no clear <br />process or agreed upon safety thresholds for identifying lead -contaminated properties; <br />2. While Implementation Action 2.4 of the Safety Element expresses a commitment to working with our <br />organization to understand the prevalence of environmental lead contamination in Santa Ana and to proposing <br />solutions and measurements of effectiveness, there is not an actual expressed commitment to remediating the <br />lead. What's more, the timeline limits the action to 2022--with a problem as widespread as soil -lead <br />contamination, one year is not enough time to effectively address the crisis; and <br />3. There is no commitment to collaborating with the Orange County Health Care Agency to provide healthcare <br />services for undocumented and uninsured residents living in neighborhoods impacted by soil -lead <br />contamination. <br />Additionally, the Environmental Impact Report should not be passed as is, because it does not account for the <br />fact that removing lead -based paint, as one of the General Plan provisions requires, actually shakes lead loose <br />into the air and substantially increases soil -lead contamination in the area. Therefore, mitigation action on the <br />city's part will be necessary to counteract this environmental impact. <br />If City Council decides to vote on the General Plan Update and Environmental Impact Report today, please vote <br />not to approve the Environmental Justice components of the plan without our recommended revisions, and do <br />not approve the EIR without accounting for the increase in lead contamination that the Plan could cause. Failing <br />to account for these issues will put the city in violation of California SB 1000, a dangerous move when the eyes <br />of the California Attorney General's office are fixed on Santa Ana. If necessary, feel free to approve the <br />Housing Element of the plan --but please, do not ignore these urgent health crises facing our community. <br />Sincerely, <br />Patrici J. Flores Yrarrazaval <br />She/her/hers, they/them/theirs <br />Project Director <br />Orange County Environmental Justice (OCEJ) <br />