My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 37 - EIR No. 2020-03 and GPA No.2020-06 Santa Ana General Plan Update
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
12/07/2021 Regular
>
Item 37 - EIR No. 2020-03 and GPA No.2020-06 Santa Ana General Plan Update
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2024 8:57:39 AM
Creation date
8/17/2023 12:02:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
37
Date
12/7/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
591
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Dale Helvig <br />2536 N. Valencia St. Santa Ana CA 92706 <br />714-541-7254 helvig_denny@msn.com <br />GRAND/17T" STREET FOCUS AREA [continued] <br />ITEM 6 <br />The five focus areas do nothing but replace General Commercial and Professional /Administrative <br />Office with up -zoning designations. I think it is safe to say this is nothing more than increasing the <br />already high -density housing in Santa Ana. For a vision of the city, it lacks the vision necessary to <br />ensure the City of Santa Ana receives the necessary development AND open space the residents of <br />Santa Ana deserve. <br />BEFORE: AFTER: <br />ML <br />_.t.. f <br />- <br />-- u. i.. � ....a. , -- .. - `t ^ I -I Esc. c�:a.,sa is • . ... _ ' <br />K.,m-.•. �. `1ST L- A`tsx4• � f <br />0_1 —J- 17th & Grand Ave- f. _ _n�� <br />,� Ylth &Grand Ave - <br />What is being proposed will drive people to other communities for shopping due to increased traffic and <br />the inability to conveniently park outside a business. While I agree Grand Avenue needs attention, the <br />desire by the city to designate the land use to Urban Neighborhood or District Center is unacceptable. <br />It removes current land use designations that support churches, government offices, schools, electrical <br />substations, single-family homes and multi -family homes. Proposed changes just make it easier for <br />developers. The other Focus areas are in the same situation. <br />Page 4 of 9 <br />2021-12-07 Letter to City Council - GP Comments on Land Use Element <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.