My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 37 - EIR No. 2020-03 and GPA No.2020-06 Santa Ana General Plan Update
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
12/07/2021 Regular
>
Item 37 - EIR No. 2020-03 and GPA No.2020-06 Santa Ana General Plan Update
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2024 8:57:39 AM
Creation date
8/17/2023 12:02:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
37
Date
12/7/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
591
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memo to City of Santa Ana Planning Commission <br />September 15, 2021 <br />Page 7 <br />traditional parks are not feasible. Encourage public, private, and commercial <br />recreational facilities in areas that are park deficient. <br />Open Space Element at 6. <br />While we support the use of "creative solutions" to address park deficiencies, <br />Policy OS-1.10 requires clarification. We are concerned by the suggestion that there are <br />neighborhoods where "traditional parks are not feasible." The City's long term goal <br />should be to provide public parkland in all park -deficient areas. Moreover, this policy <br />should be revised to make clear that while private or commercial recreational facilities <br />can be a valuable community resource, they are never a substitute for public parkland. <br />The City should not abandon efforts to create public parks in park -deficient areas merely <br />because those areas contain private or commercial recreational facilities. Such private <br />facilities do not always serve the communities in which they are located and do not <br />provide the spectrum of activities that public parks do. For example, some private <br />recreational facilities (such as golf courses) can exclude lower -income people, and thus <br />could fail to serve residents in surrounding neighborhoods. <br />We propose modifying Policy OS- 1.10 as follows: <br />Policy OS- 1.10. Creative Solutions for Deficiencies. Develop creative and flexible <br />solutions to provide greenspace and recreation activities in park -deficient <br />neighborhoods .,.he fe tfaditional rafks afe of feasible. Prioritize public parks and <br />recreational facilities in park -deficient areas. Encourage publie, private, —and <br />commercial recreational facilities in aFeas tha4 aFe park defieien that are open to <br />the public, are physically accessible and affordable to residents of surrounding <br />neighborhoods, and serve communi . needs. <br />The Open Space Element also includes the following implementation action regarding <br />new parkland: <br />Implementation Action 1.10: New parkland. Coordinate with property owners to <br />explore options to provide public access and programming in park deficient areas, <br />including options to acquire land through purchase, land dedication, easements, <br />and land leases that would allow for permanent or temporary use of land for <br />recreational opportunities. <br />Open Space Element at 17. <br />Like Policy OS-1.8, Implementation Action 1.10 should direct the City to acquire <br />new parkland. It should prioritize creation of new permanent public parkland. Other <br />temporary mechanisms can be a helpful supplement. However, these mechanisms will <br />not provide the same level of permanent public benefits or allow the same range of public <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.