Laserfiche WebLink
Santa Ana 2020 Water Shortage Contingency Plan <br />3-13 <br />hazard and associated damage, information provided by agencies specializing in a specific hazard, and relies <br />upon the City’s expertise and knowledge. <br />Earthquake fault rupture and seismic hazards, including ground shaking and liquefaction, are among the highest <br />ranked hazards to the region as a whole because of its long history of earthquakes, with some resulting in <br />considerable damage. A significant earthquake along one of the major faults could cause substantial casualties, <br />extensive damage to infrastructure, fires, damages and outages of water and wastewater facilities, and other <br />threats to life and property. <br />Nearly all of Orange County is at risk of moderate to extreme ground shaking, with liquefaction possible <br />throughout much of Orange County but the most extensive liquefaction zones occur in coastal areas. Based on <br />the amount of seismic activity that occurs within the region, there is no doubt that communities within Orange <br />County will continue to experience future earthquake events, and it is a reasonable assumption that a major event <br />will occur within a 30-year timeframe. <br />The mitigation actions identify the hazard, proposed mitigation action, location/facility, local planning mechanism, <br />risk, cost, timeframe, possible funding sources, status, and status rationale, as applicable. Mitigation actions for <br />MWDOC’s member agencies for seismic risks may include (MWDOC, 2019): <br /> Secure above ground assets in all buildings, booster stations, pressure reducing stations, emergency <br />interties, water systems, and pipelines. <br /> Conduct assessment of infrastructure to ensure seismic retrofitting is in place. <br /> Replace aging infrastructure throughout the City. <br /> Install backup power for critical facilities to ensure operability during emergency events. <br /> Enhance emergency operability by implementing communication infrastructure improvements. <br />3.4.7 Shortage Response Action Effectiveness <br />For each specific Shortage Response Action identified in the plan, the WSCP also estimates the extent to which <br />that action will reduce the gap between supplies and demands identified in DWR Table 8-2 (Appendix A). To the <br />extent feasible, the City has estimated percentage savings for the chosen suite of shortage response actions, <br />which can be anticipated to deliver the expected outcomes necessary to meet the requirements of a given <br />shortage level. <br />3.5 Communication Protocols <br />Timely and effective communication is a key element of the WSCP implementation. Per the Water Code Section <br />10632 (a)(5), the City has established communication protocols and procedures to inform customers, the public, <br />interested parties, and local, regional, and state governments regarding any current or predicted shortages as <br />determined by the Annual Assessment described pursuant to Section 10632.1; any shortage response actions <br />triggered or anticipated to be triggered by the Annual Assessment described pursuant to Section 10632.1; and <br />any other relevant communications. The City’s Water Shortage Communication Plan is documented in Appendix <br />C.